HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2016-09-26 Agendas k4Ft,D HILLS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
4301 CITY POINT DRIVE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76180
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
WORK SESSION: 6:30 PM
Held in the City Council Work Room
1 Discuss items from regular City Council meeting
2 Welcome and introduction - public official, public employee or citizen
CALL TO ORDER
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council may enter into closed Executive Session as authorized by
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Executive Session may be held at
the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need
arises for the City Council to seek advice from the city attorney (551.071) as
to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting.
The City Council may confer privately with its attorney to seek legal advice on
any matter listed on the agenda or on any matter in which the duty of the
attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of
Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter
551, Texas Government Code.
REGULAR MEETING: Immediately following executive session (but no
earlier than 7:00 p.m.)
Held in the City Hall Council Chambers
A. CALL TO ORDER
A.1 INVOCATION - COUNCIL MEMBER LOMBARD
Monday, September 26, 2016 City Council Agenda
Page 1 of 4
A.2 PLEDGE - COUNCIL MEMBER LOMBARD
A.3 SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) AND RECOGNITION(S)
A.4 CITIZENS PRESENTATION
An opportunity for citizens to address the City Council on matters which are
not scheduled for consideration by the City Council or another City Board or
Commission at a later date. In order to address the Council, please complete
a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary prior
to the start of the Council meeting.
A.5 REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA
B. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
B.1 Approve minutes of the regular September 12, 2016 and special
September 19, 20, 2016 City Council meetings.
B.2 Authorize City Manager to execute a contract for Municipal Court
prosecutorial services and Fastrack Program with Eric Ransleben.
B.3 Approve purchase of ballistic vests, helmets, and accessories from
Red, the Uniform Tailor in the amount of$77,722.00.
B.4 Approve Resolution No. 2016-029, Selective Traffic Enforcemet
Program FY 2017 Grant.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
C.1 ZC 2016-09, Ordinance No. 3429 and Ordinance No. 3431, Public
Hearing and consideration of a request from Zeon Properties, LLC for a
Zoning Change from C-2 Commercial and R-1 Single Family
Residential to RI-PD Residential Infill Planned Development on 7.456
acres and from AG Agricultural to LR Local Retail on 0.413 acres
located in the 7500 block of Davis Boulevard.
C.2 ZC 2016-14, Ordinance No. 3430, Public Hearing and consideration of
a request from Adiene Jones for a Zoning Change from R-1 Single
Family to R-1-S Special Single Family on 2.06 acres located at 7512
Bursey Road.
C.3 Public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2016-030,
authorizing the application of a Texas Parks and Wildlife Grant for the
Northfield Park renovation project.
Monday, September 26, 2016 City Council Agenda
Page 2 of 4
D. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
E. PUBLIC WORKS
F. GENERAL ITEMS
F.1 Consider Ordinance No. 3427, adopting the 2016/2017 Proposed
Budget and amending the 2015/2016 Revised Budget.
F.2 Consider ratifying an increase in property tax revenues reflected in the
Fiscal Year 2016/2017 adopted budget.
F.3 Consider Ordinance No. 3428, adopting the tax rate for Tax Year 2016.
F.4 Consider Resolution No. 2016-029, approving and ratifying the 2016
Certified Roll.
G. EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS - CITY COUNCIL MAY TAKE ACTION
ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON
WORK SESSION
AGENDA
H. INFORMATION AND REPORTS - COUNCIL MEMBER BARTH
H.1 Announcements
I. ADJOURNMENT
Certification
I do hereby certify that the above notice of meeting of the North Richland Hills
City Council was posted at City Hall, City of North Richland Hills, Texas in
compliance with Chapter 551 , Texas Government Code on Friday,
September 23, 2016 at 3:00 PM.
City Secretary
Monday, September 26, 2016 City Council Agenda
Page 3 of 4
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are
available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must
be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City
Secretary's office at 817-427-6060 for further information.
Monday, September 26, 2016 City Council Agenda
Page 4 of 4
k4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Discuss items from regular City Council meeting.
PRESENTER: Mark Hindman, City Manager
SUMMARY:
The purpose of this item is to allow City Council the opportunity to discuss any item on
the regular agenda.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The purpose of this standing item is to allow City Council the opportunity to inquire
about items that are posted for discussion and deliberation on the regular City Council
agenda.
City Council is encouraged to ask staff questions to clarify and/or provide additional
information on items posted on the regular or consent agenda. City Council may also
elect to move items from the regular agenda to the consent agenda upon receiving
clarification from staff on posted regular agenda items.
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Welcome and introduction - public official, public employee or citizen.
PRESENTER: Mark Hindman, City Manager
SUMMARY:
Introduction of public official, public employee or citizen in attendance at the meeting.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The purpose of this item is to provide City staff or City Council the opportunity to
recognize and introduce a public official, public employee or citizen in attendance at the
meeting.
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Approve minutes of the regular September 12, 2016 and special
September 19, 20, 2016 City Council meetings.
PRESENTER: Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
SUMMARY:
The minutes are listed on the consent agenda and approved by majority vote of the
Council at the City Council meetings.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The City Secretary's Office prepares action minutes for each City Council meeting. The
minutes for the previous meeting are placed on the consent agenda for review and
approval by the City Council, which contributes to a time efficient meeting. Upon
approval of the minutes, an electronic copy will be uploaded to the City's website.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve minutes of the September 12 and 19, 2016 City Council meetings.
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City DATE: September 26, 2016
Manager
SUBJECT: Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for
Municipal Court Prosecutorial Services and Fastrack Program with
Eric Ransleben.
PRESENTER: Mark Hindman, City Manager
SUMMARY:
The existing contract for Municipal Court Prosecutorial Services will expire on
September 30, 2016. The attached contract will allow the Municipal Court to continue
services with the current Prosecutor, Eric Ransleben for the next year. The cost of
these services is included in the Municipal Court Operating Budget.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The Municipal Court budget provides funds for contracted Prosecutorial Services in the
amount of $42,000 per year. The Prosecutor provides services to include
representation in over 500 bench and jury trials, review and processing approximately
5,000 cases set on attorney dockets and approximately 1,200 cases set on contested
dockets. The Prosecutor is also responsible for reviewing all 25,000
citations/complaints filed with the Court from all city departments, including the Police
Department. Through the assistance of the City Prosecutor, the Municipal Court
currently resolves 98% of filed cases prior to initiating the trial process.
In fiscal year 2012/13, the Municipal Court and Birdville Independent School District
(BISD) worked with the Prosecutor to develop the Fastrack program to concentrate on
educating truant students and their parents on the issues of school attendance while
getting students back on the "fastrack" to completing their high school education. This
program operates for 9 months of the fiscal year. The Prosecutor meets with the BISD
Attendance Officers, the NRH Juvenile Case Manager and students and parents who
have received violations for Child Fail to Attend School and Parent Fail to Send Child to
School. Each month a 2 hour educational program is held to inform students and their
parents about the importance of education in the job market, school attendance
requirements for course credit, as well as goal setting and organization skills. The
program focuses on getting the student back to school as soon as possible and
aggressively monitoring the student's progress. BISD is pleased with the results and
the combined efforts of the agencies working to bring quick resolution to the attendance
issues. The Municipal Court collects a program fee and court costs as required by
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
State law to participate in the program. These costs are used to offset the cost of the
Fastrack program. The budget includes $9,000 for this program.
This contract for Prosecutorial Services combines both the Municipal Court Prosecution
Services as well as the Fastrack Program Services into one contract totaling $51,000.
There is not an increase in the amounts of the contract.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Eric Ransleben for
Prosecutorial Services for the Municipal Court and the Fastrack Program.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
This contract is made by and between the City of North Richland Hills ("City") and
Eric G. Ransleben (Ransleben), for the purpose of documenting the terms and
conditions under which Ransleben will provide municipal court prosecution services. It
shall be performed in and is enforceable in Tarrant County, Texas.
Recitations:
1. City desires to contract with Ransleben as an independent contractor
to provide municipalcourt prosecuting attorney services.
Agreements:
2. Ransleben agrees to attend all North Richland Hiilllls municipal court
sessions and to act as prosecuting attorney in such court, and to
provide a substitute attorney at his expense on occasions where he
cannot attend.
3. City agrees to pay Ransleben $3,500 per month for such services,
payable on the first day of each month following a month of service.
4. Ransleben additionally agrees to act as prosecuting attorney in such
court for up to nine months for Fail to Attend School cases in
conjunction with BISD/FASTRACK program.
5. City agrees to pay Ranslleben $1 ,000 per month for up to nine months
for Fail to Attend School cases, payable on the first day of each
month following a month of service.
6. Ransleben agrees that he is an independent contractor and is not
entitled to any City benefits, such as health insurance, vacation, travel,
training or retirement.
7. The term of this contract is for one year.
8. This contract may be terminated by either party without cause upon
thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Upon termination,
neither party shall have any further obligation to the other under such
contract or for the termination thereof. It shall terminate immediatelly
should Ransleben become permanently disabled or disqualified as an
attorney from performing such services.
9. Notice to the parties hereunder shalll be effective upon mailing with
postage to the addresses stated herein:
Eric Ransleben
100 Indian Creek Drive, Suite 230
Trophy Club, TX 76262
Mark Hindman
4301 City Point Dr.
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
10. This contract is made contingent upon appropriations for the funding
hereof.
11. This contract shall commence and be effective October 1, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Mark Hindman, City Manager
Eric G. Ransleben
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City DATE: September 26, 2016
Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the purchase of ballistic vests, helmets, and accessories
from Red, the Uniform Tailor in the amount of$77,722.00
PRESENTER: Jimmy Perdue, Chief of Police
SUMMARY:
This year has proven to be a tough year in public safety as we have witnessed
unprecedented attacks upon first responders. The need for additional protection for
police officers and EMS has become paramount to their safety and that of the
community. The Police and Fire Departments conducted research and identified
emergency equipment to better protect themselves and citizens in high risk incidents.
This protective equipment consists of high-caliber ballistic over vests, ballistic helmets,
and gear bags.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The Point Blank level III+ ballistic vest is worn over the standard issue ballistic vest. It
will provide protection against the majority of rifle rounds and can stop many types of
armor-piercing rounds. Each vest will be marked clearly with "Police" for police officers
and "Medic" for EMS. The Point Blank level IIIA ballistic helmet will provide for
protection from smaller rounds and will also provide impact protection from blunt force
objects that may be thrown.
Every North Richland Hills police officer will be issued an individual vest and helmet to
be kept in a rapid deployment gear bag for emergency response. On duty officers will
carry their equipment in patrol vehicles allowing for quick access when needed. The
Fire Department will place vests and helmets in each of the ambulances and the
battalion chiefs' vehicles.
The vests, helmets and accessories will be purchased through Red, the Uniform Tailor
in Grand Prairie, Texas under contract pricing secured through the Interlocal Agreement
with the City of Frisco. In addition due to the demand for these items, the manufacturer
(Point Blank) has agreed to lower the price an additional amount. Per the agreement the
price would be $92,742.00 but with the additional discounts, the final purchase amount
is $77,720.00. The purchase of 123 vests, 91 helmets, and accessories ($68,922) will
be funded from Crime Control & Prevention District reserves. The purchase of 32
helmets ($8,800) will be funded from the previously awarded Justice Assistance Grant#
BJA-2013-3599.
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the purchase of ballistic vests, helmets and accessories from Red, The
Uniform Tailor in the amount of$77,722.00.
Quo.....................
. ..
TAIL U NIF0RM11k11.0R
Kim Sylvester-Regional Manager Date:September 19, 2016
Gwyn Klein-General Manager Quote #2016-0597(Revised)
Jennifer Gambino-Assistant General Manager Expiration Date: December 31, 2016
Red the Uniform Tailor To North Richland Hills
1630 1 1 1 t"Street
Grand Prairie, TX 75050
Phone:972-660-8433
Fax: 972-660-6939
MFG/Vendor Item # Description Size Unit Price Qty Line Total
Point Blank PC2KT1BV03 Active Shooter Kit, 1 PCP Flat $300.00 123 $36,900.00
Plate Carrier, 2 Steel 555
Plates, Level III+
Point Blank PTH-IIIA Paraclete Tactical Helmet, $275.00 123 $33,825.00
Level IIIA
Point Blank BAGN00130D PBBA Carry Bag, Helmet and $39.00 123 $4,797.00
Plate Carrier
Point Blank PCHMR3AC07 Double Horizontal Mag $20.00 110 $2,200.00
Pouch
TOTAL $77,722.00
n(,fl Inr:11dCDr"'
If you have any questions, please feel free to call 972-660-8433 and speak to Kim or e-mail her at
kim.sylvester @rtut.com. Shipping charges and oversize charges may apply.
MFG/Vendor Item # Description Size Unit Price Qty Line Total
Point Blank PC2KT1BV03 Active Shooter Kit, 1 PCP Flat $333.00 123 $40,959.00
Plate Carrier, 2 Steel 555
Plates, Level III+
Point Blank PTH-IIIA Paraclete Tactical Helmet, $360.00 123 $44,280.00
Level IIIA
Point Blank BAGN00130D PBBA Carry Bag, Helmet and $39.00 123 $4,797.00
Plate Carrier
Point Blank PCHMR3AC03 Double Horizontal Mag $24.60 110 $2,706.00
Pouch
TOTAL $92,742.00
30A OA l) r� 7i,.�.l.�r�r.l l�N'ir.ir�r,,); 400, oll Mrjnulrjr,lui uN Rurl�r:�il Pi i(-inr' ,
If you have any questions, please feel free to call 972-660-8433 and speak to Kim or e-mail her at
kim.sylvester @rtut.com. Shipping charges and oversize charges may apply.
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS TO APPROVE THE STEP 2017 PROGRAM GRANT
APPLICATION EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2016.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills, Texas possesses legal authority to apply
for the STEP 2017 Program Grant and make appointments for the conduct of business
relative to the Grant; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills finds it in the best interest of the
citizens of North Richland Hills to provide for increased enforcement for speed
compliance and additional enforcement hours targeting impaired drivers during fiscal
year 2016.
WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills finds that these two violations of
the law unquestionably cause our citizens injury and property damage.
WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills agrees to fund overtime hours to
provide for this additional enforcement during fiscal year 2016, in anticipation of
reimbursement from the Texas Department of Transportation as set forth in the Grant
Agreement.
WHEREAS, The City Council of North Richland Hills designates City Manager Mark
Hindman as the grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power
to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant
agency.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of North Richland Hills
approves submission of the grant for the STEP 2017 Program.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Cara Leahy White, Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Jimmy Perdue, Public Safety Director
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: ZC 2016-09, Ordinance No. 3429 and Ordinance No. 3431, Public
Hearing and consideration of a request from Zeon Properties, LLC
for a Zoning Change from C-2 Commercial and R-1 Single Family
Residential to RI-PD Residential Infill Planned Development on 7.456
acres and from AG Agricultural to LR Local Retail on 0.413 acres
located in the 7500 block of Davis Boulevard.
PRESENTER: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
SUMMARY:
Zeon Properties LLC is requesting a zoning change on 7.869 acres located in the 7500
block of Davis Boulevard. The property is proposed for development as a single-family
subdivision that includes two non-residential lots.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The site under consideration is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard between
Rumfield Road and Freedom Way. The property surrounds an existing commercial lot at
7700 Davis Boulevard, which is developed as a farmer's market and automobile repair
facility. A tributary of Little Bear Creek runs southwest to northeast through the site.
There are 11.223 acres under common ownership by Zeon Property. Of this acreage,
the northernmost 3.354 acres is zoned C-2 Commercial and not part of the zoning
change request. The zoning change proposed on the remaining 7.869 acres consists of
two parts.
• RI-PD Residential Infill Planned Development. The largest portion of the zoning
change application covers 7.456 acres. This area is proposed as RI-PD
Residential Infill Planned Development. The property is generally located south
of the Little Bear Creek tributary.
• LR Local Retail. A 0.413-acre parcel at the southwest corner of the property
along Davis Boulevard is proposed as LR Local Retail.
AS PRESENTED TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: The original application
that was advertised for the Planning & Zoning Commission public hearing on
September 1, 2016 was for a R-2 Single Family Residential Zoning Change request.
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
That application was accompanied by an 18-lot Preliminary Plat that met R-2 zoning
standards. The plat also showed a street connection to the existing dead end street of
Smith Drive in Meadowview Estates to the east. The street would extend west, take two
90-degree turns and connect to Davis Boulevard south of the farmer's market. All 18
residential lots and one commercial lot would have direct access to this new street.
After the public hearing, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of an RI-PD
(Residential Infill Planned Development) zoning district rather than the R-2 zoning
requested by the applicant. Straight zoning districts such as R-2 do not allow additional
requirements or development regulations to be placed on them by City Council. They
must develop under the existing standards of the district and all other development-
related codes. Because the Commission recommended that an emergency access-only
gate be installed between Meadowview Estates and the proposed subdivision, the RI-
PD is the appropriate zoning district.
RI-PD REQUEST TO INCREASE LOTS: Since the Commission meeting, the applicant
has further amended their request to add 7 lots to their proposal for a total of 25
residential lots. The applicant cites additional capital costs for a gate as well as
additional operations and maintenance costs for the HOA to perpetually maintain the
gate as reasons for the increase in lots. The similar circumstance of Liberty Village to
the north as well as the existing R-3 zoning to the east in Meadowview Estates are also
cited by the applicant in support of the revised RI-PD request.
The zoning change was able to be revised at the Commission meeting to an RI-PD
because it was not changing the number, size or density of residential lots that would
have otherwise been permitted by R-2 zoning. The below table describes the
differences between the R-2 Zoning District and the proposed RI-PD.
ITEM R-2 RI-IPOD 7.456 AC 25 UNITS
MIN. LOT AREA 9,000 SF 6,183 SF
AVG.LOT AIR EA - 6,600 SF
MIN FRONT YARD 20 FT 20 FT
MINN REAR YARD 10 IFT AIM ED 20% 10 IFT
MIN. LOT WIDTH 72.5 FT 56 IFT(60 IFT AVG.)
MIN. SIDE 'YARD 10 IFT&.6 IFT 6 IFT AIND 4 FT
OPEN SPACE - 79,833 SF(24.58%)
DENSITY 4 UINITS/AC 3.35 UNITS/AC
Because of these differences, it is recommended that City Council either approve the
RI-PD as it was recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission (18 residential
lots that meets all R-2 zoning district standards) OR remand the item back to the
Commission for consideration of additional lots.
k4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
DEVELOPMENT PLAN & CONNECTION TO SMITH DRIVE: The primary opposition
by residents of Meadowview Estates to this application has been the proposed
connection to the 500-foot dead end street of Smith Drive.
The property has frontage on Davis Boulevard, with a street entrance proposed just
south of the creek tributary that runs through the site. The development includes a
street connection with existing Smith Drive on the east side of the property. This aligns
with a dedicated right-of-way but undeveloped street connection that is part of the
Northeast Business Park addition, which was platted in 1974. When Meadowview
Estates was platted in 1973, four streets were stubbed out to adjacent undeveloped
properties on the east and west sides of the subdivision to accommodate future
expansion of the neighborhood. A subsequent Meadowview Estates plat in 1983
extended the dead-end of Smith Drive to meet the ROW dedicated by plat in 1974 with
the Northeast Business Park Addition. This three-step coordinated dedication provided
the path for a connection to Davis Boulevard. The physical street connection was not
made at that time, as the road was not developed on the adjacent property.
I
SM ITH DRIVE
I 'LI ILI 11
/ eoo w E iaa.
aryl i
n
� E
✓ —.
ELLTS DRIVE
sr
E I a
5 � I „r�d.S bMi„
Left: The 1974 plat dedicated the right-of-way connection for Smith Drive to access Davis Boulevard. The business
park was never developed, but the right-of-way remains. Right: The 1983 plat for a Meadowview Estates addition,
acknowledging the future connection to Davis Business Park, therefore allowing the continued dead-end street.
Because no connection was platted west of Ellis Drive, an appropriate turnaround was provided.
Both the existing residents of Meadowview Estates and the new residents of St. Joseph
Estates would benefit from a roadway connection, not just from an emergency
protection or community standpoint, but from a mobility perspective as well. Presently,
emergency response access to Meadowview Estates is only available from Rumfield
Road or by Kirk Lane. Completing this street connection provides a secondary access
point from Davis Boulevard. The existing Meadowview Estates residents will have an
opportunity to access Davis Boulevard directly, particularly for northbound trips where
the right turn onto Davis can be much more easily accommodated, even at peak times.
The proposed connection provides an alternative to potential wait times at
Rumfield/Davis by allowing an efficient right turn. This not only makes for a shorter trip
for the driver, but also relieves some of the congestion at Rumfield for other motorists.
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
The connection would benefit the St. Joseph Estates RI-PD by providing them access to
Rumfield where they can safely turn south on Davis or head west on Starnes at a
signalized intersection. The street connection also addresses past concerns of the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council about fragmentary or piecemeal
approaches to developing the remaining property in the city.
The revised plan includes a gate that is to the City's desired specifications for
emergency access. Because the gate is an RI-PD requirement, possible future removal
of the gate would also require a public hearing by City Council. As congestion on Davis
Boulevard and Rumfield Road continues, and as raised medians are installed on Davis
Boulevard, future options for removal of a gate should be considered.
The plan also includes one open space lot of 79,833 square feet (1.83 acres). Almost all
of this lot is encumbered by flood plain or floodway of a tributary of Little Bear Creek.
About 24% of the open space is potentially usable space located outside of the
floodway. The developer indicates that improvements are not anticipated in the open
space lot, though there is room on the lot at the entrance to the subdivision to
accommodate entry features, fencing, or signage. The open space lot will be owned and
maintained by a homeowners association.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan classifies this area as "Office."
This designation provides areas for the development of professional and organizational
offices along with accessory and related uses.
CURRENT ZONING: The property is currently zoned AG Agricultural, R-1 Single Family
Residential, and C-2 Commercial.
SURROUNDING ZONING ( LAND USE:
North: C-1 Commercial and C-2 Commercial I Office
West: C-1 Commercial I Retail
South: C-2 Commercial, R-2 Single-Family Residential, R-1 Single Family
Residential, and R-1-S Special Single Family I Office and Low Density
Residential
East: R-3 Single Family Residential I Low Density Residential
PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Northeast Business Park, an
undeveloped subdivision platted in 1974. A new preliminary plat was approved by the
Planning & Zoning Commission on the September 1, 2016.
PETITION IN OPPOSITION: On September 1, 2016, a written petition in opposition to
the zoning change was submitted by residents of Meadowview Estates. A copy of the
petition is attached. The petition also expresses opposition to any proposal that would
provide a connection of Smith Drive to a street in the new subdivision.
k4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
The petition in opposition contains the property owner signatures for 22 properties
within the 200-foot notification area. This amounts to 21.7 percent of the land area
within the notification area. Per Section 118-183 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section
211.006(d) of the Texas Local Government Code, a favorable vote of three-fourths of
the City Council is required when a petition of opposition contains the signatures of the
owner(s) of 20 percent or more of the total area within the 200-foot notification area.
Additional correspondence in opposition and in favor of the zoning change is also
attached.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning and Zoning Commission
conducted a public hearing and considered this item at the September 1 , 2016, meeting
and voted 6-0 to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions:
• the zoning request be converted to a Residential Infill Planned Development (RI-
PD)
• an emergency access gate be installed on Smith Drive between this
development and Meadowview Estates
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Ordinance 3429 as an 18-lot Residential Infill Planned Development OR
remand the 25-lot RI-PD proposal back to the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Approve Ordinance 3431 (LR Local Retail) as presented.
Freedom Way
lUllUwxwl
Sa ers_Ln �
Smith Dr
Y
w
EIIis_Dr
CLcn'
00
m Chuck Dr
Starnes Rd Rumfield Rd
r
r1,
lllli���uiipuuuppur i, � r r i /' ll/ U
"I,'j, �� IIIIIIIIIIII ��
` ll
J
a,�.ouau uw. mi�m
�.
III L
r
r„
r
a
y f ,u„���' �� �` �Nr �Vprii���,i I � �,,;,, � ru' �➢i ulVi 1�i1 iid � J fl�J�1J1n�lU�fl���l�ibllllf I/ l!1��� �� l�l/
HL..
o NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.: ..:W PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
r x AND CITY COUNCIL
Case Number: ZC 2016-09
Applicant: Zeon Property, LLC
Location: 7500 block of Davis Boulevard
You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200
feet of the property shown on the attached map.
Purpose of Public Hearing:
A Public Hearing is being held to consider a request from Zeon Property, LLC for a Zoning
Change from C-2 Commercial, R-1 Single Family, and AG Agricultural to R-2 Single Family
and from AG Agricultural to LR Local Retail on 11.223 acres located in the 7500 block of
Davis Boulevard.
Public Hearing Schedule:
Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
7:00 PM THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
CITY COUNCIL
7:00 PM MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4301 CITY POINT DRIVE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request,
please contact:
Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills
4301 City Point Drive
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Phone (817) 427-6300
Fax (817) 427-6303
BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT CARPENTER SCOTT CHIRRA VENKATA REDDY
ATTN: MIKE SEALE 8500 FREEDOM WAY 8504 FREEDOM WAY
6125 EAST BELKNAP NRH TX 76182-7455 FORT WORTH TX 76182
HALTOM CITY, TX 76117
MORAN LANCE R DAVIDSON TRACI M DAVIS ROY A
MORAN DORA L 8512 FREEDOM WAY DAVIS LANA
8508 FREEDOM WAY NRH TX 76182-7455 8516 FREEDOM WAY
NRH TX 76182-7455 NRH TX 76182-7455
LANE BRADLEY H MCCORMICK STEPHEN D WHIDDON AVIAN D
LANE VALERIE MCCORMICK RISE WHIDDON TASHA K
7633 JILL CT 7629 JILL CT 7628 JILL CT
FORT WORTH TX 76182-7446 FORT WORTH TX 76182-7446 FORT WORTH TX 76182-7446
LEE CHARLES A C&G CUSTOM HOMES LLC ZEON PROPERTIES LLC
Attention: PETAL ANTOINETTE AERSTIN 75 MAIN ST STE 100 75 MAIN ST SUITE 100
7600 QUARTERING DR COLLEYVILLE TX 76034 COLLEYVILLE TX 76034
NRH TX 76182-7447
PARKER JOHN C FAMILY TRUS SR BREWSTER MICHAEL
Attention: DOROTHY L PARKER STIKKEL MARK J BREWSTER TRICIA
TRUSTEE 8521 SMITH DR 8525 SMITH DR
PO BOX 821314 NRH TX 76182-7437 NRH TX 76182-7437
NRH TX 76182-1314
CLEGHORN RICHARD S PYBUS STEVEN ETUX LISA LINDENBERGER BRIAN
CLEGHORN MELISSA L 8533 SMITH DR LINDENBERGER HEIDI
8529 SMITH DR FORT WORTH TX 76182-7437 8520 SMITH DR
NRH TX 76182-7437 NRH TX 76182
SHERMAN JIMMY BLANKENSHIP CHAS HUDGEONS TERRY A
8524 SMITH DR BLANKENSHIP TERRI HUDGEONS LAURA A
FORT WORTH TX 76182-7436 8528 SMITH DR 8532 SMITH DR
NRH TX 76182-7436 NRH TX 76182-7436
ANDERSON MARTIN TEAGUE MICHAEL RINEHART JERROD
8521 ELLIS DR TEAGUE ANDREA RINEHART SHAWNA
NRH TX 76182-7439 8525 ELLIS DR 8529 ELLIS DR
NRH TX 76182-7439 NRH TX 76182-7439
GREEN DAVID F MILLER JENNIFER A SULLIVAN M A
GREEN KIMBERLY D MILLER ADAM R SULLIVAN M O RODRIGUEZ
8533 ELLIS DR 8520 ELLIS DR 8524 ELLIS DR
NRH TX 76182-7439 NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-7438
PRATT MICHAEL L GRANTOM RALPH B & MODENE ZENOR RUSSELL
PRATT CARRI GRANTOM REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST ZENOR DANA
8528 ELLIS DR 8532 ELLIS DR 8521 CHUCK DR
NRH TX 76182-7438 NRH TX 76182-7438 FORT WORTH TX 76182-7441
SMALL DAVID COLLINS MARK A HAMPTON WESTON RAY
SMALL MARY JO COLLINS MARGARET 8533 CHUCK DR
8525 CHUCK DR 8529 CHUCK DR FORT WORTH TX 76182-7441
NRH TX 76182-7441 FORT WORTH TX 76182-7441
OCONNOR MATTHEW IOANNOU GEORGE MOOS PAUL E
405 PARKWOOD CT IOANNOU KELLY MOOS PATRICIA A
SOUTHLAKE TX 76092-7419 8524 CHUCK DR 8528 CHUCK DR
NRH TX 76182-7444 NRH TX 76182-7444
KEARNS CHARLES LANGHAM DANIEL W OXFORD MICHAEL E
KEARNS DONNA OXFORD VICTORI
8425 RUMFIELD RD
8501 RUMFIELD RD FORT WORTH TX 76182-6125 8421 RUMFIELD RD
NRH TX 76182-6126 NRH TX 76182-6125
ESPINOSA ROBERT WOODBRIAR MANAGEMENT LTD TONTIN LP
102156 CRAWFORD FARM RD 411 HARWOOD RD 1170 CORPORATE DR W STE 204
KELLER TX 76244 BEDFORD TX 76021-4151 ARLINGTON TX 76006-6884
K&E LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GATEWAY CHURCH WCJ DAVIS 99 LTD
1022 E ADAMS ST Attention:ATTN TOM LANE Attention: %WILLIAM C JENNINGS CO
SPRINGFIELD IL 62703-1028 500 S NOLEN DR STE 300 2525 RIDGMAR BLVD STE 420
SOUTHLAKE TX 76092-9170 FORT WORTH TX 76116-4584
Clayton Comstock
From: D&J Red <
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:43 PM
To: Clayton Comstock
Subject: ZC 2016-09 Zeon Property Zoning Change
Clayton,
As a nearby resident, I endorse and recommend the ZC 2016-09 Zeon Property Zoning Change and the
connection of Smith Dr. to Davis Blvd.
Thank you for responding and answering my questions.
David Redelsperger
7532 Kirk,NRH
i
Clayton Comstock
From: Doris Skrodzki <
Sent: Friday,August 26, 2016 9:03 AM
To: Clayton Comstock
Cc: Steven Harding
Subject: 7500 Block of Davis Blvd.
Dear Mr. Comstock,
I am writing regarding the proposed construction in the 7500 block of Davis Blvd. (St.
Joseph's Estate and Northfield Estates). I live in Meadowview Estates on Perkins Drive.
I was wondering if there would be some kind of a gate at the end of Smith Drive to prevent
traffic coming from this development through our neighborhood. Smith Drive is a very small
street and cannot handle a lot of cut through traffic. I'm fearful of cars and trucks coming
from that development cutting through our neighborhood to avoid the light at Davis and
Rumfield and perhaps even the light at Precinct Line Road. If there are commercial buildings
in that development, then there could also be larger delivery trucks going through our
neighborhood. That would not be safe for our resident's children walking home from school
or to neighboring homes and also the many people who walk daily through the neighborhood
for exercise.
There is an iron gate at the end of the Liberty housing development on Davis to prevent
vehicles from cutting through our neighborhood. I think it would make it a lot safer for our
neighborhood residents if there was some kind of a gate at the end of Smith Drive also. Even
now, there are some people in the morning who cut from Rumfield to Kirk Road to Kirk Lane
and out to Precinct Line Road to avoid the traffic back up at the light on Precinct Line Road
and Rumfield. I know because I see them come on to Kirk Road from Rumfield and have
followed them out to Precinct Line Road. Once they know they can also cut out the light on
Davis by going through this new construction and through our neighborhood, Meadowview
Estates may be overwhelmed with cut through traffic at all times of the day and night. I'm
fearful our neighborhood streets will not be able to hold the extra amount of traffic and also
fear for the safety of our residents. It will also make an easy escape for any criminal activity in
our neighborhood with another entrance and outlet.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Doris Skrodzki
7625 Perkins Drive
817-485-2723
1
Aug 26 2016 10: 58AM 214 634 2296 P. 1
Paul Moos
8628 Chuck Drive
North Richland Hills,Tx 76182
Cell: (817) 602-2087
Telecommunications Transmittal
TO: Commissioners FAX: 817427-6303
COMPANY: NRH Planning and Zoning. Commission
FROM: Paul Moos
DATE: 8126116
TOTAL NUMBER:OF PAGES 2 + COVER
MESSAGE: Re: Zeon Property, LLC
Please, call with any questions.
Paul
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES,
PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Aug 26 2016 10: 58AM 214 634 2295 P.2 --_
August 26, 2016
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
4301 City Point Drive
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: ZC 2016-09
Dear Commissioners,
As residents of the City of North Richland Hills and Meadowview Estates for twenty-four years,
we have enjoyed the city facilities and parks, loved the small town feel of the city, and raised our
family here. When we built our house in 1992 in the Meadowview Estates subdivision, both
Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard were two lane roads, Rumfield Road was not connected
from Precinct Line Road to Davis Boulevard, and there was a lot of undeveloped land in the north
end of the city. We realized that there would be development in the city and there would be
changes in many aspects of the nearby land. We also knew that the city leaders and the city staff
would work together to ensure that only the best development would move forward and the
citizens' best interests were taken into consideration.
in Meadowview Estates over the years, the residents have been dedicated to improving the
subdivision by updating the subdivision entrance, requesting speed bumps on Northfield Drive,
working with the city to eliminate cut through traffic to and from Northfield Park by closing off the
street connections to the neighborhood, and working with the city to eliminate cut-through traffic
in the development of the Liberty Village subdivision. Our neighborhood does not have a
Homeowners'Association, but a group of residents have worked hard to improve the overall look
of the neighborhood.
We do not have any objection to the 18 lot residential subdivision and commercial lot. The
proposed residential lot size is a plus with the larger lots that are similar to or larger than the size
of the lots within Meadowview Estates.
We have some concerns with the St. Joseph Estates development street connection from the
dead end Smith Drive to Davis Boulevard. Our concern is the amount of traffic on westbound
Rumfield Road to the Davis Boulevard intersection during evening rush hour. Rumfield Road is
a striped two-lane road that widens to a left turn lane and straightlright turn lane at the Davis
Boulevard intersection. Traffic often backs up from the intersection to the Northfield Drive
subdivision entrance making it difficult to turn onto Rumfield Road in either direction. Westbound
traffic may take at least two to three signal changes to get through the intersection.
Aug 26 2016 10: 58AM 214 634 2296 P• 3
The main issue is the strong potential for cut-through traffic using the Northfield Drive to Smith
Drive to Patrick Path to Davis Boulevard {northbound}to avoid the long delays at the signal light
at the Rumfield Road/Davis Boulevard intersection during rush hour. This may be reversed during
the morning rush hour.
The other concern with cut-through traffic is the impact on the walkers, bicyclists, and children in
the neighborhood using the street for access as we do not have sidewalks in the neighborhood.
Drivers speeding through the streets to access Davis Boulevard may not be as attentive to the
residents in the streets causing a major safety concern.
Possible options to prevent the cut-through traffic may include gating the access at the end of
Smith Drive or at the commercial lot at Patrick's Path or may include a cul-de-sac at the west end
of Patrick's Path.
We would appreciate the Planning and Commission's-consideration for our concerns when
deliberating the St. Joseph Estates zoning case at the September 1, 2016 meeting.
Thank you for your consideration,
Paul and Patty Moos
8528 Chuck Drive
Clayton Comstock
From: JENNIFER RED
Sent: Friday,August 26, 2016 1:06 PM
To: Clayton Comstock
Subject: Zoning Change -ZC 2016-09 -Zeon
Zoning Change - ZC 2016-09
7500 Block of Davis Blvd.
1. I oppose the change from R-1 to R-2 and propose it be changed to
R-1L or remain at R-1. I believe that the smaller lots and R-2 zoning will
will result in a densely populated problematic area. Property values of
adjacent properties may adversely to effected.
