Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 3494 ORDINANCE NO. 3494 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 110, ARTICLE XIX, IMPACT FEES, APPENDIX A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES; AMENDING LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS; AMENDING WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code, provides a procedure enabling municipalities to enact and update impact fees; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1997, the City Council first imposed impact fees by passing Ordinance 2241 which fees have been previously reviewed as provided by law and last updated after a public hearing on March 8, 2010; and, WHEREAS, on December 11, 2017, the City Council conducted a public hearing, after compliance with all legal prerequisites, to consider amendments to the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan upon which the City's impact fees are based, as well as to consider amendments to such impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the impact fees heretofore imposed by adopting the water and wastewater fees established herein for the Service Area shown on Exhibit "A" hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the updated land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for water and wastewater improvements as set forth in the "Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study," attached hereto as Exhibit "B" which was considered at the December 11, 2017 public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the updated capital improvements plans and impact fee calculations for water and wastewater improvements to the City's water and wastewater system, which was considered at the December 11, 2017 public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvements Plans were developed by qualified professionals using generally accepted engineering and planning practices in accordance with Section 395.014 of the Texas Local Government Code; and Ordinance No. 3494 Page 1 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1: The City Council finds that all legal requisites have been met, and that the recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance for all purposes as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study as set forth in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance for all purposes. SECTION 3: The City Council hereby adopts the Capital Improvement Plans for Water and Wastewater Impact Fees for the City of Fort Worth Systems, which include service to North Richland Hills as a wholesale customer, as set forth in Exhibit "C," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance for all purposes. SECTION 4: The fees established by Appendix A of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances for Chapter 110, Article XIX, Impact Fees, are hereby amended by deleting Table 1 and replacing it in its entirety with new Table 1 as set forth in Exhibit "D," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance for all purposes. SECTION 5: All other provisions of Chapter 110 and all other fees set forth in Appendix A not amended herein in this Ordinance remain unchanged and in full force and effect. SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such Code, in which event conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such Code are hereby repealed. SECTION 7: It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and, if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of Ordinance No. 3494 Page 2 of 4 the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 8: All rights and remedies of the City of North Richland Hills are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances in the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9: This ordinance shall become effective immediately after and upon its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. PASSED on this 8th day of January, 2018. CITY OFNORT CHLAND HILLS By: s / N Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: "‘ ,11, l;.JJ,J, im• tL4 Alicia Richardson, C ecret /r�fl'JJ1/,r'/e !!tili1i14ii Ordinance No. 3494 Page 3 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: J `Male is B. McGinnis, Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 'TI/L-16 C±- Mike Curtis, Managing Director Ordinance No. 3494 Page 4 of 4 f Exhibit A-Ordinance No,3494 EXHIBIT A l NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ..�'• CITY OF / 7- <. WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY -, LEGEND ) T vmleraatl Waa stowater �, Service Area R<pMVay j 117,CM Limit } ---'-Railroad O City Limit N } Seam Lake/Pontl tl{ N R H r-7 �CHOLs Coll y lle ' Fort Worth t r .. t Watauga ( , _, • w «w , 26 II . . :-' ' Sri® -- —;� Hurst Haltom city ..; ' i ; r i�_ 1 E ® i r / Richland Hills ...,,.... ... «. ..,. tr i Exhibit B - Ordinance No. 3494 FREESE Innovative approaches Practical results Z ' , Outstanding service Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Study Prepared for: City of North Richland Hills 1\I H Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. 4055 International Plaza,Suite 200 Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817-735-7300 Project number: NRH15536 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study H F1!NICHOLS City of North Richland Hills R Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Study Prepared for: City of North Richland Hills %s ssssomeaeaoeeeeaaaeeee JESSICA L. BROWN / / STEVEN RHODES a eaeeaeaaaaoaea•assasaQ ROO ' .0 �'� //10;a 90098 aw.. /p; 118701 ;�r �� rs-ss ��=� /f� •„( • i� FR, , :E AND NICHOLS, INC. FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM ENGINEERING FIRM F-214-4 F-2144 of 2N I 5/24/2O' 7 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. 4055 International Plaza,Suite 200 Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817-735-7300 Project number: NRH15536 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study l H r-�NICHOLS City of North Richland Hills l� TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 1.0 BACKGROUND 1-1 2.0 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS 2-1 2.1 Residential and Commercial Land Use 2-1 3.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 3-1 3.1 Water and Wastewater Load Projections 3-1 3.2 Water and Wastewater System Improvements 3-2 4.