Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 2010-09-13 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, September 13, 2010 5:45 P.M. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.2 Update on New Fire Engines (5 Minutes) A.3 Discuss Calculation of Atmos Franchise Fees (10 Minutes) A.4 Discuss Proposed Rule Change to Council Rules of Procedure (10 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096- 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) C.0 Adjournment Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 10, 2010 at � JCS a. M s ist t City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. NRH City Council Agenda — September 13, 2010 Page 1 of 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, September 13, 2010 7:00 P.M. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and schedule: ❑ City Hall on the day of the meeting Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at www.nrhtx.com after 10 a.m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Barth A.2 Pledge - Councilman Barth A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) No items for this category. A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of August 6, 2010 City Council Work Session B.2 Approval of Minutes of August 23, 2010 City Council Meeting NRH City Council Agenda — September 13, 2010 Page 2 of 4 B.3 GN 2010 -075 Approve Contract for Legal Services B.4 PW 2010 -034 Approve Ordinance 3110 Amending Section 54 -81(a) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances; Establishing the Times One Way Streets are in Effect During School Zone Hours. B.5 PW 2010 -035 Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Interlocal Agreement for Design Services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project B.6 PU 2010 -020 Authorize Lease to Purchase of Radio Replacement Equipment from Motorola in the amount of $194,819.88 B.7 PU 2010 -021 Approve the Replacement of Analog Audio and Video System in the North Richland Hills Jail with the LenSec System for an Amount not to Exceed $175,000. B.8 GN 2010 -071 Consider acceptance of an Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant in the amount of $32,400 for Urban Search and Rescue Training. B.9 GN 2010 -072 Renewal of Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of North Richland Hills and Southlake for Animal Impoundment C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2009 -08 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a zoning change from "R -1 -S" Special Single Family to "R -2" Single Family on a portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 0.532 acres.) - Ordinance No. 3109 C.2 RP 2009 -05 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a replat of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition into Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 1.960 acres.) C.3 SUP 2010 -04 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from the City of North Richland Hills for a Special Use Permit to allow the use of Building Materials other than those Specified in the Masonry Definition at the North Richland Hills Recreation Center. The Masonry Definition is found in Section 118 -671 of the City of North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The proposed location of the Recreation Center is the Southeast Corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive - Ordinance No. 3108 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing D.1 FP 2010 -02 Consideration of a Request from Thomas Andrews to Approve a Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Barrett - Andrews Addition (located at 8500 Clay Hibbins Road - 4.8487 acres.) E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. NRH City Council Agenda — September 13, 2010 Page 3 of 4 F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.1 GN 2010 -067 Adopting the 2009/2010 Revised Budget and 2010/2011 Proposed Budget - Ordinance No. 3111 F.2 GN 2010 -068 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2010 - Ordinance No. 3112 F.3 GN 2010 -069 Approval and Ratification of the 2010 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2010- 027 F.4 GN 2010 -070 Approve Settlement of Atmos Energy Mid -Tex RRM Filing, Ordinance No. 3113 F.5 GN 2010 -073 Consider request for the U.S. Postal Service to officially designate North Richland Hills as the preferred city name in the postal addresses for all properties located within the North Richland Hills city limits - Resolution No. 2010 -028 F.6 GN 2010 -074 Appointment to the Civil Service Commission - Place 4 G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 Announcements - Councilman Welch H.2 Adjournment All items on the agenda are for discussion and /or action. Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 10, 2010 at a.m. - sl tan! City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking paces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. NRH City Council Agenda — September 13, 2010 Page 4 of 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 826 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, September 13, 2010 5:45 P.M. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.2 Update on New Fire Engines (5 Minutes) A.3 Discuss Calculation of Atmos Franchise Fees (10 Minutes) A.4 Discuss Proposed Rule Change to Council Rules of Procedure (10 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 696- 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067- 241297 -09)y 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) C.0 Adjournment Certification do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 10, 2010. City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6O60 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, September 13, 2010 7:00 P.M. Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and schedule: ❑ City Hall on the day of the meeting Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at www.nrhtx.com after 10 a.m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting. A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.2 Pledge - Councilman Barth A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) No items for this category. A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of August 6, 2010 City Council Work Session B.2 Approval of Minutes of August 23, 2010 City Council Meeting B.3 GN 2010 -075 Approve Contract for Legal Services B.4 PW 2010 -634 Approve Ordinance 3110 Amending Section 54 -81(a) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances; Establishing the Times One Way Streets are in Effect During School Zone Hours. B.5 PW 2010 -035 Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Interlocal Agreement for Design Services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project B.6 PU 2010 -020 Authorize Lease to Purchase of Radio Replacement Equipment from Motorola in the amount of $194,819.88 B.7 PU 2010 -021 Approve the Replacement of Analog Audio and Video System in the North Richland Hills Jail with the LenSec System for an Amount not to Exceed $175,000. B.8 GIN 2010 -071 Consider acceptance of an Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant in the amount of $32,400 for Urban Search and Rescue Training. B.9 GIN 2010 -072 Renewal of Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of North Richland Hills and Southlake for Animal Impoundment C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2009 -08 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a zoning change from "R -1 -S" Special Single Family to "R -2" Single Family on a portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 0.532 acres.) - Ordinance No. 3109 C.2 RP 2009 -05 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a replat of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition into Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 1.960 acres.) C.3 SUP 2010 -04 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from the City of North Richland Hills for a Special Use Permit to allow the use of Building Materials other than those Specified in the Masonry Definition at the North Richland Hills Recreation Center. The Masonry Definition is found in Section 118 -671 of the City of North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The proposed location of the Recreation Center is the Southeast Corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive - Ordinance No. 3108 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing D.1 FP 2010 -02 Consideration of a Request from Thomas Andrews to Approve a Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Barrett - Andrews Addition (located at 8500 Clay Hibbins Road - 4.8487 acres.) E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.1 GN 2010 -067 Adopting the 2049/2010 Revised Budget and 2010/2011 Proposed Budget - Ordinance No. 3111 F.2 GN 2010 -068 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2010 - Ordinance No. 3112 F.3 GN 2010 -069 Approval and Ratification of the 2010 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2010- 427 F.4 GN 2010 -070 Approve Settlement of Atmos Energy Mid -Tex RRM Filing, Ordinance No. 3113 F.5 GN 2010 -073 Consider request for the U.S. Postal Service to officially designate North Richland Hills as the preferred city name in the postal addresses for all properties located within the North Richland Hills city limits - Resolution No. 2010 -028 F.6 GN 2010 -074 Appointment to the Civil Service Commission - Place 4 G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.1 Announcements - Councilman Welch H.2 Adjournment All items on the agenda are for discussion and /or action. C'.arfifirafinn do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 10, 2010. City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information, The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. City of North Richland Hills City Council Work Session Meeting Agenda North Richland Hills City Hall City Council Workroom 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Monday, September 13, 2010 5:45 P.M. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.2 Update on New Fire Engines (5 Minutes) A.3 Discuss Calculation of Atmos Franchise Fees (10 Minutes) A.4 Discuss Proposed Rule Change to Council Rules of Procedure (10 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the followinq as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096 - 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) C.0 Adiournment CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. A.1 Subject: Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Manager's Office Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Chief Andy Jones Agenda No. A.2 Subject: Update on New Fire Engines (5 Minutes) Summary The Fire Department recently accepted delivery of two new fire apparatus. Fire Chief Andy Jones will provide an overview and highlight some of the features of the two new units during the work session. General Description The first unit, which arrived April 8, is a 2010 Ferrara Quint stationed at Fire Station No. 1 and is designated as Quint 221. This unit replaces a 1997 Emergency One Quint which is being placed in reserve status. This unit is called a Quint because of the five functions it provides: a water pump, water tank, fire hose, aerial ladder and ground ladders. Quint 221 is equipped with the following: 77' aerial ladder 1500 gpm pump and a pro foam system 500 gallon water tank 30 gallon foam tank Assorted hoses and nozzles Assorted hand tools The second unit arrived July 8 and is a 2010 KME Engine with a compressed air foam system (CAFS). This unit will be stationed at Fire Station No. 3 and replaces a 1994 Emergency One Engine which will be placed in reserve status. Compressed air foam increases the ability of water to absorb heat by sticking to or penetrating combustible objects, reducing the amount of water needed which reduces water damage to the property. Engine 223 is equipped with the following; 1500 gpm pump Compressed air foam system 750 gallon water tank 30 gallon foam tank Assorted hoses and nozzles Assorted hand tools Both units will be onsite at the meeting, and available for viewing. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Manager's Office Presented by: Karen Bostic Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. A.3 Subject: Discuss Calculation of Atmos Franchise Fees (10 Minutes) Summary Discuss with City Council the way franchise fees are currently being calculated by Atmos Energy and their agreement to return to the previous methodology. General Description Several times over the last decade, utility companies have been in disputes with cities over the interpretation of "gross receipts" in calculating franchise fees due to cities. Franchise fee payments to cities are usually designed as some percentage of the gross revenues collected by the company within municipal limits. The utility makes its payment to the City annually and then recovers that amount from customers within the municipality through a monthly franchise fee. The City of North Richland Hills receives a 5% franchise fee from Atmos Energy on the gross receipts from the sale of natural gas within the city. Until January 1, 2009, the monthly franchise fees collected from customers were included as part of the gross receipts calculation. Beginning in January 2009, Atmos made a decision to exclude the monthly franchise fees collected from customers from the gross receipts calculation without informing cities. This change in calculation was recently brought to the attention of Atmos Cities Steering Committee (ACSC). After discussion with the attorney that represents ACSC, Atmos has agreed to return to the previous methodology for any city that wishes to have the calculation of gross receipts include the monthly franchise fee that is collected from customers. Any city that chooses to return to the previous methodology will be reimbursed for the difference between the franchise payment already received for 2010 and the amount using the previous methodology. For North Richland Hills it is estimated that we would receive approximately $20,000 more in franchise revenue for the current year. It is estimated the monthly impact to the average residential customer would be $0.10. Atmos has also indicated that they are willing to adjust not only the 2010 franchise payment, but will recalculate franchise fees back to January 2009. The franchise fee revenue received from Atmos for 2010 is for the period June 1, 2009 through May 31, 2010. If council concurs, an additional payment for January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009 will be received. Staff needs direction from council on whether or not you concur to return to the previous methodology for calculating gross receipts whereby franchise fee revenues are included in gross receipts. Staff also needs direction from council on whether or not you concur to recalculate franchise fees back to January 2009. No formal action is necessary on this item only a consensus. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. A.4 Subject: Discuss Proposed Rule Change to Council Rules of Procedure (10 Minutes) Summary Staff has been asked to prepare a proposed rule change to the Council Rules of Procedure for discussion by Council. The proposed change will amend Section 2- 67(e)(8) of the Code of Ordinances by adding a provision in the citizen's comments portion of the agenda. General Description A request has been made that the City Council consider amending the Council Rules of Procedure to add a provision that would not allow comments during citizens presentation on matters in which Staff is scheduling stakeholders meetings or other meetings designed to solicit citizen input. The stakeholders meetings provide an opportunity for all parties to make comments on matters coming before Council for consideration. Council is then able to receive from Staff complete information on matters before them for consideration. If Council decides they would like to add this provision to the Rules, Section 2- 67(e)(8) of the Code of Ordinances will need to be amended. Below is the current wording of this section of the Code with the City Attorney's proposed language added in blue. Section 2- 67(e)(8): The citizen's comments portion of the city council meeting is set for members of the public to address the city council on any item of business that is not formally scheduled on the agenda or scheduled for public comment. Members of the public should complete a public meeting appearance card prior to the item being heard and present it to the city secretary. Such public appearance cards will state the rules for citizen presentations and an acknowledgment by citizens that they understand and will adhere to the rules regarding speaking during citizen's presentation. Citizens' comments are generally permitted at the beginning of the regular meeting, after ceremonial items, as specified on the agenda. Presentations shall be limited to three minutes each. Citizens' comments shall be limited to a cumulative total not to exceed 30 minutes for all speakers. If such comments exceed such limit the council may extend such time or hear them after other business has been completed. Presentations under citizen's comments are limited to matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the city. Citizen comments concerning matters which are or will be scheduled for consideration by the council or another city board or commission at a later date will not be allowed. No citizen comment will be allowed on any matter on which staff has scheduled or will be scheduling stakeholder meetings or similar meetings designed to solicit citizen input, it being the council's intent that such comments be made at such meetings. In compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, V.T.C.A., Government Code § 551.001, et seq., the city council may not deliberate or vote on any matter raised in citizen comments, except for the purpose of determining whether such matter should be placed on a future city council agenda. The mayor, however, may request the city manager to provide additional information on a matter of general interest to the full council, the public at large and to the citizen making the comment. If a factual question is asked and a staff member has ready knowledge of this, the staff member will be requested to provide immediate response at the council meeting. If an inaccurate statement is made and a staff member is aware of this, the staff member is requested to respond immediately at the council meeting. If the citizen inquiry is one that is either quite involved, lengthy, and/or requires research, but is one of general interest to the populace, a follow -up response to the citizen presentation can be made at a future council meeting; it may also be desirable to replay the original telecast of the citizen's inquiry. If the citizen inquiry is of a private matter or individual nature, an individual follow -up may be the approach rather than the above. In order to amend the Council Rules of Procedure, the proposed rule must first be introduced into record at a meeting of the Council, and then at a subsequent Council meeting, the rule change would be voted on and amended. If Council concurs with the proposed rule change after discussing during the work session, an item can be placed on the September 27 agenda to introduce the rule into record and adoption of the rule could occur at the October 11 meeting. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. B.0 Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. B.1 Subject: Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096- 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067- 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352- 237213 -09)) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -201 Agenda No. C.0 Subject: Adjournment City of North Richland Hills City Council Regular Meeting Agenda North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Monday, September 13, 2010 7:00 P.M. A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Barth A.2 Pledge - Councilman Barth A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) No items for this category. A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of August 6, 2010 City Council Work Session B.2 Approval of Minutes of August 23, 2010 City Council Meeting B.3 GIN 2010 -075 Approve Contract for Legal Services B.4 PW 2010 -034 Approve Ordinance 3110 Amending Section 54 -81 (a) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances: Establishing the Times One Way Streets are in Effect During School Zone Hours. B.5 PW 2010 -035 Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Interlocal Agreement for Design Services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project B.6 PU 2010 -020 Authorize Lease to Purchase of Radio Replacement Equipment from Motorola in the amount of $194,819.88 B.7 PU 2010 -021 Approve the Replacement of Analog Audio and Video System in the North Richland Hills Jail with the LenSec System for an Amount not to Exceed $175,000. B.8 GN 2010 -071 Consider acceptance of an Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant in the amount of $32,400 for Urban Search and Rescue Training, B.9 GN 2010 -072 Renewal of Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of North Richland Hills and Southlake for Animal Impoundment C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2009 -08 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a zoning change from "R -1 -S " Special Single Family to "R -2 " Single Family on a portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 0.532 acres.) - Ordinance No. 3109 C.2 RP 2009 -05 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schav for a replat of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition into Lots 3R1 and 31R2, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 1.960 acres.) C.3 SUP 2010 -04 Public Hearina to Consider a Request from the Citv of North Richland Hills for a Special Use Permit to allow the use of Building Materials other than those Specified in the Masonry Definition at the North Richland Hills Recreation Center. The Masonry Definition is found in Section 118 -671 of the City of North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The proposed location of the Recreation Center is the Southeast Corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive - Ordinance No. 3108 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing D.1 FP 2010 -02 Consideration of a Request from Thomas Andrews to Approve a Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Barrett- Andrews Addition (located at 8500 Clay Hibbins Road - 4.8487 acres.) E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.1 GN 2019 -067 Adoptinq the 2009/2010 Revised Budget and 2010/2311 Proposed Budget - Ordinance No. 3111 F.2 GN 2010 -068 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2010 - Ordinance No. 3112 F.3 GN 2010 -069 Approval and Ratification of the 2010 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2313 -027 F.4 GN 2010 -070 Approve Settlement of Atmos Energy Mid -Tex RRM Filing, Ordinance No. 3113 F.5 GN 2010 -373 Consider request for the U.S. Postal Service to officially designate North Richland Hills as the preferred city name in the postal addresses for all properties located within the North Richland Hills city limits - Resolution No. 2010 -328 F.6 GN 2010 -074 Appointment to the Civil Service Commission - Place 4 G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 Announcements - Councilman Welch H.2 Adjournment NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Mayor Oscar Trevino Agenda No. A.0 Subject: Call to Order - Mayor Trevino NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Councilman Tim Barth Agenda No. A.1 Subject: Invocation - Councilman Barth NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Councilman Tim Barth Agenda No. A.2 Subject: Pledge - Councilman Barth CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Subject: Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. A.3 No items for this category CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. A.4 Subject: Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. A.5 Subject: Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. B.0 Subject: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Patricia Hutson Agenda No. B.1 Subject: Approval of Minutes of August 6, 2010 City Council Work Session Recommendation To approve the minutes of the August 6, 2010 City Council Work Session. MINUTES OF THE BUDGET WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT THE AMERICAN AIRLINES TRAINING AND CONFERENCE CENTER, ROOM M106, 4501 HIGHWAY 360 SOUTH, FORT WORTH, TEXAS, — AUGUST 6, 2010 Present: City Council: Oscar Trevino Ken Sapp John Lewis Tom Lombard Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Mayor Council Member 1 Mayor Pro Tern Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Staff: Mark Hindman City Manager Karen Bostic Assistant City Manager Jared Miller Assistant City Manager Mike Curtis Managing Director Vickie Loftice Managing Director Jimmy Perdue Director of Public Safety Elizabeth Reining Assistant to City Manager Patricia Hutson City Secretary Larry Koonce Director of Finance Mark Mills Director of Budget Mary Peters Public Information Officer Patrick Hillis Director of Human Resources Craig Hulse Director of Economic Development Andy Jones Fire Chief Jennipher Castellanos Budget Analyst Shirley Hoover Financial Analyst CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the Council Budget Work Session to order August 6, 2010 at 8:34 a.m. with all council members present. Mayor Trevino briefly commented on the budget. Mayor Trevino expressed his support of the budget and commented that the budget's one downside was its potential negative impact to employee core benefits. The Council also expressed their support of the budget and recognized its impact to employee benefits. Throughout the work session staff presented a PowerPoint presentation that provided an overview of the Revised 2009/2010 and Proposed 2010/2011 Operating and Capital Project Budgets, initiatives to be continued from previous years, trends and major financial and economic issues affecting the budget, and modifications to existing services. The City Manager began the presentation by giving an overview of the budget discussing highlights of the budget, financial and economic assumptions and the guiding philosophy used to formulate the budget. Mr. Hindman reported that while the recession continues, the local economy is showing some signs of recovery in some areas. Some positive economic indicators are single family sales starting to pick up slightly, foreclosures are decreasing, retail sales appear to be stabilizing and the consumer price index is remaining steady. Property tax revenues are lagging behind. Property values leveled out last year and this year will see a decline resulting in a reduction of $835,000 in property tax revenues. The preliminary budget is based on keeping the City's property tax rate at 57¢ per hundred dollars of assessed value. The preliminary budget is smaller than the previous two fiscal year budgets and is based upon receiving less revenue than received in 2007/2008. Property taxes are down 4 %, sales tax is down 2% and most other revenues are also down. The preliminary budget was prepared with sensitivity to the citizens' economic conditions. In balancing the budget the focus was on decisions that could be sustained overtime. Mr. Hindman advised that very little of the budget is not a core service and the core services have been prioritized. Mr. Hindman discussed the importance of being prepared to come out of the economic recovery. The proposed budget plans for the continuation of current Capital Improvement Programs including the projects approved by the voters in the 1994 and 2003 bond elections. Mr. Hindman discussed that in preparing for recovery it is important for the City to 1) maintain its assets, both physical and employee; 2) continue to prevent decline through Neighborhood Initiative Programs, maintain code compliance efforts, add funds for demolition, continue the Street Maintenance Program and Grant Funded Programs; 3) maintain its market edge through transportation enhancements, continued enhancement of Public Safety programs, NRH20's new attraction, the new Recreation Center and the BIG Program; and 4) continue to produce local economic growth. The major budget challenge for 2010/2011 was the decline in revenues. Cost increases were seen in health care, wholesale water /sewer charges, and the maintenance of the TMRS Plan. The largest portion of expenses in the budget is personnel. The preliminary budget does not include compensation adjustments for employees, merit increases or market adjustments and the Stability Pay plan and TMRS Supplemental Death Benefit suspended in the 2009/2010 budget remain suspended for FY 2010/2011. The preliminary budget includes some staff reductions. One middle school resource officer (SRO) position will not be filled. An Assistant City Manager position was eliminated last fall and two vacant park maintenance worker positions will be frozen. Program changes in Citicable operations will reduce staffing in this division. Citicable will continue to operate in core functions but several extra services performed by Citicable will be eliminated. The positions eliminated in Citicable will be funded through March 2011 to allow the individuals holding the positions the opportunity to transition to other job opportunities. The preliminary budget utilizes some reserve balances and reduces contributions to some reserves. Should revenue exceed projections or expenses come in below budget, restoration of reserve contributions will be a top priority. Ms. Elizabeth Reining, Assistant to the City Manager, highlighted some of the past year's accomplishments supporting the Council's Goals and Objectives. - NIP expanded to include larger projects - TI F #1 expanded to larger area - City received NCTCOG sustainable development grant for TODs - Loop 820 Expansion has started - North Tarrant Parkway under construction - Boulevard 26 trail construction starts next week - CCD passed with 88% of vote - CAFS pumper completed - Police Department began Crime Victim Liaison Program - S&P raised NRH's credit rating from `AA' to `AA +' - Defeased $1.3 million of outstanding bonds - Iron Horse was voted Best Public Golf Course - City received $585,000 EECBG grant - Keep NRH Beautiful honored with $270,000 as a winner of Governor's Community Achievement Awards for outstanding community improvement - New Recreation Center will meet LEED Silver standards - Stormy Plaza opened and "Weather" debuted - Two signal boxes were added to Signal Art Project - Prestige Ameritech relocated to North Richland Hills - BIG was redesigned to encourage larger projects - Mayor Trevino received NCTCOG's William J. Pitstick Regional Excellence Award Mr. Craig Hulse, Director of Economic Development presented the economic outlook discussing national and local trends. Mr. Hulse highlighted national trends in the areas of unemployment, consumer confidence, retail sales and annual federal spending deficit. Locally, the city's unemployment rate is roughly 7.5 %, 20% less than the current national rate and 10% less than Texas and DFW. Foreclosures in the City are 50 percent less when compared to 2008 and 25% less when compared to 2009. In taxable sales, the City is up almost 1 percent or approximately $4.5 million, while most Northeast Tarrant County cities saw an overall reduction of 9.1 percent or $700 million. Northeast Tarrant County as a whole is down over $75 million. Council was advised that from an appraised property value standpoint, local assessment practices take time to catch up with market changes and tax bills and collections typically reflect values from the prior 18 months. Therefore the effects of the recession on property tax values are beginning to appear. Residential property value will decrease in 2010 as a result of dramatic increase of residential foreclosures, minor decrease in average value of homes sold and the continued slowdown in new single family residential construction. While commercial property experienced a decrease in 2669, it will experience a more significant reduction in 2616 as a result of increase in commercial property foreclosures in conjunction with decrease in sales price per square foot, continued slowdown of retail space absorption due to the shrinking small business segment compounded with increase of online shopping and continued slowdown in new commercial construction. Mr. Patrick Hillis, Director of Human Resources, presented the proposed compensation and benefits program for the 2010/2011 budget. Council was advised health insurance costs have increased 34 percent over the last 18 months. The factors that contributed to the increase in costs were discussed. Mr. Hillis discussed recommended plan design changes to the health insurance program which will allow the City to maintain the cost sharing target of 80120 percent approved by Council several years ago. Council discussed how the proposed changes compared to other health programs. Mayor Pro Tern Sapp encouraged the continued promotion of the Wellness Programs and expansion of the program to the dependent level. Staff responded to questions from Council on the City's workers comp claims, how they compare to other cities and policies on risk management. Mr. Hillis discussed the continuation of the 8 year phase -in option for TMRS. The City was notified by TMRS in May that following this year's actuarial analysis it was determined that the City's ultimate contribution rate will increase from 20% to 20.67 %. This will result in the fiscal year 2010/2011 contribution rate increasing from 15.90% to 17.26 %. The Supplemental Death Benefit was suspended in fiscal year 2009/2010 to lower the City's contribution rate and its continued suspension is recommended for 2010 to offset the increased contribution rates. Mr. Hillis discussed with Council the employee compensation programs. Pay range adjustments were made to the Public Safety and General Services Pay Plans in July 2009. For fiscal year 2010/2011 pay range adjustments have not been included in the budget. With the continuing decline in revenue, the Merit Pay Program has also been suspended. Council discussed the Stability Program and the program's cost to the various funds. Mr. Mark Mills, Budget Director, provided an overview of the Revised 200912010 General Fund Budget and the Proposed 201012011 General Fund Budget. Mr. Mills discussed the adopted versus revised revenues and expenditures and appropriations of fund balance. The revised budget for the General Fund is $38,932,584, an increase of $200,141 over the adopted budget. Council was provided with an overview of the net taxable value history. In fiscal year 2010/2011 revenues are projected at $37,353,672, a decrease from fiscal year 2009110 adopted revenues by $915,471. Net taxable property value decreased for 2010 and there is a projected decrease in taxes, fines and forfeitures, franchise fees, charges for service and miscellaneous. For fiscal year 2010/2011 expenditures are forecast to be $37,086,962, a 4% reduction compared to fiscal year 2009/2010 adopted budget. For the 18 consecutive year, the tax rate is proposed to be set at 57¢ per $100 valuation. Mr. Mills discussed the proposed tax rate and advised because the rate was below the effective tax rate of $0.603323 and the roll back rate of $0.586456 the City is not required to hold the two public hearings required by law on the tax rate. However, staff is proposing that one public hearing be held to promote openness and transparency. Mayor Trevino questioned if the fund balances could fund the stability program. Mr. Mills advised that there was a sufficient balance to cover the addition of the Stability Benefit Program. The council members were supportive of funding the program. There was concern expressed that because of the program's eligibility requirements not every employee of the city would benefit from the program. The benefit is provided to full -time employees who have completed a minimum of three years of continuous service and those employees with less than three years of service would not benefit from the program. With the suspension of several employee compensation programs, Council was supportive of providing a benefit for all employees. After discussion, the Council concurred with providing funding for the Stability Program and to include a one time Stability Benefit of $250 for employees who have not reached three years of service. Mr. Hindman advised that the funding could be added to the budget without utilizing the fund balances. Mr. Larry Koonce, Director of Finance, reviewed the Summary of Property Tax Revenue and Distribution and the General Debt Service Fund. Mayor Trevino asked for Council consensus on the General Fund Budget, the debt service and setting the tax rate at 57¢ per $100 valuation. All members of the Council concurred with the budget as presented and with the inclusion of the funding for the Stability Program and the one time payment of $250.00 for those full time employees not yet eligible for the program. Staff began a review of the Special Revenue Funds beginning with the Crime Control and Prevention District with Mayor Trevino announcing at 10:50 a.m. that he was recessing the Council Budget Work Session and calling the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget Work Session to order. After the District's Board of Directors discussed the proposed budget, Mayor Trevino adjourned the Crime District Work Session at 10:57 a.m. and called the Council's Budget Work Session back to order at 10:57 a.m. Staff reviewed and discussed with Council the remaining budgets for the Special Revenue Funds consisting of the Park and Recreation Facility Development Fund, Promotional Fund, Donations Fund, Special Investigation Fund, Drainage Utility Fund, Gas Development Fund, and Traffic Safety Fund. Mr. Mills gave an overview of Park and Recreation Facility Development Fund highlighting the revised 200912010 Park Fund Revenues and Expenditures and the preliminary 2010/2011 Park Fund Revenues and Expenditures. Mr. Mills presented overviews of the preliminary budgets for the Promotional Fund, Donations Fund, Special Investigations Fund, Drainage Fund, Gas Development Fund, and Traffic Safety Fund. Mayor Trevino asked for a consensus from Council on all of the Special Revenue Funds. Council concurred with the Special Revenue Funds as presented. The preliminary budgets for the Enterprise Funds (Utility Fund, Aquatic Park Fund and Golf Fund) were presented to Council. Mr. Mills discussed with Council the revised 200912010 Utility Fund Revenues and Expenses and the preliminary 2010/2011 Revenues and Expenses. Mr. Mills presented the Aquatic Park Fund highlighting the attendance history of the park and discussing the Revised 2009/2010 Aquatic Park Revenues and Expenses and the Preliminary 2010/2011 Revenues and Expenses. Council was advised that staff did not anticipate having funds available for park expansion reserves but should there be an excess of revenues over expenditures, the excess will be placed in reserves. Mr. Mills presented the budget for the Golf Course Fund discussing the history of rounds of golf played, the 2009/2010 Revised Golf Course Revenues and Expenditures and Preliminary 2010/2011 Revenues and Expenditures. Council concurred with the Enterprise Funds as presented. Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 12:00 p.m. and called the work session back to order at 12:47 p.m. Mr. Koonce provided to Council the Automobile Reimbursement Policy Verification Annual Report. The report validated that for the period of July 2009 through June 2010 all reimbursement forms submitted had been verified and all reimbursements were within the policy guidelines. Mr. Mills presented the Internal Service Funds consisting of the Facility /Construction Management Fund, Fleet Services Fund, Information Services Fund and Insurance Fund. An overview was given of the Revised 2009/2010 Facility Construction Management Fund and the Preliminary 2010/2011 Facility Construction Management Fund, the Preliminary 2010/2011 Fleet Services Fund, Information Services Fund, and Self Insurance Fund. Council concurred with the Internal Service Funds as presented. Mayor Trevino asked for Council consensus on all Operating Funds as presented. Council concurred with the budgets for all Operating Funds. Council was provided with a prioritized list of items to consider adding back into the budget. Council discussed the prioritization and funding of some of the items. The consensus of Council was to put funding toward Sick Leave Incentive and Neighborhood Improvement Program; any additional funds will be split between Debt Service Fund Balance and Home Town Legal. Council began a review and discussion of the Capital Projects Budget. For Fiscal Year 2010/2011 the proposed Capital Improvements Project Budget totals $33,290,411. Mr. Curtis presented the 2 01012011 Public Works Capital Improvements Program. Mr. Curtis highlighted the completed projects for fiscal year 2009/2010. The budget consists of twenty -one continuing street projects, six new street projects, nine continuing drainage projects, two new drainage projects, eight continuing utility projects, and four new utility projects. An overview of the projects was presented. After discussion and questions from the Council, Council concurred with the Public Works Capital Improvements Program. Ms. Vickie Loftice presented the Park and Recreation Capital Projects Budget reviewing the history and accomplishments of the one -half cent sales tax since inception. Since 1992 the sales tax revenue collected totals $88,017,380 and capital project expenditures to date totals $42,345,358. In fiscal year 2010/2011 revenues are projected at $4,821,151 and expenditures are projected at $4,508.852. Ms. Loftice briefly highlighted changes to the continuing projects and discussed the new projects. Staff called Council's attention to future projects that are priorities of the 2007 Parks Master Plan needing to be prioritized for future funding. Ms. Loftice presented the proposed 2010/2011 NRH2O Waterpark Budget. Ms. Loftice reviewed the operating history of the park and the proposed revenues and expenditures for 2010/2011. The proposed budget includes two continuing projects and one new project for general facility improvements. The Council concurred with the Park and Recreation Capital Projects Budget and the Aquatic Park Budget. Council began a review and discussion of the Municipal Facility Capital Improvements Program for 2010/2011. The program consists of eight continuing projects and six permanent and new projects. Mr. Perdue discussed with Council the Animal Adoption & Rescue Center project. In the 2003 bond election $1.3 million was approved by the voters for a new shelter. The shelter was estimated to cost $3 million with the balance of the funds to come from private fundraising and donations. In 2009, Council directed Staff to explore a joint facility with the City of Keller. Keller has advised they are not interested in participating in a joint facility. Council was advised of the current construction costs and cost estimates for a 12,000 square foot facility with supporting personnel. Staff requested direction from Council on their desire to continue with the project and if so, whether they desired to do fundraising for the estimated $1.2 million or to find alternate city funding source for the balance. After a brief discussion, the consensus of Council was to continue with the project and find an alternate funding source for the balance needed. Staff will bring back some options for Council to consider. Mr. Miller highlighted the remaining Municipal Facility Capital Projects. Staff then presented and discussed the Major Capital Equipment Projects and Economic Development Projects. The Council concurred with the 2010/2011 Capital Projects Budget as presented. Mr. Mills reviewed the budget calendar and dates for the upcoming public hearings. There being no further business, Mayor Trevino adjourned the work session on August 6, 2 010 at 3:30 p.m. Oscar Trevino — Mayor 1, aI*16 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Patricia Hutson Agenda No. B.2 Subject: Approval of Minutes of August 23, 2010 City Council Meeting Recommendation To approve the minutes of the August 23, 2010 City Council Meeting. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 — AUGUST 23, 20'10 WORK SESSION The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in work session on the 23` day of August, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Workroom prior to the 7:00 p.m. regular Council meeting. Present: Oscar Trevino Ken Sapp John Lewis Tom Lombard Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Mayor Mayor Pro Tem, Council, Place 2 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 3 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 Council, Place 7 Staff Members: Mark Hindman City Manager Jared Miller Assistant City Manager Karen Bostic Assistant City Manager Jimmy Perdue Director of Public Safety Mike Curtis Managing Director Vickie Loftice Managing Director Patricia Hutson City Secretary Monica Solko Assistant City Secretary George Staples City Attorney Mary Peters Public Information Officer Elizabeth Reining Assistant to City Manager John Pitstick Director of Planning & Development Larry Koonce Finance Director Gregory VanNieuwenhuize Assistant Public Works Director Eric Wilhite Chief Planner Mark Mills Budget Director Jamie Brockway Purchasing Manager Patrick Hillis Human Resources Director C'.all to ()rrlar Mayor Trevino called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Item B.6 — PW 2010 -031 — Councilman Turnage inquired about the construction status of the proposed Quick Trip. Mr. Wilhite advised of the project's status and how the MSD certification fits into the process. Agenda Item B.8 — GN 2010 -065 - Councilman Turnage questioned the final payment for the 2009 fiscal year audit. Ms. Bostic explained why the final payment exceeded the anticipated amount. B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session pursuant to Section 551.074, Texas Government Code - Personnel: deliberate the employment, evaluation, duties of public employees: City Attorney B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096- 236530 -09): 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09): 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) Mayor Trevino announced at 5:33 p.m. that the Council would convene into Executive Session as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, specifically Section 552.074 to deliberate the employment, evaluation, duties of public employees: City Attorney, and Section 551.071 for consultation with attorney regarding pending litigation — Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096- 236530 -09); (b) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067- 241297-09); (c) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352- 237213 -09). C.0 Adiournment Mayor Trevino announced at 6:01 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to the regular Council meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING A.