2. I endorse the connection of Smith Dr. to Davis Blvd. as the Meadowview
Estates addition needs an exit to the West and another to the North.
Shu Chen Wu
Meadowview Estates
NRH, TX
i
Clayton Comstock
From: Bonnie Bellows <
Sent: Monday,August 29, 2016 8:20 AM
To: Clayton Comstock
Subject: ZC-2016-09
Clayton,
The connection of Smith Dr. to Davis Blvd. I am in favor of.
Meadowview Estates needs additional exits to the North through Northfield
Park similar to the one we had when I first moved to the addition.
I am not in favor of the zoning the property to R-2.
Bonnie Bellows
Meadowview Estates
NRH
i
Clayton Comstock
From: Jennifer Redelsperger >
Sent: Monday,August 29, 2016 10:17 AM
To: Clayton Comstock
Subject: 1 ZC 2016-09 zoning change
ZC 2016-09 zoning change
C. Comstock,
I am not in favor of changing this property to R-2, but favor R-1.
I am in favor of additional exits to Davis Blvd. for Meadowview Estates including the completion of Smith Dr.,
removal of the gate on Gary Dr. and an exit north through Northfield Park.
Jeni Redel
7532 Kirk Rd.
NRH
i
Clayton Comstock
From: Peggy Spradling < >
Sent: Wednesday,August 31, 2016 3:55 PM
To: Clayton Comstock; Oscar Trevino; nrhrodriguez @att.net; nrhrwoujesky @charter.net;
nrhlombard @att.net; nrhtbarth @sbcglobal.net;wdwhitson @sbcglobal.net;
nrhsturnage @sbcglobal.net;tim-welch @sbcglobal.net
Subject: St Joseph's Estates
Smith Dr will connect to the proposed St Joseph's Estates- 18 residential lots & 1 small retail in a platted area that was
originally zoned commercial. Per the Tarrant County Appraisal District maps-
http:/Iwww.tad.org/media/pdf/MapPDF/t_20... -"Commercial Ct"which the docs from NRH are calling "undeveloped road"
is already platted as approx 9 parcels. It appears the developer is wanting to subdivide those 9 lots to double the density
to 18 lots. More concrete home slabs, driveways, and sidewalks which equal more rain runoff, more homes to provide
water supply, more traffic congestion, and more air/noise pollution.As an RE Appraiser, what I have seen in other cities in
the past decades is that stocking NRH with homes of such a narrow price range/living area size is not healthy for long
term property values. For Meadowview area citizens, it makes more sense to build high end homes on the existing 9
parcels, akin to Harmon Farms. Otherwise, in 20+ years you end up with lots of rental properties as upwardly mobile
families move to higher end subdivisions in other cities. Northfield Dr was originally designed to provide north access from
the 200+ homes in Meadowview Estates to Davis Blvd. Because NRH closed off the north access, the 200+ homes
access on the south end of Northfield Dr, Kirk Ln, and Kirk Rd. These residents, me included, experience daily traffic.
These roads dump into Rumfield Rd and Precinct Line Rd; both of which have increasing traffic congestion that will
markedly increase once the TEX Rail Smithfield Station becomes operable. Every time NRH sends a survey or other
questionnaire, I always implore them to institute conservation easements for large parcel owners so that SOME green
space will remain in this city.
am sharing the above post that I wrote on Nextdoor, the neighborhood sharing website. While a
portion of the residents of Meadowview Estates would prefer no through streets to Davis Blvd, from
an infrastructure efficiency standpoint, reopening the north end of Northfield Dr to access Davis Blvd,
as it was originally intended, is the most efficient solution. This would negatively impact those
residents that face/side to the northern part of Northfield Dr but would provide relief to those of us on
the southern end of Northfield Dr, Kirk Ln, and Kirk Rd. This would also alleviate traffic congestion on
Rumfield Rd at the Davis Blvd traffic light intersection. Residents that face Rumfield Rd near Davis
Blvd could get a bit of traffic view/noise/air-pollution relief. The solution of reopening the northern
access of Northfield Rd would negatively impact the least number of residents overall.
strongly request that NRH consider this road reopening idea as well as deny replating the existing
lots to 18 residential lots for St Joseph's Estates. You all need to expand your thinking on stewardship
of the land for NRH and think long-term of how this city's reputation and homeownership mix will look
in 20-30 years.
Peggy Spradling
TX Certified Residential RE Appraiser
214.534.2449
7528 Kirk Rd, North Richland Hills TX 76182
i
Meadowdew Estates
d
'Hemeowner's Petition to dw Platirflng and Miming Commission
Sel,munber-1, 20,16
r e,i••�,,,o
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat change to
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal. These measures will be in keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when it created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates`Gary Dr.
1� ✓ J�a rF
. .
n. ......
a
„w
� w ,
r,7 L. w
t
,I'4�M� I 1yp
" ,., ,yr ..... .. r
✓" ..... _.... 41Z
.........._.__.__,__ ..i
Page 1 of 4
Meadowview Estates "q
Hameowner's Petition to the' lanningand Zoning Conimission
September 1.,2016
uk .!
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat change to
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal. These measures will be in keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when it created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates'Gary Dr.
i�/�a"page� ir KI,����i1) �rx�.
m
"= .' " OnAw ilf'19 Atli t J v l�
9S 33
. . . . :_.. ............_..__..._..m.
_ .. ....w w . .. _ .._.. _.._ . .._.._
Page 2 of 4
d 1 J
f
Meadowview Estates
� S
1--fourneowner's Petition to the Planning and Zoning Cairkinissioin SEP -,I �,mfi
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat chnange.....
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an Increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal. These measures will be in keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when it created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates'Gary Dr.
/ik�/IG%%%/��ij/ r//
Ii�"i"�
, ' ... �
u„
w
Page 3 of 4
Meadowview Estates
I-Ro eown r's Petition to the PMnning and Zoning Commission
September 1,,,20,16
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat char'hie
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal. These measures will be in keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when it created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates'Gary Dr.
SY
ivag
4L 0
�rri�/��rr��//%%����/%dy j%r���" l'f �" 'dl%°rs�;�?f;�✓,�I ,�J.. �,,, -,� i� tp�ir��,�YalY "��r"r(v` .� „ �,r�.- rr� u�ilr<jY�'U".1,f, r... ,.�,Y.. .,,:.� .. 1�,,�.,�;
.... �. t�. : � 1¢ ,r _, _ i. ... ., . . __ _.. � � � .. .. ...... ... ...w . _ ...
t
� .I 'I�.i.M....-.- __ ._...'�� ....�. _ �� ..._... ........ .... _ ..__ _....__.._ ... ".._ .._ �� ..few._... �a� a.�-::...... . ........�,�.....,� `.. �'
Page 4 of 4
Meadow,view Estates
Homeowner's Petition to the Planning and Zonlrig Cominission
Septendwr 1,2016
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat th6nge to'
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal, These measures will be in keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when It created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates'Gary Dr.
Iii If, ���������� /�,F� r �., ✓��, u , �� m J;,� � ��
ii J it
r
.. . do ....,. .r...........
, .,
Page 1 of 4
r
Meadowiriew Estates
11om o' d'ne 's Petition and. frog j„,;tlifYiyL�C t;ni fw➢Iml
t� m ;a: '� ttttll� Sc° 21116
s
September 1, 201
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat change
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal. These measures will be in keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when it created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates'Gary Dr.
'
( ' ?
e�
a
`' _`+,�f✓�:k,,+:5,!�;`,� ...fir .,_...„ .,, e d �,�w '_'. �...1..�.�.M1._,., �'-.,,, �� "-'-!.....5,,.. .;�,i�. ..... ....... � fd`Y
Page 2 of 4
Meadowview EsLates
Harneowner's Petition tothe Planning and Zoning Commission ;,-:; � 1016
September 1,2016
We,the undersigned property owners of Meadowview Estates,wish to express our disapproval of any zoning change or property plat chang
the"Northeast Business Park"that will allow an increase in vehicular traffic through our subdivision. Specifically,our desire is that the Planning
and Zoning commission will reject any and all actions that provide for the connection of Smith Drive to any street located on the"Northeast
Business Park",regardless if that street is of the existing plat or any plat of a future proposal. These measures will be In keeping with the actions
taken by the City of North Richland Hills when it purposefully disconnected sections of Northfield Drive to eliminate through traffic. It will also
be in keeping with decisions by the City when it created an emergency vehicle only separation between the newly constructed Liberty Village
subdivision and Meadowview Estates'Gary Dr.
a �
q
py
1
( _.... . . . .... ... ........._.w._.w..- .------ _.------------
......... . ..._............_.. _........... ...._...m _ _.......
Page 3 of 4
BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT CARPENTER SCOTT CHIRRA VENKATA REDDY
ATTN: MIKE SEALE 8500 FREEDOM WAY 8504 FREEDOM WAY
6125 EAST BELKNAP NRH TX 76182-7455 FORT WORTH TX 76182
HALTOM CITY,TX 76117
MORAN LANCE R DAVIDSON TRACI M DAVIS ROY A
MORAN DORA L 8512 FREEDOM WAY DAVIS LANA
8508 FREEDOM WAY NRH TX 76182-7455 8516 FREEDOM WAY
NRH TX 76182-7455 NRH TX 76182-7455
LANE BRADLEY Il MCCORMICK STEPHEN D WHIDDON AVIAN D
LANE VALERIE MCCORMICK RISE WHIDDON TASHA K
7633 JILL CT 7629 JILL CT 7628 JILL CT
FORT WORTH TX 76182-7446 FORT WORTH TX 76182-7446 FORT WORTH TX 76182-7446
LEE CHARLES A C&G CUSTOM HOMES LLC ZEON PROPERTIES LLC
Attention:PETAL ANTOINETTE AERSTIN 75 MAIN ST STE 100 75 MAIN ST SUITE 100
7600 QUARTERING DR COLLEYVILLE TX 76034 COLLEYVILLE TX 76034
NRH TX 76182-7447
PARKER JOHN C FAMILY TRUS SR BREWSTER MICHAEL
Attention:DOROTHY L PARKER STI'KKEL MARK J BREW STER TRIICIA
TRUSTEE 8521 SMITH DR 8525 SMITH DR
PO BOX 821314 NRH TX 761 82-7437
NRH TX 761 82-1 31 4 NRH TX 76182-7437
CLEGHORN RICHARD S PYBUS STEVEN ETUX LISA LINDENBERGE:R BRIAN
CLEGHORN MELISSA L 8533 SMITH DR LINDENBERGER HEIDI
8529 SMITH DR FORT WORTH TX 76182-7437 8520 SMITH DR
NRH TX 76182-7437 NRH I'X 76182
SHERMAN JIMMY BLANKENSHIP CHAS HUDGEONS TERRY A
8524.SMITH DR BLANKENSHIP TERRI HUDGEONS LAURA A
FORT WORTH TX 76182-7436 8528 SMITH DR 8532 SMITH DR
NRH TX 76182-7436 NRH TX 76182••74.36
ANDERSON MARTIN TEAGUE MICHAEL RINEHART JERROD
8521 ELLIS DR TEAGUE ANDREA RINEHART SHAWNA.
NRH TX 76182-7439 8525 ELLIS DR 8529 ELLIS DR
NRH TX 76182-7439 NRH TX 76182-7439
GREEN DAVID F MILLER JENNIFER A SULLIVAN M A
GREEN KIMBERLY D MILLER ADAM R SULLIVAN M O RODRIQ a e
8533 IELLIS DR 8520 ELLIS DR 8524 ELLIS DR
NRH TX 76182-7439 NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-7438 "
� .I
PRATT MICHAEL L GRANTOM RALPH B&MODENE ZENOR RUSSELL�",,fi
PRATT CARRI GRANTOM REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST ZENOR DANA
8528 ELLIS DR 8532 ELLIS DR 8521 CHUCK DR
NRH TX 76182-7438 NRH TX 76182-743,8 FORT WORTH TX 761X2;?v, 4 V
p-.
SMALL...DAVID COLLINS MARK A HAMPTON WESTON RAY
SMALL MARY JO COLLINS MARGARET 8533 CHUCK DR
8525 CHUCK DR 8529 CHUCK DR FORT WORTH TX 76182-7441
NRH TX 761 82-7441 FORT WORTH TX 761 82-7441
OCONNOR MATTHEW IOANNOU GEORGE MOOS PAUL E
405 PARKWOOD CT IOANNOU KELLY MOOS PATRICIA A
SOUTHLAKE TX 76092-7419 8524 CHUCK DR 8528 CHUCK DR
NRH TX 76182-7444 NRH TX 76182-7444
KEARNS CHARLES LANGHAM DANIEL W OXFORD MICHAEL E
KEARNS DONNA 8425 RUMFIELD RD OXFORD VICTORI
8501 RUMFIELD RD FORT WORTH TX 76182-6125 8421 RUMFIELD RD
NRH TX 76182-6126 NRH TX 76182-6125
ESPINOSA ROBERT WOODBRIAR MANAGEMENT LTD TONTIN LP
102156 CRAWFORD FARM RD 411 HARWOOD RD 1170 CORPORATE DR W STE 204
KELLER TX 76244 BEDFORD TX 76021-4151 ARLINGTON TX 76006-6884
K&E LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GATEWAY CHURCH WCJ DAVIS 99 LTD
1022 E ADAMS ST Attention:ATTN TOM LANE Attention: /a WILLIAM C JENNINGS CO
SPRINGFIELD IL 62703-1028 500 S NOLEN DR STE 300 2525 RIDGMAR BLVD STE 420
SOUTHLAKE TX 76092-9170 FORT WORTH TX 76116-4584
w'
Clayton Comstock
From: T Oscar Trevino Jr <nrhoscar @sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 5:09 PM
To: Peggy Spradling
Cc: Clayton Comstock, Mark Hindman; Paulette Hartman; Karen Bostic
Subject: Re: St Joseph's Estates
Ms. Spradling,
Thank you for your email and for voicing your concerns about the proposed St. Joseph's Estates
development. The reason we hold public hearings on these items is to hear the concerns of adjacent
property owners, and to address those concerns through the review and consideration process.
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock also received your email and has provided it to the members of
the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration.
I want to clarify that the Zoning being requested is primarily R-2 Single Family Residential. The R-2
district is intended to provide areas for low-density development of single-family detached dwelling
units that are constructed at an approximate density of 4.0 units per acre. The minimum lot area for
R-2 zoning is 9,000 square feet and the minimum dwelling size is 2,000 square feet. However, it is
staff's understanding that the homes that will be built on this site, should the zoning be approved, will
be an average of 3,000 square feet with a sales prices starting around $350,000. The other zoning
being requested is LR — Local Retail. The LR district is intended for the development of convenience
retail shopping, services, and professional offices, principally serving the neighborhood needs, and
compatible in scale with adjacent residential development. This zoning is being requested on the
portion of the property that fronts Davis Boulevard. Most of property is currently zoned C-2
Commercial. The C-2 commercial district is intended to provide for the development of retail and
general business uses primarily to serve the community and region. Uses include a wide variety of
business activities and may involve limited outside storage, service or display.
Under the proposed zoning change, the more intense C-2 commercial zoning will be changed to less
intense residential and local retail zoning. Should the zoning change be approved, the homes
proposed to be built there will be of similar size and character of the homes in the Harmon Farms
subdivision you referenced. In fact, most of the homes will exceed the size and value of most of the
homes in Meadowview Estates neighborhood.
The property was previously platted years ago for commercial development that was never built. That
development also proposed a connection to Smith Road. You mentioned in your post and in your
email that another connection through to Davis Boulevard would serve the residents of that area well
by providing an additional connection to Davis Boulevard. The developer has proposed such a
connection based on the previous plat, and the City's thoroughfare plan which shows a future
connection to Davis in this area. Northfield Drive was closed years ago in response to traffic concerns
of residents in the adjacent neighborhoods. Northfield Park (built in 1985) is a community park, and is
a destination for softball and other recreation activities. The adjacent neighbors did not want to have
the park traffic coming through the neighborhood. Much of this information will be presented during
the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting tonight as well as to the City Council later this month
when we consider these items and take action on the zoning change.
1
I hope this helps to address some of your concerns. Again, your email has been provided to the
Planning and Zoning Commissioners. You have copied the City Council on this email, but we will also
be provided a copy when the item comes before us for consideration. The North Richland Hills City
Council as well as the commission members value citizen input, and it weighs heavily in our
consideration and action on items.
Thank you again for providing your input.
Oscar Trevino - Mayor
nrhoscar(@-sbcglobal.net
From: Peggy Spradling
To: "ccomstock @nrhtx.com" <ccomstock @nrhtx.com>; "nrhoscar @sbcglobal.net" <nrhoscar @sbcglobal.net>;
"nrhrodriguez @att.net" <nrhrodriguez @att.net>; "nrhrwoujesky @charter.net" <nrhrwoujesky @charter.net>;
"n rh lom bard @att.net" <nrhlombard@att.net>; "nrhtbarth @sbcglobal.net" <nrhtbarth @sbcglobal.net>;
"wdwhitson @sbcglobal.net" <wdwhitson @sbcglobal.net>; "nrhsturnage @sbcglobal.net" <nrhsturnage @sbcglobal.net>;
"tim-welch @sbcglobal.net" <tim-welch @sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:54 PM
Subject: St Joseph's Estates
Smith Dr will connect to the proposed St Joseph's Estates- 18 residential lots& 1 small retail in a platted area that was
originally zoned commercial. Per the Tarrant County Appraisal District maps-
http://www.tad.org/media/pdf/MapPDF/t_2090-440.pdf-"Commercial CV which the docs from NRH are calling
"undeveloped road" is already platted as approx 9 parcels. It appears the developer is wanting to subdivide those 9 lots to
double the density to 18 lots. More concrete home slabs, driveways, and sidewalks which equal more rain runoff, more
homes to provide water supply, more traffic congestion, and more air/noise pollution. As an RE Appraiser, what I have
seen in other cities in the past decades is that stocking NRH with homes of such a narrow price range/living area size is
not healthy for long term property values. For Meadowview area citizens, it makes more sense to build high end homes on
the existing 9 parcels, akin to Harmon Farms.Otherwise, in 20+ years you end up with lots of rental properties as
upwardly mobile families move to higher end subdivisions in other cities.. Northfield Dr was originally designed to provide
north access from the 200+ homes in Meadowview Estates to Davis Blvd. Because NRH closed off the north access, the
200+ homes access on the south end of Northfield Dr, Kirk Ln,and Kirk Rd. These residents, me included, experience
daily traffic. These roads dump into Rumfield Rd and Precinct Line Rd; both of which have increasing traffic congestion
that will markedly increase once the TEX Rail Smithfield Station becomes operable. Every time NRH sends a survey or
other questionnaire, I always implore them to institute conservation easements for large parcel owners so that SOME
green space will remain in this city.
I am sharing the above post that I wrote on Nextdoor, the neighborhood sharing website. While a
portion of the residents of Meadowview Estates would prefer no through streets to Davis Blvd, from
an infrastructure efficiency standpoint, reopening the north end of Northfield Dr to access Davis Blvd,
as it was originally intended, is the most efficient solution. This would negatively impact those
residents that face/side to the northern part of Northfield Dr but would provide relief to those of us on
the southern end of Northfield Dr, Kirk Ln, and Kirk Rd. This would also alleviate traffic congestion on
Rumfield Rd at the Davis Blvd traffic light intersection. Residents that face Rumfield Rd near Davis
Blvd could get a bit of traffic view/noise/air-pollution relief. The solution of reopening the northern
access of Northfield Rd would negatively impact the least number of residents overall.
2
strongly request that NRH consider this road reopening idea as well as deny replating the existing
lots to 18 residential lots for St Joseph's Estates. You all need to expand your thinking on stewardship
of the land for NRH and think long-term of how this city's reputation and homeownership mix will look
in 20-30 years.
Peggy Spradling
TX Certified Residential RE Appraiser
214.534.2449
7528 Kirk Rd, North Richland Hills TX 76182
3
Clayton Comstock
From: D&J Red < �
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 11:38 AM
To: Clayton Comstock
Subject: ZC 2016-09/St.Joseph's Estates/Smith Dr.
ZC 2016-09/St. Joseph's Estates/Smith Dr
I am writing because I am in favor of the connection of Smith Dr. to Davis Blvd. during the development of St.
Joseph's Estates and I oppose any limits or restrictions to the connection, i.e., a gate.
The reason for my opposition is that traffic from the Meadowview Estates addition is being unfairly diverted to
outlying residential areas affecting quality of life, health and safety.
1. The main access to Meadowview of Northfield Dr. has speed bumps intermittently along its
length. These bumps are large and effective. The result is the avoidance of Northfield Dr. by
Meadowview residents and other drivers.
2. Northwest access to Davis Blvd. by Gary Dr. through Liberty Village is gated off and labeled for
emergency use.
3. Northern access to Davis by Northfield Dr. and Cato Dr. through Northfield Park is blocked or
incomplete.
4. Due to the above, emergency vehicles have limited entry points, longer response times and are being
diverted to Kirk Rd. affecting residents.
5. The route of Smith Dr. to Davis will be so circuitous that it is inconceivable that it will be used by
outside traffic as a through street. A further deterrence is the numerous vehicles always parked in the
street along Smith reducing it to one lane.
6. NRH has allowed changes in traffic flow that diverts significant amounts of traffic to other residential
streets that is counter to its own policy.
Due in part to Meadowview residents own efforts to limit access, ingress and egress to Meadowview are by 2
points only,Northfield Dr. and Kirk Ln. From these points Meadowview's 200+residents,their 500+vehicles
and their numerous service providers, use Rumfield Rd., the smaller, narrower, non-Meadowview portion of
Kirk Ln. and Kirk Rd. to reach Davis Blvd. and Precinct Line Rd.
The diverted traffic flow, noise,pollution and dangerous Meadowview drivers unfairly impact and reduce the
safety, quality of life and health of the families living on the small, narrow, non-Meadowview portion of Kirk
Ln., Kirk Rd. and Rumfield.
Meadowview residents complain about the traffic congestion on Rumfield but counterintuitively do everything
they can to limit alternative routes. They seem to be trying to turn Meadowview into a gated community, to
benefit and protect themselves without concern for others, push things "down the road", dumping their traffic,
noise, crime, pollution and dangerous drivers downstream to others. Their efforts decrease the safety of
children and adults in other areas who enjoy walks, biking and park access, their dangerous traffic denying
access to Northfield Park and John Barfield Trail.
I am proposing that:
• The road bumps be removed from Northfield Dr.
• Smith Dr. connects unencumbered to Davis Blvd.
1
• Northfield Dr. is connected unencumbered north to Davis Blvd. during the Northfield Park
redevelopment project.
• Speed bumps are added to Kirk Rd., Kirk Ln and Rumfield Rd.
• A 3-Way stop is placed at the intersection of Kirk Ln. and Kirk Rd.
• A gate is placed at the intersection of Kirk Ln and Kirk Rd. so Meadowveiw Estates has limited
exposure to crime and through traffic,per Meadowview's own arguments.
• Gates are placed at all points allowing access to the City of NRH so we can stop "the barbarians at the
gates", limit through traffic and stop criminals from gaining access to the city. Just joking.
If Meadowview is allowed to limit access and divert traffic with speed bumps and gates for their own self-
interests,then other residential areas should be able to do the same.
The traffic congestion on Rumfield, caused in part by Meadowview residents, and the speed bumps on
Northfield Dr.,redirects and diverts traffic resulting in non-local residents, commercial vehicles and residents
from nearby additions, i.e., Stoneybrooke, using Kirk Rd. and non-Meadowview Kirk Ln as a cut-through
between Rumfield and Precinct. Large box trucks and pickups pulling trailers are common along with the
occasional 18 wheeled diesel.
The result is the residents of Meadowview Estates, Stoneybrooke, their service providers and cut through non-
locals all use Kirk Rd. and non-Meadowview Kirk Ln.
Please stop the diversion of traffic to Kirk Rd. and non-Meadowview Kirk Ln. and reduce the traffic congestion
on Rumfield by providing unencumbered alternate access points to Meadowview Estates.
David Redelsperger
NRH
z
2016-09-01 14:41 Buinger CTE Academy 8173543546 >> P 1/1
September 1, 2016
To the North Richland Hills City Council
Hello retry name is Lance Moran and I represent I in over 40 households In the adjacent(North)Liberty
Village for We would lire to urge the council to deny any zoning changes for
the 7500 block of Davis Blvd from agriculture to commercial, It is the opinion of the residents of Liberty
Village that the change would alter the essential character of the neighborhood,the change will
negatively affect the neighborhood's property values,the change poses a threat to the health and safety
of the neighborhood,the scale of the project is extensive and the change is ultimately not desired by the
neighborhood.
rurthermore,to address the subject of the change causing a "threat to the health and safety of the
neighborhood",it should be noted that the 7500 block is a FEMA flood zone and any elevation changes
on the property would in turn cause unwanted drainage to back up into liberty Village resident's yards.
Additionally,the paving of the area behind the neighborhood would allow unwanted traffic and noise in
close proximity to family households and children.
We believe this is sufficient evidence to stop the zoning change, We hope you feel the same way.
Sincerely
Lance Moran
Liberty Village Resident/Home Owner
North Richland Hills Texas
Lancejedia hotmail,corvti
7707 .................................... ....... 11 T
7613 ' 7644
0� 7612 7613 7612 7645 66(1
8416 8500 L) 7645
r7l -
$ 71 IT 7641
7605 8417 8501
7632 7637
7633 7,62 6
84104 '[8408.L8412 84 00 8
1 7629 7633
8316 7651 629
8401 8405 8�09 8413 746
8525 8529 8533 t,62
COMMERCIAL CT 8521
B309 8321
SAYERS LN
7700 841 8520 8524 8528 8532 8536 8540 8544
LL i�6
7601 8529 8533 8537 8541 7608
8521 8525
DR
6908 8601 �8605
7512 7
7501 8525 8529 8533 8537 8604
7510 7509 7508
8409 8425 8501 H 86'3
7504 7505 b� 7504
7500 8521 8525 8529 11 1
7501 7500
Legend Percent opposition portion (orange)
of total buffer area: 21.7 %
� � ZC3O1O-O8L[}C/�'|[}N
N
300 Ft BUFFER [}F LOCATION
�
F---1 �
PROPERTIES °�/
�---�
PROPERTIES |N OPPOSITION WITHIN BUFFER S
1 inch = 200feet
sINGLE FAMILV"PO^ � -- �o.-� ��uo[ssai�nau
�?
�.
Po
_B , s... f188°SQ 4"E til&6,SB', , --- .---"
ED
AT
VICINITY MAP cOMMERCIAL"o-2" ..^ ^, ., ^^4 •<" ,• �"
45 Ta55 p.xii.
LOT 1
BLOCK toot/.F P
" 262.20' S 89"58'48'W N N _
/aM y ,t SMITH D SMITH DR. in
w
<�
N COMMERCIAL"O-1" EE Q
0 I oaa SF
Q, $ w CI
T MIN.
0
H ; a
r F%
r,uo wEn�u r.:�o..Fx eau a�rs..o U)
.,. w'. 2 ��
eo 2
11531 SF
\\ 2
Co rn ^263T
o�
(� N6'"�� mnm F.F. 3 IF R.
LL BLO K 2 ...z... EL�1S DR
e 7 R 5 4 sF 3 un,
��,�.a ATE F MIN.F iz,ss
FEN�NC,su"or sE.auomED,nrR"r"EEaos aNSErsA�u -.^ice F F,
OPEN SPA GE m
as E E 1. m� �
THIN SYNE ANY EINTINI N:�re
IIIENANT1 - - _ ��• F^o m
IT SIEl NIT IEM
RE„TIIITITINI,FANV IN THE IIIIIIETI �PATRICKS PATH
--------------- - ------- a.,y sF ro N U M
E
o-
o �a
-EL _
11 10 9 8 z z oo U LL
o 92S _ 7 6 ,�v, PRELIMINARY PLAT
FPS 2 �' ST JOSEPH ESTATES
..F ¢" - COMMERCIAL e,si essss BL CK 1s sF F S 4
_ - LOTS 1-12 BLOCK 1,LOTS 1-8 BLOCK 2
250.31'r "N 89-22-30"W S &LOT 1,BLOCK 3 ® '-
�F"58'1053_W 1b833 N892350 W S88"5224 W 12503 ���NPE s
125 59 BEING 11.223 ACRES OF LAND
.IRATE h APPR.S.AL SINGLE FAIAILY R-1-S' SINGLE EASILY R1 ;
DRIVEWAY COMMERCIAL C sINC,LE FAMILV 12
- IN THE S RICRAR111,SURVEY $
,,. TEPHEN 11Gfi
F m s Pa r.rvux Pu. nor., AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS,
TARRANT COUNTY.TEAS.
re,w o:au..e a: EN T 3swVSS R JE ERIrDET AL PER DTLEE 'ir, areEa. .usr�N�
arr -.i A.N.A.4 N ULTANT L.L.C. SEEN PERTIE L.L.C. C8 U T MH MES
ORDINANCE NO. 3429
ZONING CASE ZC 2016-09
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, AND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS BY REZONING A 7.456 ACRE TRACT OF
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 7500 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD
FROM C-2 COMMERCIAL AND R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO
RI-PD RESIDENTIAL INFILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING;
AMENDING THE COMPREHENISVE LAND USE PLAN MAP;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF
ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas is a home-rule municipality located
in Tarrant County, Texas acting under its charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills regulates and
restricts the location and use of buildings, structures, and land for trade,
industry, residence, and other purposes, and provides for the
establishment of zoning districts of such number, shape, and area as may
be best suited to carry out these regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously passed an ordinance adopting a
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map as the primary document on which to
base all zoning, platting, and other land use decisions; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map provides guidance for future
development in conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the property containing approximately 7.456 acres of land
described and shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, located in the 7500
block of Davis Boulevard (the "Property") has filed an application to rezone
the Property from its present classification of C-2 (commercial) and R-1
(single family residential) to RI-PD (residential infill planned development);
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas held a public hearing on September 1, 2016, and the City Council
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, held a public hearing on
Ordinance No. 3429
ZC 2016-09
Page 1 of 4
September 26, 2016 with respect to the zoning change described herein;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that an amendment to the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map, as provided herein, redesignating
the below described property from C-2 (commercial) and R-1 (single
family residential) to RI-PD (residential infill planned development) land
use is appropriate and is in accordance with the growth goals, objectives
and planning principals set forth in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City has complied with all requirements of Chapter 211 of the Local
Government Code, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills, and all other laws dealing with notice, publication, and procedural
requirements for rezoning the Property; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and after such public hearing, the City
Council finds that granting the request herein furthers the purpose of
zoning as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills and that the zoning change should be granted, subject to the
conditions imposed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section 1: That the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is hereby amended to
redesignate a 7.456 acre tract of land within the Stephen Richardson
Survey, Abstract No. 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, located within the 7500
block of Davis Boulevard as described and shown on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated for all purposes, from C-2 Commercial and R-1
Single Family Residential to RI-PD Residential Infill Planned
Development.
Section 2: THAT the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby
amended by rezoning the Property and approving a residential infill
planned development as provided herein on a 7.456 acre tract of land
within the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract No. 1266, Tarrant
County, Texas, located within the 7500 Block of Davis Boulevard as
described and shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated for
all purposes.
Section 3: The City Council finds that the information submitted by the applicant
pursuant to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance is sufficient to
approve the residential infill planned development in accordance with the
requirements of the Residential Infill Planned Development (RI-PD)
Ordinance No. 3429
ZC 2016-09
Page 2 of 4
District Land Use and Development Regulations, and Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated for all purposes, which is approved.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills is amended
and the Planning Manager is directed to revise the official zoning map to
reflect the approved RI-PD (residential infill planned development) zoning,
as set forth above.
Section 5: The use of the property described above shall be subject to all applicable
regulations contained in the Building and Land Use Regulations and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of North Richland
Hills.
Section 6: The zoning district as herein established has been made in accordance
with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
Section 7: The Planning Manager is directed to revise the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Map to reflect the revised land use and designations as set forth
above.
Section 8: This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as
amended, except when the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct
conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such code, in which
event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such code are
hereby repealed.
Section 9: It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance
are severable, and if any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences,
clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance, since the same would have been
enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of
any such unconstitutional section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase.
Section 10: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Zoning
Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills as
amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final
conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars
($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall
constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder.
Ordinance No. 3429
ZC 2016-09
Page 3 of 4
Section 11: All rights and remedies of the City of North Richland Hills are expressly
saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances
governing zoning that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this
Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such
ordinances, same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
Section 12: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause of this ordinance
two times.
Section 13: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage.
AND IT IS SO ORDAINED.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
Approved as to form and legality:
Cara Leahy White, Assistant City Attorney
Approved as to content:
Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Ordinance No. 3429
ZC 2016-09
Page 4 of 4
SINGLE FAMILY"PG'• -- uii., RF.LL VwVEa�/D6wIPn�V
FREEDOM Y'.
_ — o- — q0
�re POB- ` PL88'SQ04�� s .E. no a SO
Ell VICINITY MAP N •'c-a'zONING &
a
AN PROPOSED a.arxx,rrm..�rry "x.r. 4 x�c
0 o TF S
ous ITT
" S 89°58'48" -
282.20'
SMITH DR do m
SO
u COMMERCIAL"G1" ~
A,
1 DO 31 1141 IF x VEWIAN
4" Y
,. ly
3 3
Co �I EP
LU q a 4
4 W W �.r
BRICK
T „sN IST N NG
LOS sF W P oP zaNl G REPO 5” ELMS D.
I III IF E
0 PRIVATE 7 6 5
OPEN SPACE k i sF F T:112 IF
' 11.IF
isF F w„o so'
s 6 NA
UE
�°oma
LOT
PATRICKS PATH 7.,..
s.v
E,xEE V,xErx°u„xa�. x..NM�u", mS18-2"u C 1� Tx41F C o—
111.1F,TR U 11
.
GATE REQU REMENTS - PROP. G/.TF O[TAI �'�
o n.�z a,.
BRICK EXJS_T,_ INCi R __a '" d°�X
— L
Z NING RI w r.T.s.
o m rt °o U
PARCEL 15 14 - 13- 12 11 = IB 9 8 ZONING EXHIBIT
at,b`d:Eu a N,x EXIST.SO IN AG _ R,.1SF IHRTSF R,F'2z„sF 21-F 1114 $ ” ST JOSEPH ESTATES
PR P z NI LR BLOC 1 ..' __ N
q, - N892250 W 5885224 W 25031 ik 892230 W -" EXIST.ZONING
R1 a^c-2^
- S 88 10 53'W 168 33 125 59 1 03 Fo PROP.mNING RI PO' ® i
COMMERCIAL C SINGLEFAMILY R' SINGLE FAMILY R1 S SINGLE FAMILY R1 , LOTS 1-15 @LOGK1 LOTS 1-11 BLOCKS
#_dd &LOT 1 BLOCK 3 5
HT
BEING 7.456 ACRES OF LAND
25 RESIDENTIAL LOTS&
2 NONRESIDENTIAL LOTS e.for
ENGINEER
(C1T iSTURIBEYIE I
rFi,a,a s-°,e,, rE INTHESTEPHE vEV
IN ASSIC ACT NO.