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS 4-1 4.1 Service Units 4-1 4.2 Maximum Impact Fee Calculation 4-3 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Historical Population 2-1 Table 3-1 Projected Water Demands 3-1 Table 3-2 Projected Wastewater Flows 3-1 Table 3-3 Cost Allocation for Water Impact Fee Eligible Calculation 3-3 Table 3-4 Cost Allocation for Wastewater Impact Fee Eligible Calculation 3-4 Table 4-1 Service Unit Equivalency Table 4-2 Table 4-2 Projected Water Service Units for 2016-2026 4-3 Table 4-3 Projected Wastewater Service Units for 2016-2026 4-3 Table 4-4 Maximum Allowable Impact Fees with Fort Worth Impact Fees 4-6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Population and Commercial Acreage by TSZ 2-3 Figure 3-1 Water System Impact Fee Eligible Capital Improvements Plan 3-5 Figure 3-2 Wastewater System Impact Fee Eligible Capital Improvements Plan 3-6 Figure 4-1 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee per SUE Comparison (Not Including Fort Worth Impact Fee Pass Through) 4-7 Figure 4-2 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee per SUE Comparison (Including Fort Worth Impact Fee Pass Through) 4-8 E Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study NRH IF.REES S City of North Richland Hills EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 BACKGROUND Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires an impact fee analysis before impact fees can be created and assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development." In September 2001, Senate Bill 243 amended Chapter 395 thus creating the current procedure for implementing impact fees. 2.0 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS To assist the City of North Richland Hills in determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. Growth and development projections were formulated based on assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses within the community. The 2016 population and commercial acreage are estimated to be 67,176 and 1,862 respectively. The projected 2026 population and commercial acreage are approximately 76,412 and 2,135, respectively. 3.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN An impact fee capital improvements plan (CIP)was developed for the City to provide high quality water and wastewater service that promotes residential and commercial development. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and reliability to meet projected water demands and wastewater flows through year 2026. The total impact fee eligible cost for the water system improvements is $13,474,237. The total impact fee eligible cost for the wastewater system improvements including financing costs is$7,578,307. ES-1 E Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study f4irt, j R lull r'REFS S City of North Richland Hills 4.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS The impact fee analysis involves determining the utilization of existing and proposed projects required as defined by the capital improvement plan to serve new development over the next 10-years. The total projected costs include the projected 10-year capital costs and the consultant cost for preparing and updating the Impact Fee Study.The calculated fees are as follows: • Maximum allowable water impact fee with 50% credit= $1,858 • Maximum allowable wastewater impact fee with 50%credit= $1,215 • Total combined allowable impact fee with 50%credit =$3,073 Comparison graphs showing impact fees for other benchmark cities are presented on Figures 4- 1 and 4-2. ES-2 E Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study NRH rig REFS S City of North Richland Hills 1.0 BACKGROUND Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires an impact fee analysis before impact fees can be created and assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development." In September 2001,Senate Bill 243 amended Chapter 395 thus creating the current procedure for implementing impact fees. Chapter 395 identifies the following items as impact fee eligible costs: • Construction contract price • Surveying and engineering fees • Land acquisition costs • Fees paid to the consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan (CIP) • Projected interest charges and other financing costs for projects identified in the CIP Chapter 395 also identifies items that impact fees cannot be used to pay for, such as: • Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than those identified on the capital improvements plan • Repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements • Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards • Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development • Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision • Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness, except as allowed above The City of North Richland Hills authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an impact fee analysis on the City's water and wastewater systems.The purpose of this report is to address the methodology used in the development and calculation of water and wastewater impact fees 1-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study R H rIlNICHOLS r City of North Richland Hills for the City. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 for the establishment of water and wastewater impact fees. 1-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study rmrNICIOEs City of North Richland Hills 2.0 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS To assist the City in determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. Growth and development projections were formulated based on assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses within the community. These land use assumptions, which include population projections, were the basis for the preparation of impact fee capital improvement plans for the water and wastewater systems. 2.1 Residential and Commercial Land Use The historical population references the 2010 Census information as well as data collected from the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The data indicated an increasing growth rate with an average of 0.96% over the last five years. Table 2-1 presents the historical populations for the City. Table 2-1 Historical Population 2010 63,343 -- 2011 63,490 0.23% 2012 63,780 0.46% 2013 64,240 0.72% 2014 65,690 2.26% 2015 66,433 1.13% Average 0.96% FNI worked with City staff and utilized the NCTCOG projections by Traffic Survey Zones (TSZs) to develop and distribute the projected populations and commercial growth. The population growth through 2026 was determined by evaluating historical trends and working with City planning staff to identify areas of potential growth for the 2026 planning period. The 2016 base year population and commercial acreage are approximately 67,176 and 1,862, respectively.The 2026 projected population and commercial acreage are approximately 76,412 and 2,135, respectively. TSZs and input from the City's planning staff were used to provide an accurate 2-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study NRH F11 flit Ears City of North Richland Hills depiction of how the population and commercial acreage is distributed throughout the City. Figure 2-1 presents the 2016 and 2026 served populations and commercial acreage by TSZ. 2-2 FIGURE 2-1 ;::::=7:1;:,:z;::::? , Ka.a. , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .,- POPULATION BY TSZ LEGEND =Traffic Survey Zone -Stream —.. En r entea fakelPona r ne,�iv, 5144 ,. ��.,Development - a,w1 ,/-------wens�av Parcel aP'1 cay Lima , Railroad avercM uma N RH -7EHOE Keller o' =x,3, wee, x,51 1 795 pal ey�, e Fort Wonh y • 5144 1 an„51 083 1101 2 206 161 2272 M 2 e , 24271,1 9 t.,Ital 1 2m21,q .. ._. UZI 2.460(201 5314 . €r7 533 '. Watauga , 43.1 = 207 0111 f° ';e, m � _ ffi34 2xa1 � PP .e � rat 426 1170 rf 1 _..;� gym... , ° ,._ 047 11801 , ■ Ill W, , aza ee, 1ael ,23,55, �,,x5, I7,0,,,5:1 \;\ 9661841 e„e1 aoe 1%11 e, 211':\ ,w nili , 5, $ - I. xb,ss' ' x.5„I,zl =re's') ,-{, Haltom Guy times , .., En ec1 ' # ... 