HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2011-07-25 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Monday, July 25, 2011
5:45 P.M.
A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting
A.2 NRH Centre Construction Update (15 Minutes)
A.3 Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis for Inside Loop 820 (20 Minutes)
AA Discussion on Part -Time Neighborhood Initiative Coordinator Position (10 Minutes)
B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to
discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code
B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for
Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) State of Texas v. City of
North Richland Hills (No. 2011 - 002840 -1); and 2) State of Texas v. City of North
Richland Hills (No. 2011 - 000462 -1)
B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to
deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property — southeast quadrant
of City
C.0 Adjournment
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was
posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas
Government Code on July 22, 2011 at
City Secretary
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available.
Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to
this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further
information.
The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed
on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body
under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly
conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
City Council Agenda —July 25, 2011
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Monday, July 25, 2011
7:00 P.M.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every
regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and
schedule:
u City Hall on the day of the meeting
Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at
www.nrhtx.com after 10 a.m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino
A.1 Invocation - Councilman Rodriguez
A.2 Pledge - Councilman Rodriguez
A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s)
No items for this category.
A.4 Citizens Presentation
An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not
scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at
a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting
Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council
meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any
subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to
discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation.
A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda
B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to
require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered.
B.1 Approval of Minutes of July 11, 2011 City Council Meeting
City Council Agenda — July 25, 2011
Page 2 of 3
C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items for this category.
D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Items to follow do not require a public hearing.
No items for this category.
E.0 PUBLIC WORKS
No items for this category.
F.0 GENERAL ITEMS
F.1 GN 2011 -055 Appointments to Civil Service Commission - Places 1, 2, 3
F.2 GN 2011 -056 Appointments to Boards & Commissions — Place 7
G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS
G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda
H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS
H.1 Announcements - Councilman Whitson
H.2 Adjournment
All items on the agenda are for discussion and /or action.
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was
posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas
Government Code on July 22, 2011 at Gl: 15arh
4
City Secretary
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available.
Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to
this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further
information.
The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed
on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body
under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly
conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
City Council Agenda — July 25, 2011
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Monday, July 25, 2011
5:45 P.M.
A.1 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting
A.2 NRH Centre Construction Update (15 Minutes)
A.3 Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis for Inside Loop 820 (20 Minutes)
A.4 Discussion on Part -Time Neighborhood Initiative Coordinator Position (10 Minutes)
B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to
discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code
B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for
Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation - 1) State of Texas v. City of
North Richland Hills (No. 2011- 002840 -1); and 2) State of Texas v. City of North
Richland Hills (No. 2011 - 000462 -1)
B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to
deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property — southeast quadrant
of City
C.0 Adjournment
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was
posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas
Government Code on July 22, 2011.
City Secretary
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available.
Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to
this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further
information.
The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed
on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body
under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly
conflicts with Chapter 551', Texas Government Code.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Monday, July 25, 2011
7:04 P.M.
Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every
regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and
schedule:
❑ City Hall on the day of the meeting
Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at
www.nrhtx.com after 10 a. m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino
A.1 Invocation - Councilman Rodriguez
A.2 Pledge - Councilman Rodriguez
A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s)
No items for this category.
A.4 Citizens Presentation
An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not
scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at
a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting
Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council
meeting. The Texas Open (Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any
subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to
discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation.
A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda
B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to
require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered.
B.1 Approval of Minutes of July 11, 2011 City Council Meeting
C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items for this category.
D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Items to follow do not require a public hearing.
No items for this category.
E.0 PUBLIC WORKS
No items for this category.
F.0 GENERAL ITEMS
F.1 GN 2011 -055 Appointments to Civil Service Commission - Places 1, 2, 3
F.2 GN 2011 -055 Appointments to Boards & Commissions — Place 7
ell =: *i /: calls IC►IXy0M11i]01110 1 hf 6
G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda
H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS
H.1 Announcements - Councilman Whitson
H.2 Adjournment
All items on the agenda are for discussion and/or action.
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was
posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas
Government Code on July 22, 2011.
City Secretary
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available.
Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to
this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817427 -6080 for further
information.
The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed
on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body
under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly
conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
City of North Richland Hills
City Council Work Session Meeting Agenda
North Richland Hills City Hall City Council Workroom
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 75180
Monday, July 25, 2011
5:45 P.M.
A.1 Discuss Items from Regular Citv Council Meeting
A.2 NRH Centre Construction Update (15 Minutes)
A.3 Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analvsis for Inside Loop 820 (20 Minuted
A.4 Discussion on Part -Time Neiqhborhood! Initiative Coordinator Position (10
Minutes)
B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The Citv Council may enter into closed Executive
Session to discuss the followinq as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas
Government Code
B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for
Consultation with Attornev regardinq Pendinq Litiqation — 1) State of Texas v.
Citv of North Richland Hills (No. 2001-002840-1): and 2] State of Texas v. Citv of
North Richland Hills (No. 2011- 000452 -1)
B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to
deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property — southeast
quadrant of Citv
C.0 Adiournment
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented lay: Agenda No. A.1
Subject Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Parks and Recreation Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Bill Thornton & Chris Amarante Agenda No. A.2
Subject: NRH Centre Construction Update (15 Minutes)
Summary:
Staff will provide an update on construction activities at the NRH Centre.
General Descrivtion:
Construction of the NRH Centre began in December 2010 and is progressing on
schedule for an April 2012 completion. Byrne Construction Services, the construction
contractor on the job, is approximately half way through the project. The majority of the
structural steel is in place and three quarters (314) of the parking lot has been poured.
The aquatic center is one of the last remaining areas to be poured and once finished the
structural steel and roof structure will be placed.
Adding to the form and structure of the facility is the exterior sheeting, brick and stone
work which is progressing from west to east. Major work also continues on the HVAC
system, duct work, plumbing and electrical rough -in. Along with the current construction
activities, the following work will be completed in the near future:
Work in Near Future
• Shot -crete pool walls
• Continue exterior brick and stone work
• Continue HVAC, plumbing, electrical rough -in
• Continue metal studs and sheetrock
• Continue roofing and structural steel
• Continue exterior sheeting and waterproofing
• Installation of door frames
• Begin low voltage wiring installation
• Set RTU's in mechanical well
• Begin installation of pool mechanical equipment
While construction continues, finish out projects are also underway including the
acquisition of the security system and cameras, computer and audio visual equipment,
access control, fitness equipment and furniture, fixtures and equipment.
Bill Thornton, Project Manager and Chris Amarante, Construction Manager will provide
a presentation on construction activities.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Parks and Recreation
Presented by: Vickie Loftice
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. A.3
Subject: Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis for Inside Loop 820 (20
Minutes)
Summarv:
The City of North Richland Hills contracted with Pros Consulting to provide a Regional
Assessment and Opportunity Analysis for the area primarily inside of Loop 820. The
study indentifies public and private recreation and entertainment opportunities for the
purpose of economic development, revitalization and redevelopment of the area.
General Description:
Community Development and Revitalization continues to be a priority for the City of
North Richland Hills and is listed as one of the City Council Goals. Over the past few
years, the City has increasingly focused on redevelopment and revitalization efforts as
well as protection of mature and historic areas and neighborhoods. Along with
successful programs like the Neighborhood Improvement Program and the 'Business
Improvement Growth (BIG) program, the City has invested significant funding in
neighborhood parks, hike and bike trails, street improvement projects, infrastructure
improvements and redevelopment incentives inside Loop 820. These efforts have
helped the area remain relatively strong and vibrant although opportunities remain for
additional redevelopment and revitalization.
To further assess opportunities for redevelopment inside Loop 820, the city contracted
with Pros Consulting to conduct a Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis for
the area. The purpose and intent of the study was to identify appropriate and innovative
options for re- energizing the area with public and or private investment to create a
unique sense of place and pride in the community while distinguishing the area in both
the City of North Richland Hills and the surrounding region.
Along with a demographics and trends analysis, the study includes a local and regional
entertainment assessment which identifies saturation, gaps and opportunities within the
city and the region. Additionally, the study provides recommendations for creating a
designated sense of place with the use of branding, a continued commitment to
connectivity and walk- ability with trails and sidewalks, along with specific recreation and
entertainment attractions that could serve as economic drivers while attracting families
and future homeowners to the area.
Brain Trusty, Senior Manager from Pros Consulting, will provide a summary of the
report including recommendations for revitalization and attractions inside Loop 820.
Attachment — Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
y x
. l y, Vii., ♦ s � r t 4. � t 1 ` •° o � r-.,' ^ �` w� ,�• c� -'�
+ -
V
l 9 A .. 7 j I
p �
L'y �sf
•
q I
� t
14RH North Richland Hills
THE CIF 01 C...—
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
July 5, 2011
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary .............................................................................................. ..............................3
Objectives of the Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis ........................... ............................... 3
The Southside of North Richland Hills Today ............................................................. ............................... 3
TheLogical Flow of this Study ..................................................................................... ..............................4
Key Recommendations and Priorities ......................................................................... ..............................4
Overviewof the Study Area .................................................................................. ..............................7
General ....................................................................................................................... ............................... 7
Observations and Additional Quick Facts: ................................................................. ............................... 8
Review of Previous and Current Plans ................................................................... ..............................9
Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2007) ........................................................................ ..............................9
ThoroughfarePlan (2007) ........................................................................................... ..............................9
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan (2007) ............................................ .............................10
Loop 820 Corridor Plan ( 2005) ................................................................................... .............................10
South Grapevine Highway Corridor Study (2003) ...................................................... .............................10
Community and Regional Assessment ................................................................. .............................11
DemographicsAnalysis .............................................................................................. .............................11
TrendsAnalysis .......................................................................................................... .............................23
Regional Recreational Assessment ............................................................................ .............................29
OpportunityAnalysis .......................................................................................... .............................37
ServiceMarket Analysis ............................................................................................. .............................37
Site / Attraction Alternatives ..................................................................................... .............................37
Summary of Opportunity Analysis Results ................................................................. .............................38
Summary of Recommendations ................................................................................. .............................39
L
k4RH
Executive Summary
The City of North Richland Hills is a community on the move. Positioned between the deep traditions
and cultural mainstay of Fort . Worth and the rapidly growing communities to the north, North Richland
Hills is a literal crossroads of opportunity for residents seeking both the sanctity of the suburbs and the
excitement of a modern city. Development in the City over the last several years has been
predominantly focused in the northern portions of town where growth and expansion was most feasible
and possible. The results of these strategic investments have positioned North Richland Hills in the
Dallas -Fort Worth metro -plex as a desirable place to live, work and play.
The purpose and intent of this Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis is to identify appropriate
and innovative options for re- energizing the southern portion of the City. This has been established as a
priority of current City leadership and elected officials to balance the investments being made
throughout the community to responsibly serve all residents. The southern portion of North Richland
Hills is a blend of older well -kept neighborhoods, newer neighborhoods, mixed commercial and light
industrial sites, and multiple high quality parks. This area includes the Southside Neighborhoods, areas
of the 820 Corridor District, and the South Grapevine Highway Corridor Planning Area. The opportunity
is to create a revitalized sense of place and pride in the community that distinguishes this area in both
the City of North Richland Hills and the surrounding region.
OBJECTIVES OF THE REGIONAL ASSESSMENT AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS
The regional assessment and opportunity analysis was developed under the following guiding principles
and objectives:
• Sustainably grow the best practices, quality and reputation of the City of North Richland Hills.
• Improve the visibility and desirability of the southern portion of the City as a unique place to
live, work and play.
• To create a unique identity for the southern portion of the City that is consistently and
innovatively reflected in the character and appearance of this area.
• Support the City to qualify for enhanced partnerships and funding opportunities in both the
public and private sectors to support community investment and revitalization in this area.
• Leave a positive legacy for current and future generations of North Richland Hills residents.
THE S OUTHSIDE OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TODAY
The Southside of North Richland Hills encompasses approximately 21% of the total land area of the City,
and is the portion of the City south of Loop 820. The neighborhoods in this area are generally older than
most of those in the northern portion of North Richland Hills, and also features a mix of commercial and
light industrial areas, and public park sites. This area also includes the renowned Iron Horse Golf Course
on the west side, a regional attraction in the DFW metro -plex, the North Hills Hospital in the northeast
corner, and the ATI Career Training Center in the southwest corner. The resident population is
predominantly middle -aged and older, but is becoming increasingly mixed with a blend of retired
residents, young families, and young singles. While these neighborhoods do include some newer and
higher priced homes, the area is mostly comprised of older, moderately priced homes on larger lots that
are generally well kept and have potential as a high value investment.
