HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 2015-09-03 Minutes MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 3, 2015
WORK SESSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in
work session on the 3rd day of September 2015 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council
Workroom prior to the 7:00 p.m. regular session.
Present: Randall Shiflet Place 4, Chairman
Bill Schopper Place 6, Vice Chairman
Don Bowen Place 3, Secretary
Mike Benton Place 2
Mark Haynes Place 1
Kathy Luppy Place 5
Absent: Don Bowen Place 3, Secretary
Steven Cooper Place 7
Jerry Tyner Ex-Officio
Staff Members: Paulette Hartman Assistant City Manager
Craig Hulse Director of Economic Development
Clayton Comstock Planning Manager
Clayton Husband Principal Planner
Chad VanSteenberg Planner
Caroline Waggoner City Engineer
David Russell Engineer Associate
Cheryl Booth Recording Secretary
Call to Order
Chairman Shiflet called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m.
1. General Announcements-upcoming city events.
Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock presented announcements. City Hall is closed
on Monday, Labor Day. City of NRH is participating Tarrant County Heart Association
Heart Walk on Saturday, 09-11-2015.
2. Planning & Zoning Commission Attendance Records.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 1
All Commission members are present with the exception of Bill Schopper, Steven
Cooper and Jerry Tyner.
3. Discuss development activity report and City Council action.
Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock discussed development activity.
4. Discuss miscellaneous topics for possible Zoning Ordinance updates.
Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock presented first of four specific topics. Staff is
seeking input from the Planning and Zoning Commission on topics for possible Zoning
Ordinance updates. The first two are more time-sensitive, due to current inquiries. The
last two less so, but staff is still interested in Commission's input.
General Description:
1. Concrete Batch Plants
2. Secondary Living Units (Granny Flats)
3. Drive-Through Restaurants
4. Fuel Sales
Concrete Batch Plants
The City has maintained a past policy that concrete batch plants are not a necessary
tool for developing within the city limits. The last concrete batch plant to have been
used was in the early 1990s or early 2000s. Zoning Ordinance currently allows use by
SUP only in the C-1, C-2, I-1 and 1-2, U and AG districts. It does not allow use in
residential zoning districts, which is generating most of the demand. Staff is
reevaluating this policy for the following reasons:
1. Since the 1990s, there are far fewer areas of the city that are large enough for
projects that would necessitate a concrete batch plant.
2. Residential subdivision developers have inquired about the use in certain
projects.
3. Southlake, Colleyville and Keller allow temporary concrete batch plants by
right with specific restrictions.
4. On-site concrete batch plants can mean fewer concrete trucks on the city's
streets as well as a higher quality and more pliable concrete product due to
the shorter time and distance to the pour site.
Possible Zoning Ordinance Revision
The revision would include removing the SUP requirement for "temporary concrete
batch plants" in all zoning districts and allow them by right if they meet certain
standards. Some of the conditions that may apply include:
1. Minimum setback of batch plant equipment from habitable residential
structures, public or private schools, and daycares. Staff is proposing six
hundred (600) feet as an initial discussion point.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 2
2. Maximum time permitted. Other communities typically have thirty (30) or
sixty (60) days with extensions available. Staff is proposing a sixty (60) day
permit with strict standards for one thirty (30) day extension. Only one (1)
permit would be permitted within a twelve (12) month period.
3. Standards for a "temporary" concrete batch plant as it relates to size, height,
capacity, and other features.
4. Specified operation hours and days.
5. Must meet all TCEQ, EPA and other state and federal standards.
Chairman Shiflet expressed concern with concrete plant dust.
Mike Benton inquired about the necessity of equipment shrouds to contain dust.
Mark Haynes inquired about state and federal requirements.
Caroline Waggoner responded that all state and federal requirements would have to be
in place before the consideration could be presented to the City.
Chairman Shiflet inquired about the six hundred (600) foot set-back. That is two (2) to
four (4) times the requirement of a gas well. That might be too far.
Kathy Luppy commented that living next door to a gas well, there was a noise issue, but
no air quality issues. In her opinion, five hundred (500) feet might be better.
Chairman Shiflet stated that he is in favor of everything the staff is presenting, with a
preference of starting the discussion at a higher set back, considering the level of
hardship.