1 r TT 7,676 ien i',TN, ... ..., ., q. Rlchiand Hills �:. _ am -j _ ' y k e E a.. . e Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study r'NIE S City of North Richland Hills 3.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN An impact fee capital improvements plan (CIP)was developed for the City to provide high quality water and wastewater service that promotes residential and commercial development. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and reliability to meet projected water demands and wastewater flows through year 2026. 3.1 Water and Wastewater Load Projections The population data was used to develop future water demands and wastewater flows based on a projected average day per capita use and peaking factors. Table 3-1 presents the projected water demands, and Table 3-2 presents the projected wastewater flows for the City. Table 3-1 Projected Water Demands 2016 67,176 11.14 22.48 39.34 2026 76,412 12.69 25.61 44.82 Table 3-2 Projected Wastewater Flows Average Annual Peak Wet Served Daily Flow Weather Flow Year Population (MGD) (MGD) 2016 67,176 5.59 19.57 2026 76,412 6.36 25.44 3-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study R H r�NICHO E City of North Richland Hills 3.2 Water and Wastewater System Improvements Proposed water distribution and wastewater collection system projects were developed utilizing the City's updated water and wastewater models and the capital improvements plan presented in the 2009 Water& Wastewater Master Plan. A summary of the costs for each of the projects required for the 10-year period used in the impact fee analysis for both the water and wastewater systems are shown in Tables 3-3 and 3-4, respectively.The 2016 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing development. It is not included in the impact fee eligible analysis and cost calculation. The 2026 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve the projected growth in the City's service area in 2026. The 2016-2026 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity required to serve development from 2016 to 2026. The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2016 through 2026 is calculated as the total actual cost multiplied by the 2016-2026 percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis.The proposed 10-year water system impact fee eligible projects are shown on Figure 3-1. Proposed wastewater system impact fee eligible projects are shown on Figure 3-2. 3-2 r NEI F CH1 5 t'1 R H Table 3-3 Cost Allocation for Water Impact Fee Calculation Percent Utilization Costs Based on 2016 Dollars Proj. 10-Year 2016. Current 10-Year No. Description of Project 2016. 2026 2026 Capital Cost Development 2016-2026 Beyond 2026 . 8-inch WL south along Davis Blvd.east and south to Northfield Drive 45% 90% 45% $123,360 $55,512 $55,512 $12,336 Ell 12-inch WL from Bridge St.to Emerald Hills Way 10% 70% 60% $295,664 $29,566 $177,398 $88,699 16-inch WL from Mid-Cities Blvd.South along Tecnol Blvd.East along 20% 90% 70% $846,642 $169,328 $592,649 $84,664 industrial Park Blvd South alon:Holida Ln.to Janetta Dr. 12-inch/16-inch WL along Holiday Ln.from Mid-Cities Blvd to existing 12- D inch WL north of Bogart Dr.12-inch WL along College Circle from Holiday 70% 95% 25% $347,587 $243,311 $86,897 $17,379 Ln.to Ross Rd. W/WW Impact Fee Study(Water Portion) 0% 100% 100% $55,000 $0 $55,000 $0 Three Pressure Reducing Valves on water lines along Holiday Ln.,Meadow 0% 90% 90% $786,300 $0 $707,670 $78,630 Lakes Dr.and Bra•evine H -in the south. ©12-Inch WL along Emerald Hills Way to replace existing 10-inch WL from 50% 90% 40% $838,700 $419,350 $335,480 $83,870 Harwood to Newman Dr. II12-inch WL to replace existing 6-inch and 8-inch WL from Davis Blvd.,east on Clark St.,north on Colorado Blvd.,east on Harwood Rd.to Grapevine 35% 90% 55% $1,606,100 $562,135 $883,355 $160,610 Hw. 12-Inch WL to replace existing 6-inch WL along Janetta Dr.from Holiday Ln. 35% 90% 55% $1,362,900 $477,015 $749,595 $136,290 to Roberta Dr. ©12-inch WL to replace existing 6-inch and 8-inch WL along Loop 820, Holiday Ln.,and Riviera Rd.from the proposed PRV near Thaxton Pkwy.to 30% 80% 50% $1,922,000 $576,600 $961,000 $384,400 Ken Michael Ct. 20-Inch WL to replace existing 12-inch WL along Mid Cities Blvd.from Rufe 40% 60% 20% $3,709,500 $1,483,800 $741,900 $1,483,800 Snow Dr.to Smithfield Rd. ©16-inch WL to replace existing 6-inch and 8-inch WL along Smithfield Rd. 2S% 75% 50% $3,116,100 $779,025 $1,558,050 $779,025 north of Mid Cities Blvd. 24-Inch WL to replace existing 12-inch WL along Watauga Rd.from Rufe 20% 70% 50% $5,968,800 $1,193,760 $2,984,400 $1,790,640 Snow Dr.to existin:16-inch WL east of Watau:a P.S.and GST 0 Expand Pumping Capacity and Ground Storage at Watauga P.S. 65% 90% 25% $7,628,600 $4,958,590 $1,907,150 $762,860 10 Offsite Water Supply Improvements from Fort Worth 55% 85% 30% $4,073,500 $2,240,425 $1,222,050 $611,025 1110-inch/12-inch WL near the Mid-Cities Blvd.and Amundson Dr. intersection and 12-inch line from Mid-Cities Blvd.and Cardinal Ln. 60% 90% 30% $968,400 $581,040 $290,520 $96,840 intersection to Bride St. 12-inch WL along Eagle Crest Dr.from Rufe Snow Dr.to existing 10-inch WL 50% 70% 20% $678,800 $339,400 $135,760 $203,640 Northwest of Industrial Park Blvd. ®8-inch WL along Country Place Dr.south of Northfield Dr. 70% 100% 30% $99,500 $69,650 $29,850 $0 Total Water Capital Improvements Cost $34,427,453 $14,178,508 $13,474,237 $6,774,709 *Utilization in 2016 on proposed projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system and therefore not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth. Mon HOE N1RH Table 3-4 Cost Allocation for Water Impact Fee Calculation Percent Utilization Costs Based on 2016 Doubts 10 n 20 �1 id Year MIIIIIIIPNIMIIIIIII 2016" 2026 2026 n,, a 2016-2026 ;.. ond2026 Aegon Lift Station Expansion from 0.9 MGD to 1.6 MGD Capacity,New 15-inch WW Lines to replace 8-inch/10-inch/12-inch Upstream and Downstream of Lift 60% 80% 20% $966,060 $579,636 $193,212 $193,212 Station. 0 W/WW Impact Fee Study(Wastewater Portion) 0% 100% 100% $55,000 $0 $55,000 $0 I15-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 6-inch,8-inch,and 10-inch WW Lines along Cardinal Ln.and Mid Cities Blvd.Also a 27-inch Incerceptor going 35% 90% 55% $4,831,200 $1,690,920 $2,657,160 $483,120 North from Grapevine Hwy.along Emerald Hills Way to Walker's Creek Park. © 8-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 6-inch WW Line south of Highway 15% 30% 15% $981,200 $147,180 $147,180 $686,840 820. ©27-inch and 24-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 21-inch WW Line along 55% 90% 35% $3,406,900 $1,873,795 $1,192,415 $340,690 Hi:hwa 820. III12-inch and 10-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 8-inch and 10-inch WW 60% 90% 30% $1,235,200 $741,120 $370,560 $123,520 Lines alon•Ma•lewood Ave.and Susan Lee Ln. ©30-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 21-inch and 24-inch WW Lines along 35% 75% 4056 $1,569,800 $549,430 $627,920 $392,450 Indust Park Blvd.North of Honda Ln. I21-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 18-inch line along Little Ranch Rd. South of Mid-Cities Blvd.;18-inch and 15-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 12 and 15-inch lines along Little Ranch Rd.from Hightower Dr.to Mid- 40% 80% 40% $2,216,300 $886,520 $886,520 $443,260 Cities Blvd.;New 15-inch line along Hightower Dr.to replace existing 12-inch Lines. ll15-inch and 12-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 8-inch and 10-inch WW Lines along Whitfield Ct.,northeast along Whitfield Dr.,east along Maple Dr., 60% 90% 30% $3,684,000 $2,210,400 $1,105,200 $368,400 north to Mid-Cities Blvd. III24-inch Interceptor replacement of existing 12-inch WW line along Richland 40% 70% 30% $1,143,800 $457,520 $343,140 $343,140 Plaza Dr.from On Dr south to Broadwa Ave. Total Wastewater Capital Improvements Cost $20,089,460 $9,136,521 $7,578,307 $3,374,632 *Utilization in 2016 on Proposed Projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system and therefore not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth. FIGURE 3-1 < ,x---,-..