Some of the greatest challenges revitalization of the Southside must overcome include, but are not
limited to:
• Divergent and limited street appeal of retail, commercial and industrial sites and properties
• Continued connectivity of neighborhoods and area amenities with pedestrian trails
pros ,"
consu �. z � -
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
• Improved use opportunities for the former Food Lion site which is now owned by the City
• Improved use opportunities for Fossil Creek Park and related trail /greenway projects
• Improved use opportunities for the former Mall site between Glenview Drive and Boulevard 25
THE LO GICAL F LOW OF THIS STUDY
This Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis in a logical path for responsive community planning
and contains the following major components:
overview of t
Study Area
Opportunity
Analysis
KEY RE COMMENDATIONS AND PRIORITIES
CREATE A SENSE OF PLACE
One of the first steps in revitalizing a portion of a growing city like North Richland Hills that encompasses
an area as large as the Southside is to create a defined and unique sense of place. Generally, successful
revitalization efforts intended to include multiple neighborhoods, multiple commercial and industrial
areas, multiple public parks, and many other local amenities will require a cohesive theme and strategy.
A primary building block for these efforts is a defined identity and sense of place.
It is recommended that the City of North Richland Hills work to create a defined sense of place for the
Southside. This could be done formally through the establishment and recognition of a planning district,
or informally through creative and consistent branding. Regardless of a formal or informal process for
distinguishing the Southside, branding efforts could include the following:
• Signage and or "gateways" at major points of entry — "Now Entering .... of North Richland Hills ",
or "Welcome to the .... of North Richland Hills ".
• Themed road and street signage on all major thoroughfares, and directional Signage at key
intersections.
• Street lamp banners that are changed seasonally on mayor thoroughfares.
• Applicable and appropriate codes, ordinances, regulations and standards that encourage more
consistent and aesthetic street appeal for businesses and store fronts.
• Multiple public gathering spaces that feature open space, and recreational and cultural
amenities and attractions.
MAINTAIN CO MMITMENT TO CONNECTIVITY
Connectivity in the Southside is strong currently with the Joann Johnson Trail and sidewalks throughout
area. Continued focus on improved and expanded sidewalks continues with the City which is critical to
building stronger connectivity and walkability in the community. Additional connectivity priorities that
are recommended are:
• Improved connection over Loop 820 to link the north side and south side of the City
• Improved north /south stem — currently there is a strong east /west stem with the Joann Johnson
Trail
I� 4
NOFiW RvE w4 RHe H14 Li
N
DEVELOP A CENTRAL PART( AMENITY
The City maintains and operates multiple high- quality parks
located in the Southside area. These include Clyde Zellers
Park, Kay Granger Park, Linda Spurlock Park, and Fossil Creek
Park. Additionally, the Iron Horse Golf Course provides
significant open space and a quality recreation amenity in
this area. These sites currently provide will dispersed parks
with either open space, or traditional recreational amenities
such as playgrounds, picnic tables, pavilions, and sports
fields.
It is recommended to consider developing an additional park
at the former Food Lion site which would be located
centrally in the Southside area. This "central park" site could
feature multiple amenities that are unique and could include
one or more of the following:
• 'Special events facility
• Interpretive or community garden
• Smalll pond or water amenity
• Sprayground / splash pad
• Walking trails
This park could play a meaningful role is the community as a
special events site, with focus on open space and cultural /
community amenities. This could serve the powerful
purpose of creating a central gathering place in the
Southside that is aligned with the values and interests of the
local residents and provides unique experiences.
Development of this park could be pursued independently
by the City, or in partnership with other private or public
organizations.
PARTNER FOR UNIQUE CULTURAL ATTRACTIONS
A key development strategy and value for the City of North Richland Hills is to engage partners to assist
with the development and operation of sites and facilities. The development of cultural attractions in
the Southside could easily lend to this partnership strategy. The focus of recommendations in this
report for cultural attractions is centered on the development of the former Food Lion site as described
above. Potential partnerships that could help carry the burden of development and operation include,
but are not limited to the following:
• Public- private partnership with a private, non - profit entity to operate and potentially develop
facilities
• Public- private partnership with a private, for - profit entity to develop and operate facilities
• Public - public partnership with another governmental entity (most likely Tarrant County) to
develop facilities
5 Consul*tir g • •
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
PARTNER FOR UNIQUE R ECREATIONAL ATTRACTIONS AT FOSSIL CREEK PARK
Fossil Creek Park is located near the southwest corner of the Southside and North Richland Hills on the
whole. This is a 58.8 acre park that is predominantly natural area along Big Fossil Creek, and also
includes three lighted softball fields, playground, and picnic area. The current uses of the park for bat -
and -ball sports is not optimal as there are numerous similar and higher quality facilities located
throughout the City, nor is demand very high. It is recommended that Fossils Creek Park be considered
to be re- purposed more exclusively as a natural area / nature park site that includes a mixture of
traditional and unique amenities. Specifically, development of an interpretive playground, picnic area,
pavilion, trails, and outdoor nature exhibit /signage would help to establish the value of Fossil Creek Park
as urban open space.
A unique recommendation at Fossil Creek Park is to consider a partnership with a private entity to
develop and operate a tree canopy facility for interpretive program and recreational purposes. Tree
canopy programs and tours have become increasingly popular and it is rare to find areas with
substantial wooded areas in the DFW metro -plex that would support such a facility. The facility could
include a network of learning stations connected by bridges and /or zip lines that visitors of diverse ages,
abilities and interests could enjoy. Development and operation of this facility could be managed
through a ground lease or concession agreement with a private entity, and would likely also require
improved parking, limited utilities, and a small structure for registration and possible retail sales.
��... 6
NORi.I R'ICH{A Hi4i
Tn Ci o• Cno
Overview of the Study Area
GENERAL
The study area of this assessment and opportunity analysis is the portion of the City of North Richland
Hills that is south of Loop 820. This is generally referred to in this report as the Southside. This area
consists of approximately 21 of the total land area of the City, and approximately 2296 of the resident
population (2010) A map detailing the study area is provided below. an this map, the yellow - shaded
target areas 1, 2 and 5 comprise the study area of this report
C3 Targel Areas
[xxJ Percentage of
Total Cily Atria
m4q�TOWER OA
I /
f�
LESS Rr-
H
Neighborhood
Revitalization
1 Population statistics were taken from the results of the 2010 Census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2 Map provided courtesy of the City of North Richland Hills.
P+'rOS - .,r ' F_
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
Below is a summary of the Southside study area as .- J to the north of the City and the
City as a whole. All statistics provided in the table below are from the databases of the Environmental
Services Research Institute (ESRI), and data collected from the U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Census.
2010 Population Profile
Southside
North side
Total
City of North Richland Hills (N'RH)
Study Area
of NRH
NRH
Resident population
12,123
53,985
56,108
Total Households
4,901
19,682
24,583
Average Household Size
2.44
2.74
2.58
Total Families
3,104
14,341
17,444
Average Family Size
3.07
3.21
3.19
Owner Occupied Housing Units
53.0%
60.2%
58.8%
Renter Occupied Housing Units
42.2%
34.1%
35.7%
Vacant Housing Units
4.8%
5.7%
5.5%
Median Household Income
$58,759
$70,954
$68,122
Median Home Value
$104,000
$135,500
$126,600
Per Capita Income
$29,038
$30,115
$29,917
Median Age
42.5
34.3
35.6
OBSERVATIONS AND ADDITIONAL QUICK FACTS.
• The resident population of the Southside study area represents approximately the same
resident density as the portions of North Richland Hills that are north of Loop 820. This is
derived from the observation that the Southside contains 2190 of the City's land area, and nearly
equals the same portion of the City's population (22%).
• The North Richland Hills resident population of the Southside is considerably older than the
residents north of Loop 820, with nearly an eight year difference in median age.
• Families represent approximately 53% of households in the Southside of the City, while families
in the north portions of the City .,. . approximately 73% of households. This indicates a
greater portion of singles and /or non- family households as a F v 'I.: b,. of the total population
that resides in the Southside. This is reiterated in the data that indicates approximately 80% of
total households live north of 820, yet 82% of North Richland Hills families live in the north.
• While renter - occupied houses represent a greater portion of the total housing units in the
Southside than that of the north portions of the City, vacant housing seems to be less.
• Home values seem to be slightly higher in the portions of North Richland Hills north of Loop 820,
as well as median household income. Per capita income, however, is very similar from the
Southside to the north portions of the City. This second fact reiterates that there are likely more
singles as a portion of households in the Southside than in the north.
3 Statistic represents portion of total housing units occupied by the unit's owner.
4 Statistic represents portion of total housing units occupied by renters.
5 Statistic :, is portion of total housing units that were vacant at the time of the 2010 Census.
6 Statistics provided by 2010 TAD appraised values.
N"—. iv —o N.t..
Iq H
T., C— . i ,_ ,
Review of Previous and Current Plans
There are multiple previous and current plans that apply to portions or all of the Southside that have
been referenced and reviewed as a component of this assessment and analysis. These are described
briefly below.
-
-, -1W
j
r
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN (2007)
This plan serves as a guide used to determine potential land
uses for the City of North Richland Hills. This plan does not
affect existing zoning, but could affect how future zoning
requests would be considered based on the updated
Comprehensive Plan.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN (2007)
This plan is a component of the updated Comprehensive Plan
that details major and minor thoroughfares throughout the
City of North Richland Hills. Streets and roadways are
classified and indicated as being either principal or minor
arterial roadways, major or minor collector roadways, or
residential streets.
13
,
N K H
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
11101111l
-
�y
�IRH
CDNMFX1M L9I�'D USE
P L &W
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN (2007)
This plan serves as a guide used to determine potential land
uses for the City of North Richland Hills. This plan does not
affect existing zoning, but could affect how future zoning
requests would be considered based on the updated
Comprehensive Plan.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN (2007)
This plan is a component of the updated Comprehensive Plan
that details major and minor thoroughfares throughout the
City of North Richland Hills. Streets and roadways are
classified and indicated as being either principal or minor
arterial roadways, major or minor collector roadways, or
residential streets.
13
,
N K H
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
PARKS, RECREATION AND ]PEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
(2007)
This plan was developed through a detailed assessment and
analysis of current sites, facilities, and programs; extensive
public input; and needs and interest analyses to determine
the key priorities of the City Parks and Recreation
Department for the next five to 10 years.
Corridor Image and Districts Plan
frna Horse 6isfHet
Clvfc Dlstslct
Cmu55 d5
CsexVgner
SOUTH GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
STUDY (2003)
This study was developed as a cooperative
strategy with the City of Richland Hills to
serve as an approved corridor plan providing
recommendations for improvements to
Boulevard 26 (Highway 26) and policy reform
which could be implemented over the near
and long term.
r q
4.J R f.
z
f
LOOP 820 CORRIDOR PLAN (2005)
This plan was developed following
extensive land use analysis and community
input to identify a common vision and
strategy built on civic planning best
practices for the Loop 820 Corridor
through North Richland Hills..
r
I
10
NRH
Community and Regional Assessment
The community and regional assessment supporting the opportunity analysis detailed in this report
included an investigation into demographics, applicable facility and participation trends, and existing
amenities within a service area that encompasses a 30- minute drive time from the Southside of North
Richland Hills. The findings of this assessment are provided in the sections that follow.
DEMOGRAPHICS ANALYSIS
Demographic data used for the analysis was obtained from Environmental Systems Research Institute,
Inc. (ESRI), the largest research and development organization dedicated to Geographical Information
Systems (GIS) and specializing in population projections and market trends. All data was acquired in May
2010 and reflects actual numbers as reported in the 2010 Census and demographic projections for 2015
as estimated by ESRI using linear regression.
Consumer spending data was obtained from ESRI, and collected by independent studies conducted by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trend data was collected from a variety of sources with references
provided as footnotes throughout that section of this report.
SERVICE AREA DISTINCTION
The first step to conducting a relevant needs analysis encompassing a region that includes both the
primary and secondary user markets of amenities within the Southside of North Richland Hills is to
establish a clear distinction of these service areas. For purposes of this assessment, the primary service
was defined as the area that encompasses residents within study area. The primary service area
contains the market that would likely be the most frequent and repeat visitors to the amenities.
The secondary service area includes residents that live within a 30- minute drive from the Southside.
The secondary service area contains the market where amenities within the study area can maintain
reasonable market capture ability depending upon the level of investment and creativity applied to
promoting within the region. Residents beyond a 30- minute drive are considered outside the primary
and secondary service areas, even though visitors will likely be found to have originated from beyond
this region.
PRIMARY SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
The primary service area of amenities in the Southside would include residents within the study area.
There were an estimated 12,123 residents in 2010, including an estimated 4,901 households. The 2010
median age of residents in the primary service area is 42.5 years with the largest 10 -year age segment
being those 45 -54 years of age (15.2%). The 2010 average household income for residents within the
study area is $59,013, with per capita income at $29,038.
