The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 2011-02-14 AgendasCITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, February 14, 2011 5:00 P.M. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.2 Recreation Center Naming Recommendation (20 Minutes) A.3 Water and Wastewater Rate Study (30 Minutes) A.4 North Richland Hills Police Department 2010 Annual Report (15 Minutes) A.5 Police Department Racial Profiling Annual Report (5 Minutes) A.6 Quarterly Financial Status Report (10 Minutes) A.7 Quarterly Capital Improvement Project Status Report (10 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to Deliberate the Lease of City Property (Mineral Leases) B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096- 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) C.0 Adjournment February 14, 2011 — City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5 Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on February 11, 2011 at 2:. ?" p.m r /� �t � n Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. February 14, 2011 — City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, February 14, 2011 7:00 P.M. Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and schedule: ❑ City Hall on the day of the meeting Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at www.nrhtx.com after 10 a.m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Whitson A.2 Pledge - Councilman Whitson A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) - Keep NRH Beautiful Green Campus Awards /Environmental Education Grants presented by Councilman Barth A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. February 14, 2011 —City Council Agenda Page 3 of 5 B.1 Approval of Minutes of January 24, 2011 City Council Meeting B.2 PU 2011 -005 Authorize Inter -local Purchasing Agreement with the City of China Grove B.3 PU 2011 -006 Renew Annual Contract with VMC Landscaping Service for the Parks Mowing Services B.4 GN 2011 -011 Authorize City of Hurst Precinct Line Road Public Safety Services Municipal Boundaries Agreement - Resolution No. 2011 -007 B.5 GN 2011 -012 Authorize Texas Governor's Office Criminal Justice Programs Competitive Grant - Resolution No. 2011 -008 C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2010 -09 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey for a zoning change from C -2 Commercial to U Institutional on Tract 9V, Abstract 1606 located at 4247 Road to the Mall. (2.993 acres) - Ordinance No. 3126 C.2 ZC 2010 -10 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Ben Johnson to revise an existing Residential Planned Development (PD 61) for West Hightower Place Addition located in the 6800 Block of Hightower Drive - Ordinance No. 3127 C.3 TR 2011 -01 Public Hearing and Consideration of amendments to Sections 118 -631 "Table of Permitted Uses" and 118 -001 "Definitions" of the North Richland Hills Zoning Ordinance. Proposed amendments include the addition of the following two previously unlisted uses to the table: Drive - Through Retail Buildings (less than 1,400 square feet) and Alternative Financial Establishments (check cashing, payday advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business) as well as the definitions of these uses - Ordinance No. 3128 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. No items for this category. E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS No items for this category. G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda February 14, 2011 — City Council Agenda Page 4 of 5 H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 Announcements - Councilman Welch H.2 Adjournment All items on the agenda are for discussion and /or action. Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliancy with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on February 11, 2011 at 'L;2,LO p.m. This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. February 14, 2011 — City Council Agenda Page 5 of 5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, February 14, 2011 5:00 P.M. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.2 Recreation Center Naming Recommendation (20 Minutes) A.3 Water and Wastewater Rate Study (30 Minutes) A.4 North Richland Hills Police Department 2010 Annual Report (15 Minutes) A.5 Police Department Racial Profiling Annual Report (5 Minutes) A.6 Quarterly Financial Status Report (10 Minutes) A.7 Quarterly Capital Improvement Project Status Report (10 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to Deliberate the Lease of City Property (Mineral (Leases) B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096 - 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) C.0 Adjournment Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on February 11, 2011. City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817- 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, February 14, 2011 7:00 P.M. Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and schedule: ❑ City Hall on the day of the meeting Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at www.nrhtx.com after 10 a. m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting. A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Whitson A.2 Pledge - Councilman Whitson A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) - Keep NRH Beautiful Green Campus Awards /Environmental Education Grants presented by Councilman Barth A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of January 24, 2011 City Council Meeting B.2 PU 2011 -005 Authorize Inter -local Purchasing Agreement with the City of China Grove B.3 PU 2011 -006 Renew Annual Contract with VMC Landscaping Service for the Parks Mowing Services B.4 GN 2011 -011 Authorize City of Hurst Precinct Line Road Public Safety Services Municipal Boundaries Agreement - Resolution No. 2011 -007 B.5 GN 2011 -012 Authorize Texas Governor's Office Criminal Justice Programs Competitive Grant - Resolution No. 2011 -008 C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2010 -09 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey for a zoning change from C -2 Commercial to U Institutional on Tract 9V, Abstract 1606 located at 4247 Road to the Mall. (2.993 acres) - Ordinance No. 3126 C.2 ZC 2010 -10 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Ben Johnson to revise an existing Residential Planned Development (PD 61) for West Hightower Place Addition located in the 6800 Block of Hightower Drive - Ordinance No. 3127 C.3 TR 2011 -01 Public Hearing and Consideration of amendments to Sections 118 -631 "Table of Permitted Uses" and 118 -001 "Definitions" of the North Richland Hills Zoning Ordinance. Proposed amendments include the addition of the following two previously unlisted uses to the table: Drive - Through Retail Buildings (less than 1,400 square feet) and Alternative Financial Establishments (check cashing, payday advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business) as well as the definitions of these uses - Ordinance No. 3128 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. No items for this category. E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS No items for this category. G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 Announcements - Councilman Welch H.2 Adjournment All items on the agenda are for discussion and/or action. Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on February 11, 2011. City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817- 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. City of North Richland Hills City Council Work Session Meeting Agenda North Richland Hills City Hall City Council Workroom 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 75180 Monday, February 14, 2011 5:00 P.M. A.1 Discuss Items from Regular Citv Council Meetina A.2 Recreation Center Namina Recommendation (20 Minutes) A.3 Water and Wastewater Rate Studv (30 Minutes) A.4 North Richland Hills Police Department 2010 Annual Report (15 Minutes) A.5 Police Department Racial Profilina Annual Report (5 Minutes) A.6 Quarterly Financial Status Report (10 Minutes) A.7 Quarterly Capital Improvement Proiect Status Report (10 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The Citv Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the followina as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to Deliberate the Lease of City Pronertv (Mineral Leases) B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attornev regardinq Pendinq Litiqation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd.. vs. Citv of North Richland Hill's (No. 096 - 235530 -09): 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09): 3) Venue at Hometown vs. Citv of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09) C.0 Adjournment CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. A.1 Subject: Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Presented by: Vickie Loftice Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. A.2 Subject: Recreation Center Naming Recommendation (20 Minutes) Summarv: The Naming Board is bringing forward a recommendation to City Council for the naming of the recreation center. Over the past several weeks, the Board has been working with staff and BrandEra, a branding and communications firm, to select a final name for Council's consideration. BrandEra is also in the process of developing a comprehensive marketing /communications plan for the new center. General Descrit)tion: In 2010, the City of North Richland Hills selected BrandEra, a branding and communications agency to assist with naming, logo, branding, strategic positioning and a marketing /communications plan for the new Recreation Center. Based on stakeholder input and in -depth market research, BrandEra created a list of more than 100 possible names for the recreation center. From this list, five final names were selected for the Naming Board's review and consideration. The five names were also presented to the Park and Recreation Board. Both the Naming Board and the Park and Recreation Board selected the same name as the preferred name for City Council consideration. Beth Owens, from BrandEra, will provide a presentation on the naming development process, the recommended name as well as logo development possibilities for the name. The Naming Board is requesting Council's input and consensus on the recommended name of the recreation center. The item will be formally considered at the February 28 City Council Meeting. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Larry Koonce Agenda No. A.3 Subject: Water and Wastewater Rate Study (30 Minutes) Summarv: The City has contracted with Reed Municipal Services to determine the revenue requirements from water and wastewater customers to meet the cost of water and wastewater services for fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013. The last rate study was completed in 2005. A three year phase in of rates was implemented beginning in fiscal year 2006, with the last increase going into effect in fiscal year 2008. General Description: Keith Reed of Reed Municipal Services has completed the analysis of cost of services and the customer rates needed to meet those costs over the next three years. He has met with management and staff to present alternative rate structures which will promote conservation, and, at the same time, produce revenues that will maintain the viability of operations and capital needs of the system. Mr. Reed will present the recommended rates for each water and wastewater customer class. He will discuss the effect these proposed rate changes will have on average customers in each class and a comparative rate survey of surrounding cities. Staff requests feedback and direction from the Mayor and Council, and would like to bring this issue back as a discussion item during budget planning this summer. "AAW SERVICES, INC. Febmary 14, 2011 CITY OF NORTH RI BLAND HILLS Service Study And Rate Deslian Reed Municipal Services, (RMS), Is pleased to present the results of our study including the accompanying schedules and relwd recomincridadons concerning Water & ftste rates for the City of North Richland Hills, ti (NRIT). Carr presentation consists of schedules and discussions of statistical history, current financial mauers., consumption patterns and a variety of other related matters associated with this study. GOALS OF THE STUDY At the beginning of thi study, we were instnicted by City Staff to explore several rate design oc nsidcrations to be revieNved prior to presentatian to the City Council. These rate designs were to include C'onnervation Rates as prescribed by the Texas Corni on Environmental Quallhe. Those conservation measures are enumerated in 'Title 30, Texas .4.dniinistral.A�e Cude - Rule 288,2. Schedule I presents exccrpOs from that code that specs ca relate it) rate making requirements. In addition for comparative purposes,, we were instructed to prepare a rate, design exactly as the current design with no inodification other than changes in 11 Base Rate Charge and Volurne Charge, That particular rate design consists of a base rate that includes 267 Ctt� Ft. per customer within the base rate and a volume charge for all excess water above the 267 Cu. Ft. A rate design saich as this, which. includes volumes in the rnimmurn. used quite regularly in past years but, is no slowly being; replaced with rates that do not include any volume in th;: base. Filially. we %vere instrLyzfed to prepare a rate structure that incorporates any and all changes to be presented to the City Council, These options we to inc a rate structure consisting of changes that would promote conservation simply by Pricing. These rates were to also include, Step Vulwne price increases based at various levels of t:ortsumption as Nvell as higherrates for Irrigation. Water. In today's utifit) operation., all of thest a1ttrna11v(, arc being used by many cities in their attempt to conserve water. I 101 Crowley Rd., Arlington, Texas 76012 - Tel. (8 17) 275-8528 - Call (817) 456-95716 While conservation can be accomplished in a variety of ways, cost/price is certainly the most effective. All other types, such as time of day watering, street number or house number watering, type of sprinkler, day of week and other types are somewhat effective but, pricing has the most dramatic and long lasting effect on consumption/usage. Basically, today's utility operation mandates that the City provide an adequate potable water supply for the health, safety and welfare of the public. The basic cost for this basic service should be shared equally by all customers. Provisions of service/volumes above and beyond that basic level should be paid for by the users of the service/volumes and not be a burden to those who do not use the service. Historically, NRH has conducted a Rate Study and Analysis on a five year plan. The last Rate Study was conducted in 2005. At that time a three -year phase -in program was adopted for the implementation of updated Water & Wastewater rates in FY 2006, 2007 and 2008. These five year rate studies are planned on this schedule so as to parallel Capital Improvements Plans and Bond Sales. This plan of five years is used in this current study to review, in detail, the fiscal years of 2011, 2012 and 2013 with limited review of years 2014 and 2015. Cost estimates and rate designs were prepared for those three years and spread sheet programs were developed for use during the remaining two years of the program. The two major components of the estimated budgeted costs associated with this study are the purchase of water and the treatment of wastewater. Water is purchased from both the City of Fort Worth and the Trinity River Authority. Likewise, Wastewater Treatment is provided by the City of Fort Worth and the Trinity River Authority. Total expenses for those operations are not controlled by the City of North Richland Hills, but rather by the agencies providing the services. Future costs increases associated with those services will be handled, as they are currently being handled, by a `Vass- through" amount to be added to individual billings to customers of NRH. Ordinance 1965, Section D, specifically authorizes this pass - through procedure. That Ordinance specifically states, "any future changes in the city's cost of water purchased and wastewater treatment front the city's suppliers will be passed through to the City's customers. " Other than those two services, NRH prepares, controls and administers the financial operations of the Water & Wastewater Utility of the city. "TEST YEAR" DETERNUNATION As in all studies of this nature, it is first necessary to gain a working knowledge of past operations and statistics. This is first accomplished by determining a "Test Year ". A test year is a particular historical twelve month period defined as "Normal" or an average of several historical years to arrive at what can be defined as "Normal ". That test year is then used as a model for future projections of customers, consumption volumes, revenue generation and other variables used in rate making and rate design. A very recent test year will result in a more accurate projection based on those historic variables. 2 In determining a test year for this particular study, we reviewed both the specific twelve month method and the averaging of four or five year method. In our review of these two methods, we determined that averaging the past five year period was not the most accurate method to be used. During that five -year period, two of the hottest years on record since 1895 have occurred. Those years were the 2005 -06 Fiscal Year and the 2009 -10 Fiscal Year. If that five year period were to be used, approximately 40% of non- normal data would be used in making future projections. That is certainly not acceptable in rate making or financial planning. Our further review of the past five -year period indicated that the Fiscal Year 2008 -09 was in fact a very "Normal" year. Actual temperatures for that year matched those defined as "Normal" and the rainfall amount very closely matched the "Normal" or average amount. In these instances, a comparison was then drawn reflecting "Actual" vs. "Normal or .Average" as defined by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association, (NOAA). Schedule II presents a comparison of actual monthly temperatures to "Normal or Average" monthly temperatures kept by NOAA. As can be seen by this graph, the pattern is almost an exact match. Schedule III is a presentation of "Actual" monthly rainfall for 2008 -09 compared to the "Normal or Average" rainfall as defined by NOAA. Again, this chart indicates that only two of the twelve months of that year seemed to have a large out of range amount. Those months were March and September, each reflecting rainfall exceeding the "Normal ". While these excesses may appear to be large, two things tend to reduce the importance or impact of these excesses. First, March and September are not two of the largest consumption months during the year and secondly, almost all of this excess rainfall occurred during a short period of time in each of the months, thereby dramatically lessening the effect on the entire month of consumption. Schedule IV is a presentation of the "Actual" daily rainfall for September, 2009. That schedule reflects that on the 11', 12' and 13', a total of 5.00 inches of rainfall occurred during that three day period. For the reasons discussed above, we feel that this rainfall did not play a major role in reducing consumption for that total month. Schedule V is a presentation of the "Actual" rainfall for the month of March, 2009. That schedule reflects that the excess rainfall all occurred during a one day period, again, not affecting the consumption volumes for that entire month. For all of the above reasons, we have determined that the 2008 -09 Fiscal Year was the prime candidate and was chosen as the designated "Test Year ". DATA GATHERING AND PEPARATION After determining a proper Test Year, the process of information gathering and statistical data preparation began. During this process, information was gathered on volume data for the entire city and for each consumption class of customer, i.e. Single Family Residential, Apartment, Mobil Home Parks, Industrial, Commercial Classes that include Schools, Churches, Restaurants, Commercial Cleaning etc. This information then provides and forms the basis for future projections when applied to customer numbers and growth during the next three -year period. 3 TONAL ANNUAL CONSUMPTION BY MONTH Schedule VI presents the total annual consumption, by month, for the "Test Year ", 2008- 09. This monthly consumption data reflects that almost 51% of water usage occurred during the months of May, June, July, August and September. This consumption pattern could certainly be expected due to use of water for irrigation purposes and other related usages during hot or usually dry periods of time. TOTAL USAGE BY CUSTOMER CLASS Schedule VII presents the Annual consumption for the "Test Year" 2008 -09 by individual customer classes. This Schedule documents that the Residential Classes of customer accounted for almost 80% of total water consumption. This class of customer consists of Single Family, Apartment, Small Multi Family and Mobil home Park. IRRIGATION USAGE: RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS At the beginning of the Rate Shady, we were instructed to review and analyze, in detail, usage and accountability for all water used for irrigation purposes. This was analyzed in beeping with the goal to move toward conservation rates as discussed earlier. In compliance with this goal, we reviewed detailed billing records for the Test Year to determine not only the total water used for irrigation, but the usage by each customer class. It should be noted that the residential class of customer consists of two separate designations. Those designations are Water & Sewer type and Irrigation type. The Water & Sewer type are those customers that use their regular household meter and their yard and house lines to supply water to their sprinkler system or movable lawn sprinklers. The other type is a residential customer who has a separate Irrigation Meter that is used only to supply water to their sprinkler system. 4 In reviewing the billing records for the Test Year, we found that there were approximately 18,680 single family residential customers designated as Water & Sewer type with an average monthly consumption of 1,215 Cu. Ft. per customer. The consumption by these customers represented approximately 65% of total annual consumption within the system. Because there is no meter to accurately measure the actual volume of water used only for irrigation, we must assume that there was a large volume of water used during the summer months for irrigation purposes. While we cannot provide a documented volume of this irrigation usage, we can give a general statement concerning that volume. During our review, we determined that the average residential usage for the three winter months of the year was slightly above 773 Cu. Ft. per month. We furth estimated that the residential monthly average usage for the four summer months was 1,500 Cu Ft. per month, per customer. The difference of 727 Cu. Ft. between these two figures can be assumed as usage for irrigation purposes during the four summer months. Under that assumption, the total usage for irrigation purposes for this type of customer would have been approximately 54,32.1,440 Cu. Ft. While we cannot say for sure that this estimate is supported by hard facts, we feel that it is certainly within reason. It is on this basis that we recommended a second rate step for non - irrigational residential accounts discussed in the WATER OPERATIONS — RESIDENTIAL RATES section 1, below. The second type of residential irrigation customer has a separate meter to register and record the volume usage for irTigation purposes only. There were 104 such customers identified in the Test Year and their annual usage for Irrigation purposes was 5,941,468 Cur. Ft. These 104 meters range in size from 3l4" inch to 2" inch. COMMERC & INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS The Commercial and Industrial classes of customers have separate Irrigation Meters installed to accurately measure and record the volume of water used for irrigation purposes only. This documentation and consumption is further broken down by particular type of customer within. the Commercial Class, i.e., Schools, Churches, Restaurants etc. Schedule VIII lists the volume used for irrigation purposes by each of these customer class groupings. BUDGET ESTTIMATES We were provided with the estimates of the Annual Operating Budget for the years 2010- 11, 2011 -12 & 2012 -13. These budgets include all O & M expenses, Capital expenses and Debt Service payments. Using these budgets and the consumption volume groupings and numbers of customers previously generated, we prepared rates that will generate the Revenue Requirements for the three -year period and provide for a balanced budget during this three -year period. One must reasonably understand that these rates are based il on assumptions of volumes of consumption, numbers of customers and estimates of expenses listed iui the budgets. As any of these volumes, customer counts or budget estimates uicrease or decrease for any reason, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in the amount of revenue generated. REVENUE OFFSETS The operation of the Water & Wastewater Utility Fund generates revenue in two separate categories. Those categories are generally classified as Operating Revenue and Other Revenue. Operating Revenues are those classified as income generated from sales of water and income from the treatment of wastewater. Other Revenues are those collections such as Investment Income, Collection & Service Charges, Taps & other miscellaneous fees. In order to provide for a balanced budget, the Operating Revenue to be provided by rates should be reduced by the amount of the Other Revenue collections to provide funding for the approved budget. This is generally called the "Revenue Offsets ". This simply means that rates charged for Water & Wastewater services are not required to provide 100% of the operating revenue. Schedule IX presents the estimated revenue offsets for the three -year period covered in this report. Using these approved Budget documents, the Revenue Offsets and the statistical information previously generated, we prepared a rate structure scenario for review and to be presented to City Staff and the Council. This scenario generates adequate revenue to provide for a balanced budget during the three -year planning period. This rate structure has been reviewed by NRH Staff and it additionally addresses the concerns that were discussed and enumerated in the Goals & Objectives at the beginning of the analysis. As in previous rates, 267 Cu. Ft. of consumption is included in the base miniinum of each account. The major changes of this new rate design are as follows: MAMM Y JI:Zf], 01:71% Y 10M RESIDENTIAL RATES 1. Establishment of a Two Step charge program for Single Family Accounts. An individual volume charge, Step 1, was established for consumption volumes between 267 Cu. Ft. and 3,000 Cu. Ft. per month. Step 2 was established for all volumes above 3,000 Cu. Ft. per month. The 3,000 Cu. Ft. threshold for this type of account was established to provide for the larger volumes of water used for irrigation purposes. As noted in the IRIGATION USAGE: RESIDENTIAL, CUSTOMERS, PP 5 of our report, the average residential customer used 1,215 Cu. Ft. per month during the Test , Year. We must keep in mind that this 1,215 is an average of 12 months but, the usage during the slimmer months is substantially greater than the average. This first 3,000 Cu. Ft. allows the customer to irrigate 5 his property to some degree before establishing a higher charge for excessive irrigation volumes. 