---„„- o _ a CITY OF ❑ I 1--- �r� ... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS € I ; i ? WATER SYSTEM y ,3' 1 ` - :..... �,� ' IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE °W - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ;= g a l e e LEGEND ' P 3 I h e.. �!' Proposed IF Eligible -- —Highway , ��� ® Pe sur Retluc np Velva PFOposedlF Eligible Road 4 � `I�® fhAnt , , , WterLne —Railroad ' 1 j I ,z des Existing IF Eligible �'1__ Wter Line Pressure Plena °Qa• Boundary 1 r161111111301111411■ Niter Meter ••• / I' ':', 0 DMder Valve !Z eke/Pontl : ,r 1 l p Pump station `" :{ q I on e Ground StorageT k ,. A€ P ro Ptene _Q Elevated Storey T k L [w .. o, J CitYLimB i 7 t- ` s ��`®i . ~� 8'and Smaller Water Una oln rCilYLmrt :..o-. `I . I.,.- S�. / � 10:and Lamer Water Line esT z me .r Rd FREESE 1 rt � N R H v7 NICHOLS ,.. - '° U OWater Impact Fee Study , ' 1 flail , , , ., is ii, WM o -:t :,,,. 4, .„.. . ,, ,ria pli., ,,n, ,4 ,u,1,, - ,.- ,„NM ji ;E p '' nom Ti !E 1 ® . S 7 f 11 1 ���� , II . 111 _ 1 3 aeeeor Ea. I - ° I an �k «.,, i - ;€ F .1 . ' ' ',r.�e elm. I.WM mes. .r......tvx.prvi..„,.. , t I c•-'! gonnalme t • r r .:4121“iiiii:>01,, ,, rop NI El ill, -- ���iii e s y I a©o6 { �a �. J fir, `1 26111Ar .i per ..a q�1w. ®r� Q. 7 ike . e, --� � �� I \ I ��,� . r. in plikalisii■ . .,-„,.. - __-_,, r/J.-• . iphonsw _ ,. ,. ...mum r :„L'7," - • - :, i, r I - a CJ® .:�< S ml, ,,,a ....._...„.,, ... , z_ t M.MOm Mq WIMP= ' , \ €s IV— 141. 1,011 11W di '11114 ' .\ .r ' r rr rrr H r'' " j Mr'. r /r , ' nl- 4■� ` < �� ✓ JI d y i , ....» ,5 ei„, .. _ wi% Ri t max._ ♦� 1 I pE , ti � E 1 SCALE IN FEET• �:.... r ."'... 1 7 r . FIGURE 3-2 MAJOR snstrrs ' o ),; i i CITY OF 61p Roar Little a..r NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Big Foss.Creek Mackey Creek S f WASTEWATER SYSTEM Callow, IMEkef IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE ✓ „.°.., CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (• 1 " L> LEGEND Proposed IF Eligible Road j• __. _—_ _._____ I -�Sewer Line - x 1 f . - -- Existing IF Eligible �`—Railroad 1 S f�,.� ._ / 1 t 1 d LIT Station ,..Stream 's 1 Lf LJI Exat,nfl IF Eligible ✓r c` r 2 end. o •SevrerL na , Lake/Pond Y � �Kaue, • Meter Station Parcel A eta t. S• t ' .. e. C011eyViile LTrei Srrine Ciry Lima[ r. - , v r -I 1o'a.Laera Other City Limit Y ` °, o Wastewater Line - I a' N R H ii�FREESE 9 c ° i NICMOLS � ' I '®Wastewater Impact FOR Study a P LLL i i4 § rRq ,r a - �Fort Worth C' - ., . g `( L • ® 0. 001 - !R lri,...... Watauga it,/;,- --,1 I: V� 1. , is o ; , , ' 3 I ' �o to , h l r II ▪r j . .14-,q - I t- �e- 'b• 14 - t t =� . _ y i ..„...,. ,. t Hurst • Haltom City ,1 aj s a, y� 1 a . ,—`I F - T.• Jf N a 9x l.J Richland Hills - 11 1 t ! `' - ° u-y 41 P 1 �.° ,I ,....0 !, . E i '' .<auLE w Fear \ ' M•..,, r F Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study rill FREESE City of North Richland Hills iNICHOLS 4.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS The impact fee analysis involves determining the total projected costs to serve new development and the projected number of service units attributed to new development over the next 10-years. The total projected costs include the projected 10-year capital costs and the consultant cost for preparing and updating the Impact Fee Study. 4.1 Service Units The maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements required by the total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility period. A water service unit is defined as service equivalent to a water connection for a single-family residence.The City does not directly meter wastewater flows and bills for wastewater services are based on the customer's water consumption. Therefore, a wastewater service unit is defined as the wastewater service provided to a customer with a water connection for a single-family residence. However, the wastewater service units are reduced by a factor of 86% in order to account for irrigation water meters included in the water meter inventory. The service associated with public, commercial and industrial connections is converted to service units based upon the capacity of the meter used to provide service.The number of service units required to represent each meter size is based on the maximum rated capacity of the meters as shown from AWWA Standards C700, C701, C702 and C703. The service unit equivalent for each meter size used by the City is listed in Table 4-1. 4-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study E NRH r.REFS S City of North Richland Hills Table 4-1 Service Unit Equivalency Table 3/4" 267 1.00 0.86 1" 446 1.67 1.44 11/2" 889 3.33 2.86 2" 1,423 5.33 4.58 3" 2,670 10.00 8.60 4" 2,849 10.67 9.18 6" 8,899 33.33 28.66 8" 16,020 60.00 51.60 Table 4-2 and Table 4-3 show the water and wastewater service units, respectively,for 2016 and the projected service units for 2026. Typically, in North Richland Hills, single-family residences are served with 3/4-inch water meters. Larger meters represent public, commercial, and industrial water use.The City provided current meter data that included the meter size and type of each active water meter. The growth in water meters was projected using population and commercial acreage growth projections and land use assumptions. The growth in service units was determined by subtracting the existing service units from the projected 2026 service units and results in a growth of 3,627 water service units and 3,120 wastewater service units over the 10-year period. 4-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study EESE City of North Richland Hills riforril CN OLS Table 4-2 Projected Water Service Units for 2016-2026 3A" 19,087 19,087 21,712 21,712 2,625 1" 1,301 2,173 1,480 2,472 299 1-1/2" 75 250 85 283 33 2" 771 4,109 877 4,674 565 3" 36 360 41 410 50 4" 17 181 19 203 22 6" 4 133 5 167 34 8" 2 120 2 120 0 Total 21,293 26,413 24,221 30,040 3,627 Table 4-3 Projected Wastewater Service Units for 2016-2026 3/4" 19,087 16,415 21,712 18,672 2,258 1" 1,301 1,869 1,480 2,126 257 1-1/2" 75 215 85 243 28 2" 771 3,534 877 4,020 486 3" 36 310 41 353 43 4" 17 156 19 174 19 6" 4 114 5 143 29 8" 2 103 2 103 0 Total 21,293 22,715 24,221 25,835 3,120 4.2 Maximum Impact Fee Calculation Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code states that the maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements required by the total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility period less a credit to account for water and wastewater revenues used to finance capital improvement plans. 