The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPZ 1970-01-22 Minutes . . . ZO~.JIJ>JG II'IDElC DJiTE OF ì-IEETIIJG SUBJECT A.CTIO!L FEBRUA11Y 26, 1970 Jar1es T. l'lood Sr. Approved FEBRUfuTtY 26, 1970 FEBRUARY 26, 1970 FEBRUARY 26, 1970 John 1'l. Barfield Tabled Jo}m T'J. Parfield Tabled C.E. Bear & Edward D. Pitchford Approved II-ARCH 12, 1970 JOh1'J \1. BA}1FIEID .Approved l':il.RCI-I 12, 1970 JOI-IIT ~r¡. Bl\.RFIELD i\.pproved l1ARCH 24, 1970 APRIL 21, 1970 APRIL 23, 1970 I~1AY 19, 1970 MAY 28, 1970 MAY 28, 1970 MAY 28, 1970 MAY 28, 1970 MAY 28, 1970 MAY 28, 1970 MAY 26, 1970 J .B. SANDLIN (VARIANCE M.E. HOLLOWAY ( VARIANCE) Denied Approved D.G. REAMES Approved Thomas H. Elting (Variance) Approved J.L. Sexton Approved J.L. Sexton Approved W.G. Cook Approved Arnold D. Pair Denied Mrs. J.B. Gibbons No action taken Norman Kilgore Approved Special Meeting of Planning & Zoning Commission & City Council JUNE 1(), 1970 JUNE 25, 1970 JULY 23, 1970 J.B. SANDLIN, (VARIANCE) Approved Educators Development Corp. Approved John If. J3arfie1d Denied JULY 23, 1970 Dock Dutton Approved Jul~T 23, 1970 Replatting of Block 42 Rich1and Terrace Addition Approved JULY 23, 1970 I1evie,,, of Pre1irilinar~l Plat of 11odman-Farre11 Inc. (I,labile Park) Tabled CASE rJO. PZ 70-6 PZ 70-7 PZ 70-8 PS 70-3 PZ 70-7 PZ 70-8 PZ 70-10 PZ 70-11 PZ 70-9 PZ 70-13 PZ 70-12 PS 70-4 PZ 70-14 PZ 70-15 PS 70-5 PS 70-6 PZ 70-17 PZ 70-16 PZ 70-18 PZ 70-19 PS 70-7 PS 70-8 ZOEITTG II\JDI0: · DATE OF IJ£ETll\JG -~--~._._.... -1~DJ~CT ___ .j~CTlor·T,_ _SASE NO._.__ ¡~U[;u.st 27, 1970 C-;eorgel'¡ . l~· · .I.jOrlDG .i\.pproved PZ 70-20 .A:U_[}lSt 27, 1970 C;.eorge 1J. Dorine l\pproveà PZ 70-22 Þ..1.1gUSt 27, 1970 Pllil ~Jeav'er Denied PZ 70-23 Septe8ber 15, 1970 r¡; ~ad~' ~ "Y'> I,. \ r¡' h Olla s \ . ar ..1-..0. \ . C e ) Denied PZ_ 70-21 October 22, 1970 October 22, 1970 October 28, 1970 October 28, 1970 G.E. Engleman(Dedication Blackfoot Trail Tabled PS 70-10 Proposed Zoning Ordi- nance Amendments #179 Tabled Proposed Zoning Ordi- nance Amem.dments ://179 Tabled (~'¡ork Session) G.E. Englen~(Dedication (11-9-70 ~ Blackfoot Trail) APPROVED BY COU~JCIL FINAL ACTION) PreliminalJr Plat Approved PS 70-10 · November 4, 1970 Proposed Zoning Ordi- (llork Session) nance Amendments #179 November 11, 1970 Proposed Zoning Ordi- nance Amendments #179 Approved I'Jovember 24, 1970 B.1"l. Giles (Variance) Denied PZ 70-24 December 15, 1970 lw~ay Advertising Company (Variance) Aproved PZ 70-25 December 16, 1970 Purvis & York - Dedication of Eldorado Tabled PS 70-9 December 16, 1970 College Hills Addition Preliminary Plat Denied PS 70-11 December 15, 1970 Expansion of McMillan Trailer Court Approved PS 70-12 December 21, 1910 Reconsideration of Variance B.W. Giles Smithfield Acres Approved January 21, 1971 Purvis & York - Dedication of Eldorado Approved PS 70-9 · January 21, 1971 111-. Harry J. James Approved PZ 71-1 January 21, 1971 1.rlr . Dawson \v. Davis Denied PZ 71-3 . . . ç ALL TO ORDER ¡:t 0 IJ.. CAIJ.. I TEr~lS ON AGENDA FOR REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING l·ŒETING IvlINUTES OF TI-Œ l':IEETII\JG OF TI-Œ PLANNING AND ZONING COI'/1líISSION OF TI-Œ CITY OF NORTH RICHLArm HILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT TrŒ CITY HALL, 4101 líORGAN CIRCLE, TIIDRS- DAY, JANUARY 22, 1970 - 7:30 P.M. The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman, Ray Porter PRESENT: Chairman Vice Chairman Secretary Ray Porter Clarence Pyron John Sprott, Jr. John Crawford James l1alker ABSE~IT : None Staff Present: C.R. Ballenger, Director of Public Works, Betty Terrell, City Clerk PS 70-1 Review of Final Plat of Oakvale Addition (Norman Kilgore) ~~. Kilgore came forward to present his case to the mem- bers. Chairman, Ray Porter read the letter from the City Engineers of their approval. Væ. Kilgore stated the soil test had been made and the letter had been received. After careful review of the plat by the members of the Commission motion of approval was made by l1r. Sprott, seconded by }:1r. ~ialker. 