AN ADDITION TO HE CI I AND HILLS
ORDINANCE NO. 3431
ZONING CASE ZC 2016-09
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, AND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS BY REZONING A 0.397 ACRE TRACT OF
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 7500 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD
FROM AG(AGRICULTURAL) TO LR(LOCAL RETAIL) ZONING;
AMENDING THE COMPREHENISVE LAND USE PLAN MAP;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF
ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas is a home-rule municipality located
in Tarrant County, Texas acting under its charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills regulates and
restricts the location and use of buildings, structures, and land for trade,
industry, residence, and other purposes, and provides for the
establishment of zoning districts of such number, shape, and area as may
be best suited to carry out these regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously passed an ordinance adopting a
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map as the primary document on which to
base all zoning, platting, and other land use decisions; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map provides guidance for future
development in conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the property containing approximately 0.413 acres of land
described and shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, located in the 7500
block of Davis Boulevard (the "Property") has filed an application to rezone
the Property from its present classification of AG (agricultural) to LR (local
retail); and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas held a public hearing on September 1, 2016, and the City Council
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, held a public hearing on
September 26, 2016 with respect to the zoning change described herein;
and
Ordinance No. 3431
ZC 2016-09
Page 1 of 4
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that an amendment to the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map, as provided herein, redesignating
the below described property from AG (agricultural) to LR(local retail) land
use is appropriate and is in accordance with the growth goals, objectives
and planning principals set forth in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City has complied with all requirements of Chapter 211 of the Local
Government Code, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills, and all other laws dealing with notice, publication, and procedural
requirements for rezoning the Property; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and after such public hearing, the City
Council finds that granting the request herein furthers the purpose of
zoning as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills and that the zoning change should be granted, subject to the
conditions imposed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section 1: That the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is hereby amended to
redesignate a 0.413-acre tract of land within the Stephen Richardson
Survey, Abstract No. 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, located within the 7500
block of Davis Boulevard as described and shown on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated for all purposes, from AG (agricultural) to LR
(local Retail).
Section 2: That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby
amended by rezoning a 0.413-acre tract of land within the Stephen
Richardson Survey, Abstract No. 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, located
within the 7500 Block of Davis Boulevard as described and shown on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated for all purposes from AG
(agricultural) to LR (local retail).
Section 3: That the official zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills is amended
and the Planning Manager is directed to revise the official zoning map to
reflect the approved LR (Local Retail) zoning, as set forth above.
Section 4: The use of the property described above shall be subject to all applicable
regulations contained in the Building and Land Use Regulations and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of North Richland
Hills.
Ordinance No. 3431
ZC 2016-09
Page 2 of 4
Section 5: The zoning district as herein established has been made in accordance
with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
Section 6: The Planning Manager is directed to revise the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Map to reflect the revised land use and designations as set forth
above.
Section 7: This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as
amended, except when the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct
conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such code, in which
event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such code are
hereby repealed.
Section 8: It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance
are severable, and if any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences,
clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance, since the same would have been
enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of
any such unconstitutional section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase.
Section 9: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Zoning
Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills as
amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final
conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars
($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall
constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder.
Section 10: All rights and remedies of the City of North Richland Hills are expressly
saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances
governing zoning that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this
Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such
ordinances, same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
Section 11: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause of this ordinance
two times.
Section 12: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage.
Ordinance No. 3431
ZC 2016-09
Page 3 of 4
AND IT IS SO ORDAINED.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
Approved as to form and legality:
Cara Leahy White, Assistant City Attorney
Approved as to content:
Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Ordinance No. 3431
ZC 2016-09
Page 4 of 4
SINGLE FAMILY"PG'• -- wi,� RF.LL VwVEa�/o6wIPn�V
Y
FREEDOM �
Ul-
,. ------------------------
VICINITY MAP •'o-2 ZONING
LLLU
s
._•x'.-say nr.,�'�w.i _
riNL
282.20' S 89°58'48"W ,
• o � � SMITH DR; N
F w
COMMERCIAL"G1" _ ~
i
r �a
STI _
EE
EL
�. o
E g N O
N
SR
rV --- N
TI
w
RARCEL#t
EXIST.Z NING"CZ'
N PROP.
JM .20NING'REPO'
INET
Ii �ELUSpR
Qr
LIT
0
..EeMEU. __ ,�E�E�EM m
M
111 110 11 111 2�
>' P4RCELH2 _ v¢
EXIST ZONING o -
PROP.ZONING'•RI-RO•' ZONING EXHIBIT
$ ST JOSEPH ESTATES
N 89'22'50"W S 88"5224 W 250.31' „ 89 2230 W - o EXIST.z NWG'AG'
S 88 10 53'W 168 33
125.59' 125 03 PROP.20NING LE' ® £
COMMERCIAL C SINGLE FAMILV R-2"RF SINGLE FAMILY R-1-S" SINGLE FAMILY•R 1 ,-
# LOTS 15 BLOCK 1 5
BEING 0.413 ACRES OF LAND
1 NONRESIDENTIAL LOTS
ENGINEER L11mi �+ �.eoo ie,s Ic THE ARR N a VEl'bTEPHEN RICHARD-1
H. AN ANNITI JN TO THE Iry FN NORTH RI HLAND HILLS,
EXCERPT FROM THE SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Chairman Randall Shiflet announced that Items C.3 and D.1 would be moved to the front
of the agenda since the majority of the audience was attending specifically for those
items.
C.3 ZC 2016-09 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM
ZEON PROPERTIES, LLC FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM C-2
COMMERCIAL, R-1 SINGLE FAMILY, AND AG AGRICULTURAL TO R-2
SINGLE FAMILY AND FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO LR LOCAL RETAIL ON
11.223 ACRES LOCATED IN THE 7500 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD.
APPROVED
Chairman Randall Shiflet announced that Item C.3 would be heard in conjunction with
Item D.1 since the items were related.
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock introduced the Zoning Change and Preliminary Plat
requests.
Applicant Osama Nashed, 5000 Thompson Terrace, Colleyville, TX 76034, with A.N.A.
Consultants came forward representing the developer to present the requests.
Chairman Shiflet asked if the Preliminary Plat displayed this evening is different from the
one that was in the agenda packet.
Planning Manager Comstock responded that the exhibit is the same except that the
existing plat and the contour lines are shown along with the new proposed plat on the
version in the agenda packet, and the version tonight only shows the proposed plat. The
previous version had created some confusion.
Mr. Comstock summarized the staff report and clarified the definition of the R -2 Single
Family Residential District.
Chairman Shiflet opened the public hearing.
Brian Lindenberger, 8520 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward and presented a petition in
opposition to the zoning and plat requests. Mr. Lindenberger gathered signatures of
property owners in the notification area that are opposition. The petition was read aloud
to the Commission. He stated that the neighborhood does not want increased traffic and
they ask the Commission to disapprove the zoning change.
Steven Pybus, 8533 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward to speak in opposition to the
requests. Mr. Pybus used the document camera to show historic photos of Meadowview
Estates from 1979, 1990 and 1995. He stated that the proposed property cannot be
developed because of flood plain and drainage issues.
Jim Sherman, 8524 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward to express concerns about the
zoning request. Mr. Sherman is opposed to the change and feels that the new street
layout changes the original intent of the development. He discussed traffic issues in the
neighborhood and the speed bumps that were installed.
Pete Daniels, 7500 Northfield Drive, NRH, was called to speak. Mr. Daniels is opposed to
the zoning change request and discussed traffic issues and flooding concerns. He wants
to maintain the quality of life in the neighborhood.
Jay Hearne, 7629 Northfield Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Hearne
encouraged the city to allow a cul-de-sac on the proposed new street and create a
pedestrian connection between Smith Drive and the new street. He pointed out that the
existing plat already shows the connection to Smith Drive and that property could be
developed commercially if this request is denied.
Mr. Comstock clarified the existing development rights of the approved plat.
Mark Stikkel, 8521 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Stikkel desires to live
at the end of a dead end street and asked the Commission to consider the perspective of
the neighborhood.
Michael Pratt, 8528 Ellis Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Pratt is opposed to the
request and agrees with the suggestion of a cul-de-sac on the proposed new street.
Terry Hudgeons, 8532 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Hudgins is
opposed to the connection on the basis of security concerns. He is not opposed to a gate
being installed for emergency services access.
Richard Cleghorn, 8529 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Cleghorn is
opposed to the request based on traffic concerns. He asked the Commission to consider
a cul-de-sac, a gate, or a bike path instead of a through street.
Tricia Brewster, 8525 Smith Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Ms. Brewster proposes
a cul-de-sac or a gate for emergency access. She is concerned about crime in regard to
the proposed street connection.
Glenn Phillips, 8613 Terrell Drive, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Phillips has a
question about the route the construction vehicles would use to enter the subdivision.
Dan Langham, 8425 Rumfield Rd, NRH, came forward to speak. Mr. Langham is
concerned about what will be constructed between the south side of the development and
his property to the south in terms of fencing.
Karen Clary, 7616 Northfield Dr, NRH, came forward to speak. Ms. Clary discussed the
neighborhood crime watch group and quality of life issues. She is concerned about traffic
and property values related to the proposed street connection.
Chairman Shiflet closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Don Bowen motioned to approve the zoning change with the stipulation
that an emergency gate be installed at the connection to Smith Drive.
Chairman Shiflet asked for clarification as to whether conditions could be placed on the
zoning approval.
City Attorney Cara White replied that no conditions may be placed on this straight zoning
request.
Commissioner Bowen made a second motion to approve the zoning change so
discussion could commence.
Commissioner Steven Cooper seconded the motion, also for the purpose of having
a discussion about the request.
Commissioner Bill Schopper commented that this area is not commercially viable since
the former Winn Dixie property was purchased by Gateway Church.
Chairman Shiflet asked Planning Manager Comstock to address the difference between
the Zoning Change request and the Preliminary Plat request.
Planning Manager Comstock explained the development process and the purpose of the
Preliminary and Final Plats.
Chairman Shiflet asked if the applicant was required to show the Preliminary Plat this
evening.
Mr. Comstock confirmed that it is not a requirement.
Commissioner Cooper asked if Mr. Comstock could answer the questions that were
raised by the speakers.
Mr. Comstock addressed the question of screening between properties.
Commissioner Mike Benton commented that it is unfortunate when we have situations
like this and he could not vote to approve this in good conscience.
Commissioner Cooper asked if this property is in a designated flood plain.
Mr. Comstock explained that the lot contains FEMA-designated flood plain but the area to
the south and north of that designated area is developable. The Preliminary Plat
designates a 25 foot erosion setback.
Commissioner Jerry Tyner asked if the city has any plans for the creation of a right turn
lane off of Rumfield Road onto Davis Boulevard.
City Engineer Caroline Waggoner came forward and explained that there are no current
plans for a right turn lane at that location but that the City understands that traffic backs
up there during the PM peak. A CIP project and right of way acquisition would be
necessary to create a new turn lane and that is something the City can investigate further.
Commissioner Kathy Luppy commented that she had faced the same situation at the end
of a dead end street and came to City Council but it did not work out it in the residents
favor. She wanted to assure those who attended the public hearing that the City has their
well-being in mind and will continue to listen to concerns from residents.
Chairman Shiflet commented that a solution is needed for the Rumfield and Davis
intersection, although the cost would be high. He stated that you cannot deny someone
the right to develop their property and purchasing the property is the only way to ensure
that it stays in its current state. The Commission will make a recommendation to the
Mayor and Council and they will be the deciding body.
Commissioner Cooper stated that this is an up or down vote for the Commission.
Mr. Comstock explained that a change to a Residential Infill Planned Development district
could be made at this meeting because that zoning district is a more stringent district than
the R-2 District.
Chairman Shiflet asked how that would be done without a denial tonight.
Mr. Comstock explained why the request can be changed.
Commissioner Bowen asked if the Commission needs to vote on the current motion and
second first before making any changes.
City Attorney Cara White stated that the Commission should proceed with voting on that
issue since there is a motion and second on the floor.
Commissioner Mike Benton asked if the original motion could be amended.
City Attorney Cara White indicated affirmatively.
Commissioner Bowen suggested they call for the question and if the original motion fails,
another motion could be considered.
Chairman Shiflet called for the question and requested a vote on the motion to approve
ZC 2016-09.
The motion failed by a vote of one in favor(Shiflet) and five opposed.
Commissioner Bowen motioned that the zoning request be approved as a
Residential Infill Planned Development with an emergency-only gate at the Smith
Drive connection. Commissioner Benton seconded the motion.
The applicant, Mr. Nashed, came forward and expressed his desire to be good neighbors
and they would be happy to install a gate.
Commissioner Bill Schopper stated that a gate would only allow the 18 homeowners of
the proposed subdivision access from Davis Boulevard.
Commissioner Bowen stated there is a bubble at the end of the street for a turn around
that would meet the criteria for emergency vehicles.
There was a discussion between Commissioners Benton and Schopper bout the number
of lots in the development.
Commissioners Benton and Luppy expressed appreciation to the developer for amending
the request and for his past cooperation with the City.
COMMISSIONER BOWEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AS A RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH AN EMERGENCY-ONLY GATE AT THE SMITH DRIVE
CONNECTION. COMMISSIONER BENTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED 6-0.
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: ZC 2016-14, Ordinance No. 3430, Public Hearing and consideration
of a request from Adiene Jones for a Zoning Change from R-1 Single
Family to R-1-S Special Single Family on 2.06 acres located at 7512
Bursey Road.
PRESENTER: Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
SUMMARY:
Adiene Jones is requesting a zoning change from R-1 Single Family to R-1-S Special
Single Family on 2.06 acres located at 7512 Bursey Road.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
Ms. Jones is the owner of a lot and house at 7512 Bursey Road, which is located on the
south side of the street between Smithfield Road and Londonderry Drive. The applicant
is requesting a zoning change with the intent to sell the property to a potential buyer
who is interested in keeping livestock (horses) on the property.
While most of the area is characterized by low density single-family neighborhoods,
there are 13 large estate lots on the south side of Bursey Road. These lots are located
between Londonderry Drive and extend along Bursey Road South.
Estate Lots
In 2014, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission held work sessions to
discuss the applicability of estate lots and the R-1-S zoning district in certain areas of
the city. Estate lots were viewed as a desired market niche for North Richland Hills as
land and house values are typically higher than average. The direction from those
discussions was to review zoning cases with the following general policy guidance:
■ Allow R-1-S zoning in the Little Ranch Road / Meadow Creek Road and
Continental Trail /Valley Drive areas
• Discourage R-2 zoning within the estate areas
• Discourage R-1-S zoning outside the estate areas
• Incorporate these policies into a future Comprehensive Plan update
k4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
The map below shows the Continental Trail / Valley Drive estate lot area. The property
under consideration is located east of this area on the south side of Bursey Road, which
is in an area where the R-1-S zoning district is discouraged. While the property
immediately east of the site under consideration is zoned R-1-S, that zoning change
was approved in August 2013 before the revised policy direction was developed in June
2014.
N
KH Greer p
LBC LOCATION N
P"P"fe Zoned AG R-1 5 7 p.
0o r„
't isi a aa'rd r soo aka+a 11N6N
Legend
zoned R I .. - -
ZO d AO
GaNTINEN7A TRH 0
Little Be Creek - iR9'"q
9J iRiYp�6
(approx_68 )
,.. ..momusnr Piro a Ova 7n 3d , „ _k9M.
rzoad vans
1 iii o4Y
fiza a9 � �
IR m V
8 t I kre9pa y iiiir 'p � C
asy v tSEY"
A
o
Livestock
The applicant has indicated that a potential buyer plans to keep livestock (horses) on
the property, which is a permitted activity in the R-1-S zoning district. The zoning
ordinance states the purpose of the R-1-S zoning district as follows:
"The R-1-S single-family residential zoning district is intended to provide areas for
very low density development of single-family detached dwelling units which are
constructed at an approximate density of one unit per acre in a quasi-rural setting.
The R-1-S district is specifically planned for the keeping of livestock in a residential
setting."
There are related standards in Chapter 14 of the Code of Ordinances (Animals) that define
livestock and affect the location of an enclosure for livestock as well as limit the number of
animals kept on the property. Livestock is defined in Chapter 14 as-
"... cattle, sheep, swine or goats commonly raised for human consumption; a horse,
pony, mule, donkey or hinny; native or nonnative hoofstock raised under agricultural
practices".
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
The chapter also states that enclosures must be located at least 100 feet from another
residence, not including the house on the property, and limits the number of livestock to one
per full acre. If the zoning is changed to R-1-S, the size of this property would allow two
animals per the definition of livestock to be kept on the site.
The Development Review Committee recommended denial of the R-1-S zoning request.
The property is not located in either of the two areas designated for the preservation of
estate lot. In addition, changing the zoning to R-1-S would allow for the keeping of livestock
on this property, not just horses. There are concerns about odor and other nuisances that
go along with the keeping of livestock since this property backs up to 3 standard residential
lots located on Woodhaven Drive in a traditional R-2 neighborhood.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan classifies this area as "Low
Density Residential." This designation provides areas for the development of traditional,
low-density single-family detached dwelling units.
CURRENT ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. A
1977 zoning map indicates the property was zoned 1-F-9 Single Family Residential.
When the zoning ordinance was updated in 1984 to its current version, the zoning
designation was revised to R-1 Single Family Residential.
PROPOSED ZONING: The proposed zoning is R-1-S Special Single Family. The R-1-S
zoning district is intended to provide areas for very low-density development of single-
family residences that are constructed at an approximate density of one unit per acre in
a quasi-rural setting. The district is specifically planned to allow for the keeping of
livestock in a residential setting. The R-1-S district requires a minimum lot size of one
acre and a minimum house size of 2,300 square feet.
SURROUNDING ZONING ( LAND USE:
North: R-2 Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential
West: R-1 Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential
South: R-2 Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential
East: R-1-S Special Single-Family I Low Density Residential
PLAT STATUS: The property is currently platted as Lot 6, Block 1, Oakvale Addition.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Planning and Zoning Commission
conducted a public hearing and considered this item at the September 1, 2016. After
hearing the applicant and four speakers in support of her application, the Commission
voted 4-0 to recommend approval. Two commissioners filed affidavits for conflict of
interest and abstained from discussing and voting on the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Deny Ordinance No. 3430.
E�u-r sne v ^Y K
...............................
LLU
te: "�� � li 91 t, y�Pik '� � � ..uV� � ��;,w � ,y@ � �%/ rra� ,.
n.
� tl
r „�F, // r
�� � ��
� � � 3 �� ,�� „ „
,; u
/% a U� �" � �%�r,''�t�;�
�„ � yr
��
� r� � ,use
,, ..� a
i
f�
�i/rr/� � c 'ip �� 5 ///f// ��Jf��l �,
i� ���
r ��{ ,�� , � / �,,
/l� r //�
%,' S'W" �e, ra/ ��� �� iii,
/; i�, i�✓�y�9 y /
ii 4 � i
;,,,
�� ��• ��/ iii � � i � �� /%��r �� � ,,�.
�%
�, r r
V �� ". �'!ry I����i '' ����/%�� G �,,� � {���«r„ yell pN��.
� ' '� n
���,
'�i � �ii�Yii� � a� a.
l �� � / r i � �/ ��
Bursey Rd South
f
�, � � ,
,�� �;
+;
r' f�./i,��� �,f,�
� ��
/`
��
,, , � ��
nr
o��.
�„
�„
,<
'` 1;
�, ,
�,�
°� r
��
;,., t
j � � � � „ r
'i� 1 ,i
/�� � �
Woodhaven Dr �%����%1�
� ' �„�
r,
,�
�x
r, ��i� ? - ri�,,,�, ..
Uir� � �
0 D � �� r���/f�
�, � ,;m��
� N''A''°�� i�'� � � ” � ��'��
��
�: H%�
�i ,<Uraa�, 1'� .Iq VVV
/� �����i ��
o l V/
I�I'�uli����yuii��yy��pl „;�� n� ui�� �I�IYOi ��i'��i'���,y,d� ��`'� "°''r
I i i ��
i i iii I�
HL..
o NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.: ..:W PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
r x AND CITY COUNCIL
Case Number: ZC 2016-14
Applicant: Adiene Jones
Location: 7512 Bursey Road
You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200
feet of the property shown on the attached map.
Purpose of Public Hearing:
A Public Hearing is being held to consider a request from Adiene Jones for a Zoning Change
from R-1 Single Family to R-1-S Special Single Family on 2.06 acres located at 7512 Bursey
Road.
Public Hearing Schedule:
Public Hearing Dates: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
7:00 PM THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
CITY COUNCIL
7:00 PM MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
Both Meeting Locations: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4301 CITY POINT DRIVE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
If you have any questions or wish to submit a petition or letter concerning the above request,
please contact:
Planning Department - City of North Richland Hills
4301 City Point Drive
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Phone (817) 427-6300
Fax (817) 427-6303
BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL LENSING ALAN
DISTRICT JONES A ADIENE LENSING LYNN
ATTN: MIKE SEALE 7801 FOREST HILLS CT 7508 BURSEY RD
6125 EAST BELKNAP NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-9201
HALTOM CITY, TX 76117
WINTERMUTE DOHRMAN CHARLES KHALIL MUJEEB CARPENTER MONTY
WINTERMUTE FRANCES LYNN 2129 CRIMSON LN CARPENTER VICI
7504 BURSEY RD KELLER TX 76248-6803 7516 BURSEY RD S
NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-8723
THOMPSON RICKY L MULLENIX MITCHELL VANCE WILLARD JR
THOMPSON KAREN G MULLENIX JANET 7904 KANDY LN
7901 KANDY LN 7900 KANDY LN NRH TX 76182-8714
FORT WORTH TX 76182-8715 NRH TX 76182-8714
SPINA DAVID GILLEAN JAMES R ROPER JOHN
SPINA LEAH GILLEAN WENDY G ROPER HELEN M
7905 ARLIE LN 7901 ARLIE LN 7900 ARLIE LN
NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-8720 NRH TX 76182-8719
TOMME JOHN BLALOCK EUDY E ALSBROOKS ROBERT
TOMME SHAUNA BLALOCK SHIRLEY
7801 BURSEY CT 7509 WOODHAVEN DR W EN DR
NRH 76182
TX 76182
NRH TX 76182 FORT WORTH TX 76182-9215 NRH
KALOSA SUSANNE DUGGAR JEFFERY A
Attention: S KALOSA REVOCABLE BRADY DEBORAH DELL DUGGAR CYNTHIA
TRUST 1004 SAN JACINTO AVE 7525 WOODHAVEN DR
7517 WOODHAVEN DR TEXAS CITY TX 77590-5545
NRH TX 76182 NRH TX 76182-9215
DALTON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST MILLER LYNN A HOVEN MARK J
Attention: RONALD EDWARD DALTON MILLER PAULA K HOVEN KATHY A
CO-TRUSTEE 7533 WOODHAVEN DR 7537 WOODHAVEN DR
7529 WOODHAVEN DR NRH TX 76182-9215 NRH TX 76180
NRH TX 76182
WHITEHEAD KEITH SALVUCCI KEITH D BALOGA CHARLES THOMAS
WHITEHEAD TAMMY SALVUCCI NANCI Y 7520 WOODHAVEN DR
7541 WOODHAVEN DR 1620 NOTRE DAME AVE NRH TX 76182-9214
FORT WORTH TX 76182-9215 BELMONT CA 94002-1927
CURRENT OWNER COMISKEY DANIEL COOPER STEVEN G
7524 WOODHAVEN DR COMISKEY KIMBERLY COOPER FRANCES
NRH TX 76182 7528 WOODHAVEN DR 7532 WOODHAVEN DR
NRH TX 76182-9214 NRH TX 76182-9214
COAN COLE REAGAN
COAN KRISTINE ANN
7536 WOODHAVEN DR
NRH TX 76182
ORDINANCE NO. 3430
ZONING CASE ZC 2016-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, AND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS BY REZONING A 2.06 ACRE TRACT OF
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7512 BURSEY ROAD FROM R-1(SINGLE
FAMILY) TO R-1-S(SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY) ZONING; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas is a home-rule municipality located
in Tarrant County, Texas acting under its charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills regulates and
restricts the location and use of buildings, structures, and land for trade,
industry, residence, and other purposes, and provides for the
establishment of zoning districts of such number, shape, and area as may
be best suited to carry out these regulations; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the property containing approximately 2.06 acres of shown
on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, located at 7512 Bursey Road (the
"Property") has filed an application to rezone the Property from its present
classification of R-1(single family) to R-1-S (special single family
residential); and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas held a public hearing on September 1, 2016, and the City Council
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, held a public hearing on
September 26, 2016 with respect to the zoning change described herein;
and
WHEREAS, the City has complied with all requirements of Chapter 211 of the Local
Government Code, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills, and all other laws dealing with notice, publication, and procedural
requirements for rezoning the Property; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and after such public hearing, the City
Council finds that granting the request herein furthers the purpose of
zoning as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Ordinance No. 3430
ZC 2016-14
Page 1 of 4
Hills and that the zoning change should be granted, subject to the
conditions imposed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section 1: That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby
amended by rezoning from R-1(single family) to R-1-S(special single
family residential) a 2.06 acre tract described as Lots 6 and 6R, Block 1,
Oakvale Addition, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas locally
known as 7512 Bursey Road, and shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated for all purposes.
Section 2: That the official zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills is amended
and the Planning Manager is directed to revise the official zoning map to
reflect the approved R-2 (residential) zoning, as set forth above.
Section 3: The use of the property described above shall be subject to all applicable
regulations contained in the Building and Land Use Regulations and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of North Richland
Hills.
Section 4: The zoning district as herein established has been made in accordance
with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
Section 5: This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as
amended, except when the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct
conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such code, in which
event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such code are
hereby repealed.
Section 6: It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance
are severable, and if any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences,
clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance, since the same would have been
enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of
any such unconstitutional section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase.
Section 7: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Zoning
Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills as
amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final
Ordinance No. 3430
ZC 2016-14
Page 2 of 4
conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars
($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall
constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder.
Section 8: All rights and remedies of the City of North Richland Hills are expressly
saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances
governing zoning that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this
Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such
ordinances, same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
Section 9: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause of this ordinance
two times.
Section 10: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage.
AND IT IS SO ORDAINED.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
Approved as to form and legality:
Cara Leahy White, Assistant City Attorney
Approved as to content:
Ordinance No. 3430
ZC 2016-14
Page 3 of 4
Clayton Comstock, Planning Manager
Ordinance No. 3430
ZC 2016-14
Page 4 of 4
-• m� � �no � � 1 1 N 1 L.1 I
"a
AG
N, r
l's R-I .„.. .�
kL ' , 1 11.1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
r�u N 1 1 -1 V IR
OWNER ZONING EXHIBIT
Adiene Jones
7801 Forest Hills Ct
NRHTX761
817.821.07114 4 >Lot 6 Block 1> Oakvale Addition
817.281.7588 2.06 acres
EXCERPT FROM THE SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
C.1 ZC 2016-14 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST
FROM ADIENE JONES FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM R-1 SINGLE
FAMILY TO R-1-S SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY ON 2.06 ACRES LOCATED
AT 7512 BURSEY ROAD.
APPROVED
Chairman Randall Shiflet and Commissioner Steven Cooper left the Council Chambers at
9:13 p.m. in order to recuse themselves. They are both property owners within 200 feet of
this zoning request.
Vice Chairman Bill Schopper read the caption for ZC 2016-14.
Planning Manager Clayton Comstock introduced the zoning change request.
Applicant Adiene Jones, 7801 Forest Hills Court, presented her zoning request. Ms. Jones
has a buyer for the home on Bursey Road but they want to be able to have a horse on the
property.
Vice Chairman Schopper opened the public hearing.
Lynn Lensing, 7508 Bursey Road, NRH, came forward to speak in favor of the request.
Elizabeth Sheppard, 2856 Mimosa Park Drive, Richland Hills, came forward to speak in
favor of the request.
Monty Carpenter, 7516 Bursey Road South, NRH, came forward to speak in favor of the
request.
Ron Dalton, 7529 Woodhaven Drive, NRH, came forward to speak in favor of the request.
Vice Chairman Schopper closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Mike Benton motioned to approve the zoning request and Commissioner
Don Bowen seconded the motion.
Commissioner Benton asked about the type of fencing that is required to keep horses in the
city as well as the fence maintenance that is required.
Planning Manager Comstock detailed the R-1-S zoning regulations including the enclosure
requirements.
Commissioner Benton stated that a horse could damage a regular wooden fence.
Mr. Comstock stated that fencing is not required in the city code.
Commissioner Kathy Luppy asked if there were any other lots zoned R -1-S in the
immediate area.
Mr. Comstock replied that Mr. Carpenter, just to the east of the subject lot, rezoned his
property to R-1-S in 2013. That is the only R-1-S property along the south side of Bursey
Road.
Commissioner Don Bowen asked if Mr. Carpenter could have chickens.
Mr. Comstock stated that the animal code allows one animal per acre in terms of livestock.
Commissioner Bowen asked Mr. Comstock to go over the estate lot guidelines that were
established in 2014.
Mr. Comstock discussed the work sessions conducted by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council in 2014 that addressed estate lots. The staff recommendation
is denial of the request in reiteration of the results of those work sessions.
Commissioner Bowen asked if there had been many phone calls to staff about this request.
Mr. Comstock replied that there have been several calls and most of those callers are
present this evening and in favor of the request.
COMMISSIONER BENTON MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2016-14. COMMISSIONER BOWEN
SECONDEDTHE MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-0.
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2016-030,
authorizing the application of a Texas Parks and Wildlife Grant for
the Northfield Park renovation project.
PRESENTER: Vickie Loftice, Managing Director of Community Services
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The City of North Richland Hills is eligible to apply for matching grant funds from the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) for the renovation of Northfield Park.
TPWD requires all grant applicants to pass a resolution authorizing the submittal of the
application, dedicating the park improvements for public use and certifying that the
applicant's matching share is readily available.
The grant application is in the amount of $500,000, and funding for the City's matching
share is available through the currently approved Parks and Recreation Capital
Improvement Program Budget.
Redevelopment of Northfield Park was the top recommendation of the Updated Park
Development Schedule adopted by Council in January 2016. The project involves the
renovation of the existing community park through the design and construction of
amenities based on public meetings orchestrated to gather stakeholder input.
At the September 12, 2016 City Council meeting, Dennis Sims, our consultant with
Dunkin Sims Stoffels, presented an update on the project and reviewed the proposed
Master Plan along with the sequence of events that will take the project through
completion. The project schedule anticipates a March 2017 notice of award of the grant.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution No. 2016-030.
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-030
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION OF A TEXAS PARKS
AND WILDLIFE GRANT FOR THE NORTHFIELD PARK RENOVATION
PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to
act on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills in dealing with the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department for the purpose of participating in the Local Park Grant Program -
Northfield Park renovation project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, does hereby
authorize and direct the City Manager to act for the City of North Richland Hills, as outlined
in Exhibit "A".
Section 2. This Resolution shall be effective from and after its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Cara L. White, Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Vickie Loftice, Managing Director of Community Services
Local Park Grant Program
Resolution Authorizing Application
A resolution of the City of North Richland Hills as hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," designating
certain officials as being responsible for, acting for, and on behalf of the Applicant in dealing with the
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department, hereinafter referred to as "Department," for the purpose of
participating in the Local Park Grant Program, hereinafter referred to as the "Program"; certifying that
the Applicant is eligible to receive program assistance; certifying that the Applicant matching share is
readily available; and dedicating the proposed site for permanent (or for the term of the lease for leased
property) public park and recreational uses.
WHEREAS, the Applicant is fully eligible to receive assistance under the Program; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant is desirous of authorizing an official to represent and act for the Applicant in
dealing with the Department concerning the Program;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE APPLICANT:
SECTION 1: That the Applicant hereby certifies that they are eligible to receive assistance under the
Program, and that notice of the application has been posted according to local public
hearing requirements.
SECTION 2: That the Applicant hereby certifies that the matching share for this application is readily
available at this time.
SECTION 3: That the Applicant hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to act for the
Applicant in dealing with the Department for the purposes of the Program, and that Mark
Hindman is hereby officially designated as the representative in this regard.
SECTION 4: The Applicant hereby specifically authorizes the official to make application to the
Department concerning the site to be known as Northfield Park in the City of North
Richland Hills or use as a park site and is hereby dedicated (or will be dedicated upon
completion of the proposed acquisition) for public park and recreation purposes in
perpetuity (or for the lease term, if legal control is through a lease). Projects with federal
monies may have differing requirements.
Introduced, read and passed by an affirmative vote of the "Applicant" on this 26th day of September,
2016.
Signature of Local Government Official
Mark Hindman, City Manager
Typed Name and Title
ATTEST:
Signature
Typed Name and Title
PWD 10696-P4000(01/2014)
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance No. 3427, adopting the 2016/2017 Proposed
Budget and amending the 2015/2016 Revised Budget
PRESENTER: Mark Mills, Budget Director
SUMMARY:
The City Council is requested to consider the approval of an ordinance adopting the
following:
• Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Annual Budget and Plan of Municipal Expenditures;
• Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Revised Annual Budget and Plan of Municipal
Expenditures;
• Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Capital Projects Budget; and
• Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Capital Project Amendments.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The proposed budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016/2017 was filed with the City Secretary's
Office and also made available at the NRH Public Library and on the City's website.
The City has posted all required publications. In order to receive additional public
comment, a public hearing was held on Monday, August 22, 2016. This public hearing
included the FY 2016/2017 Proposed Budget and FY 2015/2016 Revised Budget.
The FY 2016/2017 General Fund budget is based on a 610 tax rate. Of this 610 tax
rate, 34.8083¢ is dedicated for General Fund maintenance and operations. The interest
and sinking portion of the tax rate, which is used to pay principal and interest on tax
supported debt issued by the City, is 26.1917¢.
Revisions have been made to the FY 2015/2016 revenues and expenditures to reflect
the most current estimates. The FY 2015/2016 Revised Annual Operating Budget and
FY 2016/2017 Proposed Operating Budget for all funds are:
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
2015-2016 2016-2017
Fund Revised Proposed
General Fund $48,104,690 $45,304,685
Debt Service Fund $13,922,984 $11,655,636
Tax Increment Financing Fund $3,052,607 $3,010,380
Park & Rec Facilities Development Fund $8,585,424 $8,825,391
Crime Control District Fund $5,245,331 $6,363,357
Promotional Fund $258,943 $258,089
Donations Fund $247,155 $275,033
Special Investigations Fund $354,483 $447,000
Drainage Utility Fund $866,090 $1,172,197
Gas Development Fund $6,249,918 $257,196
Traffic Safety Fund $1,122,053 $1,105,044
Utility Fund $37,194,345 $34,259,275
Aquatic Park Fund $5,050,829 $5,449,375
Golf Course Fund $2,586,779 $2,486,459
Facilities/Construction Mgmt. Fund $3,594,223 $3,123,951
Fleet Services Fund (1) $3,998,555 $4,541,264
Information Services Fund' $3,337,196 $3,291,350
Self Insurance Fund M $13,640,209 $12,898,383
Each of these funds are Internal Service Funds. They receive revenue in the form of allocations from
other operating funds, which are used to cover the majority of expenses within each Internal Service
Fund. While necessary to appropriate the funds in the manner above, it should be noted that the
majority of expenses funded within each Internal Service Fund are also reflected as
expenditures/expenses (the allocation) within the contributing funds. In addition, resources such as
interest income, other income and fund balance are also used to offset any expenses in excess of these
allocations.
The FY 2016/2017 Proposed Capital Improvements Budget totals $14,040,972:
Category 2016-2017
Proposed
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects $1,280,000
Drainage Capital Projects $695,000
Utility Capital Projects $1,996,000
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects $4,636,000
Aquatic Park Capital Projects $531,000
Facility Capital Projects $120,800
Major Capital Equipment Projects $4,295,000
Other Capital Projects $487,172
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Over the course of the 2015/2016 fiscal year, several projects were revised. Staff is
requesting an amendment to the FY 2015/2016 Capital Projects Budget to include the
changes summarized below. Detailed revision forms have been included in the
attachment to this agenda item. Projects with a change of $0 were the result of funds
being reallocated within that project, with no additional funding required.
