The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPZ 1975-01-23 Minutes DATE OF t1EETIN~ 4IÞ January lE, lq75 January 23, 1975 January 23, 1975 January 23, lq75 "lanua ry 23, 1 <175 February 20, 1975 February 27, 1975 February 27, 1975 February 27, 1975 February 27, 1975 February 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 4IÞ March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 March 27, 1975 April 17, 1975 April 17, 1975 April 17, 1975 April 24, 1975 April 24, 1975 April 24, 1975 April 24, 1975 4IÞ znNIN~ INDEX SUBJECT ACTION Ft. Harth Christian School l\pprovPt1 Ci t.y of t!. r.". t'rproverl South Central nil Co. ^pprove~ Pichlann Enterprises ren;erl P;chland Enterprises ~en;en P.B. Anderson Tabled Rolling Hills Baptist Church Approved Jack M. Estes Subdivision Approved Henry D. Besson Approved David W. Smith Approved Floyd Jones Approved Glenann Addition Replat Approved Doyle K. Fincher Approved Bill Lightfoot LaQuinta Motor Inn Quickway Shopping, Inc. Joe V. Henry Farrington & Associates Farrington & Associates Farrington & Associates Hudiburg Chevy City Elmer Allison Approved Denied Approved Approved Denied Denied Denied Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Cameo Enterprises Hill IN Oaks Addition Richland Enterprises Northeast Construction Kip's 8ig Boy CASE NO. 8/\ 75 - 1 PS 75-1 PZ 75-1 P7 75-2 P7 7S-~ SA 75-2 PS 75-3 PS 75-2 PZ 75-6 PZ 75-4· PZ 75-5 PS 75-4 PZ 75-7 PZ 75-8 PZ 75-9 PZ 75-12 PZ 75-13 PZ 75-14 PZ 75-15 PZ 75-16 BA 75-3 BA 75-4 BA 75-5 PS 75-5 PS 75-6 PZ 75-17 PZ 75-18 DATE OF MEETING 4IÞ April 24, 1975 Apri 1 24, 1975 May 15, 1975 4IÞ May 22, 1975 May 22, 1975 May 22, 1975 May 22, 1975 June 26, 1975 June 26, 1975 June 26, 1975 June 26, 1975 June 26, 1975 Jùly 24. 1975 August 28, 1975 September 25, 1975 September 25, 1975 September 25, 1975 September 25, 1975 October 16, 1975 October 23, 1975 October 23, 1975 October 23, 1975 October 23, 1975 December 4, 1975 December 4, 1975 December 4, 1975 December 4, 1975 4IIÞ December 4, 1975 ZONING INDEX SUBJECT ACTION CASE NO. PZ 75-19 PZ 75-20 SA 75-6 First National Bank of Hurst Approved First National Bank of Hurst Approved Birdvil1e Ind. School District Approved J.V. Leggett, Inc. Approved Clyde W. Martin Denied Curtis R. Moore Approved Somerset National (La Quinta) Denied Holiday Hills Final Plat Approved Barlough Addition Approved Kip·s Big Boy(Preliminary) Approved FASGAS Approved PZ 75-21 PZ 75-22 PZ 75-23 PZ 75-24 PS 75-7 PS 75-8 PS 75-9 PZ 75-25 PZ 75-26 PS 75-10 PZ 75-27 Metroplex Datsun, Inc. Kip·s Big Boy V.H. Bowerman Approved Approved Approved North 820 Cœnn. Addition Approved PS 75-11 Srrithfie1d Adciition Approved PS 75-12 North Richland Station T~led PS 75-12 American Petrofina C . N.-- IvIar sh North Rich1and Station Denied Tabled APPROVED PZ 75-28 BA 75-7 PS 75-14 Nccrth BiO ConIn. Add. PS 75-15 APPROVED Approved PS 75-16 E.F. Crites Royal Pro¡;:erties CANCELLED Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved PZ 75-29 PS 75-17 PS 75-18 PZ 75-30 PZ 75-31 PZ 75-32 Bill Lightfoot Bill Lightfoot Bill Lightfoot Patsy Jester Ella Mae Moreland 4IÞ 4IÞ 4IÞ r~IrIt'Trs nF TPE MEFTlnG nF THE PL,l\"Jt! I~'~ !\NT" znN I N~ rn~"'~I ~s Iorl nF THr CITY nr NnoTH RICHL/\"Jr' HILLS, t1,nl Hnprl\N CrrrLF: THUr~f)rY, fJ/\.~'!f '.^PV ?1, , Q7S CI\LL TO ORDER The re~u1ar ~eet;nq of the P1ðnninn anrl 70ninq ComMission V,ras caller to orëer hy the Chë;rman, C h a r 1 e s P ð 1 a c h e'~, tl r. a t 7: 3 n p..