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order August 23, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. I:191 1 W67_1 I Present: Oscar Trevino Ken Sapp John Lewis Tom Lombard Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Mayor Mayor Pro Tem, Council, Place 2 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 3 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 Council, Place 7 Staff Mark Hindman Jared Miller Karen Bostic Jimmy Perdue Mike Curtis Vickie Loftice Patricia Hutson Monica Solko George Staples City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Director of Public Safety Managing Director Managing Director City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney A. 'I INVOCATION Councilman Whitson gave the invocation. A.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Whitson led the pledge of allegiance. A.3 SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S) BUSINESS RECOGNITION FOR EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE IN FOOD SAFETY PRESENTED BY COUNCILMAN SAPP Stephanie East, Environmental Health Supervisor and Mayor Pro Tern Sapp recognized the following for exceptional performance in food safety for the second quarter of 2010: Sam's Club, 6375 N.E. Loop 820; Chapp's, 9101 Boulevard 25; Mi Pueblo, 8412 Davis Blvd. A.4 SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S) YARD OF THE MONTH AWARDS PRESENTED BY COUNCILMAN LOMBARD. Diane Spradling, Keep NRH Beautiful Commission member, and Councilman Lombard recognized the following Yard of the Month award recipients: Marsha Pendley, 8809 Tabor Street; Donna Hardisty, 7317 Oakland Lane; Mike Cullum, 6312 Torrey Pines; Angela & Davis Tyson, 7554 Terry Drive; Gary & Mary Ray, 5101 Cliffbrook Drive; Trenton & Lydia Cogdill, 7109 Chimney Creek; Steve & Susan Phillips, 8305 Thornhill Drive; Ronald Crosby, 7745 Chasewood; Richard & Betty Sickler, 8032 Kandy Lane. Farmers Insurance was recognized as the recipient of the Business Landscape Award and Bill Holland, 8416 Bridge Street was recognized as the recipient of the SmartScape Award. A.5 CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Aaron Miller, 605 Elaine Street, Keller, spoke in behalf of a group of concerned citizens opposing a proposed rental inspection ordinance in North Richland Hills. Mayor Trevino asked Dave Pendley, Building Official to speak to the group about their concerns. A.6 REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA ►G'm B.0 APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ❑PPRnvPn B.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 9, 2010 CITY COUNCIL MEETING B.2 GN 2010 -059 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES FOR ON -LINE COMPUTER SERVICES FOR REMOTE VITAL STATISTIC ACCESS B.3 PU 2010 -019 AWARD BID NO. 07 -1390 ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC MATERIALS TO VULCAN SIGNS, ALLIED TUBE & CONDUIT, AND CENTERLINE SUPPLY B.4 PW 2010 -430 APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 104 -31: "PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY USE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS" OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES - ORDINANCE NO. 3146 B.5 PW 2014 -031 APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH TARRANT COUNTY FOR THE PARTIAL FUNDING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY PROJECT B.6 PW 2010 -432 APPROVE ORDINANCE 3147 ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL SETTING DESIGNATION FOR A 1.599 ACRE TRACT OF LAND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF LOT 1 AND LOT 2R, BLOCK 1 OF FIVE STAR FORD ADDITION WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION B.7 PW 2010 -033 APPROVE A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY FOR A MUNICIPAL SETTING DESIGNATION ON A 1.599 ACRE SITE KNOWN AS A PORTION OF LOT 1 AND LOT 2R, BLOCK 1 OF FIVE STAR FORD ADDITION - RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -025 B.8 GN 2410 -465 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $27,227.54 TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDIT FIRM OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2009 AUDIT B.9 GN 2014 -066 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010 AUDIT ENGAGEMENT, APPROVE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $126,004 FOR THE FINANCIAL AUDIT, AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $14,077 FOR THE SINGLE AUDIT, AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $6,400 FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAM AUDIT WITH THE INDEPENDENT AUDIT FIRM OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. 01- 14Ed:I=FelNIL CCR C.1 GN 2010 -060 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED 2010 -2011 BUDGETS aPPPnvPn Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing on the proposed 2010 -2011 Budget. Mr. Mark Hindman, City Manager, introduced the prepared budgets. Mr. Mark Mills, Budget Director, presented a PowerPoint presentation highlighting the revised 2009 -2010 Operating Budgets and the proposed 2010 -2011 Annual Operating Budget for all funds and the Capital Improvements Budget. Mr. Mills highlighted the revenues, expenditures and service enhancements for all funds and presented highlights of the capital projects proposed in the Capital Budget. The proposed budget will be recommended for adoption at the September 13 Council meeting. Mayor Trevino asked for public comments on the proposed 2010 -2011 Proposed Budget. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. C.2 GN 2010 -061 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED TAX RATE dPPPnvPn Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing on the proposed tax rate for fiscal year 2010- 2011. Mr. Mark Mills, Budget Director, presented the item. Mr. Mills discussed the history of net taxable values, a breakdown by tax year of appraised values, and changes in property values. The proposed tax rate for Fiscal Year 2010 -201' 1 is 57¢. If adopted, the 57¢ tax rate will have been maintained for 18 consecutive years. Mr. Mills advised that because the proposed tax rate of 57¢ is lower than both the effective tax rate of 60.3323¢ and the rollback rate of 58.6456¢, the two public hearings are not required by law. However, to foster open communication and transparency, the City of North Richland Hills will conduct a single tax rate public hearing on Monday, August 23, 2010. Mayor Trevino asked for public comments on the proposed 57¢ tax rate. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing and announced that the Council will adopt the tax rate at the 7:00 p.m. September 13, 2010 Regular Council meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in City Hall. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT D.0 Items to follow do not require a public hearing. No items for this category. 1111 14 1917 1 16]N:i�? E.1 PW 2410 -427 CONSIDER ENDORSING THE EDUCATION CAMPAIGN TO INFORM TEXANS OF TRANSPORTATION NEEDS AND URGING THE 82ND TEXAS LEGISLATURE TO ENACT REVENUE MEASURES TO FUND TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -426 APPROVED Mike Curtis, Managing Director, presented the item. The Tarrant County Mayor's Council recently approved a resolution that endorses a statewide campaign to inform Texans of transportation needs and to urge the 82 Texas Legislature to enact revenue measures to fund needed transportation improvements. In order to get this message out to as many Texans as possible, all cities are being encouraged to pass similar resolutions. Staff is recommending the approval of Resolution No. 2010 -026. COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED To APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2410 -426. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. E.2 PW 2410 -428 APPOINTMENTS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES TO THE FORT WORTH WHOLESALE CUSTOMER ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE 201012412 TIME PERIOD APPROVED Mike Curtis, Managing Director, presented the item. The Fort Worth Wholesale Customer Advisory Committee is a committee comprised of representatives from all of the wholesale customers. The purpose of the committee is to provide suggestions and input with regards to the service provided by the City of Fort Worth and to provide feedback with regards to rate studies. The current appointments to the Fort Worth Wholesale Customer Advisory Committee are Councilman Tim Welch as the Voting Member and Mike Curtis, Managing Director as the Alternate. The term of appointment is from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2012. Staff is recommending reappointment of Councilman Welch as the Voting Member and Mike Curtis as the Alternate. MAYOR PRO TEM SAPP MOVED TO REAPPOINT COUNCILMAN WELCH AS THE VOTING MEMBER AND MIKE CURTIS AS THE ALTERNATE MEMBER TO THE FORT WORTH CUSTOMER ADVISORY COMMITTEE. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4. E.3 PIN 2010 -029 AWARD OF RFB NO. 10 -040 TO RKM UTILITY SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,615,424.44 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIARWOOD ESTATES DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (DR0941) ❑PPRnvPn Mr. Gregory VanNieuwenhuize, Assistant Public Works Director, presented the item. Council is being asked to award a bid to RKM Utility Services, Inc. in the amount of $1,615,420.00 for the construction of the Briarwood Estates drainage improvements project. This project will consist of constructing a parallel storm drain system beginning at the intersection of Briarwood Drive and Noneman Street and then continuing south to tie in with the existing concrete -lined channel at the end of Hewitt Street. Approximately 4,800 linear feet of reinforced concrete storm drain ranging from 18 -inch diameter round pipe to 9X4 -foot box culverts will be installed, along with 35 new storm drain inlets. The project was set up with a Total Base Bid and five (5) Alternate Bids which were for additional drainage systems to augment the major upsizing that is the basis of this project. The design engineer recommends awarding the contract to the lowest bidder, RKM Utility Services, Inc for the base bid only. There is sufficient funding between the current Capital Projects Budget and next fiscal year's Capital Projects Budget to adequately fund the construction of the base bid portion of this project. While there is not adequate funding to finance the project's alternates, staff is recommending Council approve the following actions in an effort to have these alternates constructed: 1. RKM has committed to holding their bid prices of the alternates for six (6) months. After this time period, if the City requested this work to be done (via a change order), RKM would only request a price increase if the cost of materials had increased. 2. Staff will monitor future upcoming drainage projects to determine if it would be appropriate to include any of these alternates as alternates onto such future drainage projects. COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE PW 2010 -429; AWARD BID NO. 10 -440 TO RKM UTILITY SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,615,420.04 (BASE BID ONLY) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BRIARWOOD ESTATES DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND ACCEPT A LETTER FROM RKM TO COMMIT THEIR BID PRICES FOR 6 MONTHS FOR THE ALTERNATES. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4. ,C]=1hI =1ZTAgkd =1 &&i F.1 GN 2010 -062 AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH TEXAS MIDSTREAM GAS SERVICES COMPANY FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR INSTALLATION OF GAS PIPELINE IN FOSSIL CREEK PARK AND IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE APPROVED John Pitstick, Planning and Development Director, summarized the item. Texas Midstream Gas Services (TMGS) is requesting an amendment to the original agreement (approved on February 8, 2010) to allow an additional 6 months or installation of the pipeline to be completed by March 31, 2011 instead of the currently approved deadline of August 8, 2010. Since Texas Midstream is requesting additional time, Staff is recommending an additional fee of $56,430 which represents utilizing the same temporary work area for $0.50 per square foot or half of the original fee. All other fees have been paid along with proper bonding and insurance requirements. COUNCILMAN LEWIS MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2014-162. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION.. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4. F.2 GN 2010 -063 LICENSE AGREEMENTS WITH TEXAS MIDSTREAM GAS SERVICES COMPANY FOR GAS PIPELINES IN HOME TOWN LAKES PARK, WALKER'S CREEK PARK, DICK FARAM PARK, AMUNDSON WATER TOWER AND IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE NORTH OF LOOP 820 APPROVED John Pitstick, Planning and Development Director, summarized the item. Texas Midstream Gas Services Company (TMSG) is requesting approval to construct a series of gas pipelines 24 inches and smaller to connect to existing gas well sites. The City has previously approved pipeline license agreements with Enterprise Texas and Texas Midstream for Fossil Creek Park and Iran Horse Golf Course south of Loop 820. Agreements are now being requested for pipeline crossings at Home Town Lakes Park, Walker's Creek Park, Dick Faram Park, Amundson Water Tower and Iran Horse Golf Course north of Loop 820. Staff is following the same agreement form and fees, with the exception of allowing a longer timeframe for completion of installation. All license agreements with Texas Midstream are for a 20 -year timeframe. License fees include $2.25 per square foot of permanent licensed area which includes a 20 -foot wide easement. The license fees also include $1.00 per square foot for all temporary work spaces. Total pipeline license fees equal $369,249.00. All agreements are non- exclusive license agreements allowing the city continued use of the property. A $50,000 bond is required for all agreements to guarantee restoration of properties. A $5,000,000 general liability insurance policy is required for all agreements and an indemnity statement is included in the agreement. The pipeline must be installed within 9 months, or no later than May 20, 2011, or these agreements shall automatically terminate. There is also a requirement in the agreement for the City to give the licensee 180 days notice to remove or relocate pipeline facilities due to excavation or grading as a result of planned public improvements in conflict with the pipeline. An additional 180 days are allowed for licensee to relocate necessary pipelines. Twenty -four hour pressure monitoring is required and only the transmission of oil, gas and petroleum products is allowed. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TD APPROVE GN 2010 -063. MAYOR PRO TEM SAPP SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. Councilman Whitson left the Council Meeting at 8:29 p.m. F3 GN 2010 -064 CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED Craig Hulse, Economic Development Director, presented the item. The Economic Development Advisory Committee has five members whose terms expire in August 2010. Of the five members, three have expressed their willingness to continue service with a recommendation of two new members. Members consist of ten business leaders that serve staggered, two year terms. The Economic Development Department recommends that Council consider the reappointment of: Cindy Brewington - Edward Jones Randy Moresi - North Hills Hospital Mark Sanders - Bates Container The Economic Development Department also recommends the following new Committee members: Ben Gayton - Horne Depot Loop 820 (replacing previous Home Depot Manager) Mark Wood — Howe/Wood & Company (replacing Dan Quinto of Roaring Brook Development) COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2010 -064 REAPPOINTING CINDY BREWINGTON, RANDY MORESI, MARK SANDERS AND APPOINTING BEN GAYTON AND MARK WOOD TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. COUNCILMAN BARTH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6 -0. Councilman Whitson returned to the Council Meeting at 8:24 p.m. F.4 GN 2010 -042 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS & COMMISSIONS APPROVED Patricia Hutson, City Secretary, summarized the item. The terms of office for the individuals serving on the Boards and Commissions in Places 2, 4, 6 and Alternate 1 Ex Officio have expired. In addition the Place 3 position on the Keep North Richland Hills Beautiful Commission has been vacated. For the boards listed below, Chapter 2, Article III, Section 2-121c of the Code of Ordinances states that the City Council will act upon Council member nominations. The following nominations have been submitted for Council consideration at this time: Keep North Richland Hills Beautiful Commission Place 2 Terry Higgs Place 3 Justin Welborn Place 6 Kathy Luppy Alternate Perry Christensen Board of Adjustment Place 2 (Alternate) Place 6 Library Board Place 2 Place 6 Alternate Brian Crowson Bill Gibbs David Nelson Mike Madar Kathy Antropik Park and Recreation Board Place 2 Sixto "Tito" Rodriguez Place 6 Jay Crane Alternate Tracye Tipps Planning & Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Place 2 Mike Benton Place 6 Bill Schopper Ex Officio Kathy Luppy Substandard Building Board Place 2 Thomas Moreau Place 6 Brian Crowson Teen Court Advisory Board Place 2 Janet Golightly Place 6 Karen Russell The Place 4 nominations are not yet complete and Council will be advised of these nominations at a future Council meeting. The terms of office for Places 2, 6 and Alternates /Ex Officio's will expire June 30, 2012 and term of office for the appointment to Place 3 will expire June 30, 2011. MAYOR PRO TEM SAPP MOVED TD APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS; GN 201 0 -042. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4. F.5 GN 2014 -443 APPOINTMENTS TO PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - PLACES 1, 3, 5 AND 7 APPROVED Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary presented the item. The terms of office for the Board Members serving in Places 1, 3, 5 and 7 on the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation expired on May 1, 2010. The Corporation's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws state that appointments to the Board of Directors are to be made by the City Council and that Places 1 -4 are designated for Council Member Directors and Places 5 -7 are designated for Citizen Member Directors. Because of the purpose of this Board, practice has been to select current members of the Park and Recreation Board to serve as the citizen members on this Board. The places with expired terms are: Place 1 Council Member Director (Councilman Whitson - incumbent) Place 3 Council Member Director (Mayor Trevino - incumbent) Place 5 Citizen Member Director (Park Board Member Tracye Tipps — incumbent) Place 7 Citizen Member Director (Park Board Member Brad Greene — incumbent) COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED Td APPROVE GN 210 -043 TO REAPPOINT THE INCUMBENTS TO THE PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD. COUNCILMAN WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.6 GN 2010 -444 APPOINTMENTS TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION - PLACES 1, 2,4 AND EX OFFICIOS APPROVED Patricia Hutson, City Secretary presented the item. The terms of office for the individuals serving in Places 1, 2, 4 and Ex Officio on the Civil Service Commission expired June 30, 2010. The Charter stipulates that these appointments are mayoral appointments with confirmation by two- thirds vote of the Council. The Charter also stipulates that Positions 2 and 4 shall be appointed from a list or lists of nominees provided to the Mayor by the City employee associations. If no list is presented,. the Mayor may make the appointment as he deems fit. The North Richland Hills Fire Fighters Association is supporting the reappointment of September Daniel to Place 2 and the North Richland Hills Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 79 has nominated Arthur De La Flor to one of the positions. Mayor Trevino requested that the Place 4 appointment, Arthur De La Flor, term expiring 6/30/2012 be excluded from the list of recommended board members. Mayor Trevino stated that he had not had an opportunity to speak to Mr. De La Flor and would like to speak with him before recommending appointment. Mayor Trevino is recommending the following individuals for Council confirmation: Place 1 Sally Bustamante term expires 6/30/2011 Place 2 September Daniel term expires 6/30/2011 Ex Officio Brent Barrow term expires 6130/2012 Ex Officio Tony Rader term expires 6/30/2012 COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TO CONFIRM THE FOLLOWING APPOINTMENTS TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION: PLACE 1 SALLY BUSTAMANTE, PLACE 2 SEPTEMBER DANIEL, Ex- OFFICIO BRENT BARROW AND Ex- OFFICIO TONY RADER. COUNCILMAN BARTH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.7 GN 2410 -045 APPOINTMENTS TO RED LIGHT CAMERA ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑PPRnvPn City Secretary Patricia Hutson presented the item. In accordance with State Law and Article X of Chapter 54 of the North Richland Hills Code of ordinances, the Mayor and each member of Council is required annually to appoint an individual to serve on the Red Light Camera Advisory Committee. The committee's purpose is to advise the Council on the installation and operation of a photographic traffic signal enforcement established under Article X of Chapter 54. The Mayor and Council members have submitted the following names for appointment to the Red Light Advisory Committee. Their terms of office will expire June 30, 2011. Mayor Trevino Mayor Pro Tem Sapp Councilman Lewis Councilman Lombard Councilman Whitson Councilman Turnage Mike Witt Scott Woad Sixto "Tito" Rodriguez Scott Eager Gerald Tyner Pam Hansen Councilmen Barth and Welch will submit the name of their appointments at a future council meeting. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE GN 201 -045. COUNCILMAN WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. *:1X4911N =& *1-1101 � I IN 4 �j , G.1 ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON WORK SESSION AGENDA No action required. INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilman Turnage made the following announcements. The new school year has begun and all motorists share the responsibility of making sure students arrive to school safely. The City of North Richland Hills reminds drivers to stop for school buses and to slow down in neighborhoods where children are walking or riding bikes to school. You should also reduce your speed, and put dawn your cell phone, when driving through school zones. The North Richland Hills Public Library invites residents to display their favorite quilts at a community quilt show on September 2nd. The show will also include a small display of quilts from the Trinity Valley Quilters Guild. For more information, please call the Library at 817- 427 -6814. City Hall and other non- emergency City offices will be closed on Monday, September 6th, in observance of the Labor Day holiday. NRH20 and Iron Horse Golf Course will be open. Garbage and recycling will not be collected on Labor Day. Monday collections will shift to Tuesday and Tuesday collections will be made on Wednesday. Kudos Korner - Ricky Beard, Parks & Recreation Department. A Recreation Center member sent a note thanking Ricky for his kind effort in helping with a flat tire. The member went out to his car in the heavy rain only to find one of the car's tires completely flat. Ricky ran an extension cord to the parking space, stood in the rain and filled the tire with an air compression machine. He did all of this with a smile. The Recreation Center member was very thankful for his help. H.2 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m. Oscar Trevino — Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Mark Hindman Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. B.3 Subject: GN 2010 -075 Approve Contract for Legal Services Summary City Council is being asked to approve a five year contract with Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam L.L.P. (TOASE) to provide legal services for the City and designate George Staples as City Attorney. General Description In June 2004 the City Council approved a contract for the appointment of Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam L.L.P. (TOASE) to provide legal services to the City of North Richland Hills with George Staples as City Attorney. The contract was extended for a five year period beginning July 2005. The legal services provided include those services commonly provided by a city attorney such as preparing ordinances and resolutions, consultation with city staff, attending city council meetings, providing legal advice, etc. TOASE also provides litigation services to the city. The proposed new agreement for legal services extends the contract for 5 years effective October 1, 2010. Fees for general legal services are proposed to be $170 per hour and litigation services are proposed to be $270 per hour. These rates are the same as the City currently pays to TOASE. The City Attorney will continue to provide office hours at City Hall. TOASE and George Staples have done an excellent job representing the City of North Richland Hills both in general municipal services and litigation. Mr. Staples and his firm have been available and responsive to the City's needs for legal services. Council discussed the legal services contract and appointment of George Staples as City Attorney during executive session on August 23, 2010. Consensus at that time was to place the legal services contract on the September 13, 2010 City Council agenda for approval. Recommendation: To approve the Agreement for Legal Services with Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P., and designate George Staples as City Attorney. AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This contract is made between the City of North Richland Hills, hereinafter called "City" and Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P., hereinafter called "Attorneys," and replaces all other agreements between such parties. WITN ESSETH 1. City, desiring to secure legal services commonly furnished by a city attorney, including preparing ordinances and resolutions, consultation with City Staff, attending City Council meetings and other meetings upon request, and providing all legal advice, representation of the City in all matters which may be pending or which might be hereafter instituted in any of the Courts of the State of Texas and the Courts of the United States, and before all administrative agencies and departments of government, brought by or against City during and throughout the continuance of this agreement; attendance at meetings; the examination of all contracts; and the enforcement of obligations to the City as requested, and other legal services the City may request through staff or its City Council, hereby employs Attorneys to represent it and to furnish such legal services. Attorneys hereby designate George Staples as City Attorney to perform such services, either individually, or through the personal services of one or more attorneys employed by Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. Attorneys agree to be present at City Hall up to 20 hours per week, if deemed necessary or desirable by City. City agrees to provide a computer with internet access at City Hall. 2. City agrees to pay and Attorneys agree to accept fees of $170 per hour for all services except litigation. Litigation shall be charged at $210 per hour plus expenses. Municipal Court prosecution shall be provided upon request at a rate of $125 per hour plus expenses. City shall also pay charges for travel, postage, copying and facsimile whether for retainer or additional services, plus the actual amount of expenses and court costs incurred in representing the City. Travel time will not be charged for travel between attorney's home and City Hall. Such sums shall be billed to the City and shall be paid within thirty (30) days of billing. City will not pay for or reimburse Attorneys for any expense incurred to attend professional development seminars, courses or meetings. 3. Statements reflecting billings for services under this contract will be in writing given monthly to the city for time rendered in the previous month, showing separately the time for services other than litigation and prosecution, prosecution and litigation, together with disbursements of reimbursable charges and expenses incurred for such matters. Such reimbursable charges and expenses may include but are not limited to long distance telephone charges, postage, delivery charges, facsimile charges, travel, photocopying, filing fees, and the use of other service providers, such as computerized legal research, printers and experts, if needed, but only to the extent not provided for directly or reimbursed by the City. Amounts due and owing to the Attorneys under this Agreement shall be due and payable on or before thirty (30) days after the City's receipt of the statement reflecting such billings in accordance with this Agreement. 4. Unless and until the City Council shall otherwise expressly notify the Attorneys in writing, the City Manager and Mayor are each hereby designated representatives of the City for the purposes of this Agreement only, and each representative is authorized to act in such capacity without the assent or joinder of the other. In the case of any ambiguous or conflicting instructions from the designated representatives, if the assent of both designated representatives cannot be obtained, the Attorneys may require the instruction to be clarified by the City Council. Without the express prior approval of the City, the Attorneys will limit the activities of its attorneys at the attorneys office in the City Hall to the consultation, advice and representation of the City. 5 Subject to and in compliance with the conditions set forth below, the Attorneys may represent persons and entities ( "outside clients" )other than the City on matters which are unrelated to the Attorneys' representation of the City and the duties of the Attorneys under this Agreement; provided, however, without the express prior written authorization and consent of the City, such outside representation shall be subject to the condition that such representation of outside clients shall not create a conflict of interest with Attorneys' representation of the City. Attorneys agree not to represent current elected officials, appointed officials and employees of the City on personal matters unrelated to the interests of the City without the written consent of the designated representative. 6. City shall have the right to employ additional counsel if needed and to select another firm member for any part of the services to be provided hereunder. 7. This contract shall be in full force and effect beginning October 1, 2010, and continuing thereafter for a period of five years unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement or as provided by the charter of the City of North Richland Hills. The contract may be terminated without compensation beyond the date of occurrence of any of the following: Conviction of George Staples of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude; violations of the provisions of the Charter or of any ordinance, rule, or of special orders applicable to him. Executed at North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, this the 13 day of September, 2010. TAYLOR, OLSON, ADKINS, SRALLA & ELAM, L.L.P. C George A. Staples, Of Counsel CITY OF NORTH RICHLAN❑ HILLS C Oscar Trevino, Mayor CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Jimmy Cates Agenda No. B.4 Subject: PW 2010 -034 Approve Ordinance 3110 Amending Section 54 -81(a) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances; Establishing the Times One Way Streets are in Effect During School Zone Hours. Summary Council is being asked to amend Section 54 -81(a) of the Code of Ordinances establishing one way streets that will be in effect during school zone hours. General Description One way streets are part of the City's school traffic control plan at various school sites throughout the City. Their use is effective for maintaining traffic flow on public streets during school zone hours. The use of one way streets has been designated on nine streets throughout the City pertaining to school zone hours. During a recent review of Section 54 -81(a) of the Code of Ordinances, staff found a few revisions that need to be made. First, the specific section of Little Ranch Road that was designated as one way during school zone times was not clearly identified. In addition a section of Manor Drive was not included in the Code of Ordinances, but is designated as a one way street during school zone times. Staff has made these revisions and the attached ordinance reflects the changes. Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 3110 Amending Section 54 -81(a) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances; Establishing One Way Streets Effective During School Zone Hours. "` R _ ` ORDINANCE NO. 3110 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 54 -81(a) OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, CODE OF ORDINANCES; ESTABLISHING ONE WAY STREETS EFFECTIVE DURING SCHOOL ZONE HOURS; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish one way streets during hours when school zones are in effect ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT Section 54 -81(a) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 54 -81. School zones. (a) One -way streets during school zone times. The following streets shall be one - way during effective school zone times: (1) Cloyce Court northbound from Janetta Drive to Lola Drive; (2) Flory Drive northbound from Glenview Drive to Manor Drive; (3) Janetta Drive westbound from Susan Lee Lane to Cloyce Court; (4) Little Ranch Road northbound from Chapman Road to Hightower Drive. (5) Manor Drive eastbound from Flory Street to Mackey Drive. (6) Marilyn Lane eastbound from Rufe Snow Drive to Vance Road. (7) Shauna Drive westbound from Vance Road to Rufe Snow Drive; (8) Susan Lee Lane southbound from Lola Drive to Janetta Drive, (9) Vance Road southbound from Marilyn Lane to Shauna Drive." Section 2: Violation of this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding $200.00. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. PASSED AND APPROVED on this 13th day of September, 2010. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mike Curtis, Managing Director CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize Agenda No. B.5 Subject: PW 2010 -035 Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Interlocal Agreement for Design Services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project Summary The City Council is being asked to approve an amendment to the interlocal agreement with the City of Keller regarding the design services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project. General Description In March 2005, the City Council initially approved an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Keller relating to engineering design services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project (ST0201). This original Interlocal Agreement covered the cost sharing of engineering design services only and not the cost sharing of construction services, because at this time, only the funding for the engineering design services had been identified. To date, there have been two (2) amendments to this interlocal agreement. Since the approval of the initial Interlocal Agreement, the project's funding has changed drastically. While initially federal funding was involved, this funding was eventually replaced with funds from the Tarrant County bond program. This "defederalization" of the project's funding is the basis for the necessity of the two (2) amendments to date (and this amendment). Specifically, the first two (2) amendments were in regards to: ■ Amendment No. 1 — this amendment covered the reimbursement of the federal funds that had been expended to date (at that time). This reimbursement was split between Keller and North Richland Hills in accordance with the project funding split identified in the original interlocal agreement (56% attributable to NRH and 44% attributable to Keller). ■ Amendment No. 2 — this amendment covered the increase in engineering services' costs because defederalization increased the responsibilities of the design engineer. The design engineer was now tasked with the drafting of project specifications, the distribution of plans & specifications, the management of the bidding process, etc. — prior to defederalization, these were tasks that were to be handled by TxDOT. These costs were also split 56144 between NRH and Keller. There remains one outstanding item that deals with the project's defederalization. This last item is the reimbursement of what is termed as the State's "direct administrative costs." These costs equate to $13,626.58. As was the case with the previous " defederalization costs," in order for Keller to repay their share of these costs, the cities need to approve an amendment to this affect. It again would be appropriate to share the repayment of these costs on the same 56144 split as identified in the original interlocal agreement. Amendment No. 3 simply provides for Keller being able to expend 44% of $13,626.58 (which is $5,995.70 ). Recommendation: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Interlocal Agreement for design services for the North Tarrant Parkway Street Improvements Project (ST0201) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment. North Tarrant Pkwy Street Imp. (Davis Blvd to Whitley Rd) Y North Tarrant e Pkwy Street Imp. (Davis Blvd to Whitley Rd) Iti 11` I l 5 k HILLS r` � . 1 rojeet LoCator Map THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT § AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF KELLER. TEXAS T is Ame dment No. 3 to- the Interlocal Agreement is entered into this - 1 V day of 2010, by and between the North Richland Hills City Council ( "NRH "), an' the Keller City Council ( "Keller "), Tarrant County, Texas, municipal corporations, relating to cost sharing on the engineering design for the North Tarrant Parkway Project; the limits of this project being from Whitley Road to FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard), witnesseft WHEREAS, on March 1, 2005, NRH and Keller entered into an Interlocal Agreement (Keller Resolution No. 2281) for sharing it the costs of engineering services for the design of the reconstruction of North Tarrant Parkway from Whitley Road to FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard); and WHEREAS, approval of Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 (Keller Resolutions No. 2801 and 2874, respectively) have increased the budgeted) amount for Keller in this interlocal agreement to an amount of $598,500.00; and WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) invoiced the City of North Richland Hills for direct administrative costs of $13,626.58 in accordance with federal and state policy; and WHEREAS, the City Councils of Keller and NRH have deemed it necessary and in the best interest of the citizens of Keller, North Richland Hills and the region to move forward with this project? NOW THEREFORE, Section 1: THAT, Keller will by approval of this Amendment, authorize an additional $5,995.70 to be paid to NRH as Keller's 44% fair share of the $13,626.58 amount of direct administrative costs TXDOT requested reimbursement for. This additional amount is part of the agreed to reimbursement due TXDOT having to do with the defederalization of this project. All other provisions of the original Interlocal Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless modified by a subsequent written amendment signed by both Cities. This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in multiple counterparts, attached to the original Interlocal Agreement, and shall collectively constitute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement. 2010. AGREED this day of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Mark E. Hindman, City Manager Date: ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary CITY OF KELLER By: Dal O'Leary, City M 11 ager ATTEST: Approved as to Farm: George Staples, City Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Emergency Management Presented by: Sean Hughes Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. B.6 Subject: PU 2010 -020 Authorize Lease to Purchase of Radio Replacement Equipment from Motorola in the amount of $194,819.88 Summary Recently, 119 Public Safety portable radios were upgraded by Sprint - Nextel. This rebanding project left 77 old portable radios in the radio fleet that were not eligible to be upgraded. The remaining 77 portable radios are approximately 15 years old and are no longer supported by Motorola after October 2010. Motorola has presented a proposal to upgrade these remaining 77 portable Public Safety radios to current technology. General Description This proposal by Motorola is to purchase 77 new XTS -5000 portable radios, identical to the radios provided by Sprint - Nextel to replace 77 older, non P -25 compliant XTS2000 and XTS3000 portable radios. P -25 is a new standard of radio systems that allow greater functionality with the radios and allow for more radios to be used in a limited amount of radio frequencies. The total cost of this proposal is $233,319.88. Motorola is offering a credit of $38,500 for the trade in of our 77 old radios, making the final purchase price $194,819.88. This pricing includes all programming and other accessories to make the radios fully operational when they are delivered. This program will ensure that all of the portables in the Police and Fire Departments are the same model and all have interchangeable batteries and accessories thus enhancing interoperability, service and support of these units. The City of North Richland Hills is a member of several inter -local groups and is utilizing an existing Houston Galveston Area Council (H -GAC) contract with Motorola. The Local Government Code states that purchases made through a cooperative purchasing agreement satisfy any state law that would require the City to solicit competitive bids. Staff recommends purchasing the radios through the lease option offered by Motorola H -GAC contract, utilizing a 5 -year payout option which offers a balance of financing terms and the ability to budget this expense in future budgets. This lease allows the City of North Richland Hills to pay the lease off early, if possible. The first payment on this lease would be due September 1, 2011 and can be made from savings from the FY09- 10 and FY 10 -11 budgets. Funds for the first payment of $44,489.70 will come from cost savings from various areas of the Emergency Management budget. The new 77 portables will be put on the maintenance contract in two years as their warranties expire. Subsequent payments for years 2 through 5 (FY12 and beyond) will be included in future Emergency Management budgets. The lease does allow for the remaining balance to be paid at any time with no penalty. It is the intent of Staff to consider utilization of unallocated fund balance at the end of FY 2009/10 to fund the balance of the lease and reduce the impact on future budget. Recommendation To authorize lease to purchase of radio replacement equipment from Motorola in the amount of $194,819.88. HGAC PRICING HGAG Pricing Summary MTS -2000 replacement 4 (65) XTS -5000 Portables (6) are rugged 1 yellow $197225.32 XTS -3000 replacement (12) XTS -5000 Portables $36,094.56 TOTAL HGAC $233,319.88 August Trade In Promotion - $38,500.00 (must purchase by end of August) HGAC System Total $194,819.88 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Emergency Management Presented by: Sean Hughes Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. B.7 Subject: PU 2010 -021 Approve the Replacement of Analog Audio and Video System in the North Richland Hills Jail with the LenSec System for an Amount not to Exceed $175,000. Summary The North Richland Hills .fail has been in operation since 1987 and has gone through several security camera systems, none of which have been integrated with the city's existing LenSec security camera system. The current system in the jail has been in use for many years and the company is no longer in business. It has low grade, low resolution picture quality and provides minimal storage and retrieval capability. It will only allow recording of one camera view at a time. Recently, we have had to make several maintenance calls for this system. Since the company is no longer in business, we have had to use other vendors to patch repair the equipment as best they can. Each repair is gaining in expenses due to the age of the equipment. To improve the quality and reliability of the security recordings in the jail, we would like to replace the existing, outdated system with a new LenSec System. General Description The City of North Richland Hills currently utilizes a citywide video standard solution for all video installations. This single solution is provided by LenSec. The LenSec system's advanced digital IP -based audio and video recording, archiving and retrieval systems delivers secure, real -time images as well as the flexibility to show both full- motion and still images and sound. Implementation of this system will allow for multiple views and real time recording of prisoner cells with the ability to shade out privacy areas, view high quality resolution pictures and have full audio capability in all areas of the jail facility. This system will deliver and provide a high level of security surveillance of prisoners during their incarceration time in our facility. This system will also have the ability to be removed and re- installed in another location if needed. The project had been bid as follows: Camera system replacement $166,709.00 Replacement monitors mounts and installation $ 8,280.00 Total $174,989.00 The City of North Richland Hills is a member of several Inter -local groups and is utilizing The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) contract awarded to LenSec LLC for audio visual systems. The Local Government Code states that purchases made through a cooperative purchasing agreement satisfy any sate law that would require the City to solicit competitive bids. Funding for this project was approved in the FY2009 -2010 Municipal Facility Capital Improvement Program project # IS1001 budget in the amount of $175,000. Recommendation To approve the replacement of the analog audio and video system in the North Richland Hills Jail with the LenSec System for an amount not to exceed $175,000 was LETS kj( LenSec LLC T T TU r 04785 1800 Bering Drive, Suite 751, Houston, TX 77057 Tel: 713- 395 -0800 Fax: 713- 395 -0597 Proposal for North Richland Mills Integrated Enterprise -wide Security System — IP Video Surveillance & Access Control System Design, Supply, Installation, and Service Date: August 31, 2010 Prepared for Instan locadnn(s) Prepared by Sean Hughes North Richland Hills-Jail City Hall 7 Cams LenSec LLC. North Richland Hills, TX 761 132.4609 1800 Bering Drive, Ste 751 Houston, Taxas — 77057 Lisa Po k Part* Description Units Unit Price Total LS- IP- SVR -SW -1L LenSec Dgilal Video Management Software with user frandly interface 7 $$398.00 $2.786.00 for vomng live and recorded viidso across multiple locations. Licensing fee per camera. LS -IP- CAM- AXP3301 Axis P3301 Fbwd dome with discreet and tamper-resistant casing. 