2. Irrigation rates were established setting out the separate volume charges for all consumption through Irrigation Meters. 3. This Two Step program was also recommended for Apartment Complex, Small Multi Family and Mobil Home Accounts. 4. New Base Rates were recommended for each Customer Classification. COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL RATES 1. The Two Step Rrogram as well as the Irrigation Rate program was recommended for these classes of customers. Step 1 consists of volumes between 267 Cu. Ft. and 1,333 Cu. Ft. per month and Step 2 was established for all consumption above 1,334 Cu. Ft. 2. Irrigation rates were also established setting out separate volume charges for all consumption through Irrigation Meters. These volume charges are equal to the volume charges for Irrigation accounts in the Residential Classification. 3. New Base Rates were recommended for each Customer Classification. While these Base Rates are the same as those for the Residential/Apartment Class, the rate calculation model has the capability to accommodate different base rates for each customer class. 01"A'x.'9111D!►AM."V MNM13W01A. - 0 11112V RESIDENTIAL RATES 1. Base Rates and Volume Charges were increased 'n all Classifications of Residential Customers. It should be pointed out that the Wastewater Base Rate was increased by a larger percent than the base rate for water customers. This larger percent increase was due to the past years static nature of the Wastewater Base Rate. The Base Rate had increased only $0.05 cents during the past 15 years. While the volume rates had increased during this period, the base rate did not increase to a degree to beep up with growth and/or inflation. 7 +COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL RATES 1. Base Rates and Volume Charges were increased in all Classifications of Commercial & Industrial Customers. Base Rates were increased in this Customer Class for reasons described above for Residential Customers. Recommended bates Schedules X -1 & X -2 are presentations enumerating the recommended rates that will become effective upon Council approval. These recommended rates will be implemented on an annual basis during the first three years of the planning period. Schedule XI -1, Water Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water rates when compared to current rates of a Single Family Residential customer with monthly consumption of 1,203 Cu. Ft., (9,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Residential Customer). Schedule XI -2, Wastewater Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Wastewater rates when compared to current rates for a Single Family Residential customer with monthly consumption of 1,203 Cu. Ft., (9,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Residential Customer). Schedule XI -3, Combined Water & Wastewater, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water & Wastewater rates when compared to current rates for a Single Family Residential customer with monthly consumption of 1,203 Cu. Ft., (9,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Residential Customer). Schedule XII -1, Water Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water rates when compared to current rates of a Single Family Residential customer with monthly consumption of 5,500 Cu. Ft., (41,140 Gallons), or less. (Large usage Residential Customer). Schedule X111 -2, Wastewater Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Wastewater rates when compared to current rates of a. Single Family Residential customer with monthly consumption of 5,500 Cu. Ft., (41,140 Gallons), or less. (Large usage Residential Customer).. Schedule XII -3, Combined Water & Wastewater, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water & Wastewater rates when compared to current rates of a Single Family Residential customer with monthly consumption of 5,500 Cu. Ft., (41,140 Gallons), or less. (Large usage Residential Customer). M Schedule XIII -1, Water Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water rates when compared to current rates of a Commercial/Industrial customer with monthly consumption of 1,203 Cu. Ft., (9,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Commercial/Industrial Customer). Schedule NM-2, Wastewater Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Wastewater rates when compared to current rates of a Commercial/Industrial customer with monthly consumption of 1,203 Cu. Ft., (9,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Commercial/Industrial Customer). Schedule XIII-3, Combined Water & Wastewater, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water & Wastewater rates when compared to current rates of a Commercial/Industrial customer with monthly consumption of 1,203 Cu. Ft., (9,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Commercial/Industrial Customer). Schedule XIV -1, Water Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water rates when compared to current rates of a Commercial/Industrial customer with monthly consumption of 26,788 Cu. Ft., (200,000 Gallons), or less. (Large usage Commercial/Industrial Customer). Schedule NW -2, Wastewater Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Wastewater rates when compared to current rates of a Commercial/Industrial customer with monthly consumption of 26,788 Cu. Ft., (200,000 Gallons), or less. (Large usage CommerciaLIndustrial Customer). Schedule XIV -3, Combined Water & Wastewater, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Water & Wastewater rates when compared to current rates of a Commercial/Industrial customer with monthly consumption of 26,788 Cu. Ft., (200,000 Gallons), or less. (Large usage Commercial/Industrial Customer). Schedule XV, Irrigation Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase -in Irrigation rates when compared to a current Single Family Residential Sprinkler System customer using a 3 4" meter with monthly consumption of 7,353 Cu. Ft., (55,000 Gallons), or less. (Small usage Sprinkler System Customer). (Irrigation rates are the same for all Customer Classes). Schedule XVI, Irrigation Only, is a presentation of the proposed three year phase in Irrigation rates when compared to a current Commercial/Industrial Sprinkler System customer using a 2" meter with monthly consumption of 20,053 Cu. Ft., (150,000 Gallons), or less. (Large usage Sprinkler System Customer). (Irrigation Rates are the same, for all Customer Classes). Schedule XVII is a graphic presentation of the proposed monthly rates for a small usage residential customer compared to other area cities' rates. 7 Schedule XVIII is a graphic presentation of the proposed monthly rates for a large usage residential customer compared to other area cities' rates. Schedule XIX is a graphic presentation of the proposed monthly rates for a small usage commercial./industrial customer compared to other area cities' rates. Schedule XX is a graphic presentation of the proposed monthly rates for a large usage commercial./industrial customer compared to other area cities' rates. RECOMMENDATIONS We would recommend that the previously enumerated Rates on Schedule X -1 & X -2 be approved for the three -year planning period of the City. In addition, we would recommend that the process previously established to include any "Pass Through" amount be continued. We feel that these rates will adequately fund the operations of the Utility Fnud according to the Budget Estimates provided by the City during this study and analysis. We would be remiss if we did not express our sincere appreciation and gratitude for the assistance and cooperation of the entire City Staff, more specifically, Ms. Bellard, Mr. Koonce and Ms. Bostic. This could not have been accomplished without the leadership and direction of City Manager, Mr. Mark Hindman. Without their assistance, this project would have been extremely difficult and much more time consur ing. Should we be able to provide additional information or clarification, please feel free to contact us at RMS, Inc., 1141 Crowley Rd., Arlington, Texas, 76412, Tel. (817) 275- 8528, or Cell (817) 456 -5716. Respectfully submitted, Reed Municipal Services, Inc. 10 Schedule I Excerpts from Texas Administrative Code, Title 30, Environmental Quality, Rule 288.2, Water Conservation Plans for Municipal Uses. Cc a water rate structure which is not JvromotionaC' i.e., a rate structure 'which is cost - based and which does not encourage the excessive use of water' Cc a record management system to record water pumped; water deliveries, water safes, and water tosses which atto^ws for the desegregation of water sales and uses into the fottowing user classes: W residential (ii) commerciaC- (iii) public and institutional and (iv) industria C- "conservation - oriented water rates and water rate structures such as uniform or increasing bCock rate schedules, andlor seasonaC rates, but not flat rate or decreasing block rates;': NRH Temperature Graph 2008 -09 1 Schedule II 100.0 -- 90.0 — 80.0 70.0 60.0 H 0? 50.0 N D 40.0 30.0 20.O 10.0 0.0 OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP. � NRH Temperature 2008 -09 --o—Auerage Schedule III NRH RATE STUDY Test Year Monthly Rainfall Data 2008 -2009 Actual Average Month Rainfall Rainfall Variance October, 2008 2.29 4.11 -1.82 November 4.53 2.57 1.96 December 0.27 2.57 -2.30 January, 2009 0.82 1.90 -1.08 February 0.72 2.37 -1.65 March 5.56 3.06 2.50 April 3.54 3.20 0.34 May 4.63 5.15 -0.52 June 3.98 323 0.75 July 2.09 2.12 -0.03 August 1.64 2.03 -0.39 September 6.52 2.42 4.14 Totals 36.69 34.73 1.86 Schedule IV North Richland Hills Rate Analysis 5.00 Total Monthly Rainfall 6.52 September 2009 Rainfall Max Minimum Day Temp. Temp. Precipitation 10 95 73 0.02 11 84 70 1.00 12 73 69 2.66 13 74 69 1.34 14 74 69 0.43 15 82 70 0.00 16 77 70 0.09 17 80 67 0.19 18 81 68 Trace 19 86 71 0.00 20 88 68 0.00 21 92 68 0.58 22 72 70 0.03 23 76 62 0.00 24 82 55 0.00 25 89 55 0.00 26 95 61 0.00 5.00 Total Monthly Rainfall 6.52 Schedule V North Richland Hills Rate Analysis Total Monthly Rainfall 5.56 March 2009 Rainfall Max Minimum Day Temp. Temp. Precipitation 10 77 49 Trace 43 38 3.60 12 43 38 0.12 13 41 38 0.72 14 52 41 0.03 15 61 40 0.00 16 77 43 0.00 17 82 49 0.00 18 79 56 0.00 19 80 53 0.00 20 75 52 0.00 21 78 53 0.00 22 77 60 0.00 23 79 66 0.00 24 74 50 0.02 25 62 47 0.52 26 72 48 0.00 Total Monthly Rainfall 5.56 Schedule VI NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MONTHLY CONSUMPTION VOLUMES 2008 -2009 CONSUMPTION MONTH Cu. Ft. PERCENT Oct -08 38,103,831 8.90% Nov -08 37,919,879 8.86% Dec -08 28,135,466 6.57% Jan -09 25,615,145 5.99% Feb -09 26,561,745 6.21% Mar -09 26,652,736 6.23% Apr -09 28,289,278 6.61% May -09 28,969 ,071 6.77% Jun -09 34,523,981 8.07% Jul -09 47,101,655 11.01% Aug -09 53,424,291 12.48% Sep -09 52,641,066 12.30% TOTAL CONSUMPTION 427,930,144 100.00% Consumption for May, June, July, August & September 50.63% NORTH RI+CHLAND HILLS Schedule VII CUSTOMER CLASS CONSUMPTION DATA CUSTOMER CLASS 2008 -2009 2008 -2009 RESIDENTIAL: VOLUME PERCENT Single Family 281,895,919 65.87% Apartments 54,506,834 12.74% Mobil Home Parks 1,784,816 0.42% Duplex -Small Multi Family 402,254 0.09% Sub Total Residential 338,589,823 79.12% COMMERCIAL: Churches 3,369,781 0.79% NRH 2 0 1,352,022 0.32% Commercial 34,838,788 8.14% Restaurant 8,317,116 1.94% Commercial Multi 10,096,284 2.36% Schools 6,960,673 1.63% Hospitals 4,881,118 1.14% Commercial Cleaning 1,690,795 0.40% Sub Total Commercial 71,506,577 16.71% INDUSTRIAL: Industrial 17,817,489 4.16% Temporary Service 16,255 0.00% Sub Total Industrial 17,833,744 4.17% GRAND TOTAL CITY SALES 427,930,144 1 00.00% Schedule VIII NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IRRIGATION USAGE BY CUSTOMER CLASS 2008 -2009 CUSTOMER CLASS VOLUME Cu. Ft. PERCENT Residential: Single Family -Water & Sewer * ** 54,321,440 12.69% Single Family- Irrig. Meter 5,941,468 1.39% Apartments 9,925,468 2.32% Sub Total Residential 70,188,376 16.40% Commercial /industrial Commercial Cleaning 208,429 0.05% Churches 2,299,200 0.54% City 8,204,483 1.92% Commercial 15,620,922 3.65% Restaurant 1,652,564 0.39% Commercial Multi 2,674,476 0.62% Hospitals 714,308 0.17% Schools 3,954,068 0.92% Industrial 31,887 0.01% Sub Total Comm./Ind. 35,360,337 8.26% Grand Total Irrigation 105,548,713 24.66% Total Sales Volume 427,930,144 ** *Estimate of Volume for Residential Customers. See Report narrative. Total Operating Budget Less Other Revenue: Other Municipalities Water Taps Sewer Taps Subdivision Meter Rev. Water Well Revenue Investment Rev. Penalties & Fees Service Charge Other Income Total Other Revenue Provided by Elates NRH RATE STUDY REVENUE REQUIREMENT OFFSETS Schedule IX Water Sewer Water Sewer Water Sewer Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 2410 -11 2010 -11 2011 -12 2011 -12 2012 -13 2012 -13 $16,332,930 $10,486,330 $17,280,760 $10,955,775 $17,997,533 $11,506,618 134,000 137,000 140,000 16,000 16,0100 16,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 160,000 82,000 162,000 83,000 162,000 83,000 310,000 160,000 315,000 165,000 315,000 165,000 70,000 40,000 71,000 41,000 72,000 42,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ 707,000 $ 287,000 $ 718,000 $ 294,000 $ 722,000 $ 295,000 $15,625,930 $10,199,330 $16,562,760 $10,661,775 $17,275,533 $11,211,618 Schedule x -1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATER & WASTEWATER RATE RECOMMENDATIONS RESIDENTIAL: WATER Current 2010- 2011- Z012- Rates' 2811 2012 2013 "' (See Nate) Single Family 314" Meter, minimum for o - 267 per 144 cubic feet $9.34 $9.52 $975 $14.44 Step 1: 268 - 3,444 per 144 cubic feet $2.69 $2.81 $2.95 $3.1 o Step 2: 3,441 & over per 144 cubic feet. NIA $2.84 $101 $3.16 Irrigation - Sprinkler System, per 144 cubic feet, All Usage NIA $2.87 $3.04 $118 Apartment Complex, Small Multi Family Units & Mobil Home Parks: Unit minimum charge, unit minimum volume of 4 - 267 cubic feet $934 $9.52 $9.75 $10.04 Step 1: 268 -3,440 per 140 cubic feet $2.69 $2.81 $2.95 $114 Step 2: 3,401 & over per 140 cubic feet NIA $2.84 $141 $3.16 Irrigation - Sprinkler System, per 140 cubic feet. All Usage NIA $2.87 $3.04 $3.18 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL: WATER Commercial Multi -Unit Unit minimum charge, unit minimum volume of 0 - 267 cubic feet $9.34 $9.52 $9.75 $10.04 Step 1: 268 - 1,344 per 100 cubic feet $2.69 $2.81 $2.95 $3.10 Step 2: 1,300 & Over per 140 cubic feet NIA $2.84 $3.41 $3.16 Irrigation - Sprinkler System, per 140 cubic feet, All Usage NIA $2.87 $3.04 $3.18 All other Commercial /Industrial Classes 314" Meter, minimum for 0 - 267 cubic feet $9.30 $9.52 $9.75 $10.04 Step 1: 268 - 1,344 per 144 cubic feet $2.69 $2.81 $2.95 $3.14 Step 2: 1,300 & Over per 100 cubic feet NIA $2.84 $3.01 $116 Irrigation - Sprinkler System, per 100 cubic feet, All Usage NIA $2.87 $3.04 $3.18 Schedule X -2 RECOMMENDED RATES, CONT'D. Current Rates'' (See Note) WASTEWATER RATES: 2010- 2011- 2012- 2011 *** 2012`''' 2013 * *' Single Family Residential Minimum charge per unit $7.27 $7.70 $8.12 $8.39 Volume charge per 100 cubic feet $1.17 $1.30 $1.42 $1.54 Volume based on winter quarfer average, capped at 2,500 cu. ft. Apartment Complex, Small Multi Family Units & Mobil Horne Parks: Minimum charge per unit $7.27 $7.70 $8.12 $8.39 Volume charge per 100 cubic feet, all usage $1.17 $1.30 $1.42 $1.54 All other Commercial /Industrial Classes Minimum charge per unit $7.27 $7.70 $8.12 $8.39 Volume charge per 100 cubic feet, all usage $1.17 $1.30 $1.42 $1.54 (Note) * ** Rates do not include Pass Through charges currently in effect. Water---------- - - - - -- .95 cents per 100 Cu. Ft. Wastewater--- - - - - -- ..7851 cents per 100 Cu. Ft. Wastewater Rates do not include TSS & BQD charges for excess strength discharges. WATER ONLY SCHEDULE XI -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 314" METER SMALL VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2,.000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Cubic Fe 267 334 401 468 535 601 668 802 935 1,069 1,203 Cubic Feet Less: 0 67 134 201 267 334 401 535 668 802 936 Current Water $9.30 $14.28 $16.71 $19.15 $21.56 $23.99 $26.43 $31.31 $36.15 $41.03 $45.91 Proposed 2011 $9.52 $14.58 $17.09 $19.61 $22.11 $24.61 $27.13 $32.17 $37.17 $42.21 $47.25 Difference $0.22 $0.30 $0.38 $0.46 $0.54 $0.62 $0.70 $0.86 $1.02 $1.18 $1.34 Percent Change 2.37% 2.10% 2.28% 2.41% 2.51% 2.59% 2.65% 2.75% 2.83% 2.88% 2.93% Proposed 2012 $9.75 $14.90 $17.51 $20.13 $22.71 $25.31 $27.93 $33.15 $38.34 $43.56 $48.76 Difference $0.23 $0.32 $0.42 $0.51 $0.60 $0.70 $0.79 $0.98 $1.17 $1.35 $1.51 Percent Change 2.42% 2.22% 2.44% 2.61% 2.73% 2.83% 2.92% 3.04% 3.13% 3.20% 3.20% Proposed 2013 $10.00 $15.25 $17.96 $20.68 $23.36 $26.06 $28.78 $34.20 $39.59 $45.02 $50.41 Difference $0.25 $0.35 $0.45 $0.55 $0.65 $0.75 $0.85 $1.05 $1.25 $1.45 $1.65 Percent Change 2.56% 2.35% 2.58% 2.74% 2.86% 2.97% 3.05% 3.17% 3.27% 3.34% 3.39% Gallons Cubic Fe Cubic Feet Less Current Wastewater Proposed 2011 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2012 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2013 Difference Percent Change SCHEDULE XI -2 7,000 8,000 WASTEWATER ONLY 935 1,069 1,203 668 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 314" METER. $28.12 $30.73 27.15 29.94 SMALL VOLUME USAGE $1.65 $1.82 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 6,000 267 334 401 468 535 601 668 802 0 67 134 201 267 334 401 535 $12.48 $13.78 $15.09 $16.40 $17.70 $18.99 $20.30 $22.91 13.25 14.65 16.04 17.43 18.83 20.20 21.59 24.38 $0.78 $0.86 $0.95 $1.04 $1.13 $1.21 $1.30 $1.47 6.23% 6.27% 6.30% 6.33% 6.36% 6.38% 6.40% 6.43% 13.99 15.47 16.94 18.42 19.89 21.34 22.82 25.76 $0.74 $0.82 $0.90 $0.98 $1.06 $1.14 $1.22 $1.38 5.59% 5.60% 5.62% 5.63% 5.64% 5.65% 5.66% 5.67% 14.58 16.14 17.69 19.25 20.80 22.33 23.89 27.00 $0.59 $0.67 $0.75 $0.83 $0.91 $0.99 $1.07 $1.23 4.22% 4.34% 4.43% 4.52% 4.59% 4.64% 4.70% 4.78% SCHEDULE XI -2 7,000 8,000 9,000 935 1,069 1,203 668 802 936 $25.50 $28.12 $30.73 27.15 29.94 32.72 $1.65 $1.82 $1.99 6.45% 6.47% 6.49% 28.69 31.64 34.59 $1.54 $1.70 $1.86 5.68% 5.69% 5.70% 30.08 33.19 36.30 $1.39 $1.55 $1.71 4.85% 4.91% 4.95% SCHEDULE XI -3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 3!4" METER WATER & WASTEWATER SMALL VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Cubic Feet 267 334 401 468 535 601 668 802 935 1,069 1,203 Cubic Feet Less 267 0 67 134 201 267 334 401 535 668 802 935 Current Dotal $21.78 $28.06 $31.80 $35.55 $39.27 $42.98 $46.73 $54.22 $61.65 $69.14 $76.64 Proposed 2011 $22.77 $29.22 $33.14 $37.05 $40.93 $44.82 $48.73 $56.55 $64.32 $72.15 $79.97 Difference $1.00 $1.16 $1.33 $1.50 $1.67 $1.83 $2.00 $2.33 $2.67 $3.00 $3.34 Percent Change 4.58% 4.15% 4.19% 4.22% 4.24% 4.26% 4.28 % 4.31% 4.33% 4.34% 4.35% Proposed 2012 $23.74 $30.37 $34.45 $38.54 $42.60 $46.65 $50.74 $58.92 $67.03 $75.20 $83.35 Difference $0.97 $1.14 $1.32 $1.49 $1.67 $1.84 $2.01 $2.36 $2.71 $3.06 $3.37 Percent Change 4.26% 3.92% 3.98% 4.03% 4.07% 4.10' %a 4.13% 4.98% 4.21% 4.24% 4.22% Proposed 2013 $24.58 $31.39 $35.66 $39.92 $44.16 $48.40 $52.66 $61.20 $69.67 $78.21 $86.71 Difference $0.84 $1.02 $1.20 $1.38 $1.56 $1.74 $1.92 $2.28 $2.64 $3.01 $3.37 Percent Change 3.54% 3.36 % 3.49% 3.59 % 3.67% 3.73% 3.79 % 3.88% 3.94% 4.00 % 4.04% WATER ONLY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 314" METER LARGE VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2,000 Cubic Feet 267 Cu. Ft. Less 267 Over 3000 SCHEDULE XII -1 3,740 7,480 11,220 14,960 18,700 26,180 29,920 33,660 37,400 41,140 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3500 4000 4500 5,000 5,500 233 733 1233 1733 2233 2733 2733 2733 2733 2733 Current Water $9.30 $20.32 $38.52 $56.72 Proposed 2011 $9.52 $20.82 $39.62 $58.42 Difference $0.22 $0.50 $1.10 $1.70 Percent Change 2.37% 2.46% 2.85% 3.00% Proposed 2012 $9.75 $21.37 $40.87 $60.37 Difference $0.23 $0.56 $1.26 $1.96 Percent Change 2.42% 2.67% 3.17% 3.35% Proposed 2013 $10.00 $21.97 $42.22 $62.47 Difference $0.25 $0.60 $1.35 $2.10 Percent Change 2.56% 2.80% 3.30% 3.48% 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 $74.92 $93.12 $129.52 $147.72 $165.92 $184.12 $202.32 $77.22 $96.02 $133.77 $152.72 $171.67 $190.62 $209.57 $2.30 $2.90 $4.25 $5.00 $5.75 $6.50 $7.25 3.07% 3.11% 3.28% 3.38% 3.47% 3.53% 3.58% $79.87 $99.37 $138.67 $158.47 $178.27 $198.07 $217.87 $2.66 $3.36 $4.91 $5.76 $6.61 $7.46 $8.31 3.44% 3.50% 3.67% 3.77% 3.85% 3.91% 3.96% $82.72 $102.97 $143.77 $164.32 $184.87 $205.42 $225.97 $2.85 $3.60 $5 $5.85 $6 $7.35 $8.10 3.57% 3.62% 3.68% 3.69% 3.70% 3.71% 3.72% WASTEWATER ONLY SCHEDULE x11-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 314" METER LARGE VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2,000 3,740 7,480 11,220 14,960 18,700 26,180 29,920 33,660 37,400 41,140 Cubic Feet 267 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3500 4000 4500 5,000 5,500 Cu. Ft. Less 267 233 733 1233 1733 2233 2733 2733 2733 2733 2733 Over 3000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Current Wastewater $12.48 $17.02 $26.77 $36.52 $46.27 $56.02 $56.02 $56.02 $56.02 $56.02 $56.02 Proposed 2011 $13.25 $18.10 $28.50 $38.90 $49.30 $59.70 $59.70 $59.70 $59.70 $59.70 $59.70 Difference $0.78 $1.08 $1.73 $2.38 $3.03 $3.68 $3.68 $3.68 $3.68 $3.68 $3.68 Percent Change 6.23 % 6.35% 6.46% 6.52% 6.55% 6.57% 6.57% 6.57 % 6.57% 6.57 % 6.57% Proposed 2012 $13.99 $19.12 $30.12 $41.12 $52.12 $63.12 $63.12 $63.12 $63.12 $63.12 $63.12 Difference $0.74 $1.02 $1.62 $2.22 $2.82 $3.42 $3.42 $3.42 $3.42 $3.42 $3.42 Percent Change 5.56 % 5.64 % 5.68% 5.71% 5.72% 5.73% 5.73% 5.73 %p 5.73 % 5.73% 5.73 %4 Proposed 2013 $14.58 $19.99 $31.59 $43.19 $54.79 $66.39 $66.39 $66.39 $66.39 $66.39 $66.39 Difference $0.59 $0.87 $1.47 $2.07 $2.67 $3.27 $3.27 $3.27 $3.27 $3.27 $3.27 Percent Change 4.25% 4.55% 4.88% 5.03 % 5.12% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% 5.18% SCHEDULE XII -3 Gallons 2,000 3,740 Cubic Feet 267 500 Cu. Ft. Less 267 37,400 233 Over 3000 2000 2500 Current Total $21.78 $37.34 Proposed 2011 $22,77 $38.92 Difference $1.00 $1.58 Percent Change 4.58% 4.23% Proposed 2012 $23.74 $40.49 Difference $0.97 $1.58 Percent Change 4.26% 4.05% Proposed 2013 $24.58 $41.96 Difference $0.84 $1.47 Percent Change 3.54 % 3.63 % SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 314" METER WATER & WASTEWATER LARGE VOLUME USAGE 7,480 11,220 14,960 18,700 26,180 29,920 33,660 37,400 1000 1500 2000 2500 3500 4000 4500 5,000 733 1233 1733 2233 2733 2733 2733 2733 500 1000 1500 2000 $65.29 $93.24 $121.19 $149.14 $185.54 $203.74 $221.94 $240.14 $68.12 $97.32 $126,52 $155.72 $193.47 $212.42 $231.37 $250.32 $2.83 $4.08 $5.33 $6.58 $7.93 $8.68 $9.43 $10.18 4.33% 4,38% 4.40% 4.41% 4,27% 4.26% 4.25% 4.24% $70.99 $101.49 $131.99 $162.49 $201.79 $221.59 $241.39 $261.19 $2.88 $4.18 $5.48 $6.78 $8.33 $9.18 $10.03 $10.88 4.22% 4.29% 4.33% 4.35% 4.30% 4.32% 4.33% 4.34 % $73.81 $105.66 $137.51 $169.36 $210.16 $230.71 $251.26 $271.81 $2.82 $4.17 $5.52 $6.87 $8.37 $9.12 $9.87 $10.62 3.97% 4.11% 4.18 % 4.23% 4.15% 4.12 % 4.09% 4.07% 41,140 5,500 2733 2500 $258.34 $269,27 $10.93 4.23% $280.99 $11.73 4.35% $292.36 $11.37 4.05% SCHEDULE XIII -1 WATER ONLY SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE, 314 " METER SMALL VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,560 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Cubic Ft. 267 334 401 468 534 601 668 802 935 1,069 1,203 Cu. Ft. less 267 0 67 134 201 267 334 401 535 668 802 936 Current Water Proposed 2011 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2012 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2013 Difference Percent Change $9.30 $14.28 $16.71 $19.15 $21.56 $23.99 $26.43 $31.31 $36.15 $41.03 $45.91 $9.52 $14.58 $17.09 $19.61 $22.10 $24.61 $27.13 $32.17 $37.17 $42.21 $47.25 $0.22 $0.30 $0.38 $0.46 $0.54 $0.62 $0.70 $0.86 $1.02 $1.18 $1.34 2.37 %p 2.10% 2.28% 2.41% 2.51% 2.59 % 2.65% 2.75% 2.83% 2.88% 2.93% $9.75 $14.90 $17.51 $20.13 $22.70 $25.31 $27.93 $33.15 $38.34 $43.56 $48.79 $0.23 $0.32 $0.42 $0.51 $0.60 $0.70 $0.79 $0.98 $1.17 $1.35 $1.54 2.42% 2.22 %p 2.44% 2.61% 2.73 % 2.83 % 2.92% 3.04 % 3.13% 3.20% 3.26% $10.00 $15.25 $17.96 $20.68 $23.35 $26.06 $28.78 $34.20 $39.59 $45.02 $50.44 $0.25 $0.35 $0.45 $0.55 $0.65 $0.75 $0.85 $1.05 $1.25 $1.45 $1.65 2.56 % 2.35% 2.58% 2.74% 2.87 % 2.97% 3.05% 3.17 % 3.27% 3.34% 3.39% SCHEDULE XIII -2 WASTEWATER ONLY SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE, 314 " METER SMALL VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,560 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Cubic Ft. 267 334 401 468 534 601 668 802 935 1,069 1,203 Cu. Ft. less 267 0 67 134 201 267 334 401 535 668 802 936 Current Wastewater $12.48 $13.78 $15.09 $16.40 $17.68 $18.99 $20.30 $22.91 $25.50 $28.12 $30.73 Proposed 2011 $13.25 $14.65 $16.04 $17.43 $18.81 $20.20 $21.59 $24.38 $27.15 $29.94 $32.72 Difference $0.78 $0.86 $0.95 $1.04 $1.12 $1.21 $1.30 $1.47 $1.65 $1.82 $1.99 Percent Change 6.23 % 6.27 %0 6.30 % 6.33% 6.36% 6.38% 6.40% 6.43% 6.45% 6.47 % 6.49% Proposed 2012 $13.99 $15.47 $16.94 $18.42 $19.87 $21.34 $22.82 $25.76 $28.69 $31.64 $34.59 Difference $0.74 $0.82 $0.90 $0.98 $1.06 $1.14 $1.22 $1.38 $9.54 $1.70 $1.86 Percent Change 5.59% 5.60 % 5.62% 5.63% 5.64 % 5.65 % 5.66% 5.67% 5.68% 5.69% 5.70% Proposed 2013 $14.58 $16.14 $17.69 $19.25 $20.78 $22.33 $23.89 $27.00 $30.08 $33.19 $36.30 Difference $0.59 $0.67 $0.75 $0.83 $0.91 $0.99 $1.07 $1.23 $1.39 $1.55 $1.71 Percent Change 4.22% 4.34% 4.43% 4.52% 4.58% 4.64% 4.70% 4.78 % 4.85% 4.91 % 4.95% SCHEDULE XIII -3 SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE, 314" METER. WATER & WASTEWATER SMALL VOLUME USAGE Gallons 2.000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Cubic Ft. 267 334 401 468 534 601 668 802 935 1,069 1,203 Cu. Ft. less 267 4 67 134 201 267 334 401 535 668 802 936 Current Total $21.78 $28.06 $31.80 $35,55 $39,24 $42.98 $46.73 $54.22 $61.65 $69.14 $76,64 Proposed 2011 $22.77 $29.22 $33.14 $37.05 $40.90 $44.82 $48.73 $56.55 $64.32 $72.15 $79.97 Difference $1,00 $1.16 $1.33 $1.50 $1.66 $1,83 $2.00 $2.33 $2.67 $3.00 $3,34 Percent Change 4.58% 4.15% 4.19% 4.22% 4.24% 4.26% 4.28% 4,31% 4.33% 4.34% 4.35% Proposed 2012 $23.74 $30.37 $34.45 $38.54 $42.57 $46.65 $50.74 $58.92 $67.03 $75.20 $83.38 Difference $0.97 $1.14 $1.32 $1.49 $1.66 $1.84 $2.01 $2.36 $2.71 $3.06 $3.40 Percent Change 4.26% 3.92% 3.98% 4.03% 4.07% 4.10% 4.13% 4.18% 4.21% 4.24% 4.26% Proposed 2013 $24.58 $31.39 $35.66 $39.92 $44.13 $48.40 $52.66 $61.20 $69.67 $78.21 $86.74 Difference $0.84 $1.02 $1.20 $1.38 $1.56 $1.74 $1.92 $2.28 $2.64 $3.01 $3.37 Percent Change 3.54% 3.36% 3.49% 3.59% 3.67% 3.73% 3.79% 3.88% 3.94% 4.00% 4.04% SCHEDULE XIV -1 WATER ONLY LARGE COMMERCIAL 1 INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE, 2" METER LARGE VOLUME USAGE Gallons Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Less 1,33 Current Water Proposed 2011 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2012 