Adopted Revised
Project Through 2015-2016 Through
Category 2015/2016 Change 2015-216
Street & Sidewalk Projects $1,632,821 $1,975,000 $3,607,821
Drainage Projects $95,000 $130,000 $225,000
Utility Projects $1,625,000 $406,525 $2,031,525
Parks & Recreation Projects $1,117,000 $73,795 $1,190,795
Aquatic Park Projects $2,700,000 $188,675 $2,888,675
Facility Projects $165,000 $684,950 $849,950
Major Capital Equipment Projects $1,079,500 $8,900 $1,088,400
Economic Development Projects $0 $8,664,704 $8,664,704
Other Capital Projects 1 $351,050 1 $1,235,200 $1,586,250
The City of North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of
Directors conducted a budget work session on Friday, July 29, 2016 to review the FY
2015/2016 Revised Budget and the FY 2016/2017 Proposed Budget. The Board met
and held a public hearing on Monday, August 22, 2016 prior to the City Council
meeting. The Board adopted the FY 2015/2016 Revised Budget and the FY 2016/2017
Proposed Budget and recommended adoption by the City Council.
The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors met on
August 22, 2016 to hold public hearings on the FY 2015/2016 Revised and FY
2016/2017 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets. The Board approved the
Operating and Capital Budgets for both the FY 2015/2016 Revised and FY 2016/2017
Proposed Budget and recommended City Council adoption.
The North Richland Hills City Council conducted a budget work session on Friday, July
29, 2016 to review the FY 2015/2016 Revised Budget and the FY 2016/2017 Proposed
Budget for all funds. The City Council met and held a public hearing on these budgets
on Monday, August 22, 2016 at the regular City Council meeting for the purpose of
receiving public comment.
Copies of the revised and proposed budget were filed with the City Secretary's Office
and are also available at the NRH Public Library and on the City's website. All of these
sources are still available for public inspection.
RECOMMENDATION:
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Approve Ordinance No. 3427, Adopting the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Proposed Operating
Budget, Amending the 2015/2016 Operating Budget, Adopting the Fiscal Year
2016/2017 Capital Projects Budget, and Amending the 2015/2016 Capital Projects
Budget.
ORDINANCE NO. 3427
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER 1, 2016 THOURGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF THE
BUDGET; ADOPTING THE AMENDED BUDGET FOR OCTOBER 1,
2015 THOUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, PROVIDING FOR
INVESTMENTS AND TRANSFERS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AND EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas
Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of North Richland Hills submitted a budget
proposal to the City Council at least forty-five (45) days prior to the
beginning of the fiscal year as required by the City Charter of the City of
North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all provisions pertaining to the adoption of a
budget contained in the City Charter and in state law have been in all
things complied with; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 102.001, et seq, TEX. LOC. GOV'T Code, the
Council determined that a public hearing should be held at a time and
place which was set forth in a notices published as required by law; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing on the budget was duly held on August 22, 2016, and
all taxpayers were given an opportunity to attend and participate in such
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, after full and final consideration, the City Council is of the opinion that the
budget should be approved and adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The budget of the Revenues of the City of North Richland Hills and the
Expenses of conducting the affairs thereof for the ensuing Fiscal Year
beginning October 1, 2016 and ending September 30, 2017, as modified
by the City Council attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and the same is, in
all things, adopted and approved as the said City of North Richland Hills
budget for the Fiscal Year beginning the first day of October, 2016, and
ending the thirtieth day of September, 2017.
Ordinance No. 3427
Page 1 of 3
SECTION 2. The City Manager be and is hereby authorized to make inter-departmental
and inter-fund transfers during the fiscal year as deemed necessary in
order to avoid over-expenditure of particular accounts.
SECTION 3. The City Manager or his designee be and is hereby authorized to invest
any funds not needed for current use in any lawful manner. Interest
accrued from investments shall be deposited to the interest income
account of the funds from which the principal was invested.
SECTION 4. The amended budget for the City of North Richland Hills for the fiscal year
beginning October 1, 2015, and ending September 30, 2016, filed
herewith is hereby amended and approved. A copy of the amended
budget shall be filed with the City Secretary.
SECTION 5. The amended capital projects budget for the City of North Richland Hills
for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2015, and ending September 30,
2016, filed herewith are hereby amended and approved. A copy of the
amended projects shall be filed with the City Secretary.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of
the Code of Ordinances, City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended,
except where the provisions are in direct conflict with the provisions of
other ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of the other
ordinances are hereby repealed.
SECTION 7. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section
of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have
been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this
ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section.
SECTION 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
as provided by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
Ordinance No. 3427
Page 2 of 3
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Cara Leahy White, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Mark C. Mills, Budget & Research Director
Ordinance No. 3427
Page 3 of 3
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 1-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
GENERALFUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Taxes $29,304,675 $29,106,753 $30,150,080 $30,284,452 $31,053,012
Fines&Forfeitures 1,990,953 2,222,995 2,278,475 1,886,694 2,077,475
Licenses&Permits 1,853,340 1,852,802 1,898,736 2,586,105 2,134,034
Charges for Service 3,137,023 2,184,223 2,191,885 2,223,133 2,243,192
Intergovernmental 4,346,518 4,556,084 5,158,535 5,155,428 5,413,175
Miscellaneous 767,724 2,634,492 1,626,723 1,610,194 2,253,797
SUB-TOTAL $41,400,233 $42,557,348 $43,304,434 $43,746,006 $45,174,685
APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE
Legal Settlement&Litigation $94,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Court Technology Fund 413,838 3,250 0 59,851 130,000
Utility Assistance Program 15,000 1,906 0 0 0
PEG Fees 650,000 5,500 0 0 0
Record Preservation Fee 60,688 8,000 0 0 0
Previous Year Encumbrances 279,902 102,079 0 428,833 0
General Fund Reserves 82,800 1,200,000 0 3,870,000 0
SUB-TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,596,228 $1,320,735 $0 $4,358,684 $130,000
TOTAL REVENUES $42,996,461 $43,878,083 $43,304,434 $48,104,690 $45,304,685
EXPENDITURES
City Council $102,844 $116,848 $129,470 $129,470 $130,378
City Manager 475,273 595,828 621,833 622,366 641,381
Communications 336,172 339,844 348,706 350,246 360,125
City Secretary 490,005 426,363 466,413 478,413 427,800
Legal 268,829 265,100 304,374 346,266 314,000
Human Resources 117,203 122,253 133,415 133,698 139,776
Finance 637,863 625,357 676,191 677,341 690,732
Budget&Research 396,715 359,536 387,080 394,501 400,576
Municipal Court 1,315,875 1,335,981 1,390,388 1,466,773 1,448,105
Planning and Inspections 1,001,317 1,030,914 1,035,058 1,037,131 1,142,820
Economic Development 289,945 310,638 322,219 323,017 330,433
Library 1,991,676 2,033,512 2,104,314 2,108,506 2,146,480
Neighborhood Services 1,621,342 1,644,081 1,748,645 1,764,524 1,806,011
Public Works 3,657,403 3,989,119 4,174,467 3,253,220 3,271,770
Parks&Recreation 2,029,723 2,024,804 2,048,728 2,061,628 2,115,117
Police 12,387,294 12,644,381 12,995,899 13,235,258 13,582,482
Emergency Management 837,840 828,451 986,428 892,645 1,005,152
Fire 10,317,975 10,664,645 11,172,368 11,225,511 11,720,494
Building Services 705,401 737,070 848,774 848,774 836,737
Non-Departmental 2,006,116 767,629 973,331 1,197,928 1,098,506
SUB-TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $40,986,812 $40,862,354 $42,868,101 $42,547,216 $43,608,875
RESERVES&OTHER EXPENDITURES
Reserves $382,719 $211,929 $179,980 $1,179,980 $1,176,950
Transfers Out 1,085,459 1,642,623 125,703 4,050,653 307,975
Other 94,000 28,000 130,650 326,841 210,885
SUB-TOTAL RESERVES AND OTHER $1,562,178 $1,882,551 $436,333 $5,557,474 $1,695,810
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $42,548,990 $42,744,905 $43,304,434 $48,104,690 $45,304,685
BALANCE $447,471 $1,133,178 $0 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 2-SUMMARY OF REVENUES
GENERALFUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
TAXES
Current Property Taxes $14,444,697 $13,773,694 $14,580,715 $14,766,880 $15,254,440
Delinquent Property Taxes 105,071 114,085 114,000 58,000 110,000
Penalty and Interest 144,207 135,959 140,000 130,000 135,200
Franchise Fees 4,230,848 4,406,765 4,285,915 4,319,699 4,264,770
Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 856,215 857,706 905,116 866,271 945,688
Sales Taxes 9,009,968 9,297,668 9,601,841 9,616,109 9,808,431
Mixed Beverages 129,512 138,100 135,000 140,000 143,500
Payment in Lieu of Taxes 384,156 382,777 387,493 387,493 390,983
SUB-TOTAL $29,304,675 $29,106,753 $30,150,080 $30,284,452 $31,053,012
FINES AND FORFEITURES
Municipal Court Fines $1,725,071 $1,946,216 $1,990,725 $1,645,944 $1,842,975
Warrant&Arrest Fees 196,791 212,774 215,250 174,500 174,500
Library Fines 69,091 64,005 72,500 66,250 60,000
SUB-TOTAL $1,990,953 $2,222,995 $2,278,475 $1,886,694 $2,077,475
LICENSES AND PERMITS
Building Permits $720,877 $706,248 $775,000 $1,444,434 $1,000,000
Electrical Permits 54,343 43,436 60,000 70,423 70,560
Plumbing Permits 97,493 99,045 106,000 128,850 126,950
Mechanical Permits 84,933 70,977 75,500 75,500 72,480
Gas Drilling Permits 180,432 20,000 20,000 0 10,000
Burglar Alarm Permits 17,044 55,358 100,000 100,000 100,000
Miscellaneous Permits 83,904 91,467 75,306 84,045 79,410
Apartment Inspection Fees 94,319 98,279 100,000 100,000 100,000
Curb&Drainage Insp. Fees 83,169 112,179 59,000 70,058 70,058
Re-Inspection Fees 8,660 18,146 4,000 15,180 15,600
License Fees 23,333 21,970 23,100 21,373 21,600
Contractor Registration Fees 83,076 93,024 88,400 97,947 93,050
Plan/Review/Application Fee 55,385 74,734 45,000 47,986 43,780
Animal License/Adoption Fees 44,475 53,178 71,500 57,475 58,200
Animal Control Impoundment 25,543 26,250 26,000 23,451 23,000
Auto Impoundment Fees 9,629 13,856 13,000 13,000 13,000
Food Service Permits 137,648 151,286 148,230 152,583 153,346
Food Managers School 23,278 29,970 28,700 3,800 3,000
Fire Inspection/Alarm Fees 25,801 73,399 80,000 80,000 80,000
SUB-TOTAL $1,853,340 $1,852,802 $1,898,736 $2,586,105 $2,134,034
CHARGES FOR SERVICE
Park Facility Rental $8,575 $8,475 $8,325 $7,225 $8,325
Ambulance Fees 2,485,543 1,527,887 1,564,500 1,572,493 1,596,000
Garbage Billing 368,400 399,090 400,415 400,415 412,427
Contributions 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Recreation Fees 397 194 400 400 400
Athletic Revenue 110,747 114,306 124,245 120,105 121,805
Recreation Special Events 3,319 8,094 10,000 12,235 12,235
Planning&Zoning Fees 50,705 43,616 32,000 40,487 35,000
Sale of Accident Reports 8,417 6,389 6,000 6,000 6,000
Vital Statistics 56,925 27,453 0 0 0
Mowing 26,915 31,679 30,000 47,500 35,000
Fire Dept Certification/CPR Citizen Class 5,973 6,793 6,000 6,000 6,000
Miscellaneous 1,107 248 0 273 0
SUB-TOTAL $3,137,023 $2,184,223 $2,191,885 $2,223,133 $2,243,192
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 2-SUMMARY OF REVENUES
GENERALFUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Indirect Costs:
Utility Fund 1,990,775 2,090,315 2,194,831 2,194,831 2,304,573
Park&Rec Facilities Dev.Corp. 386,017 410,189 449,959 448,406 474,033
Crime Control District 0 4,871 24,375 22,821 27,169
Aquatic Park Fund 143,942 151,139 158,696 158,696 166,631
Consolidation Reimbursements 1,825,784 1,899,570 2,330,674 2,330,674 2,440,769
SUB-TOTAL $4,346,518 $4,556,084 $5,158,535 $5,155,428 $5,413,175
MISCELLANEOUS
Interest Income $109,126 $137,172 $113,400 $90,434 $95,193
Radio Reimbursement 247,966 195,467 273,609 234,422 273,609
Sale of City Property 4,047 14,424 3,000 10,701 3,000
Grant Proceeds 7,003 18,124 20,000 20,000 20,000
Overtime Reimbursements 0 15,545 0 1,400 0
Teen Court Reimbursement 20,400 20,405 21,272 21,272 21,272
Other Income 149,000 85,595 88,620 125,143 93,670
SRO Reimbursement(BISD) 82,422 0 0 0 0
Golf Course Loan Repayment 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,764
Designated Funds for City Hall Project Debt 0 2,000,000 959,062 959,062 1,599,289
SUB-TOTAL $767,724 $2,634,492 $1,626,723 $1,610,194 $2,253,797
APPROPRIATION-FUND BALANCE
Legal Settlement&Litigation $94,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Court Technology Funds 413,838 3,250 0 59,851 130,000
Utility Assistance Program 15,000 1,906 0 0 0
PEG Fees 650,000 5,500 0 0 0
Record Preservations Fee 60,688 8,000 0 0 0
Previous Year Encumbrances 279,902 102,079 0 428,833 0
General Fund Designated Reserves 0 1,200,000 0 0 0
General Fund Undesignated Reserves 82,800 0 0 3,870,000 0
SUB-TOTAL $1,596,228 $1,320,735 $0 $4,358,684 $130,000
TOTAL REVENUES $42,996,461 $43,878,083 $43,304,434 $48,104,690 $45,304,685
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 3-SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
GENERALFUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
EXPENDITURES
City Council $102,844 $116,848 $129,470 $129,470 $130,378
City Manager $475,273 $595,828 $621,833 $622,366 $641,381
Communications
Public Information $217,512 $222,562 $231,763 $233,303 $238,994
Citicable 118,660 117,283 116,943 116,943 121,131
Total Communications $336,172 $339,844 $348,706 $350,246 $360,125
City Secretary
City Secretary $280,116 $272,461 $305,639 $308,639 $272,047
Record Management 209,888 153,902 160,774 169,774 155,753
Total City Secretary $490,005 $426,363 $466,413 $478,413 $427,800
Legal $268,829 $265,100 $304,374 $346,266 $314,000
Human Resources $117,203 $122,253 $133,415 $133,698 $139,776
Finance
Accounting&Administration $435,255 $433,457 $455,753 $458,763 $450,989
Purchasing 202,608 191,900 220,438 218,578 239,743
Total Finance $637,863 $625,357 $676,191 $677,341 $690,732
Budget&Research
Budget $139,593 $144,830 $150,347 $151,266 $156,056
Tax 234,395 191,991 213,638 220,105 220,638
Internal Audit 22,727 22,716 23,095 23,130 23,882
Total Budget&Research $396,715 $359,536 $387,080 $394,501 $400,576
Municipal Court
Administration/Prosecution $409,663 $416,897 $412,886 $484,653 $429,732
Court Records 432,385 433,356 467,654 471,564 494,807
Warrants 384,540 393,936 408,228 408,582 419,604
Teen Court 89,288 91,792 101,620 101,974 103,962
Total Municipal Court $1,315,875 $1,335,981 $1,390,388 $1,466,773 $1,448,105
Planning and Development
Planning&Administration 260,192 252,651 253,258 253,557 334,523
Inspections 741,125 778,263 781,800 783,574 808,297
Total Planning and Development $1,001,317 $1,030,914 $1,035,058 $1,037,131 $1,142,820
Economic Development $289,945 $310,638 $322,219 $323,017 $330,433
Library
General Services $211,874 $219,866 $230,853 $233,305 $318,647
Public Services 896,194 944,570 998,426 1,052,792 907,136
Technical Services 883,608 869,076 875,035 822,409 920,697
Total Library $1,991,676 $2,033,512 $2,104,314 $2,108,506 $2,146,480
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 3-SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
GENERALFUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
Neighborhood Services
Neighborhood Resources $352,362 $252,792 $295,158 $307,512 $310,050
Animal Services 679,458 711,251 690,184 693,702 710,594
Consumer Health 287,816 283,853 312,868 324,342 325,311
Code Compliance 301,705 396,185 450,435 438,968 460,056
Total Neighborhood Services $1,621,342 $1,644,081 $1,748,645 $1,764,524 $1,806,011
Public Works
General Services $227,721 $313,551 $311,760 $312,203 $334,625
Traffic Control 1,024,437 1,056,586 1,128,790 1,174,200 1,166,514
Street&Drainage 2,405,245 2,618,981 2,733,917 1,766,817 1,770,631
Total Public Works $3,657,403 $3,989,119 $4,174,467 $3,253,220 $3,271,770
Parks&Recreation
General Services $169,995 $176,013 $184,052 $184,123 $170,306
Parks Maintenance 928,343 898,649 884,943 896,708 942,460
Recreation Services 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102
Athletic Program Services 165,771 166,711 181,461 181,815 191,236
Senior Adult Services 239,168 250,309 265,727 266,437 278,327
Youth Outreach&Cultural 39,344 46,021 45,443 45,443 45,686
Total Parks&Recreation $2,029,723 $2,024,804 $2,048,728 $2,061,628 $2,115,117
Police
General Services $851,890 $1,033,408 $1,081,382 $1,129,856 $1,118,932
Administrative Services 650,117 489,975 498,183 501,151 532,180
Criminal Investigations 2,238,726 2,250,625 2,333,515 2,337,417 2,476,851
Uniform Patrol 5,100,286 5,260,552 5,080,942 5,079,746 5,274,066
Detention Services 1,314,845 1,359,044 1,515,129 1,580,212 1,589,236
Property Evidence 307,072 303,640 346,446 346,623 362,264
Communications 1,924,359 1,947,137 2,140,302 2,260,253 2,228,953
Total Police $12,387,294 $12,644,381 $12,995,899 $13,235,258 $13,582,482
Emergency Management $837,840 $828,451 $986,428 $892,645 $1,005,152
Fire Department
General Services $350,658 $361,806 $385,605 $387,615 $396,273
Operations 7,930,185 8,185,792 8,571,547 8,580,952 8,997,235
Emergency Medical 1,376,834 1,501,204 1,579,668 1,617,845 1,668,416
Fire Inspections 660,298 615,843 635,548 639,099 658,570
Total Fire $10,317,975 $10,664,645 $11,172,368 $11,225,511 $11,720,494
Building Services $705,401 $737,070 $848,774 $848,774 $836,737
Non Departmental $2,006,116 $767,629 $973,331 $1,197,928 $1,098,506
SUB-TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $40,986,812 $40,862,354 $42,868,101 $42,547,216 $43,608,875
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 3-SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
GENERALFUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
RESERVES&OTHER EXPENDITURES
Other
Economic Development Incentives $0 $28,000 $130,650 $176,841 $210,885
Legal Settlement 94,000 0 0 150,000 0
Other Total $94,000 $28,000 $130,650 $326,841 $210,885
Transfers
Capital Projects $956,649 $1,376,198 $0 $3,924,950 $180,000
Capital Projects-Sidewalk Maintenance 50,000 68,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Fleet Services 0 21,040 0 0 0
Information Services 78,810 77,385 75,703 75,703 77,975
Neighborhood Revitalization Program 0 100,000 0 0 0
Transfers Total $1,085,459 $1,642,623 $125,703 $4,050,653 $307,975
Contribution to Reserves
General Fund Reserves $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Public, Educational,Governmental(PEG)Fees 168,000 11,929 179,980 179,980 176,950
Records Preservation 4,000 0 0 0 0
Tranportation Projects(Future) 210,719 200,000 0 0 0
Contribution to Reserves Total $382,719 $211,929 $179,980 $1,179,980 $1,176,950
TOTAL RESERVES&OTHER EXPENDITURES $1,562,178 $1,882,551 $436,333 $5,557,474 $1,695,810
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $42,548,990 $42,744,906 $43,304,434 $48,104,690 $45,304,685
BALANCE $447,471 $1,133,178 $0 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 4-SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION
NET TAXABLE VALUE: M&O I&S TOTAL
Total Appraised Value as of July 25th,2016 5,628,974,889
Less:
Absolute Exemption (319,025,838)
Cases Before ARB (260,050,864)
Incomplete Accounts (108,720,602)
Disabled Veteran (19,853,683)
Over 65 (164,764,332)
Homestead (410,628,187)
Disabled Persons (8,146,520)
Freeport Inventory Value Loss (124,765)
Pollution Control (60,904)
Solar&Wind Powered Devices (2)
Nominal Value Acounts (383,506)
In Process (718,817)
Total Reduction to Values (1,292,478,020)
NET TAXABLE VALUE AT JULY 25th,2016 4,336,496,869
Add:
Estimated Minimum ARB protested values 172,451,268
Incomplete Property 90,116,979
In Process Property 630,074
ESTIMATED NET TAXABLE VALUE AT JULY 25th,2016 4,599,695,190
ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS:
Estimated Net Taxable Value 4,599,695,190
Less:TIF#1 Incremental Value (7,970,455)
Less:TIF#1A Incremental Value 0
Less:TIF#2 Incremental Value (365,284,356)
Less:Tax Ceiling Taxable Values (532,647,433)
Net Taxable Values 3,693,792,946
Proposed Tax Rate per$100 Valuation 0.348083 0.261917 0.610000
Estimated Total Tax Levy at 100%Collection 12,857,465 9,674,703 22,532,168
Less: Estimated Uncollectable(1.5%) (192,862) (192,862)
Less: Estimated I&S Uncollectable(1.5%) (145,121) (145,121)
Estimated Revenue from Property Tax 12,519,482 9,674,703 22,194,185
Estimated Revenue from Property Tax 12,519,482 9,674,703 22,194,185
Plus:Tax Ceiling Account Revenue 2,627,306 - 2,627,306
Less: Estimated Uncollectable(1.5%) (39,410) - (39,410)
Plus:TIF Tax Rate Differential (4 cents) 149,302 - 149,302
Less: Estimated I&S Uncollectable(1.5%) (2,240) - (2,240)
ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX DISTIRBUTION 15,254,440 9,674,703 24,929,143
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 6-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
General Debt Service Taxes $7,074,213 $8,840,000 $8,391,108 $8,391,108 $9,674,703
TIF#1 and#2 Taxes(1) 3,180,219 0 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES $10,254,432 $8,840,000 $8,391,108 $8,391,108 $9,674,703
Transfer in From:
Drainage Utility $581,441 $565,838 $553,789 $553,789 $447,197
Park&Rec. Facilities Dev.Corp 356,218 341,536 329,005 329,055 320,393
Fleet Services Fund 393,134 447,714 440,414 439,793 448,414
Facilities Services Fund 25,409 24,670 27,399 27,399 26,193
Donations Fund 0 0 0 34,849 37,279
Gas Development Fund 212,053 0 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL TRANSFER IN $1,568,255 $1,379,758 $1,350,607 $1,384,885 $1,279,476
Proceeds
Bond Issuance Proceeds $3,936,985 $5,910,943 $0 $1,046,864 $0
Interest Income 14,807 15,685 12,100 10,748 10,883
City of Watauga,CIP Participation 82,853 82,853 82,853 82,853 82,853
Miscellaneous Revenues 0 108 0 0 0
Transfer In 0 0 2,424,790 2,424,790 607,721
Appropriation of Fund Balance 994,243 648,073 0 581,736 0
SUB-TOTAL OTHER $5,028,888 $6,657,662 $2,519,743 $4,146,991 $701,457
TOTAL REVENUES $16,851,575 $16,877,420 $12,261,458 $13,922,984 $11,655,636
EXPENDITURES
Existing Bonds&C.O.'s $9,065,998 $10,923,172 $12,204,458 $12,759,015 $11,561,900
Existing Loans 316,690 0 0 0 0
TIF#1 and#2 Funding 3,180,219 0 0 0 0
Issuance Costs/Paying Agent Fees 185,614 258,140 57,000 143,834 93,736
Bond Defeaseance/Refunding 3,936,985 5,648,056 0 1,020,135 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $16,685,505 $16,829,368 $12,261,458 $13,922,984 $11,655,636
BALANCE $166,069 $48,052 $0 $0 $0
Notes:
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2014/2015,TIF activitiy will be reported on Schedule 7-Tax Increment Financing Fund
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 6-SUMMARY OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCE(TIF)DISTICT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION
NET TAXABLE VALUE:
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1
Taxable Value(2016 Tax Year) $9,123,384
Less: Base Taxable Value(1998 Tax Year) 1,152,929
Taxable Value Increment(2016 Tax Year) Gain/(Loss): $7,970,455
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1A
Taxable Value(2016 Tax Year) $75,659,004
Less: Base Taxable Value(2008 Tax Year) 83,563,510
Taxable Value Increment(2016 Tax Year) Gain/(Loss): ($7,904,506)
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#2
Taxable Value(2016 Tax Year) $377,662,403
Less: Base Taxable Value(1998 Tax Year) 40,020,188
Taxable Value Increment(2016 Tax Year) Gain/(Loss): $337,642,215
ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1
Current Taxable Value Increment:TIF District#1 $7,970,455
Tax Rate per$100 Valuation and Inception $0.57
Estimated TIF District#1 Property Tax Revenue at 100% $45,432
Estimated Collection Rate 98.50%
Estimated TIF District#1 Property Tax Revenue $44,750
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1A
Current Taxable Value Increment:TIF District#1A $0
Tax Rate per$100 Valuation and Inception $0.57
Estimated TIF District#1A Property Tax Revenue at 100% $0
Estimated Collection Rate 98.50%
Estimated TIF District#1A Property Tax Revenue $0
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#2
Current Taxable Value Increment:TIF District#2 $337,642,215
Tax Rate per$100 Valuation and Inception $0.57
Estimated TIF District#2 Property Tax Revenue at 100% $1,924,561
Estimated Collection Rate 98.50%
Estimated TIF District#2 Property Tax Revenue $1,895,692
TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE(') $1,940,442
Notes:
The information presented on this schedule represents the contribution of the City of North Richland Hills to the Tax Increment Financing
Districts in which it participates. This schedule does not reflect the contribution of other entities.
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 7-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#1
REVENUES
Tax Increment Financing District#1 Taxes
City of North Richland Hills $0 $41,834 $41,206 $41,833 $44,750
Tarrant County Hospital District 0 16,726 16,726 16,726 18,164
Tarrant County College District 0 10,972 10,972 10,972 11,916
Tarrant County 0 0 19,376 19,376 21,042
Birdville ISD 0 105,318 105,318 106,704 114,376
Sub-Total $0 $174,849 $193,598 $195,611 $210,248
Other Funding Sources
Investment Income $0 $8,287 $0 $3,167 $4,500
Bond Defeasance/Refunding Proceeds 0 122,383 0 0 0
Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 512,717 487,920 482,982 451,047
Sub-Total $0 $643,387 $487,920 $486,149 $455,547
TOTAL REVENUES $0 $818,236 $681,518 $681,760 $665,795
EXPENDITURES&TRANSFERS
TIF#1 Debt Service $0 $695,852 $681,518 $681,760 $665,795
Bond Defeasance/Refunding 0 158,872 27,168 27,410 17,920
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $818,235 $681,518 $681,760 $665,795
BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT#2
REVENUES
Tax Increment Financing District#2 Taxes
City of North Richland Hills $0 $1,412,841 $1,614,694 $1,601,658 $1,895,692
Tarrant County Hospital District 0 556,250 753,805 691,531 769,476
Tarrant County College District 0 381,177 494,495 453,674 504,775
Tarrant County 0 707,616 873,222 801,082 891,375
Sub-Total $0 $3,057,885 $3,736,216 $3,547,945 $4,061,318
Other Funding Sources
Investment Income $0 $3,544 $0 $2,120 $0
Bond Defeasance/Refunding Proceeds $0 $4,646,137 $0 $997,157 $0
Sub-Total $0 $4,649,681 $0 $999,277 $0
TOTAL REVENUES $0 $7,707,566 $3,736,216 $4,547,222 $4,061,318
EXPENDITURES&TRANSFERS
TIF#2 Debt Service $0 $2,503,532 $2,369,203 $2,370,847 $2,344,585
Bond Defeasance/Refunding $0 $4,646,137 $0 $1,005,586 $0
Sub-Total $0 $2,503,532 $2,369,203 $2,370,847 $2,344,585
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $2,503,532 $2,369,203 $2,370,847 $2,344,585
BALANCE $0 $5,204,033 $1,367,013 $2,176,375 $1,716,733
Note:
Tax Increment Financing District information was previously reflected as part of Schedule 5-General Debt Service Fund
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 8-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Sales Tax $4,506,169 $4,648,841 $4,800,921 $4,808,055 $4,904,216
Interest Income 16,754 21,367 18,000 17,611 19,378
Youth Assn.Maintenance Fees 70,183 47,444 60,000 47,000 55,910
Tennis Center Revenue 358,932 329,384 355,550 358,650 372,350
Transfer in from Aquatic Park Fund 75,125 77,379 81,248 81,248 83,685
Park Impact Fees 78,513 60,635 70,000 80,000 70,000
Grants 0 0 0 187,686 50,000
Other Income 67,352 46,351 1,000 19,257 1,000
SUB-TOTAL $5,173,028 $5,231,402 $5,386,719 $5,599,507 $5,556,539
NRH CENTRE
Memberships/Drop-In Passes $1,406,005 $1,425,002 $1,420,000 $1,420,000 $1,491,000
Fitness 347,181 385,800 368,000 389,000 398,260
Recreation/Sports 247,142 234,463 286,340 246,984 272,340
Grand Hall Rental 149,737 184,919 166,800 175,864 203,750
Catering&Event Fees 11,665 15,215 17,000 8,200 13,420
Aquatic Programs 182,826 218,325 189,000 191,000 212,580
Pool Rental 4,239 4,061 5,400 5,400 5,000
Gym Rental 2,592 1,991 3,100 3,100 3,100
Concessiongs/Merchandise 28,113 30,919 27,000 27,000 27,000
Special Events 8,635 8,374 10,000 10,000 10,000
Other 26,441 22,967 13,500 13,500 15,300
General Fund 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102 487,102
SUB-TOTAL $2,901,677 $3,019,137 $2,993,242 $2,977,150 $3,138,852
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Prior Year Encumbrances $0 $0 $0 $8,767 $0
Appropriation of Park Impact Fee Reserves 0 0 0 0 130,000
SUB-TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $8,767 $130,000
TOTAL REVENUES $8,074,705 $8,250,539 $8,379,961 $8,585,424 $8,825,391
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 8-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
EXPENDITURES
OPERATING
Park Facilities Development Admin. $695,108 $710,339 $733,034 $733,318 $756,856
Parks&Public Grounds 1,831,093 1,883,460 2,022,335 2,033,063 2,078,873
Tennis Center Operations 538,224 550,900 625,843 627,261 632,254
SUB-TOTAL $3,064,425 $3,144,700 $3,381,212 $3,393,642 $3,467,983
NRH CENTRE
Center Management $631,316 $659,089 $686,952 $687,839 $731,388
Fitness 323,072 367,092 449,656 449,833 394,551
Building Operations 184,078 197,357 209,180 209,713 211,904
Aquatic 520,878 524,000 556,618 556,934 577,321
Recreation Sports 284,362 279,766 348,561 348,561 355,033
Event Center 196,329 231,986 287,869 286,959 352,168
Building Services 331,300 320,000 360,750 360,750 351,900
SUB-TOTAL $2,471,336 $2,579,290 $2,899,586 $2,900,589 $2,974,265
OTHER&RESERVES
Debt Services-CO's 356,218 341,536 329,055 329,055 320,393
Indirect Costs 386,017 410,189 449,959 448,405 474,033
Non-Departmental 37,354 40,319 44,130 101,176 58,437
Transfers to Capital Projects
Capital Projects 0 407,949 972,000 1,043,795 486,000
Capital Projects-Grant/Donation 0 0 0 92,000 50,000
Capital Projects-Impact Fees 0 0 0 55,000 200,000
Contributions to Reserves
Operating Reserve 1,255,521 726,219 90,340 0 507,088
Impact Fee Reserve 0 0 0 25,000 0
Economic Development Reserve 112,836 116,221 120,023 120,201 122,605
NRH Centre Reserve 390,999 450,999 93,656 76,561 164,587
SUB-TOTAL $2,538,945 $2,493,432 $2,099,163 $2,291,193 $2,383,143
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,074,706 $8,217,422 $8,379,961 $8,585,424 $8,825,391
BALANCE $0 $33,116 $0 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 9-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Sales Tax $4,491,735 $4,624,993 $4,781,717 $4,777,046 $4,872,587
Franchise Tax 101,908 95,538 87,711 76,443 87,248
Interest Income 1,426 2,140 2,200 1,814 2,472
SRO Reimibursement(BISD) 0 174,244 198,650 198,650 203,890
Other 0 0 0 39,159 0
Prior Year Encumbrances 0 0 0 152,219 0
Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 17,439 0 0 1,197,160
SUB-TOTAL $4,595,069 $4,914,354 $5,070,278 $5,245,331 $6,363,357
EXPENDITURES
Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $116,500 $9,500
Administrative Services 564,656 710,799 795,587 845,370 918,572
Investigations 379,865 418,933 478,490 478,667 483,781
Uniform Patrol 2,626,202 2,749,387 2,865,959 2,868,797 2,935,565
Technical Services 498,409 528,698 509,612 511,189 548,783
Property Evidence 102,439 156,317 193,889 193,889 202,338
SUB-TOTAL $4,171,571 $4,564,135 $4,853,537 $5,014,412 $5,098,539
OTHER&RESERVES
Partner Agency Funding $46,360 $61,146 $59,566 $59,566 $73,100
Other 76,604 77,525 83,034 77,712 88,549
Indirect Costs 0 4,871 24,375 22,821 27,169
Transfer to Capital Projects 0 0 0 0 1,076,000
Reserves 80,281 0 0 70,820 0
SUB-TOTAL $203,245 $143,542 $166,975 $230,919 $1,264,818
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,374,816 $4,707,677 $5,020,512 $5,245,331 $6,363,357
BALANCE $220,254 $206,677 $49,766 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 10-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
PROMOTIONAL FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Occupancey Tax Proceeds $206,930 $232,793 $224,400 $250,248 $255,253
Interest Income 2,738 3,436 2,900 2,695 2,836
Prior Year Encumbrances 0 0 0 6,000 0
SUB-TOTAL $209,667 $236,228 $227,300 $258,943 $258,089
TOAL REVENUES $209,667 $236,228 $227,300 $258,943 $258,089
EXPENDITURES
Economic Development $108,822 $98,084 $114,627 $114,716 $116,580
Cultural&Leisure 84,576 90,546 111,463 111,463 133,986
Non-Departmental 254 215 212 6,123 904
Contribution to Reserves 0 0 0 26,641 6,619
SUB-TOTAL $193,652 $188,846 $226,302 $258,943 $258,089
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $193,652 $188,846 $226,302 $258,943 $258,089
BALANCE $16,015 $47,383 $998 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 11 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
DONATIONS FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Contributions
NRH Water Bills $61,598 $59,251 $52,608 $57,183 $57,183
SUB-TOTAL $61,598 $59,251 $52,608 $57,183 $57,183
Donations
Spay/Neuter $6,609 $18,206 $11,000 $13,000 $15,000
Shelter Fund 54,646 48,958 57,500 21,058 23,500
Duncan 15,000 15,250 15,000 15,500 15,000
Santa Cops 4,394 5,000 5,000 6,122 5,500
SUB-TOTAL $80,649 $87,414 $88,500 $55,680 $59,000
Proceeds
Library Book Sale $11,425 $9,547 $9,000 $9,000 $6,650
SUB-TOTAL $11,425 $9,547 $9,000 $9,000 $6,650
Other
Interest Income $4,242 $4,672 $3,900 $3,623 $3,814
Other Income 35,563 85,595 63,403 103,291 94,600
Appropriation of Fund Balance
Teen Court 0 0 3,000 3,000 0
Library 0 19,546 21,068 19,086 43,196
Neighborhood Services 452,000 58,500 0 4,969 4,969
Parks& Recreations 0 40,908 37,986 37,986 42,375
Police 0 1,100 3,050 3,409 4,750
SUB-TOTAL $491,805 $210,321 $132,407 $175,364 $193,704
TOTAL REVENUES $645,477 $366,532 $282,515 $297,227 $316,537
EXPENDITURES
Library-Book Collection $34,034 $48,682 $58,865 $58,865 $81,225
Neighborhood Services
Animal Services 24,477 31,626 15,500 20,500 25,310
Keep NRH Beautiful 9,168 9,555 19,969 20,469 19,969
Municipal Court-Teen Court 4,250 7,000 7,000 7,000 5,000
Parks-Special Events and Arts 9,078 34,987 61,000 61,000 67,000
Police Department 17,111 22,720 35,450 44,472 39,250
Transfer to Capital Projects 470,900 78,500 77,797 34,849 37,279
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $569,019 $233,069 $275,581 $247,155 $275,033
BALANCE $76,459 $133,463 $6,934 $50,072 $41,504
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 12-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Forefeited Funds $107,275 $67,598 $71,000 $92,190 $111,000
AFIS Reimbursements 12,759 12,759 13,500 13,500 13,500
911 Telecom 178,853 178,779 0 54,950 178,000
Interest Income 3,885 4,563 4,100 4,100 2,781
Other Income 2,529 79 0 61,426 45,000
Prior Year Encumbrances 0 0 0 10,604 0
Appropriation of Fund Balance 345,923 68,296 45,000 117,713 96,719
TOTAL REVENUES $651,223 $332,075 $133,600 $354,483 $447,000
EXPENDITURES
Federal Forefeited Funds $75,877 $61,178 $75,000 $145,799 $100,000
MDT Maintenance 0 0 0 13,238 0
Radio Maintenance 0 0 0 14,961 0
State Forfeitured Funds 21,564 31,016 40,000 43,000 100,000
Local Forfeited Funds 3,000 1,000 1,000 62,424 46,000
AFIS Maintenance&Equipment 14,145 18,357 13,500 20,111 23,000
911 Telecom 178,204 61,058 0 54,950 178,000
Leose Contributions 886 0 0 0 0
Reserve for City Hall Project:
911 Telecom 54,810 55,010 0 0 0
Automated Fingerprint Identification Sys.(AFIS) 75,000 0 0 0 0
Reserves 200,000 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $623,485 $227,619 $129,500 $354,483 $447,000
BALANCE $27,738 $104,456 $4,100 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 13-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Drainage Fees $861,332 $860,836 $880,100 $861,084 $861,000
Interest Income 8,751 5,948 5,000 5,006 5,269
Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 800,000 0 0 305,928
SUB-TOTAL $870,083 $1,666,784 $885,100 $866,090 $1,172,197
TOTAL REVENUES $870,083 $1,666,784 $885,100 $866,090 $1,172,197
EXPENDITURES
Debt Service $581,441 $565,838 $553,789 $553,789 $447,197
Transfer to Capital Projects 0 800,000 95,000 195,000 695,000
Other Expenditures 67,377 33,557 30,000 30,000 30,000
Contribution to Reserves 0 0 0 87,301 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $648,818 $1,399,395 $678,789 $866,090 $1,172,197
BALANCE $221,266 $267,389 $206,311 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 14-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
GAS DEVELOPMENT FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
BONUSES
General Fund Purposes $110,423 $5,040 $0 $0 $0
SUB-TOTAL $110,423 $5,040 $0 $0 $0
ROYALITIES/OVERRIDES
General Fund Purposes $1,187,340 $664,788 $650,000 $242,649 $203,061
SUB-TOTAL $1,187,340 $664,788 $650,000 $242,649 $203,061
OTHER
Right of Way Usage Fees $0 $3,160 $0 $0 $0
Sales of Property 0 0 0 3,202,805 0
Interest Income 22,693 14,230 12,000 8,394 1,035
Other Income 0 0 0 0 53,100
Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL $22,693 $17,390 $12,000 $3,211,199 $54,135
APPROPRIATION OF RESERVES
General Fund Purposes $3,226,239 $0 $0 $2,796,070 $0
SUB-TOTAL $3,226,239 $0 $0 $2,796,070 $0
TOTAL REVENUES $4,546,696 $687,218 $662,000 $6,249,918 $257,196
EXPENDITURES
OPERATING
Transfer to Debt Service $212,053 $0 $0 $0 $0
Transfer to Capital Projects 3,814,337 20,000 0 2,796,070 0
Interfund Loan Repayment 0 0 0 3,226,239 0
Contribution to Reserves 0 0 0 227,609 257,196
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,026,390 $20,000 $0 $6,249,918 $257,196
BALANCE $520,306 $667,218 $662,000 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 16-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
Gross Fine Revenues $990,714 $1,226,566 $990,960 $1,119,159 $1,096,776
Interest Income 1,389 3,384 2,100 2,894 3,046
Appropriation of Fund Balance 125,000 0 0 0 5,222
TOTAL REVENUES $1,117,103 $1,229,950 $993,060 $1,122,053 $1,105,044
EXPENDITURES
Contractor Payments $571,100 $601,820 $612,000 $612,000 $612,000
Program Administration 163,993 191,977 197,684 167,735 237,286
Payment to State 128,249 216,385 90,638 169,712 123,745
Traffic Enforcement/Traffic Safety 23,690 26,373 18,100 6,100 115,767
Pedestrian Safety 14,617 15,033 14,887 14,887 16,246
Transfer to Capital Projects 100,000 0 0 0 0
Contribution to Reserves 0 0 0 151,619 0
SUB-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES $1,001,649 $1,051,588 $933,309 $1,122,053 $1,105,044
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,001,649 $1,051,588 $933,309 $1,122,053 $1,105,044
BALANCE $115,453 $178,362 $59,751 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 16-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
UTILITY FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
WATER SALES AND CHARGES
Water Sales $18,944,136 $18,490,684 $19,652,919 $19,342,343 $20,550,893
Water Taps 22,830 28,715 34,200 39,560 32,070
Water Inspection Fees 27,216 33,770 22,000 34,426 27,120
SUB-TOTAL $18,994,182 $18,553,169 $19,709,119 $19,416,329 $20,610,083
SEWER SALES AND CHARGES
Sewer Sales $10,195,936 $9,838,360 $10,517,612 $9,809,543 $11,001,674
Sewer Taps 7,650 9,825 9,700 11,875 9,900
Sewer Inspection Fees 25,364 27,161 16,250 24,200 25,300
SUB-TOTAL $10,228,951 $9,875,346 $10,543,562 $9,845,618 $11,036,874
MISCELLANEOUS
Interest Income $89,717 $94,614 $88,700 $68,840 $72,464
Service Charges 97,646 88,952 100,900 153,400 153,180
Late Charges 456,298 432,123 476,000 476,000 456,918
Miscellaneous 326,554 43,618 17,700 49,160 36,542
Joint Use Reimbursement-Watauga 84,842 60,439 101,440 101,440 94,700
Subdivision Meter Revenue 20,813 43,380 41,500 54,232 45,710
Bond Refunding Proceeds 187,837 107,085 0 792,063 0
Interfund Loan Repayments 0 0 0 3,310,867 0
SUB-TOTAL $1,263,707 $870,211 $826,240 $5,006,002 $859,514
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Prior Year Encumbrances $47,577 $63,150 $0 $43,824 $0
Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 2,076,449 0 2,882,572 1,752,804
SUB-TOTAL $47,577 $2,139,599 $0 $2,926,396 $1,752,804
TOTAL REVENUES $30,534,416 $31,438,325 $31,078,921 $37,194,345 $34,259,275
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 16-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
UTILITY FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
EXPENDITURES
OPERATING
Administration $283,282 $296,621 $318,735 $317,149 $321,057
Development 768,709 791,669 829,578 840,157 882,243
Right of Way Maintenance 193,756 149,328 233,754 200,000 233,754
SUB-TOTAL $1,245,747 $1,237,617 $1,382,067 $1,357,306 $1,437,054
WATER SERVICES
Water Operations $3,929,562 $4,199,796 $4,686,004 $4,519,477 $4,777,957
Purchase of Water FTW 3,447,416 4,726,223 4,625,652 4,625,652 4,957,292
Purchase of Water TRA 4,804,780 5,059,788 5,236,000 5,236,000 5,328,960
SUB-TOTAL $12,181,757 $13,985,806 $14,547,656 $14,381,129 $15,064,209
SEWER SERVICES
Sewer Operations $1,230,096 $1,285,498 $1,420,079 $1,372,905 $1,431,799
Sewer Treatment FTW 1,438,001 1,307,619 1,367,645 1,535,755 1,431,223
Sewer Treatment TRA 3,605,545 3,602,954 3,365,042 3,849,110 3,955,418
SUB-TOTAL $6,273,642 $6,196,071 $6,152,766 $6,757,770 $6,818,440
FINANCE/UTILITY COLLECTIONS
Meter Reading $467,568 $464,214 $476,385 $482,090 $503,697
Utility Billing/Customer Service 804,039 809,496 836,432 834,644 869,621
Utility Collection Services 276,209 282,857 276,711 278,366 290,015
Accounting Services 370,773 361,333 388,424 402,125 405,571
Budget&Research 199,830 206,950 212,697 214,026 219,546
SUB-TOTAL $2,118,420 $2,124,850 $2,190,649 $2,211,251 $2,288,450
Building Services $1,493,517 $1,598,063 $1,752,816 $1,752,816 $1,822,929
Non Departmental $170,018 $219,211 $262,951 $246,215 $283,355
SUB-TOTAL DEPARTMENTS $23,483,100 $25,361,619 $26,288,905 $26,706,487 $27,714,437
OTHER&RESERVES
Debt Service $1,017,980 $1,091,823 $1,066,480 $1,066,480 $1,128,595
Bond Defeasance/Refunding 187,837 107,085 0 798,283 0
Franchise Fees 856,215 857,706 905,116 866,271 945,688
Indirect Costs 1,990,775 2,090,315 2,194,830 2,194,830 2,304,572
Payment in Lieu of Taxes 384,156 382,777 387,493 387,493 390,983
Transfer to Information Technology 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000
Transfer to Equipment Services 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0
Transfer to Capital 0 1,322,000 0 1,723,262 1,600,000
Contribution to Reserves 137,347 0 0 3,226,239 0
SUB-TOTAL $4,799,310 $6,076,706 $4,778,919 $10,487,858 $6,544,838
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $28,282,411 $31,438,325 $31,067,824 $37,194,345 $34,259,275
BALANCE $2,252,006 $0 $11,097 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 17-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AQUATIC PARK FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
ATTENDANCE 219,077 227,525 255,000 245,000 250,000
REVENUES
OPERATING
Admissions $3,000,518 $3,109,013 $3,442,029 $3,307,047 $3,442,500
Food and Beverage 741,937 805,873 891,635 929,685 1,009,352
Merchandise 116,258 127,737 142,087 144,425 157,836
Rentals 139,929 148,066 161,646 154,350 249,787
Aquatic Classes/Special Events 2,913 3,823 0 1,661 0
SUB-TOTAL $4,001,556 $4,194,512 $4,637,397 $4,537,168 $4,859,475
OTHER REVENUES
Interest Income $17,313 $13,337 $12,600 $8,455 $8,900
Other Income 18,414 46,201 17,200 198,294 50,000
Bond Refunding Proceeds 0 954,326 0 206,912 0
SUB-TOTAL $35,727 $1,013,863 $29,800 $413,661 $58,900
SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $4,037,283 $5,208,375 $4,667,197 $4,950,829 $4,918,375
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Appropriation of Fund Balance $309,050 $637,974 $0 $100,000 $531,000
SUB-TOTAL $309,050 $637,974 $0 $100,000 $531,000
TOTAL REVENUES $4,346,333 $5,846,349 $4,667,197 $5,050,829 $5,449,375
EXPENDITURES
OPERATING
General Services&Utilities $797,200 $790,280 $903,246 $878,335 $918,666
Public Grounds/Aquatics/Maint. 1,117,098 1,155,830 1,226,141 1,237,165 1,237,395
Business&Office Administration 538,927 558,520 589,995 591,149 598,421
Gift Shop/Concessions 516,169 535,119 595,592 605,040 612,490
Sales/Special Events/Admissions 243,275 230,591 270,282 281,954 279,256
SUB-TOTAL $3,212,668 $3,270,342 $3,585,256 $3,593,643 $3,646,228
OTHER&RESERVES
Debt Service $873,487 $776,753 $693,718 $653,960 $956,140
Bond Defeasance/Refunding 0 954,326 0 209,105 0
Indirect Costs 143,942 151,139 158,696 158,696 166,631
Transfer Out-PARD 75,125 77,379 81,248 81,248 83,685
Transfer to Capital Projects 0 575,000 0 288,675 531,000
Reserve For Infrastructure&Major Repairs 0 0 104,436 23,981 18,025
Non-Departmental 41,111 41,410 43,843 41,521 47,666
SUB-TOTAL $1,133,665 $2,576,008 $1,081,941 $1,457,186 $1,803,147
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,346,333 $5,846,349 $4,667,197 $5,050,829 $5,449,375
BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 18-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
GOLF COURSE FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
ROUNDS 45,339 43,250 51,300 49,500 51,000
REVENUES
Green Fees $854,791 $870,480 $970,924 $994,482 $1,006,024
Pro Shop 407,590 388,861 375,856 394,345 353,090
Driving Range 82,349 92,330 80,500 86,555 85,000
Carts 375,051 370,048 391,436 415,119 391,436
Food&Beverage 642,222 660,051 614,512 695,415 650,000
General&Administrative 1,550 405 0 0 0
Other Revenue 49,600 41,355 1,100 863 909
TOTAL REVENUE $2,413,153 $2,423,530 $2,434,328 $2,586,779 $2,486,459
EXPENDITURES
OPERATING
Pro Shop $158,582 $158,563 $162,461 $162,500 $162,461
Pro Shop:Cost of Goods Sold 146,135 138,415 143,140 152,140 139,750
Driving Range 9,504 8,562 10,900 11,200 11,200
Golf Carts 220,480 230,040 228,050 229,000 223,866
Course Maintenance 580,076 542,122 594,894 599,000 586,385
Food&Beverage 238,895 263,935 250,355 262,000 252,346
Food&Beverage:Cost of Goods Sold 194,675 197,226 191,434 194,186 201,500
Sales&Membership 55,424 54,682 54,370 56,500 54,370
General&Administrative 260,917 264,863 243,933 252,000 229,143
Clubhouse 113,120 126,275 123,894 118,000 121,144
Management Fees 134,452 137,560 108,891 113,780 109,698
Capital 0 0 62,400 62,400 130,707
SUB-TOTAL $2,112,259 $2,122,244 $2,174,722 $2,212,706 $2,222,570
OTHER&RESERVES
Debt Service $120,414 $119,516 $111,600 $111,600 $116,125
Payment to Interdepartmental Loans
Water Fund 0 0 0 84,628 0
General Fund 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,760 147,764
Contribution to Reserves 32,720 34,010 0 30,085 0
SUB-TOTAL $300,894 $301,286 $259,360 $374,073 $263,889
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,413,153 $2,423,530 $2,434,082 $2,586,779 $2,486,459
BALANCE $0 $0 $246 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 19-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FACILITIES/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
CHARGES FOR SERVICE
Transfer From:
General Fund $705,401 $737,070 $848,774 $848,774 $836,737
Park Development Fund 331,300 320,000 360,750 383,940 351,900
Utility Fund 1,493,517 1,598,063 1,752,816 1,752,816 1,822,929
SUB-TOTAL $2,530,218 $2,655,133 $2,962,340 $2,985,530 $3,011,566
OTHER REVENUES
Insurance Settlements $0 $24,588 $0 $0 $0
Interest Income 7,050 14,295 11,800 10,875 11,446
Rent From Rental Properties 63,240 76,804 78,000 65,754 72,000
Other Income 20,758 530 13,500 0 0
SUB-TOTAL $91,048 $116,217 $103,300 $76,629 $83,446
SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $2,621,266 $2,771,350 $3,065,640 $3,062,159 $3,095,012
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Building Services Fund Reserves $40,000 $240,485 $15,356 $361,278 $28,939
Prior Year Encumbrances $0 $0 $0 $170,786 $0
SUB-TOTAL $40,000 $240,485 $15,356 $532,064 $28,939
TOAL REVENUES $2,661,266 $3,011,835 $3,080,996 $3,594,223 $3,123,951
EXPENDITURES
General Services $322,209 $324,362 $330,194 $330,548 $332,468
Building Servcies 1,856,409 2,025,558 2,465,505 2,638,897 2,577,848
Rental Property Program 38,991 30,385 56,910 137,560 46,120
Transfer to Capital Budget 127,420 294,000 165,000 439,116 120,800
SUB-TOTAL $2,345,029 $2,674,305 $3,017,609 $3,546,121 $3,077,236
OTHER&RESERVES
Debt Service $25,409 $24,670 $27,399 $27,399 $26,193
Other 12,860 13,079 14,898 12,591 20,522
Contribution of Facility Reserves 21,090 21,090 21,090 8,112 0
SUB-TOTAL $59,359 $58,839 $63,387 $48,102 $46,715
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,404,388 $2,733,144 $3,080,996 $3,594,223 $3,123,951
BALANCE $256,878 $278,691 $0 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 20-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FLEET SERVICES FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
CHARGES FOR SERVICE
Transfer From:
General Fund $1,082,422 $1,190,157 $1,273,468 $1,273,468 $1,389,677
Utility Fund 1,636,780 1,751,354 1,873,949 1,873,949 1,967,647
Utility CIP/Utility Construction 240,135 256,945 274,931 274,931 288,678
Crime Control District 141,768 151,692 162,310 162,310 170,426
Park&Recreation Dev. Fund 119,735 128,117 137,085 137,085 143,939
Other Funds 48,293 35,851 38,360 38,360 40,278
SUB-TOTAL $3,269,133 $3,514,116 $3,760,103 $3,760,103 $4,000,645
OTHER REVENUES
Interst Income $17,257 $16,805 $14,300 $13,823 $14,551
Sale of City Property 51,467 55,214 25,000 37,434 519,408
Other Income 51,562 30,488 32,090 7,660 6,660
Transfer from General Fund 0 21,040 0 0 0
Transfer from Utility Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0
SUB-TOTAL $170,286 $173,548 $121,390 $108,917 $540,619
SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $3,439,419 $3,687,664 $3,881,493 $3,869,020 $4,541,264
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Equipment Services Fund Reserves $359,663 $542,264 $50,000 $50,000 $0
Appropriation-PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 79,535 0
SUB-TOTAL $359,663 $542,264 $50,000 $129,535 $0
TOAL REVENUES $3,799,082 $4,229,928 $3,931,493 $3,998,555 $4,541,264
EXPENDITURES
General Services $344,853 $297,282 $325,187 $328,611 $342,021
Equipment Services Operations 1,639,640 1,481,835 1,624,748 1,626,699 1,679,639
Fire Fleet Maintenance 316,505 252,134 302,432 303,142 314,205
Equipment Purchases 321,224 300,096 675,660 719,743 314,111
Fire Vehicles/Equipment 178,058 36,638 0 0 190,815
Police Vehicles/Equipment 342,104 438,780 429,347 461,374 227,779
SUB-TOTAL $3,142,385 $2,806,765 $3,357,374 $3,439,569 $3,068,570
OTHER&RESERVES
Debt Service $393,134 $447,714 $480,406 $480,406 $448,414
Transfer to Capital Projects 0 330,000 0 0 849,000
Other 12,428 12,506 14,439 12,132 18,599
Equipment Services Reserve 50,000 49,173 50,000 66,448 156,681
SUB-TOTAL $455,562 $839,393 $544,845 $558,986 $1,472,694
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,597,947 $3,646,158 $3,902,219 $3,998,555 $4,541,264
BALANCE $201,135 $583,770 $29,274 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 21 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Transfer From:
General Fund $288,487 $321,798 $337,942 $337,942 $353,038
Park Fund 31,594 32,387 34,007 34,007 35,708
Crime Control District 26,071 26,592 27,922 27,922 29,318
Utility Fund 77,930 81,168 85,226 85,226 89,489
Other Funds 51,727 58,297 61,220 61,220 64,273
SUB-TOTAL $475,809 $520,242 $546,317 $546,317 $571,826
COMPUTERS
Transfer From:
General Fund $914,506 $932,796 $979,436 $979,436 $1,039,779
Park Fund 100,363 102,370 107,489 107,489 112,863
Crime Control District 167,732 171,086 179,640 179,640 188,622
Utility Fund 653,435 666,505 699,831 699,831 734,822
Other Funds 275,641 281,155 295,212 295,212 306,823
SUB-TOTAL $2,111,677 $2,153,912 $2,261,608 $2,261,608 $2,382,909
OTHER REVENUES
Interest Income $14,495 $12,055 $11,200 $8,224 $8,657
Transmitter Lease 151,957 136,940 145,012 145,012 152,958
Other Income 21,314 35,796 14,903 14,903 0
Transfer from General Fund 78,810 77,385 75,703 75,703 0
Transfer from Utility Fund 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000
SUB-TOTAL $441,575 $437,177 $421,818 $418,842 $336,615
SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $3,029,061 $3,111,331 $3,229,743 $3,226,767 $3,291,350
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Prior Year Encumbrances $0 $0 $0 $110,429 $0
Appropriation of Information Systems Reserves 79,203 1,339,373 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL $79,203 $1,339,373 $0 $110,429 $0
TOAL REVENUES $3,108,264 $4,450,704 $3,229,743 $3,337,196 $3,291,350
EXPENDITURES
General Services $237,121 $245,714 $254,881 $255,235 $259,577
Major Computer Systems 287,808 298,297 330,392 414,746 345,448
Microcomputer Systems 649,216 605,516 729,128 724,838 781,808
Telecommunications 291,717 354,386 378,640 378,817 394,875
Data Network 685,456 588,592 651,668 722,647 769,206
GIS System 163,435 178,592 182,804 178,804 180,523
Public Safety 448,481 382,167 464,333 475,018 363,222
SUB-TOTAL $2,763,234 $2,653,264 $2,991,846 $3,150,105 $3,094,659
OTHER&RESERVES
Other $8,238 $8,614 $10,387 $8,257 $15,982
Transfer to Capital Projects 0 1,228,944 0 95,000 156,000
Reserve for System Improvements 1,610 0 227,510 83,834 24,709
SUB-TOTAL $9,848 $1,237,558 $237,897 $187,091 $196,691
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,773,082 $3,890,822 $3,229,743 $3,337,196 $3,291,350
BALANCE $335,182 $559,881 $0 $0 $0
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
SCHEDULE 22-SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
SELF INSURANCE FUND
ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2013/14 FY 2014/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/16 FY 2016/17
REVENUES
ALLOCATIONS
Health/Medical $8,747,608 $9,234,574 $9,632,358 $9,632,358 $10,626,219
Worker's Compensation 531,480 500,390 591,441 591,441 584,920
Administration Allocation 486,621 568,619 414,122 414,122 472,832
Other Insurance 572,841 576,360 557,920 557,920 579,182
SUB-TOTAL $10,338,550 $10,879,943 $11,195,841 $11,195,841 $12,263,153
OTHER REVENUES
Interest Income $46,440 $54,014 $48,445 $37,458 $39,430
Other Income 99,497 110,060 95,800 137,800 95,800
Expenditure Reimbursement 370,394 633,327 200,000 417,252 400,000
SUB-TOTAL $516,332 $797,401 $344,245 $592,510 $535,230
SUB-TOTAL REVENUES $10,854,882 $11,677,345 $11,540,086 $11,788,351 $12,798,383
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
Self Insurance Fund Reserves $423,968 $439,392 $100,000 $1,851,858 $100,000
SUB-TOTAL $423,968 $439,392 $100,000 $1,851,858 $100,000
TOAL REVENUES $11,278,850 $12,116,737 $11,640,086 $13,640,209 $12,898,383
EXPENDITURES
Health/Medical $9,298,369 $10,096,330 $9,832,358 $11,744,028 $11,027,505
Worker's Compensation 610,942 840,925 583,470 583,470 586,463
Personnel Expenses 457,773 449,136 470,025 470,165 498,956
Other Insurance 512,022 397,704 472,920 519,746 489,183
Reserve for Insurance Claims 0 0 0 0 10,476
Other Expenses 91,088 145,906 95,800 137,800 95,800
Life Insurance Premium 94,196 86,736 85,000 85,000 90,000
SUB-TOTAL $11,064,390 $12,016,737 $11,539,573 $13,540,209 $12,798,383
OTHER&RESERVES
Transfer to Retiree Health Care Fund $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
SUB-TOTAL $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $11,164,390 $12,116,737 $11,639,573 $13,640,209 $12,898,383
BALANCE $114,460 $0 $513 $0 $0
Fiscal Year 201612017
Proposed CIP Budget
$14,040,972
Uses of Funds
Aquatic Park
3.78%
Parks& Facilities
Recreation 0.86%
33.02%� p!!!; Major Capital
,,sr pSoiiip$000iollllp�oiop400p,u Equipment 30.59%
I4
Economic
Development
0.71%
Utility CIP Personnel
14.22% 2.17%
Other 0.59%
Drainage Street&Sidewalk
4.95% 9.11%
Sources of Funds
Federal/State
Grants
4.63%
Reserves
36.56%
C.O. Bonds
48.54/°
°
!c
Sales Tax
3.46%
Other
6.81
G.O. Bonds
0.00%
1
Summary of Project Expenditures
2016/2017 Capital Improvement Program
Project To Proposed Estimated 2018 to Total
Program Classification Date 2016/2017 2017/2018 Completion Expenditures
Street&Sidewalk 39,535,962 1,280,000 461,000 0 $ 41,276,962
Drainage 3,088,222 695,000 0 0 $ 3,783,222
Utility 5,211,525 1,996,000 0 0 $ 7,207,525
Parks & Recreation 5,946,623 4,636,000 173,000 0 $ 10,755,623
Aquatic Park 3,380,425 531,000 0 0 $ 3,911,425
Facilities 76,042,318 120,800 0 0 $ 76,163,118
Major Capital Equipment 5,492,115 4,295,000 2,905,000 0 $ 12,692,115
Economic Development 15,947,826 100,000 0 0 $ 16,047,826
CIP Personnel 2,742,159 304,672 0 0 $ 3,046,831
Other 3,163,468 82,500 85,000 0 $ 3,330,968
Total CIP Project Expenditures $ 160,550,643 $ 14,040,972 $ 3,624,000 $ 0 $ 178,215,615
2
Summary of Project Funding
2016/2017 Capital Improvement Program
Funding To Proposed Estimated 2018 to Total Funds
Funding Source Date 2016/2017 2017/2018 Completion
General Obligation Bonds 61,289,172 0 0 0 61,289,172
Certificates of Obligation 33,730,000 6,815,000 460,000 0 41,005,000
Federal/State Grants 23,342,956 650,000 0 0 23,992,956
Reserves 25,988,284 5,133,064 1,000 0 31,122,348
Sales Tax 3,344,900 486,000 173,000 0 4,003,900
Other 12,855,331 956,908 2,990,000 0 16,802,239
Total CIP Project Funding $ 160,550,643 $ 14,040,972 $ 3,624,000 $ 0 $ 178,215,615
3
Summary of Project Funding
2016/2017 Capital Improvement Program
Funding To Proposed Estimated 2018 to Total Funds
Program Date 2016/2017 2017/2018 Completion
Street&Sidewalk
General Obligation Bonds 9,875,950 0 0 0 9,875,950
Certificates of Obligation 5,515,000 1,000,000 460,000 0 6,975,000
Federal/State Grants 18,277,106 180,000 0 0 18,457,106
Reserves 4,137,906 100,000 1,000 0 4,238,906
Other 1,730,000 0 0 0 1,730,000
Street&Sidewalk Sub-Total $ 39,535,962 $ 1,280,000 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 41,276,962
Drainage
General Obligation Bonds 1,863,222 0 0 0 1,863,222
Reserves 1,225,000 695,000 0 0 1,920,000
Drainage Sub-Total $ 3,088,222 $ 695,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,783,222
utility
Certificates of Obligation 2,545,000 0 0 0 2,545,000
Federal/State Grants 0 396,000 0 0 396,000
Reserves 2,101,730 1,600,000 0 0 3,701,730
Other 564,795 0 0 0 564,795
Utility Sub-Total $ 5,211,525 $ 1,996,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,207,525
Parks& Recreation
Certificates of Obligation 0 3,900,000 0 0 3,900,000
Federal/State Grants 2,882,928 0 0 0 2,882,928
Reserves 96,795 0 0 0 96,795
Sales Tax 2,819,900 486,000 173,000 0 3,478,900
Other 147,000 250,000 0 0 397,000
Parks&Recreation Sub-Total $ 5,946,623 $ 4,636,000 $ 173,000 $ 0 $ 10,755,623
Aquatic Park
Certificates of Obligation 2,600,000 0 0 0 2,600,000
Reserves 780,425 531,000 0 0 1,311,425
Aquatic Park Sub-Total $ 3,380,425 $ 531,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,911,425
Facilities
General Obligation Bonds 49,550,000 0 0 0 49,550,000
Certificates of Obligation 20,070,000 0 0 0 20,070,000
Reserves 2,700,000 120,800 0 0 2,820,800
Other 3,722,318 0 0 0 3,722,318
Facilities Sub-Total $ 76,042,318 $ 120,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 76,163,118
Major Capital Equipment
Certificates of Obligation 0 1,915,000 0 0 1,915,000
Federal/State Grants 71,171 74,000 0 0 145,171
4
Summary of Project Funding
2016/2017 Capital Improvement Program
Funding To Proposed Estimated 2018 to Total Funds
Program Date 2016/2017 2017/2018 Completion
Reserves 1,516,944 1,681,592 0 0 3,198,536
Other 3,904,000 624,408 2,905,000 0 7,433,408
Major Capital Equipment Sub-Total $ 5,492,115 $ 4,295,000 $ 2,905,000 $ 0 $ 12,692,115
Economic Development
Certificates of Obligation 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,000,000
Reserves 10,500,167 100,000 0 0 10,600,167
Sales Tax 450,000 0 0 0 450,000
Other 1,997,659 0 0 0 1,997,659
Economic Development Sub-Total $ 15,947,826 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,047,826
CIP Personnel
Reserves 2,742,159 304,672 0 0 3,046,831
C/P Personnel Sub-Total $ 2,742,159 $ 304,672 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,046,831
Other
Federal/State Grants 2,111,751 0 0 0 2,111,751
Reserves 187,158 0 0 0 187,158
Sales Tax 75,000 0 0 0 75,000
Other 789,559 82,500 85,000 0 957,059
Other Sub-Total $ 3,163,468 $ 82,500 $ 85,000 $ 0 $ 3,330,968
Total C/P Project Funding $ 160,550,643 $ 14,040,972 $ 3,624,000 $ 0 $ 178,215,615
5
Schedule 1
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
- 1 ST0902 Cloyce Court(Northeast Loop 820 to Maplewood Ave) 810,000 0 0 0 $ 810,000
- 2 ST0401 Davis Blvd/Mid-Cities Blvd Intersection 5,200,726 0 0 0 $ 5,200,726
- 3 ST0904 Grand Avenue(Library to HealthMarkets Access Road) 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000
- ST1601 Infrastructure Painting Project 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
4 ST1101 Main Street Streetscaping Project 66,000 0 461,000 0 $ 527,000
5 5 PW1602 Meadow Lakes Drive&Rufe Snow Drive Intersection 1,315,000 0 0 0 $ 1,315,000
- - SM1601 Preventive Street Maintenance(2016) 800,000 0 0 0 $ 800,000
- 6 SM1502 Preventive Street Maintenance(College Circle Pavement 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000
Rehabilitation)
- 7 ST0102 Rufe Snow Dr.Street&Utility Imp.(Karen Drive to I.H.820) 1,535,950 0 0 0 $ 1,535,950
- 8 ST0202 Rufe Snow Dr.Street&Utility Imp.(Mid-Cities to Hightower)FFEA-21] 21,703,236 0 0 0 $ 21,703,236
7 9 ST1201 Rufe Snow Drive&Glenview Drive Intersection Improvements 2,185,000 0 0 0 $ 2,185,000
- - SD1601 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Project 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000
- 10 ST1301 Signal Timing Synchronization Update 95,000 0 0 0 $ 95,000
- 11 ST1304 Smithfield Road(Davis Blvd to Mid-Cities Blvd) 2,200,000 0 0 0 $ 2,200,000
12 ST1102 Snider Street Extension Project 2,800,050 0 0 0 $ 2,800,050
- 13 ST1005 Traffic Signalization at Davis Boulevard&Creek View Drive 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000
Total Continuing Projects $ 39,535,962 $ 0 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 39,996,962
New Projects
8 SM1701 Preventive Street Maintenance(2017) 0 1,000,000 0 0 $ 1,000,000
9 - SD1701 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement Project(2017) 0 50,000 0 0 $ 50,000
11 14 ST1701 Vance and Glenview Signal Upgrades 0 230,000 0 0 $ 230,000
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 1,280,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,280,000
Total Project Costs $ 39,535,962 $ 1,280,000 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 41,276,962
Funding Sources
General Obligation Bonds
G.O.Bonds 1985 Program 368,500 0 0 0 $ 368,500
G.O.Bonds 1994 Program 1,677,450 0 0 0 $ 1,677,450
G.O.Bonds 2003 Program 7,830,000 0 0 0 $ 7,830,000
Total General Obligation Bonds $ 9,875,950 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,875,950
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 5,515,000 1,000,000 460,000 0 $ 6,975,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 5,515,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 460,000 $ 0 $ 6,975,000
Federal/State Grants
ISTEA Grant Funds 2,240,040 0 0 0 $ 2,240,040
1
Schedule 1
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Other 550,000 0 0 0 $ 550,000
TEA-21 Grant Funds 9,712,000 0 0 0 $ 9,712,000
TXDOT Funding 0 180,000 0 0 $ 180,000
Federal Grant 5,175,066 0 0 0 $ 5,175,066
Tarrant County Grant Funds 600,000 0 0 0 $ 600,000
Total Federal/State Grants $ 18,277,106 $ 180,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,457,106
Reserves
1994 Bond Program Project Savings 365,010 0 0 0 $ 365,010
G.O.Bonds 1994 Program 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000
Permanent Street Maintenance Fund 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000
Reserves 200,000 0 0 0 $ 200,000
Permanent Sidewalk Maintenance Fund 50,000 50,000 0 0 $ 100,000
