Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2015-09-14 Agendas k4FItH NOKTH KICHL.F,ND HILLS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76180 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 WORK SESSION: 6:00 PM Held in the City Council Work Room CALL TO ORDER 1. Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting 2. Discuss Canceling/Rescheduling November 23 and December 28 City Council Meetings. 3. Discuss miscellaneous topics for possible Zoning Ordinance updates. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Executive Session may be held at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the city attorney (551.071) as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting. The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. 1. Section 551.072: Deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property - (1) SE Corner of Rufe Snow & Loop 820; (2) 7901 Boulevard 26; (3) 4131 Rufe Snow, NW Corner of Rufe Snow and Glenview. REGULAR MEETING: Immediately following executive session (but no earlier than 7:00 p.m.) Held in the City Hall Council Chambers A. CALL TO ORDER A.1 INVOCATION - COUNCIL MEMBER WRIGHT OUJESKY A.2 PLEDGE - COUNCIL MEMBER WRIGHT OUJESKY A.3 SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S) Monday September 14, 2015 City Council Agenda Page 1 of 3 A.4 CITIZENS PRESENTATION An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior to the start of the Council meeting. A.5 REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA B. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS B.1 Approve minutes of the August 24, 2015 regular City Council meeting. B.2 Approve Resolution No. 2015-021, authorizing Investment Strategy and Investment Policy. B.3 Approve the purchase of stationary shelving units from Southwest Solutions Group in the amount of$ 261,252.85 for new City Hall C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C.1 SUP 2014-11, Ordinance 3371, Public Hearing and consideration of a request from Terry Browning for a Special Use Permit for the expansion of a Contractor's Office with Shop on 1.34 acres located at 3724 Rufe Snow Drive. C.2 ZC 2015-18, Ordinance No. 3374, Public Hearing and consideration of a request from the City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development #74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo). D. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT D.1 AP 2015-09 Consideration of a request from Cambridge NRH Development LLC for an Amended Plat of Cambridge Place on 1.4269 acres in the 6800 block of Iron Horse Boulevard. E. PUBLIC WORKS E.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Halff Associates for the Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project (DR1503) in an amount not to exceed $68,480 and to approve the associated budget revision. F. GENERAL ITEMS F.1 Consider Ordinance No. 3372, adopting the 2015/2016 Proposed Budget and amending the 2014/2015 Revised Budget. F.2 Consider Ratifying an Increase in Property Tax Revenues Reflected in the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Adopted Budget. F.3 Consider Ordinance No. 3373, adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2015. F.4 Consider Resolution No. 2015-022, approving and ratifying the 2015 Certified Roll. Monday September 14, 2015 City Council Agenda Page 2 of 3 171, 78-183, and 78-290(a) related to fire hydrant meters, water and water meters. G. EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS - CITY COUNCIL MAY TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON WORK SESSION AGENDA H. INFORMATION AND REPORTS - COUNCIL MEMBER WELCH H.1 Announcements I. ADJOURNMENT Certification I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills Cit Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in compliance ti .H Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on September 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM. I1 V s City Secretary This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817-427-6060 for further information. REMOVED FROM POSTING BOARD Date:4%T/�/LC Monday September 14, 2015 City Council Agenda Page 3 of 3 D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Discuss Items from Regular City Council Meeting Presenter: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary Summary: The purpose of this item is to allow City Council the opportunity to discuss any item on the regular agenda. General Description: The purpose of this standing item is to allow City Council the opportunity to inquire about items that are posted for discussion and deliberation on the regular City Council agenda. City Council is encouraged to ask staff questions to clarify and/or provide additional information on items posted on the regular or consent agenda. City Council may also elect to move items from the regular agenda to the consent agenda upon receiving clarification from staff on posted regular agenda items. Cbdl f LICbA5 D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Discuss Canceling/Rescheduling November 23 and December 28 City Council Meetings. Presenter: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary Summary: The second City Council meetings in November and December are in close proximity to Thanksgiving and Christmas. City Council will discuss whether to reschedule or cancel the November 23 and December 28 meetings. General Description: Historically, the City Council meeting schedule has been modified to either cancel or reschedule a meeting that is scheduled close to the Thanksgiving or Christmas holiday. This year both holidays fall on the fourth week of the month. This item is placed on the work session to provide Council the opportunity to discuss the second regularly scheduled City Council meetings in November and December. The Planning and Development Department has posted on the City website the 2015 meeting schedule (attached) for the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council to help developers manage their submittals. The calendar omits the November 23 and December 28 City Council meetings. The City Council may certainly choose to reschedule one or both meetings to a different week to accommodate any submittals received by the Planning and Development Department. Staff is seeking Council's direction to either cancel or reschedule the meetings. Upon direction, staff will notify the public via the City's website and at future City Council meetings during announcements. Cbdl f LICbM fb M r City of North Richland Hills � Planning & Zoning Commission �A and City Council g .... 2015 Meeting Schedule Q [ !Nf f yoh Dju?!DpvodjrtNf f yoh o )4so Ui vst ebz!pdd f !N pod *+ )3Oe N poebz!pdd f !N pod *++ o Ef df n cf s29 )3125* Kbov bsz 23 Kbov bsz!26 GF c sv bsz : w GF csvbsz!2: N bsdi N bsdi 2: Bgsjn,24 Bgsjrf27 N bz 22 0 N bz!32 Kvof 9 Kvof !29 Kvm 24 0 > Kvm!27 Bvhvt u21 0 Bvhvt U31 Tf qJ n cf s25 0 Tf qJ n cf s!28 PdLpcf s23 PdLpcf s!26 Opd n cf s : Opd n cf s!2: Ef df n cf s 25 0 .o Ef df n cf s!28 Kbov bsz!22 )3127* 0 +Uif !Q' [ ! Dpnnjttjpo!nffLt !po!dfl dstUboe!djse! Ui vst ebzit !pdf bdi !n pod /! ! Uif a [ ! o gvcld!n f f yoht !po!d f !dst u Ui vst ebz!pdf bdi !n pod !bsf !g)s!ejt dvt tjpo!pdjt t of t !vosf rbLf e! o Lp!t of djdd!dbt f t/!!Bdypo po!dbt f t !hf of sbrm!pddvst !po!d f !d jse Ui vst ebz!pdf bdi !n pod / ++Djtz!Dpvodjrin f f Lt !po!d f !t f dpoe boe Tvsd N poebzt pdf bdi !n pod /!!Qrboojoh!jLf n t bsf ! hf of sbrm!i f bse!po!d f !t f dpoe N poebz!pdf bdi !n pod P 22 0 m C bdI f LIC b/!7' D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Discuss miscellaneous topics for possible Zoning Ordinance updates. Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager Summary: Staff will be seeking input from City Council on four specific topics. General Description: There are four specific topics for work session discussion: 1. Concrete Batch Plants 2. Secondary Living Units (Granny Flats) 3. Drive-Through Restaurants 4. Fuel Sales The first two (concrete batch plants and secondary living units) are more time-sensitive, as property owners and developers have inquired about this topic and await a possible ordinance revision. The other topics are less time-sensitive, but staff is still interested in Council's input. Concrete Batch Plants The City of North Richland Hills has maintained a policy in the past that concrete batch plants are not a necessary tool for developing within the city limits. The last concrete batch plant known to have been used in NRH was for the Rufe Snow capital project in the early 2000s. The Zoning Ordinance currency allows the use by SUP only in the C-1, C-2, 1-1, 1-2, U and AG districts, and does not allow them in residential zoning districts, which is generating most of the demand. Staff is reevaluating this policy for the following reasons: a. Since the 1990s, there are far fewer areas of the city that are large enough for projects that would necessitate a concrete batch plant. b. Residential subdivision developers have inquired about the use in certain projects. c. Southlake, Colleyville and Keller all allow temporary concrete batch plants by right with specific restrictions. Cbdl f LiCb/!8 D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS d. On-site concrete batch plants can mean fewer concrete trucks on the city's streets as well as a higher-quality and more pliable concrete product due to the shorter time and distance to the pour site. Possible Zoning Ordinance Revision The proposed revision would include removing the SUP requirement for "temporary concrete batch plants" in all zoning districts and allow them by right if they meet certain standards. Some of the conditions that may apply to temporary concrete batch plants if allowed by right include: a. Minimum setback of batch plant equipment from habitable residential structures, public or private schools, and daycares. Staff is proposing 600 feet as an initial discussion point. b. Maximum time permitted. Other communities typically have 30 or 60 days with extensions available. Staff is proposing a 60-day permit with strict standards for one 30-day extension. Only one permit would be permitted within a 12-month period. c. Standards for a "temporary" concrete batch plant as it relates to size, height, capacity, and other features. d. Specified operation hours and days. e. Must meet all TCEQ, EPA and other state and federal standards. Staff is seeking direction and input on whether such revisions should be considered. ,a Y "f yl An example of a temporary concrete batch plant for a residential subdivision in Keller Secondary Living Units The City allows "secondary living units," also known as granny flats or mother-in-law units, by right in R-2, R-1 and R-1-S residential zones. The following text is from the Zoning Ordinance: Cbdl f LICbA9 D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS Secondary living unit. A second single-family residential living unit with kitchen facilities, also known as a mother-in-law unit or granny flat, located on the same lot as the primary living unit shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Use. The secondary living unit is only for use by domestic persons and their family or a relative of the occupants of the primary living unit. This unit shall not be rented or leased and shall not have a separate utility meter. (2) Connection to primary residence. Secondary living units shall be constructed no more than 25 feet from the primary living quarters and be connected by a breezeway a minimum of six feet wide, attached to the roofline. (3) Architecture. The unit must be of the same architectural style as the primary structure and meet all standards as applied to the primary structure except: the requirement for minimum gross living area; the requirement for a garage/carport; and the off- street parking requirements. (4) Maximum total floor area: 650 square feet. For a number of reasons, multi-generational households are becoming more popular across all socio-economic and demographic boundaries. For instance, the Baby Boomer generation is now caring for their elderly parents, either in their own homes or in senior living institutions. Secondary living units provide an alternative to senior and assisted living facilities. They provide privacy and independence but also the close proximity to caring family members. As the largest segment of aging seniors in U.S. history themselves continue to age, more options for senior living are necessary. Alternatively, the lessons learned from the 2009 housing market crash, the academic tuition debt of today's Millennial generation, and the propensity of younger adults to wait longer to marry and have kids has the younger population putting off independent home ownership and coming back home after college. Like their grandparents, secondary living units offer a sense of independence and privacy while being able to establish their careers and savings. That said, on occasion city staff receives complaints that the maximum floor area of 650 square feet is not sufficient for today's lifestyle standards. The connection to the primary residence requirement has also caused logistical issues if the physical layout of a property simply does not support a connected roof. Staff is seeking direction and input on whether changes to the requirements for secondary living units should be considered including the maximum square footage and roof connection requirements. Drive-Through Restaurants The 2013 NRH Citizen Survey clearly indicated that NRH residents desire more full- service restaurants and grocery stores over fast food establishments. When asked whether they would like to see more of each, 80 percent of respondents replied "yes" for full-service restaurants, while only 30 percent said "yes" for drive-through restaurants. Cbdl f LICbA D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS In the two years since the survey, however, drive-through fast food restaurants continue to develop at a faster pace than full-service restaurants and many vacant pad sites are still available for development. Staff is exploring ways to respond to this demand and provide healthier and more casual dining options for the community that improve the health and quality of life for its residents and visitors. Table 97 from the 2013 Citizen Survey below outlines respondents' answers to the types of businesses residents would like to see in their area. Tabs l Types of Business, sidenis would IIke to in their Amai r P r ieant d rr to o _ VII Service p to ur rmi a 33 t Giro 9t �r s n=5= , � � �� ; l e roalJonsl& Enlelai� num e t irm s s (q ) 6 ...... ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... 642, 136-8 C lothiru t r n 2 Pr f ion t?Offices =521 1 Medical Offtes n=527 5,21 4171 Hardware crud Hoosewaire stores 'ru= 441 56.1 Health and Beauly aln,r&Q. uv 29' 38A 611�6, Pet Related iBusjn «m@s 372 62,8; Hot t rr= 2tf 3,41 65,9 Ddve Thru Restaurants n 2 297 7101.3, I Centers n=492` 29,.3 7 0 '_ lindustriall or 1527 237 '76,,3, ar W sh es uro= 3 0J............ 18.7"- dl Opus tu�t i�rn with C ru enien Stares rro= �' t . 811.51 Auto Re pals, 'in=528 17 O 8,10, Auto Parts and Accessories rr ' 163 3 tmmarrveauursrn .( m m i .. ... ...... ........ .................................................... . '91119 . " ... .1 7 .......... Respondents were asked of they would like to see mruoure of the folllpoWng types of businesses In their area lot the ciity bus shown norm T blfe 7, more ttmarm halt of all respondents wovUld fluke to see full sem e restaurants ( ,01-5 p roenit), grocery stores, (66A percent), recre;ationaV'eruitemtaunrmmen�t businesses (65.5 percent), specialty retaut (64_2 percent), dothiung stores (5 73 3 percent),, IprotessiaOnadl offices (53A percent:), and medical offices ( 2 '9 percent) In light of the City of Keller's recent decision to place an SUP requirement on drive- throughs (see Keller Citizen article here) and the citizen survey mentioned above, staff is soliciting input from the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on current City policies related to fast food drive-through restaurants and whether revisions may be appropriate. Cbdl f LICb/121 D r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS Currently, the Zoning Ordinance does not specifically define or distinguish fast food restaurants. The "restaurant or cafeteria" use is permitted by right in the LR, C-1, C-2, OC, 1-1 and 1-2 zoning districts and "drive-through buildings of less than 1,400 square feet' require SUP approval in C-1, C-2, 1-1 and 1-2. The Zoning Ordinance also does not currently have any specific development standards for drive-through establishments. Standards common to other municipalities include drive-through stacking depths; location and orientation of menu boards, speakers and pick-up windows; and design and dimensions of drive through lanes. Some of the possible alternatives if the City proceeds with revising its standards on drive-through restaurants include: • Requiring an SUP citywide for drive-through fast food establishments. • Establishing "districts" or "overlays" where fast food may require SUP approval. • Adopting design standards for drive-through fast food establishments. • Expanding the land use definitions to distinguish "fast food" from "fast-casual," and requiring an SUP for "fast food" only or amending the districts where they are allowed by right. Fuel Sales Referring back to Table 97 from the 2013 Citizen Survey above, 80 percent of respondents did not see that additional gas stations were necessary in NRH. The Zoning Ordinance, however, allows gas stations with 8 pumps or less by right in the C-2 Commercial zoning district. Staff is seeking direction and input on combining the "Convenience Store (8 pumps or less)" use with "Service Station (9+ pumps)" and requiring an SUP in the same zoning districts for consistency. Cbdl f LICb/22 4fb Excerpt from the Minutes of the September 3, 2015 P&Z Meeting Minutes Cr 4. Discuss miscellaneous topics for possible Zoning Ordinance updates. 0 Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock presented first of four specific topics. Staff is seeking input from the Planning and Zoning Commission on topics for possible Zoning �- Ordinance updates. The first two are more time-sensitive, due to current inquiries. The 0 last two less so, but staff is still interested in Commission's input. Q General Description: 1. Concrete Batch Plants Q 2. Secondary Living Units (Granny Flats) 3. Drive-Through Restaurants 4. Fuel Sales Cr Concrete Batch Plants The City has maintained a past policy that concrete batch plants are not a necessary tool for developing within the city limits. The last concrete batch plant to have been used was in the early 1990s or early 2000s. Zoning Ordinance currently allows use by SUP only in the C-1, C-2, 1-1 and 1-2, U and AG districts. It does not allow use in residential zoning districts, which is generating most of the demand. Staff is reevaluating this policy for the following reasons- 1. Since the 1990s, there are far fewer areas of the city that are large enough for w projects that would necessitate a concrete batch plant. -: 2. Residential subdivision developers have inquired about the use in certain projects. N 3. Southlake, Colleyville and Keller allow temporary concrete batch plants by right with specific restrictions. > 4. On-site concrete batch plants can mean fewer concrete trucks on the city's z streets as well as a higher quality and more pliable concrete product due to 0 the shorter time and distance to the pour site. Possible Zoning Ordinance Revision z The revision would include removing the SUP requirement for "temporary concrete `- batch plants" in all zoning districts and allow them by right if they meet certain standards. Some of the conditions that may apply include- 1. Minimum setback of batch plant equipment from habitable residential structures, public or private schools, and daycares. Staff is proposing six hundred (600) feet as an initial discussion point. 2. Maximum time permitted. Other communities typically have thirty (30) or sixty (60) days with extensions available. Staff is proposing a sixty (60) day permit with strict standards for one thirty (30) day extension. Only one (1) permit would be permitted within a twelve (12) month period. 3. Standards for a "temporary" concrete batch plant as it relates to size, height, capacity, and other features. 0 4. Specified operation hours and days. m Cbdl f lC b/23 4fb 5. Must meet all TCEQ, EPA and other state and federal standards. Chairman Shiflet expressed concern with concrete plant dust. Cr Mike Benton inquired about the necessity of equipment shrouds to contain dust. -0 0 Mark Haynes inquired about state and federal requirements. �- Caroline Waggoner responded that all state and federal requirements would have to be o in place before the consideration could be presented to the City. Q Chairman Shiflet inquired about the six hundred (600) foot set-back. That is two (2) to four (4) times the requirement of a gas well. That might be too far. Q Kathy Luppy commented that living next door to a gas well, there was a noise issue, but no air quality issues. In her opinion, five hundred (500) feet might be better. Cr Chairman Shiflet stated that he is in favor of everything the staff is presenting, with a preference of starting the discussion at a higher set back, considering the level of hardship. 0 Mike Benton stated that concrete dust is extremely corrosive, so it could raise resident concerns about their vehicles. : Bill Schopper stated that he is very much in favor of getting them in and out quickly. w Caroline Waggoner stated that it is in the best interest of the contractor to get that CO equipment moved quickly to the next location. It just costs them money if it sits. Bill Schopper requested clarification if the SUP requirement would be eliminated for > permanent concrete stations. z 0 Clayton Comstock responded that there are really no more spaces available in the city limits for a permanent station. z Secondary Living Units CO The City allows "secondary living units", also known as granny flats or mother-in-law units, by right in R-2, R-1 and R-1-S residential zones. The following text is from the Zoning Ordinance- 2 Secondary living unit. A second single-family living unit with kitchen facilities, also known as a mother-in-law unit or granny flat, located on the same lot as the primary living unit shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Use. The secondary living unit is only for use by domestic persons and their family or a relative of the occupants of the primary living unit. This unit shall not be rented or leased and shall not have a separate utility meter. m Cbdl f LIC b/24 4fb (2) Connection to primary residence. Secondary living units shall be constructed no more than 25 feet from the primary living quarters and be connected by a breezeway a minimum of six feet wide, attached to the Cr roofline. (3) Architecture. The unit must be of the same architectural style as the -0 primary structure and meet all standards as applied to the primary structure except: the requirement for minimum gross living area; the �- requirement for a garage/carport; and the off-street parking requirements. o (4) Maximum total floor area: 650 square feet. Q IFE For a number of reasons, multi-generational households are becoming more popular across all socio-economic and demographic boundaries. For instance, the Baby Q Boomer generation is now caring for their elderly parents, either in their own homes or in senior living institutions. Secondary living units provide an alternative to senior and assisted living facilities. They provide privacy and independence but also the close proximity to caring family members. As the largest segment of aging seniors in U.S. Cr history themselves continue to age, more options for senior living are necessary. Alternatively, the lessons learned from the 2009 housing market crash, the academic tuition debt of today's Millennial generation, and the propensity of younger adults to wait longer to marry and have kids has the younger population putting off independent home ownership and coming back home after college. Like their grandparents, secondary : living units offer a sense of independence and privacy while being able to establish their careers and savings. w That said; on occasion city staff receives complaints that the maximum floor area of six CO hundred fifty (650) square feet is not sufficient for today's lifestyle standards. The connection to the primary residence requirement has also caused logistical issues if the physical layout of a property simply does not support a connected roof. o z Staff is seeking input on changing the maximum square footage and roof connection o requirements for secondary living units. An example for discussion could be up to fifty (50) % of the primary residence but not to exceed one thousand two hundred fifty z (1,250) square feet. A discussion point is elimination of the covered roof requirement and increasing the maximum distance from the primary residence to fifty (50) feet. A zCO discussion point is maximum one (1) bedroom, one (1) kitchen, one and a half (1 '/2) bathrooms and two(2) other living areas. Bill Schopper inquired if we want to be that place that allows garage apartments and out buildings. We don't seem to be that sort of community. It may be appropriate in downtown Fort Worth, but not really here where we have a higher focus on single family residential. T Chairman Shiflet inquired if the home owner would be restricted from subdividing these into separate units. 0 m Cbdl f LICIhA25 4fb Clayton Comstock replied that one of the requirements is that there cannot be separate utility meters. It operates as one residential entity. They can't have a separate water or electric meter. It would be a zoning ordinance enforcement issue. Cr Bill Schopper stated that the six hundred fifty (650) square foot unit just doesn't seem to -0 be part of our community. d Mike Benton asked for clarification that not all lots are even large enough to qualify for a 0 secondary unit, which reduces the number of potential applicants. Q Chairman Shiflet inquired about set-backs. Clayton Comstock responded that set-backs would all be the same as for the primary residential home. Mark Haynes stated that he has no problem with any of what is being proposed. Cr Kathy Luppy stated that it appears that one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) square feet would be almost property line to property line, taking up the whole back yard. She likes the idea of residents being able to have their independence. It may be that we do need to be become that kind of community that promotes the changing times of multi- generational family living. People are living longer, which creates a need for more creative living solutions. In school, she is seeing more and more grandparents, aunts and uncles living under the same household. w Chairman Shiflet stated that the larger R-2 lots would be the only ones that really fit into CO this model. He is in favor of this ordinance change. He would still like to see the breezeway remain in the ordinance to provide cohesion to the primary residence. He has spoken with John Barfield who has interest in purchasing lots south of Loop 820. > Perhaps this ordinance change could present creative building options for the developer z mindset. He suggests clarification in the verbiage to state that one thousand two 0 hundred fifty (1,250) square feet is the maximum size. He wants to see the two properties connected. z Clayton Comstock stated that there have been prior requests where the maximum size was denied, requiring the applicant to change their whole plan. Generally, they would do something like add onto the existing home. Mike Benton inquired about the difference between a "guest house" and a "secondary living unit". Clayton Comstock responded that there was a prior zoning case on Clay Hibbins Road that was a Planned Development with different properties more like a "guest house". Principal Planner, Clayton Husband presented the third and fourth of four specific topics. m Cbdl f OW26 4fb Drive-Through Restaurants The 2013 NRH Citizen Survey clearly indicated that NRH residents desire more full- Cr service restaurants and grocery stores over fast food establishments. When asked whether they would like to see more of each, eight (80) percent of respondents replied -0 "yes" for full-service restaurants, while only thirty (30) percent said "yes" for drive through restaurants. In the two years since the survey, however, drive-through fast food �- restaurants continue to develop at a faster pace than full-service restaurants and many o vacant pad sites are still available for development. Staff is exploring ways to respond Q to this demand and provide healthier and more casual dining options for the community that improve the health and quality of life for its residents and visitors. The three classifications that we see as industry standards are: • Full-service restaurant (table service with nicer finish out) • Fast-casual restaurant (majority of counter service with median finish out) Cr • Fast food restaurant (majority of drive-through service with basic finish out) In light of the City of Keller's recent decision to place an SUP requirement on drive- o through and the citizen survey mentioned above, staff is soliciting input from the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on current City policies related to fast- food drive-through restaurants and whether revisions may be appropriate. Currently, the Zoning Ordinance does not specifically define or distinguish fast food restaurants. The "restaurant or cafeteria" use is permitted by right in the LR, C-1, C-2, w OC, I-1 and I-2 zoning districts and "Drive-through buildings of less than 1,400 square feet" require SUP approval in C-1, C-2, I-1 and I-2. The Zoning Ordinance also does not currently have any specific development standards for drive-through establishments. Standards common to other municipalities include drive-through stacking depths; location and orientation of menu boards, speakers and pick-up windows; and design > and dimensions of drive through lanes. z 0 Some of the possible alternative if the City proceeds with revising its standard on drive- through restaurants includes: z • Requiring an SUP citywide for drive-through fast food establishments. • Establishing "districts" or "overlays" where fast food may require SUP approval. N • Adopting design standards for drive-through fast food establishments. • Expanding the land use definition to distinguish "fast food" from "fast-casual", and requiring and SUP for "fast food" only or amending the districts where they are allowed by right. 2 Chairman Shiflet expressed concern about turning radius for large trucks in drive- through restaurant queue lines. T LL Clayton Husband responded that the common width is ten (10) feet, which is two (2) o feet narrower than travel lanes in some streets. - m Cbdl f LIC b/27 4fb Craig Hulse expressed that the market has driven a need for restaurants to become more efficient. Concrete, construction and food costs have increased. Labor costs have increased. There is a need for higher customer turnover and lower labor costs. Jason's Cr Express is a perfect example of response to this issue. More and more restaurants will have a push for a drive through component. -0 0 Chairman Shiflet expressed concern that we are not implementing restrictions that ��- conflict with a market-driven consumer market. He is also concerned about all of these o empty spots that need to be developed, if a restaurant could be supported by the local Q residential market. He wants us to do everything we can to encourage development. U Clayton Comstock responded that there is the North Tarrant Parkway development Q which already has What-A-Burger, Chick Fil-A and Wendy's. Then there are about 10 7 additional pad sites available for development. City Council has a concern if all of these were to become drive-through restaurants. An SUP requirement would allow more careful planning. Cr Bill Schopper brought up the empty full service restaurants located on Bedford Euless Road that have been on the market for years. Craig Hulse responded that Bedford Euless Road used to be the hopping place. Now there are only about one thousand, two hundred (1,200) cars a day on that road. : Kathy Luppy stated that the parents she deals with in the schools need the drive w through restaurants. They don't have the money to go out to sit down restaurant more -: than occasionally. And they need to pick up food and eat while they are driving to the co soccer field, etc. People are going to do what they are going to do. Chairman Shiflet agreed that this topic is not as time sensitive, so we may wish to 0 discuss it in greater detail at a later time. z 0 Clayton Comstock brought up the site design standards regarding windows, drive through lanes and creating more restrictions. If they can't comply, it would force planned z development. It sounds like we shouldn't focus as much on the SUP requirement, but more on site design requirements for fast food restaurants. co N Fuel Sales Referring back to the 2013 Citizen Survey, eight (80) percent of the respondents did not see that additional gas stations were necessary in NRH. The Zoning Ordinance, however, allows gas stations with eight (8) pumps or less by right in the C-2 Commercial zoning district. T Staff will be seeking input on combining the "Convenience Store (8 pumps or less)" use with "Service Station (9+ pumps)" and requiring an SUP in the same zoning districts for consistency. The number of pumps is not a clear definition as currently stated. m Cbdl f lC b/28 4fb Chairman Shiflet recommended discussing this Fuel Sales topic in more depth at a later time due to time restrictions. He likes the idea of modernizing the ordinance. Cr O 0 d 0 0 0- U Q Cr > Q O > W N O_ Z s 0 Z N 2 T LL O m Cbdl f lC b/29 D CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Section 551.072: Deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property - (1) SE Corner of Rufe Snow & Loop 820; (2) 7901 Boulevard 26; (3) 4131 Rufe Snow, NW Corner of Rufe Snow and Glenview. Presenter: Craig Hulse, Director of Economic Development Cbdl f LICIhA2: Cl2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Approve minutes of the August 24, 2015 regular City Council meeting. Presenter: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary Summary: The minutes are listed on the consent agenda and approved by majority vote of Council at the City Council meetings. General Description: The City Secretary's Office prepares action minutes for each City Council meeting. The minutes for the previous meeting are placed on the consent agenda for review and approval by the City Council, which contributes to a time efficient meeting. Upon approval of the minutes, an electronic copy will be uploaded to the City's website. Recommendation: Approve minutes of the August 24, 2015 regular City Council meeting. Cbdl f LICbA31' C/2/b MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 AUGUST 24, 2015 WORK SESSION The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in work session on the o 24t" day of August 2015 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Workroom prior to the 7:00 p.m. regular Council meeting. Present: Oscar Trevino Mayor >> David Whitson Mayor Pro Tern o Tito Rodriguez Council, Place 1 Rita Wright Oujesky Council, Place 2 Tom Lombard Council, Place 3 > Tim Barth Council, Place 4 Tim Welch Council, Place 7 N M Absent: Scott Turnage Council, Place 6 M Staff Members: Mark Hindman City Manager Paulette Hartman Assistant City Manager m Karen Bostic Assistant City Manager Mike Curtis Managing Director Vickie Loftice Managing Director o_ Jimmy Perdue Director of Public Safety George Staples City Attorney Stan Tinney Fire Chief Cr Craig Hulse Director of Economic Development Cr Kent Austin Director of Finance Mark Mills Director of Budget N Monica Solko Assistant City Secretary LO Kyle McAfee Assistant Fire Chief Mary Peters Public Information Officer Kristin James Assistant to the City Manager N Caroline Waggoner City Engineer Clayton Husband Principal Planner ° Marrk Collier Management Assistant Chris Amarante Director of Facilities and Construction Clayton Comstock Planning Manager m Patrick Hillis Director of Human Resources Boe Blankenship Public Works Street Superintendent August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 10 Cbdl f u!Clh/!32 C/2/b Call to Order Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. Discuss items from regular City Council meeting. There were no questions from Council. 0 2. Update on Boulevard 26 – Utility Line. Managing Director Mike Curtis informed Council the Boulevard 26 utility burial project was included in the TIF No. 1 expansion that was approved in 2008. The estimated >> cost of the projects—utility burial project ($2.5M), Boulevard 26/Glenview intersection o project (500K) and Boulevard 26/Rufe Snow (to be partially funded by Richland Hills)— were included in the 2008 expansion. Based on property values within the TIF, staff's projection of 2.5M is short by approximately $500,000 for the utility burial project. The > cost estimates for the utility burial project are coming in greater than the available funding for the project. The total construction estimate is $2,340,050 which is co comprised of $1,590,050 for infrastructure cost; $300,000 for AT&T direct cost; and M $450,000 for ONCOR direct cost. The franchise companies require the city to provide M the limits and they prepare the design for their facilities, which they install and make connections to individual property owners. Prior to commencement of any work the franchise companies require the city to enter into an agreement guaranteeing payment m of estimated costs to build their facilities. Other costs include approximately $445,000 2- in professional services that includes design, surveying and coordination with franchise 4= utilities. Mr. Curtis informed Council the available funding for construction is 1.58M. > Mr. Curtis provided Council with the following options: (1) Phase the project; or Cr (2) Reduce the limits of the project—put in what the city can afford and as funding Cr becomes available complete the project; or (3) Reevaluate the project priorities. N LO Mr. Curtis emphasized that the objective of the city for South Boulevard 26 would remain unchanged should Council direct staff to reevaluate the priorities of the projects. He further commented that when the projects were identified in 2008, the North Tarrant N Express project had not started and City Hall was not proposed to be located at South Boulevard 26. The city's focus has always been how to enhance Boulevard 26. Mr. ° Curtis reviewed a possible option for Council's consideration to bury utilities from Glenview to Parchman. m In response to Mayor Trevino's question, Mr. Curtis clarified there is an intersection improvement for Boulevard 26/Glenview and the pre-construction meeting is being scheduled for this project. The award of bid for this project was approved by City Council on April 27, 2015. August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 10 Cbdl f L1Clh/!33 C/2/b Council discussed the options outlined by staff and the prior commitment of the city to North Richland Hills Baptist Church ("the church") for improvements on Glenview. Mr. Curtis shared with Council the city could take a hybrid approach and bury the utilities in front of the church and collaborate with Tarrant County to construct an asphalt street on Glenview. He informed Council there would be sufficient funding to construct the asphalt street and bury some of the utilities. Council discussed the possibility of reprioritizing projects identified in the TIF No. 1 expansion. Council directed staff to meet with the church to discuss and get their input on the following options: (1) bury o utilities on the block they are located on; (2) reconstruction on Boulevard 26; or (3) reconstruction of Glenview (concrete or asphalt). EXECUTIVE SESSION >> 0 Mayor Trevino announced at 5:52 p.m. that the Council would adjourn into Executive Session as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, specifically Section 551.072: Deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property - 1) SE > Corner of Rufe Snow & Loop 820, 2) NW Corner of Davis Boulevard & Main Street and 3) 4131 Rufe Snow, NW Corner of Rufe Snow and Glenview; and Section 551.071: N Consultation with city attorney to seek advice about contemplated or threatened M litigation or a settlement. M Executive Session began at 5:52 p.m. and concluded at 6:17 p.m. > Mayor Trevino announced at 6:18 p.m. that Council would adjourn to the regular Q Council meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER Cr m Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order August 24, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. N LO M ROLL CALL N Present: Oscar Trevino Mayor M David Whitson Mayor Pro Tern o Tito Rodriguez Council, Place 1 Tom Lombard Council, Place 3 Tim Barth Council, Place 4 m Tim Welch Council, Place 7 Absent: Rita Wright Oujesky Council, Place 2 Scott Turnage Council, Place 6 August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 10 Cbdl f u!Clh/!34 C/2/b Staff Members: Mark Hindman City Manager Paulette Hartman Assistant City Manager Karen Bostic Assistant City Manager George Staples City Attorney Monica Solko Assistant City Secretary A.1 INVOCATION 0 Council member Barth gave the invocation. A.2 PLEDGE 0 Council member Barth led the pledge of allegiance to the United States and Texas o flags. 0 A.3 SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S) > A.3.1 ACHIEVEMENT OF EXCELLENCE IN PROCUREMENT AWARD N M Director of Finance Kent Austin recognized and presented the purchasing department M with the excellence in procurement award. AA CITIZENS PRESENTATION m> A.5 REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA 0 No items were removed from the consent agenda. Cr B. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Cr APPROVED N B.1 APPROVE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 10, 2015 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. "' B.2 AUTHORIZE AWARD FOR BUILDING ENVELOPE AND ROOF REPAIRS AT N 7200A DICK FISHER, PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE CENTER, TO TRI-LAM M ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING IN THE AMOUNT OF $146,350.00. o B.3 AP 2015-08 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM DHR ENGINEERING, INC. FOR AN AMENDED PLAT FOR MORGAN MEADOWS ADDITION ON 1.840 ACRES AT 6816 & 6820 LITTLE RANCH ROAD. m B.4 AWARD SCP15-022 FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES TO DOUBLE D CONTRACTING AS THE PRIMARY CONTRACTOR, AND MART, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS AS THE ALTERNATE CONTRACTOR. August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 10 Cbdl f u!Clh/!35 C/2/b COUNCIL MEMBER LOMBARD MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCIL MEMBER RODRIGUEZ SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS CA SUP 2015-04, ORDINANCE 3370, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION o OF A REQUEST FROM ISSAM BOU-HAMDAN FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A LAUNDROMAT AT HARWOOD PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 8409 BOULEVARD 26. 0 APPROVED 0 Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing and called on Principal Planner Clayton o Husband to present the item. �2 Principal Planner Clayton Husband presented item for Council. The purpose of the request is to consider a Special Use Permit (SUP) for a self-service laundry located in the Harwood Plaza Shopping Center (southwest corner of Boulevard 26 and Emerald Hills Way). The proposed laundromat would occupy 4,800-square foot lease space. The proposed use includes 58 washers and 28 dryers that will be operated by cards > rather than coins. The applicant proposes services and amenities that will include > wash-and-fold service, Wi-Fi internet access, vending machines, and laundry carts. Q The facility will be staffed by three employees, open seven days a weeks and operate from 7:00 a.m. — 9:00 p.m. The applicant and property owner have agreed to the > following site improvements: . 1 a) Building lighting. All wallpack lights on the rear of both buildings will be replaced with conforming fixtures. Additional fixtures will be installed to increase the safety S_ of the rear alley. The use of LED or neon strip lighting is prohibited on all parts of Cr the building. _. b) Dumpster enclosure. An opaque metal gate/screen will be installed on the two dumpster enclosures on the site. Gates will remain closed during non-pickup times. This applies to both dumpster areas on the property. M c) Color of conduit. The conduit on the exterior of both buildings will be painted to blend in with the wall material of the buildings. N d) Awnings. All the awnings on both buildings will be replaced. Details on the color M and material for the replacement awnings will be provided. 0 e) Signs. The two leasing signs near the intersection of Boulevard 26 and Emerald Hills Way will be relocated to conform to the sign ordinance standards. The Development Review Committee (DRC) met and provided the following 00 recommended site enhancements to bring the property closer to compliance with the current development standards: August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 10 Cbdl f t!Clh/!36 C/2/b a. Lighting. Replace the convex lenses in all parking lot light fixtures with flat or concave lenses. Convex lenses reflect the light source out and cause glare past the limits of the property. b. Fencing/Screening. A minimum 6-foot masonry screening wall is the standard requirement between commercial and residential properties. The wood fence along Emerald Hills Way should also be removed or moved back to the standard building line of 25 feet. c. Landscaping along Boulevard 26. Based on 308.63 feet of street frontage along o Boulevard 26, a minimum of 7 trees and 62 shrubs are required within a 15-foot landscape setback along Boulevard 26. The site plan scales the fire lane parallel to Boulevard 26 in front of the State Farm office at 31 feet. If this is accurate, 7 feet of pavement can be removed along the parking stalls facing Boulevard 26 >> and the parking lot can be restriped, allowing for an improved landscape area o along Boulevard 26. d. Landscaping and sidewalk along Emerald Hills Way. Based on 516.92 feet of street frontage along Emerald Hills Way, a minimum of 11 trees and 104 shrubs > are required within a 15-foot landscape setback. It is possible for some pavement to be removed to bring the site closer to compliance with this requirement as well N as the overall requirement for 15% total lot area in landscaping. This also M provides for the required 4-foot sidewalk. M e. Landscaping at storefronts. Consult a Landscape Architect for what ornamental grasses, shrubs, and/or trees are recommended for the irrigated landscape planters at many of the storefronts. m The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 6, 2015 meeting, recommended approval subject to the five site improvements agreed to by the applicant/owner with a o_ vote of 5-0. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 3370, subject to the conditions noted for site improvements on Page 11 of Exhibit A as well as the "Operations & Security" conditions on Page 6. Cr Cr m Applicant Issam Bou-Hamdan presented request and was available to answer questions from Council N LO Mayor Trevino called for anyone wishing to speak for or against the request to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. N M COUNCIL MEMBER LOMBARD MOVED TO ORDINANCE NO. 3370 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ° NOTED FOR SIGN IMPROVEMENTS ON PAGE 11 OF THE EXHIBIT AS WELL AS THE "OPERATIONS AND SECURITY" CONDITIONS ON PAGE 6; THE FIVE STIPULATIONS PRESENTED BY STAFF; AND RELOCATION OF THE FENCE FROM EMERALD HILLS WAY TO THE BUILDING LINE. COUNCIL m MEMBER WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0. August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 10 Cbdl f t!Clh/!37 C/2/b C.2 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2015/2016 PROPOSED BUDGET AND THE 2014/2015 REVISED BUDGET. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing and called on Director of Budget and Research Mark Mills to present the item. Director of Budget and Research Mark Mills presented item for Council. The item before o Council this evening is to conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the 2015/2016 proposed budget and 2014/2015 revised budget. Mr. Mills informed Council that no action is required at this hearing. The notice of public hearing was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram in accordance with state law and City Charter. 0> 0 The 2014/2015 revised annual operating budget and 2015/2016 proposed operating if budget for all funds are as follows: TA 2014/2015 2015/2016 Fund Revised Proposed co General Fund $43,545,550 $43,304,434 M Debt Service Fund 11,095,008 12,261,458 M Tax Increment Financing Fund 3,190,418 370507721 Park & Rec Facilities Development Fund 871767372 873797961 Crime Control District Fund 478877881 570207512 Promotional Fund 2167400 2267302 Donations Fund 2767360 2757581 Special Investigations Fund 3267142 1297500 Drainage Utility Fund 174057210 6787789 Gas Development Fund 20 000 0 Traffic Safety Fund 1,029,582 933,309 Cr Utility Fund 3076167288 3170677824 Aquatic Park Fund 570117788 476677197 Golf Course Fund 273957337 274347082 Facilities/Construction Mgmt. Fund 370207607 370807996 M Fleet Services Fund 471677198 379027219 6 Information Services Fund 474457690 372297743 N Self Insurance Fund 11 413 954 11 639 573 M 0 The Proposed Capital Improvements Budget totals $8,765,371. The breakdown between project categories is as follows: m Category 2015/2016 Proposed Street& Sidewalk Capital Projects $1,632,821 Drainage Capital Projects 95,000 August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 10 Cbdl f LiCb/!38 C/2/b Utility Capital Projects 1,625,000 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects 1,117,000 Aquatic Park Capital Projects 2,700,000 Facility Capital Projects 165,000 Major Capital Equipment Projects 1,079,500 Other Capital Projects 351,050 Mayor Trevino called for anyone wishing to speak for or against the request to come s forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. € 0 D. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT o DA FP 2015-04 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM J & J NRH 100 FLP o FOR A FINAL PLAT FOR THE VILLAS AT SMITHFIELD ON 13.479 ACRES IN -2 THE 8200-8300 BLOCK OF ODELL STREET AND NORTHEAST PARKWAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPER AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL co INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS. APPROVED co Planning Manager Clayton Comstock presented item for Council. The purpose of the request is to consider the final plat for Villas at Smithfield, a 13.479-acre single family m' residential subdivision that is located at Davis Boulevard between Odell Street and 'M Northeast Parkway. The subdivision will have 93 residential lots and nine open space �-- lots. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 6, 2015 meeting, o recommended approval with a vote 5-0. Staff is recommending approval of FP 2015-04 and the associated developer agreement for municipal infrastructure costs. Mr. Comstock informed Council the applicant would be responsible for 25% of the costs Cr associated with the traffic signal at Northeast Parkway and Davis Boulevard. The m agreement has a provision for reimbursement to the applicant should the city receive -. grant funding for possible development on the west side of Davis Boulevard. N Applicant representative Jason Weaver, 2505 Mustang Drive, Grapevine, Texas M presented request. The builder for the development is Our Country Homes. The development will have zero lot line custom patio homes and townhomes that will have N three to six units. The units will have two-car garages and the single family detached M units will have driveways. The town home units will accommodate parallel parking o spaces in the alley. COUNCIL MEMBER RODRIGUEZ MOVED TO APPROVE FP 2015-04. COUNCIL MEMBER WELCH m SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0. August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 10 Cbdl f LiCb/!39 C/2/b E. PUBLIC WORKS There were no items for this category. F. GENERAL ITEMS F.1 RATIFY CHANGE ORDER #1 TO EXCEL 4 CONSTRUCTION L.L.C. FOR SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION (PHASE II) IN THE AMOUNT OF o $58,641.67. S APPROVED Managing Director Mike Curtis presented item for Council and was available to answer >> questions. o Council had no questions for staff. COUNCIL MEMBER WELCH MOVED TO RATIFY CHANGE ORDER #1 TO EXCEL CONSTRUCTION L.L.C. IN THE AMOUNT OF $58,641.67. COUNCIL MEMBER WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. N MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0. 22 M G. EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS - CITY COUNCIL MAY TAKE ACTION ON ANY > ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON THE WORK > SESSION AGENDA Q Mayor Trevino announced that Council member Welch has a conflict of interest with > item G.1 and would be abstaining from discussion and voting on the item due to being the engineer on record for the project. Council member Welch completed and filed an affidavit of disqualification with the City Cr Secretary. _. Director of Economic Development Craig Hulse presented item to Council. The purpose of the request is to authorize the city manager to execute an agreement of M purchase and sale of property with Three S&W, LLC. The property, 12.997 acres, is located in John M Crockett Survey Abstract: 273 (near the corner of Davis Boulevard N and Main Street). In August 2015, the City issued a request for proposals to identify a M developer who would agree to develop the property in the most beneficial manner after o meeting the city's minimum requirements. Council had no questions for staff. m COUNCIL MEMBER BARTH MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT OF SALE TO THREE S&W, LLC FOR 12.997 ACRES OF CITY PROPERTY AT JOHN M CROCKETT SURVEY ABSTRACT: 273. MAYOR PRO TEM WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0-1,WITH COUNCIL MEMBER WELCH ABSTAINING. August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 10 Cbdl f u!Qi/!3: C/2/b H. INFORMATION AND REPORTS H.1 ANNOUNCEMENTS Council member Rodriguez made the following announcements. The new school year has begun and all motorists share the responsibility of making o sure students arrive to school safely. The City of North Richland Hills reminds drivers to stop for school buses that are loading and unloading, put down your cell phones in school zones and obey the crossing guards. Remind your children to use designated cross walks and do not block cross walks when dropping students off or picking them >> up. o City Hall and other non-emergency City offices will be closed on Monday, September 7 in observance of the Labor Day holiday. NRH2O, Iron Horse Golf Course and the NRH > Centre will be open. Garbage and recycling will not be collected on Labor Day. Monday collections will shift to Tuesday and Tuesday collections will be made on Wednesday. N M Join Team NRH at the 2015 Heart Walk. The three-mile walk will be held Saturday M September 12, starting at 8:30 a.m. at the Will Rogers Memorial Complex in Fort Worth. Visit heartwalk.org to join the City of North Richland Hills team or to make a donation online. m' Kudos Korner — Camp NRH staff in the Parks and Recreation Department. A mother sent a note saying how awesome every counselor was again this summer. Her o_ daughter has attended camp for the last 3 years and thoroughly enjoys it. "The counselors do a fantastic job with our kids and what a relief to know they are in good hands." Cr Cr m I. ADJOURNMENT N LO Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 8:23 p.m. "' N M Oscar Trevino, Mayor ° ATTEST: m Alicia Richardson, City Secretary August 24, 2015 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 10 Cbdl f u!Clh/!41' Cl3 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Approve Resolution No. 2015-021, authorizing Investment Strategy and Investment Policy. Presenter: Kent Austin, Finance Director Summary: The Public Funds Investment Act (PFIA) requires the City Council to review and adopt by official action the City's Investment Policy and Strategy each year. General Description: The City is required by the Public Funds Investment Act (PFIA) to review and renew the City's investment policy and strategy at least annually. The City invests in only high- quality, short term instruments with a maturity no longer than five years and a weighted average maturity of three years. The City makes extensive use of investment pools for overnight liquidity. PFM Asset Management, LLC (PFM) performs the overall investment management function. For 2015, only two small changes are proposed for the investment policy: 1. Section V. Suitable and Authorized Investments This change would more closely reflect the active management of the City's portfolio by PFM Asset Management, compared with the previous passive strategy: "The City's GUFFeRtly has o "buy and held" portfolio investment strategy seeks to match investment maturities with cash flow requirements for the portion of the portfolio where maturity dates can be matched with cash flow requirements and investments are able to be purchased with the intention of being held until maturity." 2. Section X. Depositories This change would allow the City to consider depositories with locations within Texas but outside the City limits, as is permitted by State law: "The Texas City Depository Act, Local Government Code Chapter 105, prescribes procedures for selection of a city depository designating that both general-law and home-rule cities are "authorized to receive applications (as depository) for the custody of city funds from any banking corporation, association, or individual banker doing business within the Goy state of Texas." Cbdl f LICbA42 Cl3 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS Although North Richland Hills has many banks within its city limits, this change would potentially increase competition for the City's depository business. The City's Investment Committee met August 21 and recommended both these changes. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2015-021. Cbdl f OW43 C/3/b RESOLUTION NO. 2015-021 WHEREAS, Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code requires that the governing body of all municipalities adopt an Investment Policy; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to conform to such requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the City of North Richland Hills hereby adopts the attached 0 Investment Policy for the City of North Richland Hills. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. Cr 0 PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of September, 2015. S 0 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS g x 0 Y Oscar Trevino, Mayor N ATTEST: M N Alicia Richardson, City Secretary ° S APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 0 George A. Staples, Attorney u) 0 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: m Kent R. Austin, Director of Finance Resolution No.2015- Solo Page Cbdl f LICb/44 C/3/c N O CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS N Q cr O s INVESTMENT POLICY , X O co M Lo N co SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 fM� l:l N O s co L O O 16 m Cbdl f t Cb/!45 C/3/c TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface 1 I. Purpose and Objectives 3 II. Scope 5 a� III. Responsibility and Control 6 N IV. Investment Committee 8 Cr V. Suitable and Authorized Investments 9 ° E VI. Investment Parameters 12 0 VII. Investment Procedures 13 VIII. Custodial Credit Risk Management 15 0 U) IX. Arbitrage 18 co LO X. Depositories 18 XI. Investment Policy Adoption 19 M c� N O S Q) L O O m Cbdl f LICb/46 C/3/c N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) M LO N N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m Cbdl f t Cb/!47 C/3/c N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) M LO N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m Cbdl f t Cb/!48 C/3/c PREFACE "A public office is a public trust." Charles Sumner, 1872 a� 0 N Q If a public office is a public trust, then the trust must be administered properly. Public funds Cr are acquired by governments largely through involuntary payments, particularly through ° taxation. In a modern democratic society, public officials are obligated to manage these E funds in a disciplined manner. '�E 0 In most cases, laws govern the investment process. Laws alone however cannot compel public officials to a series of actions that assure the public's best interests. The actions of public officials responsible for investing public funds must be guided by knowledge, skills, o systems, policies, procedures and confidence that can be described only as professional discipline. M LO It is the policy of the City of North Richland Hills that, giving due regard to safety and risk of investments, all available funds shall be invested in conformance with these legal and N administrative guidelines, and, to the maximum extent possible, at the highest rates M obtainable at the time of the investment. N Effective cash management is recognized as essential to good fiscal management. An aggressive cash management and investment policy will be pursued to take advantage of C investment interest as viable and material revenue to all operating and capital funds. o Investment income will be used in a manner that will best serve the interest of the City of North Richland Hills. �- The City's portfolio shall be designed and managed in a manner responsive to the public _ trust and consistent with state and local law. U) 0 O' 0 m 1 Cbdl f LICW49 C/3/c N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) M LO N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m 2 Cbdl f t Cb/!4:: C/3/c I. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES A. Purpose The purpose of this document is to set forth the specific investment policy and strategy guidelines for the City of North Richland Hills. All investment activity shall be consistent with Texas law as defined in Government Code 10, Chapter 2256, known as the Public Funds Investment Act (the Act), and local law. - safety of investments and City funds - preservation of capital and protection of principal o - maintenance of sufficient liquidity to meet operating needs - diversification of investments to avoid unreasonable risks - public trust from prudent investment activities Cr - optimization of investment income for the City's portfolio 0 The City is required under the Public Funds Investment Act, Section 5, to adopt a E formal written Investment Policy regarding the investment of its funds and funds '�E under its control. This policy is to be adopted annually to meet the requirements of the Act, and has been revised periodically to comply with updated state requirements. The City of North Richland Hills' Ordinance Number 2079 states X that all investment activities and procedures shall be governed by a written o Investment Policy. The Investment Policy addresses the methods, procedures, U) and practices that must be exercised to ensure the effective and judicious management of the City's funds. LO N B. Objectives N M The City shall manage and invest its cash with four primary objectives, listed in the order of priority: safety, liquidity, public trust, and yield, expressed as optimization of investment income. The safety of the principal invested always remains the primary objective. All investments shall be designed and managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and consistent with state and local law. E An aggressive cash management program and investment policy will be pursued by the Investment Officer to take advantage of investment interest as viable and material revenue to all operating and capital funds. Cash management is defined as the process of managing monies in order to ensure maximum cash availability and maximum investment income on short-term investments of idle cash. The g City's portfolio shall be designed and managed in a manner responsive to the p° public trust. Income from investments will be used in a manner that will best serve the interests of the City of North Richland Hills. ° 1. Safety m Safety of invested principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The objective will be to mitigate credit and interest rate risk. a. Credit Risk and Concentration of Credit Risk 3 Cbdl f LICW51' C/3/c The City will minimize credit risk, the risk of loss due to the failure of the issuer or backer of the investment, and concentration of credit risk, the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of investment in a single issuer, by: (1) Limiting investments to the safest types of investments, (2) Pre-qualifying the financial institutions and broker/dealers with which the City will do business, and (3) Diversifying the investment portfolio to minimize potential losses on a� individual issuers. N b. Interest Rate Risk Cr M 0 The City will manage the risk that the investment income and the market value of investments in the portfolio will fall due to changes in the general B interest rates by: o (1) Structuring the investment portfolio so that investments mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations. From time to time, X securities may be purchased at a premium or traded for other 0 securities to improve yield, maturity or credit risk. For these U) transactions, a loss may be incurred for accounting purposes to M LO achieve optimal investment return, provided any of the following occurs with respect to the replacement security: N A. The yield has been increased, or M B. The maturity has been reduced or lengthened, or C. The quality of the investment has been improved. (2) Investing operating funds primarily in certificates of deposit, shorter- 0 term securities, money market mutual funds, or local government �- investment pools functioning as money market mutual funds, B (3) Diversifying maturities and staggering purchase dates to minimize the impact of market movements over time, and U) (4) Limiting the maximum weighted average maturity of the investment 0 portfolio to 3 years. 0 2. Liquidity The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating m requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that investments mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands. Because all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, a portion of the portfolio will be invested in shares of money market mutual funds or local government investment pools that offer same-day liquidity. 4 Cbdl f LICbA52 C/3/c 3. Public Trust All participants in the City's investment process shall seek to act responsibly as custodians of the public trust. Investment officers shall avoid any transaction that might impair public trust in the City's ability to govern effectively. 4. Yield (Optimization of Investment Income) N The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on a� investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. II. Cr SCOPE 0 This investment policy applies to all financial assets of the City of North Richland Hills E in all current funds, any funds to be created in the future, and any other funds held in '�E custody by the City, unless expressly prohibited by law or unless it is in contravention of any depository contract between the City and its depository bank. However, this policy does not apply to the assets administered for the benefit of the City by outside X agencies. These funds are accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual 0 Financial Report and include: U) M Operating Funds LO • General Fund N • Special Investigation Fund N • Drainage Utility Fund M • Crime Control and Prevention District Fund • Promotional Fund • Economic Development Fund • Donations Fund 0 • Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Fund �- • Grant Fund E • Gas Development Fund • Traffic Safety Fund • Utility Fund g • Aquatic Park Fund • Golf Course Fund 0 • Facilities/Construction Management Fund • Fleet Services Fund ° • Self-Insurance Fund • Information Services Fund • General CIP Fund m • Permanent Street Maintenance Fund • Sidewalk Maintenance Fund • Tax Increment Financing District 1 (TIF #1) • Tax Increment Financing District 2 (TIF #2) Capital Improvement Funds 5 Cbdl f LICb/53 C/3/c Debt Service Funds General Fund Balance Reserve Revenue Bond Reserves The City will consolidate cash balances from all funds with the exception of bond proceeds to optimize investment income. Investment income will be allocated to the various funds based on their respective participation and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 0 III. RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL N A. Delegation of Authority Cr 0 This Investment Policy and the outlining of investment practices and authorities is compiled in accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act, which requires the S adoption of rules governing investment policies and strategies and the designation of o an Investment Officer, as well as City Ordinance Number 2079 which designates investment officers and provides prudent investment rules. Collateral requirements are created in accordance with the Public Funds Collateral Act (Texas Government Code x 10, Chapter 2257). 0 U) Ultimate responsibility and authority for all investment transactions and cash M management reside with the City Manager and the City's Director of Finance. The N Director of Finance is also responsible for considering the quality and capability of staff to be involved in investment management and procedures. The Director of Finance N may delegate responsibility for the day to day investment activities to other qualified M staff members. These staff members will be termed Investment Officers of the City. One of these Investment Officers will be designated the Primary Investment Officer by the Director of Finance to conduct daily investment activity and prepare required investment reports. Investment Officers will not conduct any investment or banking activities involving City funds until a resolution or ordinance giving them authority to do ° so has been approved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills. All E participants in the investment process shall seek to act responsibly as custodians of public trust. B. Quality and Capability of Investment Management 0 The City shall provide periodic training in investments for the designated Investment O Officers and other investment personnel through courses and seminars offered by o professional organizations, associations, and other independent sources approved by the Investment Committee in order to ensure the quality and capability of investment management in compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act. m C. Training Requirements In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act, all authorized Investment Officers shall attend an investment training session not less than once each state fiscal biennium and shall receive not less than ten hours of instruction relating to investment responsibilities. A newly appointed Investment Officer must attend a training session of at least ten hours of instruction within twelve months of taking over or assuming duties 6 Cbdl f L1Cih/!54 C/3/c and attend an investment training session not less than once in a two year period that begins on the first day of the local government's fiscal year and consists of the two consecutive fiscal years after that date. The training shall be provided by an independent source approved by the Investment Committee. For purposes of this policy, an "independent source" from which investment training shall be obtained shall include: a professional organization, an institution of higher education, or any other sponsor certified to provide such training. N D. Management and Internal Controls The Director of Finance is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure the City's assets are protected from loss, theft, or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable N assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance Cr recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments ° by management. E Accordingly, the Director of Finance shall establish a process for annual independent ° review by an external auditor to assure compliance with policies and procedures. The internal controls shall address the following points: X X 0 • Minimize risk of collusion • Separation of transactions authority from accounting and record keeping • Custodial safekeeping LO • Avoidance of physical delivery securities • Clear delegation of authority to subordinate staff members N • Written confirmation for telephone (voice) transactions for investments and wire M transfers • Development of a wire transfer agreement with the depository bank or third party custodian E. Prudence ° E The standard of prudence to be applied by the Investment Officer shall be the "prudent investor' rule, which states: "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for g investment, considering the probable safety of capital as well as the probable income 0 to be derived." It should be noted that, in a diversified portfolio, occasional losses are 6 inevitable and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's return. 0 In determining whether an Investment Officer has exercised prudence with respect to an investment decision, the determination shall take into consideration the investment of all funds, or funds under the City's control, over which the Investment Officer had 00 responsibility rather than a consideration as to the prudence of a single investment, and whether the investment decision was consistent with the written investment policy of the City. 7 Cbdl f LICb/55 C/3/c F. Indemnification The Investment Officer, acting in accordance with written procedures and exercising due diligence, shall not be held personally responsible for a specific security's credit risk or market price changes, provided that these deviations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is taken to control the effects of such adverse developments. N The City shall provide for the defense and indemnification of any Investment Officer or Investment Committee member who is made party to any suit or proceeding, other than by actions of the City, or against whom a claim is asserted by reasons of their actions taken within the scope of their service as Investment Officers or appointed members of the Investment Committee. Such indemnity shall extend to judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement of any such claim, suit or proceeding, including Cr any appeal thereof. This protection shall extend only to members who have acted in good faith and in a manner which they reasonably believe to be in, or not opposed to, ° the best interests of the City. E G. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest ° City staff involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business X activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which o could impair the ability to make impartial investment decisions. City staff should disclose to the City Manager any material personal financial investments in financial institutions that conduct business with the City and they shall further disclose positions LO that could be related to the performance of the City's portfolio. City staff shall subordinate their personal financial transactions to those of the City, particularly with N regard to the timing of purchases and sales. M An Investment Officer of the City who has a personal business relationship, as defined by the Public Funds Investment Act of 1997, Section 2256.005 (i), with an organization seeking to sell an investment to the City shall file a statement disclosing that personal C business interest. An Investment Officer who is related within the second degree of 0 affinity or consanguinity to an individual seeking to sell an investment to the City shall file a statement disclosing that relationship. A disclosure statement required under this �- section must be filed with the Texas Ethics Commission and the governing body of the City. U) IV. INVESTMENT COMMITTEE g 0 O' An Investment Committee shall be established to assist in monitoring the performance and structure of the City's portfolio and approved brokers. Members of this committee ° shall include the Director of Finance (as Chairman) and the Assistant Director of Finance as permanent members. Additional members, numbering no less than three, will be appointed at the discretion of the Director of Finance. The Primary Investment m Officer will report to and make recommendations to the Investment Committee, but will have no vote concerning investment policy or suitability of investments. Any matters presented to the committee requiring a vote of the members shall be passed or denied by a simple majority. The Investment Officer or any other member of the committee shall have the power to call meetings of the committee. The committee shall meet no less than quarterly. 8 C bdl f LIC b/!56 C/3/c The Investment Committee shall perform the following functions: 1. Approve the process of selecting authorized dealers, brokers, investment advisors, and safekeeping agents/custodians used by the City. 2. Review the City's general portfolio activity and performance for compliance to this policy and recommend any changes or amendments to this policy to the City Council. 3. Approve the Investment Strategy document, as prepared by the Investment o Officer. This document is required by State law to be separate from the Investment Policy. The Investment Strategy will be a guide to the investment of all funds controlled by the City as described in Section II of the Investment Cr Policy. The strategy is intended to adapt to changes in market conditions. o 4. Advise the Investment Officer as to recommendations regarding investment E strategy and portfolio performance. o 5. Approve the purchase of any securities with maturities over three (3) years. x 6. Immediately notify the Investment Officer of any information brought to their o attention that materially affects the portfolio or the marketability of any u) investments purchased in accordance with the Investment Policy. LO N 7. Oversee the activities of the persons designated to carry out investment transactions and inform the City Council of unaddressed concerns with the N management of the City's investment portfolio. M c� V. SUITABLE AND AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS The City's portfolio investment strategy seeks to match investment maturities with cash flow requirements for the portion of the portfolio where maturity dates can be matched ° with cash flow requirements and investments are able to be purchased with the intention E of being held until maturity. However, investments may be liquidated prior to maturity for the following reasons: C0 - An investment with declining credit may be liquidated early to minimize loss of g Principal o 6' - Cash flow needs of the City require that the investment be liquidated o - An investment can be liquidated prior to maturity in the event that the gain and, or, overall benefit from selling and reinvesting the security is greater than the benefit that would be realized if the security continued to be held to maturity. This will occur m primarily in the core portion of the city's portfolio that is available for longer term investment. City funds governed by this policy may be invested in the instruments described below, all of which are authorized by Chapter 2256 of Government Code 10 (Public Funds Investment Act), with further restrictions imposed by local ordinances. Investments of City funds in any instrument or security not authorized for investment under the Act and 9 C bdl f LIC W57 C/3/c City ordinance is strictly prohibited. The City will not be required to liquidate an investment that becomes unauthorized, for reasons other than loss of rating, subsequent to its purchase. All prudent measures will be taken to liquidate an investment that is downgraded to less than the required minimum rating. A. Authorized Investments 1. Obligations of the United States, its agencies, and instrumentalities 2. Direct Obligations of the State of Texas or its agencies a� 3. Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ("CMOs") directly issued by a federal agency or instrumentality of the United States, the underlying security for which is guaranteed by an agency or instrumentality of the United States Cr 0 4. Other obligations, the principal and interest of which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by, backed by the full faith and credit of, this state or the B United States or their respective agencies and instrumentalities, including o obligations that are fully guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or by the explicit full faith and credit of the United States X 0 U) 5. Obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions LO of any state rated as to investment quality of not less than A or its equivalent by N a nationally recognized investment rating firm co N 6. Certificates of deposit issued by a depository institution as permitted by Texas Public Funds Investment Act section 2256.010. Certificates of deposit must be guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor, and secured by obligations in a manner and amount as provided by law. 0 7. Fully Collateralized Repurchase Agreements that are structured in compliance B with the Public Funds Investment Act. A flexible repurchase agreement can be utilized for the investment of bond proceeds to meet projected cash outflows. Repurchase agreements must be: secured by a combination of cash and U) obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; pledged to g the City or held in the City's name; deposited at the same time the investment is 0 made; and have a defined termination date. Flexible repurchase agreements (Flex-Repos) must be purchased through a primary government securities 0 dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or financial institutions doing business in this state. Flex-Repos may be utilized on new bond issues as deemed necessary and advantageous to the City. Repurchase Agreements will only be executed with counterparties that have signed a TBMA Tri-Party 00 Repurchase Agreement with the City. 8. Commercial Paper a. Commercial Paper is an authorized investment of this policy if the commercial paper: 10 Cbdl f LICb/58 C/3/c (1) Has a stated maturity of 270 days or fewer from the date of issuance; and (2) Is rated not less than A-1 or P-1 or an equivalent by at least: (a) Two nationally recognized credit rating agencies; or (b) One nationally recognized credit rating agency and is fully secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state. 9. Mutual Funds 0 a. No-load Money Market Mutual Funds are acceptable investments provided they are registered and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, have a dollar- weighted average stated maturity of 90 days or Cr less, maintain a stable net asset value of$1 per share, and provide the City �- with a prospectus and other information required by the Securities E Exchange Act of 1934 or the Investment Company Act of 1940. '�E 0 b. No-load Mutual Funds are acceptable investments provided they are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, have an average X weighted maturity of less than two years, are invested exclusively in o obligations as expressed in Section 2256, subchapter A, are continuously U) rated not less than AAA or it's equivalent by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency, and conform to all requirements under the LO Public Funds Investment Act relating to the eligibility of investment pools to receive and invest funds of investing entities. N M 10. Investment Pools N a. Investment pools must provide the Investment Officer with an offering circular or other similar disclosure instrument that contains specific and detailed information required by the Act. Additionally, the pool shall provide ° transaction confirmations, detailed monthly transaction summaries, and E monthly performance reports to the Investment Officer. The specific requirements for authorized investment pools are detailed in the Public Funds Investment Act, Subchapter A, Section 2256.016. Authorized pools must maintain credit ratings no lower than AAA or AAAm or an equivalent g rating by at least one nationally recognized rating service. An investment o pool shall invest the funds it received from entities in authorized C� investments permitted by the Public Funds Investment Act. An Investment o pool created to operate as a money market mutual fund must maintain a �- maximum weighted average maturity not to exceed 90 days and maintain a net asset value of $1 per share with the market value per share between .995 and 1.005. Any investment pool that does not meet the requirements m of one that is created to function as a money market mutual fund must maintain a maximum average dollar weighted maturity that does not exceed 365 days (or 366 days in the case of leap year) and must provide a fixed interest rate and a fixed maturity term for each pool position. b. In order to participate in an investment pool, the City Council must approve by resolution or ordinance a Participation Agreement or Inter-local 11 Cbdl f L1Cih/!59 C/3/c Agreement to be executed with the State or Inter-local authority responsible for the investment pool. This agreement will specify the City's authorized representatives and the standard delivery instructions for fund transfers and information reports. B. Unauthorized Investments The following investment instruments are specifically not authorized: a� 1. Obligations whose payment represents the coupon payments on the outstanding principal balance of the underlying mortgage-backed security N collateral and pays no principal (Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO) - Cr derived Interest Only Strips), 0 2. Obligations whose payment represent the principal stream of cash flow from E the underlying mortgage-backed security collateral and bears no interest '�E (CMO-derived Principal Only Strips), 3. Collateralized Mortgage Obligations that have a stated final maturity date of X greater than ten (10) years, 0 U) 4. Collateralized Mortgage Obligations whose interest rates are determined by an M LO index that adjusts opposite to the changes in a market index (Inverse Floaters), N 5. Certificates of Deposit and other investments issued by Savings and Loans, N M 6. Share Certificates and other investments issued by Credit Unions, and N 7. Guaranteed Investment Contracts. C� VI. INVESTMENT PARAMETERS E A. Diversification Diversification of funds and investments must be accompanied by competitive U) bidding of all investments to assure diversification among securities dealers. g Diversification is necessary to reduce the portfolio's credit and market risks, while 0 helping the portfolio attain a market rate of return. The City shall seek to conduct its investment transactions with several competing, reputable investment security 0 dealers and brokers to protect principal while optimizing interest opportunities. To assure diversification of financial institutions, business involving two party transactions (i.e. repurchase agreements) with any one investment broker should m be limited to thirty percent (30%) of the par value of the total portfolio for any reporting period. In this way, a bankruptcy, receivership, or legal action would not immobilize the City's ability to meet payroll, operating, or other expenses. It is the policy of the City to diversify its investment portfolio so that reliance on any one issuer or broker will not place an undue financial burden on the City. 12 Cbdl f tIW!5: C/3/c B. Investment Type Depositories for Municipal Funds (Chapter 105, Local Government Code), the Public Funds Investment Act (Chapter 10, Government Code), and City Ordinance Number 2079 authorize depositories and define allowable investment programs for municipal governments. It is the policy of the City to purchase only securities authorized by both the Public Funds Investment Act and Section V., subsection A., of the City's investment policy. Market risk shall be minimized by diversification of investment types. The following limits, by instrument, are established for the City's total portfolio: a� 0 1. Repurchase Agreements 50% 2. Certificates of Deposit 30% Cr 3. U.S. Treasury Notes/Bonds/Bills 100% E 4. U.S. Agencies and Instrumentalities 75% 5. Commercial paper 10% 6. State and Local Bonds and Notes 20% X 7. Money Market Mutual Funds 80% o 8. Mutual Funds 15% U) 9. Investment Pools 100% LO N co The maximum maturity of any given investment in the portfolio shall not exceed a final, stated maturity of 5 years from the date of purchase and overall portfolio 22 weighted average maturity is not to exceed 3 years. N Reductions in the size of the portfolio due to cash outflows may cause an investment type to exceed the maximum percentage allowed for that investment o type. In such situations, securities will be sold to reduce the percentage to �- allowable levels only if no loss will be realized from the sale. If a loss will be E realized, then the investment may be held to maturity. To allow for efficient and effective placement, a singular repurchase agreement U) can be utilized for the investment of bond proceeds, which exceeds the 50% g limitation. o O' VII.INVESTMENT PROCEDURES o The City's portfolio shall be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return through budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow requirements. The risk-return relationship will be 00 controlled through the investment parameters, operating requirements, and guiding policies of the City Council. Market value of all securities owned will be compared to current book value of those securities to determine portfolio performance on a quarterly basis. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of this investment policy. The City will practice competitive bidding when purchasing all investments to guarantee the highest rate of return for the desired maturity date. The right is reserved 13 Cbdl f LICbP61' C/3/c to reject the most financially favorable bid if it is potentially disruptive to the investment strategy or portfolio composition of the City. A. Approval of Broker/Dealers It is the policy of the City to purchase securities only from those institutions on the City's approved list of broker/dealers and banks. The Investment Committee shall at least annually, review, revise, and adopt a list of qualified brokers that are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City. All securities dealers must be registered and certified with the Texas State Securities Commission, National Association of Security Dealers ("NASD") and Securities and Exchange Commission a� ("SEC"). ° N Those firms that request to become qualified bidders for securities transactions, Cr including financial institutions, banks, money market mutual funds, and local o government investment pools, will be required to provide a completed broker/dealer �- questionnaire that provides information regarding creditworthiness, experience, and E reputation. Additional requirements include a certification stating that the firm has '�E received, read, understood, and agreed to comply with the City's investment policy and implemented reasonable procedures and controls to preclude investment transactions g that are not authorized by the City's investment policy. This list may be revised by the X Investment Committee as the City's investment needs change. The Investment o Committee shall approve all broker/dealers and shall also have the ability to limit the U) number of authorized securities dealers/banks doing business with the City. co LO All banks authorized to sell securities to the City will be Federal Reserve member banks and must be approved by the Investment Committee. No investments will be co placed with Savings and Loan Institutions or Credit Unions. M It is the policy of the City to purchase securities from those institutions on investment manager's approved list. The City authorizes the investment manager to engage in security transactions with broker/dealers on a carefully monitored broker/dealer list. C The Investment Committee shall at least annually review the list of broker/dealers with o investment manager. E B. Investment Transactions U) It is the policy of the City of North Richland Hills to require competitive bidding for all g individual security purchases and sales except for transactions with money market p° mutual funds and local government investment pools. A minimum of three bids must be obtained to ensure a competitive price for the transaction. All investment ° transactions must be approved by the Assistant Director of Finance, of the Director of Finance, or registered investment advisor as appointed by the City Manager to execute transactions on behalf of the City, or in their absence, an authorized m Investment Officer. All securities purchased shall require delivery on the settlement date to the City or its third party accounts on a delivery versus payment ("DVP") basis, with the exception of investment pools and mutual funds. By so doing, City funds are not released until the City has received, through the Federal Reserve wire, the securities purchased. 