~. POLL Cl\LL prFSE-'fT: CHI' I R",Ar~! V I CF rHÞ I p~~" ~~ ~ECPETJ'.rY Charle5 P~l~che~, Jr. M~ry \.JC1 Shaunty nenver ~4i 11 s Pa.yne ~taol es CITY ST f\ FF rPESEr'T: DIR. OF P.7. CLErK J\l~en Dronstad Pñuline ~nê';n 1\. r S r P 'T : ~ene L'e 1 born cons I DERÞ.TIOn nr ~~I r'I"T[~ nF THE PPEVlnus ~~EETIN~ The r1inutes of the rJoverlher ?1, 197" p1eet;n~ were apnrovprl ~s written, all votinn for. nEH BUS rr!ESS PS 75-1 l'rrrOVEO Pe<1uest of City of ~'orth °ichland Hil1s-~ep'at- n'oc~ 31 lot l-P of Dich'~nrl Terrace rrl~ition. Mr. Dronstarl spoke for the city strltinn ¡~'l utilities h~rl ~een notifi~d. ^fter discussion hv the commission members Mrs. Shaunty moved, seconc1ed h,y ~·r. Staples to approve rs 75-1 continrtent to en9ineers letter. nation c ð r r i e (~ i~ - " . P? 75-1 f\pprOVED Pequest of South Cen~ra1 nil Company to rezone lots l~C t 15C~ [dqley Addition from its present classification of Local Petail to a proposerl classification of Co~nercial. This property is 1 oca ted at 75"r ~rapevi ne Pi ah\·!ay. ~·r.. E.!',. Evans, 1 essee of the property presented this request. nr. Evans stated it could be used only for the s~le of oasoline under the present zonin~. fie 'dishes to rent trailers. J\fter rliscl1ss;on b.y the conr;ss;on mer~bers tAr. ~"i 11 s roved, secon rlert G.v ~,4rs. ~ h n unty to app rove PZ 75-1. ·~ot;on Cf'rr;erl 1'-". PZ 75-2 DENIEr Peouest of Piehl and ~nterprises to rezone j(.') acres of the "an rusen Survey froM its present c 1 ass; f; cat; 0 n 0 f 1 F - 1 2 On e F an;; 1 V D\~'e 1 , ; n n to a pro r 0 S e rl c 1 ò S S ; f i cation of 1 F - 0 nñ e F d m i , ,Y' 1ì\·!e ·11 i no . This rropert.y is locat~~ '!est and :!orth of Ha1to~ P?nchlanrl ^rlrlition. PZ 75-3 DE :,1 lED Pequest of Pichlanrl Fnterprises to rezone ?F.2 acres of the R.P. Barton Survey from its present classification of I\qriculture to a proposed class- ification of IF-o nne Famil,y D\¡!ellinq. This property ;s ~'!est of Haltom Panchland and continuous to DiaMond Oaks East ~nrl niamonrl Loch, Pnit 2. 4IÞ ~4r. Calvin Lurer presented this request statinq the last request includerl two additional requests; M.F. and 2F-0. This time we have no desire for anythino to be done ""; th that property. Since v!e last met I have met ",ith several propert,Y o~/ners in Haltom Panch 1 an d "doi ti on . ~~os t, I fee 1 ,'¡ere in ðnreement with our proposal. I helieve many present homes in Halton Panchlanrl are non conforminq in lot size. tIe are not askin~ to put l~On square ft. homes in area. \I.'e a re ask i n0 for sma 1 1 er lots so vIe can hui 1 d 1 a rqer homes than required for IF-12 zoninn. ^ lot of thou~ht vIas put into this plan. "'e feel it is ð oood rlan and comparable to present dwellinns. Louis Pinn - fF17 Briley I aM for this zoninq. Part of this property is north of Me. I realize the plat we see ~ay not be the one finally approved ~ut I am for this IF-n zoninq with a restriction of l~n~ s~. ft. minimum. 4IÞ ~ohn H. "auqhn - f".r~l T('sca nr. I cane back for sñme reason as before. They are try- in9 to build homes in area that are not cOMpatible to existing property. These hOMes should be 2000 sq. ft. ,,1ohn l',1. FreiMan - 1tf:'1~ Suncrest Dr. Propert.y in question hacks up to my house. I am a0ainst this request. Smaller homes br;nQ in less taxes and people who do not take care of their property. The city is defeat;n~ o\'!n purpose by ruttino in in. expensive houses. Sanolin & Parish built homes not far fro~ my husiness that have qreatly deteriorated. ~.1rs. C.l. Griffin - ~54n Rrilev f"r. -...-...~.~. - . ... ....1 The plan looks pretty aoon, especially the street lay- out. I believe the area is the nicest in North Pichlanrl Hills. \¡·Ie are opposerl to any thinn sMaller than lfon square feet. ~~r. Samuel E. Rlanks - f-ð()n Circlevie,·/ nr. 4IÞ I aM not opposed to rleve100rnent of property but I am opposed to IF-o. We have sp~nt time and Money on our homes anrl feel new construction shoulrl be comparable in size anrl ouality èS ones now huilt. 