Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 2012-09-10 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKROOM 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, September 10, 2012 6:00 P.M. A.0 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.1 Special Presentation - Police Department K -9 Unit (10 Minutes) A.2 Discuss Possible Sale of Additional General Obligation Bonds (20 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.087, Texas Government Code to discuss potential Economic Development incentives to business prospect in central part of the city B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code to consult with attorney to seek advice about pending or contemplated litigation; or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the city council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code C.0 Adjournment Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 7, 2012 at a.m. - (.,. 41V6 s ant City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly 1k conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. NRH City Council Agenda — September 10, 2012 Page 1 of 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Monday, September 10, 2012 7:00 P.M. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hard copies of the full City Council agenda information packet are accessible prior to every regularly scheduled Monday Council meeting according to the following locations and schedule: ❑ City Hall on the day of the meeting Additionally, the agenda packet is available for download from the City's web site at www.nrhtx.com after 10 a.m. the day of every regularly scheduled Council meeting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Turnage A.2 Pledge - Councilman Turnage A.3 Special Presentation - Formal Introduction of New Fire Chief A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of August 27, 2012 City Council Meeting NRH City Council Agenda — September 10, 2012 Page 2 of 4 B.2 Approval of Minutes of the August 30, 2012 Special Council Meeting B.3 PW 2012 -023 Approve the "Renewal and Amendment of Interlocal Agreement Court Order No. 107296" with Tarrant County for the Partial Funding of the Construction of the North Tarrant Parkway Project C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2012 -06 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Claymoore Engineering for a Zoning Change from C -2 /HC Heavy Commercial and PD 37 to Redevelopment Planned Development (RD -PD) based on HC zoning on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. D.1 RP 2012 -07 Consideration of a Request from Claymoore Engineering for a Replat to create Lots 1 R2 and 2R2, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition on property currently described as Lots 1 R, 2R and 3R, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition and Lots 1 RA, 1 RB and 2R, Block 42CR, Richland Terrace Addition located on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820 D.2 FP 2012 -03 Consideration of a Request from Integrated Real Estate Group for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Home Town Canal District located on 9.645 acres in the 8600 Block of Mid Cites Boulevard E.0 PUBLIC WORKS E.1 PW 2012 -024 Award Contract for the CIP Project Identified as Rufe Snow Drive Pavement and Striping Improvements Project (ST1202) in the Capital Improvements Budget for FY 2011/2012 E.2 PW2012 -025 Award contract for Reliable Paving, Inc. to Perform Sub -Grade Stabilization Services for the Preventive Street Maintenance Program (SM1201) F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.1 GN 2012 -076 Adopting the 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget and Amending the 2011 -2012 Revised Budget - Ordinance No. 3217 F.2 GN 2012 -079 Ratify Increase in Property Tax Revenues Reflected in Fiscal Year 2012- 2013 Adopted Budget F.3 GN 2012 -077 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2012 - Ordinance No. 3218 NRH City Council Agenda — September 10, 2012 Page 3 of 4 r F.4 GN 2012 -078 Approval and Ratification of the 2012 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2012- 025 F.5 GN 2012 -080 Appointments to the Construction Code Board of Appeals G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 Announcements - Councilman Whitson H.2 Adjournment All items on the agenda are for discussion and /or action. Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 7, 2012 at a.m kqsis *nti Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 - 427 -6060 for further information. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. NRH City Council Agenda — September 10, 2012 Page 4 of 4 City of North Richland Hills Work Session Work Session Meeting Agenda North Richland Hills City Hall City Council Workroom 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Monday, September 10, 2012 6:00 P.M. A.0 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting A.1 Special Presentation - Police Department K -9 Unit (10 Minutes) A.2 Discuss Possible Sale of Additional General Obligation Bonds (20 Minutes) B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.087, Texas Government Code to discuss potential Economic Development incentives to business prospect in central part of the city B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code to consult with attorney to seek advice about pending or contemplated litigation; or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the city council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code C.0 Adjournment M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.0 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.1 Special Presentation - Police Department K -9 Unit (10 Minutes) Presenter: Jimmy Perdue, Director of Public Safety Summary: The North Richland Hills Police Department's first narcotics detection K -9 unit is now in operation. The detector canine is trained to be highly effective in detecting specific odors as well as acting as a deterrent to crime. General Description: In today's world, sophisticated methods are used to conceal and transport a wide array of illegal contraband. Narcotic detection dogs are trained to detect the presence of controlled substances such as marijuana, cocaine, and heroin. Detector canines are highly motivated dogs and their assistance in illegal drug investigations often results in the confiscation of illegal drugs and drug - related money. The team received their certification following an extensive 5 -week training program and will continually train in narcotic search and detection techniques refining and strengthening the skills of the dog. Initial program costs, including the purchase of the canine, have been funded by asset seizure and forfeitures within the Special Investigations Fund. In addition to deployment while on shift, the K -9 unit will be on -call to assist all officers and detectives in their drug enforcement efforts. This new Police Department program will offer a highly effective resource in helping to fight the crime against drugs within our community and surrounding areas. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.2 Discuss Possible Sale of Additional General Obligation Bonds (20 Minutes) Presenter: Mark Hindman, City Manager Summary: On August 13, the City received historically low interest rates for the sale of General Obligation bonds. Based on the record -low interest rate we received, staff began evaluating the issuance of additional bonds for the Municipal Complex Project. Staff will discuss with Council the possibility of an additional sale of bonds, the pros and cons of doing so, and the methodologies that could be used for selling the bonds. At the end of the discussion, Staff will seek Council direction on whether or not to move forward with an additional bond sale. General Description: Based on the record -low interest rate we received on the recent bond issue, staff began evaluating the issuance of additional bonds for the Municipal Complex Project. The original financing plan for the project was based on an assumed interest rate of 3.15% for bonds issued in 2012 and 3.65% for bonds issued in 2013. The recent bond sale resulted in an average borrowing cost of 2.69 %. The original financing plan called for issuance of $25 million in 2012 and $10 million in 2013. While there is no assurance that interest rates will rise, most experts believe that they will rise in the next two years. If interest rates were to rise by 1 % next year to 3.7 %, this would result in a net cost increase of nearly $1 million over the term of the bonds versus issuance at the current projected rate of 2.7 %. Since the financing plan relies on utilization of cash and reserves during the early years of the project, we have the available resources to issue the additional $10 million without impacting the budget. Issuing additional bonds at this time is only justified if we can actually receive an interest rate as low, or very close to, the rates we just received. If we are unable to receive a low interest rate, then there is no benefit in deviating from the original plan. One way to sell the bonds is through a delegated sale. With this type of sale Council would approve a bond resolution with a set of parameters for the sale, such as a not to exceed amount for the interest rate, true interest cost not to exceed rate; maximum term of the debt, etc. With these parameters in place, we would be able to conduct the bond sale, or negotiate a bond sale, on a day when the market is favorable and not be tied down to a City Council meeting date like we are with a traditional sale. In order to sell the bonds, all parameters must be met. Because of the recent work with the rating agencies and preparation of the official statements, the amount of time required to conduct the sale is substantially less than if we were to wait until the spring to conduct the sale. At that point we would essentially have to start the process over. On Monday night David Medanich from First Southwest will assist in the discussion. At the end of the discussion, staff will see Council direction on whether or not to move forward with an additional bond sale. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. B.1 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.087, Texas Government Code to discuss potential Economic Development incentives to business prospect in central part of the city M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. B.2 Executive Session: Pursuant to Section 551.071 Texas Government Code to consult with attorney to seek advice about pending or contemplated litigation; or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the city council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code N RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9-10-2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. C.Q Adjournment City of North Richland Hills Regular Session City Council Regular Meeting Agenda North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Monday, September 10, 2012 7:00 P.M. A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino A.1 Invocation - Councilman Turnage A.2 Pledge - Councilman Turnage A.3 Special Presentation - Formal Introduction of New Fire Chief A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. B.1 Approval of Minutes of August 27, 2012 City Council Meeting B.2 Approval of Minutes of the August 30, 2012 Special Council Meeting B.3 PW 2012 -023 Approve the "Renewal and Amendment of Interlocal Agreement Court Order No. 107296" with Tarrant County for the Partial Funding of the Construction of the North Tarrant Parkway Project C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 ZC 2012 -06 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Clavmoore Engineering for a Zoning Change from C -21HC Heavy Commercial and PD 37 to Redevelopment Planned Development (RD -PD) based on HC zoning on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820 D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. D.1 RP 2012 -07 Consideration of a Reauest from Clavmoore Enaineerina for a Replat to create Lots 1 R2 and 2R2, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition on property currently described as Lots 1 R, 2R and 3R, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition and Lots 1 RA, 1 RB and 2R, Block 42CR, Richland Terrace Addition located on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820 D.2 FP 2012 -03 Consideration of a Reauest from Intearated Real Estate Group for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Home Town Canal District located on 9.645 acres in the 8600 Block of Mid Cites Boulevard E.0 PUBLIC WORKS E.1 PW 2012 -024 Award Contract for the CIP Project Identified as Rufe Snow Drive Pavement and Striping Improvements Project (ST1202) in the Capital Improvements Budaet for FY 201112012 E.2 PW2012 -025 Award contract for Reliable Paving, Inc. to Perform Sub -Grade Stabilization Services for the Preventive Street Maintenance Program (SM 1201) F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.1 GN 2012 -076 Adopting the 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget and Amending the 2011 -2012 Revised Budaet - Ordinance No. 3217 F.2 GN 2012 -079 Ratify Increase in Property Tax Revenues Reflected in Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Adopted Budget F.3 GN 2012 -077 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2012 - Ordinance No. 3218 F.4 GN 2012 -078 Approval and Ratification of the 2012 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2012 -025 F.5 GN 2012 -080 Appointments to the Construction Code Board of Appeals G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 Announcements - Councilman Whitson H.2 Adjournment M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.0 Call to Order - Mayor Trevino N RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9-10-2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.1 Invocation - Councilman Turnage M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.2 Pledge - Councilman Turnage M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.3 Special Presentation - Formal Introduction of New Fire Chief Presenter: Mark Hindman, City Manager Summary: Stan Tinney has been appointed as the Fire Chief for the City of North Richland Hills. He will be introduced to the City Council and community during the September 10, 2012 City Council Meeting. General Description: Chief Tinney has more than 30 years of experience with the Odessa Fire Department assuming his most recent position as Assistant Fire Chief in 2009. He has been involved in nearly all aspects of fire services including operations, emergency medical services, fire prevention, technical rescue, education, and emergency management. Chief Tinney holds a Master Fire Fighter license and is a graduate of the National Fire Academy's Executive Fire Officer Program in Emmitsburg, Maryland. He holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree from Western Illinois University and a Master of Public Administration from the University of Texas, Permian Basin. Chief Tinney is a member of the International Association of Fire Chiefs, Texas Fire Chiefs Association, International Association of Emergency Managers, the Emergency Management Association of Texas and the Domestic Preparedness Advisory Council. Chief Tinney has extensive experience in all aspects of fire services and has strong leadership skills. He will bring a fresh perspective and vision for the North Richland Hills Fire Department and the members of the Department who continue to provide an unparalleled level of commitment and dedication to the community. N RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9-10-2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.4 Citizens Presentation An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. The Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits deliberation by the Council of any subject which is not on the posted agenda, therefore the Council will not be able to discuss or take action on items brought up during the citizens presentation. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. A.5 Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. B.0 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All consent agenda items listed below are considered to be routine items deemed to require little or no deliberation by the City Council and will be voted on in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. B.1 Approval of Minutes of August 27, 2012 City Council Meeting Presenter: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary Recommendation To approve the minutes of the August 27, 2012 City Council Meeting. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 — AUGUST 27, 2012 WORK SESSION The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in work session on the 27 day of August 2012 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Workroom prior to the 7:00 p.m. regular Council meeting. Present: Tom Lombard Tito Rodriguez Rita Wright Oujesky Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Mayor Pro Tem, Council, Place 3 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 2 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 Council, Place 7 Staff Members: Mark Hindman Jared Miller Karen Bostic Jimmy Perdue Mike Curtis Vickie Loftice Patricia Hutson Monica Solko George Staples Mary Peters Kristin Weegar John Pitstick Larry Koonce Patrick Hillis Kyle Spooner Chris Amarante Mark Mills JoAnn Stout Craig Hulse Debbie York Andy Kancel Gregory VanNieuwenhuize Clayton Comstock Stacey Udoni Absent: Oscar Trevino City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Director of Public Safety Managing Director Managing Director City Secretary Assistant City Secretary City Attorney Public Information Officer Assistant to City Manager Director of Planning & Development Finance Director Human Resources Director Information Services Director Facilities & Construction Director Budget Director Neighborhood Services Director Economic Development Director Asst. Director Neighborhood Services Assistant Police Chief City Engineer Planner Public Works Management Assistant Mayor C`.all to C)rrlar Mayor Pro Tern Lombard called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. A.0 Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting There were no questions from Council. A.1 Presentation and discussion on upcoming Zoning Ordinance amendment establishing new commercial outdoor lighting standards for the City Clayton Comstock, Planner, presented a PowerPoint presentation and discussed with Council a potential lighting ordinance staff would like to draft for Council's consideration in the next few months. The objective of the ordinance will be to establish commercial outdoor lighting standards to minimize light pollution, reduce light trespass, glare or spillover, enhance safety and security, improve aesthetics at night and implement a Scenic City recommendation. The proposed regulations would apply to new development 1 installations, redevelopment, parking lots, architectural and signage. It would not include residential, recreational or interior lighting. Council was provided with good and bad examples of outdoor lighting. Mr. Comstock discussed the types of light sources that would eliminate light pollution, types of lighting that would reduce light trespass, and lighting types to regulate the intensity, temperature, rendition and height of surface. The proposed ordinance could also include other regulations such as architecture and sign illumination, gas canopies, maximum light pole heights, curfew, timers and motion sensors. Staff would like to include in the proposed ordinance a requirement for photometric plans for site plan submittals. After questions from the Council, the Council concurred with Staff proceeding with the proposed ordinance. A.2 Boulevard 26 Utility Burial Update Mr., Mike Curtis, Managing Director, provided a brief update on the Boulevard 26 Utility Burial project. Staff has met with the impacted property owners along the corridor to obtain the needed utility easements. Most of the property owners are agreeable to dedicating the necessary easements but a few property owners are unwilling to dedicate easements. Some property owners have pole signs impacted by the project and are unwilling to lose their current signage even with the City replacing their current pole sign with a monument sign if the easement is granted. Staff inquired if Council would be agreeable to proceeding with the burial of the utility lines in the areas where there are no conflicts while staff continues to work with those property owners unwilling to dedicate easements. After a brief discussion, the Council was not in favor of phasing the construction and directed Staff to continue to move forward with the original plan and to continue to work out the conflicts. B.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION - The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session to discuss the following as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code No items for this category. C.0 Adjournment Mayor Pro Tem Lombard announced at 6:10 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to the regular Council meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING A.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Lombard called the meeting to order August 27, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. :Z61 I w+y_1 I I Present: Tom Lombard Tito Rodriguez Rita Wright Oujesky Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Tim Welch Staff: Mark Hindman Jared Miller Karen Bostic Jimmy Perdue Mike Curtis Vickie Loftice Patricia Hutson Monica Solko George Staples Mayor Pro Tem, Council, Place 3 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 2 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 Council, Place 7 City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Director of Public Safety Managing Director Managing Director City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney Absent: Oscar Trevino Mayor A.1 INVOCATION Councilwoman Wright Oujesky gave the invocation. A.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilwoman Wright Oujesky led the pledge of allegiance. A.3 SPECIAL PRESENTATION AND RECOGNITION(S) No items for this category. A.4 CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. A.5 REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. 6.0 APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED B.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 27, 2012 BUDGET WORK SESSION B.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST '13, 2012 CITY COUNCIL MEETING B.3 PW 2012 -022 APPROVE THE DEDICATION OF A PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE TO THE CITY OF WATAUGA B.4 PU 2012 -024 APPROVE PURCHASE OF POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE FROM PHILPOTT MOTORS LTD COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6 -0. C.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS CA GN 2012 -073 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2011 -2012 REVISED BUDGET AND 2012 -2013 PROPOSED BUDGET Mayor Pro Tem Lombard opened the public hearing on the 2011 -2012 revised budget and 2012 -2013 proposed budget. Mr. Mark Hindman, City Manager, gave an overview of the budgets. The proposed budget includes a proposed property tax rate of 61 cents per $100 valuation. The proposed rate is a 4 cent increase over the current year tax rate of 57 cents per $100 valuation. It is the first property tax increase in 19 years. The $0.04 increase is directly related to the voters' approval of the May 2012 Band Program to build a new Municipal Complex and all revenue generated by the additional $0.04 on the tax rate will go directly toward paying for the municipal complex. Highlights of the budget include additional building inspection personnel, additional parks maintenance worker, increase in the preventative street maintenance funding, improvements to water and sewer infrastructure and consolidation of police detention and dispatch services. Mr. Mark Mills, Budget Director, presented a PowerPoint presentation highlighting the 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget for all operating funds, capital projects funds and the budgets for the Crime Control and Prevention District (CCD) and the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation (PRFDC). The proposed budget is based on a tax rate of 610 per $100 valuation. At the July 27 Council budget work session, the CCD Board met and reviewed the proposed 2012- 2013 Crime Control District and Prevention District Budget. The Board held a public hearing on the CCD budget prior to the regular Council meeting. The Parks & Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board also met prior to the regular meeting and conducted a public hearing on the Park and Recreation Facility Development Corporation budgets. The City Council is scheduled to vote on the proposed budget and the proposed tax rate on Monday, September 10, 2012 during the 7:00 p.m. City Council Meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, North Richland Hills City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. No action is required by Council at this public hearing as it is being held for the purpose of receiving public comment. Mayor Pro Tem Lombard asked for public comment on the 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Pro Tern Lombard closed the public hearing. C.2 GN 2012 -074 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2012 -2013 PROPOSED TAX RATE Mayor Pro Tern Lombard opened the public hearing. Mr. Mark Hindman, City Manager, spoke on the proposal to adopt a 610 tax rate per $100 valuation. Mr. Mark Mills, Budget Director, presented a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed adoption of a 610 tax rate for Fiscal Year 2012 -2013. The public hearing is the first of two required public hearings for the purpose of receiving public comment. Two public hearings are required if the proposed rate exceeds the lower of the effective tax rate or the rollback rate. For Fiscal Year 2012- 2013, the proposed tax rate exceeds the effective tax rate of 55.9888 cents. The rollback rate is 62.0937 cents and does not exceed the proposed tax rate. Mr. Mills discussed the history of net taxable values, taxable values for tax year 2012, the effective and roll back tax rates and the proposed tax rate and its effect on single family residential and seniors and disabled persons. The four cent increase in the tax rate is attributable to the bond election. Mr. Mills explained the two components of the tax rate and compared the distribution of the proposed tax rate to the 2011 rate. PROPOSED TAX RATE Two Components of the Tax Rate Tax Year 2012 General Fund — M & C 57.6% $0.351075 - 0.5343¢ Debt Service Fund & TIFS 42.4°! $4.258925 +4.5343¢ Total Distribution of Tax Rate 100.0% $0.610000 $4.0000¢ Tax Year 2011 General Fund — M & D 62.5% $0.356419 Debt Service Fund & TIFS 37.5°! $4.213581 Total Distribution of Tax Rate 100.0% $0.570000 Mayor Pro Tern Lombard asked for public comments on the proposed tax rate. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tern Lombard closed the public hearing and announced that the City Council is scheduled to vote on the proposed tax rate on Monday, September 10, 2012 at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. and will be held in the North Richland Hills City Council Chambers, located at 7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180. D.0 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Items to fallow do not require a public hearing. No items for this category. E.0 PUBLIC WORKS No items for this category. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS F.I GN 2012 -071 CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED Craig Hulse, Economic Development Director, summarized the item. The current members of Economic Development Advisory Committee all have terms that have expired in August 2012. Of the nine members, eight have expressed their willingness to continue to serve, with a recommendation of one new member. Reappointments for members with a one -year term expiring August 1, 2013 are Cindy Brewington, Randy Moresi, Ben Gayton, and Mark Wood. Reappointments for members with a two -year term expiring August 1, 2014 are Janet Golightly, Tom Hervey, Jim Makens, and Mike Rigby. Mark Sanders, Chairman of Bates Container, has advised that he is unable to continue to serve and has requested Bob Brown, Chief Operating Officer at Bates Container, be appointed to the committee. Mr. Brown's appointment is a two -year term expiring August 1, 2014. Staff recommends approval of the appointment and reappointments and their respective expiration dates. COUNCILMAN TURNAGE MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. F.2 GN 2012 -072 APPROVAL OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR NORTHEAST TARRANT TEEN COURT APPROVED Debbie Durko, Municipal Court Administrator, summarized the item. City Council is being asked to approve an Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of North Richland Hills, Watauga and Haltom City to continue the Northeast Tarrant Teen Court program. The combined program allows more teens the opportunity to participate in this program to adjudicate their offenses through the performance of community service in lieu of fine payments. In the fiscal year 201012011, there were 363 participants from the three cities that performed over 8,800 hours of community service. Staff is estimating over 500 participants with close to 15,000 community service hours for our communities for the next fiscal year. COUNCILMAN RODRIGUEZ MOVED TD AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, WATAUGA AND HALTOM CITY FOR THE NORTHEAST TARRANT TEEN COURT PROGRAM. COUNCILMAN WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7 -0. G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS G.1 ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON WORK SESSION AGENDA No action required. H.4 INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 WEST NILE VIRUS UPDATE Debbie York, Neighborhood Services Assistant Director, updated Council on the West Nile Virus and the city's plan of action to help combat the disease. City's efforts include: Spraying • Initially once a week in targeted areas; last week began spraying the entire city and some areas have been sprayed multiple times • Takes place between 8:30 pm and 6 am • Done by licensed professionals • Pesticide is EPA — approved as being safe for humans and the environment Larvicide • Applied to parks, trails, creeks, drainage channels and other green spaces • Prevents mosquito larvae from developing • Safe and poses no danger to animals Public Awareness • City's website, water bill inserts, Citicable Channel, E- newsletter, Facebook and Twitter pages. • Mailing — HOA, apartment complexes, assisted living centers • Hand delivered flyers in target areas • Reminding all residents of the 4 Ds: • DRAIN standing water in your yard and neighborhood; • Avoid outdoor activities during DUSK and DAWN is when mosquitoes are most active; • DRESS in long - sleeved shirts and pants when outdoors, • Use insect repellant with DEET. H.2 ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilman Rodriguez made the following announcements. The new school year has begun and all motorists share the responsibility of making sure students arrive to school safely. The City of North Richland Hills reminds drivers to stop for school buses and slow down in neighborhoods where children are walking or riding bikes to school. You should also reduce your speed, and put down your cell phone, when driving through school zones. City Hall and other non - emergency City offices will be closed on Monday, September 3rd, in observance of the Labor Day holiday. NRH20, Iron Horse Golf Course and the NRH Centre will be open. Garbage and recycling will not be collected on Labor Day. Monday collections will shift to Tuesday and Tuesday collections will be made on Wednesday. The North Richland Hills Public Library invites residents to display their favorite quilts at a community quilt show on September 6th. The show will also include a small display of quilts from the Trinity Valley Quilters Guild. For more information, please call the Library at 817- 427 -6814. Kudos Korner - Officer Gwen Kasterke of the Police Department. A resident recently submitted a letter to the Fort Worth Star Telegram to recognize and thank Officer Kasterke for organizing the Citizens Police Academy. The resident stated that the 12- week session really opened her eyes about all that police officers do to keep us safe. Officer Kasterke is an asset to our city, the resident said. H.3 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tern Lombard adjourned the meeting at 8:02 p.m. Tom Lombard — Mayor Pro Tern ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. B.2 Approval of Minutes of the August 30, 2012 Special Council Meeting Presenter: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary Recommendation To approve the minutes of the August 30, 2012 Special City Council Meeting. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 — AUGUST 30, 2012 A.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order August 30, 2012 at 7 p.m. :T61 I w+1• -1 I I Present: Oscar Trevino Tom Lombard Tito Rodriguez Rita Wright Oujesky Tim Barth David Whitson Scott Turnage Staff: Mark Hindman Jared Miller Karen Bostic Jimmy Perdue Mike Curtis Vickie Loftice Patricia Hutson Mayor Mayor Pro Tem, Council, Place 3 Council, Place 1 Council, Place 2 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 5 Council, Place 6 City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Director of Public Safety Managing Director Managing Director City Secretary 1.:1+ _ R Council, Place 7 A.1 INVOCATION Councilman Rodriguez gave the invocation. A.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Rodriguez led the pledge of allegiance. B.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS B.1 GN 2012 -075 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CAN THE 2012 -2013 PROPOSED TAX RATE Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Mr. Mark Mills, Director of Budget, presented the item. The public hearing is the second of two required public hearings for the purpose of receiving public comment on the proposed 61 cent tax rate. The first public hearing was held on Monday, August 27. Two public hearings are required if the proposed rate exceeds the lower of the effective tax rate or the rollback rate. For Fiscal Year 2012 -2013, the proposed tax rate exceeds the effective tax rate of 55.9888 cents. The rollback rate is 62.0937 cents. Mr. Mills presented a PowerPoint presentation and discussed the history of net taxable values, taxable values for tax year 2012, the effective and roll back tax rates and the proposed tax rate and its effect on single family residential and seniors and disabled persons. The four cent increase in the tax rate is attributable to the bond election. Mr. Mills explained the two components of the tax rate and compared the distribution of the proposed tax rate to the 2011 rate. PROPOSED TAX RATE Two Components of the Tax Rate General Fund — M & D Debt Service Fund & TI FS Total Distribution of Tax Rate General Fund — M & D Debt Service Fund & TI FS Tax Year 2012 57.6% _ 42.4% 100.0% Tax Year 2011 62.5% 37.5% $0.351075 $0.258925 $0.610000 $0.356419 $0.213581 Total Distribution of Tax Rate 100.0% $0.570000 - 0.5343¢ +4.5343¢ $4.0000¢ Mayor Trevino reaffirmed that the four cent increase will be used to pay for debt service associated with the general obligation debt for the Municipal Complex approved by the citizens in May and that approximately 24 percent of the single- family residential accounts have been frozen with senior tax and disabled tax ceilings. Mayor Trevino announced it was a public hearing and asked for public comments on the proposed tax rate. The following individuals came forward and spoke against the tax increase: • Theresa Riley, 7717 Red Oak Street • J.D. Fraizer, 7713 Briarcliff Court • David Emery, 7932 Shady Oaks Drive • Charles Reading, 7320 Meadowbrook Drive • Carmen Cizek, 5112 Abby Road There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino announced that the City Council is scheduled to vote on the proposed tax rate on Monday, September 10, 2012 at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. and will be held in the North Richland Hills City Council Chambers, located at 7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180. Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. C.0 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 7:24 p.m. Oscar Trevino — Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary M RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From The Office of the City Manager Subject: Agenda Item No. B.3 PW 2012 -023 Approve the "Renewal Agreement Court Order No. 107296" Partial Funding of the Construction Project Presenter: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, City Engineer i. ]5111P W1M and Amendment of Interlocal with Tarrant County for the of the North Tarrant Parkway Summary: The City Council is being asked to approve the annual renewal of the agreement with Tarrant County which authorizes Tarrant County to fund a portion of the construction of North Tarrant Parkway. General Description On December 14, 2009, the City of North Richland Hills entered into an Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County. While the reconstruction of North Tarrant Parkway is a joint project between the City of North Richland Hills (NRH) and the City of Keller (Keller), very early on in the project's conception phase, NRH and Keller agreed that NRH would be the "lead City ". Consequently, the Interlocal Agreement is between only NRH and Tarrant County. (NRH has separate Interlocal agreements for both design and construction with Keller which further cover the project funding responsibilities between the two cities.) The initial Interlocal Agreement (December 2009) has had one revision (January 11, 2010 - to accommodate lane configurations in the Keller section) and two (2) renewal agreements (August 23, 2010 and September 12, 2011). These two (2) previous renewal agreements and the current renewal agreement are necessary because Tarrant County requires this type of agreement to be renewed on an annual basis. In fact, the initial Interlocal Agreement, as well as all renewal agreements, state that the agreement expires at the end of the fiscal year (September 30, 2013 for the proposed renewal agreement) or at time of Project completion, whichever event occurs first. Even though Tarrant County requires this statement in all annual renewal agreements, Tarrant County is committed to "annually renewing" this Interlocal Agreement through Project completion. Therefore, the approval of the current renewal agreement is effectively a procedural issue. The City Attorney has reviewed this renewal agreement and it is acceptable to him. Recommendation Approve the "Renewal and Amendment of Interlocal Agreement Court Order No. 107296" with Tarrant County for the Partial Funding of the Construction of the North Tarrant Parkway Project. North Tarrant Pkwy Street Im (D avis Blvd -to y Rd) I I' I ll M e IME1111 W E S NOWTH RICHLAND � I North Tarrant Pkwy 1 Street Imp. (Davis Blvd to Whitley Rd) HILLS Project Locator Mar STATE OF TEXAS § § Renewal and Amendment of Interlocal Agreement Court Order No, 107796 COUNTY OF TARRANT § Project: North Tarrant Parkway BACKGROUND 1. Tarrant County ("COUNTY'S and the City of North Richland Hills ("CITY "o entered into an Agreement approved by Tarrant County Commissioners Court Order No. 107296, for the cooperative funding of improvements to North Tarrant Parkway ( "Project ") as described in the 2006 Tarrant County Bond Program. 