Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1999-06-28 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA :&JUNE 28, 1999—6:00'PM For the Meeting conductedsatthe<taotth Richland Hills City:I-Pall City:Pre-Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM AC=TION TAKEN. 1. Discuss Items from Regular June 28,1995 City Council Meeting (5 Minutes) J — 2. IR 99-087 Possible°Work Session Dates with Culturgiir Educational Ad Hoc Committee (5 Minutes) 3. IR 99-091 Discuss'EPA A.O. Wastewater Rehabilitation Project.(Administrative Order) (30 Minutes) - _ 4. IR 99-088 Legislative Update (10 Minutes) 5. Adjournment-6:50 p.m. . 1 C. .- 'Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. pO TED S Date _____F7-„,JUL 2 9 mr,; -/ u .) 1ttet O as Y. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 28, 1999-7:00 PM For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2 Invocation — Dr. Tommy Teague, North Richland Hills Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Special Presentations IR 99-089 a. Presentation by Tarrant County Challenge, Inc—Tarrant Youth Recovery Campus Issues b. Yard of the Month Awards and Landscape of the Month Award 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda • Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. Approval of Consent Agenda Items a.) Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting June 14, 1999 b.) Minutes of the Council Meeting June 14, 1999 GN 99-53 c.) Alternative Fuels Grant— Resolution No. 99-44 PU 99-28 d.) Award Bid for 1999 Street Wedge Milling Project to Dustrol Inc. in the amount of$38,266 7. GN 99-54 CDBG Joint Cooperative Agreement with Tarrant County— Resolution No. 99-45 8. GN 99-55 1999 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant — Resolution No. 99-46 9. GN 99-56 Set Date for Public Hearing on Local Law • Enforcement Block Grant 10 (a) Citizens Presentation (b) Information and Reports IR 99-090 Review Status of Crime Control District and Discuss Strategy for Reauthorization of District 11. Adjournment PgSTE° -en" Date orb° Ain nw _— T Ot },rrc,lI. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 99-087 Date. June 23, 1999 Subject: Possible Work Session Dates with Cultural/Educational Ad Hoc Committee At the June 14 City Council Meeting the Cultural/Educational Ad Hoc Committee presented its final report and recommendations regarding the study that they have completed regarding cultural and educational opportunities in North Richland Hills and needs for the future. The Ad Hoc Committee requested that Council hold an additional meeting time with them to further discuss their ideas and allow them to explain as well as get any further clarification. We anticipate that such a work session with this Ad Hoc Committee would be approximately one and a half-hours. If such a work session is held on the same dates of Council Meetings it would probably be necessary to begin around 4:00 p.m. If the work session is held in July I would like to remind Council that the AMCC Meeting will be July 15 and 16, and the budget retreat will be July 30 and 31. Staff would respectfully request that unless the work session is in conjunction with the City Council Meeting of July 26, that due to final preparations for the budget. that the week of July 26 through 30 not be considered for a work session. We request that the Mayor and Council Members please bring their calendars to the Pre-Council Meeting so that we can make a decision with regard to a date for the work session with the Cultural/Educational Ad Hoc Committee. Respectfully submitted, II Jive Larry J. Cunningham City Manager LJC/cs LISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 99-091 _ Date June 28, 1999 Subject EPA A O. Wastewater Rehabilitation Project The Sewer System Evaluation Study (SSES) by Carter & Burgess, Inc. done in response to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrative Order (A 0 ) was completed and presented to Council in January, 1998. The study outlined $3,198,700 in North Richland Hills rehabilitation work, including engineering and contingencies On February 23, 1998, Council approved a $3.00 residential, $2.00 multifamily, and $15.00 commercial sewer surcharge per connection. This surcharge was estimated to collect at least $3.2 million in five years to cover the cost of the proposed rehabilitation work. The EPA approved this 5-year "pay-as-you-go" plan and engineering design by Carter& Burgess, Inc. began in May of 1998. During the design phase several months ago, Carter & Burgess, Inc. noticed that some data collected during the study by the field contractor for them (Byrd/Forbes, Inc.) was not in the database which itemizes repairs and estimates the cost. After several months of checking and recalculation, the total repairs not originally included were found to amount to approximately $1,042,770. Taking into account some point repairs eliminated by the previously omitted repairs <$70,900>; reroute of an old outfall main, $50,000; additional engineering costs of$62,600 plus $5,560 totalling $68,160; and contingencies of$400,000, the total additional cost is $1,490,030. If you add this to the engineer's new estimated cost for the rehabilitation work originally identified in the study ($3,073,765), you get a total project cost of$4,563,795, compared to the original study estimate of$3,198,700. We have currently paid approximately $160,000 in design fees. The current surcharge account balance is roughly $700,000. Over the remaining period of the original ordinance (44 months), we will collect about $2.9 million. The total dollars we need to collect is $3.7 million ($4.4 million minus $700,000). This means an additional $800,000 will need to be acquired. Options for funding the additional $800,000 are shown below. Option #1- The current surcharge by ordinance will end in February 2003. In order to raise the additional funding for the project, the current surcharge would need to be collected for an additional 12 months (through February 2004). This would have the following effect on customers. Total Added Surcharge (over 12 months) : Residential Customers $ 36 per connection Commercial Customers $180 per connection Multifamily Customers $ 24 per connection Option #2: Another option is to increase the surcharge over the remaining 44 months of the original 60 month period. In order to raise the funds needed for the project, we would need to raise the surcharge by $ 0.80 (from $3 00 to $3.80) per residential, $4.00 a ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS per commercial connection (from $ 15 00 to $19 00) and $0 50 per multifamily connection (from $2.00 to $2.50) Total Added Surcharge (through the original 5 year period) . Residential Customers $ 36 per connection Commercial Customers $180 per connection Multifamily Customers $ 24 per connection The engineering design is now complete on the first of the two projects, Contract "A", and staff is ready to advertise for bids In order to try and meet the Administrative Order completion deadlines of April, 2000 for Priority One repairs and April, 2003 for Priority Two repairs, Contract "A" needs to be bid and awarded as expeditiously as possible. We plan to advertise for bids on Contract "A" promptly after the Council meeting if you have no objections. Representatives with Carter & Burgess, Inc and their field contractor, Byrd/Forbes, Inc will be at the PreCouncil meeting to give a presentation concerning the omission of the data from the SSES study and answer any questions. Staff has some questions as to the amount, if any, of additional engineering fees to pay Carter& Burgess for this work. They are requesting $62,600 for the omitted repairs and $5,560 for the Whitfield Court relocation. The Whitfield Court relocation is our preference and therefore, staff believes we should pay the $5,560. We believe C&B should not charge for the omitted projects, or at least reduce the fees and amount. John Cook with Carter & Burgess has since agreed to reduce their fees by $40,000 in response to this omission. The City will need to notify the EPA at some point about the omission of these repairs by C&B from the original study and our plan to address them. It is highly doubtful EPA will entertain extending the 5-year deadline as we were one of only two or three cities that were permitted a 5-year rehabilitation plan. Others were required to complete their plan in three years. We request Council's direction on the following: (1) Authorize advertisement for bids on Contract A—to meet Priority 1 repairs for April, 2000. (2) Method of financing —continuation of surcharge for 12 months beyond the 5 year plan or increase the surcharge now and stay with original 5 year plan. (3) Consensus regarding additional engineering fees (or authorize City filx.., ager to negotiat with and return with a recommendation). i W. icke s,Public rks Dir ctor l 2 CITA OF NORTH RICIIL AND HILLS \i ASTEN ATER S\STEM REHABILITATION DESIGN Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Total Project Probable Costs Item Study Phase