14 Cbdl f LICW62 C/3/c C. Investment Reporting The Public Funds Investment Act and City Ordinance Number 2079 require the preparation of quarterly management reports and an annual report of all investment transactions of the City be presented to the City Council. The fourth quarter report for the fiscal year will be considered as the annual report. The Primary Investment Officer will prepare the required quarterly and annual reports for evaluating investment portfolio performance. The reports will be approved and signed by all members of the Investment Committee. The reports will include the following information, as required by the Public Funds Investment Act: a� 1. A summary narrative of investment activity and portfolio performance over the Period N 2. Size and composition of portfolio at the beginning and end of the reporting period Cr 3. List all investments according to the fund for which they were purchased E 4. Beginning and ending book and market value for all securities held 5. Beginning and ending book and market value for the total portfolio X 0 6. All additions and changes to the market value during the period U) 7. State the compliance of the portfolio to the investment policy and the Public Funds LO Investment Act N N 8. Yield M 9. Diversification of investments 10. Total sales, maturities, and purchases C 0 11. Accrued interest E 12. Performance compared to an established benchmark These quarterly reports should be used along with the annual report to fully evaluate and explain market trends and adjustment of investment strategies to manage market g fluctuations. The annual report will show on a fiscal year basis the results of the overall 0 investment strategy. The quarterly reports will conform to GAAP and be reviewed annually by the City's independent auditor, with results reported to the City Council. ° D. Marking to Market m Market value of all securities in the portfolio will be determined on a quarterly basis. These values will be obtained from a reputable and independent source and disclosed to the governing body in the quarterly investment report. VIII. CUSTODIAL CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT 15 Cbdl f t1Cb/!63 C/3/c A. Safekeeping and Custodial Agreements The laws of the State of Texas and prudent treasury management require that all purchased securities shall be held in safekeeping by either the City, a City account in a third party financial institution, or the City's safekeeping account with its designated depository bank. All securities owned by the City shall be held by a third party safekeeping agent, or in the Federal Reserve Bank, except for certificates of deposit that have FDIC insurance provided. For certificates of deposit with FDIC insurance, the City will hold the deposit receipt. 0 Transfers of securities in safekeeping shall be processed with written confirmations. The confirmation will be used for documentation and retention purposes. One of the City's designated Investment Officers must approve release of collateral prior to its Cr removal from the safekeeping account. ° B B. Collateral Policy 0 Consistent with the requirements of Texas law as defined in Government Code 10, Chapter 2257, known as the Public Funds Collateral Act, it is the policy of the City to require full collateral ization of all City investments other than obligations of the United o States and its agencies and instrumentalities. Collateral on investments shall be maintained by an appropriate third party safekeeping agent, as designated by the City. This policy also applies to any deposits held in an approved depository in excess of co the amount protected by FDIC insurance. The City of North Richland Hills shall accept only the following securities as collateral: M 1. FDIC insurance coverage 2. A bond, certificate of indebtedness, or Treasury Note of the United States, or other C evidence of indebtedness of the United States that is guaranteed as to principal o and interest by the United States 3. Obligations of the United States, its Agencies, and Instrumentalities 4. A bond of the State of Texas or of a county, city, or other political subdivision of the U) State of Texas having been rated as investment grade (investment rating no less g than "A" or its equivalent) by a nationally recognized rating agency with a 0 remaining maturity of ten (10) years or less 0 Certificates of deposit plus accrued interest per non-depository bank do not need to be collateralized pursuant to this policy as long as FDIC insurance is provided. Certificates of Deposit, including accrued interest must be secured by approved m collateral for the amount in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. Collateral is valued at current market plus interest accrued through the date of the valuation. Collateral shall be marked to market daily to determine if adequate collateralization is being maintained. Repurchase agreement collateral must be maintained at the following levels, with respect to repurchase agreement par value plus accrued interest: 16 Cbdl f LiCb/!64 C/3/c Maturity of U. S. Treasury Other Collateral Securities Securities 1 year or less 101% 102% 1 year to 5 years 102% 105% a� Over 5 years 103% 110% 0 N Collateral levels should be maintained during an investment transaction. The amount placed in the bank to cover the cost of a security purchase should be fully Cr collateralized in the event the security fails to be delivered to the safekeeping agent. �- S Collateralized investments often require substitution of collateral. Any broker or financial institution requesting substitution must contact the Primary Investment Officer, or in his absence any other authorized Investment Officer, for approval and g settlement. The substituted collateral's value will be calculated and the substitution X approved if its value is equal to or greater than the original collateral ization level. o U) The Director of Finance, or an authorized designee, must give immediate notification of the decision to the bank or third party holding the collateral. Substitution is allowable LO for all transactions, but should be limited, if possible, to minimize potential administrative problems and transfer expense. The Director of Finance may limit N substitution and assess appropriate fees if substitution becomes excessive or abusive. M Collateral shall be audited at least annually by the City's independent audit firm, and may be audited by the City at any time during normal business hours of the N safekeeping party. The financial institutions with which the City invests and/or maintains other deposits o shall provide, as requested by the City, a listing of the City's certificates of deposit and other deposits at the institution and a listing of collateral pledged to the City marked to current market prices. The listing shall include total pledged securities with the following information: - U) Name g Type/description 0 CUSIP Par value ° Current market value Maturity date Moody's or Standard & Poor's rating (both if available) m Under Chapter 2257, Public Funds Collateral Act, substitution and release of collateral must be approved by the governing body. City of North Richland Hills Ordinance Number 2079 Section 3 delegates the Investment Officers' overall responsibilities to ensure that investment objectives are accomplished, and therefore, the authority to release and substitute collateral as deemed necessary and reasonable within the guidelines of this policy. 17 Cbdl f L1Cb/!65 C/3/c IX. ARBITRAGE The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Title 26 U.S.C. Section 148) provides limitations on the City's yield from investing tax-exempt bond proceeds and debt service funds. These arbitrage rebate provisions require that the City compute earnings on investments from each issue of bonds on a periodic basis to determine if a rebate is required. To determine the City's arbitrage position, the City is required to calculate the actual yield earned on the investment of the funds and compare it to the yield that would have been earned if the funds had been invested at a rate equal to the yield on the bonds sold by the City. The a� rebate provisions state that periodically (not less than once every five years, and not later than sixty days after maturity of the bonds), the City is required to pay the U.S. Treasury a rebate of any excess earnings. These restrictions require extreme precision in the monitoring and record keeping of investments, particularly in computing yields to ensure Cr compliance. Failure to comply can dictate that the bonds become taxable, retroactively �- from the date of issuance. E The City's investment position relative to the arbitrage restrictions is to continue pursuing the maximum yield on applicable investments while ensuring the safety of capital and g liquidity. It is a fiscally sound position to continue maximization of yield and to rebate X excess earnings, if necessary. o U) X. DEPOSITORIES M LO The Texas City Depository Act, Local Government Code Chapter 105, prescribes procedures for selection of a city depository designating that both general-law and home- N rule cities are "authorized to receive applications (as depository) for the custody of city M funds from any bank, credit union or savings association that maintains a place of business within the state of Texas." This clause indicates that cities are not required to designate one central depository. The City of North Richland Hills will, through a request for proposals process, designate 0 one or more banks to serve as its primary depository(ies) to maximize investment E capabilities and minimize banking cost. The depository designation does not limit investment activity to one financial institution. The consideration the City of North Richland Hills will use to execute a banking services contract will include: g 0 O' • Ability of Bank to perform and provide the required and requested services o • Reputation of bidder and quality of services provided �- • Cost of banking services • Interest paid on interest bearing accounts and deposits • Earnings credit calculation on account balances 00 • Completeness of proposal and agreement to points outlined in the request for proposals • Convenience of locations • Previous service relationship with the City • Financial strength and stability of institution 18 Cbdl f LICW66 C/3/c Obtaining competitive proposals on the City's depository specifications will be the responsibility of the Director of Finance. Selection of the depository shall be based on the institutions offering the most favorable terms and conditions for the handling of City funds and the services available to the City. The maximum term for a depository contract under State law is five years. The City's contract shall not exceed five years. A performance review will be conducted at least once every six months by the Investment Committee to evaluate the working relationship between the City and the depository bank. Special banking needs may be contracted for by the City outside the depository contract if approved by City Council. If a depository does not meet the City's requirements in the banking services contract, the bank will be required to meet the requirements within ninety days or lose the depository contract. Cr XI. INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION O The investment policy shall be adopted by ordinance or resolution of the City Council. E It is the City's intent to comply with state laws and regulations. The policy shall be '�E reviewed annually by the Investment Committee and the City Council. City Ordinance Number 2079 states that policy revisions that require enactment due to updates of g applicable state or federal laws may be authorized by the City Manager; however, X other significant revisions must be approved by the City Council. o U) M LO N N fM� l:l N O S Q) L O O m 19 Cbdl f t1Cb/!67 C/3/c N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) M LO N N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m 20 Cbdl f t Cb/!68 C/3/c N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) M LO N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m 21 Cbdl f t Cb/!69 N CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS O N Q cr O s O INVESTMENT STRATEGY ' X O U) M N co N fM� l:l N SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 O s co O c� O 16 co Cbdl f t Cb/!6: N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) lei ��H M LO N N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m Cbdl f t Cb/!7'1' PREFACE It is the policy of the City of North Richland Hills that, giving due regard to the safety and risk of investment, all available funds shall be invested in conformance with State and Federal Regulations, applicable Bond Resolution requirements, and the adopted Investment Policy and Investment Strategy. N In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act(Texas Government Code 10, Chapter 2256), the City of North Richland Hills' investment strategies shall address the following priorities (in order of importance): o N • Understanding the suitability of the investment to the financial requirements of the City Cr 0 • Preservation and safety of principal S • Liquidity • Marketability of the investment prior to maturity X 0 • Diversification of the investment portfolio u) M LO • Optimization of interest earnings co N Effective investment strategy development coordinates the primary objectives of the City of M North Richland Hills' Investment Policy and cash management procedures to enhance interest earnings and reduce investment risk. Aggressive cash management will increase the available "investment period" and subsequently interest earnings. Maturity selections shall be based on cash flow and market conditions to take advantage of various interest rate cycles. The City's investment portfolio shall be designed and managed in a manner o responsive to the public trust and consistent with the Investment Policy. The City's Funds shall be analyzed and invested according to the following major fund types: _ I. Operating Funds U) II. Capital Improvement Funds g III. Debt Service Funds o IV. General Fund Balance Reserve 0 V. Revenue Bond Reserves INVESTMENT STRATEGY m In order to minimize risk of loss on a sale because of fluctuating market prices, investment maturities will not exceed the anticipated cash flow requirements of the funds. In general, the City will structure the investment portfolio so that investments mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations. From time to time, securities maybe purchased at a 2 CCbdl f t1Cb/!72 premium or traded for other securities to improve yield, maturity or credit risk. For these transactions, a loss may be incurred for accounting purposes to achieve optimal investment return, provided any of the following occurs with respect to the replacement security: A. The yield has been increased, or B. The maturity has been reduced or lengthened, or C. The quality of the investment has been improved. Investment guidelines by fund type are as follows-0 N I. Operating Funds Cr The City of North Richland Hills Operating Funds are as follows: o S • General Fund 0 • Special Revenue Funds g o Special Investigation Fund x o Drainage Utility Fund o o Crime Control and Prevention District Fund U) o Promotional Fund LO o Economic Development Fund N o Donations Fund o Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Fund o Grant Fund 22 o Gas Development Fund N o Traffic Safety Fund • Enterprise Funds o Utility Fund o Aquatic Park Fund S o Golf Course Fund • Internal Service Funds U) o Facilities/Construction Management Fund g o Fleet Services Fund o Self-Insurance Fund o o Information Services Fund - • Capital Projects Funds o General CIP Fund 00 o Permanent Street Maintenance Fund o Sidewalk Maintenance Fund 3 Cbdl f LICb/73 • Component Units o Tax Increment Financing District 1 (TIF #1) o Tax Increment Financing District 2 (TIF #2) 1) Suitability - Any investment eligible in the Investment Policy is suitable for the Operating Funds. 2) Safety of Principal - All investments shall be in high quality securities with no perceived default risk. The maximum allowable investment in commercial paper o shall be limited to 10% of total Operating Fund investments. Market price fluctuations will occur. By managing the weighted average days to maturity for the operating fund portfolio to be less than 3 years and restricting the maximum Cr allowable maturity to five years, the price volatility of the overall portfolio will be 0 minimized. S 3) Marketability-Securities with active and efficient secondary markets are necessary in the event of an unanticipated cash requirement. Active electronically traded g markets will define an efficient secondary market. X 0 4) Liquidity-The Operating Funds require the greatest short-term liquidity of any of the U) fund types. Short-term constant dollar investment pools and money market mutual LO funds shall provide daily liquidity and may be utilized as a competitive yield N alternative to fixed maturity investments. co N 5) Diversification - Investment maturities shall be staggered throughout the fiscal year to provide cash flow based on the anticipated operating needs of the City. Market N cycle risk will be reduced by diversifying the appropriate maturity structure not to exceed the weighted average maturity allowed by the Investment Policy, and through diversification by market sector. 0 6) Yield -Attaining a competitive market yield for comparable securities and portfolio S restrictions is the desired objective. The City's portfolio shall be designed with the purpose of obtaining an optimized rate of return, through budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk, policy constraints, and cash flow U) requirements. g 0 6' II. Capital Improvement Funds 0 The City of North Richland Hills Capital Improvement Funds are comprised of the monies available from the sale of debt and other sources to finance capital improvement projects. Bond proceeds are segregated from operating funds on the 00 general ledger and in investment accounts for arbitrage compliance purposes. Capital Improvement Funds include all funding for the design and construction of capital projects, including streets, drainage facilities, utility adjustments, park improvements, and municipal buildings as well as the acquisition of capital assets. 4 C bdl f LIC b/!74 1) Suitability - Any investment eligible in the Investment Policy is suitable for Capital Improvement Funds. 2) Safety of Principal - All investments shall be in high quality securities with no perceived default risk. The maximum allowable investment in commercial paper shall be limited to 10% of total Capital Improvement Fund investments. Market price fluctuations will occur. By managing the various Capital Improvement accounts in anticipation of cash flow requirements, the impact of market risk for the portfolio will be minimized. 0 N 3) Marketability-Securities with active and efficient secondary markets are necessary in the event of an unanticipated cash requirement. Active electronically traded Cr markets will define an efficient secondary market. 0 S 4) Liquidity-The City's funds used for construction and capital improvement programs have reasonably predictable draw down schedules. Therefore, investment maturities shall generally follow the anticipated cash flow requirements. Investment pools and money market mutual funds shall provide readily available funds X generally equal to one month's anticipated cash flow needs, or a competitive 0 alternative for short-term fixed maturity investments. A singular repurchase U) agreement may be utilized if disbursements are allowed in the amount necessary to M satisfy any expenditure request. This investment structure is commonly referred to N as a Flexible Repurchase Agreement. N 5) Diversification - Market conditions and arbitrage regulations influence and limit the selection and the laddering of maturities of fixed rate investments for bond proceeds N and other construction and capital improvement funds. When investing these types of funds, every effort will be made to at least meet the maximum allowed yield, and to select and ladder maturities to meet the cash flow needs of the funds. Maturities should not exceed the normal life of the underlying projects supported by the fund. ° S 6) Yield - Achieving a positive spread to the applicable arbitrage yield is the desired objective for bond proceeds. The City's portfolio shall be designed with the purpose of obtaining an optimized rate of return, through budgetary and economic cycles, U) commensurate with the investment risk, policy constraints and cash flow g requirements. 0 6' 0 III. Debt Service Funds The City's Debt Service funds include the General Debt Service Fund and the Sales m Tax Revenue Debt Service Fund. The General Debt Service Fund is funded from ad valorem tax collections and transfers from various other funds. The Sales Tax Revenue Debt Service Fund is funded solely from transfers from the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund. 5 Cbdl f LICb/75 1) Suitability -Any investment listed as eligible in the Investment Policy is suitable for the Debt Service Funds. 2) Safety of Principal - All investments shall be in high quality securities with no perceived default risk. The maximum allowable investment in commercial paper shall be limited to 10% of total Debt Service Fund investments. Market price fluctuations will however occur. By limiting the Debt Service Funds Portfolio maturity dates to the next scheduled debt service payment, the market risk of the overall portfolio will be minimized. o N 3) Marketability - Securities with active and efficient secondary markets are not necessary as the event of an unanticipated cash requirement is not probable. Cr 0 4) Liquidity - Debt service funds have predictable payment schedules. Therefore, S investment maturities shall not exceed the anticipated cash flow requirements. Investment pools and money market mutual funds may provide a competitive yield ° alternative for time deposits and short-term fixed maturity investments. A singular repurchase agreement may be utilized if disbursements are allowed in the amount X necessary to satisfy any expenditure request. This investment structure is 0 commonly referred to as a Flexible Repurchase Agreement. U) M 5) Diversification - Market conditions influence the attractiveness of fully extending N maturities to the next unfunded payment date. At no time shall the debt service schedule be exceeded in an attempt to bolster yield. M 6) Yield -Attaining a competitive market yield for comparable securities and portfolio restrictions is the desired objective. The City's portfolio shall be designed with the purpose of obtaining an optimized rate of return, through budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk, policy constraints and cash flow requirements. ° S IV. General Fund Balance Reserve U) The City's objective regarding the General Fund Balance is to maintain a sufficient g fund balance to operate the City for a period of sixty days or 15% of the following 0 year's budgeted expenditures. The amount of funds to be invested in non-liquid other-than-overnight investments shall be limited to not more than 50% of this ° amount of the General Fund Balance. 1) Suitability -Any investment eligible in the Investment Policy is suitable for General m Fund Balance Reserves. 2) Safety of Principal — Generally, the investment quality of all securities allowed as investments in the Operating Funds will be allowable in the General Fund Balance 6 CCbdl f LICb/76 Reserve. All investments shall be in high quality securities with no perceived default risk. The maximum allowable investment in commercial paper shall be limited to 10% of total General Fund Balance Reserve investments. Market price fluctuations will occur. Under no circumstance shall any investment from this portfolio cause the combined portfolio's weighted average maturity to exceed the three year maximum allowed by the Investment Policy. The maximum allowable individual maturity is restricted to five years. 3) Marketability-Securities with active and efficient secondary markets are necessary in the event of an unanticipated cash requirement. Active electronically traded o markets will define an efficient secondary market. 4) Liquidity - The Fund Balance Reserve requires the liquidity necessary to cover the Cr City's expenditures in the event of a cash shortfall. Short-term constant dollar 0 investment pools and money market mutual funds shall provide daily liquidity and S may be utilized as a competitive yield alternative to time deposits and fixed maturity investments. 5) Diversification — Maturing investments shall be reinvested within the desired X maturity to provide cash flow in the event that cash is needed for the operating o needs of the City. Market cycle risk will be reduced by diversifying the appropriate U) maturity structure throughout three years and through diversification by market M sector. `O N 6) Yield -Attaining a competitive market yield for comparable securities and portfolio restrictions is the desired objective. The City's portfolio shall be designed with the 22 purpose of obtaining an optimized rate of return, through budgetary and economic N cycles, commensurate with the investment risk, policy constraints and cash flow requirements. V. Revenue Bond Reserves ° S Debt service reserves are required by bond covenants for a particular revenue bond issue. U) 1) Suitability - Any investment eligible in the Investment Policy is suitable for Debt g Service Fund Reserves. 0 2) Safety of Principal — Generally, the investment quality of all securities allowed as ° investments in the Operating Funds will be allowable in the Debt Service Fund Reserve.All investments shall be in high quality securities with no perceived default risk. The maximum allowable investment in commercial paper shall be limited to m 10% of total Revenue Bond Reserve investments. Market price fluctuations will occur. Under no circumstance shall any investment from this portfolio cause the combined portfolio's weighted average maturity to exceed the maximum allowed by the Investment Policy. The maximum allowable individual maturity is restricted to 7 CCbdl f LICb/77 five years. 3) Marketability-Securities with active and efficient secondary markets are necessary in the event of an unanticipated cash requirement. Active electronically traded markets will define an efficient secondary market. By utilizing the yield advantages of fixed income securities, maximum yield should be attained while meeting cash requirements. N 4) Liquidity - The Debt Service Reserve Funds require the amount of liquidity necessary to convert securities into cash if needed for payment of debts on o schedule. Short-term constant dollar investment pools and money market mutual funds shall provide liquidity and may be utilized as a competitive yield alternative to fixed maturity investments. Cr O 5) Diversification - Market cycle risk will be reduced by diversifying the appropriate S maturity structure throughout three years and through diversification by market sector. 6) Yield - Attaining a competitive market yield for comparable security-types and X portfolio restrictions is the desired objective. The City's portfolio shall be designed o with the purpose of obtaining an optimized rate of return, through budgetary and U) economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk, policy constraints and M cash flow requirements. N N f22 l:l N O S Q) L O O m 8 Cbdl f LICb/78 N O O N Q cr M O s O X O U) M LO I- �H N f22 l:l N O s Q) L O O m Cbdl f t Cb/!79 C/4 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Approve the purchase of stationary shelving units from Southwest Solutions Group in the amount of$ 261,252.85 for new City Hall Presenter: Jimmy Perdue, Director of Public Safety Summary: This purchase provides stationary shelving for new City Hall and the labor necessary for installation. General Description: The new City Hall has several areas used for short and long term storage of material and supplies. These include the storage areas in Logistics, Property and Evidence, Building Maintenance, and Information Technology. The facility was designed to utilize the more efficient rolling shelf units when practical and needed due to the amount of items being stored. The staff has inventoried our existing shelving and storage capabilities and will be reusing those items where appropriate. Working with our design team at Brinkley Sargent, the staff has identified the shelving products supplied by Southwest Solutions to fit our needs the best. They are also supplying many of the lockers and other specialized dispensing devices so they are familiar with the facility. They have a lengthy proven record for installing these storage solutions with positive recommendations. This purchase is for $261,252.85 with funding available through the City Hall project FC1205. The pricing structure contained in the quote is through the Texas Procurement and Support Services Cooperative Purchasing Program (State of Texas CO-OP), Texas State Contract #TXMAS-14-710110. All contracts available to participating members of the State of Texas CO-OP have been awarded by virtue of a public competitive procurement process compliant with state statutes. By using these services through the State of Texas CO-OP, the City meets all State competitive bidding requirements. Recommendation: Approve the purchase of stationary shelving units from Southwest Solutions Group in the amount of$261,252.85. Recommendation: Approve the purchase of stationary shelving for new City Hall. Cbdl f t1Qi/!7: Southwest Solutions Group, I nc. C/4/b 2535-B E. State Hwy 121, Ste. 110 QUOt@ # 7 Date: August 25, 2015 Lewisville TX 75056 Project# 62137 x Page 1 of 3 Phone: (soo) so3-1os3 ������������� �i�'�f������� ����,����wl� Fax: (972) 250-2229 www.southwestsolutions.com Quote valid for 30 days. BI LL TO: I NSTALL TO: Don Wertzberger Don Wertzberger City of North Richland Hills City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 — X II IIII IIII liiii IIII iiiill 1111111 III li Ii 1111111 1 1 IIIII I ICI M1 111111 III, 131 1111111,2 , II1II 1iiil l Ilil 1 1111 liiiii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII o Collin Sanders North Richland Hills City Hall Shelving — Net 30, progress billing 8 to 10 weeks (after receipt of 0 csanders @southwestsolutions.com Final Quote order) Phone: 800-803-1083 II � V IIIII IIIII m IIII IIIII II 0 'S LINE DESCRIPTION 1 Per Drawing: 62137-1E Roorn"n P k e $63,055.75 � Room 1311: Two single faced stationary units, 16'0"long x 24"deep x 8'11 3/4"high. One double faced mobile units,ActivRAC Series 7 Mechanical Assist operation, 16'0"long x 48"deep x 8'11 7/8"high. Four double faced mobile units,ActivRAC Series 7 Mechanical Assist operation, 16'0"long x 36"deep x 8'11 7/8"high. Elevation A will be provided with 8 openings per face. — Elevation B will be provided with 4 openings,3-12"high drawers and 2-6"high drawers per face. Elevation C will be provided with 3 openings per face and 1 garment rail per large openings. System locks into a compacted configuration for secure storage. N Track will be surface mounted on top of concrete slab. Rail profile is 3/8"high with beveled edges and is ADA compliant. This = rail system eliminates the need of a raised floor or deck. Mechanical assist carriages feature a three0-spoke handle,and a visually indicated positive on and off anti-roll safety lock. 0 2 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E IIlRoorrn 1Price wj 26,19:6 1 7 (3 Room 1311-1319: One double faced stationary unit,20'0"long x 42"deep x 3'0 3/4"high. Two double faced stationary units,20'0"long x 48"deep x 0 8'11 3/4"high. Three wide span units,96"wide x 48"deep x 10'0"high. Elevation K will be provided with 8 openings per face. T Elevation L will be provided with 2 openings per face. Elevation M will be provided with 2-12"high drawers and 1 -8"high 4— drawers per face. Elevation G will be provided with 3 levels of wire decking per face. 3 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E Roorn"n P� k e $39,440.61 � Room 1312: One single faced stationary unit, 10'6"long x 24"deep x 10'4 1/4"high. One single faced stationary unit, 10'6"long x 18"deep x 10'4 1/4"high. One double faced mobile unit, High Density Hand Crank operation, 10'6"long x 24"deep x 10'3 1/8"high. Two double faced mobile units, High Density Hand Crank operation, 10'6"long x 32"deep x 10'3 1/8"high. One double faced locking mobile unit, High Density Hand Crank operation, 10'6"long x 36"deep x 10'3 1/8"high. Elevation 131 will be provided with 5 openings, 3-12"high drawers and 2-6"high drawers per face. Elevation C1 will be provided with 4 openings per face and 2 a) garment rails per large opening. Elevation D will be provided with 8 openings per face. Elevation D will be provided with 8 �0 openings per face and 3 adjustable dividers per opening. Rolling tambour door to be provided for secure storage. (n 4 Per Drawing: 62137-1E IIlRoorrn 1Price $3,743 47 O Room 1326: Three wide span units,84"wide x 42"deep x 10'0"high. One wide span unit, 72"wide x 42"deep x 10'0"high. Elevation G will be provided with 3 levels of wire decking per face. m » Southwest Solutions Group, I nc. C/4/b 2535-B E. State Hwy 121, Ste. 110 QUOt@ # 7 Date: August 25, 2015 Lewisville TX 75056 Project# 62137 x Page 2 of 3 Phone: (soo) so3-1os3 ������������� �i�'�f������� ����,����wl� Fax: (972) 250-2229 www.southwestsolutions.com Quote valid for 30 days. BI LL TO: I NSTALL TO: Don Wertzberger Don Wertzberger City of North Richland Hills City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 — X II IIII IIII liiii IIII iiiill 1111111 III li Ii 1111111 1 1 IIIII I ICI M1 111111 III, 131 1111111,2 , II1II 1iiil l Ilil 1 1111 liiiii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII o Collin Sanders North Richland Hills City Hall Shelving — Net 30, progress billing 8 to 10 weeks (after receipt of 0 csanders @southwestsolutions.com Final Quote order) Phone: 800-803-1083 II � V IIIII IIIII m IIII IIIII II 0 'S LINE DESCRIPTION 5 Per Drawing: 62137-1E Roorn"n P k e $10,695.32 � Room 1328: One single faced stationary unit, 12'0"long x 24"deep x 8'11 3/4"high. One double faced stationary unit,8'0"long x 48"deep x 3'0 3/4"high. Elevation B will be provided with 4 openings,3-12"high drawers and 2-6"high drawers per face. Laminate top provided for short units. — 6 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E IIlRoorrn 1Price $31,35 1.61 � N Room 1332: -. One single faced stationary unit, 10'0"long x 24"deep x 9'11 3/4"high. One single faced stationary unit, 9'0"long x 24"deep x "= 9'11 3/4"high. One single faced stationary unit,21'0"long x 24"deep x 9'11 3/4"high. Two double faced stationary units, 11'6" 0� long x 48"deep x 9'11 3/4"high. Elevation E will be provided with 8 openings per face and locking hinged doors. Elevation F will be provided with 8 openings per face. 7 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E Roorn"n P k e $5,9:r?:93 1 0 Room 1422: Two single faced wide span units,84"wide x 18"deep x 8'0"high. One single faced stationary unit,8'0"long x 48"deep x 7'11 0 3/4"high. Elevation I will be provided with 7 levels of particleboard decking. Elevation J will be provided with 6 openings per T face. 0 8 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E IIlRoorrn 1Price $3,841.21 =7 Room 1423: !� Two single faced stationary units,5'0"long x 8"deep x 7'6"high. One single faced stationary unit,8'0"long x 8"deep x 7'6"high. Elevation O will be provided with 9 openings per face. W 0 9 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E Roorn"n P� k e $63,013.48 Room 1427: to Six wide span units,96"wide x 48"deep x 9'6"high. One single faced stationary unit, 17'6"long x 24"deep x 97 3/8"high. One double faced mobile unit,ActivRAC Series 7 Mechanical Assist operation, 17'6"long x 48"deep x 97 3/8"high. Four double Q faced mobile units,ActivRAC Series 7 Mechanical Assist operation, 17'6"long x 36"deep x 97 3/8"high. Elevation J will be p provided with 7 openings per face. Elevation G1 will be provided with 3 levels of wire decking per face. Track will be surface mounted on top of concrete slab. Rail profile is 3/8"high with beveled edges and is ADA compliant. This rail system eliminates 0 the need of a raised floor or deck. Mechanical Assist carriages feature a three-spoke handle,and a visually indicated positive on and off anti-roll safety lock. 00 » Southwest Solutions Group, I nc. C/4/b 2535-B E. State Hwy 121, Ste. 110 QUOt@ # 7 Date: August 25, 2015 Lewisville TX 75056 Project# 62137 x I Page 3 of 3 Phone: (soo) 803-1083 h���si������� �i�'�rip����� ��y�,����wl� Fax: (972) 250-2229 www.southwestsolutions.com Quote valid for 30 days. BI LL TO: I NSTALL TO: Don Wertzberger Don Wertzberger City of North Richland Hills City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 — X II IIII IIII liiii IIII iiiill 1111111 III li M, 1111111 1 1 IIIII I ICI M1 111111 III, 131 1111111,2 , II1II 1iiil l Ilil 1 1111 liiiii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII o Collin Sanders North Richland Hills City Hall Shelving — Net 30, progress billing 8 to 10 weeks (after receipt of O csanders @southwestsolutions.com Final Quote order) Phone: 800-803-1083 II � V IIIII IIIII m IIII IIIII II ° LINE DESCRIPTION 10 Per Drawing: 62137-1 E IIlRoorrn 1Price $14,3(:b().(;0 � Room 1428: One single faced stationary unit, 11'0"long x 24"deep x 9'6 1/8"high. One single faced stationary unit, 11'0"long x 18"deep x 9'6 1/8"high. Two double faced mobile units, High Density Hand Crank operation, 7'6"long x 36"deep x 9'6 1/8"high. Elevation H will be provided with 8 openings per face. — 11 RI C/TXMAS N I nstallation, freight, delivery and handling included in final pricing. _• Texas State Contract #TXMAS-14-710110 > Period in effect: January 29, 2014 - November 21, 2018 All TXMAS quotes must be entered into the TXSMARTBUY online system in order to generate a proper PO. O Per TXMAS Contract (through Smart Buy), Invoices will be mailed from and "Remit To" payments sent to O the address below: T Southwest Solutions Group, Inc. �- P.O. Box 671784 Dallas TX 75267-1784 Subtotal: $261.252.85 Add sales tax if applicable: $0.00 Option Accepted (iiniitiiall here) ................................................................................................................. Total: $261.252.85 . Qj O Authorized Signature: Date: P.O.#: U) Q 0 O m r » ' t Gkff DEntry Gf Do HTSCANNING, MOVOLAR ASEWORK MOVA0,11 WAus, AUMI cbdl f tIC 1083 Dl2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: SUP 2014-11, Ordinance 3371, Public Hearing and consideration of a request from Terry Browning for a Special Use Permit for the expansion of a Contractor's Office with Shop on 1.34 acres located at 3724 Rufe Snow Drive. Presenter: Clayton Husband, Principal Planner Summary: Terry Browning is requesting a revised Special Use Permit (SUP) for a contractor's office with a shop to accommodate the expansion of Cable Electric. The property is zoned C-2 Commercial, and the current SUP was approved in 1999. The site is 1.34 acres in size and located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive between Glenview Drive and Boulevard 26. General Description: Cable Electric is located at 3716 Rufe Snow Drive. An SUP was approved for the site in 1999 to allow a contractor's office with a shop to accommodate the relocation of the business to the property. The site includes a 4,914-square-foot office and warehouse building, covered parking areas, landscaped areas, and limited outside storage. The owner has plans to expand the business on the adjacent property to the north, and a revised SUP is required to provide for the expansion. SITE IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed site improvements are summarized below. Some of these improvements include special conditions requested by the applicant. The conditions are noted with the relevant item, and are also described in the SUP Conditions section that follows. A site plan showing the future build-out of the property is attached. a. The existing warehouse in the southeast corner will be expanded by 1,880 square feet. This building is proposed to have metal siding on the north and east exterior walls. The north wall faces the interior of the site and the east wall faces the rear of a warehouse building on the adjacent property. These walls are not visible from the street. b. An existing 1,536-square-foot building in the northeast corner will be renovated for bulk storage. This building is proposed to have exterior walls constructed of 100% concrete masonry unit (CMU) block. c. A new 3,420-square-foot building is proposed in the northwest corner of the site. This building is proposed to have metal siding on the east exterior CCbdl f LICbA84 Dl2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS wall. This wall faces the interior of the site and the bulk storage building. This wall is not visible from the street. d. A new metal awning will be constructed to provide covered parking for nine new spaces. The awning will have a gabled and pitched metal roof to match the existing covered parking area. The columns at the west end of the awnings that face the street will have a masonry cover. The remaining columns will be constructed of steel. e. A new 6-foot tall masonry screening wall will be constructed adjacent to the property's frontage on Rufe Snow Drive. The wall is proposed to be built of painted split-face CMU block. It will also include sliding vehicle gates constructed of wrought iron. The use of CMU block on street-facing walls of structures is limited to 30% of the wall area by the zoning ordinance, so a screening wall constructed of CMU block would depart from the intent of the standards. As such, staff recommends that the original wall design proposed by the applicant be constructed, which is a concrete panel wall with a cobblestone pattern. f. The site will be landscaped in accordance with current standards. A 4-foot wide sidewalk will be installed along Rufe Snow Drive. g. The improvements to the site require that the refuse container screening be updated to current standards. However, the applicant is requesting that this requirement be waived due to the addition of the new masonry screening wall. The applicant requests that the masonry wall serve as the screening for the refuse containers, but the location of the containers is at the end of the driving aisle and could be visible through the wrought iron gate. As such, staff recommends that the standard container screening be constructed. SUP CONDITIONS: The zoning ordinance provides that special use permits may establish reasonable conditions of approval on the operation and location of the use to reduce its effect on adjacent or surrounding properties. The following are the proposed conditions of approval for this SUP application. a. Use and Development. The use and development of the property must comply with the site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations. b. Building materials. Facade walls may exceed the maximum 15% limitation for metal on the east wall of the new building and the north and east walls of the addition to the existing building. c. Refuse container enclosure. The refuse container enclosure must comply with the standards of Section 118-874 of the Zoning Ordinance. d. Masonry screening wall. The masonry screening wall adjacent to Rufe Snow Drive must be six feet in height and constructed of concrete panels with a cobblestone pattern. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: This area is designated on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as "Neighborhood Service." This designation is intended to permit limited service CCbdl f LICbA85 Dl2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS establishments and retail stores for the benefit of adjacent and nearby residential areas. The types of uses should complement the character of the residential area. CURRENT ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-2 Commercial with a special use permit for a contractor's office with a shop. The C-2 district is intended to provide for development of retail and general business uses primarily to serve the community and region. Uses include a wide variety of business activities and may involve limited outside storage, service, or display. The C-2 district should be located away from low and medium density residential development and should be used as a buffer between retail and industrial uses. The district is appropriate along business corridors as indicated on the comprehensive plan. PROPOSED ZONING: The applicant is requesting a revision to the special use permit in order to expand the use of the property. SURROUNDING ZONING / LAND USE: North: C-2 Commercial / Neighborhood Service West: R-3 Single-Family Residential / Low Density Residential South: C-2 Commercial / Neighborhood Service East: C-2 Commercial / Commercial PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Lots 4 and 5, Block 2, Jack M. Estes Subdivision. Since buildings and parking areas will be straddling the existing lot lines, approval of a replat will be required prior to the issuance of any building permits or certificates of occupancy. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this item at their August 20, 2015 meeting and voted 4-0 to recommend approval subject to the SUP conditions a & b, or "use and development" and "building materials" conditions of the staff report and recommending a CMU block screening wall along Rufe Snow Drive. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance 3371 , subject to recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Cbdl f LICbA86 D/2/b' Harmonson Rd 0 0 C Cn /100000-�- LO N N On x Dr N 777"1" Cr _M N Z -T-TF 0 LON N M �J0§ C) -0J' o m 1�IRH SUP 2014-11 Special Use Permit 3716 & 3724 Rufe Snow Drive Feet Prepared by Planning 08/06/15 0 50 100 200, s Cdl f r / G f o 1 LO 22 cr LO Onyz Dr N �� 1 r r _ i s iii j j I C) o r � r /ij; Cbdl f Otl/!88 DI2ld `CHL,1 ra NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION rExf�� AND CITY COUNCIL Case Number: SUP 2014-11 Applicant: Terry Browning N N Location: 3716 & 3724 Rufe Snow Dr N M You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. N_ Purpose of Public Hearing: o 'S A Public Hearing is being held to consider of a request from Terry Browning for a Special Use Permit for the expansion of a Contractor's Office with Shop on 1.34 acres located at 3724 0 Rufe Snow Drive. U) 0 Public Hearing Schedule: d Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Cr 7:00 PM THURSDAY, AUGUST 20, 2015 N CITY COUNCIL V) 7:00 PM MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 M i� Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 0 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, 00 please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427-6300 Fax (817) 427-6303 Cbdl f LICbA89 D/2/e BROWNING REAL ESTATE MGMT LLC TD RUFE SNOW INC DIETEL ROBERT 3716 RUFE SNOW DR 3716 RUFE SNOW DR DIETEL RUBY NRH TX 76180-8848 NRH TX 76180-8848 1002 WOODVALE CT COLLEYVILLE TX 76034-38 NORTH HILLS REALTY LTD KO KAE SON RICHLAND MEDICAL CENTER 3733 FLORY ST 12916 CONIFER LN 3700 RUFE SNOW DR NRH TX 76180-8833 EULESS TX 76040-7161 FORT WORTH TX 76180-8848 ABBOTT T F MELTON RANDY CVIK CYNTHIA ABBOTT PHILLIP D 3700 RUFE SNOW DR 6680 JANNIE ST 6673 JANNIE ST N N FORT WORTH TX 76180-8848 NRH TX 76180-1502 FORT WORTH TX 76180-1503 N M FLORES RAMON SR SPIVEY DONALD R KLAVITTER EZEKIEL 6681 JANNIE ST 6662 ONYX DR N 6656 ONYX DR N NRH TX 76180-1503 FORT WORTH TX 76180-8748 NRH TX 76180-8748 N YIS O X FREEMAN MILDRED VASQUEZ RICARDO H G& M E FLORY LIV TR ETAL �- 14802 STICE RD 6657 ONYX DR N 1700 MENZER CT KRUM TX 76249-3040 NRH TX 76180-8751 FORT WORTH TX 76103-1420 4-cr a� 'S Q 0 Q N N Lo N M a O m Cbdl f lCIh/!8: DI2/f ORDINANCE NO. 3371 ZONING CASE SUP 2014-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A 1.34 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3724 RUFE SNOW DRIVE BY GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE WITH SHOP AND APPROVING A SITE PLAN; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at N least ten (10) days before such hearing; and LO N M WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least fifteen (15) days before such hearing; and, co N WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before N co both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, $ 0 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning o Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North - Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 00 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a 1.34 acre parcel of land located at 3724 Rufe Snow Drive, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, more particularly described as being the North 160.00 feet of Lot 5, Block 2, and the South 133.