7 $1,128,00 $7,896.04 Project Management Time Varifocal 2.8-10 mm lens. 114' progressive scan CMOS sensor. Multiple, 16 $138.00 $2.208.00 (Regular) Ind Wually confgurabte H.264 and Motion JPEG streams; max. VGA Cable, Camera, and 5417 x 480 resolution al. 30 fps, WDR. Video motion defection and active 7 $1,778.00 $12,446.00 Accessories Installation tampering alarm. Two-way audio with twin -in microphone, and audio detection. 110 for alarrnkvent handling. Power over Ethernet. Ir eludes power supply. Integration process including device Setup in the lab, functionality adjustment. Integration with LenSec Software, system optimization, device inform atlon tracking, Testing and Quality Assurance. LS- CBL -CAT5 PLN CAT 5e Cable Plenum 1090 It roll 3 $318.00 $954.00 Video Hardware Discount Video Hardware Disceumt (proyert speck) 4 (s2,655.00) ($2,65aw0) (project spedFc] IP Video — Equipment & Software TOM 1 $8 1 981,00 Part 4 Gesor 'on Units unit Price Total IP Camera Configuration IP Camera Configuration and Integration process including camera 7 $149.00 $1,043.00 Setup in the lab, Custom camera functionality adjustment. Integration with LenSeo Software, System optimization, Camera information tracking, Testing and Qua Assurance. Project Management Time Regular Work Hours (599 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. local Time) 16 $138.00 $2.208.00 (Regular) Cable, Camera, and Camera and Cable: CAT5e cabling labor, frrewal intrusion, drilling, and 7 $1,778.00 $12,446.00 Accessories Installation power supply. Camera placement, alining, focusing and installation of camera with housing. Per camera and cable run. Cable runs between lore networking nodes not to exceed 100 meters according to IEEE Page 4 of 3 now lrftgmted Enterpirlsemkie Securi System - Grand Total 1 $21,478.00 LenSec Terms and Conditions The pricing above is valid for equipment recommended by LenSec LLC. The pricing is valid for 50 days from the proposal date. The price is subject to change and adequate notice will be provided. Any volume discount offered will be project specific. Prices do not Include sales, use, or excise taxes, custom duty, bonding tea, licensing and/or other applicable registration fees. Excluslor[s: Equipment not covered in the proposal scope, troubleshooting and repair of any defects in the existing system, trenching, booing, renting of bucket trucks, high voltage wiring, and any complexity related to the installation that has not been specifically discussed and quoted. Scope excluded in the proposal can be serviced by LenSec under a separate change order. Remote Service Support can be provided only if LenSec has "remote access" to customer's network . onsile service and maintenance of server, cameras, access control equipment and security system is excluded from LenSec's scope. Refer to LenSec Service Support Program for more details. Changes to the scope may result in additional travel and stay charges for LenSec project manager, and/or engineer. Change to the hardware model or specifications may result in change to the pricing Hardware is covered by one year limited warranty from the manufacturer. Hardware warranty will begin from the date equipment is received on-vie. The supply of equpment is subject to availability. Installation quote will be revalidated after doing the site audit and after the receipt of customer approval. Installation pOcing is subjected to change based on the complexity of layout and any scope related changes. Estimated lead time for design, supply of the equipment, installation, system configuration and testing will be 68 weeks from the date LenSec receives signed contract with purchase order and all customer provided deliverables. The customer provided deliverables will include electronic copy of the building map, finalized and approved system layout with device locations, network information, and readiness of site for the installation of security system. Delivery location is assumed to be at above addressee(s) unless olherwise indicated. Equipment receipt and storage facility will be provided by the customer. invoices are due within 30 days of receipt. Terms of Payment: • 50% of cordract value will be invoiced upon the receipt of Purchase Order by LenSec 35% of contract value will be invoiced upon the receipt of major equipment on-site 15 of contract value will be invoiced upon customer approval Terms and Conditions as outlined in LenSec Safes, Installalion and Service agreements are applicable. It is recommended that these terms are reviewed before the award of contract LenSec Service Support Program: 1- Service Scope: Remote telephone support for software, server(s) and cameras, daily review of automated report on servers and cameras, LenSec video management software update, I"uniled or -site support for the server(s) through the manufacturer, and limited warranty support from the manufacturers of the equipment supplied by LenSec. 2- Equipment Warranty: Network cameras and other equipment supplied by LenSec will have one (1) year warranty from the date equipment is received on -site. Equipment not covered under warranty can be replaced upon the receipt of purchase order. Supply of parts would be subject to availability. 3- Remote and On -site Service Support: Above pricing plan includes remote support during the work hours and on site support for the server hardware supplied by LenSec. LenSec's remote service support team will make [heir best efforts to diagnose and resolve technical issues remotely in collaboration with page 2 of 3 Installation Total 1 &12-497 no was LEN,� customers on -site service staff. On -site visits by LenSec service technician would be billed at LenSecs discretion at $160our for service work and $851hr for travel tine. On -sire visits will be billed for minimum two (2) hour plus travel tine. All on site service work would require a PO before service technician is dispatched- 4- Service Hours: Weekdays between 600 AM CST and 6 :00 PM CST. Service support will not be available during weekends and holidays. 5- The start date for the Annual Service Contract for each site will be the next business day from the customer Sign -off (system acceptance) date OR two (2) weeks from the date the IP Video System is completely installed and is operational, whichever is earlier 6- Remote Supporl Service can be provided only If LenSec has "remote access to the IP Video system. If the LenSec service support team is not able to access the IP Video System remotety due to customer related network issues then LenSec service staff can provide service based on on -sie service terms described above. 7- Above service pricing is valid for the scope outlined in this proposal. Any change to the scope would change the service pricing. & Service payment terms: Billing will be done at the beginning of each service period- 9- LenSec Service Terms and Conditions apply. OWN LENS EC LenSec LLC 114786 1800 Bering Chive, Suite 751, Houston, TX 77057 Tel: 713 - 395 -0800 Fax: 713 -395 -0597 Proposal for North Richland Hills Integrated Enterprise -wide Security System — IP Video Surveillance & Access Control System Design, Supply, Installation, and Service Date: August 3, 2010 Prepared for Install locaflon(s) Prepared by Sean Hughes North Richland Hills- LenSec I.I.C. North Richland Hllis, TX 76182-0609 NRH Jail 2010 1800 Bering Drive, Ste 751 Houston, Texas -- 77057 Lisa Polk Part # Description Units Unit Price TOW Server Hardware Add descripton 1 $12154.00 $12,154.00 LS- IP- SVR- CONPIG Custom configuration of server - LenSec Software and OS installation, 1 51,734.00 $1,734,00 Sofhvare configuration, Loading of custom maps and HTML linkage, Testing and Quali Assurance LS IP- SVR -SW -1L LenSec Digltal Video Management Software with user friendly interface 28 $398.40 $11,144.00 for viewing live and recorded video across muRi0a locations. Licensing fee r camera. LS- LCV- DASESTN LenSec Comma rod View core software is a secure I based video 6 51,500.00 $9,000.00 surveillance video wall or desktop monitoring platform. Command View supports an unl'umiled number of IP camera inputs to scale to your systems current and future needs. Create custom camera groups and camera view based on user role and tog in credentials. Command Vk3w eliminates the need for any mutliplexers and is supported on common off the shelf inlet l PC workstations. License pricing is for Command View Software license installed in each work station. Price of hardware and installation services is quoted sWarateily. LS- LCV -20 -CAM License pricing per camera for displaying up to 20 cameras in the _ 20 540.00 5800.00 Command Video Software. The total number of cameras that can be displayed at a time would depend on quanity and technical specifications of monitors and work stations. LS- LCV-60-CAM License pricing per camera for displaying between 21 and 5D cameras In 22 $31.00 $582.00 the Command Video Software. The total number of cameras that can be displayed at a lime would depend on quanity and technical specifications of montos and work stations. E.g. List pricing for 45 cameras would be 20'45 + 2535 = $1,775.00. LS- POE4DLINK -24P R-link twenty four 24 Power Over Ethernet Switch 2 $824.00 $1.64&00 LS- UPSSUA1500VA APC Smart -UPS Rackmount 1500VA US & Serial, AC 120V, 980 Watt, 1 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 1440 VA, 6 output connector(s). 2U. Includes Network Management Card. LS- UPSSC450VA APC Smart -UPS Rackmount 450VA USB & Serial, AC 120V, 280 Watt, 1 $303.00 $303.00 Page t of 6 asap LENS R(" Page 2 of 5 450 VA, 4 output connector(s), 1 U LS- IP-CAM AXP3301 Axis P33ni Fried done with discreet and tamper- resistant casing. 11 $1.128.00 $ 12,408.40 Varifocal 2.8-10 mm lens. 114" progressive scan CMOS sensor. Muhiple, individually configurable H264 and Motion JPEG streams; max. VGA 640 x 480 resolution at 30 fps. WDR. Video motion detection and active tampering alarm. Two-way audio with built -in microphone, and audio detection. 110 for alarmlevent handling, Power over Ethernet. Includes power supply. Integration process including device Setup in the lab, functionality adjusbnent, Integration with LenSec Software, system opti mization, device information trackin , Testing and Quality Assurance. LS- IP- CAM -AXPI 343 Axis P1343 network camera SVGA, dayinght, fixed camera with 4 $1,206.00 $4,824,00 vardocal 3-8 mm DCaris lens and remote back focus. Mulliple, individually configurable H.284 and Motion JPEG streams; max SVGA resolution at 30 fps. WDR. Vdao motion detection and aclive tampering alarm. Two-way audio with built -in microphone and audio detection. VO for a[armlevent handling, SMDHC memory card slot for optional local video storage. Power over Ethernet. Power supply not included. Integration process Including device Setup in the lab, functionality adjustment, Integration with LenSec Software, system optimization, device information trackln , Testing and Quality Assurance, LS- IP- CAM- AXP3343 -V Axis P3343 SVGA, day /night, fired dome with discreet, vandal- resitant 11 51,387.00 $15,257.00 indoor casing. Varifocal 3.3-12 mm or 2.6-60 mm DC4ris lens, remote focus and zoom. Multiple, individually Configurable H.264 and Motion JPEG streams; max SVGA resolution at 30 fps. Video motion detection and active tampering alarm. Two-way audio with bull[ -in microphone and audio detection -110 for alarm/event handling. SDlSDHC memory card snot for optional local video storage. Power over Ethernet. Includes smoked and clear transparent covers. Integration process including device Setup in the lab, functionality adjustment, Integration with LenSec Software, system opti nization, device information tracking, Testing and Quality Assurance. LS -IP- GAM- AXP3343 -VE Axis P3343 SVGA, day /night, fixed donne with discreet. IP66 rated 2 $1,647.00 $3,294.00 outdoor casing. Varifocal 3.3-12 mm or 2.6 -6.0 mm DC iris lens, remote focus and zoom. Multiple, individually configurable H.264 and Motion JPEG streams; max SVGA resolution at 30 fps. Video motion detection and active tampering alarm. Two -way audio with built-in microphone and audio detection- VO for alamtlevent handling. SD/SDHC memory card slot for optional local video storage. Power over EthemeL Includes smoked and clear transparent covers. Integration process including device Setup in the lab, functionality adjustment, Integration with LenSec Software, system optimization,. device information [racking, Testing and Ovalily Assurance. LS -CBL- MGR -2U Single-sided 19 in. cable manager. 2U 2 $104.00 $208.00 LS -PP —SMI - 24PHD6 Siemon Patch Panel, 24-Port, gp!Nory 6 2 1 $299.00 $598.00 LS- Cl3L -CAT5 PLN CAT 5e Cable Plenum 1000 ft roll 10 $318.00 $3,180.00 LS- VMS -MISC- FMV Miscellaneous hardware for the Video System - edit the description as 1 $2,190.00 $2,190.O0 needed in the proposal LS- PATCH- CBL- CAT5e -T CatSe plenum patch Cabie wi[h RJ-45 connectors - 7 FT 60 $5,00 3300.00 LS- IP -CAM- MIC -AIA -1 Louroe make Audio Interface Adapter, serves as interconnection device 9 $216.00 $1,944.00 between one Microphone, LenSec IP Video Software and IP network camera and video servers with audio. LS- IP- CAM- MIGAIA 4 Louroe make Audio Interface Adapter, includes two zone audio interface 1 $434,00 $434.00 adapter designed for connecting up to two Lource microphones with LenSec IP Video Software and IP network camera that has multiple audio in LS•IP- CAM- MIC -ATI Louroe make Audio Trartslever Interface powers up speakerphone, 8 $346.00 $2, 768.Or7 Page 2 of 5 was LEN EC I.I IP Video — Equipment & Software Total 247.U0 Part # Degeriptison Units Unit Price Total Acc4ms Control — Eq & Software Total $0 Part # receives the audio signal From the speakerphone and transmits it into the Units Unit Price TOW IPCamera Configuration receiving device, and receives audio From the output of the receiving 28 $149.60 $4,172.00 device and amplifies the signal for output through the s peakefphone. LS- IP- CAM- MIC- CL"MNI Louroe make'Venfact Model A microphone, omnidirectional, low 14 $256.00 $3,640.00 impedance, eiectret condenser microphone with buiRin preamp for Cable, Camera, and producing line level output. Suitable for ceiling or wall mounting. Normal 28 $1,77$,06 $49,784.00 Accessories Installation Pick-UP pattern is approximately 16 from the microphone location, all directions, or within 30' diameter circle. LS4P- CAM- MIC -APMX Louroe passive mixer for combining two microphones, or two 1 $121.00 $121,00 sDe to one audio monitoring zone. LS-IP- CAM- MIC- SO-SPK Louroe make wall mount speakerphone designed to interface with 8 53917.00 $3, 120.00 various modes of audloMdeo transmission systems, provides Bi- directional audio to the LenSec IP Video Management Software, PC Project Management Time soundcard, IP Camera, etc., contains a built-in electret condenser 44 $138,60 $6,,072 -0 (Regula microphone and a 4" Speaker, includes control potentiometers for InstaNafr`on piscount I adjusting the sensitivity of both transmitted and received audio, back f $25,261.00 25 2 67.00 boxes for Flush and Surface mounting to a wall, and is weather resistant and suitable for outdoor a licatlons. LS-C8L- AUOI&22P2 Gable - 2212 Stranded bare copper conductors, shielded with an overall 14 $176.06 $2,380.00 jacket- Suitable for intercom, sound, and audio systems. 500 FT roll. LS- CBL- AUDIO -2(Y3 Cable - 20 gauge with a 22 gauge drain wire (microphone con r ecticn) 8 $196.00 $1.568,00 and 2 conductor twisted pair unshielded, 4 Conductor with a drain wire consisting of 2 conductor shielded, and 18 gauge (speaker connection). Suitable for intercom, sound. and audio system s. 500 FT roll. LS- VMS-MISC- HW Miscellaneous hardware for the Video System - editthe description as 40 $30.00 $1,200.00 needed in the proposal LS- CAM- 16P4RAK -PS Sixteen 16 port. 6-15 V CC, 10 amp Rack Mounted Power Supply 1 $478.00 $478.00 LS- AUDIO- SPS -24VDC Eight (8) fuse protected outputs, 24VDC @ 10 amp, 115VAC input, AG and battery monitoring. ULICUL Listed 1 $564.0 $564.06 0 IP Video — Equipment & Software Total 247.U0 Part # Degeriptison Units Unit Price Total Acc4ms Control — Eq & Software Total $0 Part # Description Units Unit Price TOW IPCamera Configuration IP Camera Configuration and Integration process including camera 28 $149.60 $4,172.00 Setup in the tab, Custom cartzeera functionality adjustment, Integration with LenSec Software, System optimization, Camera information tracking, Testlng and Quality Assurance. Cable, Camera, and Camera and Cable: CAT5e Cabling labor, fuewall intrusion, drilling, and 28 $1,77$,06 $49,784.00 Accessories Installation power supply. Camera placement, aiming, focusing and inslalalion of camera with housing. Per camera and cable run, Cable runs between two networking nodes not to exceed 106 meters according 10 IEEE standards. Price does not include supply and installation of conduit Audio System Installation Installation of audio equipment configuration, audio adjustments, testing, 21 $51100 $10, 773.00 and qualify assurance. Wiring installation is scoped and quoted separate - Installation rate per audio device. Project Management Time Regular Work Hours (5:00 A.M. - 6.00 P.M. Local Tune) 44 $138,60 $6,,072 -0 (Regula InstaNafr`on piscount I Installation Discount Kft - E'ditrhe disc noban as needed f $25,261.00 25 2 67.00 Page 3 of 5 was LENS IL Installatiort Total Pad # Description Units Unit Price Total Service fee for Video System Service Fee paid annually that covers for limited equipment warranty by 1 $21,717.00 $21,717,00 the manufacturer, server maintenance. remote support for server and camera, telephone calls for technical support, and LenSec software update during the service period. Service contract will be valid for one year and service extension can be cone based on mutual evaluation and a reement. Servce DiSCOUN Service DL- -count & f 521,267.00 21,267.00 Service supportTow I y p pp Part it Description Units Unit Price Totaf Miscellan Total Integrated Enterplrlse wide Seculrty System - Grand Total I $M.231.00 LenSec Terms and Conditions The pricing above is valid for equipment recommended by LenSec LLC. The pricing is valid for 60 days from the proposal date. The price is subject to change and adequate notice will be provided. Any volume discount offered will be project specific. Prices do not include sates, use, or excise taxes, custom duty, bonding fee, licensing and/or other applicable registration fees. Exclusions: Equipment not covered in the proposal scope, troubleshooting and repair of any defects in the existing system, trenching, boring, renting of bucket trucks, high voltage wiring, and any complexity related to the installation that has not been specfifw: ally discussed and quoted. Scope excluded in the proposal can be serviced by LenSec under a separate change order. Remote Service Support can be provided only if LenSec has 'remote aooess" to customer's network, Onsite service and maintenance of serer, cameras, access control equipment and security system is excluded from LenSec's scope. Prefer to LenSec Service Support Program for more details. Changes to the scope may result in additional travel and stay charges for LenSec project manager, and/or engineer. Change to the hardware model or specifications may result in change to the pricing Hardware is covered by one year limited warranty from the manufacturer. Hardware warranty will begin from the date equipment is rewived qn -site, The supply of equipment is subject to availability, Installation quote will be revalidated after doing the site audit and after the receipt of customer approval. Installation pricing is subjected to change based on [fie complexity of layout and any scope related changes. Estimated lead time for design, supply of the equipment, installallon, system oorrriguratfon and testing will be fib weeks from the date LenSac receives signed contract with purchase order and all customer provided deliverables. The customer provided deliverables will include electronic copy of the building map, finalized and approved system layout with device locations, network information, and readiness of site for the installation of sec,udly system. Delivery location is assumed to be at above addressee {s} unless otherwise indicated. Equipment receipt and storage facility will be provided by the customer. Invoices are due within 30 days of receipt. Terms of Payment 50% of contrail value will be invoiced upon the receipt of Purchase Order by LenSac 35% of contrail value will be invoiced upon the receipt of major equipment on -site 15% of contract value will be invoiced upon customer approval Terms and Conditions as oupined in LenSec Sales, Installation and Service agreements are applcable. It is recommended that ttrese terms are reviewed before the award of contract. Page 4 of 5 a == L EN � + LenSec Service Support Program; 1- Service Scope: Remote telephone support for software, servef(s) and cameras, daily review of automated report on servers and cameras, LenSec video management software update, limited on -site support for the servers) through the manufacturer, and limited warranty support from the manufacturers of the equipment supplied by LenSec. 2- Equipment Warranty: Network cameras and other equipment supplied by LenSec will have one (1) year warranty from the date equipment is received on -site. Equipment not covered under warranty can be replaced upon the receipt of purchase order. Supply of pafts would be subject to availability. 3- Remote and On -site Service Support: Above pricing plan includes remote support during the work tours and on-site support for the server hardware supplied by LenSec. LenWs remote service support team will make their best efforts to diagnose and resolve technical issues remotely In collaboration with customers on -site service staff. On -site v -ik by LenSec service technician would be billed at LenSec's discretion at $150lhour for service work and $65mr for travel time. On-she visits will be billed for minimum two (2) hour plus travel time. All on -site service work would require a PO before service technician is dispatched- 4- Service Hours: Weekdays between 6IJ0 AM CST and 8:00 PM CST. Service support will not be available during weekends and holidays. 5- The start date for the Annual Service Contract for each site will be the nerd business day from the customer Sign -off (system acceptance) date OR two (2) weeks from the date t1e IP V System is completely installed and is operational, whichever is earner. 6- Remote Support Service can be provided only if LenSec has "remote access" to the IP Video system, if the LenSec sery cce support team is not able to access the I Video System remotey due to customer related network issues then LenSec service slaff can provide service based on on-"e service terns described above. 7- Above service pricing Is valid for the scope outlined in this proposal. Any change to the scope would change the service pricing. Service payment terms: Billing will be done at the beginning of each service period. 9- LenSec Service Terns and Conditions apply. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Emergency Management Presented by: Sean Hughes Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. B.8 Subject: GN 2010 -071 Consider acceptance of an Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant in the amount of $32,400 for Urban Search and Rescue Training. Summary The City of North Richland Hills has been awarded $32,400 from the Governor's Division of Emergency Management, Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant to fund training, travel and overtime costs for backfill personnel in order to allow members of the North Richland Hills Fire Department to attend Urban Search and Rescue Training courses. General Description This grant will allow members of the Fire Department to attend training at the Texas Engineering Extension Service Training Facility in College Station. These highly specialized Urban Search and Rescue Training courses require personnel to attend the courses in College Station. This attendance requirement means that personnel must be off of their regular shift creating a vacancy in that shift. This grant provides for overtime and benefits to be paid to personnel filling those shifts, as well as tuition and all travel related costs for personnel selected for this training. This training will greatly enhance the ability of the personnel to respond and deal with threats and emergencies. Acceptance of this grant does not require matching funds. The city will be reimbursed 100 %. Recommendation To accept the Texas Governor's Division of Emergency Management, Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant in the amount of $32,400. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Chun Mezger Agenda No. B.9 Subject: GN 2010 -072 Renewal of Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of North Richland Hills and Southlake for Animal Impoundment Summary: Over the last few years, we have had an interlocal agreement between the cities of North Richland Hills and Southlake for Animal Impoundment, which expires on September 30, 2010. This resolution will approve the extension of the interlocal agreement for two (2) more years and will automatically renew annually without Council's approval. At any time, the interlocal agreement becomes void upon written request from either city. General Description: The interlocal agreement allows the City of North Richland Hills Animal Adoption & Rescue Center to handle Southlake animals. The City of Southlake agrees to a rate of $105.00 per animal housed at the North Richland Hills Animal Adoption & Rescue Center. All boarding fees, adoption fees, impound fees, etc. go directly to the City of North Richland Hills. The City of Southlake is responsible for medical treatment of all injured animals it brings to our shelter. Southlake's animal officer will continue to be responsible for monitoring their city and bringing any loose or stray animals to our shelter for handling. All other associated fees are based on current fees approved by ordinance. The City of Southlake houses approximately 10 -15 animals per month. We feel that renewing this interlocal agreement with the City of Southlake will have little impact on our ability to maintain current service levels and our ability to care and accommodate the animals within our City. Recommendation Approve GN 2010 -072 for the renewal of an Interlocal Agreement between the cities of North Richland Hills and Southlake for Animal Impoundment. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SOUTHLAKE FOR ANIMAL IMPOUNDMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF TARRANT X THIS ( "AGREEMENT "), is made and entered into by the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, a Home Rule municipal corporation, ( "NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "), and the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS a Home Rule municipal corporation, ( "SOUTHLAKE "), each acting by and through its duly appointed and authorized city managers: WITNESETH: WHEREAS, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SOUTHLAKE are desirous of entering into a contract for Animal Impoundment Services to provide a more effective and efficient delivery of such services; and WHEREAS, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS has the facilities available to perform Animal Impoundment for both cities; and WHEREAS, all payments for Animal Impoundment to be made hereunder shall be made from current revenues available to the paying parry; and WHEREAS, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE have concluded that this Agreement fairly compensates the performing parry for the Animal Impoundment Services being provided hereunder; and WHEREAS, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE believe that this Agreement is in the best interests of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is approved by the governing bodies of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is authorized by and in conformance with Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, the Interlocal Cooperation Act (the "Act "). NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES AND CONSIDERATION PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, THE RECEIPT AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH ARE HEREBY CONFIRMED, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SOUTHLAKE HEREBY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. All matters stated above in the preamble are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be for a term of two (2) years commencing on October 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2012, (the "Initial Term"). This contract shall upon expiration of the original term automatically renew for successive one year terms until terminated by written notice of either party to the city manager of the other. Section 3. Scope of Services to be provided by NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS hereby agrees to provide SOUTHLAKE the fallowing equipment, services, personnel, and facilities: a. Accept anima brought to the North Richland Hills Animal Shelter by Southlake Animal Control Officers. b. Provide access to the Euthanasia Room to Southlake Animal Control Officers for preparation of rabies specimen. c. Provide supplies for rabies specimen testing. d. Provide after hour building access and computer access to Animal Control Facility to Southlake Animal Control Officers. e. Hold animals brought to Animal Control Facility without collars and/or identification for at least four (4) business days and those with collars and/or identification for at least seven (7) business days. L Euthanize and cremate animals not claimed within the period provided under e. hereof if not adopted. g. Collect fees from pet owners at rates in accordance with North Richland Hills Code of General Ordinances Appendix A. h. Provide for adoption of pets. i. Accept missing pet reports from Southlake residents who come in to the North Richland Hills Animal Control facility to make such reports or to look for their animals. j. Cremation services will be offered for deceased Southlake animals brought in by their officers at $30.00 per animal. Section 4. SOUTHL Obligations. SOUTHLAKE shall: a. Perform all field work necessary to serve Southlake residents and provide animal control officers to bring animals to the North Richland Hills Animal Control facility. b. Pay North Richland Hills $105.00 per animal brought to the Animal Control facility by Southlake Animal Control Officers or Southlake Police Officers. c.. Reimburse North Richland Hills for all supplies used by Southlake personnel pursuant to Sec. 3.c. hereof d. Provide medical treatment to any Southlake injurer/ animal. Section 5. Payments for Services Performed. All payments provided for in Sec. 3. here of shall be retained by the City of Not Richland Hills as partial payment for services rendered. Section 6. Cancellation. SOUTHLAKE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement if NORTH RICHLAND HILLS breaches any of its ter or fails to perform any of the obligations it imposes, and then fails to cure the breach or failure within thirty (30) days following written notice from SOUTHLAKE. If the Agreement is terminated wader this paragraph, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS shall be entitled to retain money already received. Section 7. Notices. All notices required or provided for in this Agreement shall be sent to the following parties by certified mail — return receipt requested: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Mark Hindman, City Manager City of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS P.O. Bog 820609 7301 NE Loop 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76182 SOUTHLAIK+ Shaun Yelverton, City Manager City of Southlake P.O. Bog 770 1400 Main Sheet Southlake, TX 76092 Section 8. Dispute Resolution. In order to ensure an effective relationship between the parties and to provide the best possible public service, it is mutually agreed that all questions arising under this Agreement shall first be handled and attempted to be resolved between the City Managers of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE. Issues regarding the performance of Animal Impoundment and the operation of the Animal Impoundment Facility shall be brought directly to the attention of the NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Animal Center Supervisor. Immediate performance complaints or concerns should be addressed by communicating the problem to the on -duty Animal Control Officer. Section 9. Venue. Venue for any legal dispute arising pursuant to this Agreement shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas. Section 10. Independent Contractor. Both parties mutually agree that NORTH RICHLAND HILLS is an independent contractor, and shall have exclusive control of performance hereunder, and that employees of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS in no way are to be considered employees of SOUTHLAKE. The employment rights of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS personnel assigned under this agreement will not be abridged. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SOUTHLAKE EACH AGREE TO ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACTIONS OF THEIR OWN OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES IN THE OPERATION OF THE ANIMAL IMPOUND FACILITY, OR IN THE PERFORMANCE OR USE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, AND EACH PARTY HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND OTHERWISE HOLD HARML THE OTHER PARTY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES IN BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AGAINST ALL LIABILITY CLAIMS, SUITS, DEMANDS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, ATTORNEY FEES, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSE OF LITIGATION OR SETTLEMENT, OR CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY KIND WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON OR FOR A LOSS OF, DAMAGE TO, OR LOSS OF THE USE OF ANY PROPERTY ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED TO THE INTENTIONAL OR NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF THAT PARTY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, IN THE OPERATION OF THE ANIMAL IMPOUND FACILITY, OR IN THE PERFORMANCE OR USE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this Agreement, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE do not waive, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive any immunity or defense that. would otherwise be available to or against claims arising in the exercise of governmental functions relating hereto or otherwise. By entering into this Agreement, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE do not create any obligations express or implied, other than those set forth herein, and this Agreement shall not create any rights in any parties not signatory hereto. Section 12. Destruction of facility. In the event that the animal control facilities is damaged due to a natural or a man made disaster and is unusable, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS shall be relieved from all its responsibilities corder this contract. Section 13. Approval of Contract. This Agreement has been approved by the governing bodies of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE, respectively. The execution of this Agreement has been authorized by an act of the governing bodies of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and SOUTHLAKE at a duly called and posted meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this the day of 2010, in duplicate originals. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Mark Hindman City Manager By: Shana Yelverton City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George Staples, Attorney City- of North Richland Hills Attorney for Southlake CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. C.0 Subject: PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Presented by: Eric Wilhite Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. C.1 Subject: ZC 2009 -08 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a zoning change from "R -1 -S" Special Single Family to "R -2" Single Family on a portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 0.532 acres.) - Ordinance No. 3109 Case Summary: The applicant, Mike Stephens, is requesting a zoning change to R -2 (single- family) for a 0.532 acre portion of a larger lot that is currently zoned R -1 -S (special single family). This subdivision of the current R -1 -S larger lot will create the smaller lot indicted on the zoning exhibit as 3R. This new lot will be approximately one half (1 /2) of an acre and will be below the one (1) acre minimum size required for R -1 -S. Therefore zoning for lot 3R is being requested to be changed to R -2. The remaining portion of the existing lot will be sufficient in acreage size to stay within the R-1 -S zoning district classification. The property is also being replated, with the associated replat being processed concurrently with this zoning change. Mr. Stephens is purchasing a portion of the property to construct a single - family residence. Plat Status: A replat associated with this property is being presented concurrently with this request. Existing Site Conditions: There are no improvements currently located on this portion of the property. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts low density residential uses for this area. Thoroughfare Plan: The lot has frontage on Martin Drive which is designated as a C2U undivided Minor Collector. Surrounding Zoning 1 Land Use: North: AG & R -31 Residential structure East: R-1-S/ Residential structures South: I 1 Church West: R -2 f Residential structure Staff Recommendation: Approval of Zoning Change request ZC 2009 -08, Ordinance No. 3109. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval of ZC 2009 -08 by a 5- 0 vote. LOCATION MAP l a `1d''3 -� Mid Cities Blvd 1_1 =1Vl_11111111110W111f97 + 1 1101111R moor .I zz yy G A?, ---°,� .ter `'•- ,c,ti,, �: r J' Martin Dr "t1 o — N b PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 5 AND CITY COUNCIL Case #: ZC 2009- 08 Applicant: Gene Schay Location: 8820 Markin Drive You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearing: A Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a zoning change from "R -1 -S" Special Single Family to "R -2° Single Family on a portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive — 0.532 acres.) Public Hearing Schedule: Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 19, 2010 If recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning request will be heard by the City Council on: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2010 Bath Meeting Times: 7:00 P.M. Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department -City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427 -6300 Fax (817) 427 -6303 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS Gene Wayne Schay 8820 Martin Dr NRH Tx 76182 -4107 Timothy K Cggier Etal 8600 Martin Dr NRH Tx 76182 -4105 Richard J & Lori J L Nicks 6405 Simmons Rd Fort Worth Tx 76182-4242 Alan J Etux Corrie Kaufmann 6405 Whitney Ct Fart Worth Tx 75182 -4250 Robert Dldridge Legacy Church of Christ 6424 Sunnybrook Dr 8801 Mid Cities Blvd NRH Tx 76182 -4109 NRH Tx 76182 -4821 Joseph Dominic Qggier Patricia L Brinkley 8608 Martin Dr 8609 Malin Dr NRH Tx 75182 -4105 NRH Tx 76182-4106 Shannon James Ill & B Sawyer Timothy J Carter 6401 Simmons Rd 3517 Greenbriar Ct NRH Tx 76182 -4242 Colleyville Tx 76034 -8673 Frances Laurianne Hoppenreys Louis Leroy Law 6401 Whitney Ct 7133 Stonybrocke Dr Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4250 NRH Tx 76182 -3625 ORDINANCE NO. 3109 ZONING CASE ZC 2009 -08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A .532 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY FROM R -1 -S (SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R -2 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO ZONING; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a .532 acre tract of land located in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A and the site plan as Exhibit B from R -1 -S (Special Single Family Residential) to R -2 (Single Family Residential) zoning. Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. I:lr'I III 1i N17_1I►141a PASSED AND APPROVED on this 13th day of September, 2010. Oscar Trevino, Mayor 1_A■0 *16 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary F-11 ;j >:16] ►1 =1 DWAY -'M 11911 &] 0 t►j Wilk 19l 1 =1H_141 cis George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Planning & Development Director EXHIBIT A PROPERTY TO BE REZONED: Being a D.532 of an acre portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills as shown on the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 9455, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and also being a portion of that tract of land described in a deed to Gene Wayne Schay and recorded under Tarrant County Clerk's File No. D208231997. Said 0,532 of an acre is more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 518" iron with cap found at the northeast corner of said Lot 3R and the northeast corner of said Schay tract in the southerly line of Martin Drive; Thence N 83 degrees 25 minutes 53 seconds W with the northerly line of said Lot 3R, the northerly line of said Schay tract and the southerly line of Martin Drive, 33.70 feet to a 518" capped iron found; Thence S 89 degrees 44 minutes 59 seconds W with the northerly line of said Lot 3R the northerly line of said Schay tract and the southerly line of Martin Drive, 157.05 feet to a 518" capped iron set at the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; Thence S 00 degrees 15 minutes 01 seconds E, 225.37 feet to a 5/8" capped iron set. Thence S 89 degrees 59 minutes 20 seconds W, 100.619 feet to a 518" capped iron set in the westerly line of said Schay tract; Thence N 02 degrees 20 minutes 32 seconds W with the westerly line of said Schay tract, 84.51 feet to a 112" capped iron found in the westerly line of said Lot 3R; Thence N 00 degrees 01 minute 30 seconds W with the westerly line of said Schay tract and the westerly line of said Lot 3R, 137.03 feet to a 518" capped iron set; Thence N 85 degrees 35 minutes 32 seconds E, 61.89 feet to a 518" capped iron set in the northerly line of said Schay tract, the northerly line of said Lot 3R and the southerly line of Martin Drive; Thence N 89 degrees 44 minutes 59 seconds E with the northerly lane of said Schay tract, the northerly line of said Lot 3R and the southerly line of Martin Drive, 41.50 feet to the paint of beginning and containing 0.532 of an acre. EXHIBIT B - SITE PLAN Km Jo Oar V RENHWN rmnpu / � T -5 Lirs.W R -3 ZONE& m mm cao �. 4T 0 V) LOY® lEAOI IAY S ¢ nLOL t 0 M R. — w� R c rvo nnc WL PQ l 7 0 27, PQ may N aRRRK Ac m.G G] Km Jo 8a RENHWN rmnpu / y cL®wa/n innlloH 11 wL 31�18C m. N -5 Lirs.W R -3 ZONE& MARTIN DRIVE WW44'E9"E w,.. > r f1m , e • V _'•°•� F G E —E SCrur 1 ` 1 oecar3lvsx i �' aRmr_:v Lot aR,, encrt t. �,�_. �- ry CLEYNIN MaIRa54 � � Fn 1 `? TO REMWq R-,� IIWNG di' OC41fA ESf..3ES .. A9 i5 A ...- VEWW LOT N d w 1.f 9JLE H2fin 1 0.F1ltiN MpOpM R -2 FbNNG Lai 1R, nLtlCn 1a GBNE! A ?LI6E 94`..6 � e�Ekr,N rinrtlaN l i � IXISiIMG 20NIHG F -1 -S crewEr � 4 .�� I wnr ekss I R -2 ZaHNG I ermvErrr n nE I ro rn. .se w ,. n � w . , e f . r eams, im b. I� 1.,.4 q saM. g 590 may n am� 4 mTaw .e�av�eymr w ralne [rsn dap�nyid�hao[ ni c J o S/c mro.. Wn er: mhnw ®I eaxNr [ i2�T1 kR b f ery aw.a a •: ...r r usry �w..�3o nn.