Design Phase Construction Engineering Construction Engineering Manhole Rehabilitation 5189,800 522,500 529=230 Mainline Rehabilitation 51_237.600 5146.700 SI,236,830 New Manholes/Cleanouts SI 55,100 $23300 $330000 Line Extensions $106440 Capacity Increases 41,081,500 SI 62,200 $1.081,500 Capacity Increases Eliminated by ($320,490) Hydraulic Model Revisions SWPPP 540.000 Preconstruction Video Taping 410.000 Original Engineering Design Fee SI58,460 Construction Resident Representation SI 38,795 PROJECT SUBTOTAL-Original $2,664,000 $354,700 $2,776,510 5297,255 Scope Items Omitted Repairs $ Open cut 159,190 Trenchless(pipe burst) $862,940 Pow repair $20640 Total $1,042,770 $62,600 Point Repairs Eliminated by Omitted ($70,900) Repairs Whitfield Court Relocation $50,000 $5,560 PROJECT SUBTOTAL-Additional $1,021,870 $68,160 Scope Items(Amendment So. 1) Contingency 8135,700 5400,000 Subtotal with Contingency 52.799,700 $354,700 $4,198,380 S365.415 PROJECT TOTALS $3,154,400 $4.563,795 EPA Administrative Order Wastewater Rehabilitation Project Funding Analysis Current EPA Surcharge Balance $ 691,266 Average Monthly Collections $ 65,000 Revised Project Costs Revised Construction Costs Original Scope $ 2,776,510 Original Engineering Design Fee $ 158,460 Omitted Repairs $ 1,042,770 Point Repairs Eliminated $ (70,900) Whitfield Court Relocation $ 50,000 Engineering for Whitfield Court $ 5,560 Engineering for Omitted Repairs $ 62,600 Construction Resident Representation $ 138,795 Contingency $ 400,000 • Expanded Scope Project Estimate $ 4,563,795 Less: Engineering Design Fees Already Paid $ 158,460 Current Surcharge Balance $ 691,266 Surcharge Dollars Needed to Raise $ 3,714,069 Current Ordinance ends Feb-03, New ord. would end February-04 Will extend current ordinance by 12 Months Will Raise July 99 thru Feb 2003 ( includes growth) $ 2,912,800 Extra Dollars needed to Raise $ 801,269 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WASTWWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION DESIGN Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Contract A- Probable Costs Item Construction Cost Manhole Rehabilitation $ 1 18,870 Mainline Rehabilitation Original Study S 975,700 Additional Repairs S 1,042,770 New Manholes/Cleanouts S 235,800 Line Extensions $ 101,270 SWPPP $ 30,000 Preconstruction Video Taping $ 5,000 SUBTOTAL CONTRACT A $2,509,410 Contract B - Probable Costs Item Construction Cost Manhole Rehabilitation $ 173,360 Mainline Rehabilitation Original Study S 190,230 Additional Repairs $ 0 New Manholes/Cleanouts $ 94,200 Line Extensions $ 5,170 Capacity Increases $ 761,010 Whitfield Court Sewer Relocation $ 50,000 SWPPP $ 10,000 Preconstruction Video Taping $ 5,000 SUBTOTAL CONTRACT B $1,288,970 TOTALS FOR CONTRACTS A&B $3,798,380 CONTINGENCIES $ 400,000 CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL $4,198,380 '� 4 pb08118Scivcakn*cos,W1 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 99-088 Date June 23, 1999 Subject. Legislative Update On Monday, June 28 the Texas Municipal League will be holding a briefing in Austin related to legislation that has passed or been killed that relate to municipalities in Texas. Mayor Scoma and Steve Norwood will be attending the session on Monday and will be back in time for the Council Meeting We are including this item on the Pre-Council so that we can give a brief report of some of the major legislation affecting cities We do have some good news in that HB2045 regarding impact fees was vetoed by Governor George Bush. I believe that the City of North Richland Hills had some impact on this with the contacts made by Mayor Scoma and the city staff and the work of the Public Works Department This legislation could have had some very costly effects on our city as well as others in Texas. I believe this shows that it does pay to get involved with the legislative process and staying on top of those issues most directly affecting us. That is not always possible but we have certainly escalated our efforts and attention this past year. Again the propose of this item would be to get an update on legislative issues by those who are attending the briefing in Austin. 5 Respectfully submitted, Larry J. Cunningham City Manager LJC/cs LISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I a INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 99-089 ` Date June 28, 1999 Subject Presentation by Tarrant County Challenge, Inc Tarrant County Challenge, Inc has requested to be placed on the June 28 Council meeting to discuss issues relating to the Tarrant Youth Recovery Campus The Tarrant Youth Recovery Campus is the collaborative effort of five agencies: Tarrant County Challenge, Inc., Tarrant Council on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse, Tarrant County MHMR, Family Services, Inc. and Santa Fe Adolescent Services. The Campus is working to provide care to the youth of our community who are suffering from the disease of addiction. They would like to share briefly with the Council the mission of the Campus and other issues related to the project. Commissioner Glen Whitley, Tarrant Youth Recovery Campus Advisory Board Co-Chair, will be making a 5 to 10 minute presentation. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Hutson City Secretary i. LISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS CO)I = . 1 i 11:11 p" h 1.= E , 1 1 limi co . • ea = ... .. i C Vill e c, r 411, = C/3 w O en Mill II 21 . .a. = O CC ea 1111Pimi CO al ea .0 = O C� C ai '� C or C., = RIPE " • •O O 'CI le O .... NM CID "1 © ICI O Ca OD C Q a = •C CO N i i 1,-.5 kl .....1 ii-al . I= . . . CC i. a. vs i = Cl, am i. O y aj = CD ... 4a = . ...,.. h� yg ' a o C O 0 121 = co co y z: ,_.. i. O co i_ bin 5 co al (4 (f) * 4 CM CC MN Mil CA PI 1611 CC ossi m la CO G3 CID = I ,_ _ = Ca VS C = CD i = O O MXag= IO■ IN=O v an i .a Cf CC y y O 3 Wen ' Ca E .,_== he = E C - CD CI ,O O O co O = O as cc CD CD CD CO y CC Z CA ir�rrwr O _ ' {ID c cn = = OD 1I= y as to E = El p = 4••r y p p _ le p = . . y p w = _ *■r O y cp i • = i ics an 1� p C.7 co *r p as mi. es cm a cm p w • • *■Ir = p v sod CD al' Ca 'C CED CD NOW 1= Cia CC I p 171.5 CO p p GI 2C .121 CC or MI ihm p asami p Lim (•) look l!°u storavarawaw T .. i�YYY�IifiY IIIIIlYf�fif' Ca al Cia i co (05 vs co) = 11:3 ca es a = =cow Ego 11 :1:3 aiD = ca = = CID E .= 4:3 .1= = la Ca eme 4, '!r c CC i CD Co CD cc d, O • ra co In 07.1 co CID Ca come 0 ia. UN ti; . 14.1pLiviti;iveriM11111101110110111 U, ' O at � O Jim pir Cam! � CC • 0 = ca I �y • CD 116. in= Ca Ce 0•0 ION cs, Vai = CO 0.0,) vim mi i„,„4„,„„0,,,,,,k. Amoy COD O a. .•+ O O 1/3 'O co O O O 6 0 i i O O , — O m co so N 0 O rim _ = O � = Ca mem in 6.O O i MI O O CO 1 y � '�co i � O y i � 1 VS ce or GO CD lag iv= = ... cip I ei = O O y y *r CA II O O 2: ■ ■ O = O = O OUP ". *r row_ _ O v IS gm Ca ca an A cli , co = er 0 o '__ Um co .= oN3mcs "NW 41111L ofiffiliffpw 0111111.1.01.11, SINFPWWWWW egli"W r ,o,o,r„�r,wr .__...:__ l� j,r�,,,,,,Irr,O,r IrINIrrar.rr. .Niliiii..NgiM► CA CC O GO Isup ifissil = Ca CM O 1:1 an CU 1= or CA CID cI CID i � O E mit I ow ca CS = al = CD 0 ill wow = lbw = BIN ow E = CIII/ � E CD G womi ,P0 la CI limp CD ge CO Ca CIII a an CID O CC r Z ate+ Z lit ;e. is?) AIM NW IINWOWIlr 411... CD O ai' CD CU ■ • am OW . a, o CI - an a.. O .� O PI 615 O in "mil O O E .� CA �� O al O y O y O c O i• CO3 v O 3 Ca = Ca 21 am O Ca al ea CQ Ile, y O O y N.. O O or a O r . — m O O O O E Ir. i= 21 =iftei. O O O O .= Ca am El O E 220 O = a: a: m E Dim a. E. ca w .E V3 1C1GD y CD 1:3 1� oe C13 e am ft o 0 O. la w y co) em o ca = GOo CO Ole CD cl° E y ��. E o o CZ o cri le ler mi. y sci b. mi GD y y CA or �, aD o cois E acoov a+lwwAeaw► cia e an I Ga = Q co ...O 0 Q VD Q Q az as = = ... E co Q Zia O E in. O CO3 y O .5 co U _O o a* 0d = O C/ O y O O cc O s O O Q - y y i . O e y N. c...1� � O Q O O Q Cl, y Q 0 y.i Cm, Imo a © ...... ,� O O = O O O O O Q E O ilL Cl, E ii� "D CA O a O O 0 O O v Ca ID a= mom i0.. CD CD Cl, I i = CI CD 0 0 CC o all =I Q y =I 0 B. 0 411111.111, ' iigarar AV d.., i co 0 i 0 o CM = 0 3 3 - = — U3 �CU o at C.,= o E .= a., ga a� y 3 = O MIMI a CQ 0 0 W 01=0 o = 7 i y am 001M11 CC ca IWO W. am. Oiii 0 la US CD mmv lig v V v sa co E =. a I i■ = OW co en= ■ CA cg co E a CA al E ca as co ONO Ca Ce CA y v C� emil CA y Q PEN v , 411111111111111111W AC y O a O O 3 = CC LAI CA 1 C o as I E o m C,, >, O W O C '- - v O O �i CQ CO co =1 = O ism U3 v O O .... 0 ma = =r, a CA O O O W O N = =I = 0 imoi I O 2 aa a cc = Ca m = a C ca I— ID = a ge mit 0 0 O GI CA s O �— O Q B ca _ E ,- l- ,- O Tii V. y O = 'O v 0 ,' E C O O a . O = O = CO E O. CC N a. E .. pi i y aa ow - 71 = O .- O lag a- ea y ibis mli CQ Mii 0 1= CC a= 0 0 W 3 3 a. ;_ CC CD 5 if.,CC CI i o CD C.14 O I CC Clu 1411 MR Ce oir W ,_ Ta �. CA o Ca il ° cif y o W = O O = •• • �� = O Ca doe = y y CD E illa O y O 1� O �•+ y 0 0 = I= al In a six = = co - - .=,_ =iii. = E 0 i iv= -M4 Idol. . G3 v Old Mli '3 as •=. = 2 'Ea ca 0 co := 1-- = ,ra = = les 0 0 5 Z v . CU = . � a i mairrm„s A.i....e iiitsistaiNieff ittilaislatilli Altriffiiiiii, rtaisioarriara gigi liiiiiihr O CID E O i U— W 0 la O O 0 C Im Cl, Cia I= GO In , _ w es ._ . E U Z 420 =A dolo 111.