Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1982-01-11 Agendas - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Fur the Meeting January 11, 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM I ACTION TAKEN PRE COUNCIL 6:30 P.M. 1 Discussion on Drainage Easement Cecil Forester - Maintenance 2 Discussion on Cable TV Services Councilman Hubbard COUNCIL ' 7:30 P.M. —.._—_ -- -- - 1 Call to Order 2 Roll Call 3 Tnvnratinn 4. Approval of Minutes of the Regular _ Meeting of December 14, 1981 5. Approval of Minutes of the Special _ Meeting January 5, 1982 _ 6. Presentation of Ten Year Certificate and Service Pin to Jeanette Carson - Utility Department 7. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 81-62, Request for Final Plat of Walkers Branch Addition Page 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA the Meeting January 11, 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 81-40, Request of Gulf Oil Corporation to rezone Block 4, Snow Heights North Addition from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-Premise Consumption 9. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 81-40 10. Consideration of Awarding Bid for Property Insurance 11 Consideration of Awarding Bid for Conn Street Ground Storage Tank _ Repair and Painting 12 Consideration of Awarding Bid for —__ Valve and Pipe Work at Conn Street Booster Station 13. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #1, Rufe Snow Drive, to Austin Road Company in the Amount of $104,868.98 14. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #2, Rufe Snow Drive, to Austin Road Company in the Amount of _ v� $72,108.32 Page 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA tur the Meeting January 11, 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 15. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #6. Booth Calloway Road, _ to Austin Road Comnany in the Amount of S38 979 49 16 Consideratinn of Partial Payment Estimatp 47 Rooth Callow y Road to Austin Road Company in the Amount of 8123,127 35 _17. Consideration of Resolution Escrowing Taxes from Local Banks Until Litigation is Resolved 18. _ Consideration of Resolution Authorizing Certain Persons to Sign CheSJ;S____ 19. Consideration of Ratification of Resolution No. 82-2. 20. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate 111 , Rufe Snow - Holiday West Storm Drain Construction in the amount of $200,163.63. 21 . Citizen Presentation f�f fop '� 22. Adjournment btu ©Qu` uV E 'l, \vl\� CLI 1 0 ,]7T) J itAk -- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, DECEMBER 14, 1981 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order December 14, 1981 CALL TO ORDER at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CALL Jim Kenna Jim Wood J. C. Hubbard Councilmen Wiley Thomas Jim Ramsey Dave Freeman Sharyl Groves Councilwoman Staff: Chuck Williams City Manager Jeanette Moore City Secretary Rex McEntire City Attorney Richard Albin City Engineer Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Cecil Forester Director Public Works/ Utilities Margie Nash Member Planning and Zoning Carl Greenfield Member Planning and Zoning Don Bowen Member Planning and Zoning George Tucker Member Planning and Zoning Bob Skelton Civil Service Commission David Phelps Civil Service Commission Ed Szol Civil Service Commission 3. Councilman Freeman introduced Mr. Jay Bruner, who gave the INVOCATION invocation. 4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, APPROVAL OF MINUTES to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November OF THE REGULAR MEET- 23, 1981. ING NOVEMBER 23,1981 APPROVED Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Freeman abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. Mr. Edward Tate, member of the Snow Heights Homeowners CITIZEN PRESENTATION Association made the following presentation: SNOW HEIGHTS HOME- OWNERS ASSOCIATION - "We thank the Mayor, City Council, Snow Heights Homeowners MRS. BARBARA McKINLEY Association, North Richland Hills residents, Wayne Snyder and Associates and City Officials for this opportunity to present some viewpoints on a piece of property in our City. December 14, 1981 Page Two (Mrs. Tate showed the Council a map of the property.) Last May, Richland Terrace Addition saw an attempt made to change their deed restrictions. When they realized the possibility of a large commercial development abutting a huge section of neighboring homes, residents, along with Snow Heights Homeowners Association, assembled with their neighbors and decided this was not the most desirable land use around their homes for two major reasons: Number one flooding and number two, lack of a planned buffer zone between commercial and homes. The land in question lies in a flood plain and the consequence of flooding was exemplified in an article December 2nd and 3rd in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram: "Bill and Rose Connolly live less than five blocks from City Hall and on the afternoon of October 13th torrential rains poured out of the Texas skies and Calloway Branch Creek rose over its banks Into the streets, and by the time it was all over, the water got as high as two feet. Mrs. Connolly said they applied for a S.B.A. loan immediately after the disaster, but it was denied because of their age." Some of Area Six residents viewed the land an question and saw where the Muffin .Shcp, Color Tile and Southern Mill Outlet had drastically flooded. The cost of protection against potential flooding based on information given by a local agent, flood insurance rates using a zone map showing North Richland Hills as "C" are as follows: For the first $35,000, $0.10 per $100.00; coverage over $35,000, $0. 05 per $100.00. Thus flood insurance would cost $141.00 per year for the median home. Will the City pay this cost for each home- owner it is responsible for building in a flood plain when it is aware of the situation? Our second reason is lack of planned buffer zone between homes and commercial. This piece of land was zoned com- mercial without regard to the hundreds of homes neighbor- ing the land. According to Mike Monroe of Wayne Snyder and Associates, in a Free Press article on August 20, 1981 , "the purpose of land use planning is to protect and enhance residential areas. A community has to have a place for everything. " This leads to the question: How should a neighborhood area look that borders a "downtown?" Could a neighborhood park or mamcipal park create a buffer zone and serve a need to both? December 14, 1981 Page Three There are several examples locally, among them the city park of Hurst off Pipeline Road on 17.45 acres purchased in 1958 and built in stages. There is a recreation center building, a swimming pool, softball diamonds, tennis courts, picnic tables and playground. This park is located in what might be "downtown" Hurst. It is an ideal buffer zone, with its playground backing up to neighboring homes on three sides and commercial establishments along Pipeline Road. To quote Mike Monroe, "the core of Area Six is residential mostly single family housing. It is the most densely popu- lated, most developed neighborhood of the six in North Richland Hills." The land is considered by some to be the doorway to North Richland Hills and the City complex. It may not be the showplace of North Richland Hills, but it should not be allowed to deteriorate and in the resident's opinion it should be promoted. Residents of Area Six feel they currently are not adequately protected by a properly planned transition from commercial to residential areas and favor developing a park along the southern access road between Richland Terrace Addition and the businesses on the Grapevine Highway, not only as a buffer zone, but because, as the oldest, most populated area of the City with the least open land remaining and no parks or side- walks, Area Six feels it has "0" recreational area. As one resident says, "it' s bad enough that our kids have to walk to and from school in the streets, they shouldn't have to come home to play in them." According to Mike Monroe, "of Area Six's 849 acres, 506 are single family, 21 multi-family, 157 commercial and 93 vacant, but this vacant acreage is in "trapped lots" with the exception of the land in question. In our entire area, no acreage is devoted to parks, while newer sections of town to the north are getting City park money for baseball diamonds and are being considered as sites for the proposed municipal swimming pool, Area Six gets zero parks. We the residents are going to remain residents for years to come, and we plan to keep our neighborhood decent, safe and beautiful. We are letting the City know exactly how we feel. In fact, this is Lhe purpose of the creation of Snow Heights Homeowners Association, so we, the members, can vocal- ize our feelings about our neighborhood to the City. Ninety percent of us do care, and like the Council members, we have families, full-time jobs and commitments that make it dif- ficult to get together to express our ideas. Snow Heights Homeowners Association has held several meetings and talked to residents , and as difficult as it is to get them all together, the Association has their "vote of confidence" coming here tonight. December 14, 1981 Page Pour As it now stands, North Richland Hills will allow the last large tract of vacant acreage in Area Six to be commercially developed right up to the oldest, most densely populated, most developed neighborhood of its six designated areas without dedicating a park recreation area to these citizens. There are alternatives to allowing this to happen: 1. Municipal pool and park as suggested in our original proposal of August 3, 1981. 2. Neighborhood park with community center and tennis courts, which does not have to be used just by Area Six residents, but by shoppers and all the residents of North Richland Hills. With either of these alternatives, Snow Heights Homecx,ners Association and other civic organizations could help with landscaping and maintenance. We could ask local businesses to donate trees, shrubs, even park tables and benches. Snow Heights Homeowners Association could vote these as annual projects. We would much rather spend our money on these positive attributes to our area and City than on court costs. A. Now much would this project cost? 1. Snow Heights Homeowners Association has a letter of August 24 in which George Staples, Attorney for Donna Smith, offers the land in question for $15,000 an acre. For 15 acres, the land cost would be approximately $225,000. 2. City of North Richland Hills could condemn this land due to recent flooding and pay fair market value, which might be less than that figure. B. How could this project be financed? 1. North Richland Hills citizens voted for park money in August, 1980, one million dollar bond election, and North Richland Hills is still holding these bonds. "According to G.W.T. at Haltom Bank, interest rates are coming down fast. " According to Tom Brennan at Paine, Webber, Jackson and Curtis, "people are hungry." Companies are bidding low to keep themselves in business. The current market is good and should be oven better in about two months. What better time to sell our bonds than now? Park money is a general obligation bond. General obligation bonds are paid out of our homeowners mortgage payments, and we are ready to see our money put to use in our Area six. December 14, 1981 Page Five 2. We are aware that the City of North Richland Hills owns pieces of land throughout the City. Why not sell it and put the money in retainer for our park? In conclusion, Area Six wants and needs a park: 1. The largest tract of land is available at a decent price. 2. Money is available. 3. Citizens are very supportive. You have read numerous letters and proposals this fall from Area Six resi- dents, as well as those from other sections of North Richland Hills. 4. Parks are perfect in flood plains, according to many opinions. Please do not table this proposal indefinitely. You need your residents supporting positive City plans, not fighting in Court. Please consider the flooding potential of this area. Councilman Henna stated that just a small portion of the prop- erty was an the 100 year flood plain and that was where the buildings were presently located that flooded, with the excep- tion of the small area along the access road. The area drawn in on the map that was presented was not in the flood plain. Mr. Tate advised the Council he had another meeting to go to and would turn it over to the other members of the Associa- tion. Mayor Faram stated it seemed as though the Association or himself had a misunderstanding on the bond issue. Mayor Faram stated he thought the Council had asked for an eight (8) million ability to sell bonds with the idea that the first four (4) million would be committed to the Improve- ment of Rufe Snow Drive. He thought that was, at this time, all the ability the City had to retire indebtedness at the present tax rate. Mayor Faram stated he thought this was put before the citizenry when the bonds were asked for. Mayor Faram stated the City had only been able to go part way with Rufe Snow and was still hopeful to go all the way or go with an alternate route. Mayor Faram stated that with this in mind, and the fact four (4) million dollars wac committed, the City did not have the ability to go with additional bond indebtedness without increasing the tax rate. Mayoi Faram stated that it was anticipated that when the taxable inventories increased and the City had the ability, we would then sell additional bonds. December 14, 1981 Page Six Mayor Faram stated he thought Councilman Freeman could speak to the fact that the swimming pool idea was proposed in con- nection with school properties, a joint venture project. Councilman Freeman stated that was the origin of it. The school was doing a five year study at this point and he did not think any commitments had been made. It was to be a co-project with the School District. Mayor Faram stated that so everyone understood each other, he wanted to bring out these points. Mayor Param stated, as he understood the proposal, as put before the voters, the City could go with the present tax rate and conceivably retire an additional four (4) million dollar indebtedness. Mayor Faram stated that in the last issue the City was able to meet the payments on approximately half of what was approved by the voters. Mayor Faram stated that $0.20 out of the $0.40 and the other $0.20 took it up to about four (4) million dollars on the present taxable inventories, so the City did indeed have a financial problem. Mr. W. R. Mayfield, 7205 Karen Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Mayfield made the following statements: "The area along Calloway Creek between the Grapevine High- way and Loop 820 is subject to flooding and flood damage from the 13th of October, 1981 flood was in excess of $300,000. The area flooded to a much wider limit and also to a higher elevation than shown on the report made by Federal Emergency Management Agency for the City. This would indicate the report is now inadequate due to additional urbanization of the drainage basin or other changes that have come about. This drainage basin (5.09 square miles) is not yet totally developed and with additional development there will be increased runoff and flooding during future rain storms. The rains that fell on the 12th and 13th of October were not anywhere close to a 100-year frequency storm. This is veri- fied by rainfall reports to the WRAP Weather Watcher and to the National Weather Service Office. The City had to pass regulations and ordinances to control development and restrict construction in flood prone areas to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. If these policies are not followed the National Flood December 14, 1981 Page Seven Insurance Program could be cancelled for all of the City's homeowners and businesses. Therefore, extreme caution must be taken on permitting development on and around flood prone areas. It is obvious the subject area is considered a flood prone area and will continue to become more susceptible to flood- ing as time goes on. When these conditions exist, about the only use for such an area is to leave the areas as open spaces with very little, if any, construction being per- mitted. Park-type development could be an acceptable approach." Mayor Faram asked Mr. Mayfield what he would propose as accessibility to the area since one street had been closed off and there had been some indications the residents wanted another street closed. Mr. Mayfield stated he could not answer that. (Mrs. Tate showed an area map. ) Mr. Mayfield stated that since it was rather obvious that the report the City had for this area was not current, he would suggest that the City contact the Federal Insurance Administrator and ask for a restudy of the drainage way. Mr. Mayfield stated that apparently the development had pickup since the study was done and more area was subject to flooding since the study. Mr. Mayfield stated he felt the report should be revised. Councilman Ramsey stated he lived in Area Five and had the same situation in his neighborhood. At the end of the block there were "X" amount of acres and everyone in his neighborhood thought that was where the swimming pool should be. Councilman Ramsey stated that was the kind of dilemma the Council was setting in right now. Mrs. Barbara McKinley, 7213 Karen, appeared before the Council. Mrs. McKinley stated she would like to make it clear that Snow Heights was not saying they wanted the swim- ming pool only. Mrs. McKinley stated if they could not have the pool then they did desire a little bit of park area for their children. Mrs. McKinley stated there were no sidewalks for the children and they had to cross Riveria, Vance Road, and Holiday Lane just to get to school. Mrs. McKinley stated the children had to come home and play in the streets. Mrs. McKinley stated she felt it was owed to the residents of Area Six to consider the park. December 14, 7981 Page Eight Mrs. McKinley stated she had been told that the City owned several pieces of property that could be sold and the money put into the park they were requesting. Mayor Faram advised Mrs. McKinley if she was referring to the property where the water tower was located, that was out of a different fund and that fund would have to be re- imbursed when the property was sold. Mrs. McKinley stated she did not know where the property that could be sold was located. Councilman Freeman stated the property that was designated for the park fund was auctioned off about two years ago. Councilman Freeman stated there was some property along the Loop that the City had received a token bid on and did not accept the bid. Councilman Freeman stated he did not know of any property that was designated to the park fund. Councilman Wood stated a small neighborhood park was probably not inappropriate for this area. Councilman Wood stated there was a limit to what the City could pay for. Councilman Wood stated that all the property the City owned was obligated from the sources that the original money came from to buy it. Mrs. Dana Tate, 4620 Cummins Drive, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Tate asked if there was anything wrong with selling some of the park land the City presently had. Councilman Wood stated that the majority of the park land the City had was obligated under some form of State or Federal funding. Mayor Faram stated the Council would turn this request over to the Park and Recreation Commission and Land Planners and see what could be done. 6. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone PLANNING AND ZONING wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come APPEAL BEARING PZ 81- forward. 32, REQUEST OF CLAUDE BYRD, BYRD AUTOMOTIVE Mrs. D. Byrd, 7924 Maplewood, appeared before the Council. TO REZONE LOT 6, BLOCK 23, CLEAR VIEW ADDITION Mrs. Byrd stated she would like to have rebuttal Lime. FROM 1F-9 - ONE FAMILY DWELLING TO COMMERCIAL Mrs. Byrd stated her family had been in this area sins° 1951 and had been in business in North Richland Hills since 1961 . Mrs. Byrd stated they had never had any complaints about a junkie looking business. They closed December 14, 1981 Page Nine during the week by 5:00 p.m. and were closed on Saturday and Sunday. Mrs. Byrd stated there were businesses at both ends of Maplewood between Davis Boulevard and Grapevine Highway, also across Davis Boulevard. Mrs. Byrd stated the old Chuck Wagon restaurant was across the street from them. Mrs. Byrd stated that the lot right behind the Chuck Wagon was zoned for duplexes. Mrs. Byrd stated the lot right behind their shop, which they would like to have for park- ing, was so narrow it was not good for anything other than what they had in mind. (Mrs. Byrd showed the Council pic- tures of the lot before and after they purchased it.) Mrs. Byrd stated they needed the lot for parking because sometimes they had 50 to 60 cars overnight and also for employee parking. Mrs. Byrd stated they had installed a six foot redwood fence with a cyclone fence inside. The gate was also redwood, that was installed so the parked cars could not be seen. Mrs. Byrd asked the Council to consider granting this request because they were in bad need of the parking space. Mr. Horace Downing, 7909 Maplewood, appeared before the Council. Mr. Downing stated he was an employee of Byrd's Automotive and had been in the area only a short time. Mr. Downing stated he had made several notations that Mr. Byrd was an upstanding neighbor in North Richland Hills. Mr. Downing stated he felt Mr. Byrd should be allowed to have the area for parking. Councilman Kenna asked if all the automobiles would be parked behind the fence. Mrs. Byrd stated yes and the gate would be locked if kept overnight. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposi- tion to please come forward. Mr. Ken Fickle, 7908 Maplewood, appeared before the Council. Mr. Fickle stated he was not in total opposition to the Byrd's request. Mr. Fickle stated that about four years ago there was a problem with this same lot. It was zoned Specific Use for a parking lot. The owner of the property had papers signed for the people in the neighborhood stating nothing would be put on the lot but a parking lot. Before the owner could he stopped there was a building 30 feet tall. December 14, 1981 Page Ten The Judge had to issue an injunction to get the owner to stop building. Mr. Fickle stated the lot was zoned back to residential and the building removed. Mr. Fickle stated that if the lot had been zoned commercial at that time the building would still be there and that was what the neighbors did not want. Mr. Fickle stated he was not necessarily oppos- ing the lot as a parking lot, he would like to see some type of specific use placed on it so there would be some control on what it was used for. Mr. Fickle stated he felt that the traffic that was going to be let out of the lot would cause a problem on Maplewood. The traffic was going to tend to go back up Maplewood and this was already a very busy street. Mr. Fickle stated he was given a list of names of the people within 200 feet so that he could go around and get a petition. Mr. Fickle stated there were fifteen names on the list, four were already zoned commercial; four were rent houses and he was unable to get a hold of the actual owner; two were operat- ing businesses out of their homes; and two lived on the other street. There were onZy three people that lived within 200 feet. Mr. Fickle stated he did not feel this vas fair. Mr. Fickle stated he felt the people further down Maplewood should have something to say about what went on on Maplewood instead of property owners that lived in Dallas. Mr. Fickle stated he thought something could be worked out to put specific use on the lot so there could be some con- trol over what was put on it. Mayor Faram stated that in response to the petition, this was an appeal hearing and would require a three-fourths vote of the total Council. Mayor Faram stated that if there were those present that had an interest, this was a public hearing and if they so desired they would be heard. Mrs. Thelma Parks, 7912 Maplewood, appeared before the Coun- cil. Mrs. Parks stated that at one time the lot in question was zoned commercial and the lot next door to her was commercial. It was zoned back to one family dwelling after Mr. Stewart was put out of business. Mrs. Parks stated the whole street was in confusion over Mr. Stewart and she could see no point in letting commercial come back. Mrs. Parks stated the cars that were going to be parked could be seen from the street. Mrs. Parks stated there were others who were interested in this case but were not notified. Mrs. Parks stated there December 14, 1981 Page Eleven were commercial businesses going on in a rent house next door to her. Mrs. Parks stated she did not know what kind of business but it was dangerous because of the traffic. Mrs. Parks stated she was very much opposed to this request. Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Parks if the illegal operation in the rent house had been reported to the City staff. Mrs. Parks stated she had heard that it had been reported but could not say for sure. Mayor Faram asked that it be reported to the City staff. Mrs. James Wilson, 7904 Maplewood, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Wilson stated she was very much opposed to this request. Mrs. Wilson stated she felt it would hurt their property value. Mrs. Byrd reappeared before the Council. Mrs. Byrd stated that Mr. Fickle had said that it was the lot next to them that they wanted to make into a parking lot, but the lot they had purchased was next door to the lot Mr. Fickle was referring to. Mrs. Byrd stated that as far as the traffic, you could see better coming out of the lot than you could from the curve circle on Maplewood. Mrs. Byrd stated that in reference to the zoning, they were told they would have to have commercial zoning in order to park cars on the lot. Mr. Fickle reappeared before the Council. Mr. Fickle stated there were already cars parked in the area Mrs. Byrd was talking about. Mr. Fickle stated you could see the cars through the fence. Mr. Fickle stated he was only trying to stop what had happened in the past. Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 7. Mayor Faram reminded the Council this was an appeal hearing CONSIDERATION OF and would require three-fourths (3/4) majority vote of the ORDINANCE FOR PZ 81-32 Council. ORDINANCE NO. 931 DENIED Councilman Freeman asked if a parking lot was allowed in Specific Use zoning. December 14, 1981 Page Twelve Mrs. Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, stated that to have a parking lot you would need Commercial-Specific Ue Zoning. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Calvert if she was aware of any restrictions, as far as structures, in Specific Use, park- ing lot. Mrs. Calvert stated she believed that if it was stated Park- ing-Specific Use, it would have to be a parking lot only. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to deny PZ 81-32, Ordinance No. 931, as requested for commerical. Motion carried 7-0. Councilman Freeman stated he had no objections to Specific Usc Zoning, but that was not the issue at hand. Councilman Freeman advised Mrs. Byrd if she would like to contact Mrs. Calvert on Specific Use Zoning he would be receptive. Mayor Faram called a fifteen (15) minute recess. RECESS Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same BACK TO ORDER Council and Staff members were present as recorded aL the beginning of the meeting. 8. Flavor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone PLANNING AND ZONING - wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come PUBLIC HEARING - forward. PZ 81-35, REQUEST OF AUBREY BROTHERS TO RE- Mr. Dick Perkins, Consulting Engineer, Teague, Nall and ZONE TRACT 3A, ABSTRACT Fozkins, appeared before the Council. 1150, DAVID MOSES SURVE3 FROM AGRICULTURE TO 1F- Mr. Perkins stated there were five items that were the 12-1800, 1F-9-1700 AND concern of the Council and the Citizens in the area about IF-9-1500 the zoning request. Number one, they were concerned about the proposed zoning in relationship to the area they lived in. Mr. Perkins stated he went to the tax records and obtained the square footage of the homes in that particular area. The homes that were within 200 feet had an average square footage of 1736. The homes on Eden Road the average square foot- age was 1839. December 14, 1981 Page Thirteen Number two, in regards to the school, Mr. Perkins stated he had talked with Carl Renford with BISD and there was a 10 or 12 acre school site at the corner of Stoneybrook and Rumfield Road to the northeast of the property in question. Mr. Perkins stated Carl Ren ford had assured them that when overcrowding became apparent and when additional rooftops built in the area, that the School District would entertain the thought of going ahead with the construction of a school on this site. Number three, concerning the sewer, Mr. Perkins stated they would bring the sewer from TRA and this would provide the opportunity for the people in the area to tie into the sewer system. Number four, there was some concern of the Council that the City Planners were working on a Masterplan for the area and entire City. The preliminary indicated this property should be single family. Mr. Perkins stated he felt the request beforo the Council tonight met that criteria. Number five, was the concern of the Council and homeowners on the condition of Eden Road. Mr. Perkins stated he felt they had come up with a solution to benefit the City and the homeowners. Mr. Perkins stated he had a meeting on the site with Mr. Bob Bolder Tarrant County, Mr. Cecil Forester, Public Works Director, to dis- cuss the possibility of what might he done with their participation, County participation and the City to improve the conditions that already exist on Eden Road. Basically, their proposal was to take the money that would be set aside for escrow for the street improve- ments on Eden Road, take that money and put it with County labor forces to buy materials to improve Eden Road from Amundson Road to Rumfield. Mr. Perkins stated the cost was about $10,000.00 a mile to improve this section. Widen the street, clean out bar ditches, fill an the chug holes, regrade it and put on a penetration surface. Mr. Perkins stated they would also extend the headwalls. Mr. Perkins stated this would provide a means by which the people out there could have their road improved. Councilman Kenna stated that Mr. Perkins had mentioned in his let- ter that he would provide a date to the homeowners that the road would be fixed. Councilman Kenna asked if the residents had warning in advance of this meeting and that he would offer a better proposal. Mr. Perkins stated yes. Mr. Allison had made the information avail- able to the residents. December 14, 1981 Page Fourteen Councilman Wood asked how many homes were planned for this tract. Mr. Perkins stated the number of lots were not changed, only the minimum square footage. Councilman [food stated he noticed that in the Planning and Zoning minutes there was a possibility of some access going on through to Precinct Line Road. Mr. Perkins stated if this zoning request was approved, Doug Long was interested in obtaining a copy of the plat so that he could proceed with a preliminary plan for the land on the east side. Councilman Freeman asked if the street would be built to City standards. Mr. Perkins stated they would regrado the existing pavement, reshape it, clean out the bar ditches, and widen the street. Councilman Freeman asked if he was talking about a temporary solution. Mr. Perkins stated temporary in relationship to curb and gutters. Councilman Kenna asked if Mr. Gregory himself ever agreed, other than through Mr. Holder, that the County would participate. Mr. Perkins stated Mr. Grognry committed himself through nob Holder because he was going to be out of town. Councilman Ramsey stated the letter was not signed by anyone. City Manager Williams stated the Staff would strongly recommend not to go with this type of roadway. The experience the City had with this type was not very good. Mayor Faram asked how many lots would be in the subdivision. Mr. Perkins stated he thought there were 56 lots. Mr. Perkins asked for rebuttal time. Mayor Foram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. Mr. Billy !Wallace, 7401 Eden Road, appeared before the Council. December 14, 1981 Page Fifteen Mr. Wallace stated the Council had voted this request down twice in the last two years. Mr. Wallace stated there had been very little change. Mr. Wallace stated the residents in the area had asked for 1800 square feet so their property values would not go down. Mr. Wallace stated he felt they would build 1500 square foot houses. Mr. Wallace stated that as far as the condition of the road, he had talked to Mr. Holder and he stated the County would use their labor. The road could not be widened until utilities were moved. Mr. Wallace stated that Mr. Holder stated all they could do to help was use their equipment to reshape the road. Mr. Wallace showed the Council pictures of the road. Mr. Wallace stated he asked a contractor friend to estimate what it would cost to fix the road properly and he came up with a half million dollars. Mr. Wallace asked the Council to please think of the homeowners in the area. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Wallace what the average lot size was. Mr. Wallace stated there was one that was one acre, most were two or five acre tracts. Dr. L. Tobias, 8800 Rumfield Road, appeared before the Council. Dr. Tobias stated improving Eden Road was not going to help much. They needed access in and out. Dr. Tobias stated they could not stand any more traffic. Mrs. Jean Wollenschliger, 7308 Eden Road, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Wollenschlager stated Eden Road and Rumfield were cut through streets to Precinct Line Road. Mrs. Wollenschliger stated that the residents in the area were not the only ones using the street. Mrs. Wollenschliger stated that ninety (90) percent of the resi- dents in the area were not interested in tying onto the sewer. Mr. Dick Perkins reappeared before the Council. Mr. Perkins stated that in their agreement to the City they had agreed to extend the culverts at the developer's expense. Mr. Perkins stated one other factor was that the people in the area wanted the street improved, but that street was not under the current bond program so it would be sometime before it would be improved to City standards. Mr. Perkins stated the proposal they were making was a measure by which they could have an improved street right away. December 14, 1981 Page Sixteen Mr. Perkins stated his client was more than willing to allow his money he was putting in escrow to be used for the improve- ment of Eden Road. In order for him to do that, the people in the area were going to have to put up their money as well. Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 9. Mayor Faram reminded the Council there was a legal petition CONSIDERATION OF against this request and would require a three-fourths ORDINANCE FOR (3/4) positive vote of the Council. PZ 81-35 ORDINANCE NUMBER 932 Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, DENIED to deny PZ 81-35, Ordinance Number 932. Mr. Billy Wallace stated the homeowners were satisfied at the present time. Mr. Wallace stated the homeowners did not feel they should bear the expense of building this road for the project. Mr. Wallace stated they could live with the road as it was. Mr. Wallace stated what they were worried about was another 200 cars per day; the road could not stand it. Councilman Kenna stated he would like to remind the home- owners that 1F-9-1500, 1800, and 1F-12 was becoming a way of life in the city and developers could not afford to build larger houses. Councilman Kenna stated he would be more interested in seeing the developer work with the man to the east and have a thoroughfare through to Precinct Line Road. Motion to deny carried 7-0. 10. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Com- PLANNING AND ZONING mission had recommended approval subject to the Engineer's PS 81-60, REQUEST OF letter with the exception of Item Number 9. J. McOIL COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to BLOCK 2, A.G. WALKER approve PS 81-60, subject to the Engineer's comments. ADDITION APPROVED Motion carried 7-0. 11. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Com- PLANNING AND ZONING mission had recommended approval subject to the Engineer's PS 81-63, REQUEST OF comments. DELMA AND J. R. PHILLI. FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to 1 , 2, AND 3, BLOCK 34, approve PS 81-63, subject to the Engineer's comments. COLLEGE HILL ADDITION APPROVED Motion carried 7-0. December 14, 1981 Page Seventeen 12. Mayor Foram opened the public hearing and called for PLANNING AND ZONING anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to PUBLIC HEARING please come forward. PZ 81-37, REQUEST OF AMON T. ADCOCK TO Mr. James Rusk, 5001 Gage, Haltom City, appeared before REZONE TRACT 7, the Council. ABSTRACT 321, WILLIAM COX SURVEY FROM Mr. Rusk stated his Engineer was Jack Angel and could not AGRICULTURE TO attend the meeting tonight. Mr. Rusk stated that if the 1F-9-1500 Council would like to postpone this request until his Engineer could be present he would agree. Mayor Faram stated Mr. Rusk had indicated he would post- pone this request, but if he was ready to present the case, then the Council was ready to hear it. Mayor Faram stated he would like to point out that a legal petition had been submitted and accepted opposing this property and it would take a three-fourths (3/4) majority vote of all Council in favor to approve this zoning request. There was a full Council present. fir. Rusk stated he would go ahead and present the case tonight. Mr. Rusk stated that if it was feasible to de- velop this property, fine. Mr. Rusk stated he would like for the land next to him in Haltom City to stay open, but he could not buy it. The property was being developed and it was not into larger lots and bigger homes. Mr. Rusk stated he lived in a 2800 square foot house and 900 square foot houses were being built on the lot next to him with 50 foot frontage lots. Mr. Rusk stated he was only asking for the approval of the zoning on the property in question and not the plat- ting. Mr. Rusk stated he was only asking for the zoning so he could find out if it was financially feasible to go ahead with this. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Rusk if he was the owner of the property. Mr. Rusk replied yes. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposi- tion of this request to please come forward. Mr. Grady Buck, 7629 Hightower, appeared before the Council. Mr. Buck advised the Mayor and Council he would like to show slides of the area in question. Mayor Faram called a fifteen (15) minute recess. RECESS December 14, 1981 Page Eighteen Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. Tha .same BACK TO ORDER Council members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. Mr. Buck showed slides of the area in question. Mr. Buck stated he represented two groups of concerned citizens who had presented the City with a petition opposing this zoning request. Mr. Buck read the following caption: "We the undersigned, being residents, taxpayers, and/or registered voters of the City of North Richland Hills, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of North Richland Hills to reject the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission in the rezoning of Tract 7, Abstract 321, William Cox Survey from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of 1F-9-1500 One Family Dwellings." Mr. Buck stated that of the 28 notices mailed to property owners within 200 feet, 23 property owners or 82 percent had signed the petition. The other signatures represented 34 residents who stucd to loose as much or more than the residents who lived within the 200 feet. In all , there were 91 signatures representing 57 residences which was 100 percent greater than the number of notices sent out to the residences within 200 feet. All 57 residents were within walking distance of the prop- erty in question. Mr. Buck stated one reason for denial was there was no drainage. Mr. Buck showed slides of flooded homes in this neighbor- hood. Mr. Buck stated the water was directed to bar ditches, and the bar ditches had no protection around them. Mr. Buck stated there were not adequate drainage facilities for the water running from the property in question. Mr. Buck stated there was no way the property could be developed, provide adequate drainage and not affect the homes already built, unless the developer wanted to come in and develop the streets with adequate drainage provisions, curbs and gutters for an area roughly six hundred square blocks around the property. Mr. Buck stated the second reason the residents opposed the zoning was the streets. The streets were inadequate, over- crowded, and unimproved. Mr. Buck stated it was a major task when you tried to take the children to school , go to work, or to the store. Mr. Buck stated he was not just talking about December 14, 1981 Page Nineteen the residents within 200 feet of the property and down Little Ranch Road, he was talking about all the people in the neigh- borhood. Mr. Buck stated there were three or four new addi- tions being put in this area that had been rezoned and had adequate streets. These streets were directed on to their inadequate streets. Mr. Buck stated the residents did not feel that the streets could bear anymore traffic. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Buck if he was aware of the efforts that had been made to improve Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Buck replied yes. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Buck if he was aware that there had been many people in his neighborhood that, when the City proposed an alternate route when the City ran into a deadend road north of the railroad on Rufe Snow, that did not want the street. Mr. Buck replied yes and he totally supported the argument that Meadow Road was not a thoroughfare street. Mr. Buck stated he did not feel the citizens were asking too much of the City to improve the streets before zoning more land for residential development in that part of the City. Mr. Buck stated the third point he would like to mention was the schools. Mr. Buck stated the lack of adequate school facilities was pathetic. A few weeks after Foster Village was opened, portable buildings were erected to have class- rooms for children enrolled there. Mr. Buck stated he dis- cussed this zoning application with the Administrative Assistant in the Research and Planning Department of the School Distract and he said the schools could not handle the children from this zoning request and the surrounding property that had already been zoned single family dwell- ings. Mr. Buck stated that the Foster Village Elementary School had an enrollment, as of last week, of something like 625 children. The school was built for an enrollment of 500 children. Mr. Buck stated one final consideration that must be made - the City mailed out 28 zoning notices on this request. Mr. Buck stated 82 percent of the residents who were suppose to receive the notice signed the petition opposing it. December 14, 1981 Page Twenty From the tax rolls of the City a list was provided with the petition of the property owners along with their square footage. The square footage was available on 25 of the 28 properties to whom the notices were mailed. Of the three that no square footage was given, one is an unimproved lot, the other two had no reference to a dwelling being on that piece of property- Of 25 residences located within 200 feet of Abstract 321, the average square footage was 1919, not 1500. Mr. Ruck stated a home that was built at 1500 square feet would be 23 percent smaller than the residences within the 200 feet. Mr. Buck stated the residents urged the Council to deny this request or provide adequate protection to the property owners within 200 feet, that the homes built on this property have a minimum square footage of 1900; that was still not equal to the average size homes that were there now. Gine the residents something comparable to the size of their homes. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Buck what his property was zoned. Mr. Ruck stated 1F-9-1500. Mr. Buck stated theirs was a deed restriction or a zoning amendment shown on the City map that said 75 percent of the homes in Briarwood Estates must be 7600 square feet or greater. Councilman Hubbard stated there was a typed copy of property owners within 200 feet and their square footage; there was a signed petition with approximate square footage and he noted there was quite a bit of difference in the two. Councilman Hubbard asked which list was correct. Mr. Buck stated he would like to think the one taken from the tax roll, the typed one. Mr. Michael Arnold, 7612 Hightower, appeared before the Coun- cil. Mr. Arnold stated he had been a builder for about five (5) years and thought it was unlikely that one builder could develop all this area. Mr. Arnold stated he would like to see the size of the houses moved up to IF-9-1700 or 2F-2000- Two Family. Mr. Mike Garvin, 6908 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Garvin staled he would like to take the Council back to the minutes of the May 22, 1978 meeting concerning the Wind- crest Addition. Little Ranch Road was located in Morgan Meadows and they did have a severe drainage problem there. Mr. Garvin quoted the following from the minutes: December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-One "Councilman Mills stated he felt it was the responsibility of the Council to look at the way this property had been de- veloped. It is essentially the same kind of problem that existed on Hewitt Street. Councilman Mills stated some kind of drainage plan needed to be worked out. Councilman Mills stated the Council possibly should consider requiring the drainage to be escrowed." Mr. Garvin stated this was the time for the Council to be- come responsible, their homes had been damaged by flood waters. Action was taken by the Council in May, 1978 and in October, 1979, he received a letter from the City stating new flood drainage maps had come out and the majority of the area on Little Ranch Road was placed in the flood plain on that map. Mr. Garvin stated the citizens were asking for relief. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Garvin if he was aware that Morgan Meadows was not in the City when it was first placed and developed. Mr. Garvin stated yes. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Garvin if he was aware that when he first built his house that it was a flood area. Mr. Garvin stated he talked to people who had lived in this area for fifteen (15) years and there had never been any flood water on his property or their property. Mr. Garvin stated he was aware that the areas to the south of his property had flood problems, but not on his end of the street. Mr. Roy Strickland, 5900 Meadow Creek, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stickland stated he agreed with all that had been said by previous speakers. Mr. Strickland stated he had lived in the area fifteen (15) years and this was the first time he had been flooded. Mr. Strickland stated the area could not take any more water. Mr. Calvin Kramer, 7601 Hewitt, appeared before the Council. Mr. Kramer stated he had been an amateur meteorologist since 1972 for Channel 5, Harold Taft's Weather Watchers. In 1972 there was 51 inches of rain for the year, this year 55 inches of rain. Because of the type of soil , alakine and clay, if you have moisture for several days and rain the condition is twice as bad. Mr. Kramer stated he lived south of the property in question and would appreciate it if anyone building on it would look at the lay of the land. Mr. Kramer stated any street running from Hightower that would cut through could possibly become flooded. December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-two Councilman Hubbard stated the property list showed Mr. Kramer's house to be 2,000 square feet. According to Mr. Buck and the tax records, it showed 1345. Councilman Hubbard asked which Was correct. Mr. Kramer stated he was not sure of the square footage; it was a large house. Mr. Charles Roach, 6809 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Roach stated he was right in the middle of where all the rain hit. Mr. Roach stated he was just now beginning to come out of the flood problem. Mr. Roach stated that with more water coming down in the area, they would need some help. Mrs. Sherry Garvin, Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Garvin stated they looked at the property they now owned and even talked to Mr. Wood, who did not mention this was a flood area before the property was purchased. Mrs. Garvin stated they had no problems in getting a loan for the house, which if it was in a flood plain you would have problems in netting a loan. Mrs. Garvin stated nne of the City employees, who worked at the City at that time, but no longer does, came to them and alvised they were going to flood. Mrs. Garvin stated he told them they would be flooded because of an addition being built and there was not proper drainage. Mrs. Garvin stated they were not fighting improvements, they just did not want any more water. Councilman Freeman asked Mrs. Garvin who the man was from the City that had talked to them. Mrs. Garvin stated Mr. Jim Anderson. Mr. Burt Newman, 6916 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Newman stated that on October 13, 1981, his daughter was pulled out of the water on Little Ranch Road. For all practical purposes she was dead as she was not breathing and her heart was not beating. Mr. Newman stated she was alive now but this was going to happen again. Mrs. Helen Smith, 6805 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-three Mrs. Smith stated she had talked with the City Manager in September about the ditches, roads and culverts. On October 14, 1981, she talked with him as the Fire Department was vacuuming two rooms of her house. Mrs. Smith stated her car was also flooded. Mrs. Smith stated it was impossible to live under the conditions that everytime it rained you were going to he flooded. Mr. Bob Grant, 6809 Meadow Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Grant stated an obligation was owed to the developers that were there at the present time and allowing these developers to plan and develop houses they are building out there now and having a hard time selling. Mr. Grant stated the road you had to enter on to his road was not wide enough for a road. Mr. James A. Bellamey, 6912 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bellamey asked that all the people who came tonight because of the problem to please stand. Mr. William Bell , 6825 Meadowcreek, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bell stated he had lived in the area for fifteen (15) years. Mr. Bell stated he would like for the Council to take into con- sideration that he had three neighbors who were not present tonight that had water in their homes on October 13, 1981. Mr. Bell stated he did not have water in his home. Mr. Bell stated they could not stand any more development until something was done about the drainage. Mrs. Juanita Packston, 7600 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Packston stated her main concern was the traffic and chil- dren. Little Ranch Road leads into Richfield Park and any chil- dren or any new development was going to have to use this road. Mrs. Packston stated there was not enough room now down the road with the elementary school traffic. Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 13. Mayor Faram reminded the Council there was a legal petition CONSIDERATION OF submitted and would require a three-fourths (3/4) positive ORDINANCE FOR vote of the Council. PZ 81-37 ORDINANCE NUMBER 933 Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, DENIED to deny PL 81-37, Ordinance Number 933. December 14, 1381 Page Twenty-four Councilman Ramsey stated several of the Council members went out and looked at this property and really was more concerned with the platting than the zoning of the property. Councilman Freeman stated this was not a problem of the de- veloper; it was a problem that had been in the making for quite awhile. Councilman Freeman stated he understood the water problem that needed to be solved. Councilman Freeman stated he did not know what the answer was. The City had asked the Engineer to look at it and had made several attempts to see what could be done. Councilman Freeman stated the City did nor have the money to fix the drainage at the present time. Councilman Freeman stated the only thing he knew to do was to have a bond issue and improve the drainage in that whole end of town. Councilman Wood stated the City went through this same thing an Wi ndcrest Addition and even had some quotes on trying to reroute the water. Councilman Wood stated that in talking about the law on mailing notices to people in the right distance, there were some strange laws in the State of Texas. The Courts apparently will not decide how far a developer was responsible for his drainage. Councilman Wood stated that rnayte all development should be stopped until the Master Plan was developed. Mayor Faram stated he thought that at one tame there was soave sort of negotiation for some land west of Little Ranch Road for open drainage. Sir. Albin stated that was correct; however, that would only handle the drainage for the 300 acres west. Mr. Albin stated there were really two problems. There were two drainage areas that both funneled into this one subdivision. Mr. Alban stated there was a plan to handle the one on the west side but could not get the property owners to dedicate the easement re7uired to construct the channel. Mr. Albin stated there was an existing drainage easement that went through Morgan Meadows that was about 25 feet wad,- which would have to he mach wider than that to carry a 100 year storm. Additional easements would have to he dedicated. Brayer Faram asked if it was not correct that over the years, attempts had been made to get additional right-of-way in the a rca. Mi . Albin stated that was correct. There had been opposition to every attempt made to construct a channel that would carry the discharge from the upper drainage area. December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-five Mayor Faram stated he did not believe the City could allow another addition to go in and dump more water. Mayor Faram stated he believed that many of these homes in the area south were built on substandard streets and drainage and for the most part developed prior to its entry into North Richland Hills. Mayor Faram stated that in the meantime this problem was going to have to be addressed and he would like some suggestions on how the City could get some easements or something to handle the water. Mayor Faram stated he thought Councilman Wood's statement on the developers being required to only take the drainage to a certain point was, unfortunately, true. Mr. Albin stated the ordinance stated the developer must pro- vide for at least a ten (10) year capacity downstream from his property to the nearest recognized water source. Mayor Faram stated the problem that now existed, without the addition of the zoning request tonight, there was still going to have to be some relief in the area. Mr. Albin stated casements were needed between Little Ranch Road and Meadow Creek along the property lines in the back. Mayor Faram asked for a show of hands of who would be inter- ested in helping the City to acquire the needed easements. Mr. Garvin stated that when the discussion on Windcrest came up a few years back, the people on the east side of Little Panch Road were in agreement. At that time the City's posi- tion was that they did not have the money for the improvements and the County held the same position. Mayor Faram asked if the City and/or County had the kind of equipment needed to excavate a channel. Mr. Albin stated it would depend on how big of a channel was put in. Mayor Faram asked if there was a way the City could get in with their equipment. Mr. Forester stated the City did not have the equipment needed to do the work. Mayor Faram asked if the County had any equipment the City might borrow. Mr. Forester advised the County would probably let the City use the equipment. December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-six Mayor Faram asked that the people who were willing to help the City obtain the needed easements to leave their names and telephone numbers. Mayor Faram stated he was going to turn this matter over to the City Manager to assign a Staff member to the proj- ect and see what could be done. Motion to deny carried 7-0. 14. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and ca lied for anyone PLANNING AND ZONING wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come PUBLIC BEARING PZ 81-3d, forward. REQUEST OF TENNECO OIL COMPANY TO REZONE BLOCK Mr. Norman Esbrook, Real Estate Representative for Tenneco, 5, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH appeared before the Council. ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO LOCAL RETAIL Mr. Esbrook stated then planned to build a convenience SPECTFIC USE-SALE OF store and would like to he able to sell beer. BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposi- tion to thts request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 15. Councilman Kenna moved, ;ccondcd by Councilman Ramsey, to CON.SILERATION OP approve P7 81-36, Ordinance Number 934. ORDINANCE FOR PZ 81 ORDINANCE NO. 931 Councilman hood asked what name the permit would be issued APPROVED in. Mr. Esbrook stated hee could not provide the name at this time. Councilman Kenna amendol his motion, Councilman Ramsey amended his second, to state "the name of an official of the company would be furnished within 30 days." Amended motion carried 4-3; Councilman Kenna, Ramsey and Hubbard and Councilwoman Gloves voting for; Councilman Wood, Freeman and Thomas voting against. 16. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for PLANNING AND ZONING anyone present wishing to speak in favor of this request PUBLIC HEARING to please come forward. PZ 81-39, REQUEST OF CANADIAN TEXAS PROP- Mr. Delbert Stembridge, 3729 Flory, Consulting Engineer, ERTIES, INC. , TO REZONE appeared before the Council. TRACT 16, AND PORTIONS OF TRACTS 1,14,IB, AND Mr. Stembridge stated this property fronted on Rufe Snow IC, ABSTRACT 1588, Drive across from Lewis Lane. Mr. Stembridge stated J. M. VANDUSEN SORI'Fv Mr. Max Jordan, representative of Weitz Company, was in FROM LOCAL RETAIL r attendance and would answer any questions the Council MULTIPLE FAMILY TO might have. COMMERCIAL December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-seven Mr. Max Jordan appeared before the Council. Mr. Jordan stated they planned to develop a factory outlet mall . They had built one in Round Rock, Texas and one in Oklahoma. Mr. Jordan stated the project would cost three and one-half million dollars and would be $25,000 in property tax with an annual income of twenty million dollars. Mr. Jordan stated he would like to commend the Staff for their help. Councilman Hubbard asked if there would be space available to local parties. Mr. Jordan replied yes. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 17. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, CONSIDERATION OF to approve PZ 81-39, Ordinance Number 935. ORDINANCE FOR PZ 81-39 ORDINANCE NO. 935 Motion carried 7-0. APPROVED 18. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, PLANNING AND ZONING to approve PS 81-67, subject to the Engineer's comments. PS 81-67, REQUEST OF TAPP CORPORATION FOR Motion carried 7-0. FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, BLOCK 1, TAPP ADDITION APPROVED 19. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, CONSIDERATION OF PAY- to approve payment to Stolaruk Corporation in the amount RENT TO STOLARUK COR- of $204,246.00. PORATION FOR DAVIS BOULEVARD WATER SYSTEM Motion carried 7-0. EXTENSION IN THE AMOUNT OF $203,246.00 APPROVED 20. City Manager Williams stated specifications and bid forms CONSIDERATION OF AWARD- were sent to seven firms. Five bids were received. INC BID FOR TRACTOR- Mr. Williams stated the staff recommended the bid of Brazos LOADER BACKHOE Equipment Company (Case) , in the amount of $25,950.00. APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to award the bid to Brazos Equipment Company in the amount of $25,450. 00. December 14, 1981 Page Twenty-eight Motion carried 7-0. 21. Mr. Ed Szol, Chairman, Civil Service Commission , appeared CONSIDERATION OF before the Council. RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING $112,275.00 FROM RE- STRICTED RESERVE TO DEPARTMENTAL PAYROLL ACCOUNTS RESOLUTION NO. 81-22 APPROVED Mr. Szol presented the revised pay plan to the Council and advised that the Civil Service Commission recommended ap- proval of the pay plan for the classified personnel. Mr. Szol stated there would he an added cost to the City but felt the City would be rewarded. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve, Resolution No. 81-22. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Far am stated that on behalf of himself and the Council he would like to thank Mr. Szol and the Civil Service Com- mission for the effort put forth in preparing the pay plan. 22. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to CONSIDERATION OF ORDI- approve Ordinance Number 938 and incorporate the 1983 rates. NANCE AMENDING THE WAT] AND SEWER RULES, REGULI Motion carried 7-0. TIONS, POLICIES AND PR( CEDURES ORDINANCE NO. 936 APPROVED 23. None CITIZEN PRESENTATION 24. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of December 1.4, 1981. ADJOURNMENT DICK FARAM - Mayor ATTEST: JEAN] TTE MOORE - City Secretary MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 5, 1982 - 6:30 P.M. 1 . Mayor Faram called the special meeting to order January 5, 1982, CALL TO ORDER at 6:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CALL Jim Kenna J.C. Hubbard Wiley Thorns Councilmen Jim Ramsey Dave Freeman Sharyl Groves Councilwoman STAFF: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Jeanette Moore City Secretary ABSENT: Jim Wood Councilman Rex McEntire City Attorney 3. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, CONSIDERATION AND to approve Resolution No. 82-1 . PASSAGE OF RESOLUTION Motion carried 6-0. CONCERNING TESCO RATE TARIFF FILING OF DECEMBER 9,1981 RESOLUTION NO, 82-1 APPROVED 4. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, CONSIDERATION OF to accept the resignation of the City Manager effective RESIGNATION OF February 1 , 1982. CITY MANAGER APPROVED Motion carried 6-0. 5. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, CONSIDERATION OF to add Resolution No. 82-2 to this agenda. RESOLUTION NO.82-2 AUTOMATED FINANCIAL Motion carried 6-0. SERVICES APPROVED Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Resolution No. 82-2. Motion carried 6-0. Resolution to be placed on January 11 , 1982 agenda for ratification. January 5, 1982 Page 2 6. Mayor Faram adjourned the special meeting of January 5, 1982, ADJOURNMENT and advised the Council would go into closed session. Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary amillilill\ a:‘..1. City of,North .ichl dills �r� star of the P�Ietroples 4. ffiertifitnte of p rroite THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO: JEANETTE CARSON IN RECOGNITION OF_____Tett YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE CITY IN THE _ _ U t_4ty _ _ DEPARTMENT. DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS . 11Th _ 4 DAY OF _ ZmwAhl, 1982 1* —iditc=11-77-Crian" Mayor '/_I/it. i!_7�, City Manage � g9• 4 /'..f s Department ead F 4. City of , orth Richland Hills, Texas TO: Chuck Williams DATE: January 6, 1982 City Manager FROM: Wanda Cal vert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: P & Z Cases to be heard by City Council January 11, 1982 PS 81-62 Request for final plat of Walkers APPROVED Branch Addition. PZ 81-40 Request of Gulf Oil Corporation to APPROVED rezone Block 4, Snow Heights North (4 were contacted) Addition, from its present classifi- cation of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail - Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off- premise consumption. This property is located at 5100 Rufe Snow Drive, at the Northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast Loop 820. (817) 281-0041 r 7301 N.E LOOP 820 P 0 BOX 13305 ' NORTH RICNIANO HILLS, TEXAS 76118 DATE: January 6, 1982 SUBJECT: PS 81-62-Final Plat of Walker's Branch Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located at the northeast corner of Harwood Road and Grapevine Highway. There were several Engineer's comments which had to be discussed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to the Engineer's comments and subject to the FIA review and the Texas Department of Water Resourses review and subject to satisfying the Director of Public Work's letters of December 9th & 16th and also sprigging the slopes. _ The vote was 3-1 with Mr. Hannon voting against and Mrs. Nash abstaining since she did not understand the case. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of Final Plat BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A // nn� �/ t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, DECEMBER 17, 1981 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Carl Greenfield, at 7:40 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CHAIRMAN Carl Greenfield SECRETARY Marjorie Nash MEMBERS Don Bowen George Tucker Mark Hannon DIR. of DEVELOPMENT Allen Bronstad P & Z COORDINATOR Wanda Calvert CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mr. Tucker, to OF NOVEMBER 19, 1981 approve the minutes as written. This motion carried 4-0 with Mrs. Nash abstaining since she was not present at the meeting. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Hannon, to OF SPECIAL MEETING OF approve the minutes as written. DECEMBER 8, 1981 This motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS 1. PS 81-62 Request of Folsom Investment for final plat of Walkers Branch Addition. Gordon Swift with Gordon Swift Consulting Engineers, came forward to represent Folsom Investment in their request. Mr. Swift said their hope and intent was that they have satisfied all the comments and ordinances. Mr. Hannon said he would like to discuss the hydraulic analysis. He said he still had one problem-with the split flow. He said that looking at the FIA map and the cross sections or constructions plans of the existing ground and the proposed hydraulic grade line that you have a condition of combined flow; the flows do not go out the channels in the same portions they come in. There was a discussion regarding this with Mr. Hannon and Mr. Swift. Page 2 • P & Z Minutes December 17, 1981 Mr. Swift said he did not feel he could go down stream and into another city for more extensive study. He said he felt they had made the necessary analysis. Mr. Swift said he was aware of the memo from the Public Work's Director, Cecil Forester, regarding the rip rap and the water main. He said he would do whatever to make him happy. Mr. Bronstad said he had talked with Mr. Forester and they decided they had rather they sprig the slopes with coastal bermuda to the city's approval . Mr. Swift said they would do that. He said they want this to serve as a green space for the area. PS 81-62 Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 81-62 subject APPROVED to the Engineer's comments and subject to the FIA review and the Texas Department of Water Resourses review and subject to satisfying the Director of Public Work's letters of December 9th & 16th and also sprigging the slopes. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Hannon voting against and Mrs. Nash abstaining since she did not understand it. 2. PL 81-40 Request of Gulf Oil Corporation to rezo,• Block 4, Snow Heights North Additio. rem its present classification of • . Retail to a proposed classificat' • of Local Retail- Specific Use-Sale of - for off-premise consumption. This proper s located at the northeast corner . - 'ufe Snow Drive and Northeast Loop 82' Steve Ginsberg came forward to represent Gulf Oil Corporation in their request. He said they were asking for this for the best use of the land and a convenience to their customers. He said other stores on Rufe Snow, such as Stop n Go, 7-11 , Winn Dixie, and Tenneco have all been granted this same request. Page 2 P & Z Minutes November 19, 1981 Mr. Bowen said they had also received - letter from Lone Star Gas Company requesting their meter be moved. Mr. Hannon said that would .e no problem, that Lone Star Gas wou • "see that it is moved. PS 81-54 Mr. Tucker mo.: to approve PS 81-54 and APPROVED since thi, droperty has been a business for 17 :1ars to waive item #9. s motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon ,..-and the motion carried 4-0. PS 81-60 Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 81-60 APPROVED subject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of item #9. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. 3. PS 8 Request of Nasser Shafipour for preliminary PO -- 'OWED plat of Lot 1, Block 8, Irish Meadows Addn. Mr. Shafipour requested this request be postponed prior to the meeting. 4. PS 81-62 Request of Folsom Investments for final TABLED plat of Walkers Branch Addn. Mr. Tucker said that in view of the extensive amount of Engineer's comments, he would make a motion to table PS 81-62 until the developer takes care of the comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4- 0. 5. PS 81-63 Request of Delma & S. R. Phillips f. nal plat of Lots 1, 2, & 3, Blo d , College Hill Addn. Delbe �-embridge, Consulting Engineer, forward. He said the only thing he had to do to the final plat was to add an easement. Mr. Stembridge said they take no exception to the Engineer's comments. H TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES , 1700 N.Congress Avenue Austin,Texas $n TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD .;S1:4174`; .,�y•"0 TEXAS WATER COMMISSION Louis A. Beechen,Jr.,Chairman � .e Felix McDonald, Chairman John H. Garrett,Vice Chairman Dorsey B Hardeman George W. McCkskey '�'r:•✓' Lee B M Biggart Glen E. Roney Harvey Davis W.0.Bankston Executive Director Lonnie A. "Bo"Pilgrim December 30, 1981 Mr. William L. Boomer, P.E. Gordon S. Swift - Consulting Engineer One Hundred Three Oil & Gas Building 309 W. Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Mr. Boomer: Re: Folsom Investments, Inc., Proposed Channel Improvement Project Walker Branch - Tarrant County, Texas This is in response to your letter of December 8, 1981, concerning the referenced project. We have reviewed the material you provided and have determined that an Application for Approval of Reclamation Project need not be filed for the project. Our review indicates that the drainage area above the lowest point of construction of the proposed project is 2.93 miles. Therefore, it is exempted from the Commis- sion's jurisdiction under Section 16.236 (formerly Section 16.238) of the Texas Water Code by virtue of Rule 156.10.01.001 (d) (5) which was adopted by the Texas Water Development Board on February 20, 1979. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, vita C. R. Baskin, P.E. Director Data and Engineering Services Division P 0 Box 13087 Capitol Station • Austin,Texas 78711 • Area Codc 512/475 3187 G O R D O N S . SWIFT • C O N S L L T I N G E N G I N E E R URBAN PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT AND ENOINEERING • TELEPHONE A.C. 817-3356464 December 21 , 1981 Mr. Cecil Forester Director Public Works/Utilities City of North Richland Hills P. 0. Box 13305 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Walker Branch Project No. 7863 Dear Cecil : I first want to tell you how much Bill and I enjoy working with you. I believe the City is very fortunate to have someone as con- genial and yet dedicated to serve the City of North Richland Hills. I am receipt of your letter of December 16, 1981 concerning the treatment of the slopes of the drainage channelization adjacent to Emerald Hills Way. I suggest that we postpone the final decision of slope treatment until the channel work is completed. Bob McMillan, Bill , and I have assured you that we will devote every effort to accomplish the appropriate treatment to these channel slopes. We look forward to the opportunity of working with you on the entire project, and it is our desire that you be pleased with the entire program upon completion. SI1e rely, / 'orI don S. Swift, P. E. Consulting Engineer GSS/cv cc: Bob McMillan (w/enc.) PERMIT TO WANSTRUCT ACCESS DRIVEWAY .ACILITIES Form 105R ON HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY Rev. 1206 Emerald Hills Way // (220) To- J3ordon S. Swift Hwy. No 26 Perrot No 10—SC-251-81 (/ Consulting Engineer Control 461 Section 1 309 W. 7th Street, #103 Tarrant County Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Date December 11. 1981 Dear Sir: C 1 ¢e eupon concurrence with i proper construct Richland The 5 t Department f ihays and Public Transportation hereby authorizes you to(re) fac eo the high- way right of way for development of access to your property abutting Highway No. 26 in Tarrant County, located in the City of North Richland Hills 650 feet north of Harwood Road. provided you agree to and comply with the following conditions- 1 Design of facilities shall be as follows and/or as shown on sketch 41 ' (back to back) roadway, oroposad Emerald Hills Way. intersecting State Highway No. 26 approximately 650.0 feet north of Harwood Road. Emerald Hills Way shall have 6" H.M.A.C. surface on 6" Time Stabilized Subgrade. All construction and materials shall be subject to inspection and approval by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation 2 Maintenance of facilities constructed hereunder shall be the responsibility of the grantee,and the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation reserves the right to require any changes, maintenance or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection of life or property on or adjacent to the highway.Changes in design will be made only with approval of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation 3 The grantee shall hold harmless the State Highway and Public Transportation Commission and its duly appointed agents and employees against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit 4 The grantee shall not erect any sign on or extending ON er any portion of the highway right of way,and vehicle sen ice fixtures such as sett ice pumps,sendor stands,tanks or water hydrants shall be located at least to els e(12)feet from the right of way line to insure that an) vehicles serviced from these fixtures will be off of the highway The State Department of Highways and Public Transportation will assist as follows Viet This permit shall not be valid until grantee signs the statement in which he agrees to comply with the conditions herein Mr Jamie Lively MCS ITT 232-1304/Saginaw should be contacted at least twenty-four (24) hours before beginning the work .uthorized by this permit. Mr. Jamie Li ", • I ' • AND PUDBLIC TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAYS Big . - f' �,'� I :. . . . . '.r: B. E. Davis By N. Richland Hills Dist. Maint Engr. District Engineer I(We),the undersigned,hereby agree to accept and comply with the terms and conditions set out in per t for construc- tion of access drweew�'ay fa�cihuuueess on highway right of way. firgay.-444) WITNESS CaliF Jl -L fir` , 'y f SIGNED ACCESS DRIVEWAY REGULATIONS • The Stare H ghway and Public Transportation Commission, in recognition of its responsibility for the safety and utility of public highways under its lurisdicuon,has directed the adoption of rules and regulations to accomplish a coordinated development between highways and abutting property. For this purpose,the booklet entitled "Regulations for Access Driveways to State High- ways.'was published and adopted,setting out Departmental policies to regulate construction and maintenance of access driveway . facilities SKETCH OF INSTALLATION • 4- Form 1023 (6-75) NOTICE OF PROPOSED INSTALLATION UTILITY LINE ON NON-CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAY Date Derember 8. 1981 TO THE STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION c/o DISTRICT ENGINEER STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Fort Worth , TEXAS _ Formal notice is hereby given that Folsom Investments, Inc. Company proposes to place a 10" Water Line line within the right-of-way of State Highway No. 26 in North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as follows: (give location, length, general design, etc. ) A 10" Class 51 ductile iron pipe crossing State Highway No. 26 at its intersection with Harwood Road, said pipe running in a northwesterly direction from the northeast corner of said intersection and to be installed by boring and jacking. The location and description of the proposed line and appurtenances is more fully shown by one complete sets of drawings attached to this notice. The line will be constructed and maintained on the highway right- of-way as shown on the attached drawings and as directed by the State De- partment of Highways and Public Transportation in accordance with governing laws. Construction of this line will begin on or after the 1st day of January , 19 82 . Firm Gyr,445. Swif'�C.nI i , . BY /1I I ( rg� � vn" Title Associate Address 309 W. 7th Street, #103 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 (1. APPROVAL 1023 APPROVAL (6-75) TO: Go rAnn S Swift_ rnn cut Permit #220 W 295-81 ting Engineer ontrol 36a Section Maintenance Section No. 10 309 W. 7th Street 4103 Hwy. No. SH 76 Tarrant County Fort Worth. Texas 76102 Date Dec 15, 1981 The State Department of Highways and Public Transportation offers no objec- tion to the location on the right-of-way of your proposed 10" ater line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated ner R 1981 except as noted below. It is expressly understood that the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation does not purport, hereby, to grant any right, claim, title, or easement in or upon this highway; and it is further understood that the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation may require the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30) days written notice. You are requested to notify this office prior to commencement of any routine or periodic maintenance which requires pruning of trees within the highway right-of-way, so that we may provide specifications for the extent and meth- ods to govern in trimming, topping, tree balance, type of cuts, painting cuts and clean-up. These specifications are intended to preserve our con- siderable investment in highway planting and beautification, by reducing damage due to trimming. The installation shall not damage any part of the highway and adequate pro- visions must be made to cause minimum inconveniences to traffic and adjacent property owners. In the event the Owner fails to comply with any or all of the requirements as set forth herein, the State may take such action as it deems appropriate to compel compliance. Minimum clearances above the roadway for aerial utilities shall be 22' for power lines and 18' for communications lines. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Attached are an area map showing location, plan-profile drawings, and the following specifications which are made governing conditions of this permit: 1. Special Requirements for Installation of Utilities on Highway Right of Way. 2. Backfill of Utility Trenches, Rev. Feb. , 1971. 3. Boring and Tunneling, Rev. 10-3-75. 4. Utility Construction Work on Saturdays and Sundays for Utility Installations Authorized by Utility Permit. 5. Utility Policy Chart. Please notify Bob George - Fort Worth telephone 292-6510 . exr_283 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the ne in order that we may have a representative present. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ByYX J. R. Stone District Engineer - District Number 02 By: %ni f7 Robert B. George R.O.W. Utility Agent R.O.W. Utility Section G O R D L A S . SWIFT • C O N S .. L T I N G E N G I N E E R URBAN PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING • TELEPHONE AC. 017-335-6464 December 16, 1981 North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Commission P. 0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Walker Branch Addition PZ 81-52 Gentlemen: As a matter of confirmation this letter is written to the Planning and Zoning Commission to substantiate that Gordon S. Swift and Mike Blubaugh have discussed the Walker Branch Addition and Campus Hills Addition proposed development. Mike Blubaugh is in agreement with the final plat for Walker Branch Addition, PZ 81-62, with the anticipation that the original proposed street in Campus Hills Addition will not be required and that Campus Hills Addition can adequately be served by frontage on Grapevine Highway. Respectfully submitted, " GORDON S. SWIFT, P. E. MIKE BLUBAUGH GSS/cv 30.J WEST SEVEMTH STREET.FORT WMJTH,TEXAS 76102 1 � City of Forth Richland Hills, Texas 1, TO: Planning and Zoning Commission REF: PWM-0065-81 FROM: Cecil Forester, Director Public Works/ DATE: December 16, 1981 Utilities SUBJECT: Rip Rap Along Drainage Channel - Walkers Branch Addition I have given additional thought to my request for rip rap along the west bank of the drainage channel adjacent to Emerald Hills Way. I 'm not so sure that grassy slopes on a 3 to 1 grade wouldn't be as good. I will let you be the judge of what would be in the best interest of the City as it relates to maintenance of the channel . If the decision is not to require rip rap, I certainly would like a commitment on the part of the developer to seed all slopes. Adequate coverage of these slopes may take more than one seeding. (817) 281 0041 / 7301 N E LOOP 820 / P. 0. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 i City ofrth Richland Hills, Texas TO: Planning and Zoning Commission REF: PWM-0062-81 FROM: Cecil Forester, Director Public Works/ DATE: December 10, 1981 Utilities SUBJECT: Final Plat - Walker's Branch Addition In addition to engineer's comments, I have the following recommendations: 1 . In reference to drainage channel bank protection - such protection will be required on the west bank from Grapevine Highway northwestward along Emerald Hills right of way to a point at Station 15+00. 2. In reference to the alignment of Emerald Hills Way - a letter will be required from the developers of Campus Hills Addition stating their knowledge of said alignment. 3. In reference to the proposed 10" water main with Emerald Hills Way - the alignment of said main should be moved to the west right of way to avoid any potential conflict with the drainage channel . I have no objection to a gradual transition from beginning of 10" line to a point near Station '6+00, Bends greater than 450 should be avoided. An 8" stub out should be provided to Lot 1 , Block 2, for future fire protection. 4. In reference to the 8" water line extending from Emerald Hills Way northeastward along Grapevine - recommend strongly that it be upsized to 10" to provide adequate fire protection to Lot 2, Block 2. I agree with Richard in that the plat should not be delayed because of flood zone information. That information may be slaw in coming and can be handled by staff at permit time. (817) 281 0041 7301 N.E LOOP 820 / P 0 BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 • GORDON S . SWIFT • C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R URBAN PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING • TELEPHONE A.C. B17-3356464 December 8, 1981 Mr. C. R. Baskin Texas Department of Water Resources P. 0. Box 13087 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 RE: Channelization Project-Walker Branch City of North Richland Hills Tarrant County, Texas Project No. 7863 Dear Mr. Baskin: We are Consulting Engineers for Folsom Investments, Inc. (Mailing Address is 16475 Dallas Parkway, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75248) , owners of 73.03 acres of land in the City of North Richland Hills located at the intersection of Harwood Road and S.H. No. 26 in Tarrant County. The owner proposes to realign Walker Branch, a tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, as it traverses their property, to facilitate the development of this property. For your review, we have enclosed the following information: 1 . Proposed subdivision plat 2. Stream Profile for Walker Branch 3. Cross-Sections 4. Flood Study of this reach of Walker Branch as prepared by this office. It is our understanding that this project will not require Commission approval as it has a drainage area less than five square miles (ref. 156.10.01 .001 .d.5). The plans for this project will be approved by the City of North Richland Hills, which participates in the National Flood Insurance Program, prior to beginning construction. A letter of conditional map amendment will be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency on the project. This submittal is for your use in determining the need for Commission approval . Should there be any further questions, please feel free to call . Sincerely t)W :03peL-TALA._-‘_ William L. Boomer, P. E. WLB/cv Enclosures cc: F.E.M.A. Richard Albin Cecil Forrester �98�, G,NG Bobby McMillan 309 W.D.N.E VENT„67R6r. rop,,,oR,„,.«.R76,C2 GORDON S . S W I F T • C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R URBAN PLANNING, GEVELGPMENT AND ENGINEERING • TELEPHONE A.L. BI7-335-6464 December 8, 1981 Mr. Jim Starr City Manager City of Hurst 1505 Precinct Line Road Hurst, Texas 76053 RE: Walker Branch Addition Project No. 7863 Dear Mr. Starr: Attached is a proposed final plat for Blocks 1 and 2, Walker Branch Addition to the City of North Richland Hills. This is to advise, in accordance with the City of North Richland Hills Ordinance No. 807 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) , that this development contains alterations to the existing water course of Walker Branch. Should there be any questions, please feel free to call . InSSiincceerelly, Li?) William L. Boomer, P. E. WLB/cv Enclosure cc: Bob McMillan Richard Albin Cecil Forrester F.E.M.A. TEXAS 76102 �+;WP KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS INC CONSUI I INC. INGINIICI Ion AWorth-11.111.1,, December 9, 1981 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76113 Re: 3-959, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, WALKERS BRANCH ADDITION, PZ 81-62, REVISED FINAL PLANS We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. REFERENCES: A. K-E-F review letter of Walkers Branch Addition Preliminary Plans, (PS 79-63) , dated August 6, 1979. B. K-E-F REview letter of Campus Hills Addition Preliminary Plans, (PS 80-58) , dated December 10, 1980. C. Dunaway & Associates' letter to Wanda Calvert regarding Campus Hills Addition, dated November 8, 1981. D. K-E-F review letter of Walkers Branch Addition Final Plans, (PS 81-62) , dated November 10, 1981. E. Gordon Swift memo with information concerning approval of plans for Levee Improvements and Reclamation Projects, dated December 7, 1981. a. S.B. 521 b. Definitions 156.10.01.001 F. Gordon Swift letter to City of North Richland Hills regarding additions and corrections to Walker Branch Addition Plans, dated December 7, 1981. 2. The Developers Engineer has indicated in REF. "F", Items 8, 9, 14 and 19, that the Developer is aware of the water, sewer, curb and gutter and drainage, pro rata proposals, as described in Items 8, 9, Ref. "A", and 14, 19, REF. "D". The actual terms of the pro rata agreements should be specifi- cally noted in the City-Developer Agreement upon your con- sideration and approval of these plans. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 • ©17/263.6211 • METRO/267-3367 Page 2 -- December 9, 1981 -- Planning & Zoning Commission 3. The Developer's Engineer has indicated in REF "F", Item 5, that a re-zoning application is being prepared for the revised flood plain limits resulting from channel improvements, which he feels should correspond to the drainage easement lines. The basis for the new flood plain limit boundaries should be evaluated by the Federal Insurance Administration after the Walker Branch channel improvements are constructed. We would recommend that the revised "F.P." zoning limits correspond to the 100-year flood plain as determined by the FIA after their review of the Developer-Engineer's drainage study. We would suggest that this matter could be resolved after Council approval of the plat but before building permits are issued. 