4IÞ Wiley Hil' - 6fnl nriley nr. I loo~ forvlarrl to developn1ent of area but v!ould like to keep it IF-l?. Lots shoulrl he lar~e enouqh to have space to add on to house later if needed, also to have plenty of yarrl room for children to play \,/;thout playino in the street. \i!e need to re- tain IF-12 zonin". I aM definitely opposed to IF-9 size lots. Mrs. Pat Curry - "609 Suncrest Dr. HO\'I many fami 1 ; es ,-,i 11th ish ri nq ; n? He a 1 read.y have hiqh school taxes, what wi" it do to that? Paul J. 0ualls - f1An Tasca I certainly ohject to this zonin~ because of size homes and lots. p'r. Palache~ Rskerl everyone in audience who ooposed to stann. Fourteen people stoorl; also there were two letters sent to plannin~ anrl zoninq opposinq s a."'1e . J.n. Sandlin 4IÞ Alan Ha.MPi and I are CO-O\-lnerS of Pichland Enter- prises. \'!e have be~n in this areñ lP ~years. \le developed Holîrla,-v Heiohts, Holiday North under the IF-9 zoninq. I woul~ like for you to drive through Holida.y r!orth and compare houses. I don It think you could tell which ones had 1500 or 20n~ sq. ft. He aren1t comino in here to dertrarle any property. \~'e try to do a ~ood jo,", for the city, one that all the people \1pulrl be prpÙrl of. ~·ridth of lots in IF-9 and IF-l? woulrl he the same. Money market is bad. Why rlonlt you have houses in Fossi) Creek r niamonrl Lock East? Because you can It finence them. To buy a 3?,nnn.nn homp you have to makp lsnn.f)'1 per ",onth. ~-1ost reople rlonlt Plake ~'5n,..,.n". He ,,'ant to develop a nice suh-rlivision v.,here houses v/i'l sell. You don't \'Jant another Foss;l rreer v.'here it is rleveloped, yet no houses. ~'!p a re here to "Jork \1/; th, not fi qht you. ~'~e feel this is the hest nlan for t1e citv anrl hest use for the 1 ?nrl ñt thi s time. He \~!as as~ker hO\l' the\! vloul rl cor1pare to ?1~ hOMes. ~'onp, they \'!oul d be comrãrahl e to Snov! He i nh ts . I rlon' t Vlt'nt to ~nock ? 1~ areas. !' know of SOMe anrl the neople are takinn noorl care of them. Thev cñn't afforrl anv hiaher nr;ce hOf'1e. Just because the~ rlonlt h~ve to r~t up a rl~wn payment doesn't mean they (1 re not noon hone (l\',ln ers . I V/OU 1 d 1; ke to no' an recOfrJ say';nq that. 4IÞ ^fter fluch discussion p"Y the commission rnembers t:·r. Stðp 1 PS r'over, seconr'erl b.y ·"r.. ~~; 11 s to deny r7 75-2 as it ;s 01ready zoned IF-1? and should be left saMe. ~.~ 0 t ; 0 n C ð t"' r ; c rl It - n 4IÞ 4IÞ 4IÞ APPOINTr'~ENT OF r·1Er1BEP TO ATTEND COUNCIL r1EETI~IG OF February 24, 1975 ADJOUR~n~Er'fT "r. Staples rloved, seconnerf b.y ~~r. ~~ills to deny Z 75-1. ~4otion carr;~rl f1_n r1r. Palachek stated liThe feelinq of the hoard is that this area as it ;s developerl to the north, West and East is developed IF-l2. This is one of the last fe\',' rer1a;n;no areas \·/i11 be IF-12. t'e can zone a lot of land IF-o and due to the fact it ;s surrounderl by IF-12 anrl the rropert.y, to us, is some of the nicest in the city vIe feel it \voiJlrl be to the city's benefit to keep it with larner size lots. He also feel \~!e vJould be hreakinq faith \'1ith SOMe of the people who have hou0ht property around ; t \'li th it presently zoned 1 F-12" ~'~r. ~.1ills stated "I feel like the plat as presented v!oulrl be beneficial to the city hut r also believe that we have so ~uch orrosition a~ainst it we woulrl be hreaking faith with the people who are alrea~y there. He can't attract people into an area then rerluce zonin0. I just rlon't feel rîqht in doing that". ~~r. ~'~il1s \,¡ill attend Fehruary 2~ rneetinq. r,1r. t1il's Moved to adjourn. The Meetino a<1journed 9 : 05 P. ~1. ,J an u a ry ? , 1 075 . ~òt~ SECRETARY, PL^NNIN~ l'ND znNING