• to i v = % a .... © y a.. mi en = 5 MO _ m i = Cip f= y C y ,� i a 0 E Imil MN cop awl 1., egg y 4•■1 ria ■1 e = GD p Ca Q CC r. O o W v N ■ cc A 4 APPRIIIIIVIPIRMW AtiMPOW Aii IWO CID E o cn 0 mil O Mil GI v 0 — 0 mit al. cC = O . al =o E O 0 0 0 0 = s y CD E Ca 0 C E o ism = o 0 0) o O = CC =o w la CII CCI CO E a: = O = E o a O 0 o il- IE O 0 0 Ca O 0 y 0 o W um CD ■ i UMW rOr ,mo w ► .( f .rrrrrrr.� r�r�rrrrrrr :iriiii�rrrrr `r illiff an o P *.r v � 'O �� O = O MA IIA CD � v as O y WI = y i 3 v 'Mt =O O = v = Ga E = O C/3 O = o O E y CA y �+ 'O = y .� o o CM = ca. E. 012 CD y E E CA Pil 16. 0., O ap CO as O v.... v O v E cI _ .— O O y tom 3 = mas ,= y 0 0 = an al =i 6 ..., = y =4:0 ..., s..• ..., o ,� o ,� o ,ml.... 10.• .. .., ....CO .. i -.r v an v = . = o0 o = a� = of i = CID Ca W CD CC 4, ) .1?)- (ifr WNW Anwriawaffir P , O a _CA CID CID Ca cia m VA = Z' vs O ii— O O a 441 M co = O co 1-11 i_ .= O ca O in O O I= GI i i0.. � I= O y wej i CD O COD O � CA 1 O 0 O ... E = O 3 O O O= To• .= O dv y e . O 'ow i�O O = E = �O � O Ce y 4113 = ,= CID al la y O co C/) CD 1 E O IS : y O i = =B ,ft ' O CI CD 0 0 um en lam a ' = O. C CC 0 y O r allikillatatiftf °"°""°"' - Aalaailitigatille IiiihNEVIWOMM liiiiiMWitiifnlr aillialkilMaliiit rthliM Mrrrr o O O O M O N O O O n k M O .--■ .-. 00 r O O in kn O O N N IM LL = ., O — N co 0 CD CD CD CD : O � c O co O� 01 O 0) - O O i0 O o LL m f 0 O O II=1 1 Ca 111:: . : 412 -0 7:3 *r • N N > C O ID CD U V) N a) Q 0 I�1 a) = I W W CD a) - 0111 . = ti n o O = LL LL :112, U I- LL CZ ' - N Q P N N N _ g= . t.') E t .> 4e.-5 E -0 a) Q -n N O N O CL 1 .............., .............. im„„ . . ..: _ ... . . . _ _ .MOW YARD-OF-THE-MONTH WINNERS LIST JUNE 1999 AREA 1 James and Po Pae McDaniel 4517 Castlecombe Place North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 2 Brent & Donna Vandever 7205 Marilyn North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 3 Beverly & Mark Barfield 6321 Skylark Cr. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 4 Bill McDonald & Roxanne Robinson 5501 Scott North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 5 Dan Ross 8029 Lynda Lane North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 6 Glenn Bolton 7617 Kimberly Ct. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 7 Randy & Lisa Sain 7109 Jeffrey North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 8 Beth Swisher & Cary Hardin 7516 Red Oak St. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 AREA 9 Scott & Tracey Andrews 8917 Trails Edge Dr. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Landscape: Green Mama's 5324 Davis Blvd. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 C\WINDOWS\TEMP\699 wm.doc MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 — JUNE 14, 1999— 6:00 P.M. Present: Charles Scoma Mayor Lyle E. Welch Councilman Russell Mitchell Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman JoAnn Johnson Mayor Pro Tern Don Phifer Councilman Matt Milano Councilman T. Oscar Trevino, Jr. Councilman Larry J. Cunningham City Manager Randy Shiflet Deputy City Manager Steve Norwood Assistant City Manager Patricia Hutson City Secretary Alicia Richardson Assistant City Secretary Rex McEntire Attorney Greg Dickens Public Works Director Larry Koonce Finance Director Donna Huerta Director of Communications Marcy Ratcliff Director of Planning Jim Browne Park and Recreation Director Thomas Powell Director of Support Services Paulette Hartman Assistant to City Manager Steve Brown Library Director ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m DISCUSS ITEMS Agenda Item No. 6c, PU 99-27 — Mayor Scoma NAN FROM REGULAR questioned whether it would be advantageous to the AGENDA City to rebid the project since only two bids were received. Staff advised that twelve contractors were sent notice of the bid and seven bid packages were picked up. Staff explained why only two bids were received. Staff advised that Romine and Romine, the mechanical engineers for the project, have worked with the low bidder, Walker Mechanical, in the past and they feel the low bid is a good bid. Romine and Romine also submitted a letter in which they have stated that they do not see any benefit to postpone or rebid the project Pre-Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 2 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT This item was discussed further during the regular Council meeting. Agenda Item No. 9, PZ 99-14— Mayor Scoma NAN advised that Council had received from Staff an amendment to this item. The City Manager explained that because staff had recommended denial of this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, they felt Council should be given an alternative to , address the issue and accommodate the situation. Staff explained they recommended denial because they did not feel it prudent to allow this permitted use citywide The Council was advised that the proposed alternative ordinance being suggested by Staff would contain the following provisions. Accessory non-required off-street parking lots will be allowed as a permitted use only in the LR-Local Retail District on property fronting Northeast Loop 820 and containing no more than 7,000 square feet. All such parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the Landscape Regulations, and in accordance with Article 8, Parking and Loading Regulations and Article 10, Buffering and Screening Regulations. The item was discussed further during the regular Council meeting IR 99-081 The City Manager explained that at the 1998 Goals DONNA H. RECOGNITION OF Retreat the Council had expressed a desire to NORTH RICHLAND recognize community service providers and had HILLS COMMUNITY asked Staff to look into a reception, banquet or a SERVICE similar event to recognize these providers Mr. PROVIDERS Cunningham asked the City Council if they still wanted to pursue hosting such an event and what type of function they preferred. After discussion, the consensus of the Council was for Staff to proceed with identifying the community service providers based in North Richland Hills, to look at hosting a banquet in the Fall, and for Staff to bring back a plan to the Council. Pre-Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 3 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT IR 99-083 Staff presented to Council several options for MARCY R./STEVE N. SCHEDULING scheduling a meeting with the property owners on STRATEGY FOR Strummer. The options presented were 1) to meet THE AMENDMENT with property owners, Council and the Planning and TO THE Zoning Commission and present Staffs ideas for COMPREHENSIVE amending the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning PLAN AND Ordinance, 2) to meet with the surrounding property REZONING FOR owners, Planning and Zoning Commission and STRUMMER Council and present issues, discuss ideas and then DRIVE, LOTS 1-12, develop drafts from input received; 3) to assign this BLOCK D, planning project to the Planning and Zoning RICHLAND OAKS Commission, let them work out the details with the ADDITION property owners and conduct public hearings and bring to Council a detailed plan of action. Councilman Trevino suggested incorporating into Option 3 the development of drafts from the citizen input and schedule workshops to go over suggestions or schedule public hearings for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to formally consider the amendments. There was discussion on the tax ramifications to the property owners if the area was zoned commercial. Mr. Jim Laux, 4817 Strummer, spoke to the Council on the City not viewing the street as one project but as a series of projects. Mr. Laux felt that the street should be viewed as a series of cases because at one end of the street residential is across from commercial and at the other end there is only residential. The consensus of the Council was for Staff to proceed with Option Number 3 with the inclusion of developing drafts from the citizen input received from workshops with citizens and the Planning and Zoning Commission and to further schedule public hearings for the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission to formally consider the amendments in accordance with State law. IR 99-082 REVIEW Mr Norwood recapped the information provided to NAN IMPLEMENTATION the Council in the IR. He updated the Council on the PLAN FOR implementation of the increased Code Enforcement INCREASED CODE Program and the proactive activities being done to r'NFORCEMENT educate and encourage voluntary compliance. _ ROGRAM There were no questions from the Council. Pre-Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 4 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 6.41 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to Executive Session to discuss pending litigation as authorized by Section 551.072 of the Government Code. Charles Scoma — Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson — City Secretary MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 — JUNE 14, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order June 14, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Charles Scoma Mayor JoAnn Johnson Mayor Pro Tem Lyle E. Welch Councilman Russell Mitchell Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Don Phifer Councilman Matt Milano Councilman T. Oscar Trevino, Jr. Councilman Staff: Larry J. Cunningham City Manager Randy Shiflet Deputy City Manager Steve Norwood Assistant City Manager Patricia Hutson City Secretary Alicia Richardson Assistant City Secretary Greg Dickens City Engineer Rex McEntire Attorney 2. INVOCATION Mr. Robert Waller, Minister- College Hill Church of Christ, gave the invocation. Mr. Waller briefed the Council on the community outreach programs his Church provides to the community. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 2 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Welch removed item 6c, PU 99-27, from the Consent Agenda. 6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED A. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MAY 24, 1999 B. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING MAY 24, 1999 C. PU 99-27 — (REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA) D. AWARD BID FOR THE 1999 STREET SUBGRADE STABILIZATION PROJECT TO MCCLENDON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,415 - RESOLUTION NO. 99-41 Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 6C. PU 99-27 -AWARD BID FOR CITY HALL HVAC REPLACEMENT TO WALKER MECHANICAL IN THE AMOUNT OF 597,900 - RESOLUTION NO. 99-40 APPROVED Mr. Thomas Powell, Director of Support Services, recapped the request for Award of Bid. Councilman Welch moved to deny PU 99-27 and to rebid the project at a later date. Motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer, to approve PU 99-27 City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 3 awarding the contract for HVAC replacement to Walker Mechanical in the amount of $97,900 and pass Resolution No. 99-40 authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract. Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, Councilmen Mitchell, Metts, Phifer, Milano and Trevino voting for and Councilman Welch voting against. 7. PZ 99-11 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF WASHINGTON & ASSOCIATES FOR A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST ON 35.26 ACRES OF LAND IN THE Y.C. YATES SURVEY, A-1753 FROM R7-MULTI-FAMILY AND 12-MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL TO R7-MULTIFAMILY, 12-MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL AND C1-COMMERCIAL. (LOCATED IN THE 6900 BLOCK OF MID-CITIES BOULEVARD) - ORDINANCE NO. 2390 APPROVED Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, presented a summary of the request and staff recommendations. Mr. Wayne Flory, representing Washington and Associates,was present and answered Council questions. The Council discussed Parcel 2's close proximity to residential and questioned the reasoning for the applicant requesting that the zoning be changed from R-7 Multi-family to Industrial. The Council asked the applicant if they would have a problem if the zoning on Parcel 2 was changed to Commercial rather than Industrial. Mr. Flory was agreeable. Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor or opposition to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to approve PZ 99- 11, Ordinance No. 2390 with the exception of Parcel 2, containing 14.63 acres, being rezoned from R7-Multi-family to C-1 Commercial. The remainder to be rezoned as recommending by Planning and Zoning — Parcel 1, containing 17.63 acres, from 12 Medium Industrial to R7-Multi-Family and Parcel 3, containing 3 acres, from R-7 Multi- Family to C1-Commercial. Motion carried 7-0. City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 4 8. PZ 99-13 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DAVID CARTER FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON A PORTION OF BLOCK B, HEWITT ESTATES ADDITION FROM AG-AGRICULTURAL AND R2-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R1-RESIDENTIAL AND RIS-SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (LOCATED IN THE 7600 BLOCK OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE) - ORDINANCE NO. 2391 APPROVED Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, summarized the request and presented staffs recommendations. The applicant was present to answer questions from the Council. Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor or in opposition to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Milano moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino, to approve PZ 99-13, Ordinance No. 2391 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission rezoning the proposed Lot B3A from AG-Agriculture and R2 Single Family Residential to R1-Single Family and proposed Lot B3B from AG-Agricultural to R-1-S-Special Single Family Residential. Motion carried 7-0. 9. PZ 99-14 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1874, SECTION 310, TABLE OF PERMITTED USES TO ALLOW ACCESSORY OFF-STREET PARKING LOTS AS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE C1 AND C2-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND, 11-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND 12, MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS - ORDINANCE NO. 2392 APPROVED Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, summarized the request and presented an alternate recommendation to consider allowing accessory non-required off-street parking lots as a permitted use only in the LR-Local Retail District on property fronting City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 5 Northeast Loop 820 and containing no more than 7,000 square feet. All such parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the Landscape Regulations. All such parking lots shall be in accordance with Article 8, Parking and Loading Regulations and Article 10, Buffering and Screening Regulations. Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve Alternate Ordinance No. 2392, amending Section 310, Table of Permitted Uses to Allow Accessory Non-Required Off-Street Parking Lots as a permitted use in the LR-Local Retail District and Section 320, Subsection 19, allowing Accessory Non-Required Off- Street Parking Lots as a permitted use only in the LR-Local Retail District on property fronting Northeast Loop 820 and containing no more than 7,000 square feet. All such parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the Landscape Regulations. All such parking lots shall be in accordance with Article 8, Parking and Loading Regulations and Article 10, Buffering and Screening Regulations. Motion carried 7-0. Councilman Trevino advised that the Council needed to address at a future date the parking of trailer trucks in parking lots during weekends. 10. PZ 99-15 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 310, TABLE OF PERMITTED USES AND SECTION 320, SPECIAL LAND USE REGULATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1874, TO ADD THE USE AND REGULATIONS OF COMMUNITY HOMES FOR DISABLED PERSONS - ORDINANCE NO. 2393 APPROVED Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, presented Staffs summary and recommendations. Attorney McEntire briefed the Council on the reason for the case being presented to the Council. Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against to come forward. City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 6 There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve PZ 99-15 and Ordinance No. 2393, amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 to Section 310.A and Section 320.(16) relative to Community Homes for Disabled Persons. Motion carried 7-0. 11. PZ 99-16 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF RESOURCES FOR SENIOR LIVING FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON 13.623 ACRES IN THE L.C. WALKER SURVEY, A-1653 TO AMEND PD-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT#27 FOR ASSISTED LIVING AND TO ESTABLISH PD-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT#27A (LOCATED IN THE 8500 BLOCK OF EMERALD HILLS WAY) - ORDINANCE NO. 2394 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2395 APPROVED Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, summarized the request and presented Staff recommendations. A representative from Kurtz-Bedford Associates, Consulting Engineers, was present to answer questions. Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Ratcliff advised the Council that the current property owners have also requested that the metes and bounds description be included in the proposed ordinances. Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer, to approve PZ 99-16 and Ordinance No. 2394 amending the existing Planned Development#27 on proposed Lot 3R to reduce the lot size, eliminate the maximum density and the traffic study and to maintain the original 10 conditions of Ordinance No. 2245 and to approve Ordinance No. 2395 establishing a new Planned Development#27A on proposed Lot 4 for a 48 unit Assisted Living Alzheimer's Facility and keep the same conditions approved with Ordinance No. 2245 with the exception of a density requirement, the wrought iron fence butting Emerald Lakes Addition and the traffic study required. City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 7 Motion carried 7-0. 12. GN 99-52 RECOMMENDATIONS OF AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL ACCEPTED Mr. Steve Brown, Library Director, recapped the activities of the Cultural and Educational Committee. RECESS Mayor Scoma called a recess at 8:07 p.m. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting back to order at 8:13 p.m. with the same members present as recorded. Ms. Zanda Hilger-Seaberg, Cultural and Educational Ad Hoc Committee Member, introduced the Committee Members and presented an overview of the Committee's findings and recommendations. At the conclusion of the presentation, Ms. Hilger- Seaberg requested the Council to consider their request to schedule a work session with the members of the Committee to further explore the recommendations in greater detail. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer, to accept the report of the Ad Hoc Committee, to send the Committee a letter signed by each member of the City Council thanking them for their work, to set in place a means of keeping the committee informed as the Council considers and acts on their recommendations; and to hold at a later date a work session with the Committee to consider the Committee's recommendations in more detail. Motion carried 7-0. 13. GN 99-49 LOCATION AND BROADCASTING OF PRE COUNCIL MEETINGS APPROVED Mayor Scoma recapped the request. City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 8 Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to move the Pre-council Meetings from the City Council Chambers back to the Pre-Council Room and that such meetings not be broadcast. After discussion by the Council, Councilman Milano asked Councilman Trevino if he would amend his motion to move meetings back to the Pre-Council Room and to tape the meetings for broadcast at a later date Councilman Trevino amended his motion to include that the Pre-Council Meetings will be taped and broadcast at a later date. Councilman Welch seconded the amendment. Motion carried 7-0. 14. GN 99-50 AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE — RESOLUTION NO. 99-42 DENIED Mayor Scoma presented Resolution No. 99-42 introducing into record a proposed amendment to the Council Rules of Procedure. The proposed amendment would amend Section 3.4b of the Council Rules. Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to deny Resolution No. 99-42. After discussion, motion to deny carried 5-2; Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, Councilmen Metts, Phifer, Milano and Trevino voting for denial and Councilmen Welch and Mitchell voting against denial. 15. GN 99-51 CONSIDER LAND USE AD HOC COMMITTEE WORK ACTIVITIES DENIED Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell, to further the involvement of the Land Use Ad Hoc Committee as it relates to 1) architectural design and layout, 2) Subdivision Ordinance review, 3) Land Use Plan, review and 4) Thoroughfare Plan update. Motion failed 3-4; Councilmen Mitchell, Welch and Trevino voting in favor and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson and Councilmen Metts, Phifer and Milano voting against. City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 9 16. PW 99-11 APPROVE REPLACEMENT FUND USE BY CITY OF WATAUGA FOR THE WATAUGA ROAD BOOSTER PUMP STATION CAPACITY INCREASE APPROVED Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, gave a recap of PW 99-11. Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Milano, to approve PW 99-11 approving the withdrawal and use of$25,000 from the "replacement fund" by the City of Watauga for use on this Watauga Road Booster Pump Station Capacity Increase Project. Motion carried 7-0. 17. PW 99-12 APPROVE REGIONAL FACILITY PLANNING CONTRACT WITH THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR THE BIG FOSSIL CREEK WASTEWATER SYSTEM — RESOLUTION NO. 99-38 APPROVED Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, gave a recap of PW 99-12. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino, to approve Resolution No. 99-38. Motion carried 7-0. 18. A. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. John Hamiter, 5116 Colorado Boulevard, spoke to the Council concerning the traffic on Colorado Boulevard. Mr. Hamiter asked the Council to consider closing Colorado Boulevard near Highway 26 just beyond the Oldsmobile Dealership. B. INFORMATION AND REPORTS The Mayor reported that North Tarrant Parkway will be closed from Davis Boulevard to Precinct Line Road June 14 through June 30 for resurfacing. City Council Minutes June 14, 1999 Page 10 The Mayor reported that Information Services has installed a computer for Internet access use for the Dan Echols Senior Citizen Center. Mayor Scoma reported on the progress of the library automation and expressed his appreciation for the volunteers who helped with the project. 19. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS • Cepartment Support Services Council Meeting Date. 6/28/99 Subject: Alternative Fuels Grant— Resolution 99-44 Agenda Number GN 99-53 The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) has initiated a public sector Alternative Fuels Program. The NCTCOG is working with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) to offer financial assistance to the public sector for the conversion of vehicles to an alternative fuel or for the additional cost involved with the purchase of new alternative fueled vehicles. A grant for$10,320 to subsidize the purchase cost of three new alternative fueled vehicles has been approved by the NCTCOG. With the City Council's authorization, Staff will submit the "Agreement for Funding of Alternative Fuels Program' to the TXDOT requesting the approved funding. Resolution No. 99-44, which states that the City will comply with the terms of the agreement, must be submitted to TXDOT to receive a work order authorizing the purchase of three alternative fueled vehicles. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 99-44 authorizing Staff to submit the Alternative Fuels Program agreement to TXDOT to receive $10,320 in funding for the purchase of three new alternative fueled vehicles. Finance Review Source of Funds Account Number 510-7032-712.74-10 Bonds (GO/Rev.) Suffci t Funds Available Operating Budget X / Other 1, K bcn.LA� Finance Directo0 r -Lev �� _ 01• Department Head Signature 1 Manager -igna ure Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 — 44 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT. 1 Upon receiving a signed work order from the Texas Department of Transportation, the City of North Richland Hills agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Alternative Fuels Agreement. 2. The City assures that three new alternative fueled vehicles will be purchased to operate on an alternative fuel. 3. The proposed project is for the advancement of the Alternative Fuels Program in Texas Passed and approved this day of , 1999. APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Attorney for City • CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department Finance / Public Works Council Meeting Date 6/28/99 Subject. Award Bid for 1999 Street Wedge Milling Project to Agenda Number PU 99-28 Dustrol, Inc. in the amount of$38,266 On November 23, 1998, Council approved the 1998/99 Street Overlay Program (PW 98- 23 ). The 1999 Street Wedge Milling Project is included as part of the program. Formal bids were solicited for wedge milling to be performed on nine streets. Attached is a list of the streets included in the bid. The bid results are listed below. Dustrol, Inc. $38,266 Sutton & Associates $45,427 Staff contacted the contractors that did not respond to the invitation to bid and there are only three contractors that perform this type of work in our area. One company was too busy to complete the bid but will be interested in bidding on the project next year. Dustrol, Inc. met all the general conditions and specifications of the bid and can complete the project within thirty days. Dustrol has done satisfactory work for the City in the past and always completed projects for the bid amount and within the number of days bid. Recommendation: To award the bid for the 1999 Street Wedge Milling Project to Dustrol, Inc. in the amount of$38,266. Finance Review Source of Funds Account Number 315-6003-603.4345 Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget X Other ✓y'/V ' .c- Finance Director • --�1.,�ts ate i i -- Head Signature City Mar(ag:r Signature o.no I .