Unspecified Project Savings 375,000 0 0 0 $ 375,000
Utility Operations for Capital Projects 310,000 0 0 0 $ 310,000
Project Savings 2,302,896 50,000 1,000 0 $ 2,353,896
Certificates of Obligation Project Savings 95,000 0 0 0 $ 95,000
Bond Program Project Savings 65,000 0 0 0 $ 65,000
Total Reserves $ 4,137,906 $ 100,000 $ 1,000 $ 0 $ 4,238,906
Other
Other 1,730,000 0 0 0 $ 1,730,000
Total Other $ 1,730,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,730,000
Total Sources of Funds $ 39,535,962 $ 1,280,000 $ 461,000 $ 0 $ 41,276,962
2
Schedule 2
Drainage Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
5 1 DR1503 Calloway Branch Channel Repair Project 98,500 600,000 0 0 $ 698,500
- - DR1401 Concrete Lined Channel Rehabilitation Project 131,500 0 0 0 $ 131,500
2 DR1601 Drainage Improvements 95,000 0 0 0 $ 95,000
3 DR1501 Main Street Drainage Improvements 1,020,000 0 0 0 $ 1,020,000
4 DR1004 Meadowview Estates Channel Drainage Improvements 1,743,222 0 0 0 $ 1,743,222
Total Continuing Projects $ 3,088,222 $ 600,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,688,222
New Projects
7 5 DR1701 Walker Branch Gabion Repair Project 0 95,000 0 0 $ 95,000
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 95,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 95,000
Total Project Costs $ 3,088,222 $ 695,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,783,222
Funding Sources
General Obligation Bonds
G.O.Bonds 2003 Program 1,863,222 0 0 0 $ 1,863,222
Total General Obligation Bonds $ 1,863,222 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,863,222
Reserves
Drainage Utility Fund 900,000 695,000 0 0 $ 1,595,000
Reserves 185,000 0 0 0 $ 185,000
Bond Program Project Savings 140,000 0 0 0 $ 140,000
Total Reserves $ 1,225,000 $ 695,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,920,000
Total Sources of Funds $ 3,088,222 $ 695,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,783,222
1
Schedule 3
Utility Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
- UT0201 Big Fossil Creek Wastewater Outfall 1,200,000 0 0 0 $ 1,200,000
- 1 UT1601 Franklin Court Sewer Addition and Gifford Connection 150,000 0 0 0 $ 150,000
- UT1602 Impact Fee Update(2016) 110,000 0 0 0 $ 110,000
- 2 UT1402 Johnson Pump Station Component and Infrastructure Replacements 275,000 0 0 0 $ 275,000
- 3 UT1603 Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements(2016) 420,000 0 0 0 $ 420,000
4 UT1404 Motor Operated Transfer Valves 730,000 0 0 0 $ 730,000
- 5 UT1604 Sanitary Sewer Line Replacements(Crabtree&Onyx N.) 125,000 0 0 0 $ 125,000
- 6 UT1605 Small Water Main Replacements(2016) 420,000 0 0 0 $ 420,000
5 7 UT1607 Walker Branch Interceptor Project 416,525 0 0 0 $ 416,525
- 8 UT0708 Water Line(Boulevard 26/Cardinal Lane) 520,000 0 0 0 $ 520,000
- 9 UT1505 Water Line Replacement on Susan Lee(Lola Dr.to N.Richland Blvd.) 790,000 0 0 0 $ 790,000
- 10 UT0810 Western Center Water Facility Expansion 55,000 0 0 0 $ 55,000
Total Continuing Projects $ 5,211,525 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,211,525
New Projects
7 11 UT1701 College Hill Ground Storage Tank Stand Pipe 0 85,000 0 0 $ 85,000
9 12 CDBG17 Harmonson Road Sanitary Sewer Improvements 0 396,000 0 0 $ 396,000
11 13 UT1702 Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements(2017) 0 420,000 0 0 $ 420,000
13 - UT1703 Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation(Various Locations) 0 150,000 0 0 $ 150,000
15 14 UT1704 Sanitary Sewer System Trunk Line Rehabilitation 0 125,000 0 0 $ 125,000
17 15 UT1705 Small Water Main Replacements(2017) 0 420,000 0 0 $ 420,000
18 - UT1706 Telemetric Water Meter Annual Maintenance(2017) 0 400,000 0 0 $ 400,000
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 1,996,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,996,000
Total Project Costs $ 5,211,525 $ 1,996,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,207,525
Funding Sources
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 2,545,000 0 0 0 $ 2,545,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 2,545,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,545,000
Federal/State Grants
CDBG Grant Funds 0 396,000 0 0 $ 396,000
Total Federal/State Grants $ 0 $ 396,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 396,000
Reserves
Impact Fees 110,000 0 0 0 $ 110,000
Reserves 216,525 0 0 0 $ 216,525
Unspecified Project Savings 55,000 0 0 0 $ 55,000
1
Schedule 3
Utility Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Utility Operations for Capital Projects 655,205 1,600,000 0 0 $ 2,255,205
Project Savings 790,000 0 0 0 $ 790,000
Utility Reserve for Future Construction 275,000 0 0 0 $ 275,000
Total Reserves $ 2,101,730 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,701,730
Other
Impact Fees 564,795 0 0 0 $ 564,795
Total Other $ 564,795 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 564,795
Total Sources of Funds $ 5,211,525 $ 1,996,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,207,525
2
Schedule 4
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Pro[ect Costs
Continuing Projects
- 1 PK1401 Barfield/Cotton Belt Trail Connector 65,000 0 0 0 $ 65,000
- 2 PK9601 Calloway Branch Trail Development[CMAQ] 1,484,311 0 0 0 $ 1,484,311
- 3 PK9602 Little Bear Creek Trail Development(John Barfield Trail 2,830,420 0 0 0 $ 2,830,420
Development)[ISTEA]
- 4 PK1503 Major Trail Neighborhood Connectors 133,000 0 0 0 $ 133,000
5 PK1602 Major Trail Rest Stations 55,000 0 0 0 $ 55,000
5 6 PK1603 Northfield Park Redevelopment 402,500 3,903,000 0 0 $ 4,305,500
- 7 PK1505 NRH Centre Infrastructure Improvements(2015) 25,000 0 0 0 $ 25,000
PK1604 Park Infrastructure Maintenance(2016) 175,000 0 0 0 $ 175,000
PK1506 Park Maintenance Infrastructure(2015) 232,597 0 0 0 $ 232,597
- - PK1605 Park System Playground Replacement 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
7 - PK1606 Park System Signage 100,000 173,000 173,000 0 $ 446,000
- 8 PK1607 Richland Tennis Center Infrastructure Maintenance(2016) 30,000 0 0 0 $ 30,000
- 9 PK1509 Trail Head Gateways 2015 130,000 0 0 0 $ 130,000
9 10 PK1608 Trail Head Gateways 2016 122,260 0 0 0 $ 122,260
11 - PK1609 Unforeseen Park Damage 61,535 0 0 0 $ 61,535
Total Continuing Projects $ 5,946,623 $ 4,076,000 $ 173,000 $ 0 $ 10,195,623
New Projects
13 11 PK1701 Barfield Family Foundation Grant Program 0 50,000 0 0 $ 50,000
15 12 PK1702 Green Valley Playground Replacement and Shade Structure Project 0 200,000 0 0 $ 200,000
17 - PK1703 Park Infrastructure Maintenance 2017 0 257,000 0 0 $ 257,000
19 13 PK1704 Richland Tennis Center Infrastructure Maintenance 2017 0 18,000 0 0 $ 18,000
20 - PK1705 Trail Identification and 9-1-1 Emergency Response Signage 0 35,000 0 0 $ 35,000
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 560,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 560,000
Total Project Costs $ 5,946,623 $ 4,636,000 $ 173,000 $ 0 $ 10,755,623
Funding Sources
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 0 3,900,000 0 0 $ 3,900,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 0 $ 3,900,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,900,000
Federal/State Grants
ISTEA Grant Funds 2,882,928 0 0 0 $ 2,882,928
Total Federal/State Grants $ 2,882,928 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,882,928
Reserves
Reserves 96,795 0 0 0 $ 96,795
Total Reserves $ 96,795 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 96,795
1
Schedule 4
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Sales Tax
Park Sales Tax 2,819,900 486,000 173,000 0 $ 3,478,900
Total Sales Tax $ 2,819,900 $ 486,000 $ 173,000 $ 0 $ 3,478,900
Other
Donations Fund 92,000 50,000 0 0 $ 142,000
Impact Fees 55,000 200,000 0 0 $ 255,000
Total Other $ 147,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 397,000
Total Sources of Funds $ 5,946,623 $ 4,636,000 $ 173,000 $ 0 $ 10,755,623
2
Schedule 5
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
- - WP1501 General Facility Improvements(2015) 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
- - WP1601 General Facility Improvements(2016) 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
- - WP1502 NRH2O Facility Enhancements and Improvements 200,000 0 0 0 $ 200,000
3 - WP1503 NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement 2,986,333 0 0 0 $ 2,986,333
Total Continuing Projects $ 3,386,333 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,386,333
New Projects
4 2 WP1701 Beachside Bay Cabana Project 0 196,000 0 0 $ 196,000
5 3 WP1702 Endless River Bridge Replacements 0 235,000 0 0 $ 235,000
6 - WP1703 General Facility Improvements(2017) 0 100,000 0 0 $ 100,000
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 531,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 531,000
Total Project Costs $ 3,386,333 $ 531,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,917,333
Funding Sources
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 2,600,000 0 0 0 $ 2,600,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 2,600,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,600,000
Reserves
Aquatic Park Infrastructure Reserve 780,425 531,000 0 0 $ 1,311,425
Total Reserves $ 780,425 $ 531,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,311,425
Total Sources of Funds $ 3,380,425 $ 531,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,911,425
1
Schedule 6
Facilities Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
- 1 BD0809 820 Widening-City Hall Modifications 1,050,000 0 0 0 $ 1,050,000
- 2 BD0905 820 Widening-Professional Services 300,000 0 0 0 $ 300,000
5 3 FC1602 Building ACM Abatement and Site Demolition 630,000 0 0 0 $ 630,000
- 4 FC1601 Building Envelope/Roof Replacement 165,000 0 0 0 $ 165,000
5 FC1205 City Hall(Municipal Government Complex) 69,284,287 0 0 0 $ 69,284,287
- FC1204 Loop 820 Expansion Preparation 213,031 0 0 0 $ 213,031
- 6 ES0201 NRH Animal Adoption&Rescue Center-New Facility 4,400,000 0 0 0 $ 4,400,000
Total Continuing Projects $ 76,042,318 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 76,042,318
New Projects
6 7 FC1701 Overhead Door Replacement 0 52,000 0 0 $ 52,000
7 8 FC1702 Overhead Door Safety Edges&Remote Control Assemblies 0 68,800 0 0 $ 68,800
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 120,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 120,800
Total Project Costs $ 76,042,318 $ 120,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 76,163,118
Funding Sources
General Obligation Bonds
G.O.Bonds 2003 Program 1,550,000 0 0 0 $ 1,550,000
G.O.Bonds 2012 Program 48,000,000 0 0 0 $ 48,000,000
Total General Obligation Bonds $ 49,550,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 49,550,000
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 20,070,000 0 0 0 $ 20,070,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 20,070,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,070,000
Reserves
Building Services Fund Reserve 165,000 0 0 0 $ 165,000
Future Construction Funds 0 120,800 0 0 $ 120,800
Unspecified Project Savings 630,000 0 0 0 $ 630,000
General Fund Designated Reserves 1,350,000 0 0 0 $ 1,350,000
Pay-As-You-Go Reserves for Capital Improvements 555,000 0 0 0 $ 555,000
Total Reserves $ 2,700,000 $ 120,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,820,800
Other
Animal Control Fund Raising Campaign 1,075,000 0 0 0 $ 1,075,000
Other 2,434,287 0 0 0 $ 2,434,287
North Tarrant Express ROW Proceeds 213,031 0 0 0 $ 213,031
Total Other $ 3,722,318 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,722,318
1
Schedule 6
Facilities Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Total Sources of Funds $ 76,042,318 $ 120,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 76,163,118
2
Schedule 7
Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
- - IS1401 Cell Phone Signal Boosters in NRH Centre 98,000 0 0 0 $ 98,000
IS1503 Network Equipment Replacement 1,103,944 0 0 0 $ 1,103,944
- - IS1501 Replace/enhance Dispatch center recording equipment 196,171 0 0 0 $ 196,171
- - IS1502 Replacement of CAD/RMS Public Safety Software Platform 3,850,000 0 0 0 $ 3,850,000
- - IS1402 Replacement of the Fuel Management Software System 90,000 0 0 0 $ 90,000
3 FD1501 SCBA Air Pack Replacement 54,000 346,000 0 0 $ 400,000
- - IS1203 Teleworks Replacement for Online and VOIP Platforms 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
Total Continuing Projects $ 5,492,115 $ 346,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,838,115
New Projects
4 FS1701 Aerial Fire Apparatus(1) 0 931,000 0 0 $ 931,000
5 FS1702 Aerial Fire Apparatus(2) 0 931,000 0 0 $ 931,000
6 IT1701 Enterprise Computer System Replacement 0 95,000 2,905,000 0 $ 3,000,000
7 FS1703 Fire Engine 0 556,000 0 0 $ 556,000
8 - IT1702 Public Safety Technology 0 1,306,000 0 0 $ 1,306,000
9 - IT1703 Replacement of Hand-Held Citation Writers and Citation Portable 0 130,000 0 0 $ 130,000
Printers
Total New Projects $ 0 $ 3,949,000 $ 2,905,000 $ 0 $ 6,854,000
Total Project Costs $ 5,492,115 $ 4,295,000 $ 2,905,000 $ 0 $ 12,692,115
Funding Sources
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 0 1,915,000 0 0 $ 1,915,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 0 $ 1,915,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,915,000
Federal/State Grants
Other 0 74,000 0 0 $ 74,000
Federal Grant 71,171 0 0 0 $ 71,171
Total Federal/State Grants $ 71,171 $ 74,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 145,171
Reserves
Equipment Services Fund 0 346,000 0 0 $ 346,000
Information Services Reserve 1,415,944 251,000 0 0 $ 1,666,944
Reserves 0 1,084,592 0 0 $ 1,084,592
Unspecified Project Savings 31,000 0 0 0 $ 31,000
Utility Fund 70,000 0 0 0 $ 70,000
Total Reserves $ 1,516,944 $ 1,681,592 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,198,536
Other
Other 3,904,000 494,408 0 0 $ 4,398,408
1
Schedule 7
Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Court Technology Fund 0 130,000 0 0 $ 130,000
To Be Determined 0 0 2,905,000 0 $ 2,905,000
Total Other $ 3,904,000 $ 624,408 $ 2,905,000 $ 0 $ 7,433,408
Total Sources of Funds $ 5,492,115 $ 4,295,000 $ 2,905,000 $ 0 $ 12,692,115
2
Schedule 8
Economic Development Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
- 1 ED0803 Boulevard 26 Intersection Imp.(@ Rodger Line Rd.) 450,000 0 0 0 $ 450,000
- 2 ED0801 Business Improvement and Growth(BIG)Program 250,000 0 0 0 $ 250,000
- ED1601 City Point Infrastructure 2,596,070 0 0 0 $ 2,596,070
- ED1602 Loop 820 Redevelopment 6,500,000 0 0 0 $ 6,500,000
3 ED1002 Loop 820 Redevelopment 1,595,572 0 0 0 $ 1,595,572
5 4 ED1501 Neighborhood Revitalization Program(NRP) 206,184 100,000 0 0 $ 306,184
- 5 ED1001 SH 121/183&Bedford-Euless Road Access Plan 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
- PW0402 Sign Removal Assistance Program 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000
- 6 ED0601 TIF 1 Expansion-Intersection Improvements/Utility Burial 3,000,000 0 0 0 $ 3,000,000
- ED1503 TOD Land Management 1,200,000 0 0 0 $ 1,200,000
Total Continuing Projects $ 15,947,826 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,047,826
Total Project Costs $ 15,947,826 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,047,826
Funding Sources
Certificates of Obligation
Certificates of Obligation 3,000,000 0 0 0 $ 3,000,000
Total Certificates of Obligation $ 3,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,000,000
Reserves
General Fund Balance 0 100,000 0 0 $ 100,000
General Fund Pay-As-You-Go Reserves 50,000 0 0 0 $ 50,000
Reserves 7,781,070 0 0 0 $ 7,781,070
General Fund Designated Reserves 1,200,000 0 0 0 $ 1,200,000
Sales Tax Reserve for Economic Development 100,000 0 0 0 $ 100,000
Gas Fund Reserves(Designated for ED Activities) 1,369,097 0 0 0 $ 1,369,097
Total Reserves $ 10,500,167 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,600,167
Sales Tax
Sales Tax Reserve for Economic Development 450,000 0 0 0 $ 450,000
Total Sales Tax $ 450,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 450,000
Other
Other 1,571,184 0 0 0 $ 1,571,184
Commercial Loan 426,475 0 0 0 $ 426,475
Total Other $ 1,997,659 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,997,659
Total Sources of Funds $ 15,947,826 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,047,826
1
Schedule 9
CIP Personnel Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
GCIP12 General CIP Personnel Costs 995,183 0 0 0 $ 995,183
- - MFPF12 Municipal Facilities Project Funding 0 0 0 0 $ 0
UCIP12 Utility CIP Personnel 1,731,169 304,680 0 0 $ 2,035,849
UCNP12 Utility Construction Personnel 4,110,576 839,992 0 0 $ 4,950,568
UCPF12 Utility Construction Project Funding -4,094,769 -840,000 0 0 $ -4,934,769
Total Continuing Projects $ 2,742,159 $ 304,672 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,046,831
Total Project Costs $ 2,742,159 $ 304,672 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,046,831
Funding Sources
Reserves
General CIP Reserves and Interest Income 995,183 0 0 0 $ 995,183
Utility Reserves and Interest Income 5,841,745 1,144,672 0 0 $ 6,986,417
Municipal Facilities Project Funding 0 0 0 0 $ 0
Utility Construction Project Funding -4,094,769 -840,000 0 0 $ -4,934,769
Total Reserves $ 2,742,159 $ 304,672 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,046,831
Total Sources of Funds $ 2,742,159 $ 304,672 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,046,831
1
Schedule 10
Other Capital Projects
Budget Summary
Pg. Map Project To 2016/17 2017/18 2018 To Total
No. ID Date Proposed Estimated Completion
Project Costs
Continuing Projects
3 ES1201 Atmos Residential Energy Efficiency Program 379,359 22,500 0 0 $ 401,859
- ES0902 Litter Not Program 25,000 0 0 0 $ 25,000
4 ES0901 Neighborhood Initiative Program 237,158 10,000 10,000 0 $ 257,158
5 - FC1505 North Texas Anti-Gang Center 2015 1,506,751 0 0 0 $ 1,506,751
6 - FC1603 North Texas Anti-Gang Center 2016 900,000 0 0 0 $ 900,000
7 PL1501 Strategic Plan 75,000 50,000 75,000 0 $ 200,000
8 PW1601 TEX Rail 40,200 0 0 0 $ 40,200
Total Continuing Projects $ 3,163,468 $ 82,500 $ 85,000 $ 0 $ 3,330,968
Total Project Costs $ 3,163,468 $ 82,500 $ 85,000 $ 0 $ 3,330,968
Funding Sources
Federal/State Grants
Other 2,111,751 0 0 0 $ 2,111,751
Total Federal/State Grants $ 2,111,751 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,111,751
Reserves
Other 187,158 0 0 0 $ 187,158
Total Reserves $ 187,158 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 187,158
Sales Tax
Economic Development Sales Tax 75,000 0 0 0 $ 75,000
Total Sales Tax $ 75,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,000
Other
Donations Fund 50,000 10,000 10,000 0 $ 70,000
General Fund Balance 0 50,000 75,000 0 $ 125,000
Other 739,559 22,500 0 0 $ 762,059
Total Other $ 789,559 $ 82,500 $ 85,000 $ 0 $ 957,059
Total Sources of Funds $ 3,163,468 $ 82,500 $ 85,000 $ 0 $ 3,330,968
1
Schedule 11
2015/2016 Budget Revisions
Budget Summary
Adopted Budget 2015/2016
Page Project Project Through Revision Revised Remaining
No Number Name 2015/2016 2015/2016 Budget Amount Total
STREET&SIDEWALK CAPITAL PROJECTS
3 ST0902 Cloyce Ct.(820 to Maplewood) $ 950,000 $ (140,000) $ 810,000 $ $ 810,000
4 ST0401 Davis Blvd/Mid Cities Blvd Intersection $ 5,200,726 $ - $ 5,200,726 $ $ 5,200,726
5 ST1404 Jennings Dr./Dude Court $ 610,000 $ (35,000) $ 575,000 $ $ 575,000
6 CDBG16 Lynda Court $ 226,821 $ 35,000 $ 261,821 $ $ 261,821
7 PW1602 Meadow Lakes Drive&Rufe Snow Drive $ - $ 1,315,000 $ 1,315,000 $ $ 1,315,000
Intersection
8 SM1601 Preventative Street Maintenance(2016) $ 800,000 $ - $ 800,000 $ $ 800,000
9 SM1602 Preventative Street Maintenance(Old Cagle Rd) $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ $ 200,000
10 ST0102 Rufe Snow Drive(Karent to 820) $ 1,385,950 $ 150,000 $ 1,535,950 $ $ 1,535,950
12 ST0202 Rufe Snow Drive Improvements(Mid-Cities to $ 21,703,236 $ (100,000) $ 21,603,236 $ $ 21,603,236
Hightower)
13 ST1201 Rufe Snow Drive and Glenview Drive $ 1,435,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,185,000 $ $ 2,185,000
Intersection improvement
Sub-Total $ 32,511,733 $1,975,000 $34,486,733 $ $ 34,486,733
DRAINAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS
15 DR1503 Calloway Branch Channel Repair $ 68,500 $ 30,000 $ 98,500 $ $ 98,500
16 DR1501 Main Street Drainage Improvements $ 800,000 $ 220,000 $ 1,020,000 $ $ 1,020,000
17 DR1004 Meadowview Channel Drainage Improvements $ 1,863,222 $ (120,000) $ 1,743,222 $ $ 1,743,222
Sub-Total $ 2,731,722 $ 130,000 $ 2,861,722 $ $ 2,861,722
UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS
18 UT1601 Franklin Court Sewer Addition/Gifford $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ $ 150,000
Connection
19 UT1603 Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements $ 420,000 $ $ 420,000 $ $ 420,000
20 UT1604 Sanitary Sewer Line Replacements(Crabtree& $ 125,000 $ $ 125,000 $ $ 125,000
Onyx)
21 UT1605 Small Water Main Replace ments(2016) $ 420,000 $ $ 420,000 $ $ 420,000
22 UT1607 Walker Branch Intercept Project $ - $ 416,525 $ 416,525 $ 416,525
23 UT1505 Water Line Replacement on Susan Lee $ 800,000 $ (10,000) $ 790,000 $ $ 790,000
Sub-Total $ 1,915,000 $ 406,525 $ 2,321,525 $ $ 2,321,525
PARKS&RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS
24 PK9601 Calloway Branch Trail Development $ 1,489,811 $ (5,500) $ 1,484,311 $ $ 1,484,311
25 PK1603 Northfield Park Redevelopment $ 397,000 $ 5,500 $ 402,500 $ $ 402,500
26 PK1608 Trail Head Gateways $ 110,000 $ 12,260 $ 122,260 $ $ 122,260
27 PK1609 Unforeseen Park Damage $ - $ 61,535 $ 61,535 $ $ 61,535
Sub-Total $ 1,996,811 $ 73,795 $ 2,070,606 $ $ 2,070,606
AQUATIC PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS
29 WP1503 NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement $ 2,800,000 $ 180,425 $ 2,980,425 $ $ 2,980,425
34 WP1504 NRH2O Parking Lot Improvements $ 75,000 $ 8,250 $ 83,250 $ $ 83,250
Sub-Total $ 2,875,000 $ 188,675 $ 3,063,675 $ $ 3,063,675
FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS
35 FC1602 Building ACM Abatement and Site Demolition $ - $ 630,000 $ 630,000 $ $ 630,000
36 FC1205 City Hall(Municipal Government Complex) $ 69,229,337 $ 54,950 $ 69,284,287 $ $ 69,284,287
Sub-Total $ 69,229,337 $ 684,950 $ 69,914,287 $ $ 69,914,287
MAJOR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS
37 FS1601 Ambulance Replacement Unit 958 $ 240,000 $ 30,000 $ 270,000 $ $ 270,000
38 FS1602 Gradall $ 375,000 $ 25,000 $ 400,000 $ $ 400,000
39 FS1603 Pothole Patcher $ 172,600 $ 5,800 $ 178,400 $ $ 178,400
40 FS1604 Street Sweeper Replacement Unit 6627 $ 291,900 $ (51,900) $ 240,000 $ $ 240,000
Sub-Total $ 1,079,500 $ 8,900 $ 1,088,400 $ $ 1,088,400
1
Schedule 11
2015/2016 Budget Revisions
Budget Summary
Adopted Budget 2015/2016
Page Project Project Through Revision Revised Remaining
No Number Name 2015/2016 2015/2016 Budget Amount Total
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS
42 ED1601 City Point Infrastructure $ - $ 2,596,070 $ 2,596,070 $ $ 2,596,070
43 ED1002 Loop 820 Redevelopment(2010) $ 2,026,938 $ (431,366) $ 1,595,572 $ $ 1,595,572
44 ED1602 Loop 820 Redevelopment(2016) $ - $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 $ $ 6,500,000
Sub-Total $ 2,026,938 $ 8,664,704 $ 10,691,642 $ $ 10,691,642
OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS
45 FC1505 North Texas Anti-Gang Center $ 1,211,751 $ 295,000 $ 1,506,751 $ $ 1,506,751
47 FC1603 (2016)North Texas Anti-Gang Center $ - $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ $ 900,000
48 PW1601 TEX Rail $ - $ 40,200 $ 40,200 $ $ 40,200
Sub-Total $ 1,211,751 $ 1,235,200 $ 2,446,951 $ $ 2,446,951
Total All Projects $ 115,577,792 $ 13,367,749 $ 128,945,541 $ $ 128,945,541
SOURCES OF FUNDS
General Obligation Bonds $ 58,949,172 $ - $ 58,949,172 $ $ 58,949,172
Certificates of Obligations $ 25,506,900 $ 3,433,100 $ 28,940,000 $ $ 28,940,000
Federal/State Grants $ 18,680,464 $ 3,294 $ 18,683,758 $ $ 18,683,758
Reserves $ 8,371,753 $ 6,494,205 $ 14,865,958 $ $ 14,865,958
Sales Tax $ 1,173,691 $ - $ 1,173,691 $ $ 1,173,691
Other $ 2,895,812 $ 3,437,150 $ 6,332,962 $ $ 6,332,962
Total Sources of Funds $ 115,577,792 $ 13,367,749 $ 128,945,541 $ $ 128,945,541
2
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Cloyce Court(820-Maplewood)
ST0902
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This section of Cloyce Ct. serves as the main entrance to the Loop 820 frontage road from the north. Most of Cloyce Ct. is
fronted by multifamily, but there are some commercial uses at the frontage road. This section of Cloyce Ct. was originally
constructed in 1965. The street is approximately 47 years old and was last overlaid in 1984. This rating is considered to be
poor consisting of significant surface deterioration. An old clay sanitary sewer line pipe will be replaced with an 8" PVC pipe.
Cloyce Court is identified on the Master Thoroughfare Plan as a Residential, 2 Lane Undivided (R2U) roadway. It was,
however, constructed 40 feet wide in 1965. This 2003 Bond Program project will consist of reconstructing approximately 1,400
feet of the existing asphalt street with a new 40 foot wide concrete section with sidewalks. The limits of the project will begin at
the Loop 820 frontage road and end at Maplewood Ave. After the new street section is complete this section of Cloyce Ct. will
meet all of the City's current paving and drainage standards. In addition,the 8"Sanitary Sewer line which currently is an old
clay pipe will need to be replaced.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 06/2009 08/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 09/2015 04/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
During construction on ST0102, it was discovered that a gas line will need to relocate in order to construct the extension for the
Meadow Lake turn lane. Also, additional funds are needed to pay for the street light and signalization. In order to pay for
construction, funds will need to be transferred from this project into the Rufe Snow Karen to 820 project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
GO's 750,000 (140,000) 610,000 $610,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $950,0001 $140 000 $810,0001 $0 1 $810,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 100,000 100,000 $100,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 850,000 (140,000): 710,000 $710,000
Other 0 $0
Total $950,000 ($140,000)1 $810,000 $0 1 $810,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
3
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Davis Blvd / Mid-Cities Blvd Intersection
ST0401
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project consists of intersection improvements at the Davis Blvd and Mid-Cities Blvd Intersection. The improvements
include adding additional right and left turn lanes, signalization improvements, and all necessary water and sewer main
adjustments. This project is a 2003 Bond Program Project.
This intersection is located on a major east/west and north/south thoroughfare that runs through NE Tarrant County. Heavy
traffic congestion is experienced during peak hours. As of 2006, more than 53,000 vehicles travel through this intersection per
day. In the future, this intersection will experience significant development which will add to the traffic congestion.
Improvements to this intersection will reduce the traffic congestion and provide added capacity to handle future traffic volumes.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE I REVISION
Professional Services 10/2003 05/2008
Engineering 07/2008 10/2014
Land/ROW Acquisition 08/2014 08/2016
Construction 11/2016 06/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Revising reserves to include money that was not received through grant funding. Grant funding was reduced based on actual
monies received.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
GO Bonds $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
CO Bonds 500,000 0 i 500,000 0 $500,000
Grant 3,796,772 (471,,706) 3,325,066 0 $3,325,066
Reserves 403,954 471,706 875,660 0 $875,660
0 $0
Total $5,200,726 $0 $5,200,726 $0 $5,200,726
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $107,000 $0; $107,000 $0 $107,000
Engineering/Design 536,971 0 536,971 0 $536,971
Land/ROWAcquistion 400,000 0 400,000 0 $400,000
Construction 4,156,755 0 4,156,755 0 $4,156,755
Other 0 $0
Total $5,200,726 1 $0 $5,200,726 1 $0 1 $5,200,726
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No additional impact is projected with this project.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
4
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Jennings Drive/ Dude Court Street Reconstruction
ST1404
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will consist of reconstructing Jennings Drive from Jerrie Jo Drive to Boulevard 26. Since Dude Court is a very small
cul-de-sac located just off of Jennings this project will also include reconstructing Dude Court. The approximate length of
Jennings Drive is 1,500 LF with Dude Court adding about 200 LF. Both streets are the original asphalt streets constructed with
the subdivision. This project will reconstruct both streets as new concrete streets.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 01/2013 07/2013
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 08/2014 09/2015
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
The project came in under budget and we would like to transfer$35,000.00 to the CDBG16 Lynda Court project in order to
fulfill a pledge request from Tarrant County.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
G.O. $610,000 ($35,000) $575,000 $0 $575,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $610,0001 $35 000 $575,0001 $0 1 $575,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 173,000 0 173,000 0 $173,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 437,000 (35,000) 402,000 0 $402,000
Other 0 $0
Total $610,000 ($35,000)1 $575,000 $0 1 $575,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
5
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Lynda Court CDBG
CDBG16
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is the 41st Year Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)project. The existing street is an asphalt pavement
section and it will be reconstructed as a 31 foot wide concrete pavement section. Reconstruction of the street will also include
pavement excavation, curb and gutter replacement, sub-grade stabilization, installation of sidewalks, street right-of-way
restoration and utility improvements.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 09/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2015 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
The total cost of this project came in over the projected budgeted amount. The City needs to transfer$35,000.00 from ST1404
to cover the City's portion and the required pledge amount requested from Tarrant County.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Grants CDBG $226,821 $0 $226,821 $0 $226,821
G.O. 0 35,000' 35,000 0 $35,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $226,821 $35,0001 $261,821 $0 $261,821
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 32,700 32,700 0 $32,700
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 194,121 35,000 229,121 0 $229,121
Other 0 $0
Total $226,821 1 $35,0001 $261,821 1 $0 1 $261,821
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
6
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Meadow Lakes Drive & Rufe Snow Drive Intersection
PW1602
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
The area along Rufe Snow, south of LP 820 is severely congested that include 7 different ingress/egress points within a 700
foot span. The project proposes the conversion of current the Rufe Snow Meadow lakes 3 way signalized intersection into a 4
way signalized intersection that would be a separate but complimentary project to ST0102-Rufe Snow Drive Street& Utility
Improvements, which calls for a raised median along Rufe Snow. This project would extend Meadow lakes east of Rufe Snow,
connecting to the commercial area along LP 820. The project would also eliminate 3 of the 7 ingress/egress points within the
700 foot span.
In January of 2012, City Council requested staff to proceed with a long term plan to reduce congestion, improve safety and
enhance mobility in this particular area. According to internal traffic counts, there are over 30,000 cars per day along Rufe
Snow between Karen Drive and LP 820,with automobiles stacking well south of Marilyn Lane during peak periods. As the LP
820 corridor redevelops, traffic volume and improved access to and from commercial on the south side of LP 820 will be
necessary.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 05/2016 09/2017
Land/ROW Acquisition 05/2017 09/2017
Construction 05/2016 09/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Project was not included at time of adoption.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
CO's $1,315,000 $1,315,000 $1,315,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $1,315,000 $1,315,000, $0 $1,315,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 80,000 80,000 $80,000
Land/ROWAcquistion 435,000 435,000 $435,000
Construction 800,000 800,000 $800,000
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $1,315,000 1 $1,315,000 1 $0 1 $1,315,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
7
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Preventive Street Maintenance 2016
SM1601
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is an annual program where funds are dedicated to enhance the city's efforts for preventive maintenance of city streets.
The scope of this project provides crack sealing for approximately 15-25 streets, slurry seals for 15-25 streets and a 2" asphalt
overlay for 12-15 streets. In addition to these three maintenance methods, staff will be searching for new preventive
procedures to consider in the future.
Preventive maintenance activities delays more costly street reconstruction and extends the life of the current street system.
This project provides staff with funding to apply the appropriate maintenance activities to the streets selected for the program.
Depending on the current condition of the street and the type of preventive measures taken, the street life can be extended for
a minimum cost in comparison to a total reconstruction.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2015 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Source of funds moving from Reserves to CO's.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $800,000 ($800,000); $0 $0
Certificates of Obligation 0 800,000 800,000 0 $800,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $800,0001 $0 $800,0001 $0 1 $800,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 800,000 0 800,000 0 $800,000
Other 0 $0
Total $800,000 $0 $800,000 $0 1 $800,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
8
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Preventive Street Maintenance (Old Cagle Drive)
SM1602
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will consist of making street and subgrade improvements on City Point Drive(formally Cagle Drive) beginning at
Glenview Drive and ending at the Medical Office Building (MOB). The improvements will consist of compacting the subgrade
and providing six inches of asphalt over the newly compacted subgrade as well as repairing and replacing the bad sections of
curb and gutter. The length of roadway improved is approximately 1,250 feet.
This section of City Point is the primary construction entrance for the new City Hall project and has experienced extensive wear
and tear. It is also one of the primary access points for the Medical Office Building. Repaving the roadway and replacing the
bad sections of curb and gutter will provide a more drivable road surface.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2015 12/2015
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Source of funds moving from Reserves to CO's.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $200,000 ($200,000); $0 $0
Certificates of Obligation 0 200,000 200,000 0 $200,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $200,0001 $0 $200,0001 $0 1 $200,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 200,000 0 200,000 0 $200,000
Other 0 $0
Total $200,000 $0 $200,000 $0 1 $200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
9
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Rufe Snow Drive (Karen to 820)
ST0102
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project begins at Karen Dr. and will end on the north side of Corona Dr. The intersection of Meadowlakes Dr.will be
improved as part of this project. Rufe Snow Dr. will be widened to six(6) lanes along with right turn lanes and improved
signalization. Construction for this project is scheduled to begin after TX DOT has completed the Rufe Snow Dr. Bridge and
Frontage Roads.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 01/2001 05/2008
Land/ROW Acquisition 08/2008 01/2015
Construction 11/2015 07/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Due to an increase in construction costs(the need to replace an additional eight inch water line), funds will need to be
transferred into this project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $100,000 $10,000 $110,000 $110,000
GO 1,285,950 1,285,950 $1,285,950
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,385,950 $10,0001 $1,395,950, $0 $1,395,950
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 170,000 170,000 $170,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 198,331 198,331 $198,331
Construction 1,017,619 10,000 1,027,619 $1,027,619
Other 0 $0
Total $1,385,950 1 $10,0001 $1,395,950 1 $0 1 $1,395,950
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
10
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Rufe Snow Drive Street & Utility Improvements (Karen to 820)
ST0102
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This section of Rufe Snow Drive was originally constructed in the 1960's as an asphalt street. The average life of an asphalt
street is 20 years. This street is over 40 years old and has never been overlaid. The current street condition rating is 45. This
rating is considered to be poor, consisting of significant potholes, complete surface deterioration, and misaligned curb and
pavement surface. The additional lanes added to this section of Rufe Snow will reduce traffic congestion at the freeway
frontage roads.