SECONDARY SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
The secondary service area of amenities in the Southside includes residents within a 30- minute drive of
the study area. In this region there were an estimated 2,497,924 residents in 2010, including an
estimated 898,865 households. The 2010 median age of residents in the primary service area is 37.1
years with the largest 10 -year age segment also being those 45 -54 years of age (14.9%). The 2010
average household income for residents within a two -hour drive of the park is slightly less than that of
the primary service area at $64,993, with per capita income at $26,383..
pros-."; . ' � � I-
11 cons I bn g � •
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
12
A map detailing the primary and secondary service areas is provided below. The primary service area is
the small area outlined in blue and shaded yellow in the center of the map.
JqRH
DEMOGRAPHICS
This demographic analysis provides a basic understanding of the population characteristics of the
residents that live within a one -hour and two -hour drive of the park, which have been defined as the
primary and secondary service markets. The analysis that follows identifies multiple demographic
characteristics of interest for this project including:
• Overall size of the service area populations by individuals, households, age segments, and race
• Economic status and spending power demonstrated by household income statistics
• Prevailing discretionary spending behavior of service area residents
• Influence of demographic trends on recreation participation
TOTAL POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS FINDINGS
The total population of the secondary service area is estimated to be 2,497,924, comprised of 898,855
total estimated households. The population within the primary service area (Southside of North
Richland Hills) accounts for less than 1% of the population within the 30- minute drive (secondary service
area) with an estimated 12,123 residents in 2010. A table summarizing the population of both the
primary and secondary service areas is provided below. These illustrate the population as accounted in
the 2000 U.S. Census, an estimate for 2010, and projection for 2015. Note the highlighted cells
indicating that the degree of projected growth expected in the primary service area is nominal
compared to the expected growth within the secondary service area. This is largely due to the
developing cities to the west of North Richland Hills, and the increasing density of cities within the
Dallas -fort Worth metro -plex on the whole.
2000
2010
2015
Growth from 2000
% Change from 2000
Primary Service
Primary Service
Secondary Service
Secondary Service
Area Population
Area Households
Area Population
Area Households
12,02.7
4,847
2,041,G96
745,115
12,123
4,901
2,497,924
898,865
12,390
5,015
2.717.732
976,586
363
1.813,753
676,636
I 231.471
3:0%
3.5%
332%
31.195
KEY TOTAL POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD FINDINGS
The key findings of the total population and household analysis for the Southside of North Richland Hills
are detailed as follows:
1. The populations of both the primary and secondary service areas are growing, with the greatest
degree of growth expected in the urban areas of the secondary service market.
2. The average household size is considerably smaller in the primary service area (2.44 persons) as
it is in the secondary service area (2.73 persons).
A map depicting population density within the secondary service area is provided on the following page.
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
Estimated 2010 Population Densities
As Depicted By A 30 Minute Drive Time From
The Farmer Food Lion Site By Census Block Group
North Richland Hills
Regional Assessment and
Opportunity Analysis
NRH
r'
170
sn North Richland 4f1 l5
Berl d=
H # ursf
FOO
114 ■ N�
y
o
i a h
9 trE+am�,r aAi.in(jtoi
■� 3G
I'y + �` t
�d� i �F�rrsr
^ .,nty
f =vrrner Food Lion Site
Density
Urban - High Density, 24 or More People per Acre
Urban - Medium Density, 7.5 to 24 People per Acre
Urban - Low Density, 2.5 to 7.5 People per Acre pros
Exurban, 0.5 to 2.5 People per Acre consulting
Rural - Small Tract, 6 -25 to 05 People per Acre .Drive times are based on unimpeded 1 inch = 37,544 feet
Rural Large Tract, 0.0 to 4.25 People per Acre traffic flow at posted speed limits ® 70 ailes
14
NOFiW RvE w4 RHe H14 Li
N
AGE AND RACE
A review of the age distribution of residents within primary and secondary service areas yields the
finding that the population of the primary service area is considerably older than that of the secondary
service area as reflected by median age statistics. The graphs below and on the following page detail
the age distribution of residents in 2010 for both the primary and secondary service areas of the
5outhside of North Richlands Hills.
Primary Service Area - 2010 Population by Age
Age 0- 4,5.6%
Age 75 - 84, 6.3% Age 85 +, 3.0% Age S - 9,5.2% ® Age 0 - 4
Age 65 - 74, 8.8% Age 10 -14,5.0% ® Age 5 - 9
Age 10 -14
■ Age 15 -19
Age 55' - 64, 13.636 Age 20 - 24, 7,296
Age 20 - 24
Age 25 - 34, 13.0% Age 25 - 34
Age 35 - 44
a.
Age 45 - 54
Age 55 - 64
Age 65 - 74
Age 75 - 84
Age 85+
Median Age: 42.5 years
Secondary Service Area - 2010 Population by Age
Age 5
Median Age: 32.8 years
• Age 0 - 4
• Age 5 - 9
;e 10 - 14, Age 10 - 14
7.0%
• Age 15 - 19
• Age 20 - 24
Age 25 - 34
• Age 35 - 44
• Age 45 - 54
Age 55 - 64
Age 65 - 74
Age 75 - 84
Age 85+
Age 75 - 84, 2.6% Age 85 +,
APP es - 7n a ROA -\ 1.1%
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
The race of residents living within both the primary and secondary service areas is predominantly White,
with greater ethnic diversity in the secondary service area. Graphs depicting the racial composition of
both these regions are provided below and on the following page.
Primary Service Area - Population by Race /Ethnicity
F
90.0% -'� iv_
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
White
Alone
Hispanic origin. 18.3%
70.0% -
50.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
white Black
Alone Alone
Hispanic origin. 34.4%
3 ��i�
Black American
Alone Indian
Alone
4.4% AIM 0 2.796 +
Asian or Some Two or
Pacific Other Race More !Races
Islander Alone
Alone
Secondary Service Area - Population by Race /Ethnicity
52.1%
15.8%
5.2% 3.5%
American Asian or Some Two or
Indian Pacific Other Race More !Races
Alone Islander Alone
Alone
10
JqRH
KEY AGE AND RACE FINDINGS
The key findings of the age and race analyses for the study area are detailed as follows:
1. The largest age segment the primary service area are persons aged 45 -54 years, while the
largest age segment of the secondary service area's residential population are persons aged 25-
34 years. These statistics indicate the need to support consistent and diverse experiences for
both active adults, as well as youth.
2. The predominant race of the residential population in both service areas is White, with
considerably more diversity in the secondary service area especially among African - Americans.
3. This data indicates that facilities and services should appeal to diverse age segments, not
excluding older adults, as well as the recreational preferences of a racially diverse population
that is dominated by White residents.
HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION
The relative affluence of residents within both the primary and secondary service markets has grown
from the year 2000, and is projected to continue that growth as we approach 2015. The growth of
wealth in the secondary service area has been greater than in the primary service area, presumably
because of the expanded economies and higher -end residential areas located within a 30- minute drive
of the Southside of North Richland Hills. The graphs below and on the following page indicate the
distribution of household income as a percentage of total households in 2010.
As noted in these graphs, approximately 33.59/o of the residential population within the primary service
area in 2010 features a household income above $75,000. Approximately 16.1% of households feature
an income of $100,000 or more in 2010, indicating an average level of affluence in the resident
population compared to many other areas around the United States especially in these current
economic times.
Primary Service Area - 2010 Households by Income
$200,000+ 2.3%
$150,000 - $199,999
$100,000 - $149,999
$75,000 - $99,999
$50,000 - $74,999
$35,000 - $49,999
$25,000 - $34,999
$15,000 - $24,999
$15,000
Percentage of Total Households
23.4 YG
25.0%
0"
F F_
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
The graph below indicates that approximately 35.9% of the population in 2010 of the secondary service
area features a household income above $75,000, which is more than that of the primary service area.
Approximately 20% of households in the secondary service area feature an income of $100,000 or more
in 2010.
Secondary Service Area - 2010 Households by Income
$200,000+
$150,000 - $199,999
$100,000 - $149,999
$75,000 - $99,999
$50,000 - $74,999
$35,000 - $49,999
$25,000 - $34,999
$15,000 - $24,999
$15,000
22.0%
25.0%
A map depicting median household income by census tract within the secondary service market is
provided on the following page.
,r 18
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
Percentage of Total Households
NOFiN RvE w4 RNO H�t�s
N
T— C— ov C.--
Estimated 2010 Median Household Income
As Depicted By A 30 Minute Drive Time From
The Former Food Lion Site By Census Block Croup
$25,000 or Less
$25,001 to $50,000
$50,001 to $75,000
$75,001 to $100,000
$100,001 or More
Keene i ,
i
+ �CBebuun�
*Drive Times are based on unimpeded
traffic flow at posted speed limits
North Richland Hills
Regional Assessment and
Opportunity Analysis
Iq RH
pros it
consulting
1 inch = 37,500 feet
Uk-3
0 5 10
I OSi + f y
Median Household Income
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
ADDITIONAL MARKET PROFILE INFORMATION FOR THE PRIMARY SERVICE AREA
The following additional market profile information of the primary service area are provided by the U.S.
2000 Census, and ESRI projections for 2010 and 2015.
• Household size is slightly decreasing from 2000 to 2015.
2000 Households
4,847
2000 Average Household Size
1 2.45
2010 Households
4,901
2010 Average Household Size
2.44
2015 Households
5,015
2015 Average Household Size
2.44
• Family size is also slightly decreasing from 2000 to 2015.
2000 Families t
3,225
2000 Average Family Size
2.99
2010 Families
3,104
2010 Average Family Size
3.07
2015 Families
3,110
• Owner- occupied housing significantly outpace renter- occupied housing, with a considerable
increase in vacant housing in 2010 and continuing to 2015.
2000 Housing Units
4,998
Owner Occupied Housing Units
58.0%
Renter Occupied Housin Units
38.3%
Vacant Housing Units
3.7%
2010 Housing Units
5,148
Owner Occupied Housing Units
53.0%
Renter Occupied Housing Units
42.2%
Vacant Housing Units
4.8%
2015 Housing Units
5,297
Owner Occupied Housing Units
52.1%
Renter Occupied Housin Units
42.6%
Vacant Housing Units
5.3%
• Median home value will grow by 46% from 2000 to 2015, while per capita income is only
projected to increase 22% in that period.
Median Home Value
2000
2010
2015 '
Per Capita Income
2000
2010
2015
$88,939
$104,000
n/a
$26,664
$29,038
$32,515
7 These statistics are provided by the 2010 TAD appraisal value. 2015 estimates are not available at this time.
,� 20
r ".,v. — .. o w.
NRH
• The gender balance between male and female residents remains constant.
2000 Population by Sex
Males
48.6%
Females
51.4%
2010 Population by Sex
8.6%
Males
49.0%
(Females
51.0%
2015 Population by Sex
5.9%
Males
49.2%
Females
50.8%
• Approximately 23.5% of the population in the primary service area in 2010 has earned a
Bachelor's Degree or higher.
2010 Population 25+ by Educational Attainment
Less than 9th Grade
5.1%
9th - 12th Grade, No Diploma
8.6%
High School Graduate
28.9%
Some College, No Degree
27.1%
Associate Degree
5.9%
Bachelor's Degree
16.7%
Graduate /Professional Degree
5.8%
• Approximately 51% of the residents in the primary service area in 20110 are married.
2010 Population 15+ by Marital Status
Total 10,205
Never Married 25.7%
Married 51.2%
Widowed 7.9%
Divorced 15.1%
r'
pros -.,1 0 k-
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
MARKET BEHAVIORS
The final component of this market analysis is a basic review of prevailing market behaviors as seen
through spending patterns and time commitments in the primary service area of the Southside of North
Richland Hills. Each of the analyses that follow provides insight into these market tendencies and
P.
PRIMARY SERVICE AREA RESIDENT HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SPENDING PATTERNS
2010 Consumer Spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households
that reside in the market area. Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not
mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue. The Spending Potential Index
represents the amount spent in the area J:'! , :::. a national average of 100. Consumer Spending data
are derived from the 2005 and 2006 Consumer E.i. . "'_ Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
These <<i s.:., indicate that among consumer spending among primary service area :: "1 '�s, spending
on ileL and recreation ranks as the seventh highest spending category out of 20 total
categories. Average consumer spending of $3,218 on entertainment and recreation equates to
approximately 5% of total consumer spending ($66,190). The top seven spending categories are
detailed in the table below.
