Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 2005-12-12 Agendas
. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 12, 2005 - 5:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. IR2005-165 Discuss Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) Alternates for Loop 820 (40 Minutes) 2. Discuss Items from December 12, 2005 City Council Meeting (5 Minutes) 3. IR 2005-166 Informational Crime Prevention Program (5 minutes) 4. IR 2005-167 Report on 2005 Citizen Survey (30 Minutes) 5. Executive Session Pursuant to Sec. 551.071 Consultation with Attorney to Seek Advice about Pending or Threatened Litigation, a Settlement Offer or on a Matter in Which the Duty of the Attorney to the Governmental Body Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas Clearly Conflicts with Chapter 551 Texas Government Code: (1) Danny Newman (2, Davis v. North Richland Hills i 16. I Adjournment I ~~",~-^".^.L~:.tf~~,~~"" ," '-9.-.:. .:0'. ',' _ "',". .', ,..'.;...:.;.:...._.:.,,;.~..;.:-,. ",',' .;..... "....L¿~~3_(l{l1.,. ....1'>: 1 tll (? ...............................,.,.....,.......... . S.ec rc tary B)g~~__ 12/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 12, 2005 - 7:00 PM For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 817-427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1 . Call to Order 2. Invocation - Councilwoman Johnson 3. Pledge - Councilwoman Johnson 4. Special Presentations & Recognitions a. Presentation of Proclamations recognizing the Birdville High School Band and Richland High School Band b. Proclamation Recognizing Liberty Bank for 20 Years of Service to the Community c. Keep NRH Beautiful Holiday Lighting Contest Award Presentation 5. Citizens Presentation 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda . 12/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Consent a. Minutes of the November 3, 2005 Joint Agenda Meeting with the Planning & Zoning Commission b. Minutes of the November 14, 2005 Council Meeting FP 2005-20 c. Consideration of a Request from Brian James to Approve the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, James Addition (Located in the 8900 Block of Rumfield Road - .91 acres) GN 2005-124 d. Approve Engineering Services Agreement with Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $49,200 for the Design of Simmons Drive (Mid- Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) GN 2005-125 e. Consider Ordinance Amending Sec. 74- 32 of the Code of Ordinances and Providing for an Earlier Penalty Date for Personal Property Taxes - Ordinance No. 2865 GN 2005-126 f. Consider Contract Amendment with Tax Collection Attorneys Providing for Earlier Collection Efforts on Delinquent Personal Property Taxes PU 2005-048 g. Award Bid for Annual Contract for Police Department Uniforms - Resolution No. 2005-092 PU 2005-049 h. Authorize Interlocal Agreement with the City of Richardson for the Purchase of Firefighter Bunker Gear - Resolution No. 2005-093 PU 2005-050 I. Authorize Purchase of Postal Equipment from Pitney Bowes through the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Agreement . . 12/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 3 of 5 \ . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consent Agenda Continued PU 2005-051 j. Award Bid for Golf Course Grounds Maintenance Equipment to Austin Turf and Tractor in the amount of $91,257.23 AP 2005-07 k. Consideration of a Request from Whitfield-Hall Surveyors to Approve the Amended Plat of Lots 3R1 & 4, Block 1 Walker Branch Addition (Located in the 8500 Block of Emerald Hills Way _ 13.623 acres) 8. ZC 2005-13 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Robert McKinney to Approve a Zoning Change from "AG" Agricultural to "R-1" single Family Residential (Located in the 9400 Block of Kirk Lane - 1.0 acre) - Ordinance No. 2866 9. ZC 2005-09 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Pete Edwards of Ahlborn Development Inc to Approve a Zoning Change from"R-2" Single Family Residential to "RI-PD" Residentiallnfill- Planned Development (Located in the 8400 Block of Amundson Drive - 7.172 acres)- Ordinance No. 2867 10. SRB 2005-05 Consideration of a Request to Authorize a Building Permit to Partially Reconstruct a Nonconforming Sign by Sherry Martin of Cencor Realty Services, on behalf of the Rufe Snow Village Shopping Center (Rufe Snow L.P.), Located at (6240 Rufe Snow Drive) 11.GN 2005-127 Approve Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation for Traffic Signal Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard (Adjacent to Hometown) - Resolution No. 2005- 094 12. GN 2005-128 Approval of Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy _ Resolution No. 2005-095 . . 12/12/05 Ci~CoundlAgenda Page 4 of 5 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 13.GN 2005-129 Approve Ordinance Creating Position of Juvenile Case Manager and Juvenile Case Manager Fund - Ordinance No. 2868 14.GN 2005-131 Approve Contract with Birdville Independent School District for School Resource Officer Program - Resolution No. 2005-096 15. GN 2005-132 Appointments to the Youth Advisory Committee 16. PU 2005-052 Award of Professional Services Agreement with Halff Associates, Inc. in the amount of $88,500 for the Update to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan - Resolution No. 2005-097 17. Action on Any Item Discussed in Executive Session listed on Pre-Council Agenda Information and Reports - Mayor Pro Tem 18. Welch Energy Conservation Report - Marilyn Ackmann, Atmos Energy 19. Adjournment . iJ~:J_~~____ "1'i Tni.? B~.._ e 12/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 5 of 5 INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-165 '\ 1\"1 Date: ~\!:'-\ Subject: December 12, 2005 Texas Department of Transportation - Alternates for Loop 820 The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) along with their consultant, Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. (LAN) will provide the City Council with the current status of the Loop 820 Widening Project during the December 12, 2005 Pre Council Meeting. Currently, TxDOT is considering two different alternatives for Loop 820 and three different alternatives for SH 183/121 (east of the interchange). TxDOT and LAN are planning to go over all of the alternatives during their presentation at 5:00 p.m. and will answer questions. Maps showinQ TxDOT's current plans for Loop 820 and SH 183/121 will be displaved on the Pre Council walls at 4:15 p.m. (approximately 45 minutes prior to the start of the 5:00 p.m. Pre Council Meeting) to give Council an opportunity to review earlv. It is unclear at this time if TxDOT and LAN will be present at 4: 15 p.m. to answer any questions, however City staff will be present to address any of Council's questions during this time. TxDOT's presentation will be similar to a presentation that they conducted on November 9, 2005 for the staff of the affected cities along the SH 183/121 and Loop 820 corridors. During the November meeting all of the cities from 1-35W to SH 360 were invited to attend. That meeting was to show the staff of the various cities TxDOT's current plans and to set up later individual meetings with each city's Mayor and Council. The presentation planned for the Pre Council Meetina is primarily intended for the Mayor and Council. TxDOT would like to show the different alternatives and to qet a consensus from Council on their preference of anv of the alternatives. This is also an opportunity for Council to ask TxDOT any questions about their plans for Loop 820 (schedules, public meetings, etc.). Even though the primary purpose of this meeting is to discuss the different alternatives, Council may also wish to discuss preferences on aesthetics such as proposed bridges and retaining walls needing to match the recently completed Rufe Snow Bridge. TxDOT is planning to conduct meetings in the future for the general public and business owners. This meeting is to meet with Council to address specific concernslissues prior to TxDOT's formal Rublic hearing which is anticipated early next year. During the November meeting, staff saw no differences to the City of North Richland Hills between the two alternatives for Loop 820. The differences between the two Loop 820 alternatives occur at the 1-35W/Loop 820 interchange and do not change anything within the City of North Richland Hills city limits. Also, it is worth mentioning that the proposed exit/entrance ramps are at the same location that TxDOT has been indicating for the past 7 to 8 years. There are however some ramp differences in what TxDOT is proposing and what currently exists. TxDOT and LAN will discuss the ramp differences as well as the managed lanes during their presentation. Respectfully submitted, ..., 1/( "·11 /! + /'" . _it è (_ J i '. ..;.J Mike Curtis Public Works Director ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IR# 2005-166 Date: December 5,2005 Subject: Crime Prevention Program North Richland Hills enjoys a low crime rate and a stable community. Serious offenses are not common and the police department aggressively investigates those crimes that do Occur. However, the crime rate in North Richland Hills, like in many other cities across the country, is most affected by the crime in the theft category. This is due to the fact that the most number of offenses occur in this category. Last year, we had a total of 3,312 offenses, and a full 60% of these came from thefts. Included in this category is the offense of Burglary of a Motor Vehicle (BMV) . Many of these BMV's could have been prevented if the victim had followed some simple crime prevention techniques; however, a successful crime prevention program must have the involvement of the community to achieve its goals. It is the police department's responsibility to educate the community on utilizing these skills. To this end, we are announcing the creation of a new crime prevention program targeting BMV's. This program is patterned after a similar program currently in use in Dallas County. The key to this new program is geared towards reminding the public to remove items from locations where they are visible and, therefore, the most appealing. Small signs that say "lock your car, take your keys, hide your belongings" will be available for local businesses to purchase and install on their property. The signs are simply meant as a reminder and to act as a visible deterrent to would be offenders. The signs will be manufactured by the City's Public Works Service Center and will be available for purchase at cost. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL IR #2005-167 Date: Subject: December 12,2005 2005 Citizen Survey The City of North Richland Hills contracted with the University of North Texas Survey Research Center earlier this year to develop and conduct a citizen survey. The survey was administered by phone to a random selection of residents in September and October. The Survey Research Center has tabulated and analyzed the results. Overall, the survey found that 90 percent of respondents feel the quality of life in North Richland Hills is excellent or good; 88 percent plan on remaining in North Richland Hills for the next several years; and 92 percent would recommend NRH to a friend or family member as a good place to live. Attached is an executive summary highlighting additional results, along with the more detailed survey report. This survey was identified in the City Council Goals as an action item for 2005. The survey will help City staff d~termine which programs and services we are providing well and which programs and services need improvements. It will also establish a base line for benchmarking. It is our hope to conduct a similar survey every two to three years to measure our improvements. Dr. James Glass, director of the UNT Survey Research Center, will make a presentation regarding the survey results and will answer questions during the December 12 Pre-Council Meeting. Respectfully Submitted, rYl dJ.;J(^^-J~ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS . 2005 CITIZEN SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overall, 89.9% of the survey respondents said the quality of life in NRH is excellent (32%) or good (57.9%) and 92% would recommend NRH to a friend or family member as a good place to live. In addition, 88% of the respondents plan to remain in NRH for several years. The survey also found that: · · , · · , · 38% of the respondents reported using NRH20 and 28.3% indicated using the Recreation Center. 6% or fewer reported using the Richland Tennis Center (6%), Bursey Road Senior Center (5.5%) or Dan Echols Senior Center (4.3%). 87% of respondents who used these facilities rated them excellent (31 %) or good (55.8%). · 23% reported participation in the City's recreational programs during the past year. 88% of those respondents rated the programs as excellent (28.9%) or good (58.9%). · Nearly two-thirds (64.5%) of the respondents reported using an NRH park during the past year. 93% of those respondents rated parks as excellent (47.9%) or good (44.7%). The public library was used in the past year by 58% of the respondents. A large majority rated library services as excellent (58%) or good (37.2%). Litter (56.4%) and high grass and weeds (50.9%) were code violations seen frequently or sometimes in the city. Emergency services were rated excellent or good by a large majority of respondents. Other city services received a majority of combined excellent and good ratings. The condition of non-residential (76.8%) and residential streets (61.2%) received the lowest ratings. · Respondents split on ratings of traffic flow on major streets. 49% rated traffic flow excellent or good; 50.6% rated it fair or poor. 57% rated signal timing as excellent (5.3%) or good (51.50/0). · 58% of the respondents with Internet access had visited the NRH Web site. Nearly all of those respondents found the information they needed. · 93% of the respondents reported reading the City newsletter. 93% of those respondents found it useful. · 36.3% of respondents said they contacted a City official during the past year. Two- thirds of those respondents were satisfied with the results of the contact with the City and 86.4% said the person they contacted was courteous and helpful. · e e ~ecial Presentations Recognition: Presenter: Recipient: Explanation: Recognition: Presenter: Recipient: Explanation: Keep NRH Beautiful Holiday Lighting Contest Award Presentation Kathy Luppy, Chairperson of Keep NRH Beautiful There will be several recipients of this award. Annual recognition by Keep NRH Beautiful of NRH residents and businesses for their holiday lights and beautification efforts. Proclamations for the Richland High School and Birdville High School Bands Mayor Oscar Trevino Richland High School Band Directors - Bill Watson, Jason Bird Drum Majors - Anthony Derrick, Jordan Standlee Principal Randy Cobb will also be in attendence Birdville High School Band Directors - Brian Gibbs, Paul Heuer, Dwayne Rice Drum Majors - Christine Schwaebler, Melissa Yeakley, Taylor Hines The Richland High School and Birdville High School bands have received numerous awards this year. The Mayor will present a proclamation for each b·and to congratulate them for their outstanding accomplishments. e e . ~ecial Presentations (Continued) Recognition: Presenter: Recipient: Explanation: Proclamation Honoring Liberty Bank Mayor Oscar Trevino Mike Rigby, President and CEO of Liberty Bank. Members of the Sandlin Family and the Liberty Bank Board of Directors may also be in attendance. Liberty Bank is celebrating it's 20th Anniversary this month. A proclamation will be presented to recognize this local business for its continued service to our community. NRH CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROCLAMATION W.1fX1{X%, musíc ís yart of the fabríc of our socíety aná sfiou{á be ce{e&rateá aná yreserveá; aná W.1fX1{X%, musíc yrograms ín our sChoofs fiave offereá studènts an oyyortuníty to eJgJress tfiemse{ves creatíve{y, buí{á sefJ-confíáence aná dìsciyûne, work as yart of team, aná fee{ tfie excítement of yerformíng aná cornyetíng; aná W.1fX1{X%, the 'Bíráví{{e .1fígh Scfioo{ 'Band; unáer tfie dìrectíon of 'Brían (jíbbs aná .Jtssístant 'Baná 1Jírectors Pau{ .1feuer aná'Dwayne Ríce, has yroven íts musíca{ aná marc h íng abíûtíes by comyetíng ín many yrestígíous comyetítíons thís year; aná W.1fX1{X%, members of the 'Bíráví{{e :Hígh Scfioo{ Baná have brougfit much honor to the Cíty of North Rícfi{aná J-fí{{s aná íts cítízens, wfiífe, at the same tíme, maíntaíníng fiígfi scho{astíc aytítuáes; aná W.1fX1Œ%, the cítízens of North Rícfi(aná :Hí{fs are yrouá of the 'Bíráví{{e :Hígh Schoof 'Baná for íts many accomy{íshments, ínc{udìng 4tfi Peace at the J-l'E'B Jvlarchíng J'estívaf, 1st 1Jívísíon ratíng at the WL 'Regíon Marchíng Contest, 1st Peace at the 4.Jt .Jtrea Jvlarchíng Contest, aná 4tfi Peace at the 4.Jt State Marcfiíng Contest. Now, Therefore, L Oscar Trevíno, Jvlayor of the Cíty of North Rích{aná :Hí{fs, Texas, áo hereby aCknow{eáge aná recogníze tfie members of the 'Bíráví{{e :Hígh Schoof 'Baná aná urge the communíty to joín ín congratu{atíng these outstanding young men aná women for theír accomyûs . s aná cOrrt'fnítrnent to rnusíca{ exce{{ence. IN 'WITNESS 'W:J{'E'R'EO:F, I have hereunto set my hand and causeátfie sear of the Cíty of Nortli Rícli{aná J{í{(s to be affíxeá thís the 12th day of December 2005· ~ ~----~-------- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROCLAMATION 'W.1-fT1{TJ1lS, musíc y{ays an íncreasíng{y írnyortant roCe ín our worÛ;( tod"ay and" ís one of tfie greatest forces ín bríngíng yeoyCe togetfier and" creatíngyeace and"fiarrnony; and" 'W.1-fT1{TJ1lS, tfie 'Ríc fi {and" .1-fígfi Scfioo{ 'Band, und"er tfie cûrectíon of 'Bí{{Watson and" ..Jtssístant 'Band" 'D írec tors Jason 'Bírd" and" Xevín :McNulty, fias yroven íts musíca{ and" marcfiíng abíûtíes by cornyetíng ín many yrestígíous cornyetítíons tfiís year; and" 'W.1-fT1li'J1lS, members of tfie 'Ríc fi {and" :J-(ígfi Scfioo{ 'Band" fiave brougfit mucfi fionor to tfie Cíty of Nortfi 'Rícfi{and" J{í{{s and" íts cítízens, wfií{e, at tfie same tíme, maíntaíníng fiígfi scfio{astíc aytítUdes; and" 'W.1-fT1{TJ1lS, tfie cítízens of Nortfi 'Ríc fi {and" J-{í{[s are yroud" of tfie 'Ríc fi {and" J{ígFi ScFioo{ 'Band" for íts many accorny{ísFiments, ínc{ucûng 'UIL SweeystaÆ.es .Jlward, 1st y{ace at tfie J{T'B :MarcFiíng Contest, 3rá Peace at tfie 'Bands of .Jlmeríca .JlrŒngton 'Regíona{, 2ná Peace Crass .JlJ\.Jt at tfie 'Bands of .Jlmeríca San .Jlntonío Suyer 'Regíona{, 5th Peace at tfie 'Bands of .Jlmeríca San .Jlntonío Suyer 'Regíona{ .J'ínaCs, and" 7h prace at tfie 'Bands of .Jlmeríca grand" NatíonaCs fie{d" ín Incûanayo{ís, Incûana. Now, Tfierefore, I, Oscar Trevíno, :Mayor of tfie Cíty of Nortfi 'RícFi{aná J{í{Cs, Texas, d"o fiereby acÆ.now{ed"ge aná recogníze tfie members of tfie 'Rícfi{and" J{ígfi Scfioo{ 'Band"and" urge tFie communíty to joín ín congratu{atíng tfiese outstanding young men and" women for tfieír accornyûsfi-ments and" cOn1rnít-ment to 111usíca{ exce{{ence. IN 'WI'I'NTSS 'WJ{'E'R'EOj', I have hereunto set my hand and causedtfie sear of the Cíty of :North Rícli{aná J-{í{{s to be affíxed thís the 12th áay of December 2005_ .~~~ ------------------------------------- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROCLAMATION 1¥Ji.ereas, Líverty 'Bank fírst oyened íts doors on 'Decemver 5, 1985 at 5801 'Davís 'Bou{evard wíth J.'B. Sandfín as the founding Chaírman; and 1¥Ji.ereas, Líverty 'Bank oyened íts second vranch on (jrayevíne J-{íghway ín June 2000 and a thírd vranch on 'Bedford Road ín fevruary 2004; and 1¥Ji.ereas, Líverty 'Bank's tota{ assets have grown from $2.5 mí{fíon wnen ít fírst oyened to $85 mí{{íon today; and 1¥Ji.ereas, throughout íts hístory, Líverty 'Bank has veen a {éadér ín tne communíty voth as a fínan cía { ínstítutíon and as a coryorate cítízen; and 1¥ñereas, Líverty 'Bank ís stí{{ {oca{{y owned and contínues to yrovíde exceytíona{ vankíng servíces to the resídents of Nortn 'Rích{and J-{í{{s and a{{ of Northeast Tarrant County; and 1¥Ji.ereas, Líverty 'Bank Í5 ce{evratíng íts 20th .Jtnníversary duríng the ITLonth of December 2005. Now, Therefore, I, Oscar Trevíno, :Mayor of the Cíty of North 'Rícn{and J-{í{{s, Texas do herevy recogníze and commend the J;íverty 'Bank 'Board of'Dírectors Char{es C. 'Brínk{ey, Chaírman; :Míke 'R~gvy, Presídent and CEO; Míke Sandlin; Terry Sandlin; Scott Sandlin; Matt Syeíght; (jene 'Barrow; Roger 'Brooks; Tommy 'Brown; 'Ríchard'DavÍ5; (javín PhíŒíys; 'Bov yates; (jary Príce; Lee J-{erte{; John ParÍ5h and 'Don Phifer and do líereby yroc.{aím 1Jece-mber 12, 2005 as: ''.£I'B'E'RTy 'B54.NX 1J.JlY" IN 'WIT:JVTSS 'W3f'E'R'Eoy, I fiave fiereunto set my hand and caused the sear of the Cíty of North Rícfi{aná J-{í[{s to be affíxeá thís ~~~~::~~---- ca 'I'r 3Ií {}1;. , \~ . MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORKSESSION MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS HELD IN THE DAN ECHOLS SENIOR CENTER, 6801 GLENVIEW DRIVE NOVEMBER 3, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER The joint meeting was called to order by Mayor Trevino at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL City Council Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Suzy Compton David Whitson Nancy Bielik Mayor Mayor Pro T em Council Place 1 Council Place 3 Council Place 5 Council Place 6 Absent: Jo Cox JoAnn Johnson Council Place 2 Council Place 4 Planning & Zoning Commission Present: Richard Davis Bill Schopper Don Bowen Randy Shiflet Brenda Cole Ken Sapp Mike Benton Chair Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Ex-Officio Member Absent: Scott Wood Commission Member Other Board Members Present: Tom Duer Leslie Jauregui Fonda Kunkel Beth Davis Jerry Henry Jim Kemp Mike Filis Marlin Miller Chair, Zoning Board of Adjustment Zoning Board of Adjustment Member Zoning Board of Adjustment Member Zoning Board of Adjustment Member Zoning Board of Adjustment Member Zoning Board of Adjustment Alternate Parks & Recreation Board Member Parks & Recreation Board Member , - , Joint City Council/Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes November 3,2005 Page 2 of 5 City Staff Present: Larry J. Cunningham Richard Torres Ogden Bo Bass Karen Bostic Richard Abernethy John Pitstick Drew Corn Bill Thornton Dave Green Greg Van Nieuwenhuize Dave Pendley Holly Blake City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Ma~ager Managing Director Assistant to City Manager Director of Planning & Development Budget Director . Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Planner Assistant Public Works Director Building Official Recording Secretary 2. PRESENTATION BY NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ON CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT EXCELLENCE John Promise, P.E. Director of Environment & Development North Central Texas Council of Governments came forward. NCTCOG is a voluntary association of, by and for local governments. By state statute, the purpose of a council of governments is to make studies and plans to guide the unified, far-reaching development of the region, eliminate duplication, and promote economy and efficiency in the coordinated development of a region. In 2001, NCTCOG began to communicate together on regional issues through a new Center of Development Excellence. In 2003, NCTCOG began to celebrate together "best practices" with CLIDE (Celebrating Leadership in Development Excellence) awards. In 2005, NCTCOG began to collaborate together through "Vision North Texas" to better understand our options for growth. The projected growth for households is currently 1.9 million with added growth in the next 25 years of 1.5 million, equaling 3.4 million households. The projected growth for employment is currently 3.1 million jobs with added growth in the next 25 years of 2.3 million jobs, equaling 5.4 million jobs. With projected growth comes transportation needs. Over the next 20 years, $45 billion will be needed to make transportation improvements for rails, HOVs, tollways, intelligent transportation systems and more. Within that growth, there are environmental issues. Currently the air quality violates the eight hour ozone standard. Stream corridors have flooding risks and violate state water quality standards. Stream banks are eroding. For energy, the power plant emissions impact air quality and water supplies are facing future shortfalls even with conservation. The targets for 2030 are to attain and maintain ozone standards, make all stream corridors safe, clean and green, and make effective and efficient energy use and water use. In 2001 NCTCOG's Executive Board appointed local government and private sector stakeholders to the Development Excellence Steering Committee which is charged with , . ø Joint City Council 1 Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes November 3,2005 Page 3 of 5 advising NCTCOG regarding development issues. The steering committee is chaired by Fernando Costa, Planning Director for the City of Fort Worth and is comprised of elected officials, city managers, developers, architects, engineers, real estate finance professionals and planning and z~ning members. The mission of the Center of Development Excellence is to promote quality growth in North Central Texas that enhances the built environment, reduces vehicle miles of travel, uses water and energy resources effectively and efficiently and helps advance environmental stewardship in order to ensure continued economic. vitality and provide the highest attainable quality of life for all residents. The ten principals of development excellence are 1) development options, 2) efficient growth, 3) pedestrian design, 4) housing choices, 5) activity centers, 6) environmental stewardship, 7) quality places, 8) transportation efficiency, 9) resource efficiency and 10) implementation. In 2003, the NCTCOG created a web-based library of technical tools from across the region and recognized best practic~s with CllDE awards based on the ten principals listed above. In 2005 there were the second biennial CllDE awards. The 2003 CllDE award winners in new development were Addison Circle (Addison), legacy Town Center (Piano) and Town Center (Southlake). For redevelopment, the winners were Downtown Transit Village (Piano) and Rail Market (Fort Worth). The 2005 CLIDE award winners in redevelopment were The Block (Richardson) and The State Thomas District (Dallas). The most recently recognized needs are: to collaborate together to increase public awareness of the growth projected for our region, educate participants about the implications of regional growth, understand the options we have for accommodating that growth, and create a forum for discussion about public and private sector actions. Keypad polling for real-time feedback was done. One question was "How well do you think today's scenarios reflect our region's choices?" Fifty percent felt that they are a good reflection of the realistic range of choices we have. Forty percent felt we needed choices that represent even more dramatic change from the NCTCOG forecast. Ten percent felt these scenarios reflect choices that are not realistic. The top evaluation measures were ranked as follows: minimize traffic congestion (98%), support revitalization of existing downtowns and neighborhoods (95%), balance jobs and housing in local communities (95%), improve air quality (94%) and protect water quality in streams and lakes (930/0). The top rankings for the next steps are as follows: education about regional choices (focused on pubric officials, property owners and developers), holding similar visioning workshops at a subregional level, further study the costs and benefits of these regional growth patterns, and set regional investment priorities based on a preferred growth scenario (83% said 'essential this year' or 'important as resources become available'). For 2006 and 2007: 1) NCTCOG needs to communicate more on regional issues, especially with local governments and development communities, 2) Celebrate more of , , ø Joint City Council I Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes Novem ber 3, 2005 Page 4 of 5 our region's best practices and expand research, and 3) Collaborate more through a Vision North Texas Phase 2 to better understand our options for growth. The impc;>rtance of education, public involvement, research, policy direction and how the City can support and promote the program was discussed. Area 1: Education. Educate regional residents, business leaders, elected and appointed officials to raise awareness about the growth anticipated in the region and the choices for accommodating it in a way that is successful and sustainable. Area 2: Public Involvement. Involve more people in this discussion of the choices available to our region. Area 3: Research. Research the implications .of these choices and the tools we can use to achieve a desired choice. Area 4: Policy Direction. Decide whether to create a preferred regional scenario and, if so, what level of detail it should have and what role it should play. For North Richland Hills, this may include hearing a presentation at City Council, orienting the Planning & Zoning Commission to the ten principles of development excellen.ce, receive timely assistance during comprehensive plan update, take a field trip to CllDE winners, see a show on the City's cable TV channel, participate in a sub- regional"workshop, and meet with Mayors from other cities in regions facing the same issues. The proposed Vision North Texas Phase 2 is a second phase over two years through September 2007. The City needs to continue as a public and private partnership among NCTCOG, Urban land Institute, UTA and others. An annual budget is targeted at $300,000 with half from public sources and half from private sources. NCTCOG needs to assume staff administrative responsibilities and engage consultants. The work will continue to be guided by a steering committee of public and private leaders. Mayor Trevino explained that the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) funds projects and distributes accordingly to 14 county regions. RTC can fund some rail stations in 2 to 3 years from Dallas to Fort Worth with North Richland Hills as a stop in between. Ken Sapp commented that currently the Comprehensive Plan works to limit density. It needs to be reworked to increase density and reserve development. leslie Jauregui expressed concerns about the traffic and the density. She would like to see those concerns addressed before the population growth. Mr. Promise explained that better roads bring in better developments. Nancy Bielik commented that the current public transportation has problems that need to be worked out. Mass transportation is needed to get around the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Jerry Henry stated that people moved here to get away from the higher density and asked how do we change that. , ~ # Joint City Council/Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes Novem ber 3, 2005 Page 5 of 5 Richard Davis stated that there is a need for strategic planning on the Comprehensive Plan that includes a place for rail stations. Marlin Miller added that the public needs to be educated on public transportation so they will use it. Mayor Trevino added that air quality concerns and gas prices are helping in that matter. 3. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Oscar Trevino - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary -- e e to MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCil AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HillS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - NOVEMBER 14,2005 e PRE-COUNCIL SESSION The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in Pre-Council session on the 14th day of November, 2005 at 5:45 p.m. in the Pre-Council Room prior to the 7:00 regular Council 'meeting. Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton JoAnn Johnson David Whitson Nancy Bielik Staff Members: Larry J. Cunningham Richard Torres Ogden Bo Bass Karen Bostic Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson George Staples Mary Edwards John Pitstick Joann Stout Larry Koonce Drew Corn Mike Curtis Kyle Spooner Vickie Loftice Jimmy Perdue Dave Green Richard Abernethy Chris Swartz Call to Order Mayor Mayor Pro T em Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director Administrative/Fiscal Services City Secretary Assistant City Secretary City Attorney Public Information Officer Director of Planning & Development Neighborhood Services Director Finance Director Budget Director Public Works Director Information Services Director Parks & Recreation Director Police Chief Chief Planner Assistant to City Manager Aquatic Manager Mayor Trevino called the Pre-Council meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. 1. Discuss items from Regular November 14, 2005 City Council Meeting No items were discussed. e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 2 2. IR 2005-152 Briefina on Creatina a Capital Campaian to Fund the Animal Shelter Expansion & Renovation Ms. Joann Stout, Neighborhood Services Director, briefed the Council on the plans to fund the proposed expansion and renovation of the Animal Adoption and Rescue Center. Council was advised that $1.3 million of general obligation bonds was committed through a bond election and an additional $71,316.82 has been received through voluntary utility bill donations. Plans are to raise the remaining funds needed through a Capital Campaign. Request for Proposals were received from three qualified capital campaign fund raisers. Ms. Stout advised that staff had evaluated the effects Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Rita and the rising cost of gasoline might have on fund raising efforts and it was decided that the recent events would not impact any fund raising efforts. The capital campaign was presented to the Animal Control Shelter Advisory Board at their September 27 meeting and they recommended moving forward with the campaign. Staff has reviewed the proposals submitted by the campaign fund raisers and is ready to make a recommendation to Council. If Council is agreeable to moving forward with the campaign, staff would like to bring a contract forward to hire a Capital Campaign fund raiser for council's consideration. After discussion by the Council, consensus was to move forward with the Capital Campaign. 3. IR 2005-153 Overview of No Insurance Towina Practice Chief Jimmy Perdue discussed with Council the possible implementation of a no- insurance towing policy for vehicles that are operating without the required insurance. Several police departments in the state have implemented policies to impound vehicles found to be operating without the required insurance. The policies are not intended to punish individuals who forget their insurance cards, but are designed to target those individuals who consistently do not comply with the law. Currently during a traffic stop, North Richland Hills' officers may issue a citation for no insurance and release the driver at the scene. If Council should want to implement a no-insurance towing policy, based on towing comparisons from other cities, it is estimated there would be an additional 450 to 650 vehicles towed a year, or one to two a day. Chief Perdue advised should such a policy be put in effect in North Richland Hills, any towings would result from a legitimate traffic stop and the officers would use discretion in towing motorists with no insurance. Council discussed the impact a policy would have on the auto impoundment facility, the amount of time the officer would be engaged in the traffic stop and other issues such as racial profiling that might be affected. In general, the Council was agreeable to a conservative no-insurance towing policy that allowed for officer discretion and directed the Chief to draft a policy for Council's review. 4. IR 2005-155 Overview Gas Drilling Ordinance Mr. John Pitstick, Director of Planning & Development, presented a PowerPoint presentation giving a brief overview of the proposed gas drilling ordinance to be discussed in detail during the regular Council meeting. The regular Council agenda City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 3 e lists two items dealing with gas drilling. One item will be to conduct a public hearing to consider an ordinance regulating the drilling and production of gas wells and the second item will be to conduct a public hearing to amend the Zoning Ordinance to authorize the drilling and production of gas wells in all zoning districts. Mayor Trevino advised with Council concurrence he would open both public hearings concurrently, receive public input, close the public hearings, and separate motions will be considered for each item. Mr. Pitstick highlighted the general regulations, setbacks, noise standards, screening standards and the appeal process to the Gas Board of Appeals. Mr. Pitstick answered questions from the Council. Council discussed and took formal action on the two items during the regular Council meeting 5. ReDorts from NRH20 a) IR 2005-154 2005 End of Season Report Mr. Chris Swartz, NRH20 Manager, presented the 2005 End of Season Report for the Waterpark and summarized the highlights of the report. The park had its third best attendance season, best revenue year, highest season pass totals, highest number of group tickets sold, second best year of food and beverage revenue, and seventh best year of gift shop revenue. e b) Strategic Plan Implementation Update Mr. Swartz briefly summarized the goals of the NRH20 Strategic Plan and presented the short term action items and the implementation timeline. Mr. Swartz reviewed the recommended ticket prices for the 2006 season. Mayor Trevino asked for Council concurrence on the timeline including the ticket prices. Council concurred with the NRH20 Strategic Plan Implementation Update including the recommended ticket prices. 6. Adiournment Mayor Trevino announced at 6:53 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to the regular Council meeting. e e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 4 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order November 14, 2005 at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton JoAnn Johnson Nancy Bielik David Whitson Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Staff: Larry J. Cunningham Ogden Bo Bass Richard Torres Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson George Staples City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney 2. INVOCATION Councilwoman Compton gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilwoman Compton led the pledge of allegiance. 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 5 e 5. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Bielik removed item 7j from the consent agenda and advised she would abstain from discussion or voting on the matter. 7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED A. MINUTES OF THE JULY 14, 2005 JOINT COUNCIL MEETING e B. MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 16, 2005 JOINT COUNCIL MEETING C. MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 24, 2005 COUNCIL MEETING D. AP 2005-06 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM FOUNTAIN RIDGE, L.T.D. TO APPROVE THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 20,25, & 26, BLOCK 2 FOUNTAIN RIDGE ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 6000 BLOCK OF TURTLE CREEK COURT AND THE 8100 BLOCK OF MARBLE FALLS DRIVE) E. GN 2005-112 AMENDING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE LIST FOR TEXPOOL RESOLUTION NO. 2005-081 F. GN 2005-113 AUTHORIZE INVESTMENT OFFICERS RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 082 G. GN 2005-114 AMENDING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE LIST FOR LOGIC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-083 H. GN 2005-115 AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES FOR PLEDGEE SIGNATURE AUTHORIZATION FORM, RESOLUTION NO. 2005-084 I. GN 2005-120 INTENT TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES WITH PROCEEDS OF FUTURE DEBT - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-087 e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 6 e J. REMOVED K. PU 2005-047 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF STORAGE AREA NETWORK HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FROM DELL, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,919 - RESOLUTION 2005 - 091 L. PAY 2005-010 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO SHARROCK ELECTRIC, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,906.34 FOR THE MID-CITIES BOULEVARD AT SIMMONS DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION PROJECT MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE THE REMAINING ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO "APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 7J. PU 2005-046 AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND WRECKER SERVICES CONTRACT WITH AA WRECKER SERVICE - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-090 APPROVED e Mayor Trevino asked Councilwoman Bielik the reason for removing item from the consent agenda. Councilwoman Bielik advised council the owners of AA Wrecker donated an engine to her son's vehicle and believes it would not be moral for her to vote on the item. An affidavit of disqualification was completed and filed with the City Secretary. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE PU 2005-046. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. e 8. GN 2005-121 CONSIDER ALL MA TIERS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2005, DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2005, INCLUDING THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 2863) AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF CERTAIN OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY APPROVED City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 7 e Nature of request is to consider the refunding of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005. The city's financial advisor has informed staff conditions were favorable to refund bonds issued in prior years at higher interest rates to save interest expense. If market remains favorable, a sale of General Obligation Refunding Bonds will be executed by the city and assisted by First Southwest Company and submitted to City Council for approval. Staff has prepared and is recommending approval of Ordinance authorizing the issuance of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005. Finance Director Larry Koonce was available to answer questions from council. David Medanich of First Southwest Company summarized the sale for the General Obligation Refunding Bonds and was available to answer questions from council e COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BoNDS, SERIES 2005" IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $9,930,000; PROVIDING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF THE OBUGATIONS BEING REFUNDED AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT, SPECIAL ESCROW AGREEMENT AND A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH ESTRADA HINOJOSA & COMPANY, INC. AND UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. IN RELATION TO SUCH BONDS AND THE APPROVAL AND DISTRIBUTION OF AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT. COUNCILWOMAN BIEUK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. Mayor Trevino and Council discussed and considered item 10. 10. ZC 2005-12 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM SCOTT & RENEE HOFFMAN FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "R-1-S" SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 7800 BLOCK OF DOUGLAS LANE - 2.35 ACRES) - ORDINANCE NO. 2857 APPROVED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. e Nature of request is to consider applicant's request to rezone 2.35 acres from AG (Agricultural) to R-1-S (Special Single Family Residential) to build a single family residence. The proposed zoning request requires a minimum of 1 acre lots, 2,300 square foot residence and allows livestock. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard request and unanimously recommended approval of request. e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 8 Mr. Mark Long, applicant, was available to answer questions from council. Chief Planner Dave Green summarized item for council and was available to answer questions. Mr. Green advised council items 10 and 11 were related items. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing to comment on this request. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2005-02 AND ORDINANCE No. 2857. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 9. ZC 2005-02 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM JB & JB DEVELOPMENT FLP/JOHN BARFIELD, G. P. FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM .. "AG" AGRICULTURAL AND "C-1" COMMERCIAL TO "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY . RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 9200 BLOCK OF MARTIN DRIVE - 9.0 ACRES)- ORDINANCE NO. 2856 APPROVED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider applicant's request to rezone a 9.0 acre site from AG (Agricultural) and C-1 (Commercial District) to R2 (Single Family Residential) for the purpose of developing a 32-lot residential subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard request and unanimously recommended approval of zoning change. Mr. Mark Long, applicant, was available to answer questions from council. Mr. Green summarized item for council and was available to answer questions from council. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing to comment on this request. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILMAN LEWIS MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2005-02 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2856. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 9 e 11. FP 2005-14 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM SCOTT & RENEE HOFFMAN TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 HOFFMAN ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 7800 BLOCK OF DOUGLAS LANE - 2.35 ACRES) APPROVED Nature of request is to consider applicant's final plat of a 2.35 acre site for the purpose of building a single family residence. The property is currently zoned AG Agricultural, but a zoning change request is included on agenda for council's consideration. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard request and unanimously recommended approval of request. Mr. Mark Long, applicant, was available to answer questions from council. Mr. Green summarized item for council and was available to answer questions from council. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE FP 2005-14. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7..0. 12. ZC 2005-18 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM BRIAN JAMES FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 8900 BLOCK OF RUMFIELD ROAD - .91 ACRES) - ORDINANCE NO. 2858 APPROVED Councilman Welch abstained from discussion and voting and filed an abstention form stating he was the engineer of record for the project. Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider zoning change for a .91 acre site from AG Agricultural to R-2 Residential to build a single family residence. The R-2 district requires a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet and a minimum house size of 2,000 square feet. The preliminary plat for project was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 20. In addition the Planning and Zoning Commission heard and unanimously recommended approval of request. Ms. Jane Gilliland, representing applicant, was available to answer questions from council. City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 10 e Mr. Green summarized item for council and was available to answer questions. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing to comment on this request. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 2858 AND ZC 2005..18. C:OUNCILWOMAN BIEUK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0, WITH MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH ABSTAINING. 13. ZC 2005..19 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM PHIFER/HOGAN PARTNERS, L.P. FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "R..2" S~NGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 8500 BLOCK OF SHADY GROVE ROAD - 5.99 ACRES) - ORDINANCE NO. 2859 APPROVED Councilman Welch abstained from discussion and voting and filed an abstention e form stating he was the engineer of record for the project. Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider request to rezone a 5.99 acre site from AG Agricultural to R-2 Residential to develop a 19-1ot single family subdivision. A preliminary plat has been submitted to staff for review. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard and unanimously recommended approval of request. Mr. Don Phifer, applicant, was available to answer questions from council. Mr. Green summarized item for council and was available to answer any questions from council. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing to comment on this request. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2005..19 AND ORDINANCE No. 2859. COUNCILWOMAN BIEUK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6..0, WITH MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH ABSTAINING. e e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 11 14. RP 2005-07 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM J & J NRH 100 FLP TO APPROVE THE REPLAT OF LOTS 42R1R THROUGH 42R10R, BLOCK 10 BRANDONWOOD ESTATES PHASE II (LOCATED IN THE 7500 BLOCK OF SHADY GROVE ROAD - 4.754 ACRES) APPROVED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider a replat for a recently approved addition to reduce the number of residential lots from 12 to 10. According to State Law, it is required to conduct a pùblic hearing when a replat is being requested of an existing platted residential lot. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard and unanimously recommended approval of request. Mr. Mark Long, applicant, was available to answer questions from council. Mr. Green summarized item and was available to answer questions from council. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing to comment on this request. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE RP 2005-07 A REPLAT OF LOTS 42R1 R THROUGH 42R10R, BLOCK 10 BRANDONWOOD ESTATES PHASE II. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 15. ZC 2005-16 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM ROYAL BUILDING CORPORATION AND COMIS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 6800 BLOCK OF SIMMONS ROAD - 3.16 ACRES) - ORDINANCE NO. 2860 DENIED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider a zoning change of two tracts totaling 3.16 acres from AG Agricultural to R-2 Residential to develop a multi-lot subdivision. A subdivision plat has not been submitted by applicant for review by staff. A petition in opposition to request was received by staff, but the petition did not have the required signatures of 20% of owners within 200' of request. e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 12 Mr. Mark Comis, applicant, was available to answer questions from council. Mr. Green summarized item for council. Mr. Green mentioned a second petition to be presented to Council this evening has been verified by Staff and contains the required number of signatures to require a super-majority vote of the Council to approve. Council discussed access to Amundson, Simmons Road and Stewart Drive; the number of homes on each lot; and the size of neighboring properties. Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak in favor of request to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward. The following spoke in opposition of request: Patricia Stewart, 8708 Stewart Drive; Ralph Schwab, 8713 Stewart and Thomas Smith, 6825 Simmons. Ms. Gayle Schwab, 8713 Stewart, was recognized as not being in favor of request. There being no on else wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO DENY ORDINANCE NO. 2860 AND ZC 2005.16. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO DENY CARRIED 7-0. 16. GN 2005-116 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 118 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS AUTHORIZING THE DRILLING AND PRODUCTION OF GAS WELLS IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS _ ORDINANCE NO. 2861 APPROVED Mayor Trevino advised the public and council that he was combining items 16 and 17 and the presentation for both would be heard together. Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing for GN 2005-116, Ordinance No. 2861 and GN 2005-117, Ordinance No. 2862. e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 13 Mayor Trevino recognized Planning and Zoning Commission Chair Richard Davis and advised he would present the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Richard Davis advised council there were two items for their consideration. The first being to change the zoning districts to include gas wells within zoning districts and finally to approve an ordinance providing regulation or drilling and production òf gas wells in North Richland Hills. Mr. Davis advised council the Planning and Zon~ng Commission held two work sessions and a public hearing on the proposed gas drilling ordinance. Mr. Davis advised council North Richland Hills has set a higher ground than neighboring cities with respect to our gas drilling ordinance. Mr. Davis advised an appeals process was established for drilling that took place closer than 600 feet of residential or commercial property and the Planning and Zoning Commission is recommending that they serve as the Gas Board of Appeals. Mr. Davis thanked John Pitstick, Bo Bass, Dave Pendley, Mike Curtis and Richard Torres for their assistance. Director of Planning and Development John Pitstick presented council with a powerpoint presentation outlining the gas drilling ordinance. Mr. Pitstick advised staff reviewed ordinances from eight cities, received support from the city attorney, hired an outside attorney who specializes in gas drilling and conferred with the Fort Worth Gas Inspector and Railroad Commission and with the Physics Department at the University of North Texas and Texas A&M University. Mr. Pitstick advised a draft of the ordinance has been made available to the public since October 14 when it was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council discussed restoration of area once drilling has been completed, who would be responsible for street damage, if any and if certification is required of gas inspector. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing to comment on this request. Mayor Trevino recognized Dr. John Bain a professor at University of North Texas. Dr. Bain praised North Richland Hills for their gas drilling ordinance. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-116 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2861. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 17. GN 2005-117 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 14 e NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ESTABLISH ARTICLE 104 PROVIDING REGULATION OF DRILLING AND PRODUCTION OF GAS WELLS- ORDINANCE NO. 2862 APPROVED This item was heard in conjunction with item 16. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-117 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2·862. COUNCILMAN LEWIS SECONDED THE MOTION. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH AMENDED MOTION TO REVISE SECTION 104-18 TO SUBSTITUTE THE THE CHAIRPERSONS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD, THE KEEP NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION AND THE SUBSTANDARD BuilDING BOARD SERVING AS THE GAS BOARD OF APPEALS. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. Mayor Pro Tem Welch clarified the Gas Board of.Appeals would elect their chair. MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT CARRIED 5-2 WITH COUNCILWOMEN COX, JOHNSON, BIEUK, COUNCILMAN WHITSON AND MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH VOTING FOR APPROVAL AND COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON AND COUNCILMAN LEWIS VOTING AGAINST AMENDMENT. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MAIN MOTION CARRIED 7-0. 18. GN 2005-118 APPROVE RESOLUTION TO CAST BALLOT FOR TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-085 APPROVED Nature of request is to consider approval of resolution casting North Richland Hills 41 votes for John Henry Clanton to the Tarrant Appraisal District Board of Directors for a two-year term beginning January 1 , 2006. Budget Director Drew Corn was available to answer questions from council COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2005-085. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. e e City Council Minutes November 14, 2005 Page 15 e 19. GN 2005-122 CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION FROM THE NAMING BOARD FOR THE FUTURE DOG PARK LOCATED WITHIN NORTH FIELD PARK - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-088 APPROVED Nature of request is to consider recommendation of the Naming Board to name the city's future dog park to Tipps Canine Hollow at Northfield Park. Councilwoman Compton presented council with the Naming Board's recommendation. Councilwoman Compton advised council the Tipps family are long-time residents of North Richland Hills and have served the community as board members of the Park and Recreation Board, Keep North Richland Hills Beautiful Commission and as an educator and counselor with the Birdville Independent School District. Councilwoman Compton advised Tracye Tipps was instrumental in the development of the dog park. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-122 AND RESOLUTION No. 2"005- 088. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 20. GN 2005-119 APPROVE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE REGIONAL TRANSIT INITIATIVE - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-086 APPROVED Nature of request is to consider resolution supporting the regional transit initiative. The regional transit initiative addresses the region's rail transit needs, rail funding requirements and institutional arrangements to meet the needs of the region's rail transit. Public Works Director Mike Curtis was available to answer questions from council. Mayor Trevino advised Proposition 1 of the State Constitutional Election approved by the voters of Texas will be used to help move the big freight trains outside of city areas and will provide high rail the Northeast area. Mayor Trevino mentioned that North Richland Hills will have two rail stations. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-119. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 16 21. GN 2005-123 APPROVE RESOLUTION REQUIRING A TMOS MID- TEX DIVISION TO JUSTIFY RATES-RESOLUTION NO. 2005-089 APPROVED Nature of request is to consider approval of resolution requiring Atmos Mid-Tex Division to file a rate filing package with the city in order for the city to determine whether Atmos' rates are reasonable. Managing Director Karen Bostic advised council the consortium of cities which North Richland Hills belongs to has reviewed financial information from Atmos in reference to their two Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) rate adjustments. The consortium is of the belief that Atmos is over-earning and has recommended that each city approve and file a "Show Cause" resolution with Atmos. The resolution will require a filing based upon a test year ending June 30, 2005 and to file with the city by December 31, 2005. The resolution will require Atmos to file on a system-wide basis and in a form consistent from city to city. Any expenses associated with the rate case for the cities to review the filing and by their participation in appeals are reimbursable by Atmos to the cities, with the reimbursement to be made on a monthly basis. C:QUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2-005-089. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 22. INFORMATION AND REPORTS Councilwoman Bielik made the following announcements. City offices will be closed on Thursday and Friday, November 24 and 25, in observance of the Thanksgiving holiday. Garbage and recycling will not be collected on Thanksgiving Day, but will instead by collected on Friday. The November 28 City Council Meeting has been cancelled. The next Council Meeting will be held on December 12. The City of North Richland Hills is seeking volunteers to help with A Night of Holiday Magic on Saturday, December 3. Volunteers will assist in supervising activities in and around the children's tent. Individuals 16 years and older and community groups are invited to e e e City Council Minutes November 14,2005 Page 17 participate. For more information about volunteer opportunities, please contact Kathye McCall at 817-281-9267. Kudos Korner - Jesse Byrd and Jorden Keefer, Public Works Department Utility Division _ A call was received from a resident expressing appreciation for the way Jesse Byrd and Jorden Keefer repaired a sinkhole around her water meter box. The resident said the employees responded quickly and did excellent work. 23. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. ATTEST: Oscar Trevino - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planninq and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from Brian James to Approve Agenda Number: FP 2005-20 the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1 James Addition (Located in the 8900 Block of Rumfield Road _ .91 acre). Case Summary: The applicant, Brian James, is platting this site for the purpose of building a single family residence. Current Zoning: A rezoning request for "R-2" Single Family Residential was approved by the City Council on November 14th. Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat for this site (ref. PP 2005-11) was approved by the Planning Commission on October 20th. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage on Rumfield Road a 2-lane, undivided collector street (C2U) with 60' Right Of Way. No additional ROW dedication is required by this plat. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for low density residential uses. The proposed use is consistent with the Plan. Staff Review: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Attached is a staff memo recommending that this final plat be placed on the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Agendas for consideration. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on November 17, 2005 recommended approval of FP 2005-20 by a vote of 7-0. Recommendation: Approve FP 2005-20. Review Schedule: Application: 10/10/05 Final Hearing: 12/12/05 Total Review Time: 9 weeks Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds A vallable \ ~;~~\" t~ ~ I...· . \ , ------..)'- \.~ r.--' :) Finance Director Department Head Signature FP 2005-20 James Addition CC . . . Kirk Rd. "C ~ I: CD "C W N W¿fð..-E ~~ S NRH FP 2005-20 Final Plat James Addition 8900 Block of Rumfield Road Prepared by Planning 11/10/05 Rumfield Rd. o 100 200 Feet 400 . . . Ni~H CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator FROM: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: FP 2005-20; James Addition, Block 1, Lot 1 Final Plat DA TE: December 1 , 2005 Public Works has reviewed the proposed Final Plat document submitted to this office on November 2, 2005, for review. The applicant has addressed all of our previous comments/concerns and has been recommended for City Council approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Therefore, we recommend that this Final Plat be presented to the City Council for their consideration at the next available meeting. . . . FP 2005-20 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM BRIAN JAMES TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 JAMES ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 8900 BLOCK OF RUMFIELD ROAD - .91 ACRES). APPROVED Dave Green presented FP 2005-20. The purpose for this plat is to build a new single family structure. The Development Review Committee has reviewed this property. Staff and Public Works have provided a memo stating that all requirements have been met. Staff recommends approval. Chairman Davis opened the public hearing. As there were none wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing and asked for a motion. Don Bowen, seconded by Randy Shiflet, motioned to approve FP 2005-20. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Approve Enqineerinq Aqreement with Schrickel, Rollins Agenda Number: GN 2005-124 and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $49,200 for the Design of Simmons Drive (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) The design and construction of Simmons Drive between Mid-Cities Boulevard and Grand Avenue was approved in the 2005-2006 Capital Projects Budget. Presently, Simmons Drive between Mid-Cities Boulevard and Cardinal Lane (behind Walker Creek Elementary School) is partially constructed. The layout of Simmons Drive between Cardinal Lane and Grand Avenue has been identified; however, no right-of-way (ROW) has been obtained. The selection process used in determining the recommendation for an engineering firm to design the Simmons Drive Construction Project began with a "Request for Statements of Qualifications" (RFQ's) being sent to 31 local engineering firms. Of these engineering firms, 16 firms responded with a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ's) expressing an interest in performing engineering services for the project. An engineering selection committee comprised of an Assistant City Manager, the Budget Director, the Finance Director and the Assistant Director of Public Works reviewed and evaluated the 16 submitted SOQ's which included design experience on past similar projects, current work load, estimated design schedule, etc. From the review and evaluation of the submitted SOQ's, the selection committee selected four firms for interviews. The four firms interviewed were: 1. Halff Associates, Inc. 2. Lopez Garcia Group, Inc. 3. Neel-Schaffer, Inc. 4. Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. The selection committee determined Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. (SRA), headquartered in Arlington, Texas to be the best qualified firm for the design of the project. SRA had recently completed the design of the partially constructed portion of Simmons Drive (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Cardinal Lane) and along with this experience and knowledge, their professional demeanor implies that they will be responsive to all of the City's needs. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other .' < .....';. .." /- I + / ;.-~. ¡ ..;/., ~ ( ,.-.. 1 ..!,"Q . Department Heåd Signature Account Number ST0603 Sufficient Funds Ävall90le ~~. )/ / /1 ~L:'7t''''~':' -----"Ftnance Director .-/ Page 1 of _ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The Agreement for Engineering Services states that SRA will provide surveying, paving and drainage design, electrical design and construction administration for the construction of Simmons Drive between Mid-Cities Boulevard and Grand Avenue. The total fee of $49,200 consists of a base design fee and a fee for special services (electrical design, preparation of ROW documents and surveying). Shown below is a breakdown of the total fee: Base Design Fee Electrical Design ROW Preparation Surveying Total Fee $ 35,000 8,000 3,200 3,000 $ 49,200 The engineering design portion of the project is being funded from the Unspecified Streets Savings which is a result of the savings in the 1994 Street CIP Fund (Account No. 320- 8450-603.79-01). The amount allocated in this account for the engineering design portion of the project is $60,000. Therefore, engineering design is under budget and sufficient funds are available this fiscal year to perform such design. Recommendation: To approve the Agreement for Engineering Services with Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. for the Simmons Drive Construction Project (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue). ~--~____~___n_______ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM -~_._-----------_. -------.------ Page_of _ 13 Jul 05 10:55 GIS_0527 S_Simmons-midcities to new library.mxd M\D CITIES BLVD =< " (Proposed Future \.... Streets)·..·...·· Á./ i'~ ·..:.;.&i J<:2 . /<ë/ " ./ ..~ .~~ . ;r-~ ~~ \h ,.'.~... . -. .. ..... ~... .... ...... 0- ..... .... .. ..... . ....... ......... $ ~X' ~~ ~V; ~~ o ~ ~(Q Simmons Dr. (Mid-Cities to New Library) Scale: 1" = 800' Simmons Dr. (Mid-Cities to New Library) N w E s N~~RTH RICHLAND HILLS Project Locator Map Information Services Department - GIS . . . AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CiTY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. I. This Agreement is executed by and between the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas, acting by and through Oscar Trevino, its Mayor (hereinafter called "CITY"), and Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc., a Texas corporation, acting by and through Sanford P. LaHue, Jr., P.E., Vice President its duly authorized Principal (hereinafter called "ENGINEER"). WITNESSETH, that CITY desires professional engineering services in connection with the Simmons Drive Construction Project located between Mid-Cities Boulevard and Grand Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and ENGINEER, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, do mutually agree as follows: II. PROJECT In this Agreement, the "PROJECT" means the engineering design of the Simmons Drive Construction Project located between Mid-Cities Boulevard and Grand Avenue in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual, applicable CITY codes, regulations and standards. III. BASIC AGREEMENT ENGINEER is an independent contractor and undertakes and agrees to perform professional engineering services in connection with the PROJECT, as stated in the sections to follow. It is understood and agreed that ENGINEER is not and will not by virtue of this contract be deemed to be an agent or employee of CITY and that CITY will not be entitled to direct the performance by ENGINEER's employees or subcontractors of the tasks contemplated by this contract. All engineering services shall be performed with diligence and in accordance with professional standards customarily obtained for such services in the State of Texas. For rendering such services CITY agrees to pay ENGINEER as set forth in Section VIII: "Compensation" and Exhibit F: "Compensation". AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 1 of 25 . . . IV. SCOPE OF ENGINEER'S SERVICES ENGINEER shall render the professional services necessary for development of the PROJECT, in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A: "Project Schedule" and as detailed in Exhibit B: "Basic Engineering Services", said exhibits being attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. ENGINEER shall be responsible, to the level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional engineers in the same type of work in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex area, for professional and technical soundness, accuracy, and adequacy of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other work and materials furnished under this Agreement. v. SPECIAL ENGINEERING SERVICES The CITY will pay the ENGINEER for Special Engineering Services as indicated in Exhibit C: "Special Engineering Services", attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. VI. ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES The CITY will pay the ENGINEER for Additional Engineering Services as indicated in Exhibit 0: "Additional Engineering Services", attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. VII. SCOPE OF CITY SERVICES The City will furnish items and perform those services as identified in Exhibit E: "Services to be provided by the City", attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. VIII. COMPENSATION A. In consideration of the services described herein, CITY shall pay and ENGINEER shall receive compensation in accordance with Exhibit F: "Compensation". B. Total payments including without limitation salary and reimbursable expenses, to ENGINEER by CITY for the services stated in Section IV and Section V above shall not exceed Forty-Nine Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($49,200). C. CITY may authorize additional services to be provided by ENGINEER as mutually agreed upon by the parties. Any authorization for additional services shall be given to ENGINEER by CITY in writing and approved by CITY. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 2 of 25 . . . D. CITY and ENGINEER understand that the variables in ENGINEER's cost of performance may fluctuate. The parties agree that any fluctuation in ENGINEER's costs will in no way alter ENGINEER's obligations under this Agreement nor excuse performance or delay on ENGINEER's part. IX. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All completed or partially completed evaluations, reports, surveys, designs, drawings and specifications prepared or developed by ENGINEER under this Agreement, including any original drawings, computer disks, mylars or blue lines, shall become the property of CITY when the Agreement is concluded or terminated, and may be used by CITY in any manner it desires; provided, however, that ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other than the PROJECT described in this Agreement. x. INDEMNITY ENGINEER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES FROM ANY LIABILITY ON ACCOUNT OF ANY INJURIES OR DAMAGES RECEIVED OR SUSTAINED BY ANY PERSON OR PROPERTY, INCLUDING COURT COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED BY CITY, PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ENGINEER OR ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, CONTRACTORS, OR EMPLOYEES IN THE EXECUTION, OPERATION, OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT. Approval by CITY of contract documents shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of ENGINEER, its officers, agents, employees and subconsultants, for the accuracy and competency of the services performed under this Agreement, including but not limited to evaluations, reports, surveys, designs, working drawings and specifications, and other engineering documents. Approval by CITY shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by CITY for any error, omission, defect, deficiency or negligence in the performance of ENGINEER's professional services or in the preparation of the evaluations, reports, surveys, designs, working drawings and specifications or other engineering documents by ENGINEER, its officers, agents, employees and subconsultants, it being the intent of the parties that approval by CITY signifies CITY's approval of only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, ENGINEER and its subconsultants shall indemnify and hold CITY and all of its officers, agents, servants, and employees harmless from any loss, damage, liability or expenses, on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons, including but not limited to officers, agents or employees of ENGINEER or AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL. ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 3 of 25 . . . its subconsultants, and all other persons performing any part of the work and improvements, which may arise out of any negligent act, error, or omission in the performance of ENGINEER's professional services or in the preparation of evaluations, reports, surveys, designs, working drawings, specifications and other engineering documents incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith; ENGINEER shall defend at its own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against CITY and its officers, agents, servants and employees or any of them on account of the foregoing described negligent acts, errors or omissions, and shall pay all expenses and satisfy all judgments which maybe incurred by or rendered against CITY, its officers, agents, servants and employees or any of them, in connection with the foregoing described negligent acts, errors, or omissions; provided and except however, that this indemnification provision shall not be construed as requiring ENGINEER to indemnify or hold CITY or any of its officers, agents, servants or employees harmless from any loss, damages, liability or expense, on account of damage to property or injuries to persons caused by defects or deficiencies in design criteria and information furnished to ENGINEER by CITY, or any deviation in construction from ENGINEER's designs, working drawings, specifications or other engineering documents. XI. INSURANCE For the duration of this Agreement, ENGINEER shall maintain the following minimum public liability and property damage insurance which shall protect ENGINEER, its subcontractors, its subconsultants and CITY from claims for injuries, including accidental death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from the performance of work under this Agreement. ENGINEER shall provide a Certificate of Insurance verifying that the following minimum limits of coverage are provided: A. Worker's Compensation Insurance: Statutory requirements ($ 300,000 minimum) B. Comprehensive General Liability and Bodily Injury: Bodily Injury $ 500,000 per person, or $ 1,000,000 per occurrence; and $ 100,000 each occurrence; or $ 1,000,000 aggregate Property Damage Combined Single Limit C. Comprehensive Automobile Liability: Bodily Injury $ 500,000 per person, or $ 1,000,000 per occurrence; and $ 100,000 each occurrence; or $ 1,000,000 aggregate Property Damage Combined Single Limit AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 4 of 25 . . . D. Professional Liability: Errors and Omissions $ 1,000,000 The Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that such insurance cannot be canceled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. XII. ARBITRATION No arbitration arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall occur without both parties' written approval. XIII. TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION A. CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time for convenience or for any cause by a notice in writing to ENGINEER. Either CITY or ENGINEER may terminate this Agreement in the event the other party fails to perform in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Upon receipt of such notice, ENGINEER shall immediately discontinue all services and work and the placing of all orders or the entering into contracts for supplies, assistance, facilities, and materials, in connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed to cancel promptly all existing contracts insofar as they are chargeable to this Agreement. B. If CITY terminates this Agreement under the foregoing Paragraph A, CITY shall pay ENGINEER a reasonable amount for services performed prior to such termination, which payment shall be based upon the payroll cost of employees engaged on the work by ENGINEER up to the date of termination of this Agreement and for subcontract and reproduction in accordance with the method of compensation stated in Section VIII: "Compensation" hereof. In the event of termination, the amount paid shall not exceed the amount appropriate for the percentage of work completed. XIV. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS CITY and ENGINEER each bind themselves and their successors, executors, administrators and assigns to the other party of this Agreement and to the successors, executors, administrators and assigns of such other party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement; except as above, neither CITY nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of CITY. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 5 of 25 . . . xv. AUTHORIZATION, PROGRESS, AND COMPLETION CITY and ENGINEER agree that the PROJECT is planned to be completed in accordance with the Exhibit A: "Project Schedule" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. ENGINEER shall employ manpower and other resources and use professional skill and diligence to meet the schedule; however, ENGINEER shall not be responsible for schedule delays resulting from conditions beyond ENGINEER's control. With mutual agreement, CITY and ENGINEER may modify the Project Schedule during the course of the PROJECT and if such modifications affect ENGINEER's compensation, it shall be modified accordingly, subject to City Council approval. For Additional Engineering Services, the authorization by CITY shall be in writing and shall include the definition of the services to be provided, the schedule for commencing and completing the services and the basis for compensation as agreed upon by CITY and ENGINEER. It is understood that this Agreement contemplates the full and complete Engineering services for this PROJECT including any and all services necessary to complete the work as outlined in Exhibit B: "Basic Engineering Services". Nothing contained herein shall be construed as authorizing additional fees for services to provide complete services necessary for the successful completion of this PROJECT. XVI. SUBCONTRACTS ENGINEER shall be entitled, only if approved by CITY, to subcontract a portion of the services to be performed by ENGINEER under this Agreement. XVII. RIGHT TO AUDIT ENGINEER agrees that CITY shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, design calculations, quantity take-ofts, documents, papers and records of ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this Agreement. ENGINEER agrees that CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. CITY shall give ENGINEER reasonable advance notice of intended audits. ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that CITY shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 6 of 25 · · · examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, design calculations, quantity take- offs, documents, papers and records of such subconsultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all subconsultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space, in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article. CITY shall give subconsultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits. XVIII. EXHIBITS Both parties agree to the following exhibits and as such, the following exhibits are made a part of this Agreement: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "8" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "0" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Project Schedule Basic Engineering Services Special Engineering Services Additional Engineering Services Services to be Provided by the City Compensation XIX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Authorization to Proceed. Signing this Agreement shall be construed as authorization by CITY for ENGINEER to proceed with the work, unless otherwise provided for in the authorization. B. Legal Expenses. In the event legal action is brought by CITY or ENGINEER against the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs and expenses as may be set by the court. C. Notices. Any notice or correspondence required under this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal delivery and shall be effective upon receipt, if addressed to the party receiving the notice or correspondence at the following address: If to ENGINEER: Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. Attn: Sanford P. LaHue, Jr., P.E. 1161 Corporate Drive West Suite 200 Arlington, Texas 76006 AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 7 of 25 · · · If to CITY: City of North Richland Hills Attn: Mr. Mike Curtis, P .E. Director of Public Works 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 D. Independent Contractor. ENGINEER shall perform services hereunder as an independent contractor, and not as an officer, agent, servant or employee of the CITY and ENGINEER shall have the exclusive right to control services performed hereunder by ENGINEER, and all persons performing same, and shall be responsible for the negligent acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, and subconsultants. Nothing herewith shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between CITY and ENGINEER, its officers, agents, employees and subconsultants; and the doctrine of respondent superior has no application as between CITY and ENGINEER. E. Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas, and venue in any proceeding relating to this Agreement shall be in Tarrant County, Texas. F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and ENGINEER and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both CITY and ENGINEER. G. Severability. If any provision in this Agreement shall be held illegal by a valid final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. H. Assignment. CITY and ENGINEER each bind themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, to the other party to this Agreement and to the successors and assigns of each other party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. This Agreement is not to be assigned, sublet or transferred, in whole or in part, by either CITY or ENGINEER without the prior written consent of the other party. I. Disclosure. By signature of this Agreement, ENGINEER warrants to CITY that it has made full disclosure in writing 'of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest, including personal financial interests, direct or indirect, in property abutting the PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property owners. ENGINEER further warrants that it will make disclosure in writing of any AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 8 of 25 . . . conflicts of interest which develop subsequent to the signing of this Agreement and prior to final payment under this Agreement. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 9 of 25 · · · This Agreement is executed in two (2) counterparts. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement this the day of ,20_. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (CITY) Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. (ENGINEER) If /} ( I \ /1 By: ! ,\ SanforcY'P. LaHue, Jr., P.! .t', Principal By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor Date: . ; i ! J/¡ :J-j c: rl Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: 1 ,.I..ar" ~ .f~~~.Y,~~;'::..~ ASHLEY MEADOWS . ª":'~'b;(; Notary Public, S~ate of ïexas i ;,v;:.~,..~~ fv1y CommissIon Expires ~ 4.., .......,.v:-....:- ..'''tf,'~:I~~\\'' Sectember 13/ 2006 City Secretary ClAfA 0 i Á;\ \lA 0 A oj f)ìA ~/-- Notary Publigin and for the State of Texas A I ¡ (U ~ ~ !' ,:yf \~ Vì It( \ I ¡ f( i£\ (...) /\1 ~ Type or Prirh Notary's Name My Commission Expires: Ci/l"""'" /- -. I I , ~) i :;rCL) (0 CITY SEAL CORPORA TE SEAL AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 10 of 25 . EXHIBIT A PROJECT SCHEDULE FOR SIMMONS DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) PROJECT SCHEDULE The Scope of Services for this PROJECT is based on the following schedule: Activitv Due Date Pre-Scope Meeting December 15, 2005 Complete Preliminary Plans February 15, 2006 Identify Necessary ROW March 1, 2006 Complete Final Plans March 15, 2006 . Advertise for Construction Bids April 1, 2006 Open Construction Bids May 1, 2006 Begin Construction June 1, 2006 . AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 11 of 25 . . . EXHIBIT B BASIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SIMMONS DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) The scope of work for BASIC Engineering Services involves Preliminary Design, Project Plans, Specifications and Estimates on Roadways and Storm Drainage. I. GENERAL A. Design Meetings 1. The ENGINEER will meet with the CITY's staff during the development of the preliminary and final plan phases of the PROJECT. B. Project Management, Administration and Coordination 1. The ENGINEER will establish and maintain PROJECT schedules and budgets, develop monthly progress reports, prepare invoices, and meet with other entities on an as needed basis for the duration of the PROJECT's design. 2. Supervision of Subconsultants The ENGINEER will establish a work program and schedule for each subconsultant at the beginning of each phase/section of the PROJECT. The ENGINEER will be responsible for the coordination, supervision, review and incorporation of work performed by subconsultants. C. Data Collection 1. The ENGINEER will collect, compile and evaluate existing data collected from the CITY, or other entities that supply needed existing information for the design of the PROJECT. 2. A location map/schematic will be provided to the affected utility companies. These schematics will be used by the utility companies to show approximate locations of their facilities which are or may be affected by the PROJECT. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 12 of 25 . . . 3. The ENGINEER will make every effort to obtain As-Built Drawings, Record Drawings and/or future plans for the following facilities in the PROJECT area including: - Box Culverts - Roadway - Water Lines - Sanitary Sewer Lines - Storm Drain Lines - Southwestern Bell Underground and/or Overhead Lines - Electric Underground and/or Overhead Lines - Gas Lines - Other Utilities Known to Serve the PROJECT Area Plot the preliminary information obtained above for later use in the field to help surveyors tie existing utility locations. The locations of utilities tied from field surveys will be shown on the paving and drainage plans. 