Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 1971-03-25 Minutes . . - CALL TO ORDER COrJSIDERATIO~J OF llINUT:FS OF T HE PREVIOUS r'ÍEET Ir~G ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT ITEliS or~ AGEïIDA FOR REGULAR PlANNING AND ZOr¡IIJG I<RETII-JG lIn~UTES OF THE l-IEETING OF Trill PUI'il~ING ANTI ZOI~II~G C01I1~íISSIOI~ OF THE CITY OF l'JOILTH RICI-ILAND IiILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT THE CITY HALL, 4101 1'10RGAI~ CIRCLE, T}IURS- DAY, 1c:ARCH 25, 1971 - 7:30 P.l' ~. The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman, ~·lm. N. Ratcliff l~otion of approval was made by J.·1rs. Shaunty, seconded by lvfr. Rinn. }~. Peters pointed out that under PS 71-4 the minutes did not fully stipulate his motion, and asked that tlle minutes be corrected to read as follows; That the Engineers and Council advise the Zoning COL~ission regarding policy on lots being smaller at the front or rear as the case might be, and being located on a curved street or culdesac. With this correction to the minutes pæ. Ratcliff asked for a show of hands. l/Iotion 4-0 with Dr. Hager abstaining due to his not being present at the previous meeting. PIlESENT : Chairman Secretary Vice Chairman vim. Ì~. Ratcliff l1rs. J .1'[. Shaunty Dr. Charles Hager H.P. Peters Louis E. Rinn ABSIDIT : None C.R. Ballenger, Director of Public Works, Betty Terrell, City Clerk PS 71-5 Request of Richland Enterprise submitting Holiday North Section 2, Final Plat. }/lr. Ratcliff asked IvTr. Ballenger if this was a correct plat conforming to the approved preliminary. }/tr. Ballenger stated that this was in fact the area previously zoned 2F-9 and differed from the ap- proved preliminary by virture of the lot sizes being in- creased, and the nlli~ber of lots being reduced from ten to nine. This being an advantage to the City, the staff recommended this plat for favorable approval. r:œ. Calvin Luper representing l:Tr. Sandlin and 1·1r. PAt11TIl came forward to present the case to the COmITåssion. He stated that they wished to increase the lot size to provide more area per unit and allow for front entry rather than rear entry to offset the possibility of invading the privacy of the ad- jacent homes. 1'fr. Luper further stated that the proposed . . . ¡'m-J BUSINESS. DISCUSSIOî·J OF SERVICE STATIOIß PS 71-6 PS 71-7 ~ .structures would be of the highest type and requested this plat be finalized as submitted. No others appeared in support of, or in opposition to the request. Dr. Hager made the motion to approve the request, seconded by }æ. Rinn. l·Tot~on carried unam.Jnous~·. Request of l-ír. B.R. Franks Final Plat of Lots Gl-G2, Callo\-ray Acres. 1'·~r. Ballenger advised the Commission that 1,·~. Franks had contacted his office this date stating that he 't11aS ill and unable to attend this meeting. l'lr. Ballenger pointed out that the final plat subF~tted was identical to the previously approved prel~~inary and suggested that the Commission might vlish to consider this case. I·lotion to approve the application liaS made by l~~r. Peters, secondeà by l-:Irs. ShauntJT. l-'lotion carried unanL~ous~y. Request of 1'~. James Luttrell to finalize Section 3 of Emerald Hills Addition. 1·fr. llatcliff asked l\lr. Ballenger for his comments regarding this application. líolr. Ballinger stated that he had been in contact våth both the City Engineers and l·fr. Lut trell 's engineers regarding this tract, and suggested that if approval "',as granted it s110uld be contingent upon appropriate contracts being entered into between the Council and lIr. Luttrell regarding the bridge structure required on Belfast, and subject to the corrective curve data on curve nlli~ber two and three as indicated de- sirable in tl1e engineer's letter. I·1r. llittrellf s engineer indicated this would be no problffifi, and would be accomplish- ed prior to this plat reaching the Council. l·ír. I.luttrell carne fon-rard stating that he '~lisl1ed to finalize this section to provide additional lots to be developed. He further stated that he ,,¡as relying on his engineers to accomplish t11e requirements of the Cit~! aJld stated he ~.tB.d nothing more to offer regarding this case. There being no one present to appear in support of or opposition to this request Dr. Hager-made the motion to approve this plat as final contingent upon a satisfactory contract between t11e developer and the Cit~r Council for the con- struction of t11e required bridge structure and the satis- faction of the City Engineers regarding curve two and tl1ree on the submitted pla.l1S. i--x. Rinn seconded the motion. Ic':otion carried u_nanimousl~t. Dr. Hager pointed out to the Commission that there were numerous service station buildings vacant in the City, and in close proximity to these buildings n~ facilities are being built. It was his thinking that the Conmdssion s110uld be aware of this and consider these facts when considering future zoning. The Commission discussed this at length and all members assured Dr. Hager that consideration of tIle facts presented woulà be kept in mind. . . . OLD BUSIN~ESS: fiDJOURNl·Œ:NT: l\Ione l~otion to adjourn vTaS made b:? Dr. Hager, seconded b:;.r l'rr. Rinn. }';otion carried unaniJTlously. ITeeting adjourned 8:20 P.l:. I,larch 25, 1971. A/Y. Chairman, 1~lrn. I\. ~