�. :c .K �R flw w W re el ��urw�e.h W PH 5rt dn e.. wHy4 m a 4' ntwae ry � a E a,M µi ae � i_ rx: oaw n.eo Ra,E l atnxe N br Cw paryff ae OW rf fdfkp 1 of e pprY m fafana La m, f. e a"� rr , mn n Helton w w m - Man b fh1 - t � s iw prOn m e� mm�.e N pmpexd in 'Jq 9bak ri aan MWVn [de uMer L miw . The nmd tlm N Id ]R le po a lftglM Laf 3R1, A 14. Wxlmm� WAien m9 NI S mnb} ZONING DISTRACT CHANGE EXHIDIf FROM R -1 —S ZONING TO R -2 ZONING OF A 0.532 OF AN ACRE PORTION OF LOT 3R, BLOCK 14 GLENANN ADDIT@ON AN ADDRION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 9455 PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS RtF: Sfi2- 8A6 -SY55 EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 2010 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ZC2009 -08 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Gene Schay for a Zoning Change from "R -1 -S" special Single Family to "R -2" Single Family on a portion of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive- 0.532 acres.) Public Hearing opened at 7:01 pm Gene Schay, 8620 Martin Dr, NRH, TX came forward requesting to divide the lot into two lots in order to sell the extra lot in order for a house to be built. Eric Wilhite came forward and stated that this is a zoning change from R -1 -S to R -2. Mr. Schay currently owns a larger lot and they will be subdividing it. The following case is the replat of this property. He is requesting a zoning change for a portion of it which is the 0.532 acres from R -1 -S to R -2 in order to sell that property once it has been replatted. At that point, another individual will construct a single family residence on the newly platted lot. This request does still meet the Comprehensive Land Use Plan which in this area is Low Density Residential and staff recommends your approval. With no one wishing to speak the public hearing was closed at 7 :03 pm ►aUU:r i■i=1■1 Mike Benton, seconded by Don Bowen, motioned to approve ZC 2009 -08. The motion was carried unanimously (5 -0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Presented by: Eric Wilhite Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. C.2 Subject: RP 2009 -05 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a replat of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition into Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive - 1.960 acres.) Case Summary: The applicant, Gene Schay, is proposing to replat what is currently a 1.950 acre lot. The proposed replat will create two lots, one 0.532 acre lot, and a 1.41 acre lot. The subdivision replat will create the ability to construct a new single - family residence on the proposed lot 3R2. Current Zoning: R -1 -S (special single- family residential) is the zoning on Lot 3R1 (the 1.41 acre lot) and proposed R -2 (single - family) for proposed lot 3R2 (the 0.532 acre lot). Thoroughfare Plan: The lot has frontage on Martin Drive, which is a 2 -lane, undivided minor collector street (C2U) with 60 feet of right -of -way. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts low density residential uses for this area. Staff Review /Rough Proportionality Determination: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it complies with both the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Sidewalks are required as part of this subdivision. Therefore, the developer will be required to assume 100% of the amount required for such improvements. Staff Recommendation: Approval of replat request RP 2009 -05. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval of RP 2009 -05 by a 5- 0 vote. LOCATION MAP 1 4 ;� C) in r r f AERIAL PHOTO Martin Dr Martin Dr a ►� iR ::C - PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION .c��C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAN❑ HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION F�,� AND CITY COUNCIL Case #: RP 2009 05 Applicant: Gene Schay Location: 8620 Martin Drive You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearing: A Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Gene Schay for a replat of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition into Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive— 1,980 acres.) Public Hearing Schedule: Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 19, 2010 If recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning request will be heard by the City Council on: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2410 Both Meeting Times: 7:00 P.M. Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 78180 Phone (817) 427 -5340 Fax (817) 427 -5303 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS Gene Wayne Schay 8620 Martin Dr NRH Tx 76982 -4107 Robert 01dridge 6424 Sunnybrook Dr NRH Tx 761 824109 Legacy Church of Christ 8801 Mid Cities Blvd NRH Tx 761824821 Timothy K Oggier Etal 8600 Martin Dr NRH Tx 76182-4105 Richard J & Lori J L Nicks 6405 Simmons Rd Fart Worth Tx 76182 -4242 Allan J Etux Carrie Kaufmann 6405 Whitney Ct Fart Worth Tx 76182 -4250 Steve Etux Lois Norder 6409 Whitney Ct Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4250 Joseph Dominic aggier 8508 Martin Dr NRH Tx 76152 -4105 Shannon James III & B Sawyer 6401 Simmons Rd NRH Tx 76182 -4242 Frances Laurianne Hoppenreys 6401 Whitney Cl Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4250 William Etux Sharon Dahn 6400 Whitney Ct Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4250 Patricia L Brinkley 8609 Martin Dr NRH Tx 76182 -4106 Timothy J Carter 3617 Greenbriar Ct Colleyville Tx 76034 -8673 Louis Leroy Law 7133 Sionybrooke Dr NRH Tx 76182 -3625 Mark Alan Etux Gwenda A Selby 6404 Whitney Ct Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4250 Michael P Etux Sally L Frye Marian R Rankin 6405 Slake Ct 6401 Blake Ct Fart Worth Tx 76182-4246 Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4246 REPLAT EXHIBIT Owl 12 NW ---------- --- -------- ---- - -- ------- - ----- - ----- - ----------- - - ------ -------------- -- ----- --------- y FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 3R1 & 3R2, BLOCK 14, GLEK4NN AMMON r mwm m e —.F rose a — ! � AIRFLAiWAperW I lt�u REN11H IOCIIfN wax owloe W. KNM& R.:l *bM MIN m: Mb10Nlw anti �m MEW I __ —__� fy F411411 (F V) J im 2! WL 1�1. M. Iffl tlEXNl UW4 lu� Sti A 2�ffi Fn MARTIN DRIVE T mw T — ----- — ------- Owl 12 NW ---------- --- -------- ---- - -- ------- - ----- - ----- - ----------- - - ------ -------------- -- ----- --------- y FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 3R1 & 3R2, BLOCK 14, GLEK4NN AMMON r mwm m e —.F rose a — ! � AIRFLAiWAperW I lt�u REN11H IOCIIfN wax owloe W. KNM& R.:l *bM MIN m: Mb10Nlw EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 2010 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING RP2009 -05 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Gene Schay for a Replat of Lot 3R, Block 14, Glenann Addition into Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 14, Glenann Addition (located at 8620 Martin Drive- 1.960 acres.) Public Hearing opened at 7:05 pm Eric Wilhite came forward and stated that this replat is a public hearing because it is zoned residential. It is a 1.960 acre tract which includes the portion that he is going to be selling. It includes Lot 3R2 that was just approved for a zoning change and also his remainder that he will be keeping where there is a single family structure indicated on Lot 3R1. The replat will create two lots and they both have frontage on Martin Drive. It meets all subdivision rules and regulations and there will be a sidewalk put in once they construct the new home once the residential permit is released. With no one wishing to speak the public hearing was closed at 7:05 pm 1+I» :Ie7 ►1 =1 11 Bill Schopper, seconded by Steven Cooper, motioned to approve RP2009 -05. The motion carried unanimously (5d0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Eric Wilhite Agenda No. C.3 Subject: SUP 2010 -04 Public Hearing to Consider a Request from the City of North Richland Hills for a Special Use Permit to allow the use of Building Materials other than those Specified in the Masonry Definition at the North Richland Hills Recreation Center. The Masonry Definition is found in Section 118 -671 of the City of North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The proposed location of the Recreation Center is the Southeast Corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive - Ordinance No. 3108 Case Summary: The Parks and Recreation Department is requesting an SUP for an exception from the required masonry percentage associated with design and construction of the new 86,000 square foot Recreation Center. Section 118 -674 (C) other materials in the code of ordinances allows for exterior finishes other than those specified in the masonry definitions for new construction to be used over 15 percent of an elevation only if a special use permit (SUP) is approved. There are materials being proposed for use as exterior finish that do not meet the type defined in the code as masonry. The facility will include amenities typical for a recreation and fitness center. The facility will also include classrooms, pre-school/day care room, banquet/meeting space, senior center, elevated second floor terrace and offices. The facility will also include indoor leisure and aquatic features. The design of the building calls for architectural features which are best accommodated with a mixture of exterior building materials, including glass, brick, stone and large architectural panels. Portions of the highest areas of exterior surfaces are proposed to be constructed using architectural panels selected to accommodate the unique construction demands and scale of the building. The architectural panels will provide the look and feel of masonry but are not technically considered masonry by city definitions. Using the architectural panels at higher elevations will allow for designing larger blocks more conducive to addressing the large scale of the building while still creating an appearance of masonry. Considering the unique size of the proposed building, employing methods of detailing wall features such as color change, texture change and material module change (unit size change) are best addressed through the use of the proposed architectural panels. Exterior Material Calculations: Masonry % North 74.34% South 57.87% East 72.53% West 97.04% Arch Panel (non- masonry) % 25.66% 42.13% 27.47 % 2.96% Staff Recommendation: Due to the unique nature and architectural style of the structure the Development Review Committee (DRC) recommends approval of Special Use Permit request SUP 2010 -04, Ordinance No. 3108. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval of SUP 2010 -04 by a 5 -0 vote. LOCATION MAP Mid Cities Boulevard CD 0 < Bud Jensen Dr c CL qj 0 AERIAL PHOTO '7 77 j e n:5 e n ur 7 77 447 J Alt Y co 1 7� -0 PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING x CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .. co PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL Case #: SUP 201 0 - 04 Applicant: City of North Richland Hills Location: Southeast Corner of Hawk Ave and Bud Jensen Dr You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearing: A Public Hearing to Consider a Request from the City of North Richland Hills for a Special Use Permit to allow the use of Building Materials other than those Specified in the Masonry Definition at the North Richland Hills Recreation Center. The Masonry Definition is found in Section 115 -871 of the City of North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The proposed location of the Recreation Center is the Southeast Corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive. Public Hearing Schedule: Public Hearing Date: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 19, 2010 If recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning request will be heard by the City Council on: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2414 Meeting Time: 7:00 P.M. Meeting Location: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N E LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427 -6300 Fax (817) 427.6343 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS Mega Life & HeaEth Ins Co Branch Banking & Trust Co Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd Attn Glenn W Reed HigierAllen & Lautin PC 3500 Maple Ave Ste 1165 9151 Grapevine Hwy 5057 Keller Spgs Rd Ste 606 Callas Tx 75219-3948 NRH Tx 76180 -5605 Addison Tx 75001 -6352 Birdville 1SD 6205 Broadway Ave Fort Worth Tx 76117-4211 ORDINANCE NO. 3108 SUP 2010 -04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE BY APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE USE OF BUILDING MATERIALS OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE MASONRY DEFINITION ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAWK AVENUE AND BUD JENSEN DRIVE (10.38 ACRES) ; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan and the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by approving a special use permit to allow the use of building materials other than those specified in the masonry definition at the NRH Recreation Center located at the southeast corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive (10.38 acres). Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00 ). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause of this ordinance two times. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. I:lr'I III ri N17_1I►141a PASSED AND APPROVED on the 13th day of September, 2010. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Planning & Development Director LI GA-L. DESCRIPTIO BEING a 10.3846 acre tract of land in the L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1652, in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County,. Texas, as described in Cash Warranty Deed to City of North Richland Hills, recorded in County Clerk's Document No. D209082687 in the Official Records of Tarrant County, Texas (O.R.T.C.T.), and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found X -cut for the common corner between the most southerly southwest comer of said 10.3806 acre tract and the most westerly northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, NRH Library Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 11397 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, also being an the east right -of -way line of Simmons Drive (60 foot right -of -way); THENCE North 46 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds `Nest, along the common line between the west line of said 10.3806 acre tract and said east right- of-way line, a distance of 171.37 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 186.03 feet, whose chord bears North 23 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 146.49 feet; THENCE Northwesterly, along said common line and along said circular curve to the right through a central angle of 46 degrees 22 minutes 23 seconds, an are length of 150.57 feet to a point for comer, THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 04 seconds West, continuing along said common line a distance of 451.52 feet to a found X -cut for comer at the intersection of said east right -of -way line with the south right- of-way Iine of Bud Jenson Drive, formerly U.I.C.I. Drive (a 35 foot right-of- way), as rccordcd in Cabinet A, Slide 8762 and 8763 P.R.T.C.T.; T14ENCE North 88 degrees 00 minutes 58 seconds East, departing said common line and along the common line between said south right -of -way line and the north line of said 10,3806 acre tract, a distance of 669.01 feet to a point for the northeast coiner of said 10.3806 acre tract, from which a found X -cut bears North 27 degrees 48 minutes 34 seconds West, a distance of 0.79 feet; THENCE South 40 degrees 45 minutes 07 seconds East, departing said common line and along the east line of said 10.3806 acre tract, a distance of 669.02 feet to a 1/2 found iron rod with rap stamped "MOAK SURV INC" for a common comer between said 10.3086 acre tract and the most northerly northwest comer of said Lot 1, Block 1, NRH Library Addition. THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minute 56 seconds Vilest, along the common line between said 10.3806 acre tract and the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 34.05 feet to a point for the southeast corner of said 10.3806 acre tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 58 minutes 04 seconds Vilest, continuing along said common line, a distance of 481.69 feet to a found PK nail far comer; THENCE South 24 degrees 35 minutes 47 seconds West, continuing atom said common line, a distance of 26.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 10.3806 acres of fund, mare or less. Basis of bearing is NAD 83 (1993) Texas Coordinate System, Texas North Central Zone (4202), based upon the City of North Richland H11ss G.P.S. Monument No. 13, Monument No. AZ 14 and Monument No. WAj 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXHIBIT BEINIKY a AR x.___ sal- DU I l Q I NG ELEYALION - NORM I 6QI l Q IN G EL EYAf ION - so 1liH 1."M 2 � dm 4- D T _ TT .... � X11 ' :.� •`<�: .. -- ^ .�1I k'.. IYESi ELEYAiION � BUILDING ELEVATION - E SSi U im 0 EXTERIOR MTER IAL CALCULATIONS z % % F. m& �nr saro �i ntr R�fel: 5 s 9.511 3.6 fl S mwfB A va 5S32 12.11% scaly m 9 sw» �i �r low: aaro e9s 1, rm.sm� rs3s ie.s ,00 I ARt1ikEEilRl 1, NdN SaM C Ylefr 7 .�C11. 2498 5.196 1.92] 2 }vWi�+M 10 1(R x,79 It1xs Tz.s�x 9.�s 7. .xm L WLDIIC9fYATIUG NU¢cnrY4 74.s s>' % mn% T " &MVArm M= LEGEND - A.m rra xi x.uw .zlax s...rw �.cesc L � e - n ClAac HaiA 3pia5 F x,398 6,339 819 1 81793 10p, 7.1s3 BL14 Q".VA- MA71 9Nediry% W.9i°b 9R22k 6AS9�6 9T.891'. �' A d 11.51% um% seam 2.E9 KEY PLAN t EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 2010 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SUP 2010 -04 Public Hearing and Consideration or a Request from the City of North Richland Hills for a Special Use Permit to allow the use of Building Materials other than those Specified in the Masonry Definition at the North Richland Hills Recreational Center to be located at the Southeast Corner of Hawk Avenue and Bud Jensen Drive. The Masonry Definition is found in Section 118 -671 of the City of North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. Bill Thornton, Asst Director of Parks & Recreation, came forward representing the City of North Richland Hills in the request for a variance of the masonry requirements associated with the design and construction of the recreation center. I have some images that I want to show you and I just want to qualify them first by saying that these are computer generated representations. Based on the fact that about the time these images were computer generated representations 60 -70 % through the design of the new facility. The software that our Architect is using is called Revit allows you instantly model any portion of the building. We are able to closely model the building but what just wanted to draw your attention to is that specific colors or those kinds of things really haven't been worked through yet. So the images are just to communicate our request based on building unit size and related to the variance request. In the code of general ordinances as you know allows glass, requires 100% masonry where there isn't glass. It also references the use of color change, texture change and material module change which is the unit size of the exterior building unit. The proposed building that we have designed responds a couple things one is the large interior spaces. The two story spaces such as the gymnasium, indoor aquatics. Also combined with spaces that are more intimate single story in height with lower scale components. The architectural features which are addressed as a part of the code of ordinances include color, texture and material modular change. We are recommending that those best be accomplished with a palette of exterior building materials including a number of things such as glass or glazing, brick, stone and the use of architectural panels. In terms of glazing on the north elevation you can see a majority of the building on the back and the front is glass or glazing. One of our primary goals was to create a building that was transparent. One that you see in and out. Most of the interior of the building has been designed to be transparent as well with opening up spaces so that there aren't a lot of walls and confined spaces. In terms of glass we are proposing a structural glass material for the walls and this is actually designed to help us achieve LEED silver certification for this building. This particular type of material was selected because of its ability to efficiently conserve energy. We are also proposing stone in a large block unit. The inset images show that we are looking for a very big block, these are very large structural construction materials that are put together to give that big block effect with the glass. We are also proposing brick that would be on the Senior part of the building and leading into the banquet space. One of the things that we wanted to do was borrow materials since we are next door to the Library and wanted to stay with things that are in the color palette of the Library. We are proposing for that smaller scale changing that building module size down to something a little more suited for the scale as a single story building. We have talked about architectural panels that are up high on the building. What we are proposing to do is on those spaces that are higher up and giving the size and the magnitude of the building we want to have a large building unit. If you use a small brick up there you lose the effect of the scale of the building. We are proposing to use these large architectural panels. The purpose of the architectural panels is a way to mimic masonry, It is designed to look like masonry but it allows you to do so in a cost effective manor. If you were to try to use a very large block module in stone the structural engineering that you have to perform and the space it would take to accommodate that would be astronomical in cost and then it would also change what we would be doing inside the building in terms of support. The architectural panels are actually made of a zinc product. They vary from unit to unit and isn't very monolithic and they are put together to mimic masonry. The variance from the masonry percentage our request follows that format that we are saying that the architectural panels allow for that larger block and allow us to address other requirements in the code of the ordinances dealing with module change but also meet the intent of the masonry requirement. We believe that we will be able to accomplish that using the architectural panels. Don Bowen asked what is the composition of the panels? Bill Thornton said that there are a couple of different panels we are looking at one that is actually made of zinc there are some that are made of copper but we are looking for something that would appear that it was a masonry product. Randy Shiflet asked if it was going to be anything that looked like split faced? Bill Thornton said no. There is different ways that the material can applied and overlapped and we are looking for something that looks more like the picture on the left. It isn't monolithic, in each of the tiles the colors and the hues vary a little bit just like the stone would appear. Bill Schopper asked about the maintenance? Bill Thornton said that this is another reason why it was attractive to us because it doesn't even have the maintenance that you would have with stone with the bleaching and cleaning. It actually requires very little to no maintenance at all. Eric Wilhite came forward and stated that we are treating this the same as we would any private sector project. The masonry percentages are pretty significant and they aren't that far off from the 85% because above 8 feet you can do 15% non masonry as accent. As you see in the staff report the exterior material calculations a couple elevations are barely over 10% below what is typically required and the other is 30 %. Because of that and the maintenance of the and durability of a non masonry product and the visual aesthetic quality of it and we reviewed it and feel that it still met the spirit and intent of the masonry ordinance. Due to the unique nature and architectural style and construction methods the development committee was in total support of the request for the variance on the masonry and recommend your approval. Don Bowen asked if this was an approved material? Eric Wilhite said yes. From what the Parks Dept has reviewed and showed other staff and from discussions from the architect it is an approved material. I think that they are using the same type of material on the Tarrant County College Campus in downtown Fort Worth on the overpasses. It seemed very similar the way it was applied and seems very durable. Public Hearing opened at 7:16 pm With no one wishing to speak public hearing was closed at 7:16 pm ❑PPROVFn Steven Cooper, seconded by Don Bowen motioned to approve SUP 2414 -44. The motion was carried unanimously (5 -4). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. D.0 Subject: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Presented by: Eric Wilhite Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. D.1 Subject: FP 2010 -02 Consideration of a Request from Thomas Andrews to Approve a Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, !Barrett- Andrews Addition (located at 8500 Clay Hibbins Road - 4.8487 acres.) Case Summary: The applicant, Thomas Andrews, is requesting approval of a final plat for a 4.84 acre tract. The final plat will create two lots. The southern portion indicated as Lot 2, will be retained by the current property owner. Mr. Andrews is in the process of purchasing the proposed Lot 1 in order to construct a new single family residence. Current Zoning: A recent zoning change request changed Lot 1 to R -1 -S. The proposed Lot 2 remained AG. Thoroughfare Plan: The lots have frontage on Clay Hibbins Road, a residential street. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts low density residential for this area. This plat is consistent with the plan. Staff Review 1 Rough Proportionality Determination: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it complies with both the Zoning and Subdivision (Ordinances. The city's engineer has determined a Rough Proportionality cost for public improvement for curb/gutter and concrete sidewalk. The developer will be required to either construct the required improvements or assume 100% of the amount required for such infrastructure improvements which totals $15,015.60. The rough proportionality for the Barrett - Andrews Addition will be handled by two different methods, one for each lot. Mr. Andrews has paid the fees totaling $5,607.00 associated with Lot 1. The rough proportionality cost for Lot 2 totaling $9,408.60 will be handled by a City Developer agreement. The agreement will require that the $9,408.60 be paid prior to the city issuing any building permits for Lot 2. The agreement will be filed and will place a lien on the property until the amount is paid in full. Staff Recommendation: Approval of final plat request FP 2010 -02 Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval of FP 2010 -02 by a 5- 0 vote. LOCATION MAP Saddle Ridge Trl r Clay Hibbins Rd N .+ CD CD - cn Shady � � � a Road 0� North Tarrant Pkwy MxVFA MA: MICal FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT ` 11(111i� V✓ eya �. nrwsm nnm w...r wmmraeoxx _ .ry8: e. to .. . N�sr �n.ar. •r:w �..�w�wr.ensar ,. . w.�. crabs ®. .n nrntlra.:yxapeoanRas w SAG •,tea n � W The Fbtl Fkof LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 BARRETT- ANDREWS ADDITION g *�"� Ao•4detiUOn6 [M City pfNprth Ric119m,d Hilly, P° rex�.aw.k«. wa:K Beimg 4.84$7 Acres oat of the g THOMAS PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT N41210 TARRANP COUNTY, TLW y Q 3 �� BARYMAYN69L6`RCti dI�TN,ly. Cfl.OAiC.i. EwSR] I ro taa 3ewaa loSGd, 1]C?f033 a �nsyerteu.arc � N >R➢w177TFS/0. 41 ` Ap fh.d RiR r 0nl o..am aad .rr a, e. IU•all N.Iti%wdlllkTli FJW &11dc&>fti2 ee.. _ Q a gg S -1 P � q e F 1� BLOCK 1 ` 11(111i� V✓ eya �. nrwsm nnm w...r wmmraeoxx _ .ry8: e. to .. . N�sr �n.ar. •r:w �..�w�wr.ensar ,. . w.�. crabs ®. .n nrntlra.:yxapeoanRas w SAG •,tea n � W The Fbtl Fkof LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 BARRETT- ANDREWS ADDITION g *�"� Ao•4detiUOn6 [M City pfNprth Ric119m,d Hilly, P° rex�.aw.k«. wa:K Beimg 4.84$7 Acres oat of the g THOMAS PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT N41210 TARRANP COUNTY, TLW �7 nae S moo. e. m.ngc,. R.ew.drAdrraa n..qd: ra.s.w.r 8 I ro taa 3ewaa loSGd, 1]C?f033 xai +i55M3 A19.YIbM' -rAM OJPoIHR6Wd WT IFfLRAwPoWd6E Ap fh.d RiR r 0nl o..am aad .rr a, e. IU•all N.Iti%wdlllkTli FJW &11dc&>fti2 ee.. _ ask $vrs ura.lce. S -1 P Lur2 I i� AbpM4Po�.r. Z ` 11(111i� V✓ eya �. nrwsm nnm w...r wmmraeoxx _ .ry8: e. to .. . N�sr �n.ar. •r:w �..�w�wr.ensar ,. . w.�. crabs ®. .n nrntlra.:yxapeoanRas w SAG •,tea n � W The Fbtl Fkof LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 BARRETT- ANDREWS ADDITION g *�"� Ao•4detiUOn6 [M City pfNprth Ric119m,d Hilly, P° rex�.aw.k«. wa:K Beimg 4.84$7 Acres oat of the g THOMAS PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT N41210 TARRANP COUNTY, TLW �7 nae S moo. e. m.ngc,. R.ew.drAdrraa n..qd: ra.s.w.r Oran: Rrns /Liw Rasr 'Ik�.ie.r dJRa Ih d.o.caldroun fwn s and *r.o' nok m d. swid s Ilu JI LI mil. pimolpvmdw.elJllaacpdyv�fmih. po®d, iJat Ns%rt .eestpnprROmvbrra.y wwuwr�•npmwn ro taa 3ewaa loSGd, 1]C?f033 xai +i55M3 A19.YIbM' -rAM OJPoIHR6Wd WT IFfLRAwPoWd6E Ap fh.d RiR r !rm &BwbpAPL9 Na Seii N.Iti%wdlllkTli FJW &11dc&>fti2 ee.. _ ask $vrs ura.lce. i �rum�r._ -1 P ` 11(111i� V✓ eya �. nrwsm nnm w...r wmmraeoxx _ .ry8: e. to .. . N�sr �n.ar. •r:w �..�w�wr.ensar ,. . w.�. crabs ®. .n nrntlra.:yxapeoanRas w SAG •,tea n � W The Fbtl Fkof LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 BARRETT- ANDREWS ADDITION g *�"� Ao•4detiUOn6 [M City pfNprth Ric119m,d Hilly, P° rex�.aw.k«. wa:K Beimg 4.84$7 Acres oat of the g THOMAS PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT N41210 TARRANP COUNTY, TLW EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 2010 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FP 2010 -02 Consideration of a Request from Thomas Andrews to Approve a Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Barrett - Andrews Addition (located at 8500 Clay Hibbins Road - 4.8487 acres.) Thomas Andrews, 6020 Parker Blvd, NRH, TX came forward requesting approval for final plat for Lots 1 and 2 for the property at 8540 Clay Hibbins Road. I plan to build a house on Lot 1. Chairman Randy Shiflet asked if there were any changes since preliminary plat? Thomas Andrews said no. Eric Wilhite came forward and stated that this is a final plat for a 4.84 acre tract that will be subdivided into two lots as indicated on the exhibit. Mr. Andrews is going to purchase Lot 1 and build a new single family residence. Lot 2 currently has a single family residence on it that will remain. As you recall at the last P & Z meeting there was a zoning change request to the portion of Lot 1 for Mr. Andrews to rezone that from AG to R -1 -S. Lot 2 will remain AG but they are final platting it so that all of their current holdings will be platted. They will then sell the property to Mr. Andrews. There has been a rough proportionality determination performed by the city engineer. It has been divided up into two portions for Lot 1 and Lot 2 and the total is a little over $15,000 for some concrete sidewalk and public improvements for curb and gutter. There are 2 separate methods that those moneys are going to be secured on Lot 1. Mr. Andrews will be paying at the time of the final plat which is now and then the other lot the property owners or developer is entering into an agreement that would place a lien on Lot 2 for the remaining money which would be $9,408. It does meet all subdivision rules and regulations and staff recommends your approval. ►a :3U- r@IN=111 Mike Benton, seconded by Don Bowen, motioned to approve FP 2010 -02. The motion was carried unanimously (5 -0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. E.0 Subject: PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. F.0 Subject: GENERAL ITEMS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Budget Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Mark Mills Agenda No. F.1 Subject: GN 2010 -067 Adopting the 2009/2010 Revised Budget and 2010/2011 Proposed Budget - Ordinance No. 3111 Summary Council is requested to consider the approval of an ordinance adopting: ■ the 2010 -2011 Annual Budget and Plan of Municipal Expenditures; • the 2009 -2010 Revised Annual Budget and Pan of Municipal Expenditures; • the 2010 -2011 Capital Projects Budget; and • the 2009 -2010 Capital Project Amendments. General Description The proposed budget for 2010111 was filed with the City Secretary's office on August 2, 2010. This proposed budget was also available at the NRH Public Library and on the City website. All necessary publications and hearings have been completed in compliance with City Charter requirements, special taxing district rules and procedures, and State Law. The 2014/2011 General Fund budget is based on a 57¢ tax rate, which is the existing rate for the current fiscal year. Revisions to the 2009/2010 revenues and expenditures have been made to reflect the most current estimates for the current fiscal year. The Budgeted Operating Expenditures are: 2009/2010 2010/2011 Fund Revised Proposed General Fund $38,932,584 $37,653,672 Debt Service Fund 9,233,288 8,259,239 Park & Recreation Facilities Development Fund 4,623,197 4,537,181 Crime Control & Prevention District Fund 4,376,342 4,176,961 Promotional Fund 245,496 208,982 Donations Fund 182,586 158,459 Special Investigation Fund 436,401 384,100 Drainage Utility Fund 825,020 900,127 Gas Development Fund 684,022 439,881 Traffic Safety Fund 730,925 748,039 Utility Fund 24,057,114 25,220,085 Aquatic Park Fund 4,226,174 4,508,826 Golf Course Fund 2,750,224 2,890,676 The Capital Projects Budget Expenditures are: In addition, over the course of Fiscal Year 2009110, several projects were revised. Staff is requesting a formal amendment to the 2009110 Capital Projects Budget to include the changes summarized below. Detailed revision forms have been included in the attachments to this item. 2009110 2009110 Project Title Adopted Change Revised Street & Sidewalk Projects Briley Drive (Lariat to Rufe Snow) Charles Street Offsite Drainage Imp Colorado Blvd (Blvd 26 to Harwood) Solar Power School Zone Beacons Upgrades Traffic Signal Light Adaptive System Yarmouth Avenue [Mid- Cities to Newcastle] Street & Sidewalk Sub -Total $400,000 2010/2011 Fund Proposed Street & Sidewalk Projects $7,738,755 Drainage Projects 1,903,000 Utility Projects 2,595,205 Parks & Recreation Projects 451,500 Aquatic Park Projects 2,191,000 Municipal Facility Projects 11,417,289 Major Capital Equipment Projects 1,508,282 Economic Development Projects 7,051,577 CIP - Other 639,803 Total $35,496,411 In addition, over the course of Fiscal Year 2009110, several projects were revised. Staff is requesting a formal amendment to the 2009110 Capital Projects Budget to include the changes summarized below. Detailed revision forms have been included in the attachments to this item. 2009110 2009110 Project Title Adopted Change Revised Street & Sidewalk Projects Briley Drive (Lariat to Rufe Snow) Charles Street Offsite Drainage Imp Colorado Blvd (Blvd 26 to Harwood) Solar Power School Zone Beacons Upgrades Traffic Signal Light Adaptive System Yarmouth Avenue [Mid- Cities to Newcastle] Street & Sidewalk Sub -Total $400,000 ($200,000) $200,000 0 65,000 65,000 620,000 (75,000) 545,000 0 70,000 70,000 270,000 362,500 632,500 420,000 80,000 500,000 $1,710,000 $302,500 $2,012,500 Drainage Projects Odell Street Drainage Improvements $470,000 $5,000 $475,000 Drainage Sub -Total $470,000 $5,000 $475,000 Utility Projects Johnson Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation $120,000 $13,000 $133,000 Utility Sub -Total $120,000 $13,000 $133,000 Parks & Recreation Projects Grand Avenue Park Plaza $200,000 $34,566 $234,566 Parks & Recreation Sub -Total $200,000 $34,566 $234,566 2609110 2069110 Project Title Adopted Change Revised Municipal Facility Capital Projects David Blvd Property Acquisition - TOD Area $360,000 $300,000 $660,004 Facility Repairs from Snow Damage 0 69,982 69,982 Flooring Replacement (2010) 47,273 25,000 72,273 HVAC Replacement (2010) 112,000 35,195 147,195 Interior ! Exterior Renovations (2010) 42,852 1,584 44,436 Roofing & Building Consultant 0 70,000 70,000 Public Works Dry Materials Storage Facility 0 86,455 86,455 Municipal Facility Sub -Total $562,125 $588,216 $1,150,341 Major Capital Equipment Projects Ambulance Replacement Unit 946 $245,000 $0 $245,000 Fire Engine Replacement (Unit 933) $509,819 $57,681 $567,500 Replacement of Automated Citation Equip. 200,000 23,129 223,129 Major Capital Equipment Sub -Total $954,819 $80,810 $1,035,629 Economic Development Projects Loop 820 Redevelopment $0 $1,513,361 $1,513,361 Economic Development Sub -Total $0 $1,513,361 $1,513,361 Other Proiects Long Term Energy Efficiency Neighborhood Initiative Program Other Sub -Total $0 $120,000 $120,000 91,698 28,716 120,414 $91,698 $148,716 $240,414 2669 -2010 Capital Project Budget Change $4,108,642 $2,686,169 $6,794,811 The City of North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors conducted a budget work session on August 6, 2010 to review the 2009110 Revised Budget and the 2010111 Proposed Budget. The Board met and held a public hearing on August 23, 2010 prior to the City Council meeting. The Board recommended that the City Council approve and adopt both the revised and proposed budgets. As required by law, all legal notices were published. The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors met on August 23, 2010 to review the Proposed 2010111 Operating and Capital Budgets. The Board conducted a public hearing prior to the City Council meeting on August 23, 2010. The Board approved the Proposed 2010111 Operating and Capital Budgets and recommended City Council adoption. As required by law, all legal notices were published. The City of North Richland Hills City Council conducted a budget work session on August 6, 2010 to review the 2009110 Revised Budget and the 2010111 Proposed Budget for all funds. The Council met and held a public hearing August 23, 2010 at the City Council Meeting for public comment on the budget. As required by law, all legal notices were published. As previously mentioned, detailed copies of the proposed budget are on file with the City Secretary's Office, in the Library, and on the City's website. In addition, they were provided in the agenda materials for the budget hearing held Monday, August 23, 2010. All of these sources are still available for public inspection and review. Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 3111 adopting the 2010111 Budget for all funds, adopting revisions to the 2009//10 Budget for all funds, adopting the 2010111 Capital Projects Budget, and amending the 2009110 Capital Projects Budget. N R ` ORDINANCE NO. 3111 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2010 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; ADOPTING THE AMENDED BUDGET FOR OCTOBER 1, 2009 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, AND PROVIDING FOR INVESTMENTS AND TRANSFERS WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 102.001, of seq., TEX. Loc. GOVT CODE, the City Manager submitted to the City Council a budget for 2010/2011, and the Council determined that a public hearing should be held at a time and place which was set forth in a notice published as required by law; and, WHEREAS, such public hearing on the budget was duly held on August 23, 2010, and all taxpayers were given an opportunity to attend and participate in such public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT the budget for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2011, in words and figures as shown therein, is adopted and approved as filed herewith. A copy of the approved budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 2. THAT the City Manager be and is hereby authorized to make inter- departmental and inter -fund transfers during the fiscal year as deemed necessary in order to avoid over- expenditure of particular accounts. SECTION 3. THAT the City Manager or his designee be and is hereby authorized to invest any funds not needed for current use in any lawful manner. Interest accrued from investments shall be deposited to the interest income account of the funds from which the principal was invested. SECTION 4. THAT the amended budget for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2010, filed herewith is hereby adopted and approved. A copy of the amended budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 5. THAT the amended capital projects for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2010, filed herewith are hereby adopted and approved. A copy of the amended projects shall be filed with the City Secretary. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 13 day of September, 2010. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor /_A■0 *36 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney 1_WU:167 ►10=1r16 Mark C. Mills, Budget Director FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 1 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES :�3�►1�:7 ►�1�J�1� ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009/10 FY 2010111 REVENUES Taxes $26,642,995 $27,270,506 $27,594,294 $27,325,044 $27,566,137 Fines & Forfeitures 2,394,919 2,677,901 2,418,000 2,121,200 2,265,620 Licenses & Permits 1,863,271 1,140,070 1,055,750 1,208,373 1,108,650 Charges for Service 2,496,786 3,020,051 3,282,231 3,303,358 2,894,822 Intergovernmental 3,139,268 2,625,366 2,628,721 2,628,721 2,356,659 Miscellaneous 920,983 965,291 1,125,647 1,017,756 997,284 Sub -Total Revenues $37,458,222 $37,699,185 $38,104,643 $37,604,452 $37,189,172 Appropriation from Fund Balance Legal Settlement & Litigation $0 $112,308 $0 $196,301 $300,000 Insurance Reserves 0 47,589 115,800 115,800 0 Golf Course Loans 0 168,064 392,000 392,000 164,500 Retirement Conversion 0 100 ,000 120,000 120,000 0 CCD Designated Reserves 0 200,000 0 0 0 Court Technology Funds 0 0 0 232,885 0 Utility Assistance Program 0 0 0 64,500 0 Previous Year Encumbrances 0 590,474 0 206,646 0 Sub -Total Appropriations 0 $1,218,435 $627,800 1,328,132 $464,500 TOTAL REVENUES $37,458,222 $38,917,620 $38,732,443 $38,932,584 $37,653,672 EXPENDITURES City Council $84,535 $102,659 $126,318 $126,318 $126,146 City Manager 559,135 542,214 510,879 427,249 519,876 Communications 544,040 472,116 493,646 512,762 398,923 City Secretary 435,167 433,149 498,448 499,737 498,442 Legal 249,869 388,953 347,884 647,884 647,718 Human Resources 116,911 111,183 103,678 109,678 118,433 Finance 798,302 850,826 738,395 747,516 717,285 Budget & Research 318,366 350,133 360,094 360,094 360,083 Municipal Court 1,163,551 1,217,321 1,217,283 1,234,796 1,239,262 Planning and Inspections 1,019,389 1,002,554 909,329 909,329 823,953 Economic Development 111,342 165,814 179,995 179,995 202,413 Library 1,803,813 1,819,967 1,912,924 1,918,368 1,922,842 Neighborhood Services 1,429,315 1,414,354 1,576,225 1,585,422 1,582,055 Public Works 3,414,340 3,277,452 3,611,554 3,622,766 3,356,505 Parks & Recreation 2,592,714 2,482,675 2,645,257 2,643,178 2,380,933 Police 10,375,187 10, 218,530 10,063, 064 10,101, 695 10, 263,785 Emergency Management 332,502 358,329 766,207 788,383 778,328 Fire 9,116,349 9,116,813 9,284,333 9,310,208 9,440,887 Building Services 628,288 641,893 491,893 491,893 702,973 Non - Departmental 1,169,072 1,280,499 1,786,310 1,841,884 1,341,776 Sub -Total Departments $36,262,187 $36,247,434 $37,623,716 $38,059,155 $37,422,618 Reserves & Other Expenditures Reserves $976,647 $547,589 $615,800 $388,929 $66,554 Golf Course Loans 162,000 168,064 392,000 392,000 164,500 Legal Settlement Sub -Total Reserves and Other 0 1,138,647 112 308 827,961 0 $1,007,800 92 500 873,429 0 231,054 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $37,400,834 $37,075,395 $38,631,516 $38,932,584 $37,653,672 BALANCE $57,388 $1,842,225 $100,927 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES :�3�►1�:7_1�1�J�1� TAXES Current Property Taxes Delinquent Property Taxes Penalty and Interest Franchise Fees Utility Fund Franchise Taxes Sales Taxes Mixed Beverages Payment in Lieu of Taxes Sub -Total FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines Library Fines Warrant & Arrest Fees Sub -Total LICENSES AND PERMITS Building Permits Electrical Permits Plumbing Permits Mechanical Permits Gas Drilling Permits Miscellaneous Permits Apartment Inspection Fees Curb & Drainage Insp. Fees Re- Inspection Fees License Fees Contractor Registration Fees Plan Review /Application Fee Animal License /Adoption Fees Animal Control Impoundment Crematorium Revenues Auto Impoundment Fees Food Service Permits Food Managers School Fire Inspection /Alarm Fees Publicity Fees - Recreation Sub -Total ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009/10 FY 2010111 $12,255,130 $13,678,934 $13,913,663 $14,082,651 14,127,879 217,299 100,158 150,000 150,000 150,000 172,332 148,199 115,000 127,000 115,000 3,913,185 4,008,020 3,822,480 3,633,445 3,765,000 691,338 706,825 718,464 682,755 711,547 8,876,924 8,154,321 8,377,626 8,182,393 8,223,511 161,783 117,757 130,000 112,200 120,000 355,004 356,292 367,061 354,600 353,200 $26,642,995 $27,270,506 $27,594,294 $27,325,044 $27,566,137 $2,068,625 $2,301,822 $2,038,000 $1,764,200 $1,887,920 67,216 76,923 80,000 75,000 82,000 259,078 299,156 300,000 282,000 295,700 $2,394,919 $2,677,901 $2,418,000 $2,121,200 $2,265,620 $868,208 $282,368 $330,000 $300,000 $310,000 41,947 22,880 21,000 24,000 24,000 63,076 45,376 36,400 43,000 49,500 74,768 74,289 65,000 47,000 50,000 32,000 54,929 20,000 220,000 110,000 124,873 110,089 78,550 75,650 75,650 86,560 91,255 85,000 92,000 92,000 80,342 21,964 5,200 1,003 1,000 3,686 1,884 3,900 1,000 1,000 16,824 17,181 18,000 21,000 21,000 84,558 85,216 75,000 70,500 70,500 76,161 22,305 14,000 8,000 2,500 47,728 50,211 42,200 46,000 49,000 52,916 46,597 55,000 55,000 57,000 8,640 5,495 8,000 3,500 2,000 17,812 14,955 15,000 12,000 12,000 106,633 112,336 102 ,000 120,000 11 0,000 25,977 24,875 25,000 23,000 23,000 18,850 21,799 24,500 13,720 15,500 31,712 34,066 32,000 32,000 33,000 $1 ,863,271 $1,140,070 $1 ,055,750 $1,208,373 $1,108,650 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES 1d4►14:7_1N111 CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental Recreation Center Rental Ambulance Fees Garbage Billing Contributions Recreation Fees Cultural Arts Athletic Revenue Recreation Special Events Planning & Zoning Fees Sale of Accident Reports Vital Statistics Mowing Sub -Total INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs: General CIP Utility Fund Park & Rec Facilities Dev. Corp Crime Control District Aquatic Park Fund Direct Costs: General Fund Police Salaries Gas Development Fund Sub-Total MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income Radio Reimbursement Sale of City Property Grant Proceeds -Grim. Justice Grant Proceeds -CDBG Overtime Reimbursements Tax Attorney Fees Other Income SRO Reimbursement (BISD) Sub -Total ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009/10 FY 2010111 $9,521 $10,935 $6,500 $11,031 $11,391 20,362 20,374 16,000 19,000 19,000 1,399,676 1,968,053 2,188,586 2,264,524 1,814,176 283,515 309,819 315,000 315,000 320,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 441,819 427,427 445,445 442,801 454,048 10,337 8,864 8,200 10,500 12,207 130,483 111,575 126,500 81,876 109,000 17,714 5,402 15,000 21,026 21,000 27,691 22,093 20,000 17,600 18,000 24,812 16,619 25,000 11,000 11,000 92,178 88,845 90,000 83,000 80,000 28,678 20,045 16,000 16,000 15,000 $2,496,786 $3,020,051 $3,282,231 $3,303,358 $2,894,822 $155,000 $162,750 $170,625 $170,625 $179,156 1,485,547 1,559,825 1,637,816 1,637,816 1,719,707 288,049 302,451 317,574 317,574 333,453 200,000 100,000 0 0 0 107,412 112,783 118,422 118,422 124,343 803,260 387,557 384,284 384,284 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 3,139,268 $2,625,366 $2,628,721 2,628,721 $2,356,659 $530,885 $348,553 $402,985 $343,284 $257,695 0 0 375,000 351,935 398,786 13,950 187,433 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 12,558 15,000 15,000 15,000 63,663 34,379 25,000 19,815 19,750 0 12,299 5,000 5,000 5,000 81,015 61,834 55,000 55,000 65,000 34,944 1 21,485 37,450 31,175 55,725 181,526 920,983 186,750 $965,291 195,212) $1,125,647 181 547 1,017,756 165,328 997,284 APPROPRIATION - FUND BALANCE Legal Settlement & Litigation $0 $112,308 $0 $196,301 $300,000 Insurance Reserve 0 47,589 115,800 115,800 0 Golf Course Equipment Loan 0 168,064 192,000 192,000 164,500 Golf Course Drainage Project Loan 0 0 200,000 200,000 0 Retirement Conversion 0 100,000 120,000 120,000 0 CCD Designated Reserve 0 200,000 0 0 0 Court Technology Funds 0 0 0 232,885 0 Utility Assistance Program 0 0 0 64,500 0 Previous Year Encumbrances 0 590,474 0 206,646 0 Sub -Total $0 $1,218,435 $627,800 $1,328,132 $464,500 TOTAL REVENUES $37,458,222 $38,917,620 $38,732,443 $38,932,584 $37,653,672 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009/10 FY 2010111 City Council $84,535 $102,659 $126,318 $126,318 $126,146 City Manager $559,135 $542,214 $510,879 $427,249 $519,876 Communications Public Information $198,250 $203,855 $211,501 $211,501 $211,851 Citicable 345,790 268,261 282,145 301,261 187,072 Total Communications $544,040 $472,116 $493,646 $512,762 $398,923 City Secretary City Secretary $236,281 $232,573 $293,108 $293,108 $283,974 Record Management 198,886 200,576 205,340 206,629 214,468 Total City Secretary $435,167 $433,149 $498,448 $499,737 $498,442 Legal $249,869 $388,953 $347,884 $647,884 $647,718 Human Resources $116,911 $111,183 $103,678 $109,678 $118,433 Finance Accounting & Administration $572,789 $616,069 $522,697 $531,818 $497,966 Purchasing 225,513 234,757 215,698 215,698 219,319 Total Finance $798,302 $850,826 $738,395 $747,516 $717,285 Budget & Research Budget $71,515 $86,546 $92,227 $92,227 $90,616 Tax 219,188 217,024 222,057 222,057 223,004 Internal Audit 27,663 46,563 45,810 45,810 46,463 Total Budget & Research $318,366 $350,133 $360,094 $360,094 $360,083 Municipal Court Administration /Prosecution $312,810 $341,748 $375,144 $384,420 $371,662 Court Records 368,885 412,205 428,567 431,692 441,632 Warrants 329,744 323,558 349,382 354,494 357,981 Teen Court 61,451 63,395 64,190 64,190 67,987 Judicial 90,661 76,415 0 0 0 Total Municipal Court $1,163,551 $1,217,321 $1,217,283 $1,234,796 $1,239,262 Planning and Development Administration $79,331 $82,511 $84,293 $84,293 $87,103 Inspections 668,640 631,321 518,659 554,017 554,329 Planning 271,418 288,722 306,377 271,019 182,521 Total Planning and Development $1,019,389 $1,002,554 $909,329 $909,329 $823,953 Economic Development $111,342 $165,814 $179,995 $179,995 $202,413 Library General Services $237,439 $209,311 $225,277 $225,277 $231,125 Public Services 845,672 857,787 863,979 872,479 882,396 Technical Services 720,702 752,869 823,668 820,612 809,321 Total Library $1,803,813 $1,819,967 $1,912,924 $1,918,368 $1,922,842 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009/10 FY 2010111 Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Resources $284,664 $286,986 $307,485 $298,485 $303,458 Humane Division 572,608 584,091 687,566 681,763 679,917 Consumer Health 258,873 255,839 271,022 271,022 279,317 Code Compliance 305,740 279,767 310,152 334,152 319,363 Special Programs 7,430 7,671 0 0 0 Total Neighborhood Services $1,429,315 $1,414,354 $1,576,225 $1,585,422 $1,582,055 Public Works 137,505 112,740 138,748 140,748 135,101 General Services $169,643 $140,563 $127,240 $127,240 $134,117 Traffic Control 941,213 843,766 968,076 985,648 970,852 Street & Drainage 2,303,484 2,293,123 2,516,238 2,509,878 2,251,536 Total Public Works $3,414,340 $3,277,452 $3,611,554 $3,622,766 $3,356,505 Park & Recreation General Services $145,300 $129,156 $157,659 $160,912 $162,743 Parks Maintenance 1,155,891 1,122,629 1,146,458 1,139,126 861,178 Recreation Services 790,360 762,083 812,709 819,464 826,180 Athletic Program Services 195,620 184,261 211,866 205,111 212,361 Senior Adult Services 168,038 171,806 177,817 177,817 183,370 Youth Outreach & Cultural 137,505 112,740 138,748 140,748 135,101 Total Park & Recreation $2,592,714 $2,482,675 $2,645,257 $2,643,178 $2,380,933 Police General Services $707,242 $709,356 $644,410 $642,705 $704,077 Administrative Services 725,049 680,947 777,213 795,559 709,037 Criminal Investigation 2,049,385 1,956,411 2,019,108 1,980,446 2,063,745 Uniform Patrol 4,620,696 4,672,367 4,530,329 4,569,779 4,627,083 Technical Services 626,695 583,310 468,390 467,602 477,139 Detention Services 394,597 384,830 392,970 392,970 430,346 Property Evidence 294,421 292,204 305,925 327,915 305,094 Communications 957,102 939,105 924,719 924,719 947,264 Total Police $10,375,187 $10,218,530 $10,063,064 $10,101,695 $10,263,785 Emergency Management $332,502 $358,329 $766,207 $788,383 $778,328 Fire Department General Services $327,324 $375,786 $330,172 $338,472 $344,735 Operations 7,347,346 7,393,786 7,580,657 7,573,095 7,762,514 Emergency Medical 943,746 673,173 692,162 717,299 848,569 Fire Inspections 475,092 484,430 480,058 480,058 485,069 Emergency Management 21,825 0 0 0 0 Fleet Services - Fire 1,016 189,638 201,284 201,284 0 Total Fire $9,116,349 $9,116,813 $9,284,333 $9,310,208 $9,440,887 Building Services $628,288 $641,893 $491,893 $491,893 $702,973 Non - Departmental $1,169,072 $1,280,499 $1,786,310 $1,841,884 $1,341,776 Sub -Total Departments $36,262,187 $36,247,434 $37,623,716 $38,059,155 $37,422,618 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERALFUND Reserves & Other Expenditures Reserve for Capital Improvements Reserve for Street Maintenance Transfer to CCD Golf Course Equipment Replacement Golf Course Drainage Project Loan Legal Settlement Reserve for Self Insurance Fund Reserve for Building Services Fund Reserve for Equipment Srvcs Fund Transfer to Capital Project Sub -Total Reserves and Other Sub -Total Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009/10 FY 2010111 $710,847 $300,000 $300,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $152,000 $168,054 $192,000 $192,000 $164,500 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $112,308 $0 $92,500 $0 $115,800 $47,589 $115,800 $115,800 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $223,129 $16,554 $1,138,647 $827,951 $1,007,800 $873,429 $231,054 $37,400,834 $37,075,395 $38,631,516 $38,932,584 $37,553,672 $37,400,834 $37,075,395 $38,631,516 $38,932,584 $37,653,672 $57,388 $1,842,225 $100,927 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 4 - SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION NET TAXABLE VALUE: Total Appraised Value as of May 14, 2010 Less Exemptions: Absolute Exemption Cases Before ARB Incomeplete Accounts Disabled Veteran Over 65 Homestead Disabled Persons Less: Personal Property Nominal Value Loss Prorated Absolute Agricultural Value Loss Freeport Inventory Value Loss Pollution Control /Prorated Absolute Total Reduction to Values Add: Estimated Minimum ARB protested values Incomplete Property ESTIMATED NET TAXABLE VALUE JULY 25th $4,392,354,625 (260,429,854) (113,500,396) (14, 236,938) (12,402,195) (126, 635,802) (330,840,112) (9,215,704) (5,390) (1,387,361) (10, 080,827) (772,637) (221,092) ($879,728,308) 75,674,242 14,017,153 $3,602,317,712 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS: % of Total Net Taxable Value $3,602,317,712 Proposed Tax Rate per $100 Valuation $0.57 Estimated Total Tax Levy at 100% Collection $20,533,211 Less Estimated 1% for Uncollectables (205,332) Less TIF Transfer (1,275,000) Less Debt Service Transfer (4,925,000) TOTAL ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS(Operations) 99% $14,127,879 % of Total Tax Rate TAX RATE DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE: Tax Rate Distribution General Fund - Maintenance & Operations 65.0% $0.370219 Debt Service Fund and TIFs 35.0% $0.199781 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION OF TAX RATE 100% $0.570000 100% Projected DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE: Collection Collection Transfer to Debt Service Fund 6,200,000 6,200,000 General Fund - Maintenance & Operations 14,333,211 14,127,879 TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE $20,533,211 $20,327.879 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 5 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Lei =1ki I =1;7111101=1- 3�'1 =IATAC+t=111101� ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 REVENUES General Debt Service Taxes $6,603,946 $6,322,088 $5,800,000 $5,800,000 $4,925,000 TIF #1 and #2 Taxes 1,113,033 1,315,145 1,450,000 1,341,298 1,275,000 Sub -Total Ad Valorem Taxes $7,716,979 $7,637,233 $7,250,000 $7,141,298 $6,200,000 Transfer In From: $7,223,733 $6,627,221 $6,595,141 $6,483,580 $6,494,358 Drainage Utility $698,766 $354,198 $737,219 $737,219 $897,627 Park & Rec. Facilities Dev. Corp. 160,510 180,381 173,768 173,768 45,900 Miscellaneous 72,239 0 0 0 0 Information Services Fund 0 0 0 0 0 Fleet Services Fund 275,372 0 0 0 0 Facilities Services Fund 44,711 49,224 0 0 0 Gas Development Fund 0 0 0 346,084 439,881 Bond Refunding Proceeds 299 0 0 0 0 Interest Income 122,266 0 0 0 0 City of Watauga, CIP Participation 19,785 335,125 82,853 82,853 82,853 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 76,301 752,066 592,978 TOTAL REVENUES $9,110,927 $8,556,161 $8,320,141 $9,233,288 $8,259,239 EXPENDITURES Existing Bonds & C.O.'s $7,223,733 $6,627,221 $6,595,141 $6,483,580 $6,494,358 Existing Loans $0 $0 $0 $346,084 $439,881 TI #1 and #2 Funding 1,113,033 1,315,145 1,450,000 1,341,298 1,275,000 Issuance Costs/Paying Agent Fees 8,292 89,018 275,000 166,500 50,000 Bond Refunding Escrow Payment 0 0 0 895,826 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,345,058 $8,031,384 $8,320,141 $9,233,288 $8,259,239 BALANCE $765,869 $524,777 $0 $0 $fl FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 6 SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUNC EXPENDITURES Operating Park Facilities Development Admin. $549,153 $580,922 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED Parks & Public Grounds ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Tennis Center Operations FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009110 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 REVENUES $2,495,775 $2,525,284 $2,869,894 $2,842,278 $3,104,275 Sales Tax $4,410,260 $4, 077, 162 $4,188,813 $4,091,196 $4,111,755 Interest Income 174,935 41,237 38,280 26,302 14,950 Youth Assn. Maintenance Fees 77,421 58,923 33,000 61,500 61,500 Tennis Center Revenue 320,838 325,906 314,400 305,150 314,550 Transfer in from Aquatic Park Fund 60,000 60,000 62,400 62,400 64,896 Transfer in from Gas Development Fun. 400,000 0 0 0 0 Park Impact Fees 54,561 30,206 100,000 29,000 50,000 Contributions 3,600 3,500 3,000 3,500 3,500 Insurance 27,077 25,000 0 0 0 Other Income 0 80,247 0 0 0 Appropriation - Fund Balance 0 616,662 0 0 0 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 44,149 0 TOTAL REVENUES $5,528,692 $5, 318, 843 $4,739,893 $4,623,197 $4,621,151 EXPENDITURES Operating Park Facilities Development Admin. $549,153 $580,922 $609,087 $609,087 $641,556 Parks & Public Grounds 1,438,533 1,426,523 1,668,543 1,640,927 1,859,095 Tennis Center Operations 508,089 517,839 592 592,264 603,624 Sub -Total $2,495,775 $2,525,284 $2,869,894 $2,842,278 $3,104,275 Other & Reserves Debt Service - Revenue Bonds $1,132,213 1,124,300 $1,125,202 $995,811 $925,372 Debt Service - CD's 189,911 180,381 173,768 173,768 45,900 Indirect Costs 288,049 302,451 317,574 317,574 333,453 Non - Departmental 12,744 14,020 13,792 103,792 25,387 Reserve for Economic Development 224,712 209,441 209,442 114,560 102,794 Recreation Center Capital Project 500,000 600,000 0 0 0 Reserve for Capital Projects 685,288 30,221 30,221 75,414 0 Sub -Total $3,032,917 $2,460,814 $1,869,999 $1,780,919 $1,432,906 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $5, 528, 692 $4, 986, 098 $4,739,893 $4,623,197 $4,537,181 BALANCE $0 $332,745 $0 $0 $83,970 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 7 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT EXPENDITURES Operating Administration $75,002 $73,165 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED Administrative Services ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Investigations FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009110 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 REVENUES 2,107,800 2,074,095 2,356,391 2,290,922 2,482,522 Sales Tax $4,158,622 $3,827,245 $4,120,410 $3,771,972 $4,111,755 Franchise Tax 0 150,831 100,000 79,328 101,250 Interest Income 74,017 19,910 21,476 4,667 468 Transfer from General Fund 0 200,000 0 0 0 Loan from Transition Fund 745,655 55,079 208,878 520,375 0 TOTAL REVENUES $4, 978, 294 $4,253,066 $4,450,764 $4,376,342 $4,213,473 EXPENDITURES Operating Administration $75,002 $73,165 $88,777 $88,777 $73,026 Administrative Services 563,620 570,939 551,964 551,964 572,371 Investigations 328,959 326,780 339,169 339,169 349,704 Uniform Patrol 2,107,800 2,074,095 2,356,391 2,290,922 2,482,522 Technical Services 256,540 98,110 101,507 101,507 21,211 Detention Services 331,975 343,867 354,079 345,126 347,277 Property Evidence 109,915 92,240 89,617 89,617 93,323 Communications 100,639 64,932 126,443 126,443 171,175 Transfer to Information Services 43,718 60,000 0 0 0 Sub -Total $3,918,168 $3,704,128 $4,007,947 $3,933,525 $4,110,609 Other & Reserves Indirect Costs $200,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Police Dept. Salary Increases - General 803,260 387,557 384,284 384,284 0 Child Advocacy Center 11,725 11,725 11,725 11,725 11,725 Other 45,141 49,656 46,808 46,808 54,627 Sub -Total $1,060,126 $548,938 $442,817 $442,817 $66,352 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4, 978,294 $4,253,066 $4,450,764 $4,376,342 $4,176,961 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,512 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 8 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PROMOTIONAL FUND REVENUES Occupancy Tax Proceeds Interest Income Other Income Appropriation of Fund Balance Prior Year Encumbrances TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES Economic Development Non - Departmental Sub -Total I TOTAL EXPENDITURES (BALANCE ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 $260,319 $152,220 $205,000 $205,000 $206,025 10,342 7,587 5,215 5,764 3,545 0 448 0 0 0 0 42,604 27,086 26,537 0 0 0 0 8,195 0 $270,661 $202,859 $237,301 $245,496 $209,570 $213,099 $202,633 $226,954 $235,149 $208,607 205 226 10,347 10,347 375 $213,304 $202,859 $237,301 $245,496 $208,982 $213,304 $202,859 $237,301 $245,496 $208,982 $57,357 $0 $0 $0 $588 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 9 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES *1010 P_ %01010 14 111eIl; EXPENDITURES Library - Book Collection $38,959 $41,662 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED Neighborhood Services ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Code Enforcement NIP Program FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 REVENUES 5,742 14,136 17,510 17,510 17,510 Contributions 7,223 10,901 14,999 14,999 14,999 NRH Water Bills $90,781 $85,985 $87,692 $86,510 $87,692 Shelter Fund 11,055 6,471 15,000 7,500 9,500 Sub Total 101,836 $92,456 $102,692 $94,010 $97,192 Donations $80,082 $139,243 $165,009 $182,586 $1 58,459 Spay /Neuter $7,506 $9,892 $8,000 $12,000 $15,000 Duncan 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Santa Cops 0 0 0 11,576 11,576 Sub Total $22,506 $24,892 $23,000 $38,576 $41,576 Proceeds Critter Connection $30 $0 $0 $0 $0 Library Book Sale 2,274 5,084 3,200 9,500 10,000 Coffee Bar Proceeds 1,220 0 0 0 0 Sub Total $3,524 5,084 $3,200 $9,500 $10,000 Other Interest Income $25,772 $18,559 $13,795 $15,535 $10,217 Other Income 31,606 34,263 35,000 45,155 43,100 Sub Total $57,378 $52,822 $48,795 $60,690 $53,317 Appropriation from Fund Balance Night of Holiday Magic $0 $51,580 $0 $13,320 $0 Sub Total 0 $51,580 0 13,320 0 TOTAL REVENUES $185,244 $226,834 $177,687 $216,096 $202,085 EXPENDITURES Library - Book Collection $38,959 $41,662 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement NIP Program 3,653 2,951 0 0 0 Critter Connection 5,742 14,136 17,510 17,510 17,510 Keep NRH Beautiful 7,223 10,901 14,999 14,999 14,999 Municipal Court - Teen Court 1,000 0 0 0 0 Parks - Special Events and Arts 23,505 67,129 72,500 85,820 53,000 Police Department 0 2,464 0 4,257 12,950 Sub -Total $80,082 $139,243 $165,009 $182,586 $1 58,459 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $80,082 $139,243 $165,009 $182,586 $158,459 BALANCE $105,162 $87,591 $12,678 $33,510 $43,626 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 10 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FUND ADOPTED REVISED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 Forfeited Funds AFIS Reimbursements Radio System Reimbursements 911 Telecom Interest Income Other Income Appropriation - PY Encumbrances Appropriation of Fund Balance 111011 f_1111111:1 =IT" � 01=K EXPENDITURES Forfeited Funds Radio Maintenance AFIS Maintenance & Equipment Locally Seized Funds 911 Telecom TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1111114-3 W'_1 L Calm PROPOSED BUDGET FY 2010111 $142,874 $146,830 $60,500 $224,500 $100,500 9,421 7,537 7,537 4,162 8,800 324,027 354,377 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,341 0 17,257 12,371 8,363 10,682 7,617 6,336 2,123 0 0 0 0 0 0 99,180 0 36,737 0 180,521 67,536 267,183 $0 $29,182 $fl $0 $0 $536,652 $523,238 $256,921 $436,401 $384,100 $173,448 $129,057 $245,000 $362,680 $289,000 352,431 354,377 0 0 0 8,855 9,822 9,421 21,221 94,000 1,918 800 2,500 2,500 1,100 0 0 0 50,000 0 $536,652 $494,056 $256,921 $436,401 $384,100 $0 $29,182 $fl $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 11 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL FY 2007108 FY 2008109 REVENUES Drainage Fees $830,338 $834,075 Interest Income 21,748 33,701 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $852,086 $867,776 EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 $830,000 $834,000 $834,000 15,097 18,698 11,955 0 0 54,172 $845,097 $852,698 $900,127 Debt Service $698,766 $354,198 $737,219 $737,219 $897,627 Other Expenditures 1 ,513 2,159 0 5,710 2,500 Defeasance of Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 82,091 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $700,279 $356,357 $737,219 $825,020 $900,127 I BALANCE $151,807 $511,419 $107,878 $27,678 $G FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 12 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 1e7--V4 01AN4KOIJ1 ■1 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 REVENUES Bonuses General Fund Purposes $3,786,207 $6,186 $0 $367,383 $0 Utility Fund Purposes 0 54,220 0 0 0 Park Development Purposes 1,511,655 0 120,000 263,100 0 Economic Development Purposes 934,917 1,092 0 96,068 0 Golf Course Purposes 0 0 0 277,.100 0 6,232,779 $61,498 120,Oflfl 1,003,651 0 Royalties/Overrides General Fund Purposes $2,393 $12,751 $20,000 $20,000 $50,000 Park Development Purposes 3,418 0 20,000 54,519 70,000 Economic Development Purposes 1,026 1,034 0 1,143 20,000 Golf Course Purposes 0 35,270 0 0 0 Transfer to Debt Service $6,837 $49,055 $40,000 $75,662 $140,000 Other Interest Income $69,767 $105,518 $89,059 $57,845 $39,879 $69,767 $105,518 $89,059 $57,845 $39,879 Appropriation of Reserves General Fund Purposes $0 $2,393,291 $0 $0 $439,881 Park Development Purposes 0 1,356,709 0 0 0 Economic Development Purposes 0 0 460,000 100,000 0 0 $3,750,000 $460,000 $100,000 $439,881 TOTAL REVENUES $6,309,383 $3,966,071 $709,059 $1,237,158 $619,760 EXPENDITURES Transfer to GF -Prev. Street Mainten. $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Golf Course Fund 0 35,270 0 0 0 Transfer to Park Development Fund 400,000 0 0 0 0 Transfer to Economic Dev. Fund 100,000 0 0 0 0 Transfer to Debt Service 0 0 0 346,084 439,881 Transfer to Capital Projects 0 3,750,000 460,000 337,938 0 Other Expenditures 2,046 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $602,046 $3,785,270 $460,000 $684,022 $439,881 BALANCE $5,707,337 $180,801 $249,059 $553,136 $179,879 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 13 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND ( REVENUES Gross Fine Revenues ACTUAL ACTUAL FY 2007108 FY 2008109 $825,191 $999,584 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2009/10 REVISED BUDGET FY 2009110 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 201011 $750,000 Less: Allowable Expenditures Contractor Payments Program Administration Total Allowable Expenditures NET FINE REVENUES Less: State Share I NET FINE REVENUES TO CITY ADDITIONAL REVENUES Interest Income Appropriation of Fund Balance TOTALRESOURCES EXPENDITURES Traffic Enforcement Pedestrian Safety Traffic Signal Improvements Sub -Total &i•11F_1NW1 »i!I0lkiI]:14 - (BALANCE $978,468 $720,000 ($507,241) ($541,787) ($548,762) ($555,737) ($548,762) (97,160) (66,513) (81,123) (81,123) (171,378) ($604,401) ($608,300) ($629,885) ($636,860) ($720,140) $60,000 $110,660 $50,000 $52,495 $12,969 $220,790 $391,284 $348,583 $83,140 $29,860 ($80,573) ($247,074) ($174,292) ($41,570) ($14,930) $140,217 $144,210 $174,292 $41,570 $14,930 �� $402 $12,898 $0 $9,275 $5,201 0 0 0 1,650 0 $140,619 $157,108 $174,292 $52,495 $20,131 II $0 $10,660 $50,000 $52,495 $0 0 0 0 0 12,969 60,000 100 ,000 0 0 0 $60,000 $110,660 $50,000 $52,495 $12,969 $60,000 $110,660 $50,000 $52,495 $12,969 $80,619 $46,448 $124,292 $0 $7,162 11 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 14 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES L1j11l14ii1110 REVENUES Water Sales and Charaes Water Sales Water Taps Water Inspection Fees Water Wells Sub -Total Sewer Sales and Charges Sewer Sales Sewer Taps Sewer Inspection Fees Sub -Total Miscellaneous Interest Income Service Charges Late Charges Miscellaneous Joint Use Reimbursement- Watauga Subdivision Meter Revenue Transfer from Water to Sewer Sub -Total Sub -Total Revenues ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 $15,871,263 $15,689,051 $15,912,864 $14,722,569 $16,108,482 30,655 17,125 16,000 16,000 16,000 21,473 7,167 3,700 1,800 1,800 12,476 19,001 12,500 6,000 6,000 $15,935,867 $15,732,344 $15,945,064 $14,746,369 $16,132,282 $8,527,522 $8,153,500 $8,035,933 $7,855,143 $8,114,324 7,756 4,000 8,500 4,000 4,000 12,412 3,720 Z. 2,100 1,700 1,700 $8,547,690 $8,161,220 $8,046,533 $7,860,843 $8,120,024 $725,486 $587,053 $332,207 $361,329 $241,779 103,966 120,378 100,000 100,000 110,000 472,876 478,170 470,000 470,000 470,000 959 8,049 2,000 8,830 2,000 61,248 124,431 70,600 134,056 134,000 25,500 10,650 20,000 10,000 10,000 275,095 0 125,745 0 0 $1,665,130 $1,328,731 $1,120,552 $1,084,215 $967,779 $26,148,687 $25,222,295 $25,112,149 $23,691,427 $25,220,085 Appropriation from Fund Balance Rate Stabilization $0 Reserve for Self Insurance 37,400 Previous Year Encumbrances 452,772 TOTAL REVENUES $0 $414,432 $229,572 $0 38,600 38,600 38,600 0 0 0 97,515 4 $26,638,859 $25,260,895 $25,565,181 $24,057,114 $25,220,085 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 14 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES UTILITY FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 EXPENDITURES Operating Administration $248,722 $81,315 $287,512 $287,512 $277,019 Development 729,837 730,350 778,814 781,898 797,483 Right of Way Maintenance 165,307 137,128 251,024 270,850 200,000 Sub -Total $1,143,866 $948,793 $1,317,350 $1,340,260 $1,274,502 Water Services $5,638,120 $5,522,276 $5,593,293 $4,944,732 $5,158,100 Water Operations $3,218,354 $3,323,676 $3,488,799 $3,512,301 $3,638,859 Purchase of Water FTW 5,248,451 3,299,844 3,910,000 3,520,141 3,872,155 Purchase of Water TRA 4,342,551 3,456,214 4,010,000 3,626,288 4,116,040 Sub -Total $12,809,356 $10,079,734 $11,408,799 $10,658,730 $11,627,054 Sewer Services $1,078,968 $1,186,865 $1,305,522 $1,305,522 $1,305,522 Sewer Operations $895,643 $960,729 $1,118,533 $1,111,975 $1,121,991 Sewer Treatment FTW 1,374,722 1,335,679 1,490,000 1,153,429 1,236,109 Sewer Treatment TRA 3,367,755 3,225,868 2.,984,760 2,679,328 2,800,000 Sub -Total $5,638,120 $5,522,276 $5,593,293 $4,944,732 $5,158,100 FinancelUtility Collections 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Meter Reading $379,447 $374,462 $394,422 $394,622 $401,829 Utility Billing /Customer Service 720,506 748,756 780,825 783,242 796,290 Utility Collection Services 229,774 247,741 256,153 256,153 264,750 Accounting Services 119,085 136,473 245,337 246,841 256,009 Budget & Research 138,063 175,170 186,018 186,018 186,103 Sub -Total $1,586,875 $1,682,602 $1,862,755 $1,866,876 $1,904,981 Building Services $1,078,968 $1,186,865 $1,305,522 $1,305,522 $1,305,522 Debt Service $348,752 $348,388 $573,095 Non - Departmental $231,264 $341,907 $391,681 $429,128 $375,186 Sub -Total $22,488,449 $19,762,177 $21,879,400 $20,545,248 $21,645,345 Other & Reserves Debt Service $348,752 $348,388 $573,095 $573,095 $565,286 Franchise Fees 691,337 706,825 718,464 682,755 711,547 Indirect Costs 1,485,548 1,559,825 1,637,816 1,637,816 1,719,707 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 355,004 356,292 367,061 354,600 353,200 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Information Services Fund Contribution to Equipment Svs. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Transfer to Self Insurance Fund 38,600 38,600 38,600 38,600 0 Transfer from Water to Sewer 275,095 0 125,745 0 0 Reserve for Capital Projects 731,074 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $4,150,410 $3,234,930 $3,685,781 $3,511,866 $3,574,740 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $26,638,859 $22,997,107 $25,565,181 $24,057,114 $25,220,085 BALANCE $0 $2,263,788 $0 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 15 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AQUATIC PARK FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009/10 FY 2009110 FY 2010111 1,472,100 514,764 ATTENDANCE 233,654 231,379 270,000 257,479 265,000 REVENUES Operatin a Admissions Advanced & Group Sales Food and Beverage Library Concessions Merchandise Lockers Aquatic Classes /Special Events Sub -Total Other Interest Income Donations Other Sub -Total Appropriation from Fund Balance Reserve for Park Expansion - Debt Issue Previous Year Encumbrances Sub -Total 011•1111_1�:7A■1� � Lei 4-1 I *:i »0I @1k J:W Operating $1,786,176 $1,811,649 $2,157,364 $1,910,000 $2,005,500 1,479,113 1,311,669 1,590,394 1,402, 000 1,472,100 514,764 491,902 652,868 568,000 746,400 13,753 24,727 32,240 24,500 25,725 120,244 108,753 143,329 120,000 126,000 54,018 53,399 65,639 70,000 73,500 12,245 15,735 11,762 15,500 15,500 $3,980,313 $3,817,834 $4,653,596 $4,110,000 $4,464,725 $135,831 $111,835 $64,290 $76,138 $53,369 20,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 17,257 15,658 17,457 27,246 27,596 $173,088 $147,493 $101,747 $113,384 $90,965 $150,000 41,366 $0 0 $0 {1 $0 2,790 $0 0 $191,366 $0 $0 $2,790 $0 $4,344,767 $3,965,327 $4,755,343 $4,226,174 $4,555,690 General Services & Utilities $725,740 $756,676 $830,549 $828,049 $835,760 Public Grounds /Aquatics /Maint. 1,239,574 1,110,607 1,044,766 1,073,758 1,096,006 Business & Office Administration 435,529 449,758 470,163 480,953 482,693 Gift Shop /Concessions 485,469 437,613 528,476 507,361 500,388 Library Concessions 30,007 23,436 42,601 41,401 39,665 Sales /Special Events /Admissions 243,062 234,691 282,841 277,167 280,946 Sub -Total $3,159,381 $3,012,781 $3,199,396 $3,208,689 $3,235,458 Other & Reserves Debt Service $540,218 $554,367 $696,722 $696,722 $559,106 Indirect Costs 107,412 112,783 118,422 118,422 124,343 Transfer Out - PARD 60,000 60 ,000 62,400 62,400 64,896 Reserve For: Infrastructure & Major Repairs 297,293 147,904 425,000 14,841 425,000 Park Expansion 105,471 0 128,303 0 0 Insurance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Non - Departmental 24,992 27,492 75,100 75,100 50,023 Sub -Total $1,185,386 $952,546 $1,555,947 $1,017,485 $1,273,368 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,344,767 $3,965,327 $4,755,343 $4,226,174 $4,508,826 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,864 FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 SCHEDULE 16 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GOLF COURSE FUND ADOPTED REVISED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2007108 FY 2008109 FY 2009110 FY 2009110 ROUNDS :a=k►I=1Z Lei *= PROPOSED BUDGET FY 2010111 56,192 54,325 53,000 49,564 54,000 Green Fees $1,229,179 $1,089,925 $1,224,620 $1,039,401 $1,246,544 Pro Shop 422,473 359,922 384,198 403,453 388,477 Driving Range 69,769 73,835 79,500 71,124 80,000 Carts 491,782 432,878 497,099 432,890 480,000 Food & Beverage 497,942 501,439 522,436 487,900 587,223 General & Administrative 5,994 2,255 D 13,701 D General Fund Loan 162,000 168,064 192,000 192,000 164,500 Other Revenue 540,653 34,277 D D D Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 D 109,775 0 TOTAL REVENUES 3,4197792 $2,662,595 2,899,853 $2,750,244 $2,946,744 COST OF GOODS SOLD Pro Shop $150,391 $129,330 $139,125 $129,505 $141,750 Food & Beverage 140,946 145,099 147,496 141,359 205,528 TOTAL COGS 291,337 $274,429 $286,621 $270,864 $347,278 NET REVENUES EXPENDITURES Ooeratina Pro Shop Driving Range Golf Carts Course Maintenance Food & Beverage Sales & Membership General & Administrative Clubhouse Management Fees Capital Subtotal Other & Reserves Debt Service Payment to Interdepartmental Loans Water Fund General Fund Equipment Reserve for Equipment/ClP Subtotal TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE $3,128,455 $2,388,166 $2,613,232 $2,479,380 $2,599,466 $274,778 $231,204 $242,348 $189,323 $157,469 12,163 11,180 18,700 14,720 18,700 157,007 171,529 162,849 190,462 191,362 580,041 497,647 596,320 543,612 590,000 182,739 250,713 195,255 192,671 246,027 162 34,962 46,722 47,015 46,722 205,988 155,193 203,487 217,835 275,036 117,742 102,559 121,330 117,716 121,990 112,293 105,257 107,889 107,889 110,586 260,079 164,872 226,200 226,200 164,500 1,902,992 1,725,116 $1,921,100 $1,847,443 $1,922,392 561,017 $584,887 $581,813 $581,813 $570,894 50,242 50,242 50,124 50,124 50,112 53,707 D 47,093 D D D D 13,102 D D 554,503 27,921 D D D 1,219,469 $663,050 $692,132 $631,937 $621,006 $3,122,461 $2,388,166 $2,613,232 $2,479,380 $2,543,398 $5,994 $0 $0 $0 $56,068 Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Proposed cIP Budget $35 Utility Projects Uses of Funds 7.3% Drainage Projects 5.4% Parks & Recreation Projects 1.3% Municipal Facilities 32.2% Streets & Sidewalks 21.8% CIP Personnel 1.8 % Sources of Funds Grants Designated Reserves 20.5% Sales Tax 15.7% Aquatic Projects 0.5% Major Capital Equipment 2.8% Economic Development 19.9% ids of Obligation 25.5% Impact Fees 0.0% 8.9 %4 Summary of Project Expenditures 2010/2011 Capital Improvement Program Program Street & Sidewalk Projects Drainage Projects Utility Projects Parks & Recreation Projects Aquatic Park Projects Municipal Facility Projects Major Capital Equipment Program Economic Development Projects CIP -Other Total CIP Project Expenditures Project Proposed Estimated Remaining Total To Date 201012011 201112012 Amount Expenditures $30,802,452 $7,738,755 $10,307,520 $21,994,715 $70,843,442 3,442,000 1,903,000 2,355,000 2,750,000 10,450,000 4,498,000 2,595,205 3,999,899 50,538,954 61,632,058 2,287,017 451,500 3,220,141 14,368,850 20,327,508 219,000 2,191,000 345,000 4,545,000 7,300,000 14,871,066 11,417,289 8,561,966 6,202,129 41,052,450 305,000 1,508,282 363,282 0 2,176,564 2,261,361 7,051,577 0 0 9,312,938 839,665 639,803 622,048 955,224 3,056,740 $59,525,561 $35,496,411 $29,774,856 $101,354,872 $226,151,701 Summary of Project Funding 2010/2011 Capital Improvement Program MUNICIPAL FACILITY PROJECTS Permanent Building Maintenance Reserve Funding Proposed Estimated Remaining Total G_0_ Bonds To Date 201 012611 2611/2012 Amount Funds STREET & SIDEWALK PROJECTS 20,800,000 0 1,920,000 0 22,720,000 G_0_ Bonds $18,210,950 $640,000 $0 $3,425,000 $22,275,950 Certificates of Obligation 1,700,000 0 741,000 150,000 2,591,000 Project Savings Reserve 1,318,150 736,010 395,000 0 2,449,160 General Fund Reserve 100,000 150,000 0 0 250,000 Other 1,098,440 700,000 0 0 1,798,440 Grant Funds 18,804,657 1,865,000 1,120,020 1,120,020 22,909,697 Intergovernmental 2,500,000 0 0 0 2,500,000 Future 0 0 0 16,069,195 16,069,195 $43,732,197 $4,091,010 $2,256,020 $20,764,215 $70,843,442 DRAINAGE PROJECTS G_0_ Bonds $540,000 $1,115,000 $1,085,000 $0 $2,740,000 Certificates of Obligation 2,840,000 575,000 0 0 3,415,000 Project Savings Reserve 370,000 145,000 0 0 515,000 Future 0 0 1,100,000 2,680,000 3,780,000 $3,750,000 $1,835,000 $2,185,000 $2,680,000 $10,450,000 UTILITY PROJECTS Certificates of Obligation $2,310,100 $0 $0 $0 $2,310,100 Utility Operations for Capital Projects 971,023 760,000 0 0 1,731,023 Project Savings Reserve 555,000 1,620,000 0 0 2,175,000 Grant Funds 238,482 0 0 0 238,482 Future 0 0 3,060,104 50,513,954 53,574,058 Impact Fees 1,323,395 0 0 0 1,323,395 EPA Surcharge 280,000 0 0 0 280,000 $5,678,000 $2,380,000 $3,060,104 $50,513,954 $611,632,058 PARKS & RECREATION PROJECTS Certificates of Obligation $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 Sales Tax - Park Development 2,159,531 381,500 40,000 759,732 3,340,763 Other 79,346 0 0 0 79,346 Future 0 0 900,800 9,136,125 10,036,925 Grant Funds 1,326,188 70,000 1,927,845 46,441 3,370,474 $3,565,065 $451,500 $2,868,645 $13,442,298 $20,327,508 AQUATIC PARK PROJECTS Expansion Reserve $0 $0 $270,000 $0 $270,000 Future 0 0 75,000 4,545,000 4,620,000 Infrastructure Reserve 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 Certificates of Obligation 225,000 2,125,000 0 0 2,350,000 $225,000 $2,185,000 $345,000 $4,545,000 $7,300,000 MUNICIPAL FACILITY PROJECTS Permanent Building Maintenance Reserve $333,904 $0 $0 $0 $333,904 G_0_ Bonds 0 1,410,000 250,000 0 1,660,000 Certificates of Obligation 20,800,000 0 1,920,000 0 22,720,000 Sales Tax 1,100,000 3,000,000 0 0 4,100,000 Gas Fund Reserves 726,475 0 0 0 726,475 Reserves 1,350,000 0 0 0 1,350,000 Grants 0 153,000 0 0 153,000 Other 2,461,421 1,205,931 139,590 0 3,806,942 Future 0 0 0 6,202,129 6,202,129 $26,771,800 $5,768,931 $2,309,590 $6,202,129 $41,052,450 Summary of Project Funding 2010/2011 Capital Improvement Program CIP PERSONNEL/OTHER Economic Development Sales Tax Reserve Funding Proposed Estimated Remaining Total Grants To Date 201 012611 2611/2012 Amount Funds MAJOR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM 134,658 15,000 0 0 149,658 Certificates of Obligation $130,000 $285,000 $0 $0 $415,000 Information Services Reserve 175,000 388,282 128,282 0 691,564 Other Reserves 0 835,000 0 0 835,000 Other 0 0 235,000 0 235,000 Other $305,000 $1,508,282 $363,282 $0 $2,176,564 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS 0 0 5,135,904 89,146,403 94,282,307 General Fund Reserve $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 Certificates of Obligation 1,000,000 2,500,000 0 0 3,500,000 Other 426,475 0 0 0 426,475 Sales Tax Reserve - Economic Development 500,000 125,000 0 0 625,000 Gas Fund Reserves 1,711,463 0 0 0 1,711,463 General Fund Pay -as- you -go Reserve 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 $6,687,938 $2,625,000 $0 $0 $9,312,938 CIP PERSONNEL/OTHER Economic Development Sales Tax Reserve $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000 Grants 120,000 0 0 0 120,000 Other 134,658 15,000 0 0 149,658 Utility Funds for Operations 264,687 283,470 293,182 298,136 1,139,475 Project Savings Reserves 320,320 341,333 328,866 307,088 1,297,607 Grant Funds $839,665 $639,803 $622,048 $955,224 $3,056,740 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM G_0_ Bonds $18,750,950 $3,165,000 $1,335,000 $3,425,000 $26,675,950 Certificates of Obligation 29,005,100 5,485,000 2,661,000 3,650,000 40,801,100 Sales Tax 3,259,531 3,381,500 40,000 759,732 7,440,763 Utility Operations for Capital Projects 1,235,710 1,043,470 293,182 298,136 2,870,498 Reserves 10,510,312 4,400,625 1,122,148 657,088 16,690,173 Grant Funds 20,489,327 2,088,000 3,047,865 1,166,461 26,791,653 Impact Fees 1,323,395 0 0 0 1,323,395 Other 6,980,340 1,920,931 374,590 0 9,275,861 Future 0 0 5,135,904 89,146,403 94,282,307 Total Project Funding $91,554,665 $21,484,526 $14,009,689 $99,102,820 $226,151,701 Schedule 1 201012011 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg. I.-D- No. Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 2010/2011 2011/2012 Amount Total Continuina Proiects 1 27 Clo ce Court Northeast Loop 820 to Maplewood Ave. $ 700,040 $ 50,000 73 $0 So $ 750,000 2 29 Colorado Blvd Boulevard 26 to Harwood Rd. 130 625,000 0 l3pring Oaks Screening Wall 0 0 IMeado wlakes Drive Bride LH. 820 [TxDO 625,000 3 31 Davis BIvdlMid- Cities Blvd Intersection [TEA-211 1 700,040 1,405,000 1 485,0001 1,520,000 0 01 3,625,000 4 33 Douglas Lane (Hightower Drive to Starnes Road 1 10,691,295 1,250,000 700,000 0 0 1,950,000 5 35 Glenview Dr. Street Lighting Hone Ln. to Diamond Loch 61,000 0 0 0 61,000 6 37 Grand Avenue (LibrarV to Health Markets Access Road 75,000 0 4 1 0 75,000 7 1 39 1 Honey Lane, Phase 1 CD BGJ 187,412 22,745 0 0 210,157 8 41 Mackey Drive (Briley Dr. to Glenview Dr. 320,000 300,000 0 0 620,000 9 43 North Tarrant Pkwy- Street Imp. Davis to Whitley Rd. 18,257,150 0 0 0 18,257,150 45 NRH Park and Ride rCMAQJ 300 0 0 0 300,000 10 47 Rufe Snow Dr. Street & Utility Imp. Karen to 820 885,950 0 0 0 885,950 11 49 Rufe Snow Dr. Street & Utility Im Mid - Cities to H ightlywe r 3,325,000 2,275,000 7,127,000 1,000,000 13,727,000 12 51 Sh ady Grove Rd. Street Im Davis to Cla - Hibbins 1,048,440 100,040 0 0 1,148,440 53 Solar Power School Zone Beacon Upgrades 70 110 0 0 180,000 13 55 Starnes Road Street Imp. RuFe Snow to Crosstimbers 305,000 295,000 4 4 600,000 14 57 Tabor Street Imp- Rufe Snow Dr. to Steven St. 50,000 350,000 0 0 400,000 15 59 Terry Drive Street Imp- Susan Lee Ln. to N. Richland Blvd. 55,000 320,000 0 0 375,000 61 Traffic Light Adaptive System 4 0 4 632,500 16 63 Traffic Si nalization at Davis Boulevard & Creek Yew Drive t6 , 3 235,000 0 0 300,000 17 65 Trinidad Drive Rufe Snow Dr to Holida Ln 120,000 01 1 0 1 1,110,000 Total Continuing Projects $29,902,452 $6,282,745 $8,647,000 $1,000,000 $45,832,197 Preventive Maintenance Projects 66 Preventive Street Maintenance Projects 2014 $900,000 $0 $900,000 67 Preventive Sidewalk Maintenance Pro ects 2011 0 50 040 00 0 0 0 50,000 69 Preventive Street Maintenance Projects 2011 0 600,040 0 0 800,000 Total Preventive Maintenance Projects $900,000 $850,000 $0 $o $1,750,000 New Proiects 18 71 Hone Lane, Phase II CDBG $0 $185,000 19 73 Main Street Streetsca in Project 0 66,000 20 75 Snider Street Extension Pra ect 0 130 21 77 l3pring Oaks Screening Wall 0 225,000 Total New Projects Future Proiects 22 $o Boulevard 26 Widening (I. H- 820 to Precinct Line 23 $2,800,000 1,000,000 1,020,000 840,000 577,400 645,500 485,000 1 1,435,000 10,691,295 Boulevard 26/Harwood Road Intersection 24 0 Hi htower Drive Section C Smithfield to Davis 25 0 Hightower Drive, Section D Ston brooke to Eden 26 0 Hol id ay Lane Street Imp- Al LH. 820 to Dick Lewis 27 840,000 1 820 South Access Im provernents [TxD ❑ 28 1 IMeado wlakes Drive Bride LH. 820 [TxDO 29 1 1 Rufe Snow & Glenview Intersection Improvements 30 1 ISmithfield Road TOD Reconstruction Total Future Projects Total Project Costs $30,000 $o $215,000 230,500 230,500 527,000 1 1 270 020 2,800,050 0 0 225,000 $o $606,010 $1,660,520 51,500,520 $3,767,050 $0 $o $0 $ 2,800,040 $2,800,000 1,000,000 1,020,000 840,000 577,400 645,500 485,000 1 1,435,000 10,691,295 0 0 0 1,400,000 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 840,000 0 0 0 577,400 0 0 0 645,500 ol I ol I ol 1 485,0001 ol ol 01 1 1,435,000 0 k 0 01 1 10,691,295 $o $o $o $19,494,195 $19,494,195 $30,802,452 $ 7,738,755 $ 10,307,520 $21,994,715 $ 70,843,442 Map Pg. I.D. No. Sources of Funds G.O. Bands 2003 Program G.O. Bands 1994 Program G.O. Bands 1985 Program Certificates of Obligation Project Savings Permanent Sidewalk Maintenance Fund Permanent Street Maintenance Fund CDBG Funds TEA - 21 Fundin TxDOT Fundin City of Keller ARRA Stimulus Grant COG Sustainable Development Grant Developer Fundin General Fund Transfer Future Fundina Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 2010/2011 2011/2012 Amount ❑ ❑ 741 395,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,120,020 0 0 Total $19,465,000 2,442,450 368,500 2,591,000 2,449,160 50,000 200,000 425,157 11,900,000 7,802,000 2,500,000 542,500 2,240,040 298,440 1,500,000 16, 069,195 Total Sources of Funds $43,732,197 $4,091,010 $2,256,020 $20,764,215 $70,843,442 Schedule 2 201812011 Drainage Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg. I.D. No. Continuing Proiects Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 201012011 201112012 Amount 1 83 Briarwood Estates Drainage Improvements $1 $55 DD0 $0 $0 2 85 Brookhaven Drive Drainage Improvements 270 10 0 0 3 87 Brockridge Drive Drainage Improvements 120,000 0 0 0 - 89 Channel Cleaning I Street Drainage Imp- 2D10 235 0 0 0 4 91 Heidelburg Court Drainage Improvements 24 96 0 0 5 93 Meadowview Estates Channel Drainage Improvements 300 1 115 DDD 1 085 OQ0 0 6 95 Odell Street Drainage Improvements 585,000 D 0 0 7 1 97 Plumwood Drive Drainage Improvements 13 DDQ 52 DDD 0 0 8 1 99 1 Steeple Ridge Drainage Improvements 165 DDQ D 0 0 Total Continuing Projects $3,442,000 $1,328,000 $1,085,000 $0 Total $1,785,000 280,000 120,000 235,000 120,000 2,500,000 585,000 65,000 165,000 $5,855,000 New Projects 1 9 1101 IMeadow Creek Road Drainage 0 1103 Meadow Road Drainage Improvements ments $ 0 350,000 0 0 350,000 Total New Projects $0 $575,000 $0 $0 $575,000 Future Proiects - - Channel Cleaning 1 Street Drainage Imp- 2011 $0 $0 $0 $300 11 - Crane Road 1 Main Street Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 360 12 - Iron Horse Golf Course Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 1 13 - Jackie Lee Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 780,000 14 - Little Bear Creek LB-1 Improvements* 0 0 17D,000 70 15 - Odell Channel Im rovements D 0 0 50000 16 - Ston brooke Channel Drainage Im rovements 0 0 1 100 QQO 1FD DQ0 Total Future Projects Total Project Costs Sources of Funds $300,000 360,000 1,030,000 780,000 240,000 50,000 1,260,000 $0 $0 $1,270,000 $2,750,000 $4,020,000 Certificates of Obligation 2,840,000 575,DDD $3,442,000 $1,903,000 $2,355,000 $2,750,000 $10,460,000 G.O. Bonds 2003 Program $300,000 $1,115,DDQ $1,085,000 $0 Certificates of Obligation 2,840,000 575,DDD 0 0 G.O. Bonds 1994 Program' 165,500 D 0 0 G.O. Bonds 1965 Program' 74 D 0 0 Project Savings 370 145 0 0 Future Projects Q D 1,10D,000 2, 0,000 $2,500,000 3,415,000 165,500 74,500 515,000 3,780,000 Total Sources of Funds $3,760,000 $1,836,000 $2,185,000 $2,680,000 $10,460,000 * Funding allocated fDr Lffle Bear Creek (LB-1) Improvements Schedule 3 2010/2011 Utility Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg. I.D. No. Continuina Proiects Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 201012091 201112012 Amount Total $1,200,000 1,000,000 1,368,000 650,000 520,000 1,130,000 125,000 55,000 - 111 Big Fossil Creek WastewaterOutfall $500,000 $0 $675,000 $25,000 1 113 IH 820 Ufili Ad. (interchange to Meadowlakes 1,000,000 0 0 0 2 115 Lift Station Expansion Boulevard 26 at Precinct Line 1,368,000 0 0 0 - 117 Sanitary Sewer System Assessment 280,000 370,000 0 0 3 119 Water Line Boulevard 261Cardinal Lane 40,000 415,205 64,795 0 4 121 Water Line (Holiday Lane and Iron Horse Blvd. 1,130,000 0 0 0 5 1123IWater Line Precinct LineTFRA Pum p Station 125,000 1 01 0 0 6 1125IWestem Center Water Facility Expansion 55,000 1 01 0 0 Total Continuing Projects New Proiects $4,498,000 $785,205 $739,795 $25,000 $6,048,000 $900,000 380,000 380,000 350,000 7 127 Bursey Elevated Tank Rehabilitation $0 $0 $200,000 $0 - 128 Misc. Water/Sewer Main Re lacement 2011 D 0 0 0 9 129 Small Water Main Replacements 2011 D M35D,DOO 0 0 10 130 Telemetri c Water Meter Annual Maintenance 201'1 D 0 0 0 Total New Projects Future Sewer Proiects $0 $1,810,000 $200,000 $0 $2,010,000 - Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main Lines $0 $0 $1,300,000 $200,000 8 Line 1- 21" W W Relief Line along Loop 820 0 0 0 107,675 9 Line 10- 24" WW Line along Richland Plaza Dr 0 0 0 605,270 10 Line 11- 12' WW Line along Charles St 0 0 0 670,784 11 Line 12- 15" WW Line East along Whitfield Ct 0 0 0 1,548,624 12 Line 14- 30" WW Line along Oak Ridge Terrace D 0 0 565,958 13 Line 15- 12" WW Line East of Cummings 0 01 0 1 406,896 14 Line 16- 12715" WW Line along Thom bird Rd D 0 0 464,218 15 Line 17- 15" WW Line along Jennings Dr D 0 0 500,976 16 Line 18- 12" WW Line along Diamond Loch W D 0 0 300,392 17 Line 3- 30" W W Relief Line along Iron Horse Blvd D 0 0 748,944 18 Line 4- 18" W W Line along Little Ranch Rd D 0 0 1,813,224 19 Line 5- 2T' WW Line going north from Boulevard 26 D 0 0 1,431,360 20 Line 7- 27" WW Line going south from Boulevard 26 D 0 0 302,400 21 Line 8- Parallel 18" WW along Simmons Rd 0 0 0 1,181,783 22 Line 9 - 12" WW Line along Rumfield and Redwood D 0 0 1,450,848 Miscellaneous Sewer Line Rehabilitation 0 0 380,000 3,090,000 $1,500,000 107,675 605,270 670,784 1,548,624 565,958 406,896 464,218 500,976 300,392 748,944 1,813,224 1,431,360 302,400 1,181,783 1,450,848 3,470,000 Total Future Sewer Projects $0 $0 $1,680,000 $15,389,352 $17,069,352 Schedule 3 2010/2011 Utility Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg. I.D. No. Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 201012011 2011/2012 Amount Total Future Water Proiects - $2,310,100 Water Storage Tank Site and Storage Facility Upgrades $0 $0 $0 120,000 23 0 Johnson Booster Pump Station Expansion 0 0 0 700,000 24 TXD ©T Line 1- 24" WL along Mid- Cities Blvd 0 0 0 1,460,390 25 0 Line 10- Add 5 MG GST at Watauga PS 0 0 0 5,174,400 26 0 Line 11- 8" WL from Davis Blvd 0 0 163,772 0 27 Line 12- 8" WL from existing 24" WL in Hightower Dr 0 0 163,772 0 28 Line 13- Install 3 pressure reducing stations; Hwy 377 0 0 1 322,5601 0 29 Line 14- Offsite water supply improvements 0 0 0 3,360,000 30 Line 15- 16" WL along N. Tarrant Pkwy 0 0 0 318,470 31 Line 16- 16" WL along Smithfield Rd 0 0 0 255,680 32 Line 17- 16" WL Hightower south along Meadow Rd 0 0 0 1,025,993 33 Line 18- 12" WL along Eagle Crest Dr 0 0 0 206,379 34 Line 19- 16" WL Rom existing 16" WL along Janetta Dr 0 0 0 1,150,330 35 Line 2- 30" WL along Mid - Cities Blvd 0 0 0 2,243,828 36 Line 20- 12" WL from Corona Dr 0 0 0 474,768 37 Line 21- 12' WL along Glenview Dr 0 0 0 737,251 38 Line 22- Expand pumping capacity at Watauga PS 0 0 0 2,016,000 - Line 23- Miscellaneous Water Line Rehabilitation 0 0 0 2,688,000 39 Line 24- 16" WL Rom Davis Blvd 0 0 0 640,147 40 Line 25- Replace existing 8" WL along Boulevard 26 0 0 0 490,896 41 Line 26- Replace 12" along Precinct Line Rd. 0 0 0 1,662,091 42 Line 27- New 12' WL from Precinct Line Rd 0 0 0 739,267 - Line 28- Miscellaneous Water Line Rehabilitation 0 0 0 2,016,000 43 Line 8- 12' WL across Loop 820 0 0 0 190,440 44 Line 9- 12' WL south from Janetta Dr along Holiday Ln 0 0 0 664,272 45 Shady Grove 2 MG Elevated Storage Tank 0 0 0 950,000 - Miscellaneous Water Main Replacement 0 0 380,000 3,040,000 Telemetric Water Meter Annual Maintenance 0 0 350,000 2,800,000 Total Future Water Projects Total Project Costs Sources of Funds $120,000 700,000 1,460,390 5,174,400 163,772 163,772 322,560 3,360,000 318,470 255,680 1,025,993 206,379 1,150,330 2,243,828 474,768 737,251 2,016,000 2,688,000 640,147 490,896 1,662,091 739,267 2,016,000 190,440 664,272 950,000 3,420,000 3,150,000 $0 $0 $1,380,104 $35,124,602 $36,504,706 $4,498,000 $2,595,205 $3,999,899 $50,538,954 $61,632,058 Certificates of Obligation $2,310,100 $0 $0 $0 Utility rations for Capital Projects 971,023 760,000 0 0 Project Savings 555,000 1,620,000 0 0 TXD ©T 238,482 0 0 0 EPA Surcharge 280,000 0 0 0 Impact Fees 1,323,395 0 0 0 Future Projects 0 0 1 3,060,104 1 50,513,954 $2,310,100 1,731,023 2,175,000 238,482 280,000 1,323,395 53,574,058 Total Sources of Funds $5,678,000 $2,380,000 $3,060,104 $50,513,954 $61,632,058 Schedule 4 201012011 Park and Recreation Capital Projects Budget Summary Mao Pg. ID No. Continuina Proiects Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 2010/2011 2011/2012 Amount Total $729,183 928,000 1,600,000 164,400 37,500 250,000 90,000 120,000 2,400,000 55,000 3,500,000 1 141 Boulevard 26 Mufti -Use Trail PSTEAJ 5729,183 $0 $0 $o 2 143 Calloway Branch Trail Development [CMAQJ 250,438 0 642,562 35,000 - 145 Central West Neighborhood Park' 0 0 0 1,600,000 3 147 Davis Boulevard Streetsca a [TxDOTI 16.4,400 0 0 0 4 149 Education and Interpretative Si na a 27,500 10,000 0 0 5 151 Fossil Creek Area Revital Aion Project 1000 0 240,000 0 - 153 Founders and Le Recognition Program 90,co0 0 0 0 6 155 Lighting at Tipps Canine Hollow 120,000 0 500,000 0 7 157 Little Bear Creek Trail Development ISTEA 865,496 0 0 97,725 15 159 Trail Si na a and Identification 30 000 A25 g 0 8 161 Walker's Creek Park Phase 2 Adult Softball 0 3,500,000 Total Continuing Projects New Proiects $2,287,017 ;35,000 ;2,319,349 ;5,232,725 ;9,874,083 $50,000 70,000 161,500 100,000 35,000 Total New Projects Future Proiects $o $496,500 So $0 $416,500 - 162 Community Garden $0 $ 50,000 $0 $0 10 163 Conversion to Solar Power for City Entry Way Sign 0 70,000 0 0 - 164 Park Infrastructure Maintenance 011 0 161 0 0 - 165 Playground and Bleacher Shade 2011 0 100,000 0 0 9 167 Richland Tennis Center Asset Management 2011 0 35,000 0 0 Total New Projects Future Proiects $o $496,500 So $0 $416,500 - $ - 2007 Park Master Plan Future Priorities $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 10 40,000 Adventure World PIaVqrou nd Renovation 0 0 0 500 - Grant Funds Annual Tree Planting 0 0 35,000 105,000 - - Asset Management - Park Infrastructure 0 0 11500 281,125 11 Cross Timbers Park Development Phase II 0 0 0 0 12 Disc Golf Course at Fossil Creek Park 0 0 250.000 0 13 Little Bear Creek Community Park 0 0 0 0 14 Northfield Park Redevelopment 0 0 500,000 4,500,000 - ISkateboard Park 0 0 0 750,000 15 JStonybrooke Neighborhood Park 0 0 0 0 $3,000,000 500,000 140,000 396,925 0 250,000 0 5,000,000 750,000 0 Total Future Projects $o $o ;900,800 ;9,936,125 $10,036,925 Total Project Costs $2,287,097 $451,500 $3,220,149 $14,368,850 $20,327,508 Sources of Funds Certificates of Obligations $ - $ - $ - $ 3,500,000 Sales Tax Reserve for CIP 2,159,531 381,500 40,000 759,732 Other 79,346 0 0 0 Grant Funds 1 70 000 $1 46 Future Funding 0 - $900,800 9,136,125 $3,500,000 $3,340,763 $79,346 3,370,474 10,036,925 Total Sources of Funds $ 3,565,065 $ 451,500 $ 2,868,645 $13,442,298 $ 20,327,508 1. Pmjecr To Date amount retlecls the projects progress as approved by Council. PARR Projects additional land acquisMon costs, which have been discussed with Council, though no fomnal revuinns has been submitted at this time. The re%isian will be submited once the full impact has been ascertained. The Long Range Plan re9ects the antci ated increase in land acquisition- 2. Projects that maybe included in the '2007 Pack Raster Plan Future Priorities' include, not in any specific order, Norich Park Phase II, Cross Timbers Phase II, Amphitheater, Skateboard Park, 6olanic Garden, Fossil Creek Improvements, and Neighborhood Park in the Central East Area - AddWonal funds will be allocated in future years to complete al the priorities. Schedule 5 201012011 Aquatic Park Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pa.. Project Adopted Estimated Remaining ID No. To Date 201012011 201112012 Amount Total Continuing Projects 1 1 11731 Food Service Building $0 $0 $0 $ 0 $0 $2,191,000 2 174 New Attraction 75,000 1 $533,000 Future Funding 1 1,700,000 Total Continuing Projects $219,000 $2,131,000 $0 $0 $2,350,000 0 0 New Projects 1,045,000 5 Strategic Plan - Parkin Lot 0 - 11751NRH20 General Facility Im rovement 2011 $0 $fiD 000 $0 $D $60,000 Total New Projects $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 Future Proiects Total Future Projects Total Project Costs Sources of Funds $1,500,000 $75,000 $2,000,000 1,045,000 270,000 $0 $0 Aqua Quest $0 $0 $0 $1 500 OdD $219,000 $2,191,000 Enterprise & Strategic Development Update 0 0 75,000 - 3 Future Funding Multi-Purpose Event Area 0 0 0 2 000 ODD 4 Phase IV Attraction 0 0 0 1,045,000 5 Strategic Plan - Parkin Lot 0 0 27D 000 0 Total Future Projects Total Project Costs Sources of Funds $1,500,000 $75,000 $2,000,000 1,045,000 270,000 $0 $0 $345,000 $4,545,000 $4,890,000 Aquatic Park Infrastructure Reserve $219,000 $2,191,000 $345,000 $4,545,000 $7,300,000 Aquatic Park Expansion Reserve Aquatic Park Infrastructure Reserve Certificates of Obligation Future Funding $0 $270 000 $0 $270,000 fi{3,000 0 0 60,000 2 125 000 0 D 2,350,000 0 75,000 4,545,000 4,620,000 $225 $2,185,000 $345,000 $4,545 $7,300,000 Map Pa.. ID No. Continuina Proiects Schedule 6 2010/2011 Municipal Facility Capital Projects Budget Summary Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 2010/2011 201112012 Amount Total 1 161 8201ideni - C Hall Modifications $1 $0 $0 $0 2 182 820 Wideni - Professional Services 300 0 0 0 3 163 Commu ity Center - South of Loop 820 14 Q 2 0 4 184 Davis Boulevard Property Aoquisibon-TOD Area 2 249 779 0 0 - 185 Facility Repairs from Snow Damage 69 27 0 0 5 186 JNRH Animal Ado tion Center 452 835 1 1 249 500 0 6 187 INRH Recreation Center CrIF #2 10 1 9 fi75 ODD 4 735 DDO 0 - 166IRoofing & Building Consultant 70 1 0 Total Continuing Projects $14,607,162 $11,264,289 $8,311,966 $0 Permanent Building Maintenance Proiects Total Permanent Building Maintenance Projects New Proiects $72 273 189 Flooring Replacement 2010 $0 $49000 $72,273 147 7 190 HVAC Replacement 2010 O 47 1 Q Q 0 147,195 191 1 ntehor /Exterior Renovations 201 Q Q 57 000 O Total Permanent Building Maintenance Projects New Proiects $72 273 $0 $0 $0 $49000 $72,273 147 7 Q Improvements EECBDG O 47 1 Q Q 0 147,195 44 436 11 nstallation of a Solar Photovoltaic System ARRA Q 57 000 O Q 44,436 $263,904 $0 $0 $0 $263,904 Total New Projects Future Proiects $0 $153,000 $0 $1,050,000 300,000 2,341,590 2,300,000 97,067 3,014,760 25,010,000 70,000 $34,183,417 $Q $49,000 0 47,000 Q 57,000 $0 $153,000 - 192 De Lamp City Buildings ARPA $0 $49000 $0 7 1 1931EnerwConservabon Improvements EECBDG 0 47 1 O Q 0 - 194 11 nstallation of a Solar Photovoltaic System ARRA 0 57 000 1 O Total New Projects Future Proiects $0 $153,000 $0 $1,050,000 300,000 2,341,590 2,300,000 97,067 3,014,760 25,010,000 70,000 $34,183,417 $Q $49,000 0 47,000 Q 57,000 $0 $153,000 - Q Emerg Op Center Q $ $250,000 001 Q 7 0 2 North Richland Hills Safe Town � Q 0 - - Public Safe Regional Tonal Trainin Facili 1 Total Future Projects Total Project Costs Sources of Funds S 2,447,937 3,754,192 $0 $0 $250,000 $6,202,129 $6,452,129 $14,871,066 $11,417,289 $8,561,966 $6,202,129 $41,052,450 Permanent Building Services Fund $333 0 0 G.O. Bonds Future Issuance 2003 P' ram 0 1 250 DDD 0 Certificates of Obligation ax Increment Financing District 20 SOD OQQ Q 0 0 Certificates of Obligations 0 Q 1,920 0 Sales Tax 1 1 DO DDQ 3 0 0 Commercial Loan 1 0 0 0 Gas Development Fund Reserves 726 Q 0 0 General Fund Designated Reserves 1,350,000 Q 0 0 onations un Animal Control Fund Raising Campaign 0 1 0 0 Grant Funds 0 153 OOD 0 0 Other 351,982 27,085 139,590 0 Future Projects 0 Q 0 6 $333,904 1,660,000 20,800,000 1,920,000 4,100,000 1,573,525 726,475 1,350,000 535,914 1,178,846 153,000 518,657 6,202,129 Total Sources of Funds $26,771,800 $5,768,931 $2,309,590 $6,202,129 $41,052,450 Q 250 0 Q $ $250,000 001 Q Q 0 0 2 2447 937 Q 0 0 3 3 $14,871,066 $11,417,289 $8,561,966 $6,202,129 $41,052,450 Permanent Building Services Fund $333 0 0 G.O. Bonds Future Issuance 2003 P' ram 0 1 250 DDD 0 Certificates of Obligation ax Increment Financing District 20 SOD OQQ Q 0 0 Certificates of Obligations 0 Q 1,920 0 Sales Tax 1 1 DO DDQ 3 0 0 Commercial Loan 1 0 0 0 Gas Development Fund Reserves 726 Q 0 0 General Fund Designated Reserves 1,350,000 Q 0 0 onations un Animal Control Fund Raising Campaign 0 1 0 0 Grant Funds 0 153 OOD 0 0 Other 351,982 27,085 139,590 0 Future Projects 0 Q 0 6 $333,904 1,660,000 20,800,000 1,920,000 4,100,000 1,573,525 726,475 1,350,000 535,914 1,178,846 153,000 518,657 6,202,129 Total Sources of Funds $26,771,800 $5,768,931 $2,309,590 $6,202,129 $41,052,450 $333,904 1,660,000 20,800,000 1,920,000 4,100,000 1,573,525 726,475 1,350,000 535,914 1,178,846 153,000 518,657 6,202,129 Total Sources of Funds $26,771,800 $5,768,931 $2,309,590 $6,202,129 $41,052,450 Schedule 7 201012011 Major Equipment Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg- LD No. Continuing Proiects Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 2010/2011 201112012 Amount Total Total Continuing Projects New Proiects $130,000 95,000 $305,000 $95,000 $0 $0 $400,000 199 Aerial Bucket Truck Replacement Unit #6D4 (201 0) - $130,000 $0 $0 $D 0 20DIDump Truck Replacement Unit 680 2009 O 95 000 0 D $O 201 LenSec Security Camera System 175,000 O 0 0 Total Continuing Projects New Proiects $130,000 95,000 $305,000 $95,000 $0 $0 $400,000 $95,000 95,000 100,000 256,564 175,000 85,000 425,000 60,000 250,000 Total New Projects 202 Dump Truck Replacement Unit 682 2011 $0 $95 DOO $0 $0 0 203 Dump Truck Replacement Unit 690 2011 0 95 0 0 $O 204 GPS Monument Update Phase II 0 100 DOO 0 0 Total Sources of Funds $305,000 $1,508,282 $363,282 $0 $2,176,564 205 Police Department Toughbook Replacement 0 128,282 128,282 0 $235,000 206 Replacement of Quantix POS Software for NRH2O 0 175 0 O Sources of Funds 207 Replacement of Storage Area Network 0 85 000 0 0 208 SCADA Control Microsystems Upgrades 0 425 ODO 0 0 209 Traffic Signal Emergency Auxiliary Power 0 60,000 0 0 21 D Video Vehicle Detection System in Traffic Si nals 0 250 000 0 0 $95,000 95,000 100,000 256,564 175,000 85,000 425,000 60,000 250,000 Total New Projects $0 $1,413,282 $128,282 $0 $1,541,564 Future Projects 0 835,000 0 0 Information Services Reserve Directional Boring Machine Re lacement $ $O $235 $O $2 3 5,000 0 0 0 O 0 Total Sources of Funds $305,000 $1,508,282 $363,282 $0 $2,176,564 Total Future Projects $0 $0 $235,000 $0 $235,000 Total Project Costs $305,000 $1,508,282 $363,282 $0 $2,176,564 Sources of Funds Certificates of Obligation $130 $285 $0 $O $415,000 835,000 691,564 235,000 Project Savings 0 835,000 0 0 Information Services Reserve 175 ODD 388 128 282 D Future Projects 0 0 235,000 0 Total Sources of Funds $305,000 $1,508,282 $363,282 $0 $2,176,564 Schedule 8 201012011 Economic Development Capital Projects Budget Summary Mai) PAC. ID No. Continuina Proiects Project Adopted Estimated Remaining To Date 2010/2011 201112012 Amount $375,000 20,000 2,747,000 424,577 50,000 10,000 3,350,000 $0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a Total $ 450,000 200,000 3,000,000 1,937,938 $100,000 50,000 3,500,000 1 215 Boulevard 26 Intersection Imp. (@ Rodger Line) $75,000 - 217 Business Improvement and Growth (BIG) Program 180,000 2 219 Commercial Redevelopment Program 253,000 - 221 Loop 820 Redevelopment 1,513,361 - 222 SH 121/183 Bedford Euless Exit - Analysis & Concept Plan 50,000 - 1223 1 Sign Removal Assistance Program 40,000 3 12251TIF 1 Expansion - Intersection Imp.fUtility Burial 150,000 Total Continuing Projects $2,261,361 $6,976,577 $0 $0 $9,237,938 New Projects - 226 WayFnder Signs $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $75,000 Total New Projects Total Project Costs Sources of Funds $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $75,000 $2,261,361 $7,051,577 $0 $0 $9,312,938 General Fund Reserves $3,000,000 Certificates of Obligation 1,000,000 Commerical Loan 426,475 Sales Tax Reserve for Economic Development 500,000 Gas Fund Reserves {designated for ED activities} 1,711,463 Pay -as -you -go Reserve for Capital Improvements 50,000 $0 $0 $0 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 $3,000,000 3,500,000 426,475 625,000 1,711,463 50,000 ........... ............................... Total Sources of Funds $6,687,938 $2,625,000 $0 $0 $9,312,938 Schedule 9 201012011 CIP - Other Budget Summary Mao PA. Project Adopted Estimated Remaining - Utility Construction Personnel No. To Date 201012611 2011/2012 Amount Total Continuing Projects 228 1 Long Term E.. Efficiency EECBG ARRA $120,000 50 $0 $0 $120,000 229 INeighborhood Initiative Program 1 134,658 15 flfl0 011 0 149,658 Total Continuing Projects $254,658 $15.000 $0 $0 $269,658 Future Projects Neighborhood Revitalization- Enterprise Land Mgmt. $0 SO $0 $350,000 $350,000 Total Future Projects $0 so $0 $350,000 350,000 Total Project Costs $254,658 $15.000 $Q $350,000 $619,658 CIP Personnel - General CIP Personnel $ CIP Personnel - Utility Construction Personnel - Utility Munici al Facilities Pro ect Fundin Utili Construction Pro ect Fundin ` $388,470 398,182 408,136 1,564,475 337,254 345,685 354,327 1,366,203 764,079 783,181 802,760 3,081,404 105,000 105,000 110,000 (425,000) 760,004 800,000 850,000 (3,150,000) Total CIP Personnel Costs $585,007 $624,803 $622,048 $605,224 $2,437,082 Total CIP - Other and Personnel Costs $839,665 $639,803 $622,048 $955,224 $3,056,740 Sources of Funds Economic Development Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000 Grants -EECBG (AR RA) 120,000 0 0 0 120,000 Other 134,658 15 0 0 149,658 Project Savings and Interest Income 264,687 283,470 293,182 298,136 1,139,475 - Utility Reserves and Interest Income 320,320 341,333 328,866 307,088 1,297,607 Total Sources of Funds $839,665 $639,803 $622,048 $955,224 $3,056,740 Portions of General CIP Personnel and Utility Construction Personnel are funded from specific projects Schedule 10 200912010 Budget Revisions Budget Summary Pg. No. Streit & Sidewalk Proiect% Project Adopted Revision To Date 2009/2010 2009/2010 232 Briley Drive (Lariat Tr. to Rufe Snow)' $70,000 $400,000 ($200,000) $200,000 $o Floorin g Replacement 2010 $270,000 233 Charles St. Offske Drainage Imp (CDBG -R10)" 0 0 65,000 65,000 0 Roofing & Building Consultant 65,000 234 Colorado Blvd Boulevard 26 to Harwood Road 80,000 620,000 75,000 545,000 0 625,000 235 Solar Power School Zone Beacon Upgrades 0 0 70,000 70,000 110,000 $120,000 180,000 236 Traffic Signal Light Adaplive System 0 270,000 362,500 632,500 0 $14,244 632,500 237 Yarmouth Avenue (Mid -Cities to Newcastle)' 50,000 420,000 80,000 500,000 0 $2,686,169 550,000 Total Street & Sidewalk Projects $ 200,000 $ 1,710,000 $ 302,590 $ 2,012,504 $ 119,900 :2,322,500 Drainage Projects 238 1 Odell Street Drain age Im rovements' $110,000 $470,000 $5,000 $475,000 $o $585,000 Total Drainage Projects $110,000 $470,000 $5,000 $475,000 so $585,000 Utlli Pro acts 239 Johnson Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation" $0 $120,000 $13,000 $133,000 $o $133,000 Total Utility Projects $0 $120,000 $13,000 $133,000 so $133,000 Parks & Recreation Projects 240 1 Grand Avenue Park Plaza" $100,000 $200,000 $34,566 $234,566 $0 $334,566 Total Parks & Recreation Projects $100,000 $200,000 $34,566 $234,566 $0 $334,556 Municinal Facilitv Capital Proinctc 241 Davis Blvd. Property Aoquisition - TOD Area $1,587,497 242 Facility Repairs from Snow Damage 0 243 Floorin g Replacement 2010 0 244 HVAC Replacement 2010 0 245 Interior IExtericr Renovations 2010 0 246 Roofing & Building Consultant 0 247 Public Works Dry Materials Storage Facility" 0 i Total Municipal Facility Projects Ma for Can Ital En ui nmant Protects $360,000 $300,000 0 69,982 47,273 25,000 112,000 35,195 42,852 1,584 0 70,000 0 86,455 200912010 Revised Remaining Budget Amount Total $660,000 $52,503 $2,300,000 97,067 72,273 147,195 44,436 70,000 86,455 69,982 27,085 72,273 0 147,195 0 44,436 0 70,000 0 86,455 1 0 $1,587,497 $562,125 $588,216 $1,150,341 $79,588 $2,817,426 $245,000 $o 509,819 57,681 200000 23,129 246 Ambulance Replacement Unit 946 [2010]" $0 249 Fire Engine Replacement [Unit 933]" 0 250 Replacement of Automated Ticket Writers" 0 Total Major Capital Projects $0 $954,819 $80,810 $245,000 $o $245,000 567,500 0 567,500 223,129 0 223,129 $1,035,629 $0 $1,035,629 Economic Development Projects $240,000 Certificates of Obligation 550,000 Federal /State Grants 0 Other 2511 Loop 820 Redevelopment $0 $0 $1,513,361 $1,513,361 $424,577 $1,937,938 Total Economic Development Projects $0 $0 $1,513,361 $1,513,361 $424,577 $1,937,938 Other Projects 252 Long Term Energy Efficiency $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $o $120,000 253 Neigh borh ood Initiative Program 14,244 91,698 1 28,716 120,414 0 134,658 Total Other Projects $14,244 $91,698 $148,716 $240,414 so $254,658 Total Project Costs $2,011,741 $4,108,642 $2,686,169 $ 6,794,811 $ 614,165 $ 9,420,717 Sources of Funds G.O. Bonds $240,000 Certificates of Obligation 550,000 Federal /State Grants 0 Other 123,896 Commercial Loan 0 Gas Development Fund 2,000,000 Park Sales Tax 300,000 Court Technology Reserves 0 Reserves 51,865 $1,600,000 ($395,000) 765,000 (106,250) 0 911,250 0 167,199 0 2,000,000 0 237,938 0 0 200,000 23,129 392,125 132,480 $1,205,000 $o $1,445,000 1,208,750 911,250 318,180 2,000,000 2,237,938 300,000 223,129 776,470 658,750 D 911,250 0 167,199 27,085 2,000,000 0 237,938 0 0 223,129 0 724,605 1 D Total Sources of Funds $ 3,265,761 $3,157,125 $ 2,970,746 $ 6,127,871 $27,085 $ 9,420,717 Note: " Projects completing in FY2009.10 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Budget Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Mark Mills Agenda No. F.2 Subject: GN 2010 -068 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2010 - Ordinance No. 3112 Summary Council is requested to consider the adoption of an ordinance setting the maintenance and operations tax rate for Tax Year 2010 at 37.021' 9¢ and the debt service tax rate at 19.9781 ¢, for total tax rate of 57¢ per $100 valuation General Description The Notice of Effective Tax Rate was published in the Star Telegram newspaper on August 10, 2010 and the notice of public hearing on the tax rate on August 11, 2010, in accordance with State law. In addition, the notice of public hearing on the tax rate and the notice of vote on the tax rate were posted on the City's website and carried on Citicable in accordance with State law. The public hearing on the tax rate was held on Monday, August 23, 2010 during the regularly scheduled Council meeting even though no public hearings were required by law as the proposed tax rate was lower than both the effective rate and the rollback rate. The proposed 2010/2011 property tax rate for the City of North Richland Hills is 57¢ per $100 of valuation. If approved, this will be the 18 consecutive year with a 57¢ tax rate. The proposed rate of 57¢ is 5.5% lower in comparison to the effective tax rate of 60.3323¢. The proposed rate of 57¢ is distributed into two parts as follows: • 37.0219¢ for the purposes of maintenance and operations • 19.97810 for the payment of principal and interest on debt of the City Adoption of Ordinance No. 3112 would set the tax rate for Fiscal Year 2010111 (Tax Year 2010) at 57¢ per $100 valuation. During the 81 Session of the Texas State Legislature, HB 2291 was passed which requires specific language to be included in the ordinance adopting the tax rate if the ordinance sets a tax rate that will impose an amount of taxes for maintenance and operations that exceeds the taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year. The 57¢ tax rate, if adopted, would impose less total property taxes than in the previous year, however, it will impose a greater amount for maintenance and operations. Therefore the language specified in HB 2291 will be required in the ordinance. Recommendation Approval of Ordinance No. 3112, setting the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 tax rate for maintenance and operations at 37.0219¢ per $100 of valuation, the tax rate for the interest and sinking fund at 19.97810 per $100 of valuation, for a total tax rate of 57¢ per $100 of valuation. N R _ ` ORDINANCE NO. 3112 AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR THE 201012011 TAX YEAR. WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has followed the procedures established by the Property Tax Code, including the publishing and posting of required notices and the holding of required public hearings; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has approved separately each of the two components of the tax rate hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT there shall be and there is hereby levied the following taxes on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of valuation on all taxable property within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, to be assessed and collected for the year 2010/2011 for the purposes hereinafter stipulated, to -wit: (a) For operations and maintenance levied on the $100.00 valuation: $0.370219; and (b) For the interest and sinking fund levied on the $100.00 valuation: $0.199781. TOTAL: $0.570000 SECTION 2. THAT HB 2291, passed during the 81 Session of the Texas State Legislature, requires the following language to be included in an ordinance adopting a tax rate that will impose an amount of taxes for maintenance and operations that exceeds the taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year: THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE. THE TAX RATE WILL EFFECTIVELY BE RAISED BY 4.35 PERCENT AND WILL RAISE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS ON A $100,000 HOME BY APPROXIMATELY $16.10. SECTION 3. THAT the total tax rate of $0.570000 will impose less total property taxes than the preceding year, generating less total revenue from property tax in Fiscal Year 2010111 in comparison to Fiscal Year 2009110. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 13th day of September, 2010. 011 Was] A LI IQ A 0:10 [$]:1 W,1►1 11:1141 -1 Oscar Trevino, Mayor Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney 1 -1 ;j a:t67T1 =1 B1_lt't 11OI0161 ►10 =1 ►16 Mark C. Mills, Budget Director CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Budget Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Mark Mills Agenda No. F.3 Subject: G 2 010-0 69 Approval and Ratification of the 2010 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2010 -027 Summary Consider the approval of a resolution accepting and ratifying the Fiscal Year 2010111 (Tax year 2010) Certified Roll. General Description Tarrant Appraisal District provided the City with the 2010 Certified Tax Roll information. This includes the most current appraisal information; exemptions for disabled veterans, persons over 65, homestead and disabled persons; tax ceilings for persons over 65 and disabled persons; abatement value losses; freeport inventory value loss; and agricultural value lost. These values also include new construction, the minimum value of properties still under protest, and the estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties. The certified value is the amount used to calculate the effective tax rate and property tax revenues for fiscal year 2010/11 budget. The certified values for the City of North Richland Hills are $3,602,317,711, which includes $20,049,853 in taxable new construction. This new construction includes $17,622,855 in taxable residential new construction and $2,426,968 in commercial new construction. The certified values for the City of North Richland Hills are broken down into the following categories: Residential $2,271,495,644 Commercial* 1,306,479,264 Industrial* 52,987,899 Minerals 3,679,290 Agrigulture 107,433 Cases Before ARB ** (108,106,061) Cases Before Estimated Minimum Value ** 75,674,242 Certified Value $3,602,317,711 * - Includes Real Estate and Business Personal Property ** - Includes all property types Also included in the certified values received from the Tarrant Appraisal District is information on the average value of a single family residence within North Richland Hills. Excluding those properties under protest at the time the certified roll was issued, the average value of a single family residence in North Richland Hills is $149,482. This is a decrease of $1,380 compared to the current year's average single family residence value of $150,862. It is recommended the certified tax roll be accepted and ratified by the City Council. Recommendation Approval of Resolution 2010 -027 accepting and ratifying the Fiscal Year 2010111 (Tax Year 2010) Certified Tax Ro ll. N R H RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -027 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 2010 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of $3,602,317,711, including minimum value of properties pending disposition before Appraisal Review Board and the estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approve same on September 13, 2010. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT the approval of said Tax Rolls received from Tarrant Appraisal District in July 2010, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 2010 and it is hereby in all thing adopted and approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 13th day of September, 2010. Is] I as] Z KOI 11: 111111 0141:1 W_1 ki 11l:l 14161 e Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 1_1> > : 116] ►1 =1 b1_h't tel 70]:1 k►, Ii1►19l 1 =15H_141 CA George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mark C. Mills, Budget Director /1+ TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 25 JUL 2010 2010 Certified Appraisal Roll Valuation Summary I, Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser for the Tarrant Appraisal District, to the best of my ability do solemnly swear that the attached is that portion of the appraisal roll of the Tarrant Appraisal District which lists property taxable by the above named entity and constitutes their certified appraisal roll. APPRAISED VALUE (Considers value Caps) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > $ 4,392,354,625 Absolute Exemption $ 260,429,854 Cases before ARB $ 113,500,396 Incompletes $ 14,236,939 Deferred, Special Use, and Partial Exemptions $ 491,561,120 See Totals Report for breakdown of each Exemption NET TAXABLE VALUE---------- - - -- ---------- - - - - -> $ Appraised value minus Absolute Exemption amount, minus ARB amount, minus Incompletes, minus Deferred, Special Use and Partial Exemptions to equal the NTV. ESTIMATED NET TAXABLE VALUE--- - - - - -- ----- - - - --> $ Including suggested values to be used for pending A.R.B, accounts (see page two), and Incomplete accounts (see page three). Jeff Law ."Chief r 3,512,626,316 3,602,317,711 Page 1 of 3 2500 Handley- Ederville Road Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 284 -0024 LTR25C.fsl 7 -16 -2010 25 JUL 2010 /k TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 2090 Appraisal Roll Information Valuation Summary Section 25.01 (c) of the State Property Tax Code directs the chief appraiser to prepare a list of all properties under rotest with the Appriasal Review Board and pending disposition at the time of value roll certification. The values below are from the ARB roll and are not included in the totals certified by the chief appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report. 113,500,396 Total appraised value of properties under protest. $ 108, 106, 061 Net taxable value of properties under protest. $ 75,674,242 Estimated minimum taxable value for the same properties. This value should be added to the net taxable value on page one. Page 2 of 3 2500 Hand ey- EderviIle Road Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 284 -0024 LTR25❑.fsl 7 -16 -2010 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser 25 JUL 2010 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 2010 Incomplete Property Information Section 26.01 (d) of the State Property Tax Code directs the chief appraiser to prepare a list of all properties that are not on the certified appraisal roll and not included on the ARB roll. The values below are from the incomplete property listing and are not included in the totals certified by the chief appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report. The value of incomplete properties are subject to change and are also subject to appeal before the Appraisal Review Board. $ 14,236,939 Total appraised value of incomplete properties $ 14,017,153 Estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties Page 3 of 3 2500 Handley- Ederville Road Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 284 -0024 LTFZ25E.fsl 7 -16 -2010 0712212010 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 7.00.21 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 TOT200EP TOTALS REPORT ROLL: 25 JUL 2010 2010 CERTIFIED - REPORT ITEM - _ APPRAISED VALUE ACCOUNTS TAXABLE VALUE - 1. - r- - REAL ESTATE RESIDENTIAL ( +� 2,761,524,503 19,891 2,271,495,644 2. REAL ESTATE COMMERCIAL ( +) 1,290,764,397 1,431 1,035,736,189 3. REAL ESTATE INDUSTRIAL ( +) 23,749,165 11 23,749,165 4. PERSONAL PROPERTY COMMERCIAL( +) 272,321,098 1,723 270,743,075 5. PERSONAL PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL( +) 30,127,912 18 29,238,734 6. MINERAL LEASE PROPERTIES ( +) 3,679,290 113 3,679,290 7. AGRICULTURE PROPERTIES ( +) 10,188,260 41 107,433 8 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE f =) 4,392,354,625 23,228 3,634,749,530 9 ^- BEFORE ARB -- - - - - -- ' 4 - ) CASES 113,500,396 577 108,106,061 10. INCOMPLETE ACCOUNTS f -) 14,236,939 349 14,017,153 11. CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUE 4 =) 4,264,617,290 22,302 3,512,626,316 - - -- - - - - -' EXEMPTION DETAIL EXEMPT AMOUNT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 12. ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 260,429,854 453 260,429,854 13. AG DEFERRALS 10,080,827 41 10,188,260 14. SCENIC DEFERRALS 0 0 0 15. ABATEMENTS 0 0 0 16. PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS 0 0 0 17. INDIGENT HOUSING 0 0 0 18. NOMINAL VALUE ACCOUNTS 5,390 29 5,390 19. DISABLED VETS 12,402,195 430 64,609,993 20. FREEPORT INVENTORY 772,637 4 27,956,435 21. GOODS IN TRANSIT 0 0 0 22. HOMESTEADS - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 23. OVER 65 - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 24. DISABLED - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 25. HOMESTEADS - LOCAL OPTION 330,840,112 14,483 2,208,609,132 26, OVER 65 - LOCAL OPTION 126,635,802 3,630 478,660,610 27. DISABLED - LOCAL OPTION 9,215,704 283 34,504,794 28. SOLARIWIND 0 0 0 29. POLLUTION CONTROL 221,092 3 16,321,067 30. COMM HSE DEV 0 0 0 31. PRORATED ABSOLUTE 1,387,361 9 1,592,638 32. HISTORIC SITES 0 0 0 33. FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 0 0 0 34 TOTAL EXEMPT AMOUNT ( -) 751,990,974 35 NET TAXABLE VALUE (_) 3,512,626,316 22,302 4,264,617,290 -__- NEW LXEMPTIONS THIS YEAR -__ EXEMPT AMOUNT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE (INCLUDED IN ITEM 12 TO 33) 36. NEW ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 112,569 3 112,569 37. NEW AG DEFERRALS 0 0 0 38. NEW SCENIC DEFERRALS 0 0 0 39. NEW ABATEMENTS 0 0 0 40. NEW PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS 0 0 0 41. NEW INDIGENT HOUSING 0 0 0 42. NEW NOMINAL VALUE ACCOUNTS 5,390 29 5,390 43. NEW DISABLED VETS 876,500 27 5,448,730 44. NEW FREEPORT INVENTORY 573,681 1 3,486,653 45. NEW GOODS IN TRANSIT 0 0 0 PAGE 1 07/2212010 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 7.00.21 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 TOT200EP TOTALS REPORT ROLL: 25 JUL 2010 2010 CERTIFIED NEW EXEMPTIONS THIS YEAR EXEMPT AMOUNT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 46. NEW HOMESTEADS - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 47. NEW OVER 65 - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 48. NEW DISABLED - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 49. NEW HOMESTEADS - LOCAL OPTION 8,530,606 301 57,827,105 54. NEW OVER 65 - LOCAL OPTION 3,545,100 101 16,096,040 51. NEW DISABLED - LOCAL OPTION 450,000 13 1,777,060 52. NEW SOLAR/WIND 0 0 0 53. NEW POLLUTION CONTROL 0 0 0 54. NEW COMM HSE DEV 0 0 0 55. NEW PRORATED ABSOLUTE 1,374,296 7 589,721 56. NEW HISTORIC SITES 0 0 0 57. NEW FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 0 0 0 - NEW CONSTRUCTION TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 58. ALL REAL ESTATE 19,897,367 190 21,374,700 59. NEW BUSINESS IN NEW IMPROVEMENT 152,486 1 152,486 60. TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION 20,049,853 191 21,527,186 61. NEW CONSTRUCTION IN RESIDENTIAL 17,622,885 184 19,100,217 62. NEW CONSTRUCTION IN COMMERCIAL 2,426,968 7 2,426,969 63. ANNEXATIONS 0 0 0 64. DEANNEXATIONS 0 0 0 - - TAX CEILINGS -' TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS CEILING AMOUNT 65. OVER 65 266,362,828 3,515 1,499,310.69 66. DISABLED PERSON 19,692,117 278 122,748.82 67. TOTAL CEILINGS 286,054,945 3,793 1,622,059.51 (INCLUDED IN ABOVE) 68. NEW OVER 65 CEILINGS 29,198,532 310 173,070.69 69. NEW DISABLED PERSON CEILINGS 2,990,979 38 18,576.42 - - ^- - - - - - -- CAPPED ACCOUNTS CAP VALUE ACCOUNTS CAP LOSS 70. CAP TOTAL 62,433,214 411 3,228,607 71. NEW CAP THIS YEAR 54,315,377 355 2,710,413 ALL EXEMPTIONS BY GROUP EXEMPT AMOUNT APPRAISED VALUE 12. ALL RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNTS 490,028,859 2,761,524,503 73. ALL COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 256,606,231 1,563,085,495 74. ALL INDUSTRIAL ACCOUNTS 889,178 53,877,077 75. ALL MINERAL LEASE ACCOUNTS 0 3,679,290 76. ALL AGRICULTURE ACCOUNTS 10,080,827 10,188,260 ---------------- - - - - -- ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 77. MULTI - PRORATED ABSOLUTE 1 967,329 PAGE 2 07122/2010 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 10.54.18 ABSOLUTES, ARS & INCOMPLETE TOTALS BY CATEGORY ROLL: JUL TOT210EP 2010 CERTIFIED 1. REAL ESTATE RESIDENTIAL 2. REAL ESTATE COMMERCIAL 3. REAL ESTATE INDUSTRIAL 4. PERSONAL PROPERTY COMMERCIAL 5. PERSONAL PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL 6. MINERAL LEASE PROPERTIES 7. AGRICULTURE PROPERTITES llrYf,>! ABSOLUTES ARB INCOMPLETE AMOUNT COUNT AMOUNT COUNT AMOUNT COUNT 5,612,882 85 49,386,609 441 55,000 1 253,364,354 359 38,763,836 80 272,032 2 0 0 4,400,000 1 0 0 1,452,618 9 20,949,951 55 13,907,272 343 0 0 0 ❑ 1,215 1 0 0 0 0 1,420 2 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 260,429,854 453 113,500,396 577 14,236,939 349 07/22/2010 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 7.05.11 CERTIFIED, ARB & INCOMPLETE EXEMPTION TOTALS ROLL: JUL TOT350EP 2010 CERTIFIED CERTIFIED ARB INCOMPLETE TOTAL LOSS COUNT LOSS COUNT LOSS COUNT LOSS COUNT 1. ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 260,429,854 453 42,540 1 0 0 260,472,394 454 2. AG DEFERRALS 10,080,827 41 0 0 ❑ 0 10,080,827 41 3. SCENIC DEFERRALS 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 4. ABATEMENTS 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 5. PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6. INDIGENT HOUSING O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7. NOMINAL VALUE ACCOUNTS 5,390 29 0 0 15,464 50 20,854 79 8. DISABLED VETS 12,402,195 430 7,500 1 0 0 12,409,695 431 9. FREEPORT INVENTORY 772,637 4 0 0 0 ❑ 772,637 4 10_ HOMESTEADS 330,840,112 14,483 4,336,295 144 4,125 1 335,180,532 14,628 11. OVER 65 126,635,802 0 900,000 25 0 0 127,535,802 25 12. DISABLED PERSON 9,215,704 283 108,000 3 0 0 9,323,704 286 13, SOLAR /WIND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14. POLLUTION CONTROL 221,092 3 0 0 ❑ 0 221,092 3 15. COMM HSE DEV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16. PRORATED ABSOLUTE 1,387,361 9 0 0 200,197 1 1,587,558 10 17. HISTORIC SITES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18. FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19. NET TAXABLE VALUE OF ALL FROZEN ACCTS 286,054,945 3,793 ACCTS 20. CAP LOSS ON RESIDENTIAL MARKET VALUES 3,228,607 411 ACCTS CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUE 4,004,187,436 21,849 ACCTS PROTESTED APPRAISED VALUE 113,500,396 577 ACCTS INCOMPLETE APPRAISED VALUE 14,236,939 349 ACCTS ABSOLUTE EXEMPT VALUE 260,429,854 453 ACCTS TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE 4,392,354,625 23,228 ACCTS CERTIFIED NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,512,626,316 NET TAXABLE IN ARB 108,106,061 NET TAXABLE IN INCOMPLETE 14,017,153 TOTAL NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,634,749,530 TOT320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 1 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2010 DATE: 07/22/2010 TOC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 07 :36:26 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS Al RESIDENTIAL SINGLE- FAMILY 2,577,068,741 39,657,649 55,000 1,653 17.5300 10,852,940 17,239 217 1 4 140 NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,104,924,533 34,305,854 50,875 A2 RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOMES 534,320 12,800 0 0 0.0000 0 18 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 457,760 12,800 0 A3 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 A4 RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 AS RESIDENTIAL UNDECLARED 21,538,829 0 0 0 0.0000 0 178 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 18,544,740 0 0 A9 INTERIM USE 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 ** CAT A TOTALS 2,599,141,890 39,670,449 55,000 1,653 17.5300 10,852,940 17,435 218 1 4 140 ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAT A NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,123,927,033 34,318,654 50,875 - - - --- ------------------ B1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY 195,007,890 0 0 0 0.0000 0 36 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 195,007,890 0 0 B2 RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX 60,737,260 635,360 0 0 0.0000 0 717 10 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 58,151,095 635,360 0 03 RESIDENTIAL TRIPLEX 1,538,700 0 0 0 0.0000 0 11 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 1,538,700 0 0 B4 RESIDENTIAL QUADRUPLEX 8,563,218 474,900 0 0 0.0000 0 43 3 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 8,539,218 474,900 0 ** CAT B TOTALS 265,847,068 1,110,260 0 0 0.0000 0 807 13 0 0 0 ** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAT B NET TAXABLE VALUE 263,236,903 1,11 0,260 0 C1 VAC /PLATTED RES. LT 5 ACRES 14,558,386 1,123,340 0 11,826 109.7079 0 578 33 0 27 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 10,643,084 1,123,340 0 C2 VAC /PLATTED COMMERCIAL 48,350,087 6,746,109 265,716 0 0.0000 0 272 31 1 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 47,431,424 6,746,109 65,519 C3 VAC /UNPLATTED RURAL LT 5 ACRES 873,315 130,680 0 0 0.0000 0 10 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 873,315 130,680 0 TOT320BP - A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 2 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2010 DATE: 07/22/2010 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 07:36:26 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS ---------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- C6 VACANT EXEMPT -RIGHT OF WAY 4,444 ❑ 0 0 0.0000 0 2 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 122 ❑ 0 - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ----------------- ** CAT C TOTALS ------------- - - - - -- ------------- 63,786,232 - - - - -- --- ---------- 8,000,129 265,716 11,826 109.7079 0 862 65 1 27 0 ** CAT C NET TAXABLE VALUE 58,947,945 8,000,129 65,519 D1 ACREAGE RANCH LAND 4,483,598 0 0 5,966 49.7829 0 6 0 0 6 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 10,966 0 0 D2 ACREAGE TIMBERLAND 0 0 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 ❑ 03 ACREAGE FARM LAND 306,927 0 0 2,623 25.4600 0 3 0 0 3 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,623 ❑ 0 D4 ACREAGE UNDEVELOPED 32,531,825 532,392 0 0 0.0000 0 49 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 32,080,514 532,392 ❑ ** CAT D TOTALS 37,322,350 532.392 0 8,589 75.2429 0 58 1 0 9 0 ** CAT D NET TAXABLE VALUE 32,094,103 532,392 ❑ El FARM /RCH HOUSE + LTD ACRES 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 E2 FARM /RCH MH + LTD ACRES 0 0 0 ❑ 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 E3 FARMIRCH OTHER 0 246.892 0 0 0.0000 0 0 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 ---- - - - - -- ------------- 246,892 - - - - -- ------------- 0 - - - - -- -- ----------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ----------------- ** CAT E TOTALS ---------- 0 246,892 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 0 1 0 0 O ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CAT E NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 246,892 0 F1 COMMERCIAL 719,345,087 31,065,223 0 2,281 17.5480 2,274,482 589 45 0 1 5 NET TAXABLE VALUE 718,536,156 31,065,223 0 F2 INDUSTRIAL 19,349,165 4,400,000 0 0 0.0000 0 10 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 19,349,165 4,400,000 0 F3 BILLBOARDS 90,058 0 45,716 0 0.0000 0 3 0 1 0 ❑ NET TAXABLE VALUE 90,058 0 45,716 TOT320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 3 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2010 DATE: 07/22/2010 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 07:36:26 CATEGORY ------------------------ - - - - -- CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS ---------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ------ ---- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ** CAT F TOTALS 738,784,310 35,465,223 45,716 2,281 17.5480 2,274,482 602 46 1 1 5 ** --------------------------------------- CAT F NET TAXABLE VALUE 737,975,379 - - ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 35,465,223 45,716 G1 OIL, GAS, MINERAL RESERVE 3,677,870 0 1,420 0 0.0000 0 111 0 2 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,677,870 0 -- - -- ------------- 1,420 - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ----------------- « CAT G TOTALS ------------- - - - - -- ------------- 3,677,870 - 0 1,420 0 0.0000 0 111 0 2 0 0 ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAT G NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,677,870 0 1,420 J1 UTILITY WATER SYSTEMS 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 J2 UTILITY GAS COMPANIES 3,054,334 0 0 0 0.0000 0 4 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,054,334 0 0 J3 UTILITY ELECTRIC COMPANIES 26,805,962 0 6,316 0 0.0000 0 26 0 1 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 26,805,962 0 6,316 J4 UTILITY TELEPHONE COMPANIES 11,423.039 34,874 1,141,679 0 0.0000 0 15 1 18 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 11,423.039 34,874 1,141,679 J5 UTILITY RAILROADS 19,891 0 0 0 0.0000 0 1 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 19,891 0 0 J6 UTILITY PIPELINES 4,795,380 0 55,760 ❑ 0 -0000 0 2 0 1 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 4,795,380 0 55,760 J7 UTILITY CABLE COMPANIES 1,164,308 0 0 0 0.0000 0 2 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 1,164,308 0 0 J8 UTILITY OTHER 0 0 0 0 0.0400 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- * CAT J TOTALS ------------- - - - - -- ------------- 47,262,914 - - - - -- ------------- 34,874 1,203,755 0 0.0000 0 50 1 20 0 0 ** CAT J NET TAXABLE VALUE 47,262,914 34,874 1,203,755 L1 COMMERCIAL 190,494,621 20,915,077 12,664,117 0 0.0000 152,486 1,290 54 323 0 1 NET TAMABLE VALUE 190,384,680 20,915,077 12,648,653 L2 INDUSTRIAL 30,126,697 0 1,215 0 0.0000 0 17 0 1 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 29,237,519 0 1,215 TOT320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 4 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2010 DATE: 07/22/2010 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 07:36 :26 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AO NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS ** CAT L TOTALS 220,621,318 20,915,077 12,665,332 0 0.0000 152,486 1,307 54 324 0 1 * -----------------------------------------------------------------------------_---------------------------___------------------------------------------- CAT L NET TAXABLE VALUE 219,622,199 20,915,077 12,649,668 M1 PRIVATE WATERCRAFT 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 ❑ M2 PRIVATE AIRCRAFT 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 M3 MOBILE HOME IMPROVEMENT ONLY 4,201,034 0 0 0 0.0000 216,900 260 0 0 0 9 NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,339,520 0 0 M4 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 D ❑ 0.0000 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 * CAT M TOTALS _ -Y 4,201,034 0 0 0 0.0000 216,900 260 0 0 0 9 ** CAT M NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,339,520 0 0 N1 NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 ------------- 0 - - - - -- ------------------- ------- - - - - -- ----------------- +* ------------- CAT N TOTALS - - - - -- ------------- 0 - - - - -- 0 0 0 0.0000 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 ** CAT N NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 01 RES VACANT INVENTORY Cl 9,627,890 6,230,800 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 309 173 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 9,627,890 6,23 0,800 0 02 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY 13,914,560 1,251,760 0 0 0.0000 8,030,377 48 4 0 0 35 NET TAXABLE VALUE 13,914,560 1,251,760 0 03 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY A3 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 04 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY AA 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 05 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY A5 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 06 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY B2 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 TOT3208P -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 5 TOT3200 STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2010 DATE: 07/22/2010 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME; 07:36:26 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS 07 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY B3 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 08 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY B4 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ----------------- ** CAT 0 TOTALS ------------- - - - - -- ------------- 23,542,450 - - - - -- ------------- 7,482,560 0 0 0.0000 8,030,377 357 177 0 0 35 ** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAT 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 23,542,450 7,482,560 0 -------- - - - - -- * TDC TOTALS 4,004,187,436 113,457,856 14,236,939 24,349 220.0288 21,527,185 21,849 576 349 41 190 BEGIN CERT APPRAISED VALUE 4,264,617,290 BEGIN CERT APPRAISED ACCTS 22,302 ** TDC NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,512,626,316 108,106.061 14,017,153 107,433 ** TDC AG IMPROVEMENTS 83,084 NOTE: ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS ARE NOT INCLUDED EXCEPT FOR PRORATED ABSOLUTES 07/22/10 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT (TADB060) JURISDICTION CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AVERAGE MARKET VALUE PER ACCOUNT 3 149,482 AVERAGE NET TAXABLE VALUE PER ACCOUNT a 121,950 TOTAL MARKET VALUE >>> >a 2,578,270,784 VALUE IN PARCEL ENTITY PLEASE NOTE: ACCOUNTS IN PROTEST & INCOMPLETE ACCOUNTS ARE THOUSANDS COUNT DISTRIBUTION GRAPHICS - N ❑ T - INCLUDED IN ANY OF THE CALCULATIONS UND - 5 I ° I 5 - 10 0 10 - 15 0 15 - 20 2 �* I * 20 - 25 6 25 - 30 I 23 I * 30 - 35 21 �* 35 - 40 37 �* 40 - 45 42 �* 45 - 50 92 �* 50 - 55 111 ** 55 - 60 80 �* 60 - 65 I 128 f ** 65 - 70 267 * ** 70 - 75 1 342 75 - 80 485 * * * ** 80 - 85 637 * * * * * ** 85 - 90 854 * * * * * * * ** 90 - 95 I 755 * * * * * * ** 95 - 100 I 648 * * * * * ** 100 - 105 687 I * * * * * ** 105 - 110 884 I * * * * * * * ** 110 - 115 950 * ** * * * « «* 115 - 120 I 710 120 - 125 672 * + * * ** 125 -- 130 567 * * * * ** 130 - 135 i 519 135 - 140 491 * * * ** 140 - 145 462 * * * ** 145 - 150 430 I * * * ** 150 - 155 416 * * * ** 155 - 160 440 * * * ** 160 - 165 418 * * * ** 165 - 170 436 * * * ** 170 - 175 378 I * * ** 175 - 180 292 * ** 180 - 185 I 267 * ** 185 - 190 I 232 * ** 190 -- 195 170 195 - 200 4 166 ** 200 - 205 ! 