Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 1971-01-21 Minutes ZO~jING INDEX .' DATE OF llliETING SUBJECT ÄCTION CASE NO. January 21, 1971 Resubmission College Hills Addition Approved PS 70-11 January 21, 1971 Administrative Presentation I\'1r. R.P. Vinall Tabled February 25, 1971 February 25, 1971 Feb:ruary 25, 1971 B.R. Franks (Preliminary) Approved PS 71-1 lIre Jirnmy R. Frost, 11.11-. Charles L. Yates, & r·lr. Lucian t'l. Srnith Approved PZ 71-4 r·Ir. Jimmy R. Frost, l"ír. Charles L. Yates, & Ì·lr. Lucian ~~. Smith Approved Preliminary & Final Plat PS 71-2 February, 25, 1971 College Hills (Final.; Plat) Approved PS 71-4 Administrative Presentation l1r. R.P. VinaJ.l :No Recommendation . Iflarch 25 t 1971 r-larch 25, 1971 1\larch 25 t 1971 April 22, 1971 AP1"il 22, 1971 May 18, 1971 May 18, 1971 May 18, 1971 May 27, 197~ . May 27, 1971 May 27, 1971 May 27, 1971 Administrative Presentation l·fr. Ra¿l Thornas Favorable Attitude Holiday North Final Plat Section 2 APPROVED PS 71-5 B~R. Franks Final Plat APRROVED PS 71-6 Emerald Hills Einal Plat Section 3 RRPROVED Fa 71-7 l=.D. Bronau.g11 DE1.IIED PZ 71-5 Arthur Taliaferro A})proved PS 71-8 Archie B. Cooper (Variance) p & S BUILDING CORP. (Variance) Denied PZ 71-6, PZ 21-10 Denied Richard Nesbit (Variance) Joe L. McCanbs Approved PZ 71-32 Denied PZ 71-7 Approved PZ 71-8 Approved PZ 71-9 Approved PS 71-9 John Hay Incian W. Smith Incian W. Smith ZOtJII'JG Ir\JD~{ .' DATE OF llEEirII\JG SUBJECT ACTIOI~ CASE rJo. May 27, 1971 Glenn Buckner Approved PS 71-10 May 27, 1971 John Parish Approved PZ 71-13 June 15, 1971 John Hay (Variance) NO QUORUM PZ 71-11 June 24, 1971 Harry J. James Approved PS 71-3 June 24, 1971 Joe T. Fox Approved PZ 71-14 June 24. 1971 Joe T. Fox Approved PZ 71-15 June 24, 1971 Joe T. Fox Approved PZ 71-16 June 24, 1971 H.O. Pulliam Tabled PZ 71-17 June 24, 1971 Z.L. Simpson Approved PS 71-11 July 20, 1971 John Hay (Variance) Denied PZ 71-ll July 22, 1971 D.S. Byrd Approved PZ 71-16 . July 22, 1971 C.J. Kimnan & Louis M. Howard Approved PZ 71-19 JULY 22, 1971 C.J. Yilllman & Louis 1'1. Howard Approved PZ 71-20 July 22, 1971 Larry ~vood, Trustee Approved PZ 71-21 July 22, 1971 Larry ~vood, Trustee Approved PZ 71-22 August 17, 1971 Howard Daugherty (Variance l~pproved PZ 71-23 August 26, 1971 I:. C. Johnson Approved PZ 71-24 August 26, 1971 l.r . c . J olmson DellÌad rs 71-12 September 2ß, 19~1 Joe T. Fox (Preliminary) Approved PS 71-13 October 19, 1971 IIiIrs . Gustavo Azarnar (VARIANCE) Approved PZ 71-25 November 16, 1971 Þlickey Haz1ewGod (VARIANCE) Denied PZ 71-26 . November 18, 1971 Royalty Properties - Vera Cruz Limited Approved PZ 71-27 · · · ZO~JING INDEX DATE OF IvlEETING SUBJECT ACTION December 16, 1971 December 16, 1971 December 16, 1971 George Macatee (Vacate) Approved 14rs. Dorothy A. Kipp Approved Educators Development Corp. Approved (Replat) JanuaIJr 18, 1972 Ì'·Jrs. l~.J. Swank (VA.rïIA.NCE) Tabled (l'leeting posponed December 1971) JanUaI-\J 27, 1972 H.C. Allison & Continental Housing Consultants & Agents Denied January 27, 1972 H.C. Allison & Continental ¡-lousing Consultants & Agents Tabled January 27, 1972 P&S Construction (PreliF~nary & Final Plat) Holiday North Section #3 (Final Plat) Approved January 27, 1972 l\pproved JanuB.r¿ 27, 1972 Replat Lots ~1 - 15R-l, Block 2, Diamond loc11 l\dd. Approved February 24, 1972 Dudley Beadles, Trustee Approved February 24, 1972 Dudle:)r Beadles, Trustee llpproved Februar:y 24, 1972 II. C. Allison (\f.. Continental Housing Consultants GC Agents Approved February 24, 1972 ,~Tua..l1ita Anglin, Jerry !1.nglin & Anita L. Snow Approved February 24, 1972 uep1at - Cherokee Estates Approved T,'larch 8, 1972 Juanita Anglin, Jer1JT Anglin, & Anita L. Snow (V1U1JJ\.I\JCE) Approved March 9, J.972 J.M. West Denied CASE NO. PS 71-14 PZ 71-28 PS 71-15 PZ 71-29 PZ 72-1 PZ 72-2 PS 72-1 PS 72-2 PS 72-4 PZ 72-3 PZ 72-4 PZ 72-5 PZ 72-6 PS 72-¿~ BA 72-1 PZ 72-8 . CALL TO ORDER CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS - MEF:fING. . ROLL CALL . STAFF PRESENT: ITEr1S ON AGENDA FOR REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING lŒErING . fxlINUTES OF THE 1vŒBiI'ING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING CO~1MISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHIAND HILlS, TEXAS, HELD AT THE CITY HALL, 4101 MORGAN CIRCLE, THURS- DAY, JANUARY 21, 1971 - 7:30 