Mike Benton stated that concrete dust is extremely corrosive, so it could raise resident
concerns about their vehicles.
Bill Schopper stated that he is very much in favor of getting them in and out quickly.
Caroline Waggoner stated that it is in the best interest of the contractor to get that
equipment moved quickly to the next location. It just costs them money if it sits.
Bill Schopper requested clarification if the SUP requirement would be eliminated for
permanent concrete stations.
Clayton Comstock responded that there are really no more spaces available in the city
limits for a permanent station.
Secondary Living Units
The City allows "secondary living units", also known as granny flats or mother-in-law
units, by right in R-2, R-1 and R-1-S residential zones. The following text is from the
Zoning Ordinance:
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 3
Secondary living unit. A second single-family living unit with kitchen facilities, also
known as a mother-in-law unit or granny flat, located on the same lot as the primary
living unit shall comply with the following requirements:
(1) Use. The secondary living unit is only for use by domestic persons and
their family or a relative of the occupants of the primary living unit. This
unit shall not be rented or leased and shall not have a separate utility
meter.
(2) Connection to primary residence. Secondary living units shall be
constructed no more than 25 feet from the primary living quarters and be
connected by a breezeway a minimum of six feet wide, attached to the
roofline.
(3) Architecture. The unit must be of the same architectural style as the
primary structure and meet all standards as applied to the primary
structure except: the requirement for minimum gross living area; the
requirement for a garage/carport; and the off-street parking requirements.
(4) Maximum total floor area: 650 square feet.
For a number of reasons, multi-generational households are becoming more popular
across all socio-economic and demographic boundaries. For instance, the Baby
Boomer generation is now caring for their elderly parents, either in their own homes or
in senior living institutions. Secondary living units provide an alternative to senior and
assisted living facilities. They provide privacy and independence but also the close
proximity to caring family members. As the largest segment of aging seniors in U.S.
history themselves continue to age, more options for senior living are necessary.
Alternatively, the lessons learned from the 2009 housing market crash, the academic
tuition debt of today's Millennial generation, and the propensity of younger adults to wait
longer to marry and have kids has the younger population putting off independent home
ownership and coming back home after college. Like their grandparents, secondary
living units offer a sense of independence and privacy while being able to establish their
careers and savings.
That said; on occasion city staff receives complaints that the maximum floor area of six
hundred fifty (650) square feet is not sufficient for today's lifestyle standards. The
connection to the primary residence requirement has also caused logistical issues if the
physical layout of a property simply does not support a connected roof.
Staff is seeking input on changing the maximum square footage and roof connection
requirements for secondary living units. An example for discussion could be up to fifty
(50) % of the primary residence but not to exceed one thousand two hundred fifty
(1,250) square feet. A discussion point is elimination of the covered roof requirement
and increasing the maximum distance from the primary residence to fifty (50) feet. A
discussion point is maximum one (1) bedroom, one (1) kitchen, one and a half (1 %)
bathrooms and two(2) other living areas.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 4
Bill Schopper inquired if we want to be that place that allows garage apartments and out
buildings. We don't seem to be that sort of community. It may be appropriate in
downtown Fort Worth, but not really here where we have a higher focus on single family
residential.
Chairman Shiflet inquired if the home owner would be restricted from subdividing these
into separate units.
Clayton Comstock replied that one of the requirements is that there cannot be separate
utility meters. It operates as one residential entity. They can't have a separate water or
electric meter. It would be a zoning ordinance enforcement issue.
Bill Schopper stated that the six hundred fifty (650) square foot unit just doesn't seem to
be part of our community.
Mike Benton asked for clarification that not all lots are even large enough to qualify for a
secondary unit, which reduces the number of potential applicants.
Chairman Shiflet inquired about set-backs.
Clayton Comstock responded that set-backs would all be the same as for the primary
residential home.
Mark Haynes stated that he has no problem with any of what is being proposed.
Kathy Luppy stated that it appears that one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) square
feet would be almost property line to property line, taking up the whole back yard. She
likes the idea of residents being able to have their independence. It may be that we do
need to be become that kind of community that promotes the changing times of multi-
generational family living. People are living longer, which creates a need for more
creative living solutions. In school, she is seeing more and more grandparents, aunts
and uncles living under the same household.
Chairman Shiflet stated that the larger R-2 lots would be the only ones that really fit into
this model. He is in favor of this ordinance change. He would still like to see the
breezeway remain in the ordinance to provide cohesion to the primary residence. He
has spoken with John Barfield who has interest in purchasing lots south of Loop 820.
Perhaps this ordinance change could present creative building options for the developer
mindset. He suggests clarification in the verbiage to state that one thousand two
hundred fifty (1,250) square feet is the maximum size. He wants to see the two
properties connected.
Clayton Comstock stated that there have been prior requests where the maximum size
was denied, requiring the applicant to change their whole plan. Generally, they would
do something like add onto the existing home.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 5
Mike Benton inquired about the difference between a "guest house" and a "secondary
living unit".
Clayton Comstock responded that there was a prior zoning case on Clay Hibbins Road
that was a Planned Development with different properties more like a "guest house".
Principal Planner, Clayton Husband presented the third and fourth of four specific
topics.
Drive-Through Restaurants
The 2013 NRH Citizen Survey clearly indicated that NRH residents desire more full-
service restaurants and grocery stores over fast food establishments. When asked
whether they would like to see more of each, eight (80) percent of respondents replied
"yes" for full-service restaurants, while only thirty (30) percent said "yes" for drive
through restaurants. In the two years since the survey, however, drive-through fast food
restaurants continue to develop at a faster pace than full-service restaurants and many
vacant pad sites are still available for development. Staff is exploring ways to respond
to this demand and provide healthier and more casual dining options for the community
that improve the health and quality of life for its residents and visitors.
The three classifications that we see as industry standards are:
• Full-service restaurant (table service with nicer finish out)
• Fast-casual restaurant (majority of counter service with median finish out)
• Fast food restaurant (majority of drive-through service with basic finish out)
In light of the City of Keller's recent decision to place an SUP requirement on drive-
through and the citizen survey mentioned above, staff is soliciting input from the
Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on current City policies related to fast-
food drive-through restaurants and whether revisions may be appropriate.
Currently, the Zoning Ordinance does not specifically define or distinguish fast food
restaurants. The "restaurant or cafeteria" use is permitted by right in the LR, C-1, C-2,
OC, I-1 and 1-2 zoning districts and "Drive-through buildings of less than 1,400 square
feet"require SUP approval in C-1, C-2, I-1 and 1-2. The Zoning Ordinance also does not
currently have any specific development standards for drive-through establishments.
Standards common to other municipalities include drive-through stacking depths;
location and orientation of menu boards, speakers and pick-up windows; and design
and dimensions of drive through lanes.
Some of the possible alternative if the City proceeds with revising its standard on drive-
through restaurants includes:
• Requiring an SUP citywide for drive-through fast food establishments.
• Establishing "districts" or "overlays" where fast food may require SUP approval.
• Adopting design standards for drive-through fast food establishments.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 6
• Expanding the land use definition to distinguish "fast food" from "fast-casual", and
requiring and SUP for"fast food" only or amending the districts where they are
allowed by right.
Chairman Shiflet expressed concern about turning radius for large trucks in drive-
through restaurant queue lines.
Clayton Husband responded that the common width is ten (10) feet, which is two (2)
feet narrower than travel lanes in some streets.
Craig Hulse expressed that the market has driven a need for restaurants to become
more efficient. Concrete, construction and food costs have increased. Labor costs have
increased. There is a need for higher customer turnover and lower labor costs. Jason's
Express is a perfect example of response to this issue. More and more restaurants will
have a push for a drive through component.
Chairman Shiflet expressed concern that we are not implementing restrictions that
conflict with a market-driven consumer market. He is also concerned about all of these
empty spots that need to be developed, if a restaurant could be supported by the local
residential market. He wants us to do everything we can to encourage development.
Clayton Comstock responded that there is the North Tarrant Parkway development
which already has What-A-Burger, Chick Fil-A and Wendy's. Then there are about 10
additional pad sites available for development. City Council has a concern if all of these
were to become drive-through restaurants. An SUP requirement would allow more
careful planning.
Bill Schopper brought up the empty full service restaurants located on Bedford Euless
Road that have been on the market for years.
Craig Hulse responded that Bedford Euless Road used to be the hopping place. Now
there are only about one thousand, two hundred (1,200) cars a day on that road.