157 ** 205 - 210 141 ** 210 - 215 130 ** 215 - 220 118 ** 220 - 225 1 137 ** 225 - 230 125 ** �* 230 - 235 91 235 - 240 86 I * 240 - 245 109 ** OVR - 245 21037 I * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 17, 248 **** 5**** 10*** 15*** 20*** 25*** 30*** 35*** 40*** 45*** 50 * * *55 * * *60 * * *65* * *70 * * *75 * * *80 PARCEL COUNTS IN HUNDREDS - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ONLY - 2010 RUN DATE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 018 07]2212014 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE CALCULATION DATA ROLL CERTIFIED DATE 16:44;34 CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS JULY 25, 2010 1. 2009 Total Taxable Value. Enter the amount of 2009 taxable value on the 2009 tax roll today. Include any adjustments since last year's certification; exclude Section 25.25(4) one -third over- appraisal corrections from these adjustments. This total includes the taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings (will deduct in Line 2) and the captured $3,766,005,514 value for tax increment f[nancin will deduct taxes in Line 14 . Z. 2009 Tax Ceilings. Counties, Cities and Junior College Districts. Enter 2009 total taxabie value of homesteads with tax ceilings. These include $282,359,702 the homesteads of homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. Other units enter 0. If your taxing units adopted the tax cei li ng provision in 2009 or a prio t year for homeowners age 65 or older or disabled, use this step. 3. Preliminary 2009 Adjusted Taxable Value. Subtract Line 2 from Line 1. $3,483,645,812 4. 2009 Total Adopted Tax Rate. 1$100 0.57000000 5. 2009 Taxable Value Last because Court Appeals of ARB decisions reduced 2009 Appraised Value. A. Original 2009 ARB Values: B. 2009 values resulting from final court decisions: - C. 2009 value loss. Subtract B from A. See Litigation Report 6. 2009 Taxable Value, Adjusted for Court- Ordered Reductions. $3,483,645,812 Add Line 3 and Line 5C. + LINE 5 7. 2009 Taxable Value of Property in Territory the [Unit Deannexed after January 1, 2009. $ 0 Enter the 2009 value of property in deannexed territory. S. 2009 Taxable Value Lost Because Property First Qualified for an Exemption in 2010. note that lowering the amount or percentage of an existing exemption does not create a new exemption or reduce taxable value. If the taxing unit increased an original exemption, use the difference between the original exempted amount and the increased exempted amount. Do not include value lost due to freeport, "goods -in- transit" exemptions or tax abatements. A. Absolute exemptions. Use 2009 market value. $1,486,865 B. Partial exemptions. 2010 exemption amount or 2010 + percentage exemption times 2009 value. $13,507,596 C. Value lass. Add A and B. $14,994,461 9 • 2009 Taxable Value Lost Because Property First Qualified for Agricultural Appraisal (1 -d or 1 -d -1), Timber Appraisal, Recreational /Scenic Appraisal or Public Access Airport Special appraisal in 2010. Use only properties that qualified in 2010 for the first time; do not use properties that qualified in 2009. A. 2009 market value: $0 B. 2010 productivity or special appraised value: - $0 C. Valu lo ss. Subtract B from A. $ 0 10. Total Adjustments for Lost Value. Add Lines 7, 8C and 9C. 114,99 11. 2009 Adjusted Taxable Value. Subtract Line 10 from Line s. Verify Line 5C Calculate 12. Adjusted 2009 Taxes. Multiply Line 4 by Line 11 and divide by $100. Calculate 13. Taxes Refunded for Years Preceding Tax Year 2009. Enter the amount of taxes refunded during the last budget year for tax years preceding tax year 2009. Types of refunds include court decisions, Section 25.25 (h) and ( c) corrections and Section 31.11 payment errors. Do not include refunds for tax year 2009. This line applies only to tax years preceding tax year 2009. Use Actual Refunds 14. Taxes in Tax Increment Financing (TI F) for Tax Year 2009. Enter the amount of taxes paid into the tax increment fund for a reinvestment zone as agreed by the taxing unit. If the unit has no 2010 captured appraised value in Line 16D, enter 0. Use Actual Contribution Amount 15. Adjusted 2009 Taxes with refunds and TIF adjustments. Add Lines 12 and 13, subtract Line 14. Calculate TOT30OCl -OTHER 7 -19 -10 RUN DATE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 01$ 07/22/2010 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE CALCULATION DATA ROLL CERTIFIED DATE 15:44:34 CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS DULY 25, 2010 Page 2 16. Total 2010 Taxable Value on the 2010 Certified Appraisal Roll today. This value includes only certified values and includes the total taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings (will deduct in Line 18). These homesteads include homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. A. Certified Values only: $3,512,626,316 B. Counties: Include railroad rolling stock values certified by the Comptrollers office: + C. Pollution Control Exemption: Deduct the value of property exempted for the current tax year for the first time as pollution control property. use this Line based on Attorney's advice D. Tax Increment Financing: Deduct the 2010 captured appraised value of property taxable by a taxing unit in a tax increment financing zone for which the 2010 taxes will be deposited into the tax increment fund. Do not include any If Applicable, T1F Report new property value that will be included in Line 21 below. VERIFY AMOUNT E. Total 2010 value. Add A and B, then Subtract C and D. $3,512,626,316 17. Total Value of Properties Under Protest or Not Included on Certified Appraisal Roll A. 2010 Taxable value of Properties Under Protest. The chief appraiser certifies a list of properties still under ARB protest. The list shows the district's value and the taxpayer's claimed value, If any or an estimate of the value if the taxpayer wins. For each of the properties under protest, use the lowest of these $ values. Enter the total value. B. 2010 Value of Properties Not Under Protest or Included on Certified Appraisal ROIL. The chief appraiser gives taxing units a list of those taxable properties that the chief appraiser knows about, but are not included at appraisal roll certification. These properties also are not on the list of properties that are still under protest. On this list of properties, the chief appraiser includes the market value, appraised value and exemptions for the preceding year and a reasonable estimate of the market value, appraised value and exemptions for the current year. Use the lower market, appraised or taxable value (as appropriate.) Enter the total value. $14,017,153 C. Total Value Under Protest or Not Certified. Add A and B. $89,691,395 18. 2010 Tax Ceilings. Enter 2010 total taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings. These include the homesteads of homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. Other units enter "0." If your taxing units $286,054,945 adopted the tax ceiling provision in 2009 or a prior year for homeowners age 65 or older or disabled, use this step. 18. 2010 Total Taxable Value. Add Llnesl6E and 17C, Subtract Line 18. Calculate Venfy Calculating of line 16E 24. Total 2410 Taxable Value of Properties in Territory annexed after January 1, 2009. Include both real and personal property. Enter the 2010 value of property in territory annexed. 21. Total 2010 Taxable value of New Improvements and New Personal Property located in New Improvements. "New" means the item was not on the appraisal roll in 2009. An improvement is a building, structure, fixture or fence erected on or affixed to land. A transportable structure erected on its owner's land is also included unless It is held for sal- or is there only temporarily. New additions to existing improvements may be included if the appraised value can be determined. New personas property in a new improvement must have been brought into the unit after January 1, 2009, and be located in a new improvement. New improvements do include property on which a tax abatement agreement has expired for 2010. New improvements do not include mineral Interests produced for the first time, omitted property that $20 is back assessed and increased appraisals on existing property. 22. Total Adjustments to the 2010 Taxable Value. Add Lines 20 and 21. $20,049,853 23. 2010 Adjusted Taxable Value. Subtract Line 22 from Line 19. Calculate Verify Calcula Ung of Line 19 24. 2010 Effective Tax Rate. Divide Line 15 by Line 23 and Multiply by $100. Calculate 1$100 25. COUNTIES ONLY. Add together the effective tax rates for each type of tax the county levies. The total is the 2010 county effective tax rate. Calculate l$100 TOT30DC2 -OTHER 7 -16-10 JOB: ARB324J TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 1 RUN: 13 -07 -2010 2009 ARB 25.25(©) PROTESTS 2009 018 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACCOUNT SEPT2009 CURR2009 SEPT2009 CURR2009 NET TAXABLE NUMBER MARKET XMP MARKET XMP NET TAXABLE NET TAXABLE DIFFERENCE 01307703 97,000 48,000 97,000 48,000 49,000 01317652 129,500 42,680 129,500 42,680 86,820 01930451 76,300 37,000 76,300 37,000 39,300 02333724 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 30,000 02333902 79,200 25,000 79,200 25,000 54,200 02354675 67,700 010 46,600 010 57,545 39,610 17,935 02378248 109,400 50,000 109,400 50,000 59,400 04090187 37,244 5,700 37,244 5,700 31,544 05640105 1,007,541 559,745 1,007,541 559,745 447,796 05721377 182,300 050 120,000 050 118,955 66,000 52,955 06887279 1,275,004 662,231 1,275,000 662,231 612,769 13548263 620,236 NO SEPT ACCT 620,236 41314948 282,800 200,000 010 282,800 170,000 112,800 ----- ------- --=--== rt===-= _---- _____- TOTALS CASES SEPT MKT CURR MKT SEPT NET CURR NET NET RIFF 13 3,418,985 1,841,956 3,345,485 1,750,966 1,594,519 U'l/13 /2[11U IraKKAIvi AFVKAi,3HL ula�r�s�i 9.05.43 25.25(C) TAX UNIT REPORT FOR CITIES ARB TAX UNIT ACCOUNT YEAR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 12012963 2009 NUMBER OF CASES REPORTED FOR TAX UNIT: 1 rHUL !u ARB341EP -D HEARING DATE 2410/03/18 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Manager's Office Presented by: Karen Bostic Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. F.4 Subject: GN 2010 -070 Approve Settlement of Atmos Energy Mid -Tex RRM Filing, Ordinance No. 3113 Summary On or about March 15, 2010, Atmos Mid -Tex filed with the City an application to increase natural gas rates pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism ( "RRM ") tariff. This tariff was approved by the City as part of the settlement of the Atmos Mid -Tex 2007 Statement of Intent to increase rates. This is the third filing Atmos Mid -Tex has made under the RRM process. Staff is seeking City Council approval of the negotiated settlement of Atmos' most recent RRM filing.. Approval of the Ordinance will result in the implementation of new rates that increase Atmos Mid -Tex's revenues effective October 1, 2010. The total monthly impact to the average residential customer would be $1.40. General Description The City worked with the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ( "ACSC ") to analyze the schedules and evidence offered by Atmos Mid -Tex to support its request to increase rates. The latest Atmos Mid -Tex RRM filing sought a $70.2 million rate increase. The Ordinance and attached rate and RRM tariffs are the result of negotiations between ACSC and the company to resolve issues raised by ACSC during the review and evaluation of Atmos' RRM filing. The Ordinance resolves the company's RRM filing by authorizing an increase in the company's base rate of $27 million effective for utility bills on or after October 1, 2010. Additionally, the Ordinance authorizes supplemental revenue of $3.4 million to be recovered through the customer charge component of rates to cover direct costs associated with a steel service line replacement program. The total monthly bill impact for the average residential customer will be a $1.40 increase (about a 3.15% increase in the total bill). The RRM tariff was approved by ACSC Cities as part of the settlement agreement to resolve the Atmos Mid -Tex 2007 system -wide rate filing at the Railroad Commission. Atmos Mid -Tex's current action represents the third filing pursuant to the three -year trial project known as the RRM process. The RRM process was created collaboratively by ACSC and Atmos Mid -Tex as an alternative to the legislatively authorized Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program ( "GRIP ") surcharge process. ACSC opposed GRIP because it constituted piecemeal ratemaking, did not allow any reasonableness review, and did not allow participation by cities or recovery of cities' rate case expenses. The RRM process has allowed for a more comprehensive rate review and annual adjustment as a substitute for GRIP filings during the three -year trial period specified by the tariff. There are two components to the current RRM adjustment. The prospective component adjusts rates for known and measurable changes in operations and maintenance ( "O&M ") expense and net plant investment. Atmos Mid -Tex and ACSC agreed to cap changes to expenses and invested capital at no more than five percent per year. The true -up component evaluates whether the company has over or under - recovered its earnings for the previous year. For purposes of the RRM true -up component, the Atmos Mid -Tex rate of return on equity and its capital structure are frozen. Costs expressly prohibited from recovery through the RRM include first -class air fare, travel, meals or entertainment for an employee's spouse, alcohol, sports events, entertainment, arts and cultural events, sponsorship of sports, arts or cultural events, and social club membership dues. Rates cannot change and the Settlement Agreement with Atmos Mid -Tex cannot be implemented without passage of rate ordinances by cities. No related matter is pending at the Railroad Commission. The purpose of the Ordinance is to approve rate tariffs ( "Attachment A ") and Proof of Revenues ( "Attachment B ") that reflect the negotiated rate change pursuant to the RRM process and to ratify a Settlement Agreement recommended by the ACSC Settlement Committee and Executive Committee. As a result of the negotiations, ACSC was able to reduce the company's requested $70.2 million RRM increase to $27 million. Approval of the Ordinance will result in the implementation of new rates that increase Atmos Mid -Tex's revenues effective October 1, 2010. The impact to the average residential customer for this portion of the Settlement Agreement will be $1.24 per month. The Settlement Agreement ( "Attachment C ") to be ratified by the Ordinance authorizes an extension of the RRM process, in modified form to eliminate the true -up component, for an additional two annual filings. The Settlement Agreement also addresses the Atmos Mid -Tex steel service line replacement program and authorizes current cost recovery via an adder to residential and commercial customer charges. Steel Service Line Replacement: Under pressure from the Railroad Commission to establish a comprehensive program to replace service lines that contain steel which is subject to corrosion and leaks, ACSC has worked with Atmos Mid -Tex to establish a risk based approach to steel service line replacement that accomplishes the following goals: 1. Replace all service lines throughout the Mid -Tex Region with the highest degree of risk within two years 2. Coordination between ACSC city members and Atmos Mid -Tex to minimize disruption of rights of way without compromising safety; 3. To minimize and spread the rate impact on customers of the replacement program, the service lines with little relative risk of leaks should be replaced over a 10- year period; and 4. Current recovery of incremental (above and beyond normal maintenance and repair addressed in RRM proceedings) direct (excluding Atmos Mid -Tex overheads) cost of service line replacement should be permitted as an adder to customer charges. Fulfillment of these goals in this case will increase the average bill by $0.16 and $0.44 for residential and commercial customers respectively. The customer charge assessment may not exceed $0.44 and $1.22 for residential and commercial customers, respectively, prior to the entry of a Final Order in the next system -wide Statement of Intent rate proceeding. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, 100,000 steel service lines will be replaced prior to September 30, 2012. Reasons Justifying Approval of the Negotiated Resolution: During the time that the City has retained original jurisdiction in this case, consultants working on behalf of ACSC cities have investigated the support for the company's requested rate increase. While the evidence does not support the $70.2 million increase requested by the company, ACSC consultants agree that the company can justify an increase in revenues of $21 million. The agreement on $27 million is a compromise between the positions of the parties. The monthly bill impact for the average residential customer for this part of the Settlement Agreement will be a $1.24 increase. The Settlement Agreement includes an allowance for recovery of direct costs, excluding overheads, of the steel service line replacement program. Current year recovery factors shall impact the average customer by $0.16 for residential customers and $0.44 for commercial customers per month. The rates will be adjusted annually, but shall be capped at $0.44 for residential customers and $1.22 for commercial customers. The total monthly impact to the average residential customer is $1.40. The alternative to a settlement of the RRM filing would be a contested case proceeding before the Railroad Commission on the company's current application, would take several months and cost ratepayers millions of dollars in rate case expenses, and would not likely produce a result more favorable than that to be produced by the settlement. The ACSC Executive Committee recommends that ACSC members take action to approve the Ordinance authorizing new rate tariffs. Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 3113 ORDINANCE NO. 3113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ( "CITY ") APPROVING A NEGOTIATED RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE ( "ACSC" OR "STEERING COMMITTEE ") AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION ( "ATMOS MID -TEX" OR "COMPANY ") REGARDING THE COMPANY'S THIRD RATE REVIEW MECHANISM ( "RRM ") FILING IN ALL CITIES EXERCISING ORIGINAL JURISDICTION; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE UNREASONABLE; REQUIRING THE COMPANY TO REIMBURSE CITIES' REASONABLE RATEMAKING EXPENSES; ADOPTING TARIFFS THAT REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AND FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE ATTACHED TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE; APPROVING ATMOS MID -TEX'S PROOF OF REVENUES; EXTENDING THE RRM PROCESS FOR TWO CYCLES AND ADOPTING A NEW RRM TARIFF; RATIFYING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, INCLUDING COST RECOVER FOR A STEEL SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT; DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE COMPANY AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE'S LEGAL COUNSEL. WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas ( "City ") is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division ( "Atmos Mid -Tex" or " Company "), and a regulatory authority with an interest in the rates and charges of Atmos Mid -Tex; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ( "ACSC" or "Steering Committee "), a coalition of approximately 148 similarly situated cities served by Atmos Mid -Tex that have joined together to facilitate the review of and response to natural gas issues affecting rates charged in the Atmos Mid -Tex service area (such participating cities are referred to herein as "ACSC Cities "); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the agreement settling the Company's 2007 Statement of Intent to increase rates, ACSC Cities and the Company worked collaboratively to develop a Rate Review Mechanism ( "RRM ") tariff that allows for an expedited rate review process controlled in a three year experiment by ACSC Cities as a substitute to the current GRIP process instituted by the Legislature; and WHEREAS, the City took action in 2008 to approve a Settlement Agreement with Atmos Mid -Tex resolving the Company's 2007 rate case and authorizing the RRM Tariff; and WHEREAS, the 2008 Settlement Agreement contemplates reimbursement of ACSC Cities' reasonable expenses associated with RRM applications; and WHEREAS, on or about March 15, 2010, Atmos Mid -Tex filed with the City its third application pursuant to the RRM tariff to increase natural gas base rates by approximately $70.2 million, such increase to be effective in every municipality that has adopted the RRM tariff within its Mid -Tex Division; and WHEREAS, ACSC Cities coordinated its review of Atmos Mid -Tex's RRM filing by designating a Settlement Committee made up of ACSC representatives, assisted by ACSC attorneys and consultants, to resolve issues identified by ACSC in the Company's RRM filing; and WHEREAS, the Company has filed evidence that existing rates are unreasonable and should be changed; and WHEREAS, independent analysis by ACSC's rate expert concluded that Atmos Mid - Tex is able to justify an increase over current rates of $21 million; and WHEREAS, Atmos Mid -Tex has commenced a program to replace steel service lines based on a relative leak repair risk analysis; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee has entered a Settlement Agreement ( "Attachment C" to this Ordinance) with Atmos Mid -Tex to: (1 ) increase base rate revenues by $27 million; (2) extend the RRM process, with modifications for an additional two cycles and to thereafter require the filing of a system -wide Statement of Intent rate case on or before June 1, 2013; and (3) in the interim to allow current recovery of incremental direct costs of the steel service line replacement program in rates set via this ordinance and in future RRMs; and WHEREAS, the ACSC Executive Committee, as well as ACSC lawyers and consultants, recommend that ACSC members approve the attached rate tariffs ( "Attachment A" to this Ordinance), which will increase the Company's revenue requirement by $27 million; and WHEREAS, the attached tariffs implementing new rates and Atmos Mid -Tex's Proof of Revenues ( "Attachment B" to this Ordinance) are consistent with the negotiated resolution reached by ACSC Cities and are just, reasonable, and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties that if the City determines any rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits resulting from a Final Order or subsequent negotiated settlement approved in any proceeding addressing the issues raised in the Company's Third RRM filing would be more beneficial to the City than the terms of the attached tariff, then the more favorable rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits shall additionally accrue to the City; and WHEREAS, the negotiated resolution of the Company's RRM filing and the resulting rates are, as a whole, in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1. That the findings set forth in this Ordinance are hereby in all things approved. Section 2. That the City Council finds the existing rates for natural gas service provided by Atmos Mid -Tex are unreasonable and new tariffs and Atmos Mid -Tex's Proof of Revenues, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachments A and 6, are just and reasonable and are hereby adopted. Section 3. That Atmos Mid -Tex shall reimburse the reasonable ratemaking expenses of the ACSC Cities in processing the Company's rate application. Section 4. That the Settlement Agreement, attached as Attachment C, which includes in addition to resolution of the Third RRM: (1) extension of a modified RRM process; (2) requirement that Atmos Mid -Tex file a system- wide Statement of Intent rate case on or before June 1, 2013; and (3) current recovery of incremental direct costs for a steel service line replacement program, is hereby ratified. Section 5. That to the extent any resolution or ordinance previously adopted by the Council is inconsistent with this Ordinance, it is hereby repealed. Section 6. That the meeting at which this Ordinance was approved was in all things conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. Section 7. That if any one or more sections or clauses of this Ordinance is adjudged to be unconstitutional or invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance and the remaining provisions of the Ordinance shall be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never existed. Section 8. That if the City determines any rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits resulting from a Final Order or subsequent negotiated settlement approved in any proceeding addressing the issues raised in the Company's Third RRM filing would be more beneficial to the City than the terms of the attached tariff, then the more favorable rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits shall additionally accrue to the City. Section 9. That this Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage with rates authorized by attached Tariffs to be effective for bills rendered on or after October 1, 2010. Section 10. That a copy of this Ordinance shall be sent to Atmos Mid -Tex, care of David Park, Vice President Rates and Regulatory Affairs, at Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1862, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, General Counsel to ACSC, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767 -1725. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 13th day of September, 2010. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Karen Bostic, Assistant City Manager ATTACHMENT A ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID -TEX DIVISION RATE SCHEDULE: R — RESIDENTIAL SALES APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 10101/2010 AoNication Applicable to Residential Customers for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured through one meter. Type of Service Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to service being furnished. Monthly Rate Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and Mcf charges to the amounts due under the riders listed below: Charge Amount Customer Charge per Bill $ 7.15 per month Commodity Charge —All Mcf $2.5246 per Mcf Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR. Weather Normalization Adjustment: Plus or Minus an amount for weather normalization calculated in accordance with Rider WNA. Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with Rider RRM. Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated municipality. Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider tax. Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s). ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID -TEX DIVISION RATE SCHEDULE: C — COMMERCIAL SALES APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 1010112010 Application Applicable to Commercial Customers for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured through one meter and to Industrial Customers with an average annual usage of less than 3,000 Mcf. Type of Service Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to service being furnished. Monthly Rate Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and Mcf charges to the amounts due under the riders listed below: Charge Amount Customer Charge per Bill $ 13.91 per month Commodity Charge - All Mcf $ 1.0796 per Mcf Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR. Weather Normalization Adjustment: Plus or Minus an amount for weather normalization calculated in accordance with Rider WNA. Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with Rider RRM. Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated municipality. Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX. Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s). Agreement An Agreement for Gas Service may be required. Notice Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service. ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID -TEX DIVISION RATE SCHEDULE: I - INDUSTRIAL SALES APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 10101/2010 Next 3,500 MMBtu Application Applicable to Industrial Customers with a maximum daily usage (MDU) of less than 3,500 MMBtu per day for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured through one meter. Service for Industrial Customers with an MDU equal to or greater than 3,500 MMBtu per day will be provided at Company's sole option and will require special contract arrangements between Company and Customer. Tvoe of Service Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to service being furnished. Monthly Rate Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and MMBtu charges to the amounts due under the riders listed below: Charge Amount Customer Charge per Meter $ 450.00 per month First 0 MMBtu to 1,500 MMBtu $ 0.2750 per MMBtu Next 3,500 MMBtu $ 0.2015 per MMBtu All MMBtu over 5,000 MMBtu $ 0.0433 per MMBtu Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR. Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with Rider RRM. Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated municipality. Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX. Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s). Curtailment Overpull Fee Upon notification by Company of an event of curtailment or interruption of Customer's deliveries, Customer will, for each MM6tu delivered in excess of the stated level of curtailment or interruption, pay Company 200% of the midpoint price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily published for the applicable Gas Day in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey." Replacement Index In the event the "midpoint" or "common" price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey" is no longer published, Company will calculate the applicable imbalance fees utilizing a daily price index recognized as authoritative by the natural gas industry and most closely approximating the applicable index. Agreement An Agreement for Gas Service may be required. Notice Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service. Special Conditions In order to receive service under Rate I, Customer must have the type of meter required by Company. Customer must pay Company all costs associated with the acquisition and installation of the meter. ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID -TEX DIVISION RATE SCHEDULE: T — TRANSPORTATION APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 1010112010 Next 3,500 MMBtu Application Applicable, in the event that Company has entered into a Transportation Agreement, to a customer directly connected to the Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division Distribution System (Customer) for the transportation of all natural gas supplied by Customer or Customer's agent at one Point of Delivery for use in Customer's facility. Type of Service Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to service being furnished. Monthly Rate Customer's bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and MMBtu charges to the amounts and quantities due under the riders listed below: Charge Amount Customer Charge per Meter $ 450.00 per month First 0 MMBtu to 1,500 MMBtu $ 0.2750 per MMBtu Next 3,500 MMBtu $ 0.2015 per MMBtu All MMBtu over 5,000 MMBtu $ 0.0433 per MMBtu Upstream Transportation Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for upstream transportation costs in accordance with Part (b) of Rider GCR. Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with Rider RRM. Retention Adjustment: Plus a quantity of gas as calculated in accordance with Rider RA. Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated municipality. Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX. Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable riders). Imbalance Fees All fees charged to Customer under this Rate Schedule will be charged based on the quantities determined under the applicable Transportation Agreement and quantities will not be aggregated for any Customer with multiple Transportation Agreements for the purposes of such fees. Monthly Imbalance Fees Customer shall pay Company the greater of (i) $0.10 per MM Btu, or (ii) 150% of the difference per MMBtu between the highest and lowest "midpoint" price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey" during such month, for the MMBtu of Customer's monthly Cumulative Imbalance, as defined in the applicable Transportation Agreement, at the end of each month that exceeds 10% of Customer's receipt quantities for the month. Curtailment Overpull Fee Upon notification by Company of an event of curtailment or interruption of Customer's deliveries, Customer will, for each MMBtu delivered in excess of the stated level of curtailment or interruption, pay Company 200% of the midpoint price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily published for the applicable Gas Day in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey." Replacement Index In the event the "midpoint" or "common" price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey" is no longer published, Company will calculate the applicable imbalance fees utilizing a daily price index recognized as authoritative by the natural gas industry and most closely approximating the applicable index. Agreement A transportation agreement is required. Notice Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service. Special Conditions In order to receive service under Rate T, customer must have the type of meter required by Company. Customer must pay Company all costs associated with the acquisition and installation of the meter. ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID -TEX DIVISION RIDER: WNA — WEATHER NORMALIZATION ADJUSTMENT APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 10/01/2010 Provisions for Adjustment The base rate per Mcf (1,000,000 Btu) for gas service set forth in any Rate Schedules utilized by the cities of the Mid -Tex Division service area for determining normalized winter period revenues shall be adjusted by an amount hereinafter described, which amount is referred to as the "Weather Normalization Adjustment." The Weather Normalization Adjustment shall apply to all temperature sensitive residential and commercial bills based on meters read during the revenue months of November through April. The five regional weather stations are Abilene, Austin, Dallas, Waco, and Wichita Falls. Computation of Weather Normalization Adjustment The Weather Normalization Adjustment Factor shall be computed to the nearest one - hundredth cent per Mcf by the following formula: WNAFi = Ri Where (HSFi x (NDD -ADD) ) (BLi + (HSFi x ADD) ) = any particular Rate Schedule or billing classification within any such particular Rate Schedule that contains more than one billing classification WNAFi = Weather Normalization Adjustment Factor for the ith rate schedule or classification expressed in cents per Mcf Ri = base rate of temperature sensitive sales for the ith schedule or classification approved by the entity exercising original jurisdiction. HSFi = heat sensitive factor for the ith schedule or classification calculated as the slope of the linear regression of average sales per bill (Mcf) and actual heating degree days by month for the test year by schedule or classification and weather station as part of the RRM filing. NDD = billing cycle normal heating degree days calculated as the simple ten -year average of actual heating degree days. ADD = billing cycle actual heating degree days. Bli = base load sales for the ith schedule or classification calculated as the y- intercept of the linear regression of average sales per bill (Mcf) and actual heating degree days by month for the test year by schedule or classification and weather station as part of the RRM filing. The Weather Normalization Adjustment for the jth customer in ith rate schedule is computed as WNA = WNAF x q Where q is the relevant sales quantity for the jth customer in ith rate schedule. Filings with Entities Exercising Original Jurisdiction As part of its annual RRM filing the Company will file (a) a copy of each computation of the Weather Normalization Adjustment Factor, (b) a schedule showing the effective date of each such Weather Normalization Adjustment, (c) a schedule showing the factors of values used in calculating such Weather Normalization Adjustment and (d) a random sample and audit of thirty (30) actual customer bills, with customer information deleted, for each rate schedule or classification to which the WNA was applied in the preceding 12 month period. To the extent that source data is needed to audit the WNA application, such data will be provided by the Company as part of the annual RRM filing. If the RRM is discontinued, as provided in the Rider RRM tariff, the information required herein to be filed with the entities exercising original jurisdiction shall be filed on March 1 of each year. Base Use /Heat Use Factors Residential Commercial Base use Heat use Base use Heat use WPafhPr Staatinn Mr:f Mr f /Hnn Mrf Mr f /Hnn Abilene 1.06 .0131 9.03 .0588 Austin 1.17 .0138 19.39 .0674 Dallas 1.49 .0191 20.37 .0872 Waco 1.13 .0137 11.81 .0610 Wichita Falls 1.19 .0136 11.21 .0549 Sample WNAF Calculation: 3352 per Mcf = 2.5246 x (.0131 x (30 -17) } (1.06 + (.0131 x 17) ) Where i = Residential Single Block Rate Schedule Ri = 2.5246 per MCF HSFi = .0131 (Residential - Abilene Area) NDD = 30 HDD (Simple ten -year average of Actual HDD for Abilene Area — 9115106 —10/14/06) ADD = 17 HDD (Actual HDD for Abilene Area — 9115/06 — 10/14/06) Bli = 1.06 Mcf (Residential - Abilene Area) ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID -TEX DIVISION RIDER: RRM — RATE REVIEW MECHANISM APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 10/0112010 I. Purpose: This mechanism is designed to provide annual earnings transparency. All rate calculations under this tariff shall be made on a system wide basis. If, through the implementation of the provisions of this mechanism, it is determined that rates should be decreased or increased, then rates will be adjusted accordingly in the manner set forth herein. The rate adjustments implemented under this mechanism will reflect annual changes in the Company's cost of service and rate base. This Rider RRM will be effective for the period commencing with the Company's RRM filing on April 1, 2011, and concluding with the implementation of new, final rates established pursuant to the general rate case that Atmos will file on or before June 1, 2013. II. Definitions a) The Annual Evaluation Date shall be the date the Company will make its annual filing under this mechanism. The Annual Evaluation Date shall be no later than April 1, of each year. This filing shall be effective in electronic form where practicable. b) Audited Financial Data shall mean the Company's books and records related to the Company's Mid - Tex operating area and shared services operations. Audited Financial Data shall not require the schedules and information provided under this tariff to undergo a separate financial audit by an outside auditing firm similar to the Company's annual financial audit. c) The Evaluation Period is defined as the twelve month period ending December 31, of each calendar year. d) The Rate Effective Period is defined as the later of the twelve month period for which rates determined under this mechanism will be in effect or subsequent rates are implemented. e) Per Connection Basis is defined as the existing average number of Mid -Tex active meters to customers during the Evaluation Period. f) Final Order is defined as the most recent order establishing the Company's latest effective rates for the area in which the mechanism is implemented, and shall include municipal rate ordinances and resolutions. III. Rate Review Mechanism The Company shall file with each regulatory authority having original jurisdiction over the Company's rates the schedules specified below for the Evaluation Period, with the filing to be made by the Annual Evaluation Date following the end of the Evaluation Period. The schedules, which will be based upon the Company's Audited Financial Data, as adjusted, and provided in the same format as Atmos' RRM filing with municipalities on March 15, 2010, will exclude a true -up computation, but will include the following: a) Evaluation Period ending balances for actual gross plant in service, accumulated depreciation, accumulated deferred income taxes, inventory, working capital, and other rate base components will be used for the calculation of rates for the Rate Effective Period. The ratemaking treatments, principles, findings and adjustments included in the Final Order will apply. Regulatory adjustments due to prior regulatory rate base adjustment disallowances will be maintained. Cash working capital will be calculated using the lead /lag days approved in the Final Order. Accumulated deferred income taxes (ADIT) will be calculated using the methodology used in the Final Order. The RRM Schedules & Information section of this tariff identifies those ADIT components to be included in the calculation of rate base for both the Evaluation Period and Rate Effective Period calculations. b) Depreciation rates booked in the period will be those approved in the Final Order, or the rate most recently approved. All calculation methodologies will be those approved in the Final Order except where noted or included in this tariff, or in the most recent order addressing the methodology. In addition, the Company shall exclude from operating and maintenance expense the discretionary costs to be disallowed from Rider RRM filings listed in the RRM Schedules and Information section of this tariff. c) Return on Equity (ROE) shall be maintained at 9.7 %. d) Cost of debt will reflect actual cost for the Evaluation Period. Evaluation Period ending balances for cost of debt and capital structure will be used for the calculation of rates for the Rate Effective Period. Capital structure will be the actual Evaluation Period ratio of long -term debt and equity, with percentage equity not to exceed 50 %, based on the calculation methodology outcomes used above. e) All applicable accounting adjustments along with all supporting work papers. Such adjustments may include: 1) Pro -forma adjustments to update and annualize costs and revenue billing determinants for the Rate Effective Period. 