4. The ENGINEER will identify potential utility conflicts and provide this information to utility companies. II. PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE A. Roadway Design 1. The ENGINEER will develop a preliminary design of proposed roadway improvements. The preliminary design will include the proposed horizontal and vertical alignments. These plan sheets will be at a 1" = 40' scale and contain topographic information, existing right-of-way lines, locations of driveways, typical sections, roadway baselines, pavement edges, contours where necessary, limits of structures, limits of retaining walls, if any, drainage structures including pipes, limits of sidewalks, limits of barriers and any other information necessary for pavement construction. Profiles at 1" = 40' horizontal scale and 1 " = 4' vertical scale will contain existing ground lines at the proposed profile grade line, limits of structures and profile elevations at 1 00' intervals. Upon completion, the preliminary design will be submitted to the CITY for review. The preliminary design must be approved by the CITY prior to the start of the final design phase. 2. The ENGINEER will prepare cross-sections along roadways at minimum 1 00' intervals and will extend 20' beyond the existing right-of-way. These cross-sections will form the basis for the determination of earthwork quantities. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12102/2005) Page 13 of 25 · · · Cut and fill quantities will be computed and tabulated, referencing cross-sections. Cross-sections will not be included in the plans. B. Other Roadway Design Elements 1. A Project Title Sheet will be prepared as required and included in the Plans. 2. Roadway typical sections will be prepared for paving sections along the various roadways of the PROJECT. 3. Roadway horizontal and vertical control and horizontal curve data will be shown on the plans. 4. Sidewalk locations and widths will be shown on the plans. 5. Supplementary intersection layout information will be prepared to properly show the relationship between the profiles of intersecting streets, where deemed necessary by the ENGINEER. 6. Miscellaneous paving details will be developed as necessary to describe various types of construction such as sidewalks, curbs, etc. when no such CITY standard details are available. C. Drainage Plans and Details 1. Drainage area maps will be prepared at a minimum scale of 1" = 1,000', using available contour maps. Inlets will be located and sub-drainage areas determined. The runoff to each inlet will be calculated in accordance with City drainage criteria. 2. Culvert Plans/Profiles sheets and cross-sections, if necessary, will be provided for new culvert construction. 3. Storm Sewer Design The ENGINEER will incorporate storm sewer design into the roadway design sheets. These sheets will show the location of inlets, manholes, storm sewers, slotted drains, culverts, and open channel improvements in relation to the PROJECT's roadways. Profiles will show profile information for the proposed storm sewer trunk lines, proposed ground above the storm sewers, existing ground above the storm sewers, and locations of lateral junctions. Profiles of laterals will not be shown unless a proposed or existing utility crosses the lateral. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BEiWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 14 of 25 . . . Computation sheets will be prepared for storm sewers, culverts, slotted drains and inlets. 4. Miscellaneous Drainage Details Miscellaneous drainage details will be prepared for any drainage related items which are not covered by City standard details. D. Quantities and Cost Estimate 1. PROJECT quantities will be calculated and tabulated for inclusion in the bid proposal and cost estimates. 2. The ENGINEER's opinion of probable construction costs will be prepared for the entire PROJECT using current unit cost data. E. Submit Preliminary Plans for Review 1. Submit two (2) sets of preliminary plans for CITY review. 2. Submit plans to utility companies for review. III. FINAL DESIGN PHASE A. Prepare Final Design Plans 1. Incorporate CITY review comments and directives from the preliminary design plans, in the preparation of final construction plans. B. Calculate Final Quantities and Cost Estimates 1. Revise the preliminary quantities and opinion of probable costs per changes in the final design and CITY review comments. C. Prepare Contract Documents and Specifications 1. Compile special provisions necessary for the PROJECT. 2. Compile specifications necessary for the PROJECT. Any special specifications will also be prepared. The CITY will provide a copy of their contract documents in digital format. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12102/2005) Page 15 of 25 · · · 3. Compile and develop a list of general notes necessary for the PROJECT. 4. Prepare complete contract documents and specifications for bidding purposes. D. Submit final plans, specifications, and cost estimates for CITY review 1. Submit two (2) sets of final bid documents for CITY review and approval. 2. Submit detailed drawings and plans/specifications to appropriate regulatory agency(ies) and utility companies and obtain clearance. IV. CONSTRUCTION PHASE A. Assist the CITY in the advertisement of the PROJECT for bid. The CITY shall bear the cost of advertisement. The ENGINEER shall provide all necessary printing of construction plans, specifications and contract documents for use in obtaining bids, awarding contracts, and constructing the PROJECT. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for dispersing all plans and specifications from its office to prospective bidders. B. Assist the CITY in the opening and tabulation of the construction bids for the PROJECT and recommend to the CITY as to the proper action on all proposals received. c. Assist in the preparation of formal Contract Documents and in coordinating their execution by the respective parties. D. Represent the CITY in the non-resident administration of the PROJECT. In this capacity, the ENGINEER shall have the authority to exercise whatever rights the CITY may have to disapprove work and materials that fail to conform to the Contract Documents when such failures are brought to the ENGINEER's attention. (This function of ENGINEER shall not be construed as supervision of the PROJECT and does not include on-site activities other than occasional site visits to observe overall PROJECT conditions or when specifically requested by CITY to visit on site for a particular matter. It particularly does not involve exhaustive or continuous on-site inspection to check the quality or quantity of the work or material; nor does it place any responsibility on the ENGINEER for the techniques and sequences of construction or the safety precaution incident thereto, and ENGINEER will not be responsible or liable in any degree for the Contractor's failure to perform the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents.) AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 16 of 25 . . . E. Consult and advise the CITY; issue such instructions to the Contractor as in the judgment of the ENGINEER are necessary; and prepare routine change orders as required. F. Review samples, catalog data, schedules, shop drawings, laboratory, shop and mill tests of material and equipment and other data which the Contractor is required to submit, only for conformance with the design concept of the PROJECT and compliance with the information given by the Contract Documents; and assemble written guarantees which are required by the Contract Documents. G. Prepare or review monthly and final estimates for payments to Contractor, and furnish to the CITY any necessary certifications provided by the Contractor, as to payments to subcontractors and suppliers. H. Conduct, in company with the Contractor, a final inspection of the PROJECT for conformance with the design concept of the PROJECT and compliance with the Contract Documents; and approve in writing final payment to the Contractors. I. Revise contract drawings, with the assistance of the CITY's Resident PROJECT Representative to reflect available information as to how the work was constructed. The CITY's Resident PROJECT Representative will provide the ENGINEER a red-lined set of drawings depicting changes during construction. The ENGINEER shall revise original design drawings, noting changes during construction, and submit three (3) sets of Record Drawings and one CD-ROM (pdf format) to the CITY. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 17 of 25 . . . EXHIBIT C SPECIAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SIMMONS DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) The scope of work for SPECIAL Engineering Services involves Surveys (Right-af-Way and Design). The scope of work for the Special Engineering Services is more generally described as follows: I. SURVEYING A. Design Surveys 1. Establish Survey Control Establish survey control along each street or intersecting streets as necessary. These control points will be established based on and tied to established City horizontal and vertical control points. The horizontal control for each street in the PROJECT will be established on the State Plane Coordinate System (NAD'83 Surface Coordinates) from CITY monumentation. Control points will be established using 5/8" iron rods, 18" long. These control points will be established using GPS and conventional surveying methods. 2. Benchmark Loop A benchmark circuit will be established, based on the vertical control points provided. These benchmarks will be located outside of the construction limits and put in such a place so that they may be easily found for future use. Benchmarks will be located at about 1 ,000' intervals and will be referenced. Benchmarks shall be looped in accordance with good surveying practice prior to field surveys. All control leveling work will be performed using appropriate modified second order procedures with closed loops into the PROJECT vertical control. 3. Existing Streets and Driveways Existing streets and driveways will be profiled and cross-sectioned at 50' intervals and to a point at least 20' outside of the Right-Of-Way line. Low points, high points and other unique features will be noted. Pavement surfacing will be AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 18 of 25 . . . determined by visual inspection only. Intersecting streets will be profiled and cross-sectioned to a point at least 50' beyond the roadway being replaced. 4. Existing Drainage Channels and Drainage Area Verification Existing drainage channels and swales will be profiled and cross sectioned within the immediate vicinity of the PROJECT, 10Q' upstream and downstream. Low points, high points and any other unique features will be noted. Additional surveying may be necessary to verify the limits of drainage areas. 5. Existing Underground and/or Overhead Utilities Utility owner's will be contacted, on an as-needed basis, and requested to assist in locating existing utilities identified for the PROJECT. Above ground features of existing utilities within the proposed Right-Of-Way for the limits of the PROJECT will be field located, including elevations of sanitary and storm sewer manhole flowlines and water/gas valve stems. The location of utilities between above ground features will be determined from visual inspection, utility records, and/or from locations determined by the respective utility companies. The utilities will be tied to the PROJECT control points and depths determined in sufficient detail to identify potential conflicts with proposed construction. The excavation and other costs required to expose or probe the underground utilities will be the responsibility of others. 6. Right-Of-Way Right-Of-Way lines along the PROJECT will be located. This information will be included on the PROJECT's plan sheets. 7. Existing Storm Sewers and Culverts The size of existing culverts will be measured and tied along with existing headwalls, channels and aprons. The size, length, and flowline elevation of existing storm sewers will be surveyed. Drainage areas contributing to the PROJECT or conveying water from the PROJECT will be determined through field investigations and available topographic mapping. 8. Temporary Signs, Traffic Control, Flags, Safety Equipment, Etc. The Surveyor will exercise care in completing this surveying assignment by using traffic control devices, flags and safety equipment when necessary. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 19 of 25 . . . 9. Staking Right-of-Way Parcels The ENGINEER will be responsible for staking the new Right-of-Way lines and each Right-of-Way acquisition parcel with 5/8-inch iron rods based on the legal description and exhibits prepared by a licensed Surveyor. B. Construction Staking 1. Right-af-Way Documents Right-of-Way instruments shall be prepared in CITY approved format(s) and shall include a metes and bounds description and a sketch. Documents shall be signed, dated and sealed by a licensed Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Texas. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL. ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 20 of 25 . . . EXHIBIT D ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SIMMONS DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) I. ADDITIONAL Engineering Services, not included in the scope of work, include those services that may result from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the PROJECT or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, CITY's schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond ENGINEER's control. II. ADDITIONAL Engineering Services not included in the scope of work, also include assistance to the CITY in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or service, or preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for CITY in any litigation, arbitration or other legal proceeding involving the PROJECT. III. ADDITIONAL Engineering Services not included in the Scope of Work, also include setting of Right- Of-Way acquisition parcels with the exception of three (3) parcels adjoining the existing Simmons Drive and one parcel forthe proposed new alignment of Simmons Drive. IV. ADDITIONAL Engineering services in connection with the PROJECT, including services which are to be furnished by the CITY and services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement will be at the following rates: Staff Member and Resident Project Representative - Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 1 .50. Salary Cost is defined as the cost of payroll of ENGINEER's, draftsmen, stenographers, survey men, clerks, laborers, etc., for the time directly chargeable to the PROJECT, plus social security contributions, unemployment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, longevity payments, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay applicabie thereto. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 21 of 25 . EXHIBIT E SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY FOR SIMMONS DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) The CITY will provide the following services to the ENGINEER in the performance of the PROJECT upon request: I. Provide any existing data the CITY has on file concerning the PROJECT, if available. II. Provide any available As-Built plans for existing streets and drainage facilities, if available. III. Provide any available As-Built plans for existing water and sanitary sewer mains, if available. IV. Assist the ENGINEER, as necessary, in obtaining any required data and information from TxDOT and/or other local utility companies. . V. Provide standard details and specifications in digital format. VI. Assist the ENGINEER by requiring appropriate utility companies to expose underground utilities within the Right-Of-Way, when required. VII.Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever CITY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of the ENGINEER's services. . AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 22 of 25 . . . EXHIBIT F COMPENSA TION FOR SIMMONS DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Grand Avenue) I. COMPENSATION For and in consideration of the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER, the CITY shall pay, and the ENGINEER shall receive the compensation hereinafter set forth for the Design and Construction Phases of the work and additionally for Special Engineering Services and/or Additional Engineering Services that are in addition to the Basic Engineering Services. All remittances by CITY of such compensation shall either be mailed or delivered to the ENGINEER's home office as identified in the work authorization. "Salary Cost" used herein is defined as the cost of salaries of ENGINEER's, draftsmen, stenographers, survey men, clerks, laborers, etc. for time directly chargeable to the PROJECT plus social security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes, employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto. A. Compensation for the Basic Engineering Services (Design and Construction phases) shall be a lump sum fee of $ 35,000. The Design phase portion of the Basic Engineering Services shall be computed at 90% of the total Basic Services Charge; and the Construction phase portion of the Basic Engineering Services shall be computed at 1 0% of the total Basic Engineering Services Charge. Payment for the Design phase portion of the Basic Engineering Services shall be due in monthly installments in the proportion to that part of the services in the Design phase which have been accomplished. Final payment for services authorized in the Design phase shall be due at the completion of these services. Payment for the Construction phase of the Basic Engineering Services shall be due in monthly installments in proportion to the construction work completed on the basis of the Contractor's monthiy payment estimates. Upon completion of all work authorized in the Construction phase, the ENGINEER will be paid the remainder of the charge for this phase. AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 23 of 25 . . . B. Compensation for Special Engineering Services not covered by the Basic Engineering Services provided herein above shall be as follows: Design Surveys: Lump Sum Fee of $ 3,000 Direct Costs (Printing, Reproduction, etc.) Xerox Copies: $O.10/Page Blueline Prints: $1.00/Sheet Plots (Bond or Velum): $1 D.OO/Each Right-of-Way Documents: 4 parcels at $800.00 per parcel = $ 3,200.00 Other Direct Costs Costs time a multiplier of 1 .1 0 Electrical Consultants: Lump Sum Fee of $ 8,000 C. Compensation for Additional Engineering Services not covered by Basic Engineering Services or Special Engineering Services provided herein shall be as follows: For all of ENGINEER's personnel time applied to the Additional Engineering Services, Salary Cost times a multiplier of 1.50. For all direct non-labor and/or subcontract expense, including mileage, travel and living expenses at invoice or internal office cost times a multiplier of 1.10. Payments to the ENGINEER for authorized Additional Engineering Services will be due monthly, upon presentation of monthly statement by the ENGINEER for such services. II. AUDIT AND SCOPE CHANGE Cost budgets are set forth above and are subject to the audit provisions of this Agreement, Section XVII: "Right to Audit". It is also understood that the cost budgets are based upon ENGINEER's best estimate of work and level of effort required for the proposed scope of services. As the PROJECT progresses, it is possible that the level of effort and/or scope may differ up or down from that assumed. If there are no scope changes, the ENGINEER shall receive the full amount of lump sum and unit price fees, regardless of the cost. If at any time it appears that the cost budget may be exceeded, the ENGINEER shall notify the CITY as soon as possible in writing. If there is a scope change, the ENGINEER shall notify the CITY as soon as possible in writing and shall include a revised scope of services, estimated cost, revised fee schedule, and a revised time of completion. Upon negotiation and agreement via a signed AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 24 of 25 amendment by both parties, the cost budget, fee schedule, and total budget will be . adjusted accordingly. CITY shall not be obligated to reimburse the ENGINEER for costs incurred in excess of the cost budget. The ENGINEER shall not be obligated to perform on any change in scope of work or otherwise incur costs unless and until the CITY has notified the ENGINEER in writing that the total budget for Engineering Services has been increased and shall have specified in such notice a revised total budget which shall thereupon constitute a total budget for Engineering Services for performance under this Agreement. A detailed scope of work, total budget, and schedule will be prepared by the ENGINEER and executed by the CITY if the ENGINEER is authorized to perform any Additional Engineering Service(s). III. PAYMENT Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows: A. Invoice and Time of Payment . Monthly invoices will be issued by the ENGINEER for all work performed under this Agreement. Invoices are due and payable on receipt. Invoices will be prepared in a format approved by the CITY prior to submission of the first monthly invoice. Once approved, the CITY agrees not to require changes in the invoice format, but reserves the right to audit. Monthly payment of the fee will be in proportion to the percent completion of the total work (as indicated in Exhibit B: "Basic Engineering Services", Exhibit C: "Special Engineering Services" and Exhibit D: "Additional Engineering Services"). B. Upon completion of services enumerated in Exhibit B: "Scope of Basic Engineering Services", the final payment of any balance will be due upon receipt of the final invoice. . AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, iNC. Simmons Drive Construction Project (12/02/2005) Page 25 of 25 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · Department: BudÇJet and Research · I · Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: :-- Consider Ordinance Amending Sec. 74-32 of the Code of Agenda Number: GN 2005-125 Ordinances and Providing/for an Earlier Penalty Date for Personal Property Taxes - Ordinance No. 2865 The Texas Legislature acted in 2005 to allow the collection process to start three months earlier on delinquent personal property taxes. However, the date change does not automatically apply to taxing jurisdictions. In order to begin the collection process sixty days after the delinquency date a revision to Chapter 74-32 of the Code of Ordinances must be adopted (the proposed ordinance is attached). In addition our existing contract with the tax attorney must be amended (the contract change appears as a separate item on the December 12,2005 Council Agenda). Currently property taxes that become delinquent after February 1 and remain delinquent on July 1 incur a penalty of 20% to defray the cost of collection pursuant to Section 6.3 of the Texas Tax Code. Under the new Section 33.11 added to the Texas Tax Code by the 79th Legislature will allow taxing entities to impose the 20% collection cost on delinquent property taxes that remain delinquent sixty days after February 1. For collection of delinquent 2005 business personal property taxes the collection process is proposed to begin April 4, 2006. The proposed ordinance change will affect only delinquent business personal property tax. Unlike real estate, business personal property is mobile and can change location and/or ownership. Many times businesses close or move prior to collection efforts. The proposed April start date, as opposed to the current July start date, will increase the opportunities to collect delinquent personal property taxes. Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 2865 . Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Bu et Other Finance Review Account Number Gi:,,J Page 1 of _ . ORDINANCE NO. 2865 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SEC. 74-32 OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES AND AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY ON PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES WHICH REMAIN DELINQUENT FOR MORE THAN 60 DAYS AFTER FEBRUARY 1 OF ANY YEAR WHEREAS, the 79th Lefislature in 2005 added a new §33.11 to the Texas Tax Code authorizing governing bodies of taxing units which have contracted with an attorney under §6.30 of such code for the collection of delinquent personal property taxes before July 1 of the year in which such taxes become delinquent and which remain delinquent for 60 days thereafter to impose a penalty to defray collection costs; and, WHEREAS, the City has contracted with an attorney for the collection of such delinquent taxes; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Sec. 1 : THAT Section 74-32 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: . "Sec. 74-32. Collection costs. To defray the cost of collection of delinquent ad valorem taxes pursuant to §6.30, Texas Tax Code, such taxes which become delinquent on or after February 1 of a year shall incur a penalty of20% of the amount of taxes, penalty and interest due on the dates set forth below: (1) For delinquent personal property ad valorem taxes for the years 2005 and thereafter, such penalty is imposed as provided by §33 .11 Texas Tax Code after the tax remains delinquent on the 60th day after February 1 of such year; (2) For taxes which become delinquent under §§ 26.07(f), 25.15(e), 31.03. 31.031, 31.032, or 31.04, Texas Tax Code, such penalty is imposed on June 1 of the year such taxes become delinquent as provided by §33.08, Texas Tax Code; (3) For all other ad valorem taxes, such penalty is imposed on such taxes that become delinquent before May 1 and remain delinquent on July 1 of the year they become delinquent as authorized by §33.07, Texas Tax Code." Sec. 2: The city secretary is authorized and directed to publish this ordinance in its entirety. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. . PASSED on this 12th day of December, 2005. . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Drew Com, Budget Director CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: BudQet and Research Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Consider Contract Amendment with Tax ,Collection Attorneys Agenda Number: GN 2005-126 providing for· Earlien Collection Efforts on Delinquent Personal Property Taxes I Linebarger, Goggan, Blair and Sampson, LLP (hereafter referred to as tax attorney) has been collecting delinquent property taxes for the City of North Richland Hills since December, 1994. Per contract with our tax attorney, per City ordinance and per State law the date on which delinquent property taxes can be collected was July 1 st of each year. The Texas Legislature acted in 2005 to allow the collection process to start three months earlier on delinquent personal property taxes. However, the date change does not automatically apply to taxing jurisdictions. In order to begin the collection process sixty days after the delinquency date a revision to our existing contract with the tax attorney must be adopted (the proposed amendment is attached). In addition Chapter 74-32 of the Code of Ordinances must be amended (the ordinance change appears as a separate item on the December 12, 2005 Council Agenda). . The tax attorney has requested that we consider turning over delinquent personal property accounts sixty days after the February 1st delinquency date or April 4, 2006 for October 2005 tax bills. Unlike real estate, business personal property is mobile and can change location and/or ownership. Many times businesses close or move prior to collection efforts. The proposed April start date, as opposed to the current July start date, will increase the opportunities to collect delinquent personal property taxes. Tarrant County adopted the April turnover of delinquent personal property taxes in November 2005 and recommends adoption by all entities the Tax Assessor-Collector services (see attached letter). From a customer service standpoint, less confusion will result if all consolidated jurisdictions adopt the same turnover schedule for personal property. From an operational standpoint, efficiencies will result from consolidated contacts through mailings, collection phone calls and site visits. Recommendation Amend the City's existing contract with Linebarger, Goggan, Blair and Sampson, LLP Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number . 1/1 ~ Vf-EtJ Cd ¡c,J Department Head Signature Page 1 of . . . STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ) COUNTY OF TARRANT ) ~~MENDMENT NO.2 TO THE CONTRACT ("Contract") BETWEEN CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP WHEREAS, on December 12, 1994, the City of North Richland Hills (hereinafter "CITY") approved a Contract between the CITY and the law finn of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (fonnerly known as Linebarger Heard Goggan Blair Graham Peña & Sampson, LLP and Linebarger Goggan Blair Peña & Sampson, LLP) (hereinafter "FIRM"); and on March 22, 2004 approved J\mendment No.1 to the Contract; and WHEREAS, CITY wishes to turnover delinquent personal property taxes at the earliest practicable date and wishes to defray its costs of col1ection as authorized by Texas Property Tax Code Section 33.11; NOW THEREFORE, by execution of this Amendment No.2, the Contract is amended hereby as set forth below. I. The following language is hereby substituted for Section I of the Contract: CITY agrees to employ and does hereby employ FIRM to enforce by suit or otherwise the collection of all delinquent taxes, penalty and interest owing to CITY, provided current year taxes faHing delinquent within the period ofthis contract shall become subject to its tenns on the first day of July of the year in which the same shaH become delinquent, except as otherwise provided herein. Lawsuits and bankruptcy cases filed before the first day of July shall include current year taxes as aHowed by law. Such taxes are also subject to the tenns of this contract. Further, in the case of delinquent tangible personal property, on the 60th day after the February 1 delinquency date, such taxes are subject to this contract. II. The following language is hereby substituted for Section II of the Contract: CITY agrees to pay to FIRM as compensation for services required hereunder twenty percent (20%) of the amount of all delinquent taxes, penalty and interest of the years covered by this contract, actually collected and paid to the collector of taxes during the tenn of this contract as and when col1ected. Provided, however, that CITY agrees to pay to FIRM as compensation hereunder fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of all delinquent taxes, penalty and interest for the tax years 2002 and prior. An compensation above provided for shall become the property ofthe FIRM at the ... . . . time payment of taxes, penalty and interest is made to the collector. The collector shan pay over said funds monthly by check. The CITY may at its sole discretion turn over to the FIRM selected accounts for collection prior to July 1, except as otherwise provided in Section I hereto. The CITY agrees to pay the FIRM as compensation for collection activities on these accounts, including tax seizures pursuant to which the compensation is a cost of the seizure, an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the taxes actually collected. In bankruptcy proceedings, eminent domain proceedings or other federal receivership, the FIRM will be entitled to a fee of twenty percent (20%) of all amounts actually collected and paid to the CITY. Provided, however, that CITY agrees to pay to FIRM as compensation hereunder fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of all delinquent taxes, penalty and interest for the tax years 2002 and prior. FIRM agrees to perform the additional services enumerated in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth herein word for word. III. EFFECT OF THE AMENDMENT By execution of this Amendment No.2, the Contract is amended. No other sections, provisions, clauses or conditions of the Contract are waived or changed hereby and they shall all remain in full force and effect throughout the term of the Contract and any duly authorized extensions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by their signatures below, the duly authorized representatives of City of North Richland Hills and of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP do hereby agree and append this Amendment No.2 to the Contract dated December 12, 1994 and the Amendment No.1 to the COl1tract dated March 22, 2004. EXECUTED THIS the day of , 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP Oscar Trevino, City Mayor Stephen T. Meeks, Partner l\.TTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Page 2 .... TARRANT COUNTY TAX OFFICE BETSY PRICE Tax Assessor-Collector 100 E. Weatherford, Room 105 · Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0301 · 817-884-1100 taxoffice@tarrantcounty.com November 14, 2005 Drew Con1 City of North Richland Hills PO Box 82069 North Richland Hills TX 76182 RE: Early Turnover of Delinquent Business Personal Accounts HB 2491 Dear Drew, I wanted to make your taxing unit aware of a revision to the Texas Property Tax Code, resulting from the recent 79th session of the Texas Legislature. Section 33.11 of this year's omnibus property tax bill now allows a taxing entity to turn over delinquent business personal property accounts in April, three months earlier than the former July timeframe, and to impose the delinquent collection penalty. . Tarrant County adopted this change in October 2005. In April 2006, Tarrant County will turn over our delinquent personalprope11y accounts to our county law firm for collections. An expedited and consolidated delinquent tax program will be more effective for our governments and less confusing for our taxpayers. My office will be making program changes to facilitate this early turnover. It will be more efficient if we can make an across the board change for all entities. As the Tarrant County Tax Assessor-Collector, I fully support this change and recommend that you adopt this legislative provision, taking advantage of this opportunity to Inaximize your delinquent tax collection potential and thus the revenue it can generate for your jurisdiction. I have visited with the law finns representing Inost of you. They should be contacting you about this change. My office will need a copy of the resolution passed by your governing body. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have or meet with you, or your board/council, if you should desire. I \vould appreciate you keeping me informed of your intentions, so that I can plan accordingly. As always, Tarrant County is pleased to provide your collection services. Sincerely, ~~ Betsy Price T ax Assessor-Collector . BP:sh CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Police Department Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Award Bid for Annual Contract for Police Department Uniforms to Uniforms, Inc. - Resolution No. 2005-092 Agenda Number: PU 2005-048 In the 2005/06 adopted budget, Council allocated funds for the purchase of uniforms for the Police Department. Formal bids were solicited for an annual contract to supply uniforms. Attached is a breakdown of the bids. Bids were solicited for estimated quantities of trousers, long/short sleeve shirts and caps. Uniforms are ordered as needed for new officers or when replacement is required. The specifications require the successful bidder to obtain the correct measurements of each officer in order to provide proper uniform fit and to maintain sufficient stock on hand to deliver uniform orders within 1 0 days from date of order. The bid submitted by JB Battle does not meet the minimum specifications because they do not meet the 10-day delivery requirement. They bid 90 to 120 days on delivery and they are located in Oklahoma City. This would make outfitting officers a difficult and time consuming process. The bid submitted by Uniforms Inc. met the specifications and general conditions of the bid. The company is located in Dallas and they have supplied quality uniforms, provided good service and made deliveries within the required time limitations in past years. Uniform purchases will not exceed allocated budget amounts. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005- 092 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other x 001-8001--8007-531.61-20 Account ~ur1'1,ber 130-8001--8007-531.61-20 SUfficierýF~nt; Available II /'; \ " B d t 0, t 0~' ¡ f /~ U ge Irec or (''l-tL /t,.'l,.Þ'J /"-..:- -Z1..·'·L...~:·_.~· Finance Director . ment Head Signature Page 1 of L . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS J B Battle Uniforms, Lone Star GST Public Description Uniforms Inc. Uniform Safety Men's Uniforms: Short Sleeve Shirt $62.50 $62.80 $65.30 $62.11 Long Sleeve Shirt $65.50 $72.80 $75.50 $72.50 Trousers $65.50 $69.80 $75.25 $91.75 Cap $50.75 $39.95 $40.00 $46.95 TOTAL MEN'S 244.25 245.35 256.05 273.31 Women's Uniforms: Short Sleeve Shirt $62.50 $62.80 $65.30 $62.11 Long Sleeve Shirt $65.50 $72.80 $75.50 $72.50 Trousers $65.50 $69.80 $75.25 $91.75 Cap $50.75 $39.95 $40.00 $46.95 TOTAL WOMEN'S 244.25 245.35 256.05 273.31 Delivery Time 90 - 120 1 0 days 45 days 1 0 days days CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page of RESOLUTION NO. 2005-092 . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: . . 1 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the contract with Uniforms, Inc., for an annual contract to provide police department uniforms as the act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of December, 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: J! f /'/ Y-tZ /H.¡./), I C:<:7'~<.~_ ___ Larry Koo.f¥;e; Director of Finance v' ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Fire Department Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Authorize Interlocal Purchasinq Aqreement with the City of Richardson for the Purchase of Firefighter Bunker Gear- Resolution No. 2005-093 Agenda Number: PU 2005-049 Staff is requesting to enter into an interlocal purchasing agreement with the City of Richardson for the purchase of goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. One type of contract being considered is for firefighter bunker gear. The City of Richardson currently has an agreement with Casco Industries for firefighter bunker gear manufactured by Globe. Staff is requesting to participate in this agreement. All bunker gear purchased must meet minimum standards set by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) and the Texas Commission of Fire Protection. Casco offers gear that meets these standards. The cost for each set, one jacket and one pair of pants, through this agreement will be $1,470. The FY 2006 Fire Department budget includes $1500 per set for 20 sets of gear. Bunker gear is typically replaced every four years depending on the condition and budget availability. This averages 20 to 25 new or replacement sets purchased annually. Casco has a local office and sales representative that will make obtaining new and replacement gear more convenient. Casco is also the exclusive authorized Globe dealer for the state of Texas. The City has been purchasing equipment and miscellaneous supplies from Casco for a number of years and they have always provided excellent service and made deliveries in a timely manner. The Local Government Code states that purchases made through a cooperative purchasing agreement satisfy any State law that would require the City to solicit competitive bids. Participation in this program will be cost effective to the City as well as save staff time. Each agency will place their orders and pay the vendors directly. North Richland Hills or the City of Richardson may change or cancel the agreement with a 30- day written agreement. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005- 093 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number 001-9003-532.61-20 Sufficient F;uhds ~ai a e . ! . . ¡, i" f ¡ VL- L/ \,- Budget Director l-r \.. r 1. ,tL-.", K::(-f'-l/¡.-L~ ~~\ Decartm t Head lonature P~np 1 nf . RESOLUTION NO. 2005-093 . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the interlocal agreement with the City of Richardson authorizing each City to purchase goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process and approve the purchase of firefighter bunker gear through Casco Industries. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of December 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor . ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: . \. ,01;: ; '-( ~ ~~t,..rl.)/, ~'; ~J/¡"...é-~~ Larry Koortsie, Director of Finance . . . . INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND CITY OF RICHARDSON This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of North Richland Hills, hereinafter referred to as "NRH", and the City of Richardson, hereinafter referred to as "Richardson" . Pursuant to the authority granted by the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act {Article 4413 (32c) Vernon's Annotated Texas Statutes} providing for the cooperation between local governmental bodies, the parties hereto, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises contained herein, agree as follows: NRH and Richardson desire to enter into an Agreement for the purchase of goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. Specifications for said items should be determined in cooperation with the final approval of the entity processing the bid. The responsibility of each entity shall be as follows: I. NORTH RICH LAND HILLS 1 . NRH shall be allowed to purchase goods and services from vendors who have been selected by Richardson through the competitive bidding process. NRH will place orders directly with and pay directly to the selected vendor for goods and services purchased through a contract. 2. All purchases will be within the specifications that have been agreed to. NRH shall be responsible for the Vendors compliance with all conditions of delivery, price and quality of the purchased goods or services. 3. NRH shall give a 30-day written notification to all participating agencies of any change or cancellation of participation. 4. Donna Hurst Enos, Purchasing Agent, shall be designated as the official representative to act for NRH all matters relating to this cooperative purchasing agreement. II. CITY OF RICHARDSON 1 . Richardson shall be allowed to purchase goods and services from vendors who have been selected by NRH through the competitive bidding process of NRH. Richardson will place orders directly with and pay directly to the selected vendor for goods and services purchased through a contract. 2. All purchases will be within the specifications that have been agreed to. Richardson shall be responsible for the Vendors compliance with all conditions of delivery, price and quality of the purchased goods or services. . 3. Richardson shall give a 30-day written notification to a participating agency of any change or cancellation of participation. 4. , shall be designated as the official representative to act for Richardson in all matters relating to this cooperative purchasing agreement. This Agreement shall take effect upon execution by the signatories and shall be in effect from date of execution until terminated by either party with thirty (30) written notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY OF RICHARDSON . BY: BY: City Manager TITLE DATE: DA TE: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Secretary TITLE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Attorney for the City . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: . City Secretary/Finance Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Postal Equipment from Pitney Agenda Number: PU 2005-050 Bowes through the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Council approved in the 2004/05 Revised Budget, the replacement of the City's postage machine. The Postal Service has mandated that all postal machines using letterpress technology be removed from service and replaced with equipment using digital printing technology. The City's current postage machine uses the letterpress technology. Staff is recommending the purchase of a Pitney Bowes mailing system that complies with present and known future postal regulations and is comparable to the machine we are currently using. This equipment is available through the State of Texas contract. The City participates in an interlocal agreement with the State for the purchase of goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. The Local Government Code states that purchases made through a cooperative purchasing agreement satisfy any State law that would require the City to solicit competitive bids. Participation in this program will be cost effective to the City as well as save Staff time. The cost of the equipment through this contract will be $27,024.00. The revised budget was $ 36,831. Recommendation: To authorize the purchase of mailing equipment from Pitney Bowes through the State of Texas Cooperative Purchasing Program in the amount of $27,024. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account NUr1l,~er . 001-2503-514.43-20 Sufficient Fu~rf ,A1::ab1e I' C l· Budget Manager &aútvd f~ Decartment Head Sianature Page 1 of L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Iron Horse Golf Course Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Award Bid for Golf Course Groundsl Maintenance Equipment Agenda Number: PU 2005-051 to Austin Turf and T~actor in the amount of $91,257.23 Formal bids were solicited for specialized grounds maintenance equipment for Iron Horse Golf Course. This is replacement equipment consisting of two (2) Fairway Mowers and one (1) Utility Mower included in the five year replacement program created for the Golf Course. The results are outlined below. Professional Turf Products Austin Turf & Tractor $89,597.00 $91,257.23 Four additional companíes contacted stated they would not be submitting a bid. The recommendation is to award the bid to Austin Turf & Tractor. Past experience with the service offered by Professional Turf Products has not been favorable. Professional Turf has had slow response times, not corrected problems and not shipped parts when needed in a timely manner. Austin Turf & Tractor is the exclusive John Deere turf products distributor for Texas. They have a 98.7°k next day parts and labor ability (this includes parts in stock and out of stock). This company is also a current vendor at Iron Horse and does an excellent job in every area including service, customer support, and repairs. The majority of the equipment at Iron Horse is John Deere and golf course personnel are trained to perform maintenance on this equipment. Purchasing the Taro equipment, as provided by Professional Turf Products, would result in additional charges for the training that would be required for golf course personnel. As allowed by state law, the specifications state the bid may be awarded for the bid that offers the best value to the City. Staff feels the bid submitted by Austin Turf and Tractor offers the best value for the reasons stated above and all the warranty and service needs would be handled by one company. Their bid met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and the equipment can be delivered within 30 days. The Austin Turf and Tractor bid amount of $ 91,257.23 is within the budgeted amount of $101,958 for these three pieces of equipment. Recommendation: To award the bid for grounds maintenance equipment to Austin Turf and Tractor in the amount of $91,257.23. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number 410-7611-712.74-05 Ii Sufficient Furläs A~aila e 1/'1 , {': '7\ . (Ote-J Ii l /1 '-'';\ \{;/ R6l Budget Director i'\£i ~ . //' . fl,. ¡í¡",' Finance Director O~no "1 ",of ') " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planninq and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from for Whitfield-Hall Agenda Number: AP 2005-07 Surveyors to Approve the Amended Plat of Lots 3R 1 & 4, Block 1 Walker Branch Addition (Located in the 8500 Block of Emerald Hills Way - 13.623 acres). Case Summary: This plat includes an existing nursing home and a proposed senior independent living project which was approved in May of this year (ref. ZC 2005-06 Merrill Gardens). The purpose of the amended plat is to eliminate un-needed easements, correct existing easement calls and add new easements to serve the existing and proposed developments. Staff Review: Attached is a letter from the Public Works Department recommending the placement of this plat on the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council agendas. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on November 17, 2005 recommended approval of AP 2005-07 by a vote of 7-0. Recommendation: Approve AP 2005-07. Review Schedule: Appl ¡cation: 1 0/31/05 Final Hearing: 12/12/05 Total Review Time: 6 weeks Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AvaIlable ~ Finance Director ...---... - ) /7 I)U~ ~~~ ,-k:~y~ Department Head Signature AP 2005-07 Walker Branch Addition CC . . . . D r . N W~~~E fl~ S NRH AP 2005-07 Amended Plat Walker Branch Addition Lots 3R 1 and 4, Block 1 Prepared by Planning 11/10/05 ~Feet o 100 200 400 ¡ -~ y . . . NI~H . ..- _.~ ~--t·- .- -. .-- -- "-.... -.. - ... .". November 7,2005 MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator cf) FROM: Caroline Waggoner, Engineer Associate SUBJECT: Walker Branch Addition; Lots 3R1 & 4, Block 1 Amended Plat, AP2005-07 Public Works has reviewed the Final Plat submitted to this office on November 4, 2005. We recommend placement on the next Planning and Zoning meeting agenda. We recommend placement on the next City Council Meeting Agenda following approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. cc: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Public Works Assistant Director CLW/pwm2005-238 . . . 11. AP 2005-07 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM WHITFIELD-HALL SURVEYORS TO APPROVE THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 3R1 & 4, BLOCK 1 WALKER BRANCH ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 8500 BLOCK OF EMERALD HILLS WAY -13.623 ACRES). APPROVED Dave Green presented AP 2005-07. The purpose of this amended plat is to remove mistakes in the easements and add new easements to the plat. The Development Review Committee has reviewed this property. Staff and Public Works have provided a memo stating that all requirements have been met. Staff recommends approval. Chairman Davis opened the public hearing. Johnny Williams, Whitfield-Hall Surveyors, was present representing the applicant. There were no others wishing to speak and the Chairman closed the public hearing and asked for a motion. Ken Sapp, seconded by Scott Wood, motioned to approve AP 2005-07. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: PlanninQ and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 SUbject: Public HearinQ and Consideration of a Request from Agenda Number: ZC 2005-13 Robert McKinney to Approve a Zoning Change from "AG" Agricultural to "R-1" Single Family Residential (Located in the 9400 Block of Kirk Lane -1.0 acre). Ordinance No. 2866 Case Summáry: The applicant, Robert McKinney, is requesting a rezoning of a 1.0 acre tract in the 9400 Block of Kirk Lane from "AG" Agricultural to "R-1" Single Family Residential. The purpose of the rezoning is to build a single family residence. The "R-1 District requires a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet and a minimum house size of 2,300 square feet. Plat Status: A preliminary plat (ref. PP 2005-13 McKinney Addition) including this site was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 17th. Existing Site Conditions: The site is vacant with mostly grass as vegetation. The site is currently used to hold livestock. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts Neighborhood Services uses for this area fronting Kirk Lane. The proposed residential use is not consistent with the Plan but does reflect the existing large-lot residential uses found in this vicinity south of Kirk Lane. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage along Kirk Lane, a 2-lane local street with 50' of Right Of Way. Surrounding Zoning I Land Use: North: "R-2" { Single family subdivision (Grace Meadows) East: "AG" I Vacant South: "AG" I Vacant, single family residence West: 'lAG" I Single family residence Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on November 17, 2005, recommended approval of ZC 2005-13 by a vote of 7 -0. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Available \ £' '~.. , \ . 4·· ) ~~.. ...... .\ '~---' I ~ J _.é ......~ _;I Department Head Signature ~ Finance Director ZC 2005-13 McKinney Addition CC CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 2866 Review Schedule: Application: 8/08/05 Final Hearing: 12/12/05 T ctal Review Time: 18 weeks* *This request was held up due to issues relating to the preliminary plat. 2 . 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 .26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 . ORDINANCE NO. 2866 ZONING CASE ZC 2005-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A 1.0 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) TO R-l (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1 : THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a 1.0 acre tract of land located in the 9400 block of Kirk Lane in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit A from AG (Agricultural) to R-l (Single Family Residential) zoning. Section 2: Any person, finn or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. Ordinance No. 2866 Page 1 of 3 . 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 .24 26 28 30 32 34 Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. PASSED on this 12th day of December, 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Director of Planning and Development . Ordinance No. 2866 Page 2 of3 . EXHIBIT A BEGINNING at a point 475 varas North and 385-1/2 feet West of the Southeast corner of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Tarrant County, Texas and point being 217 feet East of the Northwest comer of that certain 8-1/3 acre tract conveyed to Zanna Pemberton Gerth, wife of H.G. Gerth; THENCE South 25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract herein described; THENCE South I degree 05 minutes West and parallel to the West line of said 8-1/3 acre tract, 208.7 feet to a point for corner; THENCE East 208.7 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 1 degree 05 minutes East 208.7 feet to a point in the South line of County Road #3050 (Rumfield Eden Road); THENCE West along the South line of said County Road #3050,208.7 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1 acre of land more or less. . . Ordinance No. 2866 Page 3 of3 . . . N W~tr.LE N RH ~~ ZC 2005-13 S McKinney Addition From "AG" Agricultural to "R-1" Residential 9400 Block of Kirk Lane (1 acre) Prepared by Planning 11/30/05 Feet o 100 200 400 "C ro o c:: Q) c: -I ....., ü c: .(3 Q) s- a.. . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL Case #: ZC 2005-13 Applicant: Robert McKinney Location: 9400 Block of Kirk Lane (1 acre) You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearina: A public hearing is being held to consider a request from Robert McKinney to rezone the property as shown on the attached map from <lAG" Agricultural to "R-1" Single Family Residential District. The applicant is proposing to build a single family residence on the 1 acre tract. The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of this request. . Public Hearina Schedule: Public Hearing Date: CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, DECEMBER 12,2005 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Time: Location: If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427-6300 Fax (817) 427-6303 . Sean and Brandi Johnson 7605 Grace Dr. . Worth, TX 76180 Stephen and Coleta Lane 9204 Hailey Ct. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Gary Gardner 3106 Oakview Dr. Hurst, TX 76054 Kellar Custom Homes 1 011 Conchos Cir. East Keller, TX 76248 Robert McKinney 6517 Smithfield Rd. Ste E N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 . Lucille Stevens T C Stevens Testamentary TR 9201 Kirk Lane Fort Worth, TX 76180 Robert McKinney 729 Grapevine Hwy #410 Hurst, TX 76054 . . . . ZC 2005-13 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM ROBERT MCKINNEY TO APPROVE A ZONING CHANGE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 9400 BLOCK OF KIRK LANE - 1.0 ACRE). APPROVED Dave Green presented ZC 2005-13. The purpose of the rezoning is to build a new single family structure. Staff recommends approval. Chairman Davis opened the public hearing. JC Garcia, representing the applicant, restated Mr. Green's explanation that Mr. McKinney would like to build a new home on the property. As there were no others wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing and asked for a motion. Brenda Cole, seconded by Scott Wood, motioned to approve ZC 2005-13. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). .--; CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Planning and Development Department Subject: Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request from Pete Agenda Number: ZC 2005-09 Edwarçjs of Ahlborn Development Inc. to Approve a Zoning Change from "R-2" Single Family Residential to "RI-PD" Residential Infill-Planned Development (Located in the 8400 Block of Amundson Drive - 7.172 acres). Ordinance No. 2867 Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Case Summary: The applicant, Pete Edwards/Ahlborn Development Inc., is requesting approval of a zoning change from "R-2" Single Family Residential to "RI-PD" Residential Infill-Planned Development. The development proposes 27 lots on 7.172 acres located in the 8400 Block of Amundson Drive. Site Plan Requirement: All requests for PD zoning must be accompanied by a site plan detailing the various elements of the proposed development. The applicant has submitted a plan and a narrative that outlines the basic development. Plat Status: A preliminary plat (ref. PP 2005-15 Town Walk Chase Addition) for this site was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 17th. Existing Site Conditions: The site is vacant with grass as the primary vegetation. The site slopes toward the south and east. A large, open, concrete channel parallels the eastern boundary of the site. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts low density residential uses for this area. The proposed use is consistent with the Plan. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage on Amundson Drive, a future 4-lane, undivided, major collector street with 68' Right Of Way. Adjacent Zoning I Land Use: North: "R-8" / Single family neighborhood East: "AG" / Vacant (current rezoning request for "R-2") South: "R-2" / Single family neighborhood West: "R-4-D" / Duplexes Land Use Summary: · Total acreage 7.172 acres (property boundary includes all of Amundson Drive and concrete drainage channel) Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Account Number Operating Budget Other \ r~4- \ . ~, . ¡) ,- - =-.l-.~ "~~ Li~ Department Head Signature ~ ~ Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Page 1 of L \ . · Number of lots · Density CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 27 for residential use, 5 smaller common areas 5.49 units per acre (net) Minimum Lot Dimensions/Setbacks: · Min. house size · Min. lot area · Average lot area · Min. lot width · Min. lot depth · Min. front setback · Min. side setback · Min. rear setback · Max. height 2,100 square foot (both one and two story) 5,004 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft. Approximately 50' Approximately 85' min. 10' (20' for front entry garages) 5' (10' min. between residences) 10' No information given. Zoning Ordinance limits total structure height in residential areas to 38' (unless varied by approved PD). Development amenities: · Established Homeowners Association; · 7 HOA maintained common areas consisting of 5 small parks and 2 landscape features; · Common area landscape amenities include Shumard Red Oaks, Crape Myrtles, Trumpet Honeysuckle vine and seasonal color; · Benches and picnic tables are provided in the "park" areas; · All common areas are irrigated with automatic watering system; · Extensive use of decorative brick pavers throughout development streets and sidewalks; · Use of decorative "Old World" cast iron street light and mail box pedestals; · Both entryways from Amundson Drive are landscaped. The eastern-most entryway consists of a divided median with landscaping and decorative copper or iron sign; · Meandering sidewalk along the development's Amundson Drive frontage; · Use of a 6' masonry wall along most of the exterior boundary along Amundson Drive with some areas of wrought iron. Housing amenities: · 100o/ó masonry first floor, 800/0 second floor; · No siding on front elevation. Other locations (including soffits) will use Hardi-board; · All doors and windows will have cast stone, stone or brick accents; · Minimum 35-year composition shingles; · Minimum 10/12 roof pitch; · All garage doors (visible from street) will be wood-clad; · Minimum 20' front setback for front entry garages; · All driveways and entry walks to be constructed using brick pavers; · Minimum 500 square feet of brick pavers in front of all homes; · All houses will be fully guttered; · All houses will have exterior decorative lighting; · All houses will have automatic irrigation systems; CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of -ª-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · All houses will have a minimum landscaping package; · All houses on Lots 2-10, Block 2 will require opaque glass on any second floor window facing south; Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on November 17, 2005, recommended approval of ZC 2005- 09 by a vote of 7-0 with the following stipulations: 1. Note in the narrative that all residential lots will feature minimum landscaping requirements and automatic irrigation systems; 2. Clearly define what areas of the exterior wall (along Amundson Drive) will be fully masonry and what areas will be combination wrought iron/masonry; 3. Note what type & size of exterior fencing will be provided along the southern boundary line; 4. Note in the narrative that Hardi-board or other concrete board materials will be used for soffits and all areas noted as siding. Plan/Narrative Revisions: The applicant has revised the attached narrative to address the above stipulations. For clarity, staff recommends that the applicant also address stipulations 2 and 3 graphically on the site plan with detailed drawings of the wrought iron / masonry wall elevation and noting the wood privacy fence along the southern boundary. Staff would ask Council to make these stipulations as part of any motion to approve this request. Petition of Opposition: Staff has received a Petition of Opposition to this request from the adjacent neighborhood. Staff has not, as yet, determined if this petition is valid (requiring a super majority vote by the Council to approve) or not. Staff will address the petition issue with Council at Monday's pre council session. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 2867 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 3 of 3 {~ ~ Case # ZC2005-09 Town Walk Chase Development Location: 8400 Block of Amundson Drive . NeiS!hborhood Petition To the City of North Richland Hills City Council We the undersigned having reviewed the zoning request for the above mentioned property from "R-2" residential to "RIPD" do hereby request that the Council vote NO to this request and leave the property with the Existing "R-2" Zoning. ADDRESS i SIGNATURE l I~ ~ ! I ~ -7~--1 I ¡ I . i .' i ~ -- --.--. - l.jJ_~-~~5' _~~ ! 1J-.~ · Š- OHA) ~ ~/)~AL4ItM ¡ J'#;'J 1?,--~-11 ~ ~ i-I4-tld I ~6 / PÙ-!5__ L/{Ç{ ~,' Let t Ø' Y\£ Y\ ! fh ~ )( ~__ tt:f.~ e-? . fk4 S/~~/ZL ~~~~ ~_~5_~ßrot.o"" j -----.-------- i i , ---J f . . . ~~~ Nei~hborhood Petition To the City of North Richland Hills City Council Case # ZC2005-09 Town Walk Chase Development Location: 8400 Block of Amundson Drive We the undersigned having reviewed the zoning request for the above mentioned property from "R-2" residential to "RIPD" do hereby request that the Council vote NO to this request and leave the property with the Existing "R-2" Zoning. t NAME ! ADDRESS rYJ J ? ¡ B320 {,I' 5/-tr1 LV\ l ~~~~L~~ ~~t~ ILl ! 1&.¡ .J. _ ~ ' ØL¡/7 DON ~ .tv-' ~~~ \-\~ I~µ\ ~ ~r, . I ¡ ~()\o""\LJ F. I-J I ~'- !Ej4}.4 b l"rN~ ()R. ~ I , i r---------..-- ¡ ! i~~.1.\l~2 ¡ I j I ! ( I ! i t I I I I ! I i ¡ - ¡ I I I ¡ I ! ; I I r---" ; ---¡- ....-------.--.. . . . N W~~E ,,~ S NRH ZC 2005-09 From "R-2" Residential to I "RI-PD" Residential Infill-Planned Developmentl J 8400 Block of Amundson Dr. (7.172 acres) I ¡ Feet ! o 100 200 400 , ~ Prepared by Planning 11/30/05 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2867 ZONING CASE ZC 2005-09 .4 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A 7.172 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY FROM R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RI-PD (RESIDENTIAL INFILL-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 8 10 12 14 WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, 16 18 WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, 20 WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, 22 24 28 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, .26 30 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 32 Section 1 : THA T the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a 7.172 acre tract of land located in the 8400 block of Amundson Drive in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, lTIOre particularly described in Exhibit A from R-2 (Single Family Residential) to RI- PD (Residential Infill-Planned Development) zoning. 34 36 38 40 Section 2: Any person, finn or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue s11all constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. 42 44 46 . Ordinance No. 2867 Page 1 of3 . 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 .24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. PASSED on this 12th day of December, 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Pitstick, Director of Planning and Development . Ordinance No. 2867 Page 2 of3 . EXHIBIT A A 7.172 acre tract ofland situated in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abst. No. 1055 in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a called 43.756 acre tract of land as conveyed by deed in Volume 6072, Page 533 D.R.T.C.T. said 7.172 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found 12" iron rod at the southwest comer of said 7.172 acre tract, same being in the northwest line of Amundson Drive (a non-dedicated right-of-way) same being the southeasterly line of the Saint Louis & Southwestern Railroad; THENCE N 55°26'14" E along the said southeasterly line of the Saint Louis & Southwestern Railroad for 1,149.67' to a set capped ~" iron rod; THENCE S 00°03' 15" E leaving said southeasterly line of the Saint Louis & Southwestern Railroad, at 53. 72' passing the southeast right-of-way line of said Amundson Drive and in all 659.53' to a set capped 12" iron rod at the southeast comer of this 7.172 acre tract and also being the northeast comer ofthe Glenann Addition as recorded in Volume 388-77, Page 47 P.R.T.C.T.; . THENCE N 89°33 '27" W along the north line of said Glenann Addition, at 870.25' passing the southeast line of said Amundson Drive and in all 947.42' to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 7.172 acres of land. . Ordinance No. 2867 Page 3 of3 . . . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL Case #: ZC 2005-09 Town Walk Chase Development Applicant: Ahlborn Development Inc. (Pete Edwards) Location: 8400 Block of Amundson Drive (7.172 acres) You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property shown on the attached map. Purpose of Public Hearina: A public hearing is being held to consider a request from Ahlborn Development Inc. (Pete Edwards) to rezone the property as shown on the attached map from "R-2" Residential to "RI- PD" Residential Infill-Planned Development. The applicant is proposing to develop a 27 -lot single family residential subdivision to be known as Town Walk Chase Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of this request. Public Hearina Schedule: Public Hearing Date: CITY COUNCil MONDAY, DECEMBER 12,2005 7:00 P.M. Time: Location: CITY COUNCil CHAMBERS 7301 N. E. lOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request, please contact: Planning Department City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Phone (817) 427-6300 Fax (817) 427-6303 James Armstrong 6901 Herman Jared Rd. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 . Bitsie Harrington 8406 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Jimmy Williams 8417 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Jason Henninger 8424 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Dean and Linda Spruill 8404 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Jane Timmermans 3453 Paint Brush Ln. Bedford, TX 76021 John and Susan Vanderlaan 8422 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Bryan and Cori Brown , 8402 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 William and Melanie Whitson 8425 Donna Dr. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Jan and Judy Miller 8420 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 James Wells 410 Landing PT # 418 Stockbridge, GA 30281 Daniet' and Billie Jones 8429 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Eric and Ines Garcia 8418 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Northlake Capital, LLC 2808 Brookshire Dr. Southlake, TX 76092 John Solecki 8433 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 _¡stoPher Duke 8416 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Leslie Ely 8700 Amundson Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Leland and Mary Coover 8437 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Marian Sims PO Box 821294 Fort Worth, TX 76182 Lydia Stewart 8708 Stewart Dr. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Robert and Patricia Musch 8441 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Kari and Asta Leppanen 8412 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 David and Kathleen Marthe 8620 Amundson Dr. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Yvette Garza 6540 Sherri Ln. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Michael and Shiela Eades 8410 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 William Hartman 8401 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Donna Hogan 8324 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 .1 Snitz 8 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Carl Thorpe 8413 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 William Blewett 8320 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 William and Tracey Richard 8316 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 . Deborah Elia 8304 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Robert Hall 8424 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Ben Allen 1312 Plantation Dr. South Colleyville, TX 76034 Michael Yorek 8428 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Mario and Brenda Phillips 8312 Crystal Ln. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Roseann Montgomery 8432 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 David Rhoads 8400 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 The OKLATX Limited Partnership 300 Harwood Rd. Bedford, TX 76021 tRia Sweeney 8404 Donna Dr. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Ozella Reves Trust of Ozella M Reves 106 Queen St. Alexandria, VA 22314 Jason Fitzwater 8408 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 Billy and Barbara Walker 6609 Simmons Rd. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Susan Gray PO Box 821389 Fort Worth, TX 76182 Thomas and Isabel Smith 6825 Simmons Rd. N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 John and Maria Poole 8416 Donna Dr. Fort Worth, TX 76180 .IJOrdan Box 821465 Fort Worth, TX 76182 . . . ZC 2005-09 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF AN REQUEST FROM PETE EDWARDS OF AHLBORN DEVELOPMENT INC. TO APPROVE A ZONING CHANGE FROM "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "RI-PD" RESIDENTIAL INFILL-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (LOCATED IN THE 8400 BLOCK OF AMUNDSON DRIVE -7.172 ACRES). APPROVED Dave Green presented ZC 2005-09. The applicant is proposing 27 lots for single family homes with a minimum square footage of 2,100 sq. ft. The average lot size is 7,500 sq. ft. The property line includes a concrete drainage ditch along the eastern boundary. The property line includes Amundson Drive as part of the property. When those two items are taken out, the amount of property that is left to develop represents net units per acre of 5.49. The applicant is proposing some amenities for the neighborhood. This project meets the requirements for the RI-PD district and staff recommends approval with the following notations: 1 ) all residential lots will feature minimum landscaping requirements and an automatic irrigation system, and 2) clarification on where the exterior wall running along Amundson will be, where it will be a full masonry wall, and where it will be a combination of masonry and wrought iron. Chairman Davis opened the public hearing. Pete Edwards, Ahlborn Development, Inc. came forward. Mr. Edwards previously came before this Board with a townhome project which was withdrawn because the neighbors were not interested in having townhomes located at this property. After months of discussion and review with Staff, Ahlborn Development believes this current project will work. This project was designed with the neighbors in mind. The project will have areas for picnics and biking that the homeowners can use as well as the surrounding neighborhoods. The neighbors to the south have the most concern about this project. In order to keep these houses from intruding on the houses to the south, Mr. Edwards is proposing opaque windows on the second floor. The elevations will be lowered to match the houses to the south. Jason Fitzwater, 8408 Donna Drive, came forward. Mr. Fitzwater has questions concerning traffic flow. Amundson Drive is becoming a major thoroughfare between Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard. With the influx of 27 new homes that increases the traffic even more. Chairman Davis stated that traffic issues would be addressed with the preliminary plat (next item on the agenda). He explained that Amundson Drive will someday be improved and widened. The developer would have to escrow funds to pay for their portion of the road as it is not currently on the capital improvements plan. . . . Lori Solecki, 8433 Donna Drive, came forward. Ms. Solecki asked for an explanation of the "pink areas" on the plans and stated. that she also had drainage issue concerns. Are these homes going to have alley way parking or garages? What will be the barrier between the south side and the new subdivision? Chairman Davis stated that the pink or shaded areas are common areas for driveways. The plat will show common area access easements. These homes will have garages and by City regulation will also have to provide enough room for two off-street parking spaces (i.e., in the driveway). The barrier will be a stockade fence, which is not mandatory. The Chairman stated that the applicant can answer some of these questions when he comes forward with his rebuttal. Chairman Davis mentioned that there were more citizens that filled out cards, but didn't wish to speak. Pat Stewart, against. Patty Musch, against. Pamela Fitzwater, against. John Solecki, against. Robert Hill, 8424 Donna Drive, came forward. What will the street widths be? Mr. Hill doesn't want to see streets the same as Home Town. There is no room to maneuver. He stated that it is his understanding that all new homes are required to have rear entry garages. How are these designed? What type of exterior composite will these homes be made of? Will all of the drainage be directed towards the new street and if so how will that street drain? Will the opaque windows be able to rise? Chairman Davis answered that there will be a 50-ft. right-of-way which will be a 31-ft. back to back street. Same as the surrounding neighborhoods. The current ordinance requires side or rear entry garages. This is an RI-PD which is a separate zoning classification. Each planned development has its own design criteria and requirements on garages. Some of these garages will be front or side. If the garages are located in the front, the design criteria states that it has to be a wood overlay garage door. The exterior will be 1 ao°/Ó brick on the first floor and 80% brick on the second floor. The preliminary plat will have to meet all the subdivision rules and regulations, including drainage. As far as the windows in the back, the applicant will have to address that. Patty Musch, 8441 Donna Drive, came forward. What materials will the fence along the south side be made of and how tall will it be? Bill Schopper stated that the only fence that is required is the one along the collector street on Amundson. Chairman Davis added that the developer will probably build a 6- to 8-ft. wood stockade fence between the subdivisions. Mr. Edwards came forward. . . . Chairman Davis asked Mr. Edwards if the opaque windows can be restricted from opening. Mr. Davis doesn't believe fire code would allow that. He also explained Mr. Edwards to explain his intentions for a fence along the south side. Mr. Edwards stated that all rooms have to have a window for exiting in case of fire. As far as the fence is concerned, normally the builder constructs a 6-ft. privacy fence. That is currently not in the building restrictions for this project but it can be added. Ken Sapp asked Mr. Edwards about press board siding. Would you have any objections to extending that to siding or soffitts? Will the mailboxes all be the same wrought iron? Mr. Edwards answered that would not be a problem to include that and all the mailboxes will match. Ken Sapp mentioned that he would like to see the fences clarified and limit the wood fences to the rear building line with wrought iron elsewhere. Also, on the mutual driveways are you going to require the same builder to buy both lots and build them at the same time? Mr. Edwards answered that clarifying the fences is not a problem, but as far as the mutual driveways are concerned a decision has not yet been made. Mr. Edwards added that all the sidewalks will be made of pavestone. The pavestone gives a rich look to the neighborhood. All the builders will be required to use a certain minimum. Chairman Davis asked Mr. Edwards if he agreed to the south side fencing. Mr. Edwards agreed. Any fencing parallel to the front line of the house will be wrought iron. Don Bowen asked if this was a public street. Are the sidewalks going to be the pavestone? Mr. Edwards stated yes. Scott Wood asked Mr. Edwards about roll over curbs. Mr. Edwards stated that he doesn't like roll over curbs because they are too skinny. Ken Sapp mentioned that with the pavestone you can minimize the curb cuts and avoid the low rider car bumping problem. Mr. Edwards stated that he is still trying to make a decision on the curbs. Chairman Davis added that Mr. Edwards needs to make a final decision by final plat. Chairman Davis asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak. As there were none, Chairman Davis closed the public hearing. Mr. Wood commented that he is happy with the changes. This project will work. Mr. Sapp agreed. This will enhance the surrounding properties. "I. . Brenda Cole commented that the properties will be offset and will not have a complete view of the backyards to the south. Randy Shiflet commented that Mr. Edwards has been very gracious with this project. Ken Sapp, seconded by Scott Wood, motioned to approve ZC 2005-09 with stipulation of the two Staff notes, clarification of landscape requirements, automatic sprinkler system, and defining which part of the fence will be masonry and wrought iron, siding and soffitts notes, and fence notation including the south side. The motion was carried unanimously (7-0). . . .~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: I nspections Department Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request to Authorize a Building Permit Agenda Number: SRB 2005-05 to Partially Reconstruct a Nonconforming Sign by Sherry Martin of Cencor Realty Services, on behalf of the Rufe Snow Village Shopping Center (Rufe Snow L.P.), Located at 6240 Rufe Snow Dr. - Article 106 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. Case Summary: The applicant is the Rufe Snow Village Shopping Center (Rufe Snow L.P.) located at 6240 Rufe Snow Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas. The applicant is requesting the Sign Review Board to authorize a building permit (sign permit) for the partial reconstruction of a non- conforming sign in accordance with the Sign Regulations, Article 106-15(C)2 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. Case Findings: According to the attached drawing, the applicant is proposing to make decorative improvements to the sides and top, including a twelve inch reduction to the overall height. Although the proposed sign project will be adding molding, trim, faux stone, and other accents; the area of the altered sign structure will remain just under the current sign area of 202 Square Feet. The applicant intends to retain the existing landscaping beneath the sign as well. Per Article 106-15(c)2 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances, the Sign Review Board has the jurisdiction to authorize sign permits for the reconstruction, extension, and or enlargement of nonconforming signs. The City Attorney has determined that this request is consistent with the provisions of this section and that this type of Sign Review Board action does not invoke a public hearing as originally interpreted by staff. Additionally, since this request is for authorization to reconstruct a portion of an existing nonconforming sign, and not a variance request, proof of a hardship is not required. Recommendation: Staff is supportive of this request primarily because the overall size of the sign is decreasing and that the sign's visual appearance is being enhanced. Staff recommends approval of this request. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other . Account Number Sufficient Funds Available '" '" ..------- Finance Director \ \.. . - ---- .' \... . \. .' r " ! -,/ , .:. -.- '~ DeDartÎnent Head"SÜ!natureí ,MM·;\ ~~<¡~ Citv Mana2:er Si~atut:¢ SRB 2005-05 ~~ ~I~ ('þ IIV'~ V'l ~~~ê c¡q. T~ ::] ~r;n ~ ---r1 E; ---.! 0-.'1= i:5 i-i'~ '11 ~ ¡ ð;:: ::s.. ......." S¡:.æ:sjp f b~ =~ ~i!! cii = 0 ~!:!j p :z: ~o =~ B ~ -0. ~ :z: ¡¡;' ... :T en ~ a ~ en ~ ~;;! V\ -f » :;¡c ~ :::¡ rn ~~ ~i ~~ , a .. H ~I .. i~ Z.ð g.. ~ 2I.:ë · ;;f= - ª.i .. ª- &. Ut("\ ~.~ · ("\1 I-:s . ¡;t ~ CJ ~ ~ $ ,.,., ~rn ~:z: »0 ~-< .. m ~:e 0-.= II ....... I ~ :z:o · 0 :-4c:: ~D:J r-- rT1 I -n » ~ rn " -< r-- o :z: ~ ffi z: 7' -4 ~II ..;' (J, C1 ¡ - - ." ./~") ("\ ~ \ i ~ .~, j \:.1 ) (.) ! I : I' r~ ~ ~ :z: -< r-- :::0 rn s: o -< rn o ~ ~ » :z rn r- ~ :::0 rn s: o -< rn C ~ » !æ :z: rn --I :::0 rn 3: o -< rn o · i'"'"'-n z~~~~o~ ~~~~C)E3: .. C) :::::¡ c::; m rn >< 3: r'\ ==-<-co~z=!:!: """'Z:I> CICÞ r-n C) r- - --f ~ ~ ~ -0 s;! ~ < $; :I> "'" ~ - :-- >c -I ~ -C>zr-~ --t::tl::c::::».....-...o:-o -c.........-<--^~o~cg ~.,,:-f -t~r-~QO.......,;a..þ.>:-nV'3: p~Ci);:~~m~E0~~ c> E ~ r- '00 ~ ,....., 3= 0 ""T'I 0 ;:lie == -c c::: ;- =='C. . 0 r- n"I. =3= =Ez-<-n;J>;J>C:: -<:õ2no"'::Cn"l!::::I>r-==== ~ ~ V> - ~. - r- ,....., ::;:: c:: Z èã[;:;;a;;<;::ri~>~~~v> r-~=n"I_;J>~3=:;a"'C:::I> ~~3=~~,.....,<z=z><~ -I c:::> ~ -a r- ~ n"I ~ S V'\ :00 O::i1-~c>r-OrT1rT1-C~n"I .....,-~p;:O--I==-IoC> n"I=lrT1V>;J>"""'O::Ec>pz;J> =¡e;v>;g.,,-I -:OOcon"l;:;:l ~8~~=~d~~r-~= d:sr-,.....,;J>."c--=~z ~-c:::>:!::¡~zo~,....., n"I :::¡ == ~ -n -I ""T'I Y' V> QO n"I V>~~2;!;~.",.....,~~==;:o O-'-'Zc:::> ;J>;J>V>~-I"""¡ <;==rT1~n"lZC03=:O-oo ~~r:;;~:;:¡P:!Z~8' == -tC::>QoC);:IIe\nmr-nr- 3> o:::;;...,.¡:sc;: -Ic>= ;::: ;:;~~rT1~c..> ~~ ::c -n~>__~~ -<v-, tD ~~,.....,~~;:o ~> r- ë5~~""'=t;~ -<C> g :z: ~ -- !:!:! c: 6 :Z: ~ . ~:Z:c:::7--fm C)r-n ~~~rT1 ::J:Ci) ~C5~;:O ~~ -:Z:C>;:IIe -nr-n ~=es~ ï=£ ~a~~ 3:Qo ar-n~=='C ~ ~ . . . NI~H SIGN REVIEW BOARD APPUCA rlON City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 81742ï-6300 (Please print or type all responses) PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION N_~me of applicant: /ì . t'"'. (-:>_ ~ e.n Co (--- \. efLl-b~1 ~rVL--U5- À. .¿t\t- \,-v-v ~lk ~~ L. A Street address of applicant: \ -±±- '.J Q L 0 à- 'rn CC) l ¿ · A \)-¡~V\-cUL - ':Xv City/State/Zip Code of applicaht Telephone number of applicant: J-/ t.f _ q ")t¡- D 30ZJ FAX number of applicant ;;l J 4 _ Cì ...." D!?¿., NOTE~ If you are not the owner of the property, you must attach \ (CL l¿LS Are you the owner of the i IT .........-1,. ~.~  / ' -./ ~L,) , Are you the owner's agent? property? DYes a letter from the property owner giving you permission to submit ca/ No ~Yes o No this application. tu-ftLcJv.d PART 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION Subject Property Legal Description: '- ~~+ Subject Property Street Address: ~Lk ~~ \J 'I ~ l¿~ PART 3. REQUEST TYPE o 5 If j~ -7 .- fL. 1 , (L,,' (", ¿d.../]" ff) .sILo l)/~· Qf1/¿r' ' '\ } ~LQ ~ -- n J V L-- , u.-I: r . & 14-0 kL'k 2;h(Jk) ìd-n'~ (. &{ 3i- Ie~lti' ~Sign Variance Request II.¿ 5-h~u~~ /hilA¿ \ J I nterpretation Request o Nonconforming Use Current zoning classification: F \ C()~CL",--L Note: A map or plot plan of the property and drawings of the proposed construction must be submitted with this application. The applicants or their representatives must be present at their scheduled public hearing. II hereby certify that I am, or that I represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for a Print Name PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Review Board Public Hearrng: Taxes. Liens and Assessments Paid? Case Number Vanance Approved: DYes 0 No I Date of Final Action: j ! Fees: $521.00 DYes 0 No Conditions of Aoprovaí: This request wIll not be scheduled for hearing until the application fee is paid. 6 I PART 5. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST List "the pertinent section(s) of the Sign Regulations and indicate the specific interpretation(s), variance(s), or nonconforming use exception(s) being requested. . ....,,' , .'\ ,. 1 . J...k:.LLûzJt-Lc~- lGv"Q.-/v'v(_~ ;)LJùS- . State the grounds for the request and detail any special conditions that cause hardships that in your opinion justify the variances or exceptions being requested. Explain any unique circumstances, if applicable, not considered by the Sign Regulations: - ~ CL-~~I\,~- ;) ~ì. (. '\ \ 'ì ---' 0 Q ,.À ')1" ~U-" ~'--' ~J.._-_::_":,,,-,"'iZ- " ). I) ~ . k~L~,-;- 6licl,· v . 7 Rufe Snow Village Sign Review Board Application - November 2005 Page Two . Part 5.... DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST List the pertinent section(s) of the Sign Regulations and indicate the specific interpretation(s), variance(s), or nonconforming use exception(s) being requested. Rufe Snow, L.P. is requesting Review Board approval to improve the aesthetic appearance of the existing "pole" or pylon sign; however, it would no longer comply with current sign ordinances: Section 106-9(A) sub-note 6 - The Rufe Snow Village pole sign exists outside of the boundaries of the rreeway overlay zone. Asking Sign Review Board for variance to retain the existing pole sign for this property, which is located on a major throughway and surrounded by commercial properties, provided: 1) sign height is lowered 28' 4", 2) the top cabinet sign message area is reduced by replacing the existing illuminated 4' x 8' dual tenant panel/cabinet with an internally lit 2'x8' single center ill paneVcabinet, 3) the tenant panels are reorganized with same number of slots (9), and 4) the altered sign structure area remains under the existing 250 square feet per face (exclusive of existing support structure) after adding the molding, faux stone columns and blue accents, all as proposed. . Section 106-13(2)c. lfthe variance to Section 106-9(A) is rejected, then the Rufe Snow Village pole sign does not meet the current monument sign requirements. Asking Review Board to grant variance allowing the existing pole sign to remain, provided: . 1) sign height is lowered 28' 4", 2) the top cabinet sign message area is reduced by replacing the existing illuminated 4' x 8' dual tenant panel/cabinet with an internally lit 2'x8' single center ill panel/ cabinet, 3) the tenant panels are reorganized with same number of slots (9), and 4) the altered sign structure area remains under the existing 250 square feet per face (exclusive of existing support structure) after adding the molding, faux stone columns and blue accellts, all as proposed. Section 1 06-3(7). Landscape requirement - existing design would not meet the 4-112' turf perimeter in all directions rrom base of sign, due to existing drives on 3 sides and parking on the 4th. Asking Board to grant variance accepting the existing burrned and landscaped median design without any changes. . Rufe Snow Village Sign Review Board Application - November 2005 Page Three . State the grounds for the request and detail any special conditions that cause hardships that in your opinion justify the variances or exceptions being requested. Explain any unique circumstances, if applicable, not considered by the Sign Regulations: Rufe Snow, L.P., the property owner, is requesting a variance approval to improve the appearance of the center's existing pylon sign within existing "grandfathered" limits. At the Review Committee's recommendation, we're proposing a reduction of the sign structure's height and decreasing sign message area, to offset the area added by a crown mold and side in-fill. In addition, the center ill panel will be relocated to the top in a new smaller cabinet, new accent blocks and uniform tenant panels will create a more cohesive and aesthetically pleasing sign. Rufe Snow Village is a multi-tenant retail center just under 100,000 square feet in size. Because the center's "pole" or pylon sign and many of its tenants are set back, away from the road and the center's entrance, maximum visibility is considered critical to the survival of its remaining businesses, especially as traffic rushes past the center. Even today, the tenants at the center ask for additional exposure through banners or temporary signs along the street just to help them "get noticed". . Rufe Snow road construction devastated area traffic patterns, the customer base and ultimately our tenant base. The closing of the Kroger store alone took over $8 million in annual sales and traffic away ITom the businesses that struggled to survive here. While the 99 Cent Only store ultimately sub-leased ITom Kroger, the discount dollar store cannot begin to generate the traffic and sales of a top grocery anchor. Just the bankruptcy of Nude Furniture, the loss of Fitness 2000 to a Watauga center and most recently the closing of an 8,000 square foot Chinese buffet equate to nearly 25% of the center's revenue and leaseable area lost and vacated in 2005 alone. The high vacancy, lost revenues, lower rents, concessions, leasing costs to back-fill and legal costs associated with failed tenants over the past few years have taken a toll on this property's financials. As a result, the owner simply cannot afford to lose any more tenants; the hardship won if the attributes and benefit of the existing pole sign were lost for appearance sake. . However, Rufe Snow, L.P. believes in the city's objective to revitalize the area and that traffic will continue to return to Rufe Snow Drive; buoyed by Musical Palette's success and positive growth since their recent relocation to Rufe Snow Village. In an effort to attract new customers and ultimately new tenants, close to $150,000 is being invested in exterior upgrades alone at this shopping center, making it a shining example for North Richland Hills: 1) Painted the original brown and orange brick to a bright, clean color scheme that compliments the design of the new 99 Cent Only anchor façade. 2) Added stone to the base of over 25 columns, again mirroring the anchor store. 3) Re-designed the landscape with "Texas-Hill Country" in mind adding lush green turf, native grasses, Desert Willows, Sage, stone accents and expanded color beds, lending the center a fresh, open and more inviting drive-up appeal. , "'\ Rufe Snow Village Sign Review Board Application - November 2005 Page Four . 4) Added individual tenant signs under the canopies to improve business visibility from t11e sidewalk. 5) Established a higher standard of sign criteria for the tenant message area on the pylon: white panel backgrounds, limited letter colors to black or blue, logos are the only splash of color; thus unifying appearance and ensuring readability while retaining the tenant's unique identity. 6) Added white lights around building perimeter and pole wreaths for the holiday season - eliminated painted window murals in former years. 7) Replacing wooden trashcans and benches with an attractive, durable commercial grade, powder-coated metal product. 8) Improving the center's pylon sign as proposed. The newest tenants are anxiously awaiting the outcome of the sign hearing. 9) Considering exterior lighting upgrades to parking lot and canopy fixtures. Tl1e center was proud to host a cooperative economic real estate forum in November for the cities of North Richland Hills, Richland Hills and Watauga to assist the growth and restoration of this area. Please support this owner's effort to make this retail center one that residents, business owners and city leaders of North Richland Hills can be proud to call their own. . . , lr. iLL m ~I ŒZ ~ \ \\ \ \ \ \~ \$) ..a WZ Qt>Z nz (f\\\\\\\\\\) ~ ~ ~ ëE 0 ~ g ~ 0 z ! (/) w U- ::::¡ ~ a:: ~ ~ .II jr: ~ 4~ '" 0tH-0 GtHtHJ GtHtHJ ~ ovo~ VCJnVltfM --- :i c J ~~-i:1~-:: S;~~~2" :~~E~!~ ~e-:~ø~~ : ¡~ &.. ~ ~: J!.. 2"acs~ ".s;," ..:.. L..J:..-a." U [~;~-'; ~l ~:;.,J~~.. -c..dax >. i-ð:&......ð5 ~~~~~5:~ ~~2~5S2.. ~øa.a¡: ..~ ":g.c~~¥~ OØJ:~u.Bwì ;~~g ð ~g~ ; i:; " :.:~ ~ t ~:s O~ ~ ~ J:a .!!. L ,,'" c 0' £: a ~ ~"ð~~~:~ :i£E1i.-'ø~ @~ ©Va (S@CJ ~I ~'7 3i ~J iI @. là: ~:I If W~ IL.IL. æ @i] ~ æ 2J€ ~:i z c( ~ a.. <:.:) z V5 c( W ....J W ~ « ....J ....J 5 === o z (J) lJ..J ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~~ g~ .a ... C/) 0 0 w 0 \.iJ U In CD 0 r---4 W > I- M 5 U1 ~ 0\ W V'J , ~ v') ru >- w~~ f- --1 ::)1J)l..... Zr" <1: W W ~V'Jo ~ «0 WX(T' r a: .....JWo I a..1-1 0 «vî~ U :1:«()\ Z (\J.....J, UJ o...Jv -«- I U í"'1 ~ (\J I I . . . 15 Jlf II . r I ~71d-/r sX/STIII' 611iN ß4sE- I ¡ ;;,1 ~ , ~- L... <..) ,2...<...; et t Á L...; " Vl '~Alu'1~{2 tJ ~ ~~ LfI.~' 3~ ~ T¡)J..~Li;'A s.s · ~ \ ¡L~..:z, S~t tt,~ D l À. tJ Tvtf ~ tZ.A~S ¡;¿~I ~ 3(; IS- if \ \ 1 +r If ., I l/-¿i' ~ ~ Co rf ----- ,t I .-J-- ---- -----~ rf--' "Z '~ _'., ~¡ "\¡/, _.- ~' --- ·0\,"-. \ ~:~ - ~.':~, 1.' l''';/~_ ~ '-.J"'~~. ,I f I' I N kJ i.....'\jl.j ~ -tVw ~f) ~ D -TE.XAS SASE- ~ C .:'; Lc,,~ t p <. -l .<::::. \ v" Id * '}j¡,1lVE ~ ~5<_:> @ e 0<:.: l. ~ NIJT1Õ S c/!rt.£ .-'4 ! [~ . Department: Public Works CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Approve Advance FundinQ AQreement with the Texas Department of Transportation for Traffic Signal Installation on Mid-Cities Boulevard Adjacent to Home Town - Resolution No. 2005-094 GN 2005-127 Agenda Number: The North Central Council of Governments (NCTCOG) had a sustainable development "call for projects" in 2001. This call for projects was specifically for infrastructure improvements adjacent to and/or within mixed-use developments such as Home Town. After several meetings with Arcadia (Home Town developer), it was decided that the City would submit a new project consisting of a traffic signal on Mid-Cities Boulevard at the main entrance into Home Town. That project met the requirements for the call for projects and was awarded the funding grant. The attached Local Transportation Project Advance Funding Agreement (L TPAFA) was received on November 14, 2005. The L TPAFA is TxDOT's standard agreement which is used for all TxDOT funded projects. The agreement outlines the responsibilities of each party. A summary of the key components of the agreement is shown below: · The City will be responsible for providing engineering services. The design will need to be reviewed and approved by the State. · Right-of-Way (ROW) shall be the responsibility of the City. (Note: A limited amount of ROW may be necessary for the proper location of the signal poles and the traffic controller box.) · Adjustments of utilities shall be the responsibility of the City. · An Environmental Assessment and any corresponding Mitigation shall be the responsibility of the City. (Note: An Environmental Assessment is not anticipated for this project.) · The maximum grant available per this agreement is $120,000 for construction and $19,200 for direct State costs (plan review, inspection and oversight). The City will be responsible for the local match ($30,000) and all cost overruns, unless this agreement is amended. · The City is required to pay $4,800 to TxDOT with approval by Council of this agreement. The $4,800 represents the local contribution for TxDOT review of the Preliminary Engineering. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number ST0403 Sufficient Funds Ävallacle nil ~L r C~-t~- Department Head Signature Finance Director Page 1 of _ I '.... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS One issue has developed regarding this project which requires further explanation. The main entrance for Home Town from Mid-Cities Boulevard has been changed by Arcadia since the City applied for the sustainable development grant. Originally the Mid-Cities main entrance was at Winter Park Drive/Amundson Drive. A few years later Arcadia revised the Home Town Thoroughfare Plan and relocated the main Mid-Cities Boulevard entrance approximately 800 feet east to the new Parker Boulevard (which is not currently constructed). Staff reflected this new main Mid-Cities Boulevard entrance in the 2005- 2006 Capital Projects Budget; however, the new location has not been changed on the agreement (L TPAFA). Because of the short turn around time that NCTCOG is providing the cities to execute the L TPAFA, staff did not have time to have TxDOT change the location on the L TPAFA. NCTCOG is requiring the L TPAFA be executed before January 20, 2006 or the grant funds will expire. In past dealings with TxDOT, making a change to the L TPAFA (no matter how minor) takes several months. In addition, NCTCOG did not provide any of the participating cities advance notice about the expiration of the grant on January 20, 2006. Staff found out about the grant deadline in November 2005 and received written notice from NCTCOG a few weeks later. Sufficient local match funds were approved in the 2005-2006 Capital Projects Budget. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005-094. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page _of_ . . . RESOLUTION NO. 2005-094 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has previously submitted funding requests for a traffic signal to be located on Mid-Cities Boulevard at Winter Park Drive and the North Central Texas Council of Governments has announced a January 20, 2006 deadline for submission of an Advance Funding Agreement for such traffic Signal and WHEREAS, the City intends to request and justify an amendment to such contract and funding request to relocate such traffic signal, but plans for such amendment have not been completed; and WHEREAS, execution of the Advance Funding Agreement will not preclude the relocation of such traffic signal, but failure to execute such agreement will make the City ineligible for funding of such traffic signal; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation for a traffic signal to be located on Mid-Cities Boulevard at Winter Park Drive. Section 2: The approval of this agreement shall not be deemed an approval of such location for such traffic signal and the City Manager is directed to prepare necessary plans and submission for an amendment to relocate such traffic signal on Mid-Cities Boulevard at a location which will better serve the residents of the City. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED on the 12th day of December 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor Resolution No. 2005-094 Page 1 of 2 . ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ~J' "'~iÞ MI e Curtis,ublic Works Director . . Resolution No. 2005-094 Page 2 of 2 13 Jul Ob 10:55 GIS_0527 S_Signalization-Midcities at Parker.mxd . ì 8ÐFTCR 0 fJ OIJ RC ~ GLcrJdrJfJ OR ¡ ~ (þ I H- ~ ::.::: U o cr: ¿ < t I~ t; . a::: o ctZ cp« :t~ ~~ Scale: 1" = 800' \ i \ ¡ ~ ~ I i -r ~ \ m ceD TON CT MARTIN rnR M\D C\TIES B ~<v f:)~ ~~ " Signalization (Mid-Cities Blvd. @ Parker Blvd.) Signalization UJ (Mid-Cities Blvd. @ Parker Blvd.) N w E s N€~RTH RICHLAND HILLS Project Locator Map Information Services Department - GtE CSJ: 0902-48-661 Project Name: Traffic Signal Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark . STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § Funding Category: CMAQ LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT For an Traffic Signal Installation Project (Off State System) THIS Local Project Advance Funding Agreement (LPAFA) is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "State", and the City of North Richland Hills, acting by and through its duly authorized officials, hereinafter called the "Local Government." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, a Master Agreement between the Local Government and the State has been adopted and states the general terms and conditions for transportation projects developed through this LPAFA; and, WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Commission passed Minute Order 107737 that provides for the development of, and funding for, the project describe herein; and, WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Government has approved entering into this LPAFA by . resolution or ordinance dated , which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Attachment A for development of the specific project which is identified in the location map shown as Attachment B. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1. The period of this LPAFA is as stated in the Master Agreement, without exception. 2. Termination of this LPAFA shall be under the conditions as stated in the Master Agreement, without exception. 3. Amendments to this LPAFA shall be made as described in the Master Agreement, without exception. . 4. Scope of Work. The scope of work for this LPAFA is described as the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark located at North Richland Hills Home Town. 5. Right of Way and Real Property shall be the responsibility of the Local Government, as stated in the Master Agreement, without exception. 6. Adjustment of utilities will be provided by the Local Government as required and as stated in the Master Agreement without exception. AFA-LPAFA_OffSys Page 1 of 7 Revised 10/19/05 CSJ: 0902-48-661 Project Name: Traffic Signal Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark 7. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation will be carried out as stated in the Master Agreement, . without exception. 8. Compliance with Texas Accessibility Standards and ADA will be as stated in the Master Agreement, without exception. 9. Architectural and Engineering Services will be provided by the Local Government. The Local Government is responsible for performance of any required architectural or preliminary engineering work. The State will review and comment on the work as required to accomplish the public purposes of the State. The Local Government will cooperate fully with the State in accomplishing these local public purposes to the degree permitted by State and Federal law. 10. Construction Responsibilities will be carried out by the State, as stated in the Master Agreement, without exception. 11. Project Maintenance will be undertaken as provided for in the Master Agreement, without exception. . . 12. Local Project Sources and Uses of Funds a. Project Cost Estimate: A Project Cost Estimate is provided in Attachment C. Any work done prior to federal authorization will not be eligible for reimbursement. It is the Local Government's responsibility to verify with the State that the Federal Letter of Authority has been issued for the work covered by this Agreement. b. A Source of Funds estimate is also provided in Attachment C. Attachment C shows the percentage and absolute dollar amount to be contributed to the project by federal, state, and local sources. c. The Local Government is responsible for all non-federal and non-state funding, including all project cost overruns, unless provided for through amendment of this agreement. d. After execution of this LPAFA, but prior to the performance of any work by the State, the Local Government will remit a check or warrant made payable to the "T exas Department of Transportation II in the amount specified in Attachment C as the local contribution for Preliminary Engineering. The Local Government will pay at a minimum its funding share for this estimated cost of preliminary engineering as stated in the Local Project Sources and Uses of Funds provision of the Master Agreement. e. Sixty (60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids, the Local Government shall remit its remaining financial share for the State's estimated construction oversight and construction costs and any others costs owing. f. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the Local Government at any time during the development of the Project, the State will notify the Local Government in writing. The Local Government will make payment to the State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's written notification. g. If any existing or future local ordinances, commissioners court orders, rules, policies, or other directives, including but not limited to outdoor advertising billboards and storm water drainage facility requirements, are more restrictive than State or Federal Regulations, or if any other locally proposed changes, including but not limited to plats or replats, result in increased costs, then any increased costs associated with the ordinances or changes will be paid by the local government. The cost of providing right of way acquired by the State shall mean the total expenses in acquiring the property interests either through negotiations or eminent domain proceedings, including but not limited to expenses related to relocation, removal, and adjustment of eligible utilities. AF A-LP AF Ä_ OffSys Page 2 of 7 Revised 1 0/19/05 CSJ: 0902-48-661 Project Name: Traffic Signal Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark . h. The state auditor may conduct an audit or investigation of any entity receiving funds from the state directly under the contract or indirectly through a subcontract under the contract. Acceptance of funds directly under the contract or indirectly through a subcontract under this contract acts as acceptance of the authority of the state auditor, under the direction of the legislative audit committee, to conduct an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. An entity that is the subject of an audit or investigation must provide the state auditor with access to any information the state auditor considers relevant to the investigation or audit. 13. Document and Information Exchange. The Local Government agrees to electronically deliver to the State all general notes, specifications, contract provision requirements and related documentation in a Microsoft® Word or similar document. If requested by the State, the Local Government will use the State's document template. The Local Government shall also provide a detailed construction time estimate including types of activities and month in the format required by the State. This requirement applies whether the Local Government creates the documents with its own forces or by hiring a consultant or professional provider. . 14. Incorporation of Master Agreement Provisions. This LPAFA incorporates all of the governing provisions of the Master Advance Funding Agreement (MAFA) in effect on the date of final execution of this LPAFA, unless such MAFA provision is specifically excepted herein. 15. Insurance. If this agreement authorizes the Local Government or its contractor to perform any work on State right of way, before beginning work the entity performing the work shall provide the State with a fully executed copy of the State's Form 1560 Certificate of Insurance verifying the existence of coverage in the amounts and types specified on the Certificate of Insurance for all persons and entities working on State right of way. This coverage shall be maintained until all work on the State right of way is complete. If coverage is not maintained, all work on State right of way shall cease immediately, and the State may recover damages and all costs of completing the work. 16. Signatory Warranty. The signatories to this agreement warrant that each has the authority to enter into this agreement on behalf of the party represented. IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate counterparts. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT By: (Signature) Title: Date: . AFA-LPAFA_OffSys Page 3 of 7 Revised 10/19/05 CSJ: 0902-48-661 Project Name: Traffic Signa/Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark eTHE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission for the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission. By: Janice Mullenix Director of Contract Services Section Office of General Counsel Texas Department of Transportation Date: e e AFA-LPAFA_OffSys Page 4 of 7 Revised 10/19/05 CSJ: 0902-48-661 Project Name: Traffic Signal Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark . ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT APPROVING THIS LPAFA . . AF A-LP AF A_ OffSys Page 5 of 7 Revised 10/19/05 . ATTACHMENT B PROJECT LOCATION MAP . . AF A-LP AF A _ OffSys Page 6 of 7 CSJ: 0902-48-661 Project Name: Traffic Signal Installation at Mid-Cities Boulevard and Winterpark Revised 10/19/05 . ~ Io- m CL. 10- (l) ~ ~ "'C c:: m "'C Io- m > (l) "S o aJ fJ) Æ G I "'C ~ ro c: .Q I§ ro êñ E . ro c: C) ü5 c.,) ~ ~ co (0 10- (Ot- r.IJ .. ~ (1) I E N co ~Z 0-'" c.,) .. (1) J .~ (f) 0 üC: . () I-- Z w :E J: (.) e:( l- I-- e:( U) o z ::> u.. u.. o w Ü ~ ::> o U) o z « w t- « ~ t- Cf) W t- LLJ <.9 o ::> CO t- Ü W J o c:: a.. L(') o Õ3 ~ '- o "C Q) C/) 'S; Q) a:: II ... t: C» E t: I- (I) > o C) - ra CJ o ..J Q) J: ... E o I- .... -c Q) l- .- "- '+- o "- Q) C> ro D.. ::1 cr Q) l- t: o .. ftS c.. .- u ; l- ra c.. - ca ... o ~ CJj >. (/) ::t= o «I LL « CL ..J I « u... « CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Support Services Council Meeting Date: 12/12/2005 Subject: Approval of Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy - Resolution No. Agenda Number: GN 2005-128 2005-095 Government public activity fleets may soon be eligible for funding assistance through the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Regional Transportation Council Clean Fleet Vehicle Program. On October 13, 2005 the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) took action on a Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy and Model Resolution for government entities to adopt. Adoption of this model resolution is voluntary, but funding incentives and procurement assistance will be tied to the adoption of the model resolution. The policy and model resolution have been developed for entities located in the Dallas/Fort Worth area because the region is in a federally designated non-attainment area for the pollutant ozone. The Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy addresses ways public fleets can have an air quality conscious fleet through vehicle acquisitions, maintenance, operations, and compliance verification. To assist local entities, the NCTCOG will be hosting workshops, meetings, and clean vehicle fairs to take the model resolution, vehicle technology and fuel information out to impacted fleets in the region. Examples of what the policy addresses are guidelines on the amount of emissions allowed for newly acquired vehicles, idling and maintenance guidelines as well as compliance verification to be provided to the NCTCOG. The City of North Richland Hills is already in compliance with several articles of the Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy and staff will be making additional changes and conducting training as needed to be in compliance as information becomes available from the NCTCOG. No additional expense to the City is anticipated at this time for meeting compliance. Recommendation: Approve the Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy - Resolution 2005-095. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other /2:i; 4ALJ Department Head Signature Account Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director · -- , RESOLUTION NO. 2005-095 Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council, comprised primarily of local elected officials, is the regional transportation policy body associated with the North Central Texas Council of Governm~nts, and has been and continues to be a forum for cooperative decisions on transportation; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council supports the adoption and implementation of a Glean Fleet Vehicle Policy by the City of North Richland Hills which was resolved on October 13, 2005; and, WHEREAS, the Dallas-Fort Worth area is a federally designated non-attainment area for the pollutant ozone and air quality impacts the public health of the entire region; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council is responsible for air quality conformity; and the Clean Air Ac~ Amendments of 1990 require that- in air quality non-attainment areas transportation plans and improvement programs conform to the applicable air quality implementation plan; and, WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills wants to set achievable goals and provide workable, cost effective solutions to improve the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area air, and implement those measures as soon as practicable to improve air quality; and, WHEREAS, approximately fifty percent of the nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in the Dallas-Fort Worth non-attainment area come from on-road vehicles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED: Section 1. Acquisition 1.1 Vehicle acquisitions for fleet expansion or replacement of model year 2004 or newer, shall be newest model year or engine standard only. 1.2 Vehicle acquisitions to replace model year 2003 or older vehicles must show at least a 25% reduction in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions rate compared to the vehicle being replaced. (Waivers are possible when new technologies or achievements of the required emission reduction are not possible.) 1.3 Aftermarket technologies and conversions are acceptable for fleet expansion and fleet replacements. t e . Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. 1.3.1 Aftermarket technologies and conversions must be Environment Protection Agency (EPA) and/or CARS verified or certified or technology equivalent or better, as determined by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) staff. 1.3.2 Conversions must comply with the provisions of EPA Memorandum 1A and Addendum Revision (June 25, 1974 and June 1, 1998). Operations 2.1 Vehicle idling is allowed only for safety, emergency response, vehicle maintenance, equipment activity, warm-up/operations in cold temperature, and manufacturer recommended minimum idle/warm-up times. 2.2 Vehicles with the lowest NOx emiSSIons that are capable of performing the required operational demands shall drive the most miles. 2.3 Fleet manager shall abide by latest refueling time/season guidance published by NCTCOG Air Quality Planning. 2.4 Non-emergency vehicles shall drive no more than the posted speed limit and avoid rapid acceleration. 2.5 All drivers shall be trained on air quality appropriate operational requirements. Maintenance 3.1 Perform annual emission and safety inspections for all vehicles, even for vehicles with no state mandated inspection requirement. 3.2 All vehicles with over 100,000 miles must have emission inspections every 25,000 miles thereafter. 3.3 Perform manufacturer's recommended maintenance. 3.4 Mandatory participation in any diesel or other Texas Commission on Environmental Quality or NCTCOG inspection/maintenance program, including applicable test or pilot programs. Compliance Verification 4.1 Public sector entity shall provide NCTCOG with an annual electronic update of fleet size and activity in a format established by NCTCOG. t 4.2 The City of North Richland Hills acknowledges that entities not adopting and complying with the Clean Fleet Vehicle Policy and/or reporting requirements will not be eligible for future clean vehicle funding and RTC may assess the City of North Richland Hills compliance when considering other RTC funding actions. Section 5. This resolution shall be in effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of December, 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor ATTEST: . Patricia Hutson, City Secretary , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ~lMá~ f2/£ Thomas Powell, Support Services Director ,; CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Municipal Court Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Approve OrqiD_~_Dce Creating Position of Juvenile Case" Agenda Number: GN 2005-129 Manager and Juvenile Case Manager Fund - Ordinance No. 2868 I - The 2005 Legislature passed into law the ability for Municipalities to adopt an optional fee of $5.00 to be added to all citations for the purpose of paying the salary and benefits of a Juvenile Case Manager. Resolution 2004-005 approved on January 25, 2004 by City Council approved the appointment of a Juvenile Case Manager for the North Richland Hills Municipal Court. A city ordinance must be adopted to allow the collection of this fee and to establish the Juvenile Case Manager Fund. The fund is a restricted use fund that can only be used to pay the salary and benefits of the designated Juvenile Case Manager. The attached ordinance amends Chapter 58 of the North Richland Hills Code. of Ordinances by adding Sec. 58-114 which outlines the allowances by law for the use of these funds, the violations to which the fee can be attached, and who will be administering this fund. This ordinance would go into effect January 1, 2006 or a date of effectiveness set by City Council. These funds would provide relief to the General Fund where the Juvenile Case Manager is currently funded. RECOMMENDATION: To adopt Ordinance No. 2868 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Ävallacle . ~'VO k:~~ Finance Director ~ ì'Ü.IÞ1Ú/ d ~ Department Heacœlgnature Paae 1 of . 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 . 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 . ORDINANCE NO. 2868 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 58 OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES; AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF A JUVENILE CASE MANAGER;.CREATING A JUVENILE CASE MANAGER FUND AND REQUIRING DEFENDANTS CONVICTED OF AN OFFENSE IN A MUNICIP AL COURT TO PAY A JUVENILE CASE MANAGER FEE OF FIVE DOLLARS ($5.00). WHEREAS, Article 45.056, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure authorizes cities on approval of the city council to employ a case manager to provide services in cases involving juvenile offenders; and, WHEREAS, Article 102.0174, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure authorizes municipalities to by ordinance create a juvenile case manager fund and require defendants convicted of a misdemeanor to pay a juvenile case manager a fee not to exceed $5.00 as a court cost; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT Chapter 58 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adding a new Sec. 58-114 which shall read as follows: "Sec. 58-114. Juvenile case manager; juvenile case manager fund; juvenile case manager court cost. (a) The employment of a juvenile case manager is hereby authorized to provide services in cases involving juvenile offenders. (b) A juvenile case manager fund is hereby created. Each defendant convicted of a fine only misdemeanor in the municipal court is required to pay a juvenile case manager fee of $5.00 as a cost of court. The municipal judge is authorized to waive the fee in a case of financial hardship. A defendant is considered convicted if: (1) (2) a sentence is imposed on the defendant; the defendant receives deferred proceedings under Article 45.052 or 45.053, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. (c) The clerk of the municipal court shall collect the costs and pay them to the finance director for deposit in the fund. Ordinance No. 2868 Page 1 of2 (k\ 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 f4\! 26 28 30 32 34 36 ,~ (d) The fund established hereunder shall be used only to finance the salary and benefits of a juvenile case manager employed pursuant to this Section and shall be administered under the direction of the city council." AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. Passed and approved this 12th day of December, 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Debbie Durko, Municipal Court Clerk Ordinance No. 2868 Page 2 of2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Approve Contract with Birdville Independent School Agenda Number: GN 2005-131 District for School Resource Officer Program - Resolution No. 2005-096 The City of North Richland Hills provides- School Resource Officers (SRO's) for the security and well being of students at several Birdville Independent School District (BISD) schools located within the City. The five schools are Birdville High School, Richland High School, North Ridge Middle School, North Richland Middle School and Smithfield Middle School. BISD has paid 50% of the SRO program costs for this past school year and has agreed to participate in funding the five SRO's that are located in these schools for 2005-06. The City agrees to place one officer at each school site every school day during the school year. BISD agrees to reimburse the City 50% of personnel, benefits costs, and some of the other operating costs of the program incurred by the City. The estimated maximum to be reimbursed is $159,167. However, this amount is likely to be reduced by $8,000 - $10,000 as the school district plans to closely monitor their requests for overtime for SRO's for special events. If they are successful, this amount could be reduced and not impact the SRO program at all. The term of this agreement is for the 2005-2006 school year and will continue each school year thereafter unless terminated by either party. Attached to this cover sheet is a copy of the contract as well as a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract for the City of North Richland Hills. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2005-096. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Available: Budget Director ~ ¿~ ~ßljd~' De ment Head Si nature Page 1 of -L e Resolution No. 2005-096 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1 . The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached contract for School Resource Officer Shared Services Agreement with Birdville Independent School District for reimbursement of 50% of the personnel and associated costs of five School Resource Officers for the 2005-2006 school year. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of December 2005. APPROVED: e Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Jimmy Perdue, Chief of Police e e e e SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT between the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS and BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT For and in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and agreements contained herein, ~orth Richland Hills, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the Birdville Independent School District, hereinafter referred to as "District," agree as follows: 1 . District and City agree that five (5) police officers ("School Resource Officers") will be assigned to t.he following schools located within the City: Birdville High School, Richland High School, Northridge Middle School, North Richland Middle School, and Smithfield Middle School. The City agrees to place one officer at each school site every school day during the school year. District agrees to reimburse the City 50% of personnel and benefits costs incurred by the City for each officer for the school year to assist in the personnel costs incurred by the City in this project, not to exceed $159, 167 for the 2005-2006 school year. The District will provide an office for each School Resource Officer with a computer work station. The City will invoice the District twice during the school year, in December and May, for such reimbursement and the District will remit such amount promptly. Payments for the above described governmental service must be made from current revenues available to the school district. 2. The term of this agreement is for the 2005-2006 school year and will continue each school year thereafter unless terminated by either party. Each party agrees to give at least 60 days notice if it does not wish to continue this agreement the following school year. 3. It is understood and agreed that this agreement may be terminated by either party when such termination is determined by its governing body to be in its best interest. Notice of such termination will be sent to the other party promptly after such action of the governing body. In the event of termination the District will be given a final invoice for reimbursement to the City for the pro-rated costs and the District agrees to remit such amount within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. 4. School Resource Officer Agreement Page 1 of 3 e e e All school resource officers furnished by the City will be employees of the City and will at all times be subject to the supervision and control of the City's Chief of Police and shall be responsible to the Chief of Police. However, the officers shall work closely with the principal of the school to which he/she is assigned. The SRO's Police Department supervisors will periodically confer with campus administrators to discuss the performance of the SRO assigned to their respective schools. Such officers shall have the school to which he/she is ass!gned as his/her primary duty assignment and will not be assigned additional police duties during regularly scheduled school hours. The City reserves the right, however, to reassign those officers temporarily in the event of an emergency or urgent police need as determined by the Chief of Police. City shall provide all law enforcement training and certification, vehicles, and police equipment, benefits, and insurance (including liability coverage) provided to all officers employed by City. The District shall provide any radio equipment necessary to allow the assigned officer to communicate with school staff. City will coordinate assignments and duty hours with District. Should it become necessary for the Chief of Police to remove or reassign a SRO, the police department will confer with the affected school principal to determine unique or important qualifications desired in the replacement officer prior to the selection of the new SRO. 5. City agrees to waive, release, indemnify, and hold harmless the District from any and all claims, damages, injuries, causes of action, or lawsuits arising out of the acts or omissions of the assigned officers. When acting as a commissioned peace officer for District, the officers jurisdiction shall include, in addition to this jurisdiction as a North Richland Hills Police Officer, all territory within the boundaries of the District that is within the city limits of North Richland Hills and all property, real and personal, outside the boundaries of District that is within North Richland Hills city limits and owned, leased, or rented by or otherwise under the control of District and its Board of Trustees. 6. District and City, in the execution, performance or attempted performance of this agreement, will not discriminate against any person or persons because of sex, race, religion, color or national origin, or age except on the basis of a bona fide occupational qualification, retirement plan or statutory requirement. 7. City and District agree that in the event either party fails to comply with any provision of this agreement, the non-defaulting party will give written notice to the other party promptly upon learning of such failure. If the defaulting party School Resource Officer Agreement Page 2 of 3 e e e fails to cure the default within 15 days, the non-defaulting may terminate this agreement. 8. The provisions of this agreement are severable and if for any reason a clause, sentence, paragraph or other part of this agreement shall be determined to be invalid by a court, federal or state agency, board or commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter thereof, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions which can be given effect without the invalid provision. 9. This written instrument constitutes the entire agreement by the parties hereto concerning the work and services to be performed hereunder, and any . other oral or written agreement which purports to vary from the terms hereof shall be void. 10. The governing bodies of City and District have approved the execution of this agreement, and the persons signing the agreement have been duly authorized by the governing bodies of City' and District to sign this agreement. City of North Richland Hills Birdville Independent School District By Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager By Dr. Stephen Waddell, Superintendent Attest: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary Approved as to Form and Legality: Approved as to Form and Legality By George Staples, City Attorney By BISD General Counsel Date: Date: School Resource Officer Agreement Page 3 of 3 NRH _TY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Office of the City Manager May 31, 2005 Stephen Waddell, Ed.D. Superintendent Birdville Independent School District 6125 East Belknap Haltom City, Texas 76117 Dear Dr. Waddell: e This current fiscal year is the first year that Birdville Independent School District has contributed toward the funding of our School Resource Officers (SROs) that are provided in the B.I.S.D. for North Richland Hills schools. The City of North Richland Hills is again requesting that 8.I.S.D. pay for part of the SROs in the same manner for the 2005/06 fiscal year. The City of North Richland Hills provides 5 SRO's - 3 in middle schools and 2 in high schools. The SRO program will cost the City of North Richland Hills approximately $382,000 in salary, benefits and training. We request that 8.I.S.D. contribute $159,167. This is 50% of the costs of the SRO's for a ten month period. We have calculated the estimated costs of the SRO's using the same methodology as was used in the current fiscal year. Attached is a spreadsheet of the calculations. We are pleased that 8.I.S.D. has shared in the cost of the SRO program in the current fiscal year and hope that you will continue to do so. Thank you for consideration of this request. Sincerely, LarryJ. unningham City Manager Attachment e CML 2005-040 7':.~n ¡\!('jrtn;:;.~·C''¡ f\_'_~', f~")r', .¡ r·-:-:-_.~0-:-_;.;nn"",... =1, \' c.·~- ftr-; ~(I"¡L: ::--. ':-. 80> G2060S: ~\!C "iT~ t=~:cn¡¿qï( H ~!!~ ! exa~: ' ?C oj 8~'-D60S! e BISD SRO COSTS 2004-2005 School Year 2005-2006 Schoof Year Annual Annual Total Annual Annual Total Base Pay Benefits Cost Base Pay Benefits Cost SRO #1 $52, 140 $16,336 $68,476 SRO #1 . $49,606 $16,949 . $66,555 SRO #2 $52, 140 $14,790 $66,930 SRO #2 $53,897 $18,826 $72,723 SRO #3 $52,140 $15,908 $68,048 SRO #3 $53,897 $20,143 $74,040 SRO #4 $50,739 $16,306 $67,045 SRO #4 $53,897 $20,747 $74,644 SRO #5 $52,140 $14,188 $66,328 SRO #5 $'53,897 $17,655 $71,552 $259,299 $77,528 $336,827 $265,194 $94,320 $359,514 Overtime $11,620 Overtime· $11,620 Su P pi ieslT rain ing/Clothing $10,537 Suppl iesfT rain ing/Cloth ing $10,537 Estimated Total Costs $358,984 Estimated Total Costs $381,671 Rounded $359,000 Rounded $382,000 e 500/0 $179,500 500/0 $191,000 During School Year (10 months) $149,583 During School Year (10 months) $159,167 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City ManaQer's Office Council Meeting Date 12/12/ 2005 Subject: Appoint Members to the Youth Advisory Committee Agenda Number: GN 2005-132 The Youth Advisory Committee By-laws specify that 10 members are to be appointed for a two-year term and 6 members are to be appointed for a one-year term for a total of 16 members. The Youth Advisory Committee is recommending appointment of the following committee members: · Collin Brewer, Birdville High School, 2 year term · Kenzie Brewer, Birdville High School, 2 year term · Sam Buckner, Fort Worth Christian, 2 year term · Justin Durko, Richland High School, 2 year term · Abby Work, Richland High School, 2 year term · Shruti Desai, Richland High School, 1 year term · Mary Ferguson, Richland High School, 1 year term · Bridget Ugoletti, Richland High School, 1 year term ..~ These new appointments are in accordance with the Youth Advisory Committee By-laws. Recommendation: Approve the Youth Advisory Committee's recommendations for the new committee members. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Ävallaole Finance Director P~np 1 nf 1 .,.. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Council Meeting Date: 12/12/05 Subject: Award of Professional Services AQreement with Halff Agenda Number: PU 2005-052 Associates, Inc. in the amount of $88,500 for the Update to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan - Resolution No. 2005-097 As part of the FY 2005/06 Parks Capital Projects Budget, the City Council approved a capital project for the update to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan to continue to provide a framework for orderly and consistent planning and development of the park system. The update to the plan will establish priorities through an extensive community based needs analysis and public input addressing parks, trails, open space, recreation programs and facilities. The plan will encompass a wide range of services including: · Inventory of existing parks and recreation facilities · Collection of data on recreation programs · Interview with key stakeholders · Evaluate standards for the Parks Master Plan · Recreation facilities review · Cost estimates for key components of the plan · Implementation Plan · City Beautification Master Plan (main entries into city and trail heads) · Trails Master Plan Update and Review · Citizen input including telephone survey, public meeting and work session · Preparation of three Concept Master Plans (Cross Timbers Park, Little Bear Creek park land, and redevelopment of Northfield Park) Staff recently advertised and solicited proposals for professional services. Seven (7) proposals were received from the following: Halff Associates, Inc. Pros Consulting HOK Planning Group Dunkin, Sims and Stoffels, Inc. GreenPlay CEHP Incorporated Bucher, Willis and Ratliff Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ¡)~ 4tã / ~j- Depa ent Head ßign'ature Account Number 125-8510-604.79-01 s tilable PK0506 Budget Director Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The proposals were reviewed and evaluated based on the following criteria: Experience of the Firm Quality of Previous Work Past Record with the City Financial Stability Qualifications of the Project Manager Management Approach A selection committee, with committee members being Mark Haynes, Park Board Chairman, Richard Torres, Assistant City Manger, Vickie Loftice, Parks and Recreation Director, JoAnn Stout, Neighborhood Services Director and Greg Van Nieuwenhuize, Assistant Public Works Director reviewed the proposals and selected three (3) firms to interview in accordance with the professional services procurement policy. The selection committee conducted interviews with Halff Associates, Pros Consulting and HOK Planning Group on October 12th, and after a thorough evaluation, selected Halff Associates, Inc. to provide the professional services for this project. The attached agreement for professional services was negotiated to a total amount of $88,500. The current year capital budget includes $125,000 for this project. Halff Associates, Inc. is a Metroplex based firm that has prepared 18 citywide master plans, four regional park plans, and multiple citywide trail plans, and has been a part of many other large scale regional and citywide recreation planning efforts, including the City of Mansfield, City of Odessa, City of Rowlett, City of Hurst, City of Corpus Christi and the City of McAllen. George Staples, the Attorney for the City has reviewed the contract. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005-097 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 . . . RESOLUTION No. 2005-097 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS: Section1: THAT the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract with Halff Associates, Inc. for the professional services for the update to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, as the act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 12th day of December 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Odi llta Vickie Loftice, Director of Parks and Recreation . North Richland Hills Parks and Open Space Master Plan Standard Terms and Conditions I. SCOPE Halff Associates, Inc. (hereinafter "Engineer") agrees to perform the services described in the attached Scope of Services, Attachment 'A', which incorporates these terms and conditions. Unless modified in writing by the parties hereto, the duties of Halff shall not be construed to exceed those services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. The Scope of Services and these General Terms and Conditions, when executed by City of NORTH RICH lAND HillS (hereinafter "Client"), shall constitute a binding Agreement on both parties. It is understood and agreed by the parties that receipt of payment(s) by Engineer from Client is in no way contingent upon Client's receipt of payment, funding, reimbursement or any other remuneration from others. . II. COMPENSATION Planning Services as described in Attachment 'A' will be provided by Halff Associates, Inc. for the maximum Base Fee of $50,000.00 and an Additional Services Fee of $38,500.00 for a total Lump Sum Fee of $88.500.00. Client agrees to pay monthly invoices or their undisputed portions within 30 days of receipt. Payment later than 30 days shall include interest at 1- 1/2 percent per month or lesser maximum enforceable interest rate, from the date the Client received the invoice until the date Engineer receives payment. Such interest is due and payable when the overdue payment is made. Time-related charges will be billed as specified in the proposal. Direct expenses will be billed at actual cost. Subcontracted services will be billed at actual cost plus a service charge of 10 percent. III. RESPONSIBiliTY Engineer is employed to render a professional service only, and any payments made by Client are compensation solely for such services rendered and recommendations made in carrying out the work. Engineer shall follow the standard practices of the engineering profession to make findings, provide opinions, make factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations. . In performing professional services, Engineer shall act as agent of Client. Engineer's review or supervision of work prepared or performed by other individuals or firms employed by Client shall not relieve those individuals or firms of complete responsibility for the adequacy of their work. It is understood that any resident engineering or inspection provided by Engineer is for the purpose of determining compliance with the technical provisions of the project specifications and does not constitute any form of guarantee or insurance with respect to the performance of a contractor. Engineer does not assume responsibility for methods or appliances used by a contractor, for safety of construction work, or for compliance by contractors with laws and regulations. IV. SCOPE OF CLIENT SERVICES Client agrees to provide site access, and to provide those services described in the attached Scope of Work. V. INDEMNIFICATION Engineer agrees to indemnify and hold Client harmless from any actual damage, liability or costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and expense to the extent caused directly by, a negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Engineer in the performance of professional services hereunder and that of his or her subconsultants or anyone from whom the Engineer is legally liable. In the event that Client is found to be concurrently negligent, Engineer shall not indemnify for the proportionate negligence of Client, but shall indemnify for the portion of negligence solely attributable to Engineer, its agents, servants, employees, and subcontractors of any tier, their agents, servants and employees. Neither party shall be liable to the other for incidental or consequential damages, whether or not the possibility of such damages has been disclosed or could have been reasonably foreseen. The parties shall indemnify one another against damages of third parties recoverable from the indemnitee to the extent caused by the comparative negligence of the indemnitor. Such negligence shall be measured by standards in effect at the time services are rendered, not by later standards. All legal actions by either party against the other arising out of or in any way connected with the services to be performed hereunder shall be barred and under no circumstances shall any such claim be initiated by either party after three (3) years have passed from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion, unless the Engineer's services shall be terminated earlier, in which case the date of termination of this Agreement shall be used. Client acknowledges Engineer may perform work at facilities that may contain hazardous materials or conditions, and that Engineer had no prior role in the generation, treatment, storage, or disposition of such materials. In consideration of the associated risks that may give rise to claims by third parties or employees of Client, Client agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Engineer harmless (including attorneys' fees) from any and all losses, damages, claims, or actions brought by any third party or employee of Client against Engineer or Engineer's employees, agents, officers or directors, in any way arising out of the presence of hazardous materials at the facilities, except for claims shown by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to arise out of the sole negligence of Engineer. VI. INSURANCE Engineer shall maintain during the life of the Agreement the following minimum insurance: A. Commercial general liability insurance, including personal injury liability, blanket contractual liability, December 2, 2005 Page 1 of 2 . and broad form property damage liability. The limit shall be not less than $1,000,000. B. Automobile bodily injury and property damage liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000. C. Statutory workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance as required by state law. D. Professional liability insurance. VII. SUBCONTRACTS Engineer shall be entitled, to the extent determined appropriate by Engineer, to subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this project. VIII. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement is binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. The Agreement is not to be assigned by either Client or Engineer without the prior written consent of the other. . IX. 'INTEGRATION These terms and conditions and the letter agreement (Scope of Work) to which they are attached represent the entire understanding of Client and Engineer as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered herein. The Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both parties. X. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State in which the Engineer's office performing the majority of the work for this project is located. Jurisdiction of litigation arising from the Agreement shall be in that State. If any part of the Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall be in full force and effect. Venue will be in the State District Court in which the Engineer's office performing the majority of the work for this project is located. XI. SUSPENSION OF SERVICES A. If the project is suspended for more than thirty (30) calendar days in the aggregate, the Engineer shall be compensated for services performed and charges incurred prior to receipt of notice to suspend and, upon resumption, an equitable adjustment in fees to accommodate the resulting demobilization and mobilization costs. In addition, there shall be an equitable adjustment in the project schedule based on the delay caused by the suspension. If the project is suspended for more than ninety (90) calendar days in the aggregate, the Engineer may, at his or her option, terminate this Agreement upon giving notice in writing to the Client. Engineer may request that the work be suspended by notifying Client, in writing, of circumstances that are interfering with normal progress of the work. B. If the Client fails to make payments when due or otherwise is in breach of this Agreement, the Engineer may suspend performance of services upon five (5) calendar days' notice to the Client. The Engineer shall have no liability whatsoever to the Client for any costs or damages as a result of such suspension caused by any breach of this Agreement by the Client. XII. TERMINATION OF WORK . Either the Client or the Engineer may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause upon giving the other party ten (10) calendar days prior written notice. The Client shall within i:\avo\ 1 006\legal\terms\gencon ten (10) calendar days of termination pay the Engineer for all services rendered and all costs incurred up to the date of termination, in accordance with the compensation provisions of this contract. XIII. TAXES The fees and costs stated in this proposal, unless stated otherwise, exclude all sales, consumer, use and other taxes. Client agrees to reimburse Engineer and its Subconsultants for the taxes paid by Engineer and its subconsultants in accordance with the laws and regulations of the applicable taxable authorities. Furthermore, it is understood and agreed that the reimbursement for such taxes shall be in addition to the fees and costs quoted herein and shall be invoiced in accordance with the normal and customary practices of the parties. XIV. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION It is agreed by both parties that Arbitration will not be allowed. In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the design or construction of the project or following the completion of the project, the parties to this Agreement understand and agree that all disputes between them arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be submitted to nonbonding mediation unless the parties agree otherwise. The parties further agree to include a similar mediation provision in all Agreements with independent contractors and consultants retained for the project and to require all independent contractors and consultants also to include a similar mediation provision in all Agreements with subcontractors, sUbconsultants, suppliers or fabricators so retained, thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for dispute resolution between the parties to those agreements. XVI. SEVERABILITY Any provision of this Agreement later held to be unenforceåble for any reason shall be deemed void, and all remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. XVII. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE The Engineer will perform his or her services with completion of project as outlined in Attachment 'C'. APPROVED: Engineer: HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. Signature: Typed or Printed Name: Title: Date: APPROVED: Client: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Signature: Typed or Printed Name: Title: Date: December 2, 2005 Page 2 of 2 . . . ... . III HaIff ASSOcIates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Attachment 'A' SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services for the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update including Additional Services for City Beautification for Streetscape and Entry Features: BASIC SERVICES 1.00 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1.01 PROJECT INITIATION MEETING Halff Associates staff will arrange a meeting in North Richland Hills with appropriate city staff as designated by the City. Key Planning Team members from Halff Associates (HA) will attend. This meeting will accomplish several pre-planning objectives: · Orientation. The City of North Richland Hills and the primary team leaders of the HA design team will become familiar with the project team structure and organization and arrive at a complete understanding of the roles and responsibilities of all project participants. · Review of Key Issues. Key significant issues to be addressed during the course of the work will be reviewed with staff and team members. · Schedule. Review contract schedule and establish key milestone dates. · Information exchange. At this meeting we will discuss all documentation needs of Halff Associates. This will give the City an opportunity to provide information or to provide HaIff Associates guidance in the securing of information not readily available at the time of the meeting. · Identify regional planning areas within the city - Regional planning study areas will be based on available demographic information and previous citywide planning efforts. These areas will be mutually agreed upon by the City of North Richland Hills and the Planning Team. The planning areas will be utilized in the telephone survey. Product - HA shall prepare meeting agenda, initial exhibits to aid discussion, and meeting notes. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - City shall recommend staff to attend, place of meeting, provide data as required to begin planning process. Attachment A - Scope of Services City of NOl1h RichlandHills - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decefnber 12, 2005 Page 1 of 13 100805-4365 . . . III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS 1.02 REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES THAT MAY IMPACT THE PARKS MASTER PLAN A. HA shall review other past or ongoing efforts that may influence the city's Parks Master Plan. This will include: · Previous comprehensive plans; · Current city zoning and land use plan; · Specific master plans previously prepared for key areas, i.e. Trails System Master Plan, City Image Study, South Grapevine Hwy. Study, N.E. Loop 820 Study and consideration of the impacts ofNRH20 and its future direction. · The thoroughfare plan; and · Other specific studies. Product - HA shall review past studies and reports. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills- City shall provide two copies of all relevant reports and documents. 1.03 PREPARATION OF BASE MAPPING A. HA shall prepare base mapping that illustrates three levels, to ensure that the plan is comprehensive, yet sufficiently detailed to serve as a future guide. HA shall prepare the base mapping in a digital fonn for future use by the City of North RicWand Hills (through incorporation and enhancement of existing City of North Richland Hills digital base mapping files). Digital aerial photographs and/or PDF/CADD illustrations obtained fÌ"om the City will be used as the base infonnation for the regional, citywide and neighborhood level maps which shall include: · Regional level, including all areas in the City ETJ, as well as relationship to fringe cities. · City-wide level, including limits established by the Comprehensive Plan, prior park master plans and council district boundaries as provided by the City of North Richland Hills in digital format, and as determined in Task 1.01 · Specific key areas - key neighborhood areas as detennined to be appropriate. B. All CADD mapping that is produced will be compatible with City base maps. All other mapping produced in illustrative fonnat will be in JPEG or PDF graphic file fonnats. Product - HA shall prepare base drawings for citywide level and individual neighborhood areas. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall provide digital copies (if available), of most recent City mapping, including regional level maps, A ttachment A ... Scope of Services City of NOlth RíchlandHHls - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decernber 12, 2005 Page 2 of 13 100805-4365 . . . iii HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS citywide maps illustrating existing zoning, and city maps illustrating existing and proposed land use. City limit boundaries will be provided in digital form. 1.04 INVENTORY OF EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES A. Map general park locations by type - illustrate the general geographic location of all park and recreation related facilities in North Richland Hills. Incorporate base locational infonnation previously compiled by the City. Facilities to be shown include: · Existing parks, recreation facilities and trails; · City owned properties, including undeveloped properties. B. Map school locations - Map existing schools that may have recreation facilities that are available to the general public. C. Review of Existing Parks - Conduct a reconnaissance of each existing park. Document existing facilities in each park, and note major deficiencies or readily apparent safety hazards. Review for general compliance with ADA requirements. D. Tabular summary of facilities - Prepare a table for each park type (i.e. neighborhood parks, community parks, etc.) that summaries the number of facilities in each park. Task Product - HA shall prepare a map that illustrates the geographic location of parks in the city. HA shall develop a table itemizing inventory of facilities in each park, classified by park type. Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall provide a copy of site plans for each existing park in the city (as available). The City shall provide data for each existing park, including address, size, current classification, and inventory of existing facilities in each existing park. The City shall provide a summary of known information on regional park facilities and other major area recreational attractions, including location, size, types of facilities, and annual or event attendance (known or estimated). 1.05 DEMOGRAPHIC REVIEW A. Use population projections developed by the City of North Richland Hills's Planning Dept, existing Comprehensive Plan or North Central Texas Council of Governments, or other information available ITom state and census sources; map demographic data that includes: · Current population; · Future growth forecasts as provided by the City of North Richland Hills; · Typical population profile, based on sex, age, ethnicity, income and education, (based on Year 2000 Census data); Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of No/th RíchlandHiI/s - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decen1ber 12, 2005 Page 3 of 13 1 00805-4365 . . . 1=1 HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS Product - HA shall summarize existing population, population characteristics and future population projections from most recently available infonnation in table format. Items provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall provide population infonnation (in digital fonn if available), including existing population by Census tracts, population projections by Tarrant County (if available), demographic characteristics, and year 2000 Census data. 1.06 COLLECT DATA ON LEAGUES, ASSOCIATIONS, AND EXISTING RECREATION PROGRAMS A. HA shall conduct a meeting with local athletic associations. HA shall prepare an infonnation request fonn for distribution to leagues and other facility users, and assist each league in obtaining and completing the information request. HA shall assemble data on leagues, associations and other entities that use recreation facilities provided by the City of North Richland Hills or other semi-public or public facilities. HA shall include select and club teams in facility discussions. B. HA shall obtain additional infonnation on other recreation providers in North Richland Hills and the surrounding area. This may include the number of teams, number and type of facility used by each team, number of participants, attendees in current and past years, as well as potential growth. C. HA shall summarize information on programs and leagues in table and text fonnat. Product - HA shall prepare meeting notes of meetings with each association or league, and prepare a summary of league usage or recreation usage by sport type. Items Provided by Leagues or recreational organizations (through City of North Richland Hills staff) - The City shall provide league program data, including number of teams, numbers of participants, breakdown by age and sex (where applicable), city program participation records for past three years, other non-city program data, and other participant data as available. The City shall organize meetings with leagues; distribute infonnation request form as necessary. 1.07 INTERVIEW KEY ENTITIES THAT MAY INFLUENCE PLAN A. Prepare key interview questionnaire to serve as a structure for the interviews. B. Interview key community representatives who are familiar with recreational facilities in North Richland Hills. A total of up to 4 interviews are included in this task. These may include: · Mayor and Council members · Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (as a group, maybe combined with Council Members meeting in working session); · Development Review Committee · Youth Committee Attachment A lOt Scope of Services City of No/1h RíchlanclHi/ls - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update DecenJber 12, 2005 Page 4 of 13 1 00805-4365 . . . . . III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS Product - HA shall prepare a summary of findings and comments made in interviews and meetings. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall make recommendations for persons to be interviewed; set up meetings where necessary; and attend meetings as desired or appropriate. 1.08 COMPILE KEY PARKS AND RECREATION LONG TERM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A. Compile a preliminary list of goals and objectives for the Parks system, to serve as a framework for modification by staff and the citizens of North Richland Hills. These goals will be based on goals developed through citizen, staff and elected official input. Review with City Staff and modify as appropriate per comments received. Product - HA shall prepare a preliminary written list of park system goals and objectives. Items provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall provide previous goals and objectives, policy statements, etc. The City shall review and comment on revised version of goals and objectives. 1.09 EVALUATE STANDARDS FOR CITY PARK AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM A. Use NRP A standards or similar area standards as starting point. Recommend adjustments or new standards as appropriate. Use the following criteria to evaluate the standards: B. Compare park spatial standards with those found in similar cities, including geographically and demographically similar cities, as well as other exceptional model cities. C. Prepare illustrations of the desired features of typical park types, including neighborhood, community, linear and special purpose parks. D. Prepare comparison of recommended spatial facilities to actual number of facilities, and develop table that illustrates deficiencies in each category. Product - HA shall draft park facility standards for North RicWand Hills in table and written fonnat. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall review and provide input for new proposed Park Standards. Attachment A .. Scope of Services City of NOlth RíchlandHills - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decelnber 12, 2005 Page 5 of 13 100805-4365 . . . iii HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS SURVEYORS 1.10 PREPARE SUMMARY OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT A. Prepare written summary of needs assessment, to include areas of significant deficiencies, both in tenns of land area, as well as specific types of facilities. Compare recommended standards to actual conditions to determine deficiencies. Summarize in chart as well as written format. B. Prepare maps/illustrations as appropriate that demonstrate key needs. C. An analysis of the existing parks system will be conducted; this analysis will be comprehensive in nature, reviewing all aspects of the parks system and programs, and will have three major components, which will be synthesized to create a collective needs assessment. · Needs based on recommended Recreation Standards · Needs based on Telephone Survey · Needs based on Review of Existing System Products - HA shall prepare a written summary of park system needs, in text, table and plan fonnat. HA shall prepare a map illustrating key needs. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall review needs assessment and comment as appropriate. 1.11 RECREATION FACILITIES REVIEW HA shall: A. Review North Richland Hills specific spatial standaids; B. Analyze recreation facilities versus availability and demand; C. Review existing park uses; D. Review and understand methodology to revitalize existing parks; E. Review O&M procedures and costs; F. Review New Recreational Trends; 1.12 COST ESTIMATES Ha shall: A. Prepare cost estimates for key components of the Parks Master plan. B. Use previous bids, current contractor costs where available, or other locally based estimates. C. Include cost ranges for proposed improvements, and identify key assumptions and items included in each estimate. Include contingencies that are appropriate for concept level estimates. Attachment A - Scope of Services City of NOlth Rícl1lanäHi/ls - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan UpdatE: ÐecenJber 12, 2005 Page 6 of 13 100805-4365 . . . III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS Product - HA shall provide cost estimates in spreadsheet fonnat for all key recommendations of the plan, including land acquisition, existing park improvements, additional improvements, etc. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills- The City shall review estimates and comment as appropriate. 1.13 PARKS MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS A. HA shall prepare a Parks Master Plan illustrating the components that are recommended. This plan will consider seven key elements: 1. Short range improvements to meet immediate needs. 2. Long range improvements to meet population growth and to enhance the parks system. 3. Opportunities for acquisition of key open space areas, as they become available. 4. Prioritization of improvements, to fund most critical projects first, based on demonstrated need, with less critical components being incorporated as funding allows. 5. Funding strategies to provide predictable funding resources for the proposed improvements 6. Recreation modifications and improvements to address key recreation needs and deficiencies B. HA shall develop criteria by which to rank potential improvements. Criteria may include: · Specific need, · Cost effectiveness, · Acceptable maintenance burden, · Site suitability, and · Relationship to remainder of system. C. Rank all recommended improvements based on the criteria developed above. HA shall prepare a plan illustrating all recommended improvements. These will be presented in four major categories: 1. Recreational facilities need; 2. Existing park rehabilitation needs; 3. Future land acquisition needs; and 4. New facility development. Using prioritization criteria, rank all recommended improvements Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of NOlth RíchlandHills - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decefnber 12, 2005 Page 7 of 13 100805-4365 . . . III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS Product - HA shall prepare prioritization criteria; and ranking of top recommended improvements. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills- The City shall review and comment as appropriate. 1.14 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (EXPENDITURE AND FUNDING PLAN DEVELOPMENT) A. This task will consist of three key steps: · Recommended improvement schedule; · Required funding level estimates; and · Suggested partnership involvement. B. Master Plan Action Plan Schedule - HA shall prepare a development schedule for the recommended plan components. · Develop a year-by-year funding level analysis to implement the Master Plan. (Expenditure Plan). · Use a 5-year short-range time fTame, and a lO-year long-range time fTame. C. Identify potential funding sources - HA shall review past sources of park development funding, and recommended potential sources of funding for the facilities proposed in the Master Plan. These may include: · Grants and Community development funds. · Sales Taxes. · Exploring joint development ventures with the school district or with private developers. · Impact fees or mandatory dedication of specific areas. · Other sources as appropriate. Product - HA shall prepare an implementation plan in written fonnat Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall provide current and past citywide and park department budgets (for past three years); provide records of past grants and other non-city funding sources; provide copy of Park Dedication Ordinance; and review Implementation plan and comment. 2.00 BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN A. Introduction The planning effort for the North Richland Hills Trails and Entry Feature Master Plan is intended to address a combination of issues, including existing physical needs and improvements. The effort will identify strategies and management structures to facilitate the implementation of desired goals. The study of issues in each individual planning area is important, but the overall goal will be to develop a vision that addresses the City's key issues while unifying the City of North Richland Hills's planning and design of their Trails and Parks System. Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of No/ih RíchlandHills - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decelnber 12, 2005 Page 8 of 13 100805-4365 . . . iii HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS B. Summary of Key Scope Components 1. Existing Conditions Analysis 2. Citizen Input 3. Map and Identify Development Areas i. Freeway Entrances to City ii. Major/Minor Thoroughfares iii. Trail Head and Linear Park opportunities, iv. Signature Park 4. Development of the Master "Vision" for the entire area collectively. 5. Development of Planning Area Design Guidelines 6. Final Review and Approval Phase 3.00 TRAILS MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND REVIEW The Trails Plan will be a key component of the Parks Master plan. HA shall review the City Trails System Master Plan Study document and incorporate any new potential trail connections, linkages and standards for trail development. The Plan will focus on trail locations, linear park trail development and trail opportunities. The plan will include the following steps; 1. Map key destinations including schools, retail areas, parks, civic facilities, etc. 2. Map key linkages to trails/key destinations in adjacent cities, Regional Veloweb, and other regional trail planning efforts. 3. Prepare illustrations that show potential trail corridors and priorities for each. 4. Develop cost estimates for ~d suggested phasing. 4.00 FINAL REPORT PREPARATION A. HA shall combine the information compiled in each of the tasks above into a high quality printed report, suitable for review and approval by the City Staff, City Council and citizens of North Richland Hills. Elements in the report will include: · Preparation of Report and Submittal of Draft to Parks and Recreation Department for Review. · Briefing presentation and final citywide public hearing to the City Council. · Revisions based on comments received, and preparation of a camera-ready original. · Approval of the final master plan by the City Council. · Note - Report will be in format acceptable to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and will be in compliance with TPWD Master Plan document requirements. Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of NC)lth RichlandHi/ls - Parks, Recreation and Opøn Space Master Plan Update Decefnber 12, 2005 Page 9 of 13 100805-4365 . . . III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS B. HA shall hand deliver the approved report to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for review and comment. HA shall address comments from TPWD staff as required. Products - HA shall prepare a report (10 draft copies in black and white); review with staff; and delivery of approved and final master plan (one (1) copy) to TPWD in Austin. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall review draft report, set up meetings and agenda items for review and approval of master plan 4.01 PREPARE EXECTIVE SUMMARY Halff shall: A. Prepare a summary of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan for the City's Comprehensive Plan, including key goals and objectives, key needs, recommendations, policies, funding strategies and public statements. B. Fonnat the summary to match current city comprehensive plan document. C. Include key graphics necessary to communicate the intent of the Parks Master Plan. D. Review with the Planning Department and the Parks Department, and modify per comments received. E. Provide a digital original to the City of North Richland Hills. Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of NOlth RichlandHiJls - Parks, Recreation and Open 6pace Master Plan Update DecenJber 12, 2005 Page 10 of 13 100805-4365 . . . ... III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES 5.00 CITIZEN INPUT Methods of obtaining citizen and board input: 1. City wide Telephone Survey 2. Public Meetings (3 with option to subtract I scheduled meeting) 3. One (1) Charette/Work Session with Mayor and City Council, Park Board, Planning and Zoning and other groups as identified by the City (location to be determined) Input will focus on park system goals, as well as citizen facility preferences and desires for additional park facilities or programs. a) Telephone Survey · Prepare questionnaire for telephone survey (5-8 minute survey, generally 3 to 4 pages in length). Review with City staff via telephone conference and modify as appropriate. Obtain City approval of survey prior to administering the survey. · Obtain appropriate random list of addresses or phone numbers for telephone survey. Divide city into three to five sections for purposes· of the survey, using previously identified plans as a basis for the survey. Prepare a total of 400 completed responses. · Analyze responses and prepare summary of key responses in report format for the City. b) Public Meeting · Open public meeting to interview, discuss and present proposed planning efforts for their City's Parks Master Plan. · Document findings and present in letter format to be included in the document. c) One (1) Work Session/Charette (at location to be determined) · Invite Mayor and Council, Park Board members and Planning and Zoning members and other groups as identified by the City to workshop (Invitations to be distributed by City of North Richland Hills staff). · Prepare exhibits and presentation for workshop session. · Prepare written summary of key items discussed during workshop. Products - HA shall prepare documentation of all public input ftom the work session/charette, public meetings and telephone survey. Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills - The City shall establish location and time for meetings; issue invitations to meetings and assist in the development of telephone questionnaires. Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of NOlth RíchlandHills - Parks, Recreatíon and Open Space Master Plan Update Dece/TJber 12) 2005 Page 11 of 13 100805-4365 . . . III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS . SURVEYORS 6.00 CONCEPT MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT Prepare three Park Concept Master Plans, (Little Bear Creek Park, Cross Timbers Park and Northfield Park), to be used for future improvement project items for the City of North Richland Hills. As the master plan develops prioritization may change as new land may be acquired. Concepts will be suitable for presentation to the public and for inclusion in the master plan. We will utilize existing base map and topography data for concept development. I. Pre-design - In this task we will visit the proposed park site with parks department staff, conduct a follow-up site reconnaissance. Building on the information and site reviews conducted during the park planning process, we will assemble information on the site that may be pertinent to the design of the park, such as potential utility service, planned road improvements, and other key information. We will assemble a preliminary program of potential recreation uses for the site which will assist in the design of the park. 2. Concept Design - We will 1st prepare a site analysis board; develop two (2) preliminary concepts for the park showing all proposed park components. We will illustrate the potential location of walkways, picnic pavilions, trails, picnic areas, and other recreation facilities, as well as the potential location of support infrastructure such as parking. The concept plan will be in color at a suitable scale, and will be reproducible at 11" x 1 7" size as well. 3. The refined concept plan will be reviewed with the City's Park staff, and will be refined based on the comments received. After staff review, the plan will be reviewed with the citizens of the City in a workshop/public meeting, and comments received during that meeting, if appropriate, will be incorporated into the plan. The refined concept plan will be presented to Park Board for possible recommendation to City Council for final approval. 4. Cost Estimates and Phasing - Cost estimates for the refined concept plan will be developed. After these are prepared, Halff will suggest phasing options for the park, if necessary and based on the anticipated funding that will be available. Attachment A ... Scope of Services City of NOlth RíchlandHil/s - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update Decefnber 12, 2005 Page 12 of 13 100805-4365 . . . ... III HaIff Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · SCIENTISTS · PLANNERS · SURVEYORS 7.00 REPORT PRINTING A. Halff shall oversee the production of a high quality full color digital original of the report for use in printing by the City of North Richland Hills in color or in black and white. Reimbursement for printing costs shall be reimbursable based on printing receipts. The exact number of copies shall be determined by the City. Product - Halff shall provide a digital original of the report on CD-ROM, and print copies of the final report (10-25 color copies) Items Provided by City of North Richland Hills- The City shall do the final review and approval of the document. Attachment A .. Scope of Services City of No/ih RíchlandHills - Parkst Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update DecenJber 12~ 2005 Page 13 of 13 100805-4365 . . . CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Attachment 'B' Basis of Compensation Basic Services - Fee Summary Planning services as described in Attachment 'B' will be provided by Halff Associates Inc. on a lump sum basis, with an authorized maximum Base Fee of $50,000 and an Alternative Fee of $38,500. Total fee for project shall be $88,500.00. The budget shown includes normal project expenses such as the cost of acquiring maps, reports and other documents necessary for the planning effort, printing of draft and final reports, delivery services, computer plots, computer charges and travel normally associated with production of these services. The overall fee total shown will not be exceeded without prior written authorization by the City. Below is the cost breakdown of services to be provided. Item Item Professional fee no. BASIC SERVICES 1 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update 2 Beautification Master Plan 3 Trails Master Plan Update 4 Report Preparation and Approval TOT AL BASIC SERVICES $50,000.00 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Citizen Input: . Telephone Survey & Analysis $10,500 5 . Public Meetings, Work Session & $10,000 Charette 6 Concept Master Plan Development (3 Park Sites) $10,000 7 Report Printing $8,000 TOT AL ADDITIONAL SERVICES $38,500.00 TOTAL SERVICES $88,500.00 Attachment B - Basís of COlT7pensatíon City of North Rich/and Hills - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Decen1ber. 12? 2005 Page 1 100805-4365 . Payment for services as described in Attachment 'B' will be computed on the basis of salary cost times a multiplier of 2.3 to determine the payment due for services. Salary cost is defined as the cost of salaries for time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, unemployment excise and payroll taxes, employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and holiday applicable thereto. The multiplier is a factor that compensates the Engineer and Planner for overhead and profit. Payments shall also include Direct Non-Labor Expenses that, in general, include expenses for supplies, transportation, equipment, travel, communication, subsistence and lodging away from home, and similar incidentals. The Direct Non-Labor expenses shall be reimbursable at actual invoice cost plus 10%, except for living and travel expenses when away from the home office on business connected with the Project, which will be charged at actual cost. The budget shown above includes an allowance for report printing and associated expenses. End of Attachment 'B': Basis of Compensation . . Attachment B - Basís of COlnpensatíon City of NOlth Rich/and Hills - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Decen1ber. 12, 2005 Page 2 100805-4365 . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Attachment 'c' Estimated Schedule The following time schedule for delivery of services and deliverables described in the Scope of Services, Attachment "B" is shown below. Task Projected Notice to Proceed on: Estimated Completion of Phase 1- Four to Five Months: Estimated Completion of Phase 2, Printing of Report - Five to Six Months *See Attachment '0' for Graph Schedule End of Attachment 'C' Estimated Schedule Attachn1ent C --.. Schedule City of North Riehlanä Hills - Parks} Recreation anä Open Space Master Plan Decen1bt.