4. The Developer's Engineer has supplied us with copies of Water Resources Board drainage plans review guidelines noted in REF. "E" above. A formal review and approval by the Water Resources Board is not required for projects which have less than a 5.0 square mile drainage area. This development has about a 3 square mile area. The plans for construction and maintenance of the proposed drainage improvements must be approved by the City although such plans shall be in compliance with the rules and standards adopted by the Water Resources Board. We would recommend that evidence of such compliance by the Developer be provided to the City, although a fornal review and approval of the drainage plans by the Board would not be required. 5. As indicated in REF. "D", Item 8, we are in basis agreement with the Developer Engineer's drainage study and feel that he has adequately taken care of storm water within the development area, if the proposed improvements are properly constructed. However, we must point out that this develop- ment or any upstream development will most surely contribute to the potential for increased flooding downstream south of Grapevine Highway due to the increased runoff from building construction within the Walker Branch Watershed. With or without this development, the City should consider future channel improvements on Walker Branch between Grapevine Highway and the Airport Freeway. This construction has previously been recommended as part of the 1980 Capital Improvenents Bond Program. 6. We would refer comments on REF. "0", Items 11 and 12, concerning maintenance of the drainage channel and rip- rap bank protection to the Public Works Department. 7. As noted in REF. "D", Item 13, and as further indicated in REF. "C", a question concerning the alignment of Emerald Hills Way has, to our knowledge, not yet been formally resolved. The Developer's Engineer has noted in REF. "F", Item 13, that Mike Blubaugh has reversed his opposition to the plans and now offers no objections to routing Emerald Hills Way through the Walker Branch Addition to Grapevine Highway rather than through the Campus Hills Addition, (See REF. "B"). To avoid future problems when the final plat for the Campus Hills Addition is submitted for approval , we would suggest that you have Mr.Bl ubaugh submit a written letter to the City stating his support For the Walker Branch Addition plan. 8. Pending a resolution of the general items described above, and additional staff input as required, we are satisfied that the construction plans are complete and we are prepared to recommend them for your approval . Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call . je i RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:mh cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works G O R D O N S . S W I F T • C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R URBAN PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING • TELEPHONE A C 019-33S-6464 December 7, 1981 City of North Richland Hills c/o Ms. Wanda Calvert 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Walker Branch Addition City of North Richland Hills Your Case No. 3-959 Project No. 7863 Gentlemen: We have received the "Engineer's Letter" for the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat for blocks 1 and 2, Walker Branch Addition. We have complied with all technical require- ments. A number of the comments are informational in nature and have been noted. To aid in your deliberations on this project, we offer the following regarding the two "Engineer' s Letters" : PRELIMINARY PLAN PS 79-63 Letter Dated: August 16, 1979 1 . The owner prefers to maintain the addition name as proposed. 2. The drainage area map is included in the final plans. 3. A complete analysis of the storm flows on Walker Branch has been prepared. 4. The City Engineer has furnished a statement similar to the one set out 5. This has been shown on the final plat. 6. This has been shown on the final plat. 7. Done 8. The developer has been advised of this proposal . 9. The developer has been advised of these pro-rata charges. FINAL PLANS Walker Branch Addition Letter Dated: November 10, 1981 1 . See above. 2. This has been done. 3. This has been done. (continued • City of Worth Richland Hills December 7, 1981 Page 2 4. This has been done. 5. The current zoning division lines have been shown on the plat. It is anticipated that the zoning division lines will be redefined to correspond with the proposed drainage easement lines prior to recording the plat. We are preparing a zoning application to conform to the subject matter. 6. This has been done. 7. This has been done. 8. As we have now received the City Engineer's comments on this project, we are proceeding with the preparation of the proper applications for submission to the Texas Department of Water Resources and the Federal Insurance Administration. 9. The plans have been revised to reflect storm drain inlets at these locations. 10. These elevations are shown on the plat. 11 . These drainage channels will have a maximum side slope of three to one. These side slopes and Emerald Hills Way adjacent to a portion of the channel provide for access to the improvements for maintenance. 12. The drainage calculations indicate velocities of the magnitude of three feet per second, which is within acceptable ranges for unlined channels. We do not feel this is a problem. However, rip rap will be placed, if required. 13. This final plat has been prepared in accordance with the previously approved pre- liminary plan. We have visited with Mike Blubaugh, and he is in support of the subject plan. 14. The developer has been advised of this requirement. 15. We are familiar with State Department of Highways and Public Transportation permit procedures for construction within State Highways and will comply with these re- quirements. 16. The proposed paving section is 6" H.M.A.C. on 6" lime stabilized subgrade. 17. Previously approved Preliminary Plans. 18. The inlets have been added to the plans. 19. The developer has been advised of these pro-rata charges. 20. A valve has been added to the plans to more clearly indicate intent. 21 . Due to the size of the tracts and the nature of the development, it will be necessar, to evaluate the on-site fire protection with each project. (continued City of North Richland Hills December 7, 1931 Page 3 We have also enclosed a set of completed check list as furnished by staff on December 3, 1981 . Should there be any other questions, please advise. Sincerely, William L. Boomer, P. E. WLB/cv Enclosures cc: Richard Albin Bobby McMillan 14.. n . t KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC %. ,,, coNSVl [INC ENGINE11<S Fun A'bit}/-ndIla, November 10, 1981 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-959, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, WALKERS BRANCH ADDITION, PS 81-62, FINAL PLANS, (GRID 106, 1151 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would refer you to our comments in connection with the preliminary plans review for PS Case No. 79-63, by letter dated August 16, 1979. 2. The address of the owner should be shown on the plat. 3. The property owner names of the contiguous unplatted tracts should be shown on the plat. 4. We would request that the acreages of the individual lots within this subdivision, in addition to the total area, he shown on the plat. 5. This subdivision covers several zoning districts: L.R., L.R.-F.P. , M.F. , and M.F.-F.P. We would request that the limits of each of these zoning districts be shown on the plat. The area designated "F.P." (Flood Plain) , has historically been prone to inundation from storm waters. The use of this flood hazard area shall be subject to the provisions of Article VII of the Subdivision Ordinance as well as all the applicable provisions of the City's "Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance", No. 807. We would expect that the Flood Plain limits will be redelineated to correspond with the proposed drainage easement boundaries if these construction plans are approved by the Flood Insurance Administration and all proposed construction improvements are correctly implemented. 6. Building setback lines of 25 feet should be provided along Harwood Road, Grapevine Highway and Emerald Hills Way. 7. The Developer Engineer' s seal of professional registration should be affixed by his signature in the drainage certification statemnt on Sheet 3 of the plans. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD TEXAS 76021 • ©17/283-6211 • METRO/2673367 Page 2, Planning ° Zoning Commission, November 10 1981 3. The Developer's Engineer has provided us with a comprehensive drainage study report in addition to the construction plans for our review. We have reviewed the report and are basically in agreement with the procedure used in the analysis. However, since this development involves the alteration of an existing water- course the Developer must submit this report along with his con- struction plans to the Texas Department of Water Resources and the Federal Insurance Administration in accordance with the provisions of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, No. 807. 9. We would note that it is the Developer's intention to use the Emerald Hills Way right-of-way in addition to the proposed drainage easement from channel station 0+50 to station 10+50 to help carry the full 100-year discharge. Concrete flumes have been proposed at two locations in Emerald Hills Way to drain the street back into the channel . We would recommend that curb inlets be located along the west side of Emerald Hills Way with underground storm drain pipes discharging into the channel , rather than draining the west gutter by surface flow across the street to the con- crete flumes. Such surface water flow across asphalt will rapidly deteriorate the street pavement. 10. The minimum allowable finished floor elevations should be shown on the plat in addition to the grading plans. Based on the com- puted 100-year slater surface elevations shown in the plans, the minimum allowable finished floor elevations would range from about 582.3 at S.H. 26 to 584.0 at the north end of this development. 11. We would suggest that the public works department be consulted regarding the accessability of the drainage channels to maintenance vehicles within the limits of the proposed easements. Additional easement width may be required. 12. The proposed east side embankment of Emerald Hills Way which will also correspond to the west bank of the Walker Branch Channel could be subject to severe erosion from flood waters rounding the curved bend before paralleling Emerald Hills Way. We would recommend that rock rubble riprap, soil cement stabilization, or some other means of embankment protection he provided along the east side of Emerald Hills Way in the areas most prone to erosion. 13. The 1971 Tnoroughfare Master Plan shows Emerald Hills Way running from Davis Blvd. to Grapevine Highway which is provided for in this development plan. However, the location of the proposed intersection of Emerald Hills Way with Grapevine Highway, as shown on the Master Plan, provides for Emerald Hills Way to cross Walker • Page 3, Planning " Zoning Commission, November 10 1981 Branch at some point - this would require the construction of a bridge or culvert structure sufficiently large to pass the 109-year discharge. A preliminary plat has previously been submitted and recommended for approval by you for the property immediately east of this development, called the Campus Hills Addition. This plan shows Emerald Hills Way crossing through both the Walkers Branch Addition and the Campus Hills Addition as shown on the attached map. We would suggest that possibly a cul-de-sac could be con- structed within the Walker's Branch addition east of the channel and tied into the proposed street extension through Campus Hills Addition with this street renamed something other than "Emerald Hills Way". In any event, we would refer this matter to the City' s planning consultants for their comhents. 14. In accordance with the provisions of Council Policy Ho. 6, the developer is responsible for construction of curb and gutter and adequate storm drainage along Grap=_vine Highway: "Persons developing or building on laid along State maintained roadways shall follod the Specifications used in the Sub-Division Ordinance pertaining to the underground strom drainage, and curb and gutter. When it is feasible to do this, the person must sign a covenant running with the land that the curb, gutter and store drainage system will be paid for when it becomes feasible to build these facilities. In all cases the plans for construciton shall meet with the approval of the State Highway Dept." 15. Written permission shall be obtained from the Highway Department for any construction within the S.H. 26 right-of-way. 15. It is not clear from the paving plans whether a 5" thick asphalt section or 7" thick section is proposed for the 41' B-B Emerald Hills Way thoroughfare by the Developer. We would recommend that at least a 6" asphalt pavement section be used due to the expected heavy traffic loads. Also the anticipated percent of lime to be used in the stabilized subgrade should be noted on the plans. 17. We would note that the distance between Grapevine Highway and Druid Lane along Emerald Hills Way exceeds 1000 feet. We would refer comment on this to the police and fire departments. 18. Although the east proposed top of curb grades of Emerald Hills Way appear to be sufficient to adequately convey gutter flow properly, the west curb grade is flat fro& station 1+50 to station 5+00 and station 7+50 to station 10+00. We would recommend that the west curb grades be changed to match the east curb grades with curb inlets at the low points as mentioned in Item "lo. 9 above, to avoid surface water discharge across the asphalt pavement. fay v, rlaun lny a Lua lily NUVUMUer 10, 1901 19. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the two parallel 21-inch and 10-inch sewer lines located on this property. We would estimate pro rata at $8.00 per linear foot for a total distance of 2,248 feet. 20. The water layout plan should show that a connection of the proposed 5-inch water line in Harwood Road is to be made to the existing 6-inch line to complete the loop in that area. A wet tap may be required if the existing line cannot be taken out of service. 21. The total platted area has not been provided with adequate fire coverage. The building inspection department should closely monitor the construction phasing in this development to insure that all structures have adequate fire protection coverage and that additional water line extensions and fire hydrants are provided. Also all ease- ments for such extensions should be dedicated to the City. Should yoo have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call . ICHARD W. ALBIN, P.F. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Allen I3ronstal, Director of Development Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works r °Ya °'"'' KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Fort Worth-Dallas August 16, 1979 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-909, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, WALKERS BRANCH ADDN. (IRISH MEADOW, SECTION 4) , PRELIMINARY PLANS, PS 79-63 We have reviewed the preliminary plans for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would suggest that the subdivison name "Walkers Branch Addition" be changed to Irish Meadows, Section 4, to minimize the ever growing number of new subdivision names in the City. 2. We would request that an offsite drainage area map be included in the plans with a minimum of 10 foot interval topographic contours provided showing a delineation of the drainage areas tributary to the creeks and channels located in this subdivision, along with the discharge calculations. 3. The increase in storm water runoff on Walker Branch due to develop- ment of this property should be indicated on the plans. Also, calculations should be presented which show the capacity of the culverts on S.H. 121 and Harwood Road to receive the increased runoff anticipated from this development. 4. Due to the fact that a portion of this subdivision is within the flood plain area designated on the current FIA flood maps, a certifi- cation statement similar to that shown below should be added to the cover sheet of the plans: I certify that the construction plans for Walker Branch Addn. (Irish Meadows, Section 4) in North Richland Hills, located in Tarrant County, Texas, were prepared by me or under my direction on (date) , and I further certify that these construction plans were prepared in strict accordance with the design criteria set forth in Chapter 10, Section 1910 of the Federal Insurance Administration's Code of Federal Regulation dated April 1, 1973. Registered Professional Engineer Gordon S. Swift, P.E. Consulting Engineer Suite 103 (SEAL) 309 W. Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • REDFORD. TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211• METRO/267-3367 riaun my a cum pa commission, August 1b, 19/9, Page z 5. The zoning for this subdivision should be shown on the plat as suggested by the City Council , along with the zoning boundary lines showing LR, FP and MF designations as they appear on the zoning map for this area. 6. All contiguous property owners of unplatted property should be noted on the plat. 7. The location of Emerald Hills Way in the Irish Meadows Addition, adjacent to this development, should be tied to either the northwest or southwest property corner and shown on the plat. 8. The water layout plan shows a proposed 10-inch water line extension in Emerald Hills Way, which is consistent with the Master Plan. We would recommend that the pro rata assessment on the existing 6-inch water line in S.H. 121 be waived if the developer will agree to install the proposed 10-inch line without City participation in any oversizing. 9. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the two parallel 21-inch and 10-inch sewer lines located on this property. We estimate pro rata at $8.00 per linear foot for a total distance of 2,248 feet. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call . se / 41/ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities DAT- January 6, 1982 t' SUBJECT: PZ 81-40 Zoning Request on Block 4, Snow Heights North Addition, from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off-premise consumption. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This is the Gulf Station at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast Loop 820 (5100 Rufe Snow Drive). There were 4 property owners within 200 feet contacted. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with a vote of 4-1 with Mr. Bowen voting against. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A Page 2 P & Z Minutes December 17, 1981 Mr. Swift said he did not feel he could go down stream and into another city for mo• extensive study. He said he felt the ad made the necessary analysis. Mr. Swift said he was aware o he memo from the Public Work's Director ecil Forester, regarding the rip rap a he water main. He said he would do vu . ever to make him happy. Mr. Bronstad --;id he had talked with Mr. Forester •d they decided they had rather they sp g the slopes with coastal bermuda to t• city's approval . 'r. Swift said they would do that. He said they want this to serve as a green space for the area. PS 81-62 Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 81-62 subject APPROVED to the Engineer's comments and subject to the FIA review and the Texas Department of Water Resourses review and subject to satisfying the Director of Public Work's letters of December 9th & 16th and also sprigging the slopes. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Hannon voting against and Mrs. Nash abstaining since she did not understand it. 2. PZ 81-40 Request of Gulf Oil Corporation to rezone Block 4, Snow Heights North Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail- Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off-premise consumption. This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast Loop 820. Steve Ginsberg came forward to represent Gulf Oil Corporation in their request. He said they were asking for this for the best use of the land and a convenience to their customers. He said other stores on Rufe Snow, such as Stop n Go, 7-11, Winn Dixie, and Tenneco have all been granted this same request. Page 3 P & Z Minutes December 17, 1981 Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Ginsberg if he was aware the council would need the name of a specific person for this request. Mr. Ginsberg said it should be put in the name of "Steven I. Ginsberg". The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 81-40 Mr. Tucker moved to approve PZ 81-40 as APPROVED requested. This motion was seconded by Mrs. Nash and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Bowen voting against. 3. PZ 81-41 This request was withdrawn. WITHDRAWN 4. PZ 81-42 Request of Nasser Shafipour to 'ezone Tracts B1A & 188, Abstract 1606, '. Wallace Survey, from their press - classification of Local Retail to a pr.Nosed classification of Commercial . This propert located at the southeast corner of . is Blvd. and Mockingbird Lane and is unded on the east by Irish Meadows Add,3ion. -" Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Shafipour in his request. He said this is 10 acres which Mr. Shafipour has plans to build an office building which will exceed the Local Retail height. Mr. Tucker asked if he could convince the Board that he didn't need Local Retail Zoning. "/ Mr. Stembridge said he did not know if he could convince them or not, but Mr. Shafipour KNOWLTON—ENGLISH—FLOWERS, INC [tf s3 .y. coNSUi nNC rNcwrei<s / F1111 wolnrDen as December 11, 1981 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 81-40, LOCAL RETAIL TO LOCAL RETAIL SU SALE OF BEER, GRID 121 We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council . / a le RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:mh cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE HANK BLDG • BEDFORD TEXAS 76021 • 817/263 6211 • METRO/267-33E7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 81-40 the following described property shall be rezoned from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off-premise consumption BEING Block 4, Snow Height North Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-141, Page 9, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 5100 Rufe Snow Drive, at the Northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast Loop 820. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 17th DAY OF DECEMBER_ ,1981. �3 ' 4' ^ /1 CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND 2 TING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 81-40 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ,1982. MAYOR DICK FARAM ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY REX MCENTIRE DATE: 1 -7-82 SUBJECT: Property Insurance DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Bids were opened January 5th, only two bids were received. _ Councilman Freeman was appointed as representative to review the insurance bids. It is Councilman Freeman's recommendation that Council accept the bid of Alexander and Alexander. The policy is written for a three year term in the amount of $9,585.00 Alexander and Alexander $ 9,585.00 C. M. T. $10,425.00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION IIEQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: Fia6]naa c . +Hands v} is t ., L,.. ,A Iexander �a ,f6iA4 ; )exCLa� finder January 5, 1982 Ms. Jeanette Moore City Secretary Municipal Complex City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tx 76118 Re: Property Insurance Bid Dear Ms. Moore: We are pleased to submit our bid for the city's property insurance coverage as outlined in your Invitation to Bid Specifications. Also enclosed is a brochure which outlines some of the many services we have to offer our clients. Our policy would be written with Royal Lloyds of Texas and contain a Guaranty Bond providing 106% reinsurance through the parent company, Royal Insurance Company of New York. The Royal Insurance Company currently has a Best Rating of A+XV. Your claims would be reported directly to our office, which maintains a large claims and loss control staff. The Royal Insurance Company maintains a local claims office which is situated at 235 N.E. Loop 820, Hurst, Texas. I would serve as your account executive and be available as required to service your account. I have resided in the city for the past 24 years and have 33 years experience in the property and casualty insurance field. My experience includes several years with the property rating division of the State Board of Insurance, 13 years with the Reliance Insurance Group as a field supervisor and the past 13 years with the Harold Nowlin Company and Alexander & Alexander of Texas, Inc. After you have had an opportunity to review our bid proposal, I would be happy to furnish any additional information or answer any questions you may have. Very truly yours, V. y Miller cp enclosure PROPERTY INSURANCE BID I. Type of Coverage: Fire & Lightning, Extended Coverage, Van- dalism and Malicious Mischief and Special Extended Coverage. Deductible: $100 Extended Coverage; $250 Special Extended Coverage IL Length of Coverage: Term Years - Effective January 20, 1982 to January 20, 1985 HI. Amount of Coverage: $2,130,000 per schedule of locations attached IV. Replacement Cost Endorsement 4165 included. V. Information as to facilities and ability to service account included in cover letter and enclosed brochure. The Royal Insurance Company began business in 1891 and is one of the largest property and casualty insurance carriers in the United States. The company's best rating is A FXV and their capital is $9,300,000. VI. Our bid will be firm for ninety (90) days. VII. Three year premium for perils listed above covering items contained in the attached schedule is $9,585. The premium may be paid with one- third down in the amount of $3,195 and the balance of two equal annual intallments of $3,338.78 each. The interest on the deferred amount of premium is $287.56, which is based on an annual rate of three percent simple interest. Alexander & Alexander of Texas, Inc. / i � /�"� 6100 Western Place, Suite 100 AZJTHORIZEJ/BY: V. Roy Mlller P. O. Box 2950 January 4„x982 Fort Worth, Texas 76113 (817) 737-4000 exaTiler otlexander AMOUNT OF COVERAGE BASED ON 80% COINSURANCE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE ' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 1 . $ 1;too.o0U ON THE ONE STORY, APPROVED ROOF, NC-BRICN BUILDING LOCATED AT 7301 I .S.HWY. 820 N.E NORTH RICHLAND HILLS', TARRANT CO. , TEXAS OCCUPIED AS CITY HALL , POLICE STATION AND LIBRARY. FILE NO. CITY 10-150. 2. $ 250,000 ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILD 3 . $ 288,000 ON THE ONE STORY, SFR-SWR BUILDING LOCATED 4101 MORGAN CIRCLE, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT CO. , TEXAS OCCUPIED AS OFFICE AND FIRE STATION. FILE NO. CITY 10-10. 4. $ 20,000 ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILD 5. $ 45,000 ON THE ONE STORY NC-ICM BUILDING LOCATED $ 4001 RUFF SNOW ROAD, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT CO. , TEXAS FILE NO. CITY 10-140. 6. $ 10,000 ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILD 7. $ 15,000 ON THE ONE STORY HT BUILDING LOCATED 80 DAVIS BLVD., NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT CO., TEXAS OCCUPIED AS AUTO REPA FILE NO. , CITY 10-80. B. $ 2,000 ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILD 9. $ 22,000 ON THE ONE STORY HTB BUILDING LOCATED 73260 CHAPHAN ROAD, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Cam_ /00 TARRANT CO., TEXAS, OCCUPIED AS CONCESSI STAND. FILE NO. CHA 5-7326C 10. $ 30,000 ON THE ONE STORY HT BUILDING LOCATED 7925 MAIN STREET, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT CO. , TEXAS, OCCUPIED AS FIRE ST/ FILE NO. CITY 10-20. 11 , $ 5,000 ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILE -2- BASED ON 80% COINSURANCE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 12. $ 131,000 ON THE ONE STORY NC-BRICK BUILDING LOCATED 5328 DAVIS BLVD. , NORTH RICHLAND • HILLS, TARRANT CO. , TEXAS, OCCUPIED AS FIRE STATION. FILE NO. CITY 10-160. 13. $ 5,000 ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILDII 14. $ 192,,000 ON THE ONE & TWO STORY SFR BUILDING LOCATED 5328A DAMS BLVD. , NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT CO., TEXAS, OCCUPIED AS • FIRE STATION. FILE NO. CITY 10-170. 15. $ 5,000 • ON CONTENTS IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BUILDII • • FOR THE CONSIDERATION ' OF JEANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AN INSURANCE PROPOSAL - ON PROPERTY Presented by - - Brook B. Crawford - C.M.T. ^ Fort Worth - -- - - - - • - - Dated: January 4 ,1982 - ] - • PROPERTY Values : See Below - Perils : Fire , lightning , extended cov- erage , special EC . Values are based on eighty (80) co-insurance. LOCATION Coverage : Values : 7301 Int. 820 N.E . Building $1 , 100,000. North Richland Hills , TX Contents 250 ,000. 4101 Morgan Circle Building 288 ,000 . North Richland Hills , TX Contents 20 ,000 . 4001 Ruff Snow Rd. Building 45 ,000. North Richland Hills , TX Contents 10, 000. 80 Davis Blvd. Building 15,000. North Richland Hills , TX Contents - - 2 ,000. 7326C Chapman Rd. Building - 22 ,000. - -North Richland Hills , TX Contents _ 7925 Main St. Building 30,000 . North Richland Hills , TX Contents 5 ,000. 5328 Davis Blvd. Building 131 ,000 . North Richland Hills , TX Contents 5 ,000 . 5328A Davis Blvd. Building 192 , 000. North Richland Hills , TX Contents 5 ,000. COST SUMMARY Three Year Fire Policy $10 ,425.00 This coverage will be written through Connecticut General/Aetna Insurance Company, an "A + 15" carrier with a long history of fine service. C.G . Aetna and INA have just recently announced intentions to merge together. INA currently writes the casualty coverage for the City of North Richland Hills . DATE: 1-6-82 SUBJECT: Awarding of Bid - Conn Street Ground Storage Tank Repair & Painting DEPARTMENT: Utility BACKGROUND: Bids were opened Tuesday, January 5th on the repair and painting of the 2 million gallon ground storage tank. Five bids were received as follows: 1 . Service Enterprise Corp. $109,250.00 2. Waco Tower & Steel , Inc. $ 81 ,040.00 3. Don L. Owen, Painting Contractor $ 71 ,048.00 _ 4. Pittsburg Tank & Tower $ 67,766.00 5. R. E. Dow & Sons $ 61 ,933.00 Engineer's estimate was $65,000.00 • CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Recommend award of bid to R. E. Dow & Sons in the amount of $61 ,933.00 BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER; Utility Surplus 4/ • KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC CONSUL [INC LNGIN(IRS ; [nit Worth-Dallas January 5, 1982 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-418(B) , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, REPAIRING AND REPAINTING CONN DRIVE STEEL RESERVOIR In accordance with your instructions, bids were received today for the referenced project. This project includes the complete repairing, refurbishing, and repainting of the interior and exterior of the Conn Drive Water Storage Tank. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from five (5) Contractors. On the basis of the bids submitted, we would recommend that the Contract be awarded to the low bidder, R.E. Dow and Sons Company, P.O. Box 818, Mineral Wells, Texas 76067, in the amount of 561,933.00, for a total time bid of 60 calendar days. We will be available at the January 11, 1982, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc Enclosures cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 • 617/263-6211 • METRO/267-3367 C_ SCO N -- !.•.y.. * m 0 co z K �� O N m 61170= in o 0 0 'moo Q. 7 9 x A M 0 a n m o H, n i ; c m r+ C .+ 4 0 .0 . < `� j T n T to 3 'S = (D = .n CO •m o m 3 I-4 W -< K p 171 A I n .0 G 10 01 nMto09w ` a " 2 0 o -1 -1 o -i c m - n . a co T - 1 o 0_ m m o (7 co C3 m 7 m J T m a j - I n C) O --1 T .O T n m x 7 -' a 6CRN • '""1 n O APO rt in ra 0 -II n In r+ - CD ` = m = 2 o m a l o w ,c -T+ � -*. N y� z C r A o Cu T m fT F 'T O C r, T in O � A O O A C C l £ O3 co 3 n m m o -1 r m m• m a I Z O_a 9 0. a o o X J N rn a N K 1 O = N •y (D N -'. m 0 C) z C 3 3 I CD ,O Iy m m 3 m J 0 ZI '� Cu o+ I m o m w r+ C - .Z. 3 3 • O 0 O. t+ 'O O m r O m O A A O. j T a m m r -. A a I I I In a a D • S O H ..1 lh "0 r T 'O I r+ T CO 0_m 0' — m m a V) (D -0 I I m m 0_r+ T O. -+ O A r-. Z C P O -. I a a Q N C Z A Z I I rr F r+ < mC 3 d 0 3 '1 T ro - I O N O 1 1 rT 3 Z CD= Co• _ I I O co .0. CD a A Is- I I I N a 3 a 3 y I o rn _1 I 1 0 ° c< Xa<< a ' Fy I a n m o \ z v pn CD• m ' I 1 d "m0 I✓ O S -1 a a I o f+ 0 [+ - -+.m o. I 1 I o n - �+ F I T z cs i S N O 0 co I I I S o _ ,T "S O I I .0 0 F 0 , Z � os Z i0 I CO CO Co I I ZO C 0 O N 1 O 0 C z A 1 1 c c c c 1 AZ Nz A -1 m N -1 I —I 1 1 1 C m- m C m ' 1 1 r- r 7- -0 r r z r 1 I N VI V1 � 2 O 1 I I -c 0 0 1 1 H 1 I N .N AZ Co 3 -0 OA 0 o r 1 ' I N 0 -I \ ((DD o V m r I I CD 0 m W T • a • ➢ N J = —I 0 co -c O __M b V £X £ 0 Ni m 01 01 co A A Co C> (n - Co_ A° Z O 0 O W O O W N V In Co N W O O CO '-I CI)'• 0 O Z O C O 0 01 "1 N O 0 0 0 V X bi '0 C W 'O 'C-1 A N Ni r A = On � ' O-- 1 O O re Om -1 0 o N m ~ co Q A CO 0 0 C w (Ta *a ea 1 S 0 0 m a LO X • 0 Io 0 ,P 0 V -i 0 V 01 0 0 O On F A•"a O 0 0 01 CM cn w A B Z Ol O O V o O Ac O 0 O 0 0 N W A' 0 O O O M A2N 3 Na C. nO NJ N) A 2 - m I�-. • Co O cn r _ - ' A y A A O • Z Z O O • m -I O O • Ni C N .Ar N 3 V ' N (D r n . I �, yq. I m C C .. 0 01 CO .. CIl 9 ti £ N Ni V O CO C tim c 1.. O Co V -1 m m Z Z 0 ?E O 0 0 co N VI VI m hG A n X Z A CO O 0 A Co N ti SF C)CI O 0 0 0 n N O 0 0 O = I V1 ' o - m a C r z A co 0 n Can 0 rn CO O - -1 \ 0 0 • O O O N m V -1 - O •7 10 -I CO p t0 m 0 £ 40 I ■ I X X m o 00 V 1--• co A m a a s A V 0 P+ O be 0 0 A O 0 O O OD N N V O) ton O 0 O 0 'I 01 -1 . i____. v m L..1 ti 0 CO O 0 Z rr J O N �. N O Cu -PI .� N Z A .S d O o N 0 7 O (J O 7 n O n o 'O d S 7 r C 7C rt r4 rT j n -J O r ' - H ) N tp C O .o < Zr -1 6 -t -I n -5 m N .0 to .rD .0 (D CO -I A. 0 7 Inn -' .. CO n N co d 3 m .A-. 0 o 0 r* N d v o ' -5 -5 O "'S < N cT 0 T d -•. 'O (0 co O a I N 3 (D D -5 CD d 'S Z CO ' GI C) CO -I -5 L] S n (D x 7 -' - 0 ✓ o` yZ a o N d n rt a N J '1 0 A P N G 0 -1 at1 n -, N m = P = Cr r d -1 Cu I.< Cr -n d CO I O G c .T O N -5 CD k O 10 T Y = S 3 -' N - -5 to O A A C K f N T n 0 o - .O d D N fD O co -1 G-o 0 I c c C 7 3 o 7' X - 2 r r0 A = a � a In asx Co y > N D rt 3 a Ni -'. (D O 0 ', 2 0 I CO n ri N w r !D 'S o A Z 1 N o ID d ID D 0. In - 1 = (l I O O O. r+ D 3 N r+ -5 ID A o A A r 1 d a J Z a m m -. 1 I co 0-F d D .rD ' 'O - y N V I- I r+ Z 3 (JON N - T m D N 1 1 N N O. to -r a -'. O Zl ry I. 1 -{1 �. -f O z G A I I 3 3 N o a 7 < n 0 --' I d a P -' w rT - '--• z 1 1 r01- * rT < --' � N O A r7 CCI I C O M -5 C -1 I 1 -5 r+ -5 ` Z J �. ct C a 0 I -.. a -P. it o - 'n z I I d 7 7 -5 rt O 0 1 cu cu as CO LO e. -.5 Y I I a N - - N d Z y I N O = OI 3 7 m T I I 7 X .0 N 7 O a 'O •• I a-< x n < a I I Cu 0 N o I In V In N N ct z C. I I 3 N 'D -, o n- '-1 > 1 o r* o r1 --I -'. N H = 1 I o n -1 -"5 1 rt S a -11 Z 0 1 I N O O N = -5 "5 Z n Y N a T 0 = = LO I N co CD 1 1 20 20 C O N I O 0 r 2 A I I C C C C I A 2 AA 2 N --I C 1 I N a-+ N .- T I a -1 --I . 5 N - I a 3- 1 I •0 m m I c m •• 1 I r n y r 1 z r i__.VI -1 S 1 1 1 - Z 0 1 I H O — I -< O 1 1 a 1 H 1 I £A r Ac T rrl -o CStl > I Co CO =0 Z n- < • o rn CO I I o o N - - N d A A C I ry -1 - 7 0 V C r I 1 0 0 T - 0 0 Ni < C D Cn CO m -I o sa x I -I o o to x m a 10 N z 0 to rn Cr m cn w -1 Z = to - O Co 0 m 0 an Ni A A a cn A a • A r• tT 0 0 rT y V 7 Co A 0 0 0 0 w a A Cr 0 0 0 O 0 Co N a 0 0 0 0 7 m . c. v c A Z O -j M C) 0 -1 v C A Z O -1 m 0 0 Cl, -1 _ N m v c m A z y O --1 T Ni 0 T O o Ni N DATE: 1-6-82 SUBJECT: Awarding of Bid - Valve and Pipe Work at Conn Street Booster Station DEPARTMENT: Utility BACKGROUND: Bids were opened on Tuesday, January 5th, on the valve and pipe work at the Conn Street Booster Station. Six bids were received as follows: 1 . Oscar Renda Contracting Co. $27,500.00 2, Onyx Construction Co. $15,423.00 3. Larry H. Jackson $13,690.00 4. A. M. Farris $12,419.90 _ 5. Blakney Construction Inc. $12,400.00 6. Merkle Construction Co. $ 7,946.00 Engineer's estimate was $18,000. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Recommend award of hid to Merkle rnnstrurtinn rn in the amount of B7 946 00 BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: Utility Surplus INKNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC CONSUL CINC ENGINE CRS/ Fort worth-Rinds January 5, 1982 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-418(A) , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, VALVE AND PIPE WORK AT CONN DRIVE PUMP STATION In accordance with your instructions, bids were received today for the referenced project. This project includes valve and bypass piping at the Conn Drive Pump Station required to take the 2.0 m.g. ground storage tank out of service for repair and repainting. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from six (6) Contractors. On the basis of the bids submitted, we would recommend that the Contract be awarded to the low bidder, Merkle Construction Company, 4621 MacGregor Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76117, in the amount of $7,945.00. Although the Contractor failed to indicate a bid time on his proposal , he has verbally agreed to perform the work in 45 calendar days. We will be available at the January 11, 1982, Council meeting to answer any at'llat-OLIA).uestions you er may have concerning this project. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc Enclosures cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • B17/283-6211• METRO/267-3367 m c_ o CD m °w m . S•jZ 0 0 ■ z a '° p _CD ^ Cxz orn Z w -<< A . 10 _ _ • 0 I T•1 A o •4 n w -I 3 -1 -I o T 1 9 D - 0 .O N N A p =r O Y OD too DOO ➢ o ' r- o 0 r K 3 3 -I )v ^1 = D F a m At 0 = O 0 (0 N V1 (n A = CO• I C 3 c- •-• T D Z ro ID - A n -< I -1 re m IO . rn - 2 0 m 5 < < O o -O r 1 1 O CD (D m m '-I > 1 0 F F ' 0 zo 'A � ^ 1 z I I o rt rt , ,1 - Z I S =- _ rte-. 1 I 1 NF-' 1-' V I I r N N '-I -I r N 1 = _ - m I I - 0 O m 1 G G C 1 I cT G G Z ➢ I m _. _. z I I < < O o I -corp I I d 2 0 1 -+ N I I < = 2 0 1 m O_ m A I I tn T -I 0 m o 0 O \ G. I I m ( ➢ ro CO Z m N o = n 0 I Z b r z C OJ m m • y V C 3 - - Ph c m c N •• I I A 'O r z -r > CD o A - N - Z co - -< O O I 1 = ➢ 1 3 I. 1 _ -1 CO■ TI O i 0 > I 1 r A Z V r n < W I !n n -I - 0 • >< C I I A z r 1 m co o` n D -1 w 0 -I r+ o z v. 1s. w = x N a - co H In O CO a Z W 0 .. O '" V -i CO O 3S A A y 0 (D V N N H X Ol n CO W - L` VI 0 Ic ICO- C A P 0 '2_ _Z 0 0 = N • m � X n n O -I = ➢ m V O I , A •. \ F A m A w O n m N) Cl N V 1 V -IV O A V n N T N A ➢ CM c\' cn VI O V N X c* o O O O� Iv • n O O -1 IN N In 0 N 2 0 0 -1 O O A 'O C Z Z O 1 m C-) 0 Co H N P1 2 0 m 2 Z -1 c> --I m N 0 T O a N ti m m o o \� O Q 2 y < co m I- O O 2 A NJ = 0 r CD co ! II fl W -I 7 -I -I l - a O 21 00 0 O N Cu i •N r o -I o o \n z 1 L M 0, COO V z z CO r m - `moo .D 0 t Z n zO n Faa -I o = PL A O 3 N ; m 0 N_ J J Pei`m CO .O I 2 CD !D A Ca 0 r T-< 1 - M (D lD - 2 Q In 1 w mmm m -I )>D en el I I o - J I n 0 N 0 0 z 1 I O [Y c? A H N Y r O S _ S 1 G r 1 I =N_N_ -I -I n N m C I I - Gl co m I co c c =1 I an. N a• b I n - -. z I 1 < O co I c N 0 I I l I 4 O N I I C a V O N 6 m Y I N y I I '^ O£ m I tit m o I I o m I 3 I I D I y L CD I I I CD `` 0 Z I • D N o z Z cn . . O 1 p N I I C b I r z c N I • - m N I W y I I -p I c -1 I I 3 - I v t I I .0 m I .2 N •. I • n O a I r z r A o I I 1.1) - = -i CO I I 2 0 W I c I 1 n I - I I I I r A Z W T a I-I 3 W I I i w 0 -I V • IV 2 2 C I I I m a cIf Or D • to O 3 0 m H . O W 5 O 3 o_ -M v. 01 7-- Oi Y 0 0 ✓ V CO N z z Z O O tD tO O co V -1 O -< -I-I c1. a a y o to S A rn rn - x = w .-. to o co 0 o vm -1 -I 6 O O •• I m C r A 2 co -o rvr co • co l • z r (n n -1 •-. d O 7 m V 7 O• m • i z w c m W Y Ni T co -• O tG O N X 0 W V1 IV '• CD O 8* o7 A co 0- 0 a V -I •-' 2 01 co co cn O O -1 OX O -I . • o• r 1 C O co VI C O 1 C T W I-•A • to a - A 2 • CO 2 ry - co f+ [ 3 JI -i '-• W tn.T • m rn V £ O O -n 1 AO N T - D PS 7 (t H to co A N Ni (D 01 O a I.A O Co --4 A N N S ■-• ■-' co VI Ol (D a rD to ko -.1 A 4-. x Oz F to co N N c O A In z m A C ANr IT r 2 l •-• a o D -I W Oz31 N rn .. w co 21 V 7 -I -c . ▪ tO co S a _ A V O f N •V O O T I I W W I l 1.--. 0 A .. A 4 O Z D O s2 OI Ot O V rn -i -il O Cl to a N a co co .-• • 7c N DATE: 1-4-82 SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate #1 - Rufe Snow Road Project DEPARTMENT: Public Works _ BACKGROUND: Austin Road Co. is requesting payment for work completed through 12-1-81. Total contract price $808,193.14 Work Completed todate $110,388.40 Less 5% Retainage $ 5,519.42 Difference $104,868.98 Less Previous Payments 0 Due This Estimate $104,868.98 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of pay estimate #1 in the amount of $104,868.98 BUDGETED STEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General CIP Bonds _ KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC CONSULTING LNG INI IRS: Fort Worm-IS-Was January 4, 1982 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE I, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 1, dated December 23, 1981, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $104,868.93 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 1, 1941. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified oa-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment in amount of $104,863.98 he made to Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector P.S. Please send next Month's estimate first to Floyd McCallum for this signature. He will then transmit estimated to us for further processing. 550 FIRST STATE SANK BLDG • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267-3367 C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I M A T E P 1 ( F FILE F331' ESTIMATE NO.- 1 JOB NO.- 3-315 P"'OJECT DFDCRIPTIOR- ST. & DRAY; . I I:PROV.CN RUFE SN051 DR. IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD ( _R- NO'T'1 RICIHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTr1 RICHLAND HILLS , TX DATE- 12/23/8: TINT CHAPGFD THRO PERIOD- 51 DAYS CONTRACTOR- , USTIN ROAD CO'PANY FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LAPOR PERFORMED IN , ERIOD ENDIRG- 12/ 1/81 '.;;)p'< 05DEP DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 315 COMPLETION DATE- 8/22/8: PREVIOUS THIS UNIT N1. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 1 . UNCL . ST"FET EXCAVATION C.Y. 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 1 .53 0.01 2. SURNPADE STAR. W/LIVE SLOPPY S.Y. 0 .00 u .00 0.00 0.80 0.0! 3. LI'IE FOR STAB. SUPG'>ADE TON 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 77 .03 0.0' 4. SAW CUTS FOR RF"OVAL ?F EXIST. CC\C. & ASPH. L.F . 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.70 0.0 5. 'RF 0'VF FX15T. CURB & GUTTFP L.F. 0 .32 0.00 0.00 2 .25 0 .0 6. CONSTPUCT 6 " CURB & 13 " GUTTER , INC. RFINF. STL L.F. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 4. 23 0.0' 7. 4 " TIIK CL .R 2000 PSI :-O-C. FOR VEDIAN5 6 'ISC. USES S.F . 0.00 0.00 0.GC 1 .91 0.0 a. 5 " TH'< CONC . DP'WYS S.F . 0 .03 0 .00 0.50 2.93 0 .0 9 . 61 ' THK CONC. ''ALLEYS S.F . 0 .30 0 .00 0.00 3 .05 0 .0 17. mC-30 OR FA-HUMS PRIME CO, F INCL. SANDING S.Y. 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 C . 28 0.2 11 . 0C-2CP F;-..VPS ASPH . TACK OAT S.Y . 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.05 0.0 TY.A H"'AC , 2 ' , THICK CO'`'°ACTED IN 1 COURSE 5.Y. 0 .5 0.00 0.00 2 .60 0 .0 13. TY.O !I`'AC ,CO'PACTED 2 " T"K. S.Y . 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 2.78 0.0 14. TY.D h,"AC FOR TRANS. & " ISC TON 0 .02 0 .00 0.20 25 .u0 0. 3 15. TY. ) H"AC , 1 1 /2 " THIC< FOR DEIOUP CORSTRJCTION S.Y. 0 .00 0. 00 0 .00 2 .34 0.0 16. ADJ. ':'ATFR VALVE BOXES TO FIN. STREET GRADE EACH 0 .00 0 .00 0.30 125.00 0.0 17. TYPE II-A-A RFFLECTORIZED TRAFFIC MARKERS EACH 0 .00 0.00 0.00 2.90 0.0 18. TYPE I-C REFLECTORIZED TRAFFIC mARKE S EACH 0 .00 0.00 0.00 2 .78 0 .0 19. YELLOW TRAFFIC BUTTONS ( NOr,-?EFLECTOCIZED) EACH 0 .00 0.00 0.00 1 .58 0.0 20. 'WHITE TRAFFIC RUTTOr:S I `I'I\'-RFFLECTORIZED ) EACH 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 1 .56 0.0 21 . 1R " DIA . CL. III RCP L.F . 0 .00 273 .00 273 .00 16 .00 4369 .0 22 . 2111 ,11A. CL. III RCP L .F. 0 .00 40.00 40.00 17.00 680.0 23. 2t ! DIA. CL• III RCP L.F. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 18.60 0.0 24. 27 ' DIA . CL. III 1CP L.F . 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 20.50 0 .0 73. 33 ' DIA• CL. III RCP L.F. 0.00 50.00 50.00 25.00 1250 .0 2/8. 3E ' DIA . CL. 111 RCP L .F. 0 .00 50 .00 50 .00 3v .40 1520.'0 2r• 4 ° " 01 ' . CL. III '2(71) L .F . 0 . 00 640.3D 64u.30 43.90 28096.0 7-' . 