The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPZ 1965-05-17 Minutes · ~ ::E ::> ~ .8 CD @) J,;. I~ tf# .ut I"~ j .~ ~ ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MAY, 17! 1965 Members Present, Clarence Pyron, Ray Porter, Jim McCoy, Bill Marshall Alan Hamm and C W Adcock. ® ~ ~~ ~..' :;)j :Þ ~ 1. Discussion-PZ-65_5 20 Acre Tract of Land out of the W. W. Wallace Survey. ( Weaver Tract ). Abstract 1606 bounded on the North by Shauna Drive, on the South by Victoria Ave. on the East by Reveria Dr. Oliver Dr. and Georgia Ave. on the West by Rufe Snow Dr.from its present Class- ification of Class "A" Residential to a proposed classification of Class "C" Residential, said tract c~mmomly called the Weaver Tract. After reading Legal Notices that appeared in the Daily News Texan, Ray Porter asked for comments from Mr. Weaver . Mr. Weaver or his agents were not present. Mr. James Parker came forward and asked if someone would explain the difference in Zoning of Class "A" to class "en, Mr Porter did so in detail. Mr. Paul Harmon asked if this zoning could be presented to the Zoning board again, Mr Porter answered yes with another fee. Mrs Bettie Tarlton wanted to go on record as being aganist the re-zoning. Mr. Brawder asked if this property was rezoned, could they build Class "C" homes, Mr. Porter stated it would revert back to Class "A" if they did not comply to their orginal request. Mr. Claude Shockelford stated he was opposed to the Zoning. Mr. James Parker asked if it would possible to make Mr. Weaver put up a performance bond, he then asked if everyone Opposed to the zoning would stand, twenty did so. Mr McCoy made a motion to deny the requested re-zoning, Mr Hamm seconded, the motion carried 4-0. 11. pz-65-6 Request to He-Zone Lot A, Block 30 from its present Classification of Class " A" Residential to a proposed Classification of Local Retail Business. Mr. Porter asked Mr. Owens to come forward and explain reasons for re- zoning this property. Mr. Owens explained College Hills had 350 resident ial lots, and the nearest Super Market and Drug Store was some two miles away. Mr. Owens felt some retail stores was needed in this area. Mr. A G Meachem asked some one to explain Local Retail Zoning to him, Mr. Hamm did so in detail. Motion carried 4-0. ~ ~ w (r) ç~( w a.. 111. pz-65-7 Request to Rezone Lot A Block 4 of the College Hills Addition from its present Classification of Class "A" residential to the proposed Classification of Local Retail. Mr. Owens stated that there was a need for a small store close to the campus, also some apartments in this area. Mr. Porter explained there would be no need for re-zoning for apartments if the request was granted Motion to grant this re-quest was made by Mr. Hamm, second by Mr. McCoy motion carried 4-0. iLl tt) IV. pz-65-B Request to re-zone a portion of a 121.7 acre tract situated East of F. M. Road 193B and North of Laura St. from its present Classification of Class "A" residential to the proposed Classification of Class "C" residential. Mr. Porter asked Mr. John Worley to explain his request for re-zoning. Mr. Worley explained their reasons for re- questing Class "C" zoning was to build smaller homes, that were to be constructed of 75% brick with air conditiong. Plans were also for a community Park and through streets one mile apart, 7.6 acre site for elementary school to be sold to the school boa~d. Mr Worley explained the only reason for zoning class "C" was to build on BooO ft. lot and c·" ;~ w ú- ~ - was not interested in any other uses of "Ct' district. Mr. G. Hall came forward and stated he had recently bought property on Laurel St. to build his home, and did not want this type of sub-division near his property. Mr & Mrs Crunk and Mr. Ed Bridgeman wanted to go on record as being opposed to this re-zoning. Mrs Portwood stated it was fine with her as long as no apartments are build. Mrs Staford said she thought the houses were to small for this area.Mrs L. A June said she was opposed to this proposal. Motion was made by Jim McCoy! to deny this request for re-zoning. Second by Mr. Alan Hamm, Motion carried 4-0. e v. SUBDIVISION. 1. ps-65-1 Preliminary plate of TOWER HEIGHTS ESTATES Addition tp the City of North Richland Hills in the J Condra Survey located in the Northwest portion of the City of North Richland Hills. After reading legal notices, Mr. Porter asked Mr Parker to come for- ward and explain portion of this plate. Mr. Parker explained plans for utilities, his plan was to install his own water system until it become inadequate, then he would connect to Tarrant County water supply. His plans were to use septic tanks now, and tie on to the City Sewer later. Mr. Porter asked for comments, no one opposed. After reviewing the plate the board felt the City needed more information on the drainage, also lab. reports were needed of soil conditions to see if septic tanks would be sufficent. After discussion Alan Hamm made motion to deny the request at this time, seconded by Jim McCoy. Motion carreid 4-0. Motion was made by Alan Hamm to adjourn, seconded by Jim McCoy. Time 1:15 A.M. - DENIED "e - ZONNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 1~7.