1 Shelter
Spq)3 ,dIflp
pyerage
$9,915.02
3 Pensions and Social Security
$6,428.41
Poteppl
Amount
5 Food at Home
$4,513.95
6 Health Care
Index
Spent
Total
Percent
Total.-.
99
$66,190 -11
$324,397,749
1000%
FQgy
101
$7,7PQ,P,5
� $fj
11 -7%
Food at
)4)
$
j;QJ
q0q
WA)vy from Home
101
W101199
$) Q
4 -9%
AlFpholic Beveraqes
106
Y605 -48
12,967,469
0 -9%
Housing
)RD
$,20,354.51
$99,757,448
I IPI8%
Shelter
99
$1,680 -42
$7§,09,762
23 -7%
Utilj�pp_ Fuel pPd Public Services
103
S4,,W4,98
u9D
7 -1%
Household Operations
W
$1,,5)y37,)h.7r��
g,,3%
F - — t - rr - SURWrs
ID1
$705 -66
$,45$,464
1 -1%
Household Fumishinqs and Equipment
85
$1,759 -65
$8,624,025
2 -7%
APppfel 44po ISenaces
79
$1,97¢.74
$e,417,Tp
4 59'v
Trany9rtation
99
435
150%
TWO
97
�) ����r
011'�94.$pfl
2 -8%
Hp4jPCare
1K
$
$
593'v
El _..i. 1, r ) Recreation
100
W18 -1p
$19,7]).,911
4 -9%
Personal Care Products 8 Services
101
1705 -88
$3,459,498
1 -1%
Education
106
$1,290 -13
$6,322,919
1 -9°%
Smokinq Products
108
$459 -83
$2
0 -7%
M)��e41 Pus (1)
98
$1,145 -1p
)AM120N
1 -7%
Suppp)j PaymentslCash Contributions /Gifts in K)fyd
)W
440, §1
$781,978
q'8%
t i1010ther Insurance
102
$425 -11
2,08 ,471
0 -6%
Pensions and Social Secur1ty
98
$6,42841
$31,505,619
9 -7%
These <<i s.:., indicate that among consumer spending among primary service area :: "1 '�s, spending
on ileL and recreation ranks as the seventh highest spending category out of 20 total
categories. Average consumer spending of $3,218 on entertainment and recreation equates to
approximately 5% of total consumer spending ($66,190). The top seven spending categories are
detailed in the table below.
1 Shelter
$20,354.51
2 Transportation
$9,915.02
3 Pensions and Social Security
$6,428.41
4 Utilities, Fuel and Public Services
$4,674.08
5 Food at Home
$4,513.95
6 Health Care
$3,904.10
7 Entertainment and Recreation
$3,218.10
,r 22
T C C,
TRENDS ANALYSIS
The Southside of North Richland Hills is well positioned to capitalize on many of the major trends
occurring in recreation and leisure because of the opportunity for unique facilities in the area. The trend
research and data provided in this analysis are an overview of recent and verifiable national trends that
can support future decision making regarding park sites and recreation services.
RECREATION TODAY
Our understanding of outdoor recreation trends in America has evolved significantly over the past four
decades since the first national survey was conducted in 1950 by the congressionally created Outdoor
Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC). Since that time, a long series of statistics have been
gathered through seven reiterations of the National Survey on Recreation and the Environment (NSRE)
that identify notable trends in participation and the evolution of new forms of recreation activities
enjoyed by Americans. The most recent of these updated reports was from the NSRE conducted in 2003-
2004. Participation in 37 outdoor recreation activities were evaluated in this study."
Some of the activities with the greatest levels of participation that are relevant to this study are
presented in the tables below. Participation is measured in millions of people and percentage of total
U.S. population.
Trail, Street, or Road Activities 188.2 88.3
Traditional Social Activities 171.8 80.5
Viewing and Photographing Activities 157.5 73.9
Viewing and Learning Activities 143.4 57.3
Outdoor Adventure Activities 118.7 55.7
Supporting these statistics are the findings from the recently completed Outdoor Recreation
Participation Report 2009, conducted in 2009 by the Outdoor Industry Foundation. During January and
February 2009 a total of 41,500 online interviews were carried out with a nationwide sample of
individuals and households from the US Online Panel operated by Synovate. A total of 15,013 individual
and 26,487 household surveys were completed. The total panel has over one million members and is
maintained to be representative of the US population.
Oversampling of ethnic groups took place to boost response from typically under - responding groups. A
weighting technique was used to balance the data to reflect the total US population aged six and above.
The following variables were used: gender, age, income, household size, region and population density.
The total population figure used was 279,568,000 people aged six and above. The report details
participation among all Americans, youth, young adults and adults.
From these results, a current and accurate picture of outdoor recreation participation trends can be
ascertained. The following pages summarize some of the key findings associated with this report.
s United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service. National Survev of Recreation and the Environment.
2003 -2004.
9 Outdoor Industry Foundation. Outdoor Recreation Participation Studv: 2009, 11th Edition. Boulder, Colorado, 2009.
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR, NATURE -BASED ACTIVITIES
An interesting note for many public park and recreation agencies whose facilities and programs are
heavily geared for traditional and team sports, the largest areas of overall participation and growth in
participation are in outdoor, non- traditional sports and activities. An example of this is the finding that
participation in mountain biking and trail running increased by 10.2% and 15.2% respectively from 2007
to 2008, while participation in road biking decreased by 2.1 %Q and road running /jogging only increased
by 0.2% over the same period.
A graph of participation in the most popular indoor recreation, team sports, and outdoor recreation
activities in 2009 . is provided below. Note that team sport participation in baseball, volleyball, soccer,
football, and basketball is considerably less than both indoor and outdoor recreation.
American Participation in the Most Popular Outdoor
and Indoor Recreation Activities (2009)
Stationary Cycling
Stretching
Weight/Resistance Machines
Treadmill
Free Weights
Baseball
Volleyball
Soccer
Football
Basketball
Hiking
Road Biking, Mountain Biking, and BMX
Running, Jogging, and Trail Running
Car, Backyard, or RV Camping
Fishing
Millions of Americans 6 and Older
The table to the right details the
outdoor recreation activities with the
greatest growth in participation from
2007 to 2008. While the top eight of
these activities are not necessarily
appropriate for North Richland Hills,
the remaining two are all well aligned
with many of the opportunities that
are or can be available in the
Southside.
70
Downhill Telemarking
1,173,000
1,435,000
22%
Snowshoeing
2,400,OOD
2,922,000
22%
Backpacking
6,637,000
7,867,000
19%
Cross - Country Skiing
3,530,000
3,848,ODO
9%
Hiking
29,965,ODO
32,511,000
9%
Backyard and Car Camping
31,375,000
33,686,000
7%
Recreational Kayaking
4,702,ODO
5,025,000
7%
Bouldering, Sport and Indoor Climbing
4,514,000
4,769,000
6%
Birdwatching
11,783,000
12,417,000
S%
Wildlife Viewing
22,974,DOO
24,113,000
5%
10 Outdoor Industry Foundation. Outdoor Recreation Participation 5tudv. 2009, . 11th Edition. Boulder, Colorado, 2009.
I
,• 24
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NOFiW RvE w4 RHe H14 Li
N
The graphs below detail the life cycle participation in recreational pursuits in both female and male
participants, as identified in the Outdoor Industry Foundation's 2009 Participation Study. These trends
can help to determine which areas of focus and categories of recreational activities are going to appeal
best to different age segments by gender among residents of North Richland Hills."
11 Outdoor Industry Foundation. Outdoor Recreation Participation Studv: 2009. 11th Edition. Boulder, Colorado, 2009.
on u+ }ray
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
PARTICIPATION TRENDS BY AGE
The Outdoor Industry Association identifies two major generational categories in the U.S.: Baby
Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) and Millennials (born between 1978 and 2003). These two
generational cohorts have distinct differences in their preferences for an active lifestyle. Baby boomers
have shed the image of the relaxed, sedentary lifestyle of generations past pursue a more active form of
"retirement ". Many boomers continue the active and healthy lifestyle they converted to in midlife, as
evidenced by the increasing number of seniors who participate in the fitness industry. Scott Parmelee,
publisher of Outside magazine, describes a boomer as a "hybrid person" who enjoys "less strenuous"
activities while still connecting with nature and the outdoors. 12
While many boomers use outdoor experiences for personal growth, the Millennials seek the thrill.
Millennials pioneered adventure and extreme sports and have been most responsible for the decline in
the traditional "bat and ball" sports leagues targeting young adults. They elect less structured activities
such as skateboarding, rock climbing, and mountain biking in place of organized youth activities like
baseball, football, and soccer.
In recent years, the Outdoor Industry Foundation (OIF), a 501(c)3 organization chartered to research
trends and support growth of the outdoor industry, has produced annual reports of the state of the
industry and outdoor recreation participation. In early 2007, OIF surveyed 60,169 households from a
representative sample that reflects the demographic and socio- economic composition of the United
States to determine the highlights of current outdoor recreation trends in America. Results from this
survey were published as The Next Generation of Outdoor Participants — 200512406 by the OIF in late
2007.
This report finds that participation in outdoor activities at least once per year drops off dramatically with
age. Seventy -nine percent (79N) of respondents aged 6 —12 years reported participating at least once in
one of the 35 outdoor recreation activities pollec16, while only 34% of respondents aged 65 years and
older reported the same level of participation. This is illustrated in the graph be 10W.13
Outdoor Participation: Participation At Least Once in
At Least One of 35 Outdoor Activities' in 2005 and /or 2006
80% —
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
c�
M.F 6 - 12
77
13 - 17 18 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 +yrs
12 Outdoor Industry Association. State of Industry Report: 2006. Boulder, Colorado. 2006.
13 Outdoor Industry Foundation. The Next Generation of Outdoor Participants — 200512006. Boulder, Colorado. 2007
26
JqRH
Americans are exposed to and participate in outdoor recreation activities considerably more when they
are younger and therefore it is critical to understand the preferences of our young recreationists to
stay aligned with evolving trends. The top five outdoor recreation activities by frequency of outings in
2006 and in 2008 of Americans aged 6 to 24 years are detailed in the table below. Mote the general
... cy over the two -year period.
1. Bicycling
2. Running /jogging /trail running
3. Skateboarding
4. Fishing
S. Wildlife viewing
1. Bicycling
2. Running / jogging / trail running
3. Skateboarding
4. Fishing
S. Car and backyard camping
The tables below detail the participation in these top five outdoor recreation activities in 2008 for all
Americans aged six and older, as well as the top five team sport activities and top five indoor recreation
activities participated in during the same year. 15
Outdoor Recreation Activities - All Persons Aged 6+
Activity % of Americans .
Freshwater, saltwater, and fly fishing 179/o 48.2 million
Car, backyard, and RV camping 159'0 42.4 million
Running, jogging, trail running 159'0 42.1 million
Road biking, mountain biking, and BMX 1590 41.5 million
Hiking 129'o 32.5 million
Team Sport Activities - All Persons Aged 6+
Basketball
9%
26.3 million
Football (touch, tackle, and flag)
7%
18.9 million
Soccer (indoor and outdoor)
6%
15.6 million
Volleyball (court, grass, and beach)
5%
15.2 million
Baseball
5%
15.0 million
14 Outdoor Industry Foundation. The Next Generation of Outdoor Partirlpants — 2005 2006. Boulder, Colorado. 2007
15 Outdoor Industry Foundation. 2009 Participation Study. Boulder, Colorado. 2009.
ros " � �
27 , cons uIbn' g +. � �
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
Indoor Recreation Activities - All Persons Aged 6+
Free weights
21 9/o
58.9 million
Treadmill
189'0
49.4 million
Weight / resistance machines
14%
38.4 million
Stretching
13 1 %
36.3 million
Stationary cycling
12 ° Jo
34.7 million
On the older end of the age spectrum, active retirees are one of the largest emerging markets for the
recreation and tourism industry. Retirees sixty -five and older remain active in many activities well into
their senior years. Just under thirty -five million Americans, or about one of every eight persons (12.4%),
were sixty -five years or older at the time of the 2000 Census. Over ninety percent of these older
Americans are retired; almost all are retired by age seventy -five.
For purposes of this study, retirees were divided into three age groups, sixty -five to seventy -four,
seventy -five to eighty -four, and eighty -five and above. Data was gathered from the National Survey on
Recreation and the Environment (NSRE). Across all the activities surveyed, with the only exception being
gardening or landscaping for pleasure, the percentage of retirees who participate in an activity is less for
persons aged 65 and older than for those under age 65. With a few exceptions among activities,
participation percentage falls from age sixty -five to age eighty -five and above. For the more passive
activities, such as walking, family gatherings outdoors, sightseeing and viewing/photographing wildlife
and flowers, the decrease with age is gradual. With the more physically demanding activities, such as
swimming, hiking and mountain biking, the decrease in percentage participating sharply increases with
age. However, some percentage of even the oldest retirees participates across most activities,
regardless of how physically demanding they are.
Although age does play a role in the ability to participate in all activities, eleven activities surveyed by
NSRE remain popular among aging Americans over 65 years of age 16:
• Walking for pleasure
• Family gatherings
• Gardening and landscaping for pleasure
• View /photograph natural scenery
• Visit nature centers, etc.
• Driving for pleasure
• Picnicking
• Sightseeing
• Visit historic sites
• View /photograph other wildlife
• View /photograph wildflowers, trees, etc.
As the retiree population grows in future years, accessible opportunities to these popular activities by
active, older adults should be accommodated.
16 United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service. National Survev of Recreation and the Environment. 2003 -2004
,• 28
T,, , . C. c...,....
REGIONAL R ECREATIONAL AS SESSMENT
The regional recreational assessment is a cursory review of facilities within a 30- minute drive of the
former Food Lion site located in the center of the Southside of North Richland Hills. This region
constitutes the area in which facilities located within the study area of this analysis would most likely
have the potential to compete with, comprising of the primary and secondary service markets as
previously defined. Facilities reviewed included those that uniquely served the recreational, cultural
and entertainment interests and needs of residents in the region.
RECREATION CENTERS
The recreation centers identified in this assessment were typically municipal facilities, with occasional
private facilities included. These facilities vary greatly in their size and amenities, and tend to serve
residents within a 10 -15 minute drive. 17 Additionally, residents tend to use recreation centers located in
the cities in which they live even though occasionally a recreation center of another city may be closer
to their residence. This is commonly because of membership or fee discounts given to residents at
municipal recreation centers.
The two most common reasons in which residents tend to use recreation centers of another,
neighboring city are:
1. The diversity and type of amenities more closely suit their interests or needs
2. Proximity to their residence
W
metro -plex, typically strive to have a
recreation center once their population
exceeds 25,000 residents. As a result, there Rendering of NRH Centre that is currently being
are numerous recreation centers within a 30- constructed
minute drive of the Southside of North Richland Hills. In fact, there are a total of 49 identified facilities
in this region. These are detailed in the table that below and on the following page, and roughly are
listed in order from the closest to the furthest away within the 30- minute drive time region.
Aside from occasional loss of resident
customers to recreation centers of
neighboring cities, the majority of residents
will utilize facilities in their home
municipality. The cities of north Texas, and
especially those in the Dallas -Fort Worth
NRH Centre
Haltom City Recreation Center
Keller Pointe
Euless Midway Park Center
Hurst Recreation Center
Boys Ranch Activity Center
Morton Fitness Center
North Richland Hills
Haltom City
Keller
Euless
Hurst
Bedford
Fort Worth
i' This is based on the professional experience and analysis findings of PROS Consulting on related recreation
center attendance studies since 1995.
18 This is based on the professional experience and analysis findings of PROS Consulting on related recreation
center attendance studies since 1995.
19 This facility is currently under construction.
pros "" � F_
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
Haws Athletic Center
Fort Worth
Bertha Collins Sports Complex
Fort Worth
Grapevine Community Activities Center
Grapevine
White Settlement Recreation Center
White Settlement
Roanoke Recreation Center
Roanoke
Lamar Recreation Center
Irving
Austin Recreation Center
Irving
Cimarron Park Recreation Center
Irving
Houston Recreation Center
Irving
Northwest Recreation Center
Irving
Georgia Farrow Recreation Center
Irving
Senter Recreation Center
Irving
Lee Park Recreation Center
Irving
Lively Point Recreation Center
Irving
Mustang Park Recreation Center
Irving
Northwest Park Recreation Center
Irving
Dottie Lynn Recreation Center
Arlington
Elzie Odom Athletic Center
Arlington
Hugh Smith Recreation Center
Arlington
Cliff Nelson Recreation Center
Arlington
Meadowbrook Recreation Center
Arlington
Coppell Aquatic and Recreation Center
Coppell
Farmers Branch Community Center
Farmer's Branch
Charley Taylor Recreation Center
Grand Prairie
Dalworth Recreation Center
Grand Prairie
GPX Skate Park and Entertainment Center
Grand Prairie
Rosemead Recreation Center
Carrollton
Crosby Road Recreation Center
Carrollton
Lewisville Recreation Center
Lewisville
Arcadia Recreation Center
Dallas
Marcus Park Recreation Center
Dallas
Polk Recreation Center
Dallas
Jaycee Recreation Center
Dallas
Martin Weiss Recreation Center
Dallas
Bachman Recreation Center
Dallas
Arlington Park Recreation Center
Dallas
Thurgood Marshall Recreation Center
Dallas
Kiest Recreation Center
Dallas
Beckley -Saner Recreation Center
Dallas
Eloise Lundy Recreation Center
Dallas
Anita Martinez Recreation Center
Dallas
Walnut Hill Recreation Center
Dallas
.. 30
NOFiW RvE w4 RHe H14 Li
N
RECREATION CENTER LOCATIONS
There were 49 identified recreation centers within the 30- minute drive time region, with the closest
facilities being the North Richland Hills Recreation Center (within a five minute drive) and the NRH
Centre currently under construction (within a 10 minute drive). The remainder of the facilities ranged
from a 15 to 30 minute drive from the study area. The vast majority of facilities are located east of
North Richland Hills in the communities of Irving (east), Arlington (southeast), Grand Prairie (east),
Carrollton (northeast), and Dallas (east), Almost all neighboring cities feature a recreation and /or
community center that serve the needs of their residents.
RECREATION CENTER SIZES
Recreation centers identified in this assessment range all sizes from smaller facilities of 15,000 — 25,000
square feet with limited amenities, to those 100,000 square feet or more that feature numerous
amenities. The facilities closest to the study area are either in the moderate size (45,000 — 75,000
square feet) or large size (100,000 square feet or more) categories.
RECREATION CENTER AMENITIES
The basic and most common amenities of the recreation centers within a 30- minute drive of the study
area are:
• Multi- purpose classrooms and activity areas
• Fitness and exercise area
• Indoor gyms and /or sport courts
Some of the larger recreation centers also feature the following amenities:
• Indoor climbing wall
• Indoor running track
• Indoor pool and aquatic areas
• Outdoor pools and aquatic areas
31 Consul*tir g +•
Grapevine Community Activities Center
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
SPORTS COMPLEXES
Sports complexes within a 30- minute drive time of the Southside of North Richland Hills were
researched and a total of 24 were identified. These complexes could involve one or more of the
following amenities:
• Multiple baseball and /or softball fields
• Multiple soccer, football and /or rugbee fields (indoor and /or outdoor)
• Support amenities such as concession stands and permanent restrooms
It is possible there are additional sports complexes not identified in this assessment due to the lack of
information available on the internet of similar facilities in cities within the region. The 16 complexes
identified are detailed in the table below, listed roughly from closest to furthest away from the study
area of this analysis.
Speed Soccer
North Richland Hills
Green Valley Community Park
North Richland Hills
Holiday Lane Athletic Fields
North Richland Hills
Walkers Creek Park
North Richland Hills
Keller Sports Complex
Keller
Keller Sports Park
Keller
Blue Sky Sports Center
Keller
Arena Athletics
Euless
Meadowpark Athletic Complex
Bedford
Rockwood Park Sports Complex
Fort Worth
Gateway Ball Park
Fort Worth
Texas Advantage Sports Complex
Fort Worth
Oak Grove Park
Grapevine
Harold Patterson Sports Complex
Arlington
Mansfield Sports Complex
Mansfield
Big League Dreams
Mansfield
Andrew Brown Community Park
Coppell
Bakersfield Park
Flower Mound
South Roanoke Park
Roanoke
Alfred J. Loos Stadium and Sports Complex
Addison
Inwood Soccer Center
Addison
Chinn Chapel Soccer Complex
Lewisville
Ross Stewart Soccer Complex
Farmers Branch
Sportsplex at Valleyview
Dallas
SPORTS COMPLEX LOCATIONS
The identified sport complexes were well distributed within the 30- minute drive time region, with five of
the 24 facilities being within a 15- minute drive of the study area. The majority of facilities featured
either diamond sports fields for baseball and /or softball, or rectangular fields for soccer, football and /or
rugbee. A limited number of complexes feature both diamond and rectangular sports fields.
.. 32
rvo5 *x Ric HUwxc wisps
NFU
SPORTS COMPLEX SIZES
The sport complexes identified in this assessment vary in size from two to eight or more fields, with
most complexes having four or eight fields of varied size. Field size can vary between regulation adult
baseball, softball, and youth baseball dimensions in diamond fields, and youth and adult sizes in soccer
fields.
SPORTS COMPLEX AMENITIES
Generally, the most common amenities among the sport complexes within the region include, but are
not limited to:
• Multiple sports fields (diamond, rectangular, or both)
• Field lighting (about 500 of sport complexes have lighting)
• Concession stand(s)
• Picnic area
• Playground
• Restrooms
• Parking
33 c{7nS1..Ilti, g ••
Walkers Creek Softball Complex — North Richland Hills
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
WATER PARKS
There were four water parks identified within the 30- minute drive region of the study area, of which one
of the most popular is in North Richland Hills. These facilities were identified based upon their focus on
water features, rides and supporting amenities. There are some recreation centers, such as Keller
Pointe in Keller, that feature extensive aquatic facilities, but these were only identified once in the
regional assessment and not included in both categories. There is a water park at Great Wolf Lodge in
Grapevine that was also not included in this analysis because of the restricted access to hotel guests
only.
The table below lists identified water parks in the 30- minute drive time region in order from closest to
furthest away from the study area.
NRH2O Family Waterpark
Hurricane Harbor
Hawaiian Falls
Bahama Beach Waterpark
North Richland Hills
Arlington
Roanoke
Dallas
WATER PARK LOCATIONS
The water parks identified range from 10 minutes to 30 minutes away from the study area, with the
closest facility being located in North Richland Hills.
WATER PARK SIZES
The largest water park within the evaluated region is Hurricane Harbor in Arlington, and the smallest is
Bahama Beach Waterpark in Dallas. The NRH2O facility in North Richland Hills is moderately sized in
comparison to either of these facilities.
WATER PARK AMENITIES
The most common amenities of the water parks identified include, but are not limited to:
• Multiple body slides
• Single or multiple tube rides
• Large swimming and/or wave pool
• Small children play area / sprayground
• Picnic areas
• Concessions
• Special event / large group area
NRH20 Family Waterpark —
North Richland Hills
34
NOFiW RvE w4 RHe H14 Li
N
HOCKEY FACILITIES
There are only four identified hockey facilities that feature rinks of NHL regulation size within the 30-
minute drive time region of the study area, with the closest facility being in North Richland Hills. There
are additional hockey facilities in the Dallas -Fort Worth metro -plex, but are outside of the 30- minute
drive time region. Most of the additional facilities are located in Richardson, Plano, Frisco, McKinney,
and Denton.
A table listing hockey facilities from closest to furthest away from the study area is provided below.
Nytex Sports Centre
ICE at The Parks Arlington
Dr Pepper Starcenter Farmers Branch
HOCKEY FACILITY LOCATIONS
Hockey facilities within the evaluated region ranged from a 10 minute to a 30 minute drive from the
Southside of North Richland Hills. The closest facility, which is in North Richland Hills, is home to the
Brahmas Hockey Team — a professional team in the Central Hockey League.
HOCKEY FACILITY SIZES
The hockey facilities identified ranged in size from a single ice rink to multiple ice rinks. The largest
facilities are the Nytex Sports Centre in North Richland Hills and the Dr Pepper Starcenter in Farmers
Branch.
HOCKEY FACILITY AMENITIES
The larger hockey facilities feature multiple ice rinks, concessions, spectator stands, team locker rooms,
small child play area, and retail sales. Some facilities also offer indoor soccer amenities to broaden
facility usage and revenue generation opportunities. The smaller facilities typically only provide a single
ink with locker/changing rooms.