P.M. The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman, ~vm. N. Ratcliff r-lotion of approval was made bY}\1rs. Shaunty, seconded by Mr. Peters. All members voting affirmative. PRESENT: Chairman Vice Chairman ~'lrn. N. Ratcliff Dr. Charles Hager H.P. Peters Louis E. Rinn 1-rIrs. J. W . Shaunty ~BSENT: None C..H. Ballenger, Director of Public Works, Betty Terrell, City Clerk PS 70-9 Purvis and York- Dedication of Eldorado., Chairman, l1r. Ratcliff asked Mr. Ballenger to come forward and present the facts concerning this request as previously asked for by the Commission. Mr. Ballenger called the Commissions attention to the plat that had been prepared and posted on the rear wall showing the entire routing of Eldorado from Harwood Road North to Newman Drive. This constituted the information previously requested by the Commission. Motion of approval was made by Dr. Hager, seconded by lJfrs. Shaunty. All members present voting affirmative. PZ 71;...1 Request of Hr. Harry James to rezone approximately 198 acres more or less from its present classification of IF-9 One Family Dwelling to a proposed classification of IF-7 One Family Dwelling. 1vír. James came forward to present his case to the Commission. ¥œ. James stated that some seven months ago ¥ir. Bob Hollin, representing Hunt Properties had requested IF-9 zoning on this piece of property. Present economic would not allow develop- ment of this property under IF-9 classification. He was requesting IF-7 classification so that immediate plans for development could be started. Mr. James presented a plat to the Commission in its rough form showing the general proposed layout including lots, blocks, streets, ~ . drainage, and park site. Dr. Hager asked if the park site would be dedicated to the City. :Mr. James answered affirma- tivly. After due deliberation motion of approval subject to an acceptable plat being submitted to the City Council covering the land in question was made by Vœ. Peters, seconded by IvIrs. Shaunty. All members present voting affirmative. . PZ 71-3 Request of }fr. Dawson H. Davis to rezone 42.87 acres more or less out of the \'Im. D. Barnes Survey from its present classification of Agriculture to Specific Use. - Mobile I-Iome Park. 1~1r. Davis advised the Commission from the floor that ¡vir. Mwi.n A. vlatts of North American Engineers, Inc. was present to represent him in the case in question. 1..fr. Watts came forward and reviewed for the Commission the submitted plat. He pointed out that the proposed park would be of five star rating. All underground utilities, curb and guttered streets, off street parking for two vehicles, all landscaped, and all provisions required by the City provided for. ~.IIr. vlatts oriented the Commission as to the exact location of the property and surrounding land use. Dr. Hager questioned the heavy traffic from one road emptying into Davis Blvd. 1w1r. Vfatts stated that two entrancies could easi1Jr be provided. I'·'Ir. Peters pointed out that the proposed land use plan for the City required an East-vlest road through the property. J'lír. ~'¡atts stated that he was unaware of this requirement but could provide the right of way if required. liTr. ~i.H. Long, owning property to the west, came forward and asked 1J1r. Watts to specify the size trailers and elaborate on the restric- tions proposed for the operation of this park, and made it clear he was not against the park, he was seeking information. 1·Ir. Watts stated that the minimum size home that would be allowed would be J2 X 50 feet, not older than three years and must be under-pinned. No rental units would be provided, and rules and regulations for the highest type maintenanœ and occupancy would be in effect. rJIr. Raymond Payne who li ves North of the property in the general vacinity carne forward and stated that he was not in favor of the changing of zoning and felt it would de- value his property and felt that this was not the best use of the land. 1"lr. A.E. ~vooten came forward asking how the project was to be financed, and. if r-1r. Davis intended to continue living at his present home site. The Commission ruled that these questions were not pertinent to the re- quest at hand. Mr. Wooten stated at that time he was against the change in zoning. Chairman Ratcliff asked J11-. Ballenger if he had checked the plat for legality and conformance to the code. 1·Ú'. Ballenger