HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA 1979-07-12 Minutes
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF JUNE 14, 1979
NEW BUSINESS
BA 79-8
TABLED
~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
JULY 12, 1979
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, H. B. Helton, at 7:11- P.M.
PRESENT:
H. B. Helton
Jo Ann Williams
Jack Roseberry
Jesse Range
ABSENT
Dr. E. K. Hahn
CITY STAFF PRESENT: James Anderson
Wanda Calvert
Mrs. Williams moved, seconded by Mr. Rose-
berry, to approve the minutes as read.
Motion carried 4-0.
Request of Earl C. Parker to vary from
the Zoning Ordinance #179 on Lot 16, Block
37, Richland Terrace Addition, to build a
garage with simulated wood grain paneling
for the exterior walls instead of the
required 75% brick.
This property is located at 5125 Karen Dr.
Mr. Parker presented his request to the
Board. He stated the garage he wants to
build would be just as substantial and good
looking as if it were brick.
Mr. Anderson asked what kind of material he
wants to use.
Mr. Parker stated it was simulated wood grain
paneling.
Mr. Anderson asked if it was something like
pressed wood.
Mr. Parker stated he felt that was probably
what it was.
Mr. Range asked if it was fire resistant.
Mr. Parker stated he guessed it would be no
more than anyother wood siding, but he really
wasn1t sure.
~
Page 2
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
.
Mrs. Williams told Mr. Parker she thought
he said it was made of aluminum when she
went out to look at his property.
Mr. Parker stated it was called simulated
wood. He said his son-in-law used it on
an office building and it was very attractive
and sturdy, but he was nit sure about how
fire resistant it was.
Mrs. Williams asked if the Board should
postpone this request and give Mr. Parker
time to get a piece of the material and
have it checked to see how fire resistant
it is.
Mr. Anderson stated we' could have Mr. Long,
the Fire Marshall, check it out.
Mr. Roseberry asked if this was going to be
attached to the house.
Mr. Parker stated it was not. He said it
would be at the back of his back yard. He
stated he has a fence and it would not be
very visable.
.
Mr. Range stated he believed the purpose for
the Ordinance for the 75% brick or masonry
construction was for fire protection rather
than just appearance.
Mr. Anderson stated he felt it was for both.
Mr. Range stated that in this case, the
appearance should not be a concern since it
would be almost totally unseen.
Mr. Parker stated there would be no flammable
products stored in it, just his boat and
things of that nature.
Mr. Anderson asked if there would be electricity
in the garage.
Mr. Parker stated he had not planned to.
.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone who
wished to speak in favor or in opposition of
this request.
Janis Mathers, 5120 Laurel Lane, stated she
was of the opinion that there was an Ordinance
~
Page 3
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
.
against detached buildings in North Richland
Hills. She also stated there are no painted
surfaces that would stand up as good as brick.
She stated she does not feel we should allow
anyone to build anything frame in this
neighborhood.
Mrs. Williams asked Mrs. Mathers if she lived
behind Mr. Parker where the 3 metal storage
buildings were in the back yard.
Ms. Mathers stated she did not live there.
She stated she was against those, too. She
said when someone is allowed to build a large
garage, the next thing is they have a garage
apartment.
Mr. Anderson stated there was an ordinance
against having garage apartments in residential
zoning in North Richland Hills.
Ms. Mathers stated if the Board allows this,
there would be no need for the Ordinances.
.
Mr. Anderson stated that was the reason we
have a IIBoard of Adjustments". He stated there are
times there is a need to vary from the Zoning
Ordinance.
The Chairman asked Mr. Anderson to read the
Ordinance regarding the 75% brick requirement.
Mr. Anderson read Ordinance #650, Section 1.01,
# V, an amendment to Ordinance #129:
IIAll Multi-family, 2 family and one family
dwellings shall have exterior walls
constructed of 75% brick, stone, or if approved
by the City Council, other masonry or materials
of equal characteristics. Exterior wall shall
mean that exposed portion of the building from
the foundation up to the ceiling line of the
first floor of the building. II
Mrs. Williams asked Ms. Mathers if she was
against the garage because it would not be
brick or if she was against the garage, period.
Ms. Mathers stated she was against it because
of the wood and also did not like it being
detached.
.
.
.
.
~
Page 4
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
Mrs. Williams asked if she would be against
it if Mr. Parker agreed to brick it.
Ms. Mathers stated she would be against it,
but not as vividly.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone else
who wished to speak.
Mr. Range stated he tried to find this
requirement in Ordinance #179, but was unable
to find it. He stated he feels this Board
has no jurisdiction over this request. He
stated they are to only hear request regarding
Ordinance #179.
Mr. Anderson stated he felt the City Council
intended this to be included, but he would
request this be postponed until he could
talk to the City Attorney.
Mr. Roseberry moved, seconded by Mr. Range,
to table BA 79~8 until Mr. Anderson can
discuss this with the City Attorney. Motion
carried 4~0.
BA 79-9
APPROVED
Request of David Barfield to vary from the
Zoning Ordinance #179 on a portion of Tract
3R, Abstract 1055, to build a house in
Agricultural zoning without the required
150 ft. ro~d frontage.
This property is located on the West side of
Precinct Line Road, approximately 700 feet
South of Amundson Road.
Mr. Barfield presented his request to the Board,
He stated he has approximately 3 acres which is
presently zoned Agriculture. He said he would
like to leave it Agriculture. Mr. Barfield
stated he has 60 ft. road frontage instead of
the required 150 ft. He stated he plans to
build a $150,000 or $200,000 house which will
be an asset to the city. He showed the Board
a plat of his property. He stated he plans to
build a 2~ story house, the garage being
underground and 2 stories above.