2. The Project is not complete and the COUNTY and the CITY desire to renew the Agreement for the 2013 Fiscal Year. Therefore, the COUNTY and CITY agree to the following 1. The COUNTY and the CITY renew the Agreement for the COUNTY's 2013 Fiscal Year with the Agreement to expire September 30, 2013 or the completion of the Project as determined by the COUNTY, whichever occurs sooner. 2. The COUNTY and CITY agree to the revised payment schedules. 3. Section II of Agreement is amended as follows: The services to be provided by the CITY include, but are not limited to, the following: A. All as-built total project costs including all construction cost, right -of- way acquisition, planning, engineering, surveying and governmental approval cast (collectively referred to as "Costs'. B. Construction agreement administration, site review, permitting and inspection; C. Interagency cooperation; D. A monthly progress report documenting the percent complete for each major component of the project shall be provided to the COUNTY; E. CITY will notify the COUNTY on completion of the project; and F. CITY will include the following language on all on -site public notice signage: "This project is funded by the City of North Richland Hills and the Tarrant County Commissioners Court through the 2006 Tarrant County Bond Program" Interlocal Agreement Transportation Bond 2006 -2007 Page 1 4. Section IV of Agreement is amended as follows: County agrees to reimburse City either $14,095,000 of its Costs or 65% of its Costs, whichever amount is less. Attachment A incorporated into this agreement by reference sets forth the funding schedule for this reimbursement. However, in the event that the schedule is delayed, the COUNTY is excused from paying until the successful completion of the scheduled phase of the project as reasonably determined by the COUNTY. The CITY will provide certification signed by the CFO or authorized official that the work has been completed and that the funds being requested have been expended. CITY understands that CITY will be responsible for any other expenses incurred by CITY in performing the services under this agreement. APPROVED on this day the day of 1 20 , by Tarrant County. Commissioners Court Order No. TARRANT COUNTY STATE OF TEXAS County Judge APPROVED AS TO FORM: District Attorney's Office* Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.' City Attorney * By law, the District Attorney's Office may only advise or approve agreements or legal documents on behalf of its clients. It may not advise or approve a agreement or legal document on behalf of other parties. Our review of this document was conducted solely from the legal perspective of our client. Our approval of this document was offered solely for the benefit of our client. Other parties should not rely on this approval, and should seek review and approval by their own respective attorney(s), Interlocal Agreement Transportation Bond 2006 -2007 Page 2 CERTIFICA 77ON OF A VAIL48LE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF S Certification of Funds Available as follows: Fiscal year ending September 30, 2007 $ Fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 $ Fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 $ Fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 $2,552,725 Fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 $5,125,454 Fiscal year ending September 30, 2012 $5,125,455 Fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 $1,281,354 All future years funding is contingent on future debt issuance and renewal of this contract Fiscal year ending September 30, 2014 $ Fiscal year ending September 30, 2015 Fiscal year ending September 30, 2015 --------------------------------- $14,095,000* Auditor's Office * Amount Includes $6,600,000 in previously designated federal fiends. Interlocal Agreement Transportation Bond 2006 -2007 Page 3 ATTACHMENT A Proiect Information City: Project Name: Proposed Proiect Schedule Design: ROW Acquisition: Utility Relocation: Construction: City of North Richland Hills Widening of North Tarrant Parkway Start Date Duration (mo) End Date * Nov -2005 36 Nov -2008 Mar -2010 33 Dec -2012 * COUNTY payments by completed please are contingent upon the COUNTY'S reasonable determination that the work regarding the project phase for which payment is expected is successfidly completed, as determined by the COUNTY. COUNTY plans to issue debt for all phases of this project, therefore payment remains contingent on debt issuance in accordance with applicable law. Once Construction commences, COUNTY payment shall be made by fiscal quarter prorated over the life of the construction but contingent upon reasonable progress in construction as may be detennined by the COUNTY. Pronosed County Payment by Phase Design: $ ROW Acquisition: $ Utility Relocation: $ Construction: $14;095,000 County Funding Total: $14,095,000 ** Proposed County Payment by Calendar Quarter (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) 1 st Quarter 2nd Ouarter 3rd Ouarter 4th Ouarter 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ** Amount includes $6,600,000 of previously designated federal funds. Inter[ocal Agreement Transportation Bond 2006 -2007 Page 4 $ $ $ $ $ $1,281,363 $1,281,363 $1,281,363 $1,281,363 $1,281,364 $1,281,364 $1,281,364 $1,281,364 $1.281,364 $1,281,364 $1,281,364 ** Amount includes $6,600,000 of previously designated federal funds. Inter[ocal Agreement Transportation Bond 2006 -2007 Page 4 N RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. C.0 PUBLIC HERRINGS COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. C.1 ZC 2012-06 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Claymoore Engineering for a Zoning Change from C-2/HC Heavy Commercial and PD 37 to Redevelopment Planned Development (RD- PD) based on HC zoning on 13,22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820. Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Senior Planner CASE SUMMARY: On behalf of H &H Limited Partnership (Huggins Honda), Claymore Engineering is requesting a zoning change from C-2/HC Heavy Commercial and PD 37 to Redevelopment Planned Development (RD -PD) based on HC zoning on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820. The purpose of the request is to zone the property to accommodate the complete demolition and redevelopment of Huggins Honda and the old Huggins Mitsubishi site. With the Loop 820 widening project and the sale of Huggins's dealership rights to Mitsubishi vehicles, the redevelopment opportunity is ripe for the site. Opposition to this case by 21.38% of the land area within 200' requires an affirmative vote of three- fourths "supermajority" (6 of 7 Council members) to approve the zoning change. Opposition is based on a single issue and is detailed below. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property under consideration is all the area which is bounded by Short Street to the north, Cloyce Court to the west, Nancy Lane to the east, and Loop 820 Frontage Road to the south. The former Huggins Mitsubishi site at 7501 NE Loop 820 was developed in 1985, around the same time the Huggins Honda site at 7521 NE Loop 820 was developed. The addition of a used car sales building on the east side of the property at 7601 NE Loop 820 was completed around 2003. In 2009, Huggins Honda demolished 12 homes it had purchased along Nancy Lane and Susan Lee Lane south of Short Street, platted the properties together and rezoned them for "HC" Heavy Commercial in preparation for the dealership's eventual expansion. CURRENT ZONING: "C -2" and "HC" Heavy Commercial and PD -37. The existing zoning would not allow Huggins Honda to develop the site to accommodate Honda's corporate requirements, so a PD was proposed that would address such things as building architecture and interior lot landscaping. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan depicts "Commercial" uses for this area. The Commercial Land Use is intended to permit a variety of commercial uses including automobile - related services, retail trade, and business service establishments with outside storage, display and sales. Outside uses are required to be buffered from residential uses and public views. The proposed zoning regulations in the drafted PD ordinance are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. SURROUNDING ZONING 1 LAND USE: North: R -2 Single Family/ Low Density Residential R -6 -T Townhouse I Medium & High Density Residential West: C -1 JCS Community Services/ Commercial South: ROW (NE Loop 820) East: R -2 Single Family/ Commercial PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as six different lots in the Richland Terrace Addition and the Rivercrown Addition. A Plat Revision to consolidate the entire block into just two lots is being considered in conjunction with this zoning request. THOROUGHFARE PLAN: The property has frontage on NE Loop 820 which is currently under reconstruction as part of the North Tarrant Express (NTE) project for widening that roadway. The property also has street frontages on Short Street, Nancy Lane and Cloyce Court, all of which are R2U local roadways —or two -lanes undivided. Access is currently planned on the applicant's PD Site Plan off of Cloyce Court (2 driveways), Short Street (1 driveway) and NE Loop 820 (4 driveways). CASE REVIEW: The proposed PD Regulations and Site Plan documents (attached) serve the following main purposes: 1. Reduce the amount of light trespass onto adjacent residential properties through specific and more stringent lighting requirements. 2. Accommodate the nature of a car dealership parking lot and buffer the site from adjacent residential uses by relocating trees and other landscape areas that would typically be required within the parking lot to the landscape buffers along the various street frontages. The result is a minimum 20' landscape buffer heavily landscaped with more large trees than what would typically be required. 3. Allow for flexibility in the architectural requirements of the building so that the standard Honda building facade can be used. 4. "Freeway Corridor Urban Design Monuments," which are three -foot tall masonry bollards or pedestals, are being required as an implementation of the 2007 Loop 820 Corridor Plan's recommendation for an identifiable, repetitive masonry element along the corridor. In response to some of the concerns raised at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on August 16, 2012, the applicant has made the following changes to their Site Plan: 1. A six foot precast decorative concrete masonry screen wall will be provided along Short Street. The applicant has indicated to staff that they "will be going with Verticrete Commercial Precast Concrete Privacy Fence. [Pictured at right] is a representative picture of the product. In regards to color and pattern, the color will complement the split faced CMU on the building and the pattern will be a stone type pattern." 2. The car wash was moved away from Short Street and more interior to the site. It did, however, move closer (now 60 feet) to Nancy Lane. Staff believes that would be acceptable since the properties across Nancy Lane are shown on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to be commercial in the future. An additional landscaping buffer was requested to provide better screening while the residential property is still being occupied. 3. The dumpster and storage area previously located at the far northwest corner of the lot has been removed. Huggins Honda will now be using a trash compactor, which requires it to be in much closer proximity to their building. They will be using an area on the west side of the building for the compactor and recycling dumpster. 4. Not driven by P &Z or resident request, but the applicant has modified various parking lot landscape islands on the Site Plan to better define the internal traffic circulation and differentiate between vehicle inventory areas and customer parking areas. 5. Similarly, decorative brick pavers and raised landscape islands are being planned on the south side of the Customer Service Center. This will also aid with internal traffic circulation by directing service customers to one single entry point and one single exit point. RESIDENT OPPOSITION: As evidenced by the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, neighboring residents of Huggins Honda appear to be satisfied with the redevelopment plans. The one issue that remains is highlighted in the attached "Petition for no curb cut access at Susan Lee Lane, nor bordering low density residential to new Honda dealership." The petition represents 22.05% of the land area within the 200' buffer area. One signature is of a property renter, but the opposition is still above 20% (21.38 %). A response letter to the petition was provided by the applicant and is included in this report. Section 211.006 of the Texas Local Government Code requires three - fourths of the governing body to vote in the affirmative of a zoning change that has 20% or more of the land area within 200' in written opposition. This is also called "supermajority" and requires six of seven votes for North Richland Hills' City Council. The driveway was originally proposed to have a 35' throat width, 50' curb radii and be utilized for the delivery route of vehicle haulers. Upon staff's request, the applicant reduced the driveway to a 30' throat width and 25' curb radii and diverted vehicle hauler traffic away from Short Street. Staff's position on this driveway has been "neutral" throughout the staff review process. The driveway is for employee use only, no trucks and/or deliveries will access the property through this driveway, and the applicant will be gating the driveway as well. However, this driveway is also not necessary in order to meet minimum public safety access requirements. Therefore, staff did not have a reason to require the driveway, yet didn't have a reason to deny the driveway. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning & Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered this item at their August 16, 2012 meeting and recommended approval (5 -0) subject to a six foot masonry screen wall being installed along Short Street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of ZC 2012 -09, subject to the applicant's commitment to a new six foot precast decorative concrete masonry screen wall along Short Street— similar to the picture provided in staff's report —with a stone pattern to complement the natural colors found on the building. LOCATION MAP AERIAL PHOTO PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION l CHL,� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Ex�`= AND CITY COUNCIL Case Number: ZC 2012- o Applicant: Ciaymoere Engineering Location: 7551 NE Loop 824 You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearin A Public Hearing is being held to Consider a request from Claymoore Engineering for a zoning change from C-2/HC Heavy Commercial and PD 37 to Redevelopment Planned Development (RD -PD) based on HC zoning at 7551 NE Loop 824. The general purpose of the RD -PD is to provide specific regulations for the reconstruction of the existing car dealership. Public Hearing Schedule: Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2012 If recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this zoning request will be heard by the City Council on: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 Both Meeting Times: 7:00 P.M. Both Meet ing Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427 -5300 Fax (817) 427 -5303 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS Rivercrown Investments LLC H & H J Texas Ltd Partnership H & H/Virginia LP PO Box 982092 CID Huggins Mitsubishi 7551 NE Loop 820 NRH Tx 76182 -8002 7551 NE Loop 820 NRH Tx 76180 -5971 NRH Tx 76180 -6971 Cale As Richland Hills Tx LLC Attn David Gochman 1800 N Mason Rd Katy Tx 77449 -2825 Montgomery, E Steve Etal 2501 Bentley Dr Grand Prairie Tx 75052 -4113 Beach, Dwayne C 4901 Maryanne Way NRH Tx 76180 -6967 Price, Wendy Lee 4903 Maryanne Way Fort Worfh Tx 76180 -6967 Phillips, James D Trust 4909 Maryanna Way NRH Tx 76180 -6967 Pugsley, Judy M 4910 Maryanna Way Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6966 Hall, Luzcille S 4904 Maryanna Way NRH Tx 76180 -6966 Creamer, Robert 3932 Old Decatur Rd Alvord Tx 76225 -7735 D®minici, James P 912 Turnberry Ln Southlake Tx 76092 -4214 Welch, John L Etux Debra L 4909 Nancy Ln Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6855 Wells Fargo Bank Na Assoc 4101 Wiseman Blvd # 205 San Antonio Tx 782514200 Brown, Robert 4911 Maryanne Way NRH Tx 76180 -6967 Johns, Joan 4908 Maryanna Way NRH Tx 76180 -6966 Beran, Mary G 5137 Gentling PI NRH Tx 76180 -6913 Creasy, Michael T Etux Rita 4805 Susan Lee Ln Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6847 Gales, Nang Morrow 4904 Susan Lee Ln Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6846 Postma, Richard Etux Linda 4905 Nancy Ln Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6855 Caudle, Rhonda 1728 Montclair Or Fort Worth Tx 76103 -1906 Autonation Fort Worth Motors 200 SW 1 St Ave FI 14 Fort Lauderdale F1 33301 -2074 Olsen, Ronald 7231 E Calle Agerrida Tucson Az 85750 -2605 Tillman, John Etux Melissa 4900 Maryanna Way NRH Tx 76180 -6956 4901 Susan Lee Family Trust Bob Neice, Trustee 4901 Susan Lee Ln NRH Tx 76180 -6847 Oliver, Tracy Etux Iva O 4908 Susan Lee Ln NRH Tx 76180 -6846 Wilkerson, Dwayne P 4901 Nancy Ln Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6855 Wright, Lacey L Etvir Charles Bowers, Aaron M Etux Britney Brake, Alice M 4900 Nancy Ln 6248 Frank Christian Rd 7308 Deaver Or Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6854 Azle Tx 76020 -7303 Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6330 LIST OF NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS (cont.) Brackett, Johnny Etux Pearlene Bockman, Robert Henry Garvin, Billy Ray 4800 Nancy Ln 4804 !Nancy Ln 5908 Quails Path Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6888 Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6888 Colleyville Tx 76034 -7514 Martinez, Charlie 5 Jr Bassar, Malissa L Davidson, Keith 1501 Fairmount Ave 4816 Nancy Ln 4820 Nancy Ln Fort Worth Tx 761044235 NRH Tx 76180 -6888 Fort Worth Tx 76180 -6888 Gulik, Eric Jason 4824 Nancy Ln NRH Tx 76180 -6888 Resident Opposition Map & Petition (Pink = Opposed Residents) .•.. '418 MM Oft e41T - Bie �t3 d9t2 a9ta a .a.. 481 n5ie I _ woc 1 e9 S N 4St4 4W' } 4996 W01 aa� 4gpe 4am - 4mt moo met 4so9 ,t _ � 7 t aao 9FtEfF757 ._ 4m I I Bate l 4M L Tom. r�yy33}L�y IiL4 T�4 I a®0 ene rat 17.12 Total acres 20Q h g � 1T bon ry er N ?5w 1 inch = 175 feet a, ( u C) W. p . 5 t�t3 Megl�s oassa ! of- Toll - N �aY� 6 3 t $2q AdA" ce v I—aw, ZD 12. aksovU r�J 1k X79 F;am: "Jim ©aminiei <JimD@premtercnnlro€s.eom> Wgiec RE: pet €tian new rewarded (need monday ) Dvk Augu5127, 2Q12 1 DZ8.17 AM CPT Ta: "Mal4 WglmiCh "crnatt @6t8landscapdartis4.eisty 1 Attachment, 35.5 KS ,91noerely, Jim Dominioi Premier Contro Is, i nc. 880.724 -2007 eat 12 817- 7244)438 Local 817- 724 -4487 Fax F mm Matt Wainrkh fmallta:ma". the%ndscanearjstnet Sent Sunday, August 26, 201212.54 PM To. Jim ❑aminid Subject: petJtlon new reworded (need monday 3 RECEIVEjj 3 AUS 2 7 20i1 _ — 22- : - -._1�1 } ,. �.t ..d_ _ "7- h_�! -[:I �L htC18i1•FL\t�„5:1'?lf. `!'„''1 II? ^45: P 745 _ �� r ^ ^' f e L" `Ea a4 w: . ! AM - -1S 2 C'�"'Y (. Y -35 7 - •J - RECEIVEjj 3 AUS 2 7 20i1 v wo S� ;11, wcAcj Ln no, e- Ma bassae Y&I In"', br,'. &7-i y-tq:;q 446e 2 20 Q ;Uj2mftlly g- 1 1 v73 t ' q z-zs---zo12 From: "Niece, Kenneth" <knieneLbmsmanagernenicerru Subi f: RE: 4901 susen lee -trust petition Oa "gust 27, 2012 3;2:118 PIVI CDT T.: Matt Weinrich unaltL�tnelandscapearlist.ne� 1 Atlachment, 43 -1 KS Here you go till in your address From: Matt Weinrich - @itn.m3tEthelandsca[rezri -snet Sent: Monday, August 27, 2412 1;0.5 PM To: Niece, Kenneth Su6,yecEr 4961 susan lee - gust petttiart SCfq " .Qnr< .aN `tys•. •L'i� $hCnrY �. rrcfc¢!rr _z f Wit-r EX V �a ��: 7 /... u. r��. mati �, � n"± �,; ._.. d.' �.:., ✓.i.- ..r_�'+lt�raS:_- .Silsx...� `� ,a::i 4't�T 3 AUG 2 9 2Q12 ENGINEERING September 5, 2012 Clayton Comstock City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 Noah Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Response to Neighborhood Petition Zoning Case # ZC 2012 -03 7551 NE Loop 820 — Huggins Honda Dear Mr. Comstock: On behalf of the Huggins Honda ownership group, please let this letter serve as formal response to the petition submitted by the adjacent neighborhood to close the existing access point to Short Street. The property has been affected by the SH 820 improvements which resulted in loss of property and an access point along the frontage road. We are simply trying to maintain the access that is left to the subject site. After discussion with rry Client, he has agreed to install a gate on the existing drive to Short Street. Should you have any questions, please let me know. We look forward to presenting this project to City Council on 9110. Sincerely, 4� A,-.- Matt Moore, P.E. ORDINANCE NO. 3215 ZONING CASE ZC 2012 -06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A 13.22 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY FROM C-2/HC (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) AND PD 37 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) TO RD -PD (REDEVELOPMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a 13.22 acre tract of land located in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A from C -2 /HC (Heavy Commercial) and PD 37 (Planned Development) to (RD -PD) (Redevelopment Planned Development) zoning and approving the PD site plan attached as Exhibit B. Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. ►-1►1 I & N PASSED AND APPROVED on this 10th day of September, 2012. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney 1_%j;j ;T91Tl =1 I1:1:1 119I+I61 ► 10 21 � 16 John Pitstick, Planning & Development Director Redevelopment Planned Development (RD -PD) District Land Use and Development Regulations for Lots 1 R2 & 2R2, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition North Richland Hills, Texas This Redevelopment Planned Development (RD -PD) District shall adhere to all the conditions of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances, as amended, and adopt a "base district" of "HC" Heavy Commercial District. The following regulations shall be specific to this RD -PD District. Where these regulations conflict with or overlap another ordinance, easement, covenant or deed restriction, the more stringent restriction shall prevail. I. ZONING A. Permitted Land Uses. Uses in this RD -PD shall be limited to the uses described below: 1. New Automobile Dealership. 2. Used Automobile Dealership, limited to used automobiles manufactured within the past ten (1 D) years. 3. High - Volume Automobile Service Center 4. Uses Incidental to a New & Used Automobile Dealership and Service Center; including but not limited to: a. Auto Parts & Accessory Sales with Machine Shop b. Automobile Rental c. Automobile & Light Truck Repair Shop d. Automobile Inspection Station e. Automobile Lubrication Center f. Automobile Alarm/Stereo/Window Tinting g. Automobile Upholstery h. Automobile Fueling Station & Fuel Storage (for dealership vehicles only) i. Paint & Body Shop j. Tire & Battery Sales & Service k. General Office Uses B. Prohibited Land Uses - Damaged or wrecked cars shall not be stored in the parking lot serving the site. C. Development Regulations. This RD -PD shall follow the development regulations of the "HC" Heavy Commercial District, with the following additions and exceptions: Dumpster Enclosures. Dumpster enclosures visible from public right -of -way shall be equipped with solid metal gates to be closed at all times, except during loading and unloading of refuse. 2. Car Canopy Covers. No part of any vehicle canopylawninglcovering structure may encroach within the 20' landscape setback. 3. Lighting. The following lighting standards shall be required in this RD -PD District: a. Shielded Light Source Required. All luminaires located in this District shall be designed so that the light source (bulb or lamp) is completely shielded from direct view of a point six feet (6) above grade at the property line. See illustration for examples. b. Light Trespass Limitation. All luminaires located in this District shall be designed or positioned so that the maximum illumination at the centerlines of Short Street and Nancy Lane shall not exceed one- quarter (114) foot - candle and shall not exceed one -half (112) foot- candle to Centerline of Interstate Loop 826 frontage lanes and Cloyce Lane. c. Parking Lot and Internal Drive Lighting. Any open area used for motor vehicle parking, storage or access may be illuminated with freestanding luminaires. Said luminaires are permitted to be a maximum of thirty feet (30') in height, except luminaires located within one Permitted Prohibited f Typical'Sh - Go. Future Typical Mal I Pact FbnW r �r r r rr I v aPa9uek 1Ll p1, de1 Typiul'B.m l;ght' I r �r Area Food Llghl Ama Food L" htwA Haod.5hield hundred feet (100') of the north and east property lines shall be a maximum of twenty feet (20'). d. Sign Illumination. Externally illuminated signs, advertising displays, building identification, and monument signs shall use top mounted light fixtures which shine light downward and which are fully shielded or upward with pin - pointed light which are fully shielded. e. Building Illumination. Building facades and architectural features of buildings may be floodlighted when the following conditions are met Floodlight fixtures are equipped with shields and are located so as to limit the fixture's direct light distribution to the fagade or feature being illuminated The configuration of the floodlight installation shall block all view to the floodlight fixture's lamps from adjacent properties and iii. The maximum luminance of any floodlighted surface does not exceed the foot - candles specified in the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America Lighting Handbook for floodlighting surfaces. f. Prohibited Lights. The following light fixtures and luminaires shall be prohibited in this District "Cobra head" type lighting fixtures having dished or "drop" lenses or refractors Flickering or flashing lights and iii. High pressure sodium or incandescent lights. g. Light Temperature and Color Rendition. Luminaires shall have a temperature between 3,500 and 5,000 degrees and a color rendering index of 70 or greater. D. Administrative Approval of Site Plans. Site plans which comply with all development - related ordinances and this Ordinance and do not increase the building square footage by more than 20% shall be administratively approved by the staff Development Review Committee. Significant deviations from the Site Plan, as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee, shall require City Council approval of a revision to this Redevelopment Planned Development. Lot 2R2 (lot on hard corner of Nancy Lane and NE Loop 820) shall be allowed to have an increase of up to 40% of the existing square footage before Council approval of a revised PD is required. Said expansion shall meet the minimum requirements of the "HC" Heavy Commercial District and all other development - related ordinances. II. LANDSCAPING A. Buffer Yard Regulations. The required fifteen foot (15') landscape buffer shall be increased to a minimum of twenty feet (20) along all public street frontages. B. Flagpoles — A total of 4 flagpoles will be provided along the frontage of the Lot. These flagpoles will be allowed at a maximum height of 100 feet. The location of the flagpoles shall be Iimted to the 20' landscape buffer along S 820. C. Landscape Maintenance and Replacement. Landscaping will be installed and maintained to typical City standards. The Landscape Plan approved as part of the PD shall govern the quantity and variety requirements. Any landscaping that is removed as a result of site expansion or revision shall be replaced on site and in close proximity to where it was removed. r A 1c �� 9Bnr Cp D. Freeway Corridor Urban Design Monuments. A total of nine (9) "Freeway w Corridor Urban Design Monuments" shall be placed within the Loop 820 landscape } setback. See details of monument at right. III. BUILDING The following regulations are based on Section 118 -692 of the City's Zoning Code. Revisions are highlighted by underlined or struck - through text. , a�� (a) Facade walls. A "facade wall" is an exterior wall facing a public street. The following standards shall apply to a maximum of all facade walls. Ground floor facade walls shall incorporate at least three of the following five requirements. These required design elements must comprise at least 50 percent of the facade wall's horizontal length. a. Exception: Only two of the elements shall apply where one of the following conditions exist- i. Where there are facade walls less than 250 feet in length. ii. Where screening of service areas is required that will screen the view of the facade. (1) Wall recesses /projections that are at least 25 feet long but no more than 155 feet long and that have a relief of at least eight inches. (2) Architectural features (at least three items from the following list): a. Raised corniced parapets over the door, or peaked roof forms having an average slope greater than or equal to a minimum 5112 pitch, or arches, or architectural details such as the work and moldings that are integrated into the building structure and design; b. Integral irrigated planters, semi - permanent pots containing plant materials, or wing walls that incorporate landscaped areas and/or places for sitting; C. Enhanced exterior lighting such as wall sconces, light covers with concealed light source, ground mounted accent lights, or decorative pedestal lights; d. Prominent three - dimensional architectural features projecting from the plane of the main exterior walls by a minimum of five feet and raised above the adjoining parapet wall /roof by a minimum of three feet, clock towers and other similar architectural design elements; and e. Pilasters projecting from the plane of the wall by a minimum of eight inches and/or architectural or decorative columns to create visual breaks and interests in the facade walls and exterior walls. (3) Arcades, covered walkways, architectural awnings, canopies or porticos. (4) Display windows, faux windows, or decorative windows. (5) Pilasters projecting from the plane of the wall by a minimum of eight inches and/or architectural or decorative columns to create visual breaks and interest in the facade walls and exterior walls. (b) Detail wall features. (These requirements apply to all facade walls.) Building facade walls shall include a pattern that incorporates no less than three of the elements listed below. At least one of these elements shall occur vertically. All elements shall occur horizontally at intervals of no more than 45 feet for buildings between 10,500 and 25,500 square feet, 65 feet for buildings between 25,001 and 50,005, and 100 feet for buildings greater than 55,055 square feet in size. (1) Color change. (2) Texture change. (3) Material module change (unit size change). (4) Sloping roofline. {c} Materials and colors (applies to all exterior walls except where noted). (1) For all facade walls: One hundred percent of all exterior building materials shall be high quality materials, and shall be limited to any combination of the following materials: a. Face brick or face tile. b. Natural stone or cultured stone. C. Glass, with the use of reflective glass limited to a maximum of 50 percent of the area of any facade wall on which it is used. d. Tinted and/or textured, concrete masonry units (e.g., split face block, burnished block with a decorative finish). e. Tilt -up concrete panels that are adorned or textured (including reveal patterns and textural coatings). (2) Exterior colors shall be low reflectance, subtle, neutral, or earth tone colors. The use of high intensity, primary, metallic, or fluorescent colors shall be prohibited, except at accent areas as defined below. (3) Building trim and accent areas may feature brighter colors, primary colors, and neon tubing for trim or accentuation in proportions consistent with trim or accentuation only. Such building trim and accent areas shall not exceed 20 percent of any single exterior wall area excluding all windows, doors, and glass construction materials. Stucco and hardiplank may be used for accent areas. The use of EIFS is prohibited. Accent areas can be expanded at showroom facade wall as defined by Honda image standards. (4) For any nonfacade wall (i.e., a nonvisible "back" or side), the following materials shall be permitted: a. Smooth -faced concrete block that is textured and nontinted or nonburnished; or b. Tilt -up concrete panels that are unadorned but still textured; and C. The color of this wall shall blend with the facade walls. {d} Roofs. Roofs shall incorporate parapets or rooftop screens concealing flat roofs and rooftop equipment such as HVAC units from public view on facade sides. Parapet height changes over one foot shall vary three dimensionally to add visual interest to the building and shall include architectural detailing, cornices, moldings, trims, variations in brick coursing, and other similar type detailing. EXHIBIT A BEING all of Lot 3R, Block 1, RIVERCROWN ADDITION, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in County Clerk's File No. D210021517 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and all of Lot 2R, and a portion of Lot 1R, Block 1, RIVERCROW N ADDITION, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 8901, of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and portions of Lot 1 R -A and Lot 1 R -B, Block 42CR, RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 917 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and a portion of Lot 2R, Block 42CR, RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388 -198, Page 87 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a'/2" iron rod found at the Northeast corner of aforesaid Lot 3R, lying at the intersection of the South right -of -way line of Short Street (a 50- foot -wide public right -of- way), with the West right -of -way line of Nancy Lane (a 50- foot -wide public right -of -way); THENCE along the East boundary line of aforesaid Lot 3R, and Lot 1R, Block 1, and the West right -of -way line of said Nancy Lane, as follows: 1. SOUTHEASTERLY 137.68 feet, along a curve to the left having a radius of 3635.00 feet, a central angle of 02 0 10'13 ", and a chord bearing S 03 24' 24" E 137.67 feet, to a 3 /4" iron rod found at the end of said curve, 2. S 04 15' 57" E 371.10 feet, to a 518" iron rod found at the Southeast corner of said Lot 3R, and the most Easterly Northeast corner of said Lot 1 R; 3. S 04 19'45" E 69.85 feet, to a' /" iron rod marked "Brittain & Crawford ", set; 4. S 04 19'45" E 70.08 feet, to a 1 /" iron rod found; 5. S 03° 51' 03" E 48.92 feet, to a 1 /2 " iron rod marked "Brittain & Crawford ", set at the beginning of a curve to the right; 6. SOUTHWESTERLY 152.05 feet, along said curve to the right having a radius of 195.43 feet, a central angle of 44 0 34'44 ", and a chord bearing S 18° 03' 44" W 148.25 feet, to a TxDOT monument found at the end of said curve; THENCE along the South boundary line of said Lot 1R, and the North right -of -way line of Interstate Highway No. 820 (N.E. Loop 820), as follows: 1. S 73 11'28" W 24.32 feet, to a TxDOT monument found; 2. N 69 35' 32" W 16.26 feet, to a TxDOT monument found at the East corner of a tract of land conveyed to the State of Texas by the deed recorded in County Clerk's File No. D11263269 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE along the North boundary line of said State of Texas Tract, being the new North right -of -way line of aforesaid Interstate Highway No. 820, as follows: 1. N 67 47' 50" W 44.67 feet, to an "X" cut in concrete set at the beginning of a curve to the right; 2. NORTHWESTERLY 169.94 feet, along said curve to the right having a radius of 2931.56 feet, a central angle of 03 0 19'17 ", and a chord bearing N 67 45' 47" W 169.92 feet, to a TxDOT monument found at the West corner of said State of Texas Tract, lying in the South boundary line of aforesaid Lot 1 R; THENCE along the South boundary line of said Lot 1R, and the North right -of -way line of aforesaid Interstate Highway No. 820, as follows: 1. N 15° 36' 16" W 27.67 feet, to a' /z" iron rod marked "Brittain & Crawford ", set; 2. N 76 55' 20" W 56.06 feet, to a 1 /2 " iron rod marked "Brittain & Crawford ", set in the West boundary line of said Lot 1 R, and the East boundary line of aforesaid Lot 2R, Block 42CR, said point being the most Easterly corner of a tract of land conveyed to the State of Texas by the deed recorded in County Clerk's File No. D211268297 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE along the North boundary line of said State of Texas Tract and a tract of land conveyed to the State of Texas by the deed recorded in County Clerk's File No. D211309623 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, being the new North right -of -way line of aforesaid Interstate Highway No. 820, as follows: S 76 19' 59" W 15.73 feet, to a TxDOT monument found at the beginning of a curve to the right; 2. NORTHWESTERLY 289.57 feet, along said curve to the right having a radius of 2931.56 feet, a central angle of 05 °39'34 ", and a chord bearing N 61 36' 31" W 289.45 feet, to a TxDOT monument found at the end of said curve; 3. N 58 46' 02" W 339.25 feet, to a TxDOT monument found; 4. N 33 51' 16" W 49.64 feet, to a TxDOT monument found at the Northwest corner of the tract of land conveyed to the State of Texas by the deed recorded in County Clerk's File No. D211309623, lying in the West boundary line of aforesaid Lot 1 R-A, and the East right -of -way line of Cloyce Lane (a 60 -foot -wide public right -of -way), THENCE along the West boundary line of said Lot 1R-A, and the East right -of -way line of Cloyce Lane, as follows: 1. NORTHEASTERLY 144.93 feet, along a curve to the left having a radius of 305.88 feet, a central angle of 24 0 08'50 ", and a chord bearing N 13° 23' 52" E 143.58 feet, to a "PK" nail set; 2. N 00° 01' 36" W 234.81 feet, to a' /2" iron rod marked "Brittain & Crawford ", set at the Northwest corner of aforesaid Lot 1 R -B, lying at the intersection of the East right -of -way line of said Cloyce Lane with the South right -of -way line of aforesaid Short Street; THENCE S 88° 13' 58" E 440.77 feet, along the South right -of -way line of said Short Street, to a 1 /2 " iron rod found at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2R, Block 42CR, and the Northwest corner of aforesaid Lot 3R; THENCE N 89 12' 10" E 409.51 feet, along the South right -of -way line of said Short Street, and the North boundary line of said Lot 3R, to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing 13.220 acres (575,865 square feet) of land. EXHIBIT B PROPOSED DETACHED- CAR WASH 2.571 $F 10 lit 111 1111 4 1- PROPOSED CAR DEALERSHIP FIRST FLOOR 84,296 SF SECOND FLOOR 14.6811 6F tOT I 17.44 ACRES 4n,i7,3 SF sr -- --------------- I I iTin I ��s cna.ira m mxw HIM III 11�, rmm w' 1 EXISTING ZOMNG I MC. C & PD 0 1 PROPOSED MINING I PD-HC 9 = L {65 S Bfl DING IL OWNER MM CASE #ZC2012,06 LOT 2 lj� A(; RE$ 77. 692 SF EXISTING USED CAR DEALERSHIP IL OWNER MM CASE #ZC2012,06 1 9 1 MTV ErffifliE _ r ■A .�-�. ...... I ......� .... . -- . .. 11�J NORTH ELEVATION 2 au : x11 — a � - )� - - - -- — Sao X EASE ELEUATM liar s' � — New Facility for Huggins Honda IAMMAL IJSA£E BY EOATmM- MN EikOM rrv�. sec aw r�o ■ u.renrnwn,�,�.a Ll NORTH RICHLAND HILL& TX ISM ED: JULY 2 , 202 V L L I Q WEST ELEV RTKA NORTH ELEVATION -CAR WASH ,nom =,b En PARIS STCRME SHOWROOM. EIEMIW �� 6 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL TVW0 LU m 1rer -1v EAST ELEVATION - CAR WASH - 1 for— SOUTH ELEVATION - CAR WASH z� SERVICE DEPARTEI ENT P PAATSSTOWE �} - ip SEENICE f ^" CRfE RQ0R FLEW - LEVEL ONE Eb 5 r -: iar -ra WEST ELEVATION - CAR WASH New Facility for Huggins Honda NORTH REa; J ■D HI L ,T X �I 46m'!M- N Facility for Huggins Honda NORTH �Ea; JULY Y22 T X �i SHADE ST RUCTURE EXHIBIT Areas where vehicle shade covers may be located are shown in hatch SHO T 7r — _ i PROPOSED it I ( uw>IAxv: CAR DEALERSHIP .. iI,"'I�` FIRST FLOOR 92,762 SF 1 , �TT — , SECOND FLOOR 74,430 SF A. LOT I � I 11.42ACRES '• .:+ w - I 497,485 SF I I i I I I -- - - - --- -- - - -- I I I I J .,..I J I r i�`g712: C -y i fiR`FPHIC SCNE .n 0 R LLD v Se � CTi e a O OWNER r� � wex.so rei Isin:�mn° nu.s. rx nseo wurscr:rmN nucanc NRH CASE #ZC 2012 -06 1 C-2 1 TRUCK DELIVERY ROUTE • SHORTSTREET V wn_m c I � 3 1 7 1 4 I n_ I PROPOSED R GAR DEALERSHIP R • • • FIRST FLOOR 92.762 SF •� •� SECOND FLOOR 14,630 SF f 1 , ❑ Qy � � I r / . LOT 1 — Q �+ r ' IIA2ACRES "�� w• I i 487,485 SF _— & �� : ��' /•�" �J I I I o _ _ _ I I9 1 1 1 1 1! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ll — a � P o A C -1 NMH CASE #ZC 2412,06 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN "'• i 4tm L o ° au.«L"ni Lnw...i~ L taa. wrw.nr :.r S �eaoem"L 9MegrMla n uj vudw W �� SHORT STRFVSr � � Jekn F. °lawphr, uu Lu 5 Z i s j TREE LEWFAU 111 4 .-- •-- . -.-.,w ..-... «9999..., PROPOSED ..• CAR DEALERSHIP 0- 0° $"Bull MUM + iw„ LOT 1 - ` 1194, ACRES R98,1733F •reta 3 . 7 1 F z _ mob �' `~"^.•� .. I_ � I I _ I: v _ l WIOBCAFE NO TES 41 i wtaaew nxvawry urt. ' y ^� 4 :� ��..e.earx.n. '� -� � J f..w. � un ie.. ..ee.asnnnw.nerxw wFw y L wd i*a+!•.e 0°aw � ��i IRAPGATK1X NR1 ttClfYfli' WF "zr -..� H a nm aFILNiFII RgFilffAwi� qe V GR4'XI 8G4E � "n�iLgnt'rntee sxmi F ;� �IF�t'ry s95law TiRH CASE #7.0 2612 -06 L-0 MEkiCkH I ALIMVL I F MXLIV S7GE7JTIRL 1�aY$fy $ITE Y�$19141fY L FYi.I]PO6E��' Sd0EWP1K Tfl�SNGL Y. SHOR STRELr -- + [50' WI OE PU BL -C R. GHT -OK - 'WA%CY p 5 F1,1 _ W ; z_; integration studio py lw E E Jahn F.. M , A9A L LU LU � KEY MAP HW PFAf�IN! HLg3r@uYR®PNdI>MMI ]l6 H5IlH PoCHLVI� HLI9, 1%MX9] ���>)xH9f wur L -1 NK14 CAST #ZC 21112-416 PROPOSED CAR DEALERSHIP + I _ i� —. — _ — _ — — — — 1� 5 TREE LEGEND SHRUB LEGEND LANDS ^E HUMS - { Lp 1 [ 1!1 � rer wn... u.,.r..,e � �w•,.,�e.n.w,a.,..+nmw«. se �;; co so "" � •• WAWATI NOTES RB �7HIC SCALE TY h3 xHtrteaa.Hy �Wv p 5 F1,1 _ W ; z_; integration studio py lw E E Jahn F.. M , A9A L LU � KEY MAP 9 Ca� � � � Z x i py lw i � KEY MAP HW PFAf�IN! HLg3r@uYR®PNdI>MMI ]l6 H5IlH PoCHLVI� HLI9, 1%MX9] ���>)xH9f wur L -1 NK14 CAST #ZC 21112-416 STAMPED AND STAINED ci 1 ,C(N KRETECRqMM TREE LEUEND Integmian studio 12: Lu F PROPOSED KkWN RY WALL WFF-I GATES ACROSS 15'M70'3rrE VISI BILITY TRIMOLES J! F. M-,h,., MA LU Z 4 E5 1; S -.— SHRUB LEGEND EMSTING RESPDENTLkL MINED; R- D L.D.D. COMMERCIAL C -STING DRIVE APPROACH TO BE REMOVEDALIO CURB AND GUTTER e- INSTALLED (TW.) L"DBM%M NDTES IRRIGATION NCIIM .:7 MMM—MR—MP T NRH EWNE #ZC. 2012416 L-2 �.� f DESTAL TYPICAL AT ENTRANCES ALONG 3OP 820 FRCNTAGE 15'.W SITE VISIBLITY TRIANGLE 7 4 -,I'? N SITE V151 alUry TRIANGLES VISMILffy LE SIGN A;L�< C s oovrFp PVTV� -k- s p--f — - - - - - - - -- Lu z LOT 1 I Inte"ian studio Q LU e. 11.44 ACRES I J.An F. p-phy. MA LU 498,173 SF I-LJ %H W MLM—R—F —a— WRI I 1 4F, #ZC. 2012416 [J� PROPOSED POLE SIGN - 3!,X PED TYPICAL A Y — ALL ENTRANCES ALONG LOOP 820 FRONTAGE LANDSCAPE 'Ants TREE LEQEKO SHM113 LEMID EXISTING DRIVE -CE TO REMAIN IPtRPOAn= NOM %H W MLM—R—F —a— WRI I 1 4F, #ZC. 2012416 [J� Lu z WI N . integmian studio LU jm. F. M,.Fhy. MA LU PROPOSM PR EMKING SMf CHEVROLF 7' ONED: P L.A.D. = COMWE I p co TRW LEGEND OHRUB LEGEND LANDUCAPE MOM miHm " Z= . L L H NRH U SE #ZC. 2912416 I L-4 I �oy PLANT LIST 'pej7•R�r av¢lRF7Rie'�' I rr.e.. •�- 6 ' 0 CANOPY TREE PLANTING �Ml1LTl- TRL1NIi PLANTING Nosh Richland Hills. Taxes HuggIm Honda slla Le ndscaye C.�lalians er.we Rn �r.nwwwndsl x,�ea� PsxlEe u aBwdm mbi,x, Wb� Pmlbe p m xd.wrd�hhe lYeplES,i • �� anre N10raq __ RgYN P rmu nwlaunrx.� m ben shdr nP pr dPV W"� w.mi.. venue Entliq Twe Axmkn �yi� — J SHRUB PLANTING : 4 Notes wl byre re m.re ioi«xno,.reee.en m.PPP.nr� aen , fL mnr.TM bkMro ¢wnr r/wllk�YW 6. bYi.d 1 b rdvuwe Ynr.ai e eml d Fenrmrrp nwhnned rro dw x d die.h riad�w,aen. e l^Y..wIN�� d�aew Werm.w rObrdhsdbrW�r. IC I bcm. Nei heFondawWwayYwwchir bnw WiYyM rr .gwnl le lnY e.wim raw duM..wes..iel u inured wM/N. Nwrr /new Bl..yr'e epp4d q [dour Mf'e• whlry .�.rn. 1il I^gslm m.¢ +inr la brnm m Mk wrw Nh W*wl ^wnv. M.Ir ^ iry imc uxy ro x mmsnvRb b nh•ege d wy uieadlw mrKea.YdPeiYxNe ph4may nwn d iriNdrMw es si n e mra'�r ioinuwiuwnmapv: eea...0 unr F,rh ICI N enw n�YY =1 ee ixh6nrl n a n.sNYad ere^wx mdexn W nn�ix.m� ea w. �fmllr•The f.nl� tl ^ Yer i. d q.Nw�r � mmn¢s �evkdrN dslwbi d rwi�h�mW WwMFne. 4 GROINDCOVER PLANTING Lu w w cytirlr w.a�nr [q,a.�.lm�+dW. lhv mw[i n.ew or1 f� � meti x�r epx err ew vw. ewr leRx•r Jdkn F. Mlwrlry, MA L u Z w �1n.hn+ ep x et w re w.R edw lbh .:. wwrted..J nerxw bee u•r �N.ry rwi 'pej7•R�r av¢lRF7Rie'�' I rr.e.. •�- 6 ' 0 CANOPY TREE PLANTING �Ml1LTl- TRL1NIi PLANTING Nosh Richland Hills. Taxes HuggIm Honda slla Le ndscaye C.�lalians er.we Rn �r.nwwwndsl x,�ea� PsxlEe u aBwdm mbi,x, Wb� Pmlbe p m xd.wrd�hhe lYeplES,i • �� anre N10raq __ RgYN P rmu nwlaunrx.� m ben shdr nP pr dPV W"� w.mi.. venue Entliq Twe Axmkn �yi� — J SHRUB PLANTING : 4 Notes wl byre re m.re ioi«xno,.reee.en m.PPP.nr� aen , fL mnr.TM bkMro ¢wnr r/wllk�YW 6. bYi.d 1 b rdvuwe Ynr.ai e eml d Fenrmrrp nwhnned rro dw x d die.h riad�w,aen. e l^Y..wIN�� d�aew Werm.w rObrdhsdbrW�r. IC I bcm. Nei heFondawWwayYwwchir bnw WiYyM rr .gwnl le lnY e.wim raw duM..wes..iel u inured wM/N. Nwrr /new Bl..yr'e epp4d q [dour Mf'e• whlry .�.rn. 1il I^gslm m.¢ +inr la brnm m Mk wrw Nh W*wl ^wnv. M.Ir ^ iry imc uxy ro x mmsnvRb b nh•ege d wy uieadlw mrKea.YdPeiYxNe ph4may nwn d iriNdrMw es si n e mra'�r ioinuwiuwnmapv: eea...0 unr F,rh ICI N enw n�YY =1 ee ixh6nrl n a n.sNYad ere^wx mdexn W nn�ix.m� ea w. �fmllr•The f.nl� tl ^ Yer i. d q.Nw�r � mmn¢s �evkdrN dslwbi d rwi�h�mW WwMFne. 4 GROINDCOVER PLANTING �pmy, Cs �y�y Fil i Q G � o w� Lu l ISLAND BOULDER DETA z integmian studio C: ...�....`.......a.- ....mod. W Jdkn F. Mlwrlry, MA L u Z w C7 �pmy, Cs �y�y Fil i Q G � o w� y l ISLAND BOULDER DETA �Fyy � Fi %H W ML rRwna_wadP q xE warren xEiaTx.- NHH C.A4, #7.0 20,""i L-S Ln 6 13 0 0 Mo. lJ 11 tn > m r > . .... . . . ... .... . '.., . ... ..... . .. u—P . . . ... .... .. .... . ... . . . ... .... . . ..... 13 q o X La . . . . . .... . . ... . . . . . . . .. .. ©m sNt01SRA32! Ln CL EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 16, 2012 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ZC 2412 -06 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Claymoore Engineering for a Zoning Change from C-2/HC Heavy Commercial and PD 37 to Redevelopment Planned Development (RD-PD) based on HC zoning on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820. Matt Moore, Claymoore Engineering, 1105 Cheek Sparger, Colleyville, TX came forward representing Huggins Honda for the proposed planned development request. Mr. Huggins and his partnership are excited to be here to discuss the new dealership. The purpose of the zoning is to clean up some of the existing zoning on the property. There are several different zoning classifications on the property as it stands now, so we are cleaning it up and proposing some modifications to the cities development standards. The side is bordered by NE Loop 826 frontage road on the south, Cloyce on the west, Short Street on the north and Nancy Lane on the east side. Access to the site along 820 was dictated by the North Tarrant Express project, there were previously 5 drives along that frontage road that will be down to 4 for the new site. As mentioned, dictated by the condemnation process by TXDOT and NTE, there were 2 existing access points along Cloyce which are proposed to remain as well as the existing access point on Short Street. Currently on the site there was the former Huggins Mitsubishi building on the west half of the site, a detail shop on the northwest corner, the Honda dealership central on the property. All three of those buildings will be demolished and a new facility will be built. The new proposed site plan will be approximately 116,000 square foot new dealership that will house the new car sales and enlarged service department. The existing used car center at the corner of frontage road and Nancy Lane will remain as is. Some of the modifications as noted on the Staff report are related to the landscaping, but with the nature of a car dealership and internal landscaping with the inventory makes it a challenge. There is also an insurance requirement where the dealership has to have so much of the inventory covered by shade structures. With some of those different factors in play, we have proposed some modifications to landscaping by essentially taking a lot of the internal landscaping and pushed it the perimeter. The city standard is a 15 ft. landscape buffer around the site and we are proposing a 20 ft. buffer to increase the area. Additionally, we have taken normal amount of trees required in the internal part of the site and pushed those to the perimeter to help buffer the site. We have worked diligently with Staff over the past few months with the lighting on the property to ensure a much more restrictive lighting regulation than what the city currently has in the ordinance to help limit the light trespass to the adjacent properties. Architecturally the building will be tilt wall construction and conventional steel. We have heard Staff's concerns about the masonry screening wall requirement along Short Street and we are willing to comply with a 6 ft. pre -cast masonry fence wall to meet the recommendation. John Pitstick said this RD -PD for Huggins Honda which will include the used car dealership on the southeast section. We understand that insurance requires 85% of the inventory to be covered so we are in agreement with setbacks on the site plan. The route plan has been developed showing trucks coming in off of Cloyce, enter the property and unload, then come back around the building to the frontage road to exit. The traffic would be able to avoid Short Street with this approved route. We would prefer to see deciduous trees on NE Loop 820 to get some color to comply with the Loop 820 Study along with 20 ft. landscape buffer rather than 15 ft. buffer and double the trees from what you typically see because they are moving the landscaping out from the requirements of the parking lot landscaping. Another aspect we are trying to see as they build this massive freeway and corridor is to add design monuments at the entry way features which are placed up and down Loop 820. This is not required currently but Mr. Huggins has agreed to put those in. There are two variances for this Planned Development and we think they have satisfied the mitigation (1) there is a variance for the landscaping which pushes the trees toward the outward part of the property (2) there is a variance for the masonry which is a requirement for Honda's marketing effect which include extra pilasters to break up the buildings. The auto body shop will not be on site so no storage of vehicles will be an issue. The PD adopts Heavy Commercial district as a base district, permitted uses are new automobile sales with used automobile sales maximum age of 10 years. Prohibited uses are storage of damaged or wrecked vehicles. There is extensive landscaping 20 ft. perimeter setbacks, the building and architectural standards varied to permit Honda's standard building fagade. If any of the car shades are faded they would have to replace them, in addition they are requesting for 4 -100 ft. flag poles with 20 ft. setbacks on NE Loop 820. There is an administrative site plan for minor changes proposed in the future which include two pylon signs and two monument signs which will conform to our current regulations. Another issue brought up is shielding from light and Huggins agreed to shield the light source and restrict the height of the light poles and maximum foot candles on the sign and buildings. No light will extend past the dealership property boundaries. Staff is recommending approval with stipulation that a monument wall be built on Short Street. Chairman Shiflet asked for clarification if the 20 ft. landscape was behind the easement on Short Street with 30 ft. wide street? John Pitstick said the fence will be inside the 20 ft. so basically you have 25 ft. of landscape area before the fence is there. Bill Schopper said he was struggling with the masonry screening wall and asked what the reasons for the wall versus the wrought iron fence wall. John Pitstick said we are very excited about the development and what Mr. Huggins is doing for the community, but we have received many calls from the public with concerns and Council wants to protect the existing residential neighborhood. Typically if a new commercial development went in they would be required to put the masonry wall. There was a general discussion regarding the rendering and site plan along Short Street regarding the masonry versus wrought iron screening wall. Don Bowen asked if there were any noise limitations to the site plan? John Pitstick said yes, there is a noise regulation and ordinance with the site plan that will be enforced if needed. Chairman Shiflet opened the Public Hearing. Charlie Martinez, 4812 Nancy Lane, NRH came forward and recommended that the Commission accept the Huggins proposal for the development. Matt Weinrich, 4901 Susan Lee, NRH came forward stating he has started a petition against no curb cut access to residential areas bordering Huggins Honda from Short Street, concerns of traffic safety for neighborhood children walking, trash from the dealership on his property. Steve Montgomery, 4920 and 4930 Cloyce Ct, NRH came forward and is favor of the proposal and masonry wall. Kathy Creecy, 4905 Susan Lee, NRH came forward with concerns of safety of children walking on Susan Lee and Nancy Lane because Huggins Honda employees are zipping down the street. Margie Lilly, 4917 Nancy Lane, NRH came forward with traffic concerns on Nancy Lane if truck traffic comes down the street and if Susan Lee would be open to the service road. She is agreement with the development and looks forward to it improving the neighborhood. Chairman Shiflet said Susan Lee would not be open to the service road, but possibly depending on what the recommendations are tonight and what City Council approves, as proposed they would have access to where someone could come in from Susan Lee or Short Street and use the parking lot, but the roadway itself would not be open. There was a general discussion about Susan Lee and Short Street and the traffic route. Richard Postma, 4905 Nancy Lane, NRH, came forward with concerns of landscaping going across Susan Lee to make a better buffer, speed bumps and concerning the possible carwash noise. Chairman Shiflet asked if anyone else wished to speak for or against, seeing none he closed the Public Hearing and entertained a motion. Chairman Shiflet asked Caroline Waggoner to make a note on the paint on the speed bumps. Matt Moore came back to the podium to address the questions by citizens. He said regarding the carwash, the cars will actually enter the wash from the north side of the building so the driers are located on the south side and will help with the noise concerns. Between the driers being located away from right -of -way, landscaping and masonry screening wall, we feel these items will mitigate the sound concerns. Regarding the traffic on Nancy Lane, there are no curb cuts proposed on Nancy Lane. There have been modifications to the internal circulation of the site based on comments from Staff so the trucks will be getting out onto the frontage road and not cut through the residential streets. We prefer to see the access to Susan Lee to remain on the plan. Chairman Shiflet asked if the opening being proposed onto Short Street required by fire code? Will it be open during business hours? Matt Moore said he does not believe it is for fire code, we do have other access points shown on the site plan. It will be open during business hours, but the main access points obviously along the frontage road. We don't feel like cut through traffic through the dealership will be a concern because it doesn't provide a visual corridor that indicates that option. We would consider closing the gate if it became a concern. Ron Huggins with Huggins Honda came forward stating he is not looking to have a thoroughfare and wants the customers to come in off the frontage road. It is a necessity to have the access open as it has been for over 28 years. As the dealership has grown we have developed and needed the access and there have been no accidents at this point. Regarding the employees, Mr. Huggins said he has made note of it and will have a discussion with employees and it will not be an issue. The back access from Susan Lee to Short Street will not be main thoroughfare and it will be controlled. Don Bowen asked if they used the Short Street entrance as part of the test drive route? Ron Huggins said no they do not. Mike Benton asked what would be the main function of the entrance. Ron Huggins said primarily for our business. For the customers, there will be a fence/ gate on the east and west side of the building, similar to what is there now to secure the back lot. The bulk of the traffic will be driven to the access road. Chairman Shiflet asked if they would consider narrowing the opening from 30 ft. to 24 ft.? Ron Huggins said he would prefer to leave it as is. He said he feels that pulling in on Susan Lee from the frontage road is much more comfortable and safer for all people involved. If the road gets narrower it will cause less security. Bill Schopper said he feels another exit is better helps with all the freeway expansion traffic and it helps with better circulation around the site. Also, Mr. Schopper said he relents on the wrought iron wall and agrees with the masonry wall. Chairman Shiflet asked if anyone else wished to speak for or against. Seeing none, he closed the Public Hearing and entertained a motion. APPROVED Don Bowen motioned to approve ZC 2012 -06 as proposed with staff recommendation with a masonry wall be installed along Short Street. The motion was seconded by Mike Benton and passed unanimously (5 -0). There was a general discussion about the masonry screening wall on Short Street. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. D.0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Items to follow do not require a public hearing. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. D.1 RP 2012 -07 Consideration of a Request from Claymoore Engineering for a Replat to create Lots 1R2 and 2R2, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition on property currently described as Lots 1R, 2R and 3R, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition and Lots 'IRA, 1 RB and 2R, Block 42CR, Richland Terrace Addition located on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820 Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Senior Planner CASE SUMMARY: On behalf of H &H Pearson – Huggins Limited Partnership (Huggins Honda), Claymoore Engineering is requesting approval of a Replat for Lots 1 R2 and 2R2, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition for the purpose of redeveloping a car dealership on 13.22 acres located on NE Loop 820 between Nancy Lane and Cloyce Court. The proposed Lot 2R2, located at the corner of Nancy and Loop 820, would continue to operate a used car dealership. The remaining 11.436 acres of the plat —Lot 1 R2 —is planned for a complete demolition and redevelopment project for a new car dealership and auto service center for Huggins Honda. For additional details on the property and the redevelopment PD being proposed, see City Council's Memorandum for Case ZC 2012 -06 on this same agenda (Agenda Item No. C.3). ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY: No additional public street paving, sanitary sewer or drainage facilities are needed to provide service to these lots. However, the Subdivision will be required to have sidewalks installed along its frontage during the building permit process on each lot. Such items/improvements (sidewalks) are roughly proportionate to the proposed Subdivision. Therefore, the developer will be required to design and construct these items/improvements per current minimum City standards. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this item at their meeting on August 16, 2012 and recommended approval by a 5 -0 vote. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of RP 2012 -07. a r 0 a r v v `o z a REPLAT EXHIBIT > = ww ea BitfrimN &CRvwPoRD mmoponw WHING a BEGUN= —1 —1 —T SHOW STREET 11. — .1-T �w .6 �11 rp.s F, Hwy $ -WLC'l X 1, J , — I1 43B ACRES 4 � 7 498.173 SQ. FT) Ul 'P W�v L4 4111 1 ER -N tm%ro —e ur .V N m-'ra'm W TTT I Aw I L nx T zz_ 11 :ffT - LOT 2R2. BLOCK I XW Z.._Wr II W W ly W 5'Qrw 1,784 ACRES Lim' (?7,1392 SQ. FT.) REPLAT LCTS 1 R2 AND 2Ft? SLCCK 1 FUVERCROVM ADDITM T—M 'Um caeca mrDrmermuuK W. unfuce WWV, AMTRACr M mm M ARE M ff L B 1R. P MD ak R 1. R4 MGWW AMffM MD LM I R W Aap 2R. K0C QGR RF']IIAPATHWE MOffnN PIAT AF AA W2T. W. b— WM REPLAT EXHIBIT (pg Z) »rosrSixEe'[ , ar Pe. ar eca w�c Ron - Dr - �I II s h II II II II II I �I I �I I� II II II I III 8 b III I si[rxr S>•x�si' �,>• � er.0 R,.re Aexr- or - M>xa I F a� +N6 Pial {R �l f I ^I � I �' a f rb i eP1[HACe •nauen• ➢eOTCAnorc ,rc f@S PyR C= ®i ®0 moo® � t'I��'Jf: al•tf [ 3Ri�iFAg[ Y•CS��hr:R.�fa �'f fe!! HfLf sT�nTCa�raea ri1N�LaS,lek 13 PFMAO- nOCCdri LFMeT FYlITNERD,P. atrgged Oxe�handeegned lk deY tller�M agora ame me rr n—a¢ee me an aacwweeeaem w.rarwa navy,w re. �, Te� ,dan W a renrc wrtonln.dee��redem.annh.� oad R.�d. o,.n. T.,oaeMwa¢ a.+w�rwetleaa e. xY¢.,.a LE0P1 DE9PAF'I'gN �raR H D r Fk Nr a M y �enager Wae eneaenw. *aenieerlq. dl eNe ahlnwded'n Lturp hMb Fk H C21l1tt:I51i dMe d T Rawi�WiemlC ry. e ®.eid al dLq: tR� uRaawimdW IR gW n, RVFAWtp1Tl KORgFSeM Cqd WM RkHeM IFq TtlercCaaq. Teen amyerrcn erprak¢rm n aenar n Uwaam, q na Pr eanma gTaeae [xurq, *m4. w Veeprc q wr rea u M�dtReehanuL Rewaw ravlwoenoorrlDrY .efieeadk.H,n lticlBMMk. *enrcc aa.r e. mdnlb ahlremR.d s:eansLasuan. FAR RawRadreeac ed Tatlr. eM¢mcn, ewe vyurtemaaam .k,Trre¢unynw.aYee�'Aauew� lASISe.P�rmden n:n�dreren cmrtr -r¢� e.n eemr�P�A�.r a.ea�abf m.r eama:�eeuhae. eerrrYRA:r.>9 ad � R.e HaM®emeeN der® Lm x a� R e,re„a.>a d An xvn �y�o3� Irbd&vt&nepGAfurtune oeMv.grc�vFinaFL wfi ne Y.vx i'pitv4ee. Ye NtemFr¢mle ra%nr done Fatlmmmryrie¢t tlotlaW UtaH, eid is TR etra l.eMte uatl rynmaRy hecml rsry I. Aa bq tlep neewtr.ald[w.tagaa�c�asAeeRameW aq.q m•wt�, ane a cod wamp a or u•u E ,srm ie[, W e u• ime w kum Yew rR cuh eurx; 2 .tAbq ma ee•eon ua rwH wma artWem mmk d'mnin aR,vn ma nevi eawy noceaRrmwgctld R a 5W ,PaeE TaA.aa.i ma F•Ieawktla; ♦ _ E aaAxtnd.aex•ion rm nw.ed l3mnevenead '. xteliw neynry ne oax r. edmTeaEArmir axe eet aoRT wneuwme ¢roMin,ry¢o,tndteeasY�,¢mroereW. c¢a'aaeY•, aedacwRneeRpsls t6M mveama eiRaetld aorynaswn noeaary rm acm Arc tR aR,w wnnnWxa¢yIncarmstas AW —ua.en M.. r¢ a sra•,.�rr WBTa�waTaPDrmaP,earcT«.e: t. w0 r&w %bfeL:ae fa00i �sunerckae Rre Eex mrrrRanea Nba oanaeedt .n=w ee eood ewmW n cwrtk can Rn nv. D11 gR Owe RaP..m atra.arc mn.,r. reaa: nnanee rtl a ud sYm vTa.,,: rtln, Were ne m.MPn tl nvx..� atl. a wtivd h.eaeh. nvtlw Ha �e m turtle: . nR'arer rr um raa. manxatl�nwrtew ..atelnana r,ae R MRiHWFSTBTLr IAAAU hR, degmdcewlote roMie.Ya ¢ndle d2Aa,.eGlmt ¢cmnalu�e d ab 2 lfti nme Aan. bvMVllne o YTe nrrtmnr aviPne sedn Mu Va y raw ttratl Irc,R aM,w NoM np[MwaY Ina a adiwaa Ir!¢gxa Hgmc�• No. l96 ®bker: t1. Haw�Arw 661YliwLtleH'mnim mMed 9etind[t.,kad'.eanfievhat we+mn he a aR re the eaa,evwaay�ne aaltmwd mr 1R eiva eu+, wa wId enM wv mxa story tunedanodd W t 1 D wn�emm�e SebdTwa.gme dew nmRnn6wq belraFk no 26BtAi d the Ocm ?etude d IevrtYLegk, Tkm merles ea m read ea¢In,dar,dw,ne leedTaxsw to road imRad In �rtk Cbn Flh no.Ol11aW6}3 d Ne Dee Reaad, d Tuttle Cady, Tee¢ beio Ne mw ereh �Ammvy ue atleme mane nyrtl. w. em, ar rmn: I SWID O wx Lme T wrvmueercWeRnn c d¢e.aee A Ia MRMW[lTellY MA T dea ad Gorr a ft roM itld�ea :red AAll Wi .w W¢be d AY]A2Y`, ndeatla beuhen&T° a,` aAA.a{ .ee T� Tvorxnercew RYe arie A H�WMIW alAZS kn. m¢1M10inmunee baR: Il 14S°11'Ww 10 &ren.we TaWrnorvneniwd Rls Weld bM mTw db de See dT«veWle geed ivawed'nC¢amaCblh Fh Hv.02112AlBPd lrrgin he rriR ea•erYlwaaaaaa Nf req ane�¢an �gnnavy Mevlcyoe MapmrgYra yfa �bcd•eark *HPw av+pne wHrewmyev xuq an+eq�.elaq rga�r.e.y tiewclt.W Sew,xwarR IB, rY/tTHEA ml f MHA1kd. dwgeeewbAaldweirA:¢eeis d;'.A6lAfed,earfie egeN #ieeP. M n ROw nraPrA H 1T iA'tP a ley ea teat W a � Ml Ye,: Ii. HCe'M'al'W MAI kd. m¢'A"i. r 'Whhh /Cmwh�d. evlR NelbNr- atwrtard ibntPY tw+wa, N!G+Ytleea*raaangna eU,R ^Y•a�ra gyrsyfpeana+tm wrawn ihYenlar he daPoewh Short keel: *HCrce aervxe .a *rear. n.swe�yreswrx. q.aea.nwannaxarn Re rwmKMa Fr .e�w.nr did nR re e�x acR tld fi. Nefi..,d�nP derarmu aR lR rneTeµ! enp �r ryt aprd na»¢l p[nr- wYO.q.�aq AVn epaalwJn�rgippaaypyay dwdlmR hYb FO!lf OFe�I1HeN9 madnre ll.TSAewm Y.V.lANl same Fa Idled r/�p xuRi91'txi•, t MNW.Ra I•Rlf. VWPIN6 CUYFdCCMEF.Hekffmw OC MU> TTENnG�idW or�R H0a PF.WiGCW - H.i6&N6 t1NREq PAAT1FAIikIP NORTH R� lANO Ht1R. T%]H q Cmra; � r Rqu NyQarq NM.. TIEPEFCRF. N KL M9Y 6TThIM PFEeE Fwra¢- aaaghc untie P hi,, nr—"h An ar Wop , h—Y -L nea Hxmekgt�FV m a Yyt.QpWik b .!e pypxW ypnnan Wk I ,, wrrW xra; ever ,ta OV anee Ryrvn IN rwne M., ,ama, ae eeer Weeny da�naie rpik wrap ew ekaavro Ram eem Iu ne pae^a. a wercmv�.wa rom. RrrrEA� nr nn,e: Fanwdn Taktl Gently, Taea eh_.apa � sax H. a H Paear¢ - Manw unwd P.mewro Rn H a kRdaeaA�I a= ne.e tlna.I,.ed aane.,k. � new Prtltlw ae ae.d rm, nagwa mna n Fa�art • e navewd Fmk.nb k,e.., n rm e ro �.n ®ten n Pwnae Re am. ee re.w.o ero— gpsm me MR he¢ewkMxemebr eervwae•kR md�[m aa wnad ati •,m r4aeeytnrve dzaq ad aetlw.rta�e dew a meianPrtl� eR m�tloa 0NduW9tAtt HN -. OK£IM- _eerx�N12 MrCr+en'dm bUma RYOY! AL NER. AY R1�E PREfEHTC iM Y LWR2L 511 ¢Rmih Pa - 1¢NSeaeRr FwmRbile 91.e dreee.dohooky a*s6 wetNia PYdieM eq mmp ue xee muted htln n eeaW emy reManwrry ¢aeiv.mn erA^>MA eI¢hdreeel} REPLAT LOTS in AW ]RZ 6LON 1 RIVERCROWN ADDITION CTaFHIIRTH iA RICN s RRWdr COLMTY, TF]iA9 ARmSA RPM MU LIM A. M-0 VR A10CI(A MY AD V M AND LOTS I RA 1% MD M. MIX A21RRC IAW iERRPGE ALO PM A�raeRR mu+s ims MrRLED N9 HST.. Ha 0 . MBE wli09AE Na- RPN OF PAST' 2 OF 2 EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 1G, 2012 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING RP 2012 -07 Consideration of a Request from Claymoore Engineering for a Replat to create Lots 1R2 and 2R2, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition on property currently described as Lots 1 R, 2R and 3R, Block 1, Rivercrown Addition and Lots 1 RA, 1RB and 2R, Block 42CR, Richland Terrace Addition located on 13.22 acres at 7551 NE Loop 820. Matt Moore, Claymoore Engineering, 1105 Cheek Sparger, Colleyville, TX came forward with a replat to combine 5 lots into a single lot to accommodate the proposed site plan for the zoning case for Huggins Honda. This replat will be two lots, one surrounding the used car center and another one to house the new proposed dealership. John Pitstick said this is a replat to combine the entire PD into 2 lots for the used car and new dealership. There is no rough proportionality or additional public streets required for this replat. APPROVED Kathy Luppy motioned to approve RP 2012 -07 as proposed. The motion was seconded by Don Bowen and passed unanimously (5 -0). M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. D.2 FP 2012 -03 Consideration of a Request from Integrated Real Estate Group for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Home Town Canal District located on 9.645 acres in the 8640 Block of Mid Cites Boulevard. Presenter: John Pitstick, Director of Planning & Development CASE SUMMARY: On behalf of Arcadia Land Partners 25, Ltd., Integrated Real Estate Group is requesting approval of a Final Plat for one lot of 9.645 acres within the Town Center zoning district and bounded by Mid - Cities Boulevard and the recently dedicated Ice House Drive. Staff has reviewed the plat and site plan and both conform to the requirements outlined in the amended comprehensive developer agreement between Arcadia and the City. Approval of the Final Plat will allow construction to commence on the "Enclave at Hometown," a multi- family residential development of 238 apartment units and 22 townhome rental units totaling just over 140,000 square feet. Five percent of the lot's total acreage will also be dedicated for public use through public open space easements. The Town Center Zoning District requires staff approval of a Site Plan that meets the regulations of the District and the Concept Plan before the property can be platted and developed. As such, a Site Plan for these 10 acres was reviewed by staff and certified by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 10, 2012. The certification by DRC means that this development will be ready for infrastructure installation and full building permit review and construction once the Final Plat for the lot is approved by City Council. Both the Concept Plan and selected Site Plan sheets are attached for reference. CURRENT PLATTING: None of the 9.645 acres in the Tandy K. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1055 and Landon C. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1652 is currently platted. A Preliminary Plat that included this lot was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission on April 19, 2012. The Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat. CURRENT ZONING: "TC" Town Center. The zoning entitles this specific tract to a maximum of 260 multi- family units, which the developer has taken. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for "Town Center" uses, which is a mix of higher - density and complementing uses planned under a Traditional Neighborhood Development model. THOROUGHFARE PLAN: The lot will have its primary and secondary entrances off of Ice House Drive on its southern property line. Ice House Drive is a "ST- 64 -38" thoroughfare, which is intended to accommodate the free movement of traffic in two directions at a maximum design speed of 30 MPH. Parallel parking, a continuous seven foot wide landscape planter strip, and a six foot sidewalk are provided on both sides of the street. Street lights are provided at 140' intervals and street trees are provided at 30' intervals. City Council approved the Final Plat dedicating Ice House Drive as public right -of -way at their meeting on August 13, 2012. Additional access will be provided on the east property line to Cardinal Lane, where the plat is also dedicating right -of -way for the 30 -foot alley and its portion of Cardinal Lane. No direct access is provided to Mid - Cities Boulevard. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY DETERMINATION: The public improvements necessary for the Hometown Canal District, Block 1, Lot 1 (the "Subdivision ") include the installation of water, sanitary sewer, drainage, traffic signal and pavement facilities. With the exception of the future traffic signal improvements necessary at the intersection of Mid - Cities Blvd and Cardinal Lane (the proposed Ice House Drive), the construction of these public infrastructure items is wholly required for the development of the Subdivision as proposed by the developer. Therefore, the developer will be required to assume 100% of the amount required for such public infrastructure improvements which will be indicated on the final approved public infrastructure construction plans for the Subdivision. The Enclave development will also contribute approximately 20% of the traffic at the intersection of Mid - Cities Boulevard and Ice House Drive (currently Cardinal Lane) and as such will be required to pay their proportional share of $40,000 for the future signal light planned at this intersection. The Amendment to the Home Town Comprehensive Development Agreement indicates that Arcadia and the City will also be responsible for splitting equally the remaining cost of this traffic signal at the time the signal light is warranted. The above determination of proportionality is made pursuant to Section 212.904, Texas Local Government Code by the undersigned professional engineer in the employ of the City of North Richland Hills, licensed by the State of Texas. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of FP 2012 -03. Unit Quantity Unit Price % Assessed Total Traffic Signal: Mid - Cities Boulevard @ Cardinal Lane future Ice House Drive EA 1 $200,000 20% $40,000.00 Total: 1 $40,000.00 The above determination of proportionality is made pursuant to Section 212.904, Texas Local Government Code by the undersigned professional engineer in the employ of the City of North Richland Hills, licensed by the State of Texas. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of FP 2012 -03. LOCATION MAP AERIAL PHOTO FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT 1� s AM G=BO=A �*A�afUaL iwYxMrnn!§e ax meY nr2inl.zc J a point of beg ming �� s�E �' A yl l�q Ili s I� + Nm �� Y �� a xamw �' A yl l�q Ili eo-muya a. _ Acing 9445=c saf Iwo out aF the - °°�. —• '°• .•.:we..>r, T-%. MAMNSURVEY.ABSTRACTNo.f055 and 8x ..rne.,.u,r. imlww n �A� Z 7�orirrw mn m„fo:xx+eade.e ,�f. pm�ix - rwx Mad w nstr�t No. race I.ot I, Block 1 �q 9.471 Ams {s � �riicw c� � �°,_ gzuvrcra a � nit= 0 I Tf.»s ma fa Yl Rh ` c Location Nasw,r � y � w,w nr..wry -� MILLER - warm. Surveying, inn. Mkbrpufl -Wmupo A, i5]I.,tlC Fu 6e7.671A6P3 rsr�ai �� Lot 1, Block T PUBLIC ETSE FASRMEN + Nm �� Y �� a xamw a�.m���e � � �`,�1 Ili eo-muya a. _ Acing 9445=c saf Iwo out aF the - °°�. —• '°• .•.:we..>r, T-%. MAMNSURVEY.ABSTRACTNo.f055 and 8x ..rne.,.u,r. imlww n �A� Z 7�orirrw mn m„fo:xx+eade.e Nasw,r � y � w,w nr..wry -� MILLER - warm. Surveying, inn. Mkbrpufl -Wmupo A, i5]I.,tlC Fu 6e7.671A6P3 rsr�ai �� Lot 1, Block T w HOMETOWN CANAL DISTRICT � +urwwmm.n. a�.m���e � � na.ddWve. the [1yd%nW BkhWdFWk Yazue,0. p,'h«m w�*aax n+RaS a. _ Acing 9445=c saf Iwo out aF the - °°�. —• '°• .•.:we..>r, T-%. MAMNSURVEY.ABSTRACTNo.f055 and 8x ..rne.,.u,r. G C. WALKER SURVEY. AR9f8AC7' Na 1662 m„fo:xx+eade.e ,�f. pm�ix - rwx Mad w nstr�t No. race CONCEPT PLAN HOMETOWN CANAL DISTRICT Certified by the Development Review Committee __________ __ __ T Ttl RTH! North Blohland EMr, TX L9 3 -d I 2 sowed Wb-r=1 "'1) 1 2 0 LEGEND LOCATION MAP Open Space / HOA lot Detached Homes Townhomes Multifamily Proposed Pedestrian Walks 7 tt Walker's Crock Trail F Park Trail to be Demolished APPLICAW CONSULTANT MARCH 5, Arcadia Realty CnrP. Roan EWmk DC lopr cw Co. 2012 3500 MBplc Arm, suite 1165 101 Summi Av Suite 606 Dallas, TX Bill Oietema, 972 774 9110 F(vrt Wwil,, TX 76102 Dan Q,into, 817 706 8353 RTH! North Blohland EMr, TX L9 3 -d I 2 sowed Wb-r=1 "'1) 1 2 0 AREA TABULATION HOMETOWN CONCEPT PLAN TRACT53 &4 s�em.a .unsxaE s�ac� ura a�r+�rcr F__ l� 7 J_ ff__ f _ __ Ila ' • ; t xrs SCALE: 1" PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PLAN LEGEND 0 Opcn Space 1 HOA lot Detached Homes Townhomes Multifamily Proposed Pedestrian Walks Walker's Creek Trail Park Trail to be Demolished All designated walks are G min APPLICANT MARCH 5, Airadia Ps lty Care 2fl 12 3500 MapEc Ave, suix 136,5 Dallas, TX _Bill [7iekcma, 972 774 91 PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE MEWS BLOCKS Fomag BraUk Derelopm t Ca Nudh Richland Bills, TX SHE6'r 141 Sammit Aw. Suite 606 Tracts 3 aid 4 O f` Fork Worth, TX 76102 Semnd su6a ilktal , Mar 4, 2012 Dan Quinto, 817 706 8353 m:.?.K. `nn 3 - R'i'g' cicys CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION OF MULTIFAMILY BUILDING ' kl it� It ► x lifl►�:'� ,tu►ta� l iti'■ PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE MEWS BLOCKS Fomag BraUk Derelopm t Ca Nudh Richland Bills, TX SHE6'r 141 Sammit Aw. Suite 606 Tracts 3 aid 4 O f` Fork Worth, TX 76102 Semnd su6a ilktal , Mar 4, 2012 Dan Quinto, 817 706 8353 m:.?.K. `nn 3 - R'i'g' cicys CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION OF MULTIFAMILY BUILDING SITE PLAN "ENCLAVE AT HOMETOWN" Certified by the Development Review Committee August 10, 2012 ' i ' f I ray I A . e 1 BURGESS F & NIPLE �wxn r��.uss�Ar..:as svgs I E, r V r� ci min, :.rc �. KK..,w vrr,..r.,a. �n FOR mn.°mt «,.rr w..r .,[K:,p M •,:n H i ;iU` 1 1 1 1 I . . E1 : e r" li d i r ti HOMF.FUI><1' _ _ I LAHGl7N C. WALKER AV AN DON C K Y - AMTkACT)( O -Ii52 41 RUSTRACT N iY 1 S LS T K C1T H.THKICHI. H11.1.5 ?ar[aRrn rocvFV, �_.. �' rsvi vna ma •• ,pr Siu � '�-�,� :...ti 2 M�wwi�vn vwmn. ser ve BURGESS F & NIPLE �wxn r��.uss�Ar..:as svgs ... _...._ ... . L - - E, r V r� ci min, :.rc �. KK..,w vrr,..r.,a. �n FOR mn.°mt «,.rr w..r .,[K:,p M •,:n H i ;iU` 1 1 1 1 I . . E1 : e r" li ... _...._ ... . L - - SrrE PLAN �n FOR ENCLAVE AT II(A.1.1111 IAH;A]MON I'm 1,DLOCK I OP TIE_+ wM'a,m HOMF.FUI><1' T�I Y. 1155 LAHGl7N C. WALKER AV AN DON C K Y - AMTkACT)( O -Ii52 41 RUSTRACT N iY 1 S LS T K C1T H.THKICHI. H11.1.5 ?ar[aRrn rocvFV, BUILDING TYPE 3 ELEVATIONS Top Elevation = View along Ice House Drive on West Side - --------- LNM-E PFV' , a , ,M PACE WM - A8CPW. 434 VDIK. V FIF6t PL R 13UWJN4 T 3 - �,DRTR WFT) Z.FVATIDM IL SPJ LU A A. LU > 9 LLI 4432 nl—� 4 INILDR4 rrF2 "W (TAWFPJ LJCVATICT. ki-i ®R OKKiI VISIBLE FIhR1 ELCCKFACP IWX ABONRT 434 SIDIM. Q FIRST PuGR 17111 II II MKI MUlm -� 1 M MRIMM IuiIJ91 II�IIA 11 ", Mill mi no Elm — M 1 1 0 0 M110 MINIMIZ I 1 2115 Al, 4 INILDR4 rrF2 "W (TAWFPJ LJCVATICT. ki-i ®R OKKiI VISIBLE FIhR1 ELCCKFACP IWX ABONRT 434 SIDIM. Q FIRST PuGR BUILDING TYPE 1 ELEVATIONS Top Elevations = View along Mid-Cities Blvd o .. .......... a 4 1 [nn .-H 0 FN FfflP 111-4 ------------ --------- A- I E.Cnl< F 4�,E =� `-5C�N Q5T P_t-Q ......... ..... 5 pi-mit, ViVA ME ------ ! ai L! Li - ,15 HE —�9 15LCCX =AC:E XW% - A50,R� 4A Fq1tr FlEi5 wwaoY4 100�6 41 tD Ui LU Lu A4_13 F TYPICAL TOWNHOUSE ELEVATIONS .......... TCW-OWIDE TYPE I To"Cisa Tyn I - ION (_2 yOl7NIRIGNTSELEVA Li lu 3: + 7 X lz Z to NP%H rA8r• 5- 2012- M , OWNI-Oju TrOm 1 c l l m—,— 5"*rc , Nlv� ION Ml ............ TowhAoueE Tyf:g I knaQ .......... TCW-OWIDE TYPE I To"Cisa Tyn I - ION (_2 yOl7NIRIGNTSELEVA Li lu 3: + 7 X lz Z to NP%H rA8r• 5- 2012- M , OWNI-Oju TrOm 1 c l l m—,— 5"*rc , Nlv� ION CLIJ3HOZE - NORTH (REAR) ELEVATIO a rs u.rR .I I 1E,_ ME 6:12 LIAO. CLuBHt] -EAST lRIGHJ ELEV4TICN lu 4 z � Lu . CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS CT.UBHOLl:iE - 11.�5T fLEfTJ ELEVA ON EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 16, 2012 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FP 2012 -03 Consideration of a Request from Integrated Real Estate Group for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Home Town Canal District located on 9.645 acres in the 8600 Block of Mid Cites Boulevard. Kenneth Fambro, Vice President, Integrated Real Estate Group, 707 Brycen Way, Southlake, TX came forward with a request for Final Plat of Home Town Canal District. John Pitstick said the Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat have already come forward and this is the Final Plat for Lot 1 Block 1 Horne Town Canal District. This 9.645 acre within the Town Center Zoning District between Mid Cities and the recently dedicated Ice House Drive is being developed as multi - family residential 238 apartment units and 22 townhome rental units. Five percent of the lots total acreage is being dedicated as public use through public open space easements. As part of the Final Plat there is rough proportionality determination which includes the developer to pay 100% of the public infrastructure improvements. They will be adding lighting on Ice House Drive and putting up $40,000.00 out of $200,000.00 requirement for a traffic signal at Ice House and Mid Cities. The traffic signal will be put in when it is warranted. This will be the first major development on the east side since about 2007. Staff recommends approval of this Final Plat. ►•IUUY.7■i=1■1 Mike Benton motioned to approve FP 2012 -03 as proposed. The motion was seconded by Kathy Luppy and passed unanimously (5 -0). M RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. E.0 PUBLIC WORKS M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. E.1 PW 2012 -024 Award Contract for the CIP Project Identified as Rufe Snorer Drive Pavement and Striping Improvements Project (ST1202) in the Capital Improvements Budget for FY 201112012 Presenter: Jimmy Cates, Public Works Operations Manager Summary: The City Council is being asked to award a contract for the CIP Project identified as Rufe Snow Drive Pavement and Striping Improvements Project (ST1202) in the Capital Improvements Budget for FY 201112012. General Description: On August 09, 2012, a bid opening was conducted for the Rufe Snow Drive Pavement and Striping Improvements Project. This project will consist of the removal and replacement of the existing raised pavement markers, cross -walk markings, stop bars, lane divider indications, and legend arrows along several segments of Rufe Snow Drive. Notice of the city's intent to bid was advertised in local newspapers, as required by state statue and posted on the city's website. The project received four (4) bids, which were opened during the August Stn bid opening. The bids were as follows: CONTRACTOR NAME TOTAL BID Total Highway Maintenance, LLC $96,970.75 TRIP Construction Group, LLC $116,210.50 Stripe —A -Zone, INC. $124,613.25 Road Master Striping, LLC $144,759.75 Staff recommends awarding the contract to the low bidder Total Highway Maintenance, LLC who has been in business for about 10 years. Staff contacted references from nearby cities that have used Total Highway Maintenance, LLC for similar work and the references agree that their projects were completed on time and met project specifications. Recommendation Award RFB No. 12 -030 to Total Highway Maintenance, LLC in the amount of $96,970.75 for the Rufe Snow Drive Pavement and Striping Improvement Project (ST1202). h �, = �Illlru Pa v e ment . =I Improvements WOW ff _ �■ �6 r - me al 1-�- - ■ 1 1 ■x..11 � ,,._ ���, RICHLAND HILLS Project Locator Map mom M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. E.2 PW2012 -025 Award contract for Reliable Paving, Inc. to Perform Sub - Grade Stabilization Services for the Preventive Street Maintenance Program (SM 1201 ) Presenter: Jimmy Cates, Public Works Operations Manager Summary: The City Council is being asked to award a contract to Reliable Paving, Inc. to perform sub -grade stabilization services. The sub -grade stabilization will take place as part of the "Preventive Street Maintenance Program" (Project # SM1201) which is identified in the Capital Projects Budget for FY 2011/2012. The 2012 Preventive Street Maintenance Program was recommended by the CIP Committee on May 1, 2012 and approved by City Council on June 11, 2{}12. General Description: On August 09, 2012, a bid opening was conducted for the Miscellaneous Street Sub - Grade Stabilization Project. This project consists of removing the existing asphalt surface and stabilizing the sub -grade using a Portland cement product on three streets. The street sections are as follows: Street Sections Blocks Bursey Road South 7800 -7955 Stewart Drive 8700 Simmons Rd. to Chilton Dr. Jerri Jo Drive 8300 Strummer Dr. to Culdesac Notice of the city's intent to bid was advertised in local newspapers, as required by state statue and posted on the city's website. The city received three (3) bids, which were opened during the August 9 th bid opening. The bids were as follows: CONTRACTOR NAME TOTAL BID Reliable Paving, Inc. $54,652.40 McClendon Construction Co.,lnc. $67,218.00 Stabile & Winn, Inc. $68,606.00 Staff recommends awarding the contract to the low bidder. Reliable Paving, Inc. has performed similar work for the city. Their work was of satisfactory quality, met all city specifications, and was completed on schedule. Recommendation Award RFB No. 12 -031 to Reliable Paving, Inc. in the amount of $54,652.40 for the Miscellaneous Street Sub -Grade Stabilization Project which is a portion of the 2012 Preventive Street Maintenance Project (SM1201) M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. F.0 GENERAL ITEMS M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. F.1 GN 2012 -076 Adopting the 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget and Amending the 2011 -2012 Revised Budget - Ordinance No. 3217 Presenter: Mark Mills, Budget Director Summary: Council is requested to consider the approval of an ordinance adopting: • The Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Annual Budget and Plan for Municipal Expenditures; • The Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Annual Budget and Plan of Municipal Expenditures, • The Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Capital Projects Budget; and • The Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Capital Project Amendments. General Description: The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 was filed with the City Secretary's Office on August 6, 2012. This proposed budget was also available at the NRH Public Library and on the City's website. All necessary publications and hearings have been completed in compliance with City Charter requirements, special taxing district rules and procedures, and State law. The Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 General Fund budget is based on a 610 tax rate, which represents a 4¢ tax rate increase. The entire 4¢ tax increase is attributable to the voter passage of the May 2012 bond election for the construction of a new municipal complex. Of this 610 tax rate, 35.1076¢ is dedicated for General Fund maintenance and operations. This maintenance operations tax rate is 0.5343¢ lower than the maintenance and operations rate in the previous year. The interest and sinking portion of the tax rate, which goes to pay principal and interest on tax supported debt issued by the City, is 25.8924¢. This interest and sinking rate is 4.5343¢ higher than the previous year. Revisions have been made to the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 revenues and expenditures to reflect the most current estimates for the current fiscal year. The 2011 -2012 Revised Annual Operating Budget and 2012 -2013 Proposed Operating Budget for all funds are as follows t�) Each of these funds are Internal Service Funds, which receive allocations from the other funds. These allocations are used to cover the majority of expenses with each Internal Service Fund. While necessary to appropriate the funds in the manner above, it should be noted that expenses funded by allocations received by an Internal Service Fund are also reflected as expend itureslexpenses (the allocation) within the contributing funds. In addition, resources such as interest income, other income, and fund balance are also used to offset any expenses in excess of these allocations. The Proposed Capital Improvements Budget totals $22,039,204 between project categories is as follows: Category Street & Sidewalk Projects Drainage Capital Projects Utility Capital Projects Parks & Recreation Projects Aquatic Park Projects Municipal Facility Projects Major Capital Equipment Projects Economic Development Projects CIP — Other The breakdown 2012 -2013 Proposed $3,879,540 0 3,299,016 1,224,598 452,000 11,511,600 765,000 0 907,450 In addition, over the course of Fiscal Year 2011 -2012, several projects were revised. Staff will be requesting a formal amendment to the 2011 -2012 Capital Projects Budget to include the changes summarized below. Detailed revision forms have been included in the attachments to this item. 2011-2012 2012 -2013 Revised Proposed General Fund $39,883,558 $40,747,073 Debt Service Fund 11,740,595 9,820,708 Park & Rec Facilities Dev Fund 7,851,499 7,620,861 Crime Control District Fund 4,301,447 4,395,500 Promotional Fund 171,182 211,528 Donations Fund 176,392 151,297 Special Investigations Fund 516,540 550,904 Drainage Utility Fund 855,034 798,721 Gas Development Fund 439,881 439,843 Traffic Safety Fund 914,429 901,343 Utility Fund 27,714,111 28,857,615 Aquatic Park Fund 4,656,707 4,734,297 Golf Course Fund 2,458,221 2,542,290 Facilities /Construction Management Fund E' 2,668,041 2,811,052 Fleet Services Fund 3,352,713 3,293,231 Information Services Fund 3,011,395 2,898,163 Self Insurance Fund (') 9,684,713 10,058,974 t�) Each of these funds are Internal Service Funds, which receive allocations from the other funds. These allocations are used to cover the majority of expenses with each Internal Service Fund. While necessary to appropriate the funds in the manner above, it should be noted that expenses funded by allocations received by an Internal Service Fund are also reflected as expend itureslexpenses (the allocation) within the contributing funds. In addition, resources such as interest income, other income, and fund balance are also used to offset any expenses in excess of these allocations. The Proposed Capital Improvements Budget totals $22,039,204 between project categories is as follows: Category Street & Sidewalk Projects Drainage Capital Projects Utility Capital Projects Parks & Recreation Projects Aquatic Park Projects Municipal Facility Projects Major Capital Equipment Projects Economic Development Projects CIP — Other The breakdown 2012 -2013 Proposed $3,879,540 0 3,299,016 1,224,598 452,000 11,511,600 765,000 0 907,450 In addition, over the course of Fiscal Year 2011 -2012, several projects were revised. Staff will be requesting a formal amendment to the 2011 -2012 Capital Projects Budget to include the changes summarized below. Detailed revision forms have been included in the attachments to this item. The City of North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors conducted a budget work session on Friday, July 27, 2012 to review the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget. The Board met and held a public hearing on Monday, August 27, 2012 prior to the City Council meeting. The Board adopted the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget and recommend approval by the City Council. All legal notices were published, as required by State law. The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors met on August 27, 2012 to review the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets and held public hearings. The Board approved the Operating and Capital Budgets for both Revised 2011 -2012 and Proposed 2012 -2013 and recommended City Council adoption. All legal notices were published, as required by State law. The City of North Richland Hills City Council conducted a budget work session on Friday, July 27, 2012 to review the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget for all funds. The City Council met and held a public hearing on these budgets on Monday, August 27, 2012 at the regular City Council meeting for the purpose of receiving public comment. All legal notices were published, as required by State law and the City Charter. As previously mentioned, detailed copies of the revised and proposed budgets are on file with the City Secretary's Office, in the Library, and on the City's website. All of these sources are still available for public inspection and review. Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 3217 adopting the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Budget for all funds, adopting revisions and amending the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Budget for all funds, adopting the 2012 -2013 Capital Projects Budget, and amending the Fiscal Year 2011- 2012 Capital Projects Budget. 2011-12 2011 -12 Category Adopted Change Revised Street & Sidewalk Projects $3,105,176 $1 02,584 $3,207,760 Drainage Projects 1,690,000 100,000 1,790,000 Utility Projects 6,585,000 (1,124,909) 5,460,091 Parks & Recreation Projects 2,133,200 35,000 2,168,200 Aquatic Park Projects 90,000 72,151 162,151 Municipal Facility Projects 2,987,636 25,103,520 28,091,156 Major Capital Equipment Projects 960,000 14,873 974,873 Economic Development Projects 150,000 611,454 761,454 Other Capital Projects 841,436 10,000 851,436 Sub -Total $18,542,448 $24,924,673 $43,467,121 The City of North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors conducted a budget work session on Friday, July 27, 2012 to review the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget. The Board met and held a public hearing on Monday, August 27, 2012 prior to the City Council meeting. The Board adopted the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget and recommend approval by the City Council. All legal notices were published, as required by State law. The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors met on August 27, 2012 to review the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets and held public hearings. The Board approved the Operating and Capital Budgets for both Revised 2011 -2012 and Proposed 2012 -2013 and recommended City Council adoption. All legal notices were published, as required by State law. The City of North Richland Hills City Council conducted a budget work session on Friday, July 27, 2012 to review the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Revised Budget and the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Proposed Budget for all funds. The City Council met and held a public hearing on these budgets on Monday, August 27, 2012 at the regular City Council meeting for the purpose of receiving public comment. All legal notices were published, as required by State law and the City Charter. As previously mentioned, detailed copies of the revised and proposed budgets are on file with the City Secretary's Office, in the Library, and on the City's website. All of these sources are still available for public inspection and review. Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 3217 adopting the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Budget for all funds, adopting revisions and amending the Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Budget for all funds, adopting the 2012 -2013 Capital Projects Budget, and amending the Fiscal Year 2011- 2012 Capital Projects Budget. ORDINANCE NO. 3217 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2012 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; ADOPTING THE AMENDED BUDGET FOR OCTOBER 1, 2011 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2012, AND PROVIDING FOR INVESTMENTS AND TRANSFERS WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 102.001, et seq., TEX. Loc. GOVT CODE, the City Manager submitted to the City Council a budget for Fiscal Year 2012- 2013, and the Council determined that a public hearing should be held at a time and place which was set forth in a notice published as required by law; and, WHEREAS, such public hearing on the budget was duly held on August 27, 2012, and all taxpayers were given an opportunity to attend and participate in such public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT the budget for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012, and ending September 30, 2013, in words and figures as shown therein, is adopted and approved as filed herewith. A copy of the approved budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 2. THAT the City Manager be and is hereby authorized to make inter- departmental and inter -fund transfers during the fiscal year as deemed necessary in order to avoid over - expenditure of particular accounts. SECTION 3. THAT the City Manager or his designee be and is hereby authorized to invest any funds not needed for current use in any lawful manner. Interest accrued from investments shall be deposited to the interest income account of the funds from which the principal was invested. SECTION 4. THAT the amended budget for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, filed herewith is hereby amended and approved. A copy of the amended budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 5. THAT the amended capital projects for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, filed herewith are hereby amended and approved. A copy of the amended projects shall be filed with the City Secretary. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 1 Oth day of September, 2012. I] I�' (7�►C�]:i�:� :�Cl:l��l►lfl:ll��� Oscar Trevino, Mayor F -AW U Patricia Hutson, City Secretary ►,1 » :T *] ►1 =1 11_RM 1191010 iii I_1211l1 X01I41 vE George A. Staples, City Attorney ►,1 » ;TQLTj =1 D1_[M Cox@is]'► I d =1 z 16 Mark C. Mills, Budget Director FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 1 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ]W1 :0.111111111RID] ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES $87,871 $74,869 $123,904 $123,9D4 $123,613 Taxes $27,805,362 $28,386,801 $27,810,874 $28,179,951 $28,678,686 Fines & Forfeitures 2,631,813 2,665,135 2,657,750 2,413,461 2,399,032 Licenses & Permits 1,301,823 1,502,822 1,213,675 1,468,774 1,355,715 Charges for Service 2,997,039 3,234,480 2,605,784 2,877,915 3,188,635 Intergovernmental 2,628,721 2,356,659 2,474,492 3,495,734 4,325,821 Miscellaneous 863,839 828,308 990,034 947,851 793,751 SUB -TOTAL $38,228,597 $38,974,205 $37,752,609 $39,383,686 $40,741,640 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 1,182,253 1,224,363 1,297,919 1,321,387 1,304,927 Legal Settlement & Litigation $196,301 $0 $0 $0 $0 Insurance Reserves 115,800 0 0 0 0 Golf Course Loans 392,000 164,500 0 0 0 Retirment Conversion 120,000 0 0 0 0 Court Technology Fund 232,885 0 0 14,185 0 Utility Assistance Program 64,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Previous Year Encumbrances 206,646 256,974 0 474,331 0 SUB -TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,328,132 $441,474 $20,000 $508,516 $20,000 TOTAL REVENUES $39,556,729 $39,415,679 $37,772,609 $39,892,202 $40,761,640 CYPCIdn1TI IRCC 491,893 702,973 673,270 673,270 678,270 City Council $87,871 $74,869 $123,904 $123,9D4 $123,613 City Manager 413,719 474,547 517,090 523,519 523,907 Communications 472,471 387,882 328,922 334,074 338,178 City Secretary 448,543 418,350 442,893 447,717 454,703 Legal 517,378 473,719 348,104 348,1 D4 338,569 Human Resources 107,312 118,975 112,998 113,961 128,322 Finance 699,961 719,254 724,646 730,593 706,801 Budget& Research 355,273 351,854 359,247 360,368 380,372 Municipal Court 1,182,253 1,224,363 1,297,919 1,321,387 1,304,927 Planning and Inspections 877,091 765,738 835,738 891,571 942,551 Economic Development 180,261 161,426 246,696 284,734 298,056 Library 1,855,966 1,879,608 1,950,202 1,974,519 1,992,928 Neighborhood Services 1,390,725 1,518,222 1,586,364 1,635,672 1,592,408 Public Works 3,414,498 3,116,187 3,557,179 3,679,018 3,627,315 Parks & Recreation 2,369,824 2,181,081 1,982,480 2,010,261 2,034,302 Police 9,779,532 10,108,539 10,439,174 11,272,925 12,186,527 Emergency Management 691,772 800,912 790,811 930,757 763,584 Fire 9,078,592 9,485,177 9,668,900 9,875,607 9,938,815 Building Services 491,893 702,973 673,270 673,270 678,270 Non -Departmental 2,324,365 1,327,013 1,678,440 2,067,095 2,140,102 SUB -TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $36,739,300 $36,290,689 $37,664,977 $39,599,056 $40,494,190 RESERVES & OTHER EXPENDITURES Reserves $988,929 $880,683 $50,000 $206,667 $183,000 Transfer to CCD 250,000 0 0 0 0 Transfer to Information Services 0 0 0 70,085 69,883 Transfer to Special Investigations 0 0 0 0 0 Golf Course Loans 392,000 164,500 0 0 0 Legal Settlement 242,500 1,095,254 0 7,750 0 SUB -TOTAL RESERVES AND EITHER $1,873,429 $2,140,437 $50,000 $284,502 $252,883 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $38,612,729 $38,431,126 $37,714,977 $39,883,558 $40,747,073 BALANCE $944,000 $984,553 $57,632 $8,644 $14,567 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES C7�►1�: #_1�1U►1n] TAXES Current Property Taxes Delinquent Property Taxes Penalty and Interest Franchise Fees Utility Fund Franchise Taxes Sales Taxes Mixed Beverages Payment in Lieu of Taxes SUB -TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines Library Fines Warrant & Arrest Fees SUB -TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS Building Permits Electrical Permits Plumbing Permits Mechanical Permits Gas Drilling Permits Miscellaneous Permits Apartment Inspection Fees Curb & Drainage Insp. Fees Re- Inspection Fees License Fees Contractor Registration Fees PlanlReviewlApplication Fee Animal LicenselAdoption Fees Animal Control Impoundment Crematorium Revenues Auto Impoundment Fees Food Service Permits Food Managers School Fire Inspection /Alarm Fees Publicity Fees - Recreation SUB -TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental Recreation Center Rental Ambulance Fees Garbage Billing Contributions Recreation Fees Cultural Arts Athletic Revenue Recreation Special Events Planning & Zoning Fees Sale of Accident Reports Vital Statistics Mowing Fire Dept Certification /CPR Citizen Class SUB -TOTAL ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011/12 FY 2011/12 FY 2012113 $13,996,294 $14,123,314 $13,792,870 $13,939,167 $14,313,171 156,501 145,540 150,000 117,000 150,000 146,161 145,895 131,000 131,000 130,000 3,877,335 4,260,653 4,091,265 4,182,0{]3 4,181,450 732,813 869,180 782,235 788,196 837,786 8,423,382 8,358,773 8,417,919 8,567,000 8,610,000 118,253 128,007 90,000 100,000 100,000 354,623 355,439 355,585 355,585 356,279 $27,805,362 $28,386,801 $27 $28,179,951 $28,678,686 $2,282,241 $2,321,370 $2,285,750 $2,093,461 $2,079,032 73,883 73,637 75,000 74,000 74,000 275,689 270,128 297,000 246,000 246,000 $2,631,813 $2,665,135 $2,657,750 $2,413,461 $2,399,032 $309,403 $426,952 $340,000 $645,aD3 $600,G00 26,298 33,120 28,500 41,507 30,000 54,576 74,525 55,000 94,447 60,G00 53,293 78,333 65,000 60,000 65,000 239,500 322,500 200,000 55,aDo 57,500 86,362 72,181 73,150 76,254 68,190 90,468 91,845 9D,500 90,500 91,000 1,790 6,180 1,000 22,000 12,500 1,392 4,424 1,500 1,614 1,500 18,943 15,120 21,000 19,000 19,000 85,361 67,822 60,000 75,000 75,000 8,239 7,426 7,000 16,00E 9,000 50,699 50,772 49,300 51,000 52 58,560 39,071 46,400 42,850 43,000 2,601 1,918 2,000 2,000 2,100 14,053 13,730 10,000 8,324 7,100 122,479 123,403 122,825 129,051 122,825 26,840 28,206 26,100 25,000 26,000 15,994 14,789 14,400 14,224 14, 000 34,972 30,505 0 0 0 $1,301,823 $1,502,822 $1,213,675 $1,468,774 $1,355,715 $8,553 $9,418 $9,000 $9,150 $9,500 7,404 15,901 0 0 0 1,917,292 2,232,111 2,060,893 2,282,272 2,576,350 315,231 327,389 325,000 331,000 335,000 10, 000 10,000 10,000 110,000 10,000 487,125 374,311 0 0 0 13,289 26,074 14,000 14,000 14,000 97,617 70,162 106,891 90,109 108,585 7,076 20,373 16,000 15,748 7,200 19,013 34,184 20,000 27,956 20,000 12,688 9,921 10,000 7,680 8,000 80,967 69,043 74,000 65,000 70,G00 20,784 30,167 20,000 20,000 25,000 0 5,426 0 5,000 5,000 $2,997,039 $3,234,480 $2,605,784 $2,877,915 $3,188,635 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES ]W1 :0.1111111111►1I1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs: General CIP Utility Fund Park & Rec Facilities Dev_ Corp. Aquatic Park Fund Direct Costs General Fund Police Salaries Consolidation Reimbursements SUB -TOTAL ■.LI LYN T1 1,7'19 17x11L interest income Radio Reimbursement Sale of City Property Grant Proceeds -Crim_ Justice Grant Proceeds -CDBG Overtime Reimbursements Teen Court Reimbursement Tax Attorney Fees Other Income SRO Reimbursement (BISD) Golf Course Loan Repayment SUB -TOTAL APPROPRIATION - FUND BALANCE Legal Settlement & Litigation Insurance Reserve Golf Course Equipment Loan Golf Course Drainage Project Loan Retirement Conversion Court Technology Funds Utility Assistance Program Previous Year Encumbrances SUB -TOTAL O[QIFa111111INATA :111*1 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 $170,625 $179,156 $188,114 $188,114 $197,520 1,637,816 1,719,707 1,805,692 1,805,692 1,895,977 317,574 333,453 350,126 350,126 367,635 118,422 124,343 130,560 130,560 137,088 384,284 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,021,242 1,727,601 $2,628,721 $2,356,659 $2,474,492 $3,495,734 $4,325,821 $203,209 $177,473 $236,416 $127,148 $64,516 326,914 256,079 289,325 289,325 297,993 18 6,994 15,000 15,000 15,000 252 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 49,154 19,750 26,858 19,750 300 12,889 0 51,863 0 0 22,250 20,567 20,567 20,567 67,523 60,152 65,000 65,000 65,000 84,076 77,989 55,850 63,964 65,290 181,547 165,328 125,366 125,366 82,875 0 0 147,760 147,760 147,760 $863,839 $828,308 $990,034 $947,851 $793,751 $196,301 $0 $0 $0 $0 115,800 0 0 0 0 192,000 164,500 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 232,885 0 0 14,185 0 64,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 206,646 256,974 0 474,331 0 $1,328,132 $441,474 $20,000 $508,516 $20,000 $39,556,729 $39,415,679 $37,772,609 $39,892,202 $40,761,640 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES :H :.I:0_111111111k ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 City Council $87,871 $74,869 $123,904 $123,904 $123,613 City Manager $413,719 $474,547 $517,090 $523,519 $523,907 Communications 396,216 414,903 452,689 458,500 442,319 Public Information $201,324 $208,151 $215,418 $219,837 $218,281 Citicable 271,147 179,731 113,504 114,237 119,897 Total Communications $472,471 $387,882 $328,922 $334,074 $338,178 City Secretary City Secretary $252,602 $262,081 $281,389 $284,580 $295,602 Record Management 195,941 156,269 161,504 163,137 159,101 Total City Secretary $448,543 $418,350 $442,893 $447,717 $454,703 Legal $517,378 $473,719 $348,104 $348,1 D4 $338,509 Human Resources $107,312 $118,975 $112,998 $113,961 $128,322 Finance Accounting & Administration $488,284 $502,205 $501,765 $505,527 $503,004 Purchasing 211,677 217,049 222,881 225,066 203,797 Total Finance $699,961 $719,254 $724,646 $730,593 $706,801 Budget& Research $1,855,966 $1,879,608 $1,950,202 $1,974,519 $1,992,928 Budget $85,907 $87,290 $88,759 $89,555 $108,545 Tax 224,315 218,111 223,234 223,833 225,879 Internal Audit 45,051 46,453 47,254 46,980 45,948 Total Budget& Research $355,273 $351,854 $359,247 $360,368 $380,372 Municipal Court Administration /Prosecution $382,948 $375,315 $379,149 $392,009 $389,000 Court Records 396,216 414,903 452,689 458,500 442,319 Warrants 340,969 353,293 376,225 380,292 382,333 Teen Court 62,120 80,852 89,856 90,586 91,275 Total Municipal Court $1,182,253 $1,224,363 $1,297,919 $1,321,387 $1,304,927 Planning and Development Administration $83,826 $87,402 $87,762 $138,089 $89,370 Inspections 531,447 551,713 604,938 609,892 703,565 Planning 261,818 126,623 143,038 143,590 149,616 Total Planning and Development $877,091 $765,738 $835,738 $891,571 $942,551 Economic Development $180,261 $161,426 $246,696 $284,734 $298,056 Library General Services $213,877 $222,180 $235,599 $238,126 $236,513 Public Services 869,244 856,832 897,479 908,900 908,012 Technical Services 772,845 800,596 817,124 827,493 648,403 Total Library $1,855,966 $1,879,608 $1,950,202 $1,974,519 $1,992,928 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES �C7�►1�: #d1�1U►1�] ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011/12 FY 2011/12 FY 2012113 Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Resources $270,959 $286,337 $295,886 $306,659 $306,822 Humane Division 574,527 610,667 648,526 669,580 662,664 Consumer Health 266,663 279,090 285,584 292,454 290,653 Code Compliance 276,136 342,128 356,368 366,979 332,269 Special Programs 2,440 0 0 0 0 Total Neighborhood Services $1,390,725 $1,518,222 $1,586,364 $1,635,672 $1,592,408 Public Works $666,520 $703,061 $719,065 $723,636 $794,516 General Services $125,532 $140,921 $139,321 $139,983 $141,202 Traffic Control 922,220 863,036 1,016,443 1,152,014 1,070,375 Street& Drainage 2,366,746 2,112,230 2,401,415 2,387,021 2,415,738 Total Public Works $3,414,498 $3,116,187 $3,557,179 $3,679,018 $3,627,315 Parks & Recreation 402,953 372,294 422,131 1,117,235 1,377,349 General Services $150,188 $157,363 $165,012 $166,920 $167,582 Parks Maintenance 999,329 794,628 872,960 880,458 946,373 Recreation Services 765,574 756,047 487,102 502,102 487,102 Athletic Program Services 154,935 152,106 124,602 124,602 154,930 Senior Adult Services 171,326 181,370 196,524 198,700 228,333 Youth Outreach & Cultural 128,472 139,567 136,280 137,479 49,982 Total Parks & Recreation $2,369,824 $2,181,081 $1,982,480 $2,010,261 $2,034,302 Police General Services $666,520 $703,061 $719,065 $723,636 $794,516 Administrative Services 748,312 711,962 717,069 725,100 635,514 Criminal Investigation 1,958,781 2,048,956 2,042,104 2,067,416 2,123,269 Uniform Patrol 4,412,490 4,600,006 4,825,910 4,882,575 4,931,218 Technical Services 448,712 467,839 457,581 136,027 0 Detention Services 402,953 372,294 422,131 1,117,235 1,377,349 Property Evidence 285,282 311,845 307,269 323,910 337,208 Communications 856,482 892,576 948,045 1,297,026 1,987,453 Total Police $9,779,532 $10,108,539 $10,439,174 $11,272,925 $12,186,527 Emergency Management $691,772 $800,912 $790,811 $930,757 $763,584 Fire Department General Services $327,603 $340,030 $352,107 $355,051 $347,492 Operations 7,465,294 7,788,260 7,846,141 7,941,674 7,888,780 Emergency Medical 634,025 870,399 983,452 1,076,346 1,115,430 Fire Inspections 479,155 486,488 487,200 502,536 587,113 Fleet Services - Fire 172,515 0 0 0 0 Total Fire $9,078,592 $9,485,177 $9,668,900 $9,875,607 $9,938,815 Building Services $491,893 $702,973 $673,270 $673,270 $678,270 Non - Departmental $2,324,365 $1,327,013 $1,678,440 $2,067,095 $2,140,102 SUB -TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $36,739,300 $36,290,689 $37,664,977 $39,599,056 $40,494,190 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES :H :.I:0_111111111k ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 RESERVES & OTHER EXPENDITURES Reserve for Capital Improvements $50,000 $611,896 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Reserve for Street Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to CCD $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Information Services $0 $0 $0 $70,085 $69,883 Transfer to Special Investigations $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Golf Course Equipment Replacement $192,000 $164,500 $0 $0 $0 Golf Course Drainage Project Loan $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Legal Settlement $242,500 $1,095,254 $0 $7,750 $0 Reserve for Self Insurance Fund $215,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve for Building Services Fund $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve for Equipment Services Fund $200,000 $18,787 $0 $0 $0 Reserve for PEG Fee $0 $0 $0 $131,667 $133,000 Transfer to Capital Projects $323,129 $250,000 $0 $25,000 $0 SUB -TOTAL RESERVES AND OTHER $1,873,429 $2,140,437 $50,000 $284,502 $252,883 SUB -TOTAL EXPENDITURES $38,612,729 $38,431,126 $37,714,977 $39,883,558 $40,747,073 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $38,612,729 $38,431,126 $37,714,977 $39,883,558 $40,747,073 BALANCE $944,000 $984,553 $57,532 $8,644 $14,567 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 4 - SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION NET TAXABLE VALUE: Tax Rate Total Appraised Value as of July 25, 2012 $4,551,304,952 Less Exemptions: $0.351076 Absolute Exemption (288,008,088) Cases Before ARB (79,845,245) Incomplete Accounts (33,770,343) Disabled Veteran (13,794,917) Over 65 (137,116,685) Homestead (331,789,258) Disabled Persons (8,039,630) Less: Personal Property Nominal Value Loss Prorated Absolute (436,720) Agricultural Value Loss (9,862,080) Freeport Inventory Value Loss (198,395) Pollution Control /Prorated Absolute (206,640) Nominal Value Acounts 0 Total Reduction to Values ($903,068,001) Add: Estimated Minimum ARB protested values 54,001,719 Incomplete Properly 30,493,090 ESTIMATED NET TAXABLE VALUE JULY 25th $3,732,731,760 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAIL COLLECTIONS: Net Taxable Value Proposed Tax Rate per $100 Valuation Estimated Total Tax Levy at 100% Collection $3,732,731,760 $0.61 $22,769,664 Less Estimated 1%for Uncollectable Less TIF Transfer Less Debt Service Transfer TOTAL ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS(Operations) 99% TAX RATE DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE: General Fund - Maintenance & Operations Debt Service Fund and TIFs TOTAL DISTRIBUTION OF TAX RATE DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE: Transfer to Debt Service Fund General Fund - Maintenance & Operations l to] IF- 1M*10h6Fi1:1 Ilk FIVI AW1L , 111d (227,697) (1,368,089) (6,860,707) $14,313,171 % of Total Tax Rate Tax Rate Distribution 57.6% $0.351076 42.4% ${)_258924 100% $()_610000 100% Projected 14,540,868 14,313,171 $22,769,664 $22,541,967 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 5 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES General Debt Service Taxes TIF 41 and #2 Taxes SUB -TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES Transfer In From: Drainage Utility Park & Rec. Facilities Dev. Corp_ Fleet Services Fund Facilities Services Fund Gas Development Fund SUB -TOTAL TRANSFER IN Other Bond Issuance Premium Interest Income City of Watauga, GIP Participation Appropriation of Fund Balance SUB -TOTAL OTHER hill] ll_1111INATA =V[q =: EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 $5,800,000 $4,925,000 $5,274,542 $5,274,542 $6,860,707 1,513,453 1,396,383 1,350,000 1,252,084 1,368,089 $7,313,453 $6,321,383 $6,624,542 $6,526,626 $8,228,796 $819,310 $910,629 $852,534 $852,534 $636,851 173,768 44,100 357,130 357,130 364,343 0 0 397,790 397,790 380,112 0 0 20,206 20,206 20,752 346,084 439,881 439,881 439,881 0 $1,339,162 $1,394,610 $2,067,541 $2,067,541 $1,402,058 $0 $2,130,000 $0 $3,078,413 $0 23,295 18,069 0 11,446 12,370 82,852 82,853 82,853 82,853 82,853 862,259 589,947 0 0 94,631 $968,406 $2,820,869 $82,853 $3,172,712 $189,854 $9,621,021 $10,536,862 $8,774,936 $11,766,879 $9,820,708 Existing Bonds & C-O's $7,623,270 $6,250,499 $6,935,055 $6,931,994 $7,905,776 Existing Loans 416,432 439,881 439,881 439,881 439,843 TIF 41 and #2 Funding 1,513,453 1,396,383 1,350,000 1,252,084 1,368,089 Issuance Costs /Paying Agent Fees 67,866 152,138 50,000 160,012 107,000 Bond Defeaseance 1 Refunding 0 2,297,961 0 2,956,624 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $9,621,021 $10,536,862 $8,774,936 $11,740,595 $9,820,708 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $26,284 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 6 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES >>l:ahla�l:a Xy:a�_S�C�].�y_[yl���l�- ^��1� ►1 ���],�T, I �a � 1�1a�] ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 REVENUES Sales Tax $4,211,692 $4, 179, 388 $4,208,960 $4,283,500 $4,305,000 Interest Income 16,900 11,060 13,337 7,018 9,671 Youth Assn. Maintenance Fees 85,917 55,976 61,500 45,140 43,206 Tennis Center Revenue 309,560 362,375 323,227 334,227 363,400 Transfer in from Aquatic Park Fund 62,400 64,896 68,141 68,141 71,548 Park Impact Fees 37,200 75,419 50,000 178,428 50,000 Insurance 21,548 0 0 25,000 0 Other Income 55,384 12,122 500 64,713 1,200 Recreation Revenue Prior to 412012 0 0 153,347 151,636 0 SUB -TOTAL $4,800,601 $4,761,236 $4,879,012 $5,157,803 $4,844,019 4,696,340 NRH CENTRE Memberships 1 Drop -In Passes $0 $0 $660,429 $1,061,384 $1,386,900 Fitness 0 0 155,541 156,196 302,290 Recreation 1 Sports 0 0 224,519 214,519 273,890 Grand Hall Rental 0 0 105,000 48,282 141,520 Catering & Event Fees 0 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 Aquatic Programs 0 0 22,680 22,680 53,360 Pool Rental 0 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 Gym Rental 0 0 3,120 1,000 3,100 Concessions/Merchandise 0 0 4,300 8,500 13,000 Special Events 0 0 1,000 1,000 10,000 Other 0 0 27,200 27,200 62,680 General Fund 0 0 487,102 487,102 487,102 SUB -TOTAL $0 $0 $1,733,891 $2,070,863 $2,776,842 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $4,800,601 $4,761,236 $6,612,903 $7,228,666 $7,620,861 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Appropriation of Fund Balance $0 $0 $122,883 $122,883 $0 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 26,154 0 39,904 0 Revenue Bond Fund Balance 0 0 460,046 460,046 0 SUB -TOTAL $0 $26,154 $582,929 $622,833 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $4,800,601 $4,787,390 $7,195,832 $7,851,499 $7,620,861 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 6 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 EXPENDITURES OPERATING Park Facilities Development Admin. $606,869 $636,781 $650,440 $657,949 $672,753 Parks & Public Grounds 1,449,414 1,714,670 1,852,677 1,902,428 1,871,326 Tennis Center Operations 540,305 571,836 595,146 603,117 606,376 Recreation Exp. Prior to 412012 0 0 438,422 442,641 0 SUB -TOTAL $2,596,588 $2,923,287 $3,536,685 $3,606,135 $3,150,455 NRH CENTRE Center Management $0 $0 $349,054 $364,233 $634,538 Fitness 0 0 242,279 593,939 319,794 Building Operations 0 0 92,248 92,248 174,637 Aquatic 0 0 307,932 307,932 567,139 Recreation Sports 0 0 221,729 221,729 300,848 Event Center 0 0 148,436 148,436 206,054 Building Services 0 0 304,075 304,075 430,050 SUB -TOTAL $0 $0 $1,665,753 $2,032,592 $2,633,060 OTHER & RESERVES Debt Service - Revenue Bonds $995,811 $1,119,401 $1,109,626 $1,109,573 $420,789 Debt Service - CO's 173,768 44,100 357,130 357,130 364,343 Indirect Costs 317,574 333,453 350,126 350,126 367,635 Non -Departmental 113,000 22,482 60,064 37,467 81,194 Reserve for Capital 0 0 0 213,117 351,978 Reserve for Economic Development 119,656 104,485 105,224 107,088 107,625 Reserve for NRH Centre 0 0 0 38,271 143,782 SUB -TOTAL $1,719,809 $1,623,921 $1,982,170 $2,212,772 $1,837,346 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,316,397 $4,547,208 $7,184,608 $7,851,499 $7,620,861 BALANCE $484,204 $240,182 $11,224 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 7 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 101I:a1k r11 W+] W sli1BRUNAV=1►h0[+7►1176`3d ;4 lot I OPERATING ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED Administration ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Administrative Services FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 REVENUES 327,455 331,906 357,338 361,832 446,225 Sales Tax $3,793, 206 $4, 107, 251 $4,155,713 $4,208,960 $4,305,000 Franchise Tax 79,328 68,846 90,515 90,500 90,500 Interest Income 8,692 2,233 1,988 1,987 0 Transfer from General Fund 250,000 0 0 0 0 Other 1,200 0 0 0 0 Previous Year Encumbrances 0 0 0 0 0 Loan from Transition Fund 188,057 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $4, 320, 484 $4,178,330 $4,248,216 $4,301,447 $4,395,500 EXPENDITURES OPERATING Administration $70,395 $71,61)4 $72,429 $72,951 $0 Administrative Services 561,465 568,092 656,973 664,287 580,389 Investigations 327,455 331,906 357,338 361,832 446,225 Uniform Patrol 2,308,798 2,508,073 2,399,310 2,417,360 2,539,899 Techinical Services 101,443 21,584 21,294 428,023 485,724 Detention Services 305,847 333,436 347,309 51,993 0 Property Evidence 84,379 88,977 98,705 99,669 101,825 Communications 117,885 78,323 159,087 29,568 0 Transfer to Information Services 0 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $3, 877, 667 $4,001,995 $4,112,445 $4,125,683 $4,154,062 OTHER & RESERVES Indirect Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Police Dept. Salary Increases - General 384,284 0 0 0 0 Partner Agency Funding 11,725 11,725 11,725 11,725 40,505 Reserve for Transition 0 0 0 0 0 Other 46,808 49,149 124,046 72,790 121,787 Reserves 0 0 0 91,249 79,146 SUB -TOTAL $442,817 $60,874 $135,771 $175,764 $241,438 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4, 320, 484 $4,062,869 $4,248,216 $4,301,447 $4,395,500 BALANCE $0 $115,461 $0 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 8 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES W:to]k Is] ►F1111111[1►1a] Economic Development $218,059 $163,725 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED Cultural & Leisure ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Non -Departmental FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES $218,206 $163,879 $158,832 $171,182 $211,528 Occupancy Tax Proceeds $240,387 $238,084 $206,000 $216,028 $210,500 Penalties & Interest 0 326 350 131 0 Interest Income 2,638 1,992 3,113 1,755 2,034 Other Income 0 0 0 0 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Year Encumbrances 0 0 0 12,350 0 SUB -TOTAL $243,025 $240,402 $209,463 $230,264 $212,534 TOTAL REVENUES $243,025 $240,402 $209,463 $230,264 $212,534 Economic Development $218,059 $163,725 158,333 171,028 106,051 Cultural & Leisure 0 0 0 0 104,366 Non -Departmental 147 154 499 154 1,111 SUB -TOTAL $218,206 $163,879 $158,832 $171,182 $211,528 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $218,206 $163,879 $158,832 $171,182 $211,528 BALANCE $24,819 $76,523 $50,631 $59,082 $1,006 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 9 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES IDL]:I -1110 NR X9111:1 C ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES Contributions 0 0 0 0 13,478 NRH Water Bills $86,058 $87,452 $87,692 $87,692 $88,692 Shelter Fund 3,656 6,165 9,000 4,350 5,500 SUB -TOTAL $89,714 $93,617 $96,692 $92,042 $94,192 Donations 4,857 9,982 13,000 22,000 12,000 Spay /Neuter $13,289 $10,679 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Duncan 15,000 15,020 15,000 15,000 15,000 Santa Cops 12,665 5,835 5,500 4,200 4,000 SUB -TOTAL $40,954 $31,534 $35,500 $34,200 $34,000 Proceeds Animal Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Library Book Sale 9,497 9,012 11,000 10,000 10,500 Coffee Bar Proceeds 0 0 1,000 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $9,497 $9,012 $12,000 $10,000 $10,500 Other Interest Income $8,045 $4,967 $9,093 $4,439 $4,509 Other Income 36,399 42,152 54,500 48,500 57,000 SUB -TOTAL $44,444 $47,119 $63,593 $52,939 $61,509 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $184,609 $181,282 $207,785 $189,181 $200,201 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Appropriation of Fund Balance $13,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 SUB -TOTAL $13,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $197,821 $181,282 $207,785 $189,181 $200,201 CYPr-K1n1T1 IRCC Library - Book Collection Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement NIP Program Animal Services Keep NRH Beautiful Municipal Court - Teen Court Parks - Special Events and Arts Police Department SUB -TOTAL 11110)I C10w.i,:I:l1111C11 N *= W-11 160 $56,600 $55,596 $60,000 $63,383 $59,988 438 0 0 0 0 13,478 12,623 22,010 22,010 25,310 11,512 12,371 14,999 14,999 14,999 0 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 44,548 21,292 51,000 51,000 36,000 4,857 9,982 13,000 22,000 12,000 $131,433 $111,864 $164,009 $176,392 $151,297 $131,433 $111,864 $164,009 $176,392 $151,297 $66,388 $69,418 $43,776 $12,789 $48,904 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 10 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AU xdlsl w Ia ►1 3r �7�1:1�] BALANCE $45,732 $13,016 $0 $0 $0 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 REVENUES Forefeited Funds $232,054 $183,295 $225,000 $151,000 $136,000 AFIS Reimbursements 5,202 10,719 12,000 12,100 13,500 Radio System Reimbursements 0 0 34,500 34,500 0 911 Telecom 0 60,377 0 83,521 120,000 Interest Income 6,241 3,873 6,045 3,545 2,323 Other Income 576 0 0 0 18,604 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 0 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 283,368 231,874 260,477 TOTAL REVENUES $244,073 $258,264 $560,913 $516,540 $550,904 EXPENDITURES Federal Forefeited Funds $180,902 $150,528 $286,700 $286,700 $234,500 State Forfeitured Funds 0 0 63,300 63,300 63,300 Local Forfeited Funds 1,368 729 1,000 5,700 1,000 Radio Maintenance 0 0 14,258 14,258 0 AFIS Maintenance & Equipment 16,071 12,362 114,000 38,574 113,500 911 Telecom 0 81,629 69,000 95,353 120,000 MDT Maintenance 0 0 12,655 12,655 0 Leose Contributions 0 0 0 0 18,604 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $198,341 $245,248 $560,913 $516,540 $550,904 BALANCE $45,732 $13,016 $0 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 11 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND REVENUES Drainage Fees Interest Income Appropriation of Fund Balance SUB -TOTAL TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES Debt Service Other Expenditures Defeasance of Debt Expenditures SUB -TOTAL TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 $839,309 $849,061 $834,000 $841,000 $849,000 13,004 7,664 14,782 8,273 6,066 0 55,004 6,252 6,252 0 $852,313 $911,729 $855,034 $855,525 $855,066 $852,313 $911,729 $855,034 $855,525 $855,066 $819,310 $910,629 $852,534 $852,534 $774,221 3,346 1,100 2,500 2,500 24,500 0 0 0 0 0 $822,656 $911,729 $855,034 $855,034 $798,721 $822,656 $911,729 $855,034 $855,034 $798,721 $29,657 $0 $0 $491 $56,345 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 12 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 10-11-`2 11 =LIF11 KelUl'lI=1i 11 r111:l C ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 PCVCMI ICC BONUSES General Fund Purposes $472,257 $20,324 $0 $0 $0 Utility Fund Purposes 20,345 0 0 0 0 Park Development Purposes 309,228 5,000 0 0 0 Economic Development Purposes 115,047 4,469 0 0 0 Golf Course Purposes 407,192 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $1,324,069 $29,793 $0 $0 $0 ROYALTIES/OVERRIDES General Fund Purposes $6,477 $40,178 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Park Development Purposes 54,519 4,088 70,000 70,000 70,000 Economic Development Purposes 1,143 2,560 20,000 20,000 20,000 SUB -TOTAL $62,139 $46,826 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 OTHER Right of Way Usage Fees $1,090,401 $46,201 $0 $596,594 $0 Interest Income 29,726 28,455 47,094 27,040 20,433 Reimbursement of CIP 0 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $1,120,127 $74,656 $47,094 $623,634 $20,433 APPROPRIATION OF RESERVES General Fund Purposes $0 $371,000 $439,881 $439,881 $439,843 Park Development Purposes 0 0 0 0 0 Economic Development Purposes 0 0 0 0 0 Golf Course Purposes 0 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $0 $371,000 $439,881 $439,881 $439,843 TOTAL REVENUES $2,506,335 $522,275 $626,975 $1,203,515 $600,276 CYPr- K1n1TI IPCC OPERATING Transfer to Golf Course Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Debt Service 346,084 439,881 439,881 439,881 0 Transfer to Capital Projects 337,938 0 0 0 439,843 Settlements 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $684,022 $439,881 $439,881 $439,881 $439,843 BALANCE $1,822,313 $82,394 $187,094 $763,634 $160,433 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 13 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 REVENUES Gross Fine Revenues $726,274 $674,745 $772,875 $872,000 $872,000 LESS: ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURES Contractor Payments {$534,740} {$548,762} ($548,762) ($600,997) ($600,000) Program Administration (63,466) (151,109) (163,463) (164,213) (157,889) TOTAL ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURES {$598,206} ($699,871) ($712,225) {$765,210} ($757,889) NET FINE REVENUES $128,068 ($25,126) $60,650 $105,790 $114,111 LESS: STATE SHARE ($63,856) $0 ($30,325) {$53,395} {$57,056} NET FINE REVENUES TO CITY $64,212 ($25,126) $30,325 $53,395 $57,055 ADDITIONAL REVENUES Interest Income $3,614 $2,041 $2,780 $1,820 $2,439 Transfer from General CIP 0 100,000 0 0 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 8,664 45,664 26,904 SUB -TOTAL $3,614 $102,041 $11,444 $47,484 $29,343 TOTAL RESOURCES $67,826 $76,915 $41,769 $100,879 $86,398 EXPENDITURES Traffic Enforcement $9,536 $0 $28,800 $82,855 $72,900 Pedestrian Safety 0 0 12,969 12,969 13,498 Traffic Signal Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $9,536 $0 $41,769 $95,824 $86,398 BALANCE $58,290 $76,915 $0 $5,055 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 14 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES !jIIl1111va111►1w ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES WATER SALES AND CHARGES Water Sales $15,033,171 $19,341,682 $17,474,894 $17,741,599 $18,668,067 Water Taps 13,905 23,565 16,000 24,000 24,000 Water Inspection Fees 8,924 2,545 4,000 12,664 22,000 Water Wells 14,355 34,805 6,000 6,000 24,000 SUB -TOTAL $15,070,395 $19,402,601 $17,500,894 $17,784,663 $18,738,067 SEWER SALES AND CHARGES Sewer Sales $8,146,592 $8,637,392 $8,771,305 $8,987,078 $5,258,145 Sewer Taps 4,150 7,550 4,000 7,500 5,000 Sewer Inspection Fees 1,645 2,410 3,000 6,208 10,000 SUB -TOTAL $8,146,387 $8,647,352 $8,778,305 $9,000,786 $5,277,145 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income $159,029 $114,131 $206,061 $88,592 $92,744 Service Charges 101,501 78,905 133,200 82,150 87,150 Late Charges 431,902 481,582 480,000 480,000 490,060 Miscellaneous 50,406 3,545 2,000 14,555 16,509 Joint Use Reimbursement - Watauga 74,260 106,959 142,000 142,000 136,000 Subdivision Meter Revenue 12,000 20,550 10,000 20,250 20,000 SUB -TOTAL $829,098 $805,676 $973,261 $827,551 $842,403 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $24,045,880 $28,855,625 $27,252,464 $27,613,400 $28,857,515 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Rate Stabilization $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve for Self Insurance D 0 0 0 0 Previous Year Encumbrances 0 0 0 100,711 0 SUB -TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $100,711 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $24,045,880 $28,855,625 $27,252,464 $27,714,111 $28,857,615 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 14 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES lj�l����111►1� ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 EXPENDITURES OPERATING Administration $271,492 $274,945 $265,586 $268,546 $271,927 Development 740,829 763,720 823,683 831,162 831,833 Right of Way Maintenance 102,429 118,460 200,000 200,000 200,000 SUB -TOTAL $1,114,750 $1,157,125 $1,289,269 $1,299,708 $1,303,760 WATER SERVICES Water Operations $3,153,573 $3,575,656 $3,975,359 $4,088,592 $4,130,817 Purchase of Water FTW 3,292,420 4,112,832 4,456,000 4,456,000 4,564,974 Purchase of Water TRA 3,853,218 4,729,315 4,184,950 4,184,950 4,631,849 SUB -TOTAL $10,299,211 $12,417,803 $12,616,309 $12,729,542 $13,327,640 SEWER SERVICES Sewer operations $994,776 $1,005,135 $1,241,547 $1,251,653 $1,298,675 Sewer Treatment FTW 1,451,929 1,096,426 1,213,598 1,575,059 1,301,489 Sewer Treatment TRA 3,244,994 3,025,870 3,091,814 2,730,353 3,146,135 SUB -TOTAL $5,691,699 $5,127,431 $5,546,959 $5,557,065 $5,746,299 FINANCEIUTILITY COLLECTIONS Meter Reading $ 385, 920 $ 401,983 $447,131 $449,774 $452,163 Utility Billing 1 Customer Service 759,673 771,633 817,481 819,829 831,555 Utility Collection Services 253,214 264,455 276,329 277,987 285,006 Accounting Services 234,923 242,059 273,746 276,458 282,480 Budget & Research 177,061 181,131 189,623 190,741 194,340 SUB -TOTAL $1,810,791 $1,861,261 $2,004,310 $2,014,789 $2,045,544 Building Services $1,305,522 $1,305,522 $1,436,074 $1,436,074 $1,436,074 Non -Departmental $409,963 $100,169 $409,964 $447,517 $508,364 SUB -TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $20,631,936 $21,969,311 $23,302,885 $23,484,695 $24,367,681 OTHER & RESERVES Debt Service $590,219 $596,942 $601,041 $658,334 $1,009,685 Franchise Fees 732,813 869,180 782,244 788,196 837,786 Indirect Costs 1,637,816 1,719,707 1,760,980 1,805,692 1,885,143 Payment In Lieu of Taxes 354,623 355,439 355,599 355,585 356,279 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to Information Services Fund 0 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Contribution to Equipment Services 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Reserve for Capital 0 0 0 396,609 176,041 SUB -TOTAL $3,315,471 $3,766,268 $3,724,864 $4,229,416 $4,489,934 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $23,947,407 $25,735,579 $27,027,749 $27,714,111 $28,857,615 BALANCE $98,473 $3,120,050 $224,715 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 15 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AQUATIC PARK FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 ATTENDANCE 242,554 274,000 265,000 265,000 265,000 REVENUES OPERATING Admissions $1,831,369 $3,447,122 $3,466,184 $3,532,860 $3,616,534 Advanced & Group Sales 1,485,468 204,826 0 0 0 Food and Beverage 519,591 606,150 775,890 775,890 775,890 Library Concessions 18,747 16,301 0 0 0 Merchandise 121,471 125,327 130,792 152,427 159,966 Lockers 68,026 0 0 0 0 Rentals 0 136,967 76,950 110,262 115,695 Programs 0 14,350 36,134 23,834 23,834 Aquatic Classes /Special Events 15,850 16,372 0 16,906 0 SUB -TOTAL $4,060, 522 $4,567,415 $4,485,950 $4,612,179 $4,691,919 OTHER REVENUES Interest Income $37,632 $34,008 $53,996 $25,687 $26,078 Donations 20,000 0 0 0 0 Other Income 25,913 20,483 16,300 16,300 16,300 SUB -TOTAL $83,545 $54,491 $70,296 $41,987 $42,378 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $4, 144, 067 $4,621,906 $4,556,246 $4,654,166 $4,734,297 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Appropriation - PY Encumbrances $2,790 0 $0 $2,541 $0 SUB -TOTAL $2,790 $0 $0 $2,541 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $4, 146, 857 $4,621,906 $4,556,246 $4,656,707 $4,734,297 EXPENDITURES OPERATING General Services & Utilities $757,430 $793,055 $869,718 $850,070 $869,818 Public Ground s /Aquatics /Maint_ 1,065,782 1,184,381 1,117,535 1,149,106 $1,159,576 Business & Office Administration 456,559 481,611 498,171 516,774 527,296 Gift Shop /Concessions 490,932 557,238 495,147 531,840 523,094 Library Concessions 32,454 25,590 0 0 0 Sales /Special Events /Admissions 262,195 279,451 283,218 281,781 283,004 SUB -TOTAL $3,065,352 $3,321,326 $3,263,789 $3,329,571 $3,362,788 OTHER & RESERVES Debt Service $835,445 $491,343 $861,174 $849,935 $1,094,229 Indirect Costs 118,422 124,343 130,560 130,560 137,088 Transfer Out - PARD 62,400 64,896 68,141 68,141 71,548 Reserve For: Infrastructure & Major Repairs 0 0 195,541 247,409 0 Park Expansion 0 0 0 0 0 Non - Departmental 54,995 28,371 37,041 31,091 68,644 SUB -TOTAL $1,071,262 $708,953 $1,292,457 $1,327,136 $1,371,509 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4, 136, 614 $4,030,279 $4,556,246 $4,656,707 $4,734,297 BALANCE $10,243 $591,627 $0 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 16 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 20112/13 ROUNDS 47,594 54,000 54,000 51,300 51,300 PCVCMI ICS' Green Fees $1,123,961 $1,005,295 $1,126,692 $1,079,900 $1,005,900 Pro Shop 376,096 352,933 397,000 366,300 365,000 Driving Range 62,749 82,835 80,000 84,280 82,000 Carts 393,958 360,658 450,344 368,782 509,925 Food & Beverage 443,756 531,657 555,738 571,039 578,418 General & Administrative 12,424 1,792 0 3,579 0 General Fund Loan 392,000 164,500 0 0 0 Other Revenue 17,959 14,778 0 5,899 11,687 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 21,205 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $2,822,903 $2,535,653 $2,609,774 $2,479,779 $2,552,930 TOTAL REVENUES $2,822,903 $2,535,653 $2,609,774 $2,479,779 $2,552,930 COST OF GOODS SOLD Pro Shop $122,008 $137,619 $141,750 $127,750 $137,760 Food & Beverage 130,790 155,075 196,006 192,145 202,448 SUB -TOTAL $252,798 $292,694 $337,756 $319,895 $340,208 TOTAL COST OF GOOD SOLD $252,798 $292,694 $337,756 $319,895 $340,208 NET REVENUES $2,570,105 $2,242,959 $2,272,018 $2,159,884 $2,212,722 CYPr-Mn1TI IRCC oral J -7,r d IN rpl Nro 5nop Driving Range Golf Carts Course Maintenance Food & Beverage Sales & Membership General & Administrative Clubhouse Management Fees Capital SUB -TOTAL OTHER & RESERVES Debt Service Payment to Interdepartmental Loans Water Fund General Fund Equipment Reserve for Equipment/CIP SUB -TOTAL TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE $140,280 $141,634 $157,410 $161,143 $144,360 7,270 9,937 18,500 7,227 15,600 166,490 194,932 195,200 193,244 242,740 440,862 521,156 589,945 568,170 605,646 159,200 232,554 224,838 223,097 228,838 34,608 44,352 47,500 45,955 46,700 201,568 230,422 248,344 214,817 237,944 93,052 111,133 119,420 112,586 118,890 106,208 26,933 110,586 110,586 114,356 392,816 161,150 249,250 249,250 122,500 $1,742,354 $1,674,203 $1,960,993 $1,886,075 $1,877,574 $579,739 $568,756 $101,485 $104,491 $126,636 50,124 0 50,112 0 50,112 0 0 147,760 147,760 147,760 0 0 0 0 0 178,549 0 0 0 0 $808,412 $568,756 $299,357 $252,251 $324,508 $2,550,766 $2,242,959 $2,260,350 $2,138,326 $2,202,082 $19,339 $0 $11,668 $21,558 $10,640 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 17 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 0_ 1 161111101= 910101►[A 9: 11100 Is] .I'Af -.1:f --TH=1'd=I:11r111a I: ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICE Transfer From: General Fund $491,893 $702,973 $673,270 $673,270 $678,270 Park Development Fund 0 0 304,075 304,075 430,050 Utility Fund 1,305,522 1,305,522 1,436,074 1,436,074 1,436,074 SUB -TOTAL $1,797,415 $2,008,495 $2,413,419 $2,413,419 $2,544,394 OTHER REVENUES 403,404 0 109,700 109,700 211,600 Interest Income $9,050 $6,921 $10,218 $4,619 $9,116 Rent From Rental Properties 77,508 76,510 78,000 78,000 78,000 Other Income 33,443 24,312 0 0 0 Transfer from General Fund 200,000 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $320,001 $107,743 $88,218 $82,619 $87,116 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $2,117,416 $2,116,238 $2,501,637 $2,496,038 $2,631,510 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE $261,982 $16,222 $62,106 $51,520 $68,423 Building Services Fund Reserves $428,123 $0 $24,334 $24,334 $179,542 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 165,258 0 0 147,669 0 SUB -TOTAL $593,381 $0 $24,334 $172,003 $179,542 TOTAL REVENUES $2,710,797 $2,116,238 $2,525,971 $2,668,041 $2,811,052 r-YPr- K1n1TI IRCC OPERATING General Services $202,400 $211,096 $242,583 $245,297 $251,480 Building Services 1,818,696 1,619,794 2,054,672 2,204,614 2,222,639 Rental Property Program 24,315 16,916 56,910 56,910 56,910 Transfer to Capital Budget 403,404 0 109,700 109,700 211,600 SUB -TOTAL $2,448,815 $1,847,805 $2,463,865 $2,616,521 $2,742,629 OTHER & RESERVES Debt Service 0 6,994 20,206 20,206 20,752 Other $8,789 $9,228 $20,810 $10,224 $26,581 Reserve for Rental Property 53,193 0 21,090 21,090 21,090 Facilities /Constr. Mgmt_ Reserves 200,000 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $261,982 $16,222 $62,106 $51,520 $68,423 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,710,797 $1,864,028 $2,525,971 $2,668,041 $2,811,052 BALANCE $0 $252,210 $0 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2612 -2613 SCHEDULE 18 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2609110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012113 REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICE Transfer From: General Fund $359,679 $563,867 $935,388 $935,388 $1,000,864 Utility Fund 1,200,350 1,200,350 1,429,626 1,429,626 1,529,700 Utility CIP 1 Utility Construction 176,105 176,105 209,743 209,743 224,425 Crime Control District 103,966 103,966 123,825 123,825 132,493 Park 8 Recreation Devlp. Fund 86,273 86,273 104,581 104,581 111,902 Other Funds 35,416 35,416 42,181 42,181 45,134 SUB -TOTAL $1,961,789 $2,165,977 $2,845,344 $2,845,344 $3,044,518 OTHER Investment Income $21,506 $15,695 $26,906 $13,622 $22,748 Sale of City Property 55,402 5,870 30,000 43,235 30,000 Other Income 9,481 55,835 12,000 12,000 12,000 Transfer from General Fund 200,000 18,787 0 0 0 Transfer from Utility Fund 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 SUB -TOTAL $286,389 $146,187 $118,906 $118,857 $114,748 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $2,248,178 $2,312,164 $2,964,250 $2,964,201 $3,159,266 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Equipment Services Fund Reserves $175,664 $0 $191,157 $376,157 $133,965 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 12,355 0 SUB -TOTAL $175,664 $0 $191,157 $388,512 $133,955 TOTAL REVENUES $2,423,842 $2,312,164 $3,155,407 $3,352,713 $3,293,2311 EXPENDITURES OPERATING General Services $289,231 $289,425 $329,038 $333,619 $336,415 Equipment Services Operations 1,440,442 1,592,008 1,558,015 1,607,404 1,599,157 Fire Fleet Maintenance 0 204,575 250,047 252,366 256,610 Equipment Purchases 187,959 0 183,910 360,936 180,200 Fire Vehicles /Equipment 0 0 0 0 68,481 Police Vehicles/Equipment 297,487 139,368 312,510 312,510 347,678 SUB -TOTAL $2,215,119 $2,225,376 $2,633,520 $2,866,835 $2,788,5411 OTHER & RESERVES Debt Service $0 $0 $397,790 $397,790 $380,112 Other 8,723 9,160 24,097 10,061 24,578 Equipment Services Reserve 200,000 0 100,000 78,027 100,000 SUB -TOTAL $208,723 $9,160 $521,887 $485,878 $504,690 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,423,842 $2,234,536 $3,155,407 $3,352,713 $3,293,231 BALANCE $0 $77,628 $0 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 19 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES RI7�l:�d�1_� iC�7:69 �a�►Cd� -'� 1�lai ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES TELECOMMUNICATIONS Transfer From: General Fund 268,053 $266,560 $271,833 $271,833 $280,455 Park Fund 12,088 12,089 29,254 29,254 30,716 Crime Control District 16,997 16,997 17,847 17,847 25,346 Utility Fund 68,721 68,721 72,157 72,157 75,765 Other Funds 45,610 45,611 47,892 47,892 50,287 SUB -TOTAL 411,469 $409,978 $438,983 $438,983 $462,569 COMPUTERS Transfer From General Fund 854,863 $820,174 $835,075 $835,075 $889,056 Park Fund 40,671 39,350 92,925 92,925 97,571 Crime Control District 141,445 136,846 143,689 143,689 163,066 Utility Fund 595,555 576,193 605,002 605,002 635,253 Other Funds 251,229 243,058 255,211 255,211 267,971 SUB -TOTAL 1,883,763 $1,815,621 $1,931,902 $1,931,902 $2,052,917 OTHER REVENUES Interest Income 22,665 $10,240 $22,637 $7,442 $10,902 Transmitter Lease 120,434 106,216 128,701 112,492 112,492 Other Income 10,308 2,168 0 10,673 14,400 Transfer From General Fund 100,000 250,000 0 70,085 69,883 Transfer From Utility Fund Reserve 0 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 SUB -TOTAL $253,407 $543,624 $326,338 $375,692 $382,677 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES 2,548,639 $2,769,223 $2,697,223 $2,746,577 $2,898,163 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 $0 $0 $86,269 $0 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 303,261 154,164 0 178,549 0 SUB -TOTAL 303,261 $154,164 $0 $264,818 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $2,851,900 $2,923,387 $2,697,223 $3,011,395 $2,898,163 EXPENDITURES OPERATING General Services 217,146 $226,236 $235,008 $236,787 $233,933 Major Computer Systems 291,377 346,958 301,770 305,067 289,141 Microcomputer Systems 671,558 541,421 646,775 667,480 820,486 Telecommunications 273,518 269,880 272,212 286,461 329,645 Data Network 587,195 486,091 600,890 729,553 637,382 GIS System 234,928 175,430 140,636 143,322 148,276 Public Safety 336,352 339,805 469,860 636,062 396,886 SUB -TOTAL 2,612,074 $2,385,821 $2,667,151 $3,004,732 $2,855,749 OTHER & RESERVES Other 6,672 $7,006 $18,188 $6,663 $21,150 Reserve for System Improvements 0 0 0 0 21,264 SUB -TOTAL 6,672 $7,006 $18,188 $6,663 $42,414 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,618,746 $2,392,827 $2,685,339 $3,011,395 $2,898,163 BALANCE 233,154 $530,560 $11,884 $0 $0 FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 SCHEDULE 20 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 69:11aIL i11:7:►.fy=1111.IIr ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2009110 FY 2010111 FY 2011112 FY 2011112 FY 2012J13 REVENUES ALLOCATIONS Health/Medical $6,877,189 $7,109,473 $8,019,544 $8,102,330 $8,411,204 Workers Compensation 0 0 449,500 449,500 500,390 Administration Allocation 909,028 692,913 443,486 454,447 466,786 Other Insurance 415,654 436,438 449,926 468,328 485,235 SUB -TOTAL $8,201,871 $8,238,824 $9,362,456 $9,474,605 $9,863,615 OTHER 0 35,577 0 83,460 60,000 Interest Income $47,197 $31,138 $55,321 $18,469 $35,359 Other Income 87,203 92,496 0 83,850 60,000 Transfer from General Fund 215,800 0 0 0 0 Transfer from Uti lity Fund 0 0 0 0 0 Expenditure Reimbursement 563,719 353,880 0 7,789 0 SUB -TOTAL $913,919 $477,514 $55,321 $110,108 $95,359 SUB -TOTAL REVENUES $9,115,790 $8,716,338 $9,417,777 $9,584,713 $9,958,974 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE $0 $1,696,436 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Capital Projects $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Retiree Health Care Fund 698,767 0 0 0 0 Self Insurance Fund Reserves 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL $1,198,767 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 TOTAL REVENUES $10,314,557 $8,716,338 $9,517,777 $9,684,713 $10,058,974 CYPCIdn1TI IRCC OPERATING Health/Medical $8,026,853 $5,589,910 $8,019,544 $8,102,330 $8,411,204 Workers Compensation 643,614 490,355 449,560 460,521 500,390 Personnel Expenses 534,649 457,089 452,345 452,345 463,808 Other Insurance 405,382 288,199 449,926 390,926 425,235 Reserve for Insurance Claims 100,000 0 46,402 36,131 38,337 Other Expenses 0 35,577 0 83,460 60,000 Life Insurance Premiums 54,059 58,772 0 59,000 60,000 SUB -TOTAL $9,764,557 $6,919,902 $9,417,777 $9,584,713 $9,958,974 OTHER & RESERVES Transfer to Capital Projects $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Retiree Health Care Fund 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 SUB -TOTAL $550,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,314,557 $7,019,902 $9,517,777 $9,684,713 $10,058,974 BALANCE $0 $1,696,436 $0 $0 $0 Fiscal Year 241212013 Proposed CIP Budget $22 Uses of Funds Municipal Facility YO Aquatic 2.0! Pai Recr 5.. Utility 14.97° Major Capital Equipment 3.49% 'rsonnel 66% Sources of Funds C.D. Bonds Federall5tate 3.47% Grants 11 _n7°/ G.O. Bonds 54.49% Reserves 24.58% Tax 0% 3.15% 17.61% 0.45% Summary of Project Funding 201212013 Caoital Imorovement Proaram Funding To Proposed Estimated 2014 to Total Funds Funding Source Date 201212013 2013/2014 Completion General Obligation Bonds Certificates of Obligation Federal /State Grants Reserves Sales Tax Other Total CIP Project Funding 42,905,950 12,010,000 11,490,000 3,000,000 69,405,950 32,355,000 765,000 2,730,500 22,230,500 58,081,000 22,601,661 2,437,942 545,500 0 25,585,103 14,998,238 5,427,081 0 0 20,425,319 3,722,789 705,212 379,211 0 4,807,212 7,637,863 693,969 37,500 20,000 8,389,332 $ 124,221,501 $22,039,204 $15,182,711 $25,250,500 $ 186,693,915 Summary of Project Expenditures 2012/2013 Cauital Imurovement Proaram Project To Proposed Estimated 2014 to Total Program Classification Date 2012/2013 2013/2014 Completion Expenditures Street & Sidewalk Drainage Utility Parks & Recreation Aquatic Park Municipal Facility Major Capital Equipment Economic Development CIP Personnel Other Total CIP Project Expenditures 42,833,277 3,879,540 2,266,000 230,500 $ 49,209,317 4,630,000 0 0 0 $ 4,630,400 8,290,091 3,299,016 0 0 $ 11,589,107 4,167,797 1,224,598 379,211 0 $ 5,771,606 0 452,000 0 0 $ 452,400 55,857,370 11,511,600 10,000,000 25,000,000 $ 102,368,970 325,000 765,000 0 0 $ 1,090,400 6,987,938 0 2,500,000 0 $ 9,487,938 836,839 805,981 0 0 $ 1,642,820 293,189 101,469 37,500 20,000 $ 452,158 $ 124,221,501 $ 22,039,244 $ 15,182,711 $ 25,250,500 $ 186,693,916 Schedule 1 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap No_ ID Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion Project Costs 0 Continuing Projects D $ 1 ST0902 Cloyce Court (Northeast Loop 820 to Maplewood Ave) 2 STG401 Dams BlvdlMid -Cities Blvd Intersection 3 ST09G4 Grand Avenue (Library to HealthMarkets Access Road) 4 ST1101 Main Street Streetscaping Project 5 ST0201 North Tarrant Pkwy. Street Imp. (Davis to Whitley Road) - SM1201 Preventive Street Maintenance (2012) 6 ST0102 Rule Snow Dr. Street & Utility Imp. (Karen Drive to I.H. 820) 7 ST0202 Rule Snow Dr. Street & Utility Imp_ (Mid -Cities to D $ 800,000 Hiohtower)lTEA -211 8 ST1201 Rule Snow Drive & Glenview Drive Intersection Improvements 9 ST1203 Smithfield Road/Dams Boulevard Intersection Improvements 10 ST1102 Snider Street 6dension Project 11 ST1103 Spring Oaks Screening Wall 12 ST1001 Starnes Road Street Imp. (Rule Snow Dr. to Crosstimbers 0 0 In) 13 ST1002 Tabor Street Improvements (Rule Snow Drive to Steven 545,5D0 0 $ Street) 14 ST12G4 Traffic Signal Light Infrastructure Upgrades 15 ST1005 Traffic Signal ¢ation at Davis Boulevard & Creek Yew Drive 16 ST0909 Trinidad Drive {Rafe Snow Dr to Holiday Ln.} Total Continuing Projects $ New Projects - SD1301 New Sidewalk and Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project (2013) - SM1301 Preventive Street Maintenance (2013) 17 ST1301 Signal Timing Synchronization Update 18 ST13G4 Smithfield Road (Davis Blvd to Mid -Cities Blvd) Total New Projects $ Total Project Costs Funding Sources General Obligation Bonds G_O. Bonds 1985 Program G_Q. Bonds 1994 Program G_O. Bonds 2003 Program Total General Obligation Bonds Certificates of Obligation Certificates of Obligation Total Certificates of Obligation 750,000 0 0 D $ 750,000 3,625,000 0 0 0 $ 3,625,000 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000 66,000 0 230,500 230,5D0 $ 527,000 18,439,317 0 0 0 $ 18,439,317 800,000 0 0 D $ 800,000 885,950 0 0 0 $ 885,950 13,727,000 0 0 D $ 13,727,000 1,435,000 0 0 0 $ 1,435,000 70,000 0 0 0 $ 70,000 130,010 2,124,540 545,5D0 0 $ 2,800,050 225,000 0 0 0 $ 225,000 600,000 0 0 0 $ 600,000 400,000 0 0 0 $ 400,000 195,000 0 0 0 $ 195,000 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 1,110,000 0 0 0 $ 1,110,000 42,833,277 $ 2,124,540 $ 776,000 $ 230,500 $ 45,964,317 0 50,000 0 D $ 50,000 0 900,000 0 D $ 900,000 0 95,000 D 0 $ 95,000 0 710,000 1,490,000 D $ 2,200,000 0 $ 1,755,000 $ 1,490,000 $ 0 $ 3,245,000 $ 42,833,277 $ 3,879,540 $ 2,266,000 $ 230,500 $ 49,209,317 368,500 0 0 0 $ 368,500 1,177,450 0 D 0 $ 1,177,450 13,750,000 710,000 1,490,000 0 $ 15,950,000 $ 15,295,950 $ 710,000 $ 1,490,000 $ 0 $ 17,495,950 1,000,000 0 230,500 230,500 $ 1,461,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 0 $ 230,500 $ 230,500 $ 1,461,000 1 Schedule 1 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap ISTEA Grant Funds TEA -21 Grant Funds Total Federal /State Grants Reserves 1994 Bond Program Project Savings G_O. Bonds 1994 Program General Fund Balance Permanent Street Maintenance Fund Reserves Unspecified Project Savings Utility Operations for Capital Projects Project Savings Pay-As-You-Go Reserves for Capital Improvements Bond Program Project Savings General CIP Project Savings Total Reserves Other City of Keller Other Permanent Sidewalk Maintenance Fund Total Other Total Sources of Funds Project To Date 2012!13 Proposed 2013114 Estimated 2014 To Completion Total 0 1,694,540 545,500 0 $ 2,240,040 19,462,000 0 0 0 $ 19,462,000 $ 19,462,000 $ 1,694,540 $ 545,500 $ 0 $ 21,702,040 365,010 0 0 0 $ 365,010 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000 700,000 0 0 0 $ 700,000 100,000 800,000 0 0 $ 900,000 47,150 95,000 0 0 $ 142,150 1,075,000 0 0 0 $ 1,075,000 200,000 0 0 0 $ 200,000 1,696,000 0 0 0 $ 1,696,000 0 100,000 0 0 $ 100,000 65,000 0 0 0 $ 65,000 70,000 0 0 0 $ 70,000 $ 4,393,160 $ 995,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,388,160 2,682,167 0 0 0 $ 2,682,167 0 430,000 0 0 $ 430,000 0 50,000 0 0 $ 50,000 $ 2,682,167 $ 480,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,162,167 $ 42,833,277 $ 3,879,540 $ 2,266,000 $ 230,500 $ 49,209,317 2 Schedule 2 Drainage Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. Map Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total No. ID $ Date Proposed Estimated Completion 2,500,000 Project Costs Continuing Projects 1,340,000 0 D D $ 1,340,000 1 DR0902 Brookhaven Drive Drainage Improvements 280,000 0 0 D $ 280,000 2 DR0903 Brookridge Drive Drainage Improvements 120,000 0 0 D $ 120,000 3 DR1201 Channel Cleaning/Street Drainage Improvements 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 4 DR1002 Heidel burg Court Drainage Improvements 130,000 0 0 D $ 130,000 5 PK1205 Iron Horse Golf Course Erosion Control Phase I 85,000 0 0 0 $ 85,000 6 PK1206 Iron Horse Golf Course Erosion Control Phase 11 210,000 0 0 D $ 210,000 7 DR1102 Meadow Creek Road Drainage Improvements 225,000 0 0 D $ 225,000 6 DR1103 Meadow Road Drainage Improvements 350,000 0 0 0 $ 350,000 9 DR1004 Meadowview Estates Channel Drainage Improvements 2,500,000 0 0 D $ 2,500,000 10 DR1005 Plumwocd Drive Drainage Improvements 65,000 0 0 0 $ 65,000 11 DR1202 Shadywood Ln & Dams Blvd (Drainage and Signalization 200,000 0 0 D $ 200,000 Improvements) 12 DR0913 Steeple Ridge Drainage Improvements 165,000 0 D 0 $ 165,000 Total Continuing Projects $ 4,630,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,630,000 Total Project Costs $ 4,630,000 $ 0 $ D $ D $ 4,630,000 Funding Sources General Obligation Bonds G_O. Bonds 2003 Program 2,500,000 0 D D $ 2,500,000 Total General Obligation Bonds $ 2,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,500,000 Certificates of Obligation Certificates of Obligation 1,340,000 0 D D $ 1,340,000 Total Certificates of Obligation $ 1,340,000 $ 0 $ D $ 0 $ 1,340,000 Reserves G_O. Bonds 1985 Program 120,000 0 0 D $ 120,000 Project Savings 200,000 0 0 D $ 200,000 2003 Bond Program Project Savings 105,000 0 0 D $ 105,000 Certificates of Obligation Project Savings 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 General CIP Project Savings 65,000 0 0 D $ 65,000 Total Reserves $ 790,000 $ 0 $ D $ D $ 790,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 4,630,000 $ 0 $ D $ D $ 4,630,000 3 Schedule 3 Utility Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. Map Project To 2012!13 2613114 2014 To Total No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion Project Costs Continuing Projects - UT0201 Big Fossil Creek Wastewater Oulfall 1,200,000 0 0 0 $ 1,200,000 1 UT0203 I.H. 820 Utility Adjustments (Interchange to Meadowlakes) 1,000,000 0 0 0 $ 1,000,000 2 UFT1202 Sanitary Sewer (Loop 820 Corridor Interceptor Replacement) 1,730,000 0 0 0 $ 1,730,000 - UT 1203 Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main Lines (Phase I) 1,500,000 0 0 0 $ 1,500,000 3 CDBG12 Scruggs Drive Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (CDBG) 200,091 0 0 0 $ 200,091 4 UT0708 Water Line (Boulevard 26/Cardinal Lane) 520,000 0 0 0 $ 520,000 5 UT1207 Water Main & Valve (Across Loop B20 East of Iron Horse 315,000 0 0 0 $ 315,000 Blvd-) 6 UT12GB Water Main (Loop B20 Crossings) 1,770,000 0 0 0 $ 1,770,000 7 UT0810 Western Center Water Facility Expansion 55,000 0 0 0 $ 55,000 Total Continuing Projects $ 8,290,091 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,290,091 New Projects - UT1301 Automatic Dead End Flushing Devices 0 B5,000 0 0 $ 85,000 8 CDBG13 Dude Court & Jennings Drive Galvanized Water Main 0 224,016 0 0 $ 224,016 Renlaremerd ic.nRGl - UT1303 Miscellaneous Water /Sewer Main Replacement (2013) 0 410,000 0 0 $ 410,000 9 UT13G4 Pump and Motor Replacements 0 105,000 0 0 $ 105,000 - UT1305 Sanitary Sewer System Inflow and Infiltration Elimination 0 65,000 0 0 $ 65,000 - LFf1307 Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main Lines (Phase Il) 0 1,500,000 0 0 $ 1,500,000 - LFT1308 Small Water Main Replacement (2013) 0 410,000 0 0 $ 410,000 - UT1309 Telemetric Water Meter Annual Maintenance (2013) 0 350,000 0 0 $ 350,000 10 LJT1310 Transmission Water Line Valve Replacements 0 150,000 0 0 $ 150,000 Total New Projects S 0 $ 3,299,016 $ D $ D $ 3,299,016 Total Project Costs S 8,290,091 $ 3,299,016 $ D $ 0 $ 11,589,107 Fundina Source s Certificates of Obligation Certificates of Obligation 5,715,000 0 0 0 $ 5,715,000 Total Certificates of Obligation $ 5,715,000 $ 0 $ D $ D $ 5,715,000 Federal /State Grants TXDOT Funding 238,482 0 0 0 $ 238,482 Federal Grant 200,091 224,016 0 0 $ 424,107 Total Federal /State Grants $ 438,573 $ 224 $ D $ 0 $ 662,589 Reserves Future Construction Funds 0 2,421;DO0 0 D $ 2,421,000 Other 0 70,000 0 D $ 70,000 Unspecified Project Savings 216,518 0 0 D $ 216,518 4 Schedule 3 Utility Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap Utility Operations for Capital Projects Certificates of Obligation Project Savings Total Reserves Other EPA Surcharge Impact Fees Total Other Total Sources of Funds Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 0 $ 1,255,205 0 0 0 S 1,255,205 0 439,000 0 0 $ 439,000 S 1,471,723 $ 2,930,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,401,723 0 664,795 145,000 0 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 145,000 664,795 $ 664,795 $ 145,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 809,795 $ 8,290,091 $ 3,299,016 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11,589,107 5 Schedule 4 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap Project Costs 2012!13 Proposed Continuing Projects 2014 To Completion 1 PK1201 Adventure World Playground Renovation - PK1202 Annual Tree Planting (2012) 2 PK9702 Boulevard 25 Mufti -Use Trail [ ISTEA] 3 PK9601 Calloway Branch Trail Development [C MAO] 4 PK9602 Little Bear Creek Trail Development [ ISTEA] - PK0908 Trail Signage and Identification Total Continuing Projects New Projects 0 $ - PK1302 Parks Infrastructure Maintenance (2013) 5 PK1303 Richland Tennis Center Infrastructure Management (2013 - PK1306 TUCOR Irrigation System Upgrade Total New Projects 474,507 Total Project Costs 0 $ Fundina Source s Federal /State Grants ISTEA Grant Funds Total Federal /State Grants Sales Tax Park Sales Tax Total Sales Tax Total Sources of Funds Project To Date 2012!13 Proposed 2013114 Estimated 2014 To Completion Total 500,000 40,000 0 0 $ 540,000 35,000 0 0 0 $ 35,000 769,183 0 0 0 $ 769,183 794,815 424,091 290,905 0 $ 1,509,811 2,013,799 474,507 BB,306 0 $ 2,576,612 55,000 0 0 0 $ 55,000 $ 4,167,797 $ 938,598 $ 379,211 $ 0 $ 5,485,606 0 146,000 0 0 $ 146,000 0 60,000 0 0 $ 60,000 0 B0,000 0 0 $ 80,000 $ 0 $ 286,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 286,000 $ 4,167,797 $ 1,224,598 $ 379,211 $ 0 $ 5,771,606 2,581,088 519,386 0 0 $ 3,100,474 $ 2,581,088 $ 519,386 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,100,474 1,586,709 705,212 379,211 0 $ 2,671,132 $ 1,586,709 $ 705,212 $ 379,211 $ 0 $ 2,671,132 $ 4,167,797 $ 1,224,598 $ 379,211 $ 0 $ 5,771,606 X Schedule 5 Aquatic Park Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap KI- In New Projects - WP1302 Concrete Revitalization - WP1303 General Facility Improvements -2013 - W P1304 Long Term Development Plan - W P1305 Repair of Catering Building Roof Structure - W P1306 Security and Nightti me Operation Light Replacement Total New Projects 100,000 Total Project Costs 0 S Fundina Source s Reserves Aquatic Park Infrastructure Reserve Future Construction Funds Unspecified Project 'Savings Certificates of Obligation Project Savings Total Reserves Total Sources of Funds Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 0 150,000 0 0 S 1150,000 0 72,000 0 0 S 72,000 0 100,000 0 0 S 100,000 0 55,000 0 0 S 55,000 0 75,000 0 0 S 75,000 S 0 $ 452,000 $ D $ 0 $ 452,000 S 0 $ 452,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 452,000 0 352,000 0 0 $ 352,000 0 55,409 0 0 $ 59,405 0 27,583 0 0 S 27,583 0 13,008 0 0 S 13,008 S 0 $ 452,000 $ D $ 0 $ 452,000 S 0 $ 452,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 452,000 VA Schedule 6 Municipal Facility Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap Continuing Projects 0 1 BD0809 820 Widening - City Hall Modifications 2 BD0905 820 W idening - Professional Services 3 BD0906 Dams Boulevard Property Acquisition - TOD Area - FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation 4 FC1205 Municipal Government Complex 5 ES0201 NRH Animal Adopti on & Rescue Center - New Facility 6 PK04G4 NRH Recreation Cerder (TIF #2) Total Continuing Projects New Projects 0 $ 7 FC1301 Building Envelope and Roofing Repairs 8 FC1302 Concrete Floor Finish Resurface 9 FC1304 General Construction 10 FC130B Overhead Doors Replacement Total New Projects 0 $ Total Project Costs 24,990,000 Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 1,050,000 0 0 0 $ 1,050,000 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 2,300,000 0 0 0 $ 2,300,000 103,520 0 0 0 $ 103,520 25,000,000 10,ODD,ODO 10,0D0,0D0 25,ODD,ODD $ 70,000,000 2,113,850 1,300,000 0 0 $ 3,413,850 24,990,000 0 0 0 $ 24,990,000 S 55,857,370 $ 11,300,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 102,157,370 0 91,500 0 0 $ 91,500 0 48,000 0 0 $ 48,000 0 14,500 0 0 $ 14,500 0 57,600 0 0 $ 57,600 S 0 $ 211,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 211,600 $ 55,857,370 $ 11,511,600 $ 10,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 102,368,970 Fundinn Sources General Obligation Bonds G.O. Bonds 2003 Program Total General Obligation Bonds Certificates of Obligation Certificates of Obligation Total Certificates of Obligation Reserves Building Services Fund Reserve Gas Development Fund Reserves General Fund Designated Reserves Total Reserves Sales Tax Park Sales Tax Total Sales Tax Other Animal Control Fund Raising Campaign 25,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,ODO 3,000,000 $ 48,000,000 110,000 1,300,000 0 D $ 1 $ 25,110,000 $ 11,300,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 49,410,000 0 0 D 22,000,000 $ 22,000,000 23,300,000 0 D D $ 23,300,000 S 23,300,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 22,000,000 $ 45,300,000 0 211,600 0 D $ 211,600 726,475 0 0 0 $ 726,475 1,350,000 0 0 0 $ 1,350,000 $ 2,076,475 $ 211,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,288,075 1,580,000 0 0 D $ 1,580,000 S 1,580,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,560,000 1,242,367 0 0 D $ 1,242,367 8 Schedule 6 Municipal Facility Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap KI- In Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone # 2 Commercial Loan North Tarrant Express ROW Proceeds Total other Total Sources of Funds Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 871,483 0 0 0 $ 871,483 0 0 0 0$ 0 1,573 „525 0 0 0 $ 1,573,525 103,520 0 0 0 $ 103,520 $ 3,790,895 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,790,895 $ 55,857,370 $ 11,511,600 $ 10,000,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 102,368,970 9 Schedule 7 Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap No. ID Project Costs Continuing Projects Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion - IS1201 Computer /Phone Rep lace menIJU pgrade for New Recreation 130,000 Center 65,000 - IS1202 Hardware Replacement for the IBM AS400 65,000 - IS1203 Tele orks Replacement for Online and VOIP Platforms 130,000 Total Continuing Projects $ 325,000 $ New Projects 0 0 0 $ 130,000 0 0 0 $ 65,000 0 0 0 $ 130,000 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 325,000 - FS1302 2013 Dump Truck Replacement (Unit 691) 0 105,000 - FS1304 2013 Rescue Pumper Replacement (Unit 935) 0 660,000 Total New Projects $ 0 $ 765,000 $ Total Project Costs $ 325,000 $ 765,000 $ Funding Source s Certificates of Obligation 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 105,000 660,000 0 $ 0 $ 765,000 0 $ 0 $ 1,090,000 Certificates of Obligation 0 765,000 0 0 $ 765,000 Total Certificates of Obligation $ 0 $ 765,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 765,000 Reserves Information Services Reserve 118,920 0 0 0 $ 118,920 Utility Fund 70,000 0 0 0 $ 70,000 Total Reserves $ 188,920 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 188,920 Sales Tax Park Sales Tax 106,080 0 0 0 $ 106,080 Total Sales Tax $ 106,080 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 106,080 Other Court Technology Fund 30,000 0 0 0 $ 30,000 Total Other $ 30,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 30,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 325,000 $ 765,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,090,000 10 Schedule 8 Economic Development Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap KI_ In Project Costs 0 Continuing Projects 0 $ 1 ED0803 Boulevard 26 Intersection Imp. (@ Rodger Line Rd.) - ED0801 Business Im prove ment and Growth (BIG) Program 2 ED0602 Commercial Redevelopment Program - ED1002 Loop 820 Redevelopment - ED1001 SH 1211183 & Bedford -Road Access Plan - PW0402 Sign Removal Assistance Program 3 ED0601 TIF 1 Expansion - Intersection Improvements /Utility Burial - ED1101 Wayfinding Signage Total Continuing Projects $ Total Project Costs $ Fundina Source s Certificates of Obligation Certificates of Obligation Total Certificates of Obligation Reserves General Fund Pay -As -You-Go Reserves Sales Tax Reserve for Economic Development Gas Fund Reserves (Designated for ED Activities) General Fund Reserves Designated for ED Total Reserves Sales Tax Sales Tax Reserve for Economic Development Total Sales Tax Other Other Commercial Loan Total Other Total Sources of Funds Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 450,000 0 0 0 $ 450,000 200,000 0 0 0 $ 200,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 $ 3,000,000 2,087,938 0 0 0 $ 2,087,938 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000 1,000,000 0 2,500,000 0 $ 3,500,000 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000 6,987,938 $ 0 $ 2,500,000 $ 0 $ 9,487,938 6,987,938 $ 0 $ 2,500,000 $ 0 $ 9,487,938 1,000,000 0 2,5DD;DDD 0 $ 3,500,000 S 1,000,000 $ o $ 2,500,000 $ 0 $ 3,500,000 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000 175,000 0 0 0 $ 175,000 1,861,463 0 0 0 $ 1,861,463 3,000,000 0 0 0 $ 3,000,000 S 5,086,463 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,086,463 450,000 0 0 0 $ 450,000 S 450,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 450,000 25,000 426,475 0 0 D D D $ D $ 25,000 426,475 $ 451,475 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 451,475 $ 6,987,938 $ 0 $ 2,500,000 $ 0 $ 9,487,938 11 Schedule 9 GIP Personnel Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap KI- In Continuing Projects GCIP12 General CIP Personnel Costs MFPF12 Municipal Facilities Project Funding UCIP12 Utility CIP Personnel UCNP12 Utility Constructi on Personnel UCPF12 Utility Constructi on Project Funding Total Continuing Projects Total Project Costs 0 Fundina Source s Reserves General CIP Reserves and Interest Income Utility Reserves and Interest Income Municipal Facilities Project Funding Utility Construction Project Funding Total Reserves Total Sources of Funds Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 404,834 402,372 0 0 $ 807,206 0 0 0 0$ 0 401,808 403,609 0 0 $ 805,417 785,197 820,000 0 0 $ 1,605,197 - 755,000 - 820,000 0 0 $ - 1,575,000 S 836,839 $ 805,981 $ D $ 0 $ 1,642,820 S 836,839 $ 806,981 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,642,820 404,834 402,372 0 0 $ 807,206 1,187,005 1,223,609 0 0 $ 2,410,614 0 0 0 0$ 0 - 755,000 - 820,000 0 0 $ - 1,575,000 S 836,839 $ 805,981 $ D $ 0 $ 1,642,820 $ 836,839 $ 806,981 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,642,820 12 Schedule 14 Other Capital Projects Budget Summary Pg. M ap No. ID Continuing Projects - ES1201 Atmos Residential Energy Efficiency Program - ES0902 Litter Not Program - ES1001 Long Term Energy Efficiency EECBG (ARRA) - ES0901 Neighborhood Initiative Program Total Continuing Projects Total Project Costs Fundina Sources Federal /State Grants ARRA Stimulus Grant Total Federal /State Grants Reserves Other Total Reserves Other Donations Fund Other Total Other Total Sources of Funds Project To 2012!13 2013114 2014 To Total Date Proposed Estimated Completion 120,000 10,000 35,000 35,000 20,000 $ 100,000 8,531 13,969 2,500 D $ 25,000 120,000 0 0 0 $ 120,000 154,658 52,500 0 0 $ 207,158 $ 293,189 $ 101,469 $ 37,500 $ 20,000 $ 452,158 $ 293,189 $ 101,469 $ 37,500 $ 20,000 $ 452,158 120,000 0 0 0 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 120,000 $ 293,189 $ 101,469 $ 37,500 $ 20,000 $ 452,158 154,658 32,500 0 0 $ 187,158 $ 154,658 $ 32,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 187,158 0 18,531 20,000 48,969 0 37,500 0 $ 20,DDD $ 20,000 125,000 $ 18,531 $ 68,969 $ 37,500 $ 20,000 $ 145,000 $ 293,189 $ 101,469 $ 37,500 $ 20,000 $ 452,158 13 Schedule 11 201112012 Budget Revisions Budget Summary Page Project Project No Number Name STREET & SIDEWALK CAPITAL PROJECTS 3 ST0801 Douglas Lane Street and Utility Imp. ❑ (Hightower Dr. to Stames Rd) - Closing in FY 18,257,150 11112 4 ST10D6 Glenview Dr. Street Lighting (Honey Ln. West 18,439,317 to Diamond Loch) - Closing in FY 11112 5 ST0201 North Tarrant Pkwy. Street Imp. (Davis to 0 Whitley Road) 6 ST1003 Terry Drive Street Imp. (Susan Lee Ln. to 300,000 North Richland Blvd) -Closing in FY 11112 7 ST1005 Traffic Signalization at Davis Boulevard & $102,584 Creek View Drive $0 Sub -Total Adopted Revision 2011112 Remaining Total Through 201112012 Revised Amount 2011/2012 Budget $1,950,DDO ($100,OOD) $1,850,000 $0 $1,850,DD❑ 61,DDO 16,000 77,000 ❑ 77,ODO 18,257,150 182,167 18,439,317 ❑ 18,439,317 414,871 4,417 419,288 0 419,288 300,0DO 0 300,000 0 300,DDO $20,983,021 $102,584 $21,085,605 $0 $21,085,605 DRAINAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS 18 FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation 11 UT1101 Bursey Elevated Tank Rehabilitation - Closing 8 DR0901 Briarwood Estates Drainage Improvements - $1,945,DDO ($100,000) $1,845,000 $0 $1,845,DDO Closing in FY 11112 3,413,850 - 3,413,850 12 UT1203 Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main 3,D0❑,DDO (1,500,000) 9 DR1002 Heidelburg Court Drainage Improvements 130,DDO D 130,000 ❑ 130,ODO 10 DR1202 Shadywood Ln & Davis Blvd (Drainage and O 2D❑,❑OD 200,000 0 200,DDO Signallzation Improvements) 85,ODO 0 85,000 ❑ Sub -Total Sub -Total $2,075,000 $100,000 $2,175,000 $0 $2,175,000 UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS 18 FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation 11 UT1101 Bursey Elevated Tank Rehabilitation - Closing $900,ODO $175,000 $1, 075,000 $❑ $1,075,DDO in FY 11112 $500,DDO (2011) 3,413,850 - 3,413,850 12 UT1203 Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main 3,D0❑,DDO (1,500,000) 1,500,000 - 1,500,DDO Lines (Phase 1) 60,000 0 60,DDO 16 PK1203 Parks 'Infrastructure Maintenance (2012) - 13 CDBG12 Scruggs Drive Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 0 200,091 200,091 0 200,D91 [CDBG] 85,ODO 0 85,000 ❑ Sub -Total $3,900,000 ($1,124,909) $2,775,091 $0 $2,775,091 PARKS & RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS 18 FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation $0 14 PK1201 Adventure World Playground Renovation $500, ❑DO $0 $500,000 $0 $500,DDO (2011) 3,413,850 - 3,413,850 - 3,413,850 Facility 15 PK1102 Community Garden - Closing in FY 11112 50,DDO 10,060 60,000 0 60,DDO 16 PK1203 Parks 'Infrastructure Maintenance (2012) - 192,DDO 25, ❑DO 217,000 ❑ 217,DDO Closing in FY 11112 85,ODO 0 85,000 ❑ 85,DD❑ Sub -Total $742,000 $35,000 $777,000 $0 $777,000 AQUATIC PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS 17 WP1002 New Attraction (2011) - Closing inFY11112 $1,900,000 $72,151 $1,972,151 $❑ $1,972,151 Sub -Total $1,900,000 $72,151 $1,972,151 $0 $1,972,151 MUNICIPAL FACILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS 18 FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation $0 $1D3,520 $103,520 $0 $103,520 19 FC1205 Municipal Government Complex 0 25,DDO, ❑DD 25,000,000 45,000,DO❑ 70,D0❑,DDO 20 ESD201 NRH Animal Adoption & Rescue Center - New 3,413,850 - 3,413,850 - 3,413,850 Facility 22 FS1201 Dump Truck Replacement Unit 683 (2 012) - 100,ODO Sub -Total $3,413,850 $25,103,520 $28,517,370 $45,000,000 $73,517,370 MAJOR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS 21 UT1210 Directional Drill Baring Machine Replacement - $260, ❑DO $14,873 $274,873 $0 $274,873 Closing in FY 11112 22 FS1201 Dump Truck Replacement Unit 683 (2 012) - 100,ODO 0 100,000 ❑ 100,DD❑ Closing in FY11112 23 FS1202 Sewer Cleaning Equipment Replacement for 85,ODO 0 85,000 ❑ 85,DD❑ Unit 5501(2012) - Closing in FY11112 Sub -Total $445,000 $14,873 $459,873 $0 $459,873 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS 24 ED1201 Economic Development Land Purchase - $0 $586,454 $586,454 $0 $586,454 Closing in FY 11112 25 ED1101 Wayfinding Signage 75,ODO 25,000 10D,000 100, ❑DO Sub -Total $75,000 $611,454 $686,454 $0 $686,464 1 Schedule 11 2011/2012 Budget Revisions Budget Summary Page Project Project No Number Name OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS 26 ES1201 Atmos Residential Energy Efficiency Program Sub -Total Total All Projects SOURCES OF FUNDS General Obligation Bands Certificates of Obligations Federal 1 State Grants Reserves Sales Tax Other Total Sources of Funds Adopted Revision 2011112 Remaining Total Through 201112012 Revised Amount 201112012 Budget $0 $10,000 $10,000 s0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10.000 $33,533,871 $24.924,673 $58.458,544 $45,000,000 $103,458.544 $8,335,D()0 $24,904,417 $33,239,417 $23,000,()00 $56,239,417 7,895,000 (1,766,892) 6,128,108 22,000,000 28,128,108 9,750,DD0 2D0,091 9,950,091 0 9,950,091 2,683,935 1,005,485 3,689,420 0 3,689,420 742,DDD 0 742,000 0 742,000 4,127,936 581,572 4,709,508 ❑ 4,709,508 $33,533,871 $24.924,673 $58.458,544 $45,000,000 $103,458.544 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Douglas Lane Street and Utility Imp. (Hightower Dr. to Starnes Rd.) S T0801 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project provides for the reconstruction and widening of 2700 linear feet of an existing 2 lane asphalt roadway with bar ditches. Douglas Lane is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan and will be widened to a 40 foot wide concrete street. This project will also consist of relocating the City's 8" water and sewer mains within new right -of -way that will be purchased with this project. The bar ditches will be eliminated and the drainage will be collected in the street as well as a newly built underground drainage utility system. This section of Douglas Lane was constructed in the 1950's prior to any development taking place within the proximity of the roadway. Since the original construction of this section of Douglas the area has experienced substantial development. Currently, two schools are located at Douglas and Starnes. Traffic volumes have increased and lack of side walks cause school children walk in the streets to avoid bar ditches. The street and utility improvements are necessary to ease traffic congestion and pedestrian walking safety. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 10/2007 0412008 0912008 04/2009 Land /ROW Acquisition 0712008 0212009 0712009 05/2010 Construction 10/2009 0212011 0112011 02/2012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Savings from this project in the amount of $100,000 will be transferred to project DR1202 Shadywood Ln & Davis Blvd (Drainage and Signalization Improvements). FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bonds $1,200,000 ($100,000) $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Certificates of Obligation 700,000 700,000 $700,000 Other - Project Savings from Utility Imp. 50,000 50,000 $50,000 0 $0 0 $0 Total $1,950,000 ($100,000) 1 850 000 1 $01 $1,850,000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Engineering /Design 242,200 242,200 $242,200 Land /ROW Acquistion 302,800 (83,442) 219,358 $219,358 Construction 1,405,000 (16,558) 1,388,442 $1,388,442 Other 0 $D Total 1 $1,950,000 ($100,000)1 1 850 000 0 $118 DDD IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET There is no anticipated impact on the operating budget. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012!13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I 1 0 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Glenview Dr. Street Lighting (Honey Ln. West to Diamond Loch) S T1006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project will consist of replacing the existing street lighting units along Glenview Drive form Honey Lane west to Diamond Loch Drive with the North Richland Hills standards street lighting units. These standard street lighting units currently exist along Glenview Drive from Rufe Snow Drive west to Honey Lane The City has received numerous requests to install the North Richland Hills standard lighting units in the corridor since the completion of the street lighting unit installation in the section of Rufe Snow west to Honey Lane. Note: It is anticipated that one or two street light locations within this corridor will need additional easements granted in order to install the street light units in the appro priate locations. The reserves funding identified is from the 1994 Bond program project savings. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 0112011 0312011 Land /ROW Acquisition 0312011 0512011 Construction 0612011 0312012 1212011 07/2012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION The additional funding is needed for lighting the remainder of the Glenview Drive corridor west (of the current project's end point) to the City's city limits. Authorizing the additional $16,000 now and installing these remaining street lighting units with the current project will be considerably less expensive than the costs for additional engineering and installation of these remaining street lighting units as a separate project in a future Capital Projects Budget. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES 1994 Bond Program Project Reserves $61,000 $61,000 $61,000 Gen. Capital Project Misc. Street Savings 0 16,000 16,000 $16,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $61,000 $16,000 $77,000 0 $77.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $664 $664 $664 Engineering /Design 20,800 (7,700) 13,100 $13,100 Land /ROW Acquistion 2,500 (2,500) 0 $0 Construction 37,700 25,536 63,236 $63,236 Other 0 $0 Total $61,0001 16 000 $77,0001 0 77 Ofl0 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I I $0 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects North Tarrant Pkwy. Street Imp. (Davis to Whitley Rd) S T0201 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project is for the widening and reconstruction of 20,000 feet of roadway. The design estimate is based on 10" of reinforced concrete pavement over lime - stabilized subgrade. Also included is irrigation, pavers, beams, trees, shrubs and street lighting. The NRH section will be constructed to NRH standards, and the Keller section to Keller standards. An interlocal agreement has been approved with the City of Keller to include the additional section located in the City of Keller. Traffic volumes and congestion have increased in the northern part of the City over the past few years. Widening North Tarrant Parkway will reduce the traff c congestion and provide additional capacity for the growth expected in NE Tarrant County. Total Project Casts: The "Other" expenditures in 2011 -2012 represents bond funds sold for the project prior to award of the construction contract. These funds will cover unexpected utility relocations and/or construction costs. The "Federal /State Grants" is Tarrant County funds. The "Other" is the Keller share. $1,600,000 in General Obligation Bands is from the 1994 Bond Program, $3,860,000 is from the 2003 Bond Program and the Reserves are project savings. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2111112 ORIGINAL 2111112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 0912002 08/2005 Engineering 1112005 10/2009 Land /ROW Acquisition 0512009 11/2009 Construction 0312010 02/2012 1212012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Keller desires the installation of traffic signals at a new street (Keller- Smithfield Road) in their city that intersects with North Tarrant Parkway. While Keller and /or Tarrant County will wholly reimburse NRH for the cost of installing these traffic signals, NRH, as the lead city on this project, will need to initially make payments to the contractor when such payments are due. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bonds $5,460,000 $5,460,000 $5,460,000 Certificates of Obligation 500,000 500,000 $500,000 Federal /State Grants 9,750,000 9,750,000 $9,750,000 Reserves 47,150 47,150 $47,150 Other 2,500,000 182,167 2,682,167 $2,682,167 Total $18,257,150 $182,167 $18.439,317 0 1 $18,439.317 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Engineering /Design 1,699,650 177,632 1,877,282 $1,877,282 Land1ROW Acquistion 70,000 (132) 69,868 $69,868 Construction 15, 000,000 182,167 15,182,167 $15,182,167 Other 1,487,500 (177,500) 1,310,000 $1,310,000 Total r $18,257,150 182 167 $18,439,317 0 $18,439, IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No additional impact is projected with this project. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 2013114 2014/2015 1 201512016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I 1 0 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Terry Drive Street Imp. (Susan Lee Ln. to North Richland Blvd.) S T1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This street is identified on the Master thoroughfare Plan as a Residential, 2 Lane, Undivided (R2U). This project will begin at Susan Lee Ln. and will end at North Richland Blvd. Currently, the existing street consists of asphalt pavement. This project will consist of reconstructing approximately 1,100 linear feet of the asphalt pavement with concrete pavement and providing drainage improvements necessary to comply with the current city standards. This section of Terry Dr. was originally constructed in 1973 as an asphalt street. The average life of an asphalt street is 20 years. The current street condition rating is 40. This rating is considered to be very poor, consisting of areas of complete pavement failure, exhibiting bad riding quality, numerous potholes, areas of ponding water and typically high maintenance. In the areas of pavement failure, the subgrade has been compromised. The original project scope did not include sanitary sewer reconstruction as it was operating with no significant problems. Recently, service - related issues have developed in this area. It is now the City's policy to replace non -PVC sanitary sewer mains located beneath roadway pavement during a street reconstruction project. The G.O. Bonds are from the 2003 Bond Program. Reserve funding is Utility Fund Construction project savings. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 0512010 1012010 Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 0312011 12/2011 Other REVISION EXPLANATION A revision was needed in order to cover the overage for this project. Money came from encumbered funds in the engineering account, as well as funds that were left over from another project. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bonds $375,000 $4,417 $379,417 $0 $379,417 Reserves 39,871 39,871 $39,871 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $414,871 $4,417 $419,288 0 $419.288 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Engineering /Design 53,300 (6,071) 47,229 $47,229 Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 361,571 10,488 372,059 $372,059 Other 0 $0 Total $414,871 $4,4171 419 288 0 419,288 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No anticipated operating impact. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I 1 0 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Traffic Signalization at Davis Boulevard & Creek View Drive S T1005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project consists of both the design and construction of a new traffic signal light at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Creek View Drive/Post Office drive entrance. The traffic signal light will conform to the City's current standards which include black powder coated poles and mast arms, ILSN signs, opticom system, LED lights, video detection system, and street lights mounted on the mast arms. The Post Office driveway will need to be realigned and relocated to match the intersecting street of Creek View Drive. The Post Office parking lot configuration for entry and parking will need to be reconfigured to match the new entrance. This traffic signal installation is necessary to handle the existing traffic volumes along with the amount of turning movement volumes onto Davis Boulevard from Creek View Drive and the Post Office driveways. The traffic signal light will help to provide adequate safe gaps in the traffic stream on Davis Boulevard for motorists who exit Creek View Drive or the Post Office driveway. The current configuration of Creek View Drive and the Post Office driveway creates too many traffic conflicts. The new alignment, along with the traffic signal light, will help improve the safety of the motorists who travel along this corridor. Reserves is from the GCIP GO Bonds project savings ($65,000) and 1994 GO Bond Election project savings ($235,000). PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 0512010 0412012 09/2012 Land/ROW Acquisition Construction 1012010 1012012 0412012 04/2013 Other REVISION EXPLANATION During the budget year, it was determined that additional studies be performed on this project. Therefore, funds were transferred to Engineering to cover the additional costs. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Reserves $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 0 $D 0 $D 0 $0 0 $0 Total $300,000 D $300,000 0 $300.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Engineering /Design 65,000 44,000 109,000 $109,000 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 235,000 (44,000) 191,000 $191,000 Other 0 $0 Total $300,0001 D $300,0001 0 300 D0D IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Maintenance costs ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 1,0831 1,3001 1,300 0 $3,683 Drainage Capital Projects Briarwood Estates Drainage Improvements DR0901 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project consists of constructing a parallel storm drain system beginning at the intersection of Briarwood Drive and Nonemane Street continuing south tying into the existing concrete lined channel at the end of Hewitt St. Approximately 3,300 L.F. reinforcement concrete storm drain pipe ranging from 24 -inch diameter will be constructed with this project, with approximately 50% of the storm drain pipe being 60 inch diameter. The storm drain pipe and curb inlets will be designed and constructed to handle the difference in runoff resulting from the changes in this subdivision was constructed (1972) to the City's current criteria. Briarwood Estates was originally designed in 1972 in accordance with the drainage criteria in place at the time. As of today, the drainage design criteria for the City has changed over the years. Drainage improvements are need to address flooding issues residents are experiencing during storm events. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 01/2009 0412010 Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 05/2010 1012010 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Savings from this project in the amount of $100,000 will be transferred to project DR1202 Shadywood Ln & Davis Blvd (Drainage and Signalization Improvements). FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Cert ificates of Obligation $1,785,000 ($81,892) $1,703,108 $1,703,108 2001 CO Project Savings in 94 BE 160,000 (18,108) 141,892 $141,892 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $1,945,000 ($100.000) 1 845 000 1 $01 $1,845,000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $D Engineering /Design 170,000 170,000 $170,000 Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $D Construction 1,775,000 (100,000) 1,675,000 $1,675,000 Other 0 $0 Total 1 $1,945,000 ($100,000)1 1 845 000 0 1 845,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET There is no anticipated impact on the operating budget. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 01 D Drainage Capital Projects Heideiburg Court Drainage Improvements DR 1002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project consists of converting the existing storm drain inlet in Heidelburg Court to an "open back" inlet and then constructing an overflow concrete drainage flume from the back of this storm drain inlet that would tie into an existing concrete flume system which collects and directs storm water from adjacent properties and into Jester Court. The new overflow flume would be designed to eliminate public storm water from traveling through private property. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 0612010 0612011 0712011 06/2012 Land /ROW Acquisition 0812010 0612011 04/2012 Construction 08/2011 0712012 0412012 12/2012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Transferring funds from the Engineering account to the Construction account to cover project expenditures. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Cert ificates of Obligation $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 Reserves 105,000 0 105,000 0 $105,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $130,000 0 $130,000 0 $130.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 24,000 399 24,399 0 $24,399 Land /ROW Acquistion 10,000 0 10,000 0 $10,000 Construction 96,000 (399) 95,601 0 $95,601 Other 0 $0 Total $130,0001 0 $130,0001 0 130 000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No anticipated operating impact. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I 1 0 Drainage Capital Projects Shadywood Ln & Davis Blvd (Drainage and Signalization Improvements) DR 1202 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project consists of the City constructing the necessary drainage and signal light improvements to accommodate the future crossing of the Little Bear Creek Trail at Davis Boulevard and Shadywood. The drainage improvements will consist of the extension of five 7'X4` Box Culverts and the construction of a new concrete headwall. The signal light improvements will consists of the relocation of the traffic control cabinet and equipment to accommodate the construction of the eastbound section of Shadywood which will allow the Little Bear Creek Trail to cross Davis Boulevard at a signalized intersection. The signal light improvements will also include the installation of the signal light and pedestrian crossings at Shadywood and Davis Boulevard for the trail crossing. This project will allow the users of the trail to cross at a signalized intersection. This project will be constructed by the Developer for the Thornbridge West Subdivision. The City will pay the Developer in full for the construction of this project after the project has been accepted by the City. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 0912012 12/2012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION The current location for the Little Bear Creek Trail crossing at Davis Boulevard is located approximately 100' (feet) north of the existing Shadywood. The existing conditions make it impossible for the trail to cross at Shadywood. This project will install the necessary signal light and drainage improvements to allow the trail crossing to be moved to the south and line up with Shadywood on the west side of Davis Boulevard. This will allow users of the trail to cross at a signalized intersection. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES GO Project Savings (ST0801) $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 CO Drainage Project Savings (DR0901) 100,000 100,000 $100,000 0 $a 0 $0 0 $0 Total $01 S200,000 $200,000 0 $200 .000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 200,000 200,000 $200,000 Other 0 $a Total o 1 $200 ,0001 20D 000 0 2ao aoa IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No operating impact is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 3001 3001 3001 300 1 $1,200 10 Utility Capital Projects Bursey Elevated Tank Rehabilitation UT1 101 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project will consist of refurbishing the interior and exterior portions of the 2 MG (million gallons) Bursey Road elevated potable water storage tank. Internal structure repairs will be made along with minor repairs such as replacing the 24 inch diameter water access hatch and replacing roof ventilation structures to meet the latest Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regulations. The project will also include removing the existing chain link fence and replacing it with an 8 foot black chain link fence fabric. The primary purpose of this project is to provide a safe water supply and to meet all TCEQ regulations concerning potable water storage tanks. Annually, staff conducts deficiency assessment for deterioration on all water storage tanks in the City. This is done so deficiencies can be identified and corrected before TCEQ performs their inspections of the water storage tanks in the City. Correcting the deficiencies before an inspection is performed by TCEQ helps the City to maintain iYs Superior Water rating. Staff noticed during the recent assessment of this tank that the tank bowl is rusting and the paint is deteriorating. Internal structural apparatuses are in need of repair (internal roof plates, access ladders, sidewalk plates, floor plates, and riser pipes)-Typically, elevated water storage tanks need to be refurbished and repaired every 10 to 15 years to meet TCEQ regulations. This elevated storage tank was refurbished in 1994. The repairs and paint have lasted approximately 15 years. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 1012010 0512011 0612011 09/2012 Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 07/2011 0312012 1212011 08/2012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION During the design of the project, a detailed structural inspection was performed on the tank bowl. Several structural deficiencies were found that require correction. The deficiencies noted in the inspection report include deteriorated rafters inside the tank bowl and the replacement of all riser ladders to meet new TCEQ regulations. Correction of the deficiencies will require an overall cost increase to the project. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Utility Fund Reserves $900,000 $175,000 $1,075,{)00 $1,075,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $900,0001 175 000 1 $1.075,000 1 $01 $1,075.