5' ' 11A. CL. III " CD L.F . ) .TT 1'09' .00 109?.30 63 .20 74474.4 29. 5 ' STD . CUP' IJL'T EACH ) .00 ') .00 0 .00 1050 .00 1R ' STN. CUPS INLET EACH 3. 00 0 .00 0 .00 141(..0: 0.0 15 ' ST" . CURE IILAT EACH 3 . 00 0.00 0.00 2100.03 0.3 32. 70' ,. CORP INLET EACH 0 .00 0 .OJ C.00 2600.0, 3.0 C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I M A T E P 2 OF 3 FILE F3315 CSTI"ATP NO.- 1 JOP 00.- 3-315 200=CT DrSC219TI0'":- ST. & DRAIi . I ''PROV.ON RUFF SN'DJ DR. IH920 TO IN0U3• IRK (0-VD ) �N NO°T" " ICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAD HILLS , TX LATE- 12/23/? 1 I= CHARC-F0 TH3L' PERIOD- 51 JAYS ^)NTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY - cm) MATF° : \LS F(IP,IISHED AND LA9OR PFRFORVED ; PERIOD E'aDII',- 12/ 1/81 3RK T9017 DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 315 COMPLETION DATE- 8/22/52 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ':O. IT=" DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PiRICL AMOUNT 10 ' STAGF I ( HALF ) Ir.LET , INCL. Ti"v°R COVER EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 0.0C 201ETA F I ( HALFIINLFT , INCL . Ti -' COVF? EACH 0 .03 0 .03 C .00 1500.00 0.00 35. STE)Pv 03A IN VAULT AT 5T?. 11+71 L.S . 0.00 0.00 0.00 1720 .00 O.0C )9. ST02u oRAUL VAULT AT STA. 15+ 11 L.S. U.00 0 .00 0.00 1720.00 0. 3( )7. STO°M DRAIN VAULT AT STA. ?1+50 L.S. 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 1720.00 0.3C 39. STOR" "RAI ^. VAULT AT STA . 25+32 L.S. 0 .00 O .0C 0.00 1720.00 0.3: ?E. STOR" 3'AI `: VAULT AT STA. 35+73 L .S. 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 1720.00 0 .0C 40. STORF. TRAI "! VAULT AT STA. 29+55 ( " A " ) L.S. 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 32o0.U0 U.CC Al STO:V ^,CAIN VAULT AT SSA. 37+80 ( " A " ) L.S. 0 .00 0 .30 0.00 2503.00 0 .0,: r./. Cf,.C. F ICASEMFNT FOR LATER LIN="S , INCL. 'RFIMF. STL C.Y . 0 .0:) 0 .00 0.00 78 .00 0.3C <.3. FLFXI"L` 9ASF , CRUSHFP STONE F;R PAVE''F>.T RFPLACEVFNT C.Y. 0.00 0 .00 0.00 19.90 0.0.: A-4. TRAFFIC R°SI5. AT RUFF S^.0 DC . F. IH820 N . SERV . P') L.S. 0. 00 0.00 0.00 2550 .00 0 .0( C O T P A C T O R S E S T I M A T E P 3 OF FILE F331 ESTIMATE Nn.- 1 JOB NO.— 3-315 PROJECT DESCRIPTION`:— ST. & DRAIN. IMPROV.ON RUFE SNOW DR. IH920 TO INDUS. PK BLVD fl FR- 'NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE— NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , TX DATE— 12/23/8 ,F CHARGED THRU PERIOD— 51 DAYS CONTRACTOR— AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING— 12/ 1/81 ' MK ORDFQ ^ATE— 10/12/A1 CALENDAR DAYS— 315 COMPLETION DATE— 8/22/8 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT N9. IT°'-' DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT FIELD VERIFICATION OF JOB CONDITIONS 49D CO:'F !RMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES SCE DRAFT Copy ( O'•: "FP ' S PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE ) DATE— , 19 ,,PP'OVFD— TOTAL 110388 .4 ..ft!LTON—E':ALISH—FLOeER5 , INC. LESS 5 PERCENT RETAINED • • • • 5519.4 CONSULT : . . ENGINEERS DIFFERENCE • • • • . . . . . . . 104868 .9 PLUS 75 PERCENT '4ATLS ON HAND. . 0.0 -44C 1V, at44...- f a. TOTAL . . . . • . . . . . . . 104868.9 LESS PREVIOUS•PAYMENTS 0 .0 W.TF- a.3 198 DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE • • 104968 .9 ---- NOTE—PAY LAST A''OUN T SHOWN TOTAL °AF919G5 ( INCL. RETAIN. )-8 110384.40 TOTAL RID—S 808193 . 14 PERCENT— 13 .6 I'E CH49GED THRU THIS PERIOD— 51 DAYS TOTAL TIME— 315 DAYS PERCENT— 16. 1 DATE: 1-7-82 SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate # 2 - Rufe Snow Road Improvement Project DEPAaTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: Austin Road Co. is requesting payment on work aerformed through December 31 , 1981 . Total Contract Price $808,193.14 Work Performed $186,291 .90 Less 5% Retainage $ 9,314.60 Difference $176,977.30 Less Previous Payments $104,868.98 Due This Estimate $ 72,108.32 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of payment in the amount of $72,10832 BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUNBEa: General CIP Bonds r4/61- .- ] w-Y.,.,04 KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC ° VW, CONSUL I NC INGINI FRS ' Furl Winth-Dallas January 7, 1982 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE I, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 2, dated January 7, 1982, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $72,108.32, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 5, 1982. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment in amount of $72,108.32 ba made to Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate fora for preparing next month's estimate. ' aat-- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road hlr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector P.S. Please send next Month's estimate first to Floyd McCallum for this signature. He will then transmit estimate to us for further processing. 550 FIRST 5 SATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 617/263.6211 • METRO/267.3357 C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I M A T E P 1 OF FILE F33] ESTIMATE NO.- 2 JOB NO.- 3-315 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- ST. & DRAIN. IMPROV.CN RUFE SNOW DR. IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD -R- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX DATE- 1 / 7/E T1 . E CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 86 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1/ 5/82 WORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 315 COMPLETION DATE- 8/22/E PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 1 . UNCL. STREET EXCAVATION C.Y. 0 .00 500.00 500.00 1 . 53 765.0 2. SUBGRADE STAB. W/LIME SLURRY S.Y. 0 .00 11200 .00 11200.00 0. 80 8960.0 3. LIME FOR STAB. SUBGR4DE TON 0 .00 133 .00 133 . 00 77 .03 1C241 .: 4. SAW CUTS FOR REMOVAL OF EXIST . CONC. & ASPH. L.F . 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.70 O.0 5. REMOVE EXIST . CURB & GUTTER L.F. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 2.25 . - O.0 6. CONSTRUCT 611 CURB & 19 " GUTTER . INC. REINF. STL L.F . 0.00 0 .00 0.00 4.23 O.C. 7. ‘ " THK CL.B 2000 PSI CONC. FOR MEDIANS & MISC. USES S.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 .91 0.0 8. 5 " THK CONC . DRWYS S.F. 0.00 0 .00 0.00 2.93 O.0 9. 6 " THK CONC. VALLEYS S.F. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 3 .05 - - - O.0 10. MC-30 OR EA-HVMS PRIME COAT INCL. SANDING S.Y. 0 .00 11200.00 11200 .00 0.28 3136.0 11 . RC-2 OR EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK COAT S.Y . 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0. 05 0.0 12 TY.A H"AC . 2 " THICK COMPACTED IN 1 COURSE S.Y. 0 .00 0.00 - - 0.00 _ - -2.60 --0• C 13. TY.D H'1AC .COMPACTED 2 " THK. S.Y . 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 2.78 0.0 14. TY.D HMAC FOR TRANS. & MISC TON 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 25 .00 0.0 15. TY.D HMAC . 1 1/2 " THICK FOR -- DETOUR CONSTRUCTION S.Y. 0 .00 11200. 00 11200.00 2 . 34 26208 .0 16. ADJ . WATER VALVE BOXES TO FIN. STREET GRADE EACH 0.00 0.0C 0:00 - -- 125.00 -- O. 0 17. TYPE II-A-A REFLECTORIZED TRAFFIC MARKERS EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.90 D.0 18. TYPE I-C REFLECTORIZED -- - - TRAFFIC MARKERS EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.78 O.0 19. YELLOW TRAFFIC BUTTONS ( NON-REFLECTORIZED) EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 58 0.( 20. WHITE TRAFFIC BUTTONS ( NON-REEFLECTORIZEDI EACH 0 .00 0.00 0.00 1. 56 O.0 21. 18" DIA. CL. II RCP L.F. 273.00 290 .00 563.00 16.00 9008 .0 22. 21 " DIA. CL. II RCP L.F. 40.00 0.00 40 .00 17 .00 680.0 23. 24' 101A. CL. II RCP L.F . 0 .00 0. 00 0.00 18 .67 0.0 24. 27 11DIA. CL. 11 RCP L. F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 23. 50 - 0.0 25. 33 11DIA. CL. II RCP L.F. 50 .00 0.03 50.00 25 .00 1250.0 26. 36 1 / DIA. CL. II RCP L.F. 50.00 455 .00 505 .00 30.40 15352.0 27. 48 1 ' DIA. CL. II RCP L. F. 640.00 185 .00 825.00 43 .90 36217.5 28. 54 " DIA. CL. II RCP L .F. 1092 .00 0 .00 1092.00 68 .20 74474.4 29. 5 ' STD. CURE NLET _ _ EACH 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 1050.00 O.0 3C 10' STD. CURB INLET EACH 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 1410.00 O.0 31 . 15 ' STD. CURB INLET EACH 0 .00 0.00 0.00 2100.00 O.0 32. 20' STD. CURB INLET EACH 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 2600.00 D.0 C O N T . R A C T O R ' S _ E S T I M A T E P 2 OF FILE F3: ESTIMATE NO.- 2 JOB NO.- 3-315 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- ST. & DRAIN . IMPROV.ON RUFE SNOW DR . IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD OWNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS °LACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , TX DATE- 1 / 7, ME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 85 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY rJR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1/ 5/82 WORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 315 COMPLETION DATE- 8/22, PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUR' 33. 10 ' STASE I ( HALF ) INLET . INCL. TI"P.ER COVER EACH 0.00 0 .00 _ 0.00 900. 00 0, 34. 20' STAGE I ( HALF ) 1 ':LET , INCL. TIBER COVER EACH 0 . 20 0.00 0.00 1500. 00 0 , 35. STORM DRAIN VAULT_ AT _ STA. 11+71 L.S. 0. 00 0.00 0.00 1720.00 0, 36. STOR' DRAIN V^ULT ST.:. 15+71 L .S. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 1720.00 O, 37. STC .- IN VAULT AT -" - STA. 23+50 L.S . 0 .00 0.00 0.00 1720.00 0. 33. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 26+32 L.S. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1720.00 0. 39. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 35+73 _ L.S. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 1720.00 0. 40. STOP°" DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 29+55 ( " A " ) L.S. 0.00 0.00 0.00 3290.00 0 . 41 . STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 37+80 ( " A " ) L.S. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 2500.00 0. 4,. CONC . ENCASEMENT FOR WATER LINES , INCL. REINF. STL C.Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.00 0. 43. FLEXIBLE BASE , CRUSHED STONE -- - - - --- - _- -- FOR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT C.Y. 0 .00 0.00 0.00 19.90 0. 44. TRAFFIC RESIG. AT RUFE SNOW DR. & IH820 N. SERV. RD L.S. 0.00 0.00 0 .00 2550 .00 O. C O N T R A C T O R I S E S T I M A T E P 3 OF FILE F331 ESTIMATE NO.- 2 JOR NO.- 3-315 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- ST. & DRAIN. IMPROV.ON RUFE SNOW DR. 1H820 TO IADUS. PK BLVD OWNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . TX DATE- 1 / 7/8 I _ CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 86 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMOANY FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1 / 5/82 WORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 315 COMPLETION DATE- 8/22/8 PREVIOUS THIS - UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT FIELD VERIFICATION OF JOB CONDITIONS AND CONFIRMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES - - - - _-"- - -- - - - RY- see D(zeFT Conk (OWNER ' S PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE ) DATE- . 19 APPROVED- TOTAL 185291 .9 KNO''LTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS . INC . LESS 5 PERCENT RETAINED . . . 9314 .6 CON, TING ENGINEERS - - - DIFFERENCE • • • . -. . - ; - 176977.3 /�//iy//�, PG PLUS 75 PERCENT MATLS•ON HAND. 0.0 `-'w"" �- /-C TOTAL . . . . . . 176977 . 3 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 104868. 9 DATE- 7 . 19 8'L DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE • • 72108. 3 7 ---- NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN TOTAL EARNINGS ( INCL. RETAIN. ) -S 186291 . 90 TOTAL BID-S 808193 . 14 PERCENT- 23.0 TIME CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 86 DAYS TOTAL TIME- 315 DAYS PERCENT- 27.3 DATE: 1-4-82 SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate #6 - Booth Calloway Road Project DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: Austin Road Co_is requesting payment for work completed through 12-1-81 . Total Project Cost $474,699.15 Work Completed todate $313,927.85 Less 10% Retainage $ 31 ,393.79 Difference $282,544.06 _ Less Previous Payments $243,564.57 Difference Due $ 38,979.49 Please refer to engineer's letter of 12-11-81 for ex.lanation of .ncrete strength on culvert. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of pay estimate in the amount of $3.8.979.49 BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General CIP Bonds It7&d-'5,4n KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Fort Worth-Dallas • I : : r , ,. . i- rnr' i • /lr r ! City Co:ncil :, 11 Oct:1 .:iChin0..1 'iflIS - 11n hart, • IC' i i.l: 'Iii !°, Tex.'s 79111 is-0 CT' c : i' ni.: „'irl 't _ ____ _ _ _ __________ __ !, it_ ,. -_1,1: - r).. . , ,;I ,)r«c. .:rii..1 '?., -srl ^I+ , .I• , .-•d ov ,� ;° _ . 'n 1.1st 'n ',oad ,IcaFM' 1'. .1" }WIC of '). 1 flr 3i.,t'i313 Curl-y;(1,20 a1:cl r,o,-,• eectiD-D ._ r,P the rr'r )ri .cr'd pr 'icier. �s of cc=1.1s • 1, i4 ,I. ▪ J ;11,.: , ti - r , 11 ' - t •, 'ir - ,f ; .. yObr ro )r?5 n' t`fii '' -iov! .Cal '.0 Di iPJ ;!arc„ In; . I:Iiytt:r) :ill t', • 'stf'n: , v : J. 0 .,.,. 21:c:(42.• .• . it . .: -tuii . , ., , :l _L')'1 ..• ni tn? I:'t1 I , I{,h. 1.1 -15;1u - c , i' .'B ,,. CI'1 'l^ . CO. , . 1. ., , -”r` , a S. .' roil HUI 3 c tti: I ,ct: Cu; tr ctor 13 nr ; 1., fur;f,, '.,. I a _a ,n'• :'i :, :e 'r'- ,ri : :1t. s , i Ca.._' cc-, .p 1 ■ t 1 -. . I ..i1 'rOnISC,'.r. ' i,' •-t). "a)1 : .^I:<s'-'e.,, l;-I;: NY-4' r.--"a !r '11.,n P.r.tn ad , ni ' - tip if .y,, ,nt •'r• 'lrr/:! :'c°a111..1, City ir1 n ct?e 'iis si :n ,-,re ;;e: vi? I,en Tr?, cnit - , .. ti fur fir^.:,di' 'r- :• -sing, 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267-3367 • C C T ° ,. 7 „ ' S .: S T I ' A T E i• I CF FILE F31:1 • ECT D.SCPIOTI .- BonTri CALL.:..AY R3•+ STREET ARD DRA ! AGE I3•PJ'JE . - 475 • 3- PT' ' ICS ' ND HILLS >_LACE- aG't'n 5IC- _.,S0 r1ILLS JATF- 12-1-81 ' I c CH GC, ', �_.'< i J7- 192 MAYS C )'.T 2.,CT Ti- . --- ___ SST I : ..,SAC CJ.�PA .° ''AT=,PIALS :OoniS_EC . L• " P=_- FCc'. . PEUUJ: E'.JI .G- '=r OP 1E "41'=- 5 / 19/Q1 CAL.-:\ •A2 DAvS- 29: CO::>LETIJA DATE- 2/21/3; .=VI2JS THIS UNIT I. IT5 •1 OESCRI'TI2N u'IIT EST : = EST ! ' ATE TOTAL PRICE A10Uf:T • U"CL . STREET FYCAVAT ' C . Y . 0.00 2 . 12 2. Sllor..ADE PREP. , .0 AD`' IX S.Y . 0 .00 1 .75-- __ 3. 5'.' •GRAUF 5T4=. '< IT•; LIVE SLOPRY ( 5 " Tr'IC< I S.Y . 3 . 70 1 .23 L I'.IE Fro STA^ ILIZ= ) SU'GRA 'E G' 2 75 .00 5 . 5Ai, CUTS =fR -r • RF = 4I5T 4 . - c:i . L .F. 3 .00 1 .03 5. d• '/OVE EXIST . U.R3 S GUTTER L .F . . .90 -..- 2 .05 7. RF.•0J° =x IS . 5 " THK CONC . _ ')R I VE. 'PY5 S. F. ' .3U 1 .03 D . C ONST,:1'C�: 5 ' ' CUn3 . G"TTF= . I 'iCL. ';FI :F . 5TL L.F. 3 .)0 4 . 91 A. 5 ' T"iCK C0'..C. VALLEYS , _-_! CL. RE IMF . STEEL S.F. 0.00 3 .21 .C. L'C-3C CR E4-HVVS PRIME COAT WITH S ar.7 5.Y. 0.00 :i . ?C-2 ,^.0 FA-•'V05 'lSPH . TAO/ :,.AT S.Y. 0 . :3 0 . 11 2. TY. 4 H'.: C , 4 " T UCK , CO-P. IN 2 E(3UAL C3,.'.'S S .S.Y. 0. 75__-_- 5 .70 . 3 . TY.D ,:C , C.Y:•P4CT°_D 21 ' EE.Y. ,, ..70 2 .93 . 5. TY. ,-VAC FOR TR A,S. IEC . USES - _ o TJ'. _J. ADJ . EXIST . SA:,. . :::_' ,.r. TO FIN. I5F2 STREET GR4"' EACH 12.: .2:0 A 5. ADJ. EXIST . .5. CLF ,OUTS . ., , c VALVE 50XE5 9.."‘C.1 0 . 70 120 .5'0 . 7. 5 " TniC< CO>,CEETE I ':CL. PETE . STEEL S.F. 0.450 3 .46 . 5. 4 " THICK CC•IC JTE Sn .::.LLS I '- CL. RE! '•'° STEEL S.F . J..;' 3 .43 RF"OV= SET 54CC & 'DEL_CPT- FXISTI^:G F. L.E. 1725 . :) 0 1725 1 .62 2794 .50 nVF EXIST . CULVERT -TR,.C . AT CALuO:;AY •'.1 . 5 C. nt;. L.S. -- --1 . 0 0 1 115: .337050.00 ' L . '.•',"C.L . C1•4. -: L EX,CAvATI:. : C.Y. 3 ,,,, .pc, 277 3677 4 .0014708 .00 CL.A ( 3000 vSI ) F.,'2 FJd C'ULV .&TRA :3. SnUC. C.V. 290 . 07 iO4N7-- 331 .97 247 . J081996 . 59 • :L., ( 2 : . . 9S I I U:F. L•''.C . FOR .L I ' :R ''I S.`. j5F5 C. . . A /5.47_ 133 .47 _ 2,._ 0026694 .00 - , " L� - 0 12 100 .80 , . - Clio /=JT „ Li .G L. r. J .; : _ _/ 44 148 17.70 . 2619 .60 C -- . r ' . - . ' S S , I A r E r c a __ __ _ _ fI : F: . •_ .% .i= "T RIB TIn . - r JoT ..., • AY .J A; ST3IET 4 .3 2,.'.A - ;,GE I 'P ?J'v[ ♦TS -- .0'+T-' 7ICr'L.1\J HILLS GLACE- :T' 71.3-0-4'..) . TLLS L;412-1-81 C“A--"E0 "f„ot_r " '. I3 192 ,.,Y6 - T2A ";: AuSTI ;. 4443 .2 'u:. 4 ( -.'O 'ATFRI 4LS FUr.r.' I SHE_ , A L4 )/0.4 PEPFC : 4E0 :U0 i_ .D ').: , '%" JET: :4TF- 5 / id/.51__"' AL`.---_SAYS- 200 C S PL I.0. 0A [- 2/21 /+ p7.E7:3'JS THIS U .IT [ TE i OESCRIPT :J\ UNIT EST i"'TE EST i't1TL T0T,:L PRICE A- GU..T ., A`:Cr' P PLATES FOR CJL_'VERT -_ - _-AiLI (:G EACH 16 .30 0 --7(---r6 _ 26 .50 424 ... 00 7. POSTS FDR CUL:'EgT RAILINS EACH 3 .:.0 j (e 16 16'.0J 2624 .00 ''I -F . STFELFO3 CULVE?T_ ° _ T?d°SITIO'r STR.,CT.JRES L . 399332 .Jv.) $AIa`�- • 20C< ; : - "'D ( 12- i .CHI C.Y . 0 .,,, 164 42222 . 7 3 . 3312666 .81 164 164 S, .CL 8692 .0u ==n7 .C. '+ATF° I ' L ( 4- i ) 5 55 1045 .00 . . 1 � ' .., . ( CL. iii ) 7C? :iC!L. .0 . 0 EXC. . °'F . t +ACKFILL L .F . 217 . J3 0 217 21 .00 4557 . 00 ' 2 . 21 ' . ( CL. I I III_?C I ' CL• FAC. tEv4 . 6 ',C'<FILL L .F . 1:d 1,, 0 --159 23 . 10 3672-90 . 30 " DI ... ( CL. III ) R CP : '.CL. _xC. , +'4 . 6 u;.C• c - _ L .F . 33J .C2 0 300 35 . ::2, 10500 . 00 .. 31 " JIA. ( CL. III ) PCP INCL. FXC. .FV9 . , 3ACKFILL L. F. 321.40 0 321 4C . JJ 12840 .00 • 35" '3 I:'-. ( CL. III ) RC° I':CL . __-Fx _ . _v"' . , -ACCFILL L. E. 450 . 03 0 450 ‘"" 21150 .00 H . 3 c " JI 4. ICL. I I I I ^. I .CL. _ SxC .' d, -ACKFIL! L. P . 356 -, 3 0 356 5 .J';9580_00 . 5C " x31 " 1'ULLY LI 'EJ G CI)ATFD C-'' PIPE ARC" L .F . 214. 00 0 214 63 . J313482 .00 5 ' CU" ; '.LET EAC-, 0. 00 0 0 1054 .03 EA _ 0 0 132. 0 .3 .▪ i5 ' '33 "'LET EACH 0 . 00 0 0 2:..3,, . ,,., -1 . ST.0R- 04:. I = AT VAULT T 0 L ..,. 1 . 0.. 0 _- _1 ?15. .,,,. 3150 .00 '2 • ST03" ...PAP.. VAULT AT STA . 10+R4 L.S. 1 ..iU 0 1 21.;7 .L0 2100 .00 • i . STC 'I '?AI \ VAULT AT STA. - 2100 .00 4444 5; 15-33 L .S . 1 . .0 0 1 21..,. .,,,, I VAULT AT ST. L . . 5 . 921-53 L. S. 1 . 00'- 0 __--- _.1- .: 19 . 30 1900 .00 ' r „ : IA . ( CL .501DUCTILE NC ', '.. ATE2 LINE 264 •j'-3 4752 .00 1 •'ATr2 LINE L . =. 236 . :0 0 236 c 3304 .00 -7. :rUCTILE I 0P.: = ITT I:'G S - --- L . 2052 . 0_0 0 2052 3078 .00 • . . 1f . t �! TAP. SA"ILF 6 3 " TAJPI VALVE /Th EACr. 2 . 02 0 2 1630 . ,; 3200 .00 , . " ; T14. SLrc/r 6 _ T. c ) i . r. _LJC „ ,i - -- 0 - g- ' - - 3600 .00 . " . q " T44. 4_E = 2,_ , .- " 0 0 - = 0 . . . - 44, 4__4 ., .. " - - - - -- - - -- - T,,.:J i ..l ' ;LVE ../ 10A EACP ... ), 0 4 4240 .00 C ' T '> C T , :. ' 5 7 T . 4 i E r 3 CF - FILE FS31 -,▪('SECT JE _% IDTI;Y - 3,1:T^ C1LLO A ?'J,;., ST=-ET =AI .AGE I•. suVE .- :.TS 2- - PMN ' ICnL:.\C ii LLS 4.L .CE- .O"TF 4IC.ILA \S HILLS OATL_ 12-2-81 ' :•= :G=� i..ol: c° : i,.t'1- 192 . . .�� . - __ _ __--- (-a _ .- • -, . , J'2- nUa : i :. ,Jnn Cy;F: .Y ▪ ATPP I ALS =U . IS)'Ec, .'ra Pc'<F , . JE2I.,_■ E .DI '.G- C - T - 5 /14 /P1 CAL- 'CAR _.AYS- 2 =J CG' PLETIJ,. DATE- 2/21/5 PR_'IGU5 T- IS W. IT O. ITE'1 ^ESC'' IcTIO:! U'' iT ESTIVATE ESiI 'ATE TOTAL PRICE AVOU`:T 2. '.iAT°P 3F '. IC_ T.2A SF: 1 EAC- 9 . 23 0 9 42J .OU 3780 .0( .c ATEQ SERVICE LINE L.F . 2d5 . .)0 _ --0 285 5 .50 1852 . 5( .. RELOCATE_ EXISTING F17= '-Y?:A^T EACH 1 . 33 0 1 6o3 .OJ 600 . 0( )5. ' CIA. EX. STRE:4GTF ■ .. . SA'I. 5=:'7; LIE L.F . 445 .:,0 0 446 15 . 50 7136 .0( :5. _SA• SP .:1E7 "FCTI3'. F_r,C.y ..,O 0 4 i6_ . 640 .0( , 7. 4-F C- SA " . CF'.'E")SE%V. LF =1 L .P . 17 ). ), ..-0 170 0 .50 1105 .0( . 4. 2 " DI A .&3 ' ' 3 U . '4ATER Li E T'RA\JS F CJ„ ECT I S EAC, 5 . 5 500 .00 2500 . 0( .9. LI Di . . SS% t . ) 2. , . .. 2 91.. .30 1820 . 0( " ' ') i S .S. ( C.O. '',,. 1 ) L .F. 243 .33 240 19 .05 4764 .0( 1 . TY.D H'.AC 2.7-T PL. , C . 2. 1 ) ,Y . 2 . 0 4 . 14 0 :2. BX6 TAP , SLV.`,/VAL ( C. 0. NO. 1 ) C' 1 .3C 1 ---" 1145 .33 1145 .0( 3 . Cn'•'C . E' CASP E',!T (c. G. 'i0.3 ) L .F . 122 .30 122 17 . 53 2135 .0( '.0. #5 11/2" Water Ser_viceTransferes_ EA _ 1 5.22 . 50 522 . 5( " " Line LF 5 15 8 . 80 132 .0( 2" " " LF 0 20 9 . 90 198 .0( '.0.#4 Storm Drain Vault or Sta. 6+40 _ 1 6418 . 50 6418 . 5( ncrease LS price of Item 41 1 3338 . 50 3338 .5( :dd excay. in rock 74 174 yC'50 957 .0( :onc. collar for SOX 31 CMP _ 2 6.80 . 00 1320 .0( 'EILD MODIFYCSOX 3310CMP.. ' C.% 'ii i T L. S 4 54'0 .00 2200 .0( F CO',FIR:'ATia •' PAY QUA,iTI T IES g LE55 _ /,,_, 4 7,3 5 FoR vuorR- STZEN67/1 Co N60Ere owl CcL✓E27 `PECK CSee- Le-Iler o/ /A/iitsv;oY_�P ' s a >JUP.T ?EP? SEiTAT lvFI _ --- - _- - c V 33,939d =P7OVFC- TOTAL __..3.1-5-1-7.-C(�( ,. LT;..-- LIS"-FLCr - =3 . INC. LESS 13 PERCENT ETAI :∎=O 31518 . 3: CJ':S'JLTI ,G E`:C ::.EE S _ -__ --___- - DIFFE1E_CE . . . . . • • • • • • 283664 .81 PLUS 75 PEIRCE 41 , 'ATLS 01 HA:.i). . ia AL 283664 . 8( LESS P'2_VIO'JS :'AY' E';TS . . 24�3�5�cp4q�.�5 ATF- . 19 DIFFE,2ENCE DJE TnIS LSTI!ATE . . 401A8 3 .. T -P Y LE,: T , ...;i1:7 SH3 . 0_3047949 T-L ? i ' SS ( . .=L . .=_: 1 - i , OT' iii-. 47469 15 FE :C E : /2 C-,. <Y. T- T • i5 Cr' . ;77- 'A'. S 707L E- 2P, _..YS -2 RCE,\T- A- KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC CONSULIIM. RL.INFFP, I1 Ili [III December 11, 1981 Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills , Texas 76118 Re: 3-318, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD BOX CULVERT In accordance with the provisions of Section 3.1.06(b) of the Modifications of the General Conditions of the Contract Documents for the referenced project, the Contractor has secured the services of a Registered Professional Engineer to evaluate the circumstances of the concrete strength tests per- formed for the culvert superstructure. Enclosed is a letter report of his findings and recommendations. He has concluded that since the core tests demonstrated concrete strength in excess of 85% of the design strength, then in accordance with the provisions of ACI-318, Para. 4.8.4.4, the concrete should be judged acceptable in view of the inexact nature of the sampling and testing procedures used. We would concur with the opinion that the finished culvert will still safely meet its intended use, but with quality measurably diminished below specified amount. Because the measured core strength tests average 95% of the design strength, we would recommend that a price credit be provided in an amount proportionate to the percent of superstructure strength below the 3000 p.s.i . requirement. Based on an estimated concrete quantity of 101 cubic yards in the top deck and sidewalks, where the core tests were taken; an average strength re- duction of 5% of the required 3000 p.s.i . ; and a concrete unit price proportionately reduced by $12.35 per cubic yard, we would recommend re- ducing the contract amount by $1,247.35. If a Council decision is required on this matter, we will be available to meet with them during a Pre-Council session or whenever convenient if necessary to initiate a change order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any questions. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:mh Enclosures cc: Mr. Charles W. Williams, City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road M. A. Vinson Construction Co. , Inc. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 017/203-6211• METRO/267-3367 DATE: 1-7-82 • SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate # 7 - Booth Calloway Road Improvements DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: Austin Road Co. is requesting payment for work completed through December 31 , 1981 . Total Contract Price $474,699.15 Work Completed $450,746.01 Less 10% Retainage $ 45,074.60 Difference $405,671 .41 Less Previous Payments $282,544.06 Due This Estimate $123,127.35 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of pay estimate in the amount of $123,127.35 BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General CIP BondsC,�//� /, KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC CONSULTING INGINCCRS / Furt VA'urth-Dallas January 7, 1982 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-318, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE_ NO. 7 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 7, dated January 7, 1982, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of S123,127.35 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 31, 1981. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the iten extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment in amount of 5123,127.35 be made to Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R'WA/l jc cc: Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector P.S. Please send next Month's estimate first to Floyd McCallum for this signature. He will then transmit estimate to us For further processing. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD TEXAS 76021 • 617/263.6211• METRO/267-3367 C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I M A T E P 1 OF FILE F33 =STI"ATr ' 7 JCR N0.- 3-318 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- EODTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE I'• PROVE(EKTS ? ''FR- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 1 / 7/ T c CHARGE') THRU PERIOD- 232 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY =012 MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERECR'+ED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1 / 4/82 'ORK ORDER DATE- 5 /18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- 2/21/ PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTI "ATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 1. L1CL . STREET EXCAVATION C.V. 0.00 2254 .00 2254 .00 2 . 12 4773 . 2. SURPRADE PREP, + NO ADMIX S.Y. 0.00 172 .00 172 .00 1 . 75 301 . 3. SU°GRA)F STAR. WITH LIME - SLURRY ( 6 " THICK ) S.Y . 0 .00 13429 .00 13429.00 1 . 23 16517.! 4. LIVE FOR STAPILIZED SUEGRADE TO': 0 .00 199 .50 199. 50 75 .00 14962. 5. SAW CUTS FOR REMOVAL OF - - _ - - - -- EXIST . CONC. AND ASPH. L.F. 0 .00 751 .00 751 .00 1 .03 773 . ' 6. REMOVE EXIST . CURB & GUTTER L.F . 0 .00 _ 642 .00 642 .00 2 .05 1316. 7. RE'OVF EXIST . 5 " THK CONC. - - DRIVEWAYS S.F . 0 .00 873 .00 073 .00 1 .09 942. E 8 . CONSTRUCT 6 " CURB 6. 18 " (UTTER + INCL. REINF. STL L.F. 0 .00 4980.00 495 :2 .00 4.91 24451 .1 9. 6 " THICK CONC. VALLEYS + INCL. REINF._ STEEL S.F. 0. 00 2030 .00 2030 .00 3. 21 6516.: 10. 'C-30 OR EA-HVMS PRIME COAT -- -- - - -WITH SAND S.Y. 0 .00 10015 .00 10015.00 0.25 25C3.' 11 . RC-2 OR EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK COAT S.Y. 0.00 10436.00 10416 .00 0. 11 1147.E 12. TY.A HMAC + 41 ' THICK , CO' P. IN 2 EQUAL COURSES S.Y. 0 .00 . 10015 .00 10015.00 5.70 57085. ` 13. TY.D -MAC . COMPACTED 2 " THK S.Y . 0 .00 421 .00 421 .00 2. 93 1233.° 14. TY. D HMAC FOR TRANS. & MISC. USES TON O.00 0 .00 0.00 30.00 0 .0 15. ADJ . EXIST . SAN. SEWER M.H. TO FINISHED STREET GRADE EACH 0 .00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.0 16. ADJ . EXIST . S.S. CLEANOUTS & MATER VALVE BOXES EACH 0.00 0 .00 --- 0:00 120.00 ---0:C 17. 5 " THICK CONCRETE DRWYS. . INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F. 0 .0 : 1258 .00 1258 .00 3.40 4277 .2 1E. 4 " -THICK CONCRETE` SIDEWALKS -- -- "----- INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.40 O. 0 19. REMOVE+ SET BACK & RELOCATE =XISTING FENCING L. F . 1725 .00 ' '0 .00 1725 .00 1 . 62 2794.5 20. REMOVE EXIST. CULVERT STRUC . AT CALLOWAY BR. & C. RD. L. S. 1 . 11 _ 0.00 1 .00 1050.00 1050. 0 21. UNCL. CHANNEL EXCAVATION C.Y. 3677 .00 0.00 3677.00 4.L0 14706 .0 22. CL. A ( 3000 PSI ) FORMED CONC. FOR CULV.&TRANS. STRUC. C.Y. 331 .97 1 .00 331.97 247.00 81996. 5 23. CL.B12100 PSI ) UNF. CONC . - - - ---- - --- - - -FOR CH.LINER &MISC. USES C.Y. 133.47 0.00 133.47 200.00 26694.0 24. 3 " DIA. WEEP HOLES, INCL. FILTER MEDIA EACH 12 .00 0.00 12.00 ------8 .40 10: . 8 25 TRIPLE PIP= RAILING FOR CULVERT RAILING L.F. 148 .00 0.00 148 .20 17.70 2619.6 C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I V A T E P 2 OF FILE F33 ESTIVATE NO.- 7 JDs .0.- 3-318 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- 800TH CALLO..AY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 0"":_ER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 1 / 7/ 1 F CHARGED THRU PEP : ' )- 232 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY FOR MATERIALS Ell - : SHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1/ 4/22 WORK ORDER. 'a-E- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 220 COVPLEIID, DATE- 2/21/ PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 26. ANCHOR PLATES FOR CULVERT PA ! LjA'G E: :` 16.00 0 .00 16 .00 26. 50 424. 27. °"S'S FOP CULV- .T RAILING EACH 16.00 0.00 16.00 164. _ 1 2624. 23. ,F IN=, STEEL FOR CULVERT & TRANSITION STRUCTURES LB. 42222 . 700 C . :0042222.700 0.30 12666. 29. ROCK PIPRAP ( 12- INCH ) C.Y . 164 .00 0.00 164.00 53 .00 8692 : 30, BEDDING MATERIAL ( 4- :NCH/ C.Y. 55 .00 0.00 55 .00 19 .00 1345 .■ 31 . 18 " DIA . ( CL. III ) RCP INCL. EXC. .EVB. & PACKFILL L.F . 217.00 0.00 217.00 21 . 00 - 4557.1 32. 21 ' DIA. ( CL. III ) RCP INCL. EXC. .EMB. & BACKFILL L.F. 159 .00 0. 00 159 .00 23. 10 3672.' D1A. ( CL. IIIIRC INCL. 33. 30 " ° EXC. ,ENB• & FACKFILL L.F. 300 .00 0.00 300.00 35.00 10500.1 34. 3R " DIA. ( CL. III ) RCP INCL. FXC. .EMB. & BACKFILL L.F. 321 .00 0 .00 - - 321 .00 - 40.00 12840.1 35. 36 ' DIA. ( CL. IIIIRCP INCL. EXC. . EMB. & BACKFILL L . P . 450.00 0.00 450.00 47.00 21150.! 3 39 " D ? A. ( CL. II ! 1 °DP INCL. - - EX,C. . FMB. : BACKFILL L.F . 356 .00 0 .00 356.00 55.00 19580.1 57. 50 " X? 1 " FULLY LINED & COATED CGM PIPE ARCH L.F . 214 .00 0.00 214.00 -63.00 13482.1 38. 5 ' CURB INLET EACH 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 1050. 00 0.( 39. 10 ' CURB INLET EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 1320.00 0.( 40. 15 ' CRP INLET EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 2300.00-- - -0.( 41. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. M+23 L. S. 1 .00 0.00 1 .00 3150.00 3150.( 42. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. -- ------- ------ 10+84 L.S. 1 .00 0.00 1 .00 2100.00 2100.! 43. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 15+38 • L.S. 1.00 0.00 1 .00 2100.0(1 211110-I-( 44. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 21+63 _ L.S. 1 .00 0 .00 1.00 1900.00 1900.( 45. 8 " CIA . ( CL. 501DUCTILE IRON HATER LINE L.F. 264.00 0.00 264.00 18 .00 4752.( 46. 6 " DI = . ( CL.50 )DUCTILE IRON WATER LINE L.F. 236.00 0 .00 236:00 -- - 14.00 3304( 47. DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB. 2052 .00 0 .00 2052.00 1 . 50 3078.( 48. 16 " DIA. TAP. SADDLE & 8 " _ TAPPING VALVE W/°"X EACH 2 .00 0.00 2 .00 1600.00 3200.( 49 . 8 " X8 " TAP. SLEEVE & 8 " TAPPING VALVE W/BOX _ EACH 3 .00 0.00 2 .00 1200. 00 3600.; 50 6 " X6 " TAP. SLEEVE & 6 " - - - - TAPPING VALVE W/BOX EACH 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 1050.00 0.( 51 . 16 " DIA. TAP. SADDLE & 6 " TAPPING VALVE /BOX EACH 4.00 0.03 4.00 1060. 00 4240.( C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I M A T E P 3 OF FILE F331 =5T I'•4TE "0.- 7 JOB N0.- 3 •318 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- ROOTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS OWNER- ':ORT.-' RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 1 / 7/8 T - CHARGED THRU PERIOf• 232 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY EC:,. MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1 / 4/82 ?.ORC ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- 2/21/8 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT +,0. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 52. WATER SERVICE TRANSFER EACH 9 .00 0 .00 9.00 420 .00 3780.0 53. WATER SERVICE LINE L.F . 285 .00 0.00 285 .00 6. 50 1852 .5 54. RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE - - - - HYDRANT EACH 1 .00 0 .00 1 .00 600.00 600.0 55. 8 " DIA. EX. STRENGTH V.C. SAN. SEWER LINE L.F . 446.00 0 .00 446.00 16.00 7136 . 0 56. SAN. SEWER SERV. COMNECTION EACH 4.00 0 .00 4 .00 160.00 640 . 0 57. 4-INCH SAN . SEWER SERV. LINE L.F . 170 .00_ 0.00 170 .00 6. 50 1105 .0 58. 2 " DIA.&3 " DIA. WATER LINE -- TOA"SFER CONNECTIONS • EACH 5 .00 0 .00 5.00 500.00 2500.0 59. 4 ' DIA . SS"+H (C.O. NO. 1 ) EACH 2 .00 0 .00 2. 00 910.00 1820.0 50. 8 " DIA. S .S. (C.O. NO. 1 ) L.F. 240.00 0.00 240 .00 19. 85 4764.0 61 . TY. D H''AC PVMT REPL. IC.O. 1 ) S.Y . 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 4. 14 0.0 -62. 8X6 TAP .SLV. /VAL (C.0. NO. 1 ) EACH _ 1 .00 0 .00 1 .00 . 11.45 .00 1145 .0 63. CO1,C . ENCASEMENT ( C. O. NO. 31 L.F. 122 .00 3 .00 122.00 17. 50 2135.0 64. 1-1 /2 " nAT .SERV•TR• ( CO. NO. 5 ) EACH 1 .00 0.00 1 .00 522. 50 522 .5 65. 1-1 /2 "'v• S. LINE ( CO• N0.5 ) L. F. _ 15 .00 0 .00 15.00 8 . 80 132.0 6f 2 " ':'AT . SERV. LINE ( CO. NO. 5 ) L.F. 20 .00 0 .00 20.00 ----9.90 - --- 198 .0 6i . VAULT AT 6+40 ( CO• N0.4 ) L.S. 1 .00 0 .00 1 .00 6418 .50 6418 . 5 68. VAULT EX . AT 7+23 ( CO. N0.41 L. S . 1 .00 0 .00 1 .00 333.8. 503. 338 . 5 59. ROCK EXCAVATION ( CO. N0.4 ) C.Y. 174 .00 0 .00 174 .00 5 . 50 957 .0 70. CO^'CRETE COLLAR ( CO.N0.4 ) EACH 2.00 0 .00 2 .00 660.00 1320. 0 71 . MODIFY 50X31 CMP ( CO. N0.4 ) EACH 4 .00 0 .00 4.00 550.00 2200. 0 72. DECREASE FOR UNDER-STRENGTH -- - - -- - - - - ----- -- - - - --- - CULV. CONC. ( L. 12/11/81 ) L.S. 1 .00 0.00 1 .00 -1247.35 -1247.3 C O N T R A C T O R ' S E S T I V A T E P 4 OF FILE F3: EST I''ATE '+O.- 7 JO° NO.- 3-318 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- ROOTH CALLORdAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Oqc„_ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 1 / 7, T ' VE CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 232 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY r'ATE0IALS FURNIS4EO AND LAPOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 1 / 4/82 - %ORK O'DFR DATE- 5/18 /81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- 2/21. PREVIOUS THIS - -. UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT FIELD VERIFICATION OF J05 CONDITIONS AND CONFIR'•'ATION OF PAY 0UANTITIES - - ---- - FY- Sag hlAFT Colt - - - _ (OWNER ' S PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE ) --_ -- - - --- _- DATE- . 19 APPROVED- TOTAL - . 450745. KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS . INC. LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED • . . • 45374. COKSS: i\G ENGINEERS - - _— DIFFERENCE . -. . . . -. - 405671 ; / (11.64.1_ �c. PLUS 75 PERCENT MAILS ON HAND. . 0. ' T -- TOTAL 405671 . LESS PREVIOUS-PAYMENTS -.- • -• ---282544. F- -7 . 1981_ DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE • . 123127. NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN TOTAL EARfT .GS ( INCL. RETAIN. ) -$ 450746.01 TOTAL °ID-$ 474699 . 15 PERCENT- 94. TIVF CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 232 DAYS TOTAL TIME- 280 DAYS PERCENT- 82 . • RESOLUTION NUMBER STATE OF TEXAS X AGREEMENT COUNTY OF TARRANT X WHEREAS, there is pending before the Supreme Court of Texas a suit by Bank of Texas, et.al. vs. John Childs, et.al. which is a course of action contesting the validity of taxing bank shares by Municipalities in Texas; and WHEREAS, the undersigned banks located in North Richland Hills, Texas, are taking the position of the Plantiff in the above case and maintain that it is unlawful for the City of North Richland Hills to tax bank shares; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto recognize that the outcome of the above styled litigation is doubtful and uncertain; and, WHEREAS, the below named banks do not wish to be delinquent in the payment of their ad valorem taxes in the event that it is finally determined in the above styled case that the Municipalities may tax bank shares. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, agrees that it will accept the 1981 tax on the bank shares of the below named banks under protest by said banks and will agree to be bound by the outcome of the above styled case as to whether or not such tax is legal. In the event that the final holding is said case is that the tax is unlawful, the City agrees to refund without interest, such 1981 tax pay- ments paid under protest within ninety (90) days of final judgment in the above styled case. WITNESS OUR HANDS this day of , 1982. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Mayor NORTHEAST NATIONAL BANK By: President FIRST UNITED RICHLAND By: President BANK OF NORTH TEXAS By: President ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary DATE: 1-7-82 SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Certain Persons to Sign Checks DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This resolution needs to be approved in order to remove the former City Manager's name as an authorized person to sign on checks and all bank accounts. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: Resolutions of Corporate Board � . • I, Jeanette Moore Secretary of City of North Richland Hills — , tarpOriti011 • duly or aniacd and existing under the laves of the irate tar Texas __ ,tea dnm, hnsmas m North Richland Hills Tea... do hereby certify dint I am keeper of the records ad minutes of the roendings of the Board of Directors of said Corporation, and char on the 11th day of January _ . 1982 _, there was duly end redly bad a ,stuns or said nova of Dim rs, at which a quotas of the Directors was present and gain„ as coua.ou, and at said me-do3 the following resolutions were vnaatomsty :domed r -t RESOLVED. That NORTHEAST NATIONAL BANK. Fos \posh, hrevaftr called "Bork. Is hereby designated as a depositor/ of this Corporation and that an account or accounts shall be established is behalf of this Corporation ;kith Bank under the style of see attached list • and sub,ect In the Arles and regulations u from time time prescribed by Bank aheretn may he deposited any of the funds of this Corpsration a bather a ensed by cash, checks, ntt<, or other evidences of debt and from which withdrawals are hereby authorized in the name of the rorue`ation. b) any t two 12) of the foliovio3' (Humber of r;,rain required) Mavnr Dirk Faram__ Jeanette Moore Mayor Pro Ten Dave Freeman • ii Is FURTHER RIAOI VEO that any of the above-named conies sha I he authorized n individually stn for and receive and dire) ucFa of chit orpnnn appoim aeeo_t t a for rod r such docum:tats, and any of the teed epartir are FveLy ferhne amhrkrd CO stop pa,mentsn against d ran this [trporrion and to bbd the co:ye:Rion t reo rodonemenrs for deposit ion he by cntn or stamped endorsanent of the Corpo:awa w,rhoa oia:anon of the parry nA.ne the endorsement. FURTHER RESOLVED, That any (hn tort i(�' rr ; t o[ the (ol:otrivg' re of g r e ) Mayor Dick Faram Jeanette Moore _Mayer Pro Tem.QaYe_ Freeman rein bon !Lot to curt Larmn t Unity in hen r the Corpomri n from the r' and t e Corporation other - of in Inbred. her .r n ot% n and for tech t name r of Iore a may bed said o may be she• s Plan and any of sid ;era may a the pfinent of any or all si Jebel and oblg .n other the nCo poet n Band by the e u &livery for and on behalf of the Rouse:Con N deed. of r . _ dne:d m stuns mllnerd ayeet,oa, 1 peed e s o n n, Ire and ocher city a Inert s . Ohernayarutor that may be 1mni:ed by the Ban., s-hether of xlvue trnmvated or air-emeriti, said a a may.at o^g o:hr th:v . dk&c ,-mbr, are • o- any or,all proper-6m of the Cor balk, receivable. «4. bonds. eel tarn and er'onal tpropary,roam). well as any other prolxez end ass the Ctr whether similar onthos raced so and the , bill; n - of deposit, and other [ and owned by said Corporation nay be transferred to said Bank for ,edisc r far perch ate or for collection on endorsement of any of saidsrroso and any of said persons shall hate authority to waive demand, prresr. and r notice of protest or dishonor of any thcrk,note, bill. drarr. or other Instrument made. drawn. ot endorsed by the Corpondon FURTHER RESOLVED. That Bank is hereby authorized to honor any and all withdnn !s of the Corporations funds payabse to officer or near -ntng. or a the sit or payable to Bank. whether itch wihaam4 arc presented for cub or for reedit to the personal account of such officer or agent or the countersigning presenting the s and Bank need a. inquiry concerning any such item FLRTtie_n RESOLVED, That the Secretary or any Ass'.cot S rssyea'a l c tali ' Bank then of the presently duly elected and quali:yiad officers of this Corporaston a. .alt as the person; authorized he:ender.and firll prom rime 'e hereafter, as chants in the personal o said officers or the persons auhorind her:ander a, ndy certify m nn3 sacs chants to It.tat, and tank shall be fully protected in nl>mg on such tehcanotu of the Rosary Lai made. be�z .. ced and saved harn_taa fion sly claims, demands. espen.u, loses, or dan'sa ambled from ing out f Iron the of an>persons so rcified o refusal', o hot any sigoam're n trtfad. • to FURTHER RI-sun EDn The s+d authority herein mebrred shall remain m fore. uoul x them notice ROE revocation thereof slag be received by sad F a sup-Hudson the present one. IOaTllEfl RESOLVED.t fir: sole. and the ' t:«n He audi pas and a ssigOS f lir!: I fn.thcr rdfy that the fns. ins aye then end the a and o , a e turd of the Prc en. of any of th its Corm-moon and the pnovs ...,_uuevl to sigo for trod on Leh_b of the Corporation in the fcre oing rkoluavm. .a S.cr a.p auubrer Irtrttary _ (SEAL) Lenarn IN %A CFISS ' fi LRLOr, I ham heratnn :et ray h,na as &arum of sa,t Cur;on:nn, and Lie uuch.d bueco the official seal of said Corr —day of ,... . —_.—aver eery DATE: 1-7-82 SUBJECT: Resolution 82-2 DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Resolution was passed January 5, 1982. Is to be ratified at this meeting. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO___ ACCOUNT NUMBER: RESOLUTION NUMBER BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILL, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The services of Automated Financial Services are hereby retained for said Firm to provide each and all of the services outlined in Dennis Horvath's letter of December 23, 1981, and the letter of Automated Financial Services dated December 28, 1981. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of _ , 1982. Dick Param - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - City Attorney ACCEPTED: AUTOMATED FINANCIAL SERVICES By: o\n. 1-7-82 SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate #1 - Rufe Snow - Holiday West Storm Drain Construction --- DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: J. D. Griffith Construction Co. is requesting payment inr_work -_ completed through December 31 , 1981, Estimated Contract Price $245,000.00 Work Performed To-date $222.337 37 Less 10% Retainage $ 22.233 74 - Difference $200,103.63 - -- -- Less Previous Payments $ 0- ---- Due This Estimate 8200,109 63 Ibis storm drain project is_tflf_e_Sno.itielated system necessary__to dra Ut&1J_that runoff from Rufe�SnSiW thr.Lghthe_Ha]ida _lie5_t..ddn At_a_prpvious meeting the Council ratified this contrast and agrzed_to bear the__entire_cost of the cf£-site_ ..- storm drain required to drain Rufe Snow. When the Holiday West Addn._develops along the off-site storm drain, the City will collect a pro-rata share of the cost. We estimate the total amount to be recovered to be $166,235.00 once development is completed. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of pay estimate in the amount of $200,103.63 .__ BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: General CIP Bonds Js ROUTE 1 BOX 151A• KELLER,TEXAS 7248• 18171 379-5927,379-5530 ESTIMATE NO gyp+.,.--(-9, � ,) DATE nec, 30, 1981 PROJECT North Richland Hills Industrial park OWNER City Of North Richland Hills ENGINEER Gordon s. swift KW Item DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1. wrench Excavation 5532 / 1.35 7,468. 2( 2, Deleted 3. 21« RCCP • I 122.5 14.35 1, 757.8": 4. 24" RCCP 45 17.00 765.0( 5• 30" RCCP . . 0 20.08 6. 33" RCCP -0- 23.22 /4, /t4. :� 7. 39" RCCP 0 34.00 ,r r a. co 8. 48" RCCP /, ' 270 35.80 _9,666:0( 9. 4' Storm Drain Manhole 0 2,000.00 10. 5' storm Drain Manhole 0 2400.00 11. 10' standard Inlet 0 1450.00 12 10' Standard Double Inlet 0 2750.00 13 Deleted 0 19.00 ?7, 7: 7". - - 14. 27" RCCP 15. 36" RCCP _= 565 33.13 18,718. 4 16. 42" RCCP . . 585 =',- c : : 41.55 24, 306.7' 17. 54" RCCP „ . , . : _ - - ' 1 1076 I?,.r..- 65. 56 70, 542.51 18. 60" RDDP 271,' 80.88 21, 918. 41 19. 66" RCCP 1053 / 93.62 98. 581.81 20. 6' Storm Drain Manhole 0 3500.00 21. 24« Reinforced Concrete plug 0 50.00 22. 27" Reinforced Concrete plug 0 50.00 23. 30" Reinforced concsete plug 0 60.00 24 33" Reinforced Concrete plug 0 75.00 25 36« Reinforced Concrete plua 0 75.00 26 Rock Rubble Rip Rap 0 150.00 27. 5" Reinforced Cpncrete Rip Rap 0 100.00 2.=„>7. :7 yellue of work preformed to date -2531725.1' Less 10(A Retainage , Ir 25, 372.-5 Less previous Estimate " 22,008.51 TOTAL DUE THIS ESTIMATE *206, 344.1 f„ ,2. I ;:/2