11otion carried unanimously. PS 70-2 Review of Final Plat of Diamond Loch (Formally Sabine Valley Country Club Estates) l\'fr. Ben Surgot came for- ward. Drainage was discussed. Drainage and lot size have been approved by the City Engineers, and ~Ir. Ballenger. Letter of approval from the City Engineers was read by Chairman, Ray Porter. Final construction plans to be approved by the City Engineers. After careful review of the plat motion of approval was made by IJIr. Walker, seconded b:}r 1fœ. Crawford. Ì·lotion carried unanimously. PZ 69-41 Request of IJœ. Clint Smith to rezone 15.739 acres from its present classification of "IF-9 One Family Dwelling" to a proposed classification of "Planned Development". 1-Jr. Delbert H. ~'1ontgomery came forward to represent Iv1r. Smith in his zoning request. 1'·1r. l!Iontgomery presented a plat to the Commission showing the proposed layout, and the arrangement and number of buildings that would be placed on this property. He further stipulated that the density would be some 19.4 units per acre. The proposed project would front on r·laplewood. A screening wall would . . PZ 7 'r:J-.} p~ 70-2 PZ 70-3 . PZ 70-;1 PZ 70-5 f ..~ !"") (1 r? d n ~; the ts< ~-td>~,).,..t h -) ide s. '~ (J n t rl:C t i 0:" ~,:nll~;::J t,p l::r.-1S nr tone, YJd t,"\TO ')]'1 i t "\,J(Y'J lrl 1'8 rr0\T1(~ ed ~ } r ~ Sirc1p 8;:?!(':P f0r'::J"rc~ I~ppre:~entinc -!:- '1. C ~-3 pas e ~-; re r Ycu~g of 7~16 J~dp ?6 Oì-'mCr3 of prOr(:rt~: ~,~ i +- 1: .~ fee t , j t i () -n i [11 e d the S A h 0 Tn e () ~'In ~ r.3 ¿~~~(1 "fiF" the']ornrni ion to g,pprove this app1ic8-tion vIas prei3cnted. Pr. Young stated tha,t p.re'JiOllS~:/ these home o\^JYl'?rs h~1d neen mi.s informed, and at th3.. t time had opposed th~ proposerl rezoninc, but had sinGe availed themselves of the facts and T¡lere non\rinced, thru no harrassement from Mr. Smith, that the proposed zoning was the best possi1)le use for this propert:l. T.'Ir. Ta:;rlor Cross of 5201 Gloyce COllrt, ca.me forth e..nd substantiated the remarks made by Mr. YOD.ng) and assured the Commission that at no time Tr'las He intimidated or pressured to sign the peti tioD, but had done so on his own, in the interest of fair play. !'!Jr. Richard Johnson, littornecY, C2,me fOr1:1ard representing I"Irs. Gooper of 5129 Cloyce COl.~.rt, and read to the Com- mission a prepared statement i~ opposition. A copy of this statement beinc made a pa.rt of the perr.1anent file on this case. T-1r. John Gille:/ of 5116 Cloyce Court appeared in opposition. Mr. Kenneth Chestnut, Attorney also represent- ing Mrs. Cooper, spoke in opposition giving as reasons the accessibility, density, traffic, and over crowding of schools. TiTr. lIerbert Jikins of 5125 Cloyce C011rt spoke briefly in opposition, as did I,!r. B.H. 13ird of 5113 CJ.oyce C01J~rt J and r,Tr. DUG F8rg1.1S0n of 5101 Cloyce Court statinc as their reasons primarily the increased traffic. As a part of the permanent file, there are letters recommend- ing approval covering 100 per cent of the area in front of this property to the South. No recorded opposition and petitions representinG 100 per cent of the area with- in 200 feet to the ~est, and a petition filed by Mr. Young representing all of the area within 200 feet to the North, Ì1'Ji th th~ excepti8!'l of one propert:/ 01!.mer recistering a. vote of :)pposition, 2.nd tVIO property O':imers i,,·¡ho ramained ne1J.tr31. E~ight si~atu_res in oprosi tior. representi.ng picht lots .')11t of eiGhteen lots to the~~ast ~'Jere duely noted. .ilft9r c~1ref"l;.1 c':::nsideration, ::.nà jeliberation, u. Tn 0 t j C ::1 to 3, p pro vet he Z c; n iYl g r e C:1.11. e.3 -: : ¡ (13 ;n 8. d G b~:r r\~ r . P~Tro rt J &nd 2eco~ded bJr Hr. Sfr0tt. All vctinc ~ffirmativet with Itr. Créctlford ab3t2..i~ing f")r persorr:J..l :re~so:cs. n. e q:1J. est 0 f It i c 1"12. rd ~1I. 1{1).. S 8 ell, T rtlfJ t r; e tore Z 0 n e 7.::: .3 2 2.C::'8S fror.1 its preS811t cla.ssification of "IF-12 On.e Fa:-nil:l D\\1'ellinc to ~.