Kathy Luppy stated that the parents she deals with in the schools need the drive
through restaurants. They don't have the money to go out to sit down restaurant more
than occasionally. And they need to pick up food and eat while they are driving to the
soccer field, etc. People are going to do what they are going to do.
Chairman Shiflet agreed that this topic is not as time sensitive, so we may wish to
discuss it in greater detail at a later time.
Clayton Comstock brought up the site design standards regarding windows, drive
through lanes and creating more restrictions. If they can't comply, it would force planned
development. It sounds like we shouldn't focus as much on the SUP requirement, but
more on site design requirements for fast food restaurants.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 7
Fuel Sales
Referring back to the 2013 Citizen Survey, eight (80) percent of the respondents did not
see that additional gas stations were necessary in NRH. The Zoning Ordinance,
however, allows gas stations with eight (8) pumps or less by right in the C-2
Commercial zoning district.
Staff will be seeking input on combining the "Convenience Store (8 pumps or less)"use
with "Service Station (9+ pumps)"and requiring an SUP in the same zoning districts for
consistency. The number of pumps is not a clear definition as currently stated.
Chairman Shiflet recommended discussing this Fuel Sales topic in more depth at a later
time due to time restrictions. He likes the idea of modernizing the ordinance.
5. Discuss items from the regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock presented ZC 2015-18 consideration of a request
from the City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development
#74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo). This
Nonresidential Planned Development (NR-PD) District shall adhere to the conditions of
the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances, as amended, and adopt a "base district" of
"C-1 Commercial District. The following regulations shall be specific to this NR-PD
District. Where these regulations conflict with, or overlap another zoning standard, these
regulations shall prevail.
• Permitted Land Uses
o Indoor Shooting Range Required. A minimum of 45 <change to
"40"> percent of the building area shall be initially reconstructed
and developed required <changed to "for at least"> as an indoor
gun range for at least including a minimum <change to eliminating
the minimum restriction> of the following uses:
• Open/Public Firing Range Lanes
• Private Firing Range Lanes
• Tactical Firing Range Lanes
• Indoor Skeet Range
• Gunsmith
• Archery Lanes
• Classroom/Event Space
• Retail sales of firearms and firearm accessories
• Simunition Non-live Fire (airsoft/paintball) Training
• Laser-video Firing Systems
o The sale and consumption of alcohol shall not be permitted within
the Indoor Shooting Range occupancy.
o The Indoor Shooting Range use shall be revoked from this NR-PD
if a Certificate of Occupancy for said use is not issued by January
1, 2017.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 8
o Other Permitted Uses. Other uses within this NR-PD may only be
permitted after a full demising wall meeting Building Code
requirements is installed and proof of nonrefundable purchase of a
shooting range ventilation system and/or bullet collection and
containment system is provided to the City. Once a Certificate of
Occupancy for an Indoor Shooting Range has been established, it
shall always be required for new uses to be permitted. <change to
striking last sentence.> Other uses in this NR-PD shall be those
permitted in the "C-1" Commercial District and shall also include the
following:
• Indoor Amusement Arcade
• Bowling Lanes
• Indoor Miniature Golf Course
• Indoor Race Track
• Roller or Ice Skating Rink
• Indoor Skydiving
• Indoor Rock/Wall Climbing
• Other Indoor Commercial Recreation
• Personal Security Training
• Indoor Gold Range
• Archery
• Indoor Music Venue
• Hardware & Building Materials
• Micro Brewery
• Comedy Club
• Billiards as Accessory Use
• New Marine Equipment Sales
• New Motorcycle Sales
• New Small Vehicle Sales (ATVS, Scooters, Golf Carts, etc.)
• Outdoor Sales & Display associated to marine equipment,
motorcycles, and other small vehicles limited to the
westernmost row of parking stalls along David Blvd.
o Development Regulations. This NR-PD shall follow the
development regulations of the "C-1" Commercial District, with the
following additions and exceptions.
• Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the
Indoor Gun Range, the following improvements shall be
made to the property:
• All internal traffic control devices (i.e. stop signs,
speed bumps, etc.) will be replaced or refurbished)
• All fire lanes and parking lines shall be newly applied.
• Landscaping shall be installed per the attached
Landscape Plan.