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2013 Difference Percent Change 10,000 25,000 40,000 50,000 75,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 1,337 3,342 5,348 6,685 10,028 10,696 13,370 16,042 20,053 23,396 26,738 0 2,005 4,0111 5,348 8,691 9,359 12,033 14,705 18,716 22,059 25,401 $62.27 $135.25 $208.27 $256.94 $378.62 $402.94 $500.27 $597.53 $743.53 $865.22 $986.87 $63.44 $139.43 215.46 $266.13 $392.83 $418.15 $519.49 $620.76 $772.78 $899.48 $1,026.14 $1.17 $4.18 $7.19 $9.19 $14.21 $15.21 $19.22 $23.23 $29.25 $34.26 $39.27 1.88% 3.09% 3.45% 3.58% 3.75% 3.77% 3.84% 3.89% 3.93% 3.96% 3.98% $64.67 $144.07 223.5046 $276.45 $408.83 $435.29 $541.18 $646.99 $805.82 $938.21 $1,070.55 $1.23 $4.63 $8.04 $10.32 $16.00 $17.14 $21.68 $26.22 $33.04 $38.73 $44.41 1.93% 3.332% 3.73% 3.88% 4.07% 4.10% 4.17% 4.22% 4.28% 4.31% 4.33% $66.000 $148.41 230.8536 $285.80 $423.20 $450.66 $560.56 $670.38 $835.23 $972.63 $1,109.98 $1.33 $4.34 $7.35 $9.35 $14.37 $15.37 $19.38 $23.39 $29.41 $34.42 $39.43 2.06% 3.01% 3.29% 3.38% 3.51% 3.53% 3.58% 3.62% 3.65% 3.67% 3.68% SCHEDULE XIV -2 WASTEWATER ONLY LARGE COMMERCIAL f INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE, 2" METER LARGE VOLUME USAGE Gallons 14,000 25,000 40,000 50,000 75,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 Cubic Feet 1,337 3,342 5,348 6,685 10,028 10,696 13,370 16,042 20,053 23,396 26,738 Cubic Feet Less 1,33' 0 2,005 4,011 5,348 8,691 9,359 12,033 14,705 18,716 22,059 25,401 Current Wastewater 64.82 103.92 143.04 169.11 234.30 247.32 299.47 351.57 429.78 494.97 560.14 Proposed 2011 68.85 110.55 152.28 180.09 249.62 263.52 319.14 374.71 458.14 527.68 597.19 Difference $4.03 $6.64 $9.24 $10.98 $15.33 $16.20 $19.67 $23.15 $28.36 $32.71 $37.05 Percent Change 6.22% 6.39% 6.46% 6.49% 6.54% 6.55% 6.57% 6.58% 6.60% 6.61% 6.61% Proposed 2012 72.69 116.80 160.94 190.35 263.90 278.59 337.42 396.20 484.45 557.99 631.52 Difference $3.84 $6.25 $8.66 $10.26 $14.27 $15.07 $18.28 $21.49 $26.30 $30.31 $34.32 Percent Change 5.58% 5.65% 5.68% 5.70' 5.72% 5.72% 5.73% 5.73% 5.74% 5.74% 5.75% Proposed 2013 75.74 122.25 168.79 199.81 277.37 292.87 354.90 416.89 509.95 587.51 665.04 Difference $3.04 $5.45 $7.86 $9.46 $13.47 $14.27 $17.48 $20.69 $25.50 $29.51 $33.52 Percent Change 4.19% 4.67% 4.88% 4.97% 5.11% 5.12% 5.18% 5.22% 5.26% 5.29% 5.31% SCHEDULE XIV -3 LARGE COMMERCIAL 1 INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE, 2" METER WATER & WASTEWATER LARGE VOLUME USAGE Gallons Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Less 1,337 Current Total Proposed 2011 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2012 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2013 Difference Percent Change 10,000 25,000 40,000 50,000 75,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 1,337 3,342 5,348 6,685 10,028 10,696 13,370 16,042 20,053 23,396 26,738 0 2,005 4,011 5,348 8,691 9,359 12,033 14,705 18,716 22,059 25,401 $127.09 $239.17 $351.31 $426.05 $612.92 $650.2.6 $799.74 $949.10 $1,173.32 $1,360.19 $1,547.01 $132.29 $249.99 $367.74 $446.22 $642.46 $681.67 $838.63 $995.48 $1,230.92 $1,427.16 $1,623.33 $5.20 $10,81 $16.43 $20.18 $29.54 $31.41 $38.89 $46.37 $57.61 $66.97 $76.32 4.09% 4.52% 4.68 %0 4,74% 4.82% 4.83% 4.86% 4.89 % 4.91% 4.92% 4,93% $137.36 $260.87 $384.44 $466.80 $672.73 $713.88 $878.60 $1,043.19 $1,290.27 $1,496.20 $1,702.06 $5.07 $10.88 $16.70 $20.58 $30.27 $32.21 $39.96 $47.71 $59.35 $69.04 $78.73 3.83 % 4.35% 4.54% 4.61% 4.71% 4.73% 4.77 % 4.79% 4.82% 4.84% 4.85% $141.74 $270.66 $399.55 $485.62 $700.57 $743.52 $915.45 $1,087.27 $1,345.18 $1,560.13 $1,775.02 $4.38 $9.79 $15.21 $18.82 $27.84 $29.65 $36.87 $44.08 $54.91 $63.94 $72.96 3.19 % 3.75% 3.96 %n 4.03% 4.14 % 4.15% 4.20% 4.23% 4.26% 4.27 %n 4.29% SCHEDULE XV SINGLE FAMILY SPRINKLER SYSTEM 314" METER Gallons 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Cubic Feet 668 1,337 2,005 2,674 3,342 4,011 4,679 Cubic Feet Less 267 401 1,070 1,738 2,407 3,075 3,744 4,412 Current Total Proposed 2011 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2012 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2013 Difference Percent Change 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 5,348 6,016 6,684 7,353 5,081 5,749 6,417 7,086 $26.43 $50.78 $75.10 $99.45 $123.78 $148.11 $172.44 $196.77 $221.10 $245.43 $269.76 $27.37 $52.93 $78.45 $104,00 $129.53 $155.07 $180.60 $206.14 $231.67 $257.20 $282.74 $0.94 $2.15 $3.35 $4.55 $5.76 $6.96 $8.16 $9.37 $10 $11 $12.97 3.56% 4.23% 4.46% 4.58% 4.6 4.70% 4.73% 4.76 x 10 4.78% 4.80% 4.81% $28.29 $54.98 $81.63 $108.33 $134.99 $161.66 $188.33 $215.00 $241.67 $268.34 $295.02 $0.91 $2.05 $3.18 $4.32 $5.46 $6.59 $7.73 $8.87 $10.00 $11.14 $12.28 3.33% 3.87% 4.06% 4.16% 4.21% 4.25% 4.28% 4.30% 4.32% 4.33% 4.34% $29.10 $56.73 $84.32 $111,95 $139.54 $167.15 $194.76 $222.37 $249.97 $277.58 $305.19 $0.81 $1.75 $2.68 $3.62 $4.56 $5.49 $6.43 $7.36 $8.30 $9.23 $10.17 2.87% 3.18% 3.29'% 3.34% 3.37% 3.40% 3.41% 3.42% 3.43% 3.44% 3.45% SCHEDULE xVI LARGE BUSINESS SPRINKLER SYSTEM 2" Meter Gallons Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Less 267 Current Total Proposed 2011 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2012 Difference Percent Change Proposed 2013 Difference Percent Change 10,000 15,000 25,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 75,000 80,000 100,000 150,000 1,337 2,005 3,342 4,011 5,348 6,685 8,022 10,028 10,696 13,370 20,053 1,070 1,738 3,075 3,744 5,081 6,417 7,755 9,761 10,429 13,103 19,786 $62.27 $86.59 $135.25 $159.60 $208.27 $256.94 $305.60 $378.60 $402.94 $500.27 $743.53 $63.44 $88.96 $140.03 $165.59 $216.66 $267.74 $318.81 $395.42 $420.96 $523.10 $778,39 $1.17 $2.37 $4.78 $5.99 $8.39 $10.80 $13.21 $16.82 $18.02 $22.83 $34.86 1.88% 2.74% 3.54% 3.75% 4.03% 4.20% 4M% 4.44% 4.47% 4.56% 4.69% $64.67 $91.32 $144.67 $171.36 $224.71 $278.05 $331.40 $411.42 $438.09 $544.79 $811.44 $1.23 $2.36 $4.63 $5.77 $8.04 $10.32 $12.59 $16.00 $17.14 $21.68 $33.04 1.93% 2.65% 3.31% 3.49% 3.71% 3.85% 3.95% 4.05% 4.07% 4.14% 4.25% $66.00 $93.59 $148.81 $176.44 $231,66 $286.87 $342,09 $424.92 $452.53 $562.96 $838,97 $1.33 $2.27 $4.14 $5.08 $6.95 $8.82 $10.69 $13.50 $14.44 $18.18 $27.53 2.06% 2.48% 2.86% 2.96% 3.09% 3.17% 3.23% 3.28% 3.29% 3.34% 3.39% SCHEDULE XVII Small Residence 9,000 Gal., (1,203 Cu. Ft.) Usage Combined 'Water & Wastewater M'onthly Billing Comparison Large Residence 30,000 Gal., (4,010 Cu. Ft. 'Usage ;222.91 21 6.06 $214.53 $212.42 �► *. SC HEDULE XVIII Ft. N R H B U R L E S 0 N E H U E W U E E 10 R L S L- T i T E H R N R H B U R L E S 0 N E U E L E F Combined Water & Wastewater Monthly Billing C omparison Small Commercial SCHEDULE XIX 9,000 Gal., (1,203 Cu. Ft.) Usage 94.$1 $90.56 $79.97 ombinecl Dater & Wastewater Monthly Billing Comparison SCHEDULE XX Large Commercial 100,000 Gal., (13,369 Cu. Ft.) Usage ql if eOOO7 'A Combined Water & Wastewater Monthly Billing Comparison CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Jimmy Perdue Agenda No. AA Subject: North Richland Hills Police Department 2010 Annual Report (15 Minutes) Summarv: The North Richland Hills Police Department Annual Report for 2010 provides a snapshot of the Police Department's activity during the calendar year. It shows a variety of activity measurements indicating the effort of the dedicated Police Department employees. General Description: While there was a slight increase in crime in 2010 compared to 2009, comparative data over the past five years indicates the 2010 numbers are in line with the overall trend. These numbers are reported in traditional Uniform Crime reporting (UCR) format and the new National Incident based Reporting System (NIB'RS). During 2010, we continued to improve both our efficiency and effectiveness in serving our community. We strengthened partnerships with community members, implemented a number of new police initiatives and made significant technological advances. Many of these advances were unseen by the community, but were all designed to equip our employees with the best tools necessary to serve our citizens. Our programs and accomplishments are detailed within the attached report. North Richland Hills Police Department 2010 Annual Report R/ r r � 1: OUR VISION Our vision is a community environment where the public has full faith and confidence in its police department to provide an atmosphere where people feel safe and secure. 10111 aiAl6 - -: [•7►� Our mission is to work in a "�� partnership with our citizens to R maintain a safe, peaceful H community by providing P �excellence in all police services dedicated to the highest standards of ethics and integrity while preserving and protecting life and property. OUR PHILOSOPHY We are committed to maintaining high ethical standards by conducting ourselves with integrity, compassion and accountability. We, both as individuals and as an organization, strive to be leaders in our profession and in the community we serve. Effective leadership will model the way, enable others to act and inspire a shared vision. We endorse the principles embodied in our Constitution. We respect and protect the rights of all citizens, and we endeavor to ensure the safety, security and protection of life and property. Integrity is central to the values we embrace and establishes the foundation for community trust. We are accountable to each other and to the citizens we serve and we expect ethical, legal and moral behavior in all aspects of our lives. We strive to maintain the highest quality of life for all that reside within and visit our community. Our values guide our work and decisions, help us contribute to the quality of life and promote a positive work experience.. We are dedicated to preserving the goals and values that make North Richland Hills the "City of Choice." I r e if` fir i:� e h , f - F(� The North Richland Hills Police Department experienced another great year in 2010 as we built upon our successes and positioned our department for the future. We strengthened partnerships with community members, implemented a number of new police initiatives and made significant technological advances. Many of these advances were unseen by the community but were all designed to equip our employees with the best tools necessary to serve our citizens. We never forget that we only exist through the willingness of our community to support us and our programs. The most significant example of this commitment was shown during the passage of our Crime Control District renewal referendum. Our community approved a 20 -year extension of the CCD with over 87% of the votes. This overwhelming support demonstrated the loyalty of our citizens to support the police department's efforts. Each member of the department joins me in thanking everyone throughout our City for their unwavering support and commitment to our mission and philosophy. We are grateful for that support and seek to demonstrate our commitment to the community through our actions. We were always mindful of our vision to provide an atmosphere where people feel safe and secure and dedicate ourselves to that cause. As a new year unfolds, we look forward with great anticipation for the implementation of some new programs recognizing the many challenges that lay before us. The widening of Loop 820 through our city will have a multi -year impact to our operations but will not diminish our commitment to maintaining our high level of service. In addition, we are looking to partner with our neighboring cities on some new projects to share resources and reduce our overall fiscal impact to the community. We intend to be good stewards of the resources given to us and maximize the service we provide with them. The men and women of the North Richland Hills Police Department are committed servants who seek to provide the highest quality of service possible in everything they do. I am constantly amazed at their work ethic and willingness to go above and beyond to serve society. I am very proud of our department and am again humbled by their support. It is my honor to work alongside them and to serve the citizens of North Richland Hills. f [ I. F -- (� F - I. [-F I 111whki, CCD Election The Crime Control and Prevention District (CCD), funded with a half - cent sales tax, was originally approved by voters in February, 1996 for a period of five years to provide improved police services to the citizens of North Richland Hills. On May 5, 2001, a continuation referendum was held, reauthorizing the District for an additional 10 years. The District was renewed by the voters for an additional 20 years as a result of the most recent continuation referendum held on May 8, 2010. The CCD provides for the continuation of the upgraded plan, supplies, training and equipment maintenance for 48 police personnel and will continue the support for Alliance for Children and the Special Investigations Unit program. Best Practices r NRH /M- P[]LICE 8957 �' www.nrAtx:Cnm } a� In 2010, the North Richland Hills Police Department began the process for state accreditation through the Texas Law Enforcement Recognition Program. This voluntary process confirms the agency's compliance with over 160 Texas Law Enforcement Best Practices. These Best Practices cover aspects of law enforcement operations such as use of force, protection of citizen rights, pursuits, property and evidence management, and patrol and investigative operations. Recognition status in the program assures both City Management and its citizens that their Police Department is operating in a manner that reflects the current Best Practices of Law Enforcement. Implementation of Nixie Messaging Service Continuing to expand our community outreach efforts, a new Community Information Service — Nixle — was launched in 2010. Nixle is designed to deliver important and timely information to citizens in our community using the latest technology. This service allows all those who live, work, and visit our community to receive trusted, up -to- date neighborhood -level public safety and community event notifications by web, e-mail, and cell phone. Through www.nixle.com, the department sends alerts to subscribers citywide or within a focused radius as little as a' /4 mile. Police Uniform In 2010, the North Richland Hills Police Department enhanced the safety and presence of its police officers through the modernization of the previously- issued police uniform. The new uniform allows officers a more contemporary and professional appearance to the public. It provides officers greater comfort and enhanced weather protection and a light reflection option for enhanced officer safety in low lighting. Duty Weapon Conversion A study was conducted to find a replacement for the Police Department's duty pistol. The current pistol had become undesirable in terms of its reliability, quality of manufacturer service and adaptability among the unique roles and characteristics of Department members. The process involved external agency surveys, product and company research, and extensive discussions with the involved manufacturers. The study concluded with a recommendation to transition all sworn officers to the new Glock service pistol. An agreement was negotiated with a vendor through the Local Government Purchasing. Cooperative to purchase the department's inventory of pistols and allowed for the funds to be received in the form of credit to be applied towards the purchase of the new duty weapon and all associated equipment to accommodate the transition. NURTH RKH' AND rs - p0 1 I� ;.. it Chief of Police Jimmy Perdue llnff ed Bern final nv ti adonis i i r Technical Services Caplan Captain Captain Coordinator Mike Youq Ken Bouts Rick Scott Franl F mrellm Lieuternams Crimes Persons=SU Ron Beale, Sid Brmum Prof. Standards Comnwnity Services Fleet Maintenance = RdLjMC--, Sergeant Lieutenant Sergmrt TSr] Maffr em, Jeff vvih Jrie Sli kard Billy Privett Bill Schneider ReeordslP y Properly Cry ropert n mmun� Administrat r e 8 $ergeanf5 -Patrol F pObc ing, Intemau Affaiss 3R4s I DARE I Crime Rev. Manager Manager Sergeant 1 Sergeant - Traffic W� es,Acci edilation VolunleerlExpbnerProgram BianreEagletmn DebbieEskew GYi s Mmrgan Dinkins, Espy, Hanson, Media Relations Safely Town Jackson, Mares, l} Scott, jCUrUS_] Tri ", C -Vin,„ Wrkp Educateonlrrainng Manager LR�rck Sergeant Michael Lara L E AT. r Guard Jeff Gartner tmiC ime Ana" DD LaRc uards Jeff Menton Jeff Mentor Communications Supervisor JennioVebe 9 Communications Supervisor JennioVebe Fj� F r F F r ' (-, (-:� r- F The Management Services Bureau is under the command of Assistant Chief Andy Kancel. This Bureau is responsible for coordinating the activities of the Administrative Services Division and the Technical Services Division. In addition to the assistant chief, the bureau is staffed by one captain, one lieutenant, two sergeants, eight police officers, one civilian division coordinator and 40 full -time civilian personnel. The Administrative Services Division is responsible for planning, research, and policy development for the Police Department and the management of awarded state and federal grants. Charitable outlets and grant funding sources are sought after to build new service programs and supplement police resources not otherwise available to the department. Additionally, the Division oversees the Community Services Section, Professional Standards, and the Training Section. Crime prevention and community relations are the top priorities of the Community Services Section. Instruction of the highly- successful D.A.R.E. program and primary law enforcement responsibilities in the area schools are the focus of the School Resource Officers. This section also provides community outreach, partnership, and interaction through the administration of programs such as: • Neighborhood CrimeWatch • Citizen's Police Academy • Crime -Free Multi- Housing • Volunteers in Police Service • National Night Out • Community Resource Coordinator During the Holiday Season, many families are unable to celebrate or exchange gifts due to financial hardship. The "Santa Cops" and "Shop with a Cop" are two programs that step in to help those families throughout our community. In 2010, these programs brightened the holiday season for 126 children. Helping the community stay safe has always been the primary goal of the police department, but being able to help in other ways is a very satisfying role for the men and women who wear the police uniform. A newly created program is defining our department's leadership role in providing quality victim's assistance — the Crime Victim's Liaison Program. This program provides support to crime victims through counseling, professional referrals, and assistance in the State's qualification process for compensation.. The Professional Standards Section ensures optimum department staffing and the highest quality of service delivery by providing the best qualified candidates for police employment. The Police Agency Combined Testing or P.A.C.T. is the testing device that is used to establish a list of qualified applicants. The six participating cities of P.A.C.T. — Euless, Hurst, Keller, Southlake, Colleyville and North Richland Hills — have joined forces to recruit the most qualified police officer applicants. This combined testing provides one test with multiple opportunities to become a police officer. Professional Standards' staff also maintain positive working relationships with the media by remaining accessible, visible, and delivering appropriate responses in a timely manner. Internal control and compliance issues are addressed by investigating allegations of misconduct by department employees. The Training Section coordinates and delivers advanced, continued training opportunities and professional development of all department personnel. Efforts to conduct personnel development include annual weapons qualifications, a 40 hour in- service class, maintaining all licenses required or issued by the State of Texas, and roll - call training. A ZLL 11 _L it ► r LL _LL _ -+r k r F r r FE r i 1��, F,� r i Adult Arrests The Technical Services Division is organized into four sections. Detention Services is responsible for the safe detention, control and care of all prisoners within the jail facility. All Detention Officers receive training in jail regulations, departmental regulations, defensive tactics including less - lethal weapons and jail standard operating procedures to ensure that the prisoner's constitutional rights are not violated. This section is also responsible for proper recording and testing of suspected DWI violators through the Department's State Certified Intoxilyzer Program. An average of 12.77 prisoners are housed per day, and facility staff serves an average of 15,000 prisoner meals each year. The ,Property and Evidence Section is responsible for: • the procurement and management of the inventory and issuance of all police equipment; • the maintenance and accountability for the Department's vehicle fleet; • the storage, safekeeping and the ultimate disposal of all property /evidence recovered during a criminal investigation; and • the coordination and supervisory oversight of building security and facilities management. Quarterly audits were conducted in 2010 on all firearms, narcotics, and money. Audits were conducted to ensure compliance with policy and procedures. Annually, an inventory is conducted of the entire collection of property maintained in the property room. The Records Section serves as the North Richland Hills Police Department's official record custodian along with the processing and retention of all police records. This section provides the services necessary to track, file, and efficiently retrieve all police reports for the department by maintaining a record scanning program for all archived records. This section serves as the record liaison for the public, the State and the FBI. Personnel assigned to this service provide assistance to citizens with various needs either face to face or by telephone. They also assist the Patrol Section by taking non - emergency police reports that do not require the presence of a police officer allowing more time to devote to proactive crime reduction activities. The Communications Section is the public's link to police, fire, ambulance, and City emergency and non - emergency services. The primary responsibility of the Communications Section is to provide citizens with the best possible response to their request for information or the need for service. Communications personnel accomplish this by responding to a need for service by notifying and causing a response of available police, fire, ambulance, City personnel and emergency equipment as well as outside agencies. Personnel are trained to provide educated answers to a vast array of questions from our citizens and provide 9 -1 -1 education to the young children of the community. s moo in '` r r :e r� 1 Answering the Call to Service We are very fortunate to have a community of citizens that support their police department and, in addition that are willing to participate in helping make it safer. Volunteers can create valuable ties between law enforcement and members of the community. The Police Department has two very exceptional groups of citizen volunteers — The Citizens Police Academy Alumni Association and our Volunteers in Police Service — "VIPS." Their involvement and the value in their work encompass not only personal time, but individual skills and talents. Our citizen volunteers are a very powerful resource. Together, these two groups had a combined total of over 5,000 service hours in 2010. VOLUNTEER PATROL A1111pr o �g4a�82 VIPS are a team of trained citizen volunteers who provide a value -added level of support to the police department. VI PS members assist with non - enforcement duties, allowing police officers time to respond more effectively to enforcement and policing priorities and to focus on crime reduction. Volunteers attend an orientation program to acquaint them with the department, personnel, policies, and procedures that will have a direct impact on their work assignment. They also receive training in crime prevention, CPR and first aid, driver awareness and patrol procedures. Volunteers do not take enforcement action, carry weapons, or make arrests. The Citizens' Police Academy is the cornerstone of this relationship as it allows us to educate the public about how we perform our jobs providing them an exposure to the intricacies of the police department. Many graduates of this academy continue to build on this knowledge by joining our Citizens' Police Academy Alumni Association. This non -profit association brings graduates of all CPA classes together to improve relations between the police department and the civilian community in all phases of law enforcement and to further the goals and objectives of North Richland Hills Police Department. These individuals support their police department and provide a core group of people that perform a variety of functions.. Both groups were honored during the 2010 National Volunteer Week with a luncheon served by members of the police department command staff in appreciation for their generous spirit and service to the community. Proudly, sixteen of our volunteers received personal recognition from President Obama through the United States Presidential Service Award. Each recognized volunteer received a presidential pin and signed letter from the president thanking them for their dedicated service. ri y �l f L'. `Il,, ``'�1■ ;armor r r F "' In February 2010, the North Richland Hills Police Department utilized grant funding to improve the existing Family Resource Program. This program has proven successful in addressing the needs of families in our community who are experiencing difficulties or needing support due to circumstances beyond their control. The original program was federally funded through the Tarrant County Youth Collaboration with the grant mandated objective of helping children at risk of abuse or neglect. The North Richland Hills Police Departments' procurement of A grant funding through the U.S. Department of Justice - Justice Assistance Grant Program, allows for the continuation of the program — goals along with the opportunity to expand and enhance objectives. These newly expanded goals and objectives allow for the program to provide assistance to all members of the community with the newly renamed Community Resource Program. The Community Resource Program is a multi- component, collaborative partnership project, which seeks to proactively identify and intervene in the lives of our citizens in need. This program offers assistance by connecting citizens with available community resources that specialize in assistance with various issues such as, risk of abusing and/or neglecting their children, financial hardships, counseling, and other daily coping alternatives. The program includes a Community Resource Coordinator (CRC) from the police department who works closely with officers and others to systematically identify and help those most in need. The CRC receives referrals from local schools, CPS, officers and other contacts to intervene in situations before they become detrimental to one's quality of life. The program connects persons in need with local resources that are dedicated to offer a hand up, not a hand out. The CRC also acts as a liaison for MHMR to identify those in the community that need mental health assistance. Sometimes the circumstances in their life may have caused those in need to become disconnected from mental health programs, and this partnership acts to restore the connection to available quality mental health services. The purpose of the program is to develop and implement an alternative community response system that will more efficiently connect community -based resources to better serve our citizens. Existing social research reveals that families who are socially isolated from formal and informal social support systems in the community tend to face greater struggles in daily life. The Community Resource Program is designed to reduce this social isolation which can have a profoundly negative impact upon our citizens, the basic family structure, and community as a whole.. The goal of the Community Resource Program is to find new and creative ways not just to avert isolation, but to actually strengthen family resiliency within the community. By intervening at the earliest signs of distress, the program hopes to reduce negative social impact by connecting and strengthening the bonds of our citizens within the community in which we all share. FBI Uniform Crime Report Part I Offenses Pant II Offenses Homicide, Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Vandalism, Forgery /Fraud, Narcotics, Weapons, Assault, Burglary, Theft, Vehicle Theft Sex Offenses, Simple Assaults 3,000 2,000 1,000 2007 2008 2009 2008 2009 2010 National Incident-Based Reporting System NIBRB) 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2010 2007 Group A Offenses Arson, Assault, Bribery, Burglary, Forgery, Fraud, Gambling, Homicide, Kidnapping, Narcotics, Robbery, Sex Offenses, Theft, Weapon Violations 6,000 4,000 5 ' 1 �� 4,500 4,825 4,786 4 „811 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,500 1,000 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 Group B Offenses Bad Checks, Curfew, Disorderly Conduct, DUI, Family Offenses (Nonviolent), Peeping Tom, Runaway, Trespassing 2008 2009 2010 . Comparative Statistics FBI Uniform Crime Report Type of Offense 2009 2410 Homicide 2 0 Theft 1,491 1,607 Burglary 419 411 Auto Theft 99 94 Aggravated 113 155 Assault Robbery 38 40 Rape 24 31 TOTAL 2,186 2,338 % of Dec/Inc Change -2 -100.0 116 7.8 -8 -2.0 -5 -5.1 42 37.2 2 5.3 7 29.2 152 6.9 Average Clearance Percentages Part 1 Crimes 74.0 °I° 20110 19.0'% 70.1% 2009 18.7°x° 47.1 18.6% 69.7% 2008 19.0 %!