ì r',ropoGer1 classificc..tio:v.J. of "Lncal-It8ti:1il". ReÇi1::.es t of Richard 1::. HllSS ell, Tr113 tee to rezoY~e 20. /;27 acres fro;n its present classificatior: of "IF-12 One Fami~.y D1,.¡el 1 ir-1G" to a proposed cIas:: ification of "Local-Retail". R e ~;i11 ~ S t 0 f H, i c h é.).rd ~,!. ltu sse 11, T ru.s tee tore Z 0 n e 11. 341 acres from its present clé~ssificatioYl of "Agriclll tllre" toa proposed class ificEtt ion of "Local-H.eta.ilft Heq::"l8st of Hichard ~'\I. 1Ö1.sse11, Trl1stee to rezone 2.998 a,cres from its present classifica.tion of tfIF-12 One Family D:vAlling" to a proposed classificaticn of "Lo::)al-Retail". Request of Richard ~..J. R11ssell, Trustee to rezone 7.307 an.d 4.343 acres from its present classification of "IF-12 One . Family Dwelling" to a proposed classification of "2F-9 Two Family Dwelling". . l~Ir. FrankCampbell came forward to represent ~jrr. Richard W. Russell, Trustee and present the cases to the members of the Commission. l''Ír. Russell requested permission to present all five cases at one time. The Commission on a show of hands agreed to hear all five cases at once, and tw{e individual action on each case. Mr. Campbell stated that they wished to use the "2F-9rt as abuffer zone. He pointed out that the area covered under PZ 70-4 was pro- posed to be used for an office and professional building. The remaining property he asked for "Local-Retail" Zoning. The area covered by PZ 70-1 he stated was under option for Child Care Center. No plan was presented for this or the balance of the property. 11r. Porter asked those to come forward who opposed the proposed zoning. }/Tr. })i vlilburn 6754 1-~ike Drive representing the session of St. Paul Presbyterian Church voiced their opposition. The follow- ing citizens within 200 feet came forward and voiced a protest. 1,1r. Jolm lie Vaughn 6401 Tasca Drive, Vir. 14.1:1. Clinger 6701 Victoria, 14r. Paul Pauska 6340 Tosca, !1r. Chester l'Jheeless 6325 Tosca Drive, l1r. Billy G. Ernst 6612 Tabor, lJr. T .D. Armstrong 6601 Tabor, and }lr. IJe\'lis Renn 6617 Briley who also presented a petition in protest. All of the above stating as reasons the de-evaluation of their property, the incressed traffic, and the fact they had bought in "IF-12 One Family DW'elling" area and wished the present zoning to remain. After careful consideration by the Commission, l..Ir. Porter asl{ed for a motion on each individual case. The results being as follo~: PZ 70-1 líotion of denial was made by ~1r. Cra't'lford, sec- onded by l·Ir. vIaJJ{er. lcfotion carried unanimously. PZ 70-2 1"1otion of denial was made by lir. Sprott, sec- onded by 1~1r. Pyron. 1,1otion carried unanimously. P Z 70-3 1-1otion of denial was made by 1vlr. ~'¡alker, sec- onded by lIre Crawford. PZ 70-4 }/Iotion of denial was made by 1·1r. Crawford, sec- onded by IJlr. 1¡J'alker. lIotion carried unanimouly. PZ 70-5 líotion of denial was made by fJIr. Pyron, sec- onded by lIr. Sprott. lIotion carried unanimously. . PZ 70-6 Request of }~œ. James T. Wood Sr. to rezone 6.5281 acres from its present classification of "Agriculture" to a proposed classification of "Planned Development". }ír. Robert Mussina \iÍth K&K Industries came forward and in- formed the Corrnnission that l'J1r. Creorge Kolb who was to present the case and furnish the plat showing the intent of the use had been unavoidably detained, and was unable to appear at this meeting. Upon suggestion of }jr. Porter the Commission voted unanimously to Table this case until the next regular scheduled meeting. OLD BUS INESS: r.Jone . . . A DJOURNI/1E~JT : Secretary, John Sprott, Jr. ~ l-íotion to adjourn was made by lIr. Sprott, seconded by 1\:1r. Crawford. 1-1otion carried unanimously. l'1eeting ad- journed 10:35 P.I-J. January 22, 1970. Chairman, Ray E. Porter