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 2, Jack M. Estes, Jr. Subdivision, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and further described in the metes and bounds description attached hereto as Exhibit A; by granting a Special Use Permit for the expansion of a Ordinance No.3371 SUP 2014-11 Page 1 of 2 Cbdl f LICbA91 DI2/f Contractor's Office with Shop; and approving the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. N LO AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. M PASSED on this 14th day of September, 2015. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS co N co By: -0 Oscar Trevino, Mayor d ATTEST- 0 Alicia Richardson City Secretary 00 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Department Head Ordinance No. 3371 SUP 2014-11 Page 2 of 2 Cbdl f LICbA92 ep(o[ iA=li-iodhb(spl;3,pgq]NiZZ'SZ�Eii Aiiho; u ipq-n8 CY) ICD 01) o ro L.- ©¢ow �~oo rn° z ' m t5 ' o �1--0 �.a o= wNO oo av w Z w m ooz °pozp <Qo z f ' ww ozww-xpw W to .�. rut-JZw 0 w=.� thw�tna o~ �►. ��, m w°O LL-Et z o-=-tat� 00< ._tamowW�- Q=© ''-'-' p 3 �>>°O�Z tnv O op-LM c?°w Ow � ��oj-- W"XZo "<w Zw NOM �mo� OOz �j t--¢O0 �Ci �--in w' =~p©�COLVi LL.I-- HF-W°zlil WAZ t..0a OC1"'o 3 t 7i NF-- Otrow 3m t-^O l3 O f-- •- t-o m m RsJ 13„ Zzwz (A�Uomzcu 5t�itMZSZ !_O V)(1) O <QMW rn'�Fzmzam°-mzmomoz ._zoo a 000_,r¢ - ODI=- (, zoo U) C3 LLI ��a ¢-F, www t7nwo v�--t�,otnw¢ct_vZ �- o m¢O{J�ZWF- �to:-Sto y¢..Z-tow¢Oaomc)wwwm w ZZX�°wzow wo°e-c[l�gZzO0 W:2 Or tom- �. —°,tom Zzm000�3zt �°i--::)xV5]tn 0:Ne.cn t� n ow ouz z z c�zo�M¢ -5z5W z �00o IA-mQl-MM=M S2°0MM-¢,oco�j.- m Lt-Co room<-lr�N�tnzj=t co tiC°vc.;�< 491-- '`-'00 o wed}-z , ►Q--�wwtwtno�c:wc0.�t�t'0����wL)jr)i ��X 0U-c.� aiw wwz-jLijWo-.)Xowmwo A�Eoou)-*ML wiw : ozw_j ,00 m-jo J-j 0 ON ¢= mm-iww wwo Ow w t-C.Dj5w z cc)z 0 ? �-�-ww =ca°Z°s ZoOce--�z_a°ce-- w oa O ( Z _OZCDZL�hl °`- 0 �apcoZ c>; w- 3::iQMdo ' mso °t =a-�c°1¢�'cE-� o� 4J E-- O oozes w.,.J2 1 00051-owo V O�-QO Z f-Lj- �I Z� �Z3� wzlslzo0M-ZwQ<g�ts.tSit/)°—Q¢ 00 zit-- zo r�wa'�r wm COQ c,� c� x chcawoct, w cE-wow wsr, ,o ¢F-_ �Q zp�rimwiz.0_t --025wtt�Z0 Sm r--zt� t!10 F-IL WmZv- POO> r fr¢b--ta. =jm�FiLU-1 :3(D �. LULL — Q '. . Z� I . U) . .w Q LU It LL r NII AOlI� ^N dN Ln C WO ON wE LU 0(L Vl sgCWI o34snl oaWru a a / s wCwo°cZ� �I �J 0 J_ �0 X 0 Z XRU LUx .�� LLl r t6w 4 11J r nllJ � kU ww0 illcn6' a aAlHa MONS a=in m >z� 17UN34183N SN VNI191X3 JIM Q LU Z LU ~ i � esu W cn@ d-6'1r Q n Nr /Y � � � di .q: cs'`r,' N Q L @m �� r Q Q V � L1 � O z Q p t1O Q p cl X D 1� A Q � N N5 95 U5 a� O 3 95 U5 N5 N5 45 N LU 111 111 111 0 — @_ @ N cn '� @ .4Q @`"rte 6� 1�} 114 to U U Q tR N V � r_ N S cv— `t lL l� F —1 = E Q 0 - 66 <w 66 <w L1 � � _ 0 N I OIL uj �s `JS w cn w w z ? .. n u4lw QLLL wP4 (1 c�i `. u►11w Qc�i!k wiY4 1\ D 0 0 0 U N -j OLO J ' 11 -F U Ck ZLU � .. . . Ulm .t....r. z� LXiiw O O i �7 p z Na uXi LU F 1 3 Q � O � n w z O� 0 LLq -in LU t5y �7 LU CD? r U w� I I ' z0 w L J N - --------------- z� �U N ill i LU O U �l1 � z p O } � iu m w LU z F LU z0 ���� Dl2lj C.1 SUP 2014-11 Public Hearing and Consideration of a request from Terry Browning for a Special Use Permit for the Expansion of a Contractor's Office with Shop on 1.34 acres located at 3724 Rufe Snow Drive. Vice Chairman Schopper called on Principal Planner, Clayton Husband to present SUP 2014-11for the expansion of Contractors Office located at 3724 Rufe Snow Dr. Applicant Terry Browning 3716 Rufe Snow Drive presented the request to expand his business to the adjacent property. N Vice Chairman Schopper opened Public Hearing at 7:12 p.m. N LO N Terry Cunningham 3604 South Cooper Arlington TX, came forward in favor to discuss. The dumpster is far at the back of the site the workers are constantly putting stuff in the > dumpster throughout the day.lt might inhibit thier work flow if they have to move the screen every time they need to use it. N Mike Benton believed the CMU walls are sturdier than the panel that the city was 4= requiring. He prefers the CMU walls for the site because of security reasons. z Bill Schopper ask why metal walls are being used instead of masonry? Terry Browning said, right now he has containers that are a difficult to operate in and z out of daily. He wants to keep it metal because it cannot be seen from the street. Mike Benton asked about how the gate will be constructed to make sure that the M dumpster cannot be seen. Terry Cunningham said the gate can be pit with a mesh or wood screen to make it appear solid. Vice Chairman Schopper asked for anyone wishing to speak on the item to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Schopper closed the Public Hearing at 7:19 p.m. 0 APPROVED MIKE BENTON MOVED TO APPROVE SUP 2014-11 WITH SUP CONDITIONS OF A AND B, m ALLOWING THE CMU SCREEN WALL,AND A SCREEN OR MESH ON THE SLIDING GATE. MARK HAYNES SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0. Cbdl f LICbA96 Dl3 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: ZC 2015-18, Ordinance No. 3374, Public Hearing and consideration of a request from the City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development #74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo). Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager Summary: Planned Development #74 was approved in March 2015 for an indoor shooting range and other indoor recreation and entertainment uses. A minor text revision is proposed to clarify language in the conditions that inadvertently affect the future use of the building by other tenants. General Description: On March 23, 2015, City Council approved Ordinance No. 3353, which adopted a nonresidential planned development for an indoor shooting range in the former Home Depot Expo building. The shooting range would be owned and operated by Bodyguard Sports, LLC. The approved zoning also allows a number of other uses associated with indoor recreation and entertainment as well as small recreational vehicle sales (i.e., boats, ATVs, motorcycles, scooters, and golf carts). During the negotiations for the sale of the property, it was discovered that some of the language of the conditions could be construed in a way to have an adverse effect on the financing of the project and the future use of the building by other tenants. In order to clarify these conditions, the following two amendments are proposed- 1. Indoor Shooting Range Required. The language will be adjusted to state that 40 percent of the building area must be initially reconstructed and developed as an indoor shooting range. The existing language requires that 45 percent of the building area be dedicated to an indoor shooting range, which restricts the potential use of the building by a future tenant. 2. Other Permitted Uses. The following sentence will be deleted from the conditions: "Once a certificate of occupancy for an indoor shooting range has been established, it shall always be required for new uses to be permitted." This language would unintentionally restrict the ability of CCbdl f LICbA97 Dl3 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS other tenants to occupy the remainder of the building should the indoor shooting range be replaced by another tenant in the future. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: The site is currently developed with a 92,475 square foot retail building constructed in 1999 and formerly occupied by Home Depot's "Expo Design Center" concept. The property was vacated in 2005 and has sat dormant since. Much of the site has been maintained to minimal levels. PLATTING STATUS: The property is platted as Lot 1R, Block 1, Venture Addition. No replat will be necessary as part of the zoning change or the accompanying improvements being proposed. EXISTING ZONING: NR-PD Nonresidential Planned Development for an indoor shooting range and other indoor recreation and entertainment uses. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan depicts "Retail" for this property. The Retail Land Use is intended to permit a variety of retail trade, personal and business services establishments and offices. SURROUNDING ZONING / LAND USE: North: R-2 Single Family / Low Density Residential C-2 Commercial / Retail South: C-1 & C-2 Commercial / Retail East: C-1 Commercial / Retail West: Davis Boulevard (FM 1938) right-of-way and flyover PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this item at their September 3, 2015 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval as presented. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 3374. Cbdl f LICbA98 D/3/b' m N '> a lewood 0 �e VO N N M N cr Z �o N co N Be or ul ss Rd o 0 m NE Loop 820 1�IRH ZC 2015-18 Minor Revisions to PD-74 7901 Boulevard 26 Feet Prepared by Planning 08/21/15 0 100 200 400 6o Cbdl f dC�h/!99 .K'9Z�9ia li`iggLZ(iibgN4jgfs;gi6Z'9Z�9ia liho; u 'Pq'n8 i o W L) 00 -� r�i ,. kk�rr�I�i o �� �����I i i>A,,; i%It�i.i�lui�i�N.��i�a<ar,anri ri�im G✓. S° � r DI3/d `CHL,q ra NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION rExf�� AND CITY COUNCIL Case Number: ZC 2015-18 Applicant: The City of North Richland Hills Location: 7901 Boulevard 26 N M You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 ° feet of the property shown on the attached map. LO N_ Purpose of Public Hearing: 0 'S A Public Hearing is being held to consider a request from The City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development #74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard o 26 (former Home Depot Expo). U) 0 Public Hearing Schedule: d Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Cr 7:00 PM THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 CITY COUNCIL co 7:00 PM MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 M 0 Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 ° NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS m If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427-6300 Fax (817) 427-6303 Cbdl f tlQift 1 Dl3/e JEAN Y MAR Birdville Independent School District NEW JONATHAN ENTERPRISE INC 6221 BOWIN DR Attn: Mike Seale 1717 W WALNUT HILL LN STE 105 FORT WORTH TX 76132-5001 6125 East Belknap IRVING TX 75038 Haltom City, TX 76117 SYLVIA G CHANCELLOR MARY L GOSDIN SAMANTHA SMITH 7817 BIRCHWOOD DR 7821 BIRCHWOOD DR 6828 STILLMEADOWS CIR N FORT WORTH TX 76180-7043 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76182 JAMES ARTHUR ST GERMAIN EDWIN KELVIN DILKS ALVIN L MARTIN 7829 BIRCHWOOD DR 7113 STONE VILLA CIR RUTH MARTIN NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7043 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76182-6173 7837 BIRCHWOOD DR FORT WORTH TX 76180-7043 �! N M r) CURTIS ELDRED YBLOOD JAMES A STEPHENSON LYNN M BROWN 816 W LONESOME DOVE TR 1602 W BUSINESS 380 STE 100 7820 BIRCHWOOD DR `n ARLINGTON TX 76001-6131 DECATUR TX 76234-3281 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7 N 0 x LINDA D BAILEY RONALD N AKINS LEONTYNE ROSS �- 7824 BIRCHWOOD DR 7828 BIRCHWOOD DR 7832 BIRCHWOOD DR NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7042 FORT WORTH TX 76180-7042 FORT WORTH TX 76180-7042 Cr a STEVEN HIMES JUSTIN GLYNN CASEBIER LARRY WO R EL S CONNIE RRELL � 7836 BIRCHWOOD DR 7840 BIRCHWOOD DR O NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7042 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7042 7900 BIRCHWOOD DR Q NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7 N ALTON L SADLER KIABREE WAY LTD GEORGE STERIE N SALLY ANN STERIE 7912 BIRCHWOOD DR 200 WESTGATE PKWY UNIT D M FORT WORTH TX 76180-7044 AMARILLO TX 79121-1100 3105 FOX RUN DR GRAPEVINE TX 76051-6580 0 NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES LP Attention: C/O CHRISTOPHER HOME DEPOT USA INC RICHLAND-DAVIS LLC TESSITORE PO BOX 105842 1401 BROAD ST m 450 S ORANGE AVE STE 900 ATLANTA GA 30348 CLIFTON NJ 07013-4236 ORLANDO FL 32801-3339 RONALD WEBB ANASTACIO RODRIGUEZ ELLEN A HINCKLEY 7901 LAURA ST M T RODRIGUEZ 7909 LAURA ST NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7133 7905 LAURA ST FORT WORTH TX 76180-7133 FORT WORTH TX 76180-7133 COLLEEN EST MURPHY RAINIER SUNWEST PORTFOLIO I LP AUTONATION FORT WORTH MOTC 4821 ASH ST 13760 NOEL RD STE 800 200 SW 1 ST FL 14 AVE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-7135 DALLAS TX 75240-1307 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33301-2074 Cbdl f tlQift 2 Dl3/e PUBLIC STORAGE INC MEGMA LLC TAVESCO INC Attention:ATTN DEPT PT-TX 27222 22 WOODLAND CT Attention: % MICHAEL TAYLOR PO BOX 25025 MANSFIELD TX 76063-6033 729 GRAPEVINE HWY#311 GLENDALE CA 91221-5025 HURST TX 76054-2805 TEXAN RANCH PROPERTIES LLC D L ROGERS CORP 4124 ELK SPRINGS TR 5013 DAVIS BLVD RICHARDSON TX 75082-3748 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76180-6874 rn N N M r) LO N YIS O X d cr O 'S Q Q N N M r) O m Cbdl f tlQift 3 DI3/f ORDINANCE NO. 3374 ZONING CASE ZC 2015-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS BY AMENDING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT NO. 74 ON A 9.04 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7901 BOULEVARD 26 (FORMER HOME DEPOT EXPO); PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, N co N WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper o of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, - LO co WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the N Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and LO Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, 0 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is d in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, N THEREFORE, co M BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND ° HILLS, TEXAS: 0 Section l: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by amending m Planned Development (PD) Zoning District No. 74 on a 9.04 acre tract of property located at 7901 boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo) and described more fully by Exhibit A; and hereby adopting the site plan and exhibits attached hereto as Exhibit B. Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of Ordinance No.3365 Page 1 of 2 Cbdl f LICbA 4 DI3/f the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. PASSED on this 14th day of September, 2015. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: co Oscar Trevino, Mayor M ATTEST: - LO co N LO co Alicia Richardson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: $ 0 d N George A. Staples, Attorney co M APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 0 Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager m Ordinance No.3365 Page 2 of 2 Cbdl f LICbA 5 z � . N r M w Y r07- C'� J U Q Q U U r w CL > C) co 00 0 N Z OL¢ J J J U O / LO . z `n O w �J LLNLQ U ~ � UC) ri ^ / z 6 < N 5 oM w Lu w NOS w � Of w . / S'2 E< M ti J J � N U 0. . ` • / moo o � U) co LU U LU CO H - O CO U j C uJ \ ` ¢ Q O w N ZD TTL w M ® ® \ co C co \` N z K) H Q M N w U p Q p o Q °° L � ` • ` m w cy- > OJ CL UJ • /` >> O / w / o ` • cn m CO X w of / C:) X rn W C) � • / O w IN LI) 0NOa ', ' W Y ~ U) U �yI � a � ����• m � Q C7 Q' OJ Q • W / p L w / N U J w � ° o . w e p J Q U)U) / •, 00 w U) [if / w U p jJ CO w Q cy-U) n m U r w w U N r p p W LU M m U) m V U U m w LU x d > w U U � M • p m Q U) Co U) W • ` U) a_ • N U p ` w J U.) m W ` M cy- U) a X m w C N w J W Z �` LL LU w z 0 w z w I � U _ O nv^v^v^✓ ~ w z z LU J w (D (n Z w 0� LL Q w Q CD Z w w U > > w w w � U CO � > _ O pz 0 w 0 000 U Z J LL U ❑ Z J O Cn O � LL O U Z z LL Q Q LL J = O Q w w v LU LL LL 0 w 0 0 LL: z C) w O ❑ J l U J Z) ti a O r CO N Q Z U) Q Z ui p.. D/3/h Oposf tjef oybnOboof e Ef wf rpgn f ou)OS.QE Ejt uoduOp/ 85* IVboe!Vt f !boe!Ef wf rpgn f odSf hvrbypot North Richland Hills, Texas This Nonresidential Planned Development (NR-PD) District shall adhere to the conditions of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances, as amended, and adopt a "base district" of "C-1" Commercial District. The following regulations shall be specific to this NR-PD District. Where these regulations conflict with, or overlap another zoning standard, these regulations shall prevail. I. Permitted Land Uses B. Indoor Shooting Range Required. A minimum of 405 percent of the building N area shall be initially reconstructed and developed as an indoor gun N range 4s*—,, for at leas!#w4 = minim,,m of three of the following uses: co 1. Open/Public Firing Range Lanes ° 2. Private Firing Range Lanes LO 3. Tactical Firing Range Lanes N 4. Indoor Skeet Range -. 5. Gunsmith 6. Archery Lanes 7. Classroom / Event Space 8. Retail sales of firearms and firearm accessories o 9. Simunition Non-live Fire (airsoft/paintball) Training 10.Laser-video Firing Systems > U) C. The sale and consumption of alcohol shall not be permitted within the Indoor Shooting Range occupancy. N co D. The Indoor Shooting Range use shall be revoked from this NR-PD if a Certificate of Occupancy for said use is not issued by January 1, 2017. o E. Other Permitted Uses. Other uses within this NR-PD may only be permitted after a full demising wall meeting Building Code requirements is installed and proof of nonrefundable purchase of a shooting range ventilation system and/or bullet collection and containment system is provided to the City. nORGe-a Ger+;f te A m be required fer pevV uses, be permitted. uses in this NR-PD shall be those permitted in the "C-1" Commercial District and shall also include the following: 1. Indoor Amusement Arcade 2. Bowling Lanes 3. Indoor Miniature Golf Course 4. Indoor Race Track 5. Roller or Ice Skating Rink Cbdl f t Qi/!: 9 Dl3/h 6. Indoor Skydiving 7. Indoor RockNVall Climbing 8. Other Indoor Commercial Recreation 9. Personal Security Training 10.Indoor Golf Range 11.Archery 12.Indoor Music Venue 13.Hardware & Building Materials 14.Micro Brewery 15.Comedy Club 16.Billiards as Accessory Use 17.New Marine Equipment Sales 18.New Motorcycle Sales N 19.New Small Vehicle Sales (ATVs, Scooters, Golf Carts, etc.) co 20.Outdoor Sales & Display associated to marine equipment, motorcycles, M and other small vehicles limited to the westernmost row of parking stalls ° along Davis Blvd. LO co N F. Development Regulations. This NR-PD shall follow the development regulations of the -. "C-1" Commercial District, with the following additions and exceptions. Q 1. Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the Indoor Gun Range, the following improvements shall be made to the property: ) a. All internal traffic control devices (i.e. stop signs, speed bumps, etc.) will be -2 replaced or refurbished prior to a C.O. for the Indoor Shooting Range use. U) b. All fire lanes and parking lines shall be newly applied prior to issuance of a C.O. for the Indoor Shooting Range use. N co N c. Landscaping shall be installed per the attached Landscape Plan. 0 d. Any non-compliant outdoor lighting including those affixed to the building—shall be replaced with fixtures that meet current outdoor lighting standards. e. Existing concrete light pole bases to be repainted m f. Existing chain link fence on each side of the loading dock to be replaced or refurbished g. Franchise utilities to be contacted regarding the removal of a dead-end utility pole extension at the northwest corner of the property h. Existing irrigation system to be inspected and repaired as required to provide fully operational system Cbdl f tlQift Dl3/h i. Handicap-accessible sidewalk ramp to be installed on the north side of the Davis Boulevard driveway at the northwest corner of the property j. The 6' wood fence between the property and the vacant commercial property to the north to be removed. Administrative Approval of Site Plans. The purpose of this NR-PD is to provide Land Use and Development Regulations beyond the scope of what is typically required. Site plans which comply with all development related ordinances and this Ordinance shall be administratively approved by the staff Development Review Committee. Deviations from the regulations provided herein shall require City Council approval of a zoning change to revise this Nonresidential Planned Development. N N M LO N O Q U) O Q U) N N M O m Cbdl f LICM211 Dl3/h BODYGUARD SPORTS:SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION TO SUP APPLICATION 1) Background a) Ownersh ip i) General Partner: William M.Brandenburg LtCol USMCR(Ret) (1) 24-Yr veteran of the U.S.Marine Corps specializing in combat rums and logistics (2) CutTent Federal Firearms Licensed(FFL)retailer and firearms trainer (3) 4-Yr experience as a Police Officer(Lynchburg Police Dept Lynchburg, VA) (4) Project Management Professional(PMP) Celtification (5) NRA certified instructor in most shooting and safety disciplines N (6) Owner/Operator of Jimmy John's Gourmet Sandwiches franchise restaurant in Arlington,TX. SEnold the business in 2010 that is still thriving. N (7) Top Secret (TS)with an added Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) security clearance. (8) Former Boy Scout Scoutmaster (Troop 308 in North RichlruId Hills,TX) LO (9) Youth athletic coach ruld mentor in several sports ii) Limited Partners(disciplines): N (1) Several institutional investors specializing in Retail ruld Restaurant industries -. specifically with experience in business start-ups,expansion and growth stage o companies in the US. Several of them currently sit on the Board of Directors of multiple .0- large national corporations. (2) Financial services expert U- (3) Firearms Training 0 0 (4) Other small business owners(attorneys, physicians and property management) 0- 2) Business Model: Bodyguard Sports (BGS)proposes to purchase the property at 7901 Boulevard s 26 in North Richland Hills,TX. This building is approximately 92,475 SF on a 9+-acre lot. BGS k— expects to occupy approximately 42,200 SF of the building. llle remainder of the building space U) will be leased according to the terms of the purchase agreement. 'Tlle agreement will stipulate that only taxable entities will be leased. It is anticipated that destination recreation/sporting type of of business models will occupy those spaces. N N The business will be a Retail/Entertainment i Education l Indoor Range facility. This will be a co state-of-the-art facility for enthusiasts of all levels of experience. The business will be especially family and community fi"i endly,which will embrace all demographics including;youth,female, competition, self-defense, hunting,recreational and competitive shooters. Initially ilie business o will have a staff of 27 employees. a) Features: i) Retflil: (1) 111e services will cater to women,men and youth enthusiasts ranging in experience to m the sport. (2)Products will include firearms,accessories,apparel to include women and youth, training materials,reloading equipment,firearm parts etc. ii) Entertainment: 11 le non-live fire entertainment and training component will include a TiOutdoors system. This encompasses a laser-video system that will attract folks of all ages and levels of firearms experience. It can be used in a classroom or office space. Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LIChP212 D/3/h Basically afirearm outfitted with a laser(impossible to insert live ammunition)is directed at a screen in which real-life scenarios are presented. Each shooter's laser is tagged with a chip that is recognized by the computer and provides feedback such as shot placement, score,timing etc. The shooter's score is uploaded to the website where they can compare their score with other shooters. There are hundreds of scenarios in which to choose from ranging from a concealed catTy defense, western style shootout etc. There's even a Bianchi Cup Match course where the shooter shoots the actual course the professional competitors shoot. Tite sister application TiTraining,has many scenarios cunentlyused by Law Enforcement agencies around the country to include some in the DEW area. It's not only educational from a training perspective but lots of fun! iii) Education: N (1) The following list shows some of thebase courses thatwill be offered. N (a) Realistic safety best practices in and outside the home (b) Safety for the professionals who work alone with the public i.e.real estate agents, 22 those in the trades such as appliance repair folks etc. (c) Youth safety courses designed for various age groups (d) Pistol;begirmer,intermediate and advanced (e) Rifle;beginner,intermediate and advanced N (f) Shotgun for home defense -. (g) Texas Concealed Carry License Course o (h)Hunter Safety Course •0- (i) Reloading (j) AR building class (2) Seminars and workshops conducted by nationally recognized experts in the field of O shooting.,safety,self-defense etc. We have several already lined up to do this. iv) Firing RangeM.• -2 (a) Two Live Fire Bays: > s (i) 11-lane 25-yd general purpose bay (ii) 11-lane Tactical Shooting Bay which will include multiple tmgeting systems, C3 custom lighting and would also double as a general purpose bay when tactical shooting is not taking place. (b) 5-Stand Sport Shooting Clays Range(Approx 90'x 150' Bay). This will accommodate (5)shooters shooting spOIt clays at once. N v) Indoor Shoot House <> (1) An indoor shoot house where Simunition type ammunition will be used. Simunition is a NON-LIVEFIRE Airsoft (paintball) type of munitions. No real atmunition is used. This scenm-io-based training is designed to train the average citizens how to safely o defend themselves in an enclosed structure. TIlis type of training is currently being used by military and law enforcement across the country and is rapidly expanding into the commercial market due to its safe and practical applications. (2) 111e shoot house is constmcted from wooden panels put together to simulate ahouse, pp office environment,store or anything else. Different furniture and other types of items typically found in the subject scenarios will be utilized to create a realistic feel. This is a very safe and challenging educational way to train. Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LICh/03 D/3/h vi) Food Service: A food service component in the form of a cafe serving hot and cold sandwiches.'fl I ere will be a limited seating area in front of the cafe counter and adjacent to the retail area Patrons will also have additional seating in the range lounge(s)- Primary equipment used for the food preparation includes but not limited to: (1) Refrigeration units (2) Fryer (3) Grill (4) Oven (5) Exhaust system vii)Adtlitional Component: We feel it is our responsibility to work with the community and give back. Therefore, we will on occasion,provide our facility Event Center to community gw ups who are designed to help their neighborhoods, educational structure,and the general well being of the area. N 3) Range Construdion: M a) Range Equipment Vendor: We have contracted Action Target of Provo,UT to install our range. Action Target is the premier range equipment company in the U.S. They are the primary vendor LO for most of the Federal,Military and Municipal ranges in the country. They have installed the overwhelming majority of the newer ranges in Texas especially in the DEW area. We selected N them for their professionalism;work in coordinating with architects and engineers and the =• ventilation experts and of course the quality of their product and installation process. o sz b) Ventilation:We have contracted Carey's Small Arms Range Ventilation out of Tinley Park,IL to install the range ventilation. As mentioned earlier,the range is a building within a building and requires its own self-contained ventilation system to ensure airflow works to keep contaminates out o of the range. Extensive research speaking with the best-of-the-best range operators in the country revealed Carey's is the nation's best at installing a ventilation system that will not only meet but -2 also exceed all Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA), Environmental Protection s Agency(EPA)and National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH) standards_Texas k— doesn't have designated standards and like many other states defaults to these agencies'standards. U) As with Action Target,the range equipment vendor,Carey's is the preeminent ventilation vendor for the majority of all Federal,State and local municipal ranges_ llleir quality in equipment and of professional installation has now brought them to be the dominant ventilation vendor in the newer commercial ranges being built across the country. In addition to installing the system, they provide N 24/7 monitoring to ensure the system is working at peak efficiency. M 4) Most asked questions concerning an indoor shooting range: a) What assurances do we have a bullet will not exit the range and harm someone? o i) Think of the range as a building within a building. The bay walls are constructed of concrete filled blocks able to stop ammunition greater than what will be allowed to shoot. ii) The overhead baffles are constructed of AR-500 ballistic steel layered in such a way that no round can exit from above_ pp iii) The bullet-trap is Acton Target's Total Containment Trap(TCT) constructed in such manner that contains the bullet and eliminates ricochets. Because there are no flammable components to this type of trap,there is no chance of a fire starting due to a type of ammunition fired. It's designed to collect the lead bullet/fragments in a patented device and works in concert with the ventilation system to reduce lead build-up within the range. Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!214 D/3/h b) What about noise? WiU there be excessive noise fi'Om the building? The range is constructed of concrete with the building's ell.ierior walls being Tilt-wall concrete. There will be special sound attenuation materials attached on the inner range walls specifically designed to reduce sound attenuation. I I Iese same materials are being used in several ofthe newer ranges around the country where they met other municipality stringent requirements. In the unlikely case sound does escape, it would be a muffie and not as loud as the normal traffic. Given the physical proximity of the building from Davis Blvd,Grapevine Hwy,the houses and neighboring businesses,no noticeable sound should be heard. See the additional inforrrration on the sound attenuation materials. c) Will there be Professional Supervision on the range? Yes,whenever there is a shooter shooting, each bay will have a NRA Certified Range Safety Officer (RSO)on site to ensure the safety of everyone and enforce the range rules. N The number of shooters in the bay will determine how many RSO's will be on-hand. Note: THe NRA RSO courses are the"standard"for firearms safety education nationwide. d) What are the checks to ensure no physically (mind altering drugs or alcohol) or mentally impaired person is allowed on the range? i) Each person who wishes to shoot must first read the range mles and acknowledge in writing LO they understand and agree to abide by them_ Government picture ID's are required to shoot. During the course of this interaction,the range personnel both at the check-in station N and continuing into the range by the RSO will observe for obvious signs of impairment =• such as alcohol use or mental imbalance. Of course this is a subjective evaluation relegated o to common sense. Regarding alcohol,there is a zero tolerance policy for anyone who is suspected of having consumed any amount of alcohol or under the influence of mind- altering drugs. Even if someone who is just in the retail area with afireaml and is suspected of having consumed alcohol or under the influence of drugs will be required to 0 leave the premises. ii) The Range Safety Officers and other staff will be educated on how to handle these -2 situations to ensure the safety of all. > s e) What a•-e the age•-estrictions to use the range? i) Since we are going to promote youth shooting especially with groups such as the Boy and U) Girl Scouts, 4-H Clubs etc,the age limits are a relative thing. Any youth under the legal age of possessing a firearm without their parent with them must be with an organization that has their parent's written permission to shoot on the range. TI lat organization must have a sufficient number of responsible adults to supervise them. Children with parents N must be able to abide by the same rules as everyone else_ The Range Safety Officer will c> make the subjective call whether to deny usage and require the child to leave. No child that is so young that they are just accompanying the parent is allowed. If they are not capable of handling a firerum in a safe manner according the rules, they will not be permitted to enter o the range. There is no room for error when using fireamis! ii) The bottom line is we are trying to promote firearm safety at an early age. We believe that is i.mportrult for the youth to respect firearms and be responsible shooters as they go through life. Unless there are restrictions placed upon us by our insurance company,a specific age pp may not be instituted because even a 17 year old or any adult could be unsafe. f) Will the disabled,for example those in wheelchairs be able to shoot? Yes,the shooting stalls are designed to accommodate wheelchair bound shooters. Those not relegated to a wheel chair but have trouble standing such as the elderly will have chairs Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!215 D/3/h provided and given special attention by an additional Range Safety Officer in order for them to enjoy their shooting experience in a safe manner. g) What about protection for shooters,from shooters,In neighbOIing shooting stalls? In addition to the RSO's enforcing the Range Safety Regulations,the shooting stalls are constructed of AR500 ballistic steel capable of stopping a.SO Caliber projectile. We will not allow that powerful of a round to be shot anyway. The most powelful rifle round allowed will be .30 caliber rifle. 5) Benefits for the City of No..th Richland Hills? a) Shooting facilities are in actuality destination businesses. This means people are not necessaril y drawn to this type of business because of surrounding businesses in the immediate locality. As such consumers not normally coming to Ninth Richland Hills for commerce purposes will now be coming to spend their money at our facility and the surrounding venues N North Richland Hills has to offer. Estimates are for 5 0,000 consumer visits yearly where over co 90% are anticipated to be from outside the City of North Richland Hills_ We estimate reven ues for our business alone to range between $2,200,000(low estimate)to$3,100,000(expected estimate)in the first 12 months. From a calendar year perspective,that's an average of$26,000 (North Richland Hills's tax rate of.01) to the city's coffers in the first year. This doesn't take into account the additional revenue to North Richland Hills's businesses that would not Q0 otherwise be received and city retail taxes. N b) Services available to North Richland Hills's Police Department. We understand the North =• Richland Hills Police Dept uses a range at the Tarrant County College facility_ The [Tactical o Training]features of our range coupled with the fact that it would practically be located in the •0- Police Department's"back yard"would benefit the city in not only convenience but from a budgetary prospective. An affordable contract between our "home"city and our business would be a win-win for both concerned. o i) The Shoot House and the TiTraining(sister system to the TiOutdoors)system is a low cost 0- alternative alleviating the cost of ammunition. Many police departments across the country -2 use this type of training. It affords the officers the ability to train other than just shooting at > s stationary targets on the traditional type of range. A Law Enforcement progran I has been designed and available for police departments. C3 ii) The Tactical Bay is designed for [controlled]fotward of the shooting line firing and whil e moving. The custom lighting is desired so that it incorporates No-li ght and Low-light shooting to simulate the "moonlight"and"streetlight"environment the officers will likely encOtmter in the event they have to utilize their weapons. The tactical bay incorporates N three types of targeting systems plus a 3-D moving target: c> (a) 25-Yard electronic keypad moving the targets forward/rearward. (b) Pneumatic high-speed turning targets at the target line that are remote controlled by the trainer. These targets can be actuated in any order or sequence(independently o or as a specified group) (c) "Running Man"Target System that moves a target the width of the target line. (d) MotoShot remote controlled 3-D robot target that travels in a 360-degree direction at the hands of the trainer. It provides a more realistic look at what a moving m (human) target would be. 6) Demographics: Below are the demographics reinforcing the anticipated success of Bodyguard Sports. It not only shows the spending potential at this location in North Richland Hills but also compares it with its main competitors. Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!216 iii D/3/h a) Indoor Shooting Range Locations: i) Shoot Smart(135 W Fort Worth) ii) The Shooting Gallery (I-820/Lancaster Fort Worth) iii) DEW Gun Range(Mid-Dallas on Mockingbird Ln) iv) Defender Outdoors (Fort Worth University Ave)in construction phase v) Bullet Trap(Plano) vi) Eagle Gun Range(Lewisville) vii)Frisco Gun Club(Frisco) viii) Texas Gun Club (Grapevine) in planning phase b) Chart displays location of primary competitors up to a 15 minute Drive-Time. BodyGuard Sports N ICBc PC j/Buar 7901Boulevard 26,NRH-Site Location(Primary Competitrn's) N lm, V t d LO ew I `unamn[d� I vN n N 'flyuNu �,""„q,x WWI i •� rvw y m , 1 MN' �Y �dYWe YI NY �t,� `4—^ rj w 4i b o f Wyi wmwwn a{�xt ' dyr d. a t 4,a ,� co �l n u �aie ;,^t^^^^^^ p 22 ... ""•wii�nr�"�rv. _ �m„ PdGr} .m, w .�r� �....� .ate, .h �, .� ro M�r4 !�, ....w.rmw;� 'ST rc.c... �Il I i Ri50:lte �d mi ]. .L1E;e�+ei]GSAon.w^LCnii{U �niti x 'ii e e o�] h<<on}i�:E o 1�ISYCya� Tie Q pn..aatlmi fY llsp���:eitr eb�midlltj Si ei _. c op-eor cx�llov r �..4EC ak<<o Ul a it nhe vetice_ � co W Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!217 D/3/h c) 111 e below chatt displays the 2013 Entertainment and Recreational spending within a S-mile radius. golf sbil—fou' Si tlslb Kpo Fyq=N:.—J )zsmn .'.lGlca wa 8u81'n!7r,wp ......YUG4Y JN4M aaAl J Uk Aa aAS,rvN 5 a5r.n.b•Y J UFW Gu Clu b Y Y rxJUV N f NKH �. " Iry a @�:rer ...,,d..,.4J:"' a�a3',",r__,._..r.?,�,,..z swww 4.,,�'r�F' .�W''�',,�"�4E......,...�SCW......,_.^p..'�!!,✓'. N Eegl'a.Cvu....Club EYG„9 YM 0':9,l41M `a. :fl1,]IM2 '.+11,4iM� A4 tnMf.� 1..°r.'Y9M, !%„Y ING 5 SAT;A.t9 ],I w3. YI.lT S!Y � Fd---Gun Club lAb YwQ tl.,J.94A.X S N1Y lKVSY 1w;..':k YA$AuVH. 1;fiM. __)A 3.T.F ]f8.,,lPoA 1.'/ 13 tlX Q T-.Gum Club �. O Q VJ O Q I(U) V N N M r) O m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!218 D/3/h 7) Technical Component Information a) Total Contairunent Trap(TCT) BULLET TRAPS US.We TS S000763,511:17001,S121671154960�u 5400M, MUM,ng4a", TOTAL CONTAINMENT TRAP" appRoations whom safety,raflabifity,simple rvvrrvv�ensmce,anif ease of use am top pdorAps. N GG wt�. N U) 0 I � M O m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!219 D/3/h i n�dq' m{,�r�,ipiptG�d ri 4�4�i;,)wl�r'I II'I Ili{Il�k%r; MEMIMMINMEM V ey dD D� J @D I IYpAU II UWIINa IN Ut71W I IMC ON I:)4.CI 11 NA I"ION UI IAIVII:BP.N ul A N A IVI IVI U IW L..I O IN /c N CO r) I:MSI COIII iJ11ON UIVII 'IiM, CO iJt7lVll"'L.I II I1lt01"I'.iJf"I71V N O CO I HI IV1111I I'IAIIIS COM1 I il`!•ION (n N ® M 0 m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiQi/!21 Dl3/h b) Safety Baffles:We will use the 114"Steel thickness in the General Purpose Shooting Bay. Shooters will not go forward of the firing line in this bay_ We will use a combination of W' and 3/8"steel thickness in the Tactical Bay as shooters will attimes go fOlward ofthe firing line_ Both of these type baffles are for heavy-duty usage and afford the best protection for the shooters. The baffles utilized are best the industry. TI N TBGFUZ CBG3\/FT! TARGET INDOOR RANGES TECHMCAL oO DATA r r V/T/Q(,, Tjo N CD N �'•^�awa d urt.. I I a um l7Ar V lnfa>^trt V tlmromrohP /r U<)V4J //f. 11(XAdl if id 9 Y hov kAV VJ'R IIK PI F.m N " na<.�x ltw @:,xot«A 41 fl fs rat / <r7,i uru d}�)r�,ttur III `ASV VV V MII]f1fV 116 fDVP VtII IIIIallSs II r.116,11d11 uullh,m01fV`1111111111,.4:'n` UITk(VV:',occ g:,jj V(Df I,q N ps Y/I'I lrm(.Ftte us6F TkN r�Im bl.r) t L fll1c 1It HL ttVuvll ]fV II t`pnrAn01l`11IIA-`\. Ln y II']I"]letll .xdur tl,h xe].A WA II.A Q' ----- ar114NWW:m,= Ilk .....xadia dtl"i°I[It r p cx�I tlP�K AML v[��QY(EwI:V 1 I1 AF'el cl eet 1e Ildd'�V"u<[ k.',..f3"K WY' SINGLE ROW CON RGOAATION IIIIIIII:IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII- J a_ n ­ I6I MI'l � III.jjX illt)IG4 10(hir liia.,ry�ty yy 191`.1 w II Vu c: C I Wa IV I t rr l D a' l�l •N f IlfCl r. la Ill­N B IIII IID II dAll,.......1- f u " .Niu'f"I" l I f // "b" •> I�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIYIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINHHHHHHINNWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NMTI VI VCONFIOUAAn N /fN.rla/VVC Wry.m11'P k P N �,II U«7 A@ kll)(N'c�SVVV<J.I.I.J C 9 S .V f.➢f,.JYbrr f'rdAf,I'«prd.aJ"'I''7 qi/rxl Vq d{ CCD'ri C pn�4 @Aa IIVa u..0"a3l?.GG Op,11MIa9l,,J l® g IRIMJt*u amn r,vy cp Lpn 11-.c= (tf 11hzcl1 n U1111 .A.. .11ll l F®® t ID I)ANI m1A"IrlIQ1,L, Cl ur«tb wpIru�h,._.nn(Nrnlrrarmhr6tlltg",.,.,.7r9t # °3v 111 mod/ I&�r`�'A�ID .,.,&III°X�.rcrB°I II kRn....11',ijV�Jd�I jeojn dnuSmMl 11',t.>I'Ep 0 d OT................ CID r ht.ml�rxotl At CD N L) N IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII W uuuuuuuuul � - ^o �,.,..�. -... a r Q I,r�M41_8M4WMFW7IMMC•PG kGfl9Y�.P6IRFM1Atl7,0.17 849g81.68+!'�u)97'7' 1'�•1tlY!N`dNM� IIIRdBf.Wp1'�AI Q4Cw� "VMI ®Iii Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LICM221 D/3/h N N M LO N O Q U) O Q U) N N M O m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LICh/!222 D/3/h SAFETY INDOOR RAINGES , r r 6, N N M Q LO t0 3 � O Q r; I s �i U) N r M � Q O m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LICh/!223 D/3/h , Il Y I I VI:1L 1 I,a II1,.,a , Ir,,xo(1 .,uO Y I!,h.,.;11d wi I d, ',.(r I I VI L... :3 19,1f1 w, mo 1r,,xlo 1 1t AI,, �,Iwd mid vvlll � 1 I I, r,I I(,'L`, I101(MIjI1ro1,I1(I�, iwd, S,Aiiml()to ,i,,IImJ mid r„1,t11 1,1,0,1111 iouild�, ^Prod ,at o CO r , ,at>i !)111 1.1�,1I ,{I�,{I,,,., 1,„ ,'I11tj' i1 1111 ,, �}�,I d d'1{1({1Yu.'r/ � T- V ,,�a�,,l 1,111,, m;u,,x1111 1V,,1x„101,(1 r1;1 kl ,,,;v, � � r�1 I,a II,�. wills h,,,,i,.l,�.,.1 ,,1 11,.1r,rt,11 111,Y�1 tx,,V,a Ira,1na�, iil r d ,., ,qtr,tu.,V 01 r P,rffl¢r. ,1II(I .S(w rIj,,(i V,I ,u,mmji; or ; ,,Tat as(1,,,11,,,';8, Ir1m71 N 1)OI-ID,r'11)Guhi 11,11t1.xjo I,r[ho�,Iw11,hdo 111,1, .r I I VI':.L... "� I,a IN,�a;u,, 1r1,111e o ' ' rntld �,L,,,,,rid will 1, �,ct. U ,11x1 (;(,1 I r,III ,Ibis 1rl I o II(J1JII1 1 Ira,1ncls. Chi,,rl ;111 ,111 ,1 ql, I VlflL k9 ffllw, mo 1r1,x10 „ ,, 1 �,Io, sarld "MI N „ ;111 k„1,I (IogIoo, , rl`01YI 1x,I1,,,IId 11)1,11 ,,1h , 1ri, ,0,,11,,,,1 mid colaw r1 �.i,uuuaro I,1,iyun iouild�, i°Iwd ,r;I � 1x1 luartl,xl,, k, rh, .I,,,,1 1,hd Ilk, ,1 11 w,o(10"'o1 t,,1111) 1,r1omid mlqlo VVIYh 11( 11,ut1,x11; t„ 1 �,Imfl 1,hdo Lf� II ,- „1111 I,1,0(),,x1 1.,,101 d0, ,11 ,1 „ , , ., ,111(1 m, ,{1 1 tx ,V,.1 „11r,�, r ,ux110 with "w”,1:1,1,,1 11 1 11;u1r1.x1,, I,r 11ho 11,,, 1,I,a1, mid 342) Mod,11 VI 1,,,1 1,,,1,01.(111,1,,111,p1,,I-It'Ih1v„rV,t 10111 id, III 1,,1),11,1 tx.11x.1,01,,11 m mmjlo VAI 11,1111x,,t„ ',�,i,,,;1 N ,f .r J,1 (JI,X I.,.Y,v' „ qba .h 1'�>1'„e1,Ivr1Y,. C O mlxjlo 1'nirx1,111'1III 11,,�,My „u 1,,,1111,1;h Pmd I IIIo 1>aa1l, CLd C CO r r Y,„ , N ,Iki lII uI^J r, Mk U N orsq,sIl)rrri(jl)11 rc4,,a91:C a1tr11 C 1,),-I IY p .1111 - I „rillf �” nu�mmv a,I ,,, ;,. .II",ir rtia.d WWWAMIGNIARGET,COM W Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!224 D/3/h c) Ventilation(Shooting Range): The ideal airflow is designated as laminar,or even flow_TI lis is construed as an air supply which has only slight velocity variation,when measured from ceiling to floor. 'TIlis variation cmmotexceed 15%. lil order to achieve this desired airflow,special air distribution systems must be constructed. The primary goal is to provide the proper cubic foot value of air to the range through the supply duct bunk. The air is then to be distributed through a continuous graduated plenum to a singular continuous diffuser system. The diffuser system may vary in type per each application.Either way, each configuration should provide for an even flow of air across the entire width mld height of the rmlge. The exhaust duct system should be constructed in a fashion that evenly e)o.lracts the supply air from the range. Our experience in this matter has been to create an extraction opening the width of the range,ml d capable of sustaining an inlet,or capture,velocity of 2000 feet per minute. The exhaust furl and filter system should be designed to allow for 350 to 500 fpm velocities across the filter N media. The exhaust fan should be sized so as to allow for operational static pressure a 5"wg at the desired volume of airflow. The filter media should be that of at least 95% at.03 microns. This will help achieve the federal exhaust emission levels established under EPA 40 CFR 50.12 (1.5 Micrograms oflead per cubic meter quarterly). LO N O U) -- --- --- ----- -w N - N M Air improperly introduced from the back of the range can cause eddies to form in front of the shooter's face_ O m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LICh/!225 D/3/h N VENTILATION y N I L2 H N iq� rIrIIP '�'r 11i I t ,,,yi II'41iW'uliY'll:, I P 0 I U) IIIIIIIIII it I�Io� I III Yhllf� iI1 lil it Illq�ll �I�Illl�ill�ll��;,�{���,I�IIII��II,i N "I ��11111116i���' 0 Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f L10h/!226 Ili D/3/h rn N N i �i LO a N O Q � t O L U) ii, N v CO a N iip y„ 22 O Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LICh/!227 D/3/h d) Sound Reduction Using"Sound Silencer"made with PEPP Sound Silencer"' Srr lol 0,11,1Ilo I IY`.>.Icwith°orout IN>uld(,d Por fo— 'IIm Sand Silln:tr Icoustic Htform l 11ce Silts and 4flins11)1is s ��rW r, nroalMVrrrf n{r In< uuu ®� ". CO wW'd I nr4 Mt,1 7 I ............ ......... ........................ r M,1r �<<< , u awl 4n-aee -a O N _ U 107 a w dbul)I'd IHIR wwm........... .. r:r� � o�:r.1 r ,11 X17,I cv .........a� LO 5i I .. ,,, A! ., A urJ)1 C '� v a .. ...._... ' r� '9i '➢ rl 0 tbft a Ill pr Matt mm a amt t ..oll vn ° �slrx" wig r.rn n ;i 6r✓y > 00 uag 'mm;MF1 m ao;a r 101, o 119,o W 11 e x -.1 u',I xll xe�'n�1� 4✓ f� o�w.Aw„ ma ea nn�wn,w Iwa: 0 �, M w Loo a_. r... r 7 Katfmauanh.sm f4 �, C7 rl7 4V 4 -------------------------- ,,,,, tl' N 1G LL .....---If1"-------------------------------------------------- t Hltnum w gyro-1 ,�IxI SI LIRSIIIII��� P IIU �, 1 I I t 1 1^ex Li oU ut 1 i>1 nola is cunorii i,aC CO VTdvJdn/rrnrN«.dam w.a rlrw r r O N U N Z.; C d cc r r 125Hz 1z11H1 SMI e ++ utlM_ IIIIIIIII STrfbkhr 1oI„ro111raI r 4 - .y t 5o7n1 t c 3'1' UP T@ 11 sr r �In a lrl�ott<IU 1Ir I I�I� II,nu., I—,hI ]S,II '1 r.--1, rr Ml— IT I ”"' 1111—p R1 ?„IMN1 IClns A �` Y,I rrn `I M� I.,�r,.?lar, Illl.11lCl Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!228 D/3/h I,II:.S «t ICU 0L11INN(.11l �hI f ih5iml IO �.( OA IJO 111, 111 III 11 I drt I FPCibI' IIIl1:7W W Y116 t'ac-'i^' .r.'tlli r I'll 1Lli r:nci\i 1111"lil 1tlh-Ii II,L i fl. �I 'I'll'7�SV f t'C'il al .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... N N M LO N O Q U) O Q U) N N M r) O m Bodyguard Sports LLC SUP Application: Supplemental Cbdl f LiCh/!229 C.1 ZC 2015-18 Public Hearing and Consideration of a request from the City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development #74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo). APPROVED Chairman Shiflet called on Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock to present ZC 2015- 18. Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock presented ZC 2015-18 consideration of a request from the City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development #74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo). This Nonresidential Planned Development (NR-PD) District shall adhere to the N conditions of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances, as amended, and adopt a co "base district" of "C-1 Commercial District. The following regulations shall be specific to M this NR-PD District. Where these regulations conflict with, or overlap another zoning standard, these regulations shall prevail. LO • Permitted Land Uses o Indoor Shooting Range Required. Staff proposes changing the minimum percent from forty five (45) to forty (40) % of the building 4M area to be initially reconstructed and developed required as an o indoor gun range. Staff proposes eliminating the minimum use z restriction of the following uses: 0 • Open/Public Firing Range Lanes • Private Firing Range Lanes z • Tactical Firing Range Lanes • Indoor Skeet Range co ■ Gunsmith ■ Archery Lanes ■ Classroom/Event Space ■ Retail sales of firearms and firearm accessories ■ Simunition Non-live Fire (airsoft/paintball) Training ■ Laser-video Firing Systems o Other Permitted Uses. Other uses within this NR-PD may only be permitted after a full demising wall meeting Building Code requirements is installed and proof of nonrefundable purchase of a shooting range ventilation system and/or bullet collection and ° containment system is provided to the City. Once a Certificate of Occupancy for an Indoor Shooting Range has been established, it shall always be required for new uses to be permitted. Staff m recommends striking the following sentence from the permitted use requirements. Other uses in this NR-PD shall be those permitted in the "C-1" Commercial District and shall also include the following: • Indoor Amusement Arcade • Bowling Lanes • Indoor Miniature Golf Course • Indoor Race Track • Roller or Ice Skating Rink Cbdl f LiQi/!22: • Indoor Skydiving • Indoor Rock/Wall Climbing • Other Indoor Commercial Recreation • Personal Security Training • Indoor Gold Range • Archery • Indoor Music Venue • Hardware & Building Materials • Micro Brewery • Comedy Club • Billiards as Accessory Use N • New Marine Equipment Sales N • New Motorcycle Sales M • New Small Vehicle Sales (ATVS, Scooters, Golf Carts, etc.) • Outdoor Sales & Display associated to marine equipment, LO motorcycles, and other small vehicles limited to the co westernmost row of parking stalls along David Blvd. _. o Development Regulations. This NR-PD shall follow the 4M development regulations of the "C-1" Commercial District, with the o following additions and exceptions. z ■ Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the 0 Indoor Gun Range, the following improvements shall be made to the property: z • All internal traffic control devices (i.e. stop signs, speed bumps, etc.) will be replaced or refurbished) co • All fire lanes and parking lines shall be newly applied. • Landscaping shall be installed per the attached Landscape Plan. • Any non-compliant outdoor lighting-including those affixed to the building-shall be replaced with fixtures that meet current outdoor lighting standards. • Existing concrete light pole bases to be repainted. • Existing chain link fence on each side of the loading dock to be replaced or refurbished o • Franchise utilities to be contacted regarding the removal of a dead-end utility pole extension at the northwest corner of the property. m • Existing irrigation system to be inspected and repaired as required to provide fully operational system. • Handicap-accessible sidewalk ramp to be installed on the north side of the Davis Boulevard driveway at the northwest corner of the property. • The six (6)' wood fence between the property and the vacant commercial property to the north to be removed. Cbdl f LiCh/!231 o Administrative Approval of Site Plans. The purpose of this NR-PD is to provide Land Use and Development Regulations beyond the scope of what is typically required. Site plans which comply with all development related ordinances and this Ordinance shall be administratively approved by the staff Development Review Committee. Deviations from the regulations provided herein shall require City Council approval of a zoning change to revise this Nonresidential Planned Development. Chairman Shiflet opened Public Hearing at 07:15 p.m. N N The Commission had no questions for staff. Chairman Shiflet asked for anyone wishing M to speak on the item to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Shiflet closed the Public Hearing at 07:15 p.m. LO MARK HAYNES MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2015-18. MIKE BENTON SECONDED THE MOTION. 4M MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0. o Z O Z N 2 T LL O m Cbdl f LiCh/!232 E/2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: AP 2015-09 Consideration of a request from Cambridge NRH Development LLC for an Amended Plat of Cambridge Place on 1.4269 acres in the 6800 block of Iron Horse Boulevard. Presenter: Clayton Husband, Principal Planner Summary: Cambridge NRH Development LLC is requesting approval of an Amended Plat of Cambridge Place to move the common lot line between two lots. The property is located on the north side of Iron Horse Boulevard and west of Richmond Drive. The plat is administratively complete and meets the requirements of the subdivision regulations. General Description: The Final Plat for Cambridge Place was approved in January 2015. The Final Plat includes 60 single-family residential lots, two public open space lots, and three common open space lots owned by the homeowners association. This Amended Plat affects two lots in the subdivision: a private open space lot and a residential lot and at the northwest corner of Iron Horse Boulevard and Richmond Drive. The Amended Plat will correct the location of the common lot line between the residential lot and the open space lot. The lot line would align with the 10-foot wide pedestrian access easement on the open space lot. In addition, an 8-foot wide pedestrian access easement will be added to the open space lot to cover the existing sidewalk on the lot. The sidewalk connects to a public open space lot at the west end of the subdivision, which includes a trailhead for the Cottonbelt Trail. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan classifies this area as "Low Density Residential." The Low Density Residential Land Use provides for traditional, low-density, single-family detached dwelling units. THOROUGHFARE PLAN: One of the lots has frontage on Iron Horse Boulevard, classified as a C4U Major Collector and built as a four-lanes with a center turn lane within an 80-foot wide right-of-way. The other lot has frontage on Richmond Drive, classified as a local street. Additional right-of-way is not required from this property. CURRENT ZONING: R-PD Residential Planned Development (PD 73). An R-PD district must be a minimum of 10 acres in size. Its purpose is to permit flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in situations where modification of specific base district Cbdl f LiCh/!233 Ell r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS regulations is not contrary to its intent and purpose and provides a public benefit to the community. This Amended Plat is consistent with the zoning standards of the planned development. SURROUNDING ZONING / LAND USE: North: R-PD Residential Planned Development/ Low Density Residential West: R-PD Residential Planned Development/ Low Density Residential South: R-PD Residential Planned Development/ Low Density Residential East: R-PD Residential Planned Development/ Low Density Residential PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Lot 1 and Lot A, Block 2, Cambridge Place. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this item at their September 3, 2015 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Recommendation: To Approve AP 2015-09. Cbdl f LIChP234 % 4$zEEn 7GggZ6Hbq npq§}7 4$zEEO 7 holu pqn 8 LO \ \ �\ _ �\ \ w ' : � ^ ...................................................... ZICHMOND DRIVE Fo 00 C,,O cc 00 LU cn (.7) Ln 70 0� ;-, — Qc " 0 0 r,4 0 W W W W t W W t rj....................................................... u r, Z U) 4— kn < r*l 00 "t r1i Lr) ........................................................ C! 0 0 -4t U Ln U)l = C) C) ro C) Ln � o w C� a� r*, a fn 2 ........................------------------------------- fn 00 4� r1i ol v- ko 0 r*l o6 r � v- > T--1 N r,4 ------------------------------------------------------- :3 u LU <z Cc fn C) ......................................................... W 44 W 44 4 W ........................................................ ......................................................... E/2/d D.1 AP 2015-09 Consideration of a request from Cambridge NRH Development, LLC for an Amended Plat of Cambridge Place on 1.4269 acres in the 6800 block of Iron Horse Development. APPROVED Chairman Shiflet called on Principal Planner, Clayton Husband to present the item. Principal Planner, Clayton Husband presented the staff report for consideration of AP 2015-09. This is an administratively complete application. Staff recommends approval. Applicant on behalf of Cambridge NRH Development, LLC was absent this evening, so N no presentation was provided. M m The Commission had no questions for staff. co co KATHY LUPPY MOVED TO APPROVE AP 2015-09. BILL SCHOPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0. o Z O Z N 2 T LL O m Cbdl f LiCh/!237 F/2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Halff Associates for the Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project (DR1503) in an amount not to exceed $68,480 and to approve the associated budget revision. Presenter: Caroline Waggoner, City Engineer Summary: Council is being asked to approve a professional services agreement with Halff Associates for engineering design services for the project identified as the Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project. General Description: The Calloway Branch is one of the City's major tributaries, beginning near the City's northern boundary and running over four miles south into Richland Hills. Its path is comprised of both concrete and earthen sections, and the watershed is largely developed. This spring staff became aware of some bank stability issues along an earthen section of Calloway Branch in the vicinity of the Graham Ranch subdivision. With the extraordinary rainfall this spring the side slopes of a portion of this channel failed, sliding into the channel bottom and causing a loss of material in several of the backyards along Waggoner Ranch Road. Staff hired a Geotechnical firm to learn exactly what caused the failure and what could be done to correct the problem. Unfortunately it is not as simple as replacing the dislodged material back onto the channel bank; the bottom line is that the clay material is not suited to exist at the required slope with elevated moisture content. And while the rains this year were unusually high, it is certain that we will experience this level of rainfall again at some point. With the Geotech report in hand outlining several options to fortify the bank, the next step is to hire an engineering consultant experienced in streambank stabilization projects to develop project plans and assist us in selecting and fine-tuning a solution. Given the urgent nature of this situation (with pools and backyards located feet away from the current failure plane) Engineering staff began direct discussions with a Halff Associates, a local engineering consultant who meets the criteria, rather than engaging multiple firms through the standard professional services selection route. Halff Associates, Inc., headquartered in North Texas, is an employee-owned regional consulting firm that has provided full-service engineering, architecture, and related services for decades. They currently have over 50 dedicated Water Resources staff specializing in erosion control, drainage, storm water management, flood control, floodplain management, hydrology and hydraulics, water supply, and permitting. They Cbdl f LiCh/!238 F/2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS have completed numerous channel and streambank stabilization projects in North Texas for municipalities, TxDOT, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The scope of the design work includes site survey, any necessary permitting through the Army Corps of Engineers, and preparation of plans and specifications to bid the reconstruction of this portion of the channel. The project design will be paid for with funds from the project identified in the current CIP plan as the "Concrete Lined Channel Rehabilitation CIP Project' (DR1401). At this time staff is requesting the funding for design only, with the future construction costs (currently estimated at $550,000) to be identified in the coming months after the final design. Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Halff Associates for the Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project (DR1503) in an amount not to exceed $68,480 and to approve the associated budget revision Cbdl f LiCh/!239 ,,s(qb;81a;ooq !Di !pogsoizq XuWqo i`iegLZ(iioDisc5ibgNia'(o(pAAiho; u !pgn8 u L1 f/ S lfLft NN > r / �t a l! QL r r fi 1 r / y / i CG'. Jlr�� /i 1 � mrlJYrtPr r f lu � N� IV j�1� Fi i i SIP C � Cu I t� 6� iii + IIIYI(hV 911 1 xV Y F/2/c Drainage Capital Projects Concrete Lined Channel Rehabilitation Project DR 1401 PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION This project involves beginning a rehabilitation process of the City's seven (7) miles of concreted lined channels. The scope of the project will include repairing areas of concrete lined channels that have deteriorated, cracked, dropped, collapsed, heaved or hold water due to heavy ground movement and/or age. The list of needed repairs will include patching sections of channel walls and bottoms and replacement of sections of channel walls and bottoms. Staff has inventoried all concrete lined channels and estimates that 50,000 square foot of repairs are initially needed to begin the repair process. Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION O O Professional Services p Engineering O Land/ROW Acquisition Construction 10/2013 11/2014 C? N Other x REVISION EXPLANATION Funds are needed for the emergency repair to the Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project. M N O FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION....; 2014/15 BALANCE COST N FUNININCrS( URGE LO $0 $0 N Reserves 200,000 ; 131,500 $131,500 �! 0 $0 0 0 $0 0 $0 Total F $200,000 ,;t,,,, $ �}„ ;;, $131,5001 $0 $131,500 m F�ROJEOT EXP N[11'1'URE Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 200,000 ( ,5 131,500 $131,500 Other 0 $0 Total $200,000 $131,500 $0 1 $200,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Minimal operating impact is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LICh/241 F/2/d Drainage Capital Projects Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project DR 1503 PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION With the extraordinary rainfall this spring the side slopes of a portion of this channel failed, sliding into the channel bottom and causing a loss of material in several of the backyards along Waggoner Ranch Road. Staff hired a Geotechnical firm to learn exactly what caused the failure and what could be done to correct the problem. Unfortunately it is not as simple as replacing the dislodged material back onto the channel bank;the bottom line is that the clay material is not suited to exist at the required slope with elevated moisture content. And while the rains this year were unusually high, it is certain that we will experience this level of rainfall again at some point. Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION O O Professional Services 09/2015 02/2016 p Engineering O Land/ROW Acquisition Construction 02/2016 08/2016 �? N Other X REVISION EXPLANATION Creation of project. M N O FINANCIAL DATA ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION....; 2014/15 BALANCE COST U) FUNININCrS( URGE $0 $0 Reserves 0 ;, 68,500 $68,500 �! 0 $0 0 0 $0 r 0 $0 Total $0 $68,5001 $0 $68 500 m F�ROJEOT EXP N[�I'1'URE Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 68,500 $68,500 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 Other 0 $0 Total $0 ,;t $„S,5Q;;,1 $68,500 $0 1 $68,500 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Minimal operating impact is anticipated. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LICh/242 Cd2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Consider Ordinance No. 3372, adopting the 2015/2016 Proposed Budget and amending the 2014/2015 Revised Budget. Presenter: Mark Mills, Director of Budget & Research Summary: The City Council is requested to consider the approval of an ordinance adopting the following: • Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Annual Budget and Plan of Municipal Expenditures; • Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Revised Annual Budget and Plan of Municipal Expenditures; • Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Capital Projects Budget; and • Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Capital Project Amendments. General Description: The proposed budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/2016 was filed with the City Secretary's Office on August 6, 2015. This proposed budget was also made available at the NRH Public Library and on the City's website. The City has posted all required publications. In order to receive additional public comment, a public hearing was held on Monday, August 24, 2015. This public hearing included the FY 2015/2016 Proposed Tax Rate, FY 2015/2016 Proposed Budget and FY 2014/2015 Revised Budget. The FY 2015/2016 General Fund budget is based on a 610 tax rate. Of this 610 tax rate, 36.47310 is dedicated for General Fund maintenance and operations. The interest and sinking portion of the tax rate, which is used to pay principal and interest on tax supported debt issued by the City, is 24.5269¢. Revisions have been made to the FY 2014/2015 revenues and expenditures to reflect the most current estimates. The FY 2014/2015 Revised Annual Operating Budget and FY 2015/2016 Proposed Operating Budget for all funds are: Cbdl f LICh/243 Cd2 r4 NORTH RQCHLAND HILLS 2014-2015 2015-2016 Fund Revised Proposed General Fund $43,545,550 $43,304,434 Debt Service Fund 11,095,008 12,261,458 Tax Increment Financing Fund 3,190,418 3,050,721 Park & Rec Facilities Development Fund 8,176,372 8,379,961 Crime Control District Fund 4,887,881 5,020,512 Promotional Fund 216,400 226,302 Donations Fund 276,360 275,581 S ecial Investigations Fund 326,142 129,500 Drainage Utility Fund 1,405,210 678,789 Gas Development Fund 20,000 0 Traffic Safety Fund 1,029,582 933,309 Utility Fund 31,038,542 31,067,824 Aquatic Park Fund 5,011,788 4,667,197 Golf Course Fund 2,395,337 2,434,082 Facilities/Construction Mgmt. Fund 3,020,607 3,080,996 Fleet Services Fund 4,167,198 3,902,219 Information Services Fund 4,445,690 3,229,743 Self Insurance Fund(1) 11,413,954 11,639,573 Each of these funds are Internal Service Funds. They receive revenue in the form of allocations from other operating funds, which are used to cover the majority of expenses within each Internal Service Fund. While necessary to appropriate the funds in the manner above, it should be noted that the majority of expenses funded within each Internal Service Fund are also reflected as expenditures/expenses (the allocation) within the contributing funds. In addition, resources such as interest income, other income and fund balance are also used to offset any expenses in excess of these allocations. The FY 2015/2016 Proposed Capital Improvements Budget totals $8,765,371: Category 2015-2016 Proposed Street& Sidewalk Capital Projects $1,632,821 Drainage Capital Projects $95,000 Utility Capital Projects $1,625,000 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects $1,117,000 Aquatic Park Capital Projects $2,700,000 Facility Capital Projects $165,000 Major Capital Equipment Projects $1,079,500 Other Capital Projects $351,050 Cbdl f LICh/244 Cd2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS Over the course of the 2014/2015 fiscal year, several projects were revised. Staff is requesting an amendment to the FY 2014/2015 Capital Projects Budget to include the changes summarized below. Detailed revision forms have been included in the attachment to this agenda item. Projects with a change of $0 were the result of funds being reallocated within that project, with no additional funding required. Adopted Thru 2014-2015 Revised Thru Project Title 2014-2015 Change 2014-2015 Street& Sidewalk Projects $22,589,186 $500,000 $23,089,186 Drainage Projects $3,300,000 ($500,000) $2,800,000 Utility Projects $840,000 $0 $840,000 Parks & Recreation Projects $27,718,112 $1 $27,718,113 Aquatic Park Projects $200,000 $75,000 $275,000 Facility Projects $4,470,000 $150,000 $4,620,000 Major Capital Equipment Projects $3,255,000 $1,395,115 $4,650,115 Economic Development Projects $4,680,000 $1,426,184 $6,106,184 Other Capital Projects $0 $1,211,751 $1,211,751 The City of North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors conducted a budget work session on Friday, August 7, 2015 to review the FY 2014/2015 Revised Budget and the FY 2015/2016 Proposed Budget. The Board met and held a public hearing on Monday, August 24, 2015 prior to the City Council meeting. The Board adopted the FY 2014/2015 Revised Budget and the FY 2015/2016 Proposed Budget and recommended approval by the City Council. The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors met on August 24, 2015 to hold public hearings on the FY 2014/2015 Revised and FY 2015/2016 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets. The Board approved the Operating and Capital Budgets for both the FY 2014/2015 Revised and FY 2015/2016 Proposed Budget and recommended City Council adoption. The North Richland Hills City Council conducted a budget work session on Friday, August 7, 2015 to review the FY 2014/2015 Revised Budget and the FY 2015/2016 Proposed Budget for all funds. The City Council met and held a public hearing on these budgets on Monday, August 24, 2015 at the regular City Council meeting for the purpose of receiving public comment. As previously mentioned detailed copies of the revised and proposed budget were filed with the City Secretary's Office and are also available at the NRH Public Library and on the City's website. All of these sources are still available for public inspection. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 3372. Cbdl f LICh/245 Cd2 r4 NORTH KICHLAND HILLS ORDINANCE NO. 3372 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2015 THOURGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; ADOPTING THE AMENDED BUDGET FOR OCTOBER 1, 2014 THOUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, AND PROVIDING FOR INVESTMENTS AND TRANSFERS. WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 102.001, et seq, TEX. LOC. GOV'T Code, the City Manager submitted to the City Council a budget for Fiscal Year 2015/2016, and the Council determined that a public hearing should be held at a time and place which was set forth in a notices published as required by law; and, WHEREAS, such public hearing on the budget was duly held on August 24, 2015, and all taxpayers were given an opportunity to attend and participate in such public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. THAT the operating and capital budgets for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2015 and ending September 30, 2016, in words and figures as shown herein, are adopted and approved as filed herewith. A copy of the approved budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 2. THAT the City Manager be and is hereby authorized to make inter- departmental and inter-fund transfers during the fiscal year as deemed necessary in order to avoid over-expenditure of particular accounts. SECTION 3. THAT the City Manager or his designee be and hereby authorized to invest any funds not needed for current use in any lawful manner. Interest accrued from investments shall be deposited to the interest income account of the funds from which the principal was invested. SECTION 4. THAT the amended budget for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2014, and ending September 30, 20157 filed herewith is hereby amended and approved. A copy of the amended budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. SECTION 5. THAT the amended capital projects budget for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2014, and ending September 307 2015, filed herewith are hereby amended and approved. A copy of the Cbdl f LICh/246 Cd2 r4 NORTH KICHLAND HILLS amended projects shall be filed with the City Secretary. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 14th day of September, 2015. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mark C. Mills, Director of Budget & Research Cbdl f LICh/247 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 1 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERALFUND 0 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET U) FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 N REVENUES LO Taxes $28,315,208 $29,304,675 $28,730,683 $28,933,259 $30,150,080 N Fines&Forfeitures 2,424,064 1,990,953 2,229,005 2,188,442 2,278,475 r? Licenses&Permits 1,952,862 1,854,140 1,898,484 1,831,128 1,898,736 0 Charges for Service 3,519,825 3,136,223 3,642,389 2,068,433 2,191,885 Qj Intergovernmental 4,173,981 4,346,518 4,485,995 4,598,468 5,158,535 0 Miscellaneous 742,156 767,724 2,683,835 2,605,085 1,626,723 SUB-TOTAL $41,128,095 $41,400,233 $43,670,391 $42,224,815 $43,304,434 m W APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE Legal Settlement&Litigation $0 $94,000 $0 $0 $0 Court Technology Fund 58,860 413,838 0 3,250 0 0 Utility Assistance Program 6,381 15,000 10,000 1,906 0 > PEG Fees 0 650,000 5,500 5,500 0 U Record Preservation Fee 0 60,688 0 8,000 0 0 Previous Year Encumbrances 387,534 279,902 0 102,079 0 Q General Fund Reserves 0 82,800 0 1,200,000 0 Cr SUB-TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $452,775 $1,513,428 $15,500 $1,320,735 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $41,580,870 $42,913,661 $43,685,891 $43,545,550 $43,304,434 N EXPENDITURES N City Council $102,795 $102,844 $127,943 $127,943 $129,470 City Manager 526,000 475,273 605,171 605,398 621,833 22 Communications 322,447 336,172 352,637 352,815 348,706 0 City Secretary 422,820 490,005 474,311 482,311 466,413 S Cr Legal 318,493 268,829 303,928 303,928 304,374 Human Resources 129,946 117,203 124,029 124,064 133,415 pp Finance 695,709 637,863 675,320 674,765 676,191 _. Budget&Research 365,626 396,715 411,875 374,361 387,080 j Municipal Court 1,285,723 1,315,875 1,377,246 1,380,063 1,390,388 N Planning and Inspections 909,060 1,001,317 1,026,913 1,027,221 1,035,058 =, Economic Development 303,544 289,945 322,689 322,689 322,219 Library 1,961,961 1,991,676 2,073,313 2,075,100 2,104,314 w Neighborhood Services 1,540,309 1,621,342 1,737,317 1,750,447 1,748,645 Public Works 3,397,672 3,657,403 4,157,896 4,170,338 4,174,467 Parks&Recreation 1,993,755 2,029,723 2,061,510 2,059,805 2,048,728 > Police 12,098,984 12,387,294 12,540,705 12,585,338 12,995,899 Emergency Management 915,788 837,840 928,502 852,626 986,428 0 Fire 9,989,287 10,317,975 10,714,679 10,731,828 11,172,368 a Building Services 678,270 705,401 737,070 737,070 848,774 Non-Departmental 2,238,435 2,006,116 2,313,009 913,875 973,331 0 SUB-TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $40,196,625 $40,986,812 $43,066,063 $41,651,985 $42,868,101 Cr RESERVES&OTHER EXPENDITURES - d Reserves $219,468 $432,719 $543,040 $565,680 $229,980 Transfers Out 69,883 824,802 76,788 1,277,385 75,703 m Legal Settlement 12,500 94,000 0 0 0 0 Economic Development Incentives 0 0 0 50,500 130,650 SUB-TOTAL RESERVES AND OTHER $301,851 $1,351,521 $619,828 $1,893,565 $436,333 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $40,498,476 $42,338,333 $43,685,891 $43,545,550 $43,304,434 m BALANCE $1,082,394 $575,328 $0 $0 $0 =F 0 m Cbdl f LICh/248 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 2-SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERALFUND 0 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET U) FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 TAXES N LO Current Property Taxes $13,984,586 $14,444,697 $13,820,165 $13,740,985 $14,580,715 N Delinquent Property Taxes 100,046 105,071 110,000 113,318 114,000 c? Penalty and Interest 127,461 144,207 134,000 149,827 140,000 0 Franchise Fees 4,095,542 4,230,848 4,146,720 4,320,393 4,285,915 F Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 847,359 856,215 912,607 852,104 905,116 0 Sales Taxes 8,686,713 9,009,968 9,096,914 9,233,855 9,601,841 Mixed Beverages 117,223 129,512 127,500 140,000 135,000 pp Payment in Lieu of Taxes 356,279 384,156 382,777 382,777 387,493 a> SUB-TOTAL $28,315,208 $29,304,675 $28,730,683 $28,933,259 $30,150,080 FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines $2,107,901 $1,725,071 $1,948,755 $1,903,192 $1,990,725 j Warrant&Arrest Fees 245,556 196,791 215,250 215,250 215,250 U Library Fines 70,606 69,091 65,000 70,000 72,500 0 SUB-TOTAL $2,424,064 $1,990,953 $2,229,005 $2,188,442 $2,278,475 Q Cr LICENSES AND PERMITS Building Permits $894,625 $720,877 $775,000 $700,000 $775,000 Electrical Permits 69,384 54,343 70,000 45,743 60,000 N Plumbing Permits 119,725 97,492 117,000 95,000 106,000 Mechanical Permits 77,426 84,933 86,000 62,646 75,500 co Gas Drilling Permits 130,000 124,432 60,000 20,000 20,000 N Miscellaneous Permits 98,925 100,948 163,484 131,567 175,306 M Apartment Inspection Fees 92,795 94,319 96,000 99,097 100,000 0 Curb&Drainage Insp. Fees 49,883 83,169 42,000 125,105 59,000 S Cr Re-Inspection Fees 3,507 8,660 4,000 14,951 4,000 License Fees 17,270 23,333 18,000 21,000 23,100 0 m Contractor Registration Fees 78,545 83,076 80,000 90,421 88,400 =• Plan/Review/Application Fee 32,222 55,385 30,000 87,566 45,000 LO Animal License/Adoption Fees 47,282 44,475 58,000 51,000 71,500 N Animal Control Impoundment 28,775 25,543 35,000 26,147 26,000 _ Crematorium Revenues 1,748 800 0 0 0 �- Auto Impoundment Fees 10,804 9,629 11,000 13,000 13,000 Food Service Permits 133,752 137,648 133,000 148,405 148,230 Food Managers School 25,732 23,278 24,000 29,255 28,700 Fire Inspection/Alarm Fees 40,464 81,801 96,000 70,225 80,000 > SUB-TOTAL $1,952,862 $1,854,140 $1,898,484 $1,831,128 $1,898,736 -• 0 0 CHARGES FOR SERVICE a Park Facility Rental $7,623 $8,575 $10,025 $7,625 $8,325 Ambulance Fees 2,876,634 2,485,543 2,995,924 1,433,619 1,564,500 0 'S Garbage Billing 371,867 368,400 374,710 396,450 400,415 s Contributions 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Cr Recreation Fees 660 397 0 510 400 d Athletic Revenue 88,234 110,747 92,075 107,018 124,245 Recreation Special Events 15,203 3,319 13,000 8,084 10,000 m Planning&Zoning Fees 48,234 50,705 45,000 34,589 32,000 0 Sale of Accident Reports 9,990 8,417 10,727 6,100 6,000 - Vital Statistics 56,645 56,925 55,000 27,453 0 Mowing 28,191 26,915 30,000 30,000 30,000 Fire Dept Certification/CPR Citizen Class 6,319 5,973 5,928 6,985 6,000 m Miscellaneous 225 307 0 0 0 SUB-TOTAL $3,519,825 $3,136,223 $3,642,389 $2,068,433 $2,191,885 0 0 m Cbdl f LICh/249 i ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 2-SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERALFUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED �- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 U) N INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs: LO Utility Fund 1,895,976 1,990,775 2,090,315 2,090,315 2,194,831 N Park&Rec Facilities Dev.Corp. 367,635 386,017 405,318 417,943 449,959 r? Crime Control District 0 0 0 12,625 24,375 O Aquatic Park Fund 137,088 143,942 151,139 151,139 158,696 aj Consolidation Reimbursements 1,773,282 1,825,784 1,839,223 1,926,446 2,330,674 O SUB-TOTAL $4,173,981 $4,346,518 $4,485,995 $4,598,468 $5,158,535 m MISCELLANEOUS a> Interest Income $23,076 $109,126 $55,000 $108,172 $113,400 Radio Reimbursement 284,212 247,966 289,325 195,467 273,609 Sale of City Property 0 4,047 15,000 11,752 31000 Grant Proceeds-Crim.Justice 17,194 7,003 20,000 20,000 20,000 > Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 1,000 0 U Overtime Reimbursements 0 0 0 1,200 0 Teen Court Reimbursement 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,405 21,272 Q Tax Attorney Fees 50,296 61,551 45,000 0 0 Cr Other Income 107,812 87,449 91,350 99,329 88,620 SRO Reimbursement(BISD) 82,875 82,422 0 0 0 Golf Course Loan Repayment 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,760 N Special Event Donation 8,532 0 0 0 0 Designated Funds for City Hall Project Debt 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 959,062 N SUB-TOTAL $742,156 $767,724 $2,683,835 $2,605,085 $1,626,723 M APPROPRIATION-FUND BALANCE o Legal Settlement&Litigation $0 $94,000 $0 $0 $0 Cr Court Technology Funds 58,860 413,838 0 3,250 0 Utility Assistance Program 6,381 15,000 10,000 1,906 0 pp PEG Fees 0 650,000 5,500 5,500 0 _. Record Preservations Fee 0 60,688 0 8,000 0 j Previous Year Encumbrances 387,534 279,902 0 102,079 0 N General Fund Designated Reserves 0 0 0 1,200,000 0 =, General Fund Undesignated Reserves 0 82,800 0 0 0 SUB-TOTAL $452,775 $1,596,228 $15,500 $1,320,735 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $41,580,870 $42,996,461 $43,685,891 $43,545,550 $43,304,434 O C� O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LiQi/!24 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 3-SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERALFUND 0 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED �- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 U) N City Council $102,795 $102,844 $127,943 $127,943 $129,470 LO City Manager $526,000 $475,273 $605,171 $605,398 $621,833 N 22 Communications 0 Public Information $210,410 $217,512 $224,275 $224,453 $231,763 Citicable 112,037 118,660 128,362 128,362 116,943 0 Total Communications $322,447 $336,172 $352,637 $352,815 $348,706 m City Secretary a> City Secretary $264,577 $280,116 $306,057 $291,057 $305,639 Record Management 158,243 209,888 168,254 191,254 160,774 Total City Secretary $422,820 $490,005 $474,311 $482,311 $466,413 0 Legal $318,493 $268,829 $303,928 $303,928 $304,374 U 0 Human Resources $129,946 $117,203 $124,029 $124,064 $133,415 Q Cr Finance Accounting&Administration $513,596 $435,255 $464,566 $464,011 $4551753 Purchasing 182,112 202,608 210,754 210,754 220,438 N Total Finance $695,709 $637,863 $675,320 $674,765 $676,191 Budget&Research N Budget $117,585 $139,593 $146,044 $145,901 $150,347 M s Tax 211,853 234,395 243,048 205,712 213,638 0 Internal Audit 36,188 22,727 22,783 22,748 23,095 S Cr Total Budget&Research $365,626 $396,715 $411,875 $374,361 $387,080 m Municipal Court _. Administration/Prosecution $413,588 $409,663 $406,751 $414,751 $412,886 LO Court Records 414,656 432,385 461,689 461,063 467,654 N Warrants 379,272 384,540 403,332 403,775 408,228 =, Teen Court 78,208 89,288 105,474 100,474 101,620 Total Municipal Court $1,285,723 $1,315,875 $1,377,246 $1,380,063 $1,390,388 w Planning and Development Planning&Administration 243,930 260,192 259,533 260,019 253,258 > Inspectors 665,130 741,125 767,380 767,202 781,800 W Total Planning and Development $909,060 $1,001,317 $1,026,913 $1,027,221 $1,035,058 0 Economic Development $303,544 $289,945 $322,689 $322,689 $322,219 0 'S Library General Services $190,431 $211,874 $223,189 $223,189 $230,853 Cr Public Services 915,365 896,194 978,189 978,815 998,426 d Technical Services 856,165 883,608 871,935 873,096 875,035 Total Library $1,961,961 $1,991,676 $2,073,313 $2,075,100 $2,104,314 m 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!251 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 3-SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERALFUND 0 ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED �- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 U) N Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Resources $298,353 $352,362 $319,535 $289,713 $295,158 LO Animal Services 646,325 679,458 696,286 709,060 690,184 N Consumer Health 256,314 287,816 305,371 305,371 312,868 r? Code Compliance 339,316 301,705 416,125 446,303 450,435 0 Total Neighborhood Services $1,540,309 $1,621,342 $1,737,317 $1,750,447 $1,748,645 0 Public Works General Services $136,155 $227,721 $347,151 $349,986 $311,760 m Traffic Control 1,023,741 1,024,437 1,084,032 1,093,394 1,128,790 0 Street&Drainage 2,237,775 2,405,245 2,726,713 2,726,958 2,733,917 Total Public Works $3,397,672 $3,657,403 $4,157,896 $4,170,338 $4,174,467 Parks&Recreation > General Services $166,388 $169,995 $179,757 $179,829 $184,052 U Parks Maintenance 929,827 928,344 914,710 912,933 884,943 0 Recreation Services 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102 Q Athletic Program Services 137,032 165,769 172,695 172,695 181,461 C3 Cr Senior Adult Services 235,961 239,170 258,866 258,866 265,727 Youth Outreach&Cultural 37,445 39,343 48,380 48,380 45,443 Total Parks&Recreation $1,993,755 $2,029,723 $2,061,510 $2,059,805 $2,048,728 N Police co General Services $796,945 $851,890 $970,393 $1,018,000 $1,081,382 N Administrative Services 642,817 650,117 480,572 478,338 498,183 M Criminal Investigations 2,126,606 2,238,726 2,302,380 2,293,076 2,333,515 0 Uniform Patrol 4,979,969 5,100,286 5,009,606 5,024,756 5,080,942 S Cr Technical Services 41,600 0 0 0 0 Detention Services 1,335,644 1,314,845 1,381,914 1,390,146 1,515,129 pp Property Evidence 292,188 307,072 348,557 329,971 346,446 _. Communications 1,883,217 1,924,359 2,047,283 2,051,051 2,140,302 LO Total Police $12,098,984 $12,387,294 $12,540,705 $12,585,338 $12,995,899 N Emergency Management $915,788 $837,840 $928,502 $852,626 $986,428 Fire Department General Services $328,151 $350,658 $373,885 $377,861 $385,605 Operations 7,935,231 7,930,185 8,247,593 8,244,876 8,571,547 > Emergency Medical 1,130,163 1,376,834 1,482,529 1,486,790 1,579,668 Fire Inspections 595,742 660,298 610,672 622,301 635,548 0 Total Fire $9,989,287 $10,317,975 $10,714,679 $10,731,828 $11,172,368 a s Building Services $678,270 $705,401 $737,070 $737,070 $848,774 .0 Non Departmental $2,238,435 $2,006,116 $2,313,009 $913,875 $973,331 Cr d SUB-TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $40,196,625 $40,986,812 $43,066,063 $41,651,985 $42,868,101 m 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!252 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 SCHEDULE 3-SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERALFUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED �- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 U) N RESERVES&OTHER EXPENDITURES Reserve for Capital Improvements $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $68,000 $50,000 LO N Transfer to Information Services $69,883 $78,810 $76,788 $77,385 $75,703 22 s O Legal Settlement $12,500 $94,000 $0 $0 $0 O Reserve for Equipment Services Fund $16,507 $0 $21,040 $21,040 $0 m Reserve for PEG Fee $152,961 $168,000 $168,000 $175,000 $179,980 0 Reserve for Records Preservation Fee $0 $4,000 $4,000 $1,640 $0 Transferto Grant Fund $27,217 $0 $0 $0 $0 > U Transfer to Capital Projects $0 $745,992 $0 $1,200,000 $0 Reserve for Transportation Projects $0 $210,719 $200,000 $200,000 $0 C3 Cr Reserve for Neighborhood Revitalization Program $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 N Economic Development Incentives $0 $0 $0 $50,500 $130,650 SUB-TOTAL RESERVES AND OTHER $329,068 $1,351,521 $619,828 $1,893,565 $436,333 N M TOTAL EXPENDITURES $40,525,693 $42,338,333 $43,685,891 $43,545,550 $43,304,434 0 'S Cr BALANCE $1,055,176 $658,128 $0 $0 $0 m LO r` N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!253 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 SCHEDULE 4-SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE: M&O I&S TOTAL Total Appraised Value as of May 29, 2015 5,048,668,465 U) Less Exemptions: N Absolute Exemption (322,159,118) Cases Before ARB (85,431,243) LO Incomplete Accounts (116,134,399) N Disabled Veteran (16,879,995) M Over65 (154,091,594) o Homestead (368,597,246) a> Disabled Persons (7,929,899) Freeport Inventory Value Loss (17,776) Pollution Control/Prorated Absolute (51,409) m Nominal Value Acounts (941,208) o Total Reduction to Values (1,072,233,887) 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE AT JULY 25th 3,976,434,578 > U a> Add: — Estimated Minimum ARB protested values 59,358,642 Cr Incomplete Property 114,394,707 ESTIMATED NET TAXABLE VALUE AT JUNE 25th 4,150,187,927 N ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS: Estimated Net Taxable Value 4,150,187,927 N Less: TIF#1 Incremental Value (7,339,211) 22 Less: TIF#1A Incremental Value 0 0 Less: TIF#2 Incremental Value (287,606,598) Cr Less: Tax Ceiling Taxable Values (434,064,929) Net Taxable Values 3,421,177,189 0 m Proposed Tax Rate per$100 Valuation 0.364731 0.245269 0.610000 LO r` N Estimated Total Tax Levy at 100%Collection 12,478,094 8,391,108 20,869,202 =. Less: Estimated Uncollectable (1.5%) (187,171) (187,171) Less: Estimated I&S Uncollectable (1.5%) (125,867) Estimated Revenue from Property Tax 12,165,056 8,391,108 20,682,031 Estimated Revenue from Property Tax 12,165,056 8,391,108 20,556,164 > Plus: Tax Ceiling Account Revenue 2,334,468 - 2,334,468 0 Less: Estimated Uncollectable (1.5%) (35,017) - (35,017) 0 Plus: TIF Tax Rate Differential (4 cents) 117,978 - 117,978 Less: Estimated I&S Uncollectable(1.5%) (1,770) - (1,770) 0 'S ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX DISTIRBUTION 14,580,715 8,391,108 22,971,823 Cr d m 0 m 0 m Cbdl f tCh/!254 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 6-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M General Debt Service Taxes $6,860,707 $7,074,213 $8,840,000 $8,840,000 $8,391,108 0 TIF#1 and#2 Taxes�'� 3,053,270 3,180,219 0 0 0 '0 SUB-TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES $9,913,977 $10,254,432 $8,840,000 $8,840,000 $8,391,108 0 Transfer in From: m Drainage Utility $774,221 $581,441 $565,838 $565,838 $553,789 a> Park&Rec. Facilities Dev.Corp 364,343 356,218 341,536 341,536 329,005 0 Fleet Services Fund 370,094 393,134 447,714 447,714 440,414 Facilities Services Fund 20,752 25,409 24,670 24,670 27,399 Gas Development Fund 439,843 212,053 0 0 0 > SUB-TOTAL TRANSFER IN $1,969,253 $1,568,255 $1,379,758 $1,379,758 $1,350,607 U 0 Proceeds �- Bond Issuance Program $0 $3,936,985 $137,324 $137,324 $0 Cr Interest Income 2,971 14,699 7,000 12,029 12,100 City of Watauga,CIP Participation 82,853 82,853 82,853 82,853 82,853 Miscellaneous Revenues 195,401 1 0 0 0 N Transfer In 0 0 0 0 2,424,790 Appropriation of Fund Balance 58,058 994,243 648,073 648,073 0 SUB-TOTAL OTHER $339,282 $5,028,780 $875,250 $880,279 $2,519,743 N M TOTAL REVENUES $12,222,512 $16,851,467 $11,095,008 $11,100,037 $12,261,458 0 'S EXPENDITURES Cr 0 Existing Bonds&C.O.'s $8,065,577 $9,065,998 $10,854,508 $10,854,508 $12,204,458 m Existing Loans 549,205 316,690 0 0 0 LO TIF#1 and#2 Funding 3,053,270 3,180,219 0 0 0 Issuance Costs/Paying Agent Fees 148,208 185,614 240,500 240,500 57,000 Bond Defeaseance/Refunding 0 3,936,985 0 0 0 . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $11,816,260 $16,685,505 $11,095,008 $11,095,008 $12,261,458 BALANCE $406,252 $165,962 $0 $5,029 $0 0 O C� O 'S Cr d m O m O Notes: Beginning in Fiscal Year 2014/2015,TIF activitiy will be reported on Schedule 7-Tax Increment Financing Fund m Cbdl f LiCh/!255 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 6-SUMMARY OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCE(TIF)DISTICT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION 0 NET TAXABLE VALUE: U) Q0 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1 N Taxable Value(2015 Tax Year) $8,492,140 S Less: Base Taxable Value(1998 Tax Year) 1,152,929 N Taxable Value Increment(2015 Tax Year) Gain/(Loss): $7,339,211 M s o_ TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1A 0 0 Taxable Value(2015 Tax Year) $70,012,773 "— Less: Base Taxable Value(2008 Tax Year) 83,563,510 m Taxable Value Increment(2015 Tax Year) Gain/(Loss): ($13,550,737) 0 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#2 Taxable Value(2015 Tax Year) $327,613,759 > Less: Base Taxable Value(1998 Tax Year) 40,020,188 U Taxable Value Increment(2015 Tax Year) Gain/(Loss): $287,593,571 0 Cr N ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE Q0 N M TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1 Current Taxable Value Increment:TIF District#1 $7,339,211 0 'S Tax Rate per$100 Valuation and Inception $0.57 Cr Estimated TIF District#1 Property Tax Revenue at 100% $41,834 0 Estimated Collection Rate 98.50% m Estimated TIF District#1 Property Tax Revenue $41,206 N_ TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1A Current Taxable Value Increment:TIF District#1A $0 Tax Rate per$100 Valuation and Inception $0.57 Estimated TIF District#1A Property Tax Revenue at 100% $0 Estimated Collection Rate 98.50% Estimated TIF District#1A Property Tax Revenue $0 0 0 C� TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#2 Current Taxable Value Increment:TIF District#2 $287,593,571 0 'S Tax Rate per$100 Valuation and Inception $0.57 Estimated TIF District#2 Property Tax Revenue at 100% $1,639,283 Cr Estimated Collection Rate 98.50% _d Estimated TIF District#2 Property Tax Revenue $1,614,694 —: m 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE(') $1,655,900 m Notes: The information presented on this schedule represents the contribution of the City of North Richland Hills to the Tax Increment Financing Districts in which it participates. This schedule does not reflect the contribution of other entities. m Cbdl f LiCh/!256 iii ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 7-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FUND 0 U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO N TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1 r? s 0 REVENUES 0 Tax Increment Financing District#1 Taxes y- City of North Richland Hills $0 $0 $44,098 $44,098 $41,206 m Tarrant County Hospital District 0 0 16,726 16,726 16,726 Tarrant County College District 0 0 10,972 10,972 10,972 0 Tarrant County 0 0 19,376 19,376 19,376 Birdville ISD 0 0 105,318 105,318 105,318 Sub-Total $0 $0 $196,490 $196,490 $193,598 0 Other Funding Sources U 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance $0 $0 $498,953 $498,953 $487,920 4- Sub-Total $0 $0 $498,953 $498,953 $487,920 Cr TOTAL REVENUES $0 $0 $695,443 $695,443 $681,518 EXPENDITURES&TRANSFERS N TIF#1 Debt Service $0 $0 $695,443 $695,443 $681,518 (.0 N Sub-Total $0 $0 $695,443 $695,443 $681,518 M TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $695,443 $695,443 $681,518 0 'S BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cr 0 m LO r` N TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#2 REVENUES Tax Increment Financing District#2 Taxes City of North Richland Hills $0 $0 $1,508,216 $1,508,216 $1,614,694 0 Tarrant County Hospital District 0 0 622,447 622,447 753,805 Tarrant County College District 0 0 408,366 408,366 494,495 Tarrant County 0 0 721,054 721,054 873,222 S Sub-Total $0 $0 $3,260,083 $3,260,083 $3,736,216 TOTAL REVENUES $0 $0 $3,260,083 $3,260,083 $3,736,216 Cr d EXPENDITURES&TRANSFERS m 0 TIF#2 Debt Service $0 $0 $2,494,975 $2,494,975 $2,369,203 "- Sub-Total $0 $0 $2,494,975 $2,494,975 $2,369,203 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $2,494,975 $2,494,975 $2,369,203 LP BALANCE $0 $0 $765,108 $765,108 $1,367,013 0 Note: Tax Increment Financing District information was previously reflected as part of Schedule 5-General Debt Service Fund m Cbdl f LiCh/!257 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 SCHEDULE 8-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 LO REVENUES N Sales Tax $4,343,358 $4,506,169 $4,547,801 $4,616,928 $4,800,921 co Interest Income 5,379 16,754 7,700 13,700 18,000 0 Youth Assn.Maintenance Fees 56,037 70,183 54,500 57,000 60,000 F Tennis Center Revenue 364,603 358,932 386,850 348,498 355,550 O Transfer in from Aquatic Park Fund 71,548 75,125 77,379 77,379 81,248 Park Impact Fees 110,761 78,513 25,000 70,864 70,000 pp Insurance 5,191 0 0 0 0 a> Other Income 2,545 67,352 1,500 19,664 11000 O SUB-TOTAL $4,959,422 $5,173,028 $5,100,730 $5,204,033 $5,386,719 s NRH CENTRE > Memberships/Drop-In Passes $1,308,667 $1,406,005 $1,386,900 $1,410,000 $1,420,000 U Fitness 338,251 345,720 368,000 371,005 363,000 Recreation/Sports 263,439 248,742 259,610 263,664 291,340 Grand Hall Rental 129,542 149,737 165,000 174,105 166,800 Cr Cr Catering&Event Fees 13,368 11,665 17,000 17,000 17,000 Aquatic Programs 81,560 182,826 180,600 189,000 189,000 Pool Rental 5,646 4,239 5,400 5,400 5,400 N Gym Rental 5,910 2,592 3,100 3,100 31100 Concessiongs/Merchandise 29,580 28,113 25,000 28,838 27,000 (.0 Special Events 10,542 8,635 10,000 10,000 10,000 N Other 108,326 26,441 13,700 13,125 13,500 22 General Fund 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102 SUB-TOTAL $2,781,933 $2,901,817 $2,921,412 $2,972,339 $2,993,242 Cr APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE m Appropriation-Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 _ SUB-TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LO r` TOTAL REVENUES $7,741,355 $8,074,844 $8,022,142 $8,176,372 $8,379,961 O C� O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!258 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 SCHEDULE 8-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 LO EXPENDITURES N M OPERATING Park Facilities Development Admin. $680,471 $695,247 $709,231 $711,278 $733,034 O Parks&Public Grounds 1,701,318 1,831,093 2,006,358 2,002,685 2,022,335 O Tennis Center Operations 573,145 538,224 628,662 628,036 625,843 SUB-TOTAL $2,954,934 $3,064,564 $3,344,251 $3,341,999 $3,381,212 pp a> NRH CENTRE O Center Management $609,060 $631,316 $676,291 $678,291 $686,952 Fitness 294,418 323,072 344,197 346,297 449,656 Building Operations 168,211 184,078 200,096 200,096 209,180 Aquatic 481,301 520,878 525,536 525,536 556,618 U Recreation Sports 279,238 284,362 342,678 342,678 348,561 Event Center 154,901 196,329 250,109 250,109 287,869 Building Services 430,050 331,300 320,000 320,000 360,750 Cr SUB-TOTAL $2,417,180 $2,471,336 $2,658,907 $2,663,007 $2,899,586 OTHER&RESERVES N Debt Services-CO's 364,343 356,218 341,536 341,536 329,055 Indirect Costs 367,635 386,017 405,318 417,943 449,959 (.0 Non-Departmental 47,309 37,354 37,383 39,635 44,130 N Transfer to Capital Projects 0 0 0 221,278 972,000 22 Reserve for Capital 1,115,423 1,255,521 858,592 726,219 90,340 0 Reserve for Economic Development 109,778 112,836 113,653 115,423 120,023 Reserve for NRH Centre 364,754 390,999 262,502 309,332 93,656 Cr SUB-TOTAL $2,369,241 $2,538,945 $2,018,984 $2,171,366 $2,099,163 m TOTAL EXPENDITURES $7,741,355 $8,074,844 $8,022,142 $8,176,372 $8,379,961 LO r` BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O C� O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!259 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 9-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N Sales Tax $4,329,737 $4,491,735 $4,547,801 $4,598,460 $4,781,717 co Franchise Tax 71,037 101,908 81,000 95,538 87,711 0 Interest Income 2,334 1,426 2,200 2,200 2,200 F SRO Reimbursement(BISD) 0 0 174,244 174,244 198,650 O Appropriation of Fund Balance 15,000 0 61,922 17,439 0 SUB-TOTAL $4,418,108 $4,595,069 $4,867,167 $4,887,881 $5,070,278 pp a> EXPENDITURES O Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Administrative Services 513,320 564,656 747,467 744,787 795,587 Investigations 436,689 379,865 471,496 470,035 478,490 Uniform Patrol 2,570,542 2,626,202 2,844,326 2,838,032 2,865,959 U Technical Services 506,183 498,409 521,810 522,104 509,612 Property Evidence 106,703 102,439 147,338 150,160 193,889 �. SUB-TOTAL $4,133,437 $4,171,571 $4,732,437 $4,725,118 $4,853,537 Cr Cr OTHER&RESERVES Partner Agency Funding 38,249 46,360 57,205 65,294 59,566 N Other 62,120 76,604 77,525 84,844 83,034 Indirect Costs 0 0 0 12,625 24,375 (.0 Reserves 184,302 80,281 0 0 0 N SUB-TOTAL $284,671 $203,245 $134,730 $162,763 $166,975 M s O TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,418,108 $4,374,816 $4,867,167 $4,887,881 $5,020,512 Cr 0- BALANCE $0 $220,254 $0 $0 $49,766 W m LO r` N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LiQi/!25 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 10-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PROMOTIONAL FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M Occupancey Tax Proceeds $221,003 $206,930 $215,000 $219,473 $224,400 0 Interest Income 745 2,737 1,400 2,544 2,900 F SUB-TOTAL $221,748 $209,667 $216,400 $222,017 $227,300 O TOAL REVENUES $221,748 $209,667 $216,400 $222,017 $227,300 Op a> EXPENDITURES 0 Economic Development $101,203 $108,822 $112,196 $112,196 $114,627 Cultural&Leisure 82,420 84,576 103,989 103,989 111,463 s Non-Departmental 250 254 215 215 212 > SUB-TOTAL $183,873 $193,652 $216,400 $216,400 $226,302 U a> TOTAL EXPENDITURES $183,873 $193,652 $216,400 $216,400 $226,302 .- Cr BALANCE $37,875 $16,015 $0 $5,617 $998 N N M O 'S Cr Q O m r LO r` N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LICh/261 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 11 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DONATIONS FUND 0 U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M Contributions NRH Water Bills $67,000 $61,598 $57,737 $57,182 $52,608 0 SUB-TOTAL $67,000 $61,598 $57,737 $57,182 $52,608 0 Donations pp Spay/Neuter $8,852 $6,609 $15,000 $13,808 $11,000 a) Shelter Fund 5,951 54,646 46,500 49,650 57,500 0 Duncan 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,250 15,000 Santa Cops 4,651 4,394 4,000 5,800 51000 SUB-TOTAL $34,455 $80,649 $80,500 $84,508 $88,500 0 U Proceeds 0 Library Book Sale $9,245 $11,425 $8,500 $9,540 $9,000 SUB-TOTAL $9,245 $11,425 $8,500 $9,540 $9,000 Cr Other Interest Income $1,481 $4,242 $2,500 $3,486 $3,900 N Other Income 28,174 35,563 46,200 80,834 63,403 Appropriation of Fund Balance Teen Court 0 0 0 0 3,000 N Library 0 0 38,365 19,546 21,068 M Neighborhood Services 0 452,000 0 58,500 0 0 Parks&Recreations 0 0 43,700 40,908 37,986 S Police 0 0 3,600 1,100 3,050 Cr SUB-TOTAL $28,174 $487,563 $131,865 $200,888 $132,407 m TOTAL REVENUES $140,354 $645,477 $281,102 $355,604 $282,515 r` EXPENDITURES N Library-Book Collection $16,270 $34,034 $58,865 $58,865 $58,865 Neighborhood Services Animal Services 21,899 24,477 25,310 31,446 15,500 Keep NRH Beautiful 11,994 9,168 14,999 14,999 19,969 Municipal Court-Teen Court 2,500 4,250 1,000 7,000 7,000 Parks-Special Events and Arts 2,498 9,078 60,000 60,000 61,000 Police Department 9,668 17,111 10,000 25,550 35,450 0 Transfer to Capital Projects 0 470,900 0 78,500 771797 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $64,830 $569,019 $170,174 $276,360 $275,581 0 'S BALANCE $75,524 $76,459 $110,928 $79,244 $6,934 d m 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LICh/262 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 12-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N Forefeited Funds $323,285 $107,275 $135,250 $129,019 $71,000 M AFIS Reimbursements 12,920 12,759 13,500 12,759 13,500 0 911 Telecom 118,903 178,853 116,000 116,068 0 Interest Income 790 3,885 2,100 3,357 4,100 O Appropriation of Fund Balance 252,285 345,923 28,650 68,296 45,000 TOTAL REVENUES $708,184 $651,224 $295,500 $329,499 $133,600 pp a> EXPENDITURES O Federal Forefeited Funds $145,012 $75,877 $110,000 $134,889 $75,000 State Forfeitured Funds 31,111 21,564 55,000 55,000 40,000 Local Forfeited Funds 6,382 3,000 1,000 1,500 11000 U AFIS Maintenance&Equipment 12,532 14,145 13,500 18,685 13,500 911 Telecom 118,903 178,204 0 0 0 .. Leose Contributions 1,184 886 0 0 0 Cr Cr Reserve for City Hall Project: 911 Telecom 0 54,810 55,000 55,010 0 Public Safety Answering Point(PSAP) 0 0 61,000 61,058 0 N Automated Fingerprint Identification Sys.(AFIS) 0 75,000 0 0 0 Reserves 0 200,000 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $315,123 $623,486 $295,500 $326,142 $129,500 N M BALANCE $393,060 $27,738 $0 $3,357 $4,100 0 'S Cr Q O m r LO N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LICh/263 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 13-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND o U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M Drainage Fees $852,856 $861,332 $860,000 $871,386 $880,100 0 Interest Income 1,613 8,751 3,900 4,345 5,000 F Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 0 800,000 0 O SUB-TOTAL $854,469 $870,083 $863,900 $1,675,731 $885,100 - m TOTAL REVENUES $854,469 $870,083 $863,900 $1,675,731 $885,100 a> 0 EXPENDITURES s Debt Service $774,221 $581,441 $565,838 $565,838 $553,789 0 Transfer to Capital Projects 0 0 0 800,000 95,000 U Other Expenditures 1,947 67,377 35,000 39,372 30,000 a> TOTAL EXPENDITURES $776,168 $648,818 $600,838 $1,405,210 $678,789 Cr BALANCE $78,302 $221,266 $263,062 $270,521 $206,311 N N M O 'S Cr Q O m r LO N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LICh/264 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 14-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GAS DEVELOPMENT FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M BONUSES General Fund Purposes $0 $110,423 $0 $0 $0 SUB-TOTAL $0 $110,423 $0 $0 $0 O ROYALITIES/OVERRIDES pp General Fund Purposes $920,757 $1,187,340 $1,080,000 $680,000 $650,000 SUB-TOTAL $920,757 $1,187,340 $1,080,000 $680,000 $650,000 O OTHER Right of Way Usage Fees $2,160 $0 $0 $3,160 $0 Interest Income 0 22,693 16,300 16,300 12,000 U SUB-TOTAL $2,160 $22,693 $16,300 $19,460 $12,000 a> APPROPRIATION OF RESERVES Cr General Fund Purposes $439,843 $0 $0 $0 $0 SUB-TOTAL $439,843 $3,226,239 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $1,362,760 $4,546,696 $1,096,300 $699,460 $662,000 N EXPENDITURES N M OPERATING Transfer to Debt Service $439,843 $212,053 $0 $0 $0 'S Transfer to Capital Projects 61,000 3,814,337 0 20,000 0 Cr TOTAL EXPENDITURES $500,843 $4,026,390 $0 $20,000 $0 a> m BALANCE $861,917 $520,306 $1,096,300 $679,460 $662,000 LO N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LICh/265 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 16-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N Gross Fine Revenues $923,282 $990,714 $939,175 $1,147,321 $990,960 M Interest Income 3,491 1,389 900 2,249 2,100 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 125,000 0 0 0 •0 TOTAL REVENUES $926,773 $1,117,103 $940,075 $1,149,570 $993,060 O m EXPENDITURES a> Contractor Payments $571,358 $571,100 $612,000 $612,000 $612,000 0 Program Administration 153,879 163,993 188,906 194,350 197,684 Payment to State $94,461 $128,249 $70,700 $170,486 $90,638 Traffic Enforcement $0 $23,690 $0 $37,522 $18,100 Pedestrian Safety 14,611 14,617 15,224 15,224 14,887 U Transfer to Fleet Services Fund 60,000 0 0 0 0 a> Transfer to Capital Projects 0 100,000 0 0 0 SUB-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES $894,309 $1,001,649 $886,830 $1,029,582 $933,309 Cr TOTAL EXPENDITURES $894,309 $1,001,649 $886,830 $1,029,582 $933,309 N BALANCE $32,464 $115,453 $53,245 $119,988 $59,751 N M O 'S Cr Q O m r LO N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LICh/266 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 16-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES UTILITY FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED (.0 N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M WATER SALES AND CHARGES Water Sales $19,656,674 $18,944,136 $20,099,458 $18,474,864 $19,652,919 O Water Taps 44,660 22,830 34,412 34,412 34,200 O Water Inspection Fees 12,444 27,216 11,000 33,213 22,000 Water Wells 12,534 0 0 0 0 pp SUB-TOTAL $19,726,312 $18,994,182 $20,144,870 $18,542,489 $19,709,119 a) O SEWER SALES AND CHARGES Sewer Sales $9,803,411 $10,195,936 $10,320,773 $10,350,856 $10,517,612 Sewer Taps 12,250 7,650 9,683 9,683 9,700 Sewer Inspection Fees 9,307 25,364 9,000 27,161 16,250 U SUB-TOTAL $9,824,968 $10,228,951 $10,339,456 $10,387,700 $10,543,562 MISCELLANEOUS Cr Cr Interest Income $68,660 $89,717 $52,700 $71,878 $88,700 Service Charges 102,630 97,646 102,300 86,613 100,900 Late Charges 482,333 456,298 484,359 431,752 476,000 N Miscellaneous 17,617 326,554 18,000 43,148 17,700 Joint Use Reimbursement-Watauga 138,831 84,842 108,817 108,817 101,440 Subdivision Meter Revenue 36,335 20,813 29,212 44,145 41,500 N SUB-TOTAL $846,406 $1,075,870 $795,388 $786,353 $826,240 <> s O APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE S Prior Year Encumbrances $0 $47,577 $0 $0 $0 Cr c- Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 0 1,322,000 0 a> SUB-TOTAL $0 $47,577 $0 $0 $0 m TOTAL REVENUES $30,397,686 $30,346,579 $31,279,714 $31,038,542 $31,078,921 `n N O O O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LICh/267 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 16-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES UTILITY FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED (.0 N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO EXPENDITURES N M OPERATING Administration $274,698 $283,282 $307,720 $307,153 $318,735 0 Development 784,500 768,709 856,769 838,505 829,578 0 Right of Way Maintenance 146,594 193,756 200,000 155,000 233,754 SUB-TOTAL $1,205,792 $1,245,747 $1,364,489 $1,300,658 $1,382,067 pp a> WATER SERVICES 0 Water Operations $3,932,239 $3,929,562 $4,652,964 $4,383,887 $4,686,004 Purchase of Water FTW 3,760,119 3,447,416 5,018,705 4,281,717 4,625,652 Purchase of Water TRA 4,507,960 4,804,780 5,000,000 4,630,568 5,236,000 0 SUB-TOTAL $12,200,318 $12,181,757 $14,671,669 $13,296,172 $14,547,656 U 0 SEWER SERVICES Sewer Operations $1,190,306 $1,230,096 $1,386,320 $1,383,487 $1,420,079 Cr Sewer Treatment FTW 1,358,282 1,438,001 1,420,242 1,423,100 1,367,645 Sewer Treatment TRA 3,357,188 3,605,545 3,572,771 3,602,954 3,365,042 SUB-TOTAL $5,905,776 $6,273,642 $6,379,333 $6,409,541 $6,152,766 N FINANCE/UTILITY COLLECTIONS Meter Reading $428,983 $467,568 $471,501 $474,993 $476,385 N Utility Billing/Customer Service 798,650 804,039 843,335 840,635 836,432 M Utility Collection Services 271,018 276,209 288,922 288,386 276,711 0 Accounting Services 269,066 370,773 395,312 374,161 388,424 S Budget&Research 190,881 199,830 209,292 209,470 212,697 Cr SUB-TOTAL $1,958,599 $2,118,420 $2,208,362 $2,187,645 $2,190,649 m Building Services $1,436,074 $1,493,517 $1,598,063 $1,598,063 $1,752,816 LO Non Departmental $272,297 $170,018 $342,323 $282,737 $262,951 SUB-TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $22,978,856 $23,483,100 $26,564,239 $25,074,816 $26,288,905 OTHER&RESERVES Debt Service $1,007,954 $1,017,980 $1,091,530 $1,091,530 $1,066,480 Franchise Fees 847,359 856,215 912,607 852,104 905,116 Indirect Costs 1,895,976 1,990,775 2,090,315 2,090,315 2,194,830 0 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 356,279 384,156 382,777 382,777 387,493 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to Information Services Fund 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 0 Contribution to Equipment Services 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Transfer to Capital 0 0 0 1,322,000 0 Reserve for Capital 3,086,262 137,347 13,246 0 0 Cr SUB-TOTAL $7,418,830 $4,611,474 $4,715,475 $5,963,726 $4,778,919 �- m TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,397,687 $28,094,574 $31,279,714 $31,038,542 $31,067,824 0 BALANCE $0 $2,252,005 $0 $0 $11,097 m 0 m Cbdl f LICh/268 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 17-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AQUATIC PARK FUND 0 U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO ATTENDANCE 242,504 219,077 255,000 241,000 255,000 N M REVENUES 0 OPERATING 0 Admissions $3,278,623 $3,000,518 $3,442,500 $3,234,779 $3,442,029 Food and Beverage 779,507 741,937 897,600 856,669 891,635 pp Merchandise 127,047 116,258 147,900 133,728 142,087 a> Rentals 154,566 139,929 156,099 153,458 161,646 0 Aquatic Classes/Special Events 0 2,913 0 7,881 0 SUB-TOTAL $4,339,742 $4,001,556 $4,644,099 $4,386,515 $4,637,397 OTHER REVENUES U Interest Income $3,506 $17,313 $7,600 $9,866 $12,600 0 Other Income (47,488) 18,414 17,200 40,407 17,200 Q SUB-TOTAL ($43,982) $35,727 $24,800 $50,273 $29,800 Cr SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $4,295,760 $4,037,283 $4,668,899 $4,436,788 $4,667,197 N APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE Appropriation of Fund Balance $290,477 $309,051 $0 $575,000 $0 (.0 SUB-TOTAL $290,477 $309,051 $0 $575,000 $0 N M TOTAL REVENUES $4,586,237 $4,346,334 $4,668,899 $5,011,788 $4,667,197 0 'S Cr EXPENDITURES 0 m OPERATING General Services&Utilities $755,156 $797,200 $887,078 $824,577 $903,246 LO Public Grounds/Aquatics/Maint. 1,151,316 1,117,098 1,224,468 1,161,611 1,226,141 N Business&Office Administration 522,527 538,927 573,321 585,840 589,995 Gift Shop/Concessions 602,371 516,169 569,660 550,598 595,592 .. Sales/Special Events/Admissions 262,807 243,275 272,212 259,865 270,282 SUB-TOTAL $3,294,177 $3,212,669 $3,526,739 $3,382,491 $3,585,256 OTHER&RESERVES > Debt Service $1,050,492 $873,487 $771,316 $771,316 $693,718 Indirect Costs 137,088 143,942 151,139 151,139 158,696 0 0 Transfer Out-PARD 71,548 75,125 77,379 77,379 81,248 a Transfer to Capital Projects 0 0 0 575,000 0 Reserve For Infrastructure&Major Repairs 0 0 102,051 14,188 104,436 0 Non-Departmental 32,932 41,111 40,275 40,275 43,843 S SUB-TOTAL $1,292,060 $1,133,665 $1,142,160 $1,629,297 $1,081,941 07 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,586,237 $4,346,334 $4,668,899 $5,011,788 $4,667,197 m BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LICh/269 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 SCHEDULE 18-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GOLF COURSE FUND 0 U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 LO ROUNDS 50,524 48,299 51,300 44,864 49,515 N M REVENUES 0 Green Fees $919,499 $854,791 $957,518 $914,877 $970,924 0 Pro Shop 415,859 407,591 375,856 377,056 375,856 Driving Range 76,078 82,349 80,500 80,500 80,500 m Carts 398,651 375,051 391,436 391,436 391,436 0 0 Food&Beverage 609,922 642,222 589,027 630,468 614,512 General&Administrative 4,442 1,550 0 0 0 Other Revenue 38,310 49,600 1,000 1,000 1,100 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance 216,100 0 0 0 0 U SUB-TOTAL $2,678,861 $2,413,154 $2,395,337 $2,395,337 $2,434,328 COST OF GOODS SOLD Q Pro Shop $141,078 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cr Food&Beverage 191,113 0 0 0 0 TOTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD $332,191 $0 $0 $0 $0 N NET REVENUES $2,346,669 $2,413,153 $2,395,337 $2,395,337 $2,434,328 N M EXPENDITURES 0 'S OPERATING Cr Pro Shop $150,752 $158,582 $165,718 $165,718 $162,461 0 Pro Shop:Cost of Goods Sold 0 146,135 143,140 143,140 143,140 m Driving Range 10,361 9,504 13,000 13,000 10,900 =° Golf Carts 232,628 220,480 231,999 231,999 228,050 LO Course Maintenance 548,172 580,076 601,500 601,500 594,894 N Food&Beverage 255,793 238,895 250,211 250,211 250,355 =• Food&Beverage:Cost of Goods Sold 0 194,675 191,434 191,434 191,434 Sales&Membership 52,454 55,424 50,501 50,501 54,370 General&Administrative 228,983 260,917 239,771 239,771 243,933 Clubhouse 112,920 113,120 115,880 115,883 123,894 Management Fees 147,874 134,452 119,535 119,535 108,891 > Capital 99,329 0 0 0 62,400 dj SUB-TOTAL $1,839,267 $2,112,259 $2,122,689 $2,122,692 $2,174,722 0 OTHER&RESERVES o Debt Service $126,724 $120,414 $119,500 $119,500 $111,600 S Payment to Interdepartmental Loans General Fund 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,760 Cr Reserve for Eqiupment/CIP 232,918 32,720 5,385 5,385 0 d SUB-TOTAL $507,402 $300,894 $272,645 $272,645 $259,360 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,346,669 $2,413,153 $2,395,337 $2,395,337 $2,434,082 0 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $246 m 0 m Cbdl f LiCi/!26 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 19-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FACILITIES/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FUND U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M CHARGES FOR SERVICE o Transfer From: General Fund $678,270 $705,401 $737,070 $737,070 $848,774 O Park Development Fund 430,050 331,300 320,000 320,000 360,750 Utility Fund 1,436,074 1,493,517 1,598,063 1,598,063 1,752,816 m SUB-TOTAL $2,544,394 $2,530,218 $2,655,133 $2,655,133 $2,962,340 O OTHER REVENUES Insurance Settlements $0 $0 $0 $24,587 $0 Interest Income 23,427 7,050 5,700 10,473 11,800 > Rent From Rental Properties 72,820 63,240 78,000 78,000 78,000 Other Income 23,252 20,758 13,500 16,702 13,500 SUB-TOTAL $119,500 $91,048 $97,200 $129,762 $103,300 Q Cr SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $2,663,894 $2,621,266 $2,752,333 $2,784,895 $3,065,640 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE N Building Services Fund Reserves $0 $40,000 $56,784 $240,485 $15,356 SUB-TOTAL $0 $40,000 $56,784 $240,485 $15,356 N TOAL REVENUES $2,663,894 $2,661,266 $2,809,117 $3,025,380 $3,080,996 M s O EXPENDITURES Cr General Services $254,699 $322,209 $322,247 $322,247 $330,194 Building Servcies 1,809,079 1,856,409 2,077,121 2,288,600 2,465,505 pp Rental Property Program 49,859 38,991 56,910 56,910 56,910 -. Transfer to Capital Budget 322,099 127,420 294,000 294,000 165,000 LO SUB-TOTAL $2,435,736 $2,345,029 $2,750,278 $2,961,757 $3,017,609 N OTHER&RESERVES Debt Service $20,752 $25,409 $24,670 $24,670 $27,399 Other 11,258 12,860 13,079 13,090 14,898 Reserve for Rental Property 22,961 21,090 21,090 21,090 21,090 SUB-TOTAL $54,971 $59,359 $58,839 $58,850 $63,387 > W TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,490,707 $2,404,388 $2,809,117 $3,020,607 $3,080,996 0 BALANCE $173,187 $256,878 $0 $4,773 $0 O 'S Cr d m O m O m Cbdl f LIChP271 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 20-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FLEET SERVICES FUND 0 U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M CHARGES FOR SERVICE o Transfer From: General Fund $1,000,864 $1,082,422 $1,190,157 $1,190,157 $1,273,468 0 Utility Fund 1,529,700 1,636,780 1,751,354 1,751,354 1,873,949 Utility CIP/Utility Construction 224,425 240,135 256,945 256,945 274,931 m Crime Control District 132,493 141,768 151,692 151,692 162,310 0 0 Park&Recreation Dev. Fund 111,902 119,735 128,117 128,117 137,085 Other Funds 45,134 48,293 35,851 35,851 38,360 SUB-TOTAL $3,044,518 $3,269,133 $3,514,116 $3,514,116 $3,760,103 OTHER REVENUES U Interst Income $5,494 $17,257 $6,900 $12,651 $14,300 Sale of City Property 11,528 51,467 20,000 55,214 25,000 Q Other Income 38,183 51,562 12,000 32,039 12,090 C3 Cr Transfer from General Fund 16,507 0 21,040 21,040 0 Transfer from Traffic Safety Fund 60,000 0 0 0 0 Transfer from Utility Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 N SUB-TOTAL $181,713 $170,286 $109,940 $170,944 $101,390 N SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $3,226,231 $3,439,419 $3,624,056 $3,685,060 $3,861,493 M s APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE 0 Equipment Services Fund Reserves $208,717 $359,663 $204,410 $536,618 $50,000 Cr Appropriation-PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 5,646 0 SUB-TOTAL $208,717 $359,663 $204,410 $542,264 $50,000 m TOAL REVENUES $3,434,948 $3,799,082 $3,828,466 $4,227,324 $3,911,493 LO N EXPENDITURES =• General Services $339,706 $344,853 $350,931 $351,401 $325,187 Equipment Services Operations 1,651,351 1,639,640 1,735,876 1,735,950 1,624,748 Fire Fleet Maintenance 240,653 316,505 279,972 281,133 302,432 Equipment Purchases 403,570 321,224 342,915 346,353 675,660 Fire Vehicles/Equipment 26,534 178,058 60,437 62,645 0 > Police Vehicles/Equipment 392,195 342,104 548,115 550,323 429,347 aD SUB-TOTAL $3,054,008 $3,142,385 $3,318,246 $3,327,805 $3,357,374 0 OTHER&RESERVES Debt Service $370,094 $393,134 $447,714 $447,714 $480,406 0 'S Transfer to Capital Projects 0 0 0 330,000 0 Other 10,845 12,428 12,506 12,506 14,439 Cr Equipment Services Reserve 0 50,000 50,000 49,173 50,000 d SUB-TOTAL $380,939 $455,562 $510,220 $839,393 $544,845 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,434,947 $3,597,947 $3,828,466 $4,167,198 $3,902,219 0 BALANCE $0 $201,135 $0 $60,126 $9,274 m 0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!272 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 21 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND 0 U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M TELECOMMUNICATIONS o Transfer From: General Fund $280,455 $288,487 $294,255 $325,876 $337,942 0 Park Fund 30,716 31,594 32,227 32,387 34,007 Crime Control District 25,346 26,071 26,592 26,592 27,922 m Utility Fund 75,765 77,930 79,490 81,048 85,226 0 0 Other Funds 50,287 51,727 52,763 58,297 61,220 SUB-TOTAL $462,569 $475,809 $485,327 $524,200 $546,317 s 0 COMPUTERS U Transfer From: General Fund $890,266 $914,506 $932,796 $932,796 $979,436 Park Fund 97,571 100,363 102,370 102,370 107,489 Q Crime Control District 163,066 167,732 171,086 171,086 179,640 C3 Cr Utility Fund 635,253 653,435 666,505 666,505 699,831 Other Funds 267,971 275,641 281,155 281,155 295,212 SUB-TOTAL $2,054,127 $2,111,677 $2,153,912 $2,153,912 $2,261,608 N OTHER REVENUES N Interest Income $2,320 $14,495 $6,700 $9,047 $11,200 M Transmitter Lease 133,455 151,957 145,012 145,012 145,012 Other Income 23,020 21,314 18,410 22,358 14,903 0 Transfer from General Fund 69,883 78,810 76,788 76,788 75,703 Cr Transfer from Utility Fund 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 SUB-TOTAL $403,678 $441,575 $421,910 $428,205 $421,818 m SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $2,920,374 $3,029,061 $3,061,149 $3,106,317 $3,229,743 LO N APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE _• Prior Year Encumbrances $0 $0 $0 $110,429 $0 Appropriation of Information Systems Reserves 0 79,203 0 1,228,944 0 SUB-TOTAL $0 $79,203 $0 $1,339,373 $0 TOAL REVENUES $2,920,374 $3,108,264 $3,061,149 $4,445,690 $3,229,743 > 0 EXPENDITURES 0 General Services $232,080 $237,121 $247,632 $247,632 $254,881 a Major Computer Systems 273,071 287,809 321,634 419,053 330,392 Microcomputer Systems 717,206 649,216 719,091 720,341 729,128 S Telecommunications 288,084 291,717 343,260 382,133 378,640 Data Network 592,221 685,456 655,183 657,493 651,668 Cr GIS System 146,190 163,435 186,096 186,096 182,804 d Public Safety 394,918 448,481 468,209 477,659 464,333 co SUB-TOTAL $2,643,769 $2,763,234 $2,941,105 $3,090,407 $2,991,846 0 OTHER&RESERVES Other $6,789 $8,238 $8,614 $8,614 $10,387 Transfer to Capital Projects 0 0 0 1,228,944 0 Reserve for System Improvements 0 1,610 111,430 117,725 227,510 m SUB-TOTAL $6,789 $9,848 $120,044 $1,355,283 $237,897 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,650,558 $2,773,082 $3,061,149 $4,445,690 $3,229,743 BALANCE $269,816 $335,182 $0 $0 $0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!273 ATTAC H M FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 SCHEDULE 22-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SELF INSURANCE FUND o U) ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED N ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 LO REVENUES N M ALLOCATIONS o Health/Medical $8,389,915 $8,747,608 $9,131,504 $9,131,504 $9,632,358 0 Worker's Compensation 500,390 531,480 591,441 591,441 583,470 Administration Allocation 469,673 486,621 477,568 477,565 422,093 m Other Insurance 486,559 572,841 574,920 574,920 557,920 0 0 SUB-TOTAL $9,846,537 $10,338,550 $10,775,433 $10,775,430 $11,195,841 OTHER REVENUES Interest Income $0 $46,440 $24,000 $40,732 $48,445 > Other Income 104,910 99,497 95,800 280,987 95,800 Expenditure Reimbursement 449,084 370,394 0 422,054 200,000 SUB-TOTAL $553,994 $516,332 $119,800 $743,773 $344,245 Q Cr SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $10,400,531 $10,854,882 $10,895,233 $11,519,203 $11,540,086 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE N Self Insurance Fund Reserves $225,388 $423,968 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Health Claim Offset(ERRP Funds) 85,765 0 0 0 0 N SUB-TOTAL $311,153 $423,968 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 M s TOAL REVENUES $10,711,684 $11,278,850 $10,995,233 $11,619,203 $11,640,086 .0 Cr EXPENDITURES 0 Health/Medical $8,895,807 $9,298,369 $9,154,738 $9,578,403 $9,832,358 pp Health Claim Offset(ERRP)Funds 85,765 0 0 0 0 -. Worker's Compensation 337,885 610,942 591,441 591,441 583,470 c Personnel Expenses 439,449 457,773 458,270 459,206 470,025 N Other Insurance 610,526 512,022 479,920 479,920 472,920 -. Reserve for Insurance Claims 0 0 20,064 0 0 Other Expenses 95,209 91,088 95,800 109,984 95,800 Life Insurance Premium 61,280 94,196 95,000 95,000 85,000 SUB-TOTAL $10,525,919 $11,064,390 $10,895,233 $11,313,954 $11,539,573 OTHER&RESERVES aj Transfer to Retiree Health Care Fund $185,765 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 0 SUB-TOTAL $185,765 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 s TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,711,684 $11,164,390 $10,995,233 $11,413,954 $11,639,573 'S BALANCE $0 $114,460 $0 $205,249 $513 Cr d m 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!274 ATTAC H M Fiscal Year 201512016 N Proposed CIP Budget LO $8,765,371 N M O Uses of Funds ° Parks& m Recreation Aquatic Park o 12.74% 30.80% 1 � U Utility 18.54% �- Cr r• N u uu Y,I Facilities co Drainage I� 9111'�4' 1.88% M 1.08% !ill w���V ajor Capital quipment 12.32% O 'S Cr Economic Street&Sidewalk Development m 18.63% Other 0.00% 0.39% r• CIP Personnel N 3.62% _ Sources of Funds Federal/State Grants •� 2.59% U) C.O. Bonds X 40.01% Reserves 44.27% �i�idu�i�i IIIIIIIIIIIIIII �uui�� > ea 1 � JU G.O. Bonds Sales Tax 0.00% Other 11.09% 2.04% m O m Cbdl f LICh/!275 ATTAC H M Summary of Project Expenditures 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program N Project To Proposed Estimated 2017 to Total LO Program Classification Date 2015/2016 2016/2017 Completion Expenditures N M Street&Sidewalk 38,932,532 1,632,821 461,000 0 $ 41,026,353 O O Drainage 3,163,222 95,000 0 0 $ 3,258,222 4- C m Utility 8,895,000 1,625,000 0 0 $ 10,520,000 a) O Parks & Recreation 4,935,828 1,117,000 1,973,000 1,673,000 $ 9,698,828 Aquatic Park 575,000 2,700,000 0 0 $ 3,275,000 U Facilities 75,192,368 165,000 0 0 $ 75,357,368 °a) Major Capital Equipment 5,492,115 1,079,500 346,000 0 $ 6,917,615 cr Economic Development 10,509,362 0 0 0 $ 10,509,362 N CIP Personnel 2,424,859 317,300 0 0 $ 2,742,159 N Other 1,895,768 33,750 360,000 10,000 $ 2,299,518 M Total CIP Project Expenditures $ 152,016,054 $ 8,765,371 $ 3,140,000 $ 1,683,000 $ 165,604,425 s Cr 0 m LO r` N O Q U) X U 0 m O m Cbdl f LIC)h/!276 iii ATTAC H M C�2lc Summary of Project Funding 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program N Funding To Proposed Estimated 2017 to Total Funds LO Funding Source Date 2015/2016 2016/2017 Completion N M General Obligation Bonds 62,499,172 0 0 0 62,499,172 0 Certificates of Obligation 32,915,000 3,506,900 2,261,000 1,500,000 40,182,900 0 Federal/State Grants 23,894,232 226,821 0 0 24,121,053 m Reserves 20,384,069 3,880,900 350,000 0 24,614,969 O Sales Tax 2,552,900 972,000 173,000 173,000 3,870,900 M Other 9,770,681 178,750 356,000 10,000 10,315,431 Total CIP Project Funding $ 152,016,054 $ 8,765,371 $ 3,140,000 $ 1,683,000 $ 165,604,425 U 0 Cr N N M O 'S Cr Q O m r LO r` N O Q U) X U 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LICM277 ATTAC H M C�2lc Summary of Project Funding 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program N Funding To Proposed Estimated 2017 to Total Funds LO Program Date 2015/2016 2016/2017 Completion M Street&Sidewalk .0 General Obligation Bonds 11,085,950 0 0 0 11,085,950 ° Certificates of Obligation 3,400,000 0 461,000 0 3,861,000 m Federal/State Grants 19,728,382 226,821 0 0 19,955,203 0 Reserves 4,288,200 1,406,000 0 0 5,694,200 M Other 430,000 0 0 0 430,000 U Street&Sidewalk Sub-Total $ 38,932,532 $ 1,632,821 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 41,026,353 Drainage Cr General Obligation Bonds 1,863,222 0 0 0 1,863,222 Reserves 1,300,000 95,000 0 0 1,395,000 N Drainage Sub-Total $ 3,163,222 $ 95,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,258,222 N_ utility M Certificates of Obligation 6,445,000 0 0 0 6,445,000 0 'S Reserves 1,785,205 1,625,000 0 0 3,410,205 Cr Other 664,795 0 0 0 664,795 0 m Utility Sub-Total $ 8,895,000 $ 1,625,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,520,000 n r` N Parks& Recreation Certificates of Obligation 0 0 1,800,000 1,500,000 3,300,000 Federal/State Grants 2,882,928 0 0 0 2,882,928 Reserves 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 ° Sales Tax 2,027,900 972,000 173,000 173,000 3,345,900 Other 0 145,000 0 0 145,000 U) Parks&Recreation Sub-Total $ 4,935,828 $ 1,117,000 $ 1,973,000 $ 1,673,000 $ 9,698,828 X Aquatic Park 4— Certificates of Obligation 0 2,600,000 0 0 2,600,000 Reserves 575,000 100,000 0 0 675,000 > t Aquatic Park Sub-Total $ 575,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,275,000 -9 Cr Facilities General Obligation Bonds 49,550,000 0 0 0 49,550,000 CJ Certificates of Obligation 20,070,000 0 0 0 20,070,000 0 Reserves 1,905,000 165,000 0 0 2,070,000 Other 3,667,368 0 0 0 3,667,368 Facilities Sub-Total $ 75,192,368 $ 165,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,357,368 m 0 Major Capital Equipment 4— Certificates of Obligation 0 906,900 0 0 906,900 Federal/State Grants 71,171 0 0 0 71,171 m Reserves 1,516,944 172,600 0 0 1,689,544 Cbdl f LICM278 ATTAC H M C�2lc Summary of Project Funding 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program N Funding To Proposed Estimated 2017 to Total Funds LO Program Date 2015/2016 2016/2017 Completion M Other 3,904,000 0 346,000 0 4,250,000 0 0 Major Capital Equipment Sub-Total $ 5,492,115 $ 1,079,500 $ 346,000 $ 0 $ 6,917,615 "- C Economic Development m 0 Certificates of Obligation 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,000,000 Reserves 6,376,703 0 0 0 6,376,703 0 Sales Tax 450,000 0 0 0 450,000 U Other 682,659 0 0 0 682,659 a> Economic Development Sub-Total $ 10,509,362 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,509,362 Cr CIP Personnel Reserves 2,424,859 317,300 0 0 2,742,159 N C/P Personnel Sub-Total $ 2,424,859 $ 317,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,742,159 N Other c? 0 Federal/State Grants 1,211,751 0 0 0 1,211,751 s Cr Reserves 187,158 0 350,000 0 537,158 a 0 LP Sales Tax 75,000 0 0 0 75,000 =. Other 421,859 33,750 10,000 10,000 475,609 LO r` N_ Other Sub-Total $ 1,895,768 $ 33,750 $ 360,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,299,518 Total C/P Project Funding $ 152,016,054 $ 8,765,371 $ 3,140,000 $ 1,683,000 $ 165,604,425 "- 0 U) X U 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LIChP279 i ATTAC H M Cd2/c Schedule 1 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Budget Summary N F3 LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v- 9 1 ST0902 Cloyce Court(Northeast Loop 820 to Maplewood Ave) 750,000 200,000 0 0 $ 950,000 m O 11 2 ST0401 Davis Blvd/Mid-Cities Blvd Intersection 5,200,726 0 0 0 $ 5,200,726 O 13 3 ST0904 Grand Avenue(Library to HealthMarkets Access Road) 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000 v- L O 15 4 ST1403 Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Project 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000 > U 17 5 ST1404 Jennings Dr/Dude Ct.Street Reconstruction 1,039,570 0 0 0 $ 1,039,570 O 19 6 ST1101 Main Street Streetscaping Project 66,000 0 461,000 0 $ 527,000 Q 21 - SM1501 Preventive Street Maintenance(2015) 700,000 0 0 0 $ 700,000 23 7 SM1502 Preventive Street Maintenance(College Circle Pavement Rehabilitation) 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 N 25 8 ST0102 Rufe Snow Dr.Street&Utility Imp.(Karen Drive to I.H.820) 1,385,950 0 0 0 $ 1,385,950 Q0 27 9 ST0202 Rufe Snow Dr.Street&Utility Imp.(Mid-Cities to Hightower)FFEA-21] 21,703,236 0 0 0 $ 21,703,236 N r M 29 10 ST1201 Rufe Snow Drive&Glenview Drive Intersection Improvements 1,435,000 0 0 0 $ 1,435,000 O 31 - SD1501 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Project(2015) 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000 S Q 33 11 ST1301 Signal Timing Synchronization Update 95,000 0 0 0 $ 95,000 O _m 35 12 ST1304 Smithfield Road(Davis Blvd to Mid-Cities Blvd) 2,200,000 0 0 0 $ 2,200,000 -' r LO 37 13 ST1102 Snider Street Extension Project 2,800,050 0 0 0 $ 2,800,050 N_ 39 14 ST1001 Starnes Road Street Imp.(Rufe Snow Dr.to Crosstimbers Ln.) 757,000 0 0 0 $ 757,000 41 15 ST1005 Traffic Signalization at Davis Boulevard&Creek View Drive 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 v- Total Continuing Projects $ 38,932,532 $ 200,000 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 39,593,532 O s? New Projects 43 - ST1601 Infrastructure Painting Project 0 100,000 0 0 $ 100,000 4- U) 45 16 CDBG16 Lynda Court(CDBG) 0 226,821 0 0 $ 226,821 47 - SM1601 Preventive Street Maintenance(2016) 0 800,000 0 0 $ 800,000 5 49 17 SM1602 Preventive Street Maintenance(Old Cagle Drive) 0 200,000 0 0 $ 200,000 .W 51 - SD1601 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Project 0 50,000 0 0 $ 50,000 53 18 ST1602 Traffic Signal Video Detection Systems 0 56,000 0 0 $ 56,000 > Total New Projects $ 0 $ 1,432,821 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,432,821 Cr Total Project Costs $ 38,932,532 $ 1,632,821 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 41,026,353 Q U Funding Sources 0 O v- General Obligation Bonds 11,085,950 0 0 0 $ 11,085,950 Certificates of Obligation 3,400,000 0 461,000 0 $ 3,861,000 Federal/State Grants 19,728,382 226,821 0 0 $ 19,955,203 m Reserves 4,288,200 1,406,000 0 0 $ 5,694,200 O v- Other 430,000 0 0 0 $ 430,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 38,932,532 $ 1,632,821 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 41,026,353 m Cbdl f LiQi/!27: ATTAC H M C�2lc Schedule 2 Drainage Capital Projects Budget Summary N LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— 5 DR1503 Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project 68,500 0 0 0 $ 68,500 m O 7 - DR1201 Channel Cleaning/Street Drainage Improvements 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 O 9 - DR1401 Concrete Lined Channel Rehabilitation Project 131,500 0 0 0 $ 131,500 v— L 11 1 DR1501 Main Street Drainage Improvements 800,000 0 0 0 $ 800,000 O > U 13 2 DR1004 Meadowview Estates Channel Drainage Improvements 1,863,222 0 0 0 $ 1,863,222 O Total Continuing Projects $ 3,163,222 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,163,222 Q Cr New Projects S� 15 3 DR1601 Drainage Improvements 0 95,000 0 0 $ 95,000 N r Total New Projects $ 0 $ 95,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 95,000 N Total Project Costs $ 3,163,222 $ 95,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,258,222 j O Funding Sources S Cr s? General Obligation Bonds 1,863,222 0 0 0 $ 1,863,222 O _m Reserves 1,300,000 95,000 0 0 $ 1,395,000 —• LO Total Sources of Funds $ 3,163,222 $ 95,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,258,222 N v- v— O S? U) X U O m O m Cbdl f LIChP281 ATTAC H M Schedule 3 Utility Capital Projects Budget Summary N F3 LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— 9 - UT0201 Big Fossil Creek Wastewater Outfall 1,200,000 0 0 0 $ 1,200,000 m O 11 1 UT1402 Johnson Pump Station Component and Infrastructure Replacements 275,000 0 0 0 $ 275,000 O 13 2 UT1404 Motor Operated Transfer Valves 730,000 0 0 0 $ 730,000 v— L 15 3 UT1202 Sanitary Sewer(Loop 820 Corridor Interceptor Replacement) 1,730,000 0 0 0 $ 1,730,000 O U 17 - UT1203 Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation of Main Lines(Phase 1) 1,500,000 0 0 0 $ 1,500,000 O 19 4 UT0708 Water Line(Boulevard 26/Cardinal Lane) 520,000 0 0 0 $ 520,000 Q 21 5 UT1505 Water Line Replacement on Susan Lee(Lola Dr.to N.Richland Blvd.) 800,000 0 0 0 $ 800,000 23 6 UT1207 Water Main&Valve(Across Loop 820 East of Iron Horse Blvd.) 315,000 0 0 0 $ 315,000 N 25 7 UT1208 Water Main(Loop 820 Crossings) 1,770,000 0 0 0 $ 1,770,000 27 8 UT0810 Western Center Water Facility Expansion 55,000 0 0 0 $ 55,000 N r M Total Continuing Projects $ 8,895,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,895,000 O New Projects Cr' 0? 29 9 UT1601 Franklin Court Sewer Addition and Gifford Connection 0 150,000 0 0 $ 150,000 O m 31 - UT1602 Impact Fee Update(2016) 0 110,000 0 0 $ 110,000 LO 33 10 UT1603 Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements(2016) 0 420,000 0 0 $ 420,000 N 35 11 UT1604 Sanitary Sewer Line Replacements(Crabtree&Onyx N.) 0 125,000 0 0 $ 125,000 37 12 UT1605 Small Water Main Replacements(2016) 0 420,000 0 0 $ 420,000 `�- 38 - UT1606 Telemetric Water Meter Annual Maintenance(2016) 0 400,000 0 0 $ 400,000 O S? Total New Projects $ 0 $ 1,625,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,625,000 .^ w Total Project Costs $ 8,895,000 $ 1,625,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,520,000 (n Funding Sources X Certificates of Obligation 6,445,000 0 0 0 $ 6,445,000 Reserves 1,785,205 1,625,000 0 0 $ 3,410,205 Other 664,795 0 0 0 $ 664,795 > Total Sources of Funds $ 8,895,000 $ 1,625,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,520,000 Cr U O w m 0 w m Cbdl f LiCh/!282 ATTAC H M Schedule 4 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Budget Summary N LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Pro[ect Costs O Continuing Projects v- 11 1 PK1401 Barfield/Cotton Belt Trail Connector 65,000 0 0 0 $ 65,000 m O 13 2 PK9601 Calloway Branch Trail Development[CMAQ] 1,489,811 0 0 0 $ 1,489,811 O 15 - PK1502 City Wide Trail and Route System Plan 30,000 0 0 0 $ 30,000 v- L O 17 3 PK9602 Little Bear Creek Trail Development(John Barfield Trail 2,830,420 0 0 0 $ 2,830,420 > Development)[ISTEA] U 19 4 PK1503 Major Trail Neighborhood Connectors 133,000 0 0 0 $ 133,000 O 21 5 PK1505 NRH Centre Infrastructure Improvements(2015) 25,000 0 0 0 $ 25,000 Q 23 - PK1506 Park Maintenance Infrastructure(2015) 232,597 0 0 0 $ 232,597 25 6 PK1509 Trail Head Gateways 2015 130,000 0 0 0 $ 130,000 N Total Continuing Projects $ 4,935,828 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,935,828 New Projects M 27 7 PK1601 Adventure World Playground Shade 0 150,000 0 0 $ 150,000 O 29 8 PK1602 Major Trail Rest Stations 0 55,000 0 0 $ 55,000 CY' Q 31 9 PK1603 Northfield Park Redevelopment 0 397,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 $ 3,697,000 O m 32 - PK1604 Park Infrastructure Maintenance(2016) 0 175,000 0 0 $ 175,000 r LO 33 - PK1605 Park System Playground Replacement 0 100,000 0 0 $ 100,000 1,- N 35 PK1606 Park System Signage 0 100,000 173,000 173,000 $ 446,000 w 37 10 PK1607 Richland Tennis Center Infrastructure Maintenance(2016) 0 30,000 0 0 $ 30,000 `�- 39 11 PK1608 Trail Head Gateways 2016 0 110,000 0 0 $ 110,000 O 0? Total New Projects $ 0 $ 1,117,000 $ 1,973,000 $ 1,673,000 $ 4,763,000 .^ w Total Project Costs $ 4,935,828 $ 1,117,000 $ 1,973,000 $ 1,673,000 $ 9,698,828 (n Funding Sources X Certificates of Obligation 0 0 1,800,000 1,500,000 $ 3,300,000 Federal/State Grants 2,882,928 0 0 0 $ 2,882,928 Reserves 25,000 0 0 0 $ 25,000 > Sales Tax 2,027,900 972,000 173,000 173,000 $ 3,345,900 Other 0 145,000 0 0 $ 145,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 4,935,828 $ 1,117,000 $ 1,973,000 $ 1,673,000 $ 9,698,828 U O w m O w m Cbdl f LiCh/!283 ATTAC H M Schedule 5 Aquatic Park Capital Projects Budget Summary N LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— 5 - WP1501 General Facility Improvements(2015) 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000 m O 6 1 WP1502 NRH2O Facility Enhancements and Improvements 200,000 0 0 0 $ 200,000 O 7 - WP1504 NRH2O Parking Lot Improvements 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000 v— L 8 - WP1503 NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement 200,000 2,600,000 0 0 $ 2,800,000 O U Total Continuing Projects $ 575,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,175,000 v— New Projects Cr 9 - WP1601 General Facility Improvements(2016) 0 100,000 0 0 $ 100,000 �Q Total New Projects $ 0 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,000 N Total Project Costs $ 575,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,275,000 N M Funding Sources O Certificates of Obligation 0 2,600,000 0 0 $ 2,600,000 S Cr s? Reserves 575,000 100,000 0 0 $ 675,000 O _m Total Sources of Funds $ 575,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,275,000 —' LO N O S? U) X U O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!284 ATTAC H M Schedule 6 Facilities Capital Projects Budget Summary N F3 LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— 5 1 BD0809 820 Widening-City Hall Modifications 1,050,000 0 0 0 $ 1,050,000 m O 6 2 BD0905 820 Widening-Professional Services 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000 O 7 3 FC1205 City Hall(Municipal Government Complex) 69,229,337 0 0 0 $ 69,229,337 v— O 8 FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation 213,031 0 0 0 $ 213,031 > U 9 4 ES0201 NRH Animal Adoption&Rescue Center-New Facility 4,400,000 0 0 0 $ 4,400,000 O Total Continuing Projects $ 75,192,368 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,192,368 Q Cr New Projects S� 10 5 FC1601 Building Envelope/Roof Replacement 0 165,000 0 0 $ 165,000 N r Total New Projects $ 0 $ 165,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 165,000 N Total Project Costs $ 75,192,368 $ 165,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,357,368 j O Funding Sources S Cr s? General Obligation Bonds 49,550,000 0 0 0 $ 49,550,000 O _m Certificates of Obligation 20,070,000 0 0 0 $ 20,070,000 —• LO Reserves 1,905,000 165,000 0 0 $ 2,070,000 N Other 3,667,368 0 0 0 $ 3,667,368 = Total Sources of Funds $ 75,192,368 $ 165,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,357,368 y— O S? U) X U O m 0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!285 ATTAC H M C�2lc Schedule 7 Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Budget Summary N LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— 5 - IS1401 Cell Phone Signal Boosters in NRH Centre 98,000 0 0 0 $ 98,000 m O 6 IS1503 Network Equipment Replacement 1,103,944 0 0 0 $ 1,103,944 O 7 - IS1501 Replace/enhance Dispatch center recording equipment 196,171 0 0 0 $ 196,171 v— L O 8 - IS1502 Replacement of CAD/RMS Public Safety Software Platform 3,850,000 0 0 0 $ 3,850,000 > U 9 - IS1402 Replacement of the Fuel Management Software System 90,000 0 0 0 $ 90,000 O 10 FD1501 SCBA Air Pack Replacement 54,000 0 346,000 0 $ 400,000 Q 11 - IS1203 Teleworks Replacement for Online and VOIP Platforms 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000 Total Continuing Projects $ 5,492,115 $ 0 $ 346,000 $ 0 $ 5,838,115 N New Projects 12 - FS1601 Ambulance Replacement Unit 958 0 240,000 0 0 $ 240,000 M 13 - FS1602 Gradall Excavator Replacement Unit 633 0 375,000 0 0 $ 375,000 O 3` 14 - FS1603 Pothole Patcher Replacement Unit 673 0 172,600 0 0 $ 172,600 Cr' Q 15 - FS1604 Street Sweeper Replacement Unit 6627 0 291,900 0 0 $ 291,900 O m Total New Projects $ 0 $ 1,079,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,079,500 LO Total Project Costs $ 5,492,115 $ 1,079,500 $ 346,000 $ 0 $ 6,917,615 w Funding Sources v— Certificates of Obligation 0 906,900 0 0 $ 906,900 O Federal/State Grants 71,171 0 0 0 $ 71,171 Reserves 1,516,944 172,600 0 0 $ 1,689,544 U) Other 3,904,000 0 346,000 0 $ 4,250,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 5,492,115 $ 1,079,500 $ 346,000 $ 0 $ 6,917,615 5 w U O w m 0 w m Cbdl f LIChP286 iii ATTAC H M Schedule 8 Economic Development Capital Projects Budget Summary N F3 LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— 5 1 ED0803 Boulevard 26 Intersection Imp.