35 Consul'tir g •
Polar Ice House Grapevine
NYTEX Sports Centre, Brahmas Minor League Hockey Team — photo
courtesy of www.brahmas.com
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL AMENITIES
There are additional amenities within the 30- minute drive time region of the study area that serve
recreational interests and needs, and/or are regional tourism attractions. These include, but are not
limited to:
• Six Flags Over Texas, Arlington
• The Ballpark at Arlington (Texas Rangers), Arlington
• Cowboy Stadium, Arlington
• Fort Worth Zoo, Fort Worth
• Amon Carter Museum, Fort Worth
• Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, Fort Worth
• Cabelas, Fort Worth
• Texas Motor Speedway, Fort Worth
• Lake Grapevine, Grapevine
• Gaylord Texan Resort, Grapevine
• Great Wolf Lodge, Grapevine
• National Scouting Museum, Irving
• Irving Arts Center, Irving
• Lone Star Park, Grand Prairie
• Verizon Center, Grand Prairie
• Eagle Mountain Lake, Saginaw
• Lake Lewisville, Lewisville
• American Airlines Center, Dallas
• Dallas Zoo, Dallas
• Dallas Nature and Science Museum, Dallas
• Fair Park, Dallas
I
36
NOFiN RvE Ht RNO H�4ti
Tnt C- of C,,
Opportunity Analysis
An opportunity analysis was performed to specifically identify facilities and /or amenities that may have
the greatest potential for success and sustainable operation in the Southside of North Richland Hills.
Much of the categorization of opportunities in this analysis is based on the industry experience of the
PROS Consulting Team having conducted over 700 similar projects and studies over the last 15 years
throughout the United States. This analysis is illustrated in the tables that follow.
SERVICE MARKET ANALYSIS
The first opportunity analysis was performed based on the number of existing facilities within the 3Q-
minute drive time region of the study area. These results are based on multiple variables such as:
• Number of current facilities
• Unique service market of facilities
• Population density
• Household income
• Operational costs
Facility / Amenity
Recreation centers
Sport complexes
Water parks
Water parks
2
3
■
4
• •
5
1
Museums
3
4
5
1
2
4
5
Hockey facilities
Golf courses
I Amusement parks
Museums
Outdoor performance venues
Canopy tours
1
3
4
5
2
3
4
5
1
3
4
5
1
2
4
5
1
2
3
5
1
2
3
4
Nature center
Community gardens
Traditional parks
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
4
5
The following results were derived from this analysis of different potential facilities to be located in the
study area. These results are the culmination of reviewing the variables listed above.
Canopy tours
Water parks
Community gardens
Hockey facilities
Nature center
Amusement parks
Outdoor performance venues
Museums
Traditional parks
SITE /ATTRACTION ALTERNATIVES
The second opportunity analysis reviews partnership potential and likely operating costs of each of the
identified facilities. The evaluation of these facilities is based on the research and experience of the
consulting team over the last 15 years. These results are detailed in the tables on the following page.
37 proS;,lti'
on s uiltil g F
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
PARTNERSHIP POTENTIAL.
Facility / Amenity
TIUMI
o • • -
• •
.
Recreation centers
1
2
3
4
5
Sport complexes
1
2
Water parks
4
5
Water parks
1
2
2
4
5
Hockey facilities
1
2
3
2
5
Golf courses
1
2
3
11
5
Amusement parks
1
2
3
4
4
Museums
1
2
3
5
5
Outdoor performance venues
1
2
3
4
5
Canopy tours
1
2
3
4
14
Nature center
1
2
3
6
5
Community gardens
2
3
4
Traditional parks
j
3
4
5
OPERATIONAL COSTS
SUMMARY OF OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS RESULTS
The cumulative results of each opportunity analysis are summarized in the table below, with the three
highest scoring options highlighted in yellow.
Facility / Amenity
Recreation centers
771
2
2
5
Sport complexes
3
3
8
Water parks
3
3
3
9
Hockey facilities
2
4
2
8
Golf courses
1
4
2
7
Amusement parks
2
5
4
11
Museums
3
4
2
9
Outdoor performance venues
4
4
4
12
Canopy tours
5
5
5
15
Nature center
5
4
4
13
Community gardens
5
5
4
14
Traditional parks
3
1
2
6
I
,• 38
N H
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The key findings of the assessment and analysis are that there are a large number of regional attractions
within a 30- minute drive time of the Southside of North Richland Hills, and in fact many of these
attractions are within the City of North Richland Hills. There are a substantial number of recreational
centers, sports complexes, hockey facilities, water parks, amusement parks, regional parks, museums,
professional sport stadiums, and other attractions that serve the needs and interests of residents and
visitors in the region. Based on this assessment, it is recommended that the facilities explored for the
former Food Lion site and possibly for Fossil Creek Park try not to compete with these other attractions.
Unique facilities and amenities that serve residents and provide a draw for visitors include the following
those detailed below.
FORMER FOOD LION SITE
This site is well located to be a highly valued public asset, but is constrained by a number of factors that
include:
• Existing building that is advised to be removed
• Poor drainage largely resulting from site elevation differences with neighboring properties to
the north and west
• Limited space / acreage; limited road frontage
As a result of these constraints, there are two potential directions that development of this site can
take: (1) use of the existing property with no additional acreage or acquisition, or (2) expansion of the
site with acquisition of the neighboring property bordering Rufe Snow and Glenview Drive. Based upon
review and discussion with leadership of the City, the primary focus of this analysis is based on the first
option - use of the existing property with no additional acreage or acquisition.
Given the layout, configuration, and constraints of the site, the following recommendations have been
developed:
1. Remove the former Food Lion building and related infrastructure. This building is not suitable
for any potential uses that are envisioned, and features multiple structural challenges that
would likely be more expensive to address than the costs of removal and redevelopment.
2. Improve drainage at the site. This can be achieved through one or more of the following
options;
a. Site elevation solutions addressing neighboring properties to the north and west
b. New storm water management infrastructure
c. Construction of an interpretive wetland that manages storm water runoff while
providing green infrastructure
3. Develop community assets at the site. To improve the
value this site provides to the surrounding neighborhoods
and community, it is recommended that one or more of
the following amenities be considered for this site:
a. Special events park
b. Special events center (building)
c. Sprayground / splashpad
d. Community /interpretive gardens
e. Trails
p ros-. " ? F
Example sprayscape
Regional Assessment and Opportunity Analysis
4. Additional uses of the site can be considered. The prevailing additional use of the site that has
been discussed is to relocate the City's animal shelter to this location. This is only
recommended if it does not impeded the use of the site as a community asset that includes one
or more of the other recommended amenities.
FOSSIL CREEK PARK
Fossil Creek Park is a gem in the City of North Richland Hills, with potential to provide more
opportunities for residents and visitors to enjoy the site. The current uses of the site include softball
fields, picnic area, and nature trail. Based on evaluation of the site and other similar athletic amenities
in the City, it is recommended to repurpose the park from the current uses as a softball complex. Based
on the size, location, and notable natural resources it is recommended this park be utilized more as a
nature center with other unique attractions. Any development must be attentive to the potential for
flooding at the site. The primary recommendations for Fossil Creek
Park include:
1. Nature park with limited facilities or development.
Limited exhibits, displays, and interpretive demonstration
areas could be incorporated into the site to enhance the
interpretive value provided in the user experience.
2. Canopy tour facility. A canopy tour facility that could be
developed and operated by a private partner could provide
a combination of educational and recreational experiences
to visitors of all ages, backgrounds and abilities. This would
be a unique facility in the Dallas — Fort Worth metro -plex,
and likely a major regional attraction.
3. Trails. The development and maintenance of trails
throughout the property, with a possible suspension bridge
or zipline across Fossil Creek would continue the existing
use of the property by trail goers.
,r 40
Leff: example boardwalk within interpretive wetland; !Right: example glass Douse special events center
Top: interpretive trail;
Bottom: canopy tour
rvo5 *x Ric HUwxc wisps
NFU
While there are currently no canopy tour facilities operating in the metro -plex, there are multiple such
facilities in Texas and throughout the United States. The table below details three operators in Texas
that are distinctly canopy tour facilities versus the more traditional challenge course amenity.
Cypress Valley Canopy Tours Austin, Texas 512 -264 -8880 www .cvoressvallevcanoovtours.com
Wimberley Zipline Adventures Wimberley, Texas 512- 847 -9990 www.wimberievzlollne.com
WIRED Zipline Challenge Course Canton, Texas 903 - 567 -2681 www.ziDtheusa.com
ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS
There are additional recommendations that were developed in association with
this assessment and analysis. These include the following:
• Develop a designated sense of place within the Southside area of North
Richland Hills. This can be completed either through formal or informal
action by the City, and should include a consistent branding, signage,
and beautification campaign. This would align with the current
neighborhood revitalization priorities of the City for the Southside area.
Example street banners defining
an area within a city
• Consider working with the private landowner of
the former mall site near the North Hills Hospital
to develop a regional attraction. One of the
attractions that would likely perform well at this
location is TopGolf, a recreational golf amenity
that compliments the golf courses in the region.
TopGolf currently has two locations in North
Texas — Dallas and Allen — and the market area of
North Richland Hills would not compete with
these other facilities. These facilities generally
require 10 -15 acres for their developed amenities,
with additional space for parking.
Opposite: Large oaks at Fossil Creek Park
41 consultil g
�
TopGolf — Woad Dale, Illinois
~_- .�
Woo v
AMP
fb
jw
A l
Ai
- r1l,
- As
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Police Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Jimmy Perdue Agenda No. A.4
Subject: Discussion on Part-Time Neighborhood Initiative Coordinator Position (10
Minutes)
Summarv: The Neighborhood Initiative Program began in January of 2003 and was
expanded in fiscal year 2009 -10 to include volunteers assisting in repairing the exterior
of properties that meet the qualifications of either being low income, a senior citizen,
single parent or persons with disabilities. The funding source came from a one time
transfer of monies from a TXU settlement case. All other funding comes from volunteers
and businesses that make monetary donations.
In evaluating other revitalization programs, some have been very successful by working
through a separate non - profit organization that collects donations and manages their
volunteers and projects.
The discussion tonight will be whether to contract with the Community Enrichment
Center to hire a Part-Time 'NIP Coordinator who will manage and coordinate volunteers
for specific projects and most importantly, market the program, write grants for future
funding and meet with businesses to obtain more donations. We feel this position will be
most successful in obtaining more donations due to CEC having a 501(c)3 Non- Profit
exemption where businesses can use their donations as a tax credit.
General Descriration: The Neighborhood Initiative Program has been quite successful
since its inception. From fiscal year 2006 -07 to 2008 -09, we have seen an average of
75 project requests each year with approximately 306 volunteers. In 2009 -10, the NIP
Program was expanded to include a weekend where volunteers come together to make
repairs and cleaning up properties for those who cannot do it themselves. We call this
our "NIP Blitz." We have had two (2) "blitzes" and completed 28 projects where many
had significant repairs needed. Our volunteer base has grown from 306 to almost 1,000
volunteers. With that, we are averaging about $10,200 each year in donations.
If this P/T position is approved, the city will contract with the Community Enrichment
Center for $20,000, to hire a part-time employee who will assist us in coordinating our
citizens, employees and our church volunteers for the "blitzes." They will be required not
only to coordinate the volunteers but they will market the program, seek grant monies
and visit with businesses to obtain larger donations that hopefully will be the only
funding sources needed to continue this program. We are hopeful that through the use
of their 501(c)3 Tax Exemption, more businesses will be willing to give larger donations.
If council agrees with contracting with CEC, then the $20,000 needed for this position
will come from the NIP Donation Account. The effectiveness of this proposal hinges on
this position being able to increase contributions by more than $20,004 thereby at least
offsetting its own cost. If this proves not to be the case after an adequate testing period,
staff will recommend elimination of this position.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented lay: Agenda No. B.0
Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive
Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government
Code
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Agenda No. B.1
Subject: Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for
Consultation with Attorney regarding Pending Litigation — 1) State of Texas v. City of
North Richland Hills (No. 2011 - 002840 -1); 2) State of Texas v. City of North Richland
Hills (No. 2011 - 000462 -1)
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Agenda No. B.2
Subject: Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.072, Texas Government Code to
deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property — southeast quadrant
of City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. C.0
Subject Adjournment
City of North. Richland Hills
City Council Regular 'Meeting Agenda
North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
Monday, July 25, 2011
7:00 P.M.
A.0 Call to Order - Mavor Trevino
A.1 Invocation - Councilman Rodriquez
A.2 Pledge - Councilman Rodriquez
A.3 Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(sl
No items for this category.
A.4 Citizens Presentation
An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not
scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or
Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a
Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the
start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits
deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda,
therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought
up during the citizens presentation.
A.5 Removal of Item(s) from Consent Aaenda
B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed
to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council
Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered.
B.1 Approval of Minutes of July 11. 2011 Citv Council Meeting
C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items for this category.
D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Items to follow do not require a public hearing.
No items for this category.
E.0 PUBLIC WORKS
No items for this category.