~r 12. 2005 Completion Date 1/05/2006 5/15/2006 11/15/2006 Peg£:: 1 100805-4365 .... . . . City of North Richland Hills Parks and Open 81 ATTACHMENT IDI Se t. Oct. Nov Project I nitiation/Kick Off Base Mapping and Data Assembly 4 General Area Market Observations · · Review Demographic trends · Develop Draft Goals ·";0' ." -:-- J [ k ........1);.. Park and Traillnventorv . Assessment of Each Park . t;¡'\,'ç. ::;.2>,',\'7\<,. ',', 1 > ,,:,..... ..<'.... i"Z<. .",} .' i}'::7\" }e, :"', Discussion Groups Interviews with Key Entities . Telephone Survey Field Work . . Telephone Survey Report Public Meetings Tabulate Citizen Input *' . C~:~1 Prepare Needs Assessment . Develop Target Levels of Service .. Summa of Needs Assessment ,:>':~r ,'l'i'\J,'~~' ,",'" ',:¡ ~ Public Forum II . Evening Public Meetings · . Summarize for Report """ },'¡~- .;T;.L-~ ),.X< ,I TL;I ,......' t,r;;-:;", '.".,' .:<:·:'7 4 Concepts for Key Parks · ACQuisition and Open Space Strategy . · . Review Trails Plan .. I . Cost Estimates 4 · P ri 0 ritizati 0 n "'<<C,." .., ,,> '.. 1 ..'; ',"i" ..' ," "J.' '" k/·'.c", .. - , ';' \.' <:;, .:,',.;' Identify Funding Sources/Staff Needs . Prepare Report Document . Present for Approval INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR #2005-168 Date: December 12, 2005 Subject: Energy Conservation Report Marilyn Ackmann, Manager of Public Affairs for Atmos Energy Corporation, has asked to speak to Council about the rising cost of natural gas, and what residents can do to conserve energy and save on their gas bill. Marilyn estimates that she will need about five minutes to go over the information and then will be available to answer any questions you may have. Attached are energy conservation tips from the Atmos Energy website. A link to this information can be found on the City website www.nrhtx.com under the City Highlights section. Respectfully Submitted, ICt¿LwtLI<t- Karen Bostic Managing Director ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS s... . Energy Conservation Tips (Information From Atmos Energy Website) . For Your House · Insulate, seal, and weather-strip windows and doors. · Put added insulation in your attic. · Repair leaky faucets, one leaky faucet can use about 6,000 gallons of water in a year. · Atmos Energy does not maintain and is not responsible for any piping downstream of the meter (with the exception of Kansas and Missouri customers). If the condition of the piping is not monitored, it may be subject to the potential hazards of corrosion and leakage. Buried gas piping should be periodically inspected for leaks if the piping is metallic and repaired if any unsafe condition is discovered. · Make sure the pilot light on all gas devices is a blue color. If the flame is red or yellow, call an authorized contractor to have it checked for an improper mixture of air and gas. Not only can the wrong mixture lower efficiency, it can be unsafe and needs immediate attention. · Clean cobwebs, dust or other debris from your space heater before using for the first time in cold weather. Remove dust and lint from furnace vents, registers and baseboard heaters. · Make sure weather stripping around doors and windows is in good condition. Replace if necessary. · Make sure your duct work is properly insulated and sealed. Unsealed ducts in attics and crawl spaces lose air. Non-insulated ducts lose heat, wasting energy and money. · Keep blinds or draperies opened on sunny days to let the sun's warmth in. This is especially important on any windows or glass doors receiving direct sunlight. · Remove any leaves, nests or other obstructions from inside the flue or chimney. · If you have a wood-burning fireplace, consider installing a natural gas fireplace insert, which can save on energy costs compared with wood. A gas fireplace also will dramatically reduce the air pollution created from burning wood. · Always use gas devices only for their intended use. For example, do not use a gas stove to warm the house. · Consider storm or thermal windows and doors or double paned glass. A less-expensive alternative is plastic sheeting, which can be temporarily fastened over doors and windows to retain heat or air conditioning. · When buying new appliances, compare energy efficiency ratings and annual operating costs. A slightly higher initial cost for a high-efficiency appliance could pay for itself in a very short time, through energy savings and lower utility bills. . For Your Heating System · Change your air filter in a forced heating and cooling system regularly. · A dirty air filter makes the heating and cooling system work harder. · You can reduce your energy bills by 5 % or more by simply keeping a clean filter in your heating and cooling system. · Inspect your thermostat, older thermostats only go down to 60 degrees. If you are gone for long periods of time or on vacation lower your thermostat to 55 degrees. · An inaccurate thermostat can cost you money. For example it may read 68 degrees but it really may be 71 degrees in your home. Have your thermostat checked by a contractor if it needs an adjustment. · Set your thermostat at 70 degrees or lower in the winter. Every degree you raise your thermostat means a higher heating bill. If you plan to be away from home for several days, 55 degrees or so is a good setting. Heating costs will increase four to six percent for every thermostat setting above 70 degrees during the winter. ·. ." · Have your heating system inspected by a professional technician. This will reduce chances of equipment failure and your unit run more efficiently. · Instal/ a programmable thermostat. You can save up to 10% a year on your heating and cooling bills by simply turning your thermostat back 10% to 15% while you are away during the day, on vacation or sleeping. · Replace or clean the filter on your furnace every 30 days. For Your Water Heater · Heating water is the second largest energy expense in your home. Keep the setting at 120 degrees. You can save 15 % if you cut back the temperature on YOUr water heater from 140 degrees to 120 degrees. If you are gone for a long period of time set your thermostat at the "vacation" or the lowest setting. · Drain the water from your water heater periodical/y. This process removes the mineral sediment found in all water supplies. · Inspect the relief (pop-off) valve on your water heater regularly. ~ For Your Washer · Cold water does just as good a jOb as warm or hot water for laundry, always select cold water in the rinse cycle. · Wash a full load and it if equipped with an energy saver cycle, use it. · Be sure that dishwashers, washing machines and clothes dryers are fully loaded before running. · Reduce clothes drying costs by cleaning the lint filter after every load to improve air circulation, and don't over-dry clothes. · Moving the washing machine's water temperature setting from hot to warm cuts a load's energy use in half . \ 2 . . Announcements and Information December 12, 2005 . Announcements December is "Bring Your Bear to Story Time" month at the North Richland Hills Public Library. The Children's Department will feature bear stories on Wednesdays at 10:30 a.m. and 11: 15 a.m. Children are encouraged to bring their teddy bear with them. For more information, please call 817 -427- 6818. City offices will be closed on Monday, December 26, and Monday, January 2, in observance of the Christmas and New Year's Holidays. Trash and recycling çollections will not be affected by the holidays. The December 26 City Council Meeting has been cancelled. The next meeting is scheduled for January 9 at 7p.m. Allied Waste Services will pick up Christmas trees curbside for recycling on Saturday, December 31. Residents can also drop off Christmas trees for recycling December 27 through January 6 at Green Valley Community Park, 7701 Smithfield Road. The recycled trees will be turned into mulch. Mulch will be available for pickup January 7 - 11 at the park. For more information, please call Allied Waste Services at 817-332-7301. Kudos Korner Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Mary Beth Harvey, Animal Adoption & Rescue Center A letter was received from a resident expressing thanks to Mary Beth for making arrangements for a dog that had died. The resident said Mary Beth's kind words of comfort will always be appreciated. :' ~ n, ~ ( ) = g - = . ª ( » - :: .... ... ñ të ~ ; ;: ( ~ - ] ~ J is : ~ ) » ~ a - = = - en ~ :: ];! - .. ~ - "> <: iii S ~ s:U Q; - ~ - J :; ç ~ ",,) I ~ ) ,.. ~ ::: ~ ~ z .- ç ü ..; Ffff . ~ Q :. të '< - (J - - = - I--- () .. - - = LJ - I I-- I-- I-- - - - i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of North Richland Hills 2005 Citizen Survey Prepared for: City of North Richland Hills By: D'Arlene Ver Duin Paul Ruggiere James Glass Survey Research Center University of North Texas October 20,2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS T AS LEO F CO NT E NT S . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . · · · · . · · . · . . · . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . · · . . . . . . . .1 LI ST 0 F FI G U RES................................................. ....................... .... ............. ........................... .11 LI ST 0 F T AS L ES ..................................................................................................................... I V EX E CUT I V E SUM MAR Y ........................................................................................................... V I. I NTRODUCTI ON ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. MET H 0 DO LOGY ................................................................................................................... 2 SAMP LE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . .2 INS T RUM E NT .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . · 2 D A T A CO LLE CTI 0 N .................................................................................................................... 2 A N A L Y S I S BY DEMO G RA PHI C G R 0 UPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . · . 3 REPORT FORMAT..............................................................························································ 3 III. SAM P L E C H A RA C T E R 1ST I C S . .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eo . . . . eo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . 4 I V. QUA L I TY 0 F L I FE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 V . CITY SERVICES .................................................................................................................. 11 PARKS AN D R E C REA TI ON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11 LIB RA R Y .............................................................................................................................. . · . 20 NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES AND PUBLIC WORKS........................ eo eo.......· eo......·· eo eo....... eo........... .22 EMERGENCY SERViCES......................................................····················································· 25 T RA F F I C .............................................................................................................................. · . . 42 VI. CO M M U N I CAT I ON S ........................................................................................................... 44 I NTE R N ET .............................................................................................................................. · 45 CITY NEW S LETTE R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 CAB LE T E LEV I S ION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . · . · . . · 52 CONTACT WITH CITY OFFiCiALS..............................................················································· 56 V II. CO N C L US ION S ................................................................................................................ 60 APPENDIX: SURVEY INSTRUMENT. ... ..................................... ........ ... ..... ............... ....... ... ..... 62 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas i I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 21 Figure 22 Figure 23 Figure 24 Figure 25 Figure 26 Figure 27 Figure 28 Figure 29 Figure 30 Figure 31 Figure 32 Quality of Life in North Richland Hills............................................................. 6 Co n d it ion of N R H Com m u n i ty . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7 Plan on Remaining in N RH for Next Several years....................................... 8 Recommend NRH as Good Place to Live.................................................... 10 Ratings of NRH Recreation Facilities........................................................... 14 Participation in Recreation Programs in Past year...................................... 15 Rating of N RH Recreation Programs........................................................... 16 Usage of NRH Parks in Past Year ............................................................... 17 Rating of NRH Parks ...................................................................................19 Usage of NRH Public Library in Past year................................................... 20 Rating of NRH Public Library .......................................................................21 Ratings of Police Services........................................................................... 25 Comparison of NRH Police Services to Other Communities........................ 26 Contact with N RH Police Officer in Past year.............................................. 27 Police Officer was Courteous...................................................................... 30 Police Service Provided in Timely Fashion.................................................. 31 Ratings of Fire Services ..............................................................................32 Comparison of NRH Fire Services to Other Communities ........................... 33 Needed Fire or EMS Service in Past year................................................... 34 Fire or EMS Employee was Courteous ........................................................36 Fire Department Responded Promptly........................................................ 37 Ratings of Traffic Flow on Major City Streets............................................... 42 Ratings of Traffic Signal Timing on Major City Streets................................. 43 Get Enough Information about City Programs and Services........................ 44 Access to I nte rn et. . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . · · · . · . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45 Visited N RH Web Site ................................................................................. 47 Found Needed Information on Web Site .....................................................49 Read City Newsletter................................................................................... 50 City Newsletter Provides Information about Services and Programs ...........51 Have Cable Television at Home ..................................................................52 Watch Citicable N RH................................................................................... 53 Contacted City Officials in Past 12 Months.................................................. 56 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas ii Figure 33 Satisfied with Results of Contact .................................................................58 Figure 34 City Officials were Courteous and Helpful................................................... 59 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas Hi I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 Table 11 Table 12 Table 13 Table 14 Table 15 Table 16 Table 17 Table 18 Table 19 Table 20 Table 21 Table 22 Table 23 De mog ra phi cs ............................................................................................... 4 Primary Reason for Leaving NRH.................................................................. 9 Usage of Recreation Facilities in Past year................................................. 11 Used NRH20 by Selected Demographics.................................................... 11 Used Bursey Road Senior Center by Selected Demographics ....................12 Participation in Recreation Programs in Past Year by Selected De mog rap hies ............................................................................................. 1 5 Usage of NRH Park in Past Year by Selected Demographics ..................... 18 Usage of NRH Public Library in Past Year by Selected Demographics ....... 20 Code Violations Seen in City....................................................................... 22 Junk Vehicles by Selected Demographics ...................................................23 Substandard or Deteriorating Housing by Selected Demographics ............. 23 Drainage or Flooding Problems by Selected Demographics........................ 24 Contact with NRH Police Officer by Selected Demographics....................... 28 Reason for Contact with Police Officer ........................................................ 29 Reason for Contact with Fire or EMS Personnel.......................................... 35 Service Performance................................................................................... 38 Se rvices Needi ng Imp rovement.... .. · . . . . ... ... . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. . .. 39 Access to I nternet by Selected Demog raphics ............................................ 46 Visited NRH Web Site by Selected Demographics ...................................... 48 C it i ca b I e Pro g ra m s W ate h ed ............................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 54 Watch City Council Meetings by Selected Demographics ........................... 54 Source of Most News about NRH ................................................................ 55 City Person or Office Contacted.................................................................. 57 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overall, quality of life in NRH is excellent (32.0 percent) or good (57.9 percent) reported 89.9 percent of the survey respondents. Ninety-two percent would recommend NRH to a friend or family member as a good place to live. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents planned to remain in NRH for several years. . Thirty-eight percent of the respondents reported using NRH20 and 28.3 percent indicated using the Recreation Center. Six percent or fewer reported using the Richland Tennis Center (6.0 percent), Bursey Road Senior Center (5.5 percent) or Dan Echols Senior Center (4.3 percent). Eighty-seven percent of respondents who used these facilities rated them excellent (31.0 percent) or good (55.8 percent). · Twenty-three percent reported participation in the City's recreational programs during the past year. Eighty-eight percent of those respondents rated the programs as excellent (28.9 percent) or good (58.9 percent). · Nearly two-thirds (64.5 percent) of the respondents reported using an NRH park during the past year. Ninety-three percent of those respondents rated parks as excellent (47.9 percent) or good (44.7 percent). · The public library was used in the past year by 58.0 percent of the respondents. A large majority rated library services as excellent (58.0 percent) or good (37.2 percent). · Litter (56.4 percent) and high grass and weeds (50.9 percent) were code violations seen frequently or sometimes in the city. · Emergency services were rated excellent or good by a large majority of respondents. · Other city services received a majority of combined excellent and good ratings. The condition of non-residential (76.8 percent) and residential streets (61.2 percent) received the lowest ratings. · Respondents split on ratings of traffic flow on major streets. Forty-nine percent rated traffic flow excellent or good; 50.6 percent rated it fair or poor. Fifty-seven percent rated signal timing as excellent (5.3 percent) or good (51.5 percent). · Fifty-eight percent of the respondents with Internet access had visited the NRH Web site. Nearly all of those respondents found the information they needed. · Ninety-three percent of the respondents reported reading the City newsletter. Ninety-three percent of those respondents found it useful. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas v I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. INTRODUCTION During the months of September and October 2005, a citizen survey was administered to residents of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. The survey measured citizen perceptions regarding several areas of interest: · Ratings of the quality of life in North Richland Hills; · Ratings of city services in several areas: o Parks and recreation o Library o Neighborhood Services and Public Works o Emergency Services o Traffic; and · Communication with citizens, including contact with City officials. The Survey Research Center at the University of North Texas conducted the survey in association with the staff of the City of North Richland Hills. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 1 II. METHODOLOGY Sample The conceptual population for the survey was all residents of the City of North Richland Hills who were 18 years of age or older and who reside in households with telephones. Random digit dialing (ROD) was used as the method of sample generation because it offers the best coverage of active telephone numbers, and it reduces sample bias. The ROD method ensures that: · the conceptual frame and sampling frame match; · unlisted telephone numbers will be included, and; · the sampling frame will be as current as possible, thus maximizing the probability that new residents will be included. To ensure that only residents of North Richland Hills were interviewed, telephone prefixes outside of the city were excluded. Since NRH shares its telephone exchanges with several other cities, screening questions were included in the survey instrument to exclude anyone outside of North Richland Hills. Anyone who had lived in North Richland Hills for less than three months was also screened from the survey. A total of 400 usable interviews were conducted and analyzed. In a random sample, 400 interviews yields a margin of error of ± 4.9 percent. This means, for example, that if 40 percent of the respondents answered "yes" to a question, we can be 95 percent confident that the actual proportion of residents in the population who would answer "yes" to the same question is 4.9 percentage points higher or lower than 40 percent (35.1 percent to 44.9 percent). Instrument SRC staff provided draft questionnaires for NRH staff to review. NRH staff gave guidance to SRC staff on instrument content preferences. SRC staff produced a draft instrument using this guidance and provided it to NRH staff for review. Several revisions were made before NRH staff approved the final questionnaire. The instrument can be found in the Appendix. Data Collection Trained telephone interviewers who had previous experience in telephone surveys were used to conduct the survey. Each interviewer completed an intensive general training session. The purposes of general training were to ensure that interviewers understood and practiced all of the basic skills needed to conduct interviews and that they were knowledgeable about standard interviewing conventions. The interviewers also attended a specific training session for the project. The project training session provided information on the background and goals of the study. Interviewers practiced administering the questionnaire to become familiar with the questions. All interviewing was conducted from a centralized telephone bank in Denton, Texas. An experienced telephone supervisor was on duty at all times to supervise the administration of the sample, monitor for quality control, and handle any other problems. Data for the survey were collected from September 28 to October 10, 2005. Su/Vey Research Center, University Of North Texas 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Analysis by Demographic Groups Each question in the survey was cross-tabulated with the following 12 demographic categories: Years of education Zip code Own or rent home Age of respondent Gender of respondent Length of residence Household income Whenever the responses to a single question are divided by demographic groups, the percentage distribution of responses within one group will rarely exactly match the percentage distribution of another group; there will often be some variation between groups. The most important consideration in interpreting these differences is to determine if the differences in the sample are representative of differences between the same groups within the general population. This consideration can be fulfilled with a test of statistical significance. The Survey Research Center only reports those differences between groups that are found to be statistically significant. Employment status Have children Report Format The remainder of the report is arranged in four sections beginning with Section III. This section, "Sample Characteristics," presents the findings for all respondents except where it is otherwise noted. Section IV, "Quality of Life," presents findings about attitudes regarding the quality of life in North Richland Hills. Section V, "City Services" presents findings regarding services received. "Communications," where citizens get their information about North Richland Hills plus an assessment of Internet access and usage is dealt with in Section VI. Section VII is the report Conclusions. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 3 III. SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS Table 1 Demographics Demographics Percentage (n=400) Education 8 years or less 0.8 Some high school 2.3 High school graduate 20.8 Some college 37.2 Bachelor's degree 28.9 Graduate school/degree 10.1 Length of residence 3 to 12 months 8.3 1 to 5 years 32.0 6 to 10 years 15.8 More than 1 0 years 44.0 Gender of respondent Female 64.0 Male 36.0 Age of Respondent 1 8 to 25 4.5 26 to 35 12.3 36 to 45 20.1 46 to 60 31.8 61 to 70 17.0 71 or older 14.3 Have children 34.3 Less than 6 years old 14.5 6 to 12 years old 18.0 13 to 1 8 years old 17.3 · As seen in Table 1, 76.2 percent of the sample had attended college (37.2 percent), had a Bachelor's degree (28.9 percent) or more (10.1 percent). The first three categories were combined (high school grad or less) in cross-tabulations appearing later in this report. · Forty-four percent of the sample had lived in North Richland Hills more than 10 years. · Sixty-four percent of the sample was female and over one-third (36.0 percent) was male. · Sixty-three percent of the respondents in the sample were 46 years old or older. · Fifteen percent reported having children less than 6 years old. Eighteen percent had children age 6 to 12, and 17.3 percent had children age 13 to 18. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Demographics Percentage (n=400) Income (n=358) Under $10,000 1.4 $10,001 to $25,000 11.2 $25,001 to $50,000 24.0 $50,001 to $75,000 24.3 $75,001 to $100,000 18.4 Over $100,000 20.7 Own or rent home Own 84.4 Rent 15.4 Rent-free situation 0.2 Employment status Fulltime 52.8 Part-time 7.8 Unemployed 2.8 Retired 25.6 Student 1.5 Homemaker 9.5 · Forty-three percent of the respondents earned between $50,000 and $100,000 per year. Thirty-seven percent earned less than $50,000 per year. The first two categories were collapsed into one ($25,000 or less) to run the cross-tabulations. · Eighty-four percent owned their homes. · Over half (52.8 percent) of the respondents were employed fulltime. One-quarter (25.6 percent) were retired. Unemployed, student and homemaker categories were collapsed into one to run the cross-tabulations. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 5 IV. QUALITY OF LIFE Figure 1 Quality of Life in North Richland Hills (n=397) 1 00% 80% 57.9% 20% 0.5% 60% 40% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents were asked to describe the quality of life in North Richland Hills. As shown in Figure 1 , 89.9 percent of the respondents reported that the quality of life in North Richland Hills was either excellent (32.0 percent) or good (57.9 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 2 Condition of NRH Community (n=400) 1 00% 80% 64.3% 600/0 0.8% 40% 20% 00/0 Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents were asked to rate the condition of the NRH community in terms of cleanliness, quality of houses, and general appearance. As shown in Figure 2, 83.8 percent of the respondents rated the condition of the NRH community as excellent (19.5 percent) or good (64.3 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 7 Figure 3 Plan on Remaining in NRH for Next Several Years (n=373) Yes 87.9% No 12.1 0/0 . Respondents were asked if they planned to remain in North Richland Hills in the next several years. As shown in Figure 3, 87.9 percent of the respondents planned to remain. . There were significant differences among respondents in their plans to remain in NRH. Respondents with children under age 6 (77.6 percent) were less likely to report they planned to remain in NRH compared to respondents without children under age 6 in the household (89.8 percent). Ninety-one percent of respondents who own their home and 69.2 percent of those who rent planned to remain in NRH in the next several years. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 8 I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 2 Primary Reason for Leaving NRH (n=45) Like other cities/areas better Con estion Job relocation Pro ert taxes are too hi h Access to ublic schools Want bi er/newer housin Closer to ·ob Move to smaller cit Move closer to famil Ifriends Want to live in count lown land Crime Will move wherever find the house for them Other, s ecif Percentage res ondin 17.8 11.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 6.7 6.7 6.7 4.4 4.4 4.4 2.2 6.7 . Respondents who did not plan to remain in NRH were asked the primary reason they considered leaving. As shown in Table 2, 17.8 percent of the respondents reported they liked other cities or areas better. Eleven percent said their primary reason for leaving was the congestion. Other reasons included: landlord is returning to NRH and wants the house back, not made a decision yet, and personal reasons. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 9 Figure 4 Recommend NRH as Good Place to Live (n=394) Yes 92.4% No 7.6% . Respondents were asked if they would recommend NRH to a friend or family member as a good place to live. Ninety-two percent of the respondents answered, "yes" (see Figure 4). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V. CITY SERVICES Parks and Recreation Table 3 Usage of Recreation Facilities in Past Year Percenta Yes 38.3 28.3 6.0 5.5 4.3 · Respondents were asked if they or a member of their family had used any of the recreation facilities listed in Table 3 in the past year. Respondents were more likely to report visiting NRH20 (38.3 percent) or the Recreation Center (28.3 percent). Six percent or less reported using the other recreation facilities. NRH20 · Thirty-eight percent of the respondents reported using NRH20 in the past year. · There were significant differences among respondents about usage. As shown in Table 4, the percentage of the respondents that reported using NRH20 generally decreased as the age of the respondent increased and varied with employment status and income. Usage was greater among male respondents, respondents with children and homeowners. Table 4 Used NRH20 by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Age of respondent 18 to 25 55.6 44.4 26 to 35 40.8 59.2 36 to 45 56.3 43.7 46 to 60 31.5 68.5 61 to 70 32.3 67.7 71 and over 28.1 71.9 Gender Female 32.3 67.7 Male 49.0 51.0 Have children Yes 60.6 39.4 No 26.5 73.5 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 11 Percentage responding Yes No Employment status Fulltime 45.9 54.1 Part-time 35.5 64.5 U nemp loyed/ student/homemaker 30.9 69.1 Retired 28.0 72.0 Income $25,000 or less 31.8 68.2 $25,001 to $50,000 40.5 59.5 $50,001 to $75,000 25.3 74.7 $75,001 to $100,000 47.0 53.0 More than $100,000 55.4 44.6 Own or rent home Own 40.2 59.8 Rent 26.7 73.3 Recreation Center · Over one-quarter (28.3 percent) of the respondents reported using the Recreation Center in the past year. Richland Tennis Center · Six percent of the respondents reported using the Richland Tennis Center during the past year. · Usage of the Richland Tennis Center was greater among respondents with children age 6 to 12 (11.1 percent) compared to respondents without children this age (4.9 percent). Bursev Road Senior Center . Six percent of the respondents indicated someone in their family had used the Bursey Road Senior Center. . As shown in Table 5, usage increased as the length of residence and education increased. Homeowners were more likely than renters to report usage of the Bursey Road Senior Center. Table 5 Used Bursey Road Senior Center by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Length of residence 3 to 12 months 12.1 87.9 1 to 5 years 24.4 75.6 6 to 10 years 28.6 71.4 More than 1 0 years 34.1 65.9 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Percenta Yes 17.0 83.0 27.0 73.0 33.0 67.0 47.5 52.5 31.6 68.4 11.5 88.5 Dan Echols Senior Center · Four percent of the respondents indicated that someone in their family had used the Dan Echols Senior Center. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 13 Figure 5 Ratings of NRH Recreation Facilities (n=335) 60% 55.8% 1 0% 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents were asked to rate NRH recreation facilities. As shown in Figure 5, 86.8 percent of the respondents rated NRH recreation facilities as excellent (31.0 percent) or good (55.8 percent). . Respondents without children age 13 to 18 (89.3 percent) were more likely to rate the NRH recreation facilities as excellent or good compared to respondents with children this age (75.8 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 6 Participation in Recreation Programs in Past Year (n=398) Yes 22. g% No 77.10/0 . Respondents were asked if any member of their household had participated in the City's recreational programs during the past year. As shown in Figure 6, 22.9 percent of the respondents reported participation in the city recreation programs. Participation was greater among male respondents and respondents with children and varied with income (see Table 6). . Table 6 Participation in Recreation Programs in Past Year by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Gender Female 18.4 81.6 Male 30.8 69.2 Have children Yes 36.0 64.0 No 16.0 84.0 Income $25,000 or less 17.8 82.2 $25,001 to $50,000 25.9 74.1 $50,001 to $75,000 17.2 82.8 $75,001 to $100,000 21.2 78.8 More than $100,000 36.5 63.5 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 15 Figure 7 Rating of NRH Recreation Programs (n=90) 1 00% 80% 58. gOlo 20% 1.1°/0 60% 40% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents whose family had participated in the NRH recreational programs were asked to rate those programs. As shown in Figure 7,87.8 percent of those respondents rated the recreation programs as excellent (28.9 percent) or good (58.9 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 8 Usage of NRH Parks in Past Year (n=400) Yes 64.5% No 35.5% . Respondents were asked if any member of their household had used an NRH park during the past year. As shown in Figure 6, nearly two-thirds (64.5 percent) of the respondents reported using an NRH park during the past year. Usage of NRH parks varied with length of residence and employment status, generally decreased as the age of the respondent increased, and increased as education increased (see Table 7). Reported usage was higher male respondents and respondents with children. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 17 Table 7 Usage of NRH Park in Past Year by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Length of residence 3 to 12 months 57.6 42.4 1 to 5 years 74.2 25.8 6 to 1 0 years 55.6 44.4 More than 1 0 years 61.9 38.1 Age of respondent 1 8 to 25 83.3 16.7 26 to 35 75.5 24.5 36 to 45 82.5 17.5 46 to 60 59.1 40.9 61 to 70 63.2 36.8 71 and over 38.6 61.4 Gender Female 57.8 42.2 Male 76.4 23.6 Have children Yes 81.8 18.2 No 55.5 44.5 Education High school grad or less 52.6 47.4 Some college 64.2 35.8 College grad 73.0 27.0 Grad school/degree 72.5 27.5 Employment status Fulltime 72.9 27.1 Part-time 71.0 29.0 U nemployed/ student/homemaker 63.6 36.4 Retired 47.1 52.9 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 9 Rating of NRH Parks (n=257) 60% 50% 47.90/0 400/0 0.8% 30% 20% 1 0% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents whose family had used an NRH park in the past year were asked to rate the parks overall. As shown in Figure 9, 92.6 percent of the respondents rated parks as excellent (47.9 percent) or good (44.7 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 19 Library Figure 10 Usage of NRH Public Library in Past Year (n=398) Yes 58.0% No 42.0% . Respondents were asked if any member of their household had used the North Richland Hills Public Library during the past year. As shown in Figure 10, 58.0 percent of the respondents said they had used the library in the past year. . Usage of the public library was greater among respondents with children, respondents with income of $50,001 to $75,000, and homeowners (see Table 8). Table 8 Usage of NRH Public Library in Past Year by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Have children Yes 66.2 33.8 No 53.8 46.2 Income $25,000 or less 55.6 44.4 $25,001 to $50,000 58.1 41.9 $50,001 to $75,000 72.1 27.9 $75,001 to $100,000 60.6 39.4 More than $100,000 48.6 51.4 Own or rent home Own 61.4 38.6 Rent 40.0 60.0 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 11 Rating of NRH Public Library (n=231 ) 1 00% 800/0 58.0% 60% 0.40/0 400/0 200/0 00/0 Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents whose family had used the public library were asked to rate the library's services. As shown in Figure 11, 95.2 percent of those respondents rated library services as excellent (58.0 percent) or good (37.2 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 21 Neighborhood Services and Public Works Table 9 Code Violations Seen in City Rarel Never 34.8 8.8 33.5 15.6 40.3 26.5 36.9 33.7 40.5 30.5 32.1 43.9 25.4 59.4 . Respondents were asked how often they had seen any of the code violations listed in Table 9 in the city. Results are presented in descending order of the combined percentage of frequently and sometimes responses. Litter · Respondents were more likely to report seeing litter (56.4 percent) in the city either frequently (15.5 percent) or sometimes (40.9 percent). Hiah arass and weeds · Fifty-one percent of the respondents reported frequently (15.6 percent) or sometimes (35.3 percent) seeing high grass and weeds in the city. · The percentage of the respondents who reported frequently or sometimes seeing high grass and weeds in the city generally increased as income increased: $25,000 or less (33.4 percent); $25,001 to $50,000 (47.0 percent); $50,001 to $75,000 (57.5 percent); $75,001 to $100,000 (57.8 percent); and more than $100,000 (54.1 percent). Stray animals . One-third (33.3 percent) of the respondents reported frequently or sometimes seeing stray animals in the city. . Respondents with children (42.3 percent) were more likely than those without children (28.5 percent) to report frequently or sometimes seeing stray animals in the city. Junk vehicles . Junk vehicles were frequently or sometimes seen in the city by 29.4 percent of the respondents. . As shown in Table 10, the percentage of respondents who reported frequently or sometimes seeing junk vehicles in the city generally increased as length of residence increased, and was greater among homeowners and respondents with income of $50,001 to $75,000. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 10 Junk Vehicles by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never Length of residence 3 to 12 months 9.1 6.1 24.2 60.6 1 to 5 years 6.3 23.4 32.8 37.5 6 to 1 0 years 1.6 21.0 41.9 35.5 More than 1 0 years 10.9 23.4 40.6 25.1 Income $25,000 or less 8.9 8.9 44.4 37.8 $25,001 to $50,000 8.2 16.5 28.2 47.1 $50,001 to $75,000 6.9 29.9 41.4 21.8 $75,001 to $100,000 4.6 27.7 41.5 26.2 More than $100,000 10.8 18.9 37.8 32.4 Own or rent home Own 9.0 23.1 38.7 29.1 Rent 1.6 13.1 29.5 55.7 Substandard/deterioratinq housinq · Twenty-nine percent of the respondents reported seeing substandard or deteriorating housing in the city frequently (5.3 percent) or sometimes (23.8 percent). · As shown in Table 11, the percentage of respondents who reported seeing substandard or deteriorating housing in the city either frequently or sometimes decreased as the age of the respondent increased and varied with employment status and income. Thirty percent of respondents without children age 13 to 18 and 24.6 percent of respondents with children in this age group reported seeing substandard housing frequently or sometimes. Table 11 Substandard or Deteriorating Housing by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never Age of respondent 1 8 to 25 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 26 to 35 6.1 34.7 20.4 38.8 36 to 45 3.8 25.0 48.8 22.5 46 to 60 7.1 26.0 44.9 22.0 61 to 70 5.9 23.5 36.8 33.8 71 and over 1.8 10.5 40.4 47.4 Have children age 13 to 18 Yes 2.9 21.7 56.5 18.8 No 5.8 24.2 37.3 32.7 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 23 Percentage responding Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never Employment status Fulltime 5.2 28.1 40.0 26.7 Part-time 0.0 12.9 67.7 19.4 U nemployed/ student/homemaker 9.1 30.9 29.1 30.9 Retired 4.9 14.7 40.2 40.2 Income $25,000 or less 15.6 17.8 35.6 31.1 $25,001 to $50,000 3.5 19.8 38.4 38.4 $50,001 to $75,000 5.7 23.0 46.0 25.3 $75,001 to $100,000 3.0 31.8 40.9 24.2 More than $100,000 2.7 29.7 45.9 21.6 Drainaae or floodina problems . Nearly one-quarter (24.0 percent) of the respondents reported frequently (7.5 percent) or sometimes (16.5 percent) seeing drainage or flooding problems in the city. . As shown in Table 12, the percentage of the respondents who reported seeing drainage or flooding problems either frequently or sometimes generally increased as education and income increased, and was greater among respondents without children under age 6. Table 12 Drainage or Flooding Problems by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never Have children under 6 Yes 12.1 6.9 25.9 55.2 No 6.8 18.2 33.2 41.8 Education High school grad or less 3.2 11.6 29.5 55.8 Some college 10.1 14.2 33.1 42.6 College grad 7.0 24.6 29.8 38.6 Grad school/degree 10.0 15.0 42.5 32.5 Income $25,000 or less 2.2 22.2 20.0 55.6 $25,001 to $50,000 12.8 10.5 32.6 44.2 $50,001 to $75,000 4.6 18.4 42.5 34.5 $75,001 to $100,000 3.0 24.2 28.8 43.9 More than $100,000 12.2 14.9 32.4 40.5 IlIeaal dumpinQ . Fifteen percent of the respondents reported seeing illegal dumping in the city either frequently (4.3 percent) or sometimes (10.8 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 24 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Emergency Services Figure 12 Ratings of Police Services (n=383) 600/0 50% 48.3% 40% 300/0 20% 1 00/0 00/0 Excellent Good Fair Poor · Respondents were asked to rate the services provided by the police department. As shown in Figure 12, 88.5 percent of the respondents reported that police department services were either excellent (40.2 percent) or good (48.3 percent). · Ratings were compared by type of contact the respondent had with a police officer in the past 12 months. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 25 Figure 13 Comparison of NRH Police Services to Other Communities (n=355) 60% 51.3% 50% 40% 30% 20% 1 0% 0% Better Same Worse . Respondents were asked if NRH has better, same or worse police services compared to services in other communities. Forty-three percent of the respondents reported that NRH police services are better than services in other communities (see Figure 13). Over half (51.3 percent) said police services are the same. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 26 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 14 Contact with NRH Police Officer in Past Year (n=400) Yes 51.00/0 No 49.0% . Respondents were asked if they had come into contact with a North Richland Hills police officer in the past year. As shown in Figure 14, over half (51.0 percent) of the respondents reported contact with an NRH police officer. The percentage of the respondents who reported contact with an NRH police officer generally decreased as the age of the respondent increased, and increased as education increased. Contact was greater among respondents with children (65.0 percent) and respondents employed fulltime (59.5 percent). . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 27 Table 13 Contact with NRH Police Officer by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Age of respondent 1 8 to 25 77.8 22.2 26 to 35 53.1 46.9 36 to 45 65.0 35.0 46 to 60 49.6 50.4 61 to 70 50.0 50.0 71 and over 26.3 73.7 Have children Yes 65.0 35.0 No 43.7 56.3 Education High school grad or less 43.2 56.8 Some college 45.9 54.1 College grad 60.9 39.1 Grad school/degree 62.5 37.5 Employment status Fulltime 59.5 40.5 Part-time 51.6 48.4 U nemployed/ student/homemaker 50.9 49.1 Retired 34.3 65.7 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 28 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 14 Reason for Contact with Police Officer (n=203) Traffic violation To re ort a crime Reported noise/suspicious behavior in nei hborhood Social interaction Called 911 for hel Called to make an in ui Talked to olice on atrol Police res onded to alarm Traffic accident Participated in Citizens Police Academy or other crime revention ro ram Police makin in uiries Vehicle violation Other 11.3 9.4 6.9 5.9 4.9 3.9 3.4 3.0 3.0 2.0 6.4 . Respondents who had been in contact with a police officer in the past year were asked the reason for the contact. As shown in Table 14, the most common reasons for contact were traffic violations (20.2 percent) or to report a crime (19.7 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 29 ...-' Figure 15 Police Officer was Courteous (n=202) Yes 95.0% No 5.0% . Respondents in contact with a police officer were asked if that officer was courteous. As shown in Figure 15, nearly all of those respondents said the officer was courteous. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 16 Police Service Provided in Timely Fashion (n=192) Yes 94.80/0 No 5.2% . Respondents in contact with a police officer were asked if the service was provided in a timely fashion. As shown in Figure 16, 94.8 percent indicated that it was. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 31 Figure 17 Ratings of Fire Services (n=341) 1 0% 0.0% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor . Respondents were asked to rate the services provided by the fire department. As shown in Figure 17, 97.7 percent of the respondents rated the fire department's services as excellent (53.7 percent) or good (44.0 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 32 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 50% 400/0 30% 20% 1 0% Figure 18 Comparison of NRH Fire Services to Other Communities (n=328) 60% 56.1 % 0% Better Same Worse Respondents were asked if NRH has better, same or worse fire services compared to services in other communities. NRH fire services were reported to be better by 43.0 percent of the respondents and the same as other communities by 56.1 percent. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 33 Figure 19 Needed Fire or EMS Service in Past Year (n=400) Yes 11.8% No 88.2% . Respondents were asked if they had needed fire or EMS service during the past year. As shown in Figure 19, 11.8 percent of the respondents reported needing fire or EMS services during the past year. . Respondents age 71 or older (22.8 percent) were more likely to report needing fire or EMS service during the past year that those in other age groups: 18 to 25 (11.1 percent), 26 to 35 (18.4 percent), 36 to 45 (10.0 percent), 46 to 60 (10.2 percent), and 61 to 70 (2.9 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 34 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 15 Reason for Contact with Fire or EMS Personnel (n=47) Percentage responding Called 911 for EMS 63.8 Called 911 to report a fire 14.9 Responded to alarm 6.4 Hazardous situation 6.4 Traffic accident 4.3 Called to make an inquiry 0.0 Other 4.3 · Respondents who had been in contact with fire or EMS personnel in the past year were asked the reason for the contact. As shown in Table 15, the most common reason for contact with fire or EMS personnel was calling 911 for EMS assistance (63.8 percent). · Other reasons for contact included changing the smoke detector and a social occasion. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 35 Figure 20 Fire or EMS Employee was Courteous (n=45) Yes 100.0% No 0.0% . Respondents in contact with a fire or EMS employee were asked if that employee was courteous. As shown in Figure 20, 100.0 percent of these respondents indicated that the employee was courteous. Survey-Research Center, University Of North Texas 36 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 21 Fire Department Responded Promptly (n=47) Yes 97.9% No 2.1 % . Respondents in contact with the fire department were asked if the department responded promptly. Ninety-eight percent of these respondents answered "yes" (see Figure 21). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 37 Table 16 Service Performance Percenta Excellent Good Poor 41.7 52.4 0.5 45.0 44.7 2.5 40.4 48.2 3.5 33.8 53.4 2.1 23.7 61.4 12.9 2.0 13.2 63.6 20.2 3.1 10.3 50.9 29.3 9.5 . Respondents were read the list of services that the city provides its residents and asked to rate the City's performance on each service. As shown in Table 16, 85 percent or more rated maintenance of parks (94.1 percent), garbage collection (89.7 percent), recycling (88.6 percent), animal control (87.2 percent), and maintenance of landscape medians and rights-of-way (85.1 percent) as excellent or good. . Seventy-seven percent rated the condition of non-residential streets as excellent or good, while 61.2 percent rated residential streets as excellent or good. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 38 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 17 Services Needing Improvement Percenta e res Much Some No 17.9 60.5 21.7 13.2 46.6 40.2 11 .1 42.3 46.6 8.3 45.0 46.6 8.6 44.5 46.9 3.5 49.4 47.1 3.7 35.7 60.6 4.4 33.6 62.0 4.0 30.8 65.2 3.3 30.5 66.3 4.7 28.2 67.1 4.1 28.3 67.7 4.8 23.9 71 .3 4.1 23.6 72.3 0.6 18.8 80.7 · Respondents were asked whether the city services listed in Table 17 needed much, some or no improvement. Services are listed in descending order of their reported need for improvement. Street maintenance · Street maintenance (78.4 percent) ranked highest among services that needed much (17.9 percent) or some improvement (60.5 percent). Street liahtina · Sixty percent of the respondents reported that street lighting needed much (13.2 percent) or some (46.6 percent) improvement. · Seventy-four percent of respondents with children under 6 and 57.6 percent of respondents without children this age indicated that street lighting needed much or some improvement. Code enforcement · Code enforcement was reported by 53.4 percent of the respondents to need much (11.1 percent) or some (42.3 percent) improvement. Zonina · Fifty-three percent of the respondents indicated that zoning needed much (8.3 percent) or some (45.0 percent) improvement. · The need for zoning improvement (much or some) varied with length of residence: 3 to 12 months (63.6 percent), 1 to 5 years (39.3 percent), 6 to 10 years (48.1 percent), and more than 10 years (62.7 percent). Male respondents (57.6 percent) were more likely than female respondents (50.5 percent) to report that zoning needed much or some improvement. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 39 Storm drainaae · Fifty-three percent of the respondents reported that storm drainage needed much (8.6 percent) or some (44.5 percent) improvement. La n d scap i n a/bea utif ica ti on · Landscaping/beautification was reported to need some (3.5 percent) or much (49.4 percent) improvement by 52.9 of the respondents. · Respondents with children under 6 (65.5 percent) were more likely to report that landscaping/beautification needed much or some improvement than respondents without children under 6 (50.9 percent). Police protection · Thirty-nine percent of the respondents reported that police protection needed much (3.7 percent) or some (35.7 percent) improvement. Recreational proarammina · Thirty-eight percent of the respondents indicated that recreational programming needed much (4.4 percent) or some (33.6 percent) improvement. · The need for much or some improvement of recreational programming varied with employment status: part-time (60.7 percent), unemployed/student/homemaker (39.1 percent), fulltime (38.8 percent), and retired (26.9 percent). Senior citizen center services · Over one-third (34.8 percent) of the respondents reported that senior citizen center services needed much (4.0 percent) or some (30.8 percent) improvement. Library services · Library services was reported by 33.8 percent of the respondents to need much (3.3 percent) or some (30.5 percent) improvement. · The need for much or some improvement varied by length of residence: 3 to 12 months (29.2 percent), 1 to 5 years (27.7 percent), 6 to 1 0 years (53.7 percent), and more than 10 years (31.6 percent). Animal control · Thirty-three percent of the respondents indicated that animal control needed much (4.7 percent) or some (28.2 percent) improvement. Parks · Thirty-two percent of the respondents reported that parks needed much (4.1 percent) or some (28.3 percent) improvement. Garbaae collection · Garbage collection was reported to need much (4.8 percent) or some (23.9 percent) improvement by 28.7 percent of the respondents. Water service · Over one-quarter (27.7 percent) of the respondents indicated that water service needed much (4.1 percent) or some (23.6 percent) improvement. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · The need for much or some improvement to water service varied by length of residence: 3 to 12 months (31.3 percent), 1 to 5 years (21.0 percent), 6 to 10 years (35.4 percent), and more than 10 years (29.1 percent). Fire protection · Nineteen percent of the respondents reported that fire protection needed much (0.6 percent) or some (18.8 percent) improvement. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 41 Traffic Figure 22 Ratings of Traffic Flow on Major City Streets (n=400) 60% 500/0 43.5% 1 00/0 40% 30% 20% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor · Respondents were asked to rate traffic flow on major city streets. As shown in Figure 22, half (49.5 percent) of the respondents rated traffic flow as excellent (6.0 percent) or good (43.5 percent). Thirty-nine percent rated traffic flow as fair and 11.3 percent said it was poor. · The percentage of the respondents who reported that traffic flow on major city streets was excellent or good varied with income: $25,000 or less (48.9 percent); $25,001- $50,000 (50.0 percent); $50,001 to $75,000 (25.1 percent); $75,001 to $100,000 (39.4 percent); and more than $100,000 (50.0 percent). Homeowners (50.5 percent) were more likely than renters (44.3 percent) to rate traffic flow on major city streets as excellent or good. · Problem areas due to excess traffic include Loop 820, Rufe Snow, Davis Blvd., and Denton Highway. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 42 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 23 Ratings of Traffic Signal Timing on Major City Streets (n=394) 60% 51.5% 500/0 400/0 30% 20% 1 0% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor · Respondents were asked to rate traffic signal timing on major city streets. As shown in Figure 23, 56.8 percent of the respondents rated signal timing as excellent (5.3 percent) or good (51.5 percent). Forty-three percent rated it as fair (27.9 percent) or poor (15.2 percent). Female respondents (62.6 percent) were more likely than male respondents (46.9 percent) to rate traffic signal timing as excellent or good. In general, there are complaints that one must stop at every light along Rufe Snow, Davis Blvd., and Mid-Cities Blvd. because the lights are not synchronized. Others mentioned that lights do not stay green long enough for traffic to flow or that lights do not remain yellow long enough. Another comment made by several respondents was that lights remained red for far too long. · · Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 43 VI. COMMUNICATIONS Figure 24 Get Enough Information about City Programs and Services (n=396) Yes 81.8% No 18.2% . Respondents were asked if they got enough information about City programs and services. A large majority (81.8 percent) of the respondents answered "yes" (see Figure 24). . The percentage of the respondents who reported getting enough information about City programs and services varied with the age of the respondent: 18 to 25 (47.1 percent), 26 to 35 (65.3 percent), 36 to 45 (93.8 percent), 46 to 60 (85.0 percent), 61 to 70 (81.8 percent), and 71 and over (82.1 percent). A greater percentage of homeowners (83.7 percent) than renters (72.1 percent) reported getting enough information. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 44 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I Internet Figure 25 Access to Internet (n=399) 60% 50.4% 50% 400/0 300/0 20% 1 0% 0% Home Work Both No access · Respondents were asked if they had access to a computer with Internet access at work, home or both. As shown in Figure 25, 50.4 percent of the respondents indicated they had Internet access at both home and work, while 32.6 percent said they had access at home only. Thirteen percent had no access to the Internet. · The percentage of the respondents who reported Internet access at home and work increased with length of residence, education, and income, and varied with employment status (see Table 18). Male respondents, respondents with children and homeowners were more likely to have Internet access at home and work. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 45 Table 18 Access to Internet by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Home Work Both No access Length of residence 3 to 12 months 36.4 15.2 30.3 18.2 1 to 5 years 34.4 2.3 51.6 11.7 6 to 1 0 years 27.0 1.6 63.5 7.9 More than 1 0 years 32.6 3.4 48.6 15.4 Gender Female 36.1 3.9 42.0 18.0 Male 26.4 3.5 65.3 4.9 Have children Yes 29.2 2.9 60.6 7.3 No 34.4 4.2 45.0 16.4 Education High school grad or less 37.9 3.2 29.5 29.5 Some college 32.4 2.0 52.0 13.5 College grad 30.4 7.0 59.1 3.5 Grad school/degree 25.0 2.5 70.0 2.5 Employment status Fulltime 10.5 6.7 77.1 5.7 Part-time 41.9 0.0 51.6 6.5 Un employed/student/homemaker 56.4 0.0 27.3 16.4 Retired 61.8 1.0 7.8 29.4 Income $25,000 or less 33.3 6.7 17.8 42.2 $25,001 to $50,000 45.3 7.0 32.6 15.1 $50,001 to $75,000 36.8 1 .1 55.2 6.9 $75,001 to $100,000 18.2 3.0 75.8 3.0 More than $100,000 21.6 2.7 75.7 0.0 Own or rent home Own 33.4 2.4 52.5 11.6 Rent 27.9 11.5 41.0 19.7 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 26 Visited NRH Web Site (n=340) Yes 57.6% No 42.4% . Respondents with Internet access were asked if any member of their household had visited North Richland Hills' Web site (www.nrhtx.com). Fifty-eight percent report visiting the Web site (see Figure 26). As shown in Table 19, the percentage of the respondents that reported visiting the NRH Web site varied with the age of the respondent, and increased as education and income increased. Respondents with children (71 .4 percent) were more likely than respondents without children (49.5 percent) to report visiting the Web site. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 47 Table 19 Visited NRH Web Site by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Age of respondent 18 to 25 42.9 57.1 26 to 35 69.6 30.4 36 to 45 71.1 28.9 46 to 60 54.0 46.0 61 to 70 52.7 47.3 71 and over 32.0 68.0 Have children Yes 71.4 28.6 No 49.5 50.5 Education High school grad or less 42.2 57.8 Some college 55.2 44.8 College grad 64.9 35.1 Grad school/degree 69.2 30.8 Income $25,000 or less 30.8 69.2 $25,001 to $50,000 47.9 52.1 $50,001 to $75,000 69.1 30.9 $75,001 to $100,000 58.7 41.3 More than $100,000 64.9 35.1 Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 48 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 27 Found Needed Information on Web Site (n=194) Yes 94.8% No 5.2% . Respondents who said a member of the household had visited the NRH Web site were asked if they found the information they needed. As shown in Figure 27, 94.8 percent of those respondents reported finding the information they needed. Ninety-seven percent of the respondents without children under age 6 and 86.8 percent of those with children under 6 reported finding the information they needed on the Web site. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 49 City Newsletter Figure 28 Read City Newsletter (n=399) Yes 92.7% No 7 .3% · Respondents were asked if they read the newsletter the City mails to its citizens three times a year. As shown in Figure 28, 92.7 percent of the respondents reported reading the newsletter. · The percentage of the respondents who reported reading the City newsletter increased as education increased: high school graduate or less (86.2 percent), some college (94.6 percent), college graduate (94.8 percent), and graduate school/degree (97.5 percent) . · Reports of reading the City newsletter were greater among homeowners (95.8 percent) when compared to renters (78.3 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 50 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 29 City Newsletter Provides Information about Services and Programs (n=367) Yes 92.9% No 7.1 % . Respondents who read the city newsletter were asked if the newsletter was useful to them in providing information about City programs and services. As shown in Figure 29, 92.9 percent of those respondents found the newsletter to be useful. Ninety-four percent of homeowners and 84.8 percent of renters indicated that the City newsletter was useful to them. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 51 Cable Television Figure 30 Have Cable Television at Home (n=398) Yes 37.20/0 No 62.8% . Respondents were asked if they had cable television in their home. As shown in Figure 30, over one-third (37.2 percent) of the respondents had cable television. . Nearly half (49.3 percent) of the respondents with children age 13 to 18 reported having cable television at home compared to 34.7 percent of the respondents without children in this age group. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 52 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 31 Watch Citicable NRH (n=148) Yes 59.50/0 No 40.50/0 . Respondents who had cable television were asked if they watched Citicable NRH, the City of North Richland Hills government access Channel 7. Sixty percent of the respondents with cable television reported watching Citicable NRH (see Figure 31). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas S3 Table 20 Citicable Programs Watched* (n=88) Cit Council meetin s Plannin and Zonin Commission meetin s Informational announcements Texas Parks & Wildlife ro ram Inside NRH Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Milita News Rec X ress Fur Friends Tarrant Count Commissioners Court Other Percentage res ondin 52.3 25.0 9.1 3.4 3.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.1 1.1 29.5 · Respondents were asked which Citicable programs they preferred to watch. Fifty-two percent of the respondents who watched Citicable programs reported watching City Council meetings (see Table 20). One-quarter (25.0 percent) reported watching Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. · Thirty percent of the respondents answered "other." The most commonly mentioned "other" program was about the local school district. · As shown in Table 21, the percentage of the respondents who reported watching City Council meetings generally increased as length of residence increased, and was greater among male respondents and homeowners. Table 21 Watch City Council Meetings by Selected Demographics Percentage responding Yes No Length of residence 3 to 12 months 14.3 85.7 1 to 5 years 42.9 57.1 6 to 10 years 78.6 21.4 More than 1 0 years 54.3 45.7 Gender Female 43.1 56.9 Male 64.9 35.1 Own or rent home Own 59.2 40.8 Rent 8.3 91.7 Because respondents could give more than one answer, the percentages will not total to 100.0. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 54 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 22 Source of Most News about NRH (n=396) Percentage responding Fort Worth Star- Telegram 32.8 City newsletter 23.0 Local television news 12.1 Through word of mouth 8.6 City Web site 7.6 Cable television 4.3 Calling the city 3.5 Utility bill inserts 1.5 All of the above 1.5 Dallas Morning News 1.0 Library 1.0 Other Web site 0.8 Other 2.3 · Respondents were asked where they got most of their news about North Richland Hills. As shown in Table 22, the two most common sources were the Fort Worth Star- Telegram (32.8 percent) and the City newsletter (23.0 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 55 Contact with City Officials Figure 32 Contacted City Officials in Past 12 Months (n=399) Yes 36.3% No 63.7% · Respondents were asked if a member of their household had contacted the City of North Richland Hills about a complaint, request for service, or for information in the past 12 months. As shown in Figure 32, over one-third (36.3 percent) of the respondents reported contacting the City of NRH in the past 12 months. · The percentage of the respondents who reported contacting the City of North Richland Hills in the past 12 months generally increased as income increased: $25,000 or less (26.7 percent); $25,001 to $50,000 (28.2 percent); $50,001 to $75,000 (47.1 percent), $75,001 to $100,000 (37.9 percent), and more than $100,000 (50.0 percent). · Homeowners (38.6 percent) were more likely than renters (23.0 percent) to report contacting the City in the past 12 months. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 56 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 23 City Person or Office Contacted (n=144) Percentage responding Public Works 26.4 Mayor or Council 13.9 Police 13.9 Planning and Zoning 10.3 Animal Control 7.6 Neighborhood Services 5.6 City Manager's office 4.9 Parks and Recreation 4.2 Water/Utility Billing 4.2 Inspections 3.5 Fire 2.1 Budget and Research 1.4 Economic Development 0.7 Other 1.4 · Respondents who reported contacting the city in the past 12 months were asked who or what office they contacted. As shown in Table 23, over one-quarter of the respondents reported contacting the Public Works Department. Fourteen percent each contacted the Mayor/Council (13.9 percent) and the Police Department (13.9 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 57 Figure 33 Satisfied with Results of Contact (n=121) Satisfied 66.90/0 Not satisfied 33.10/0 . Respondents who had contacted the City were asked if they were satisfied with the results of the contact. As shown in Figure 33, two-thirds (66.9 percent) of the respondents were satisfied with the results of their contact with the City. . Satisfaction varied with length of residence: 3 to 12 months (100.0 percent), 1 to 5 years (63.4 percent), 6 to 10 years (47.6 percent), and more than 10 years (72.0 percent). Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 58 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 34 City Officials were Courteous and Helpful (n=118) Yes 86.40/0 No 13.60/0 . Respondents who had contacted the City were asked if the people they contacted were courteous and helpful. As shown in Figure 34, 86.4 percent of the respondents who had contacted the City reported the officials were courteous and helpful. A greater percentage of respondents with children under age 6 (100.0 percent) than those without children under age 6 (83.5 percent) indicated that the people they contacted were courteous and helpful. . Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 59 VII. CONCLUSIONS The 2005 North Richland Hills Citizen Survey reveals that the majority of respondents (89.9 percent) rated the quality of life in North Richland Hills as excellent (32.0 percent) or good (57.9 percent). Eighty-four percent of the respondents rated the condition of the NRH community as excellent (19.5 percent) or good (64.3 percent). Eighty-eight percent planned to remain in NRH in the next several years. Ninety-two percent indicated they would recommend North Richland Hills to a friend or family member as a good place to live. Respondents were most likely to report using the NRH20 (38.3 percent) and the Recreation Center (28.3 percent) facilities. Recreation facilities (86.6 percent), recreation programs (87.8 percent), and city parks (92.6 percent) all received favorable (excellent or good) ratings from respondents who used them. A large majority of the respondents (95.2 percent) rated the public library services as excellent or good. Litter (56.4 percent) and high grass and weeds (50.9 percent) were seen frequently or sometimes by over half of the respondents. Other code violations seen frequently or sometimes were stray animals (33.3 percent), junk vehicles (29.4 percent), substandard or deteriorating housing (29.1 percent), drainage or flooding problems (24.0 percent), and illegal dumping (15.1 percent). NRH police services received excellent or good ratings from 88.5 percent of the respondents. When compared to other communities, 43.4 percent of the respondents reported that NRH police services were better and 51.3 percent answered, "the same." Ninety-eight percent of the respondents rated fire services as excellent or good. Nearly all respondents indicated that NRH fire services were either better (43.0 percent) or the same (56.1 percent) as other communities' fire services. Most city services received favorable ratings (excellent or good) from 85 percent or more of the respondents: maintenance of parks (94.1 percent), garbage collection (89.7 percent), recycling (88.6 percent), animal control (87.2 percent), and maintenance of landscape medians and rights-of-way (85.1 percent). Ratings for the condition of non-residential or major streets (76.8 percent) and residential streets (61.2 percent) were less favorable. Street maintenance was reported to need much (17.9 percent) or some (60.5 percent) improvement. Following street maintenance was street lighting with 59.8 percent of the respondents reporting a need for much (13.2 percent) or some (46.6 percent) improvement. Fifty percent rated the traffic flow on major City streets as excellent or good, while 56.8 percent rated traffic signal timing as excellent or good. Eighty-two percent indicated that they get enough information about City programs and services. The two most common sources of news about NRH were the Fort Worth Star- Telegram (32.8 percent) and the City newsletter (23.0 percent). Ninety-three percent of the respondents reported reading the City newsletter and 92.9 percent of those respondents found the newsletter useful. Half (50.4 percent) of the respondents had access to the Internet at home and work. Access to the Internet from both home and work increased as household income and education increased. Fifty-eight percent of respondents with Internet access reported visiting the City's web site. Nearly all of those respondents found the information they needed. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents had cable television at home. Of those with cable television, 59.5 percent reported watching Citicable NRH. Half (52.3 percent) of this group watched City Council meetings. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 60 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Thirty-six percent of the respondents reported contacting the city about a complaint, request for service, or for information in the past 12 months. Departments contacted most often were the Public Works department (26.4 percent), the Mayor or Council (13.9 percent) and Police Department (13.9 percent). A large percentage of city officials were courteous and helpful. Two-thirds (66.9 percent) were satisfied with the results of their contact with the City. Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 61 APPENDIX: SURVEY INSTRUMENT Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 62 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITIZEN SURVEY 2005 Hello, my name is I'm calling from the Survey Research Center at the University of North Texas. The City of North Richland Hills is conducting a survey of its citizens and I would like to talk with any female/male age 18 or older. (TO RESPONDENT) The City is conducting a survey to determine how citizens rate City services. The questions that I want to ask you will take about 15 minutes and your answers will be useful to the City as it develops programs and budgets for the future. All of your answers will be kept confidential. This project has been reviewed by the UNT Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects. If you have any questions, please call 1-800- 687-7055. 1. To be sure that we are speaking with people in all parts of the city, can you first give me your zip code? (DO NOT READ RESPONSES WHEN ALL IN CAPS) 1. 76180 2. 76034 3. 76054 4. 76053 5.76118 6.76117 7.76148 8. 76248 9. OTHER (TERMINATE INTERVIEW) 10. DK/NR (TERMINATE INTERVIEW) 1A. That zip code includes more than one City, can you tell me the name of the city you live in? 1. North Richland Hills 2. Bedford 3. Colleyville 4. Euless 5. Haltom City 6. Hurst 7. Keller 8. Richland Hills 9. Watauga 10. Other 99. DK/NR IF ANSWER IS NOT "NORTH RICHLAND HillS" TERMINATE INTERVIEW 2. How long have you lived in North Richland Hills? 1. lESS THAN 3 MONTHS (TERMINATE INTERVIEW) 2. NO lONGER liVE IN NORTH RICHLAND HilLS (TERMINATE INTERVIEW) 3. 3 TO 12 MONTHS 4. 1-5 YEARS 5. 6-1 0 YEARS 6. MORE THAN 1 0 YEARS 9. NR/DK Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 63 Quality of Life 3. Generally, would you rate the quality of life in North Richland Hills as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 4. In terms of cleanliness, quality of houses, and general appearance, would you rate the condition of the community as excellent, good, fair, poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK Parks and Recreation Our next set of questions are regarding parks and recreational facilities and programs. 5. Please tell me whether you, or a member of your family, have used any of the following recreation facilities in the past year. YES NO NR/DK a. NRH20 1 2 9 b. Richland Tennis Center 1 2 9 c. Recreation Center 1 2 9 d. Bursey Road Senior Center 1 2 9 e. Dan Echols Senior Center 1 2 9 6. Generally, would you rate North Richland Hills recreation facilities as excellent, good, fair or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 7. Have you or a member of your family participated in any of the City1s recreational programs during the past year? 1. Yes (ASK Q7A) 2. No (SKIP TO Oa) 7A. How would you rate the City's recreational programs? Would you rate them as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 8. Have you or a member of your family used a North Richland Hills Park in the past year? Yes (ASK QaA) No (SKIP To Q9) 8A. Would you rate city parks overall as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK Librarv 9. Have you or a member of your family used the North Richland Hills Public Library in the past year? Yes (ASK Q9A) No (SKIP To Q10) 9A. Generally, would you rate the services provided at the North Richland Hills Public Library as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 64 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Neiahborhood Services and Public Works 10. How often would you say you have seen the following problems in your City? Have you seen frequently, sometimes, rarely or never? How about. . . Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never NR/DK a. Litter 1 2 3 4 9 b. Illegal dumping 1 2 3 4 9 c. High grass and 1 2 3 4 9 weeds d. Junk vehicles 1 2 3 4 9 e. Stray Animals 1 2 3 4 9 f. Drainage or Flooding 1 2 3 4 9 Problems g. Substandard or 1 2 3 4 9 Deteriorating Housing Emeraencv Services 11. Now please think about emergency services in North Richland Hills. Overall how would you rate the service provided by the police department? Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 12. Compared to police services in other communities, do you think North Richland Hills has better, about the same, or worse police service? 1. BETTER 2. SAME 3. WORSE [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 13. In the past year, have you come into contact with a North Richland Hills police officer? 1. YES (ASK Q13A -13C) 2. NO (SKIP TO Q14) 13A. What was the reason for your contact? 1. TO REPORT A CRIME 2. TRAFFIC VIOLATION 3. PARTICIPATED IN CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY OR OTHER CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAM 4. CALLED 911 FOR HELP 5. CALLED TO MAKE AN INQUIRY 6. OTHER [SPECIFY] 9. DK/NR 13B. Was the police officer you spoke with courteous? 1. YES 2. NO 13C. Was police service provided in a timely fashion? 1 . YES 2. NO Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 65 14. Now we will discuss the Fire Department. Overall how would you rate the service provided by the Fire Department? Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 15. Compared to fire services in other communities, do you think North Richland Hills has better, about the same, or worse fire service? 1. BETTER 2. SAME 3. WORSE [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 16. Have you or anyone in your household needed Fire or EMS service during the past 12 months? 1. YES (ASK Q 16A - C) 2. NO (SKIP TO Q 17) 9. NR/DK 16A. What was the reason for your contact? 2. TRAFFIC ACCIDENT 3. CALLED 911 FOR EMS 4. CALLED 911 TO REPORT A FIRE 5. CALLED TO MAKE AN INQUIRY 6. OTHER [SPECIFY] 9. DK/NR 16B. Was the employee you spoke with courteous? 1 . YES 2. NO 16C. Did the Fire Department respond promptly? 3. YES 4. NO 17. I am going to read a list of services that the city provides to its residents. For each of the services, rate the City's performance on each service as excellent, good, fair or poor. The first is animal control. Would you rate the city's animal control as excellent, good, fair, or poor? [Ask why for each poor rating]. Excellent Good Fair Poor NR/DK [Specify] a. Animal control 1 2 3 4 9 b. Garbage collection 1 2 3 4 9 c. Recycling 1 2 3 4 9 d. Maintenance of landscape 1 2 3 4 9 medians and rights-of-way e. Maintenance of Parks 1 2 3 4 9 f. Condition of Residential Streets 1 2 3 4 9 g. Condition of non-residential or 1 2 3 4 9 major streets Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 66 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 18. We have talked about a number of City services so far. Now I am going to mention some of those services again. After I mention each service please tell me whether that service needs much, some, or no improvement. Service Much Some No NR/DK (ROTATE LIST) a. Garbage Collection 1 2 3 9 b. Street Maintenance 1 2 3 9 c. Library Services 1 2 3 9 d. Recreational Programming 1 2 3 9 e. Parks 1 2 3 9 f. Police Protection 1 2 3 9 g. Fire Protection 1 2 3 9 h. Code Enforcement 1 2 3 9 i. Landscaping/beautification 1 2 3 9 j. Animal control 1 2 3 9 k. Water Service 1 2 3 9 I. Storm Drainage 1 2 3 9 m. Street Lighting 1 2 3 9 n. Zoning 1 2 3 9 o. Senior Citizen Center 1 2 3 9 Services 19. INTERVIEWER: FOR EACH SERVICE WHERE MUCH IMPROVEMENT IS NEEDED ASK: You mentioned that needs improvement? Can you tell me what needs improving? Service (list): 1 . 2. 3. 4. Traffic 20. How would you rate the traffic flow on major City streets. Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK 21. How would you rate traffic signal timing on major City streets. Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair, or poor? 1. EXCELLENT 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK Communications 22. Do you think you get enough information about City programs and services? 1. Yes 2. No 9. NR/DK 23. Do you have access to a computer with Internet access at work, home or both? 1. HOME 2. WORK 3. BOTH 4. NO ACCESS (DO NOT ASK Q24) 9. NR/DK (DO NOT ASK Q24) Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 67 24. Have you or a member of your household visited North Richland Hills's web site www.nrhtx.com? 1. Yes 2. No 9. NR/DK 24A. Were you or your household member able to find the information that you needed on www.nrhtx.com? 1. Yes 2. No 9. NR/DK 25. Do you read the newsletter that the City mails to its citizens three times a year? 1. Yes (ASK Q25A) 2. No (SKIP TO Q26) 9. NR/DK 25A. Is the City Newsletter useful to you in providing information about City services and programs? 1. Yes 2. No 9. NR/DK 26. Do you have cable television in your home? 1. Yes (ASK Q26A-B) 2. No (SKIP TO Q27) 9. NR/DK 26A. Do you watch Citicable NRH--the City of North Richland Hills government access Channel 7? 1. Yes 2. No 9. DK/NR 26B. Which Citicable programs do you prefer to watch: a. CITY COUNCil MEETINGS b. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETINGS c. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE lUNCHEON d. MILITARY NEWS e. TEXAS PARKS & WilDLIFE PROGRAM f. INSIDE NRH g. REC XPRESS h. FURRY FRIENDS i. TARRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT j. INFORMATIONAL ANNOUNCEMENTS k. OTHER 27. Do you get most of your news about North Richland Hills from the newspaper, local television, the city's cable channel, the city's web site, by calling the city or some other method? Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 68 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Contact with City Officials 28. Now I would like to ask you about contacts you have had with City officials. Have you or a member of your household contacted the City of North Richland Hills about a complaint, request for service, or for information in the past 12 months? 1. Yes (ASK Q28A-C) 2. NO (SKIP TO Q29) 9. NR/DK 28A. Who in the City did you contact, what person or office? 1. CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 6. POLICE 2. MAYOR OR COUNCIL 7. FIRE 3. PUBLIC WORKS 8. PARKS AND RECREATION 4. PLANNING/ZONING 9. OTHER, 5. INSPECTIONS 99. NR/DK 28B. Were you generally satisfied or not satisfied with the results you got? 1. SATISFIED 2. NOT SATISFIED 9. NR/DK 28C. Were the people you contacted courteous and helpful or not courteous and helpful when you called? 1. YES, HELPFUL 2. NO, NOT HELPFUL 9. NR/DK Profile 30. Now for the last few questions, I would like to ask you several things about yourself so that we can develop a general profile of our sample. First of all, are you between the ages of . . . (INTERVIEWER: CODE RESPONSE INTO CORRECT CATEGORY) 1. 18-25 5. 61-70 2. 26-35 6. 71 and over 3. 36-45 9. NR/DK 4. 46-60 31. Are you employed fulltime, part-time, presently unemployed, retired, or are you a student, or homemaker? 1. FULL TIME 2. PART-TIME 3. UNEMPLOYED 4. RETIRED 5. STUDENT 6. HOMEMAKER 9. NR/DK 32. How many years of education have you completed? 1. 8 OR LESS 5. COLLEGE GRAD 2. SOME HIGH SCHOOL 6. GRAD SCHOOUGRAD DEGREE 3. HIGH SCHOOL GRAD 9. NR/DK 4. SOME COLLEGE Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 69 33. I am going to read several different income categories. Without telling me your exact income, into which category did your total household income for the past year fall? 1. Under $10,000 5. $75,001-100,000 2. $10,001-25,000 6. Over $100,000 3. $25,001-50,000 9. DK/NR 4. $50,001-75,000 34. Please tell me if you have any children living at home in the following age groups. Less than 6 years old 6-12 years old 13-18 years old YES 1 1 1 NO 2 2 2 NR/DK 9 9 9 35. Do you own your home or do you rent? 1. OWN 2. RENT 9. NR/DK 36. Looking ahead for the next several years, do you plan on remaining in North Richland Hills? 1. Yes (SKIP TO Q37) 2. No (ASK Q36A) 9. NR/DK 36A. What is the primary reason causing you to consider leaving North Richland Hills? 1 . COST OF HOUSI NG 2. ACCESS TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3. JOB RELOCATION 4. MOVE TO SMALLER CITY 5. CONGESTION 6. CLOSER TO JOB 7. OTHER, 9. DK/NR 37. Would you recommend North Richland Hills as a good place to live to a friend or family member? 1. Yes 2. No [SPECIFY] 9. NR/DK Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. We believe that this project will help City officials provide better services to all citizens. 38. INTERVIEWER: RECORD GENDER OF RESPONDENT 1. FEMALE 2. MALE 9. NR/DK Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas 70 Table of Contents o Overview o Lot Sizes and Building set back o Neighborhood Amenities o Building Restrictions o Exhibits - Typical Elevations - Home Typical Street Lamp Typical Wall EI~vations Overview Town Walk Chase The springboard to North Richland Hills new Residential In fill- Planned Development (RI-PD). It is designed to appeal to an increasing population of residents who prefer a luxury single family detached home with less yard maintenance. Convenience, luxury, and personality are the theme. To view a product that is similar in lot size to design you could tour the addition in Hurst known as Grayson Villas. Grayson Villas adheres to an "Old World" theme as will Town Walk Chase with large homes constructed onsmaller easily maintained lots. T own Walk Chase is unique in that it is inviting to the surrounding existing residences. It is located adjacent to N .R.H. ' s new biking and jogging trail along the current Tarantula Train Tracks and close to the new public park on the next block. Town Walk Chase H.O.A. offers shaded park areas for these bikers and joggers to share .with its residences along with five such areas within its walls. Town Walk Chase started with a design of 31 single family lots. After much discussion with members ofD.R.C. it is now a design of27 lots and 7 landscaped and irrigated HOA areas. The approximant usable area in Town Walk Chase is 5.8 acres this equates to approximately 4.65 units to the acre which is close to the density of its larger neighbors to the south R2 and less density than the R - 8 and R4D to the north and west. T own Walk Chase will be very restrictive in its building requirements leaving little to chance in an effort to keep the homes in a similar price range to each other. We expect the homes to range from $250,000 to $350,000 each. Lot Size and Building Set Backs · Average lot size approximately 7500 square feet · Minimum lot size approximately 5000 square feet · Building pad size approximately 2400 square feet ( 40x60) · Minimum building set back is 1 0 feet / · Garage set back is 20 feet (Front entry) · Minimum side yard is 5 feet . · Minimum distance between homes is 1 0 feet · Minimum rear yard building line is 1 0 feet · Block B, lots 2 thru 10, are required to use opaque glass on any second floor windows which are facing south Town Walk Chase Neighborhood Amenities o Old World Look o Non linear streets o 7 HOA Park areas o Extensive landscaping o Extensive use of park benches throughout o Brick paved accents throughout the subdivision o Irrigated and landscaped parkway entry o Irrigated and landscaped roadway circle at Chase 81. and Town Walk Dr. o Matching, decorative wrought iron -mail boxes for each home o Brick wall with brick columns and wrought iron along Amundson 6' minimum o Landscaped, irrigated, and lighted at both entries o "Old World" look wrought iron street lamps throughout o Meandering side w~lk within 9 ~ feet of privacy wall along Amundson Dr. o 6 ' Wood Privacy Fence along southern boundary line Town Walk Chase Building Restrictions/Covenants o 21 00 square feet minimum living space o 2 car garage minimum o 1 0 feet minimum plate lines 1 st floor o 9 feet minimum plate lines 2nd floor o 1 00% masonry 1 st floor o 80% masonry 2nd floor o All front windows and doors will have cast stone, stone, or brick accents, double row lock, soldiers courses, etc surrounds o Hardi board or other concrete board shall be used on all siding and Eves and Facia, no pressed board siding o No siding on front elevation o Minimum 35 year composition shingles (Timberline or like) o Matching decorative wrought iron mail boxes o Minimum 10/12 pitch roofs on front elevations o All garage doors visible to street shall be decorative wood clad . o 20 feet minimum garage set back on all front entry garages o All driveways and entry walks at front of home to be constructed of brick pavers (pavestone) o Minimum 550 square feet of brick pavers at front of all houses o Fully guttered o Exterior accent lighting o All lots shall be fully landscaped with automatic irrigation systems and minimum 3" caliper tree at front of each house. Lots 6,7,15, and 16 block B and lots 3 and 4 block A the tree will be planted in the rear yard. o All side yard fences parallel to front building line shall be Wrought Iron. The next two photos are included to show typical "Old World" street lamps. Also a typical divided entry with a landscaped median and use of wrought iron fencing. \ The next 3 photos depict typical home elevations. Notice uses of stone venires and brick patterns, wood garage doors, and wrought iron. Town Walk Chase will boast more dimensional views than seen in these photos. The garage doors typically will be set back 8' feet further than the front façade of the house. This design will also promote a larger back yard. The required use of true brick pavers will also greatly enhance the look and feel of the neighborhood. '~ To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records