~ 1965 1 PZ...65,...,S Request to rezone a 20 acre tract or lam in the w" W" Wallace Survey!' Abstract 1606 $I bounied on the North by Shau'tJa Drive ~ on the Soutb by Victoria Avenue ~ on the East by Blverla Dr. Oliver Drive I' and Georgia Avenue and on the West by Rufe Snow DR", from its present Classification of Class"A" Besldent1al to a proposed Classification of Class "c" Resldent1a19 said tract commonly called the Weaver Tracto After reading legal notice that appeared in the Daily News Texan, Ray Porter asked for comments from Mr" Weavel"$ Mr" Weaver or his agents were not present.t Mro Porter asked for comments from tbe flooro Mro James Parker came forward. am asked if someone would expla1n the difference in Zon1ng of' "All to "C" a Mro Porter do so 1n detail" Mro Pau1 Harmon came forward and asked if this Zoning could be presented to the board again at Y!r~ Weaver' 8 reque8t~ Mr.. Porter answered yes with another fee., Mrs Batt1e Tarlton oame forward arJd wanted to go on reoord as being against the rezoning.. Mr ø Brawder came forward an ask 1f this property was re-zoned, could they buIld c1.a8s "Cft homes rather than apartmentsQMre Porter stated 1t wouJ.d revert back to Class "A" if they did not compJ.;r to theIr orglœJ. 1'8qµeat" Mro Claude Shookelford came forward and stated he would l1ke to go on record as being opposed to this re-zoni1'1goHr. James Parker. came forward am asked if 1t would be Possible to make ~. Weaver put up a performance bomo Mro Parker then asked if a1170118 would stand that was opposed to the Zoning" Twenty six did 80. No other comments were heard from the fJ. oar 01 Atter dIscussion by the board members, Mr" McCoy made a mo'tlon to de~ _ the requested re-zoning, Mr" Hamm seconed. the motion carried 4~O 0 '. APPROVED1~'~ PZ-6S-6 Bequest to Rezon6 Let "A" Block 30 from its present Cla.ss1f1catien of Class "All Res~-dent1al to the proposed Classlfi..., cation of L cal Reta11jl College Hill Add" After reading legal notice that appeared In the Dai17 News Texan, t1¡...... Porter ask Mr, Owens to come forward' and expla1n reasons . rorre-zoni~ this propert'ø .~~ Owens e~laiD8d COllege Hills had 350 residentual lot8~ am the œa:rest Super Market an Drug Store was some two miles away () Mr.. Owens feJ.t SOlIe retail .tore. ware needed 1n this area~ Mr" Porter asked ~or cODBeDts trom the f1o~" Mr" A G", Meachem came forward and asked someone to explainn ~y~~_~~~~t,_,,-~':~:~~_~~~:~. ~~'-. ~~~:_ M:,~.~ did 80G Vote OOK4:)Jt.~, .I»~~.~,\ WBRmVEDll1"PZ-6S_? Bequest at ~zone Lot "Aft Block 4 ot the College HUls Add1t1on from its present Classification of Class "A" res1dential to the proposed Classlficationof Local Beta110 . Mr.. OweDS stated that there was t:i need for a slIIÙl store olose to the calttpus" also Some apartment 1n this area.. Mr.. Porter expl$lDed . there would be no need for re-zoningfor apartments if the request was granted 0 Seconed Jim McCoY' a motion carried 4...0.. IENIED lVo pz..6s...a Request to Rezone a portion of a 121011 $-ore tract situated East of F"M.. Road 1938 and North ot Laura Stret)'t from its present Classir~cation of Class "Aft residential to the pro~ . posed Class1ficat1on of Class "C· res1den'tlal" After readi11g lega1 notice" Mr" porter asked Mr" John Wc.rley to explain his request for re-zo'Dl1:Jg class ftA- to cJ.as8 .C... Mro Wor1ey came forward and exp1.ained their reasons for request.ing. o1ass "C" zoning~ were to bul1d smaJ.ler bomes,tbat were -to be oonstructed of 75% brick, with air conditioDo PlaDS were ~ùso for ") 4:'" -.J \ ... . S, community Park and through streets one mlle apart, 7,>6 aore site for elementry school" to be sold to the school board" Mr" Worley explained the only reason for zoning olass "C" was to build on a 8000 ft., lot am was not interested in any other uses of "C" district Mr" Porter asked for comments from the floor" Mr Q" F..a.ll came i'orward am stated he had recently bought property on Laurel St., . to build his home, and did not 1~nt this type of sub.-.divlsion that near his property" Mr &: Mrs Crunk also opposed Mr Ed., Br1.d,,~ geman ifanted to go on rec::>:t'd as opposed, Mrs Port\'1ood stated. it was satisfacto.ry with her as 10¡:¡g as ther<e were no apartments., fih"'s,., Staford stated she thought the houses were to small før this area Mrs.o L A June stated she was opposed to this perposial.; t1otion TA1B,S made by Jim McCoy to deny this requested re~zoni-og, Seconed by XoI!-, Allen Hamm I\l{.)t1on caI~rled 4 ,-,0 ;., t -. V 0 Subdlvls1c)ns? 1" ps-65~"1 Preliminary plat of TOWER IL~IGHTS ESTATES ,Add1tion to the City Of No.rth Rlchland HIlls I1.1"Uìe :r c, èö11d'Fã1rürvey located ir:, the Northwest portion of the City of North Bichland Hills After reading legal notlce~ Mr~ Porter askMr., Parker to come fox'~ ward and explain portions of this plate" r;ïr~ Parker explained :plana for utIlities" His plans were to install his own water systemr UTI:~. til it become inadequate then he would connect to Tarrant; County Water Supply" His plans were to use septic tanks now,) and tie on to the City Sewer later, Mr~ Porter ask for comments;¡ no ona opposed After revewlng the plate the board felt the City needed more lnfor~ matlon on the drainages also lab" reports ware needed of soil con... dition to see if septic tanks would be 8UrrIc&nt" After a lengthy disoussion motion was made by Allen Hamm to deny the request at this tlme9 seconded by Jim McCoy Motion carried 4-0Q Motion was w3de by Allen Hamm to ad .1ourn ~ seconded by J 1m McCoy" Time ). ~ 15 A" M 0 e