2) Pro -forma or other adjustments required to properly account for atypical, unusual, or nonrecurring events recorded during the Evaluation Period. f) Shared Services allocation factors shall be recalculated each year based on the latest component factors used during the Evaluation Period, but the methodology used will be that approved in the Final Order. g) Any changes to corporate structure or allocation of common costs will include narrative explanations with the filing. IV. Calculation of Rate Adjustment a) The Company shall provide additional schedules indicating the following revenue deficiency /sufficiency calculations using the methodology accepted in the Final Order with the exception of any allowance for a true -up component in the April 1, 2011 or the April 1, 2012 RRM filings. Evaluation Period ending balances will be used for the calculation of rates for the Rate Effective Period. These schedules shall identify the rate adjustments necessary for the setting of prospective rates for the Rate Effective Period. The result shall be reflected in the proposed new rates to be established for the Rate Effective Period. In calculating the required rate adjustments, such adjustments will be made pro - ratably to the customer charge and usage charge based upon actual revenue generated, as adjusted under the Company's approved Weather Normalization Adjustment (WNA) Rider. Provided, however, that neither the Residential nor the Commercial customer charges may increase more than 20% per year. b) The Company may also adjust rates for the Rate Effective Period to include recovery of any known and measurable changes to operating and maintenance costs including, but not limited to, payroll and compensation expense, benefit expense, pension expense, insurance costs, materials and supplies, bad debt costs, medical expense, transportation and building and lease costs for the Rate Effective Period. Provided, however, that adjustments may only be made for costs that are reasonable and necessary. Additionally, utility plant and rate base for the Rate Effective Period will be established by using the Evaluation Period ending balances, including associated changes in depreciation and amortization expense and taxes. In calculating the Company's known and measurable changes for prospective RRM adjustment purposes, the following limitations will apply, on a Per Connection Basis. Operating and Maintenance expenses per connection for the Rate Effective Period cannot increase more than 5% per year without specific identification and justification. Any proposed adjustment above 5% per year, is subject to the provisions of the Evaluation Procedures of this tariff. Such procedures provide that the regulatory authority will review the proposed adjustment and that the Company and regulatory authority will work collaboratively to seek agreement on the proposed adjustments to the Company's schedules and proposed rates. Justification for such expenditures over the cap shall include an event or combination of events beyond the control of the Company. The beginning adjusted Operation and Maintenance expense per connection for the 2007 RRM Evaluation Period will be limited to not exceed $151 million divided by the connections for the period. The increase in adjusted Operation and Maintenance expenses per connection for the 2008 Rate Effective Period and the subsequent Rate Effective periods cannot exceed 5% per year, without specific identification and justification Net plant investment per connection for the Rate Effective Period cannot increase more than 5% per year without specific identification and justification. Any proposed adjustment above 5% per year, is subject to the provisions of the Evaluation Procedures of this tariff. Such procedures provide that the regulatory authority will review the proposed adjustment and that the Company and regulatory authority will work collaboratively to seek agreement on the proposed adjustments to the Company's schedules and proposed rates. However, in performing a cap test to verify compliance, the Company shall exclude any changes in net plant investment associated with federal, state, or local mandates related to safety, compliance, or road moves, including steel service line replacement program costs incurred prior to October 1, 2010. The initial 2008 rate will be set using net plant limited to not exceed [$1,243,607,206 divided by average active meters for the 12 months ended June 30 2007] times 1.025 times the average active meters for calendar year 2007. Subsequent filing calculations of net plant investment will be made using the same method used in the Company's September 20, 2007 Statement of Intent except that Evaluation Period ending balances will be used for net plant in the calculation of rates for the Rate Effective Period. The rate increase limitations set forth in this tariff shall not preclude the Company from recovering any excluded net plant costs during a subsequent Evaluation Period in which the 5% limitation for net plant investment is not reached or in a subsequent Statement of Intent case. To the extent that the Company seeks to recover any excluded net plant costs during a subsequent Evaluation Period in which the 5% limitation for net plant investment is not reached or in a subsequent Statement of Intent case, the Company shall identify these costs as a specific line item in the schedule accompanying the RRM rate adjustment filing. The regulatory authority may disallow any net plant investment that is not shown to be prudently incurred. Approval by the regulatory authority of net plant investment pursuant to the provisions of this tariff shall constitute a finding that such net plant investment was prudently incurred. Such finding of prudence shall not be subject to further review in a subsequent Evaluation Period or Statement of Intent filing. c) Notwithstanding the limitations in subparts IV (a) through (b) of this tariff, the Company shall be entitled to separately adjust rates for the Rate Effective Period to include recovery for direct incremental costs associated with a steel service line replacement program incurred on and after October 1, 2010, a return on equity of 9.0% for such incremental costs as capitalized, depreciation, and applicable taxes. Capital structure will be the actual Evaluation Period ratio of long -term debt and equity, with percentage equity not to exceed 50 %, based on the calculation methodology outcomes used above. Rate recovery associated with a steel service line replacement program shall be recovered through the Residential and Commercial customer charges and shall not be subject to or included in the rate increase limitations set forth in IV (a) through (b) of this tariff. Current year recovery factors are presumed to be $0.15 for residential customers and $0.41 for commercial customers. The rates will be adjusted annually, however, in no case will the per customer monthly cost recovery factors attributable to a steel service line replacement program exceed $0.44 for residential customers or $1.22 for commercial customers, prior to or during the pendency of the Company's next Statement of Intent case. Moreover, the per customer amount attributable to cost recovery for a steel service line replacement program shall be subject to review by the regulatory authority in a subsequent Evaluation Period and all costs associated with a steel service line replacement program will be subject to a prudence /reasonableness review in the Company's next Statement of Intent rate case. d) The Company shall provide a schedule demonstrating the "proof of revenues" relied upon to calculate the proposed rate for the Rate Effective Period. The proposed rates shall conform as closely as is practicable to the revenue allocation principles approved in the Final Order. V AttPStatinn A sworn statement shall be filed by the Company's Chief Officer in Charge of Mid -Tex Operations affirming that the filed schedules are in compliance with the provisions of this mechanism and are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, information and belief. No testimony shall be filed, but a brief narrative explanation shall be provided of any changes to corporate structure or allocation of common costs. VI. Evaluation Procedures The regulatory authority having original jurisdiction over the Company's rates shall have no less than ninety (90) days to review the Company's filed schedules and work papers. The Company will be prepared to provide all supplemental information as may be requested to ensure adequate review by the relevant regulatory authority. The Company shall not unilaterally impose any limits upon the provision of supplemental information and such information shall be provided within ten (10) working days of the original request. The regulatory authority may propose any adjustments it determines to be required to bring the schedules into compliance with the above provisions. During and following the ninety (90) day review period and a thirty (30) day response period, the Company and the regulatory authority will work collaboratively and seek agreement on, the proposed adjustments to the Company's schedule and proposed rates. If agreement has been reached by the Company and the regulatory authority, the regulatory authority shall authorize an increase or decrease to the Company's rates so as to achieve the revenue levels indicated for the Rate Effective Period. If, at the end of the thirty (30) day response period, the Company and the regulatory authority have not reached agreement on the proposed adjustments, the Company shall have the right to appeal the regulatory authority's action or inaction to the Railroad Commission of Texas. Upon the filing of any appeal, the Company shall have the right to implement the proposed RRM rate adjustment, including the adjustment attributable to steel service line replacement program costs, subject to refund. Rates established pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism, if approved as provided herein, shall be effective on August 15 of each year. VII. Reconsideration and Appeal Orders issued pursuant to this mechanism are ratemaking orders and shall be subject to appeal under Sections 102.001(b) and 103.021, et seq., of the Texas Utilities Code (Vernon 2007). VIII. Notice Notice of the annual Rate Review Mechanism filing shall be provided pursuant to Section 104.103, TEx. UTIL. CODE ANN. no later than forty -five (45) days after the Company makes its annual filing pursuant to this tariff. The notice to customers shall include the following information: a) a description of the proposed revision of rates and schedules; b) the effect the proposed revision of rates is expected to have on the rates applicable to each customer class and on an average bill for each affected customer; c) the service area or areas in which the proposed rate adjustment would apply; d) the date the proposed rate adjustment was filed with the regulatory authority; and e) the Company's address, telephone number and website where information concerning the proposed rate adjustment may be obtained. IX. RRM Schedules and Information Accumulated Deferred Income Tax ("ADIT ") Items To Be Recognized in Rate Base The following list identifies those ADIT components to be included in the calculation of rate base for both the Evaluation Period and Rate Effective Period calculations: Mid -Tex: Gas Plant in Service Insurance Accruals Benefit Accruals Deferred Expense Projects Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Customer Advances UNICAP Section 263A Costs (which shall be removed from Atmos Mid -Tex when these costs are transferred to Atmos Pipeline Texas) Regulatory Asset - Mid Tex Regulatory Liability - Mid -Tex Other Plant SSU - Customer Support: Gas Plant in Service SSU - General Office: Gas Plant in Service Insurance Accruals Benefits Accruals Deferred Expense Projects Prepaid Expenses Regulatory Liability - Atmos 109 FAS 115 Adjustment Treasury Lock Adjustment Revenue Agent Report Carryforward Adjustments 1990 -1985 Tax Net Operating Loss Credit Carryforwards State Bonus Depreciation R & D Credit Valuation Allowance Other Plant b. Discretionary Costs to Be Disallowed from Rider RRM filings The following types of employee reimbursed expenses and directly incurred costs are to be removed from all expense and rate base amounts included within Rider RRM filings for the Evaluation Period and for the Rate Effective Period: Amounts incurred for travel, meals or entertainment of employee spouses. Amounts for air travel that exceed published commercial coach air fares. Amounts incurred for hotel rooms exceeding $250 per night inclusive of taxes and fees assessed on such rooms. Amounts for alcoholic beverages. Amounts paid for admission to entertainment, sports, art or cultural events, and all event sponsorship costs. Amounts for social club dues or fees. ATTACHMENT 6 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION SUMMARY OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RATE STRUCTURE TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009 (2010 RRM SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL) Line No. Description Current Proposed (Beginning Oct 1) (a) (b) (d) 1 Rate R 2 Customer Charge per month $7.00 $7.00 3 4 Consumption Charge per MCF $2.2647 $2.5246 5 2008 RRM True -up per MCF $0.0000 $0.0000 6 2009 RRM True -up per MCF $0.0060 $0.0000 7 Total Consumption Charge per MCF $2.2707 $2.5246 8 Rate C 9 Customer Charge per month $13.50 $13.50 10 11 Consumption Charge per MCF $0.9825 $1.0796 12 2008 RRM True -up per MCF $0.0000 $0.0000 13 2009 RRM True -up per MCF $0.0052 $0.0000 14 Total Consumption Charge per MCF $0.9877 $1.0796 15 Rate I & T 16 Customer Charge per month $425.00 $450.00 17 18 Consumption Charge per MMBTU: 19 First 1,500 MMBTU $0.2496 $0.2750 20 Next 3,500 MMBTU $0.1820 $0.2015 21 Over 5,000 MMBTU $0.0390 $0.0433 22 2008 RRM True -up per MMBTU: 23 First 1,500 MMBTU $0.0087 $0.0000 24 Next 3,500 MMBTU $0.0064 $0.0000 25 Over 5,000 MMBTU $0.0014 $0.0000 26 2009 RRM True -up per MMBTU: 27 First 1,500 MMBTU $0.0000 $0.0000 28 Next 3,500 MMBTU $0.0000 $0.0000 29 Over 5,000 MMBTU $0.0000 $0.0000 30 Total Consumption Charge per MMBTU 31 First 1,500 MMBTU $0.2583 $0.2750 32 Next 3,500 MMBTU $0.1884 $0.2015 33 Over 5,000 MMBTU $0.0404 $0.0433 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION CUSTOMER IMPACT OF PROPOSED RATES COMPARED TO CURRENT RATES TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009 (2010 RRM SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL) Line No. Description Prospective Rate Increase (a) (b) 1 Rate R 2 Consumption Charge per MCF Change from Current 3 Rate $0.2539 4 Billing Units for Specified Period 78,500,000 5 Total Change in Base Revenue $19,934,212 6 Associated Revenue Taxes $1.490.401 7 Total Rate Impact $21,424,613 8 Number of Bills for Specified Period 17,287,740 9 Average Impact per Bill $1.24 10 Rate C 11 Consumption Charge per MCF Change from Current 12 Rate $0.0919 13 Billing Units for Specified Period 49,500,000 14 Total Change in Base Revenue $4,547,060 15 Associated Revenue Taxes $339,966 16 Total Rate Impact $4,887,026 17 Number of Bills for Specified Period 1,445,436 18 Average Impact per Bill $3.38 19 Rates I &T - Customer Charge 20 Customer Charge Change from Current 21 Rate $25.00 22 Billing Units for Specified Period 10,985 23 Total Change in Base Revenue $274,625 24 Associated Revenue Taxes $20,533 25 Total Rate Impact $295,157.61 26 Rates I &T - 1 st block 27 Consumption Charge per MCF Change from Current 28 Rate $0.0167 29 Billing Units for Specified Period 10,597,655 30 Total Change in Base Revenue $177,031 31 Associated Revenue Taxes $13,236 32 Total Rate Impact $190,266 33 Rates I &T - 2nd block 34 Consumption Charge per MCF Change from Current 35 Rate $0.0131 36 Billing Units for Specified Period 10,791,216 37 Total Change in Base Revenue $141,297 38 Associated Revenue Taxes $10,564 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Total Rate Impact $151,862 Rates I &T - 3rd block Consumption Charge per MCF Change from Current Rate $0.0029 Billing Units for Specified Period 16,585.623 Total Change in Base Revenue $47,655 Associated Revenue Taxes $3.563 Total Rate Impact $51.218 Rates I &T - Total Total Rate Impact $688 Number of Bills for Specified Period 10,985 Average Impact per Bill $62.68 Total Change in Base Revenue $25,121,880 Total Rate Impact (Inc. Rev. Taxes) $27,000,142 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION AVERAGE BILL COMPARISON- OCTOBER 1, 2010 TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009 Line 10.31 K $4.6303 = 21.03 1 Rate R (_ 4.5 Mcf $ 41.34 2 Customer charge X $4.6303 = 158.57 3 Consumption charge 4.5 MCF 4 Rider GCR Part A 4.5 MCF 5 Rider GCR Part B 4.5 MCF 6 7 Subtotal 8 Rider FF & Rider TAX $41.34 9 Total 10 11 Customer charge 12 Consumption charge 4.5 MCF 13 Rider GCR Part A 4.5 MCF 14 Rider GCR Part B 4.5 MCF 15 16 Subtotal 17 Revenue- related Tax Reimbursement $42.49 18 Total 19 20 21 Rate C CCU 34.2 Mcf 22 Customer charge 23 Consumption charge 34.2 MCF 24 Rider GCR Part A 34.2 MCF 25 Rider GCR Part B 34.2 MCF 26 27 28 Subtotal 29 Revenue - related Tax Reimbursement $224.87 30 Total 31 32 Customer charge 33 Consumption charge 34.2 MCF 34 Rider GCR Part A 34.2 MCF 35 Rider GCR Part B 34.2 MCF 36 37 Subtotal 38 Revenue - related Tax Reimbursement $228.02 39 Total 40 41 Rate 10 3457 MMBTU 101112010 CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE X $2.2707 = 10.31 K $4.6303 = 21.03 X $0.6611 = 3.00 $ 41.34 X 0.07477 = 3.09 $7.00 X $2.5246 = 11.46 X $4.6303 = 21.03 K $0.6611 = 3.00 X 0.07477 = $42.49 X 0.07477 = $224.87 $13.50 X $1.0796 = 36.97 K $4.6303 = 158.57 X $0.5542 = 18.98 X 0.07477 = $228.02 $245.07 $3.38 1.40% CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE $45.67 $1.24 2.79% CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE $13.50 X $0.9877 = 33.82 X $4.6303 = 158.57 X $0.5542 = 18.98 X 0.07477 = $224.87 $13.50 X $1.0796 = 36.97 K $4.6303 = 158.57 X $0.5542 = 18.98 X 0.07477 = $228.02 $245.07 $3.38 1.40% CURRENT PROPOSED CHANGE 42 Customer charge X $0.2015 = X $0.2583 43 Consumption charge 1,500 MMBTU 44 Consumption charge 1,957 MMBTU 45 Consumption charge 0 MMBTU 46 Rider GCR Part A 3,457 MMBTU 47 Rider GCR Part B 3,457 MMBTU 48 49 Subtotal 50 Revenue - related Tax Reimbursement $18,246.23 51 Total 52 53 Customer charge 54 Consumption charge 1,500 MMBTU 55 Consumption charge 1,957 MMBTU 56 Consumption charge 0 MMBTU 57 Rider GCR Part A 3,457 MMBTU 58 Rider GCR Part B 3,457 MMBTU 59 Subtotal 60 Revenue- related Tax Reimbursement $18,321.91 61 Total 62 63 Rate T f- 3480 MMBTU 64 Customer charge 65 Consumption charge 1,500 MMBTU 66 Consumption charge 1,957 MMBTU 67 Consumption charge 0 MMBTU 68 Rider GCR Part B 3,457 MMBTU 69 70 Subtotal 71 Revenue - related Tax Reimbursement $2,239.56 72 Total 73 74 Customer charge 75 Consumption charge 1,500 MMBTU 76 Consumption charge 1,957 MMBTU 77 Consumption charge 0 MMBTU 78 Rider GCR Part B 3,457 MMBTU 79 Subtotal 80 Revenue - related Tax Reimbursement $2,315.24 81 Total X $0.2750 = X $0.2015 = X $0.0433 = X $4.6303 = X $0.3062 = X 0.07477 = CURRENT X $0.2583 = $425.00 X $0.2015 = X $0.2583 = 387.45 0.00 X $0.1884 = 368.69 X $0.0404 = 0.00 173.10 X $4.6303 = 16,006.67 X $0.3062 = 1,058.42 $18,246.23 X 0.07477 = 1.364.20 X $0.2750 = X $0.2015 = X $0.0433 = X $4.6303 = X $0.3062 = X 0.07477 = CURRENT X $0.2583 = 387.45 X $0.2015 = X $0.1884 = 368.69 0.00 X $0.0404 = 0.00 X $0.3062 = 1,058.42 173.10 $2,239.56 X 0.07477 = 167.44 $450.00 412.51 394.31 0.00 16,006.67 1,058.42 $18,321.91 1,369.86 $19,691.77 $81.34 0.41% PROPOSED CHANGE $450.00 $25.00 X $0.2750 = 412.51 $25.06 X $0.2015 = 394.31 $25.62 X $0.0433 = 0.00 X $0.3062 = 1,058.42 $2,315.24 X 0.07477 = 173.10 $2,488.34 $81.34 3.38% ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION CUSTOMER IMPACT OF PROPOSED RATES COMPARED TO CURRENT RATES (STEEL SERVICE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM) Line No. Description Prospective Rate Increase (a) (b) 1 Rate R 2 Monthly Customer Charge Change from Current 3 Rate $0.15 Billing Units for Specified 4 Period 17,287,740 Total Change in Base 5 Revenue $2,593,161 Associated Revenue 6 Taxes $193,880 7 Total Rate Impact $2,787,041 Number of Bills for Specified 8 Period 17,287,740 9 Average Impact per Bill $0.16 10 Rate C 11 Monthly Customer Charge Change from Current 12 Rate $0.41 Billing Units for Specified 13 Period 1,445,436 Total Change in Base 14 Revenue $592,629 Associated Revenue 15 Taxes $44,308 16 Total Rate Impact $636,937 Number of Bills for Specified 17 Period 1,445,436 18 Average Impact per Bill $0.44 19 Total Change in Base 20 Revenue $3,185,790 Total Rate Impact (Inc. Rev. 21 Taxes) $3,423,979 ATTACHMENT C SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION AND ATMGS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE WHEREAS, this settlement agreement is entered into by Atmos Energy Corp's Mid -Tex Division and Atmos Cities Steering Committee ( "ACSC ") whose members include the Cities of Abilene, Addison, Allen, Alvarado, Angus, Anna, Argyle, Arlington, Bedford, Bellmead, Benbrook, Beverly Hills, Blossom, Blue Ridge, Bowie, Boyd, Bridgeport, Brownwood, Buffalo, Burkburnett, Burleson, Caddo Mills, Carrollton, Cedar Hill, Celeste, Celina, Cisco, Cleburne, Clyde, College Station, Colleyville, Colorado City, Comanche, Coolidge, Coppell, Corinth, Corral City, Crandall, Crowley, Dalworthington Gardens, Denison, Desoto, Duncanville, Eastland, Edgecliff Village, Emory, Ennis, Euless, Everman, Fairview, Farmers Branch, Farmersville, Fate, Flower Mound, Forest Hill, Fort Worth, Frisco, Frost, Gainesville, Garland, Garrett, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Haltom City, Harker Heights, Haskell, Hewitt, Highland Park, Highland Village, Honey Grove, Hurst, Iowa Park, Irving, Justin, Kaufman, Keene, Keller, Kemp, Kennedale, Kerrville, Killeen, Krum, Lakeside, Lake Worth, Lancaster, Lewisville, Lincoln Park, Little Elm, Lorena, Malakoff, Mansfield, McKinney, Melissa, Mesquite, Midlothian, Murphy, Nocona, North Richland Hills, Northlake, Oakleaf, ©villa, Palestine, Pantego, Paris, Parker, Pecan Hill, Plano, Ponder, Pottsboro, Prosper, Quitman, Red Oak, Reno (Parker County), Richardson, Richland, Richland Hills, Roanoke, Robinson, Rockwall, Roscoe, Rowlett, Sachse, Saginaw, Seagoville, Sherman, Snyder, Southlake, Springtown, Stamford, Stephenville, Sulphur Springs, Sweetwater, Temple, Terrell, The Colony, Tyler, University Park, Venus, Vernon, Waco, Watauga, Waxahachie, Westlake, Whitesboro, White Settlement, Wichita Falls, Woodway, and Wylie. WHEREAS, on March 15, 2010, Atmos filed with the ACSC Cities an application, hereafter referred to as the 2010 RRM filing, to adjust rates pursuant to Rider RRM - Rate Review Mechanism; and WHEREAS, ACSC has hired experts and lawyers to analyze the rates proposed by Atmos Energy Corp.'s, Mid -Tex Division ( "Atmos" or "Company ") in its 2010 RRM filing; and WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement resolves all issues between Atmos and ACSC ( "the Signatories ") regarding the 2010 RRM filing, which is currently pending before the ACSC Cities, in a manner that the Signatories believe is consistent with the public interest, and the Signatories represent diverse interests; and WHEREAS, the Signatories believe that the resolution of the issues raised in the 2010 RRM filing can best be accomplished by each ACSC City approving this Settlement Agreement and the rates, terms and conditions reflected in the tariffs attached to this Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants established herein, the Signatories, through their undersigned representatives, agree to the following Settlement Terms as a means of fully resolving all issues between the ACSC Cities and Atmos involving the 2010 RRM filing: Settlement Terms 1. Upon the execution of this Settlement Agreement, Atmos and the counsel for the ACSC cities will recommend that an ordinance or resolution be adopted to approve this Settlement Agreement and implement the rates, terms and conditions reflected in the tariffs attached to this Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A. (Attachment A to the Ordinance ratifying this Agreement). Said tariffs should allow Atmos an additional, prospective $27 million in annual revenue by implementation of rates shown in the proof of revenues attached as Exhibit B. (Attachment B to the Ordinance ratifying this Agreement). The uniform implementation of gas rates, terms and conditions established by this Settlement Agreement shall be effective for bills rendered on or after October 1, 2010. 2. In an effort to streamline the regulatory review process, Atmos and ACSC have agreed to renew the Rate Review Mechanism ( "Rider RRM ") for a period commencing with the Company's April 1, 2011 filing under this mechanism for the calendar year 2010, effective August 15, 2011, and concluding upon the implementation of new, final rates established pursuant to the general rate case that Atmos will file on or before June 1, 2013. Rider RRM provides for an annual rate adjustment to reflect changes in billing determinants, operating and maintenance expense, depreciation expense, other taxes expense, and revenues as well as changes in capital investment and associated changes in gross revenue related taxes. The revised RRM tariff is included in Exhibit A. 3. Notwithstanding the RRM rate adjustments that will occur pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Settlement Agreement, Atmos and ACSC agree that on or before June 1, 2013, Atmos shall file a general, system -wide rate case for the Mid -Tex Division. During the pendency of the general rate case, Atmos and ACSC agree that rate adjustments associated with the RRM filing for calendar year 2011 shall be implemented on August 15, 2012, and shall remain in effect until the earlier of either the issuance of a final order by the Railroad Commission of Texas in the general rate case to be filed on or before June 1, 2013, or the entry of an agreed upon order resolving all issues involved in the general rate case. The adjustments made or requested in the 5 th year RRM shall not be considered precedent during the general rate case. 4. Atmos and ACSC further agree that for the period commencing March 1, 2010 through September 30, 2012, Atmos will expand its existing steel service line replacement program to complete the replacement of 100,000 steel service lines within its Mid -Tex Division during this period. Atmos and ACSC agree that a risk -based approach should be adopted to allow replacement of the highest priority steel service lines within this time period. Atmos agrees to provide the ACSC cities with quarterly reports providing the number and location of the lines replaced during the quarter. Atmos agrees to coordinate with ACSC member cities to minimize disruption to cities' rights of way without compromising the safety of residents of the cities. 5. Atmos and ACSC agree that costs incurred to replace steel service lines prior to October 1, 2010 shall be included in the RRM rate adjustment calculation for the 2010 calendar year, and shall not be subject to or included in the rate cap limitations set forth in subsection IV (a) -(b) of the Rider RRM tariff. E. Atmos and ACSC agree that the projected incremental direct costs incurred to replace steel service lines on or after October 1, 2010 shall be separately identified and shall not be subject to or included in the rate cap limitations set forth in subsection IV (a) -(b) of the Rider RRM tariff. Atmos and ACSC further agree that such projected direct incremental costs incurred to replace steel service lines after October 1, 2010, shall be separately calculated and recovered as a discrete component of customer charges in the Company's annual RRM filings as set forth below: a. Atmos and ACSC agree that Atmos shall be entitled to separately adjust rates for the Rate Effective Period as defined in the Rider RRM tariff to allow recovery of the projected annual revenue requirement associated with direct incremental costs to be incurred in connection with a steel service line replacement program, that are not otherwise included within the RRM cost of service, including a return on equity of 9.0% within the overall weighted cast of capital applied to net investment (net plant additions, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated deferred income taxes), depreciation expense and applicable taxes; b. Atmos and ACSC further agree that the capital structure used to calculate the steel service line replacement rate adjustment will be the actual Evaluation Period (as defined in the Rider RRM tariff ratio of long -term debt and equity, with an equity percentage not to exceed 50 %; c. Rate recovery associated with a steel service line replacement program shall occur through an adjustment to the Residential and Commercial customer charges. Current year recovery factors as of October 1, 2010 shall be $0.15 for residential customers and $0.41 for commercial customers. The rates will be adjusted annually, however, Atmos and ACSC agree that in no case will the per customer monthly cost recovery factors attributable to a steel service line replacement program exceed $0.44 for residential customers or $1.22 for commercial customers, either prior to or during the pendency of the general rate case Atmos will file on or before June 1, 2013. d. Atmos and ACSC further agree that any per customer amount attributable to cost recovery for a steel service line replacement program shall be subject to review by the regulatory authority in a subsequent Evaluation Period as defined in the Rider RRM tariff and all incremental costs associated with a steel service line replacement program shall be subject to a prude ncelreasonableness review in the general rate case to be filed by Atmos on or before June 1, 2013. 7. With respect to the Company's annual RRM filings, Atmos agrees to pay all reasonable and necessary expenses of each entity having original jurisdiction that are incurred to review the Company's annual RRM filings. Atmos further agrees that in calculating the proposed rate for any Rate Effective Period, the Company shall not include: (1) any external legal, expert, or consultant costs to prepare and/or provide supportive information related to its filing; or (2) reimbursements to original jurisdiction entities. 8. Notwithstanding paragraph 7 of this Settlement Agreement, Atmos and ACSC agree that in the event of an appeal of an original jurisdiction entity's decision regarding a proposed RRM adjustment, recovery of rate case expenses shall be determined according to Chapters 103 and 104, TEX. UTIL. CODE ANN. Further, in the event of such appeal(s), Atmos shall recover any reimbursement made to the original jurisdiction entity through a surcharge to all customer rates that are subject to the Commission's jurisdiction in that proceeding or proceedings that might be joined therewith, regardless of whether such reimbursements are made during the initial review period or appeal period. 9. The ACSC Cities agree that they will not challenge the legal basis of the rates, terms, and conditions reflected in Exhibit A, or any annual RRM adjustment that is implemented pursuant to Rider RRM. 10. Atmos and the ACSC Cities further agree that the express terms of the Rider RRM are supplemental to the filing, notice, regulatory review, or appellate procedural process of the ratemaking provisions of Chapter 104 of the Texas Utilities Code. If the statute requires a mandatory action on behalf of the municipal regulatory authority or Atmos, the parties will follow the provisions of such statute. If the statute allows discretion on behalf of the municipal regulatory authority, the ACSC Cities agree that they shall exercise such discretion in such a way as to implement the provisions of the RRM tariff. If Atmos appeals an action or inaction of an ACSC City regarding an RRM filing to the Railroad Commission, the ACSC Cities agree that they will not oppose the implementation of interim rates or advocate the imposition of a bond by Atmos consistent with the RRM tariff. Atmos agrees that it will make no filings on behalf of its Mid -Tex division under the provisions of TEX. UTIL. CODE ANN. § 104.301 while the Rider RRM is in place. In the event that a regulatory authority fails to act or enters an adverse decision regarding the proposed annual RRM adjustment, the Railroad Commission of Texas shall, pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Utilities Code, have exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review the action or inaction of the regulatory authority exercising exclusive original jurisdiction over the RRM request. In addition, the Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the ACSC. Cities' right to initiate a show cause proceeding or the Company's right to file a Statement of Intent under the provisions of the Texas Utilities Code. 11. Atmos and ACSC further agree that the ordinance or resolution adopting this Settlement Agreement shall include a provision authorizing Atmos to establish regulatory asset account(s) for costs related to working gas in storage. Atmos and ACSC further agree that the language authorizing these regulatory asset account(s) shall be the same as that set forth in the 4 th Ordering Paragraph (Page 10 of 11 ) of the Final Order Nunc Pro Tunc issued by Railroad Commission of Texas in GUD No. 9869 on February 23, 2010. This language states as follows: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Atmos shall be allowed to establish a regulatory asset for the ad valorem taxes related to working gas in storage. In addition, Atmos shall be allowed to establish a regulatory asset for (1) the costs associated with Accumulated Deferred Income Tax for UNICAP Section 263A, (2) the WACOG to FIFO change, and (3) an amount equal to the rate of return approved in this RRM Proceeding for the Accumulated Deferred Income Tax items related to working gas in storage. Atmos shall record these amounts in Other Regulatory Assets (Account 182.3). These deferred items shall be considered, along with the investment in working gas, for consideration and possible inclusion in rates for Atmos Pipeline -Texas in that entity's next filed rate case. If the Commission determines that such deferred items are not properly included in the rates of Atmos Pipeline — Texas, the items shall be further deferred until the next Atmos Mid -Tex rate case filed after the final decision in the Atmos Pipeline -Texas rate case for inclusion with the working gas investment in the Atmos Mid -Tex rates. 12. Atmos and ACSC agree that each ACSC city should approve this Settlement Agreement and adopt an ordinance or resolution to implement for the ACSC Cities the rates, terms, and conditions reflected in the tariffs attached to this Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A, as well as the regulatory asset authorization language discussed in paragraph 12 of this Settlement Agreement. 13. The Signatories agree that the terms of the Settlement Agreement are interdependent and indivisible, and that if any ACSC city enters an order that is inconsistent with this Settlement Agreement, then any Signatory may withdraw without being deemed to have waived any procedural right or to have taken any substantive position on any fact or issue by virtue of that Signatory's entry into the Settlement Agreement or its subsequent withdrawal. If any ACSC city rejects this Settlement Agreement, then this Settlement Agreement shall be void ab initio and counsel for the ACSC Cities shall thereafter only take such actions as are in accordance with the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. 14. The Signatories agree that all negotiations, discussions and conferences related to the Settlement Agreement are privileged, inadmissible, and not relevant to prove any issues associated with Atmos' 2010 RRM filing. 15. The Signatories agree that neither this Settlement Agreement nor any oral or written statements made during the course of settlement negotiations may be used for any purpose other than as necessary to support the entry by the ACSC Cities of an ordinance or resolution implementing this Settlement Agreement. 16. The Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement is binding on each Signatory only for the purpose of settling the issues set forth herein and for no other purposes, and, except to the extent the Settlement Agreement governs a Signatory's rights and obligations for future periods, this Settlement Agreement shall not be binding or precedential upon a Signatory outside this proceeding. 17. The Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts and may be filed with facsimile signatures. Agreed to this day of August, 2010. ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEX DIVISION By John A. Paris President, Mid -Tex Division Agreed to this day of August 2010. ATTORNEY FOR ATMOS TEXAS MUNICIPALITIES, WHOSE MEMBERS INCLUDE THE CITIES OF ABILENE, ADDISON, ALLEN, ALVARADO, ANGUS, ANNA, ARGYLE, ARLINGTON, BEDFORD, BELLMEAD, BENBROOK, BEVERLY HILLS, BLOSSOM, BLUE RIDGE, BOWIE, BOYD, BRIDGEPORT, BROWNWOOD, BUFFALO, BURKBURNETT, BURLESON, CADDO MILLS, CARROLLTON, CEDAR HILL, CELESTE, CELINA, CISCO, CLEBURNE, CLYDE, COLLEGE STATION, COLLEYVILLE, COLORADO CITY, COMANCHE, COOLIDGE, GOPPELL, CORINTH, CORRAL CITY, CRANDALL, CROWLEY, DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, DENISON, DESOTO, DUNCANVILLE, EASTLAND, EDGECLIFF VILLAGE, EMORY, ENNIS, EULESS, EVERMAN, FAIRVIEW, FARMERS BRANCH, FARMERSVILLE, FATE, FLOWER MOUND, FOREST HILL, FORT WORTH, FRISCO, FROST, GAINESVILLE, GARLAND, GARRETT, GRAND PRAIRIE, GRAPEVINE, HALTOM CITY, HARKER HEIGHTS, HASKELL, HEWITT, HIGHLAND PARK, HIGHLAND VILLAGE, HONEY GROVE, HURST, IOWA PARK, IRVING, JUSTIN, KAUFMAN, KEENE, KELLER, KEMP, KENNEDALE, KERRVILLE, KILLEEN, KRUM, LAKESIDE, LAKE WORTH, LANCASTER, LEWISVILLE, LINCOLN PARK, LITTLE ELM, LORENA, MALAKOFF, MANSFIELD, MCKINNEY, MELISSA, MESQUITE, MIDLOTHIAN, MURPHY, NOCONA, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NORTHLAKE, OAKLEAF, OVILLA, PALESTINE, PANTEGO, PARIS, PARKER, PECAN HILL, PLANO, PONDER, POTTSBORO, PROSPER, QUITMAN, RED OAK, RENO (PARKER COUNTY), RICHARDSON, RICHLAND, RICHLAND HILLS, ROANOKE, ROBINSON, ROCKWALL, ROSCOE, ROWLETT, SACHSE, SAGINAW, SEAGOVILLE, SHERMAN, SNYDER, SOUTHLAKE, SPRINGTOWN, STAMFORD, STEPHENVILLE, SULPHUR SPRINGS, SWEETWATER, TEMPLE, TERRELL, THE COLONY, TYLER, UNIVERSITY PARK, VENUS, VERNON, WACO, WATAUGA, WAXAHACHIE, WESTLAKE, WHITESBOR©, WHITE SETTLEMENT, WICHITA FALLS, WOODWAY, AND WYLIE IN Geoffrey Gay* * Subject to approval by ACSC City Councils CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Communications Presented by: Mary Peters Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. F.5 Subject: GIN 2010 -073 Consider request for the U.S. Postal Service to officially designate North Richland Hills as the preferred city name in the postal addresses for all properties located within the North Richland Hills city limits - Resolution No. 2010 -028 Summary The U.S. Postal Service uses another city's name for the mailing addresses in three North Richland Hills neighborhoods. The addresses were set up based on zip code boundary lines, rather than city limit lines. We are seeking City Council's support in requesting that the Postal Service officially designate North Richland Hills as the preferred city name for addresses in these three neighborhoods. General Description Most neighborhoods in North Richland Hills have a mailing address that ends with "North Richland Hills, TX 76180" or "North Richland Hills, TX 76182." There are three neighborhoods however that have a different last line for their mailing address. This includes approximately: ■ 588 properties with Haltom City, TX 76117 105 properties with Watauga, TX 76148 72 properties with Hurst, TX 76053 While these neighborhoods are located in the North Richland Hills city limits, they are served by post offices in neighboring cities and their "city, state, zip" line corresponds with the post office that serves their neighborhood. Fort Worth may also be used as an alternate acceptable city name in their address. City staff gets questions a few times each year as to why these properties do not have a North Richland Hills address. To minimize confusion, we would like for North Richland Hills be officially designated by the U.S. Postal Service as the "preferred last line" for these three neighborhoods. If this designation is approved, residents would continue to use their current zip code, but with the North Richland Hills city name. Residents would continue to be served by their current post office and by their same mail carriers. The city name that is used in their current mailing address would also still be acceptable. The Postal Service's address matching software would automatically change the city in the last line of each address to North Richland Hills. All mailers who use this address matching software (utilities, credit card companies, insurance companies, bulk mailers, and other major corporations) would automatically default to North Richland Hills when sending correspondence to these neighborhoods. This change could help clear up any confusion about what city these properties are located in. It could also help to make residents in the affected neighborhoods feel more included as part of the North Richland Hills community. The neighborhoods that would be impacted are highlighted in yellow on the map below. �_W I 70244 'Ei 2 38 I col 116 KwxR Xi•Im• 76034 FRrt x.wa.nc M82,,_ W.r h M.hW.d Xila 1 76137 's Vol W" 76148 1 76054 t wsm upa E .. i i j 76180 E... " MWh RkMand Hill. t _ l j Xvrst 76117 - rfiU53 Fort Worth 1._ . NRH ZIPCODES N 76118 September 2009 source: North central Texas 'r i + Council of Ga rnm is 1 inch = 4, 000 Feet i'. '• After receiving an official request from the City for a "preferred last line" designation, the Postal Service will survey residents in each affected neighborhood to make sure a majority agree with this designation. Recommendation To approve Resolution No. 2010 -028 requesting that North Richland Hills be officially designated by the U.S. Postal Service as the "preferred last line" for all properties within the North Richland Hills city limits, including those within the 76117, 76148 and 76053 zip codes. N R _ ` RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -028 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS REQUESTING THAT THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE DESIGNATE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AS THE "PREFERRED LAST LINE" FOR ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY LIMITS WHEREAS, most neighborhoods in North Richland Hills have a mailing address that ends with "North Richland Hills, TX 76184" or "North Richland Hills, TX 76182," however three neighborhoods in our community have a different last line for their mailing address; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills desires for all properties within our incorporated boundaries to have North Richland Hills in the last line of their official postal address; and WHEREAS, such a designation by the U.S. Postal Service would impact approximately 588 properties in the Haltom City 76117 zip code, approximately 105 properties in the Watauga 76148 zip code, and approximately 72 properties in the Hurst 76053 zip code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; Section 1. that the Mayor and City Council officially support the request for the U.S. Postal Service to designate North Richland Hills as the "preferred last line" in the official addresses for all properties located with in the North Richland Hills city limits, including those specified properties within the 76117, 76148 and 76053 zip codes; and Section 2. that City Staff will provide the U.S. Postal Service with any and all information required to formally make such designation. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 13th day of September, 2010. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney 1,1 ;j'rl:t8] ►1 =1 BWAIRS &X0163'►111 =1 z 16 Mary Peters, Public Information Officer CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. F.6 Subject: GN 2010 -074 Appointment to the Civil Service Commission - Place 4 Summary Council is being asked to confirm the appointment of Mr. Arthur De La Flor to Place 4 on the Civil Service Commission. General Description The term of office for the individual serving in Place 4 on the Civil Service Commission expired June 30, 2010. The Charter stipulates that the appointments to this Board are mayoral appointments with confirmation by two - thirds vote of the Council. The Charter also stipulates that the Place 4 position shall be appointed from a list or lists of nominees provided to the Mayor by the City employee associations. If no list is presented, the Mayor may make the appointment as he deems fit. The North Richland Hills Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 79 has nominated Arthur De La Flor to the position. Mayor Trevino met with Mr. De La Flor on September 8 and is recommending Council confirm the appointment. Recommendation: To confirm the appointment of Mr. Arthur De La Flor to Place 4 on the Civil Service Commission, term expiring June 30, 2012. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. G.0 Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Presented by: Agenda No. G.1 Subject: Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. H.0 Subject: INFORMATION AND REPORTS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Councilman Tim Welch Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. H.1 Subject: Announcements - Councilman Welch Announcements: Want to make your home more energy efficient and reduce your utility bills? Stop by the North Richland Hills Energy Efficiency Fair to learn steps you can take to save energy. The fair will take place from 3 to 6 p.m. on Friday, September 17 and from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturday, September 18 in the Community Room at the NRH Public Library. Free weatherization kits will be available while supplies last. For more information, please call the Neighborhood Services Department at 817- 427 -6650. The NRH Public Library and Carter Blood Care will host a blood drive from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Monday, September 20. This event will take place in the Community Room at the Library. To sign up or get more details, visit carterblood care. org or call the Library at 817- 427 -6814. Line up the babysitter and dust off those dancing shoes for an evening of live Latin music and salsa dancing on Saturday, September 25. This unique, cultural event will take place from 7 to 9:15 p.m. at Stormy Plaza, which is located on Grand Avenue across from the Library. Seating will be on the lawn. You are welcome to bring lawn chairs or blankets. For additional information, please call 817- 427 -6620. Kudos Korner: Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Chris Jungst, Kent Carter, Mary Sullivan, Jeff Stone and David Nock, Fire Department — A resident e- mailed to thank the Fire Department for their rapid and professional response to his heart attack. Because of their quick efforts he had minimal damage to his heart. The resident said he appreciates the Cardiac Cath Lab program and all who have committed the resources and expertise for helping patients. They did an amazing job on him and he is still alive because of it, the e-mail said. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 9 -13 -2010 Agenda No. H.2 Subject: Adjournment