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 150,000 150,000 $150,000 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 750,000 175,000 925,000 $925,000 Other 0 $0 Total $900,0001 175 000 1 $1,075,0001 $0 $110 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No impact on operating budget is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Utility Capital Projects Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main Lines (Phase 1) UT1203 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION In 2010, the City conducted a Sanitary Sewer Assessment for the southern portion of the City (Project 1JT0902). The Study found that approximately 9,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer main lines are in need of replacement. The main lines are made of vitrified clay tile and have deteriorated to a point where pipe failures have occurred causing blockage and overflows. Many of the joint pipe sections are separated, allowing ground water and surface water intrusion resulting in capacity issues and added cost for the treatment of wastewater. This project will replace segments of the main lines by using the latest technology such as pipe bursting to eliminate the problem lines. The construction methods used will create minor inconveniences to residents. Approximately 6,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer lines will be replaced or repaired with this project. All of the sanitary sewer improvements will occur south of Loop 820. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 1012011 0312012 0912012 Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 1 012012 1112012 0912013 Other REVISION EXPLANATION The project has been split into two phases. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Cert ificates of Obligation $3,000,000 ($1,500,000) $1,500,000 $1,500,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $3,000,000 ($1,500.000) 1 $1 500 000 1 $01 $1,500,000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 500,000 (300,000) 300,000 $300,000 Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 2,400,000 (1,200,000) 1,200,000 $1,200,000 Other 0 $0 Total 1 $3,000,000 1 ($1,50 $1 500 000 1 $01 $1,5 00 000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No operating impact is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I 1 0 12 Utility Capital Projects Scruggs Drive Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation [CDBG] CDBG12 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This is the 37th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project. The Project will consist of the rehabilitation (pipe bursting) of approximately 1200 lineal feet of sanitary sewer within Scruggs Drive Right -of -Way between Glenview Drive and Harmonson Road. The existing sanitary sewer main is 6" diameter vitrified clay pipe that will be pipe bursted with 8" diameter high - density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. The existing clay pipe has become problematic requiring regular maintenance. The pipe has partially collapsed in areas and roots have intruded within the pipe throughout this 1200 lineal foot section. Because a portion of the existing clay pipe is located partially under pavement and another portion of the pipe is immediately next to large diameter trees, replacing this pipe via traditional open - trench construction would also require removal and replacing portions of Scruggs Drive and the removal of the large diameter trees. This type of construction would also be extremely disruptive to traffic and to the adjoining properties. Pipe bursting this sanitary sewer with HDPE pipe is cost effective as pavement will only need to be removed and replaced at those locations where sanitary sewer service laterals and manholes currently exist. Additionally, the disruption to traffic and to the adjoining properties would be minimized. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering 10/2011 01/2012 Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 0412012 1012012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION The Project is 100% Grant Funded (no local funds are required) and was inadvertently not included in the adopted FY 2011 -2012 Capital Projects Budget. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Federal State Grant $0 $200,091 $200,091 $200,091 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 0 $200,091 $200,091 0 $200.091 PROJECT EXPENDITURES $0 $0 Professional Services Engineering /Design 0 25,099 25,099 $20,099 Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 173,992 173,992 $173,992 Other 0 $0 Total U $200,091 $200,091 0 200,U91 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I I $0 Ii Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Adventure World Playground Renovation (2011) PK1201 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project will provide for a major renovation of Adventure World Playground. Major drainage improvements are being planned in and around the playground in addition to the complete replacement of the largest play area with the introduction of some shade fabric and a greater percentage of fully accessible play components. The remainder of the small play areas will be carefully evaluated to determine their usability and to formulate a plan for renovation or removal and replacement. Sidewalks in and around the playground will be replaced to assure compliance with ADA. The playground, now seventeen years old is situated next to a rolling hillside in Cross Timbers Park. Active rain stones over the years have caused significant gully erosion throughout the entire playground and have displaced hundreds of yards of fallsafe material over the past several years. Additionally, due to heavy use and age, the playground has become out dated for continued use into the future. This project will serve to provide a safe, accessible and high quality play experience for our citizens to enjoy for years to come. This project is recognized as a high priority on the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and the Parks Infrastructure Asset Management Plan. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 10/20711 0412012 0212012 06/2013 Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 0412012 0812013 0612013 02/2014 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Funds are requested to be transferred from Construction to Professional Services to cover the cost of Professional Services for the design contract with Dunaway. The design fee is $49,600 plus $2,500 in reimbursable expenses for a total of $52,100. The original estimate for professional services was $50,000. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Sales Tax $500,000 $0 $500,000 $500,0700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $500,000 0 $500,000 0 $500.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $50,000 $2,100 $52,1007 $52,100 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 450,000 (2,100) 447,900 $447,900 Other 0 $0 Total I S500,000 D $500,0001 0 500,DOD IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET There is no impact to the operating budget. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 01 0 14 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Community Garden PK9102 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project provides for the development of a space designed to promote and encourage community gardening and greening by volunteers and supporters within the community. The project will provide for the installation of raised planting beds, irrigation, equipment and tool storage, soil, mulch and composting bins, and fencing. Consistent with other community garden projects, the City will seek partnership with community groups to identify an appropriate location. Community gardening improves people's quality of life by providing a catalyst for neighborhood and community development, stimulating social interaction, encouraging self - reliance, producing nutritious food, reducing family food budgets, conserving resources and creating opportunities for recreation, exercise, therapy and education. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 1012010 0312011 Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 04/2011 0712011 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Original budget did not account for $10,000 donation in Home Depot Gift Cards received. The revision accounts for this donation and the associated expense. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Sales Tax $50,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 Other 0 10,000 10,000 $10,000 0 $D 0 $0 0 $0 Total $50,000 $10,0001 6D 000 0 $60.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 50.GOC 10,000 60,000 0 $60,000 Other 0 $0 Total 50,000 $10,0001 6D 000 0 10 DDD IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I I $D Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Parks Infrastructure Maintenance [2012] PK1203 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project provides for maintenance of park infrastructure in response to use and age. The Parks and Recreation Department developed an Asset Management Plan for park amenities. The plan addresses the long term funding needs for replacement and renovation of park amenities, demonstrating stewardship of property assets by the City. Funding is included to address drainage issues at Ace Park, Clyde Zellers Park, the North Electric Trail, and Green Valley Park. Additional projects include the repair and replacement of fencing at Clyde Zellers Park, replacement of pond fountains at HomeTown Lakes, enlargement of dugouts at Richfield Park, and re- lamping of light standards on selected athletic Fields. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land/ROW Acquisition Construction 1012011 1012011 0912012 09/2012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Other funding source for $25,000 is an insurance settlement check received from Continental Casualty Company (CNA) for damage to the Cotton Belt Trail. These funds are being used to offset the cost of trail repairs. The Funding and Expenditures for PK1203 are requested to be increased to cover the addition of these funds. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Sales Tax $192,000 $192,000 $192,000 Other 25,000 25,000 $25,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $192,000 $25,000 $217,000 0 $217.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 192,000 25,000 217,000 $217,000 Other 0 $0 Total $192,0001 25 000 $217,0001 0 217,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 0 1 01 01 0 $0 16 Aquatic Park Capital Projects New Attraction (2011 ) WP1002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This attraction, located in the southwest area of the facility near the Accelerator, is planned to be an "off the shelf' attraction customized for installation at NRH2O. The project revision is for the design and installation of a three -part raft raft conveyor system adjacent to the Viper waterslide to transport the rafts from the run out pool to the top of the tower. The project includes a ground level loading conveyor, a vertical conveyor and a discharge /launch conveyor at the top tower. This attraction will reach multiple audience demographics and will provide increased capacity for the park and additional experiences for guests. Each raft for the Viper raft is approximately 67" in diameter and while guests have expressed their enjoyment of the ride experience, they have also expressed frustration with carrying the large rafts up to the top of the tower. Carrying the rafts has been challenging for smaller riders and for some adults. This project will greatly increase the overall guest experience from the Viper, and will reduce the time spent to maintain the rafts at the desired air pressure. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 1012009 1012009 1112011 11/2011 Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 1112010 1112010 0412012 0412012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Three options for designing the conveyor system were evaluated. The selected option provides a conveyor launch system at the top of the tower and includes the ability to place a scale directly underneath the multi person raft to ensure compliance with the 600 pound total weight limit before the raft launches. This method which is safer for lifeguards and guests requires additional funding over the adopted amount, however, annual labor savings make this the best option. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Cert ificates of Obligation $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Reserves 200,000 72,151 272,151 $272,151 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $1,900,00O $72,151 1 $1,972,151 1 $01 $1,972.151 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $187,000 {$5,932} $181,068 $0 $181,068 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 1,713,000 78,083 1,791,083 0 $1,791,083 Other 0 $0 Total $1,900,000 $72,151 1 $1,972,151 0 $119 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Based on selecting option 3, an additional lifeguard would not be required, avoiding an increase in annual anticipated expenditures by $12,500. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 201512016 1 TOTAL Projected {12,500} (12,500) {12,500) (12,500) {12,500} {$62,500} 17 Municipal Facility Capital Projects Loop 820 Expansion Preparation FC 1204 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION Due to the expansion of Loop 820 the City needs to conduct a space needs assessment and site plan analysis. In addition lighting located in the ROW will be impacted by the expansion and will need to be relocated. The space needs assessment and site plan analysis will allow the City to evaluate the current configuration of departments and determine the best way to maintain efficient City services into the future. The assessment will determine the space needs for NRH facilities and associated costs for infrastructure impacted by the expansion of Loop 820. Funding source of "Other" for this project will be provided by revenue from NTE ROW acquisitions. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 1112011 10/2012 Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 0312012 1012012 Other REVISION EXPLANATION New project resulting from Loop 820 Expansion during FY 11 -12. Revision is necessary to include project in current year budget. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES NTE Row Acquisitions $0 $103,520 $103,520 $0 $103,520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 0 $103,520 $103,520 0 $103.520 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $92,000 $92,000 $92,000 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 11,520 11,520 $11,520 Other 0 $0 Total 0 $103,5201 103 520 0 103,52D IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I I $0 18 Municipal Facility Capital Projects Municipal Government Complex FC 1205 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project is for the design, acquisition, and construction of a new municipal complex up to 180,000 square feet to consolidate multiple city services and departments into one location. The new municipal complex will include the following city services and departments: City Hall, Police Department (including Police Property, Traffic, Crime Scene and SWAT), Municipal Court, Parks Administration, Citicable, Fire Administration & Emergency Management, and Neighborhood Services. The proposed 180,000 square feet would be constructed to provide Public Safety operations 94,000 square feet, City Hall 71,000 square feet, and Municipal Court 15,000 square feet. The square feet dimensions by function could be redefined during the design process. The new Municipal Government Complex will allow the City to position multiple City services and departments into one conducive location for the Residents, Employees, and Visitors of North Richland Hills. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 0712012 1212015 Engineering 0712012 1 212013 Land /ROW Acquisition 0612012 08/2012 Construction 1212013 12/2015 Other REVISION EXPLANATION The existing location of city services and departments have been impacted by the widening of Loop 820 resulting in a reduction of available parking spaces, fire lanes, and adequate space in front of buildings for emergency responder access. Due to the widening of 820, locations are non - compliant with several codes and government regulations. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bonds $0 $25,000,000 $25,000,000 $23,000,000 $48,000,000 Certificates of Obligation 0 0 0 22,000,000 $22,000,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total fl 1 $25,000,000 $25.000,000 $45.000,000 $70,000.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES $0 $4,665,847 $4,665,847 $0 $4,665,847 Professional Services Engineering /Design 0 282,000 282,000 0 $282,000 Land /ROW Acquistion 0 2,600,000 2,600,000 0 $2,600,000 Construction 0 11,969,565 11,969,565 45,000,000 $56,969,565 Other 0 5,482,588 5,482,588 0 $5,482,588 Total 0 $25,000,000 1 $25,000,0001 $45 000 000 $70,00 0 000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Operating impact will be added after Consultants are hired and provided a Performa on estimated expenditures. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011/12 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 201412015 1 201512016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 01 0 19 Municipal Facility Capital Projects NRH Animal Adoption & Rescue Center - New Facility ES0201 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project entails building a new facility of roughly 10,865 square feet to replace the older antiquated facility currently in use. The current facility shelters an average 102 - 120 animals daily with a current design capacity of 95. The new facility will be able to provide additional kennel capacity, adoption areas, sick and incoming isolation areas, and a separate entry and exit to reduce cross - contamination issues, as well as additional storage space and work areas. The new Adoption Center is needed to enhance adoption and customer service operations, minimize animal overcrowding, reduce cross contamination between sick and well animals, provide needed material/equipment storage and staff work areas, and allow for an on -site adoption related minor surgical center. The total cost for the design and construction of the new facility is estimated to be slightly over $3 million. General obligation bonds in the amount of $1.3 million have been committed for this project as well as $839,814 in accumulated voluntary utility bill donations. Current available funding is $2,171,483. The remaining project monies ($1,242,357) need to be raised through an area wide fund raising campaign focused on individual donors, businesses and citizens. Lawrence & Assoc. will coordinate the Capital Campaign in conjunction with Quorum Architects who will design the facility. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services 04/2006 07/2013 Engineering 12/2006 1012013 Land /ROW Acquisition Construction 03/2014 0912014 Other REVISION EXPLANATION Funding from the voluntary utility bill donations as well as accumulation of miscellaneous donations received from outside sources that are not related to utility bills have been identified and made available to this project. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bonds $1,300,000 $0 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Other - Accumulated Voluntary LIB Donations 535,914 335,569 871,483 $871,483 Other - Fundraising Campaign 1,577,936 (335,569) 1,242,367 $1,242,367 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $3,413,850 1 $01 $3.413,850 1 $01 $3,413.850 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 Engineering /Design 415,760 0 415,760 $415,760 Land /ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 2,898,090 0 2,898,090 $2,898,090 Other 0 $0 Total 3,413,850 1 $01 $3,413,8501 0 3 413 850 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET In July 2014, one (1) full -time Humane Technician (clerk), one (1) full -time Kennel Technicians, and one (1) part -time Kennel Technician will be hired to begin training. In January 2015, a full -time veterinarian will be hired. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 201512016 1 TOTAL Projected 01 01 31,8491 132,4881 137,787 $302,124 20 Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Directional Drill Boring Machine Replacement UT1210 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This project consists of purchasing a Directional Drill Boring Machine to replace the existing machine that is used by the Public Works Construction Division on a regular basis. The Construction Division uses a directional drill boring machine for replacing 8,000 - 10,000 linear feet of water supply lines and 1,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer lines on an annual basis. The machine allows the division to bore and replace the lines underground without having to excavate street pavement or residents' yards. This saves the City money by not having to replace street pavement, driveways, or residents' yards. Use of this boring machine also prevents disruption to the street traffic flow and results in less damage to residents' property. The existing directional drill boring machine is over ten years old and needs to be replaced. It is too small and does not have the power required to drill through the hard soils in the City. The machine breaks down frequently and needs major repairs. Some of the features on the machine can not be replaced because the machine is outdated or the cost is considerably high. Replacement of this equipment has been in the 10 Year Plan for several years. Funding is Utility Reserves. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction Other 1002011 0912012 REVISION EXPLANATION Project savings identified from the completion of project UT1211 Hydra - Excavation Vacuum to be transferred to UT1210 Directional Drill Boring Machine Replacement to provide funding for the purchase of a trailer for the equipment. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Reserves $260,000 $14,873 $274,873 $274,873 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $260,000 $14,873 $274,873 0 $274.873 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 Other 260.00 14,873 274,873 0 $274,873 Total I 5260,000 $14,8731 274 873 0 274,873 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No anticipated operating impact. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 01 0 21 Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Dump Truck Replacement Unit 683 (2012) FS1201 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This is the replacement of a 1996 Chevrolet Kodiak tandem dump truck assigned to the Public Works Street Division. The GIP Major Capital equipment replacement program was implemented using the recommendations obtained in an independent study conducted for the City by Peat Marwick in August of 1986 and August of 1993 which recommended a minimum 10 -year replacement for capital equipment. At the 10 -year interval, the equipment is evaluated for replacement based on frequency of use, the number of like equipment in the fleet, equipment condition, and the availability of parts and service. The dump truck will be 16 years old when replaced and mileage is projected to be over 100,000 miles. The replacement dump truck would be equipped with an energy - efficient clean - burning diesel engine which meets the replacement guidelines of the Clean Fleet Vehicle Program. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction Other 1012011 1012011 0912012 0912012 REVISION EXPLANATION During budget review, it was determined that reserves would be used instead of issuing Certificates of Obligation. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Cert ificates of Obligation $100,000 ($100,000) $0 $0 0 $0 Reserves 0 100,000 100,000 $100,000 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $100,0001 4 $100,0001 0 $100.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 Other 100,000 100,000 $100,000 Total $100,0001 0 $100,0001 0 100 000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No impact on operating budget is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0 PA Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Sewer Cleaning Equipment Replacement for Unit 5501 (2012) FS1202 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION This is the replacement of the Harben sewer cleaning equipment assigned to the Utility Division of the Public Works Department. The sewer cleaning equipment is mounted inside the service body on unit ##5501, a 2002 Freightliner truck. The equipment being replaced includes the high pressure pump, drive engine, water tank, retractable hose reel, and associated wiring /hoses. The GIP Major Capital equipment replacement program was implemented using the recommendations obtained in an independent study conducted for the City by Peat Marwick in August of 1986 and August of 1993 which recommended a minimum 10 -year replacement for capital equipment. At the 10 -year interval, the equipment is evaluated for replacement based on frequency of use, the number of like equipment in the fleet, equipment condition, and the availability of parts and service.The Harben sewer cleaning equipment is a specialized one -of -a -kind unit setup which is subject to 24 hoursl7 days a weekoperation by the user department for maintenance of the City sewer system. The City also provides backup emergency assistance with this specialized equipment to surrounding cities as requested. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition Construction Other 1112011 1112011 0612012 06/2012 REVISION EXPLANATION During budget review, it was determined that Reserves would be used instead of issuing Certificates of Obligation. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Cert ificates of Obligation $85,000 4$85,0007 $0 $0 0 $0 Reserves 0 85,000 85,000 $85,000 0 $0 0 $0 Total $85,000 0 $85,000 0 $85.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 Other 85,000 85,000 $85,000 Total $85,0001 0 $85,0001 0 85 000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No impact on operating budget is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0 23 Economic Development Capital Projects Economic Development Land Purchase E ❑9207 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION Purchase of 2.224 acre tract of land located directly east of the City's recreation center. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition 0212012 09/2012 Construction Other REVISION EXPLANATION The 2.224 acre tract of land located directly east of the City's recreation center has been utilized for years as parking for the recreation center and became mailable for purchase. The City felt that we should act on the opportunity and acquire the contiguous property. Other source of funding is the North Tarrant Express Funds. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Other $586,454 $585,454 $0 $586,454 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 0 $586,454 $586,454 0 $586 ,454 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land/ROW Acquistion 585,454 585,454 0 $586,454 Construction 0 $0 Other 0 $0 Total 0 $586,4541 586 454 0 586,454 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET No operating impact is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 01 0 24 Economic Development Capital Projects Wayfinding Signage ED1101 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION Wayfinding is the methodology of providing indicators to guide people to their destinations. Signs improve mobility and are integral to a clearly designed Wayfinding program. The central sector of the City contains numerous local and regional destinations where Wayfinding signage will serve as an enhanced guide. There are numerous regional destinations within North Richland Hills that enhance the City's image and exemplify the Council goal of 'Positive City Image'. Placement of wayfinder signs to these destinations will be done in phases. Phase I will be the central sector of the City within Harwood, Boulevard 26, Precinct Line, Mid Cities and Davis Boulevard. Central sector destinations include: NRF120, NRH Library, NYTEX, TCC, Birdville ISD Fine Arts and Athletic Complex, in addition to the future NRH Recreation Center and possible Performing Arts Center. It is projected that Phase I will require 15 total signs to sufficiently cover this area. Each sign will conform with the City image study and will be designed to accommodate additional future destinations. Note: Recommended source of funding is the Economic Development Sales Tax Reserves and Promotional Fund. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land /ROW Acquisition 1012010 05/2013 Construction 1012010 0512013 1012012 10/2013 Other REVISION EXPLANATION During budget review, it was determined project construction costs increased by an additional $25,€100. Additional cost was funded by the Promotional Fund. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Reserves $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Promotional Fund 25,000 25,000 $25,000 0 $D 0 $0 0 $0 Total $75,000 $25,000 $100,0001 0 $100.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $ Land /ROW Acquistion 25,000 0 25,000 0 $25,000 Construction 50,000 25,000 75,000 0 $75,000 Other 0 $0 Total $75,0001 25 ODD $100,0001 0 1 DO D0D IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Minimal operating impact expected. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012.13 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected I I I I I 1 D 25 Municipal Facility Capital Projects Atmos Residential Energy Efficiency Program ES 9201 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION The City has a contract with Atmos to provide low income NRH residents with energy efficient measures to their homes such as wall and attic insulation, duct sealing, repair /replacement of hot water heaters, caulking. This is a reimbursement type grant. An audit of the home is performed before and after the energy efficiency measures are completed to report the effectiveness of the work. Atmos allows up to $1,500 per home. This grant funding will provide energy efficiency to low income residents making their homes safer, more marketable and reduce their energy bills as well as the amount of energy used. Other funding is Atmos Energy Residential Energy Efficiency Program Grant. PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2011112 ORIGINAL 2011112 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION Professional Services Engineering Land/ROW Acquisition Construction Other 1012012 0912013 REVISION EXPLANATION Revision being submitted to include in the FY11/12 Capital Budget. FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2011112 REVISION 2011112 BALANCE COST FUNDING SOURCES Other $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 0 $10,0001 10 000 0 $10.000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering /Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 Other 0 10,000 10,000 0 $10,000 Total I 0 $10,0001 $10,0001 0 10 000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2011112 1 2012113 1 2013114 1 2014/2015 1 2015/2016 1 TOTAL Projected 1 01 01 01 01 0 $0 pit M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. F.2 GN 2012 -079 Ratify Increase in Property Tax Revenues Reflected in Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Adopted Budget Presenter: Mark Mills, Budget Director Summary: State law requires that when adopting a budget that will raise more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year, a separate vote of the governing board is required to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget. General Description: When adopting a budget that generates more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year, State law requires the City to state the increase in property tax revenue, no matter what the cause; whether the increase is based on increased property values, new construction or an increased tax rate. The budget includes a proposed tax rate of 61¢ per $100 of valuation. If adopted, this would increase the tax rate 4¢ and would be the first increase to the tax rate in 19 years. Prior to this increase, the tax rate had remained at 57¢ per $100 of valuation for 19 consecutive years. Both an increase in appraised values and an increase in the tax rate will result in increased property tax revenues for the City. The language required to appear as a cover page to the budget document by State law is as follow: This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year's budget by $2,146,015 or 10.40 %, and of the amount $185,666.72 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. While the total amount of revenue generated from property taxes is $2,146,015 higher than the previous year, the additional revenue generated by the 4¢ tax increase will go directly to debt service to cover the cost of the new municipal complex as approved by voters in the May 2012 bond election. In addition, a greater portion of the tax rate in Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 will be directed to debt service, resulting in a decrease to the maintenance and operations component of the tax rate in the amount of 0.5343¢. This proposed tax rate of 610 exceeds the effective rate of 55.9888¢, but falls below the rollback rate of 62.0937¢. The aforementioned legislation requires the governing body to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the adopted budget. The vote to ratify this property tax increase must be in addition to and separate from the vote to adopt the budget or the vote to set the tax rate. Recommendation Ratify the increase in property tax revenues reflected in the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Adopted Budget, using the following motion: "I move to ratify the increase in property tax revenues reflected in the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 budget." M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. F.3 GN 2012 -077 Adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2012 - Ordinance No. 32'18 Presenter: Mark Mills, Budget Director Summary: Council is requested to consider the adoption of an ordinance setting the maintenance and operations tax rate for Tax Year 2012 at 35.1076¢ and the debt service tax rate at 25.8924¢, for a total tax rate of 610 per $100 valuation. General Description: The Notice of Public Hearing on the tax rate was published in the Star Telegram on August 15 The 2012 Property Tax Rate notice was published in the Star Telegram newspaper on August 21, 2012. The required Notice of Tax Revenue Increase ran in the Star Telegram on Tuesday, August 28 and Friday, August 31 St , immediately after each of the required tax rate public hearings. The publication of each of these notifications was done in accordance with State law. In addition, the notice of public hearing on the tax rate and the notice of vote on the tax rate were posted on the City's website and carried on Citicable. The public hearings on the tax rate were held on Monday, August 27, 2012 during the regular City Council meeting and Thursday, August 30, 2012 during a special meeting of the City Council. The proposed Tax Year 2012 (Fiscal Year 2012 -2013) property tax rate for the City of North Richland Hills is 610 per $100 of valuation. If approved, this will result in a 4¢ increase in the tax rate, the first increase in 19 years. Prior to this increase, the tax rate had remained at 57¢ for 19 consecutive years. The 4¢ increase is directly attributable to the successful bond election held in May 2012 for the construction a new municipal complex. The proposed tax rate of 610 is 8.95% higher than the effective tax rate of 55.9888¢ but lower than the rollback rate of 62.0937¢. The proposed tax rate of 610 is distributed into two components as follows: • 35.1076¢ for the purpose of maintenance and operations; and • 25.8924¢ for the payment of principal and interest on debt of the City. Adoption of Ordinance No. 3218 would set the tax rate for Tax Year 2012 (Fiscal Year 2012 -2013) at 610 for $100 of valuation. State law requires specific language to be included in the ordinance adopting the tax rate if the ordinance sets a tax rate that will impose an amount of taxes for maintenance and operations that exceeds the taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year. The 610 tax rate at a 100% collection rate, if adopted, would impose more total property taxes ($2,146,015) than in the previous year and more property taxes for the purpose of maintenance and operations ($541,761), which makes this additional language mandatory. Recommendation Approval of Ordinance No. 3218, setting the Tax Year 2012 (Fiscal Year 2012 -2013) tax rate for maintenance and operations at 35.1076¢ per $100 of valuation, the tax rate for the interest and sinking fund at 25.8924¢ per $100 of valuation, for a total tax rate of 610 per $100 of valuation using the motion as provided below: "I move that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of 61¢ per $100 of valuation, which is effectively a 8.95 percent increase in the tax rate; that Ordinance 3218 be adopted, setting the portion of the tax rate for maintenance and operations at 35.1076¢ per $100 of valuation; and setting the portion of the tax rate for debt service at 25.8924¢ per $100 of valuation." M RH �]k��71►1,1►[+3�►[��3��iE�3 AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR THE 2012 TAX YEAR. WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has followed the procedures established by the Property Tax Code, including the publishing and posting of required notices and the holding of required public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved separately each of the two components of the tax rate hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT there shall be and there is hereby levied the following taxes on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of valuation on all taxable property within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas to be assessed and collected for the Tax Year 2012, Fiscal Year 2012 -2013, for the purposes hereinafter stipulated, to-wit (a) For operations and maintenance levied on the $100.00 valuation; $0.351076; and (b) For the interest and sinking levied on the $100.00 valuation, $0.258924. TOTAL: $0.610000 SECTION 2. THAT the tax rate for operations and maintenance of $0.351076 will impose an amount of taxes that exceeds the amount of taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year, therefore: THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE. SECTION 3. THAT the maintenance and operations tax rate of $0.351076 exceeds the effective maintenance and operations rate of $.335198, therefore: THE TAX RATE WILL EFFECTIVELY BE RAISED BY 4.74 PERCENT AND WILL RAISE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS ON A $100,000 HOME BY APPROXIMATELY $15.88. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the lo day of September, 2012. Is] I was] M'I:QAd:IN191:IW -Alki I NJ: III %� Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 1_1 U U;191 ►1 =1 o7:1�2 11910191 N t ►►I_1► I III *H -1 I I wa George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mark Mills, Budget Director M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. FA GN 2012 -078 Approval and Ratification of the 2012 Certified Roll - Resolution No. 2012 -025 Presenter: Mark Mills, Budget Director Summary: State law requires the legislative to body ratify the Certified Tax Roll as a separate action item during the budget and tax rate approval process. General Description: The Tarrant Appraisal District provided the City with the 2012 Certified Tax Roll. This includes the most current appraisal information; exemptions for disabled veterans, persons over 65, homestead and disabled persons; tax ceilings for persons over 65 and disabled persons; abatement value losses; Freeport inventory value loss; and agriculture value lost. These values also include new construction, minimum value of properties still under protest, and the estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties. The certified value is the amount used to calculate the effective tax rate and property tax revenues for the Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 Budget. The certified taxable values for the City of North Richland Hills are $3,732,731,760, which includes $30,470,891 in taxable new construction. This new construction includes $27,369,542 in taxable residential new construction and $3,101,349 in commercial new construction. The certified values for the City of North Richland Hills are broken down into the following categories: Residential Commercial' Industrial* Mineral Lease Agriculture Cases Before ARB ** Estimated Value of Cases Before ARB ** Incomplete Accounts ** Estimated Value of Incomplete Accounts" Total $2,287,891,671 1,376,678, 894 56,208,203 34,988,840 107,746 (77,145, 313) 54,001,719 (30,493,090) 30,493,090 $3,732,731,760 * - Includes Real Estate and Business Personal Property ** - Includes all property types Also included in the certified values received from the Tarrant Appraisal District is information on the average market value of a single family residence within North Richland Hills. Excluding those properties under protest at the time the certified roll was issued, the average market value of a single family residence in North Richland Hills is $150,315. This is an increase of $385 compared to the current year's average single family residence market value of $149,930. Recommendation Approval of Resolution 2012 -025 accepting and ratifying the Tax Year 2012 (Fiscal Year 2012 -2013) Certified Roll. M RH 10 *463Itlil 0161► I k' 161wilZ PZ11+ -1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas received the Ad Valorem Tax Roll for the year 2012 from the Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of $3,732,731,760, including minimum value of properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board and the estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Roll and approve same on September 10, 2012. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT the approval of said Tax Roll received from the Tarrant Appraisal District in July 2012, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall be collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for Tax Year 2012 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 10 day of September, 2012. [a]I Was] M► IQ A11:1N191:IW'_1►1 NJ: III %� Oscar Trevino, Mayor /_1 a 11 16 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney 1.1 �:tGl ►1 =1 IF_'V 11exeie] � IN 4 ►16 Mark Mills, Budget Director 25 JUL 2012 AD TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 2012 Certified Appraisal Roll Valuation Summary I, Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser for the Tarrant Appraisal District, to the best of my ability do solemnly swear that the attached is that portion of the appraisal roll of the Tarrant Appraisal District which lists property taxable by the above named entity and constitutes their certified appraisal roll. APPRAISED VALUE (Considers value Caps) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > $ Absolute Exemption $ 288,008,088 Cases before ARB $ 79,845,245 Incompletes $ 33,770,343 Deferred, Special Use, and Partial Exemptions $ 501,444,325 See Totals Report for breakdown of each Exemption NET TAXABLE VALUE ------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -> $ Appraised value minus Absolute Exemption amount, minus ARB amount, minus Incompletes, minus Deferred, Special Use and Partial Exemptions to equal the NTV. ESTIMATED NET TAXABLE VALUE --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -> $ Including suggested values to be used for pending A.R.B. accounts (see page two), and Incomplete accounts (see page three). Jeff Law, iser 4,551,304,952 3,648,236,951 3,732,731,760 Page 1 of 3 2500 Handley- Ederville Road Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 2840024 LTR25C.fsl 6 -29 -2052 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 2012 Appraisal Review Board Information 25 JUL 2012 Section 25.01 (c) of the State Property Tax Code directs the chief appraiser to prepare a list of all properties under protest with the Appraisal Review Board and pending disposition at the time of value roll certification. The values below are from the ARB roll and are not included in the totals certified by the chief appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report. 79,845,245 Total appraised value of properties under protest. $ 77, 145,313 Net taxable value of properties under protest. $ 54,001,719 Estimated minimum taxable value for the same properties. This value should be added to the net taxable value on page one. Page 2 of 3 2500 Handley- Ederville Road Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 284 -0024 LTR25o.fsi 6 -29 -2012 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser 25 JUL 2012 2012 Incomplete Property Information Section 26.01 (d) of the State Property Tax Code directs the chief appraiser to prepare a list of all properties that are not on the certified appraisal roll and not included on the ARB roll. The values below are from the incomplete property listing and are not included in the totals certified by the chief appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report. The value of incomplete properties are subject to change and are also subject to appeal before the Appraisal Review Board. $ 33,770,343 Total appraised value of incomplete properties $ 30,493,090 Estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties Page 3 of 3 2500 Handley- Edervilie Road Fort Worth, Texas 78118 (817) 284-0024 LTR25E.tsl 6 -29 -2012 07/20/2012 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 7.24.48 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 TOT200EP TOTALS REPORT ROLL; JUL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012 CERTIFIED REPORT ITEM APPRAISED VALUE ACCOUNTS TAXABLE VALUE 1. REAL ESTATE RESIDENTIAL 2,785,739,578 19,889 2,287,891,671 2. REAL ESTATE COMMERCIAL 1,381,473,075 1,501 1,098,715,698 3. REAL ESTATE INDUSTRIAL 24,346,385 11 24,346,385 4. PERSONAL PROPERTY COMMERCIAL( +) 279,546,976 1,529 277,963,196 5. PERSONAL PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL( +) 32,492,692 15 31,861,818 6. MINERAL LEASE PROPERTIES (f) 37,736,420 4,950' 34,988,840 7. AGRICULTURE PROPERTIES [ +} 9,969,826 39 107,746 8 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE ( =) 4,551,304,952 27,934 3,755,875,354 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. CASES BEFORE ARB ( -} 79,845,245 281 77,145,313 10. INCOMPLETE ACCOUNTS ( -) 33,770,343 3,022 30,493,090 11. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUE 4,437,689,364 24,631 3,648,236,951 EXEMPTION DETAIL EXEMPT AMOUNT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 12. ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 288,008,088 543 288,008,088 13. AG DEFERRALS 9,862,080 39 9,969,826 14. SCENIC DEFERRALS 0 0 0 15. ABATEMENTS 0 0 0 16. PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS 0 0 0 17. INDIGENT HOUSING 0 0 0 18. NOMINAL VALUE ACCOUNTS 0 0 0 19. DISABLED VETS 13,794,917 446 70,079,193 20. FREEPORT INVENTORY 198,395 2 27,943,841 21. GOODS IN TRANSIT 0 0 0 22. HOMESTEADS - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 23. OVER 65 - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 24. DISABLED - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 25. HOMESTEADS - LOCAL OPTION 331,789,258 14,377 2,216,181,258 26. OVER 65 - LOCAL OPTION 137,116,685 3,916 534,145,119 27. DISABLED - LOCAL OPTION 8,039,630 247 29,923,651 28. SOLAR /WIND 0 0 0 29. POLLUTION CONTROL 206,640 2 22,467,308 30. COMM HSE DEV 0 0 0 31. PRORATED ABSOLUTE 436,720 4 577,580 32. HISTORIC SITES 0 0 0 33. FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 0 0 0 34 TOTAL EXEMPT AMOUNT ( -) 789,452,413 35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NET TAXABLE VALUE (_) 3,648,236,951 24,631 4,437,689,364 NEW EXEMPTIONS THIS YEAR EXEMPT AMOUNT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE (INCLUDED IN ITEM 12 TO 33) 36. NEW ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 0 0 0 37. NEW AG DEFERRALS 0 0 0 38. NEW SCENIC DEFERRALS 0 0 0 39. NEW ABATEMENTS 0 0 0 40. NEW PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS 0 0 0 41. NEW INDIGENT HOUSING 0 0 0 42. NEW NOMINAL VALUE ACCOUNTS 0 0 0 43. NEW DISABLED VETS 1,245,667 20 4,373,350 44, NEW FREEPORT INVENTORY 0 0 0 45. NEW GOODS IN TRANSIT 0 0 0 PAGE 1 07/2012012 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 7.24.48 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 TOT200EP TOTALS REPORT ROLL: JUL 2012 CERTIFIED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW EXEMPTIONS THIS YEAR EXEMPT AMOUNT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 46. NEW HOMESTEADS - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 47. NEW OVER 65 - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 48. NEW DISABLED - STATE MANDATE 0 0 0 49. NEW HOMESTEADS - LOCAL OPTION 6,249,154 208 41,872,874 50. NEW OVER 65 - LOCAL OPTION 4,265,909 123 20,636,040 51. NEW DISABLED - LOCAL OPTION 162,000 5 672,500 52. NEW SOLAR /WIND 0 0 0 53. NEW POLLUTION CONTROL 0 0 0 54. NEW COMM H5E DEV 0 0 0 55. NEW PRORATED ABSOLUTE 436,720 4 577,584 56. NEW HISTORIC SITES 0 0 0 57. ------------µ------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 0 0 0 NEW CONSTRUCTION TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 58. ALL REAL ESTATE 30,437,168 213 46,996,715 59. NEW BUSINESS IN NEW IMPROVEMENT 33,723 1 33,723 60. TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION 30,470,891 214 47,030,438 61. NEW CONSTRUCTION IN RESIDENTIAL 27,369,542 202 30,285,180 62. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION IN COMMERCIAL 3,101,349 12 16,745,258 63. ANNEXATIONS 0 0 0 64. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEANNEXATIONS 0 0 0 TAX CEILINGS TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS CEILING AMOUNT 65. OVER 65 299,997,941 3,778 1,696,910.73 66. DISABLED PERSON 16,963,060 242 104,714.28 67. TOTAL CEILINGS 316,961,001 4,020 1,801,625.01 (INCLUDED IN ABOVE) 68. NEW OVER 65 CEILINGS 27,771,698 291 160,096.08 fig. NEW DISABLED PERSON CEILINGS 1,131,341 16 6,409.32 CAPPED ACCOUNTS CAP VALUE ACCOUNTS CAP LOSS 70. CAP TOTAL 29,238,182 182 1,614,045 71. NEW CAP THIS YEAR 26,994,119 160 1,406,814 ALL EXEMPTIONS BY GROUP EXEMPT AMOUNT APPRAISED VALUE 72. ALL RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNTS 497,847,907 2,785,739,578 73. ALL COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 284,341,157 1,661,020,051 74. ALL INDUSTRIAL ACCOUNTS 630,874 56,839,077 75. ALL MINERAL LEASE ACCOUNTS 2,747,580 37,736,420 76. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALL AGRICULTURE ACCOUNTS 9,862,080 9,969,826 - - - - -- PAGE 2 07/20/2012 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 018 7.25.50 ABSOLUTES, ARB & INCOMPLETE TOTALS BY CATEGORY ROLL: JUL TOT210EP 2012 CERTIFIED 1. REAL ESTATE RESIDENTIAL 2. REAL ESTATE COMMERCIAL 3. REAL ESTATE INDUSTRIAL 4. PERSONAL PROPERTY COMMERCIAL S. PERSONAL PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL 6. MINERAL LEASE PROPERTIES 7. AGRICULTURE PROPERTITES TOTAL ABSOLUTES ARB INCOMPLETE AMOUNT COUNT AMOUNT COUNT AMOUNT COUNT 4,949,620 79 19,788,736 124 62,700 1 281,605,656 455 24,790,702 77 495,681 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,452,812 9 30,767,242 69 23,435,675 405 0 0 3,304,315 2 23,627 1 0 0 1,194,250 9 9,752,660 2,614 0 0 0 0 0 0 288,008,088 543 79,845,245 281 33,770,343 3,022 07/20/2012 7.30.37 TOT350EP CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUE PROTESTED APPRAISED VALUE INCOMPLETE APPRAISED VALUE ABSOLUTE EXEMPT VALUE TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE CERTIFIED NET TAXABLE VALUE NET TAXABLE IN ARE - NET TAXABLE IN INCOMPLETE TOTAL NET TAXABLE VALUE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CERTIFIED 3,022 ACCTS 288,008,088 LOSS 1. ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 288,008,088 2. AG DEFERRALS 9,862.080 3. SCENIC DEFERRALS 0 4. ABATEMENTS 0 5. PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS O 6. INDIGENT HOUSING 0 7. NOMINAL VALUE ACCOUNTS 0 S. DISABLED VETS 13,794,917 9. FREEPORT INVENTORY 198,395 10. HOMESTEADS 331,789,258 11. OVER 65 137,116,685 12. DISABLED PERSON 8,039,630 13. SOLAR /WIND O 14. POLLUTION CONTROL 206.640 15. COMM HSE DEV 0 16. PRORATED ABSOLUTE 436,720 17. HISTORIC SITES 0 18. FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 0 19. NET TAXABLE VALUE OF ALL FROZEN ACCTS 20. CAP LOSS ON RESIDENTIAL MARKET VALUES CERTIFIED APPRAISED VALUE PROTESTED APPRAISED VALUE INCOMPLETE APPRAISED VALUE ABSOLUTE EXEMPT VALUE TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE CERTIFIED NET TAXABLE VALUE NET TAXABLE IN ARE - NET TAXABLE IN INCOMPLETE TOTAL NET TAXABLE VALUE 4,149,681,276 21,363 ACCTS 79,845,245 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 33,770,343 3,022 ACCTS 288,008,088 018 CERTIFIED, ARB & INCOMPLETE EXEMPTION TOTALS 3,648,236,951 ROLL: JUL 2012 3,755,875,354 CERTIFIED ARB INCOMPLETE TOTAL COUNT LOSS COUNT LOSS COUNT LOSS COUNT 543 234,147 1 3,259.216 39 291,501,451 583 39 0 0 0 0 9,862,080 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,632 35 8,632 35 446 12,000 1 0 0 13,806,917 447 2 332,074 3 0 O 530,469 5 14,377 1,778,565 48 9,405 1 333,577,228 14,426 0 288,000 8 0 0 137,404,685 8 247 55,000 2 0 0 8,094,630 248 0 '0 O 0 0 0 0 2 146 1 0 0 206,786 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 436,720 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 316,961,001 4,020 ACCTS 1,614.045 182 ACCTS 4,149,681,276 21,363 ACCTS 79,845,245 281 ACCTS 33,770,343 3,022 ACCTS 288,008,088 543 ACCTS 4,551,304,952 27,934 ACCTS 3,648,236,951 77,145,313 30,493,090 3,755,875,354 T07320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 1 T073204 STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2012 DATE: 07/20/2012 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 08:18:57 CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS Al RESIDENTIAL SINGLE- FAMILY 2,633,922,877 18,542,456 62,700 t,730 17.5300 24,748,480 17,524 104 1 4 169 NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,150,041,487 16,456,916 53,295 A2 RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOMES 483,152 10.900 0 0 0. 0000 0 16 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 414,775 10,900 0 A3 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 ❑ 0 A4 RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 A5 RESIDENTIAL UNDECLARED 21,011,888 193,500 0 0 0.0000 0 178 1 ❑ 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 17,742,124 164,475 0 A9 INTERIM USE 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 ** CAT A TOTALS 2,655,417,917 18,746,856 !^ 62,700 1,730 17.5300 24,748,480 17,718 106 1 4 169 ** CAT A NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,168,198,386 15,632,291 53,295 B1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY 276,430,791 0 0 0 0.0000 0 38 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 276,430,791 0 0 B2 RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX 59,854.240 724,770 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 712 12 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 57,287 724,770 0 B3 RESIDENTIAL TRIPLEX 1,530,100 0 0 0 0.0000 0 11 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 1,530,100 0 0 84 RESIDENTIAL QUADRUPLEX 8,399,500 154,300 0 0 0.0000 0 46 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 8,394,062 154,300 0 ** CAT B TOTALS 346,214,631 879.070 O 0 0.0000 0 807 13 0 0 0 ** CAT B NET TAXABLE VALUE 343,642,785 879,070 ❑ Cl VAC /PLATTED RES. L7 5 ACRES 13,513 143,810 0 12,083 104.6599 0 555 4 0 24 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 9,956,045 143,810 0 C2 VAC /PLATTED COMMERCIAL 49,844,002 3,544,990 0 499 4.4000 0 267 24 0 2 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 49,176,763 3,544,990 0 C3 VAC /UNPLATTED RURAL LT 5 ACRES 365,654 0 0 23 0.2100 0 6 0 0 1 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 365,152 0 0 TOT320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 2 TOT3204 STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2012 DATE: 07/20/2012 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 08 :18:57 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE APB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS C6 VACANT EXEMPT-RIGHT OF WAY 26,480 0 0 0 0.0000 0 2 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,048 0 0 ** CAT C TOTALS --- - -- -- -- - -- - - --- 63,749,494 - 3,688,800 0 12,605 109.2699 0 830 28 0 27 0 *+ CAT C NET TAXABLE VALUE 59,511,008 3.688,800 0 D1 ACREAGE RANCH LAND 4,199,008 0 0 3.070 26.8389 0 5 0 ❑ 5 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,070 0 0 D2 ACREAGE TIMBERLAND 0 0 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 0 ❑ ❑ O 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 O 0 D3 ACREAGE FARM LAND 56.925 0 0 2,360 21,8500 0 1 0 0 1 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,360 0 0 D4 ACREAGE UNDEVELOPED 26,447,983 1,506,512 0 0 0.0000 0 45 1 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 26,447,983 1,506,512 0 ** CAT D TOTALS ------------- - - - - -- ---------- 30,703,916 -; - - -- - ---- ------- 1,506,512 -- 0 5,430 48.6889 0 51 1 0 6 0 ** CAT D NET TAXABLE VALUE 26.453.413 1,506,512 0 E1 FARM /RCH HOUSE + LTD ACRES ❑ 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 E2 FARM /RCH MH + LTD ACRES 0 0 0 0 0.0000 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 E3 FARM /RCH OTHER 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 - - - - -- ---- -- 0 --- ------- - -- ------------- -- -- -- --- ---- - - ---- ----------------- ** CAT E TOTALS ----- ------- - - - ---- ------------- 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** CAT E NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 F1 COMMERCIAL 720,473,286 19,505,053 495,681 5,411 4 0.9920 3,067,626 582 51 1 2 7 NET TAXABLE VALUE 719,304,036 19,505,053 O F2 INDUSTRIAL 24,346,385 0 0 0 0.0000 0 11 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 24,346,385 0 0 F3 BILLBOARDS 0 0 115,631 0 0.0000 0 0 0 4 ❑ 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 115,631 TOT320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 3 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2012 DATE: 07/20/2012 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 08:18:57 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS *+ CAT F TOTALS 744,819,671 19,505,053 611,312 5,411 40.9920 3,067,626 593 51 5 2 7 +* --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------__-- CAT F NET TAXABLE VALUE 743,650,421 19,505,053 115,631 G1 OIL, GAS, MINERAL RESERVE 26,789.510 1,194,250 7,005,080 0 0.0000 0 2,327 9 2,577 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 26,789,510 1,194,250 7,005,080 ** CAT G TOTALS ------------- - - - --- --- -------- 26,789,510 ,- - - - --- ------ 1 194,250 ------- ------ 7,005,080 - 0 0.0000 0 2,327 9 2,577 0 ❑ ** CAT G NET TAXABLE VALUE 26,789,510 1,194,250 7,005,080 J1 UTILITY WATER SYSTEMS O D 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 ❑ 0 42 UTILITY GAS COMPANIES 3,812,954 0 0 0 0.0000 0 4 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,812,954 0 ❑ J3 UTILITY ELECTRIC COMPANIES 26,356,568 0 0 0 0.0000 0 27 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 26,356.568 0 0 J4 UTILITY TELEPHONE COMPANIES 8,515,920 335,389 1,388,376 0 0.0000 0 16 1 20 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 8,515,920 335,389 1,388,376 J5 UTILITY RAILROADS 26,640 0 0 0 O.00DO 0 1 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 26,640 0 0 JS UTILITY PIPELINES 9,351.300 0 0 0 0.0000 0 6 0 ❑ 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 9,351,300 0 0 J7 UTILITY CABLE COMPANIES 1,549,799 0 0 0 0.0000 ❑ 2 O 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 1,549,799 0 0 J8 UTILITY OTHER 608.400 0 0 0 0.0000 0 1 0 0 0 ❑ NET TAXABLE VALUE 608,400 0 ❑ ** CAT J TOTALS ----------- --- - - - -- ----- 50,221,581 -- ----- - -- 335,389 1,388,376 ❑ 0.0000 0 57 1 20 0 0 ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CAT J NET TAXABLE VALUE 50,221,581 335,389 1,388,376 L1 COMMERCIAL 175,563.792 30,431,853 21,931,668 0 0.0000 33,723 11018 68 381 0 1 NET TAXABLE VALUE 175,501,973 30,387,291 21,907,081 L2 INDUSTRIAL 29,164,750 3,304,315 23,627 0 0.0000 ❑ 12 2 1 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 28,821,534 3,016,657 23,627 TOT320BP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 4 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2012 DATE: 07/20/2012 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIDE: 08:18:57 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS ** CAT L TOTALS 204,728,542 33,736,168 21,955,295 ❑ 0.0000 33,723 1.030 70 382 0 1 ** CAT L NET TAXABLE VALUE 204,323,507 33,403,948 21.930,708 M1 PRIVATE WATERCRAFT 0 0 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0. 0 0 M2 PRIVATE AIRCRAFT 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 O M3 MOBILE HOME IMPROVEMENT ONLY 3,775,370 19.000 0 0 0.0000 71,700 246 1 0 0 5 NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,185,695 0 0 M4 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 ** CAT N TOTALS 3,775,370 19,000 0 0 0.0000 71.700 246 1 0 0 5 ** CAT M NET TAXABLE VALUE 2,185,695 0 0 N1 NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 ❑ 0 ** CAT N TOTALS ____ 0 0 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 ** CAT N NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 01 RES VACANT INVENTORY Cl 12,317,844 0 ❑ 0 0.0000 0 382 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 12,317,844 0 0 02 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY 10.942,800 0 0 0 0.0000 5,465,000 47 0 0 0 28 NET TAXABLE VALUE 10,942,800 0 0 03 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY A3 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 04 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY A4 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 05 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY A5 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 06 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY 82 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 TOT320SP -A TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 5 TOT320J STATE USE CODE STATISTICS 2012 DATE: 07/20/2012 TDC: 018 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TIME: 08 :18:57 CATEGORY CERT. APPR VALUE ARB VALUE INCOMPLETE VALUE AG VALUE AG NEW CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS NUMBER OF ACCTS ACREAGE NUMBER OF ACCTS 07 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY B3 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 08 RES IMPROVED INVENTORY B4 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 0 0 0 ** CAT 0 TOTALS ---- --------- - - - --- ----- 23,260,644 -- ----- -- - -- -- -- -- 0 - 0 0 0.0000 5,465,000 429 0 0 0 28 ** CAT 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE 23,260,644 0 0 ** TDC TOTALS _ 4,149,681,276 79.611,098 31,022,763 25,176 216.4808 33,386,529 24,088 280 2,985 39 210 BEGIN CERT APPRAISED VALUE 4,437,689,364 BEGIN CERT APPRAISED ACCTS 24,631 ++ TDC NET TAXABLE VALUE 3,648,236,951 77,145,313 30,493,090 107,746 ** TDC AG IMPROVEMENTS 82,570 NOTE: ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS ARE NOT INCLUDED EXCEPT FOR PRORATED ABSOLUTES 07/20/12 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT JURISDICTION CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AVERAGE MARKET VALUE PER ACCOUNT > 150,315 AVERAGE NET TAXABLE VALUE PER ACCOUNT a (TADBO60) 122,598 TOTAL MARKET VALUE >>>>> 2,635,025,525 VALUE IN PARCEL ENTITY PLEASE NOTE: ACCOUNTS IN PROTEST & INCOMPLETE ACCOUNTS ARE THOUSANDS COUNT DISTRIBUTION GRAPHICS - N 0 T - INCLUDED IN ANY OF THE CALCULATIONS UND - 5 ' 0 5 - 10 0 10 - 15 0 15 - 20 4 �* 20 - 25 7 �* 25 - 30 19 �* 30 - 35 19 I+ �* 35 - 40 44 40 - 45 51 �* 45 - 50 77 �* 50 55 119 ** 55 - 60 144 ** 60 - 65 210 * ** 65 - 70 325 * * ** 70 - 75 421 * * * ** 75 - 80 538 + * * * ** J 80 - 85 ' 597 * * * * + ** 85 - 90 818 * * * * * * * ** 90 - 95 665 * * + * * ** 95 - 100 638 * * * * * ** 100 - 105 794 * * * * * * ** 105 - 110 i 806 * * * * * + * ** 110 - 115 852 { + **+* * * ** 115 - 120 676 * * * * * ** 120 - 125 639 * * * * * ** 125 - 130 532 * * * * ** 130 - 135 506 * * * * ** 135 - 140 464 * * * ** 140 - 145 451 * * * ** 145 - 150 403 * + * ** 150 - 155 406 * * * ** 155 - 160 380 * * ** 160 - 165 414 * * * ** 965 - 170 393 * * ** 170 - 175 381 * * ** 175 - 180 327 * * ** 180 - 185 316 * * ** 185 - 190 282 * ** 190 - 195 207 * ** 195 - 200 179 ** 200 - 205 171 ** 205 - 210 147 ** 210 - 215 143 ** 215 - 220 148 ** 220 - 225 128 ** 225 - 230 j 150 E ** 230 - 235 103 ** 235 - 240 113 ** 240 - 245 120 ** OVR - 245 2,183 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 17,530 **** 5**** 10*** 15*** 20*** 25*** 30*** 35*** 40*** 45*** 50 * * *55 * * *60 * * *6 * * * * * * * * * PARCEL COUNTS IN HUNDREDS - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ONLY - 2012 RUN DATE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 018 07/20/2012 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE CALCULATION DATA ROLL CERTIFIED DATE 07:28:21 CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS JULY 25, 2412 I . 2011 Total Taxable Value. Enter the amount of 2011 taxable value on the 2011 tax roll today. Include any adjustments since last year's certification; exclude Section 25.25(d) one -third over - appraisal corrections from these adjustments. This total Includes the taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings (will deduct in Line 2) and the $3,619,631,648 captured value for tax increment finance will deduct taxes in Line 14). 2. 2011 Tax Ceilings. Counties, Cities and Junior College Distracts. Enter 2011 total taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings. $308,031,453 These include the homesteads of homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. Other units enter 0. If your taxing units adopted the tax ceiling provision in 2011 or a prior year for homeowners 2E GS or older or disabled, use this step. 3. 1 Preliminary 2011 Adjuster! Taxable Value. Subtract Line 2 from Line 1. $3,311,600,195 4. 12011 Total Adopted Tax Rate. 1$100 0.57000000 5. 2011 Taxable Value Last because Court Appeals of ARB decisions reduced 2011 Appraised Value. A. Original 2011 ARB Values: B. 2011 values resulting from final court decisions: C. 2011 value loss. Subtract B from A. See Litigation Report S. T axable Value, Adjusted for Court- Ordered Reductions. $3,311,600,195 1 2011 Add Line 3 and Line 5C. + LINE 5 7. 2011 Taxable Value of Property in Territory the Unit Deannexed after January 1, 2011. $0 Enter the 2011 value of property in deannexed territory. 8. 2011 Taxable Value Lost Because Property First Qualified for an Exemption in 2012. Note that lowering the amount or percentage of an existing exemption does not create a new exemption or reduce taxable value. If the taxing unit increased an original exemption, use the difference between the original exempted amount and the increased exempted amount. Do not include value lost due to freeport, "goods -in- transit" exemption . 1436, A. Absolute exemptions. Use 2011 market value. 724 B. Partial exemptions. 2012 exemption amount or 2012 + percentage exemption times 2011 value. $11,922,730 C. Value loss. Add A and B. $12,359,450 S. 2011 Taxable Value Lost Because Property First Qualified for Agricultural Appraisal (I -d or 1 -d -1], Timber Appraisal, Recreational /Scenic Appraisal or Public Access Airport Special appraisal in 2012. Use only properties that qualified in 2012 for the first time', do not use properties that qualified in 2011. A. 2011 market value: $0 B. 2012 productivity or special appraised value: - $0 C. Value foss. Subtract B from A. $0 10. Total Adjustments for Lost Value. Add Lines 7, 8C and 9C. $ 12,359,4 50 11. 2011 Adjusted Taxable Value. Subtract Line 10 from Line fi. Verify Line 5C Calculate 12. Adjusted 2011 Taxes. Multiply Line 4 by Line 11 and divide by $100. Calculate 13. Taxes Refunded for Years Preceding Tax Year 2011. Enter the amount of taxes refunded during the last budget year for tax years preceding tax year 2011. Types of refunds include court decisions, Section 25.25 (b) and ( c) corrections and section 31.11 payment errors. Do not include refunds for tax year 2011. This line applies only to tax years preceding tax year 2011. Use Actual Refunds 14. Taxes in Tax Increment Financing (TI F) for Tax Year 2011. Enter the amount of taxes paid into the tax increment fund for a reinvestment zone as agreed by the taxing unit. If the unit has no 2012 captured appraised value in Line 15D, enter 0. Use Actual Contribution Amount 15. Adjusted 2011 Taxes with refunds and TIF adjustments. Add Lines 12 and 13, subtract Line 14. Calculate TOTWOC1 -OTHER 6-29-12 RUN DATE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 018 47/2412012 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE CALCULATION DATA ROLL CERTIFIED DATE 07;28:21 CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS JULY 25, 2012 Page 2 16. Total 2012 Taxable Value on the 2012 Certified Appraisal Roll today. This value includes only certified values and includes the total taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings (will deduct in Line 18). These homesteads include homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. A. Certified Values: $3,648,236,951 B. Counties: Include railroad rolling stock values certified by the Comptroller's office: + C. Pollution Control Exemption: Deduct the value of property exempted for the current tax year for the first time as pollution control property. r use this Line based on Attorney's advice D. Tax Increment Financing: Deduct the 2012 captured appraised value of property taxable by a taxing unit in a tax increment financing zone for which ` the 2012 taxes will be deposited into the tax increment fund. Do not include any If Applicable, TIF Report new property value that will be included in Line 21 below. VERIFY AMOUNT E. Total 2012 value. Add A and B, then Subtract C and D. $3,648,236,951 17. Total Value of Properties Under Protest or Not Included on Certified Appraisal Roll A. 2012 Taxable value of Properties Under Protest. The chief appraiser certifies a list of properties still under ARB protest. The list shows the districts value and the taxpayers claimed value, it any or an estimate of the value if the taxpayer wins. For each of the properties under protest, use the lowest of these values. Enter the total value. $54,001,719 B. 2012 Value of Properties Not Under Protest or Included on Certified Appraisal ROI I. The chief appraiser gives taxing units a list of those taxable properties that the chief appraiser knows about, but are not included at appraisal roll certification. These properties also are not on the list of propertles that are still under protest. On this list of properties, the chief appraiser includes the market value, appraised value and exemptions for the preceding year and a reasonable estimate of the market value, appraised value and exemptions for the current year. Use the lower market, appraised or taxable value (as appropriate.) Enter the total value. $3 0,493,090 C. Total Value Under Protest or Not Certified. Add A and B. $84,494,809 18. 2012 Tax Ceilings. Enter 2412 total taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings. These include the homesteads of homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. Other units enter "0." If your taxing units $ 3 1 6, 961,001 adopted the tax ceiling provision in 2011 or a prior year for homeowners age 65 or older or disabled, use this step. 19. 2012 Total Taxable Value. Add Lines16E and 17C, Subtract Line 18. Calculate Verity Calculafrng of Line 16E 20. Total 2012 Taxable Value of Properties in Territory annexed after January 1, 2011. Include both real and p ersonal p ro erty. Enter the 2012 value of pro e in territory annexed. $ 0 21. Total 2012 Taxable value of New Improvements and New Personal Property located in New Improvements. "Nevi' means the item was not on the appraisal roll in 2011. An improvement is a building, structure, fixture or fence erected on or affixed to land. New additions to existing improvements may be included if the appraised value can be determined. New personal property in a new improvement must have been brought into the unit after January 1, 2011, and be located in a new improvement. New improvements do include property on which a tax abatement agreement has expired for 2412. $30,470,891 22. Total Adjustments to the 2412 Taxable Value. Add Lines 20 and 21. $30,470,891 23. 2012 Adjusted Taxable Value. Subtract Line 22 from Line 19. Calculate Ve " CalculaUng ofL008 24. 2012 Effective Tax Rate. Divide Line 15 by Line 23 and Multiply by $100. Calculate 1$1e0 2$. COUNTIES ONLY. Add together the effective tax rates for each type of tax the county levies. The total is the 2012 county effective tax rate. Calculate 1$100 TOT300C2 -OTHER &2402 JOB: ARB324J TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 1 RUN: 17 -07 -2412 2011 ARB 25.25(D) PROTESTS 2011 018 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACCOUNT SEPT2011 CURR2011 SEPT2011 CURR2011 NET TAXABLE NUMBER MARKET XMP MARKET XMP NET TAXABLE NET TAXABLE DIFFERENCE 01308823 105,200 78,504 105,240 78,500 26,700 04090373 9,500 4,540 9,500 4,500 5,000 04424557 1,471,773 1,103,800 1,471,773 1,103,800 367,973 07700091 640,374 426,995 640,374 426,995 213,379 11232390 56,421 37,802 56,421 37,802 18,619 41228499 728,240 014 504,000 010 618,970 428,400 190,570 ======-- ------==========-- ---------= TOTALS CASES SEPT MKT CURB MKT SEPT NET CURR NET NET DIFF 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3,411,468 2,155,597 2,902,238 2,079,997 822,241 M RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. F.5 GN 2012 -080 Appointments to the Construction Code Board of Appeals Presenter: Dave Pendley, Building Official Summary: The terms of office for three places on the Construction Code of Appeals Board have expired and staff is recommending that the City Council reappoint three members to the board. General Description: The terms of office for the board members serving in Places 2, 4, and 6 on the Construction Code of Appeals Board expired June 30, 2012. Section 98 -42 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances states that appointments to the Construction Code of Appeals Board are recommended by City staff and appointed by City Council. Appointments to this board must meet the requirement of technical expertise in the construction fields. At least one member must be a registered master electrician, one member a state licensed master plumber, one member a master mechanical contractor and all others familiar with construction. Current Board members not up for reappointment include Joe Crane, Place 1; Robert L. Nicholas, Place 3; John Klein, Place 5; and W. D. (Mac) McCarthy, Place 7. The Building Inspection Department is recommending the reappointment of Kurt Cameron (Local Builder) to Place 2; Lynn Motheral (Local Builder) to Place 4; and Lloyd Robinson (Master Plumber) to Place 6. All nominees for appointment meet the technical requirements of the ordinance. Nominees: • Place 2 - Kurt Cameron (Local Builder) — 2 Year Term • Place 4 - Lynn Motheral (Local Builder) — 2 Year Term ■ Place 6 - Lloyd Robinson (Master Plumber) — 2 Year Term Recommendation To reappoint Kurt Cameron to Place 2, Lynn Motheral to Place 4, and Lloyd Robinson to Place 6, with all terms expiring in June of 2014. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. G.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. G.1 Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session Listed on Work Session Agenda M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. H.0 INFORMATION AND REPORTS M RH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. H.1 Announcements - Councilman Whitson Announcements The 4th annual Wags & Waves event will be held at NRH20 Family Water Park from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturday, September 15th. Bring your four - legged friend and paddle alongside your pup in the NRH20cean and Endless River. Admission is $20 per person. This event benefits the Metroplex Animal Coalition. Please visit www.wagsandwaves.org for more details. The public is invited to an open house on Wednesday, September 19th to learn about the progress of the North Tarrant Express highway construction project. The open house will be held from 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the Hurst Conference Center. There will be maps and visuals on display and project staff will be available to answer questions and take comments. For more information, call 1- 888 -683 -2015 or visit northtarrantexpress.com. Keep NRH Beautiful is seeking volunteers for the annual Trash Bash litter cleanup event on Saturday, September 29th. Everyone is invited to participate. Volunteers must pre- register to receive free trash bags, gloves and safety vests. Please contact Debbie York at 817- 427 -6651 to sign up and get more details. Kudos Korner Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Tonight we recognize: Heather Hollingsworth from Teen Court - An email was received from a BISD principal regarding Heather's efforts to help one of his students. This student was constantly truant and unmotivated, but once he ended up in Teen Court things changed. Thanks to Heather's can do attitude and high expectations, the student passed summer school and is now back on track to graduate with his peers. "None of this could have happened without the hard work and dedication of Heather Hollingsworth. She exemplifies everything that is great about our city," the principal said. M KH COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: 9 -10 -2012 Subject: Agenda Item No. H.2 Adjournment