stated that the legal description was correct and quoted the total footage and averages proposed and further stated that to this point the requirements of the City had been met. After much discussion by members of the Càmrnission a motion of approval was made by Dr. Hager, seconded by }fr. Rinn. . ~ . On a show of hands Dr. Hager and lvfr. Rinn voting affirmative, ¥æ. Ratcliff, Mr. Peters, and Mrs. Shaunty voting negative. Motion denied. . PS 70-11 Resubmission College Hills Addition- Dr. Ramey came forward to present his case to the Commission. Dr. Ramey pointed out that the plat had been revised from the previous meeting and the closing of Jayme and the lots objectional in the preceeding plat were not a part of this request, and the area included in the request concerned only the area and replatting made necessary by the construction of HOliday Lane. Mr. Peters and Dr. Hager questioned the lot sizes and information not in- cluded on the submitted plat. Members discussed the culdesac closing a portion of College Circle South and general design and content of the subJpitted plat. After much discussion motion was made by Dr. Hager, seconded by lyfrs. Shaunty to approve the plat conditionally when all corrections are indicated and recommend to the City Council that if the developer chooses to leave the culdesac that lots 5,6,7, and 8 be left as platted. Þœ. Peters requested that the motion be amended to designate the following conditions: (1) Plat does not show the existing houses on Lots 3R, and 2R of Block 2OA, and Block 17 as called for in Section 1-03, Article D, Paragraph 7 of the Subdivision Ordinance. (2) lots in Block 17 are not numbered or lettered, Section 1-03, Article D, Paragraph 11. (3) Front building setback lines on Lots 20R and Lots in Block 17 now shown, Section 1-03 Article D, Paragraph 12. (4) Lots 20R and Lots in Block 17 do not have the dimensions, Section 1-03, Article D, Paragraph 8,_ (5) Lots 10 thru 17 do not have dimensions at rear of lots, Section 1-03, Article D, Paragraph 8, (6) Lots 18, 19, 20, Block 20A do not meet the minimwn width at rear of Lots for IF-9 zoning, Article,r.i3, Section 3, Paragraph 5. (7) lots 5 thru 8, and 10 thru 12 do not meet the mininn.un width at front of lots, Article 13, Section 3, Paragraph 5. 1·Irs. Shaunty seconded the amend- ment. On a show of hands of all members present voted affirmative. . Mr. R.P. Vinall - Consideration of closing Frankie B and Buck Street. lir. Ratcliff asked ~rr. Ballenger to state the business at hand. f.'Jr. Eallenger cal1.ed the Com- mission's attention to a letter in the files addressed to the City l.'lanager requesting the vacation and closing permanently of the unbuilt sections of Frankie B and Bucl{ Streets. l·Ir. Ballenger stated he had been instructed by the City }~ager to seek guidance as to the Commission's feelings so that the Administrative Staff might further advise lIr. Vinall whether or not to proceed with his application.l:!r. Ballenger oriented the Commission and re- lated those facts knm1n to him pertinent to this case. 11r. Vinall being in the audiance asked the Connnission if he rnight speak. In the interest of justice and information Dr. lIager rnade the motion to suspend the rules and allO\"1 . Vinall to speak. 11otion was seconded by Þ1rs. Shaunty. All members present voting affirmative. }vir. Vinall stated that he owned some 2~ acres of land between the area that Frankie B and Buck would extend into 14eadow Road. He up- held the fact that no roads were built at the present, and felt that the building of same would serve no purpose. l\11r. Vinall pointed out the problems of drainage and requested the City's claim to the R.O.W. in question be permanently terminated. After much discussion by the members of the Commission Dr. Hager made the motion to table the consid- eration until the next regularly scheduled meeting to allow the members time for on site inspection, and the accumulation of additional facts by the staff. Motion was seconded by 1-fr. Rinn. Dr. Hager, }vIr. Rinn, Mrs. Shaunty, and IvIr. Peters voting affirmative, I-ir. Ratcliff voting negative. OLD BUSINESS: None ADJOURNr~ŒNT : Motion to adjourn was made by Dr. Hag.r, seconded by Mrs. Shaunty. All members voting affirmative. r'Ieeting adjourned 9:15 P.M. January 21, 1971. . -1J!it,AR g.,?f JA/1/Jff Secr ary, 11/ s. J. ~v . Shaunty .~ ) Chairman, ~im. .