This project begins at Karen Drive and ends on the north side of Corona Drive (approximate ending of the TxDOT Bridge
project). The intersection at Meadow lakes Drive will be improved as part of this project. Rufe Snow Drive will be widened with
right turn lanes and improved signalization. This section will transition from the wider section at the bridge to the 4 lane section
at Karen Drive. The project will be constructed as a concrete street with sidewalks and all necessary water and sewer main
adjustments. Street lights and signalization at Meadow Lakes will be constructed to the City's standards.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 01/2001 05/2008
Land/ROW Acquisition 08/2008 01/2015
Construction 11/2015 07/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
During construction, we've discovered that a gas line will need to relocate in order to construct the extension for the Meadow
Lake turn lane. Also, additional funds are needed to pay for the street light and signalization. This water line was not originally
accounted for in the construction budget. In order to pay for construction, funds will need to be transferred into this project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $110,000 $110,000 $110,000
GO's 1,285,950 140,000 1,425,950 $1,425,950
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,395,950 $140,0001 $1,535,950, $0 $1,535,950
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 170,000 170,000 $170,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 198,331 198,331 $198,331
Construction 1,027,619 140,000 1,167,619 $1,167,619
Other 0 $0
Total $1,395,950 1 $140,0001 $1,535,950 1 $0 1 $1,535,950
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
11
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Rufe Snow Drive Improvements (Mid-Cities to Hightower)
ST0202
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project widens approximately 5,300 feet of the existing 5-lane thoroughfare to 7 lanes. This section of Rufe Snow Drive
will be reconstructed as a concrete street with sidewalks along both sides, signalization improvements at the major
intersections and all necessary water and sewer main adjustments. The funding for design will be provided by the 1994 Bond
Program and Federal Grants(TEA-21). The funding for the construction phase of this project will come from the 2003 Bond
Program and Federal Grants.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 03/2008 03/2014
Land/ROW Acquisition 04/2011 06/2014
Construction 04/2016 02/2018
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Funds will be restored as part of the FY2015-16 revised budget.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
GO $5,690,000 $5,690,000 $5,690,000
CO 2,900,000 2,900,000 $2,900,000
Federal/State Grants 12,162,000 12,162,000 $12,162,000
Reserves 951,236 (100,000) 851,236 $851,236
0 $0
Total $21,703,236 ($100,000)1 $21,603,236, $0 $21,603,236
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 1,700,000 1,700,000 $1,700,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 6,933,263 6,933,263 $6,933,263
Construction 13,070,000 (100,000): 12,970,000 $12,970,000
Other 0 $0
Total $21,703,263 ($100,000)1 $21,603,263 1 $0 $21,603,263
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 TOTAL
Projected $0
12
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Rufe Snow Drive & Glenview Drive Intersection Improvements
ST1201
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project consists of improvements to the intersection of Rufe Snow Dr. and Glenview Dr. Glenview Dr. will be widened to
provide dedicated left turn lanes for the eastbound and westbound leg of the intersection and realign the southbound segment
of Rufe Snow Dr. to shift the dedicated right turn lane adjacent to the other travel lanes. Additionally, aesthetic improvements
will be installed which include a public art exhibit at the northwest corner of the intersection, landscaping features, burying
power lines at the immediate intersection and brick pavers at crosswalks.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 11/2011 09/2017
Land/ROW Acquisition 06/2014 09/2017
Construction 11/2018 11/2019
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Part of the funding was a grant that was credited to this project but was awarded actually to a different project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Grants $550,000 ($550,000) $0 $0
Reserves 885,000 0 885,000 0 $885,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,435,000 1 ($550,000) $885,0001 $0 1 $885,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 200,000 0 200,000 0 $200,000
Land/ROWAcquistion 200,000 0! 200,000 0 $200,000
Construction 1,035,000 (550,000): 485,000 $485,000
Other 0 $0
Total $1,435,000 ($550,000)1 $885,000 $0 1 $885,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No anticipated operating impact
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
13
Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects
Rufe Snow Drive & Glenview Intersection
ST1201
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project consists of improvements to the intersection of Rufe Snow Dr. and Glenview Dr. Glenview Dr. will be widened to
provide dedicated left turn lanes for the eastbound and westbound leg of the intersection and realign the southbound segment
of Rufe Snow Dr. to shift the dedicated right turn lane adjacent to the other travel lanes. With the addition of a new charter
school at Glenview and Rufe Snow, a traffic impact analysis was conducted. The traffic impact analysis indicated that the city
would see a considerable increase of traffic on Rufe Snow and Glenview. In order to mitigate the traffic the Rufe Snow/
Glenview intersection will be expanded to provide an additional lane north and south of Glenview, and a traffic signal will be
added at Glenview/Chapel Park to aide those wanting to take a left out of the charter school to allow vehicular traffic to return
north via Rufe Snow. Additionally, aesthetic improvements will be installed which include a public art exhibit at the northwest
corner of the intersection, landscaping features, burying power lines at the immediate intersection and brick pavers at
crosswalks.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 03/2016 07/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition 04/2016 09/2016
Construction 10/2016 09/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
An additional amount of funds in the amount of$1,300,000.00 will be added to project ST1201. These funds are from a
City-developer agreement for public improvements required by the rough proportionality determination on the charter school
located at Rufe Snow and Glenview Drive.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
GO $0 $0
CO 0 $0
Reserves 885,000 885,000 $885,000
State and Federal Grants 0 $0
Other 1,300,000! 1,300,000 $1,300,000
Total 1 $885,0001 $1,300,000 $2,185,000, $0 $2,185,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 200,000 300,000 500,000 $500,000
Land/ROWAcquistion 200,000 100,000 300,000 $300,000
Construction 485,000 900,000' 1,385,000 $1,385,000
Other 0 $0
Total $885,0001 $1,300,000 1 $2,185,000 1 $0 1 $2,185,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
14
Drainage Capital Projects
Calloway Branch Channel Repair
DR 1503
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is for the repair of failing channel along the Calloway Branch Channel that has resulted in the loss of material in several
backyards along Waggoner Ranch Road. With the extraordinary rainfall this spring the side slopes of a portion of this channel
failed, sliding into the channel bottom and causing a loss of material in several of the backyards along Waggoner Ranch Road.
Staff hired a Geotechnical firm too learn exactly what caused the failure and what could be done to correct the problem.
Unfortunately, it is not as simple as replacing the dislodged material back onto the channel bank. The clay material is not
suited to exist at the required slope with elevated moisture content. While the rains this year were unusually high, it is a high
probability that we will experience the level of rainfall again at some point.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE I REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 09/2015 02/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
The hydraulic analysis of the Calloway Branch Channel Improvements resulted in a rise in water surface elevations. The rise
resulting from work within the floodway will require FEMA approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision prior to construction.
The preparation of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision was not included in the original scope of work for this project. In
addition, there will be a required FEMA review fee for this project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $68,500 $0 $68,500 $68,500
Reserves 0 30,000 30,000 $30,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $68,5001 $30,0001 $98,5001 $0 1 $98,500
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 68,500 30,000 98,500 $98,500
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 0 $0
Total $68,5001 $30,0001 $98,500 $0 1 $98,500
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
15
Drainage Capital Projects
Main Street Drainage Improvements
DR1501
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will consist of replacing approximately 1000 linear feet of 18" and 21" Reinforced Concrete Pipe(RCP)with 30"
and 36" RCP beginning at Chilton Drive and ending at Crane Road.A branch of the new system will be extended up Jerry
Court and will connect to an existing system. Because much of the storm drainage system will be underneath the existing street
pavement the street cuts will be patched and the entire street will be overlaid to provide a uniform pavement finish and look.
Some driveways and curb and gutter will be reconstructed. There will also be the relocation of approximately 400 feet of an
existing 6"water and 6" sanitary sewer line.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 11/2014 03/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 05/2015 11/2015
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Due to an increase in construction costs, all bids received exceeded the project's construction budget. In order to pay for
construction, funds will need to be transferred into this project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $800,000 $100,000 $900,000 $900,000
GO 0 120,000 120,000 $120,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $800,0001 $220,0001 $1,020,000, $0 $1,020,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 89,500 89,500 $89,500
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 710,500 220,000 930,500 $930,500
Other 0 $0
Total $800,0001 $220,0001 $1,020,000 1 $0 1 $1,020,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
16
Drainage Capital Projects
Meadowview Channel Drainage Improvements
DR 1004
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
Reconstruction of the existing concrete channel from Northfield Park to Jill Court and reconstructing larger box culverts at
Northfield Drive.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 09/2010 07/2013
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 06/2014 05/2015
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Funds will be restored as part of the FY2015-16 revised budget.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
GO $1,863,222 ($120,000) $1,743,222 $1,743,222
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,863,222 ($120,000)1 $1,743,222, $0 $1,743,222
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 415,000 415,000 $415,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 1,448,222 (120,000): 1,328,222 $1,328,222
Other 0 $0
Total $1,863,222 ($120,000)1 $1,743,222 1 $0 1 $1,743,222
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
17
Utility Capital Projects
Franklin Court Sewer Addition and Gifford Connection
UT1601
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project consists of design and construction of a new 6" sanitary sewer along Franklin Court with a partial connection to
Gifford for future development. The project will consist of approximately 1,000 linear feet of 6" sanitary sewer.
The lots on Franklin Court were platted in the 1950's and have not had access to NRH City utilities since that time. The older
mobile homes on the street were served by individual septic systems. Currently the platted lot sizes(less than '/4 acre each)
pose a challenge to development in the area as there is insufficient land area to accommodate conventional R-2 homes with
onsite septic systems. A sanitary sewer stub-out to the far south end of Franklin Court was provided in the 1990's with Shady
Oaks. Extending this system north to serve Franklin Court unlocks development potential on the immediate 19 lots and also
allows for a future extension to serve Gifford Lane, which also lacks sewer service
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 11/2015 06/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition 07/2016 08/2016
Construction 08/2016 04/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Source of funds moving from Reserves to CO's.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $150,000 ($150,000); $0 $0
Certificates of Obligation 0 150,000 150,000 0 $150,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $150,0001 $0 $150,0001 $0 1 $150,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 20,000 20,000 $20,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 10,000 10,000 $10,000
Construction 120,000 0 120,000 0 $120,000
Other 0 $0
Total $150,000 $0 $150,000 $0 1 $150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
18
Utility Capital Projects
Miscellaneous Water/Sewer Main Replacements (2016)
UT1603
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is an annual program that is completed by the Public Works Construction Division. The program will provide for water&
sewer replacements on the following streets: Chapman Rd. (7104 Chapman to Brookshire), Cummings(Maplewood to
Janetta), Mary Drive(Davis Blvd. to Stone).
The specific projects are selected based on factors such as maintenance cost, location, age, and size. This project provides
for the retirement of existing water lines which are causing a decrease in system capacity and water quality. This project also
replaces old lines that have significant maintenance and operating costs. The construction of these lines are completed by the
Public Works Construction Division.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2015 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Source of funds moving from Reserves to CO's.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $420,000 ($420,000); $0 $0 $0
Certificates of Obligation 0 420,000 420,000 0 $420,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $420,0001 $0 $420,0001 $0 1 $420,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 420,000 0 420,000 0 $420,000
Other 0 $0
Total $420,000 $0 $420,000 $0 1 $420,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
19
Utility Capital Projects
Sanitary Sewer Line Replacements (Crabtree &Onyx N.)
UT1604
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will consist of pipe bursting 1,790 If of 6 inch clay pipe on Crabtree Ln. (6900 Block thru 7000 Block). The project
will also include replacing a 6 inch ductile iron sewer main that crosses the storm drainage channel on Onyx Dr. N. ( Kris Street
through Charles Street).
The sanitary sewer line on Crabtree Ln. has root intrusion from surrounding vegetation that has caused deterioration to the
existing pipe. The line is located in the rear easement of the surrounding homes. Numerous failures have occurred on the line
and deterioration of the line is beyond typical repairs for city crews.
The sanitary sewer line on Onyx Dr N spans aerially across a storm drainage channel. The ductile iron pipe is deteriorating
faster than normal due to the environment of the aerial pipe. A failure to this pipe could cause major violations from TCEQ
(Texas Commission On Environmental Quality)due to having sanitary sewer discharging into the storm drain.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 09/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 01/2016 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Source of funds moving from Reserves to CO's.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $125,000 ($125,000) $0 $0 $0
Certificates of Obligation 0 125,000 125,000 0 $125,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $125,0001 $0 $125,0001 $0 1 $125,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 20,000 0 20,000 0 $20,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 105,000 0 105,000 0 $105,000
Other 0 $0
Total $125,000 $0 $125,000 $0 1 $125,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
20
Utility Capital Projects
Small Water Main Replacements (2016)
UT1605
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is an annual program that is completed by the Public Works Construction Division. The project replaces old 2" and 4"
water mains with 6"or larger water pipes and provides adequate fire hydrant coverage to areas currently without proper
coverage. This project will provide for small water main replacement on the following streets: Shamrock Court (Ulster to
Cul-de-sac), St. Patrick(Newman to Cork), Timberidge(Starnes to Timberlane), Terry Court(Scott to Cul-de-sac) , Still
Meadows Cir. N &S.)Susan Court(Scott to Cul-de-sac) .
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2015 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Source of funds moving from Reserves to CO's.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $420,000 ($420,000); $0 $0 $0
Certificates of Obligation 0 420,000 420,000 0 $420,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $420,0001 $0 $420,0001 $0 1 $420,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 420,000 0 420,000 0 $420,000
Other 0 $0
Total $420,000 $0 $420,000 $0 1 $420,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
21
Utility Capital Projects
Walker Branch Intercept Project
UT1607
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
As the Transit Orientated Development(TOD)areas begin to develop it is becoming apparent that the city's existing sanitary
sewer system needs to be upgraded. The Walker Branch Interceptor Project will consists of sanitary sewer improvements.
Section one of the project will consists of increasing the sizes of the lines from 6-inch, 8-inch, and 10-inch to an 8-inch, 12-inch
and a 15-inch respectively from Smithfield Road along Main Street to the Walker Creek and Mid-Cities Boulevard confluence.
The total length of sewer line for this section is approximately 5,500 feet. Section two consists of replacing an 18"inch and
21-inch line with a 27-inch sewer line. The approximate length of this section of the project is 4,100 feet.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 07/2016 04/2017
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
A portion of the sewer upgrade in the Smithfield area is on the city's long term CIP plan but will now need to be constructed
sooner than we had originally planned and one portion is a direct result of the development of the TOD. Funding sources are
split 50/50 from the impact fees(listed as other)and utility fees(listed as reserves).
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves(Utility fees) $0 $216,525 $216,525 $216,525
Other(Impact fees) 0 200,000; 200,000 $200,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $416,5251 $416,5251 $0 1 $416,525
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 416,525 416,525 $416,525
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 0 $0
Construction 0 0 $0
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $416,5251 $416,525 $0 1 $416,525
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
22
Utility Capital Projects
Water Line Replacement on Susan Lee
UT1505
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will consist of replacing 1,950 feet of the existing 12 inch cast iron water line and 1,600 feet of the existing 8 inch
cast iron water line on Susan Lee Lane with new 12 inch PVC water line. This project will be performed by open cut trench
method.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2014115 ORIGINAL 2014115
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 05/2015 12/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 03/2016 11/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
During construction, we found an eight inch water line that needs to be replaced in project ST0102. This water line was not
originally accounted for in the construction budget. In order to pay for construction, funds will need to be transferred from this
project into ST0102.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2014/15 REVISION 2014/15 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $800,000 ($10,000) $790,000 $790,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $800,0001 $10 000 $790,0001 $0 1 $790,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 105,000 (10,000) 95,000 $95,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 695,000 695,000 $695,000
Other 0 $0
Total $800,000 $10,000 'i $790,000 $0 1 $790,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 1 2017/2018 1 2018/2019 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
23
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Calloway Branch Trail Development (CMAQ)
PK9601
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project provides for the design and construction of a 5 mile on-road/off-road multi-purpose concrete trail along the
Calloway Branch Drainage Corridor from Liberty Park to the John Barfield Trail. The trail has terminus points at Holiday Lane
and at the John Barfield Trail within the Little Bear Creek Community Park site. Connections are provided to Liberty Park,
Richfield Park, the Cotton Belt Trail, and Cross Timbers Park. The project, and associated time-line, is being implemented
concurrently with the John Barfield Trail.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 01/1996 09/2012
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 04/2013 04/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Funds are being transferred to the Northfield Park Redevelopment Project to cover the contract with Dunkin, Sims &Stoffels.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Federal/State Grants $733,120 $733,120 $733,120
Sales Tax 756,691 (5,500) 751,191 $751,191
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,489,811 ($5,500)1 $1,484,311 $0 $1,484,311
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 275,973 275,973 $275,973
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 1,213,838 (5,500): 1,208,338 $1,208,338
Other 0 $0
Total $1,489,811 ($5,500)1 $1,484,311 1 $0 1 $1,484,311
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
24
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Northfield Park Redevelopment
PK1603
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project involves the redevelopment of the existing community park and adjacent natural area through the design and
construction of new amenities based on meetings to gather stakeholder input. Recommended park elements for the
redevelopment of the park include a new park entry, new modern park layout with a unique theme, upgrade of all equipment
and support facilities and introduction of loop trails. This project will also ensure the protection of the natural creek corridor and
provide engaging views to natural areas.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 09/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 12/2016 12/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Dunkin, Sims&Stoffels were selected to provide professional services for the redevelopment of Northfield Park. Their contract
was negotiated to$402,500 which required an additional$5,500 which was available from savings in PK9601.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Sales Tax $397,000 $5,500 $402,500 $402,500
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $397,0001 $5,5001 $402,5001 $0 1 $402,500
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 397,000 5,500 402,500 $402,500
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 0 $0
Total $397,0001 $5,5001 $402,500 $0 1 $402,500
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
25
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Unforeseen Park Damage
PK1608
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project provides for the design and construction of trail head gateways to our trail system that would offer amenities for
trail users to include information kiosks or signage, landscaped gateway monuments and parking for trail users. FY 2015-2016
priorities include a trail head gateway for the John Barfield Trail at Fire Station# 1 on Davis and Shadywood.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 01/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 03/2016 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Double D Contracting was selected as having the best value to the city with their proposal, which was slightly over budget.
Staff was able to review options with DoubleD to reduce cost by$5,500 without reducing the scope of the project. This
reduced the amount of additional funding needed for the project to$10,260. These funds are available in the park
Development Fund, reserve for future capital projects.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Sales Tax $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Other 90,000 2,000 92,000 $92,000
Reserves 10,260 10,260 $10,260
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $110,0001 $12,2601 $122,2601 $0 1 $122,260
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 15,000 (11,540) 3,460 $3,460
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 95,000 23,800 118,800 0 $118,800
Other 0 $0
Total $110,0001 $12,2601 $122,260 $0 1 $122,260
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal impact is anticipated
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
26
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Unforeseen Park Damage
PK1609
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project provides for the repair and replacement of park amenities and structures as well as street and right-of-way
landscape, hardscape, furniture and other enhancements in response to unanticipated or foreseen damage resulting from
vandalism or accidents.
This project allows for quickly responding to damage or vandalism of landscape features, amenities and structures in our parks
and within our rights-of-way arising from accidents or vandalism. Often, public safety is paramount to taking quick action to
repair such damage. Because processing insurance claims is a time consuming course of action, allocated funds to repair this
damage allows staff to repsond to the accident or vandalism event quickly, preserving public safety and maintaining a positive
City image, especially when located in areas of high visibility.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2016 09/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
This project is a result of damage that occurred at various places around the city parks. This project was not a part of the
FY15-16 budget, it will now become an annual project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $0 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $60,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $60,0001 $60,0001 $0 1 $60,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 60,000 60,000 0 $60,000
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $60,0001 $60,000 $0 1 $60,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal impact is anticipated
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
27
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects
Unforeseen Park Damage
PK1609
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project provides for the repair and replacement of park amenities and structures as well as street and right-of-way
landscape, hardscape, furniture and other enhancements in response to unanticipated or foreseen damage resulting from
vandalism or accidents.
This project allows for quickly responding to damage or vandalism of landscape features, amenities and structures in our parks
and within our rights-of-way arising from accidents or vandalism. Often, public safety is paramount to taking quick action to
repair such damage. Because processing insurance claims is a time consuming course of action, allocated funds to repair this
damage allows staff to repsond to the accident or vandalism event quickly, preserving public safety and maintaining a positive
City image, especially when located in areas of high visibility.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 10/2016 09/2017
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
This project is a result of damage that occurred at various places around the city parks. This project was not a part of the
FY15-16 budget, it will now become an annual project. Another incident was added to this project on 3/31.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $60,000 $1,535 $61,535 $0 $61,535
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $60,0001 $1,5351 $61,5351 $0 1 $61,535
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 60,000 1,5351 61,535 0 $61,535
Other 0 $0
Total $60,0001 $1,5351 $61,535 $0 1 $61,535
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal impact is anticipated
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
28
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement
WP1503
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will provide for the first major attraction renovation identified in the recently completed NRH2O Long Term
Development Plan. The project will include the design and construction of a new themed slide tower and slides replacing the
original wooden slide tower and body slides. Demolition of the existing tower and slides will allow for construction of the new
tower which will provide access to four new slide experiences.
As designated in prior and current NRH2O Strategic Plans, new facilities and attractions must be added to continue to keep
current guests attending as well as attracting future guests. NRH2O continues to add these facilities at the rate of
approximately once every 2-3 years. This keeps the park fresh and keeps the interest in the facility high. Continued
development enables the park to reach audiences and increase the economic opportunities for the City of North Richland Hills.
This attraction will reach multiple audience demographics and will provide increased capacity for the park and additional
experiences for the guests.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2014 01/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 01/2015 05/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Rest of the Bid Bond money will be utilized to finance this project.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $200,000 $117,769'' $317,769 $0 $317,769
Certificate of Obligation 2,600,000 0 2,600,000 $2,600,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $2,800,000 $117,7691 $2,917,769, $0 $2,917,769
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 200,000 200,000 $200,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 2,600,000 117,769 2,717,769 0 $2,717,769
Other 0 $0
Total $2,800,000 1 $117,7691 $2,917,769 1 $0 1 $2,917,769
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact on revenue
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
29
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement
WP1503
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will provide for the first major attraction renovation identified in the recently completed NRH2O Long Term
Development Plan. The project will include the design and construction of a new themed slide tower and slides replacing the
original wooden slide tower and body slides. Demolition of the existing tower and slides will allow for construction of the new
tower which will provide access to four new slide experiences.
As designated in prior and current NRH2O Strategic Plans, new facilities and attractions must be added to continue to keep
current guests attending as well as attracting future guests. NRH2O continues to add these facilities at the rate of
approximately once every 2-3 years. This keeps the park fresh and keeps the interest in the facility high. Continued
development enables the park to reach audiences and increase the economic opportunities for the City of North Richland Hills.
This attraction will reach multiple audience demographics and will provide increased capacity for the park and additional
experiences for the guests.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2014 01/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 01/2015 05/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Reallocating funds from PS to CN to accommodate Change Order No. 2 to JC Commercial.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $351,183 $351,183 $351,183
Certificate of Obligation 2,600,000 2,600,000 $2,600,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $2,951,183 $0 $2,951,183 $0 $2,951,183
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 200,000 (5,908) 194,092 $194,092
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 2,751,183 5,9081 2,757,091 $2,757,091
Other 0 $0
Total $2,951,183 1 $01 1 $0 1 $2,951,183
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
30
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement
WP1503
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will provide for the first major attraction renovation identified in the recently completed NRH2O Long Term
Development Plan. The project will include the design and construction of a new themed slide tower and slides replacing the
original wooden slide tower and body slides. Demolition of the existing tower and slides will allow for construction of the new
tower which will provide access to four new slide experiences.
As designated in prior and current NRH2O Strategic Plans, new facilities and attractions must be added to continue to keep
current guests attending as well as attracting future guests. NRH2O continues to add these facilities at the rate of
approximately once every 2-3 years. This keeps the park fresh and keeps the interest in the facility high. Continued
development enables the park to reach audiences and increase the economic opportunities for the City of North Richland Hills.
This attraction will reach multiple audience demographics and will provide increased capacity for the park and additional
experiences for the guests.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2014 01/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 01/2015 05/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
To Accommodate Change Order no. 2 to JC Commercial. Additional funding is currently available as part of the Fiscal Year
2015-16 Aquatic Park Development Fund designated for reserves.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $317,769 $33,414 $351,183 $0 $351,183
Certificate of Obligation 2,600,000 0 2,600,000 $2,600,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $2,917,769 $33,4141 $2,951,183, $0 $2,951,183
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 200,000 200,000 $200,000
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 2,717,769 33,414 2,751,183 $2,751,183
Other 0 $0
Total $2,917,769 1 $33,4141 $2,951,183 1 $0 1 $2,951,183
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact on revenue
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
31
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement
WP1503
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will provide for the first major attraction renovation identified in the recently completed NRH2O Long Term
Development Plan. The project will include the design and construction of a new themed slide tower and slides replacing the
original wooden slide tower and body slides. Demolition of the existing tower and slides will allow for construction of the new
tower which will provide access to four new slide experiences.
As designated in prior and current NRH2O Strategic Plans, new facilities and attractions must be added to continue to keep
current guests attending as well as attracting future guests. NRH2O continues to add these facilities at the rate of
approximately once every 2-3 years. This keeps the park fresh and keeps the interest in the facility high. Continued
development enables the park to reach audiences and increase the economic opportunities for the City of North Richland Hills.
This attraction will reach multiple audience demographics and will provide increased capacity for the park and additional
experiences for the guests.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2014 01/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 01/2015 05/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
To accommodate Change Order No. 1 to Walker Utilities. Additional funding is currently available as part of the Fiscal Year
2015-16 Aquatic Park Development Fund designated for reserves.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $351,183 $1,175 $352,358 $352,358
Certificate of Obligation 2,600,000 2,600,000 $2,600,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $2,951,183 $1,1751 $2,952,358, $0 $2,952,358
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 194,092 194,092 $194,092
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 2,757,091 1,175 2,758,266 $2,758,266
Other 0 $0
Total $2,951,183 1 $1,1751 $2,952,358 1 $0 1 $2,952,358
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
0
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
32
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
NRH2O Slide Tower Replacement
WP1503
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project will provide for the first major attraction renovation identified in the recently completed NRH2O Long Term
Development Plan. The project will include the design and construction of a new themed slide tower and slides replacing the
original wooden slide tower and body slides. Demolition of the existing tower and slides will allow for construction of the new
tower which will provide access to four new slide experiences.
As designated in prior and current NRH2O Strategic Plans, new facilities and attractions must be added to continue to keep
current guests attending as well as attracting future guests. NRH2O continues to add these facilities at the rate of
approximately once every 2-3 years. This keeps the park fresh and keeps the interest in the facility high. Continued
development enables the park to reach audiences and increase the economic opportunities for the City of North Richland Hills.
This attraction will reach multiple audience demographics and will provide increased capacity for the park and additional
experiences for the guests.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2014 01/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 01/2015 05/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
To accommodate Change Order No. 3 to JC Commercial.Additional funding is currently available as part of the Fiscal Year
2015-16 Aquatic Park Development Fund designated for reserves.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $352,358 $28,067 $380,425 $380,425
Certificate of Obligation 2,600,000 2,600,000 $2,600,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $2,952,358 $28,0671 $2,980,425, $0 $2,980,425
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 194,092 194,092 $194,092
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 2,758,266 28,067 2,786,333 $2,786,333
Other 0 $0
Total $2,952,358 1 $28,0671 $2,980,425 1 $0 1 $2,980,425
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
33
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
NRH2O Parking Lot Improvements
WP1504
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project involves the removal of existing parking spaces in order to accommodate adjacent commercial development along
the north property line of the park. A portion of a parking drive isle will be removed and parking spaces will be re-configured
accordingly.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 09/2015 12/2015
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
It has been determined that additional funding will be required to complete the project
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $75,000 $8,250 $83,250 $83,250
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $75,0001 $8,2501 $83,2501 $0 1 $83,250
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 75,000 8,250 83,250 $83,250
Other 0 $0
Total $75,0001 $8,2501 $83,250 $0 1 $83,250
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 1 $0
34
Municipal Facility Capital Projects
Building ACM Abatement and Site Demolition
FC 1602
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
Contract with a materials monitoring company and with an ACM abatement/demolition contractor for the city building located at
6720 NE Loop 820. Complete removal of all utilities back to the service tap and the demolition and removal of all structures
from the site. This will leave the property a vacant lot for future development.
With the completion of the new City Hall Complex all departments currently located at 6720 and 7301 NE Loop 820 will relocate
to the new City Hall. To prepare for the sale and/or future development of this site, all existing structures is to be removed.
Demolition of structures will provide a site for future investment and or development opportunities.
Project funding source is Facilities Reserves and the sale of property.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 01/2016 01/2017
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Project was not included at time of adoption, this is a proposed FY17 project that is needed in FY16
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $0 $275,000 $275,000 $0 $275,000
Other-Sale of Property 355,000; 355,000 $355,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $630,0001 $630,0001 $0 1 $630,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $74,000' $74,000 $0 $74,000
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 556,000' 556,000 0 $556,000
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $630,0001 $630,000 $0 1 $630,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact is expected
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
35
Municipal Facility Capital Projects
City Hall (Municipal Government Complex)
FC1205
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project is for the design, acquisition, and construction of a new municipal complex up to 183,000 square feet to
consolidate multiple city services and departments into one location. The new City Hall (Municipal Government Complex)will
include the following city services and departments: City Hall, Police Department(including Police Property, Traffic, Crime
Scene and SWAT), Municipal Court, Parks Administration, Citicable, Fire Administration &Emergency Management, and
Neighborhood Services. The proposed 183,000 square feet would be constructed to provide Public Safety operations 93,000
square feet, City Hall 75,000 square feet, and Municipal Court 15,000 square feet. The square feet dimensions by function
could be redefined during the design process.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 07/2012 09/2016
Engineering 07/2012 09/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition 06/2012 02/2013
Construction 12/2013 09/2016
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Revision to include additional funding
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
General Obligation Bonds $48,250,000 $0 $48,250,000 $0 $48,250,000
Certificates of Obligation 18,600,000 0 18,600,000 0 $18,600,000
Other 2,379,337 54,950 2,434,287 0 $2,434,287
0 $0
0 $0
Total $69,229,337 $54,9501 $69,284,287, $0 $69,284,287
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $4,944,197 $0; $4,944,197 $0 $4,944,197
Engineering/Design 282,000 0 282,000 0 $282,000
Land/ROWAcquistion 162,785 0 162,785 0 $162,785
Construction 58,645,756 0 58,645,756 0 $58,645,756
Other 5,194,599 54,950 5,249,549 0 $5,249,549
Total $69,229,337 1 $54,9501 $69,284,287 1 $0 $69,284,287
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Operating impact will be added after Consultants are hired and provided a Performa on estimated expenditures.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
36
Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects
Ambulance Replacement Unit 958
FS1601
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is the purchase of a new ambulance to replace unit 958,a 2002 year-model Ford 450 outfitted with a 14'Frazer brand
generator-powered module. When replaced,the ambulance will be 14 years old and have an estimated odometer reading of 172,000
miles.
Estimated cost of the ambulance is$240,000 which does not include the cost of any replacement medical equipment, if required. The
Fire Department operates three front-line ambulances and utilizes three reserve ambulances. A new ambulance is placed into front
line service for six years and then utilized as a reserve unit for another six years.The new ambulance will be placed into front line
service at Fire Station No.3. Unit 980,which is a 2009 year-model,will then be placed into reserve status for six years. Each fire
station that operates a front line ambulance also has a reserve unit located at that same location. This helps ensure an ambulance
can respond as needed.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE I REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 10/2015 12/2015 02/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other 12/2015 03/2016 06/2016 09/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
The quote came in higher than anticipated due to the Stryker cot and load system previously funded by the Fire Department.
Funds will will be transferred from another Fleet capital project that experience savings in order to cover the higher than
anticipated costs.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Certificates of Obligation $240,000 $30,000 $270,000 $270,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $240,0001 $30,0001 $270,0001 $0 1 $270,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES'
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 240,000 30,000 270,000 $270,000
Total $240,0001 $30,0001 $270,000 $0 1 $270,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 1 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
37
Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects
Gradall Excavator Replacement Unit 633
FS1602
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is the purchase of a new Gradall excavator to replace unit 633, a 1998 year-model XL4100 series tandem-axle excavator outfitted
with dual cabs and air conditioning. When replaced,the Gradall will be 18 years old and have an estimated odometer reading of
27,500 miles.
The CIP Major Capital equipment replacement program was implemented using the recommendations obtained in an independent
study conducted for the City by Peat Marwick in August of 1986 and August of 1993 which recommended a minimum 10-year
replacement for capital equipment. At the 10-year interval,the equipment is evaluated for replacement based on frequency of use,the
number of like equipment in the fleet, equipment condition, and the availability of parts and service. The Gradall excavator is a
specialized one-of-a-kind unit setup which is subject to 24 hours/7 days a week operation by the user department for maintenance of
the City roadways and creeks. The City also provides backup emergency assistance with this specialized equipment to surrounding
cities as requested. The replacement excavator would be equipped with an energy-efficient clean-burning diesel engine which meets
the replacement guidelines of the Clean Fleet Vehicle Program.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other 10/2015 12/2015 04/2016 03/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
The quote came in higher than anticipated.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Certificates of Obligation $375,000 $25,000 $400,000 $400,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $375,0001 $25,0001 $400,0001 $0 1 $400,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 375,000 25,000 400,000 $400,000
Total $375,0001 $25,0001 $400,000 $0 1 $400,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
38
Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects
Pothole Patcher Replacement Unit 673
FS1603
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is the purchase of a new pothole patcher to replace unit 673, a 1999 year-model GMC Kodiak with a Pro-Patch module.
Estimated cost of the pothole patcher is$172,600. When replaced,the pothole patcher will be 17 years old and have an estimated
odometer reading of 82,000 miles.
The CIP Major Capital equipment replacement program was implemented using the recommendations obtained in an independent
study conducted for the City by Peat Marwick in August of 1986 and August of 1993 which recommended a minimum 10-year
replacement for capital equipment. At the 10-year interval,the equipment is evaluated for replacement based on frequency of use,the
number of like equipment in the fleet, equipment condition, and the availability of parts and service. The pothole patcher is a
specialized one-of-a-kind unit setup used to maintain City streets. The City currently has two of these units in service. The
replacement pothole patcher would be equipped with an energy-efficient clean-burning diesel engine which meets the replacement
guidelines of the Clean Fleet Vehicle Program.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 10/2015 12/2015 01/2016
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other 01/2016 02/2016 07/2016 07/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
The quote came in higher than anticipated.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $172,600 $5,800 $178,400 $178,400
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $172,6001 $5,8001 $178,4001 $0 1 $178,400
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 172,600 5,800 178,400 $178,400
Total $172,6001 $5,8001 $178,400 $0 1 $178,400
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
39
Aquatic Park Capital Projects
Street Sweeper Replacement Unit 6627
FS1604
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is the purchase of a new street sweeper to replace unit 6627, which is a 2007 year-model Tymco street sweeper. When
replaced, the street sweeper will be 9 years old and have an estimated odometer reading of 53,000 miles.