4-3 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study FilNICHOLS FREESE City of North Richland Hills The total projected costs include the projected capital improvement costs to serve 10-year development and the consultant cost for preparing and updating the capital improvements plan. 4-4 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study NRH r'N E LS City of North Richland Hills Maximum Water Impact Fee: Capital Improvement Costs $ 13,474,237 Total Eligible Costs $ 13,474,237 Total Water Impact Fee Credit (50%) $ 6,737,119 The total eligible cost associated with the existing and proposed water system improvements to meet projected growth over the next ten years is $13,474,237. The increase in the number of service units due to growth over the next ten years is projected as 3,627 service units. Maximum Water Impact Total Eligible Costs—Credit Fee with 50% Credit = 10-year growth in Service Units $ 13,474,237- $6,737,119 3,627 SUE = $ 1,858/SUE Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee: Capital Improvement Costs $ 7,578,307 Total Eligible Costs $ 7,578,307 Total Wastewater Impact Fee Credit (50%) $ 3,789,154 The total eligible cost associated with the existing and proposed water system improvements to meet projected growth over the next ten years is $7,578,307. The increase in the number of service units due to growth over the next ten years is projected as 3,120 service units. Maximum Wastewater Total Eligible Costs—Credit Impact Fee with 50% = 10-year growth in Service Units Credit $ 7,578,307-$ 3,789,154 3,120 SUE = $ 1,215/SUE The total maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fee is $3,073. 4-5 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study rarnilEREs City of North Richland Hills In addition to the maximum allowable impact fees calculated above, as a wholesale customer, the City of North Richland Hills must also include Fort Worth's impact fees. The inclusion of Fort Worth's current water and wastewater impact fees, of $1,457 and $865, is required as part of the water and wastewater wholesale agreement between the City and Fort Worth. Approximately 60%of the City's water is supplied by Fort Worth, and are therefore responsible for 60% of Fort Worth's water impact fee, or $874. The City's maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees with Fort Worth's impact fees is summarized in Table 4-4. Comparison graphs showing impact fees in other benchmark cities throughout the Metroplex are included as Figures 4-1 and 4-2. Table 4-4 Maximum Allowable Impact Fees with Fort Worth Impact Fees 50% of Allowable Impact Fee $1,858 $1,215 $3,073 Fort Worth Impact Fee* $874** $865 $1,739 Total Impact Fee $2,732 $2,080 $4,812 *Effective April 1st, 2017. Fees are for a'/." meter. **60%of Fort Worth's water impact fee for a'/4" meter. 4-6 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study R H r'jrairs S City of North Richland Hills o°i aa.) powag LL L.L. ++ ++ U U CO CU Q Q LO N uoulwJ% ri ri) ç .iu.i▪ aa) = i m▪ ul co ;sing -o in tj in G �� 1111111111 L n u LI m i' 4 JOMUoA r in IN p C LL m � H• V Z . tO : tuaJm))HUN . to E E tn. mliii Q. E .2' L L ✓ a a JaiiaN © ® 111M11111111111 M .O M d &I I, ssain3 O. a 0 S, cu 1 Lll i-1 11.11.1111.. LL cn m t auInader9 . ' ........ a Auolop Uqj• ° ■■ 11■■11■. o LL i of E uosapng qp r 1111....'. .. C c L 2 n (algeMoliv . ° xeW%OS)HUN t4' 111111.11111111.1.11 iiiuuiiiiuiii, !M A woH to 44' II 01 1 e n oas!J j x .11...11.11..... anelyonos 8 g .11.11111111111111..1111.. plal}sueIN a "'• wommilmillommummommliammam a 0 0 8 L°n 0 0 0 0 0 0 4..n.8 in 8 0 8 8 0 LA R re M N N , . "? 4/1. 4./1. "A "L t/f 4.1 V1 414 4-7 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Study H r 11 NICHOLS S City of North Richland Hills u_ PJO�Pag V V V co ca en a a Q. co E J 11111 O 3 3 tn as v y *4a.JOM poi d V vii = H � � _ � 111111 111 o g ssaln3 ti*r_. ..c i= ca c o :E .� 1/111111 0 0 i °LL o Z aulnadea9 a s Q � CL ` 11111111 W = E u°. E E l�uo a n O L L L nj un C .. 1111 in.. 0 ,,, G., m 31 El NI ao W. NSis, ..p.mil CD ci. co LL 111111111 — € *JapaN a eq pa, M RI S 11111111 tr M k 07SU j tel 4.41. o m 11111111111 TI LL (}uaJJn))MIN o`o °, ra too CD 441 = 1111111111111 v o 3 c 'i: Plal;sueW N .�NI Ai 470 4 .." 1111111111111111H v cu = :4 ., I\ I *uosalJng v �' Oa o .a LL I 11 111111111111 -4'''' i i �, (a emo u . ��"s\,L1�►ti� .: • xe IN%OS)I a N ° 2 �111111111111� fi +n i'�\ �`4 AID wo31eH to °' to 1111 111111111111 ae no a as at ®mod■•■l♦■•■ M■ II■■■■■■ to °8 8 8 8 °s 8 § o of 4-8 "Exhibit C" Ordinance No. 3494 Fort Worth Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans Fr err {fir$ 4 fxmTE N� FREESE Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan Water Facilities 2017-2037 Prepared for: City of Fort Worth Water Department FoRT RI H® Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. 4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817-735-7300 FTW16125 October 07, 2016 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update rBM ,__1 FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D-Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities NICHOLS Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Prepared for: City of Fort Worth Water Department -":kc OF Oh ;.', t' ,i 3 .eOF Otto ,k�1#��b4w YfyY +� �7.:\t,,- y S. .*.ii7.. �I.1 L� � . � `�1 s . t E'� .- / i • . ,f eisrr.r�r c..e..s.a r.ci.�r.w * %*! f..: f ✓ .:ES «A L BLOWN r f- MA EN K. KAwASM: i 0 ANDREW S.FRLNKO 0 if • - . a.......*OTT w.4 /. L .`". /tiL• . l?I 1 ' l0f 1-llka 4c01 -7 1 t 1=E:`E F .t �.t?l: .it: !�' s INN. - -r- - - - .AC..IL' NIL. .::IL F:7, {,�_ FREESE AND NICHOL INC. -- :� .� ='kUYS-F .-I, _-_x+,.S PEGS,-=F:=1: TEXAS REGISTERED F`1.., i, i-;'h a I • ;,i ,I' • r ta', ;'e+r I ENGINEERING FIRM 21z.ii r-214,1 F-2144 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. 4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817-735-7300 FTW16125 i Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r�NREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 EXISTING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 2-1 2.1 Raw Water Sources and Transmission 2-1 2.2 Water Treatment Plants, Pump Stations and Storage 2-2 3.0 PROJECTED WATER DEMANDS 3-1 3.1 Projected Water Demands 3-1 4.0 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4-1 5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS 5-1 5.1 Service Units 5-1 5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation 5-3 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Water Supply Allocated to Fort Worth 2-1 Table 2-2 Raw Water Supply Facilities 2-2 Table 2-3 Water Treatment Plant Facilities 2-2 Table 3-1 Projected Water Demands 3-2 Table 4-1 Proposed Water CIP Projects 4-2 Table 5-1 2017-2027 Impact Fee Eligible 5-1 Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors 5-2 Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2017 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter 5-2 Table 5-4 Water Impact Fees by Meter Size 5-4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure D-1 Existing Facilities 5-5 Figure D-2 Proposed Improvements 5-6 APPENDICES Appendix A- Existing Water Pumping Capacities Appendix B - Existing Distribution System Storage Appendix C-Water CIP Projects Appendix D -Water Meter Summary Appendix E - Credit Calculation Analysis ii Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NREESES FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc., to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. This report establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2012. Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with expanding the municipal water system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, pumping stations, storage facilities, and pipelines that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the water system is known as the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this study with capital projects and costs provided by previously commissioned master planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water Department staff. The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth water facilities are eligible to be included in the impact fee analysis.The additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the study period are summarized. 1-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update LIM FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities IllrigmiNICHOLS 2.0 EXISTING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 2.1 Raw Water Sources and Transmission The City obtains the majority of its raw water supply from the Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD), with the balance supplied by the City's permitted capacity at Lake Worth, the Corps of Engineers (COE) permitted capacity at Lake Benbrook, and several small reuse projects. The City's supply from TRWD is per a long term contract, with no contractual limits on the water withdrawn from the Richland- Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs,subject to the TRWD permit limits.The current water supplies for the City are as follows in Table 2-1: Table 2-1 Water Supply Allocated to Fort Worth Permitted or Contracted Water Right Amount Source Holder (MGD) West Fork TRWD 142.37 Lake Worth (Fort Worth Permit) Fort Worth 11.85* Lake Benbrook(COE Contract) Fort Worth 0.65 Richland-Chambers Reservoir TRWD 182.87 Cedar Creek Reservoir TRWD 153.88 *Fort Worth has allowed this water right to be used as part of TRWD's West Fork System Through a series of pump stations, the TRWD has implemented improvements to allow water from the Richland-Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs to flow to Lake Benbrook. The blended water can then be pumped to Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant (RHWTP), North Holly Water Treatment Plant (NHWTP)/South Holly Water Treatment Plant (SHWTP), or Westside Water Treatment Plant (WSWTP). TRWD implemented improvements to tie Lake Benbrook to Eagle Mountain Lake, where Fort Worth operates the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant (EMWTP). 2-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NIEESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities The existing raw water supply facilities are shown as follows in Table 2-2: Table 2-2 Raw Water Supply Facilities Unit Capacity Eagle Mountain Lake 66 mgd Eagle Mountain Pump Station and Pipeline 105 mgd* Lake Worth Intake and Pipeline 127 mgd Clear Fork Pump Station 90 mgd* Cedar Creek System 136 mgd* Richland-Chambers System 118 mgd* *Indicates firm capacity with largest pump out of service 2.2 Water Treatment Plants, Pump Stations and Storage The City's distribution system consists of ten pressure planes. The pressure planes include the Holly, Eastside II (ES II), Northside II (NS II), Northside III (NS III), Northside IV (NS IV), Southside II (SS II), Southside III (SS III), Westside II (WS II), Westside III (WS III) and Westside IV (WS IV) Pressure Planes. Some pressure planes, such as Holly and ES II, are supplied principally by pump stations at the water treatment plants. The City currently operates five water treatment plants, summarized in Table 2-3 below. These plants take raw water from the TRWD reservoirs and treat it, and is then pumped into the distribution system through the high service pump stations at each treatment plant. Table 2-3 Water Treatment Plant Facilities Treatment Capacity Water Treatment Plant (MGD) North Holly Plant 80 South Holly Plant 80 Rolling Hills Plant 200 Eagle Mountain Plant 108 Westside Plant 12 In order to provide adequate pressure to each of the City's ten pressure planes, the City operates a series of twenty-one pump stations. A summary of the existing system pumping capacities of each high service pump station as well as the in-system pump stations can be found in Appendix A. These pump 2-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities r�?NICHOLS stations are used to fill the twenty-seven ground and elevated storage tanks located throughout the City. A summary of the existing system storage capacities of the ground and elevated storage tanks can be found in Appendix B. 2-3 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r�NREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities 3.0 PROJECTED WATER DEMANDS 3.1 Projected Water Demands Average day demands were developed for the City of Fort Worth for the on-going 2016 Water Master Plan Update. Based on historical usage, a residential and non-residential per capita was developed for each individual pressure plane, resulting in a city 2017 average day demand of 166 mgd, and a City 2027 average day demand of 210 mgd (City demands do not include wholesale demand). An average day to maximum day peaking factor was also developed for each pressure plane, resulting in a City 2017 maximum day demand of 313 mgd, and a City 2027 maximum day demand of 404 mgd. The wholesale customer demand was provided by the wholesale customers as part of the wholesale customer surveys. The 2017 average day demand for wholesale customers is 68 mgd, and the 2027 average day demand for the wholesale customers is 82 mgd. The 2017 maximum day demand for wholesale customers is 158 mgd, and the 2027 maximum day demand for the wholesale customers is 185 mgd. The total 2017 average day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 234 mgd. The total 2027 average day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 292 mgd. The total 2017 maximum day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 471 mgd.The total 2027 maximum day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 589 mgd. The 2016 Water Master Plan Update recommended a maximum day to peak hour peaking factor of 1.5, resulting in a total 2017 peak hour demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers of 707 mgd, and a total 2027 peak hour demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers of 884 mgd. 3-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update �! FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities ri NICHOLS Table 3-1 