° 45.7 °I° ■ NRH Violent Crimes 17.4% 40.7% NRH Property Crimes 2007 15.5 ° /° 44.5% National Violent Grimes 16.5% National Property Calls for Service 150,000 r 125,000 100,000 75,000 50,©00 25,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 ■ All Units Other Field Activity Assist Units Traffic Stops Total Activity North Richland Hills Police Department - 2010 Annual Report Page 12 r The Operations Bureau is under the command of Assistant Chief Mike Hamlin who is responsible for coordinating the activities of the Uniformed Services Division and the Criminal Investigations Division. In addition to the assistant chief, the bureau is staffed by two captains, four lieutenants, 13 sergeants, 72 police officers and 25 civilian personnel. The Uniformed Services Division consists of two Sections — the Patrol Section, and the Traffic Section, four specialty units — the Special Weapons and Tactical Unit, the Honor Guard Unit, and the Bicycle Patrol Unit, and the civilian Public Service Officers. Services provided by this division include uniformed police patrols, traffic law enforcement, accident investigation and reconstruction, and special threat situations. These sections are equally tasked with providing high police visibility while working with citizens in a preventive approach to problems within the community. This contemporary concept in policing — referred to as Beat Management — extends the commitment by our police officers to best serve our community while also forming a partnership with our citizens. Beat assignments have created more familiarity between the beat officer and the community served. The officers are encouraged to stop by and interact with students in schools on their beats; attend the D.A.R.E. graduations at schools on their beats meet residents, attend homeowner's associations meetings, and attend neighborhood watch meetings on their assigned beats. Public Service Officers focus upon completing those tasks that do not require the services of a police officer. The program's purpose is to create greater efficiency and effectiveness of the department's police officers, allowing them more time to address matters and overall police services to the community. ,,, Investigative The Criminal Investigations Division consists of three sections — the Crimes Against Persons Section, the Property Crimes 4,000- Section, and the Narcotics Section. Specialized units within the Division are the Crime Scene Search Unit and the Special 2, 000- r Investigations Unit. The Crimes Against Persons Section investigates causes of all violent crimes including homicide, robbery, r - sexual assault, family violence and juvenile crimes. The Property "' 20 2010 Crimes Section investigates property - related offenses including auto 13 Cases ' theft, burglary, theft, and fraud. Detectives perform follow -up 13 Gases C d C 1 Cases Cleare by E xce p ti o n investigations such as recovery of stolen property and arrest of ■ Gases C l o sed fugitives. The Special Investigations Unit investigates narcotic offenses in NRH as well as working closely with Federal and State agencies in an attempt to reduce the flow of narcotics into our community. Additionally, task force assignments extending beyond local jurisdiction promote cooperative and coordinated drug enforcement efforts drawing from the expertise of state and local law enforcement. The Crime Scene Search Unit collects and processes all evidence from NRH crime scenes and supervises the multi - agency Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS). Crime Analysis compiles information on statistical implications and trends and produces detailed criminal intelligence data for use by the department and neighboring agencies. NO TH RPCsfi ANp � t30JJCE rj e(l rr C� r II I ` r r _j The North Richland Hills Police Honor Guard is a ceremonial police unit dedicated to upholding the highest values and traditions of the men and women of law enforcement. Officers of the NRH Police Honor Guard are committed to representing the City of North Richland Hills and their law enforcement family, both locally and nationally. They remain ready to serve at the direction of the Chief of Police and participate at a variety of ceremonial events, including Police Officer Memorials, Award Ceremonies, and government activities requiring the "presentation and posting of colors." The team incorporates precision marching movements into their ceremonial presentations and they embody the values of law enforcement through a display of discipline, focus and teamwork. The NRH Police Honor Guard is civically minded and remembers our military veterans, as well as individuals and organizations that are dedicated to public service. ism , POLICE a f I A number of supervisors and officers from throughout the Department are also cross trained to serve in the capacity of a Special Weapons and Tactics Unit (S. W.A. T.). The unit will provide their specialized service to the community and will assist surrounding communities, if requested. Their duties include performing hostage rescues and counter - terrorism operations, serving high risk arrest and search warrants, subduing barricaded suspects, and engaging heavily -armed criminals. They have specialized equipment including heavy body armor, ballistic shields, entry tools, an armored vehicle, advanced night vision optics, and motion detectors for covertly determining the positions of hostages or hostage takers inside an enclosed structure. To prepare for these dangerous encounters, this highly - dedicated team has specialized training utilizing real -life situations in which their skills and training are refined. The newest specialized unit is the Bicycle Patrol Unit. This Unit consists of patrol officers who patrol the city primarily on bicycles. Bicycle officers can exercise the option to ride throughout the entire year, dependent upon weather conditions and staffing. Officers are permitted to conduct routine day and night patrols while on bicycle and are assigned to cover special community events. The department has bicycle transportation racks so officers can attach their bicycles onto their patrol vehicles and utilize them as needed. Police Cyclist training includes instruction on operating the bicycle through various skills courses, up and down stairs, over obstacles, and multi -mile endurance rides. Bicycle maintenance skills, rider physical conditioning, and health concerns are also included in this course. This Unit is a visible deterrent to crime and an approachable source of assistance and information. The flexibility, approachability and problem - solving interaction of the Bicycle Patrol is an additional facet of the Department's proactive approach to law enforcement and service to the community.. ' Jill I 1 r F, F F e ( n F' f 'F F'i YdIce elfAcm Xeid gukiurn elffic'" NWMz goe"T SeTyemat ;far on eftic" aeex� jame6 Cgi"% SeA.A'fa wa AeA&41aw Sewice UaLazd Detectiue jea .1�1. wnt4 vgicet J am da" Vgicm .A'fatt e"mem t1` ic" e" @rcau4o -rd (2) Sewea nt `..J�" euxtie SmWw t g o" & pg (2) Smyewd )�ea garnet Cgicet XWaa gwte J`7 zawL .1 eAwcian Dam& Mea ww Officer .l im mefine,66V ufpcex ami. - c mtw, mimt J dire `.Dept. SeVe d .Afartt Jacbm (2) Detective Shayne Xetam elgim Sevin Paw Detective .Af"aet Butlien Sexgea nt efiw,,u AoV= (2) C ficen Aewu J alarm (2) Deterave MwwM AadW egice✓c 'efiu"e Re"guez `.Detediue Afkhae# Sf'eeKW B"euterux d 14 `flliti@i wm C gicex, Wdhwn Woo ham el ficer Nafim Wyatt ++C'.Gow"i u n g a gAga d `bete d iaic Sem vwicee gheamm 9netnuctove fo'l'1�li�ir _, . f_ AR , Offic" .A'fefii,5a a ea C� 9u,6 tin Xtack Rem ub g echnicitut j9ecza eotatm Officet `7e&a .l a i -Srr id Necoub .l edu iciau ange& `t(1aUz Of Afet ea aflzn office', .`Duetin J c$ O f icon gafiwd e" pedee (2) sec .1 erhn cian i eem 'Cemm f9 firm yurrcdfuut, Deawwad `Die patc$et Jeauw M&ei 32ecomb g erfiruciau jean .hex ogice& a&xa nAm jamee Diepatchen Xim: Xia'icui Detention .Afanage& Afidad Baxac Ogicet Sed Afavwa Vf ice& C ajM 9064ext eleven (2) C ° ficen .` "iaa. Jabnet e fire J wvie J ec a Detectiue . wwM RatW (2) .AG. efiwetaphm She , citirzeu [9gicen ef'vue Ne"gUeIZ `.Die patdm Aumw Sfiagge office* ice* a&m Smead G`? fficex Deha J aV&v, - Smid .`Die patefiex jenni f u `f iebey offim Ugm Vi" Detective .A'fatt Vieeen Cgkm Fxic'`f"Ue&tet R The City of North Richland Hills is located in North Central Texas in Tarrant County, approximately eight miles northeast of downtown Fork Worth off NE Loop 820. The City's population has grown from 30,600 residents in 1980 to more than 66,000 residents today. The community began when W.S. Peters agreed to bring 600 families into the area within a three -year period as part of a land grant. Families began arriving in the summer of 1848. In 1849, Tarrant County was established and named for General Edward H. Tarrant. The community of Birdville (adjacent to what is now North Richland Hills" southwest boundary) was named the first County Seat. The area remained a rural farming and ranching community for more than 100 years. In 1952, Clarence Jones began to subdivide his 268 acre dairy farm into a suburban addition in the area that is now Cummings Drive. In 1953, the North Richland Hills Civic League sought to have the area annexed to Richland Hills, then voted to form their own city when annexation was denied. An election was held, and the 268 acres of the Jones' Farm, with a population of 500, became officially incorporated as the City of North Richland Hills. North Richland Hills operates under a charter adopted in 1964, which provides for a "Council- Manager" form of government. The City Council is composed of a Mayor and seven Council Members: Mayor Oscar Trevino, Mayor Pro Tern Ken Sapp, Councilman Tim Welch, Councilman David Whitson, Councilman John Lewis, Councilman Tom Lombard, Councilman Scott Turnage and Councilman Dr. Tim Barth. The Mayor and Council Members are elected at -large and serve two -year terms. Under the provisions of the City Charter and subject only to limitations imposed by the Texas Constitution, State Law, and the City Charter, the Council enacts local legislation, adopts the annual operating budget, and sets policy. Mr. Mark Hindman, the City Manager, is responsible for the day -to -day operations of the City and reports directly to the Council. North Richland Hills has come into its own as a truly urban community, serving over 180,000 people daily. With over 66,000 citizens, the City of North Richland Hills is the V largest city in Tarrant County. There are many reasons for our continued growth: close proximity to Dallas and Fort Worth, low crime rate, excellent schools and government services, abundant recreation opportunities and high quality of life. The North Richland Hills City Council and team of city employees are committed to providing quality services and to making North Richland Hills the City of Choice. ■1■<I The North Tarrant Express (NTE) is a $2.5 billion, 13 -mile project dedicated to improving mobility along the IH820 and SH121- 1831Airport Freeway corridor through a regionally supported managed lane system. With construction now underway, this project will help relieve regional traffic, improve safety and pave the way for future growth in one of the country's most congested and fastest - growing regions. Drivers will have the option of bypassing congestion in general purpose lanes for new high -speed managed lanes. The project will also provide reconstruction of interchanges, upgrade existing toll -free facilities to the latest and most current standards, and maintain them at the developer's expense. The NTE Mobility Partners' firms collectively employ more than 2,000 Texans and will put more than 100 additional Dallas -Fort Worth and Texas companies, and their employees, to work on this project. The NTE will be designed, built, financed, operated and maintained by NTE Mobility Partners, which will work in close collaboration with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and local communities. This important highway project will be wholly owned by Tx DOT. Construction began in late 2010, and is on the fast track for completion by 2015. In partnership with local communities and the state, NTE Mobility Partners is committed to developing and operating the safest, most advanced and reliable roadways for drivers and their families. The NTE project was one of two North Texas highways under development to be named "2010 Project of the `Fear" by the American Road & Transportation 'Builders Association. The NTE was recognized as one of the most innovative, comprehensive and complex roadways currently planned and in development in the United States. Aw it Aso all 2010: The Year In Pictures 6� ■ R141 D 1 I_ r PO 1 N Record Snowfall 20 Annu I Awards Panquet WWI Mayor Trevino & NRH Bike Unit -- Stof m yP Governor Perry visits NRH Tour Dallas 201U my Plaza Le Dedication 71 1 'h Family 4 Celebration P.A.C.T. physical testi g Chamber of Commerce Hometown o -Nz - �.i 4.s Hometown, Fall Festival R- spirit Employee of the Year Geny Court, ommun7ty Resource Coordinator North Richland Hills Police Department 2010 Annual Report l � y r i 7801 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 78180 (817) 427 -7000 www.nrhtx.com/police - M� - r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Jimmy Perdue Agenda No. A.5 Subject: Police Department Racial Profiling Annual Report (5 Minutes) Summarv: The required policy on racial profiling must include a report to the governing body of each county or municipality served by the agency. The Police Department hired Alex del Carmen. PH.D., of Del Carmen Consulting to analyze data collected by the Police Department. Dr. del Carmen concluded that the North Richland Hills Police Department has complied with the Texas Racial Profiling Law (SB1074). General Description: The 77 "' Regular Session of the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 1074. an Act relating to the prevention of racial profiling by certain peace officers. This law specifically prohibits racial profiling by peace officers in Texas and states the requirements for training. In addition, this law includes Section 2.132 to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that requires police departments to adopt a policy on racial profiling, which we have done. The required policy on racial profiling must include a report to the governing body of each county or municipality served by the agency. The North Richland Hills Police Department provided the required training to all its members before the September 1, 2003 statutory deadline. Most Patrol Section Officers received this training before January 1, 2002 when key portions of the statute took effect and we continue to train new officers. The annual report must contain, "information relating to traffic stops in which a citation is issued and to arrests resulting from those traffic stops, including information relating to: a) the race or ethnicity of the individual detained; and b) whether a search was conducted and, if so, whether the person detained consented to the search." 'If the Police Department did not have video - recording equipment in all patrol cars and audio - recording devices for motorcycle officers, the required data collection and analysis would be much more extensive. The Police Department reported to Dr. del Carmen that during calendar year 2010 we received two racial profiling complaints and both were determined to be unfounded. The analysis of the nine -year traffic- related contact data suggested that the North Richland Hills Police Department has been, for the most part, consistent in the racial /ethnic composition of motorists it comes in contact with during a given year. The consistency of contacts for the past nine years is in place despite the fact the city demographics may have changed, thus, increasing the number of subjects likely to come in contact with the police. (1) Tier 1 Data Motor Vehicle - Related Contact Information (1/1/10- 12/31110) RacelEthnicity I Contacts I Searches I Consensual I PC I Custody Searches Searches Arrests Total 1 21,708 1 100 1 529 1 100 1 75 1 100 1 454 1 100 — 1 798 1 100 — "N " represents "number" of traffic - related contacts * Race/Ethnicity is defined by Senate Bill 1074 as being of a "particular descent, including Caucasian„ African, Hispanic, Asian, Native American or Middle Eastern ". "Figure has been rounded N % N % N % N % N % Caucasian 17,899 82 391 74 60 80 331 73 584 73 African 1,137 5 77 15 8 11 69 15 120 15 Hispanic 2,012 9 58 11 6 8 52 11 90 11 Asian 530 2 2 .4 1 1 1 .2 3 .4 Native 26 .1 1 .2 0 0 1 .2 1 .1 American Middle 19 .09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eastern Other 85 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 21,708 1 100 1 529 1 100 1 75 1 100 1 454 1 100 — 1 798 1 100 — "N " represents "number" of traffic - related contacts * Race/Ethnicity is defined by Senate Bill 1074 as being of a "particular descent, including Caucasian„ African, Hispanic, Asian, Native American or Middle Eastern ". "Figure has been rounded (II) Motor Vehicle- Contacts and Fair Roads Standard Comparison Comparison of motor vehicle - related contacts with households in DFW that have vehicle access (in percentages). 111110- 12131110) Race /Ethnicity* Contacts Households with (in percentages) vehicle access (in p ercentages ) Caucasian 82 58 African 5 12 Hispanic 9 14 Asian 2 3 Native American .1 .54 Middle Eastern .09 N/A Other .4 N/A Total 1 100 ** 1 100 ** 1 * Race /Ethnicity are defined by Senate Bill 1074 as being of a "particular descent, including Caucasian, African, Hispanic, Asian, Native American and Middle Eastern ". "Represents rounded figure (III) Nine -Year Tier 1 Data Comparison Comparison of Nine -Year Traffic and Motor Vehicle - Related Contact Information (111102 - -- 12181110) RacelEthnicity* I Traffic - Related Contacts (in percentages) Caucasian African Hispanic Asian Native American Other 6 8 2 10 30 (09) 82 80 81 80 78 80 81 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 11 9 10 10 9 9 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 09 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .3 41 A .6 .8 .6 K k� k� MMMMME10i k� Total 100 100 ** 100 ** 100 ** 100 ** 100 100 100 ** * Race/Ethnicity is defined by Texas Senate Bill 1074 as being of a "particular descent, including Caucasian, African, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American ". ** Figure has been rounded. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Budget Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Mark Mills Agenda No. A.£ Subject: Quarterly Financial Status Report (10 Minutes) Summarv: At the February 14 City Council Work Session, staff will present the Quarterly Financial Status Report to the City Council for the period ending December 31, 2010. General Descrir)tion: Beginning in Fiscal Year 2010111, staff will present a quarterly financial status report to the City Council. This report will include a brief presentation that highlights the major operating funds of the City, focusing on revenue and expenditures to date in relation to expectations. In addition, this presentation will include a section that briefly addresses the changes made to the monthly financial report that Council will receive. This presentation will then be followed by an opportunity for staff to address Council questions. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Budget Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Mark Mills Agenda No. A.7 Subject: Quarterly Capital Improvement Project Status Report (10 Minutes) Summarv: O a quarterly basis, the Budget & Research Department presents a status update on a selection of major projects. The presentation will focus on project expenses, timelines and highlight any significant adjustments that have occurred since Council was last briefed. This quarterly presentation is then followed by an opportunity for staff to address Council questions regarding the capital improvement program. General Descrir)tion: There are over 100 capital projects included in the 'Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Capital Projects Budget. Departmental personnel responsible for each project update information monthly to provide management with a project overview. This overview consists of expenses -to -date versus approved budget, percent complete against project phase timelines and the current status of the project including any critical issues. This information is compiled into a quarterly report which is issued to City Management and City Council. The purpose of the quarterly presentation is to highlight specific projects and provide an opportunity for staff to address City Council questions. The following capital projects have been selected for highlighting in this update: • Honey Lane Phase I and Phase II • Rufe Snow Drive Improvements (Mid- Cities to Hightower) • Shady Grove Road Street Improvements (Davis to Clay- Hibbins) • Signalization at David Boulevard & Creek View Drive • Boulevard 26 Multi -Use Trail CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. B.0 Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code 18311 wKel a NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Manager's Office Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Jared Miller Agenda No. B.1 Subject: Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to Deliberate the Lease of City Property (Mineral Leases) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. B.2 Subject: Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096 - 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067 - 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352- 237213 -09)) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. C.0 Subject: Adjournment City of North. Richland Hills City Council Regular Meeting Agenda North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Monday, February 14, 2011 7:00 P.M. A.0 Call to Order - Mavor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Whitson A.2 Pledoe - Councilman Whitson A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recoanition(s) - Keep NRH Beautiful Green Campus Awards /Environmental Education Grants presented by Councilman Barth A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Aaenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of January 24. 2011 Citv Council Meeting B.2 PU 2.011 -005 Authorize Inter -local Purchasinq Aqreement with the City of China Grove B.3 PU 2011 -006 Renew Annual Contract with VMC Landscapina Service for the Parks Mowinq Services B.4 GN 2011 -011 Authorize Citv of Hurst Precinct Line Road Public Safetv Services Municipal Boundaries Agreement - Resolution No. 2011 -007 B.5 GN 2011 -012 Authorize Texas Governor's Office Criminal Justice Proarams Competitive Grant - Resolution No. 2011 -008 C KIM 1lJ:1a[yp12FTAIV110 C.1 ZC 2010 -09 Public Hearina and Consideration of a Reauest from Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruev for a zonina chance from C -2 Commercial to U InstitutionaV on Tract 9V, Abstract 1606 located at 4247 Road to the Mall. (2.993 acres) - Ordinance No. 3126 C.2 ZC 2010 -10 Public Hearina and Consideration of a Reauest from Ben Johnson to revise an existing Residential Planned Development (PD 61) for West Hiahtower Place Addition located in the 6800 Block of Hiahtower Drive - Ordinance No. 3127 C.3 TR 2011 -01 Public Hearina and Consideration of amendments to Sections 118- 631 "Table of Permitted Uses" and 118 -001 "Definitions " of the North Richland Hills Zonina Ordinance. Proposed amendments include the addition of the followina two previously unlisted uses to the table: Drive - Throuah Retail Buildings (less than 1,400 square feet) and Alternative Financial Establishments (check cashing, pavdav advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business) as well as the definitions of these uses - Ordinance No. 3128 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. No items for this category. E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS No items for this category. G.1 Action on Anv Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.1 Announcements - Councilman Welch H.2 Adjournment NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Mayor Oscar Trevino Agenda No. A.0 Subject: Call to Order - Mayor Trevino NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Councilman David Whitson Agenda No. A.1 Subject: Invocation - Councilman Whitson NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Councilman David Whitson Agenda No. A.2 Subject: Pledge - Councilman Whitson CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Doris Tipps Agenda No. A.3 Subject: Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s) - Keep NRH Beautiful Green Campus Awards /Environmental Education Grants presented by Councilman Barth Summarv: The (Keep NRH Beautiful Commission recognizes and rewards the efforts made by North Richland Hills school groups to enhance our community and educate youth on ways they can play an important role in protecting the environment. The monies awarded to these schools will go toward beautification of their school campuses. General Descriration: Each Green Campus Award winner will receive $150.00 to be used toward beautification of their school campus. Each Green Campus Award winner will receive $150.00 to be used toward beautification of their school campus. The 2011 Green Campus Award winners are: Holiday Heights Elementary North Ridge Elementary Richland High School Smithfield Middle School The Academy at Carrie F Thomas Elementary Walker Creep Elementary 2011 Environmental Education Grants are awarded on a competitive basis annually. The following schools will receive funding for their projects: Holiday Heights Elementary — Outdoor Learning Center $1,000.00 North Richland Middle School — Hummingbird Garden Planting $220.00 Richland High School — Baseball Facility Landscaping $400.00 The Academy at Carrie F. Thomas — Irrigation $380.00 The monies awarded to these schools will go toward beautification of their school campuses. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. A.4 Subject: Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. A.5 Subject: Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. B.0 Subject: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. B.1 Subject: Approval of Minutes of January 24, 2011 City Council Meeting Recommendation: To approve the minutes of the January 24, 2011 City Council 'Meeting. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 — JANUARY 24, 2011 k 1 lVe] 0 1 1"1&1 **_1 IQ L , The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in work session on the 24 day of January 2011 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Workroom prior to the 7:00 p.m. regular Council meeting. Present: Oscar Trevino Ken Sapp John Lewis Tom Lombard Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Mayor Mayor Pro Tern, Council, Place 2 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 3 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 Council, Place 7 Staff Members: Mark Hindman City Manager Jared Miller Assistant City Manager Karen Bostic Assistant City Manager Jimmy Perdue Director of Public Safety Mike Curtis Managing Director Vickie Loftice Managing Director Patricia Hutson City Secretary Monica Solko Assistant City Secretary George Staples City Attorney Dana Alden Assistant to City Manager Mary Peters Public Information Officer John Pitstick Director of Planning & Development Larry Koonce Finance Director JoAnn Stout Neighborhood Services Director Craig Hulse Economic Development Director Kyle Spooner Information Services Director Gregory Van N ieuwenhuizeAssistant Public Works Director Mike Hamlin Assistant Police Chief Dave Pendley Building Official Chris Swartz NRH20 Manager Jamie Brockway Purchasing Manager Call to Order Mayor Trevino called the work session to order at 5:31 p.m. A.1 Discuss Items from Reaular Citv Council Meetina There were no questions from Council. A.2 Discuss Code of Ordinances. Sec. 166 -11, Temporary Sians Durina Roadwav Construction Mr. Craig Hulse, Director of Economic Development, presented the item. During a September 2616 work session Council requested input from the NRH Business Mobility Team and Staff on possible amendments to the sign ordinance on the use of temporary signage for businesses impacted by roadway construction. After meeting with the Team, the recommendation is to allow yard signs and A- Frames with the rationale being the signs are inexpensive to produce and are low to the ground, resistant to wind and do not obstruct driver visibility. Mr. Hulse presented recommended specifications for the temporary signs. Council concurred with proceeding with formal adoption of the additional temporary sign specifications. Council also requested to be provided with an outline showing the businesses that will fall within the 300 -foot limit. Council also requested that Staff address signs on the collector street located behind Home Depot, Burlington Coat Factory and the other surrounding businesses to inform the public of better access from behind the businesses. B.6 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The Citv Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the followina as authorized by Chapter 551. Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.671, Texas Government Code for Consultation with Attornev reaardina Pendina Litigation - 1 ) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096 - 236530 -09): 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. Citv of North Richland Hills (No. 667- 241297 -09): 3] Venue at Hometown vs. Citv of North. Richland Hills, et al (No. 352- 237213 -09) Mayor Trevino announced at 5:39 p.m. that the Council would convene into Executive Session as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, pursuant to Section 551.671 for consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) Hometown Urban Partners, Ltd. vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 096- 236530 -09); 2) Arcadia Land Partners 25 Ltd., et al vs. City of North Richland Hills (No. 067- 241297 -09); 3) Venue at Hometown vs. City of North Richland Hills, et al (No. 352 - 237213 -09). C.0 Adiournment Mayor Trevino announced at 6:39 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to the regular Council meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING A.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order January 2.4, 2011 at 7:06 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Oscar Trevino Ken Sapp John Lewis Tom Lombard Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Mayor Mayor Pro Tem, Council„ Place 2 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 3 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 Council, Place 7 Staff Mark Hindman Jared Miller Karen Bostic Jimmy Perdue Mike Curtis Vickie Loftice Patricia Hutson Monica Solko George Staples City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Director of Public Safety Managing Director Managing Director City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney A.1 INVOCATION Councilman Lombard gave the invocation. A.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Lombard led the pledge of allegiance. A.3 SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S) No items for this category. A.4 CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Charles Cale, 6125 Riviera Drive, expressed his concerns for seniors at home and brought to Council's attention services offered by Life Alert. He also expressed his concerns with recycling and if it was profitable to continue, how to promote recycling in the city, and brought attention to the second hole tee box at Iron Horse Golf Course. Mayor Trevino asked JoAnn Stout, Neighborhood Service Director and Managing Director, Vickie Loftice to help Mr. Cale with his concerns. A.5 REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA ►m B.0 APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED B.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 10, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING B.2 GN 2011 -404 RESCHEDULE THE MARCH 14, 2011 COUNCIL MEETING TO MARCH 7, 2011 B.3 PU 2011 -001 AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF BADGER WATER METERS AND TELEMETRIC DEVICES FROM ATLAS UTILITY SUPPLY COMPANY FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $350,000 B.4 PW 2011 -001 TERMINATE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT OF PROJECT RFB NO. 10 -034 WITH J & T EXCAVATING, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $840,828.50 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHADY GROVE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (ST0802) FROM DAVIS BOULEVARD TO CLAY- HIBBINS ROAD, APPROVE A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,691.88, AND AWARD THIS PROJECT TO RELIABLE PAVING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $793,401.30 COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS No items for this category. D.0 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT No items for this category. E.0 PUBLIC 'WORKS EA PW 2011 -002 REVISE THE FY 201012011 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET AND AWARD RFB NO. 11 -003 TO RKM UTILITY SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $598,815.90 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MACKEY DRIVE (BRILEY DRIVE TO GLENVIEW DRIVE) STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (ST0905) APPROVED Mayor Trevino announced that the following item was not a public hearing but request to speak cards had been received from citizens on the item. Mayor Trevino called for Council approval to allow the citizens to speak on the item. All of Council was in agreement to allow the citizens to speak. Mayor Pro Tern Sapp advised that the folllowing citizens wanted to speak in opposition of the construction of the sidewalks. Ms. Carol Barbee, 4154 Mackey Drive. Ms. Barbee explained that she was in the process of having the property preserved as a presidential historical site and did not want the addition of the sidewalks to hinder the original appearance. Mayor Trevino asked Dana Alden, Assistant to the City Manager to see if the City could help Ms. Barbee with the process of historical preservation. Mr. Etoy Horne and Mrs. Barbara Horne, 4145 Mackey Drive. They are in favor of the construction to the street but did not want the sidewalks citing concerns of loss of property, additional lawn work, uneven sidewalks after a period time, sidewalks would cause damage to tree roots and enjoyed their neighborhood and 'lawns as is. Ms. Romania D. Gomez, 4142 Mackey Drive. Ms. Gomez did not wish to speak but wanted to go on record as being in opposition of the sidewalks. Mayor Pro Tem Sapp announced the following individuals submitted 'letters in favor of the project with sidewalks. Mrs. Penny Frazier, 4415 Mackey Drive Ms. Belinda K. Gracy, 4147 Mackey Drive Mr. Richard F. Whitbeck, 4328 Mackey Drive Ms. Tina Dorsey, 4424 Mackey Drive came forward to speak in favor of the project with sidewalks. Ms. Dorsey stated that the sidewalks were necessary for the safety of all the children that walked to and from school and the addition of the sidewalks would help endorse a community atmosphere to the neighborhood.. Gregory VanNieuwenhuize, Assistant Public Works Director summarized the item. The City Council is being asked to award a construction contract for the CIP Project identified as "Mackey Drive (Briley Drive to Glenview Drive)" in the Capital Projects Budget. The project will consist of reconstructing approximately 1,800 lineal feet of asphalt pavement with concrete pavement to comply with the current city standards. In addition, sidewalks will be constructed, and the existing storm drainage system will be expanded. The City requested bids in accordance with city policy and proposals were received from nine firms. The design engineer reviewed the bids and recommends awarding the contract to the lowest bidder RKM Utility Services, Inc. COUNCILMAN LEWIS MOVED TO APPROVE PW 2011 -002 WITH SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. Mayor Pro Tem Sapp recognized Brain Huss with Boy Scout Troop 329 who is working on his citizen badge. E.2 PW 2411 -443 REVISE THE FY 2010/2011 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET AND APPROVE THE FUNDING AND REPLACEMENT OF A PORTION OF THE 16 -INCH WATER SUPPLY LINE RUNNING ALONG BIG FOSSIL CREEK (UT1107) APPROVED Jimmy Cates, Public Works Operations Manager, summarized the item. This project will consist of replacing approximately 100 linear feet of a 16" North Richland Hills water supply line located adjacent to the Diamond Oaks Country Club and crossing Big Fossil Creek in Haltom City. Over time the channel bottom and slopes have eroded to a point where the water supply line is now exposed. A breakage of this line would result in the loss of water deliveries from one of city's three potable water entry points from Fort Worth and a loss of water pressure in the city's south side. The replacement of this portion of the water line is considered an emergency situation. The estimated cost for the project is $225,000. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TO APPROVE PIN 2411 -443; TO REVISE THE FY 20/012411 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET TO FUND $225,440 FOR THE PROJECT AND APPROVE THE REPLACEMENT OF THE 16 -INCH WATER SUPPLY LINE RUNNING ALONG BIG FOSSIL CREEK. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. (NOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.1 GN 2011 -005 APPROVAL OF CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN TARRANT COUNTY'S HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM - RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -002 APPROVED JoAnn Stout, Neighborhood Services Director presented the item. In 2008, City Council approved Resolution No. 2008 -031 which appropriated $75,000 in matching funds on all HOME expenditures. The resolution that was passed allowed for automatic renewal of the grant for three years, running through 2009, 2010 and 2011. A change in the HOME Investment 'Partnership Grant now requires municipalities to provide 30% matching funds, instead of the 25% requirement of prior years, and now must specify in a resolution the amount of matching funds that will be appropriated to the program. The maximum amount of HOME Funds a municipality can request is $300,000 and the minimum is $100,000. The approval of Resolution No. 2011 -002 will allow the City of North Richland Hills to request $100,000 in HOME Funds for 2011 and will appropriate 30% in matching funds or $30,000. COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -002. COUNCILMAN SAPP SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4. F.2 GN 2411 -406 CALLING MAY 14, 2011 CITY COUNCIL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING A JOINT ELECTION AGREEMENT WITH OTHER TARRANT COUNTY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS AND CONTRACT FOR ELECTION SERVICES WITH TARRANT COUNTY - RESOLUTION NO. 2411 -443 APPROVED Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary, presented the item. The Resolution orders the City's General Election for May 14, 2011 for Council Places 1, 3, 5 and 7 for two -year terms of office, establishes voting locations, provides for the appointment of election officials, provides for early voting and election day procedures and authorizes the Mayor to execute a contract with Tarrant County for election services. Tarrant County has requested those governing bodies holding a May election to enter into a joint election agreement and contract with the County for election services. The city's election will be held jointly with other Tarrant County political entities holding an election with Tarrant County administering the election. After Tarrant County has finalized all early voting locations, the City Council will need to approve an amended resolution that lists the locations of each early voting location throughout the County. COUNCILMAN SAPP MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -003. COUNCILMAN BARTH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.3 GN 2011 -007 APPROVE INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND INVESTMENT POLICY - RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -004 APPROVED Larry Koonce, Finance Director presented the item. The Public Funds Investment Act ( "PFIA ") requires that the City Council review and adopt the city's Investment Strategy and Investment Policy annually. The city contracted with Public Financial Management, LLC ( "PFM ") to provide Investment Advisory Services on October 1, 2009. Upon staff review and advice from PFM there are no recommended changes to the City of North Richland Hills Investment Policy or Strategy at this time. Advisors and staff will monitor the upcoming legislative session for changes that would impact the city. COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2011 -007; RESOLUTION No. 2011 -004. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION.. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.4 GN 2011 -048 APPROVE SUSPENSION OF THE FEBRUARY 14, 2011 EFFECTIVE DATE OF ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY'S REQUEST TO INCREASE RATES — RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -005 APPROVED Karen Bostic, Assistant City Manager, presented the item. Oncor Electric Delivery Company ( "Oncor " or "the Company") filed an application on or about January 7, 2011 with cities retaining original jurisdiction seeking to increase system -wide transmission and distribution rates by $353 million. The Company asks the city to approve a 14.6% increase in residential rates, a 15.5% increase in commercial rates, and a 25.9% increase in street lighting rates. According to Oncor, rates would increase by approximately $60 on an annual basis for an average residential customer. Approval of Resolution No. 2011 -005 suspends the February 14, 2011 effective date of the Company's rate increase for the maximum period permitted by law to allow the city, working in conjunction with the Steering Committee of Cities served by Oncor, to evaluate the filing, determine whether the filing complies with law, and if lawful, to determine what further strategy, including settlement, to pursue. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2011-008; RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -045. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.5 PU 2011 -003 AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT FROM CONSOLIDATED TRAFFIC CONTROLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $190,900 TO REPLACE THE EXISTING LOOP DETECTORS APPROVED Jimmy Cates, Public Works Operations Manager presented the item. This item is to request authorization to purchase video detection system at signalized intersections along Boulevard 26 from Glenview Drive to Walker Boulevard, Smithfield Road from Chapman Drive to Starnes Road and Glenview Drive from Rufe Snow to Vance Road. Currently the intersections use a pavement vehicle detection system that consists of small electrical current wires. Temperature changes and precipitation cause interference with the operation and pavement failure or movement of the pavement will cause the wires to break. When the system fails the signal light is affected, leading to traffic delays and an increase in fuel consumption and air pollution. The new video vehicle detection equipment is not effected by weather conditions or pavement fail ureldeterioration and has a life expectancy of up to 10 years. COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE PU 2011 -003 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT FROM CONSOLIDATED TRAFFIC CONTROLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $190,000 TO REPLACE THE EXISTING LOOP DETECTORS. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.6 GN 2011 -009 AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING RESTRICTED RESIDENCY - ORDINANCE NO. 3125 APPROVED Assistant Police Chief Mike Hamlin presented the item. Currently, the City has no regulations governing the residential location of persons that were convicted or adjudicated for certain offenses as defined in Chapter 62 (Sex Offender Registration Program) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Police Department is seeking Council approval for an ordinance regulating the residency of certain persons convicted or adjudicated of certain offenses involving a victim younger than 17 years of age. Persons required to register as sex offenders stemming from offenses in which the victim was younger than 17 years of age are prohibited from residing within 1,000 feet of locations where children commonly gather. COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TD APPROVE GN 2011 -009; ORDINANCE NO. 3125. MAYOR PRO TEM SAPP SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.7 PU 2011 -004 AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT OF POINT -OF- SALE SYSTEM FOR NRH20 FAMILY WATERPARK FROM CENTAMAN INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $161,375 APPROVED Chris Swartz, NRH2O Park Manager summarized the item. Item is to consider the purchase of replacement of the 2001 software system for NRH2O Family Water Park. As the park relies on this system for the collection of approximately $4,000,000 in revenue annuallly, this system's stability and set of features is of utmost importance to the continued operation of the park. The City requested Requests for Proposals in accordance with city policy and proposals were received from eight firms. The City's selections committee reviewed and evaluated the proposals and is recommending the purchase of the point of sale system from Centaman Systems in the amount of $161,375. COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE PU 20111 -004 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF THE REPLACEMENT OF THE POINT OF SALE SYSTEM FOR NRH2O IN THE AMOUNT OF $161,375. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. GA EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON WORK SESSION AGENDA B.1 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION - 1) HOMETOWN URBAN PARTNERS, LTD. VS. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (NO. 096 - 236530 -09); 2) ARCADIA LAND PARTNERS 25 LTD., ET AL VS. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (NO. 067 - 241297 -09); 3) VENUE AT HOMETOWN VS. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ET AL (NO. 352 - 237213 -09)) George Staples, City Attorney, presented the item - (Venue at HomeTown vs City of North Richland Hills, et al, No. 352 - 237213 -9). A lawsuit was filed in 2009 against the City called Venue at Home Town vs City of NRH and Dave Pendley in his capacity as Building Inspector. The case is set for trial in February in District Court and as part of the court ordered process it was necessary for the City Manager and the City's Attorneys to attend mediation. After meeting in mediation, an agreement was reached that Staff feels appropriate for Council to consider. Mr. Staples recommended to Council that they authorize the City Attorney to enter into an agreed judgment on the following terms agreed to in mediation — the judgment would have effect only with respect to the Venue I and would allow the conversion of the bottom floors of two of the existing buildings that are finished out with commercial space to no more than 20 multi- family units; each party will bear their own attorneys fees and expenses; and that none of this will have any effect on any of the city's ordinances or have any bearing on any of the other litigation that the city is involved with. In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Staples reconfirmed that it would not impact any of the other ongoing litigation; the judgment only impacts two buildings (Bldgs 3A and 313) at Venue I on the ground level that is currently constructed as retail space, and the option would remain to convert the space back to commercial if there was a change in the market. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO ENTER INTO A JUDGMENT IN CAUSE No. 352 - 237213 -9 AS OUTLINED ALLOWING CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL SPACE IN EXISTING VENUE ONE BUILDINGS 3A AND 3B TO NO MORE THAN 20 MULTIFAMILY UNITS. COUNCILMAN SAPP SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5 -2, COUNCILMAN WELCH AND COUNCILMAN BARTH AGAINST. H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilman Turnage made the following announcements. The City of North Richland Hills will host its annual Daddy - Daughter Valentine Dance on Saturday, February 5th. Ages 3 to 7 are invited to dance from 6 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., while ages 8 to 16 are invited from 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The cost is $8 per person. Tickets are on sale at the NRH Recreation Center. For more details, please call 817- 427 -6600. Volunteers from AARP will be at the North Richland Hills Public Library each Monday from February 7th through April 11th to assist people with their tax returns. Taxpayers of all ages are eligible for this free service. Appointments are required. To make an appointment or get more information, please call the Library at 817- 427 -6814. Kudos Korner - Joe Slinkard, Matt Visser, Secca Collins, Jenny Cort and Christi Garcia, Police Department. A resident recently called to express her deep appreciation and thanks to those in the Police Department who helped her after she had been defrauded and lost every penny. The police investigated her case and helped her with the bank paperwork in order to recover her money. They also helped her pay a month of rent and electricity so she would not lose her apartment. As a senior citizen with no family, she is thankful that someone was there to help. It is clear that the NRH Police Department truly cares for its residents, she said. H.2 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m. Oscar Trevino — Mayor r_ra1 *36 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: (Finance Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Larry Koonce Agenda No. B.2 Subject: PU 2011 -005 Authorize Inter -local Purchasing Agreement with the City of China Grove Summarv: This item is a request for Council to approve an inter -local purchasing agreement with the City of China Grove. General Descrir)tion: The City of China Grove is requesting to enter into an inter -local purchasing agreement for the purchase of goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. The City of China Grove is interested in purchasing from the City of Forth Richland Hills current contract (10 -042) for fire fighting clothes /bunker gear. Council has authorized several of these inter -local agreements in the past and they have been mutually beneficial to North Richland Hills and the other agencies. Participation reduces the overall expense of soliciting bids and purchasing in larger quantities often lowers the cost of the goods and/or services. Each agency will place their orders and pay the vendors directly. North Richland Hills or the City of China Grove may change or cancel the agreement with a 30 -day written notice. North Richland Hills currently participates in inter -local agreements with several local governments. Some of the agreements are with the City of Cedar Hill for the purchase of EMS medical supplies, Tarrant County for the purchase of road materials and the City of Hurst for the purchase of auto parts. Recommendation: Authorize an inter -local agreement with the City of China Grove. |NTERLOCAL/wGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF NORTH R|CHLAMD HILLS AND CITY OF CHINA GROVE This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City cf North Richland Hills, hereinafter referred to as "NRH", and the City of China Grove, hereinafter referred to as "City of China Grove". Pursuant hn the authority granted by the Texas |ntedooa| Cooperation Act (Article 4413 (32t)\6annnn'n Annotated Texas Statutes} providing for the cooperation between local governmental bodies, the parties hereto, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises contained herein, agree anfollows: NRH and City of Chi na Grove desire ho enter into on Agreement for the purchase of goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. Specifications for said items should be determined in cooperation with the final approval of the entity processing the bid. The responsibility cf each entity shall beaofollows: NORTH RlCHLANDHILLS 1 NRH shall be allowed ho purchase goods and services from vendors who have been selected by City of China Grove through the competitive bidding process. NRH will place orders directly with and pay directly to the selected vendor for goods and services purchased through ocontract. 