(@ Rodger Line Rd.) 450,000 0 0 0 $ 450,000 m O 7 2 ED0801 Business Improvement and Growth(BIG)Program 250,000 0 0 0 $ 250,000 O 9 3 ED1002 Loop 820 Redevelopment 2,026,938 0 0 0 $ 2,026,938 v— O 11 4 ED1501 Neighborhood Revitalization Program(NRP) 206,184 0 0 0 $ 206,184 > U 13 5 ED1001 SH 121/183&Bedford-Euless Road Access Plan 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000 O 14 - PW0402 Sign Removal Assistance Program 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000 .-- S? 15 - ED1401 Strategic Land Acquisition 3,226,240 0 0 0 $ 3,226,240 17 6 ED0601 TIF 1 Expansion-Intersection Improvements/Utility Burial 3,000,000 0 0 0 $ 3,000,000 N 19 - ED1503 TOD Land Management 1,200,000 0 0 0 $ 1,200,000 Total Continuing Projects $ 10,509,362 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,509,362 M Total Project Costs $ 10,509,362 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,509,362 p Cr S? Funding Sources O m Certificates of Obligation 3,000,000 0 0 0 $ 3,000,000 _. LO Reserves 6,376,703 0 0 0 $ 6,376,703 N Sales Tax 450,000 0 0 0 $ 450,000 =• Other 682,659 0 0 0 $ 682,659 — v— Total Sources of Funds $ 10,509,362 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,509,362 O s? v— t X U O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!287 ATTAC H M Schedule 9 CIP Personnel Capital Projects Budget Summary N e� LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v— GCIP12 General CIP Personnel Costs 995,183 0 0 0 $ 995,183 CO O MFPF12 Municipal Facilities Project Funding 0 0 0 0 $ 0 O UCIP12 Utility CIP Personnel 1,416,053 315,116 0 0 $ 1,731,169 v— UCNP12 Utility Construction Personnel 3,268,392 842,184 0 0 $ 4,110,576 O U UCPF12 Utility Construction Project Funding -3,254,769 -840,000 0 0 $ -4,094,769 O v— Total Continuing Projects $ 2,424,859 $ 317,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,742,159 Q Cr Total Project Costs $ 2,424,859 $ 317,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,742,159 N Funding Sources Reserves 2,424,859 317,300 0 0 $ 2,742,159 N Total Sources of Funds M $ 2,424,859 $ 317,300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,742,159 O 'S Cr S? O m r LO N O S? U) X U O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!288 ATTAC H M Schedule 10 Other Capital Projects Budget Summary N LO Pg. Map Project To 2015/16 2016/17 2017 To Total N No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion �? s 0 Project Costs O Continuing Projects v- 3 ES1201 Atmos Residential Energy Efficiency Program 356,859 23,750 0 0 $ 380,609 m O 4 ES0902 Litter Not Program 25,000 0 0 0 $ 25,000 O 5 ES0901 Neighborhood Initiative Program 227,158 10,000 10,000 10,000 $ 257,158 v- 6 FC1505 North Texas Anti-Gang Center 1,211,751 0 0 0 $ 1,211,751 O U 7 PL1501 Strategic Plan 75,000 0 350,000 0 $ 425,000 O v- Total Continuing Projects $ 1,895,768 $ 33,750 $ 360,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,299,518 Q Cr Total Project Costs $ 1,895,768 $ 33,750 $ 360,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,299,518 N Funding Sources Federal/State Grants 1,211,751 0 0 0 $ 1,211,751 N Reserves 187,158 0 350,000 0 $ 537,158 c O Sales Tax 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000 Cr Other 421,859 33,750 10,000 10,000 $ 475,609 W O _m Total Sources of Funds $ 1,895,768 $ 33,750 $ 360,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,299,518 LO N O S? U) X U O m O m Cbdl f LiCh/!289 ATTAC H M Schedule 11 2014/2015 Budget Revisions Budget Summary co N LO N Adopted Budget 2014/2015 M Project Project Through Revision Revised Remaining Number Name 2014/2015 2014/2015 Budget Amount Total p .F STREET&SIDEWALK CAPITAL PROJECTS 0 ST0102 Rufe Snow Dr.Street&Utility Imp(Karen Dr.to $885,950 $500,000 $1,385,950 $0 $1,385,950 I.H.820) m ST0202 Rufe Snow Dr.Street&Utility Imp(Mid-Cities to 21,703,236 - 21,703,236 21,703,236 O H ightower)[TEA-21] � Sub-Total $22,589,186 $500,000 $23,089,186 $0 $23,089,186 DRAINAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS DR1501 Main Street Drainage Improvements $800,000 $0 $800,000 $0 $800,000 � U DR1004 Meadowview Estates Drainage Project 2,500,000 (636,778) 1,863,222 1,863,222 DR1502 Walker Branch Channel Repair - 136,778 136,778 136,778 "- DR1401 Concrete Line Channel Rehabilitation Project 200,000 (68,500) 131,500 131,500 DR1503 Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project - 68,500 68,500 68,500 Cr Sub-Total $3,500,000 ($500,000) $2,800,000 $0 $2,800,000 N UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS UT1403 Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements $420,000 $29,179 $449,179 $0 $449,179 Q0 N UT1405 Small Water Main Replacements 420,000 (29,179) 390,821 390,821 22 Sub-Total $840,000 $0 $840,000 $0 $840,000 0 'S Cr Q PARKS&RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS PK1201 Adventure World Playground Renovation $653,246 ($7) $653,239 $0 $653,239 m PK1401 Barfield/Cotton Belt Trail Connector 45,000 20,000 65,000 65,000 PK9601 Calloway Branch Trail Development(CMAQ) 1,509,811 (20,000) 1,489,811 1,489,811 LO PK0404 NRH Recreation Center(TIF#2) 25,020,155 4,246 25,024,401 25,024,401 N PK1302 Parks Infrastructure Maintenance(2013) 146,000 (514) 145,486 145,486 PK1506 Parks Infrastructure Maintenance(2015) 228,900 3,697 232,597 232,597 PK1303 Tennis Center Infrastructure Management(2013) 60,000 (3,724) 56,276 56,276 "- PK0908 Trail Signage and Identification 55,000 (3,697) 51,303 51,303 O Sub-Total $27,718,112 $1 $27,718,113 $0 $27,718,113 AQUATIC PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS U) WP1502 NRH2O Facility Enhancements and $200,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 Improvements X WP1504 NRH2O Parking Lot Improvements - 75,000 75,000 75,000 2; Sub-Total $200,000 $75,000 $275,000 $0 $275,000 FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FC1506 Disaster Recovery EOC Infrastructure $0 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $150,000 > FC1502 Flooring and Cabinet Upgrade 30,000 40,000 70,000 70,000 FC1503 Interior/Exterior Renovations 40,000 (40,000) - - ES0201 NRH Animal Adoption&Rescue Center 4,400,000 - 4,400,000 4,400,000 Cr Sub-Total $4,470,000 $150,000 $4,620,000 $0 $4,620,000 MAJOR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS U IS1503 Network Equipment Replacement $0 $1,103,944 $1,103,944 $0 $1,103,944 O IS1501 Replace/Enhance Dispatch Center Recording 125,000 71,171 196,171 196,171 v- Equipment IS1502 Replacement of CAD/RMS Software Platform 3,000,000 (150,000) 2,850,000 2,850,000 FD1501 SCBA Air Pack Replacement - 400,000 400,000 400,000 IS1203 Teleworks Replacement for Online and VOIP 130,000 (30,000) 100,000 100,000 m Platforms -' Sub-Total $3,255,000 $1,395,115 $4,650,115 $0 $4,650,115 O m Cbdl f L1Qh/!28: ATTAC H M Schedule 11 2014/2015 Budget Revisions Budget Summary co N LO N Adopted Budget 2014/2015 M Project Project Through Revision Revised Remaining Number Name 2014/2015 2014/2015 Budget Amount Total O .F ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS 0 ED1501 Neighborhood Revitalization Program $0 $206,184 $206,184 $0 $206,184 ED1502 Strategic Land Acquisition - 1,680,000 1,680,000 1,680,000 m ED1502 Strategic Land Acquisition 1,680,000 (1,660,000) 20,000 20,000 ED0601 TIF 1 Expansion-Intersection 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 3,000,000 improvements/Utility Burial ED1503 TOD Land Management - 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Sub-Total $4,680,000 $1,426,184 $6,106,184 $0 $6,106,184 U a> OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS v- FC1505 North Texas Anit-Gang Center $0 $1,211,751 $1,211,751 $0 $1,211,751 Q Sub-Total $0 $1,211,751 $1,211,751 $0 $1,211,751 Cr Total All Projects $67,2525298 $4,258,051 $71,310,349 $0 $71,310,349 N SOURCES OF FUNDS General Obligation Bonds $10,385,950 $0 $10,385,950 $0 $10,385,950 N Certificates of Obligations 33,670,000 - 33,670,000 33,670,000 M Federal/State Grants 12,895,120 1,282,922 14,178,042 14,178,042 0 Reserves 3,816,236 2,233,944 6,050,180 6,050,180 S Sales Tax 3,440,112 1 3,440,113 3,440,113 Cr Other 2,844,880 741,184 3,586,064 3,586,064 Total Sources of Funds $67,052,298 $4,258,051 $71,310,349 $0 $71,310,349 m LO N O Q U) X U 0 m 0 m Cbdl f LICh/1291 ATTAC H M C�2lc !!HHHTLsf f Lt' Fjef x br-h!DbgjLbrfQsplf dd Svgf !Topx !Es/!TLSf f L' !Vy*!.h q/!)L bsf o!EsApUl /l931 N ST0102 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project begins at Karen Drive and ends on the north side of Corona Drive. The intersection at Meadowlakes Drive will be a> improved as part of the project. Rufe Snow will be widened with right turn lands and improved signalization. This section will ° transition from the wider section at the bridge to the 4 lane section at Karen Drive. The project will be constructed as a m concrete street with sidewalks and all necessary water and sewer main adjustments. Street lights and signalization at Meadow a) Lakes will be constructed to the City's standards. �° 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering 01/2001 05/2008 M Land/ROW Acquisition 08/2008 01/2011 0 Construction 06/2014 11/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO A revision was made due to additional services required to incorporate the current city standards and system into the plans and N specifications for the traffic signal components. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? General Obligation Bonds $785,950 ;;, $785,950 $0 0/896-: 61 Reserves 100,000 ; 100,000 0 0/211-111 5 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0/896- 61 ;r i °1... 0/896-: 61 0/4 0/896-: 61 Professional Services $0 %1 Cr Engineering/Design 170,000 1% 4 184,500 0 0/295-611 0 Land/ROW Acquistion 198,331 ' 198,331 0 0/2: 9-442 C) Construction 517,619 (14, 503,119 0/E14-22: o Other 0 0/a Total 0/896- 61 0 0/896-: 61 1 0/4 1 0/896-: 61 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Road maintenance and other operating expenses should be nominal during the first 5 to 10 years for this project. ° ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 0 1 01 01 01 0/4 Cbdl f LICK/!292 ATTAC H M C�2lc Utility Capital Projects Rufe Snow Dr. Street & Utility Imp. (Karen Drive to I.H. 820) N ST0102 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project begins at Karen Drive and ends on the north side of Corona Drive (approximate ending of the TxDot Bridge a> project). The intersection at Meadowlakes Drive will be improved as part of this project. Rufe Snow Drive will be widened with ° right turn lanes and improved signalization. This section will transition from the wider section at the bridge to the 4 lane section at Karen Drive. The project will be constructed as a concrete street with sidewalks and all necessary water and sewer main m 0 adjustments. Street lights and signalization at Meadow Lakes will be constructed to the City's standards. This section of Rufe Snow Drive was originally constructed in the 1960's as an asphalt street. The average life of an asphalt street is 20 years. This street is over 40 years old and has never been overlaid. The current street condition rating is 45. This > rating is considered to be Poor, consisting of significant potholes, complete surface deterioration, and misaligned curb and 0 pavement surface. The additional lanes added to this section of Rufe Snow will reduce traffic congestion at the freeway 0 frontage roads. Q Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q00 N Engineering 01/2001 05/2008 M Land/ROW Acquisition 08/2008 01/2011 0 Construction 06/2014 11/2015 11/2016 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Project bids came in higher than anticipated. Funding that was to be utilized for for project ST0202 Rufe Snow Street& Utility N Improvements(Mid Cities to Hightower), will be moved to to this project to cover the higher than anticipated expenditures. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS(�URCE General Obligations Bonds $50;6,'0;06`;,, „$1,2 General 85,950 $1,285,950 Centificate of Obligations 0 $0 5 Federal/State Grants 0 $0 Reserves 100,000 100,000 $100,000 Other 0 $0 > Total $885,950 Q, Q,;:` $1,385,950- $0 $1 385 950 Cr Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 170,000 170,000 $170,000 Land/ROWAcquistion 198,331 198,331 $198,331 Construction 517,619 X0:6 p:0 1,017,619 $1,017,619 0 Other 0 $0 Total $885,950 ,;t 0, ,OQ;;, $1,385,950 $0 $1,385,950 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LICKP293 ATTAC H M Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Rufe Snow Dr. Street & Utility Imp. (Mid-Cities to Hightower)[TEA-21] N ST0202 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project widens approximately 5,300 feet of the existing 5-lane thoroughfare to 7-lanes. This section of Rufe Snow Drive a> will be reconstructed as a concrete street with sidewalks along both sides, signalization improvements at the major intersections and all necessary water and sewer main adjustments. The funding for design will be provided by the 1994 Bond m Program and Federal Grants(TEA-21). The funding for the construction phase of this project will come from the 2003 Bond a) Program and Federal Grants. �° The development that has taken place in recent years in Northeast Tarrant County has caused traffic volumes to increase along this section of Rufe Snow. Currently, the traffic counts are 29,355 vehicles per day. This area of Rufe Snow is also aa)i adjacent to commercial property.Additional lanes are needed for this section of Rufe Snow to reduce traffic congestion. Since U this project will be coordinated with Texas Department of Transportation (TxDot), all schedules are subject to change by TxDot. 0 Like any other TxDot project, this project will also be subject to state and federal reviews, an environmental assessment and a Q public hearing meeting will need to be conducted. Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 10/2001 10/2007 N Engineering 03/2008 03/2014 M Land/ROW Acquisition 04/2011 06/2014 0 Construction 09/2014 05/2015 05/2017 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Available drainage savings were recognized when bids for DR1004 Meadowview Estates Drainage Project came in lower than N anticipated. A portion of these drainage savings will be moved from DR1004 to ST0202 to cover a portion of the drainage expenses associated with this project. This frees street funding to cover the higher than anticipated bids received for ST0102 Rufe Snow(Karen to I1-1820). The net change to the project is$0. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 �,f �/If7N 2014/15 BALANCE COST FUNININCr General Obligation Bond $5,690,000 $5,690,000 $5,690,000 Certificate of Obligation 2,900,000 2,900,000 $2,900,000 5 Federal/State Grants 12,162,000 12,162,000 $12,162,000 Reserves 951,236 951,236 $951,236 0 $0 Total $21,703,236 ,;t ;� ; $21 703 236 $0 $21,703,236 Cr RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 1,600,000 1,600,000 $1,600,000 Land/ROWAcquistion 7,033,236 7,033,236 $7,033,236 Construction 13,070,000 13,070,000 $13,070,000 0 Other 01 1 $0 Total $21,703,236Q! $21,703,236 $0 $21,703,236 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LiCh/!294 ATTAC H M Drainage Capital Projects Main Street Drainage Improvements N DR1501 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project will consist of replacing approximately 1000 linear feet of 18" and 21" Reinforced Concrete Pipe(RCP)with 30" a> and 36" RCP beginning at Chilton Drive and ending at Crane Road.A branch of the new system will be extended up Jerry ° Court and will connect to an existing system. Because much of the storm drainage system will be underneath the existing street pavement the street cuts will be patched and the entire street will be overlaid to provide a uniform pavement finish and m 0 look. Some driveways and curb and gutter will be reconstructed. There will also be the relocation of approximately 400 feet of an existing 6"water and 6" sanitary sewer line. The city began upgrading the existing drainage system in Main Street during the late 1990's. The last section of the drainage > system in Main Street was planned to be reconstructed with the Crane Road Paving Project in early 2000. However there were 9 not sufficient funds to cover the cost of to Drainage Improvements in Main Street so that portion was put off to a future date. 0 Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering 11/2014 05/2015 03/2015 10/2015 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 05/2015 12/2015 09/2016 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO To cover a higher than expected professional services cost. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE General Obligation Bonds $0 $0 Certificate of Obligations 0 $0 5 Federal/State Grants 0 $0 Reserves 800,000 ; 800,000 $800,000 Other 0 $0 > Total $800,000 ,;t i $," $800000 $0 $800,000 RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $0 $0 Q Engineering/Design 75,000 14,5b 89,500 $89,500 _. Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 725,000 (14,50.6`; 710,500 $710,500 0 Other 0 $0 Total $800,000 $Q! $800,000 $0 1 $800,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LiCh/!295 ATTAC H M C�2lc Drainage Capital Projects Meadowview Estates Drainage Project N DR 1004 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project consists of reconstructing the existing concrete channel from Northfield Park to Jill Court and reconstructing a a> larger bridge(box culverts)at Northfield Drive. The length of the channel is approximately 1,800 linear feet. The new box ° culverts will be designed for the 100 year rain event. C m a� This channel was constructed in the early 1980's. Sections of this channel are failing and are a continuous maintenance �0 problem. The failed sections are also causing erosion problems to adjacent property owners. A section of the channel failed a few years ago and cost approximately$70,000 for this one repair. In addition to the channel failing,the concrete portion of the channel was only designed for the 25 year rain event. This project will extend the concrete lining to the top of the bank and > consequently, will provide for more channel capacity. This will eliminate the need to mow or apply herbicide to the section of 9 side slop that is currently earthen bank and as such will reduce future maintenance cost. General Obligation Bonds are part of 0 the 2003 Bond Program. Q Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q00 N Engineering 09/2015 04/2013 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 04/2014 03/2015 10/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO The bids received for this project where lower than anticipated. Funding in the amount of$500,000 will be moved to ST0202 N Rufe Snow(Mid Cities to Hightower)to cover a portion of the drainage expense associated with that project. This will free up street funding to cover increased expenditures associated with ST0102 Rufe Snow(Karen to I1-1820) resulting from high than anticipated bids. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCdr General S(�URCE ($�O;b,,0A,6�„ „$2,0, Obligation Bonds $2,500,000 00,000 $2,000,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 > Total $2,500,000 ;t,,,,$ �, Q,, ;;, $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 Cr RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 415,000 415,000 $415,000 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 2,085,000 1,585,000 $1,585,000 0 Other 0 $0 Total $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LIChP296 iii ATTAC H M C�2lc Drainage Capital Projects Meadowview Estates Drainage Project N DR 1004 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project consists of reconstructing the existing concrete channel from Northfield Park to Jill Court and reconstructing a a> larger bridge(box culverts)at Northfield Drive. The length of the channel is approximately 1,800 linear feet. The new box ° culverts will be designed for the 100 year rain event. C m a� This channel was constructed in the early 1980's. Sections of this channel are failing and are a continuous maintenance �0 problem. The failed sections are also causing erosion problems to adjacent property owners. A section of the channel failed a few years ago and cost approximately$70,000 for this one repair. In addition to the channel failing,the concrete portion of the channel was only designed for the 25 year rain event. This project will extend the concrete lining to the top of the bank and > consequently, will provide for more channel capacity. This will eliminate the need to mow or apply herbicide to the section of 9 side slop that is currently earthen bank and as such will reduce future maintenance cost. General Obligation Bonds are part of 0 the 2003 Bond Program. Q Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q00 N Engineering 09/2015 04/2013 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 04/2014 03/2015 10/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO An emergency arose this FY at the Walker Branch Creek Channel that required repairs due to the heavy rains the area N received. Money was transferred from this project to project number DR1502. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST F lJ N[1.I NCrS(�(1 RC E General ($1��3,,77��;;,,. ,.$1.8, Obligation Bonds $2,000,000 63,222 $1,863,222 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $2,000,000 1, �7 $1,863,222- $0 $1 863 222 Cr Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 415,000 b;; 415,000 $415,000 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 1,585,000 X1; 8.,77 1,448,222 $1,448,222 0 Other 0 $0 Total $2,000,000 ... � , ?$ $1,863,222 $0 $1,863,222 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 TOTAL m Projected $0 C)dl f LIChP297 ATTAC H M C�2lc Drainage Capital Projects Walker Branch Channel Repair N DR 1502 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Following recent heavy rains, portions of the Walker Branch Channel just downstream of Hardwood Road experienced a> structural issues along the east bank adjacent to an apartment complex. The channel bank needs to be reestablished and ° fortified to prevent intrusion intot he adjacent property. Aconcrete headwall structure will be poured in place of the failed gabion m structure, and paving repair will be perfomed on the adjacent property where the loss of bank material impacted several parking a) spaces. 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 07/2015 09/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION This was an emergency project not included in the FY15 capital budget. Funds are being transfered from DR1004. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? GO Bond $0 $i,/ 77$." $136,778 $0 $136,778 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 r � Total $0 $136,7781 $0 1 $136,778 Cr IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 136,777 � 136,778 0 $136,778 0 Other 0 $0 Total $0 ,;t ,13 ,7 $136,7781 $0 1 $136,778 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No operating impact ° ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LIChP298 ATTAC H M !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VyljiE!DbgjLbri0splf dLt Njt df abof pvt !X bd s(Tf x f s!Nbjo!Sf grbdf n f OU N UT1403 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This is an annual program that is completed by the Public Works Construction Division. The program will provide for water& a> sewer replacements on the following streets: Lancashire Drive (Buckingham to Yarmouth), Stone Drive (Mary to Jean Ann), Lariat Trail (Meadow Lakes to Riviera), and Redondo (4512 Redondo to Riviera). The specific projects are selected based on m factors such as maintenance cost, location, age, and size. This project provides for the retirement of existing water lines which a) are causing a decrease in system capacity and water quality. This project also replaces old lines that have significant �° maintenance and operating costs. The construction of these lines are completed by the Public Works Construction Division. 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q0 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2013 09/2014 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revised budget to reflect additional cost associated for the Redondo Sewer Project, including dump site services, street repairs N and other related purchases. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Reserves $420,000 2f $449,179 0//55:-28: 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total °/531-111 ;t °/`3�t„ , y,' 0/55: -28: 0/4 0/55: -28: IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 %1 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 420,000 , 449,179 0/55:-28: 0 Other 0 0/a Total 0/531-111 ;t /3gt�; 0/55: -28: 1 0/4 1 0/55: -28: IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No operating impact is anticipated. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0/4 Cbdl f u!Clh/!299 ATTAC H M !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VyljiE!DbgjLbltQsplf dLt Tn brff bd s!N bjo!Sf qrbdf n f OU N UT1405 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This is an annual program that is completed by the Public Works Construction Division. The project replaces old 2" and 4" a> water mains with 6"or larger water pipes and provides adequate fire hydrant coverage to areas currently without proper coverage. This project will provide for small water main replacement on the following streets: Deville Dr. (Victoria to m Cummings),Tunbridge Dr. (Sandhurst E. to Sandhurst S.), Main Street(Amundson to Sherri Lane). This is an annual program a) that is completed by the Public Works Construction Division. The project replaces old 2" and 4"water mains with new 6"or �° larger water pipes and provides adequate fire hydrant coverage to areas currently without proper coverage. In addition, this project helps to replace water lines that have deteriorated to a point where numerous water line breaks occur. aa)i U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q0 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2013 10/2013 09/2014 09/2014 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revised budget to reflect transfer to UT1403 Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements (2014) N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Reserves $420,0002 , 7 ' $390,821 0/4: 1-932 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0/C31-111 ;t 0/ ,', ,*;+ 0/4: 1-932 0/4 0/4: 1-932 Professional Services $0 %1 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 U Construction 420,000 ( T : y 390,821 0/4: 1-932 0 Other 0 0/a Total 0/531-111 , 0/4: 1-932 %1 0/4: 1-932 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No operating impact is anticipated. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0/4 Cbdl f u!Ci/!29 ATTAC H M !!!!!!Qbsl t !' !Sf dsf blJpo!DbgjLbrfQsplf dd Bed owsf !X psria!Qiazhspvoe!Sf op\Abypo N PK 1201 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project will provide for a major renovation of Adventure World Playground. Drainage improvements are being planned in a> and around the playground in addition to the complete replacement of the largest play area and associated accessible play components. The remainder of the small play areas will be carefully evaluated to determine their usability and to formulate a m plan for renovation or removal and replacement.The restroom building will be assessed for any improvements necessary to a) maintain ADA compliance. �° 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 04/2012 08/2013 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 09/2013 03/2014 = Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revising the budget to reflect transfer of funds to PK0404. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Sales Tax $548,521 7 , $548,514 °/E59-625 Other 104,725 104,725 0/215-836 5 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 01764-357 ;t i 01764-34: 0/4 01764-34: Professional Services $52,100 $52,100 0/bi3-211 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 601,146 601,139 01112-24: 0 Other 0 0/a Total 01164-357 ;t i„ % 01164-34: 1 0/4 1 °1164-34: IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m There is not an operating impact from this project 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0/4 Cbdl f LiQi/!2: 1 ATTAC H M Cd2/c !!!!!!CQbsl t !' !Sf dsf bl.jpo!DbgjLbriQsplf dd Cbsdf re!ODpLLpo!Cf rdUsbjrtDpoof daps N PK1401 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Design and construction of a pedestrian connection between the Cotton Belt Trail and the new John Barfield Trail immediately a> west of Precinct Line Road and south of the Tarrant County Maintenance Facility. ° m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 10/2013 01/2014 04/2015 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 03/2014 05/2014 09/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Funds needed to cover the cost of the preparation of Construction Documents and Permit for the Trail connector at John N Barfield Trail and the Cotton Belt Trail. _ FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE Sales Tax $45,000 52 ,x;; $65,000 $0 11 - 6 111 o :^ 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 > Total 0/56-111 ;t °/`3� { 1,1,1,;; 0176-111 0/a 0176-111 Professional Services $5,000 $5,000 0/bi-111 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 40,000 2d;` 60,000 0111-111 0 Other 0 0/a Total 1 0/56-111 rt�n ri 0116-111 0/a °116-111 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 0/4 C)dl f LiQi/!2: 2 ATTAC H M Cd2/c !!!!!!CQbd t !' !Sf dsf btjpo!DbgjLbrfQsplf dd Dbrrpx bz!Csbodi !L)sbjrlff W rpgn f oLt)DNBR* N PK9601 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Design and construction of 5 miles on-road/off-road multi-use concrete trail along the Calloway Branch Drainage Corridor from a> Liberty Park to the John Barfield Trail. ° m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 04/1996 09/2012 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 04/2013 04/2014 09/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Funds needed to cover the cost of the preparation of Construction Documents and Permit for the Trail Connector at John N Barfield Trail and the Cotton Belt Trail. _ FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE Federal/State Grants $733,120 $733,120 °/844-231 Sales Tax 776,691 ( } 756,691 0/867-7:2 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0/2-61: -922 ;r °/ ,� 0/2-59: -922 0/4 0/2-59: -922 Professional Services $0 %1 Cr Engineering/Design 275,973 275,973 0/386-: 84 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 1,233,838 ( ,4 1,213,838 0/2-324-949 0 Other 0 0/a Total 0/2-61: -922 ;t %q3 J;91„ „ 0/2-59: -922 0/4 1 0/2-59: -922 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 0/4 Cbdl f L Qi/!2: 3 ATTAC H M Cd2/c !!!!!!CQbsl t !' !Sf dsf btjpo!DbgjLbl if dd OSI !Sf dsf bypo!Df od s!)U G!$3* N PK 0404 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project provides for design and construction of a recreation center of approx. 86,000 square feet and will include indoor a> leisure and aquatic features. Other amenities include a double gymnasium, expansive fitness center, indoor walking track, ° classrooms, pre-school/day care room, banquet/meeting space, senior center,elevated 2nd floor terrace, kitchen facilities, m showers, lockers, and offices. a) 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 10/2007 03/2008 N Engineering 03/2009 01/2012 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2010 04/2012 Cr Other 10/2010 10/2013 W m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revising the budget to cover the cost of modification to the showers at the NRH Centre. Additional funds are needed to cover N the "after-hour"work by the contractor to minimize the impact of NRH Centre operations, and the purchase of Red Guard Sealer that was needed for the women's showers. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? General Obligation Bonds $110,000 $110,000 0/221-111 Sales Tax 1,580,000 4,:;t 4 1,584,246 0/2-695-357 5 Certificates of Obligation 23,300,000 23,300,000 0/x'34-411-111 , 30155 0/41-266 Other 30,155 �;� � 0 0/4 Total 0/86-131-266 ;t °„, 0/a36-135512 0/4 0/a36-135-512 IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 $0 %1 Cr Engineering/Design 2,356,256 2,356,256 0/3467-367 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 I 0 0/4 Construction 21,906,399 44U 21,910,645 0/82-: 21-756 0 Other 757,500 "" `' 757,500 0/868-611 r Total /86-131-266 ° r 41�� �"7; 0/86-135512 1 0/4 1 %i6-135512 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m The department has received the updated Performa from the consultants which provided the estimated expenditures and ° revenue figures. The estimated annual financial impact as calculated is shown below. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 1 2,937,6171 01 01 01 01 %i-: 48-728 Cbdl f LiQi/!2: 4 ATTAC H M !!!!!!Qbsl t !' !Sf dsf blJpo!DbgjLbrfQsplf dd Qbsl t !.bot Lsvdwsf !NbjoLf obodf !)3124* N PK 1302 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project provides for maintenance of park infrastructure in response to use and age. The Parks and Recreation Department a> developed an Infrastructure Management Plan for park amenities. The plan addresses the long term funding needs for replacement and renovation of park sites and their amenities, demonstrating responsible stewardship of property assets by the m City. Funding is included to address drainage issues within and along various parks and trails, flatwork and sidewalk repair at a) various parks, re-lamping ball field lights, play structure repairs at various playgrounds, painting park buildings �° (restrooms/concessions/pavilions), and repairs to the fishing docks at Green Valley Park. 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2012 09/2013 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revising the budget to reflect transfer of funds to PK0404. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Sales Tax $146,00014 ' $145,486 0/256-597 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0/257-111 / 0/256-597 0/4 0/256-597 Professional Services $0 %1 Engineering/Design 0 0/4 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 146,000 145,486 0/256-597 0 Other 0 %1 r Total 0/257-111 # 0/256-5971 0 t „/f� �„„ /256-597 /01 /256-597 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m There is not an operating impact from this project 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0/4 C bdl f LiQi/!2 5 ATTAC H M Cd2/c Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Park Maintenance Infrastructure (2015) N PK1506 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project provides for maintenance of park infrastructure in response to age and use. The Parks and Recreation Department a> developed an Infrastructure Management Plan for park amenities. The plan addresses the long term funding needs for replacement and renovation of park sites and their amenities, demonstrating responsible stewardship of property assets by the co City. Funding is included to address sports field renovation, sidewalk and trail repair, bridge deck replacement, replacement of a) park furniture and drinking fountains, park rules and regulation sign replacement and irrigation renovation. �° 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2014 09/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Closing PK0908,transferring remaining funds to PK1506 to help cover the cost of park rules and regulation signs replacement. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST F lJ N[.I NCrS(�(1 RC E Sales Tax $228,900 $232,597, $232,597 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $228 900 $232 597 $0 1 $232,597 Cr r , RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 228,900 3r 232,597 $232,597 0 Other 0 $0 Total $228,900 ,;t ,,,,,,,$f, 7, $232,597 i $0 1 $232,597 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 C)dl f LiQi/!2: ATTAC H M Cd2/c !!!!!!CQbsl t !' !Sf dsf blJpo!DbgjLbrfQsplf dd Uf oojt Of od s!.bot Lsvdwsf !Nbobhf n f ou!)3124* N PK 1303 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project provides for maintenance of the Tennis Center infrastructure in response to use and age. The Parks and a> Recreation Department developed an Infrastructure Management Plan for the Richland Tennis Center which addresses long term funding needs for replacement and renovation, demonstrating responsible stewardship of property assets by the City on m behalf of its citizens. The 2012/2013 priority will be removal and replacement of the slat-wall within the lobby area and updating a) all original plumbing fixtures in the facility.. �° 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2012 09/2013 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revising the budget to reflect transfer of funds to PK0404. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Sales Tax $60,000 f �,7 1 ' $56,276 0/bi7-387 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0171-111 ° 0/bi7-387 0/4 0/bi7-387 Professional Services $0 %1 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 60,000 4 ; 56,276 °/E7-387 0 Other 0 0/a Total 0171-111 0/bi7-387 0/4 1 0/bi7-387 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m There is not an operating impact from this project 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0/4 Cbdl f LiQi/!2: 7 ATTAC H M Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Trail Signage and Identification N PK0908 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project provides for the design and installation of identification and information signs to be introduced along major trails a> within the trail system. The sign installations for each major trail would include the introduction of one large identification sign with a City-wide trail map locator, three"you are here" signs at terminus and mid-points, and smaller identification signs at co cross streets. a) 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 04/2009 04/2009 03/2014 11/2014 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Balance of project funds to be transferred to PK1506 Park Maintenance Infrastructure (2015)to help offset the cost of park N signs. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE Sales Tax $52,486 ;3 $48,789 $48,789 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $52,486 ,;t,,,,,, $48,7891 $0 1 $48,789 Cr Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 52,486 ( };; 48,789 $48,789 0 Other 0 $0 Total $52,486 $48,789 $0 1 $48,789 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LiQi/!2: 8 ATTAC H M Aquatic Park Capital Projects NRH2O Facility Enhancements and Improvements N WP 1502 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Development of branding scheme for water park including fabrication and installation of sign and park enhancements as a> dictated by branding scheme. m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 10/2014 09/2015 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 01/2015 07/2015 05/2015 12/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO The scope of professional services expanded based on the needs of the water park beyond the initial development of the N project a year ago. The revision is to account for this. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININdr RCE water par k reserves , eserves $200,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 > Total $200,000 ,;t ;� $0"1 $200,0001 $0 1 $200,000 RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $10,000 ,5f ``, $67,500 $67,500 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 190,000 � ; ,50. 132,500 $132,500 0 Other 0 $0 Total $200,000Q! $200,000 $0 1 $200,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LiQi/!2: 9 ATTAC H M Aquatic Park Capital Projects NRH2O Parking Lot Improvements N WP 1504 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project involves the removal of existing parking spaces in order to accommodate adjacent commercial development along a> the north property line of the ark. A portion of a parking drive isle will be removed and parking spaces will be re-configured ° p p Y p p p 9 p 9 p 4— accordingly. m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 09/2015 12/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO The developer of the proposed commercial property on the north side of the parking lot at NRH2O recently announced their N plans to begin construction of their new development later this year. The re-configuration of the NRH2O parking lot is necessary to accommodate their development plans. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST F lJ N[.I NCrS(�(1 RC E Reserves $0 7j5 p,04',, $75,000, $0 $75,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $0 $' QQ,,'` $750001 $0 1 $75,000 Cr r, Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 05 0.04; 75,000 $75,000 0 Other 0 $0 Total $0 $75,000 $0 1 $75,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m N/A ° ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LiQi/!2: ATTAC H M Cd2/c Facilities Capital Projects Disaster Recovery EOC Infrastructure N FC 1506 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Addition of 400 AMP electrical service from the ONCOR transformer to provide service to EOC future UPS systems and data a> servers. Wiring and 200amp electrical panel to be located in the IT server room and required electrical outlets. The existing generator will be removed and the area will be enclosed with matching exterior finish. A new generator pad with m measurements of 11'0"x 16' 0"will be constructed with a privacy fence surrounding the area. Conduit will be installed underground to the enclosure from the generator pad. There is a plan in place for repurposing the 100 KVA generator at the Police Department on the generator pad, as well as repurposing two(2) 18 KVA UPS from City Hall. Update to the backup dispatch office and EOC telecommunication capabilities requires an increase in power available for these services. This will aa)i provide the city with the necessary infrastructure and equipment to handle emergency communications in any situation should U the main dispatch go offline. 0 Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 02/2015 10/2015 N Engineering 02/2015 10/2015 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 02/2015 10/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO This project was not included in the original FY14/15 Budget. Funding for this project is CO N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? CO's $0 $Tb 0.04` $150,000 $150,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $0 $150 000 $0 1 $150,000 r, NZOJtC""E'XT,RUNU... , Cr Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 150,000 $150,000 0 Other 01 1 $0 Total $0 ,;t,,,,, "i,59,40,,, $150,000 $0 1 $150,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No operating impact is expected. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LICh/!311 ATTAC H M C�2lc Facilities Capital Projects Flooring and Cabinet Upgrades N FC 1502 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Remove ceramic tile and diamond grind concrete sub-floor in kitchen/dining and South bathroom areas at Fire Station#3 and a> the North bathroom areas at Fire Station#2 ($30,000). Remove and replace all cabinets and countertops in kitchen at Fire Station#3. Remove and replace countertops in the bathrooms at Fire Station#2 and Fire Station#3 ($40,000). m These facilities are 24/7 operations with high traffic of personnel. Ceramic tile is original to the construction of these facilities a) with above typical deterioration of grout and chipping of tile surfaces. Refinishing the concrete floor areas will remove trip �° hazards, improve indoor air quality. Countertop surfaces are cracking, pealing and showing the years of typical usage damage. This is a continuation of the City Long Range Plan for City Facilities. Replacing these items will provide necessary aa)i storage, provide germ-free food preparation ares, (stainless steel), extend the life cycle and enhance the aesthetics of each U facility. 0 Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q0 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2014 09/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO This revision is a merger of FC1502 and FC1503 whose scope had changed and are now one project. This revision allows for N the name of FC1502 to be changed to Flooring and Cabinet Upgrades, and brings in the funding from FC1503 to be included in the new FC1502 project. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FONININCrS( URGE U? Budget 0�' $70,000, $70,000 Other-Facilities Operating Bud et $30,000 $4'4p;, 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 t 0 $0 Total 1 $30,000 ;t,,,,,,, 9, �„ $70,0001 $0 1 $70,000 Cr IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 30,000 4b 004;: 70,000 0 $70,000 0 Other 0 $0 Total $30,000 ,;t $tQ,QQ ; $70,000 $0 1 $70,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No impact is expected. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LIChP312 ATTAC H M Cd2/c Facilities Capital Projects Interior/Exterior Renovations N FC 1503 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Repair interior walls as required, paint all interiors walls at Fire Station#1 and Fire Station#4($24,000). a> 0 Replace kitchen cabinets/countertops and bathroom countertops at Fire Station#3($11,500) Replace kitchen and bathroom m countertops at Fire Station#2($4,500) a) 0 This is a continuation of the City Long Range Plan. The facilities experience high usage due to crew sizes and 24/7 operations. Providing these improvements protect the wall surfaces from further damage and seals the surfaces. It improves aa)i the indoor air quality, extends the serviceability and life cycle of the facilities and enhances the aesthetics. U The existing cabinetry and countertops are original to the construction and exhibits the years of 24/7 use. 0 Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 10/2014 09/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO FC1503 is merging into project FC1502 and so this revision is for the transfer of funds from this project to FC1502. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Other-Facilities Operating $40,000 ($4b,,0* $0 $0 $0 0 $0 x 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $40,000 ,; { Q ;;, $0 $0 1 $0 Cr IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 40,000 (40.,d00' 0 0 $0 0 Other 0 $0 Total $40,000 (},0,x} $0 $0 1 $0 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m None 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LICh/!313 ATTAC H M C�2lc !!!!!!!!NvojdjgbrtGbdj*!DbgjLbrtQsplf dLt OSI !Bojn brtBepgljpo!' !Sf t dvf !Df od s!.!Of x !Gbdj* N ES0201 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project entails building a new facility of 10,303 square feet to replace the older antiquated facility currently in use. The a> current facility shelters an average 102- 120 animals daily with a current design capacity of 96. The new facility will be able to provide additional kennel capacity, adoption areas, sick and incoming isolation areas, and a separate entry and exit to reduce m cross-contamination issues, as well as additional storage space and work areas. a) 0 The new Adoption Center is needed to enhance adoption and customer service operations, minimize animal overcrowding, reduce cross contamination between sick and well animals, and provide needed material/equipment storage and staff work aa)i areas. U a� Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 04/2006 04/2006 12/2014 02/2015 N Engineering 12/2006 12/2006 12/2014 02/2015 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 02/2014 02/2014 12/2014 02/2015 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Due to subcontractor issues and inclement weather, the project completion date has been revised. N Due to continued fundraising efforts, the amount of reserves needed is reduced. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FIJN[.INCrS(�URCE Reserves $700,000 $555,000 $0 .........W66-111 i � 1�4�, ,; Other 930,000 14 1,075,000 0 0/2-186-111 5 General Obligation Bonds 1,300,000 1,300,000 0 0/2411-111 Certificates of Obligation 1,470,000 6! 1,470,000 0 0/2-581-111 0 0/4 > Total 0/5-511-111 ;t i °f�1,; 0/5-511-111 0/a 0/5-511-111 RO018C"1"EX,PM61T„U t Professional Services $100,000 $100,000 $0 0/211-111 Engineering/Design 415,760 415,760 0 0//526-871 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0 0 0/4 Construction 3,884,240 6! 3,884,240 0 0/4-995-3 51 0 Other 0 """" 4 ' 0 0 0/4 Total 0/5-511-111 ;t i °1�1,; 0/5-511-111 0/a 0/5-511-111 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No impact to operating budget 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 0/4 C)dl f LIChP314 ATTAC H M N btps!DbgjLbrtFr vjgn f oUDbgjLbrtQspIf dLt Of Lx psl Fr vjqn f ou!Sf grbdf n f ou N IS1503 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Purchase and installation of network hardware and software for the new City Hall project. This project encompasses all costs a> associated with engineering,design, hardware staging (for configuration), data migration, voice version upgrades, installation, site configuration, project management, training and knowledge transfer to City staff. This project includes equipment for the m main data server room, 10 intermediate data rooms, and all wireless connectivity to complete transition to the new facility. The a) system design of this project positions the City to meet the demands of continued changes and expansion of technology in the �° new facility. 0 This project is necessary to keep the City's network infrastructure functional and operational in a continuous uninterrupted U state. 0 Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014/15 ORIGINAL 2014/15 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q0 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 10/2014 12/2015 a) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO This is the creation of a capital project. This project will be incorporated into the FY14/15 Capital Project Budget during the N annual budget process and mid-year revisions. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE Reserves , (Information Services Reserves) $0 47 ATTAC H M C�2lc Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Replace/Enhance Dispatch Center Recording Equipment N IS1501 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Replace and upgrade audio logging recorder in Public Safety Communications. Statues mandate that all 9-1-1 telephone calls as well as radio traffic be recorded and maintained for a specific time frame. The current system i outdated and no longer compatible with the advanced operating systems in use by the Dispatch Center. m a� As the radio equipment transitions to P25 compliant digital specifications, newer technology recording loggers are necessary to �° insure we are complaint with laws governing recording and retention. Additionally,the dispatch consoles do not currently have an instant playback capability which should be available to enhance fire fighter and police officer safety. This feature will be aa)i included in the replacement equipment. The last replacement/enhancement of the Dispatch recording equipment twas U 2005/2006. 0 The other revenue sources is Information Systems Reserves. Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014/15 ORIGINAL 2014/15 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q00 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 10/2014 10/2014 10/2015 03/2016 C) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO This revision adds a Grant revenue source and the usage (expense)of that resource. The grant supports the original project N description and justification. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE Federal/State Grants $0 $71;1TL.., $71,171 $71,171 Reserves 125,000 125,000 $125,000 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $125,000 r $'�1171,i $196171 1 $0 1 $196171 Cr RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 125,000 196,171 $196,171 Total $125,000 ,;,t $ 1,,1��,i $196,171 1 $0 1 $196,171 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m None. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 Cbdl f LICh/!316 ATTAC H M Cd2/c Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Replacement of CAD/RMS Public Safety Software Platform N IS1502 E9 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 Replacement of the current CAD/RMS software platform(CRIMES)with a different software and vendor. The current software a> (CRIMES) is not meeting the needs for Public Safety. CRIMES has proven to be improperly developed and this poor development becomes apparent when the end-users attempt to use the software. Typically, the fixes from CRIMES are m implemented and tend to cause more issues for the user. The problematic software platform causes problems for all users a) involved in the Joint Dispatch project-North Richland Hills, Richland Hills, Watauga, & Haltom City. �° 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q0 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 10/2014 12/2014 a) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Revised budgeted amount for the moving of funds to FC1506 EOC infrastructure project N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? , , , , $2850000 $0 $2850000 CO $3,000,000 �$1 .0�.6�', 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $3 000 000 $2 850 000 $0 $2,850,000 Cr r, Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 3,000,000 (15f1004)j 2,850,000 0 $2,850,000 Total $3,000,000 ,;,t � l,�},Q $2,850,000 $0 $2,850,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Software platform maintenance 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 200,0001 210,0001 220,0001 230,000 1 $860,000 C)dl f LIQI/!317 ATTAC H M C�2lc Facilities Capital Projects SCBA Air Pack Replacement (2017) N FD 1501 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 The NRH Fire Department is seeking to replace all of its SCBA air packs-with an extra cylinder for each unit. In addition to the a> air packs-face pieces, Rapid Intervention Team(RIT)SCBA assemblies, and a comprehensive accountability system are also ° needed. These air packs will be placed in service on all of our apparatus and each member will receive their own face mask m with heads up display and communication capabilities. The department will place the RIT bags on each front line apparatus. a) New SCBAs will employ a comprehensive accountability system controllable from the Command unit. �° Most of the SCBA units exceed ten years in age and fail to even meet 2002 NFPA standards. The equipment must be replaced by January 2018 as it will have reached the end of its life cycle. The replacement of face masks, accountability aa)i system and RIT bags are all to conform to the new air packs and not only comply with the latest standards but take advantage U of safety enhancements provided through updated technology. The procurement of new SCBA equipment will enhance service 0 delivery during fire ground operations, provide for the safety of our firefighters and maintain compliance with NFPA safety Q standards. It will also improve efficiency and effectiveness of operations and lower maintenance costs. Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 10/2016 09/2017 a) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO This project was not included in the Adopted FY15 Capital Budget. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Other $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $400 000 $,G $4000001 $0 1 $400,000 Cr Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 400,000 ����""' 400,000 $400,000 � Total $400,000 ,t i $Q! $400,000 $0 1 $400,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m No significant change is expected to the Operating Budget for maintenance over and above what is already accounted for. ° With that said, due to the nature of the equipment's use, there is always potential for impact on the operating budget. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LIChP318 ATTAC H M C�2lc Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects Teleworks Replacement for Online and VOIP Platforms N IS1203 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This replacement will enhance all of the current IVR platforms used currently by the City-Utility Billing and Planning/Inspections. a> This is a replacement to our current IVR(interactive voice response) payment system currently being used by the three departments. The system will continue to use automated calling mechanisms to call our water customers concerning past due m bills, urgent city notifications(service interruptions), and the ability for our customers to access their accounts, balance a) inquiries, and FAQs. The Courts module will continue to allow our citizens to call in for court status, enter a plea, and make �° payments. In addition, the new system will allow Municipal Courts to automatically call out with schedule changes and warrant notification. All phone and internet transactions such as payments, pleas and schedule changes will be posted immediately aa)i without delays due to processing at night. All modules interface directly with HTE and Incode. U a� Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q0 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 03/2012 09/2016 W m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Court is no longer involved with this project, funding therefore was lowered by the removal of Court Technology Funds, as well N as a corresponding lowering of expense. FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URCE U? Reserves- Information Services Reserve $30,000 $ $30,000 $0 $30,000 Reserves-Utility Fund 70,000 ' 70,000 0 $70,000 5 Other-Court Technology Fund 30,000 ( ,04�, 0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $130,000 ,; OQ °;;, $100,0001 $0 1 $100,000 Cr IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 130,000 ..... ' 100,000 0 $100,000 Total 1 $130,000 10091,11 $100,000 $0 $100,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Maintenance cost from vendor. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 20,000 0 $20,000 Cbdl f LIChP319 ATTAC H M Cd2/c !!Fdpopn jd!Ef d rpgn f oLtDbgjLbrfQsplf dd Ofjhi cpsi ppe!Sf\yLbrjj bljpo!Qsphsbn !)OSQ* N ED 1501 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 The Neighborhood Revitalization Program(NRP) is designed to revitalize neighborhoods by renovating single-family, a> owner-occupied homes in a target zone. By renovating homes, the program will not only boost property values in these neighborhoods, but also provide interested single-family home buyers the opportunity to purchase an updated and safe home m that they can be proud to own at a reasonable price. This program aims to give such neighborhoods a"facelift"while continuing a) to attract responsible citizens. �° This program provides a twenty percent(20%)grant of up to $10,000 for the completion of well-designed home renovations that make a home more aesthetically pleasing and inspire the continued community growth of the neighborhoods in the aa)i program's initial target zone. Both contractors"flipping" homes and residents who currently own homes qualify for this U incentive. 0 Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 02/2015 02/2017 Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Project was not included in the 2014/2015 Capital Budget. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE W, Other $2 � � f� ,. , ,; � � 06,184 /x317-295 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0/4 ,,;t,,,,,°/ ) 0/a317-295 0/4 0/a317-295 Professional Services $0 %1 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 0 0/a o Other 0 0/a Total 0/4 /t ,,,,,i,,,,,°lt, 0/4 1 0/4 1 %1 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 0/4 C)dl f LiQh/i31; ATTAC H M C�2lc !!Fdpopn jd!Ef d rpgn f oLtDbgjLbrfQsplf dd TLsbd hjd!IVboe!Bdr vjtjl po N ED 1502 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This is for the purchase of property along Boulevard 26, south of Loop 820. a> 0 This project acquires property for strategic economic development use. m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 01/2015 09/2015 m REVISION EXPLANATION This project is added for strategic land acquisition. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCrS( URGE U? Other $0i1; ,�> $1,680,000 $0 0/2-791-111 0 %1 x 0 %1 0 %1 0 0/4 Total 0/4 ,,;r,,, 7 ;1„ 1,, 0/2-791-111 0/4 1 0/2-791-111 Professional Services $0 %1 Cr Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 Construction 0 0/a o Other 0 1 � 1,680,000 0 0/2-791-111 Total %1 ,t 79.1,t/l ., 0/2-791-111 1 0/4 1 %i1-111 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 01 0/4 Cbdl f LIChP321 ATTAC H M Economic Development Capital Projects Strategic Land Acquisition N ED 1502 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This is for the purchase of property along Boulevard 26, south of Loop 820. a> 0 This project acquires property for strategic economic development use. m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction S Cr Other 01/2015 09/2015 a) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Project has been revised due to the property no longer being purchased. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININdrS( URGE U? Other $1,680,000 $20,000 $0 $20,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 > Total 1 $1,680,000 ,;� Q ,;;, $20 000 $0 1 $20,000 Cr IRO1C1..E3CP,,I [IT,U,,,, , Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 1,680,000 ; ,(1. r 004}`, 20,000 0 $20,000 Total $1,680,000 , IK ,,,,001`, $20,000 $0 1 $20,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m None 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/19 1 TOTALm Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LiCh/!322 ATTAC H M C�2lc Drainage Capital Projects TIF 1 Expansion-Intersection Improvements/Utility Burial N ED0601 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 This project will consist of making improvements at two intersections and burying approximately 1.25 miles of above ground a> utilities along Boulevard 26. These two locations represent a portion of an overall branding and marketing communications strategy planned for the section of Boulevard 26. The city's portion of the intersection improvements along with the above m ground utilities are to be funded by Certificates of Obligation as part of the TIF 1 expansion effort. This is a cooperative effort a) between the Public Works Department, Planning & Inspections Department and Economic Development. Burying of utilities �° along the NRH side of Boulevard 26 is part of the TIF#1 expansion efforts as approved by the City and all taxing entities. 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering 05/2006 08/2012 M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 08/2014 12/2015 Cr Other 03/2014 10/2014 a) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO We need to transfer the funds to cover future construction expenses with utility burial on Boulevard 26. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FONININCr RCE CO's $3,000,000 $0` $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 0 $0 x 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 > Total $3,000,000 ,;t ;� ; $3 000 000 $0 $3,000,000 RO1C1,.E3CP„I [IT„U,,,, Professional Services $100,000 ;; $100,000 $0 $100,000 Engineering/Design 450,000 0,; 450,000 0 $450,000 Land/ROWAcquistion 450,000 ( 004j;; 250,000 0 $250,000 Construction 2,000,0000:6 p:(7 2,200,000 0 $2,200,000 0 Other 0 0 $0 Total $3,000,000Q! $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Minimal operating impact is anticipated. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LICh/!323 ATTAC H M Economic Development Capital Projects TOD Land Management N ED 1503 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 The City has established two geographic areas that are designated for high levels of growth through mass transit activities. a> These Transit Oriented Development(TOD)areas require the advance purchase of property to facilitate various components of ° mass transit which include parking, platforms, loading, unloading, etc. m a� 0 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services Q00 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 04/2015 04/2016 0 Construction S Cr Other a> m REVISION EXPLANATION LO This is a new project introduced in mid-fiscal year. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCdr General Fund-Trans Transportation Reserve $1,20;6,0,04; „$1 2 p 00,000 $1,200,000 0 $0 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total $0 ,;t„ QQ;;` $1,200,000 1 $0 1 $1,200,000 tCT"E'XP„I_aIT„U,,,, $ ( Professional Services ,.0 :` $30,000 $30,000 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROWAcquistion 1,,16,0.04` 1,170,000 $1,170,000 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 0 $0 Total $0 „5r) ,, ,q,0,, $1,200,000 1 $0 1 $1,200,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Since this is from a reserve account,there is no impact to the operating budget. ° ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected $0 C)dl f LiCh/!324 ATTAC H M C�2lc !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Pd f s!DbgjLbri0spIf dLt Opsd lUfybt !Boy.Hboh!DfoLfs! N FC 1505 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 The High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program is a program authorized by federal legislation and funded through a> the President's Office for National Drug Control Policy.The North Texas HIDTA(NTHIDTA) is one of 28 HIDTAs across the country and is the one in which the City of North Richland Hills is located. NTHIDTA desires to start a new task force m specifically to deal with gangs and has applied for a grant from the Office of the Governor to start the program. The grant funds a) must be disbursed to a governmental entity and requires a fiduciary to administer the funds and pay invoices generated by �° NTHIDTA. The Governor's office has contacted the City of North Richland Hills about acting as the fiduciary for this grant.As fiduciary,the City will receive a 5%administrative fee for such services. This fee, estimated at$61,424, is reflected in the Other aa)i category and will be transferred out of the project as a project expense as it earned. U a� Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 03/2015 03/2015 08/2016 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 03/2015 03/2015 09/2015 Cr Other 03/2015 03/2015 08/2016 a) m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Council approved revision of Resolution No.2015-026 on 02/09/2015. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE Office of the Governor $0 ;,1, =1,751",. $1,211,751 , 0/2-322-862 0 0/a .X 0 0/a 0 0/a 0 0/4 Total %1 2/ -,$,6� 0/2-322-862 0/4 0/2-322-862 Professional Services $0 {± $530,827 0/bi41-938 Engineering/Design 0 0/a Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0/4 C) Construction 0 615,000 01126-111 0 Other 0 �,924" 65,924 °116-: 35 Total 0/4 ,,/`fq #F,, 0/2-322-862 1 0/4 1 0/2-322 62 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 0/4 Cbdl f LIChP325 ATTAC H M Cd2/c Drainage Capital Projects Concrete Lined Channel Rehabilitation Project N DR 1401 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION O This project involves beginning a rehabilitation process of the City's seven (7) miles of concreted lined channels. The scope of F the project will include repairing areas of concrete lined channels that have deteriorated, cracked, dropped, collapsed, heaved ° or hold water due to heavy ground movement and/or age. The list of needed repairs will include patching sections of channel co walls and bottoms and replacement of sections of channel walls and bottoms. Staff has inventoried all concrete lined channels a) and estimates that 50,000 square foot of repairs are initially needed to begin the repair process. �° ° U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition O Construction 10/2013 11/2014 Cr Other ° m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Funds are needed for the emergency repair to the Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO lt"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE $0 $0 Reserves 200,000 ; 131,500 $131,500 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total F $200 000 sod , $131,5001 $0 $131,500 Professional Services $0 $0 -0 Engineering/Design 0 $0 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 U o Construction 200,000 ( ,5 131,500 $131,500 Other 0 $0 Total $200,000 „$,��},, ,, $131,500 $0 1 $200,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Minimal operating impact is anticipated. ° ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LiCh/!326 iii ATTAC H M C�2lc Drainage Capital Projects Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project N DR 1503 LO N M PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION 0 With the extraordinary rainfall this spring the side slopes of a portion of this channel failed, sliding into the channel bottom and F causing a loss of material in several of the backyards along Waggoner Ranch Road. Staff hired a Geotechnical firm to learn exactly what caused the failure and what could be done to correct the problem. Unfortunately it is not as simple as replacing m the dislodged material back onto the channel bank;the bottom line is that the clay material is not suited to exist at the required a) slope with elevated moisture content. And while the rains this year were unusually high, it is certain that we will experience this �° level of rainfall again at some point. 0 U a> Cr PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115 START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION N Professional Services 09/2015 02/2016 N Engineering M Land/ROW Acquisition 0 Construction 02/2016 08/2016 Cr Other 0 m REVISION EXPLANATION LO Creation of project. N FINANCIAL DATA o ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL BUDGET THRU FARO l t"ri BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT 2014/15 REVISION BALANCE COST FUNININCr RCE $0 $0 Reserves 0 5 ;, 68,500 $68,500 5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Total 1 $0 $68,5001 $0 1 $68,500 r, R00ECT"EXP„I Cr Professional Services $0 $0 Engineering/Design 0 68,500 $68,500 Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0 Construction 0 $0 0 Other 0 $0 Total $0 $ $59911,1 500 $0 1 $68 500 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET m Minimal operating impact is anticipated. 0 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 2014/15 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL m Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0 Cbdl f LIChP327 Cd3 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Consider Ratifying an Increase in Property Tax Revenues Reflected in the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Adopted Budget. Presenter: Mark Mills, Director of Budget & Research Summary: State law requires that when adopting a budget that will raise more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year, a separate vote of the governing board is required to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget. General Description: When adopting a budget that generates more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year, State law requires the City to state the increase in property tax revenue, no matter what the cause; whether the increase is based on increased property values, new construction or an increased tax rate. The Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Budget includes a proposed tax rate of 610 per $100 of valuation. An increase in certified taxable values, primarily related to the addition of new construction, will result in increased total property tax revenues for the City. The language required to appear as a cover page to the budget document by State law is as follows: This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year's budget by $311 ,658 or 1.38 percent, and of that amount $670,665 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. As a point of clarification, staff added the following: The amount of tax revenue to be raised from existing property on the tax roll will decrease by $3597007. As a result of the additional total property tax revenue, the aforementioned legislation requires the governing body to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the adopted budget. The vote to ratify this property tax increase must be a record vote in addition to and separate from the vote to adopt the budget or the vote to set the tax rate. Recommendation: Ratify the Increase in Property Tax Revenues Cbdl f LiCh/!328 Cd4 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Consider Ordinance No. 3373, adopting the Tax Rate for Tax Year 2015. Presenter: Mark Mills, Director of Budget & Research Summary: The City Council is requested to consider the adoption of an ordinance setting the maintenance and operations (M&O) tax rate for Tax Year 2015 at 36.47310 and the debt service tax rate (I&S) at 24.5269¢, for combined total tax rate of 610 per $100 of valuation. General Description: The proposed Tax Year 2015 (Fiscal Year 2015/2016) property tax rate for the City of North Richland Hills is 610 per $100 of valuation. This tax rate is lower than both effective tax rate of 66.4683¢, and the rollback rate of 61.3273¢. The proposed tax rate is distributed into two components as follows: • 36.47310 for the purpose of maintenance and operations; and • 24.5269¢ for the purpose of tax support debt principal and interest payments. Adopting Ordinance No. 3373 would set the tax rate for Tax Year 2015 at 610 per $100 of valuation. If adopted, this would be the fourth consecutive year that the combined tax rate was set at 610. State law requires specific language to be included in the ordinance adopting the tax rate if the ordinance sets a tax rate that will impose an amount of taxes for maintenance and operations that exceeds the taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year. If adopted, the 610 tax rate would impose more total property taxes for the purpose of maintenance and operations, which makes the additional language mandatory. If Council chooses to adopt the proposed tax rate of 610, staff requests the following three motions be made, each followed by a Council vote: 1. "1 move that the property tax rate for Maintenance and Operations be set at 36.4731 cents per$100 of valuation" Cbdl f LiCh/!329 Cd4 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS 2. "1 move that the property tax rate for Interest and Sinking be set at 24.5269 cents per$100 of valuation" 3. "1 move to approve Ordinance 3373, adopting a combined 61 cent tax rate for Tax Year 2015, Fiscal Year 2015/2016." Recommendation: (1) set the Maintenance and Operations component of the tax rate at 36.4731 cents; (2) set the Interesting and Sinking component of the tax rate at 24.5269 cents; and (3) approve Ordinance No. 3373, setting the Tax Year 2015 tax rate. Cbdl f LiQi/i32 C�4fb ORDINANCE NO. 3373 AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR THE 2015 TAX YEAR WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills has followed the procedures established by the Property Tax Code, including the publishing and posting of required notices and the holding of required public hearings; and WHEREAS, The City Council has approved separately each of the two components of the tax rate hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH 4M RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Cl) T SECTION 1. That there shall be and there is hereby levied the following taxes on each �- One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of valuation on all taxable property within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas to be assessed and collected for s Cr the Tax Year 2015, Fiscal Year 2015/2016, for the purposes hereinafter stipulated, to-wit: m N (a) For maintenance and operations levied on the $100.00 valuation; N $0.364731; and 0 (b) For interest and sinking levied on the $100.00 valuation; o $0.245269. 4M SECTION 2. That the tax rate for maintenance and operations of$0.364731 will impose U) an amount of taxes that exceeds the amount of taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year, therefore- 0 THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE. m SECTION 3. That the maintenance and operations tax rate of $0.364731 exceeds the effective maintenance and operations rate of$0.340745, therefore: THIS TAX RATE WILL EFFECTIVELY BE RAISED BY 7.04 PERCENT AND WILL RAISE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS ON A $100,000 HOME BY APPROXIMATELY $23.98. Cbdl f LiChfi331 C�4fb PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 14th day of September, 2015. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 4M U) T George A. Staples, City Attorney 2 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Cr m Mark C. Mills, Director of Budget & Research M N O O d 4M U) T O m Cbdl f LiChfi332 Cd5 r4 NORTH RQCHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Consider Resolution No. 2015-022, approving and ratifying the 2015 Certified Roll. Presenter: Mark Mills, Director of Budget & Research Summary: State law requires the legislative body to ratify the Certified Tax Roll as a separate action item during the budget and tax rate approval process. General Description: The Tarrant Appraisal District provided the City with the 2015 Certified Tax Roll. This includes the most current appraisal information; exemptions for disabled veterans, persons over 65, homestead and disabled persons; tax ceilings for persons over 65 and disabled persons; abatement value losses; Freeport inventory value loss; and agriculture value lost. These values also include new construction, minimum value of properties still under protest, and the estimated net taxable value of incomplete property accounts. The certified value is the amount used to calculate the effective tax rate and property tax revenues for the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Budget. The certified taxable values for the City of North Richland Hills are $4,150,187,927, which includes $109,945,013 in taxable new construction. The new construction includes $45,219,791 in taxable residential new construction and $64,725,222 in taxable commercial new construction. The certified values for the City of North Richland Hills are broken down into the following categories: Cate o Taxable Value Residential $2,563,931,184 Commercial* 1,521,224,849 Industrial* 48,231,055 Mineral Lease 41,880,110 Agriculture 360,147 Cases Before ARB** (84,798,060) Estimated Value of Cases Before ARB** 59,358,642 Incomplete Accounts** (114,394,707) Estimated Value of Incomplete Accounts** 114,394,707 Certified Value Total $4,150,187,927 * Includes Real Estate and Business Personal Property ** Includes all property types Cbdl f LiCh/!333 Cd5 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS Also included in the certified values received from the Tarrant Appraisal District is information on the average market value of a single family residence within North Richland Hills. Excluding those properties under protest at the time the certified roll was issued, the average market value of a single family residence in North Richland Hills is $166,255. This is an increase of $3,562 compared to the current year's average single family residence market value of$162,693. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2015-022. Cbdl f LiCh/!334 Cd5 r4 NORTH KICHLAND HILLS RESOLUTION NO. 2015-022 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas received the Ad Valorem Tax Roll for the Tax Year 2015 from the Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of $4,150,187,927, including minimum value or properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board and the estimated net taxable value on incomplete properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Roll and approve same on September 14, 2014. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the approval of said Tax Roll received from the Tarrant Appraisal District in July 2015, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall be collectively considered the Tax Roll of this City for Tax Year 2015 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 14th day of September, 2015. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, City Attorney Cbdl f LiCh/!335 Cd5 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mark C. Mills, Director of Budget & Research Cbdl f LiCh/!336 Cd6 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Consider Ordinance No. 3368, amending Appendix A of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances by amending the fee charged under sections 78-125, 78-171, 78-183, and 78-290(a) related to fire hydrant meters, water and water meters. Presenter: Kent Austin, Finance Director Summary: City staff has reviewed miscellaneous water and water meter-related charges. Increases are proposed for cut-off charges, activation fees, after-hours turn-on, and others. Additionally, fire hydrant meter charges are being included. Previously they were handled off-line via letter contract with the customer. General Description: The City's Utility Customer Services division assesses a variety of fees related to water and water meters, such as activation fees and cut-off charges. Periodically the City compares its fees to those of other cities; it also considers whether a given fee is covering the cost involved in providing the service. For example, currently it costs almost $20 to activate new service, while the existing fee is only $10. Fees may also be changed to discourage or penalize certain behaviors, like meter tampering. Fire hydrant meter fees are being added to the fee schedule. Fire hydrant meters are special meters loaned to contractors to legally obtain water from City fire hydrants. The meters are intended for temporary use and historically have been rented at a rate determined by letter contract rather than being included in the fee schedule. Consumption can range from zero gallons per month to 28,000 or more. As a result, fire hydrant meter rates have not changed since the 1980's. The proposed ordinance will increase the base monthly charge from $48 (which included 16,000 gallons) to $100 and the volume rate from $3.00 to $4.25 per 1,000 gallons. These amounts are comparable to those for a three-inch water meter. A change to the language of Section 78-290(a)(1)b would eliminate the need for the fire hydrant meter contracts to be reviewed every six months. A recent comparison of NRH fees with other cities suggests that increases to some fees are appropriate. An ordinance has been prepared to amend the City's fee schedule (sections 78-125, 78-1717 78-183 and 78-290(a)), Appendix A of the Code of Cbdl f LiCh/!337 Cd6 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS Ordinances. A worksheet comparing the existing and proposed fees is provided after the ordinance and Exhibit A. An additional document displays a partial listing of miscellaneous charges actual activity in 2014. If approved, the new fees could generate an additional $63,180 per year, based on 2014 totals. Finally, a copy of survey city data is provided to show how the NRH fees compare to area cities. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 3368, amending Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances to amend miscellaneous fees related to water and water meters Cbdl f LiCh/!338 Cd6fb ORDINANCE NO. 3368 . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 78-290(a)(1)(b) AND 4M APPENDIX A OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES AND AMENDING THE FEES CHARGED UNDER SECTIONS 78-125, 78-171, 78-183 AND 78-290(A) RELATED TO WATER AND WATER METERS. 0 WHEREAS, Changes have been recommended by staff to the miscellaneous water and 4M water meter fees established by Chapter 78 of the Code of Ordinances; x NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE o CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section l: Section 78-290(a)(1)(b) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: o 0 "An applicant for service from a fire hydrant where water is placed in a tank truck or other container shall place a meter deposit with the city, m the amount of which will be specified by Appendix A. fire hydrant meters co are designed for use in construction projects, the exact location of which N will be required on the application. Each applicant shall be required to submit their meter each month for reading purposes. Procedures for use of fire hydrant meters shall be established by the Utility Services Manager. Should an applicant fail to provide a reading, he shall be billed a minimum as established in Appendix A, per month. The deposit will be refunded, or U) in the event a balance is due, applied against the final bill for services required upon termination of the contract. The city will not pay interest on 0 meter deposit funds." o Section 2: That Appendix A of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances be amended by amending the fees therein established for Sections 78-125, 78-171, 78-183 and 78-290(a) to the fees set forth in Exhibit A attached d hereto and made a part hereof by reference. T Section 3: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. Cr Cr m AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. �i PASSED AND APPROVED on the day of 2015. Cr 0 0 m Ordinance No.3368 Page 1 of 2 Cbdl f dChfi339 Cd6fb CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS �i 4m By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: -0 O 4m Alicia Richardson, City Secretary 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: o George A. Staples, Attorney o 0 m co N N O Q U) O O O d m T O Cr Cr m 4m Cr O m Ordinance No.3368 Page 2 of 2 Cbdl f dCifi33: C�6/c FYI ZJJ!B Tf dgpo!89.236-!qsf!i zesboL+!rpbejoh!epol !ps!L.bol !L.svdl !dvt L.pn f st Fire hydrant meter, minimum monthly $100.00 Volume rate per 1,000 gallons $4.25 Tf dgpo!89.282!X bJ s!boe!Tf x f s!Ef qpt jL.t Water Loading dock, tank truck customers, or fire hydrant meters $1,300.00 4M Tf dgpo!89.294!Njt df rrbof pvt !x bLf s!boe!x bLf s!n f Lf s!gf f t x Dpef Eftdsjggpo Bn pvou o DP Cut-off charge $45.00 4= NP Lock cut $100.00 x SD Returned check/ACH $35.00 > TD Service charge (activation charge) $20.00 0 BI After hours turn-on charge $100.00 CQ Meter bypass or tamper fee CQ First Occurence $100.00 Second Occurence $150.00 0 Third Occurence $200.00 O 0 UG Transfer fee $20.00 IVB Cut lock ring $100.00 UU Tamper with transponder $100.00 C° ON Pull meter fee $35.00 .E I.D. verification fee $2.00 N M CD Tf dgpo!89TS: 1)b*!Di bshf t !boe!ef gptjLS !g)s!dpoof dgpot !L.p!f yjt goh!x bLf s!n bjot !boe!rbL.f sbrb U Service charge applied to each meter(activation fee) $20.00 T LL O CO O m Qbdl f u!Qh/!341 C�6/d Comparison of existing and proposed miscellaneous water-related fees Tf dypo!89.236-!qsf !i zesbou-!rpbejoh!epol -!ps!ibol !Lsvdl !dvt Lpn f st Loading dock, tank truck customers, or fire hydrant meters Existing Proposed Three-inch meter, minimum $ 48.00 $ 100.00 Volume rate per 1,000 gallons $ 3.00 $ 4.25 Tf dypo!89.282!X buf s!boe!Tf x f s!Ef gptjLt �- Loading dock, tank truck customers, or fire hydrant meters $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 4M Tf dypo!89.294-!Njt df rrbof pvt !x bLf s!boe!x W s!n f Lf s!gf f t 4M Code Description Existing Proposed CO Cut-off charge $ 30.00 $ 45.00 0 DB Damage meter box $ 25.00 $ 25.00 LO Lock cut $ 30.00 $ 100.00 RC Returned item $ 25.00 $ 35.00 -" SC Service charge (Activation fee) $ 10.00 $ 20.00 Q AH After hours charge $ 20.00 $ 100.00 BP Meter bypass or tamper fee $ 50.00 BP Meter bypass or tamper fee: first occurrence $ 100.00 Meter bypass or tamper fee: second occurrence $ 150.00 Meter bypass or tamper fee: third occurrence $ 200.00 0 TF Transfer fee $ 10.00 $ 20.00 0 LR Cut lock ring $ 30.00 $ 100.00 TT Tamper with transponder $ 50.00 $ 100.00 LP NF Notice of cutoff to a multi-family residential tenant $ 10.00 $ 10.00 SD Same day service fee $ - $ 25.00 N PM Pull meter fee $ - $ 35.00 ID I.D. verification fee $ - $ 2.00 RS Replacement sign-tap $ - $ 15.00 z 0 Tf dypo!89.3: 1)b*-!Di bshf t !boe!ef gptjLt !Lp!f yjt yoh!x bLf s!n bjot !boe!rbLf sbrb Service charge applied to each meter (activation fee) $ 10 1 $ 20 Cr 0 0 m Cbdl f LiCh/!342 Cd6/e 1111 1 NRH � M iscellaneous ChargesApplied 2014 k proposed • - •-• Cut-Off Charge $ 30.00 1,946 $ 58,380.00 $ 45.00 1,946 $ 87,570.00 Lock Cut $ 30.00 26 $ 780.00 $ 100.00 26 $ 2,600.00 Broken Lock Rng $ 30.00 2 $ 60.00 $ 100.00 2 $ 200.00 Returned Item Fee $ 25.00 149 $ 3,725.00 $ 35.00 149 $ 5,215.00 Activation Fee $ 10.00 3,039 $30,390.00 $ 20.00 3,039 $ 60,780.00 - After Hour Turn On(currently$20, revising to$100 if on call person turns on after 6:30) $ 20.00 0 $ - $ 100.00 0 $ - Return Trip Fee $ 20.00 46 $ 920.00 $ 20.00 46 $ 920.00 -0 x M eter Bypass Fee(combine with W Tamper fee) $ 50.00 - $ - $ 100.00 - $ - P P Tamper Fee(combine Meter bypass 4M and tamper fee) $ - $ - 5 1st Occurrence $ 50.00 3 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 3 $ 300.00 Q 2nd Occurrence $ 50.00 $ - $ 150.00 $ - o 3rd Occurrence $ 50.00 $ - $ 200.00 $ - Transfer Fee $ 10.00 - $ - $ 20.00 - $ Notice of cut-off to multi-family residential tenant(per unit) $ 10.00 - $ - $ 10.00 - $ - M eter testi ng fee $ 55.00 - $ - $ 55.00 - $ - o $94,405.00 $ 157,585.00 LP Increase $ 63,180.00 co N Cost Estimate for New Service and Cut - LO Off Increases: N M Cost Estimates J,n -R ,P-M., := Cr C.S Rep 14.58 $ 0.24 $ 0.58 7.89 Cr W.S Rep 17.55 $ 0.29 - 6cpense- New Turn on Estimated Estimated -E time Mileage Materials Cost i5 Activate Act and Create Work Order 10 0 Work Work Order- round trip 30 12 0 _ Cost Estimates $ 11.21 $ 6.90 $ - $ 18.11 z Estimated Estimated ° 6cpense- Cut Off and Restore Services time Mileage Materials Cost Create Cut Off Work Order/ Restore sic 20 m Work Work Order- round trip x 2 60 24 7.89 Cost Estimates $ 22.41 $13.80 $ 7.89 $ 44.10 Cbdl f LiCh/!343 C�6/f Fee Survey--North O:ntral Texas Utilities Fbundtable Oties,June 2015 Description Current city Sachse Keller Burleson - Worth Gut-Off Char $ 30.00 $ 45.00 $30.00 $ 35.00 $ 25.001 35.00 $ 50.00 $ 25.00 O)de Enf $25.00 $ 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 25.00 Meter Box Damage Char $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 75.00 Lode Cut $ 30.00 $ 100.00 $75.00 $ $ 100.00 $ 12.50 $ 100.00 O)de Enf $52.50 $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ $ 50.00 $ 25.00 $ 60.00 Iatrrned Item Fee $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $35.00 $ 35.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $25 $35.00 $ 25.00 $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Activation Fee $ 10.00 $ 20.00 $NA $ $ 15.00 $ 10.00 $ $ 25.00 $0 $15.00 $ 20.00 $ $ 15.00 NA $ 10.00 $ 15.00 After Hour Turn On(currently$20, N/A do not revisingto$100 if on cell person reconnect trrrsonafter6:30 $ 20.00 $ 100.00 $25.00 $ 40.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 60.00 $ 50.00 $40 $60.00 $ 50.00 after PTA PTA $ 50.00 $ 35.00 Iaturn Trip Fee $ 20.00 $ 20.00 1 1$ 15.00 $0 $ I NA Meter Bypass Fee $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $75.00 $ $ 100.00 $ 100.00 ODde Enf damages $ $ 50.00 $ PTA $500.00 Tamper Fee(consider combining Meter hypassand tamper fee) $ $500.00 1st Ooc rrence Actual $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $75.00 $ 250.00 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 $ 250.00 $ 100.00 ODde Enf damages $ 50.00 $200.00 $ 70.00 -k 2nd Oo ence $ 50.00 $ 150.00 $100.00 $ 200.00 3rd Ooarre= $ 50.00 $ 200.00 $150.00 Transfer Fee $ 10.00 $ 20.00 $20.00 $ 10.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 25.00 $15.00 $ $ $ 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 15.00 Ort or Broken Laic B $ 30.00 $ 100.00 N/A $ $ 100.00 $ 31.00 $ 100.00 ODde Enf $52.50 $ 35.00 $ $ $ 50.00 $ 25.00 PTA Tmper with transponder $ 50.00 $ 100.00 4M Notice of cut-off to multi-family residential tenant r unit $ 10.00 $ 10.00 NA $ 35.00 $ $ $ 2.50 Meter testi fee $ 55.001$ 55.001 Actual cost $ 30.00 $ 55.00 4M SvEt. Sendce Fee $ $ 25.00 $25.00 $ $ PTA $0 $75.00 $ $ 15.00 $ PTA PTA $ 25.00 Pull wine $ 1$ 35.001 30.00 1$ 100.00 1 1$ 25.00 X O 4M X Q O O O m N N > O m Cbdl f LICh/!344 /2 r4 NO&TH KICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM From: The Office of the City Manager Date: September 14, 2015 Subject: Announcements Presenter: Mary Peters, Public Information Officer Summary: General Description: Announcements: The 2015 Doggie Beach Bash will be held at NRH2O Family Water Park from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturday, September 26th. Tickets are $20 each, with two dogs allowed per person. This event benefits the North Richland Hills Animal Adoption & Rescue Center. Please visit the city's website for more details and to purchase your tickets online. A prescription drug collection event will be held Saturday, September 26th. The public may dispose of unused prescription drugs in a safe manner by bringing them to the Fire Administration building between the hours of 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. If you have questions, please call 817- 427-7000. Keep NRH Beautiful is seeking volunteers for the annual Trash Bash litter cleanup event on Saturday, October 3rd. Everyone is invited to participate. Volunteers should pre-register to receive free trash bags, gloves and safety vests. Please call Neighborhood Services at 817-427-6651 to sign up and get more details. Kudos Korner: Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Tonight we recognize: TJ Byington in the Communications Department — An email was received recognizing TJ for going above and beyond to help an elderly resident. TJ contacts the resident multiple times each week to let her know when her trash and recycling need to be set out. The resident has some memory issues, so TJ's phone calls are the only way she is able to accomplish this simple task. "There are not many individuals who would take the time to do this. I believe TJ should be celebrated for the excellent service she is providing," the email said. Recommendation: N/A Cbdl f LiCh/!345