F.0 GENERAL ITEMS
F.1 GN 2011 -055 ADr)ointments to Civil Service Commission — Places 1, 2, 3
F.2 GIN 2011 -056 Apr)ointments to Boards & Commissions — Place 7
G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS
G.1 Action on Anv Item discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session
Aaenda
H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS
H.1 Announcements — Councilman Whitson
H.2 Adiournment
140WLeJm
!NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Mayor Oscar Trevino Agenda No. A.0
Subject Call to Order - Mayor Trevino
140WLoJi
!NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Councilman Tito Rodriguez Agenda No. A.1
Subject Invocation - Councilman Rodriguez
140WLoJi
!NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Councilman Tito Rodriguez Agenda No. A.2
Subject Pledge - Councilman Rodriguez
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Subject Special Presentation(s) and Recognition(s)
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. A.3
No items for this category.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25-2011
Presented by: Agenda No. A.4
Subject: Citizens Presentation
An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not
scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at
a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting
Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council
meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any
subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to
discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. A.5
Subject: Removal of Item(s) from Consent Agenda
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Agenda No. B.0
Subject: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to
require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Agenda No. B.1
Subject: Approval of Minutes of July 11, 201'1 City Council Meeting
Recommendation:
To approve the minutes of the July 11, 2011 City Council Meeting.
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 — JULY 11, 2011
WORK SESSION
The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in work session on the
11 day of July 2011 at 5:45 p.m. in the City Council Workroom prior to the 7:00 p.m.
regular Council meeting.
Present: Oscar Trevino
Tim Barth
Tito Rodriguez
Ken Sapp
Tom Lombard
David Whitson
Scott Turnage
Tim Welch
Staff Members: Mark Hindman
Jared Miller
Karen Bostic
Jimmy Perdue
Mike Curtis
Vickie Loftice
Patricia Hutson
George Staples
Mary Peters
John Pitstick
Craig Hulse
Joann Stout
Gregory Van N ie
Dave Pendley
Andy Kancel
Kristin Weegar
Stephanie East
Call to Order
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern, Council, Place 4
Council, Place 1
Council, Place 2
Council, Place 3
Council, Place 5
Council, Place 6
Council, Place 7
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Director of Public Safety
Managing Director
Managing Director
City Secretary
City Attorney
Public Information Officer
Director of Planning &r Development
Director of Economic Development
Director of Neighborhood Services
uwenhuizeAssistant Public Works Director
Building Official
Assistant Police Chief
Sr. Mgmt. Asst. — Dev. Services
Environmental Health Supervisor
Mayor Trevino called the work session to order at 5:54 p.m.
A.1 Discuss Items from Reaular Citv Council Meeting
There were no questions from the Council.
A.2 Updates to Food Establishment Ordinance
Stephanie East, Environmental Health Supervisor, presented a PowerPoint presentation
highlighting proposed changes to the Food Service Establishment Ordinance. The
proposed changes include updates and clarifications of the existing code and sets
specific guidelines for new construction and remodeled facilities, outlines the
administration of re- inspection fees and includes changes to encourage businesses to
internally regulate their operations. Council questioned how the establishments would
be notified of the new ordinance. Ms. East advised the majority of the changes are
current policy but that the establishments would be notified in writing. Council
concurred with the changes and the proposed ordinance will be placed on a future
council agenda for Council action.
A.3 Updates to the Child Care Ordinance
Stephanie East, Environmental Health Supervisor, presented a PowerPoint presentation
highlighting proposed changes to the Child Care Ordinance. The proposed ordinance
will replace the existing code and reflects state law changes and health and safety
requirements that will assist in protecting the overall safety and welfare of children.
Some of the changes include clarification on the issuance and renewal of child care
permits, specific procedures for releasing children from the center, construction
guidelines, and standards for facilities that provide evening and night care. Council
concurred with the updated Child Care Ordinance and the proposed ordinance will be
placed on a future council agenda for action.
A.4 Discuss Possible Amendments to Section 118 -727 of the North Richland Hills
Code of Ordinances "Customary Home Occupations"
Mr. John Pitstick, Director of Development, highlighted proposed amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance regarding regulations for customary home occupations. This item is
also on the regular Council agenda for action. The proposed amendments refine the
regulations to require primary residence for conducting home occupations and clarifies
what will be allowed and not allowed for home occupations. Changes include:
• New paragraph added regarding physical appearance and visible evidence that
includes restrictions on visual or audible interference, restricts additional solid
waste, restricts outdoor assembly and restricts storage of business supplies.
• New paragraph on traffic and parking that restricts on- street and off - street
parking to the drive way and curb immediately adjacent to the premises and the
total number of vehicles allowed.
• Clarifications added to home uses allowing telecommuting and professional
consultants rendering services in a home office but have personal contacts off -
site.
• Added hours of operation for private tutoring.
• Added land uses not allowed including restrictions on contractor's offices,
electronics repair, lending agencies, health and social and psychological
counseling.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed changes and had
questions on parking and outdoor assembly for home occupations. As a result of their
discussion staff added to the regulations, "No outdoor assembly of employees, clients or
equipment at home residences ". Council was advised action on the item could be
postponed if Council had questions /concerns. Council concurred with the proposed
changes and took formal action on the item during the regular council meeting.
B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The Citv Council may enter into closed Executive
Session to discuss the followina as authorized by Chapter 551. Texas
Government Code.
B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code for
Consultation with Attornev reaardina Pending Litiaation - 1) State of Texas v. Citv
of North Richland Hills (No. 2011 - 002840 -1); and 2) State of Texas v. Citv of
North Richland Hills (No. 2011- 000462 -1).
B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code, to
consult with city's attornev to seek advice about pendinq or contemplated
litigation or a settlement offer or on a matter in which the duty of the attornev to
the governmental bodv under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional
Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Texas
Government Code.
Mayor Trevino announced at 6:28 p.m. that the Council would convene into Executive
Session as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, pursuant to Section
551.071 for the following:
a) Consultation with Attorney to seek advice about pending litigation
1) State of Texas v. City of North Richland Hills (No. 2011- {102840 -1); and
2) State of Texas v. City of North Richland Hills (No. 2011- 000462 -1)
b) Consultation with City's Attorney to seek advice about pending or
contemplated litigation or a settlement offer or on a matter in which the duty of
the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of
Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter
551 of the Texas Government Code.
C.0 Adiournment
Mayor Trevino announced at 6:47 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to the regular
Council meeting.
N* Cie1W- 1 ;V16111► Eli 10141=1 =1 I I ► IL9
A.0
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order July 11, 2011 at 7:00 p.m.
I ZT91 I wey-A1 I I
Present: Oscar Trevino
Tim Barth
Tito Rodriguez
Ken Sapp
Tom Lombard
David Whitson
Scott Turnage
Tim Welch
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern, Council, Place 4
Council, Place 1
Council, Place 2
Council, Place 3
Council, Place b
Council, Place 6
Council, Place 7
Staff
Mark Hindman
Jared Miller
Karen Bostic
Jimmy Perdue
Mike Curtis
Vickie Loftice
Patricia Hutson
George Staples
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Director of Public Safety
Managing Director
Managing Director
City Secretary
Attorney
A.1
INVOCATION
Councilman Lombard gave the invocation.
A.2
FLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilman Lombard led the pledge of allegiance.
A.3
SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S)
No items for this category.
A.4
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
►m
A.5
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
None.
B.0
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
APPROVED
B.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 13, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
B.2 APPROVAL OF (MINUTES OF JUNE 27, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILMAN
RODRIGUEZ SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
C.1
ZC 2009 -08 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM
GENE SCHAY FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "R -1 -S" SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY
TO "R -2" SINGLE FAMILY ON A PORTION OF LOT 3R, BLOCK 14,
GLENANN ADDITION — ORDINANCE NO. 3109
(LOCATED AT 8620 MARTIN DRIVE - 0.532 ACRES.)
APPROVED
Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing.
Mr. Gene Schay, applicant, came forward to request a zoning change from R -1 -S to R -2
on a 6.532 acre parcel.
Mr. John Pitstick, Director of Planning, summarized the item. The applicant is
requesting the zoning change due to a larger lot being sub - divided. The intent is to
construct a new single- family residence on the new lot being created on the property.
The remaining portion of the lot is sufficient in size to remain in the R -1 -S zoning district.
A replat is being presented concurrently with the zoning request. The Planning and
Zoning Commission initially recommended approval on August 19, 2010. The applicant
requested continuance at the September 13 meeting and withdrew his request at the
October 11 meeting to resolve some unexpected issues. The applicant is now ready to
move forward with the zoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval on June 16, 2011.
Mayor Trevino called for comments from those opposed or in support of the request.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing.
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2009 -08, ORDINANCE NO. 3109..
COUNCILMAN WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0.
C.2
RP 2009 -05 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM
GENE SCHAY FOR A RE -PLAT OF LOT 3R, BLOCK 14, GLENANN ADDITION INTO
LOTS 3R1 AND 3R2, BLOCK 14, GLENANN ADDITION (LOCATED AT 8620
MARTIN DRIVE - 1.960 ACRES.)
APPROVED
Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing.
Mr. Gene Schay, applicant, came forward to request approval of the replat associated
with the previous zoning case.
Mr. John Pitstick, Director of Planning, summarized the item. The replat divides the
current 1.95 acre parcel into two lots, one 0.532 acre lot and a 1.41 acre lot. The replat
creates the ability to construct a new single- family home on the proposed 3R2.
Sidewalks are required as part of this subdivision and the developer will be required to
assume 100% of the amount required for sidewalk improvements. The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended approval on June 16.
Mayor Trevino called for comments from those opposed or in support of the request.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing.
COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ MOVED To APPROVE RP 2809 -05. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE
SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
Mayor Pro Tern Barth recognized Brandon Cleitz, Boy Scout Troop 205, who is working
on his citizenship in community merit badge.
C.3
TR 2011-02 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO
SECTION 118 -727 OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES
"CUSTOMARY HOME OCCUPATIONS" —
ORDINANCE NO. 3146
APPROVED
Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing.
Mr. John Pltstick, Director of Development, presented the request. After a review of the
regulations for customary home occupations Staff is recommending the regulations be
refined to require primary residence for conducting home occupations to clarify what is
allowed and not allowed for home occupations. Recommended revisions include:
• Adding a new paragraph regarding physical appearance and visible evidence
that includes restrictions on visual or audible interference, restricts additional
solid waste, restricts outdoor assembly and restricts storage of business
supplies.
• Adding a new paragraph on traffic and parking that restricts on- street and off -
street parking to the driveway and curb immediately adjacent to the premises as
well as the total number of vehicles allowed for home based businesses.
• Clarifications added to the home uses; allowing telecommuting and professional
consultants rendering services in a home office, but have personal contacts off -
site.
• Hours of operations for private tutoring.
• Added land use not allowed including restrictions on contractor's offices,
electronics repair, lending agencies, health and social and psychological
counseling.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed changes and questioned
parking and outdoor assembly for home occupations. The Commission discussed the
new craze in personal training including neighborhood boot camps where several
individuals perform calisthenics in neighborhoods, open spaces and parks. In
response, staff added a sentence in the proposed regulations to restrict any paid
personal training instructor for a boot camp to be limited to appropriate commercial
zoned areas or be limited to formal city recreational programs for public parks and open
space uses. The proposed ordinance was recommended for approval by the Planning
and Zoning Commission on June 16.
Mayor Trevino called for comments from those opposed or in support of the request.
Ms. Cindy Carriger, 8448 Ruthette Drive, questioned if contractors without employees
who work out of their homes is a non - allowed use and why there is a prohibition against
outside storage of supplies and business items at residences.
Mr. Pitstick advised a contractor would be permitted to work out of his home as long as
there were not any employees who assembled at the residence. Mr. Pitstick also
explained the reason outside storage would not be permitted.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing.
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED To APPROVE TR 2011 -02, ORDINANCE No. 3146.
COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
D.0
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Items to follow do not require a public hearing.
No items for this category.
PUBLIC WORKS
E.1
PW 2011 -011 AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $60,000 TO TEAGUE, NALL AND PERKINS FOR THE GPS
MONUMENT UPDATE PHASE II PROJECT.
APPROVED
Mr. Gregory VanNieuwenhuize, Assistant Public Works Director, presented the item.
Council is being asked to award a professional services agreement for the GPS
Monument Update Phase II Project (Project No. PW1101) in the Capital Projects
Budget. Staff is recommending approval of an agreement with Teague, Nall and
Perkins in the amount of $60,000. Some of the items within the agreement's scope of
work include readjustment of 1990 leveling data. readjustment of 2008 control stations,
mapping grade positions of existing city benchmarks, existing GPS and Azimuth
monumentation reconnaissance and establishment of new control stations.
COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE PW ,2011- 011, APPROVING THE PROFESSIONAL
SERVCIES AGREEMENT WITH TEAGUE, NALL AND PERKINS IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,000 FOR
THE GPS MONUMENT UPDATE, PHASE II PROJECT (PW1101). COUNCILMAN WHITSON
SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
E.2
PW 2011 -012 APPROVE THE 2011 PREVENTIVE STREET
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
APPROVED
Councilman Welch, Chair of the CIP Committee, presented the Committee's
recommendation to approve the program.
Mr. Jimmy Cates, Public Works Operations Manager, presented the 2011 Street
Maintenance Program. The program submitted to and approved by the CIP Committee
consists of an asphalt overlay on 17 streets, a slurry seal on 18 streets and crack
sealing 18 streets.
COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2011 PREVENTIVE STREET MAINTENANCE
PROGRAM. COUNCILMAN SAPP SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
F.1
GN 2011 -049 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
APPROVED
Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary, presented the following Council nominations for
appointment to the Boards and Commissions.
Keep North Richland Hills Beautiful Commission
Place 1
Place 3
Place 5
Board of Adjustment
Place 1
Place 3
Place 5
Dianne Spradling
Justin Welborn
Donah Tyner
Jim Kemp
Robert Housewright
Thomas Duer
Library Board
Place 1
Don Tipps
Place 3
Mary 5hilcutt
Place 5
Avis Crisp
Park and Recreation Board
Place 1
Tracye Tipps
Place 3
Brad Greene
Place 5
Marty Kusmierski
Alternate
Paul Pena
Planning & Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee
Place 1
Mark Haynes
Place 3
Don Bowen
Place 5
Dianna Madar
Substandard Building Board
Place 1
Gary Cope
Place 3
Deryl Brown
Place 5
John Larriviere
Teen Court Advisory Board
Place 1 Dylan Barth
Place 3 Ronald Moore
Councilman Whitson will be submitting his Place 5 nomination to the Teen Court
Advisory Beard at a future council meeting. Councilman Welch will be presenting his
nominations for Place 7 appointments at an upcoming Council meeting.
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2411 -049, APPROVING THE COUNCIL
MEMBER NOMINATIONS AS PRESENTED TO THE BOARDS $ COMMISSIONS.. COUNCILMAN
WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -4.
F.2
GN 2411 -450 APPOINTMENTS TO THE ANIMAL ADOPTION AND RESCUE
CENTER COMMITTEE- PLACES 1, 2 AND 3
APPROVED
Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary, presented the item. Council is being asked to
consider three appointments to the Animal Adoption and Rescue Center Advisory
Committee. Terms of office have expired for the individuals serving in Places 1 and 3
and the Place 2 position is vacant. The ordinance establishing the Committee requires
the individual serving in Place 1 to be a licensed veterinarian, Place 2 a city official and
Place 4 an individuals whose duties include the daily operation of the City's Adoption and
Rescue Center. Currently serving in Place 1 is Jed Ford, a licensed veterinarian and
Place 3 is Joann Stout, Director of Neighborhood Services. Former Council member
John Lewis vacated the Place 2 position. Council was advised that Jed Ford had
agreed to serve another term in the Place 1 position.
Mayor Trevino called for nominations to Places 2 and 3.
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD NOMINATED COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ TO THE PLACE 2 POSITION.
COUNCILMAN WHITSON NOMINATED JOANN STOUT TO THE PLACE 3 POSITION.
COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS AND TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT
OF JED FORD TO PLACE 1, COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ TO PLACE 2 AND MS. JOANN STOUT TO
PLACE 3. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
F.3
GN 2011 -051 APPOINTMENT OF BOARD DELEGATE TO REINVESTMENT ZONE
NO. 1 AND REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 2
APPROVED
Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary, presented the item. Council is being asked to
appoint a council member to fill the vacancies left by former Council member John
Lewis on the Board of Directors of Reinvestment Zone No. 1 and Reinvestment Zone
No. 2. Reinvestment Zone No. 1 consists of five council members and Reinvestment
Zone No. 2 consists of six council members. At the recommendation of the City's
Financial Advisor, the Council has historically appointed the same council members to
both boards with the exception of the one extra member on Reinvestment Zone No. 2.
Currently serving on Reinvestment Zone No. 1 are Mayor Trevino, Councilman Whitson,
Councilman Turnage and Councilman Welch. Currently serving on Reinvestment Zone
No. 2 are Mayor Trevino, Councilman Sapp, Councilman Whitson, Councilman Turnage
and Councilman Welch.
COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO NOMINATED COUNCILMAN SAPP TO REINVESTMENT ZONE
NO. 1 AND COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ TO REINVESTMENT ZONE No. 2.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER NOMINATIONS, NOMINATIONS WERE CLOSED. COUNCILMAN
TURNAGE SECONDED THE NOMINATIONS.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
FA
GN 2011 -052 APPOINTMENTS TO RED LIGHT CAMERA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPROVED
Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary presented the fallowing Council members annual
appointments to the Red Light Advisory Committee.
Mayor Trevino
Mayor Pro Tem Barth
Councilman Rodriguez
Councilman Sapp
Councilman Lombard
Councilman Whitson
Councilman Turnage
Mire Witt
Steve Koons
Bob McCary
Scott Wood
Scott Eager
Gerald Tyner
Pam Hansen
Councilman Welch will present his appointment to the Committee at an upcoming
Council meeting.
COUNCILMAN SAPP MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE RED LIGHT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE SUBMITTED BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL, TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 2012.
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
F.5
GN 2011 -053 APPOINTMENTS TO CONSTRUCTION CODE OF APPEALS
APPROVED
Mr. Dave Pendley, Building Official, presented Staff's recommendations for appointment
to Places 1, 3 5 and 7 on the Construction Code of Appeals Board. Appointments to the
board are recommended by City Staff and appointed by Council and must meet the
requirement of technical expertise in the construction fields. Recommended for Council
approval is the reappointment of Joe Crane (Master Electrician) to Place 1, Robert
Nicholas (Structural Engineer) to Place 3, John Klein (Architect) to Place 5 and W.D.
McCarthy (Master Mechanical Contractor) to Place 7.
COUNCILMAN LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2011 -053 APPROVING THE REAPPOINTMENT
OF JOE CRANE TO PLACE 1, ROBERT NICHOLS TO PLACE 3, JOHN KLEIN TO PLACE 5 AND
W.D. MCCARTHY TO PLACE 7, WITH ALL TERMS EXPIRING IN JUNE OF 2013. COUNCILMAN
RODRIGUEZ SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0.
F.6
GN 2411 -454 BJA JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM LOCAL AWARD -
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -026
APPROVED
Assistant Chief Andy Kancel presented the item. The Police Department is seeking
authorization to pursue grant funds available under the 2011 Bureau of Justice
Assistance Grant (JAG) program. Funds under the program have been allocated to
assist in funding law enforcement programs in the City of North Richland Hills for local
solicitation. To receive the funds North Richland Hills and other cities in the County and
Tarrant County are required to file a joint application after negotiating the sharing of
funds with Tarrant County. The funds from this grant will be used to enhance officer
safety through an advanced force simulation- training program known as FX
Simunitions. The approval of Resolution No. 2011 -026 will authorize application for the
grant and appoint the Public Safety Director as the agent to act for the City relative to
the grant.
COUNCILMAN WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -026. COUNCILMAN SAPP
SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-4.
G.1
ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON WORK
SESSION AGENDA
No action needed.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
H.1
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Barth made the following announcements.
The North Richland Hills Office of Emergency Management and the NRH Amateur
Radio Club invite area residents to earn their entry -level radio license. Training will be
held from 6:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Wednesdays starting July 13th and continuing
through August 3rd. The cost is $38. For additional information, please call 817 -427-
6969.
Dive -in Movies continue on Friday nights at NRH20. Join us on ,July 15 for "Jaws" and
July 22 for "How to Train Your Dragon." Dive -in Movies are free with paid admission to
the park. For more details, please call 817- 427 -6500.
Learn CPR and save a life! The North Richland Hills Fire Department conducts CPR
training classes once each month. The next class is scheduled from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on
Saturday, July 23rd. The cost is $25. The class is American Heart Association
approved and participants will receive a Certification Card. To sign up or get more
information, please call 817- 427 -6966.
Kudos Korner - Dave Pendley and Cary Taylor, Planning & Development Department.
A resident e- mailed thanks to Dave and Gary for the information and assistance they
provided. She had contacted the city planning offices with some questions and
concerns about the building codes for a construction project. Dave and Gary took time
to meet with her and all issues were resolved expeditiously. She said appreciates all
that they do for the community.
Councilman Whitson gave kudos to City Staff for their volunteer work assisting with
traffic control during Dr. Tommy Teague's services.
H.2
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 7:46 p.m.
Oscar Trevino — Mayor
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented lay:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. C.0
Subject PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items for this category
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. D.0
Subject: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Items to follow do not require a public hearing.
No items for this category.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Subject: PUBLIC WORKS
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. E.0
No items for this category.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. F.0
Subject: GENERAL ITEMS
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by: Patricia Hutson
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. F.1
Subject: GN 2011 -055 Appointments to Civil Service Commission — Places 1, 2, 3
Summarv:
Council is being asked to confirm the Mayor's appointments to the Civil Service
Commission.
General Description:
The terms of office for the individuals serving in Places 1, 2 and 3 on the Civil Service
Commission expired June 30, 2011. The Charter stipulates that these appointments are
mayoral appointments with confirmation by two- thirds vote of the Council. The Charter
also stipulates that Position 2 shall be appointed from a list or list of nominees provided
to the Mayor by the City employee associations. If no list is presented, the Mayor may
make the appointment as he deems fit. The associations were notified on July 6 of the
upcoming Place 2 appointment and were asked to submit for the July 25 council agenda
their recommendations to the City Secretary. The North Richland Hills Firefighter's
Association submitted the attached recommendation in support of the reappointment of
September Daniel to Place 2. Mayor Trevino is recommending the following individuals
for Council confirmation:
Place 1 Sally Bustamante term expires 8130/2012
Place 2 September Daniel term expires 8130120112
Place 3 Bill Fenimore term expires 6/3012013
Recommendation:
To take action on the Mayor's appointments.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by: Patricia Hutson
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. F.2
Subject: GN 2011 -056 Appointments to Boards & Commissions - Place 7
Summary:
Councilman Welch is requesting Council to approve his nominations to the Place 7
positions on several of the City's Boards & Commissions.
General Description:
The terms of office for the individuals serving in the Place 7 positions on the following
Boards and Commissions listed below have expired. Chapter 2, Article III, Section 2-
121c of the Code of Ordinances states that the City Council will act upon Council
member nominations for these boards. Councilman Welch is submitting the following
nominations for Council's consideration.
• Keep North Richland Hills Beautiful Commission Holly Bullington
• Board of Adjustment Jerry Henry
• Library Board Jerry Sorenson
• Park and Recreation Board Mike Filis
• Planning & Zoning Commission/
Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Steven Cooper
• Substandard Building Board Robert McCary
• Teen Court Advisory Board Diana Goodwin
• Red Light Camera Advisory Committee Karen Williams
The terms of office for all of the above nominations will expire June 30, 2013.
Recommendation:
To take action on Councilman Welch's nominations to the Place 7 positions on the
above listed Boards & Commissions.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented lay:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. G.0
Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Agenda No. G.1
Subject: Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session
Agenda
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. H.0
Subject: INFORMATION AND REPORTS
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Presented by: Councilman Whitson Agenda No. H.1
Subject: Announcements — Councilman Whitson
Announcements
The City of North Richland Hills reminds all property owners that lawn and landscape
watering is prohibited between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m. Sprinkler systems should be set to
operate in the early morning or late evening, when less water will be lost to evaporation.
If drought conditions persist, Stage 1 of the Drought Contingency Plan may be triggered
soon. This would limit outdoor watering to twice per week. Watch for more information
about watering restrictions on the city's website and in the next city newsletter.
The City of North Richland Hills also encourages residents to take steps to conserve
energy. Efficient use of energy will lower your electricity bills and reduce the strain on
the state's electric grid during the hot summer months. Energy saving tips can be found
on the city's website at www.nrhtx.com.
The North Richland Hills Police Department is accepting applications for the next
Citizens Police Academy. The academy will be held from 0 a.m. to Noon on Thursdays,
starting September 1 and continuing through November 17. Get more information on
the city's website or by calling 817427 -7000.
Kudos Korner
Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do.
Kevin Jackson, Public Works Department - A resident sent an email praising Kevin
after he responded to a water leak. The resident said Kevin was very courteous and
willing to help beyond what would normally be his job description. His behavior was
more appreciated because it is so rarely demonstrated today. "Thanks again to a fine
young man and an asset to the work force," the resident added.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: City Secretary
Presented by:
Council Meeting Date: 7 -25 -2011
Agenda No. H.2
Subject: Adjournment