2. All purchases will bo within the specifications that have been agreed to. NRH shall bn responsible for the Vendors compliance with all conditions of delivery, price and quality of the purchased goods nrservices. 3. NRH shall give a 30-day written notification to all: participating agencies of any change or cancellation ofparticipation. 4- The Purchasing Agent, %hall he. designqted as thp official representative to act for NRH all matters relating to this cooperative purchasing agreement. City of China Grove 1. City oY China Grove shall beallowed to purchase goods and services from vendors who have been selected byNRH through the competitive bidding process nfNRH. City of China Grove will place orders directly with and pay directly ko the selected vendor for goods and services purchased through acontract. All purchases will ba within the specifications that have been agreed to. City of China Grove shall be responsible for the Vendors compliance with all conditions of delivery, price and quality of the purchased goods or services. City of China Grove shall give a 30-day written notification to a participating agency of any change cv cancellation cfparticipation. /y�� /o/ )r / � ////r�� ' k�//K shall bm designated aa the official representative to act for City uf China Grove in all matters relating tn this cooperative purchasing agreement. This Agreement shall take effect upon execution by the signatories and shall be in effect frorn date of execution until terminated by either party with thirty (30) written notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY Qty Manager DATE: ATTEST: Qty Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Attorney for the City CITY OF CHINA GROVE °�m /v/Lc ^r^^= ATTEST APPRO ED AS TOXPRM: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Presented by: VLofitce /LKoonce Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. B.3 Subject: PU 2011 -000 Renew Annual Contract with VMC Landscaping Service for the Parks Mowing Services Summarv: This item is a request for Council to approve a one year extension of the contract with VMC Landscaping Services for park mowing services. Background: The City of North Richland Hills contracts mowing services for general mowing of city parks and municipal facilities. The current contract with VMC Landscape Services was executed on October 8, 2007. The contract can be renewed for five consecutive one - year periods. The effective dates for this third renewal option will be in effect until January 31, 2012. Renewal of the contract is based on an evaluation of the contractor's performance and the anticipated contract amount considerations. According to the terms of the contract, VMC Landscape Services is required to submit a renewal request allowing for a .price increase in accordance with the Consumer Price Index of the previous 12 month period. Based on the Consumer Price Index, VMC has notified Purchasing in writing that their prices will remain unchanged until January 31, 2012. VMC Landscape Services has performed extremely well since the general parks mowing began in May 2005. Responses to requests and concerns have been handled in a timely, professional and efficient manner. The actual expenditures in FY2009/2010 were $305,837. Although the total mowing contract amount is based on a maximum number of mowing cycles, the number of cycles per mowing season is contingent upon weather and the amount of rainfall and growing conditions each year. Funding for contract mowing services is allocated in both the General Fund and the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund. The total approved budget for FY2010/2011 is $338,844. The contract per cycle pricing remains unchanged. It is the recommendation of Parks and Recreation Department and the Purchasing Division that the contract be renewed. Recommendation: Approve renewal of the annual contract with VMC Landscaping Service for the parks mowing services. January 31, 20 VIMC Landscape Service Dave Myers 2433 Merrill Road Dallas, TX 75229 Re: RFP No. 07 Annual Contract for General Parks Mowing Services Dear Mr. Myers: Referenced contract was for hvclvc (12) months with up to five (5) options to renew for additional twelve (12) months each. The original contract was for the period of Oct 9, 2007 through Oct. 8, 2009. The effective dates for the third renewal option will run. front Feb 1, 2011 through Jan. 31, 2011 The North Richland Hills Purchasing Department hereby extends an invitation to VMC Landscaping to accept the third option for an additional one (1) year period for this contract as awarded on October 8, 2007. Please mark the appropriate response below and provide your signature above your printed name. All prices must remain firm for the CVti on Renewal period through January 31, 2012, C� Yes, VMC Landscape Services wi I] accept the offer to extend the same contract pricing through Jan. 31, 2012. No, VMC Landscapc Services will not accept the offer to extend the same contract pricing through Jan. 31, 2012. Please fax you signed response to (8 17) 427-6151 or email toPurchiLsM'Lra?,-xrhtx. cum by February 4, 201 Sincerely, . ZI r r I �Ji o xckway, Purchasing ma% City of North Richland HdIs VMC Landscape Services CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Presented by: Jimmy Perdue Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. BA Subject: GN 2011 -011 Authorize City of Hurst Precinct Line Road Public Safety Services Municipal Boundaries Agreement - Resolution No. 2011 -007 Summarv: The City of North Richland Hills and the City of Hurst desire to enter into an agreement for the provision of public safety services on a portion of Precinct Line Road that begins at the north side of State Highway 26 with such roadway traveling northbound to its termination at the northern boundary of Hurst. Most of this section of Precinct Line Road lies within the city limits for North Richland Hills, except for the area from Rumsfield north to the Colleyville city limit, which is predominantly within the city limits of Hurst. This agreement does not substantially add to the response burden for North Richland Hills, but it does clarify which agency is primarily responsible for providing public safety service. General Descrir)tion: The City of North Richland Hills and the City of Hurst have agreed that the City of North Richland Hills shall be responsible for providing police, fire, and emergency medical services on that portion of Precinct Line Road north of State Highway 26 regardless of municipal boundaries between the two cities. No additional revenues are necessary to provide this service. The agreement will only apply to the portion of Precinct Line Road which is located north of the extension of the northernmost right of way which is represented by the extension of the lateral curb line of State Highway 26 which runs from southwest to northeast along State Highway 26. If no curb exists, the authority by the City of North Richland Hills shall extend to the beginning of the nearest property line adjacent to the east side of the roadway including improved or unimproved shoulders and any right of ways that are public land. The agreement has no impact on the maintenance of any roadway, signal lighting, or the regulation of curb cuts. This agreement replaces an existing agreement that did not comply with applicable state laws on boundary and jurisdictional issues. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2011 -007 mm1 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -007 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT the City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached agreement between the City of North Richland Hills and the City of Hurst for the provision of public safety services on a portion of Precinct Line Road. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 14th day of February, 2011. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary N16 *63M►[6].i11:INIs]:1W,1'I all alIwi Oscar Trevino, Mayor 1,1 ;j ;j:T8]►1=1lffiv- x 11*1 x+]:16 Wil►111I XC1,141 wig George A. Staples, City Attorney 1,1 »:T81►1 =1 IWIR r INX0163 2 10=1►16 Jimmy Perdue, Public Safety Director STATE OF TEXAS § § AGREEMENT COUNTY OF TARRANT § This Agreement, made and entered into by and between the City of Hurst, a municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "Hurst," and the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "North Richland Hills," evidences the following: WHEREAS, North Richland Hills and Hurst desire to enter into an Agreement for the provision of public safety services on a portion of a public roadway known as Farm to Market Road 3029, hereinafter referred to a Precinct Line Road, and WHEREAS, the Agreement shall only apply to the portion of Precinct Line Road which is located north of the extension of the northernmost right of way which is represented by the extension of the lateral curb line of State Highway 26 (Boulevard 26) which runs from Southwest to Northeast along State Highway 26 (Boulevard 25); and WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 791, provides authorization for any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act: and WHEREAS, North Richland Hills and Hurst have agreed that North Richland Hills shall provide public safety services on the aforementioned roadway regardless of municipal boundaries between the two cities; and WHEREAS, public safety services are defined as services, duties or functions performed by police, fire or emergency medical service (ambulance service) departments; and WHEREAS, no additional revenues are necessary to provide this service at the time of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is mutually advantageous to both parties to enter into the arrangement evidenced by this Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, the parties in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, agree as follows: North Richland Hills shall be responsible for providing police, fire, and emergency medical services on that portion of Precinct Line Road north of State Highway 26, without regard to whether such road is in Hurst or North Richland Hills. 2. All calls for police, fire or emergency medical services shall be directed to North Richland Hills to assure timely emergency response to the public. 3. The only areas affected by this Agreement are those portions of existing or future roadway on Precinct Line Road that begins at the north side of State Highway 26 (Boulevard 26) with such roadway traveling northbound to its termination at the northern boundary of Hurst. The roadway that North Richland Hills will be responsible to provide public safety service upon shall be any and all portions of the roadway within the extension of the lateral curb lines on the east side of Precinct Line Road. If no curb exists, the authority by North Richland Hills shall extend to the beginning of the nearest property line adjacent to the east side of the highway, thereby including improved or unimproved shoulders and Rights of Ways that are public land. 4. This Agreement has no impact on the maintenance of any roadway, signal lighting, regulation of "curb cuts" or any other area that does not fall directly under the authority of North Richland Hills. 5. This Agreement shall serve as the prevailing Agreement regarding police, fire and emergency medical service response should any conflict occur as a result of any other agreement. 6. That the selection of any contract wrecker service to be utilized in the performance of public safety duties shall the responsibility of North Richland Hills. 7. To the extent permitted by law, North Richland Hills shall have the same rights and privileges on Precinct Line Road in the locations described as if the areas described were within the incorporated city limits of North Richland Hills. Each City does hereby waive all claims against and agrees to release every other City, its police department, officials, agents, officers and employees in both their public and private capacities, from and against any and all claims, suites, demands, losses, damages, causes of action and liability of every kind, including but not limited to court costs and attorney's fees which may arise due to any death or injury to any person, or the loss of, damage to, or loss of use of any property arising out of or occurring as a consequence of the performance of this Agreement whether such injuries, death or damages are caused by the sole negligence or the joint negligence of any City, its official, agents, officers and employees. It is the express intention of the parties hereto that the waiver and release provided for in this paragraph includes claims arising out of such other City's own negligence, whether that negligence is a sole or a concurring cause of the injury, death or damage. It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this Agreement, no City waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. This Agreement replaces the Agreement between the parties executed in 1994 and shall be in full force and effect until terminated by either party with 30 days written notice to the other or until both parties mutually agree to change or modify the terms of this Agreement. Mark Hindman, City Manager � ]ItWKOI *31 W. Allan Weegar, City Manager The Agreement was executed on the day of 12011. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Presented by: Jimmy Perdue Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. B.5 Subject: GN 2011 -012 Authorize Texas Governor's Office Criminal Justice Programs Competitive Grant - Resolution No. 2011 -008 Summarv: The Criminal Justice Division of the Texas Governor's Office has notified the Police Department that grant funds have been allocated to assist in funding law enforcement programs in the Council of Government's North Central Texas Region under the 2011 CJD Criminal Justice Programs Competitive Grant #24687 -01. If awarded, the Police Department plans to use the funds to establish a Commercial Vehicle Enforcement (CVE) Unit. The North Richland Hills CVE Unit will focus directly on traffic safety issues that have the greatest potential to harm our citizens by hazardous spills, traffic fatalities, and the degradation of city infrastructure. General Description: The North Richland Hills CVE Unit will be charged with keeping our roadways safe for all motorists by monitoring and inspecting the commercial vehicles that utilize these same roadways for transporting goods and services. Pursuant to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1999, the CVE Unit will ensure traffic safety through enforcement of safety regulations; targeting high -risk carriers and commercial motor vehicle drivers; monitoring and inspecting commercial vehicles; and increasing safety awareness. With the availability of these funds, the police department will be able to match similar enforcement efforts now underway in Tarrant County and specifically in the cities of (Fort Worth, Arlington, Euless, and Hurst. The total of this grant request is $77,766 which will be utilized for the implementation of the CVE program to pay for needed equipment. The personnel participating in the program will come from the recent reorganization of the traffic section of the police department. There is no requirement for a cash match under the terms of the CJD grant. The grant funds are passed through the Criminal Justice Division and will be dispersed on a competitive basis throughout the NCTCOG's 16- county region. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2011 -008 N RH RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -008 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills, Texas possesses legal authority to apply for and accept the Texas Governor's Office Criminal Justice Programs Competitive Grant and make appointments for the conduct of business relative to Grant #24687 -01; and WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills finds it in the best interest of the citizens of North Richland Hills that we request the funds available under this Grant; and WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Governor's Office Criminal Justice Program funds, The City Council of North Richland Hills assures that the funds will be returned to the Texas Governor's Office in full„ and WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills designates Public Safety Director Jimmy Perdue as the grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of North Richland Hills approves submission of the grant application for the Texas Governor's Office Criminal Justice Programs Competitive Grant #24687 -01. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 14th day of February, 2011. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: Oscar Trevino, Mayor Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Jimmy Perdue, Public Safety Director CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. C.0 Subject: PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Presented by: John Pitstick Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. C.1 Subject: ZC 2010 -09 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey for a zoning change from C -2 Commercial to U Institutional on Tract 9V, Abstract 1606 located at 4247 Road to the 'Mall. (2.993 acres) - Ordinance No. 3126 Case Summary: The applicants, Northgate Church (represented by Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey), are requesting a zoning change on a 2.993 acre parcel from C -2 (Commercial) to U (School, Church, Institutional). Although churches are permitted in any zone, this change will more accurately reflect the actual use of this property on the zoning map and will allow for flexibility in signage options in the future if desired. This category will also permit a twenty -five foot rear setback from residential zones as opposed to the standard thirty -five foot rear setback associated with all other zones. Plat Status: The preliminary and final plat associated with this property will be presented at a future meeting for consideration. Existing Site Conditions: The lot is currently vacant with no vegetation. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts office uses for this area. Thoroughfare 'Plan: The lot has frontage on Road to the Mall which is designated as an R2 U Local Street. Surrounding Zoning 1 Land Use: Worth: C -2l Commercial West: R -21 Residential South: C -2 I Commercial East: C -21 Commercial Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: On January 20, 2011 the P &Z Commission recommended approval by a vote of 7 -0. Staff Recommendation: Approval of Zoning Change request ZC 2010 -09 and Ordinance No. 3126. LOCATION MAP I I i � I .� O _ � ,• �_ 4 s,f f y' / r= ►:1:ir_l00101tie PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .1►1 We] IW&GI611J► us] I Case #: ZC 2010- 09 Applicant: Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey Location: 4247 Road to the Mall You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 240 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearina: A Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey for a zoning change from C -2 Commercial to U Institutional on Tract 9V, Abstract 1606 located at 4247 Road to the Mall. Public Hearina Schedule: Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 2011 If recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning request will be heard by the City Council on: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2011 Both Meeting Times: 7:04 P.M. Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 824 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 824 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427 -6300 Fax (817) 427 -6303 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS Bromont Pavilion Mdstr Mst LP Zs Associates LLC Charlyn N Hospers 4110 N Scottsdale Rd Ste 200 4838 Jenkins Ave 4400 Ken Michael Ct Scottsdale Az 85251 -3635 North Charleston Sc 294054816 Fort Werth Tx 76180 -82€30 Bvp Investments Inc 5309 Roberts Rd Colleyville Tx 76034 -4811 John Etux Cecilia Moran 4352 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180 -8260 James Ray Rohde 4348 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 761 80 -8260 Jaime Etux Silvia Lugo 4344 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180-8280 Charles T Logan 4332 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180 -8260 Martha J Cook 4320 Ken Michael Ct Fart Worth Tx 76180 -8260 John A Etux Jennifer M Isbell 8515 Boulevard 26 Apt 1409 NRH Tx 76180 -5645 Bena Smith Stampke 4340 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180 -8260 Kenneth Etux Patt McCallister 4328 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180.8260 4613 Ken Michael Trust 5227 Prescott Ave Lincoln NE 58506 -5436 Northgate Church Inc PC Box 3191 Grapevine Tx 76099 -3191 Nolan E Dunn Est % Dana Dykes 2808 Matthews Dr Richland Hills Tx 76118-6534 Eva Mae Pannell 4324 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180 -8260 Terry W Etux Brandy R Smith 4312 Kan Michael C€ NRH Tx 76180 -8260 Kenny Etux Marilyn Fry 4217 Ken Michael Ct Fort Worth Tx 76180 -8321 Jason Kiser Name Brands Inc 4221 Ken Michael Ct 7215 S Memorial Dr NRH Tx 7618"321 Tulsa Ok 74133 -2943 ORDINANCE NO. 3126 ZONING CASE ZC 2010 -09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A 2.993 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY FROM C2 (COMMERCIAL) TO U (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a 2.993 acre tract of land located in the City of North !Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A from C2 (Commercial) to U (Institutional) zoning. Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. 1_1►I III kd VIOX810 RIM 12149) PASSED AND APPROVED on the 14th day of February, 2011. e ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Planning & Development Director EXHIBIT A i 1 Tenant W. WALLACE SURVEY, ABS7RACTNO 1606, ho hia [&y of bounds as fiat; tY, and b� mars �y �dbym and BEG INNING aota Y12 hxah lruou7fq[ ld st &M nOnfti straainerofLot 4 Brfack 1,1 � y Addllfran lo Abe City ofNvr#? nd Mig AccOf t9V to &M ► Pet recorded P? Irok#"e 3881T1 Es an T � � hi ft 028t &W ofLoot33, H. W CRY of to Me pbtlmxn *id Volumes - M6 - W, Pzge 13, J%tRamq* TaarrantCauaty, Taxes, 7HENCE M&M 00 ftrum, 37 minutm, 04 soxds West akW7g the seat line of said ff W Kemy Estates a dlst of 737-66 tmt to a 112 Inc* Imn fain fixnd for ca?w 7HENCE i offfi 63 degrees, 32 n*n1hm 08 mcmds Eag a dk&nos ofm +33 tiset tai a 112 Inch ►ion pin found forca7w In die souft wftdy Ilea of Road To The Me//, THENCE &bV flee &xr ffiwwtarfyand wwtivJe of sad Road To The AW,, die following bmfkW and dab&wes; SO i�� 8 at fibs Brad n; mdus of W.90 feK a dlshncv of 73. feet to a &XIM 52 do9mm, 29 minutes, 02 seconds Eas4 a d&l Nxs of M294 feet a 112md) imn pin iFwrld at ft b log ofa am es to &0 4PW /Oft a O&M of f2B.2 Awt alV Me a ffm lo ft nPbt a abOnae of 1 f5.4 f feet to an ilm pin found stffie eyed of said carve; South AO oVraes, 55n11nuA4ws, 44 seommis Eas4 a dsOnae oof517.0 AW to a 112lrxO' Iron pfn faind for corraaratft ncrdiesst sad Lot5, Bkv* 9, Akv i Edgely A ddltb7; THENCE So&td 69 U3 Minn 2d sPaavads W"4 &bV dfae narM line of saved Lot 5, Btoratr f, 8 � of�ipt to #w OMIVT OFBEGIAWI1VG avad � f 1, 357 s� AW ar2. 943 as w offend. 9- 1t-2 saz 1 Lxebjx8k�� r idlY �FmFd - .1 F MS x aZ- B Icr Yl £ry .We FwwxrY ` � ee IX �+dtl I Y LC -� 8 ]P0626 E r]95' Lot 5. Block t NoFth Hill$ "loge d d.na— Be—arf R-7. MfJS t/� MST LF Zoned C2fHC y 4 N a9�254�. 0� \ I 1 � ZONING EXHIBIT 4 Locetfon Map 5,- a Lot 1, Block 3 � 983 re8 Fl Rrihtdnd Terroce Addition Volume 3&7 -764 Pngrr 45 13x357 Sq- Ft D-- 2s a--a - Zoned C2/NC Em'sting zoMnp c7lfic Propnssd t�ntny 1 1 - Mstlu Ftvnvl l — rf t .. �ur•sd w s¢•r.cs• or Jf � I lutes ° "" rr SXerz xecnve rypq [2(gr_ A£kxrKM � AYE 6Ar-1 rx Jed -1l8 Flue P8 awncr F Y !l yvon BTArEp�liG9e +PJ+ /+➢M fa Trte M h' saowrrcFxuanwr Zo,*ed ca/fic e dw' •,µ.rde.'redrxwdr m. al..ar � mrnn `rpw.nl' dibpoperyoub,ao W m3'+eruwxi�¢ Fet ��>e P. L £. nm Lldrr IM T csrrarcxdxv aes ReRr, e��.s aeosa &17 -x85 -urea d IaYs Icme��N aw bai Lot 1, &look A °r ➢ ms .eam dot an- rw•.,a�.e. Edesv Jewelers Addition rw plra.er: Ati 8 le w PF m Xwrn raaunw ✓ cave M` _ So (D SCALE- 1 °- 60 mid 2wow [Wxa�'wa&e N cn m. A�*e�➢ wW Zmn*+v Ctmniab+ naeE SYc.rinN ✓'�+ ^g wee mwg cep 6nr �Fird oed or&m W. W. FYFt f r1 L"E siPe¢vEa; .p6�i 773iG?Na7" r8U!$ rr ass Gbyar E -5d Fewn doNgv 7aayq srxYSa tprrl.'awvparaF.xk�dyo eddr amao bonrrda as - e,a r.2dxnc�on ,7k➢r6asda5avnn . a°nReatoanae . dtef`4 dA&xot r, tiltna7 .4oEra,9Ye GYgr errrnkrCr P.tde4vd! mtlte,Rdt�mrAadkrWiFsarr3AB .21£ Pfd Rac� T om# Cau'r4: Fsrn sla trespt dq are sadt.�rs Wl.d 3,$ !a! MY. rt a r Hero cb sr ut asmeotr w�na axe asst aye daaard s% W Keey Edhho� ■ ddaevca � aas ss, m s t!f moo Aa'n p6+�a�d kr C arrm: 7tr aMCE r.6sra5 F,7 ,$7ndraNeE Lr6asva rsa�E et+Sa9ox's orz?� D3 kw to a r/3"M daa pir rExcrdrFare�mersr ms ,Was arRr+a,Ta 13� 77 �a'pYia dw.m'tnaelwayarxt nlas+Ckkwd,o ]Trey A.4A, ASS ftMopw Spudr: sixty s cwna br tlra e fAnka at PV,9069 dSftIO& OF79 72 mat As 112 Rr fhe erdofww exS'1'6,' Mr bn ramyd dF tlldVb mm alll At a /8a cd> ,�M�• 6't R.$#PII tr[M1 f�f1 sbV age aao-e'to d5a r,4pX a p*hwe of I f5.4f fWAP sn kw M Ax rdWft eedofm*fa -w r tOG06F1 da�rliE, SrStrnirdeui 44�Rnaaxd as af$t7.1F'f&W10 s r kWh karr FA7 rf w0fix.mnsrat ass rantfreae[rcrr°et orsa�H 4 ak.* r, A01M EOL cYAa Mbn,' 7pasw —E ,Sands A9 03nwmms .a7aaecrrot+ 6YesL stva 9§e,eardr ffix ofs�tud4 fbbot t,aa�m— . or�.m .;T TOFa�Ei�956�taiaZJ f3D,36..tea, K.? B�sWSS ollead nnacvAtt ,�aaYTre 77rerRtaa�eM C+hnaczx � oE.ds yaot rltiafA`� Sae �dar.rAd�°asrdae ■hos® e6}sa!wbd gad vrfindmdsa larerbymrrwymass r6rpcc5.ac Has. a'saRaps: r,�P+loflwo'� srrpcmidtwhPe'srmas s4onn wa aAs p&d 8rca!rt�k+aca flkaw Lub GDUNrYOF TARRANT QE01 Aw aFMkiwMwM' avdrw$ m tla4r apps s sdLbev t m —gaaeaasparaa Maw— dm > srs4lmredrfs9d fdgprxm a� #W atm M — kr Ma pfef+maeer aui sgavddsd aJMAr 04e CWAOa y dear +s&rnryhwd"amerooh"gfsrtre-dwya .aura RW ,,y; QR& Ar7 X8 OWERS' Northgate Church, Inc. P.O Box 3191 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Brent Jones 517 -966 -3567 ZONING EXH10 T CURRENT ZONING C -2 REQUESTING U x.993 Acres of land in the W. W WALLACE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO 1606 JN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, 7 COUNTY, TEXAS Scale- I inch = 60 feet r.M�® nm r1We0 rae �� sFd➢ Lof P] Fwt fFFTA r,;MfBTBdiO � LY �� svoiwr� F w ° r�ra n �a 01 macaw Xa. a rer ° rd�:e.> 1 g q so � rw min eo -eleo .1 F MS x aZ- B Icr Yl £ry .We FwwxrY ` � ee IX �+dtl I Y LC -� 8 ]P0626 E r]95' Lot 5. Block t NoFth Hill$ "loge d d.na— Be—arf R-7. MfJS t/� MST LF Zoned C2fHC y 4 N a9�254�. 