Mr. Roseberry asked exactly where his property
was located.
Mr. Range asked what the property to the North
looked like.
~
Page 5
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
.
Mr. Barfield showed where his land was
located. He stated the land to the North
was just pasture land.
Mr. Roseberry asked if the utilities were
served by another city.
Mr. Barfield stated they were- not. He said
the water is there, but he would have to
have a septic tank. He stated he has not
requested the perk test yet, but felt sure
he would have no problem since he has lots
of sand.
Mr. Anderson stated several people in this
area have had trouble with septic tanks, but
if you have sand, maybe you will not have
any problems.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone who
wished to speak in favor or in opposition
of this request.
.
Mr. Charlie E. Rosenau, 6929 Precinct Line Rd.,
stated he owns the land to the East of
Mr. Barfield. He stated he was not speaking
for or against this request, but wanted to ask
some questions. He stated he had used this
road, which is an easement, for 19 years.
He stated when he built his home, he faced it
on this little road. He stated Mr. Barfield
does not own this road.
There was much discussion regarding this road.
Mr. Rosenau stated he had hauled in rock and
broken cement to fill up the holes, besides
spending around $1 ,000 on it.
Mr. Anderson asked if the city had accepted
this road.
Mr. Rosenau stated they had not.
Mr. Barfield stated he ownes this 60 ft., he
has an insured title to it, but he has no
intention of not allowing Mr. Rosenau the use
of it. Mr. Barfield stated he has offered to
swap this road for enough of Mr. Rosenau's
land to build a road to the South.
.
.
.
.
Page 6
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
BA 79-10
APPROVED
~
Mrs. Williams asked who Mr. Barfield bought
this land from.
Mr. Barfield stated he bought it from
John McNary who bought it from Mr. Card.
Mr. Anderson stated that he understands that
if a piece of property has been used as a
road for years, it becomes a public road.
He stated there are several cases like this
in North Richland Hills. He said he did not
know if this would be this way or not.
Mr. Barfield stated legally the road is his,
he has an insured title to it, but he does
not plan to block the road off nor does he
plan to keep Mr. Rosenau from using it.
He said all he wants is to be able to get into
his property.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone else
who wished to speak.
Mrs. Williams moved, seconded by Mr. Range,
to approve BA 79-9 as requested. Motion
carried 4-0.
Request of E. F. Wigley to vary from the
Zoning Ordinance #179 on Lot 11, Edgley
Addition, to build a storage room of wood
exterior in~tead of the required 75% brick.
This property is located at 4174 Willman.
Mr. Wigley presented his request to the Board.
He stated he has the Richland Hills Flower
shop which had previously been a residence.
He said the house is brick with a wood garage
and enclosed breezeway. Mr. Wigley stated
they are in need of more storage area so he
would like to build a storage building on to
the frame garage.
Mr. Anderson asked Mr. Wigley when he bought
the house.
Mr. Wigley stated it was in 1971.
Mrs. Williams stated there is a doctor~s office
next to it, but there is a lot of space
between.
~
Page 7
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
.
Mr. Roseberry asked what would be stored
in this room.
Mr. Wigley stated mostly pottery, glass, etc.,
nothing flammable.
Mr. Range stated he was trying to see if this
is a non-conforming building. He said he
doesnlt believe it meets the zoning requirements.
Mr. Roseberry stated it was the City Council IS
policy to not allow expansion of non-conforming
buildings in Commercial zoning.
Mr. Wigley stated he was in Local Retail.
.
Mr. Anderson read Section V of page 87 of the
Zon i ng Ord i nance: II A non-conformi ng use s ha 11
not be extended or rebuilt in case of obsoles~
cence or total destruction by fire or other
cause. In case of partial destruction by fire
or other causes, not exceeding fifty percent
of its value, the Building Inspector shall
issue a permit for reconstruction. If greater
than fifty percent and less than the total,
the Board of Adjustment hereinafter created
may grant permit for repair after public
hearing and having due regard for the property
rights of the persons affected when considered
in the light of the public welfare and the
character of the area surrounding the designated
non-conforming use of the conservation and
preservation of property. II
Mr. Range stated if you were to have a fire,
damaging the garage, you could reconstruct
it with wood and it gives this Board the
authority to grant this variance.
Mr. Roseberry stated for Local Retail, all
Mr. Wigley would have to do to comply would be
to brick it and put in conduit.
Mr. Wigley stated it would not be feasable to
brick what is already there. It would be
unreasonable.
.
Mr. Anderson stated what Mr. Roseberry was
saying-it might be cheaper in the long run to
go ahead and make the building conform because
every time you want to make anykind of remodeling,
you will have to come before this Board again.
.
.
.
Page 8
Z B A Minutes
July 12, 1979
ADJOURNMENT
~
Mrs. Williams asked if this addition would
take up too much of the lot.
Mr. Anderson stated it would not because
Mr. Wigley has a large lot.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone who
wished to speak in favor or in opposition
of this request.
Mr. Range moved, seconded by Mrs. Williams,
to approve BA 79-10 as requested. Motion
carried 4-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:25 P.M.
-- .) "(
( "'\/ / t2;¿/o
'''---- /~ / . / X ,\ /1 ".' ¡/, K.'"-----·--·"·-···,
. '7: V ..0 /J "'" ~ .. - t - ¿ . L _ ....
CHAIRMAN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT