HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 2016-05-05 Agendas NRH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76180
THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2016
WORK SESSION: 6:30 PM
Held in the City Council Work Room
CALL TO ORDER
1. Announcements - Upcoming City Events
2. Discuss development activity report and City Council action.
3. Masonry Screening Wall Standards
4. Discuss Items from the Regular Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting.
REGULAR MEETING: Immediately following worksession (but not earlier than 7:00 pm)
Held in the City Hall Council Chambers
A. CALL TO ORDER
A.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission may enter into closed Executive Session
as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Executive Session
may be held at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting
that a need arises for the Planning and Zoning Commission to seek advice from
the city attorney (551.071) as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may confer privately with its attorney to
seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which
the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary
Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
B. MINUTES
B.1 Approve minutes of the April 21, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting.
C. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Thursday May 5, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Page 1 of 2
•
C.1 AP 2016 -01 Consideration of a request from Robert Richardson for an Amended
Plat for Lot 6R, Block 1, Woodbert Addition on 0.924 acres located at 8301
Woods Lane.
C.2 RP 2015 -11 Consideration of a request from PSI Atlantic Richland Hills TX, LLC
for a Replat of Red Gate Addition on 4.552 acres located in the 7800 block of
Mockingbird Lane.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D.1 RP 2016 -06 Public Hearing and consideration of a request from JPC Realty LTD
for a Replat of Lots 23R and 24R, Block 1, W.E. Odell Addition on 1.10 acres
located at 8121 -8129 Odell Street.
D.2 SDP 2016 -03 Public Hearing and Consideration of a request from Our County
Homes for a Special Development Plan for Iron Horse Commons on 27.842
acres in the 6400 and 6500 blocks of Iron Horse Blvd.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills Planning
and Zoning Commission was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Te�yyuu�
di/ compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on May 2, 2016 at 4:0q '. H . rfa
' F. 1 h • :y
\ 9i Secretary �'' .••. �a� E
i •• � �• \���
°'- #Aiir�7m�nnn���'`''�
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available.
Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours
prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817 -427 -6060
for further information.
REMOVEL. FROM
POSTING EsOARD
DATE: 5 I . t
,
I
BY: to ... k
Thursday May 5, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Page 2 of 2
•
alk
r 4 RZ H
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76180
THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2016
WORK SESSION: 6:30 PM
Held in the City Council Work Room
CALL TO ORDER
1. Announcements - Upcoming City Events
2. Discuss development activity report and City Council action.
3. Masonry Screening Wall Standards
4. Discuss Items from the Regular Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting.
REGULAR MEETING: Immediately following worksession (but not earlier than 7:00 pm)
Held in the City Hall Council Chambers
A. CALL TO ORDER
A.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission may enter into closed Executive Session
as authorized by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Executive Session
may be held at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting
that a need arises for the Planning and Zoning Commission to seek advice from
the city attorney (551.071) as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may confer privately with its attorney to
seek legal advice on any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which
the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary
Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
B. MINUTES
B.1 Approve minutes of the April 21, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting.
C. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Thursday May 5, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Page 1 of 2
C.1 AP 2016-01 Consideration of a request from Robert Richardson for an Amended
Plat for Lot 6R, Block 1, Woodbert Addition on 0.924 acres located at 8301
Woods Lane.
C.2 RP 2015-11 Consideration of a request from PSI Atlantic Richland Hills TX, LLC
for a Replat of Red Gate Addition on 4.552 acres located in the 7800 block of
Mockingbird Lane.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D.1 RP 2016-06 Public Hearing and consideration of a request from JPC Realty LTD
for a Replat of Lots 23R and 24R, Block 1, W.E. Odell Addition on 1.10 acres
located at 8121-8129 Odell Street.
D.2 SDP 2016-03 Public Hearing and Consideration of a request from Our County
Homes for a Special Development Plan for Iron Horse Commons on 27.842
acres in the 6400 and 6500 blocks of Iron Horse Blvd.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills Planning
and Zoning Commission was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in
compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code on May 2, 2016 at 4:00 PM.
City Secretary
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available.
Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours
prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Secretary's office at 817-427-6060
for further information.
Thursday May 5, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Page 2 of 2
D
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: Announcements - Upcoming City Events
Presenter: Clayton Husband, Principal Planner
Summary:
The purpose of this item is to allow the Planning & Zoning Commission the opportunity
to discuss any item on the regular Planning & Zoning Commission agenda.
General Description:
The purpose of this item is to allow the Planning & Zoning Commission the opportunity
to inquire about items that are posted for discussion and deliberation on the regular
Planning & Zoning Commission agenda. The Commission is encouraged to ask staff
questions to clarify and/or provide additional information on items posted on the regular
agenda.
Packet Pg. 3
D
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: Discuss development activity report and City Council action.
Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Summary:
The purpose of this item is to allow the Planning & Zoning Commission the opportunity
to discuss any item on the regular Planning & Zoning Commission agenda.
General Description:
The purpose of this item is to allow the Planning & Zoning Commission the opportunity
to inquire about items that are posted for discussion and deliberation on the regular
Planning & Zoning Commission agenda. The Commission is encouraged to ask staff
questions to clarify and/or provide additional information on items posted on the regular
agenda.
Packet Pg.4
D
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: Masonry Screening Wall Standards
Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Summary:
At the request of the Commission, staff is bringing forward a work session item to
discuss the minimum standards for masonry screening walls.
General Description:
The purpose of this item is to discuss the existing minimum standards for masonry walls
in North Richland Hills and begin discussions on possible revisions. A major update to
the Screening & Fencing section of the Zoning Ordinance was completed in 2013 to
address refuse container screening and front yard rural-style fences. This report simply
introduces the existing standards and poses questions for discussion at the meeting.
Staff will be providing additional information, including other area cities' screening wall
standards, picture examples of walls throughout NRH, and recommendations made by
previous planning studies.
EXISTING REGULATIONS: Masonry screening walls are addressed in the following
areas of the City Code. Attached are excerpts from selected sections that deal with
masonry screening walls.
Chapter 104— Gas Well Drilling & Production
• Minimum 8-foot wall meeting the minimum design standards to be placed
around any gas well drilling pad site as well as any valve station or above-
ground appurtenances, among other standards.
Chapter 110— Subdivision
• Masonry screening walls required of residential subdivisions along
thoroughfares classified as C4U or larger on the Master Thoroughfare Plan
• See attached excerpt from the Subdivision Ordinance
Packet Pg. 5
D
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
Chapter 114— Landscape
• Masonry screening walls required between commercial, multi-family, and
single family residential districts as part of the 15-foot landscape setback
requirements.
• Special design standards for the Freeway Corridor Overlay District
Chapter 118— Zoning
• Masonry wall required between commercial, multi-family and single-family
residential districts
• Screening of outside storage, loading docks, refuse containers, vehicles
waiting repair, etc.
• Concrete CMU block prohibited
• Maximum height of 8 feet applies to all masonry walls
• See attached excerpt from the Zoning Ordinance
Public Works Design Manual
• Drainage openings required at the base of walls
• 12-inch wide concrete mow strip centered under the wall
• Must be contained within a 2.5-foot wide wall easement
• Sight visibility easements/triangles must be maintained
• Prefabricated screening fences such as "brickcrete" or "woodcrete" may be
substituted for on-site masonry construction, provided that the finish
resembles typical masonry constructed fences. No ordinary concrete finishes
or traditional smooth faced concrete block as a finish shall be allowed along
collector or arterial streets. However, a concrete finish consisting of exposed
aggregate shall be allowed.
• See attached excerpt from the Public Works Design Manual
POSSIBLE CONSIDERATIONS:
Packet Pg. 6
D
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
• The City Image Study recommends deteriorating wood fences along the City's
major corridors be replaced with masonry walls. Revisions to the minimum
masonry wall standards would need to keep such replacements in mind as to not
price out possible reimaging of the corridors.
• A wall adjacent to a major thoroughfare is much more visible than a wall at the
back of a commercial development adjacent to residential. Should there be a
separate set of standards based on visibility to the public?
• One particular and very prevalent developer on the north side of North Richland
Hills has electively installed masonry screening walls that exceed the City's
minimum requirements. Has this developer raised the expectations of screening
walls citywide or just on the northern end of the city?
• Once a development's wall is complete, maintenance responsibility is passed on
to either the adjacent homeowner or an association of homeowners. Will
increasing standards increase future replacement costs?
• There is currently no setback requirement for walls along the street right-of-way;
nor is there any landscape requirement for residential subdivision walls to
"soften" the impact of the wall along the street. Should wall setbacks or
landscaping be required moving forward with new subdivisions?
• The Public Works Design Manual and the City's definition of "masonry" as a
minimum 1-inch thickness allows for concrete panel thin-walls as a permitted wall
type. Is this an acceptable wall type moving forward now that newer, thicker, and
more diverse concrete wall products are on the market? A common example of
the newer product is the Verti-Crete wall systems that have been used on gas
well sites, commercial developments, and residential subdivisions in NRH over
the past few years.
r i
4
vl
Concrete "Thin-WaFi"Panel System Newer, thicker stained concrete wall systems
Packet Pg. 7
3.a
Section 1-07.-Masonry/concrete screening walls.
A. Construction.Masonry or concrete screening walls shall be constructed according to the following specifications.
1. Concrete foundations shall have a minimum compressive strength of 3,000 psi at 28 days.Compressive strength tests conducted by an independent testing
laboratory shall be submitted to the city staff for confirmation.All testing costs shall be paid by the developer or his contractor.
2. Reinforcing steel shall be billet steel conforming to the requirements of ASTM A-615-GR.60.
3. Concrete for piers shall be placed within eight hours of drilling pier holes.
4. Brick masonry shall be as approved by the city.
5. Mortar shall be Type"S".
6. Construction shall be in accordance with the requirements ofthe"Recommended Practice for Engineered Brick Masonry"Brick Institute of America.
7. Use#9 Gauge 13/4 inch wide galvanized ladder wire to extend horizontal in wall panel on every course. U)
8. The wall shall be a minimum of six feet in height as measured from the nearest/adjacent sidewalk grade.No masonry or concrete screening wall or column
shall exceed eight feet in height unless the wall is functioning as a retaining wall and is designed as such.
9. Unless it has been determined by the public works directorthat no drainage problems are anticipated,an opening designed to allow for stormwater
drainage shall be provided.The opening shall be a uniform two inches high the full length between columns. CO
10. Prefabricated screening fences such as"brickcrete"or"woodcrete"may be substituted for on-site masonry construction,provided that the finish resembles
typical masonry constructed fences.No ordinary concrete finishes ortraditional smooth faced concrete block as a finish shall be allowed along collector or
arterial streets.However,a concrete finish consisting of exposed aggregate shall be allowed.
11. A 12-inch wide concrete mow strip shall be centered underthe wall.
12. Screening walls must be contained within a 2.5 foot screen wall easement.
13. Screening wall maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner or homeowners association.
CO
14. All masonry or concrete screening walls shall be designed by a professional structural or civil engineer licensed in the State of Texas.Sealed plans shall be
submitted to the city for review and permitting.
B. Location.
U)
1. No masonry or concrete screening wall shall be located on public right-of-way.
2. Adequate sight visibility easements shall be provided at all street intersections.
3. The location and placement of a masonry or concrete screening wall shall be coordinated with the public works department to avoid conflicts with utility and
drainage easements.
C. Plan approval.
1. Plans are to be designed,signed,sealed and dated by a professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Texas and furnished with the following
information:
a. The title shall include the legal name ofthe property on which the wall is being constructed. �q
b. A plan view ofthe wall showing its location,limits,and stationing.
E
c. A profile ofthe wall including grades forthe top ofthe concrete mow-strip,adjacent top of curb,sidewalk and finished floor of proposed and/or existing 0
adjacent slabs.
d. Elevation view of atypical column. CO
e. Elevation view ofthe wall.
f. Mow-strip detail.
g. Drainage clearance under wall(uniform two inches).
h. Steel tensile strength.
i. Concrete compressive strength.
j. Wind load calculations.
(Res.No.2007-012,2-26-2007)
a�
U)
0
2
CL
Packet Pg. 8
4/29/2016 North Richland Hills,TX Building and Land Use Regulations F 3.b
Sec. 118-871 . - Masonry screening walls.
(a) Applicability. In addition to the applicability standards herein provided in section 118-870, this Section
shall be applicable to any proposed building remodeling, alteration, addition, or expansion in which
either the value of the proposed improvements exceed 50 percent of the current appraised value of
the existing structure, excluding the value of the land, or increases the square footage of the building
by 30 percent or more.
(b) Masonry screening wall required. A masonry screening wall, not less than six feet nor more than eight
feet in panel height, shall be required on all property in accordance with section 118-872, except as
otherwise provided herein. co
(c) Location of screening wall. The masonry screening wall shall be constructed along the entire length of
the common property line between such properties and within the property required to erect the
screening wall. The masonry-screening wall shall be constructed prior to the issuance of any
certificate of occupancy.
co
(d) Abutting Iron Horse Golf Course. Residential lots that abut Iron Horse Golf Course shall be exempt frorr
the masonry screening wall requirement. U)
(e) Little Bear Creek Corridor. Only those portions of lots or tracts lying within the Little Bear Creek
Corridor shall be exempt from the masonry screening wall requirements.
(f) R-7-MFmultifamily residential district and MH-1 HUD Code manufactured district. Perimeter screening
abutting public street right-of-way, parks, or other dedicated open space shall be provided as follows:
(1) Where a proposed development is adjacent to a C-4-U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the ,
master thoroughfare plan, said screening shall consist of a permanent decorative masonry
screening wall, not less than six feet in height, constructed along and adjacent to said
0
thoroughfare. co
(2) Where a proposed development is adjacent to a C-2-U or R-2-U thoroughfare, park, or other
dedicated open space, said screening wall shall consist of a permanent decorative screening wall
of masonry, stone, or wrought iron type construction, or a combination thereof, not less than six
feet in height. Wrought iron material shall not exceed 40 percent of the total wall face, including
columns. co
(g) Hotel/motel developments. A masonry screening wall shall be eight feet in height where a motel or
hotel use abuts property zoned for residential use, designated on the comprehensive land use plan
for residential use, or used or subdivided for residential use.
(h) Masonry screening walls required along C-4-U or larger. The rear or side lot lines of any new residential
subdivision adjacent to any thoroughfare designated as C-4-U or larger on the Master Thoroughfare E
Plan shall provide a masonry screening wall. No screening wall shall be constructed within the street
right-of-way.
(i) Masonry screening walls. Masonry screening walls shall be constructed in accordance with the Public
Works Design Manual and, where possible, shall be in a manner consistent with the exterior finish of
the main building in material and color. Where applicable, screening walls shall be extensions of the
development's architectural design.
(j)
https://www2.municode.com/library/b(/north_richland_hiIIs/codes/buiIding_and_Iand_use_regulations?nodeld=PTIICOOR_CH118Z0_ARTVIIIS Packet Pg. 9
4/29/2016 North Richland Hills,TX Building and Land Use Regulations 3.b
Outdoor storage of material or commodities. Outdoor storage of material and commodities shall e
screened with a minimum six-foot masonry wall. Materials or commodities shall not be stacked at a
height greater than the height of the screening wall/fence. See section 118-716, outside storage
regulations.
(k) Screening not required for outdoor display, temporary uses, or incidental outdoor display. Outdoor
display, temporary uses and incidental outdoor display, as defined within section 118-7151 are
exempt from the screening requirements of this section.
(1) Loading docks and delivery entrances facing public street. Loading docks and delivery entrances facing a
u)
public street shall require approval of a special use permit in accordance with division 6, article II of
this chapter. Loading docks and delivery entrances not facing a public street shall be screened from
any public roadway. Service/loading areas shall be screened from view from property zoned for co
residential use or 0-1 office district, designated on the comprehensive land use plan for residential or
office use, or used or subdivided for residential use by a minimum six-foot tall masonry wall, a solid ,
living screen or a combination thereof.
(m) Screening of vehicles waiting repair. A masonry screening wall not less than six feet nor more than
eight feet in panel height, shall be required to screen any vehicle parked or stored for the purpose of c)
pending repairs.
U)
(Ord. No. 1874, art. X, § 1020(A)—(C), 3-22-1993; Ord. No. 2069, § 1, 12-11-1995; Ord. No. 2186, § 3, 4-14-
1997; Ord. No. 2429, § 1, 11-22-1999; Ord. No. 3244, § 4, 4-22-2013)
Sec. 118-872. - Table of district screening requirements.
The following is the table of district masonry screening requirements. Where a residential zoning
district is not listed, no district screening requirements exist. Refer to separate screening requirements in
the town center zoning district and transit-oriented development zoning district.
Table 10-F co
0
Masonry Screening Requirements for Districts Shown
E
in Column 1 When Abutting Certain Districts
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Column 1 Abutting District
Wall AG R-1 - R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4- R-6- R-8 MH- R-7- U PD
Required S D T 1 MF
This
District
R-7-M F R2 R R R R R R R R R1
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
MH-1 R2 R R R R R R R R R R1
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
0-1 R2 R R R R R R R R R R R1
LR R2 R R R R R R R R R R R 1
https://www2.municode.com/library/b(/north_richland_hiIIs/codes/buiIding_and_Iand_use_regulations?nodeld=PTIICOOR_CH118ZO—ARTVIIIS Packet Pg. 10
4/29/2016 North Richland Hills,TX Building and Land Use Regulations 3.b
C-1 R2 R R R R R R R R R R R-
................................................................
..........................................................
C-2 R2 R R R R R R R R R R R1
OC R2 R R R R R R R R R R R1
1-1 R2 R R R R R R R R R R R1
1-2 R2 R R R R R R R R R R R1
U R2 R R R R R R R R1 co
PD As required by the approved site plan
"R" denotes masonry screening wall requirement.
co
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1 Wall required when the planned development is for residential use.
2 Wall required when the AG-zoned district is planned for low density residential or
medium density residential use on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
(Ord. No. 1874, art. X, § 1020(D), 3-22-1993; Ord. No. 2086, § 3, 11-13-1995; Ord. No. 2184, § 2, 3-24-1997;
Ord. No. 2209, § 1, 7-14-1997; Ord. No. 2274, § 8, 3-23-1998 Ord. No. 2444, § 1, 1-10-2000; Ord. No. 2599, 2
Ex. B, 2-11-2002; Ord. No. 3244, § 5, 4-22-2013; Ord. No. 3247, § 14, 6-10-2013) co
Sec. 118-873. - Screening wall and fence criteria generally.
(a) Height. Walls and fences shall be no greater than eight feet in height. The height of a wall or fence
shall be the vertical distance between the ground and the top of the wall or fence. In terrain where
the ground slopes at a grade of ten percent or more, the wall or fence may be built in eight-foot
horizontal stair step sections. The average height of each fence section shall be no greater than eight
feet in height. Masonry columns may exceed the maximum height by no more than eight inches and
shall not exceed the average height of the adjacent fence sections by more than eight inches.
(b) Maintenance.
(1) All screening and fences shall be adequately maintained, kept in good repair and in sound
structural condition by the property owner and shall not create urban blight. Dilapidated fences
shall be repaired or replaced in accordance with provisions of this article.
(2) The property owner shall maintain fences, including those existing prior to the adoption of this
section, at all times in a state of good repair, safe and secure condition, with all braces, bolts,
nails, supporting frames and fastenings free from deterioration, termite infestation, rot, rust or
loosening, and able to withstand at all times the wind pressure for which they were designed.
(3) Property owners shall paint, stain and/or seal fence supports, gates, structural members and
exterior surfaces as necessary to prevent rusting, peeling or blistering surfaces. Board-on-board
and similar wood privacy fences may be painted or stained with natural wood colors. The use of
https://www2.municode.com/library/b(/north_richland_hiIIs/codes/buiIding_and_Iand_use_regulations?nodeld=PTIICOOR_CH118ZO—ARTVIIIS Packet Pg. 11
4/29/2016 North Richland Hills,TX Building and Land Use Regulations 3.b
high intensity, primary, metallic, or fluorescent colors shall be prohibited on any fence sur ace.
(c) Frontyards. Fences may only be allowed in front yards of property zoned for single-family residential
and agricultural uses which have at least 100 feet of frontage on a street. Such fences shall be open
air or nonsight-barring fences and shall meet the following standards:
(1) Fences shall be wrought iron or ornamental metal, may have brick or stone columns spaced 20 t(
50 feet on center, and shall be no greater than four feet in height.
(2) Front yard fences greater than four feet and no higher than six feet in height may be permitted
on residential lots greater than one acre in size with 200 feet or more of street frontage. Said
U)
fence shall be wrought iron or ornamental metal and shall have brick or stone columns spaced 2(
to 50 feet on center. Such properties, if zoned AG or R-1-S, may also be permitted a rural fence
type as provided herein. co
(3) A Rural Fence may be permitted in the front yard of any property zoned AG or R-1-S, with a
minimum of one acre, and with at least 150 feet of frontage on a street. Said rural fence may not
exceed five feet in height and may be one of the following fence types: mortised split rail,
wrought iron or ornamental metal, tubular steel pipe, post-and-rail, or post-and-board. The use o 2
cable may be permitted in conjunction with tubular steel pipe fencing. The use of continuous co
square mesh fencing, or "non-climb" fencing, and/or masonry columns spaced 20 to 50 feet on
U)
center may be used in conjunction with any of the aforementioned rural fence types. The use of
barbed wire or electric fencing for the purpose of livestock containment shall only be permitted it
conjunction with any of the aforementioned rural fence types.
(4) Private entry driveway gates maybe permitted for any property that is permitted a front yard U)
fence. Said gates shall be set back from the planned ultimate right-of-way line as shown by the
master thoroughfare plan a minimum of 20 feet to accommodate the on-site queuing of one
vehicle.
(d) Visibility triangle. All walls and fences located on a corner lot shall comply with any applicable visibility
co
sight triangles as provided for in this chapter.
(e) Transverse frontage lots. When the rear yard of a first lot abuts the side yard of a second lot, no fence
on the first lot shall encroach into the side yard adjacent to the street unless the fence complies with
subsection (c) of this section.
r
(f) Reverse frontage lots. When the rear yards of two corner lots abut, fences complying with this section
co
may be constructed within the side yard adjacent to the street.
(g) Prohibited fencing material. No fence shall be constructed of sheet/corrugated metal, plywood,
concrete masonry unit block, or other materials not manufactured or designed for the primary
purpose of fence construction. The use of"W or "diamond" mesh, or chain link fencing is not
permitted forward of the principal building on the lot, nor along any street frontage.
(h) Finished side facing thoroughfare. Wood fences adjacent to a collector or arterial street as identified on
the master thoroughfare plan shall have the finished or smooth side of the fence facing the
thoroughfare and fence posts shall face interior to the lot.
(i) [Fence adjacent to screening wall.]Where a residential subdivision masonry screening wall is provided
adjacent to a C-4-U collector street or larger as identified on the master thoroughfare plan, the height
of a fence adjacent or perpendicular to the screening wall shall not exceed the height of the
subdivision's screening wall.
https://www2.municode.com/library/b(/north_richland_hiIIs/codes/buiIding_and_Iand_use_regulations?nodeld=PTIICOOR_CH118ZC_ARTVIIIS Packet Pg. 12
4/29/2016 North Richland Hills,TX Building and Land Use Regulations 3.b
(Ord. No. 1874, art. X, § 1025, 3-22-1993; Ord. No. 2209, § 1, 7-14-1997; Ord. No. 2356, § 1, 1-11-199 9; urcl.
No. 2444, § 1, 1-10-2000; Ord. No. 2577, 10-22-2001; Ord. No. 3052, § 2, 5-18-2009; Ord. No. 3244, § 6, 4-
22-2013)
co
S
co
0
a
co
0
U)
a
0
t�
https://www2.municode.com/library/b(/north_richland_hiIIs/codes/buiIding_and_Iand_use_regulations?nodeld=PTIICOOR_CH118Z0_ARTVIIIS Packet Pg. 13
4/29/2016 North Richland Hills,TX Building and Land Use Regulations 3.0
Sec. 110-373. - Masonry screening wall requirements (semipublic improvement).
Every newly platted residential or nonresidential subdivision or resubdivision of lots adjacent to a C-4.
U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown in the prevailing master thoroughfare plan, shall comply with the
screening wall requirements as provided in this section.
(1) The developer of any lot located in a newly platted residential subdivision, or resubdivision of
existing residential lots adjacent to a C-4-U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the prevailing
master thoroughfare plan, shall be required to construct a masonry or concrete screening wall
co
along and adjacent to said thoroughfare. However, a replat of an existing one lot residential
subdivision on any street is exempt.
(2) The developer of any lot located in a newly platted nonresidential subdivision, or resubdivision of
lots, which have a rear property line adjacent to a C-4-U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the
prevailing master thoroughfare plan, shall be required to construct a masonry or concrete co
screening wall along and adjacent to said thoroughfare.
(3) The masonry or concrete screening wall shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the
standards and specifications contained in the design manual. Any combination of wrought iron
and landscaping at street intersections, or entrances to subdivisions, shall be considered as an CID
acceptable alternate material. Except for landscaping materials, no masonry or concrete
screening wall or its foundation shall be constructed within the street right-of-way.
(4) Any masonry screening wall constructed within the city which is not required by subsection (1) or
subsection (2) of this section shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the standards and °
specifications contained in the design manual.
co
(Ord. No. 1982, § 1(355), 3-24-1994)
0
U)
M°
co
t�
https://www2.municode.com/library/b(/north_richland_hiIIs/codes/buiIding_and_Iand_use_regulations?nodeld=PTIICOOR_CH11OSU_ARTXRE Packet Pg. 14
D
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: Discuss Items from the Regular Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting.
Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Summary:
The purpose of this item is to allow the Planning & Zoning Commission the opportunity
to discuss any item on the regular Planning & Zoning Commission agenda.
General Description:
The purpose of this item is to allow the Planning & Zoning Commission the opportunity
to inquire about items that are posted for discussion and deliberation on the regular
Planning & Zoning Commission agenda. The Commission is encouraged to ask staff
questions to clarify and/or provide additional information on items posted on the regular
agenda.
Packet Pg. 15
B.1
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: Approve minutes of the April 21, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting.
Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Summary:
The minutes are approved by majority vote of the Commission at the Planning & Zoning
Commission meetings.
General Description:
The Planning & Zoning Office prepares action minutes for each Planning & Zoning
Commission meeting. The minutes from each meeting are placed on a later agenda for
review and approval by the Commission. Upon approval of the minutes, an electronic
copy will be uploaded to the City's website.
Recommendation:
Approve minutes of the April 21, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
Packet Pg. 16
B.1.a
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APRIL 21, 2016
WORK SESSION
U)
2
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in
work session on the 21st day of April, 2016 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Workroom 0
prior to the 7:00 p.m. regular session.
E
r_
Present: Randall Shiflet Place 4, Chairman
Bill Schopper Place 6, Vice Chairman
Mike Benton Place 2 ,
Kathy Luppy Place 5
Jerry Tyner Ex-Officio
Absent: Don Bowen Place 3, Secretary
Steven Cooper Place 7 cm
Mark Haynes Place 1 cm
a
Staff Members: Clayton Comstock Planning Manager
Clayton Husband Principal Planner
Chad VanSteenberg Planner (Recording Secretary)
Justin Naylor Civil Engineer
0
Call to Order
Vice Chairman Bill Schopper called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. co a.
1. General Announcements - Upcoming City Events
U)
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock presented announcements including upcoming
events in North Richland Hills.
2. Discuss Development Activity Report and City Council action
cm
Planning Manager Comstock discussed City Council action from their April 11, 2016,
meeting as well as development activity in the city.
cm
3. Discussion of Blood Plasma Centers as a new and unlisted use
Planning Manager Comstock introduced the topic and stated that staff is seeking an
interpretation from the Commission about where Blood Plasma Centers would fit into
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 1
Packet Pg. 17
B.1.a
the Table of Permitted Uses. He explained that there had been a few recent inquires to
staff from companies interested in locating a facility in the city and he covered existing
definitions of the land use from other U.S. communities. The concept of plasma
donations that are traded for cash or gift cards was discussed. A list of the current
medical-related land use categories was read and input was requested from
Commission members.
U)
2
There was a discussion between staff and Commission members about the market for
this type of land use and the population that this service would benefit. 0
Chairman Randall Shiflet asked if we could include this use in the current most
restrictive land use category and, if the use does not result in any problems, it could be
changed to a less restrictive category later. He would like to see a Special Use Permit
required in all applicable zones and possibly revisit the matter in the future. ,
E
r_
Planning Manager Comstock stated that staff will make that revision and bring this back
ig
to the Commission for a public hearing. CL
4. Discuss items from the regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting cm
cm
Principal Planner Clayton Husband and Planning Manager Clayton Comstock presented
the items on the April 21, 2016, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda.
5. Adjournment
U)
2
There being no other business, Vice Chairman Schopper adjourned the work session at
7:03 p.m.
0
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
co
The Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting is immediately following the
work session (but not earlier than 7:00 p.m.) in the main council chambers.
S
A.0 CALL TO ORDER
CL
Vice Chairman Bill Schopper called the April 21, 2016, meeting to order at 7:11 p.m.
cm
Present: Randall Shiflet Place 4, Chairman
Bill Schopper Place 6, Vice Chairman °.
Mike Benton Place 2
Kathy Luppy Place 5
Jerry Tyner Ex-Officio
Absent: Don Bowen Place 3, Secretary
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 2
Packet Pg. 18
B.1.a
Steven Cooper Place 7
Mark Haynes Place 1
Staff Members: Clayton Comstock Planning Manager
Clayton Husband Principal Planner
Chad VanSteenberg Planner (Recording Secretary)
Justin Naylor Civil Engineer
0
A.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
0
Kathy Luppy led the pledge of allegiance to the United States and Texas flags.
°
B. MINUTES CL
B.1 APPROVE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 2016, PLANNING & ZONING Cq
COMMISSION MEETING.
CL°
APPROVED
MIKE B I TON MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES,OF THE MARCH 17,2016, PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING. KATHY LUPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
0
Vice Chairman Schopper explained that he is chairing the meeting instead of Chairman
Randall Shiflet because Chairman Shiflet had dental work earlier in the day, and he is
also recusing himself in the matter of Items C.1 and C.2 as he has acted as a consultant
for the applicant in the past. Chairman Shiflet does not want there to appear to be a ,.
conflict of interest.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
C.1 SUP 2015-06 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST Cq
FROM MARVIN SMITH FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETENTION
POND ON THE PROPOSED SMITH FARM ADDITION SITE LOCATED AT
7601 DOUGLAS LANE. Cq
APPROVED
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 3
Packet Pg. 19
B.1.a
C.2 FP 2015-02 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM MARVIN SMITH FOR A
FINAL PLAT OF SMITH FARM ADDITION ON 8.00 ACRES LOCATED AT
7601 DOUGLAS LANE.
APPROVED
°
Chairman Randall Shiflet left the City Council Chambers at 7:13 p.m.
0
Principal Planner Clayton Husband introduced the Special Use Permit request and the
Final Plat request.
0
Ed Kellie with Kellie Engineering, 205 Lindenwood Drive, Fort Worth, stated he was
here representing the applicant, Marvin Smith, and provided details of the request. He
indicated that they are here to answer any questions about the SUP and the Final Plat
requests.
Vice Chairman Schopper asked the Commission if there were any questions. Seeing
none, he asked Clayton Husband to present the staff report.
Principal Planner Husband presented the staff report for both requests and stated that
the Commission should also take action on the Final Plat following the Public Hearing
for the Special Use Permit.
0
Vice Chairman Schopper opened the Public Hearing for SUP 2015-06 at 7:18 p.m.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Schopper closed the Public Hearing at
7:18 p.m. and asked for a motion on SUP 2015-06.
L
MIKE BENTON MOVED TO APPROVE SUP 2015-06. KATHY LUPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 3-0.
Vice Chairman Schopper called for a motion on FP 2015-02.
MIKE BENTON MOVED TO APPROVE FP 2015-02. KATHY, LuPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
ad
CL
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 3-0.
e
Vice Chairman Schopper clarified that Gerald Tyner is Ex-Officio capacity on the
Commission. This capacity, according to the City Charter allows him to participate in
the discussions, but does not allow him to vote on any cases.
Chairman Randall Shiflet returned to the City Council Chambers at 7:19 p.m.
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 4
Packet Pg. 20
B.1.a
C.3 ZC 2016-01 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST
FROM SPRY SURVEYORS FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM R-1-S
SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO R-1 SINGLE FAMILY ON 0.463 ACRES
LOCATED IN THE 7200 BLOCK OF BURSEY ROAD.
APPROVED U)
CA RP 2016-02 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST 0
FROM SPRY SURVEYORS FOR A REPLAT OF LOTS 2R1 AND 2R2, BLOCK
1, DOUBLE K RANCH ADDITION ON 4.138 ACRES LOCATED AT 7229
LONDONDERRY DRIVE AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 110-365 OF THE
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (SEWAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS).
APPROVED
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock introduced the Special Use Permit request and
the Final Plat request.
cm
Mark Wood, 6617 Precinct Line Road, North Richland Hills, 76182 stated he was here cm
on behalf of property owners Dr. Bob and Susan Griggs. Mr. Wood provided details of
both the Zoning Change and Final Plat cases including information about the variance
requested for the sewage facility requirements.
4-
0
Vice Chairman Schopper asked if there were any questions for Mr. Wood.
Commissioner Mike Benton asked if the applicants had run any percolation tests related
to the proposed septic tank.
0
Mr. Wood responded no, they have not. He stated that the owner understands that
approval of a variance for septic would be made subject to meeting Tarrant County co°o
guidelines, otherwise the sewer line would have to be extended.
U)
Planning Manager Comstock summarized the staff report for both requests and
discussed the variance request to Section 110-365 of the North Richland Hills
Subdivision Ordinance regarding sewage facility requirements. He stated that staff
recommends approval of the Zoning Change and Replat request but denial of the
variance request.
cm
Chairman Randall Shiflet asked if the recommendation for denial was because of the
subdivision regulations.
cm
Planning Manager Comstock replied that from a policy standpoint, staff recommends
not approving variance requests to the Subdivision Ordinance related to sanitary sewer.
He also stated that Justin Naylor, Civil Engineer, is available to answer any questions.
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 5
Packet Pg. 21
B.1.a
Chairman Shiflet stated that this is a one lot subdivision as opposed to a fifty lot
subdivision and that one size does not fit all.
Vice Chairman Schopper asked the Commission if there were any questions. Seeing
none, he opened the Public Hearing for ZC 2016-01 at 7:30 p.m.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Schopper closed the Public Hearing for
ZC 2016-01 at 7:30 p.m. and asked for a motion on the matter.
0
MIKE BENTON MOVED TO,APPROVE ZC 2016-01. KATHY LUPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
°
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
Vice Chairman Schopper stated that the next case was RP 2016-02 and opened the
Public Hearing for RP 2016-02 at 7:32 p.m.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Schopper closed the Public Hearing for CL
RP 2016-02 at 7:32 p.m. and requested a motion on the matter that addresses the
requested variance.
°
RANDALL SHIFLET MOVED TO APPROVE RP" 2016-02 WITH THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE CL
SEPTIC SYSTEM. MIKE BENTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
0
Commissioner Benton stated that he would like to add to the motion that approval
should be based on the results of the percolation test. He asked if that test would take
place before this request goes before the City Council.
Planning Manager Comstock stated that it would not likely be conducted prior to City
Council. A percolation test would be required from the Tarrant County Health
Department when building permits are pulled. If a permit cannot be issued based on
those test results, they would have to extend sanitary sewer.
Chairman Shiflet asked about the addressing for the proposed lot.
Planning Manager Comstock explained that when the replat is processed by city staff
the new lot would be assigned an address on Bursey Road. ad
CL
e
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
e
C.5 ZC 2016-02 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST
FROM ARTEC FOR A REVISION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 36 (PD-36)
LOCATED IN THE 9000-9100 BLOCKS OF NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 6
Packet Pg. 22
B.1.a
INCLUDING ADJACENT PARCELS ON DAVIS BOULEVARD AND
PRECINCT LINE ROAD.
APPROVED
C.6 RP 2016-04 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM SUN HOLDINGS FOR
A REPLAT OF LOTS 2R1 AND 2R2, BLOCK 1, WAL-MART ADDITION ON
3.91 ACRES LOCATED IN THE 8200 BLOCK OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD.
0
APPROVED
0
Principal Planner Clayton Husband introduced the Zoning Change and Replat requests.
David Rey with ARTEC, 6800 Weiskopf Ave, McKinney, stated that they are the
architects of record for this project and are before the Commission on behalf of the
owner. Mr. Rey stated that the exterior has been upgraded to meet NRH requirements. CL
Principal Planner Clayton Husband summarized the staff reports for both the zoning
change and the replat.
Commissioner Benton asked if the white brick the applicant is proposing is actual white
colored brick or a painted brick.
0
Principal Planner Husband confirmed that it is a white brick.
Vice Chairman Schopper opened the Public Hearing for ZC 2016-02 at 7:42 p.m.
0
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Schopper closed the Public Hearing for
ZC 2016-02 at 7:42 p.m. and entertained a motion on the request.
KATHY LUPPY MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2016-02 SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN DESIGN. RANDALL SHIFLET SECONDED c�
THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
ad
CL
Vice Chairman Schopper stated that the next case was RP 2016-04 and requested a
motion.
MIKE BENTON MOVED TO APPROVE RP 201604 WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
CERTIFICATION THAT IS REQUIRED. KATHY LuPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 7
Packet Pg. 23
B.1.a
C.7 ZC 2016-05 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST
FROM SAFEWAY CONSULTING AND CONTRACTING, LLC FOR A ZONING
CHANGE FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO R-2 SINGLE FAMILY ON 2.66
ACRES LOCATED AT 8500 CLAY HIBBINS ROAD.
APPROVED
C.8 PP 2016-01 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM SAFEWAY
CONSULTING AND CONTRACTING, LLC FOR A REVISED PRELIMINARY
PLAT OF FRESH MEADOW ESTATES ON 13.536 ACRES LOCATED IN THE
8400 AND 8500 BLOCKS OF SHADY GROVE ROAD AND CLAY HIBBINS
ROAD.
APPROVED
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock introduced the zoning change and preliminary plat
requests.
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock summarized the two requests and stated that PP
2016-01 is a revised preliminary plat request.
Osama Nashed with ANA Consultants, 5000 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville, stated that
his company requested a zoning change and plat for this area last year. The City
Council at that time requested that the whole area be secured for development instead
of taking a piecemeal approach. Mr. Nashed stated that adding this property will provide
three exits instead of two and this property will be a good addition to the subdivision.
L
Vice Chairman Schopper opened the Public Hearing for ZC 2016-05 at 7:49 p.m.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Schopper closed the Public Hearing for
ZC 2016-05 at 7:49 p.m. and entertained a motion on the request.
RANDA L SHIIFLET MOVED TO.APPROVE ZC 2016-05. KATHY LUPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
ad
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0. CL
e
Vice Chairman Schopper stated that the next case was PP 2016-01 and requested a
e
motion.
MIKE BENTON MOVED TO APPROVE PP 201601. KATHY LUPPY SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 8
Packet Pg. 24
B.1.a
ADJOURNMENT
Cb
S
Vice Chairman Schopper adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m.
Chairman Secretary
0
c�
a
Randall Shiflet Don Bowen
Recording Secretary
cm
cm
a
0
co
S
CL
April 21,2016
P&Z Minutes
Page 9
Packet Pg. 25
C.1
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: AP 2016-01 Consideration of a request from Robert Richardson for an
Amended Plat for Lot 6R, Block 1, Woodbert Addition on 0.924 acres
located at 8301 Woods Lane.
Presenter: Clayton Husband, Principal Planner
Summary:
On behalf of Lonnie and Deborah Gillilan, Robert Richards is requesting approval of an
Amended Plat to combine existing Lots 6 & 7, Block 1, Woodbert Addition into one Lot
6R. This 0.924-acre lot is located on the north side of Woods Lane and west of Davis
Boulevard. The proposed amended plat meets the requirements of the zoning
ordinance and subdivision regulations.
General Description:
The original plat for Woodbert Addition was platted in 1946 to the Town of Smithfield.
The amended plat will combine two existing lots into a single lot for constructing a new
house on the property.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan classifies this area as "Low
Density Residential." This designation provides areas for the development of traditional,
low-density single-family detached dwelling units.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN: The development has frontage on Woods Lane, classified
as an R2U local street. Woods Lane is a two-lane undivided street with a 50-foot wide
right-of-way. Additional right-of-way is not required from this property. Woods Lane is a
dead-end street on the west end, and future development in this area will need to
provide a connection with Sayers Lane to the south. Curbs and gutters exist on both
sides of the street. Sidewalks do not exist on Sayers Lane.
CURRENT ZONING: R-3 Single-Family Residential. This final plat is consistent with the
R-3 zoning standards.
SURROUNDING ZONING ( LAND USE:
North: R-1-S Special Single-Family I Low Density Residential
West: R-3 Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential
South: R-3 Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential
Packet Pg. 26
C.1
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
East: R-3 Single-Family Residential I Low Density Residential
PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Woodbert
Addition.
CITY COUNCIL DATE: The City Council will consider this request at the May 9, 2016,
meeting.
Recommendation:
To approve AP 2016-01.
Packet Pg. 27
C.1.a
—re en Vail Ve D r
cm
................
ood
v
Ln
TF CD
CL
cm
bay e rs n
Packet Pg. 28
�, rr
C 1 b
jjj
i
i
�h1��li% l�fGl�Jl/%/%///r/lrl f�Giii / ))ll��y%l7%l/11JJV(lI/1111%111rD1�1 '�.
/ „t Green Valley Dr
Cm
"
i
CL
✓' ,
CD
CL
CD
to
f iti u,
oy
e
1 T—
Sayers L n " �; CL
r
I
1
uum�� iii
I
E I�
f ,� � III uuuuuuuuuuu V�.i
l � /
I
� VVVV
,✓� l � Packet Pg. 29 '��
T 2
I a s o Is s I�, �E o It a s I I ° mOON o f I t
I-
I° E m
a to z to w�
t o a o a s O a Q z O m O O- a Q c z O
I m =
I
Is E I� o w 19 - Icy F4 c a w 19
I�o ~o L..
wo E°' w Im a — oy wO y w Ia
IJ Q� o�aQ z to z`° Im Q� oo �a z jo o ad d la �� to
o w J c ? to o ® o ? I`o z m a o ? I`o
No m am o z 3 No mo�o cD ID z
u
mu3 ° o o aco °o
_ c o+> o0 o N
E`o
a o
o{
_ �
o d
-vi o rn
U a w a
oFU
_ V\� ti
-
-
N.c a
o mom �� m° m`o
O N a m Z a
a N C O O+ of C O o O
�N O
-_m > Z \Z
O Z a w W o 0
in
III
III -
z
Oz
zZ J
- m
_ am I
Z6Wv 3„LL.117.00s
II -
I
I
w o
I
II=
II IIa o I
III^�
> I I
i
s
I I
NIN63d Z O z
LN f1H o O O
z 0 Fr c0 WI 1� COI o
o
J Oao] m _
n
m W U O
So
Q ava
lllf iaN�
z p J � � w r< N � � Dod
d iN O
o LL ” Q J m M fO m c-4 C° O
z x N �U .,� rOOO 3
w SI�tlO rfli
z oo
'o00
a ■ w 3 01?738WI1 ?
13AOID z 'n
— ..5
i38W3 w °° N Fo ESl ]Z
3 �1IIH ii3BW11 xs.o s.o'
z Y 3 rr-E 2
iMs;
C.2
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: RP 2015-11 Consideration of a request from PSI Atlantic Richland Hills
TX, LLC for a Replat of Red Gate Addition on 4.552 acres located in the
7800 block of Mockingbird Lane.
Presenter: Clayton Husband, Principal Planner
Summary:
On behalf of the owner, Davis/Mockingbird NRH Ltd., PSI Atlantic Richland Hills LLC is
requesting approval of a replat of Lot 1R, Block 2, Red Gate Addition. The property is
located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and north of Mockingbird Lane. The plat is
complete and meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance and subdivision
regulations.
General Description:
The final plat for Red Gate Addition was approved in 1987. Over time, several land
swaps occurred between this property and the La Casita Manufactured Home
Community property (Holiday East Mobile Home Park Addition) to adjust the common
property line due to several home sites in the park being built over the common property
line. The applicant submitted a replat in order to establish the current property boundary
for the development of the site as a self-storage facility.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: This area is designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan as "Retail." This designation is intended to permit a variety of retail trade, personal
and business services establishments, and offices.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN: The property has frontage on Davis Boulevard and
Mockingbird Lane. Davis Boulevard is classified as a Principal Arterial (P6D) at this
location, which is ultimately a six-lane divided roadway with a right-of-way of 120 feet.
Mockingbird Lane is classified as a Residential street (R2U), which is a two-lane
undivided roadway with an ultimate right-of-way of 50 feet. Right-of-way dedication is
not required for this property.
CURRENT ZONING: The property is currently zoned NR-PD Non-Residential Planned
Development for the development of a self-storage facility of 606 or fewer units. The
NR-PD was approved by City Council on April 11, 2016, and it includes development
standards for the self-storage facility and establishes C-2 Commercial as the base
Packet Pg. 31
C.2
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
zoning district. The C-2 district is intended to provide for development of retail and
general business uses primarily to serve the community and region. Uses include a
wide variety of business activities and may involve limited outside storage, service, or
display. The C-2 district should be located away from low and medium density
residential development and should be used as a buffer between retail and industrial
uses. The district is appropriate along business corridors as indicated on the
Comprehensive Plan.
SURROUNDING ZONING / LAND USE:
North: TC Town Center and C-1 Commercial Town Center
West: C-1 Commercial and C-2 Commercial Retail
South: C-1 Commercial, C-2 Commercial, and R-2 Single-Family Residential
Retail
East: PD Planned Development I Manufactured Homes
PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Lot 1, Block 2, Red Gate Addition.
CITY COUNCIL DATE: The City Council will consider this request at the May 9, 2016,
meeting.
Recommendation:
To approve RP 2015-11.
Packet Pg. 32
C.2.a
CO
Cir
Ln
Red River Run
Cm
CL
XX
Ln
Cm
������w�,w...........�,w...........�,w...........�,w...........�,u...........!�,u...........!�,ww������q�,u...........�,w...........�,u...........!�,w...........�,w...........�,u...........!�,u...........!�,u...........�,w������������,w�����������iu������������,u............�,w�����������iu������������iu����������
a
a�
�w
mockingbird c�kiingbird Lnw a.
P
m
� sh
� r
Packet Pg. 33
4 L°5 WZ dM VEOZ) 0104d IBIJOV L L°5 WZ dM :IU9W )BPV
N
U a
d
a
a
vw
AN
r,
i
r)
r: //,i�o/o l ✓ ✓
/�/ r,,, , f'/ ✓ rf,
✓lfir ��
��� � ✓i//��'d�'uih,Ti„� 1!� ���/,� ✓��ii////,'yU /iii✓/i�f//piri/�,
/� / ✓ � � / i/����i fir,✓ �/ ��i✓r✓/
ij/ �� �r � / r „iii/�✓��,// r, U ” �
r�
u��VVUUUU I
i
"wwv
r i N
a
i uui au
i { YBIIIIIV�i
// iii' ✓ / i M..
�� � � �,✓ 1�: � i%l ii �� I ' ✓" r,l ✓ Y •rr� � �uuuum uu �Vtlly� �I�Y 111(r iijfllll Vhu(,r�
�y��/✓// �� I �/a4!�„ ��- �i '•"^i ��0 Jr �° l�, ��� /%�/� III�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :, � pdiib,
I
I V VIII
01 �
1 IIII
IIII .
IIII Y IuuuV'u... .. III '9P.
:..,7/a ,. ✓(/ ;,'�'�� lr 9i����rr r i,,,,,,,r„l��ili/d a� ,�i�%fi,/.���//frii�i�.', ,//"'"„ ,yriUri � � ���:.m//i/
U
H
L.L. J •
Z J
O M U M H
N JZODU
U
M
N° rM,
O 0_
°
0_Y
Y U U
0] U° �O �_�� J
�M 6 �y V) U V) m N U,N On
LL
—41 ,Z�s CZ 9` S� a Qf Q ��M J Zoo
S� U°� (n W O M Lo
r S �r1 w V) (3) Q=M° \ u;s.'r.yl:rtCI
04 LLI a —(saws)_ _ zs,ts.zo S) Z 00 N CV D Y°
lL'86 M „62,CZ.ZO cn"r� m
s� � � - - - - - - - - - _ _ U
U
\ U 0- V)
zo F9sC \ � \ NNU O WZQ �a
UWU v)WU U�
NSF .Z N N U W N
X�, N Q U W N W
I \°
00'24'46"E 102.63' 1\J a �in
N OD'24'46"W 111.70'
M. L
`nw I LO_ 0 (D
00 N I
m °nvwi � U-j 01
O
W °w Zo 00 1-) C)
W o i0 Ij II m
Of (L I 40_ HJUU
a w in
3 D_
�_ IW
D!
I �
64.5' /
o_
w
WZa
( U
S 00'2446"E 37.50' U U w
Ln
g I 65.3' U- a
ro ro I V U
N N
\ r
WH I I
Z W
�ui
W Z
au I
�a I
�W
o0
a z �D J I M
a
Ckf to Z
� 0CLJ
I w
w a a IQ o I U 0-
0) io
` co m Q r7
1n 1n I 3 M = I m LCD LLJ
D.1
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: RP 2016-06 Public Hearing and consideration of a request from JPC
Realty LTD for a Replat of Lots 23R and 24R, Block 1, W.E. Odell
Addition on 1.10 acres located at 8121-8129 Odell Street.
Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Summary:
JPC Realty, LTD is requesting approval of a replat for Lots 23R & 24R, Block 1, W.E.
Odell Addition for the purpose of platting two office lots on 1.10 acres at the northwest
corner of Davis Boulevard and Odell Street.
General Description:
The proposed replat combines two existing platted lots and portions of two platted lots
into two new lots and reorients them toward Davis Blvd instead of Odell Street. The
purpose of the plat is for the development two 4,000-square-foot office buildings on
separately platted lots.
This is reconsideration of a replat that was denied by the Planning & Zoning
Commission on March 17, 2016. The previous plat was denied because the
Commission also recommended denial of the corresponding zoning change request to
0-1 Office. However, the applicant appealed the Commission's recommendation to the
City Council, who approved the zoning change request on April 11, 2016.
As required by the 0-1 Office zoning district and residential adjacency standards, 25-
foot building lines are provided on both street frontages and 35-foot building lines are
provided adjacent to residential properties. Sight visibility easements are provided at all
driveway and street intersections to keep any visual obstructions out of these
intersection areas, such as landscaping and monument signs.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN: The property has frontage on both Odell Street and Davis
Boulevard (F.M. 1938). The Thoroughfare Plan designates Davis Blvd as a P7D, 7-lane
divided principal arterial roadway, and Odell Street as a standard R2U residential street.
Each roadway has the appropriate right-of-way, and additional right-of-way dedication is
not required.
Packet Pg. 36
D.1
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: This area is designated on the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan as "Low Density Residential." This designation provides for traditional
low-density single-family detached dwelling units.
PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Lots 23, 24, and portions of Lots 25
and 26, W.E. Odell Addition.
CURRENT ZONING: The property is currently zoned 0-1 Office.
SURROUNDING ZONING / LAND USE:
North: R-3 Single Family Low Density Residential
West: R-3 Single Family Low Density Residential
South: R-3 Single Family and LR Local Retail I Low Density Residential
East: TOD Transit Oriented Development I Transit Oriented Development
CITY COUNCIL DATE: City Council is scheduled to consider this request at the May 9,
2016, meeting if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
PUBLIC HEARING: The replat meets the State's requirement under Section 212.015
of the Local Government Code, for a public hearing since it has been zoned for single-
family residential uses within the past 5 years. As such, property owners included in the
W.E. Odell Addition within 200 feet of the proposed replat have been given notice of the
public hearing. Advertisement of the public hearing has also been made in the Fort
Worth Star Telegram.
While a public hearing is required, Section 212.005 of the Local Government Code still
applies. This statute states that municipalities must approve a plat that satisfies all
applicable regulations. In this particular case, no variances are being requested and the
plat meets all applicable development regulations.
Recommendation:
To approve RP 2016-06.
Packet Pg. 37
D.1.a
a
CL
CM
m
o�
a2
Odell St
Cm
Northeast Pi Packet Pg. 38
D.1.b
CM
CL
/
/�i�i�✓ i iii �'
/���r �f ��f�i��' ry(�%i�(/�%////////' �:►r�ss��r fj/ of ��jy��/��/(/.
/ CM
11� CD
CL
CM
CL
i
V li I I
f
i%�,,, Packet Pg. 39
D.1.c
`CHL,g
d NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.. :: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TExPS AND CITY COUNCIL
Case Number: RP 2016-06
Applicant: JPC Realty LTD
Location: 8121 - 8129 Odell Street
cm
a.
You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200
cm
feet and located in the same subdivision of the property shown on the attached map.
Purpose of Public Hearings:
RP 2016-06: A Public Hearing is being held to consider a request from JPC Realty LTD for a
Replat of Lots 23R and 24R, Block 1, W.E. Odell Addition on 1.10 acres located at 8121-
8129 Odell Street.
Public Hearing Schedule:
0
Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
7:00 PM THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2016
cm
CITY COUNCIL 0.
7:00 PM MONDAY, MAY 9, 2016
Both Meeting Locations: *CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7301 N. E. LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
*(PLEASE NOTE: THESE MEETINGS WILL NOT BE
HELD AT THE NEW CITY HALL BUILDING ON CITY
POINT DRIVE.)
If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request,
please contact:
Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Phone (817) 427-6300 Fax (817) 427-6303
Packet Pg.40
D.1.d
YAZHARI PARVIZ J&J NRH 100 FLP STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION
YAZHARI KHOSROW 700 HARWOOD STE A 125 E 11TH ST
1230 BROWN TR STE 105 HURST TX 76054 AUSTIN TX 78701-2409
BEDFORD TX 76022-8028
Current Owner BORODACHEV NIKOLAY WEST HOPE A
8109 ODELL ST BORODACHEV OLGA 8117 ODELL ST
NRH TX 76182 8113 ODELL ST NRH TX 76182-3545
NRH TX 76182-3545
LINCH RONALD L JR BROTHERS STEVE
LINCH R F JPC REALTY LTD PO BOX 820502 BROTHERS MELINDA
8119 ODELL ST NRH TX 76182-0502 8104 ODELL ST
NRH TX 76182-3545 NRH TX 76182-3544
CL
MURILLO JIMMY VO HOANG M SANDY JOHN W .
MURILLO LAUREN R NGUYEN MINH T 8116 ODELL ST
8108 ODELL ST 8112 ODELL ST
NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-3544 NRH TX 76182-3544
NGUYEN GIAO Q KIM JAMES SUNG
8120 ODELL ST 8124 ODELL ST
NRH TX 76182-3544 NRH TX 76182
0
CL
2
0
4-
0
2
CL
0
Packet Pg.41
U
+' 6 a v 0 o ° �o � > i 0 a) -
O U N O
N C p
0- 0
O U) 6 E 7 0
° a� .�
° + L -° : t O O m O o f � OL ° ° O ° to
U O � 7 + � >, -p p C U
a � ° ° O p L� C N m 000 p ^O O =
� E
cn c N ° L O ° c O \ p N U) o C c
U .2 N -O �., N -O O U .� O
� o o °� L (> >, � o N 3 L c CO O °
L °c � :3
O -o 0)-o j a °) °
O �
°
O p , O >o -° ° L ° o o O p O o ° O `L
Dx :3 c a)
Cf) + Q) o a) � + U 0) c0) ° a
Q,
V) o E w N O _ o
c '� ° O:E = a) U — NO c
Q Q o Q o O -° D vi ;> Q > -° °E
oelz 0����7� 8�6L 4-./ . � NoU r7 ._ � w Q- � ° m � r- C/) 3 ao m L U
Q
Li n
C U
K Q
O = O
� ~ UN >- Ln Ln
,Op bsOO�sZ z
Q O
\ G, S U Q
ro\ J Q 0
O
\ .°Z 8� >
....
_............................................ _........................ ...................
O o0
c9
LLI LO
Li
NO � Q oQ C w � �N
F � O
Li
I-- �
Lv �
OU) O J > a
O Jw om
J U-) �' >> r\,
x —
ON Q � �
_................................................ . . _................................................ . . _............................ ...........0 .....�-........................ _.............................................N
O m
LJ LO
W lL. � O (p JUG
I-- Li O
,�
C) C) 5 ro
D.2
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the City Manager Date: May 5, 2016
Subject: SDP 2016-03 Public Hearing and Consideration of a request from Our
County Homes for a Special Development Plan for Iron Horse
Commons on 27.842 acres in the 6400 and 6500 blocks of Iron Horse
Blvd.
Presenter: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Summary:
OCH Development is requesting approval of a Special Development Plan within the Iron
Horse Transit Oriented Development Zoning District. The applicant proposes to
develop three distinct phases at the northwest, northeast and southeast corners of Iron
Horse Boulevard and Browning Drive. The purpose of this Special Development Plan
is for the consideration of four waivers to the Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
Code.
General Description:
A similar application for this property was denied by City Council on March 14, 2016.
The applicant has revised their development plan in response to the comments made
by City Council.
IRON HORSE COMMONS DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: The proposed Iron Horse
Commons is divided into three tracts. The following summarizes the development by
each tract.
Tract 1 — Northwest Corner of Iron Horse & Browning
• 70 — 25'x90' Townhome Lots
• 15 — 25'x90' Live/Work Units
o A live/work unit is a dwelling unit that is also used for work
purposes, provided that the `work' component is restricted to the
uses of professional office, artist's workshop, studio, or other similar
uses and is located on the street level. The `live' component may
be located on the street level behind the work component, or onany
other level of the building.
o Approximately 15,000 square feet of commercial "work" area is
provided through the live/work units (13% of the total first floor
building area of Tract 1).
Packet Pg.43
D.2
140L IM Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
• Direct access to the Cotton Belt Trail
• Parallel on-street parking along Iron Horse Blvd townhome units and
angled on-street parking along live/work units.
• A 0.30-acre open space park adjacent to the Cotton Belt Trail featuring
public art.
Tract 2— Northeast Corner of Iron Horse & Browning
• 21 — 40'x100' Single Family Residential Lots
• 23 — 30'x95' Townhome Lots
• 27 — Option of 30'x95' Townhome Lots or 30'x95' Cottage Lots
• A 0.63-acre open space park featuring public art
• Parallel on-street parking along Iron Horse Boulevard
• Approximately 22,400 square feet of existing or future commercial at the
hard corner of Iron Horse & Browning (14% of the approximate first floor
area of Phase 2)
Tract 3— Southeast Corner of Iron Horse & Browning
• 3-story residential apartment building requested by SDP to face Browning
• 3-story mixed use and/or shopfront commercial buildings along Iron Horse
• To conform to mixed-use criteria
• Approximately 0.67-acres of publicly accessible open space area
City Council's primary concern with the previous plan was the lack of commercial uses
and the requests for modifications to the mixed-use criteria of the TOD Code. The new
application addresses this and differs from the previous application in the following
areas:
1. Fifteen (15) townhome units along Iron Horse in Tract 1 were converted to
live/work units to provide a commercial presence in on the northwest side
of the development.
2. No changes were made to Tract 2 to address Council's concerns for
commercial uses. However, the applicant has demonstrated the feasibility
of 22,400 square feet of future commercial uses to develop on property
adjacent to Tract 2.
3. The applicant requests special approval for 27 lots to be developed as
detached townhomes in Tract 2 if the market shows interest in this product
in this location. Their "Texas Townhome" would be a 25-foot wide home
on a 30-foot wide lot. The minimum lot width for a detached single-family
residential home in the TOD is 40 feet; therefore, approval of this option
through the Special Development Plan is required.
Packet Pg.44
D.2
140L 1W Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
4. Tract 3 is completely different from the original proposal. The applicant
proposes 3-story mixed-use buildings along Iron Horse Boulevard, with
two stories of multi-family residential above a first floor of flex/commercial
space that will meet the mixed-use criteria of the district. They have
requested special approval of a 3-story apartment building along the
Browning Drive frontage. The below exhibit shows the original plan (left)
and the revised plan (right) for comparison purposes.
r
k
�Ta i3 1
r
i
Tract 3 Original Plan Tract 3 Revised Plan
MIXED USE CRITERIA: The table below demonstrates how the applicant proposes to
comply with the Mixed Use Criteria cumulatively across all three tracts of the
development. As they intend to comply with the TOD requirements, this information is
for demonstrative purposes only and is not part of the Special Development Plan.
Approximate First Floor Area Uses— Iron Horse Commons
Tract 1 84,000 SF (72%) 19,500 SF (17%) 12,700 SF (11%) 11 1
Tract 2 112,000 SF (69%) 22,400 SF (14%) 27,358 SF (17%) „J
Tract 3 43,200 SF 33% 58,740 SF 45% 29,200 SF 22% ,111111„ , '
11 10
Total Use 239,200 SF (58%) 100,640 SF (25%) 69,258 SF (17%)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & CURRENT ZONING: This area is designated on the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is currently zoned as "Transit Oriented
Development.” The purpose of the Transit Oriented Development Code is to support the
development of the community's station areas into pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use
urban neighborhoods, with convenient access to rail transit, shopping, employment,
housing, and neighborhood retail services. The goal of each station area is to
encourage an efficient, compact land use pattern; encourage pedestrian activity; reduce
the reliance on private automobiles; promote a more functional and attractive
Packet Pg.45
D.2
140L Im Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
community through the use of recognized principles of urban design; and allow property
owners flexibility in land use, while prescribing a high level of detail in building design
and form.
The Character Zone (i.e. subzone) that the majority of the land is located is the "General
Mixed Use" Character Zone, which permits single-family townhomes, single-family
detached homes, and live/work units by right.
SURROUNDING ZONING ( LAND USE:
North: 1-2 Industrial Transit Oriented Development
West: 1-2 Industrial Transit Oriented Development
South: R-7-MF & TOD I Transit Oriented Development
East: 1-2 Industrial I Transit Oriented Development
PLAT STATUS: A Preliminary Plat is anticipated to be considered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission on May 19, 20167 if this application receives approval from City
Council. Proposed Phase 1 (northwest corner of Browning & Iron Horse) is currently
platted as Lot 2A, Block 2, Industrial Park Addition. Phases 2 and 3 at the northeast
and southeast corners are unplatted and described tracts within the Edmund King
Survey, Abstract No. 892.
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The applicant is requesting a Special Development
Plan for consideration of five waivers to the Transit Oriented Development Code. The
Special Development Plan process is intended to allow applicants development
flexibility to address specific market opportunities and/or contexts within the Transit
Oriented Development District. In evaluating a Special Development Plan, the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council must consider the extent to which the
application meets the following:
• the goals and intent of transit oriented development in the city;
• provides an alternative "master plan" approach by consolidating multiple
properties to create a predictable, market responsive development for the area;
• fits the adjoining context by providing appropriate transitions;
• provides public benefits such as usable civic and open spaces, livable streets,
structured and shared parking, and linkages to transit; and,
• does not hinder future opportunities for higher intensity transit oriented
development.
TOD WAIVERS REQUESTED: The following waivers to the TOD Code have been
requested by the applicant or identified by staff as part of this Special Development
Plan.
1. Open Space Distribution. The Regulating Plan for the Iron Horse TOD
identifies a 2.5-acre "Proposed New Civic/Open Space" area at the southwest
corner of Browning Drive & Hilltop Drive. Rather than providing a centralized
park area, the applicant is proposing to disperse smaller open space areas
Packet Pg.46
D.2
140L IM Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
throughout all three tracts of the 27-acre development. Five percent (5%) open
space is the minimum requirement within the TOD, which the proposed
development plan far exceeds. The TOD Code states "Open Spaces should be
designed to be prominently featured, visible, and accessible from the public right
of way, and add value to the neighborhood." The Development Review
Committee deferred approval of the open space distribution in lieu of a more
centralized open space area as defined by the Regulating Plan.
2. Iron Horse On-Street Parking. The TOD Code designates Iron Horse
Boulevard through most of this proposed development as a "TOD Boulevard."
The TOD Boulevard cross section, as currently planned, does not include on-
street parking. On-street parking is proposed in order to create a safe buffer
between pedestrians and the moving traffic on Iron Horse and to provide easy-
access parking for townhome and live/work unit residents and visitors. The City
hired Kimley-Horn & Associates to develop an Iron Horse Boulevard Corridor
Plan that would help identify the preferred cross section for Iron Horse through
the TOD area. It is anticipated that one of the resulting recommendations will be
for on-street parking along this stretch of Iron Horse Boulevard.
3. Tracts 1 & 2 Reduction of Fagade Openings. The TOD Code requires all new
residential buildings within the TOD to have windows or doors covering no less
than 30% of all street facing facades. The applicant has requested a reduction to
20% on all side-street facing facades but has agreed to increase the minimum
openings to 35% on all front-facing facades.
4. Tract 3 Apartment Building along Browning. In response to City Council's
comments, the applicant has provided 3-story mixed-use buildings along Iron
Horse that will accommodate the minimum percentage of commercial uses
required by the TOD for this district. They are requesting approval to allow a 3-
story apartment building (no first floor commercial standards) along Browning
Drive on Tract 3.
5. Tract 2 Cottage Lot Option. As previously mentioned
27 Tots internal to Tract 2 are 30-feet wide by 95-feet
deep. Single-family attached townhomes are shown as
the primary option and are a permitted building type in this
area of the TOD. The applicant is requesting approval to �:,��
allow these Tots - at the same quantity and dimensions -
the option to develop as single-family detached homes.
1
This would be a 25-foot wide house on a 30-foot wide lot. '
The purpose is to allow a diverse product mix and a �„�
transition from the single-family detached lots on the east
side of Tract 2 to the townhomes along Iron Horse.
Packet Pg.47
D.2
140L 1w Rib
"ArRok.,
NORTH KIC;HLA D HILLS
CITY COUNCIL DATE: City Council is scheduled to consider this request at the May
16, 2016, meeting if action is taken and a recommendation is made by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Recommendation:
To approve SDP 2016-03.
Packet Pg.48
D.2.a
11,1111„�,��
I S�
1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
V 1
I ��
I ��
I
I
I ��
1
1
I
I
I 1
uuuuuu
1 I
1
1 I
1
1 I
1 CM
1
1 I
00 1
1 1 0011 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 CL
1 1
Cl)
a
M
M
11 VpVVUU ������������'IUUUUUUUUUUVVUVVUUV VVVVVUUUUWUUUUW ���
I � Vu11VVVWVVW ���
11 WI 1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1jpp11�,,I,^ ,,,,,,'uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
I1
I
1
pDp' ��������uuul VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV ����
hpptl11111tlj Wp1111uuWUU S
a�
111 o
to
uu11w1u� t�
11WVp111uw
u11
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
u1
1
1
u.
1 1
u
u
1
1
1
J 11111111111
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
11
e11111111111111111111,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,1,
0
5111111 cm
co
e04
Packet Pg.49
'f 1 Q�/r� r ��/�/ �/ ' )re rh ��j �i � i 1„//' o�', P� ✓r IV )I�N� 41�1�q'i�p v
r
r
f �
i
g/e stD
PEA
cm
CL
CO
CD
1
o
1 /
CL
�T
C =I
to
CD
Browning Dr
CL
CO
l
/ru'Gl�rrr
,���/�:? r;�lr✓„�” II err, � idl l�� 11/d� � %r+y ���ii�;�� f�,i��l// �r�AQ ��'f1�� 1�; °�
i I
i
� V r'��, r,%� r°'� j",.^P`"�r"�i/�// l �,�r;�,i' ���°r����jj��l r����I I rl�� ,7�, .„,,,�✓ � �
Packet Pg. 50
D.2.c
`CHL,g
d NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.. :: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TExPS AND CITY COUNCIL
Case Number: SDP 2016-03
Applicant: Our Country Homes
Location: 6400 and 6500 blocks of Iron Horse Boulevard
CN
CL
You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 co
feet of the property shown on the attached map.
Purpose of Public Hearing:
A Public Hearing and consideration of a request from Our Country Homes for a Special
Development Plan for Iron Horse Commons on 27.842 acres in the 6400 and 6500 blocks of
Iron Horse Boulevard.
Public Hearing Schedule:
Public Hearing Date: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
7:00 PM THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2016
Meeting Location: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS — OLD CITY HALL
7301 NE LOOP 820
cm
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
co
Public Hearing Date: CITY COUNCIL
7:00 PM MONDAY, MAY 16, 2016
Meeting Location: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS — NEW CITY HALL
4301 CITY POINT DRIVE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request,
please contact:
Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Phone (817) 427-6300
Fax (817) 427-6303
Packet Pg. 51
D.2.d
REGIONAL RAIL ROW CO
PROPROP LLC NRH INDUSTRIAL PRTNS LTD Attention:ATTN: DALLAS AREA RAP
204 MILL XING 511 E JOHN CARPENTER FWY#550 TRANSI
COLLEYVILLE TX 76034 IRVING TX 75062-8156 PO BOX 660163
DALLAS TX 75266-0163
COMPANY TWO LLC CHESAPEAKE LAND DEV CO LLC RFI HILLTOP LLC
8411 PRESTON RD STE 711 6100 N WESTERN AVE 5221 N O CONNOR BLVD STE 600
DALLAS TX 75225-5519 OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73118-1044 IRVING TX 75039-4414
VOLLINTINE CARY VOLLINTINE CARY
DRUM PROPERTY COMPANY LTD Attention:ATTN VOLLINTINE LAND& Attention:VOLLINTINE L&C STE 101
PO BOX 550368 CATTLE cue
DALLAS TX 75355-0368 2401 NW BOCA BLVD STE 100 2401 NW BOCA BLVD
BOCA RATON FL 33431-6632 BOCA RATON FL 33431-6632
CL
SIXTEEN SAC SELF-STORAGE CORP AMERCO REAL EST CO OF TX INC RADER PARTNERS C0 Attention: PRIME RAIL INTERESTS IP
1250 E MISSOURI AVE PO BOX 29046 PO BOX 249
PHOENIX AZ 85014-2912 PHOENIX AZ 85038-9046 COLLEYVILLE TX 76034
J &K BOWERS LLC ABERFELDY PROPERTIES INC PS TEXAS HOLDINGS LTD
PO BOX 161758 PO BOX 1287 PO BOX 25025
FORT WORTH TX 76161-1758 NORTHBROOK IL 60065 GLENDALE CA 91221-5025
0
I-
EC BROWNING LTD AG/IRG NORTH RICHLAND HILL LLC UB II FITZ LLC
3825 CAMP BOWIE BLVD Attention: C/O QUADRELLE REALTY 9450 W BRYN MAWR AVE STE 750
1 WEST AVE
F 4-
ORT WORTH TX 76107-335 LARCHMONT NY 10538-2470 ROSEMONT IL 60018
2
GROVES IRVING M III INTOWN SUITES
3721 BINKLEY AVE 2727 PACE FY RD SE# 111200
DALLAS TX 75205-2137 ATLANTA GA 30339-4053 CL
C0
Packet Pg. 52
o � 0
C
6� I
q i
nnr
e� %////� // �zU�u w ✓Dili �
i r, � ills
IN
u
5 I
r A wj
r Ilk
Am
Iii wy,� o
R
/
11 ��
n
3 i
o oo
ol
o
o
„Y o —lo
o
o
C ° _ — -2 " v _
O o oL
o
O c � �° �� E
U e o _
o
3 E a
2 W � ew oo
v
� V N o 0 w
ol O L m w m >w <
~ Q i Q a v Q O Q
O0 � a �
M
I I
li
LL
O
tw .
O
M i
fC
Q
fC
•,� 01� �IIN�jJANn
7'
n
r
t
{� fl
r
I /
till //L , �� %:
v
J -�w _ f
-----------
------------------------ --- --- -----------------------
��b - - --- — — - --
� 3AIi14 d011lIH
\ S P
ry
\, o /
fd
7f
J \
\ oQ�
r 4'r
k
r Cj
,' X :� ✓ {�t ICE,.
kn f
\ \ P
a
C
D
(7 V
J Z
Q Z
� 5
a�
N o pw O�o
En