0� \ I 1 � ZONING EXHIBIT 4 Locetfon Map 5,- a Lot 1, Block 3 � 983 re8 Fl Rrihtdnd Terroce Addition Volume 3&7 -764 Pngrr 45 13x357 Sq- Ft D-- 2s a--a - Zoned C2/NC Em'sting zoMnp c7lfic Propnssd t�ntny 1 1 - Mstlu Ftvnvl l — rf t .. �ur•sd w s¢•r.cs• or Jf � I lutes ° "" rr SXerz xecnve rypq [2(gr_ A£kxrKM � AYE 6Ar-1 rx Jed -1l8 Flue P8 awncr F Y !l yvon BTArEp�liG9e +PJ+ /+➢M fa Trte M h' saowrrcFxuanwr Zo,*ed ca/fic e dw' •,µ.rde.'redrxwdr m. al..ar � mrnn `rpw.nl' dibpoperyoub,ao W m3'+eruwxi�¢ Fet ��>e P. L £. nm Lldrr IM T csrrarcxdxv aes ReRr, e��.s aeosa &17 -x85 -urea d IaYs Icme��N aw bai Lot 1, &look A °r ➢ ms .eam dot an- rw•.,a�.e. Edesv Jewelers Addition rw plra.er: Ati 8 le w PF m Xwrn raaunw ✓ cave M` _ So (D SCALE- 1 °- 60 mid 2wow [Wxa�'wa&e N cn m. A�*e�➢ wW Zmn*+v Ctmniab+ naeE SYc.rinN ✓'�+ ^g wee mwg cep 6nr �Fird oed or&m W. W. FYFt f r1 L"E siPe¢vEa; .p6�i 773iG?Na7" r8U!$ rr ass Gbyar E -5d Fewn doNgv 7aayq srxYSa tprrl.'awvparaF.xk�dyo eddr amao bonrrda as - e,a r.2dxnc�on ,7k➢r6asda5avnn . a°nReatoanae . dtef`4 dA&xot r, tiltna7 .4oEra,9Ye GYgr errrnkrCr P.tde4vd! mtlte,Rdt�mrAadkrWiFsarr3AB .21£ Pfd Rac� T om# Cau'r4: Fsrn sla trespt dq are sadt.�rs Wl.d 3,$ !a! MY. rt a r Hero cb sr ut asmeotr w�na axe asst aye daaard s% W Keey Edhho� ■ ddaevca � aas ss, m s t!f moo Aa'n p6+�a�d kr C arrm: 7tr aMCE r.6sra5 F,7 ,$7ndraNeE Lr6asva rsa�E et+Sa9ox's orz?� D3 kw to a r/3"M daa pir rExcrdrFare�mersr ms ,Was arRr+a,Ta 13� 77 �a'pYia dw.m'tnaelwayarxt nlas+Ckkwd,o ]Trey A.4A, ASS ftMopw Spudr: sixty s cwna br tlra e fAnka at PV,9069 dSftIO& OF79 72 mat As 112 Rr fhe erdofww exS'1'6,' Mr bn ramyd dF tlldVb mm alll At a /8a cd> ,�M�• 6't R.$#PII tr[M1 f�f1 sbV age aao-e'to d5a r,4pX a p*hwe of I f5.4f fWAP sn kw M Ax rdWft eedofm*fa -w r tOG06F1 da�rliE, SrStrnirdeui 44�Rnaaxd as af$t7.1F'f&W10 s r kWh karr FA7 rf w0fix.mnsrat ass rantfreae[rcrr°et orsa�H 4 ak.* r, A01M EOL cYAa Mbn,' 7pasw —E ,Sands A9 03nwmms .a7aaecrrot+ 6YesL stva 9§e,eardr ffix ofs�tud4 fbbot t,aa�m— . or�.m .;T TOFa�Ei�956�taiaZJ f3D,36..tea, K.? B�sWSS ollead nnacvAtt ,�aaYTre 77rerRtaa�eM C+hnaczx � oE.ds yaot rltiafA`� Sae �dar.rAd�°asrdae ■hos® e6}sa!wbd gad vrfindmdsa larerbymrrwymass r6rpcc5.ac Has. a'saRaps: r,�P+loflwo'� srrpcmidtwhPe'srmas s4onn wa aAs p&d 8rca!rt�k+aca flkaw Lub GDUNrYOF TARRANT QE01 Aw aFMkiwMwM' avdrw$ m tla4r apps s sdLbev t m —gaaeaasparaa Maw— dm > srs4lmredrfs9d fdgprxm a� #W atm M — kr Ma pfef+maeer aui sgavddsd aJMAr 04e CWAOa y dear +s&rnryhwd"amerooh"gfsrtre-dwya .aura RW ,,y; QR& Ar7 X8 OWERS' Northgate Church, Inc. P.O Box 3191 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Brent Jones 517 -966 -3567 ZONING EXH10 T CURRENT ZONING C -2 REQUESTING U x.993 Acres of land in the W. W WALLACE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO 1606 JN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, 7 COUNTY, TEXAS Scale- I inch = 60 feet EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 20, 2011 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ZC 2010 -09 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Darrell Johnson and Robert Cruey for a zoning change from C -2 Commercial to U Institutional on Tract 9V, Abstract 1606 located at 4247 Road to the Mall. Darrell Johnson, 1901 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville with North Gate Church came forward requesting a zoning change from C -2 to U to construct a church on the property. John Pitstick said that churches are typically allowed in any zoning district but they have chosen to change to "U" to allow them a 25 ft. rear setback rather than a 35 ft. set back and would allow church related signage. They also have made a request for Preliminary and Final Plat that will be coming forth soon. Chairman Shiflet opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak for or against? Seeing none he closed the Public Hearing. APPROVED Mike Benton motioned to approve ZC 2410 -09, seconded by Mark Haynes. The motion carried unanimously (7 -0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Presented by: John Pitstick Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. C.2 Subject: ZC 2010 -10 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from 'Ben Johnson to revise an existing Residential Planned Development (PD 61) for West Hightower Place Addition located in the 6800 Block of Hightower Drive - Ordinance No. 3127 Planned Development Case Summary: The applicant, Ben Johnson of Johnson Diversified Enterprises, Inc., is requesting approval of a zoning change for a Revised "R -PD" Residential Planned Development. The site is 22.4 acres and located near the south -east intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and Hightower. The original request was approved in 2007 as a Residential Planned Development rather than a Residential Infill PD because it was over the ten (10) acre maximum size for a RI -PD. Mr. Johnson has begun building homes under the name of American Life Homes and has constructed or is under construction on 5 homes. The applicant is proposing to make several changes to the house plans primarily moving from a rear and side detached garage to a front entry attached garage product on a majority of lots. Eliminating the rear detached garage product will also require a plat revision from a 1 and 9 foot side setbacks to a 5 and 5 foot side setback. This revised RPD also includes the elimination of small open space areas which would be incorporated into adjoining lots. The major open space common areas would still be maintained including 17% of the subdivision. Land Use Summary: • Total acreage 22.4 acres • Number of lots 96 residential 13 common open space • Gross density 4.2 dlu per acre (gross) Minimum Lot Dimensions /Setbacks: • Min. house size 2,0100 square foot minimum • Min. lot area 5,500 square foot • Min. lot width 50 foot minimum • Min. lot depth 110 foot typ. • Min. front setback 20 foot Development amenities: • Enhanced concrete pavers in pedestrian crosswalk areas of street, and mailbox areas; • Landscaped open space areas with sidewalks, open space pockets and entrance; • Open space includes neighborhood pavilion and landscape plantings; • Established Homeowners Association (HOA), will maintain open space; • Decorative grouped mail boxes; • Decorative street light fixtures Housing amenities: • Combination enhanced masonry faQade elevations, • Decorative wood garage doors when facing front yard, decorative metal doors on alley facing; • Minimum lot landscaping requirements • Enhanced roofing material. Proposed Changes to West Hightower Place RPD: The primary change to this development is a result of the cost of the separate detached garage rear entry product and the ability to sell for a competitive price in the current economy. Mr. Johnson has a good subdivision and a good product and staff is generally in support of some of this change. However, the proposed change is a substantial departure from the previously approved West Hightower Place development which included 89% of the lots that had either rear alley served or rear detached garages. The proposed new development has only 39 % of the lots with rear entry. The application does include a stipulation for all front entry garages to be setback a minimum of 5 feet behind the main building and that all front entry garages have two single garage doors with doors made of wood or simulated wood with raised decorative accent panels to mitigate the front entry product. Staff is encouraged by the quality homes that have been built to date and would be in general agreement on the partial conversion of lots from rear entry to front entry garages at West Hightower Place. Staff initially recommended approval of this request with the stipulation that onlv 25 lots be allowed to be converted to front entry aaraaes at this time (rather than the requested 59 lots) and that all front entry lots be required to have staaaered front main buildina setbacks of 15 and 20 feet with no more than two identical setbacks on adjacent lots. Staffs recommendation will allow Mr. Johnson to proceed with development and still provide for a clear majority of the lots to have either rear or side entry homes as originally established in this residential planned development. Staggering the lots on the front entry homes will also provide for slight variation of building fronts and eliminate the regimented front garage elevation look. Once the initial 25 front entry lots have been constructed at the West Hightower Place subdivision, staff would be in support of the current developer to potentially request additional revisions to this planned development and allow the city to review further building changes based on market conditions and quality building and architectural controls at that time. Land Use Summary Current Proposed Rear garage alley served 29 lots 29 lots Rear detached garage 56 lots 0 lots Front detached swing garage 11 lots 0 lots Front attached garage 0 lots 59 lots Rear attached garage 0 lots 8 lots Percent of rear of side garages 89 % 39 % Percent of front entry garages 11 %0 61% The primary change to this development is a result of the cost of the separate detached garage rear entry product and the ability to sell for a competitive price in the current economy. Mr. Johnson has a good subdivision and a good product and staff is generally in support of some of this change. However, the proposed change is a substantial departure from the previously approved West Hightower Place development which included 89% of the lots that had either rear alley served or rear detached garages. The proposed new development has only 39 % of the lots with rear entry. The application does include a stipulation for all front entry garages to be setback a minimum of 5 feet behind the main building and that all front entry garages have two single garage doors with doors made of wood or simulated wood with raised decorative accent panels to mitigate the front entry product. Staff is encouraged by the quality homes that have been built to date and would be in general agreement on the partial conversion of lots from rear entry to front entry garages at West Hightower Place. Staff initially recommended approval of this request with the stipulation that onlv 25 lots be allowed to be converted to front entry aaraaes at this time (rather than the requested 59 lots) and that all front entry lots be required to have staaaered front main buildina setbacks of 15 and 20 feet with no more than two identical setbacks on adjacent lots. Staffs recommendation will allow Mr. Johnson to proceed with development and still provide for a clear majority of the lots to have either rear or side entry homes as originally established in this residential planned development. Staggering the lots on the front entry homes will also provide for slight variation of building fronts and eliminate the regimented front garage elevation look. Once the initial 25 front entry lots have been constructed at the West Hightower Place subdivision, staff would be in support of the current developer to potentially request additional revisions to this planned development and allow the city to review further building changes based on market conditions and quality building and architectural controls at that time. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: On ,January 20, 2011 the Commission recommended approval by a vote of 7 -0 for a maximum of 30 lots to be converted to front entry garages with the stipulation that all allowed front entry lots be required to have staggered front main building setbacks of 15 and 20 feet with no more than two identical setbacks on adjacent lots. Staff 'Recommendation: Staff is in concurrence with the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommends approval of Ordinance No. 3127. LOCATION MAP J City of Watauga a I� Hightower Dri IAI Ire FM ►a =IN F -A 00191111.1 LL il IIII III � Fm g 'I '.,r � �.,t ...«,�.,+�. � E� �- .7r ^�►. � w, +s a . yam, +w.: i+e. -* +�.. " .. Hightower Drive Mal In - 11Vatau0 a Wren Lri - e 1ry F Swallow Ln Few � $—� Drlfflelcl Cir PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION C: v .. A'� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING v CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS � .."U9., PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL Case #: ZC 2010- 10 Applicant: Ben Johnson Location: 6800 Block of Hightower Drive You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 240 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearina: A Public Hearing to Consider a Request from Ben Johnson to revise an existing Residential Planned Development (PD 61) in order to allow front entry garages in the West Hightower Place Addition located in the 6800 Block of Hightower Drive. Public Hearina Schedule: Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 2011 If recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning request will be heard by the City Council on: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2011 Both Meeting Times: 7:04 P.M. Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 824 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 824 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427 -6300 Fax (817) 427 -6303 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS Johnson Diversified Ent Inc American Life Homes Inc M & P Rufe Snow LP 1712 Oak Knoll Dr PO Box 822697 Attn Ira M Morgan Colleyville Tx 76034 -4479 NRH Tx 76182 -2697 506 Liberty Ave Ste 300 Pittsburrah PA 15222 -2721 Robert Etal Folsom Fairway Realty LP North Richland Hills Plaza LP PO Box 9005 8530 Esters Blvd 5455 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1847 Spokane Wa 99209 -9005 Irving Tx 75053 -2205 Los Angeles Ca 90036 -4268 Ar Hightower LP Etal Billy J Graham Graham Ranch Homeowners Assoc 1930 Stonegate Dr 7000 Hightower Dr 6617 Precinct Line Ste 200 Birmingham Al 35242 -2523 NRH Tx 76182 -3342 NRH Tx 76182 -4389 RH Frisco Health Investments LP Jody D Etux Kerensa Miller Stephanie iEtvir Ben B Deloach 21726 Hardy Oak Blvd 6851 Driffield Cir W 6855 Driffield Cir W San Antonio Tx 782584832 N Richlnd His Tx 76182 -4463 NRH Tx 76182 -4453 Eric Spooner Shawn Smajstda Jamie & M Gaona Wahkinney 5605 Guadalajara Dr 6901 Driffield Cir 5905 Driffield Cir NRH Tx 76180 -6555 N Richlnd His Tx 76182 -4469 NRH Tx 76182 -4469 Kelly Etvir Michael Vizeaino Michael E Magee Steven Tisdel 6909 Driffield Cir 6913 Driffield Cir 6917 Driffield Cir NRH Tx 76182 -4469 NRH Tx 76182 -4469 NRH Tx 761824469 Scott Schroder Kristin M Lung Mark Schmidt 6921 Driffield Cir 6925 Driffield Cir 6308 Femcreek Ln NRH Tx 76182 -4469 NRHllls Tx 76182 -4469 Fart Worth Tx 76179 -4701 Josh Archer Michael Etux Cynthia Micknius Secretary of Hud 6933 Driffield Cir 6937 Driffield Cir 5040 Addison Cir Ste 300 NRH Tx 76182 -4469 NRH Tx 76182 -4469 Addison Tx 75001 -3352 Christina B Graves Ruben Etux Ncrma I Cerda William Lemmon 6945 Driffield Cir 6949 Driffield Cir 133 E Rio Rdg N Richlnd His Tx 76182 -4469 N Richlnd His Tx 761824469 Azle Tx 76020 -1557 Karen S Kee Edward Etux Deidrae Suda Jessica & Justin Rivas Sapien 6856 Driffield Cir E 6852 Driffield Cir E 6404 Iron Horse Blvd Apt E N Richlnd His Tx 75182-4466 N Richlnd His Tx 761824466 N Richlnd His Tx 76180 -6028 Todd S Etux Ann M Lavergne Jerry Powell Jr Thomas A Baker 3620 HufiPines Blvd Apt 418 6916 Driffield Cir 6920 Driffield Cir CarrDllton Tx 76010 -6448 N Richlnd His Tx 76182 -4468 N Richlnd His Tx 76182 -4468 Scott A Fisher 6924 Driffield Cir NRH Tx 7618244468 Stacy D Duckworth 6928 Driffield Cir NRH Tx 76182-4468 Violeta L Zertuche 6932 Driffield Cir N Richlrid His Tx 76182 -4468 Amett Berkstresser 6936 Driffield Cir NRH Tx 76182-4468 Timothy J Etux Linda M Pierce 6837 Hadley Dr Fart Worth Tx 76182 -4441 Jerome Etux Deborah Gray 6849 Hadley Dr Fart Worth Tx 76182 -4441 Hank Loyd 6944 Driffield. Cir N Richlnd His Tx 76182 -4468 David A Etux Sandi Stathopulo 2716 Golfing Green Dr Farmers Branch Tx 75234 -4902 Dave G Etux Cynthia Brandon 6856 Megan Ln Fort Worth Tx 761 82 -4442 Brett G Etux Madeena Dawning 6845 Hadley Dr Fort Worth Tx 76182 -4441 ORDINANCE NO. 3127 ZONING CASE ZC 2014 -14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 61 A 22.342 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY BY ADOPTING AN AMENDED SITE PLAN AND ALLOWING FRONT ENTRY GARAGES TO 30 OF THE 96 LOTS IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by amending the Planned Development 61 a 22.342 acre tract of property by adopting an amended site plan and allowing front entry garages to 30 of the 96 lots described in detail on the site plan which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. 1_1►I III kd VIOX810 RIM 12149) PASSED AND APPROVED on the 14th day of February, 2011. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Planning & Development Director w Q� z� z� E- Fy Z 4 Op REAR ENTRY ATTACT111) GARAGE: LOTS -_ 1 , ' t j I $ ` WEST HIGHTOWER PLACE NQR7`F[ RICHLAIVD HILL;, TEXAS BOBWHITE DRIVE 4 - - - - -- 5 _ - - - - - - I I rz OAR A G1 1 I -U li STTRCIII?r? 1V CJ I? T N 3 CC 2 �__ -- - - - - -- _ - -- --- - - -- Y 3 I! - - - --- 4 3 4 $ C - -- .� WARBLE LANE 1 r to C) F I 4 V 3 2 1 f sow c - --I 12 8 9 IMF � 11 12 13 g RoKnmfmTTmrw t _ —__� 2 1 FINCH UR[� E FINCH DRIVE - T -.V V� 4 14 1 V 1� 10 V§ 8 7 V V 4 j 1 [ 3 2 REAR FNT'ItY ATTACHM GAIL AG E; 1,0TS T, a�` ENT) �.. ,,..r INTC COMMON AREA INCORPORATED IPFTG AL1JOiNING.I.,ryf LOT USE DESIGNATIQN GAR F; NTRY REAR AT'TAC: FIF.0 gA[ L',© ! 1 HIGH 1OYY151w' P ACE SI DE E N Y1� 1'r l Illvil c✓ T e ru t- R s .nx+w wA. 11 13W201 0 m *.Y LM xe rummow#oLo mr�nwsrrs ALPINE K4c^s+_FLEvnn�•c TYPICAL FRONT ENTRY ATTACHED GARAGE TEXAS REGIONAL DESIGN Po4CN WuM9 RD,FLm W,A]iNE OAKHURST TYPICAL FRONT ENTRY ATTACHED GARAGE AMERICAN TRADITIONAL DESIGN GLEN ROSE -e LEVG• � � F TYPICAL FRONT ENTRY ATTACHED GARAGE TYPICAL 2 CAR GARAGE SIDE ENTRY TYPICAL FRONT ENTRY ATTACHED GARAGE TYPICAL 3 CAR GARAGE SIDE ENTRY BON HAM TYPICAL REAR OR SIDE ENTRY ATTACHED GARAGE TYPICAL REAR OR SIDE ENTRY ATTACHED GARAGE wfn uemnrow.ue w .a .� ELEVATIONS WEST HIGHT[3WER PLACE PMNNI D DIVE ME W EXHI 91W OWL =.Wr— I M C�- Typical Front Entry Attached Garage Lot Plan N.T.S. LOT 5T =E1 �ENTRV Typical Rear Entry Attached Garage Lot Plan N.T.S. Typical Side Entry Attached Garage Lot Plan [Without Allevj N.T.S. 9m �D ff�� iTftm REAR �R�/� WR� LM N ]* ME- �.T E. 7�/KAR ETIV. _t w— w E,TRr/F" DEr ED �RAM 11 1 �T DET�RED GARACER 11 MDNT ENVY/F— ATTACHED — D FREAIT ERTRY/F"I ATTK ED pA GVV D 61 STQE —/REAR ATTACHED raga "f m ITT"Itt.A ATTACHED 0 a M a5 Is- (DK—G -1/AC! ..3 ..3 0 CP Typical Side Entry Attached Garage Lot Plan N. T, S. SINGLE FAMILY DIAGRAMS WEST -HIGHTOWER PLACE 12-30-2010 LOT STAA13—R 0 CP Typical Side Entry Attached Garage Lot Plan N. T, S. SINGLE FAMILY DIAGRAMS WEST -HIGHTOWER PLACE 12-30-2010 EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 20, 2011 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ZC 2010 -10 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Ben Johnson to revise an existing Residential Planned Development (PD 61) for West Hightower Place Addition located in the 6840 Block of Hightower Drive. Ben Johnson, 1712 Oak Knoll, Colleyville, came forward with a request to change the Planned Development to change some set back lines and garage orientation for front entry garages on 59 existing lots. Chairman Shiflet asked if this was due to economics driving the change? Mr. Johnson said he would rather use the word viability. He said the last time he was in front of P &Z was in June 2007 on this same project. He said in the last 42 months he has had to make changes due to the economy and housing industry. There was a whole different set of circumstances when this project was first presented in 2006 and recommended for approval in 2007. He said he has found after having this project and trying to market it for this period of time that the lots by the alley is not viable in it's current state. The prices have been reset and the opportunities in the market demand have been reset. Today he is building homes out there at about a 2004 level what the market will accept and how it's functioning. The subdivision was envisioned and presented with a rear entry detached garage and it is not viable in today's market, there is no market standard or comparable product in close proximity that you can go and compare. He has learned this by trying to go out and market the property. When it was not marketable it became obvious this was one of the reasons. He said he believes it is for everyone's best interest to build the property out. Today there are three finished houses on the ground, one occupied and five other properties under some phase of construction. This proves that the property at this location is marketable and accepted. In 2007 when he presented these properties he thought they wound sell for a quarter million dollars or more. Today the average sales price on the six sold are over a quarter million dollars. In trying to sell this product and market to other companies the only way they will make an offer if it is traditional front entry five foot set backs. To summarize, Mr. Johnson said the reason for the request to increase the viability and bring the opportunities back into that subdivision and City. He said he wishes to move the lot lines from one to nine which allow a traditional front entry garage on those lots that were previously planned to have a detached rear garage. There has been an additional packet presented with new additions with set backs and facade enhancements. These efforts would mitigate the front entry garage. He said Staff has some recommendations and once they are made he would Like to address those. John Pitstick said this 22.4 acre Residential Planned Development off the southeast intersection of Rufe Snow and Hightower. It was approved in 2007 and Mr. Johnson is building under the name American Life Homes and builds a very nice product. Most of the homes build today have been off the alley. The primary change is going from a detached garage to an attached garage product with the majority to be front entry. The current platted subdivision has a one foot side yard and a nine foot side yard which would allow for the rear detached product. There are a lot of nice amenities with it that include 96 total lots. The minimum house size is 2000 sq. ft., enhanced concrete pavers, and landscape open areas. He is proposing to eliminate some of the short open spaces but basically stay the same ninety six single family lots. There are pavilion and landscape planning's in the area, decorative group mailboxes and street light fixtures and decorative wood garage doors. The basic change would be to move fifty nine lots to front attached garages and eight lots with rear detached garages. This would be moving from a clear majority of rear or side entry garages to majority front entry garages. There is a stipulation that all front entry garages be set back a minimum of five feet behind the main building and all front entry garages have two single garage doors with a column which breaks up the elevations. There is an elevation that includes a side entry garage for three car garage. Staff has recommended that all the garage doors be made of wood or simulated wood with raised decorative accent panels to mitigate the front entry product. Staff recommends approval of his request but only twenty five lots be allowed to be converted to front entry garages. Mr. Johnson would be allowed to pick which lots he preferred and Staff recommends they be at the back of the subdivision. All the front entry lots would be required to have a staggered front main building setback. This would allow for a slight variation of building fronts and eliminate the regimented front garage elevation look. Once the initial twenty five front entry lots were constructed, Staff would not have a problem with the Developer coming back and reviewing things at that time. Don Bowen asked if Staff was suggesting that only twenty five lots be converted and he would still have thirty one left? John Pitstick said yes he would keep the setbacks as is and if the market came back for that then he could build a detached garage or rear attached. He could come back in eighteen to twenty four months and see what the market determines. It would also give Staff a chance to look at what the buildings would look like and made recommendations for architectural features. Don Bowen said if we only allow twenty five, then will the remainder going to stay as they are now? John Pitstick said that is what we are recommending. Chairman Shiflet asked what does that do with the one and nine and five and five? John Pitstick said the City Attorney recommends if twenty five lots are approved, Mr. Johnson could pick which ones and it would be a plat revision to allow for the lots to have the five and five. The other lots remaining would stay as is. At the time he built the twenty fifth structures or before if he felt there was market for it he could come back. Don Bowen asked if he has to decide his twenty five lots now? John Pitstick said it is a plat revision so if he only did it one at time he would have to file on each lot and would be a hassle for him. We recommend he would pick a row or segment of areas that would be twenty five lots so he could revise at one time. Don Bowen asked if it could be done at the administrative level? John Pitstick said we have talked to the City Attorney and just changing the side yard setbacks could be a plat revision. Dianna Madar asked if there were currently eleven lots approved for front entry? So would twenty five be a total? John Pitstick said that is correct. He said twenty five total new lots to the front entry. The current one calls for eleven lots of detached swing garages. He is saying he does not want to build a detached product so the front entry attached would be a total of twenty five. Ben Johnson came back to address Staffs position and since this is a significant change that was once presented. He said when they opened the model home in mid October and by Christmas had sold six homes and in today's market feels that is a great celebration. The problem he has with the twenty five is with the viability. With two homes a month and ninety six lots that is a four year build out. If there is a limit on only twenty five it would be a Iproblem with other builders it would increase the build out. Also it hard to make a sale in today's market and if a customer likes a certain lot that is not available it would be an impediment and challenge to the sale. If we plat twenty five of the lots then they would all have to be in a block because if you do five next to a one, then the one can't be built on because of the ten foot requirements to get to either side. In lieu of that plus the fact of the other limitations I see, I recommend that we change the lots to have the customer pick the lots and at that time there would be a review process at twenty five. So if we do the whole process one plat, one lot change, one plat mechanism and do the whole plat when a customer comes and wants to buy twenty five lots from me, then I come back to the City and by that time I will have some houses up where you can see the product. He stated he is not asking for changes to the architectural standards, but to enhance the standards. This would be more workable and a win -win situation for all parties involved. I would like to see the City still have control after the twenty five lots are complete and I come back for review. These are planned development lots that are fifty by one hundred ten, some are as little as one hundred three. The City wants to keep the monotony away and set the houses back and stagger them. The original presentation back in 2007 had curve -a- linear streets and in this new presentation this was done to accomplish the same thing anywhere where there is more than three lots. Only on Swallow Lane in the back where this is not done. Chairman Shiftet asked if the house under construction now is a rear entry? Ben Johnson said yes it is and was designed to fit in the alleys, but instead of going in the back they turned it to the side Ibecause it was a pie shaped lot and there was enough room to do that. It is in our best interest to do that for most lots. Chairman Shiflet opened the Pubic Hearing and asked if anyone wished to come forward. Sherry Conway, 6104 Pebble Creek, NRH came forward and said she doesn't know anything about Mr. Johnson or his development except what she has seen and heard tonight, but encouraged Staff to help approve this plan and let him have front entry garages because of the issues she has living in Hometown with rear entry garages due to traffic issues and be allowed visitors to come and park. There was no one else wishing to speak for or against so Chairman Shiflet closed the Public Hearing and entertained a motion. Bill Schopper asked John Pitstick was there a way to make it enforceable or workable where we would approve changing all the lots and then have another look -see at twenty five. John Pitstick said the problem with platting all of it causes an inconsistency with the current zoning regulation. If you plat all of them with the five and five feet then you are basically saying all of them can be front entry garages. So this becomes a legal issue with the zoning. If Mr. Johnson has to come back with a plat revision on every lot it would be a hassle and costly. But he can pick either platting them single, ten or whatever he wants to do. Bill Schopper said he agrees with Mr. Johnson and it makes sense that customers want what they want and doesn't want to stop any sales. Steven Cooper asked if the recommendation from Staff of the garage doors either wood or veneer type already in the plans or does it need to be added? John Pitstick said no, it is in his request that he would have single garage doors with wood or simulated wood. The only time he would have a two garage door is on a side entry on three garages. Steven Cooper asked about the setback he mentioned? John Pitstick said Staff is suggesting that no more than two identical setbacks on adjacent lots. Don Bowen asked since he is doing this in blocks and he builds a house that is the middle of say Swallow Lane that is five and five does that restrict the entire block to five and five? John Pitstick said he would have to continue to the end of the block unless there is an open space. We are requesting that the twenty five be towards the rear of the subdivision unless the economy comes back and he could come back and build towards the front. Mike Benton asked if we approved the twenty five do we stipulate in six months or a year that he can come back and apply for another twenty five? John Pitstick said he can always come back. If he builds ten lots and feels like he can come back and show the rest can be built like that, it is certainly available to him. In many cases we would say no. But we don't know what the economy is going to do and certainly we would be open to him coming back. We think Mr. Johnson has a great product and certainly trust him. We are not sure who might own it eighteen or twenty four months from now and that is the concern now. Staff recommends approval of his request but only the twenty five lots. Dianna Madar asked if on the south side of Shallow Lane since there is no street behind them would they all be front entry? John Pitstick said yes. Don Bowen motioned to approve ZC 2010 -10 with the stipulations that Staff have applied that only twenty five lots be allowed to be converted to front entry garages at this time and all front entry lots be required to have staggered front main building setbacks of fifteen and twenty feet with no more than two identical set backs on adjacent lots. Mike Benton seconded the motion. Bill Schopper said he is torn because he does not like between the front entry garages but the Developer is awesome and has done everything he said he would do and we are putting a requirement that will make it really tough to sell it down. Conversely, he said he knows the Developer and the City has a great working relationship and if he has a deal the City will work with him. He would support the motion or support one that causes to develop all fifty one of them. Mike Benton answered that is he comes back in six months or a year we would not have a problem approving another twenty five or the rest of the lots. Steven Cooper agreed with Bill Schopper and is torn with the stipulation too but wants him to have the opportunity to build out. Don Bowen suggested that since there are fifty nine lots if we approve thirty instead of twenty five he would be half way there and only have to come back one more time if he needs to do so. Chairman Shiflet said his concern is the lot development expense and agrees that by approving thirty Mr. Johnson would only have to come back and pay the expense only one more time. APPROVED ZC 2010-10 Don Bowen amended his motion to thirty lots instead of twenty five with the stipulations that Staff recommended that they be converted to front entry garages at this time and all front entry lots be required to have staggered front main building setbacks of fifteen and twenty feet with no more than two identical set backs on adjacent lots. Mike Benton seconded the motion, it carried unanimously (7 -0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: John Pitstick Agenda No. C.3 Subject: TR 2011 -01 Public Hearing and Consideration of amendments to Sections 118 -631 "Table of Permitted Uses" and 118 -001 "Definitions" of the North Richland Hills Zoning Ordinance. Proposed amendments include the addition of the following two previously unlisted uses to the table: Drive - Through Retail Buildings (less than 1,400 square feet) and Alternative Financial Establishments (check cashing, payday advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business) as well as the definitions of these uses - Ordinance No. 3128 TR- 2011-01: Public Hearing and Consideration of Amending the Zoning Ordinance by adding uses to Section 118 -631 "Table of Permitted Uses" requiring special use permits for alternative financial establishments and drive through buildings less than 1,400 sauare feet and amending Sections 118 -1 by creating definitions for alternative financial establishments, bank or financial institution, car title loan business, check cashing business, money transfer business and payday advance or loan business. Staff Summarv: This request is to amend the current permitted land use table by adding new listings of land uses in which staff has received inquires. This allows staff to adequately address the zoning districts in which they are permitted. The table designates all land uses to be permitted by right (P), allowed under a special use permit (S) or not allowed at all (blank). The requirement of a special use permit it is intended to provide flexibility by allowing certain types of uses in areas where special conditions may need to be considered to reduce adverse effects on adjacent or surrounding properties. A development specific site plan shall accompany every application, include all the contents established for site plans and be made part of the ordinance. Staff is recommending that a requirement for a special use permit be in effect for smaller drive through buildings less than 1,400 square feet in the CS (Community Services) HC (Heavy Commercial) 11 (Light Industrial) and 12 (Medium Industrial) zoning districts. This change would allow a way to examine these uses on a one on one basis for compatibility with surrounding properties. Staff is also recommending a requirement for a special use permit for alternative financial establishments. We are seeing several requests for these type of businesses and would request the ability to review each of these businesses under a special use permit in the 12 (Medium Industrial) zoning district. Other cities in Texas have already enacted similar controls to regulate these types of businesses. These establishments are clearly different than banks and savings and loan institutions that serve as a depository and are licensed by appropriate state and federal agencies. Following is a current list of alternative financial establishments in NRH. Ace Cash Express Ace Cash Express Advance America Gash Cash Plus Cash Stop Check `n Go Cliff's Check Cashing First Cash Advance Payday One Texas Car Title & Payday (Loan Texas Car Title & Payday (Loan 5310 Davis Boulevard 8405 Harwood Road 8412 Davis Boulevard 5980 Rufe Snow 6248 Rufe Snow 5334 Rufe Snow 50162 Davis Boulevard 5204 Rufe Snow 6242 Rufe Snow 7309 Boulevard 26 5501 Davis Boulevard In order to distinguish between these financial establishments, the proposed ordinance includes definitions for alternative financial establishments as opposed to banks or financial institutions. All existing alternative financial establishments would be allowed to continue their current operation. No changes would have to be made until the current business was closed for more than 6 months. Fallowing are the proposed new definitions: Alternative Financial Establishment means a check cashing business, payday advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business. Sank or Financial Institution is an establishment, open to the public, for the deposit, custody, loan, exchange or issue of money, the extension of credit and/or facilitating the transmission of funds and that is licensed by the appropriate state or federal agency as a bank, savings and loan association, or credit union. This includes business activities listed under SIG Codes 60 and 61 but excludes pawnshops, check cashing businesses, payday advance /loan businesses, money transfer businesses and car title loan businesses. Car Title Loan Business means an establishment that makes small, short-term consumer loans that leverage the equity value of a car or other collateral where the title to such vehicle is owned free and clear by the loan applicant any an existing liens on the car or vehicle cancel the application, and where failure to repay the loan or make interest payments to extend the loan allows the lender to take possession of the car of vehicle. This excludes state or federally- chartered banks, savings and loan associations, or credit unions engaged primarily in the business of making longer term loans and which make loans that leverage the total equity value of a car or vehicle as collateral. Check Cashing Business means an establishment that provides to the customer an amount of money that is equal to the fact of the check or the amount specified in the written authorization for an electronic transfer of money, less any fee charged for the transaction, and where there is an agreement not to cash the check or execute an electronic transfer of money for a specified period of time, the business of cashing checks, warrants, drafts, money orders or other commercial paper serving the same purpose for compensation by any person or entity other than a retail seller engaged primarily in the business of selling consumer goods, including consumables to retail buyers, that cashes checks or money orders or issues money orders or money transfers for a minimum flat fee as a service that is incidental to its main purpose or business. This definition excludes a state or federally- chartered bank, savings and loan associations, credit union, pawnshop, grocery store or gas station so long as the gas station does not conduct more than 100 such transactions within any calendar month. Money Transfer Business means an establishment, other than a bank or financial institution that engages in or facilitates the transmission of funds to or from a location outside the United States and its territories for a fee. Payday Advance or Loan Business means an establishment that makes small consumer loans, usually backed by postdated check or authorization to make an electronic debit against an existing financial account, where the check or debit is held for an agreed upon term or until the applicant's next payday, and then cashed unless the customer repays the loan to reclaim such person's check. Please see attached draft ordinance and recommended land use table changes. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Commission met on January 20, 2011 and voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of TR- 2011 -01. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval TR- 2011 -01 and Ordinance No. 3128. ORDINANCE NO. 3128 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY AMEDDING SECTIONS 118 -1 AND 118 -631 OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES; ADDING DEFINITIONS AND RESTRICTING THE LOCATION OF DRIVE THROUGH BUILDINGS OF LESS THAN 1400 SQUARE FEET AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS; 'PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER. WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the matters herein dealt with, which recommendations were made after the holding of a public hearing before said Commission on such matters; and WHEREAS, notice has been published of the time and place of a public hearing held before the City Council concerning the changes herein made, which public hearing has been duly held; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance herein made is in the best interest of the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Section 118 -1 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, is hereby amended by adding the following definitions: "Sec. 118 -1. Definitions Altemative Financial Establishment means a check cashing business, payday advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business. Bank or Financial Institution means an establishment, open to the public, for the deposit, custody, loan, exchange or issue of money, the extension of credit and/or facilitating the transmission of funds and that is licensed by the appropriate state or federal agency as a bank, savings and loan association, or credit union. This includes business activities listed under SIC Codes 60 and 51 but excludes pawnshops, check cashing businesses, payday advance /loan businesses, money transfer businesses and car title loan businesses. Car Title Loan Business means an establishment that makes small, short -term consumer loans that leverage the equity value of a car or other collateral where the title to such vehicle is owned free and clear by the loan applicant any an existing liens on the car or vehicle cancel the application, and where failure to repay the loan or make interest payments to extend the loan allows the lender to take possession of the car of vehicle. This excludes state or federally - chartered banks, savings and loan associations, or credit unions engaged primarily in the business of making longer term loans and which make loans that leverage the total equity value of a car or vehicle as collateral. Check Cashing Business means an establishment that provides to the customer an amount of money that is equal to the fact of the check or the amount specified in the written authorization for an electronic transfer of money, less any fee charged for the transaction, and where there is an agreement not to cash the check or execute an electronic transfer of money for a specified period of time, the business of cashing checks, warrants, drafts, money orders or other commercial paper serving the same purpose for compensation by any person or entity other than a retail seller engaged primarily in the business of selling consumer goods, including consumables to retail buyers, that cashes checks or money orders or issues money orders or money transfers for a minimum flat fee as a service that is incidental to its main purpose or business. This definition excludes a state or federally- chartered bank, savings and loan associations, credit union, pawnshop, grocery store or gas station so long as the gas station does not conduct more than 100 such transactions within any calendar month. Money Transfer Business means an establishment, other than a bank or financial institution that engages in or facilitates the transmission of funds to or from a location outside the United States and its territories for a fee. Payday Advance or Loan Business means an establishment that makes small consumer loans, usually backed by postdated check or authorization to make an electronic debit against an existing financial account, where the check or debit is Iheld for an agreed upon term or until the applicant's next payday, and then cashed unless the customer repays the loan to reclaim such person's check." SECTION 2. THAT Sec. 118 -831 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances be amended by amending Subsection G of the Table of Permitted Uses to allow drive through buildings of less than 1400 square feet only with a special use permit in the CS (Community Services), HC (Heavy Commercial), 11 (Light Industrial) and 12 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts. SECTION 3. THAT Sec. 118 -831 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances be amended by amending Subsection G of the Table of Permitted Uses to allow Alternative Financial Establishments only with a special use permit in the 12 (Heavy Industrial) district. SECTION 4. Severability. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and section of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5. Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6. Savings. All rights and remedies of the City of North Richland Hills are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provision of any other ordinances regulating solicitation or canvassing activities that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 7. Publication. The City Secretary of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby directed to publish the caption and penalty of this ordinance in the official City newspaper. F-11 � I IIII 19 611:19X61 17- 11►14111 PASSED AND APPROVED on this 14th day of February, 2 011. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Planning & Development Director CHANGES TO THE TABLE OF PERMITTED USES RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS NON- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS C. RETAIL AND SERVICE USES Alcohol Beverage Sales -Mc re Than S S 75% Revenue (See Sec. 118-711) Alternative Financial Establishments Tale of Permitted LL 77 2 7 � � � � = v iR � ,� � tU � .►. � Antique Shop P P P P Arts & Crafts Store P P U Bakery Shop t Uses 75 LL u- u© Q P J Barber ShoplBeauty Salon P 5 P P 15 P P C U P _� d} Q] P d Beauty Supply Store 3 P E Camera Sales and Service Store J P P Carpet & Tile Sales Store P P P Cigarette & Cigar Shop co P P z Clock Store P P P Gleaning and Pressing Pick -up Q_ P P P Station Clothing Store P P P P Coffee ShopfTea Room P C. RETAIL AND SERVICE USES Alcohol Beverage Sales -Mc re Than S S 75% Revenue (See Sec. 118-711) Alternative Financial Establishments (check cashing, payday advance or loan business, moneytransfer business or car title loan business) Antique Shop P P P P Arts & Crafts Store P P P Bakery Shop P P P Bank and Savings and Loan P P P P Barber ShoplBeauty Salon P P P P Bicycle Shop P P P P Book Store P P P P Beauty Supply Store P P P Camera Sales and Service Store P P P Carpet & Tile Sales Store P P P Cigarette & Cigar Shop P P P Clock Store P P P Gleaning and Pressing Pick -up P P P Station Clothing Store P P P P Coffee ShopfTea Room P P P P Computer Sales and Service Store P P P Computer Software Store P P P Consumer Electronics Store P P P S P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C9 U 4 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS NON- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS as [L ❑ LL 0 c J J C rya c C5 E ca -L :2 C) Uj O r G] Z r 47 N w C 1A N Ld M w i1 E $ L 0 0 � "7 a C ++ J � C C C M C P E P P ED Table of Permitted S S P a P P P P Uses � LL w U_ 0 LL a d � C S S S S f!1 f!J u7 co S 5 N fY co n fy S P G. RETAIL AND SERVICE USES (continued) P P Copy Center Convenience Store (3 Pumps or Less) S P Department Store P P [log Training School S Drive-Through Retail Buildings (less than 1,400 sq S S S ft) S P P P Dry Cleaners (13) P Equipment Rental Requiring Outdoor Display Area P P Fabric Shop P P P Farmer's Market P P Florist Shop P P P P Furniture & Home Furnishing Store Gift Shop P P P P Greeting Card Store P Groue Store/Supermarket P P Hardware Store S P P P Health and Nutrition Food Store Imported Goods Store P P Jewelers P P P Kennel Key Shop/Locksmith Laundry, Self Service P P as [L ❑ LL 0 c J J C rya c C5 E ca -L :2 C) Uj O r G] Z r 47 N w C 1A N Ld M w i1 E $ L 0 0 � "7 a C ++ J � !g VP c E = N C o '� [6 +�+ j 69 L U o � D P P P P S S P P P P P P P - S S S S S 5 5 8 S P P P S S P P P P S S S S S S P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P S P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P S S S P P EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 20, 2011 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TR 2011 -01 Public Hearing and Consideration of amendments to Sections 118 -631 "Table of Permitted Uses" and 118 -401 "Definitions" of the North Richland Hills Zoning Ordinance. Proposed amendments include the addition of the following two previously unlisted uses to the table: Drive- Through Retail Buildings (less than 1,400 square feet) and Alternative Financial Establishments (check cashing, payday advance or loan business, money transfer business or car title loan business) as well as the definitions of these uses. John Pitstick said this is recommended as a new and unlisted use due to the request on both fronts with the drive through buildings and alternative financial establishments. We are recommending they be under a Special Use Permit not to necessarily eliminate the uses but to be able to 'look at them as they come forward on a Special Use Permit. It is intended to provide some flexibility by allowing certain types of uses in areas where special conditions may need to be considered to reduce the adverse affects on adjacent or surrounding properties. We felt the 1400 square feet are the smaller buildings that could be on some of those lots and have issues with parking and would look at those as they would be appropriate in those districts, Community Service (CS), Heavy Commercial (HC), Light Industrial (I1) and 12 Medium Industrial. Mr. Pitstick said the alternative financial establishments are clearly different than banks and we have added definitions to all the uses and recommend they be required by Special Use Permit in the Medium Industrial District for the categories car title loan business, check cashing, money transfer and payday advance or loan businesses. We do have a few of those businesses in the community now and they can stay in operation as is under their current zoning. If they went out of business they would have to conform and come back in with a Special Use Permit. Chairman Shiflet opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak for or against this matter? Seeing none he closed the Public Hearing and entertained a motion. APPROVED Steven Cooper motioned to approve TR 2011 -01, seconded by Dianna Madar. The motion carried unanimously (7 -0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. D.0 Subject: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. No items for this category. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Subject: PUBLIC WORKS Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. E.0 No items for this category. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Subject: GENERAL ITEMS Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. F.0 No items for this category. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. G.0 Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Agenda No. G.1 Subject: Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Manager's Office Council Meeting Date: February 14, 2011 Presented by: Jared Miller Agenda No. B.1 Subject: Consider Approval of an Oil and Gas Lease for approximately 3.77 acres of City property. Summarv: The City has received an offer from Chesapeake Energy to lease minerals under five small tracts in three separate locations for a bonus of $5,250 per acre with a three year lease term and 25% royalties. The City would receive a bonus of $19,792.50. General Description: Over the past several years, the Barnett Shale natural gas field has become one of the busiest natural gas fields in the country with drilling and production activity occurring all over North Central Texas. The City of North Richland Hills passed a gas drilling regulatory ordinance to ensure the public safety and minimize the impact of drilling and production activities on the City's residents and the environment. The City has received an offer from Chesapeake Energy to lease approximately 3.77 acres of minerals under five small tracts in three separate locations. Two of the tracts, totaling 0.33 acres, are located on Green Valley Drive near Davis Boulevard. Two of the tracts, totaling 2.88 acres, are located south of Amundson Drive near Simmons Road. The final tract, 0.56 acres, is located at the southwest corner of Chapman Road and Central Avenue. The City will receive a lease bonus of $5,250 per acre, or $19,792.50, with a three year lease term and 25% royalties. Recommendation: To authorize the City Manager to execute an Oil and Gas Lease for approximately 3.77 acres of City property. no 5 tq N -1 M N U LO O m � m 0 3 1 ' r U (0 ti 'm N M m U ti A m �- m N n A A t N E J � � m d G W d 3 O L OI CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. H.0 Subject: INFORMATION AND REPORTS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Presented by: Councilman Tim Welch Agenda No. H.1 Subject: Announcements - Councilman Welch Announcements Registration is underway for Camp NRH, which will be held at the NRH Recreation Center March 14th through 18th during Spring Break. A Tennis Camp and an Art Camp are also 'being offered during Spring Break. All 3 camps are open to children ages 6 to 12. For more details, please call the Recreation Center at 817 -427 -6600. The NRH 'Fire Department conducts CPR classes each month for the community. The next class is scheduled from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. on Thursday, February 17th. The cost is $25. The CPR classes are American Heart Association approved and each participant will receive a book and course completion card. To register or get more details, please c a l l 817 -427 -6901. Kudos Korner Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Staff, NRH Public Library — A note was received in the library book drop thanking the City and all of the staff at the NRH Public 'Library for providing such splendid library resources, especially in the children's department. "My 5 year old and I love this library and the large collection of books and DVDs. Thank you so much ", the note said. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Presented by: Council (Meeting Date: 2 -14 -2011 Agenda No. H.2 Subject: Adjournment