The street sweeper is a specialized one-of-a-kind unit which is subject to 24 hours/7 days a week operation by the user
department for sweeping City streets and parking lots. The City also provides backup emergency assistance with this
specialized equipment to surrounding cities as requested. The replacement street sweeper would be equipped with an
energy-efficient clean-burning diesel engine which meets the replacement guidelines of the Clean Fleet Vehicle Program.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other 10/2015 04/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
City issues CO's in increments of$5,000 so this project needed to be rounded up.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Certificates of Obligation $291,900 $3,100 $295,000 $295,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $291,9001 $3,1001 $295,0001 $0 1 $295,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 291,900 3,100 295,000 $295,000
Total $291,9001 $3,1001 $295,000 $0 1 $295,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No impact is expected
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
40
Major Capital Equipment Capital Projects
Street Sweeper Replacement Unit 6627
FS1604
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is the purchase of a new street sweeper to replace unit 6627,which is a 2007 year-model Tymco street sweeper. Estimated cost
of the street sweeper is$291,900. When replaced,the street sweeper will be 9 years old and have an estimated odometer reading of
53,000 miles.
The CIP Major Capital equipment replacement program was implemented using the recommendations obtained in an independent
study conducted for the City by Peat Marwick in August of 1986 and August of 1993 which recommended a minimum 10-year
replacement for capital equipment. At the 10-year interval,the equipment is evaluated for replacement based on frequency of use,
the number of like equipment in the fleet, equipment condition, and the availability of parts and service. The street sweeper is a
specialized one-of-a-kind unit which is subject to 24 hours/7 days a week operation by the user department for sweeping City streets
and parking lots. The City also provides backup emergency assistance with this specialized equipment to surrounding cities as
requested. The replacement street sweeper would be equipped with an energy-efficient clean-burning diesel engine which meets the
replacement guidelines of the Clean Fleet Vehicle Program.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering 10/2015 10/2015 12/2015 12/2015
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other 01/2016 01/2016 07/2016 07/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
The quote came in lower than anticipated.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Certificates of Obligation $295,000 ($55,000) $240,000 $240,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total 1 $295,0001 $55 000 $240,0001 $0 1 $240,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 295,000 (55,000) 240,000 $240,000
Total $295,000 ($55,000)1 $240,000 $0 1 $225,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
41
Economic Development Capital Projects
City Point Infrastructure
ED 1601
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This is for the purchasing of the land for new municipal facilities
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Project created after first of new fiscal year
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $0 $2,596,070 $2,596,070 $0 $2,596,070
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $2,596,070 $2,596,070, $0 $2,596,070
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROWAcquistion 0 2,596,070' 2,596,070 0 $2,596,070
Construction 0 $0
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $2,596,070 1 $2,596,070 1 $0 1 $2,596,070
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 1 $0
42
Municipal Facility Capital Projects
Loop 820 Redevelopment
ED 1002
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
The North Tarrant Express is bringing added attention and interest from the commercial development community at this key
North Richland Hills intersection. This project will provide the ability to optimize accessibility and dictate uses with an emphasis
on quality and impact to community. The construction costs associated with creating left turn access from southbound Rufe
Snow via Corona into the southeast corner of Rufe Snow&Loop 820 is also included.
To optimize transportation access while controlling future development, the City stands to benefit through the following:
1. Increase in sales tax revenues.
2. Increase in property tax revenues.
3. Potential increase in hotel tax revenues.
4. Indirect positive impact to other commercial areas within the vicinity.
5. Provide NRH citizens with a high quality development.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 12/2010 09/2016
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition 11/2009 02/2017
Construction
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
Reduce funding as purchases were shifted to more appropriate project, that was a revision in FY16.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRIJ REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $1,600,463 ($431,366) $1,169,097 $0 $1,169,097
Other 426,475 0 426,475 0 $426,475
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $2,026,938 ($431,366)1 $1,595,572, $0 $1,595,572
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $100,000 $0; $100,000 $0 $100,000
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROWAcquistion 1,776,938 (431366) 1,345,572 0 $1,345,572
Construction 150,000 0 150,000 $150,000
Other 0 0 $0
Total $2,026,938 ($431,366)1 $1,595,572 1 $0 1 $1,595,572
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal operating impact expected
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
43
Economic Development Capital Projects
Loop 820 Redevelopment (2016)
ED 1602
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
With the North Tarrant Express finalized, continued interest from potential business brings a need to facilitate high quality uses
along the sound side of the 820 corridor,just east of Rufe Snow. This project will allow the city the ability to attract quality
positive full service restaurants to the community.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other 01/2016 12/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
Project created after first of new fiscal year.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Reserves $0 $5,185,0001 $5,185,000 $0 $5,185,000
Other 0 1,315,000 1,315,000 0 $1,315,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $6,500,000 1 $6,500,000 $0 $6,500,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 0 6,500,000' 6,500,000 0 $6,500,000
Total $0 $6,500,000 1 $6,500,000 1 $0 1 $6,500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact on operating budget is expected to be minimal.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
44
Other Capital Projects
North Texas Anti-Gang Center
FC 1505
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
The High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area(HIDTA) program is a program authorized by federal legislation and funded through
the President's Office for National Drug Control Policy. The North Texas HIDTA(NTHIDTA) is one of 28 HIDTAs across the
country and is the one in which the City of North Richland Hills is located. NTHIDTA desires to start a new task force
specifically to deal with gangs and has applied for a grant from the Office of the Governor to start the program. The grant funds
must be disbursed to a governmental entity and requires a fiduciary to administer the funds and pay invoices generated by
NTHIDTA. The Governor's office has contacted the City of North Richland Hills about acting as the fiduciary for this grant. As
fiduciary, the City will receive a 5%administrative fee for such services. This fee, estimated at$61,424, is reflected in the Other
category and will be transferred out of the project as a project expense as it earned. This project is the result of the Office of the
Governor contacting the city of North Richland Hills to act as the fiduciary agent responsible for administering this particular
grant.
D
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 03/2015 08/2016 09/2016
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 03/2015 08/2016 09/2016
Other 03/2015 08/2016 09/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
On 02/16/2016, an MOA between NRH and the FBI was providing up to$125,000 for the reimbursement of renovation
expenses associated with the TAG space.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Federal/State Grants $1,211,751 $1,211,751 $1,211,751
Other 125,000 125,000 $125,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,211,751 $125,0001 $1,336,751 $0 $1,336,751
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $530,827 $530,827 $530,827
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 615,000 615,000 $615,000
Other 65,924 125,000 190,924 $190,924
Total $1,211,751 1 $125,0001 $1,336,751 1 $0 1 $1,336,751
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 1 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
45
Other Capital Projects
North Texas Anti-Gang Center
FC 1505
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
The High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area(HIDTA) program is a program authorized by federal legislation and funded through
the President's Office for National Drug Control Policy. The North Texas HIDTA(NTHIDTA) is one of 28 HIDTAs across the
country and is the one in which the City of North Richland Hills is located. NTHIDTA desires to start a new task force
specifically to deal with gangs and has applied for a grant from the Office of the Governor to start the program. The grant funds
must be disbursed to a governmental entity and requires a fiduciary to administer the funds and pay invoices generated by
NTHIDTA. The Governor's office has contacted the City of North Richland Hills about acting as the fiduciary for this grant. As
fiduciary, the City will receive a 5%administrative fee for such services. This fee, estimated at$61,424, is reflected in the Other
category and will be transferred out of the project as a project expense as it earned. This project is the result of the Office of the
Governor contacting the city of North Richland Hills to act as the fiduciary agent responsible for administering this particular
grant. This is federal grant money that is filtered from the state.
D
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 03/2015 08/2016 09/2016
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 03/2015 08/2016 09/2016
Other 03/2015 08/2016 09/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
This revision is due to the landlord providing$170,000 for remodeling work.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Federal/State Grants $1,211,751 $1,211,751 $1,211,751
Other 125,000 170,000 295,000 $295,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $1,336,751 $170,0001 $1,506,751 $0 $1,506,751
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $530,827 $530,827 $530,827
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 615,000 170,000 785,000 $785,000
Other 190,924 0 i 190,924 0 $190,924
Total $1,336,751 1 -$170,0001 $1,506,751 1 $0 1 $1,506,751
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating impact expected.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
46
Other Capital Projects
North Texas Anti-Gang Center(2016)
FC 1603
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
The North Texas HIDTA(NTHIDTA) is one of 28 HIDTAs across the country and is the one in which the City of North Richland
Hills is located. NTHIDTA desires to start a new task force specifically to deal with gangs and has applied for a grant from the
Office of the Governor to start the program. The grant funds must be disbursed to a governmental entity and requires a
fiduciary to administer the funds and pay invoices generated by NTHIDTA. The Governor's office has contacted the City of
North Richland Hills about acting as the fiduciary for this grant. This grant was awarded directly by the Governor's Office and
only includes monies from the State of Texas. (Project is in conjunction with the anti gang center grant awarded by the federal
government.)
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 03/2015 09/2016
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction 03/2015 09/2016
Other 03/2015 09/2016
REVISION EXPLANATION
This grant was awarded in the middle of fiscal year 2015/2016.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Grant-State Grant $900,000 $900,000 $0 $900,000
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $900,0001 $900,0001 $0 1 $900,000
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $0
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 900,000 900,000 $900,000
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $900,0001 $900,000 $0 1 $900,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No impact on operating budget
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected 01 01 01 01 0 $0
47
Other Capital Projects
TEX Rail
PW1601
PROJECT DESCRIPTION&JUSTIFICATION
This project is for the design of the TEX Rail that will be coming to North Richland Hills in the near future. The rail will stop at
areas around Iron Horse and near Smithfield.
North Richland Hills is partnering with the T(Fort Worth Transportation Authority)to bring the light rail that extends from Fort
Worth to Grapevine, and will have two stops in NRH.
PROJECT STATUS ORIGINAL 2015116 ORIGINAL 2015116
START DATE REVISION END DATE REVISION
Professional Services 02/2016 10/2016
Engineering
Land/ROW Acquisition
Construction
Other
REVISION EXPLANATION
This project was not included in the original Capital Projects Budget for FY16.
FINANCIAL DATA
ADOPTED REVISED TOTAL
BUDGET THRU PROJECT BUDGET THRU REMAINING PROJECT
2015/16 REVISION 2015/16 BALANCE COST
FUNDING SOURCES
Other $0 $40,200 $40,200 $0 $40,200
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
Total $0 $40,2001 $40,2001 $0 1 $40,200
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Professional Services $0 $40,200 $40,200 $0 $40,200
Engineering/Design 0 $0
Land/ROW Acquistion 0 $0
Construction 0 $0
Other 0 $0
Total $0 $40,2001 $40,200 $0 1 $40,200
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No impact is anticipated.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT 1 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 1 2018/2019 1 2019/2020 1 TOTAL
Projected $0
48
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Consider ratifying an increase in property tax revenues reflected in
the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 adopted budget.
PRESENTER: Mark Mills, Budget Director
SUMMARY:
State law requires that when adopting a budget that will raise more revenue from
property taxes than in the previous year, a separate vote of the governing board is
required to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
When adopting a budget that generates more revenue from property taxes than in the
previous year, State law requires the City to state the increase in property tax revenue,
no matter what the cause; whether the increase is based on increased property values,
new construction or an increased tax rate. The Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Budget includes
a proposed tax rate of 610 per $100 of valuation. An increase in certified taxable
values, and the addition of new construction values, will result in increased total
property tax revenues for the City. The language required to appear as a cover page to
the budget document by State law is as follows:
This budget will raise more revenue from property taxes than last year's budget
by an amount of $2,276,004, which is a 9.10 percent increase from last year's
budget. The property tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the
tax roll this year is $755,293.
As a result of the additional total property tax revenue, the aforementioned legislation
requires the governing body to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the adopted
budget. The vote to ratify this property tax increase must be a record vote in addition to
and separate from the vote to adopt the budget or the vote to set the tax rate.
RECOMMENDATION:
Ratify the Increase in Property Tax Revenues
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance No. 3428, adopting the tax rate for Tax Year
2016.
PRESENTER: Mark Mills, Budget Director
SUMMARY:
The City Council is requested to consider the adoption of an ordinance setting the
maintenance and operations (M&O) tax rate for Tax Year 2016 at 34.8083¢ and the
debt service tax rate (I&S) at 26.1917¢, for a combined total tax rate of 610 per $100 of
valuation.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The proposed Tax Year 2016 (Fiscal Year 2016/2017) property tax rate for the city of
North Richland Hills is 61¢ per $100 of valuation. This tax rate exceeds the effective tax
rate of 58.3909¢ but remains below the rollback rate. The proposed tax rate is
distributed into two components as follows:
• 34.8083¢ for the purpose of maintenance and operations; and
• 26.1917¢ for the purpose of tax supported debt principal and interest payments.
Adopting Ordinance No. 3428 would set the tax rate for Tax Year 2016 at 610 per $100
of valuation. If adopted, this would be the fifth consecutive year that the combined tax
rate was set at 610.
State law requires specific language to be included in the ordinance adopting the tax
rate if the ordinance sets a tax rate that will impose an amount of taxes for maintenance
and operations that exceeds the taxes imposed for that purpose in the preceding year.
If adopted, the 61¢ tax rate would impose more total property taxes for the purpose of
maintenance and operations, which makes the additional language mandatory.
Since the proposed tax rate of 610 exceeds the effective tax rate of 58.3903¢, new
legislation requires 60% of the members of the City Council to vote in favor of the
ordinance setting the property tax rate for it to pass. Although only voting in the cast of
a tie, the Mayor counts toward Council membership in regard to calculating the required
60%. In order for the ordinance pass, 5 members of the City Council must vote in favor
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
of the ordinance. If Council chooses to adopt the proposed tax rate of 610, staff
requests the following three motions be made, each followed by a Council vote:
1. "I move that the property tax rate for Maintenance and Operations be set
at 34.8083 cents per $100 of valuation"
2. "I move that the property tax rate for Interest and Sinking be set at
26.1917 cents per $100 of valuation"
3. "I move that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax
rate of 61 cents, which is effectively a 4.468 percent increase in the tax
rate."
RECOMMENDATION:
Vote to set the Maintenance and Operations component of the tax rate at 34.8083
cents, vote to set the Interest and Sinking component of the tax rate at 26.1917 cents,
and approve Ordinance No. 3428, setting the combined Tax Year 2016 tax rate at 61
cents.
ORDINANCE NO. 3428
AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE TAX RATE; LEVYING AND ASSESSING
GENERAL AND SPECIAL AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE USE AND
SUPPORT OF THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; APPORTIONING THE LEVIES FOR SPECIFIC
PURPOSES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas
Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of North Richland Hills submitted a tax rate
proposal to the City Council prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, and in
said tax rate proposal set forth the estimated necessary tax rate required
to provide adequate revenues for the general use and support of the
Municipal Government of the City of North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all provisions pertaining to the adoption of an ad
valorem tax rate have been in all things complied with; and
WHEREAS, Public Hearings were held by the City Council for the City of North
Richland Hills on August 22, 2016, September 12, 2016 and September
19, 2016- and
WHEREAS, after a full and final consideration, the City Council is of the opinion that
the tax rate should be approved and adopted; and
WHEREAS, the taxes have been levied in accordance with the adopted fiscal year
2017 budget as required by state law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. There shall be and there is hereby levied and assessed and there shall be
collected for the tax year 2016 for the general use and support of the
Municipal Government of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas a total ad
valorem tax of Sixty-One Cents ($0.61) on each One Hundred Dollars
($100.00) of valuation of property — real and personal — within the
corporate limits of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, subject to taxation.
The assessment ration shall be One Hundred percent (100%).
SECTION 2. The taxes collected shall be apportioned for the use as follows:
Ordinance No. 3428
Page 1 of 3
(a) For maintenance and operations levied on the $100.00 valuation;
$0.348083; and
(b) For interest and sinking levied on the $100.00 valuation;
$0.261917.
All monies collected and hereby apportioned and set apart for the specific
purposes indicated and the funds shall be accounted for in such a manner
as to readily show balances at any time.
SECTION 3. That the tax rate for maintenance and operations of$0.348083 will impose
an amount of taxes that exceeds the amount of taxes imposed for that
purpose in the preceding year, therefore:
THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S
TAX RATE.
SECTION 4. That the maintenance and operations tax rate of $0.348083 exceeds the
effective maintenance and operations rate of$0.322308, therefore:
THIS TAX RATE WILL EFFECTIVELY BE RAISED BY 7.997
PERCENT AND WILL RAISE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE
AND OPERATIONS ON A $100,000 HOME BY
APPROXIMATELY $25.78.
SECTION 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section
of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment
or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have
been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this
ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section.
SECTION 6. this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as
provided by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 26th day of September, 2016.
Ordinance No. 3428
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Cara Leahy White, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Mark C. Mills, Budget & Research Director
Ordinance No. 3428
Page 3 of 3
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 2016-029, approving and ratifying the 2016
Certified Tax Roll
PRESENTER: Mark Mills, Budget Director
SUMMARY:
State law requires the legislative body to ratify the Certified Tax Roll as a separate
action item during the budget and tax rate approval process.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
The Tarrant Appraisal District provided the City with the 2016 Certified Tax Roll. This
includes the most current appraisal information; exemptions for disabled veterans,
persons over 65, homestead and disabled persons; tax ceilings for persons over 65 and
disabled persons; abatement value losses; Freeport inventory value loss; and
agriculture value lost. These values also include new construction, minimum value of
properties still under protest, and the estimated net taxable value of incomplete property
accounts. The certified value is the amount used to calculate the effective tax rate and
property tax revenues for the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Budget.
The certified tax roll reflected estimated net taxable value for North Richland Hills in the
amount of $4,599,695,190. This includes $123,818,592 in taxable new construction,
consisting of $47,037,419 in taxable residential new construction and $76,781,173 in
taxable commercial new construction. The certified taxable values for the City of North
Richland Hills are broken down into the following categories:
k4FItH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Category F value
Residential $2,921,829,357
Commercial 1,387,228,059
Personal Property Commercial 26,729,937
Personal Property Industrial 311,192,462
Industrial 24,490,891
Mineral Lease 2,039,010
Agriculture 93,160
Cases Before ARB* (246,358,954)
Estimated Value of Cases Before ARB 172,451,268
Incomplete Accounts (90,116,979)
Estimated Value of Incomplete Accounts 90,116,979
In Process Accounts (630,074)
Estimated Value of In Process Accounts 630,074
Certified Value Total $4,599,695,190
Also included in the certified values received from the Tarrant Appraisal District is
information on the average market value of a single family residence within North
Richland Hills. Excluding those properties under protest at the time the certified roll was
issued, the average market value of a single family residence in North Richland Hills is
$199,954. This is an increase of $33,699 compared to the 2015 average single family
residence market value of $166,255. The average taxable value on the same
properties is $151,578, compared to $135,262 in the previous year; a change of
$16,316.
The increase in the average home value is due in part to increased appraisals, as well
as the higher value of new homes added to the property tax rolls. The average market
value for new homes built in NRH over the past year is approximately $304,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution 2016-029, approving and ratifying the 2016 Certified Tax Roll.
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-029
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas
Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas received the Ad
Valorem Tax Roll for the Tax Year 2016 from the Tarrant Appraisal District
in the amount of $4,599,695,190, including minimum value or properties
pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board and the estimated
net taxable value on incomplete properties; and
WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Roll and approve same on September
26, 2016.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the approval of said Tax Roll received from the Tarrant Appraisal
District in July 2016, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall be
collectively considered the Tax Roll of this City for Tax Year 2016 and it is
hereby in all things adopted and approved.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of September, 2016.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Oscar Trevino, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alicia Richardson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Cara Leahy White, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Mark C. Mills, Budget & Research Director
Tarrant Appraisal District
Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser
CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS 018
Appraisal Roll Information Valuation Summary as of July 25, 2016
2016 Certified Property Information
I, Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser for the Tarrant Appraisal District, to the best of my ability do solemnly
swear that the attached is that portion of the appraisal roll for the Tarrant Appraisal District which lists
property taxable by the above named entity and constitutes their Certified Appraisal Roll.
APPRAISED VALUE (Considers Value Caps) -- -- - -- -- - -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -> $ 5,628,974,889
Number of Accounts: 60,419
Absolute Exemptions $ 319,025,838
Cases before ARB—Appraised Value $ 260,050,864
Incompletes $ 108,720,602
Partial Exemptions $ 603,961,899
In Process $ 718,817
NET TAXABLE VALUE - -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - > $ 4,336,496,869
Appraised Value minus Absolute Exemption amount, minus Cases before ARB amount, minus
Incompletes, minus Partial Exemptions, minus the In Process accounts equals the Net Taxable Value.
ESTI MATE D N ET TAXAB LE VALLI E - -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - -- -- - -- --> $ 4,599,695,190
Including suggested values to be used for pending ARB accounts (see page two), Incompletes (see page
three) and In Process accounts (see page four).
1 °yr
Jeff Law, ief Appraiser
Tarrant Appraisal District
2500 Handley Ederville Road - Fort Worth, Texas 76118 - 817.284.0024
1
Tarrant Appraisal District
Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser
CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS 018
Appraisal Roll Information Valuation Summary as of July 25, 2016
2016 Appraisal Review Board Information
Section 25.01 (c) of the State Property Tax code directs the Chief Appraiser to prepare a list of all
properties under protest with the Appraisal Review Board and pending disposition at the time of value
roll certification.
The values below are from the ARB roll and are not included in the totals certified by the Chief
Appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report.
$ 260,050,864
Total appraised value of properties under protest.
$ 246,358,954
Net taxable value of properties under protest.
$ 172,451,268
Estimated minimum taxable value for the same properties.
This value should be added to the net taxable value on page one.
Tarrant Appraisal District
2500 Handley Ederville Road - Fort Worth, Texas 76118 - 817.284.0024
2
Tarrant Appraisal District
Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser
CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS 018
Appraisal Roll Information Valuation Summary as of July 25, 2016
2016 Incomplete Property Information
Section 26.01(d) of the State Property Tax Code directs the Chief Appraiser to prepare a list of all
properties that are not on the appraisal roll and not included on the ARB roll.
The values below are from the incomplete property listing and are not included in the totals certified
by the Chief Appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report.
The value of incomplete properties are subject to change and are also subject to appeal before the
Appraisal Review Board.
$ 108,720,602
Total appraised value of incomplete properties
$ 90,116,979
Estimated net taxable value of incomplete properties.
This value should be added to the net taxable value on page one.
Tarrant Appraisal District
2500 Handley Ederville Road - Fort Worth, Texas 76118 - 817.284.0024
3
Tarrant Appraisal District
Jeff Law, Chief Appraiser
CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS 018
Appraisal Roll Information Valuation Summary as of July 25, 2016
2016 In Process Property Information
The values below are from In Process properties and are not included in the totals certified by the
Chief Appraiser and represented on page 1 of this report.
$ 718,817
Total appraised value of In Process properties
$ 630,074
Estimated net taxable value of In Process properties.
This value should be added to the net taxable value on page one.
Tarrant Appraisal District
2500 Handley Ederville Road - Fort Worth, Texas 76118 - 817.284.0024
4
`' Tarrant Appraisal District
CITY OF N RICHLAND HILLS 018
Totals for Roll Instance July Certification -7-22
2016
Value Detail Market Appraised Counts Taxable
Real Estate Residential 3,816,345,313 3,540,397,856 20,618 2,921,829,357
Real Estate Commercial 1,721,550,137 1,721,550,137 1,533 1,387,228,059
Real Estate Industrial 26,729,937 26,729,937 17 26,729,937
Personal Property Commercial 312,681,455 312,681,455 1,572 311,192,462
Personal Property Industrial 24,878,174 24,878,174 13 24,490,891
Mineral Lease Properties 2,644,170 2,644,170 36,628 2,039,010
Agricultural Properties 10,433,598 93,160 38 93,160
Total Value 5,915,262,784 5,628,974,889 60,419 4,673,602,876
Pending Detail Market Appraised Counts Taxable
Cases Before ARB 263,915,272 260,050,864 713 246,358,954
Incomplete Accounts 109,962,011 108,720,602 681 90,116,979
In Process Accounts 718,817 718,817 5 630,074
Certified Value 5,540,666,684 5,259,484,606 59,020 4,336,496,869
7/22/2016 3:09:15 PM Page 66 of 353
Exemption Detail Market Exempt Counts Appraised
Absolute Public 218,797,723 217,097,723 640 218,797,723
Absolute Charitable 24,066,734 24,066,734 27 24,066,734
Absolute Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0
Absolute Religious&Private Schools 78,068,584 77,861,381 68 78,068,584
Indigent Housing 0 0 0 0
Nominal Value 383,506 383,506 19,085 383,506
Disabled Vet 10-29% 16,295,571 400,000 80 14,685,282
Disabled Vet 30-49% 7,595,332 292,500 39 6,903,750
Disabled Vet 50-69% 11,976,228 550,000 55 11,112,093
Disabled Vet 70-99% 62,710,453 3,621,960 304 56,982,325
Disabled Vet 100% 21,773,492 13,477,110 94 19,490,737
Surviving Spouse Disabled Vet 100% 2,564,667 1,112,889 12 2,350,178
Donated Disabled Vet 0 0 0 0
Surviving Spouse Donated Disabled Vet 0 0 0 0
Surviving Spouse KIA Armed Service Member 0 0 0 0
Transfer Base Value for SS Disable Vet 590,786 399,224 2 564,399
Inventory 23,119,360 124,765 2 23,119,360
Homestead State Mandated-General 0 0 0 0
Homestead State Mandated-Over 65 0 0 0 0
Homestead State Mandated-Disabled Person 0 0 0 0
Homestead Local Option-General 3,008,659,237 410,628,187 14,540 2,736,731,643
Homestead Local Option-Over 65 896,045,024 164,764,332 4,660 807,172,091
Homestead Local Option-Disabled Person 41,300,449 8,146,520 232 36,629,613
Solar&Wind Powered Devices 491,299 2 2 486,167
Pollution control 40,307,801 60,904 2 40,307,801
Community Housing Development 0 0 0 0
Abatements 0 0 0 0
Historic Sites 0 0 0 0
Foreign Trade Zone 0 0 0 0
Misc Personal Property(Vehicles, etc.) 0 0 0 0
Total Exemptions 922,987,737 39,844
Deferrals Market Deferred Counts Appraised
Ag Deferrals 9,197,080 9,174,547 35 22,533
Scenic Deferrals 0 0 0 0
Public Access Airports 0 0 0 0
Other Deferrals 0 0 0 0
Total Deferrals 9,197,080 9,174,547 35 22,533
7/22/2016 3:09:15 PM Page 67 of 353
New Exemptions Market Exempt Counts Appraised
Absolute Public 0 0 0 0
Absolute Charitable 0 0 0 0
Absolute Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0
Absolute Religious&Private Schools 0 0 0 0
Indigent Housing 0 0 0 0
Nominal Value 0 0 0 0
Disabled Vet 10-29% 2,328,074 55,000 11 2,184,823
Disabled Vet 30-49% 1,630,916 52,500 7 1,543,421
Disabled Vet 50-69% 2,074,421 90,000 9 1,957,461
Disabled Vet 70-99% 10,713,694 528,000 44 10,095,271
Disabled Vet 100% 4,204,144 2,765,952 17 3,929,359
Surviving Spouse Disabled Vet 100% 1,849,751 864,158 8 1,712,189
Donated Disabled Vet 0 0 0 0
Surviving Spouse Donated Disabled Vet 0 0 0 0
Surviving Spouse KIA Armed Service Member 0 0 0 0
Transfer Base Value for SS Disable Vet 395,657 255,200 1 374,330
Inventory 7,872,649 49,354 1 7,872,649
Homestead State Mandated-General 0 0 0 0
Homestead State Mandated-Over 65 0 0 0 0
Homestead State Mandated-Disabled Person 0 0 0 0
Homestead Local Option-General 78,707,953 11,518,983 340 76,542,011
Homestead Local Option-Over 65 31,147,004 4,636,788 132 29,069,284
Homestead Local Option-Disabled Person 1,189,568 216,000 6 1,136,899
Solar&Wind Powered Devices 491,299 2 2 486,167
Pollution control 0 0 0 0
Community Housing Development 0 0 0 0
Abatements 0 0 0 0
Historic Sites 0 0 0 0
Foreign Trade Zone 0 0 0 0
Misc Personal Property(Vehicles, etc.) 0 0 0 0
Total New Exemptions 21,031,937 578
New Construction Market New Value Counts Taxable
All Real Estate 128,800,755 49,931,637 179 123,818,592
New business in new improvement 0 0 0 0
Total New Construction 128,800,755 49,931,637 179 123,818,592
New Construction in Residential 52,019,582 30,668,698 171 47,037,419
New Construction in Commercial 76,781,173 19,262,939 8 76,781,173
Market Appraised Counts Taxable
Annexation 0 0 0 0
Deannexation 0 0 0 0
7/22/2016 3:09:15 PM Page 68 of 353
Tax Ceiling Market Taxable Counts Ceiling Amount
Over 65 896,045,024 511,053,436 4,660 2,515,389.00
Disable Person 42,019,541 21,593,997 236 111,917.00
Total Ceilings 938,064,565 532,647,433 4,896 2,627,306.00
New Over 65 Ceilings 29,595,217 0 123 0.00
New Disabled Person Ceilings 1,078,020 0 6 0.00
Capped Accounts Market Cap Loss Counts Appraised
Cap Total 2,334,180,658 272,007,531 11,832 2,062,173,127
New Cap this Year 2,167,640,650 250,227,806 11,041 1,917,412,844
All Exemptions by Group Market Exempt Counts Appraised
Residential 3,019,231,521 610,360,448 14,644 2,747,223,990
Commercial 338,597,550 311,862,540 533 338,597,550
Industrial 23,119,360 159,589 2 23,119,360
Mineral Lease 605,160 605,160 19,203 605,160
Agricultural 0 0 0 0
Exemption Total 922,987,737 34,382
Market Exempt Counts Appraised
Prorated Absolute 336,130 128,927 1 336,130
Multi-Prorated Absolute 0 0 0 0
Current Taxable Counts Appraised
Value Loss-25.25(d) 0 0 0
Average Market Average Appraised Counts Average Taxable
Averages for Value Single Family 199,954 185,048 18,021 151,578
7/22/2016 3:09:15 PM Page 69 of 353
uif ui ��fN�uiluflll�u uintu��uif4�o� �f!""Ill�unti��ui � Page 1 of 2
7/25/2016 10:46:58 AM
20:,16 Jiu«<IIIy 722,
alto 111131 CU y ("XI' IP''u III III' ;:�"III 11 A II"14 h9111 111.III S
�00���1�101��1�511�111111������1�11ti11111111111��111� p�,1»���u�hiai
Abatements $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Absolute Charitable $24,066,734 27 $0 0 $200 1 $24,066,934 28
Absolute Miscellaneous $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Absolute Public $217,097,723 640 $0 0 $11,355,687 18 $228,453,410 658
Absolute Religious&Private Schools $77,861,381 68 $5,454,350 2 $7,136,942 6 $90,452,673 76
Community Housing Development $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Disabled Vet 100% $13,477,110 94 $0 0 $0 0 $13,477,110 94
Disabled Vet 10-29% $400,000 80 $0 0 $0 0 $400,000 80
Disabled Vet 30-49% $292,500 39 $0 0 $0 0 $292,500 39
Disabled Vet 50-69% $550,000 55 $0 0 $0 0 $550,000 55
Disabled Vet 70-99% $3,621,960 304 $12,000 1 $0 0 $3,633,960 305
Donated Disabled Vet $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Foreign Trade Zone $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Historic Sites $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Homestead Local Option-Disabled Person $8,146,520 232 $108,000 3 $0 0 $8,254,520 235
Homestead Local Option-General $410,628,187 14,540 $6,665,866 186 $73,442 4 $417,367,495 14,730
Homestead Local Option-Over 65 $164,764,332 4,660 $1,224,000 34 $36,000 1 $166,024,332 4,695
Homestead State Mandated-Disabled Person $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Homestead State Mandated-General $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Homestead State Mandated-Over 65 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Indigent Housing $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Inventory $124,765 2 $227,694 1 $0 0 $352,459 3
Misc Personal Property(Vehicles,etc.) $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Nominal Value $383,506 19,085 $0 0 $1,352 6 $384,858 19,091
Pollution control $60,904 2 $0 0 $0 0 $60,904 2
Solar&Wind Powered Devices $2 2 $0 0 $0 0 $2 2
Surviving Spouse Disabled Vet 100% $1,112,889 12 $0 0 $0 0 $1,112,889 12
Surviving Spouse Donated Disabled Vet $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Surviving Spouse KIA Armed Service Member $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Transfer Base Value for SS Disable Vet $399,224 2 $0 0 $0 0 $399,224 2
Illfn lll'n �f ""Illlllfl�n Ili h4ut�lllfaru� �t!""III It h4t�lll � Page 2 of 2
7/25/2016 10:46:58 AM
2,0:,16 hl«IIIy 7-22
alto 111131 CU il Y ("XI' IP''u III III' ;:��III 11 A II'44 III h9111 111.III S
at
�00���1�10111��11511�111111��1��11�ti1titi11111111111�1111 o,,,�w�AStiti������.1�v»titi5p» �1011��1�111�11111 111�1�1�100111��11�11� 1111111\I 1�l»»�iii��������»�������»»�������»p»il} 1111111\I ,��w��u���u�4� 100�111111�1
Prorated Absolute(included in above Absolute categories) $128,927 1 1 $0 0 $0 0 $128,927 1
Ag Deferrals $9,174,547 35 $0 0 $1,165,891 3 $10,340,438 38
Scenic Deferrals $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0
Entity Totals
Total Appraised* $5,628,974,889
Absolute Exempt $319,025,838
Cases Before ARB $260,050,864
Incompletes $108,720,602
Partial Exemptions $603,961,899
In Process $718,817
Calculated Net Taxable Value $4,336,496,869
Total#of Accounts* 60,419
* Only includes totals from Agricultural Properties, Mineral Lease Properties, Personal Property Commercial, Personal Property
Industrial, Real Estate Commercial,Real Estate Industrial,and Real Estate Residential.
r4RH
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: September 26, 2016
SUBJECT: Announcements
PRESENTER:
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
At each Council meeting a member of the governing body announces upcoming events
in the City and recognizes an employee that exemplifies the City's core values.
Announcements:
Join us for the annual NRH Road Runner 5K on Saturday, October 1St starting at Green
Valley Park. This year's race will benefit the Community Enrichment Center and HELP
Inc. Special guest at the Road Runner 5K will be former Olympian Jeff Galloway. Visit
the website to get more information and register online.
The City of North Richland Hills will observe National Night Out on Tuesday, October
4th. Residents are encouraged to turn on their porch lights and gather with their
neighbors to show unity against criminal activity. Contact the Police Department for
more information.
Our next 'Round the Town with Oscar will be held Thursday, October 6t" and will be a
Back the Blue ride. Wear blue and join us at 5:45 p.m. at Cross Timbers Park to help
honor all law enforcement officers. Please visit our website or call the Parks Department
for more details.
Kudos Korner:
Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Tonight
we recognize:
Ken Cloud, Rayburn Murphy and Todd Mays in the Fire Department - A citizen
posted her gratitude online for these employees after they pushed her disabled vehicle
out of a busy intersection, were able to get it started again and then followed her to her
destination to make sure she arrived safely. "I understand that they could not accept
any gratuity, but I promise them I WILL pay it forward. If anyone knows any of them,
please pass on my sincerest gratitude," she said.