-f LOCATION FROM/TO LINEAR FEET Green Ridge Trail Hightower Dr. to Windhaven Rd 2,660 Janetta Drive E. of Roberta to Roberta Dr. 310 Ridgetop Road Crosstimbers Ln. to Rufe Snow Dr 2,800 Buck Street Hewitt Dr. to Dead-end 1,900 Crosstimbers Lane Ridgetop Rd. to Hightower Dr. 2,700 Greendale Court Culdesac to Rufe Snow Dr. 1,500 Starnes Road Crabtree to Davis Blvd. 3,900 Jerrie Jo Drive Wyoming Trail to Nevada Trail 575 Redondo Street Marilyn Ln. to Briley Dr. 2,700 1999 Street Wedge Milling Project Bid#99-871 COMPLETION CONTRACTOR AMOUNT DAYS 1 Dustrol Incorporated $38,266 00 30 2 Sutton &Associates $45,427.00 30 Advertised in Star Telegram April 29 & May 6 and sent to North Texas Construction Plan Room Notice was mailed to the following Contractors but did not submit a bid 1. Brock Paving Industries - does not have milling machine 2 Jackson Construction -does not do asphalt work 3 APAC of Texas -only does hot mix, does not do wedge milling 4 Richard Carr Construction-timing was not good, can not be competitive on this type of work 5 New World Company-too busy to complete bid, wants to stay on vendor list for next year 6 Ed A.Wilson Inc -does not do asphalt work it I6 e.24 FM.y G6 Na:0021 MAP n.1 w...tn.p PLOL...il .a..IN ' I " p I w _. E. 11111151ilia Legend: ' - " 04 I ii - sidew a..r. 111 C 2 - Green Ridge Trail 1 - IIU.:� Or 3 - Janette Drive a ''11 _ o cc 4 - RidgetopRoad 7 .rl��1�� . fir" �r ,� 5 - Buck Street 4 .tift7 - -'• '�I •��'`i a y J 6 - Crosstimbers Lane !C Glyn X10 kit': . chili -all�F 7 - Greendale Court 6 ,t�' �a . 8 - Redondo Street �%s�„'r"- 4,.rialt 9 - Stames Road ^ �� MM�I -- .. tra tr - fr ��: i -^asionerwan Pei ir 12- Jeni Jo Drive . r s !Jr �' A� IIILV 21 1 -- et IF: i .,_ - 8 7aw innd'17z e . : -.� j S '�m...i:n 'let f 1 rhrf A GLENVIEW D . I MiulM' PR - .. - .! 1998199 l .:.r purr( ,a City Street Overlay Program � o� '1 7U/ 7,��!- ���. NORTH HILLS D.e.m.m el Sea..te.Swan-O.gr.0„ie MI.m.0m fr.wa.1061 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department City Manager's Office Council Meeting Date 6/28/99 Subject CDBG Joint Cooperative Agreement with Tarrant County Agenda Number GN 99.54 Resolution No 99-45 In 1996 the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) designated the City as a metropolitan city to receive direct entitlement of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds At that time, the City Council directed the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Tarrant County to administer these grant funds The agreement was negotiated and approved by City Council through Resolution 96-43 June 24, 19% This joint cooperative agreement was for fiscal years 1997 through 1999 As we are approaching the end of the 1999 fiscal year. City staff has received the resolution from Tarrant County to renew the joint cooperative agreement for administration of the CDBG funds for fiscal years 2000 through 2002 The terms of the agreement remain the same as the current agreement, and the City can opt out annually with written notice to Tarrant County This resolution is important because it will allow the City to be included in Tarrant County's planning process as part of a consortium with other cities, and it allows Tarrant County to continue the administrative responsibilities involved with CDBG entitlement funds The result of not entering into this agreement would be that the City would have to take on the costly administrative functions currently performed by the County on our behalf Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Resolution No 99-45 Finance Review Source of Funds Account Number AccountNumber Bonds (GO/Rev ) — Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget Other Finance Director Department Head Signature IJ� City Ma ag r Signature RESOLUTION * 99-45 RESOLUTION REGARDING CITY OF North Richland Hills, A DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) METROPOLITAN CITY DESIGNATED AS A DIRECT ENTITLEMENT CITY, FOR PARTICIPATION IN TARRANT COUNTY'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE THREE PROGRAM YEAR PERIOD, FISCAL YEAR 2000 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2002, SUBJECT TO THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT ATTACHED (ATTACHMENT "A") . WHEREAS, Title I of the Housing and Community Act of 1974, as amended through the Housing and Community Act of 1992, establishes a program of community development block grants for the specific purpose of developing viable communities by providing decent housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income, and WHEREAS, Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, establishes the HOME Investment Partnership Act to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for very low-income and low-income Americans, and WHEREAS, Tarrant County has been designated an "Urban County" by the Department of Housing and Urban Development entitled to a formula share of Community Development Block Grant and HOME program funds provided said County has a combined population of 200, 000 persons in its unincorporated areas and units of general local government with which it has entered into cooperative agreements, and WHEREAS, Article III, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution authorizes Texas counties to enter into cooperative agreements with local governments for essential Community Development and Housing Assistance activities, and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills shall not apply for grants under the Small Cities or State CDBG Program from appropriations for fiscal years during the period in which it is participating in Tarrant County' s CDBG program, and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills shall not participate in a HOME consortium except through Tarrant County, regardless of whether or not Tarrant County receives a HOME formula allocation, and WHEREAS, through cooperative agreements Tarrant County has authority to carry out activities funded from annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Program Allocation from Federal Fiscal Years 2000, 2001 , and 2002 appropriations and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds subject to the Joint Cooperative Agreement attached (attachment "A" ) , and WHEREAS, Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills agree to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and low income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, and WHEREAS, Tarrant County will not fund activities in support of any cooperating unit of general government that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes the county' s actions to comply with its fair housing certification, and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has adopted and is enforcing a policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within jurisdictions, and WHEREAS, Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the Urban County' s certification required by section 104 (b) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, section 109 of Title I of the Housing Community Development Act of 1974, and other applicable laws, and WHEREAS, prior to disbursing any CDBG or HOME Program funds to a subrecipient, Tarrant County shall sign a written agreement with such subrecipient, and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills agrees to inform the county of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds received and that any such program income must be paid to the county to be used for eligible activities in accordance with all Community Development Block Grant and HOME Program requirements, on behalf of the City, and WHEREAS, in accordance with 24 CFR 570 . 501 (b) , Tarrant County is responsible for ensuring that CDBG funds are used in accordance with all program requirements, including monitoring and reporting to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on the use of program income and that in the event of close-out or change in status of the city of North Richland Hills, any program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the close-out of change in status shall be paid to the county, and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills agrees to notify Tarrant County of any modification or change in the use of the real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement, including disposition, and further agrees to reimburse the County in an amount equal to the current fair market value (less any portion thereof attributable to expenditure of non-CDBG funds) of property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG regulations, and WHEREAS, any money generated from disposition or transfer of property will be treated as program income and returned to the county for use by the City of North Richland Hills prior to or subsequent to the close-out, change of status or termination of the cooperation agreement between county and the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of North Richland Hills, that the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas, A Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) metropolitan city designated as a direct entitlement city, supports the application of Tarrant County for funding from Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 , as amended, and Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, and asks that its population be included for three successive years with that of Tarrant County, Texas to carry out Community Development Program Activities Eligible for Assistance under Public Law 93-383 , and Affordable Housing activities under Public Law 101-625, and authorizes the Mayor of North Richland Hills, Texas to sign such additional forms as requested by the Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to the purposes of the Resolution, and further that the City and County understand that this resolution is subject to the Joint Administrative Agreement attached (attachment "A") . The City of North Richland Hills, Texas understands that Tarrant County will have final legal responsibility for administration of projects and for filing annual grant requests. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this agreement will automatically be renewed for participation in successive three-year qualification periods, unless Tarrant County or the City of North Richland Hills provides written notice it elects not to participate in a new qualification period. Tarrant County will notify the City of North Richland Hills in writing of its right to make to such election on the date specified by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in HUD' s urban county qualification notice for the next qualification period. Any amendments or changes contained within the Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for a subsequent three-year urban county qualification period must be adopted by Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills, and submitted to HUD. Failure by either party to adopt such an amendment to the ° agreement will void the automatic renewal of this agreement . This agreement remains in effect until CDBG, HOME funds, and income received to the fiscal 2000, 2001, 2002 programs, and to any successive qualification periods provided through the automatic renewal of this agreement, are expended and the funded activities completed, neither Tarrant County nor the City of North Richland Hills may terminate or withdraw from the agreement while the agreement remains in effect . Official notice of amendments or changes applicable for a subsequent three-year urban county agreement shall be in writing and be mailed by certified mail to the City Secretary of the City of North Richland Hills . Any notice of changes or amendments to this agreement by the City of North Richland Hills to Tarrant County shall be in writing to the Tarrant County Community Development Division Director. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of , 1999 ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY SECRETARY MAYOR Commissioners Court Clerk County Judge APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Approval Form for District Attorney Approved as to Form* *By law, the District Attorney' s Office may only advise or approve contracts or legal documents on behalf of its clients. It may not advise or approve a contract or legal document on behalf of other parties. Our review of this document was conducted solely from the legal perspective of our client . Our approval of this document was offered solely for the benefit of our client . Other parties should not rely on this approval, and should seek review and approval by their own respective attorney(s) . JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT § The CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, hereinafter called "City", has accepted a designation by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a metropolitan city eligible to receive direct entitlement of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the FY 2002 program year,and The CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS has entered into a cooperative agreement (attachment "A") with TARRANT COUNTY, hereinafter called "County", to participate in the County's CDBG program as a metropolitan city eligible to receive direct entitlement of CDBG funds, and The CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and TARRANT COUNTY have agreed to abide by HUD requirements as detailed in CPD 96-04, Article 5, in the cooperative agreement (attachment "A"), and in accordance with 24 CFR 570.308 Joint Requests. This JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City Council of the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and TARRANT COUNTY and the parties hereby AGREE as follows: 1. Scone of Term of Services. The City of North Richland Hills hereby employs the County through this Joint Administrative Agreement to administer all activities and requirements of federal, state and local law,and rules and procedures of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development with regard to the City's metropolitan city designation and related Community Development Block Grant entitlement program for the Fiscal Years 2000 through 2002. 2. Distribution of CDBG Funds. The City shall receive CDBG entitlement program funding from the County as an entitled metropolitan city. The amount of funding shall be equivalent to or greater than what HUD determines annually as the City's entitlement as a metropolitan city. 3. Duties of County. The County shall be responsible for administering all activities related to the City CDBG entitlement program in accordance with 24 CFR 570.500 Subpart "J" Grant Administration. 4. Duties of the City. The City will approve all City CDBG entitlement program funding decisions. The City will determine specific programs, projects, or any other uses to the extent • permitted and consistent with HUD eligible activities. 5. Fee for Services The County shall be paid an annual fee based upon FOURTEEN PERCENT(14%) of the total City CDBG entitlement program funding 6. City Administrative Expenses. The County shall remit to the City SIX PERCENT(6%) of total City CDBG entitlement program funding for administrative costs incurred by the City in accordance with HUD eligible reimbursable administrative costs. This Joint Administrative Agreement is executed on behalf of the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and TARRANT COUNTY by its duly authonzed officials. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MAYOR DATE: TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS TOM VANDERGRIFF,JUDGE DATE: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS apartment Police Department Council Meeting Date 6/28/99 Subject 1999 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant-Resolution No 99-46 Agenda Number GN 99-55 The City is in the process of applying for the 1999 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. One of the requirements of the Grant application is the City Council's formal approval to apply. If awarded the Grant will provide $38,804.00 for two vehicles for the School Resource Officers. The City's matching amount will be 3,881 00. These funds are available from the Federal and State forfeiture monies. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No 99-46 Rnance Review Source of Funds Account Number 115-8010-531 74-10 Bonds(GO/Rev) Suffci-nt Funds Available Operating Budget — Other 644, Finance Director RAWla ..I11.49. Department Head Signature - -'g gnature Page 1 of _ RESOLUTION NO. 99-46 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills possesses legal authority to apply for the 1999 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant; NOW, THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, THAT the filing of the application for the 1999 Local Law Enforcement Grant is hereby authorized and that Captain Sid Johnson act as the official representative of the City in connection with the Grant application PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the 28th day of June 1999. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST. ti City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS apartment Police Department Council Meeting Date 06/28/99 Subject Set Date for Public Hearing on Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Agenda Number GN 99-56 • The 1999 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Application process is currently underway, and the Police Department proposes that this year's grant funds be used to purchase two (2) vehicles for the School Resource Officers This year, the United States Department of Justice has allocated $38,804 00 to the City of North Richland Hills for use in the Police Department One of the requirements of the grant is a public hearing regarding the proposed use of the payment under the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program. Recommendation Set the public hearing date for the Local Law Enforcement Grant for July 12, 1999. Finance Review Source of Funds Account Number Bonds (GO/Rev ) — Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget Other Finance Director op ar �• Imo" ♦./ Department Head Signature Vty Manager Si. at,re Page 1 of IINFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No.IR99-090 { Date. Monday, June 28, 1999 Subject: CCD Update/Public Awareness Plan Since the passage of the "Crime Control and Prevention District" half-cent sales tax referendum in February of 1996, there have been many accomplishments in the North Richland Hills Police Department. Goals set at the outset of the implementation of the CCD budget have been met. Some of those goals consisted of reduced police response times, maintaining lower crime rates, maintaining higher crime clearance rates and improving productivity through the additional staffing of commissioned and civilian personnel. In an effort to support the added 37 personnel hired under the referendum's umbrella, various types of equipment were purchased. In summary, many accomplishments have been achieved through the establishment of the Crime Control District. The Cnme Control District was created for five years, and will expire in February, 2001, or must be reauthorized by the voters. The Mayor and City Council set as one of its top priorities and goals, to develop a plan for reauthorization of the CCD and to provide an evaluation of the use of these funds. Staff would like to take this means to provide a status of Council's goals on this matter At the Council session, staff would like to present two topics. One is to give a status report on the use of the CCD funds and the accomplishments. Police Chief Tom Shockley will make this presentation. Secondly, we would like to provide an overview to Council of the strategy for educating the public on the results of the CCD and advantages for the citizens to support the reauthorization. This is proposed to be an on-going effort for the next 18-20 months Communications Director Donna Huerta will make this presentation. We welcome your questions about the CCD programs and results and solicit your suggestions about the Public Awareness Plan. We look forward to the discussion Monday night Res ectfully submitted, Donna Huerta Communications Director Attachment: ' Outline of Public Awareness Plan L ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS NRH Crime Control and Prevention District Proposed Public Awareness Program 1 . Program Definition • Survey Citizens to determine their expectations of Police Department • Define services and benefits provided through the CCD • Implement Public Awareness Program 2. Alternatives/Competition • Define the competitive landscape —Where do CCD tax dollars come from? — Who pays the CCD sales tax? —Where do your CCD tax dollars go? — What would be the tax impact if there were no 1/2 cent sales tax for a CCD? 3. Public Education • Scope of Service — Statement defining current services provided with CCD tax dollars • Current and Future Impact — Statement summarizing benefits of new or continued services provided with CCD tax dollars 4. Communication Strategies • Define target audiences and their demographics • Identify best methods of reaching audience • Initiate information flow 5. Public Awareness Strategies • Outline Public Awareness Plan highlights • Provide Backup Public Awareness Plan • Obtain editorial calendars • Make personal contacts with media • Execution - Disseminate monthly media releases - Produce & Broadcast monthly PSAs - Quarterly newsletter story - Produce information brochure - Produce information video - Host quarterly community & neighborhood meetings - Arrange speaking engagements 6. Advertising • Strategy & execution - Seek outside sponsorship for funding - Hire Public Relations Firm for final months - Overview of media schedules & timing - Overview of advertising expenditures 7. Program Schedule • Begin 20-month Public Awareness Program July 1999 - February 2001 • Begin 2 month Advertising Program December 2000 • Timing - Isolate timing dependencies critical to success • t!�E r? —ha i I - i IC lorg U O .. U LA J „100)111111 Fl < r CI J` :3 J Ig f -± 0 a O (/) L- co ca. 411111 . 1u2 L 7:3 CD U_ a) 0 0 0 'cn O a) cn CI) _U E o p7 000 E cn •O 07 a, � 0 � � cn a) co I� U )_ c a) .? CO ti 07 Ct) .co CD v c) 0) N u) c . = al 0) V- i C6 N O O -0 a) O _J o O ` >- a) CO I— CD LL -c N— N "0 O LL J 0 < 0 � � I I • t, . r - .c.'3- vr- i I 11 rie fig L . J I_J !C Mk TT� V, CTO v/ CD C 0 CO U c6 2 co u) 0_ u) U to c O E N •U • •> U v 4- 00 U .> U •� p d) M U � � � °— ° � a) p — p — Q 4— Q d) = LT_ = s— Q I I I I I I • v / nV r _ ....._ a) 0 c c co cia (1) .L cn co I) 4c z o co CO _o - CO ") 1 0 ca a) �+- 0 0 0n c) ti V - 1- L.6 o co = w 0 0 p N LL N— �--+ ›--0 — a--+ i 1 1 co a) c, (6 0) (..0 ti oo ° ad 0) x 2 .E rn rn rn E o a) X >, c n cfl i c oo ° o > L o 0 o a) L a) a. c S °- -_� O o) a) a) 0- a) 0) * .L- 0 O 4— T- N— (/) .. r- * LL Q Q LL LL LL. LL V I I I • ; r i i : ' 112 C-?) *kr' 4-• as c.) e() ft) IZ cn :71 cgt- oacn ,ED ..... CV CO CO C) CO cti 4-• w 73 Ci) C a) rw, CO N. CO CT) 71:.; CD .%.00 C) 0) C7) E > in co co = u) cp cr) a) ( o) w 13 cl) (4)) >- LL LL CD C • • y11•[� • __J c? _J` _i J �C i= _a )Eib a) v Co a v) a) >1 LL etc ai a) .— 00 c N E d +� .. ti CO C d N — 0) I` � = i c o) v Q a) cn 73 a) 'C N _ 0) a) O r C) ai cn E L. L as = .c n ._ U) >- L.L. CD u' t o o N •— o LL C ja C c CD ti E N o. 9 N - 'a O u) 4t i = co 4 p g m -3 ••M N O fil _17 co c C a_ to CV C c" N E .>to a) N Y d 2 Q a W CO co V ca °o c- 11 V o I I v v t— t— cfl o evt in .0 oo - W = I I I I • j i b""'.°°^...._,ma . J Nom, _, -" = EC' U) U_ a) a) • (1) cD U LL. > - d) U O ku > E- 0 Cn ce) "e2. C2 -0 "CD CD ao W L v ._ ct eL a. a I I I • C--r I f 1 1111 i- I ,IP _Jr _J -----i- CI 2; -.1 R „ _ LIE E o U o E ca _c j, }' o co (6 .(1) ° E ..c al 0 Li_cu c 1- 0 E a) a) -1-P E (13 a) E N-- _o d) ,„0 -1-1, ,,," co- 0 co ....., v, - m., , -o c (/) cf) I- >, a) E — Q co c co to .c o Q) (10 o o � j)O � P_ (D u) CD 0 E c.) F- o o -� -� c� o 0 C: --) 2 2 2 • • • • • • • A JiL : ik13 ...,�{� 1,, ''v. ::A _ O U \ L O L O co co •v cs _N 0_ � O CO = U) �+ E L O 2 enU) O O Q Ce) N N — cI N 0 1 1 • En .tleDn►1 L < _J Jti _J _t �) ra, 0 co C U O O 2 ._'5 7) ci L_iri all .0 N (I) a) 2 09- 0 Cl)- U co CD E c a)cn o v N O CZ • o E U) c L c c O = w ° O U U w o . n O c a O v � "0 la CD f O 77 �, a) �- N c�.475 as N a) L N (o o 0, -0 -0 LL cn v ._ 0 Q ui m scl) 0 -1 '< 0 8 2 " a) 4- 4. 4- o a) E 0_ ci 0 V I I • M � M ■ ■ 0 r kW' r" 4 -k, , �r : . � k t� 0 •{. 0) r' '6 r I 0) M t go.co ■ • xa` cn r `� l►��"fl H < �-i g; a Jr •J ELg a 0 0 p 0 i 0 -0 73 plill ,.., Cs 0 N CO Q C .g., o cn o o o co 2 :€, 0.) t 0 (/) 0) W U CD > ' CO v o •• I— • 0 15) , Ii -all - IL tee, V •may CA •'••1 C A 0 = E •- •∎ect o •- 4E a > CI PI Am.a) Pmil 0 a)i.., p„, c.) a) si. Cs) W) 1:1 44 0 0 : : ( a, Ai, P■I ;NO C -C FAO `t c' 0 C ;I* 0 0 W ct ■Imi t vlia 0 .?, v •— ca C.) .v (1) _ 0 • c...) c p., C E •..... .c E o. E 0 0 ca '0 O oo < 4 ,._ .‘,.,,,,_. , _;,,___.w.:;,-',.. aONMNIIIIMIMIIMMIMNIPso- 0, sr • ' M L GI .4.„a E a) t Cr) c co u) •. CX lip Q a) L Q C V C a) 2 w a) 0 1_, as a) (,,,) 0 0 ._ Q • , 0 co .0 v • • ar)u) 4'm 0 LiTz4( C 0 a) = a) c c) O = (1) N c •- L Q. 11.42 0 0 •■ 0 1.3 E >,. - v) a) E to W E_..... ct a) 0 a) iv _ w . ;.-i a) ,_ > — cm to a a 0 0 , x w L t!) 0 0 a 0 A-- • . ; • , .,. .. . ... Ch Oh 8 e; _. 0' E cu 0- 0 O c%• a) 0 Q. 0 .c V v ..... ca u) E c•- 13 o o O C v ca `�0 cn Ec as x (I) • 1.-1 as .i.- 42) _ a..) $::Li .� O ca "'r as 0 7:3 E •_ ... ,, W ; CI cts V V _c D L Cii.) E a) is: NI CD ci) O 0 = E a) O a ro a) Om .E < • T� V c) CD 0 -C a) c.) O i:".= Co•_ 4 ..... •_ (.01 cu p a) c • a) . _a O z: -0 CL cy) O. M x V .n3 N a1 _ •F.+ co) an a ctl II I■1 Sow = E . � i•... ._ -1-- ct a) _c u- = iv Lzi c....) a) -cis •... Cn = Ts (1) a) —o _mi y.. a) ca w •- x ..,4 o E -a -1-,2, E c 21 ca O r v ..., • ,-1 ..... o co ci =(..) (1) 1 (..) 1 P-iii • . , . , 0 M x �� L D) a) ..... _c _c cf) }i V 1..) 73 as • ,.. C L to 1 Ct 4) Q ;.-4 c.) 0,_e cA 4_) 0 C • O 13 `b+ ■- O Z G) ca • 1. -o RS cn E +, c,) E Cit co •- 4-1 U � � O L... cl a)• ,-4 v 14- as as .c2 w c 4-11 s_ ci) E a) �� c •_ a) c 0 .. w 4-I as 4....., E w a) a w •NMI O 0 13 _ ca _ C...) 0 _. • • CT CT 0 M — ui) as •_ cf) -a T^ a) a) VJ C c E cu as a) • '"i L mc tn am CD ♦m. •I--_ (11) � Ct Cl) a 1 a) co 0 .4-, .v T v a) — i -a a) - ci) as = — C cA O- c1 (1) O � v Q C) 4) v = •- CD ;--14 •- L C v 0 p Cl. m CU 13 UI) Simi ill .0 -a a) U E512 co a) = •- •- a)am „..., - S = 0) o (xi -12 CO O .0 a. o. 0 2 P-ii • .,_. - elk • • .. O M , u) 0 a) v) 4/2 co CO 2 a) Tt) >+ oa Eni ...a .c o >% a) CD O O •— a)co E 4§ .0" 5 = ' a) ct 'DE c E c 5 >%Pl.. CA - v •� .p E "Iiii cm 4� O ca In v .E _v E 2� a� a.-1 a� � � p � E c c a� O .— .— - (I) 0 E V 1' V (s) p c 5) 77 u) ti a s 0 2 0 .05 ot = 0 p = L. ii. i c c.) u .- el- a 0- • ,..1 a) 0 x I I I I I T-442) LV 1 • Pi-- c, O M I CD E 1._ •_ m ma 4- I a)o.a E ix;•_ Sim 0 Nu a) E co a) cp to a) 2 (..) 0 0 MINE Oa +.111 N °' a) 0 .." a) 1...) as a) .L 0 > > u) i 0 0 t I I I I C1 M. E o m v- co Fii O L.. a) O cm v C N 0 :� i � L.. 'i O- RS t� L- C ._ Q /2 .- V 12 I a) D cu = O > w a a) C. c) Q a)� � O 73 U = 0 0) >' 5 O c O � N .. U 0 cA E 1—) ° 1 &_ E cn N � N � � � ct c L ca v 0 •_,, 0) •_. ai) ._ o = 0 b.!) En 0 a) t)CD L_ a) a) .E . cl) 1 Pl-i O M rV