• Any non-compliant outdoor lighting-including those
affixed to the building-shall be replaced with fixtures
that meet current outdoor lighting standards.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 9
• Existing concrete light pole bases to be repainted.
• Existing chain link fence on each side of the loading
dock to be replaced or refurbished
• Franchise utilities to be contacted regarding the
removal of a dead-end utility pole extension at the
northwest corner of the property.
• Existing irrigation system to be inspected and
repaired as required to provide fully operational
system.
• Handicap-accessible sidewalk ramp to be installed on
the north side of the Davis Boulevard driveway at the
northwest corner of the property.
• The six (6)' wood fence between the property and the
vacant commercial property to the north to be
removed.
o Administrative Approval of Site Plans. The purpose of this NR-PD
is to provide Land Use and Development Regulations beyond the
scope of what is typically required. Site plans which comply with all
development related ordinances and this Ordinance shall be
administratively approved by the staff Development Review
Committee. Deviations from the regulations provided herein shall
require City Council approval of a zoning change to revise this
Nonresidential Planned Development.
Principal Planner, Clayton Husband presented AP 2015-09 Consideration of a request
from Cambridge NRH Development, LLC for an Amended Plat for Cambridge Place on
1.4269 acres in the 6800 block of Iron Horse Boulevard.
6. Adjournment.
There being no other business, Chairman Shiflet adjourned the work session at 07:06
p.m.
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
The Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting is immediately following the
work session (but not earlier than 7:00 p.m.) In the main council chambers.
A.0 CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Shiflet called the September 3, 2015 meeting to order at 07:09 p.m.
Present: Randall Shiflet Place 4, Chairman
Bill Schopper Place 6, Vice Chairman
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 10
Don Bowen Place 3, Secretary
Mike Benton Place 2
Mark Haynes Place 1
Kathy Luppy Place 5
Absent: Don Bowen Place 3, Secretary
Steven Cooper Place 7
Jerry Tyner Ex-Officio
Staff Members: Paulette Hartman Assistant City Manager
Craig Hulse Director of Economic Development
Clayton Comstock Planning Manager
Clayton Husband Principal Planner
Chad VanSteenberg Planner
Caroline Waggoner City Engineer
David Russell Engineer Associate
Cheryl Booth Recording Secretary
A.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Kathy Luppy led the National Pledge of Allegiance.
Kathy Luppy led the Texas Pledge of Allegiance.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission may enter into closed Executive Session as
authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Executive Session may be held
at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises
for the Planning and Zoning Commission to seek advice from the city attorney (551.071)
as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may confer privately with its attorney to seek
legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of
the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of
Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 51, Texas
Government Code.
A.2 ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Due to today's absence of two Commissioners, decision was made to postpone the
election of officers of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 11
POSTPONED
BILL SCHOPPER MOVED TO POSTPONE THE ELECTION OF OFFICERS OF THE PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION. MIKE BENTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO POSTPONE CARRIED 5-0.
B.0 MINUTES
B.1 Approve minutes of the August 20, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting.
APPROVED
BILL SCHOPPER MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 20, 2015 MEETING. KATHY
LUPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
C.1 ZC 2015-18 Public Hearing and Consideration of a request from the City of
North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned Development #74
on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot Expo).
APPROVED
Chairman Shiflet called on Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock to present ZC 2015-
18. Planning Manager, Clayton Comstock presented ZC 2015-18 consideration of a
request from the City of North Richland Hills for minor text revisions to Planned
Development #74 on 9.04 acres located at 7901 Boulevard 26 (former Home Depot
Expo). This Nonresidential Planned Development (NR-PD) District shall adhere to the
conditions of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances, as amended, and adopt a
"base district" of "C-1 Commercial District. The following regulations shall be specific to
this NR-PD District. Where these regulations conflict with, or overlap another zoning
standard, these regulations shall prevail.
• Permitted Land Uses
o Indoor Shooting Range Required. Staff proposes changing the
minimum percent from forty five (45) to forty (40) % of the building
area to be initially reconstructed and developed required as an
indoor gun range. Staff proposes eliminating the minimum use
restriction of the following uses:
• Open/Public Firing Range Lanes
• Private Firing Range Lanes
• Tactical Firing Range Lanes
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 12
• Indoor Skeet Range
• Gunsmith
• Archery Lanes
• Classroom/Event Space
• Retail sales of firearms and firearm accessories
• Simunition Non-live Fire (airsoft/paintball) Training
• Laser-video Firing Systems
o Other Permitted Uses. Other uses within this NR-PD may only be
permitted after a full demising wall meeting Building Code
requirements is installed and proof of nonrefundable purchase of a
shooting range ventilation system and/or bullet collection and
containment system is provided to the City. Once a Certificate of
Occupancy for an Indoor Shooting Range has been established, it
shall always be required for new uses to be permitted. Staff
recommends striking the following sentence from the permitted use
requirements. Other uses in this NR-PD shall be those permitted in
the "C-1" Commercial District and shall also include the following:
• Indoor Amusement Arcade
• Bowling Lanes
• Indoor Miniature Golf Course
• Indoor Race Track
• Roller or Ice Skating Rink
• Indoor Skydiving
• Indoor Rock/Wall Climbing
• Other Indoor Commercial Recreation
• Personal Security Training
• Indoor Gold Range
• Archery
• Indoor Music Venue
• Hardware & Building Materials
• Micro Brewery
• Comedy Club
• Billiards as Accessory Use
• New Marine Equipment Sales
• New Motorcycle Sales
• New Small Vehicle Sales (ATVS, Scooters, Golf Carts, etc.)
• Outdoor Sales & Display associated to marine equipment,
motorcycles, and other small vehicles limited to the
westernmost row of parking stalls along David Blvd.
o Development Regulations. This NR-PD shall follow the
development regulations of the "C-1" Commercial District, with the
following additions and exceptions.
• Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the
Indoor Gun Range, the following improvements shall be
made to the property:
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 13
• All internal traffic control devices (i.e. stop signs,
speed bumps, etc.) will be replaced or refurbished)
• All fire lanes and parking lines shall be newly applied.
• Landscaping shall be installed per the attached
Landscape Plan.
• Any non-compliant outdoor lighting-including those
affixed to the building-shall be replaced with fixtures
that meet current outdoor lighting standards.
• Existing concrete light pole bases to be repainted.
• Existing chain link fence on each side of the loading
dock to be replaced or refurbished
• Franchise utilities to be contacted regarding the
removal of a dead-end utility pole extension at the
northwest corner of the property.
• Existing irrigation system to be inspected and
repaired as required to provide fully operational
system.
• Handicap-accessible sidewalk ramp to be installed on
the north side of the Davis Boulevard driveway at the
northwest corner of the property.
• The six (6)' wood fence between the property and the
vacant commercial property to the north to be
removed.
o Administrative Approval of Site Plans. The purpose of this NR-PD
is to provide Land Use and Development Regulations beyond the
scope of what is typically required. Site plans which comply with all
development related ordinances and this Ordinance shall be
administratively approved by the staff Development Review
Committee. Deviations from the regulations provided herein shall
require City Council approval of a zoning change to revise this
Nonresidential Planned Development.
Chairman Shiflet opened Public Hearing at 07:15 p.m.
The Commission had no questions for staff. Chairman Shiflet asked for anyone wishing
to speak on the item to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman
Shiflet closed the Public Hearing at 07:15 p.m.
MARK HAYNES MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2015-18. MIKE BENTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0.
D. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 14
D.1 AP 2015-09 Consideration of a request from Cambridge NRH Development,
LLC for an Amended Plat of Cambridge Place on 1.4269 acres in the 6800
block of Iron Horse Development.
APPROVED
Chairman Shiflet called on Principal Planner, Clayton Husband to present the item.
Principal Planner, Clayton Husband presented the staff report for consideration of AP
2015-09. This is an administratively complete application. Staff recommends approval.
Applicant on behalf of Cambridge NRH Development, LLC was absent this evening, so
no presentation was provided.
The Commission had no questions for staff.
KATHY LUPPY MOVED TO APPROVE AP 2015-09. BILL SCHOPPER SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Shiflet adjourned the meeting at 07:18 p.m.
Chairman Secretary
C-• 4,4,. vgga44,,,,_
Randall Shiflet Don Bowen
Recording Secretary
September 3,2015
P&Z Minutes
Page 15