summarizes the projected water demands for Fort Worth. Table 3-1 Projected Water Demands Average Maximum Day Day Peak Hour Demand Demand Demand Entity Planning Year (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) 2017 166 313 470 City of Fort Worth 2027 210 404 606 Wholesale Customers 2017 68 158 237 (Portion Served by Fort Worth) 2027 82 185 278 2017 234 471 707 Total Demand 2027 292 589 884 3-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update MUM FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities 4.0 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS This section establishes the City of Fort Worth water facilities and engineering studies that are eligible for inclusion in the calculation of the impact fee. The City's existing water model was updated by FNI staff to reflect the updated demands for the impact fee period, as well as include the recommended CIP projects for the impact fee period. Projects included in the CIP increase system capacity as a result of projected growth. Only those projects warranted by capacity needs derived from growth occurring during the study period (2017 to 2027) can be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in place. Projects included in the impact fee study are TRWD supply projects, raw water supply and transmission, water treatment facilities, regional transmission lines, pump stations, storage facilities, and engineering studies. Table 4-1 provides a summary of each water CIP project cost and allocation for the 2017-2027 study period. The 2017 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing development. It is not included in the impact fee analysis. The 2017-2027 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve development projected to occur from 2017 to 2027.The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2017 through 2027 is calculated as the total cost multiplied by the 2017-2027 percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. Figures D-1 and D-2 show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study period. Appendix C describes each water CIP project for the 2017-2027 planning period. The purpose of each project,the portion that is allocated to growth and the current status is also included. 4-1 .. PREESE FORT WORTH® ,,,iii NICHOLS Table 4-1 Water Capital Improvement Projects 2017-2027 %Allocated Cost W Ealsting Allocated to %Allocated to Cost Allocated to%%Muted to Cost AllOmted Prole% Initial Protest Project Cott in 2017 Completion Added 2017 Existing 2017 24173027 2017-2027 Impact Impact Fees 1 Impact fees ID Project Title MojM Phase Cost Dollars` 588KDate Date Capacity Capacity EaCapacity Impact fees Fees alter 2027 to 2027 TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT(TRW D)PROJECTS Connection Water k ne a P t 4693 $138867.058 5130,067450 2006 2. 27 WC 390% 90450,153 13.0% 918,092,714 4.0% 066656,180 onst 61.076,947. 51476.947000 2. 2020 167.5 mGD 04% 4 24.2% 5261,117,039 5015029961 - 9k7e06047,894609 Wetlands om Conn 561400.000 901,000..0 a 1999 2015 8961400 35.156 521.393.267 64.9% 539,606,733 RAW WATER SUPPLY AND TREATMENT PLANTS Vase 11012 MGD1 14,572,125 5,972,125 51,97].2(0 5994.425 50 Phase 110.12 111 120 566.047759 546.847759 47470,207 59,369,552 50 6256 Eagle Mountain amnion 83 54300434 52860,644 $2,968644 5593,719 60.0% $1,761,186 20.0% 5093.729 Pack Const $1400.000 51055,500 90 01,055,500 00 ss e a n Membrane WY. 51,000400 50,055500 So 5854,555 1.8. 5200845 . Clearfork 049 Water Pump Station Parallel 84.1144 to 00111017 Eng 5639.000 5674.465 - 50 92. 5215,829 WO. $458.636 a d Water mn ara Id Ppel e m 9d9wry 56,306,000 56,700,473 50 $2,156,935 4.583.408 92-183 E4pand Second Eagle Mountain 9 Water 520,000 5217433 - 4 486,973 5130460 180 Expand Second Eagle Mountain WV Water PS from 358t0o1T4069 $2,060,000 12,024,330 2021 2023 35 4.010 02,6 $0 5860,732 60.442 61104598 - $s.WG,RV 55,277.. 1 - 0. 50 $2,111,000 4,166.500 82-184 Eagle Mountain WP�emm�from 100 MOD°1321460 04 52,278400 52,932,179 2021 2023 - 00% 5o 51,172,872 Ed. 51759307 32.188 Eagle 020980 24,9 E404409 from 105 01406 140 MGD Cons) 540,690,000 151.192295 2011 , 2023 35910 0092 50 40.0% 520,556,518 60.0% 930,035,377 REGIONAL TRANSMISSION LINES AND PUMP STATIONS 13-01 McCart Pump 109 Expansion to 35146. 5563370 9563375 2013 2013 10140. O.% SO 86. $484 578,873 $182602 - $124,169 550,432 NISI 3 WO Wendy Pump Station 21 Walsh Ranch Tank Const 11729,685 01,825,683 2016 2017 3 MGD 0. 50 68. 51,241,460 5584210 Pump Station to 70 1.400 Eng ns 51.194.391 01,366,230 2 0200 5450,856 415.374 54-5 3 o5ouAMde N Pump 1tation at Son 03259y,,M Mc 980400 5130882 50 6.04, 56,544 05. 1124.338 S4-5 3 M60.uths,de IV Purnp Station at Son Country Tank 9,020,00 $1346.555 2020 2021 3 000 60 $65,230 01,000,608 W4-3 41060Wesiskie IV Pump Station Eng 9166000 1175,213 2020 SOU - 02 5136,666 21056 538,47 861 01,739,466 4900 51,356,782 5382,602 • N54424735T7aramiWOn SiinePlas08 87100002 539334,816 540462,390 2015 2017 - o.0% 50 160% 514,161,839 6114 526,300,49 STORAGE TANKS Tank&Nen.022629" Eng 8 Cana 4,284,791 4,244,791 2006 2008 5 M 63.0% 92,699,318 29. $1,242,589 EON 5342,763 472,215 - - 5369,663 - 5180.192 %8Gwte45torme Tank on Hum 267 287&Land PUnrate Cara d Land 14,088,1360 4,068,060 2014 2025 1 MG 17.0. 5691,170 55.056 $2,237,433 24.0% 51439457 142-10 5 0 84.6 fiortnside It Ground Storage Tank at the Callor Tang site Eng 9601,729 5601,729 201.4 2015 5 0% 930086 $240,692 54.0. 9330351 142.10 5.140 Nort.lde II Ground 9e180030104 Site Cona 4,879,432 4870840 2015 2016 5 MG 5.056 5140,073 40.044 01,951,776 55.056 $1683.092 es s.a Elevated roc a rank North of e o goad Eng $575000 1506.913 2010 2017 0 096 46 31.096 $188,143 69.056 418.770 Wam ide VElevated Storage Tank north of Medo Road Const 52.45,000 54,717,919 2018 2014 1 MG 50 5842,553 Ed. 51875,360 Mnsi 5525,0.. 0606,913 2020 0021 4 47.0% 5285,249 51056 $321.664 01e0204e%0049084521704a 7094 Const 5 4,575.000 52717 1MG 00 47.0% $1,277,419 52.0% 51,440,484 Storage W34 2.5 MG WestsidellIGround South $1400.2 51,055,100 - 4 $379,980 5675,520 w83124ed Ground Storage 7ank5o2M a6I8;0 56100.000 92,216,546 2020 2022 2.5 14 50 5797,958 64.0% 51,418791 02,73 5.0 MG Southside II Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station Eng 5348315 50 $87,079 1261.236 52-73 5.0 MG%diddle ndStorage Tank at the%Egad P49 50 33477 53300.000 53.,63.146 1024 2025 5 14 k 25.0% 5070,788 754% 52.612.363 63;3 2.0 MG Nonnside ill Elevated Storage Tank 9340,315 - 50 5160,125 9188000 9213 2.0 MG 5017380 III OGO.)ed StOraBe Tank Const 53300,000 53,483.150 2022 2023 2 M 04% 50 460% 51,602,249 54.061 51.880901 ENGINEERING STUDIES - 2004 Water Master Plan 2005,2025 Study 51360.306 11360.386 .3 2005 60.0% 9816]32 40.4% 5544,154 50 • - 3 5768,160 - 200% 6153634 9384,084 $230.450 - 19004 Fee:wdy-2m>pn 203 Study 5117987 0177.987 2010 1016 - 0.074 4 100.056 0117,987 0.0% so TOTAL WATER COP $1,485,209,961 WATER COP ELIGIBLE COST $391,610,439 20d Water System Master Plan,Freese 6,Nichols 10-ttaro Bonds 201 62026,Tarrant Regional Water District Fort Worth Water Department Capkal Improvement Program 2015-2019 •Clryof factor Worth cost to Inflate iwtboro from 2016 dollars°2017 dollen.proposed pmlects only Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities 5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS Table 5-1 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs for projects.Table 4-1 shows the detail development of the costs and capacities of the eligible facilities. Table 5-1 2017-2027 Impact Fee Eligible Costs %Allocated 2017-2027 Total Growth to 2017-2027 Growth Related CIP Category Related Cost Impact Fees Cost TRWD Projects $1,276,814,058 25.0% $318,776,489 Raw Water/Treatment Plants $126,308,153 32.6% $41,225,877 Transmission Lines/Pump Stations $47,750,444 37.8% $18,028,053 Storage Tanks $32,090,765 39.1% $12,533,795 Engineering Studies $2,246,541 46.6% $1,046,225 IMPACT FEE CIP SUBTOTAL $391,610,439 FINANCING COSTS $233,431,318 TOTAL IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE COST $625,041,757 5.1 Service Units The different costs between customer types are allocated through the application of the equivalent meter concept. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential customer, a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8" x 3/4" meter capacity.Table 5-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standard C700-02, Cold-Water Meters — Displacement Type, Bronze Main Case and AWWA Standard C701-07, Cold-Water Meters—Turbine Type for Customer Service. 5-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update �i FREESE FORT WORTH®---,ir.----- Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities l NICHOLS Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors 5/8"x 3/4" Meter Size Equivalency Factor 5/8"x 3/4" 1.00 3/4" 1.50 1" 2.50 1-1/2" 5.00 2" 8.00 3" 21.75 4" 37.50 6" 80.00 8" 140.00 10" 210.00 Appendix D contains the number of water meters for residential and non-residential customers by meter size for the City of Fort Worth, as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this information to FNI. The number of equivalent meters was also calculated for the City and wholesale customers. The next calculation step determines factors for population per residential meter and employment per non-residential meter. Table 5-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and wholesale customers using 2017 information. Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2017 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter Description Residential Non-Residential City of Fort Worth Number of Equivalent Meters 299,889 117,005 Population/Employment 825,967 550,117 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.75 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 4.70 Wholesale Customers Number of Equivalent Meters 157,108 62,912 Population/Employment 392,163 201,803 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.50 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 3.21 FNI did not receive meter count information from five of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers; however,their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per equivalent meter in Table 5-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all 5-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent meter, FNI divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or employment served by Fort Worth. The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2017 and 2027 uses the ratios in Table 5-3 and the population and employment projections for 2017 and 2027 in Exhibit A- Water Land Use Assumptions report.The calculation is shown below. City of Fort Worth Residential = Population Change/Population per Equivalent Meter = (1,026,780—825,967)/2.75 =73,023 Non-Residential = Employment Change/Employment per Equivalent Meter = (679,901—550,117)/4.70 =27,614 Fort Worth Total = Residential+Non-Residential =73,023+27,614 = 100,637 Wholesale Customers Residential = Population Change/Population per Equivalent Meter = (462,435—392,163)/2.50 =28,109 Non- Residential = Employment Change/Employment per Equivalent Meter = (245,018—201,803)/3.21 = 13,463 Wholesale Total = Residential+Non-Residential =28,109+ 13,463 =41,572 Grand Total =Fort Worth Total+Wholesale Total = 100,637+41,572 = 142,209 5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation This report is based on a credit equal to 50% of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan, as specified in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Should the City choose to adopt an impact fee of greater than 50% of the total projected cost, a detailed credit calculation analysis is included in Appendix E. 5-3 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update �InFREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities NICHOLS Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of expansion for the study period from Table 5-1 divided by the increase in equivalent meters from Section 5.1. This fee equals the maximum water impact fee for a 5/8" x 3/4"water meter size. Maximum Water Impact Fee =Cost of Expansion/Increase in Equivalent Meters =$625,041,757/142,209 =$4,395 per 5/8"x 3/4" equivalent meter The water impact fees for meters other than 5/8" x 3/4" are the product of the fee per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 5-2. The maximum allowable water impact fees are provided in Table 5-4, as well as the resulting impact fee at a 50% collection rate. Table 5-4 Water Impact Fees by Meter Size 5/8"x 3/4" Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Meter Size Equivalency Factor Impact Fee (Collected at 50%) 5/8"x 3/4" 1.00 $4,395 $2,197 3/4" 1.50 $6,593 $3,296 1" 2.50 $10,988 $5,493 1-1/2" 5.00 $21,975 $10,985 2" 8.00 $35,160 $17,576 3" 21.75 $95,591 $47,785 4" 37.50 $164,813 $82,388 6" 80.00 $351,600 $175,760 8" 140.00 $615,300 $307,580 10" 210.00 $922,950 $461,370 5-4 I l TrA I FIGURE D-1 ,L-,_, I CITY OF FORT WORTH / 2017 WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY m . n C EXISTING FACILITIES ,.__..��'IJusti . r LEGEND /, 1 '""• Z NORTHLAKE Existing f- Road,11 —{= ,w '° '-. ® Pump Station Egli -§z Existing Lake \'Rhome ,. 'tD Ground Storage Tank Fort Worth City Limit �'� E Existing ...___.. !! r. 1 Fort Worth ETJ Boundary FM Elevated Storage Tank \ - "'N ;-- I / Existing Water Wholesale p Customer ``(+"� '-Jr ROANOKE ® Walef Treatment Plant { - on- o esa e _r __IL, Senders Ranch GST and PS � 1-1 Customer WISE Newark --- y --gill-ET"—-_ _.---1_. r1,- —; .. FORT WORTH. _.._ County Boundary _ /- --' 'I f l ; ,, i FREESE `�, ® Willow Springs EST ' { r �� NICNOLS _ {{j M1a'8 I LI Crumb EST� i I � 7 _ . / HASLET ® 5 Graplinet� ! I Caylor Road rGST' SOUTHLAKE 26 ligi Logic, n I� f r-' KELLER L L ct 1 [llin+ntanl l i,( j 1 74-7_2., - f� I y - �n_ \-- I �'O l•�F_North Beach GST and PS '+)�`''' `t'� '-•"` • \\ L y <.'"") Bradley EST I 1, !-°-� Vista PS _ `°1 • iii � � �� 0 Azle x f 1 j t -_a - ® __ Coffeyville _ AIRPORT MI Y —, r �_ ,..g` n Lake Country EST I 1— r ? t ®Y L'-''' 28 + ' ^`\ i a,.T 1-.-_ l Y__ > %WATAUGA ate, saGiNAw else �Yy1\: ,---yam Moui d [ NoRTH + ' I N. 4� 'Y/ r---� 1 t RICHLANB ( Bedford Euless , 1 Eagle Mountain ntam WTP {f �� ` y, I. • Cantr IIS som PS HILLS li ' -� i• i : LAKE f `\N M1 HURST It I i 1 -La eslde.l WORTH_ ,� ,� I Fleetwood GST and PS u 5555 I ,---Jenkins Heights PS Norths de GST and PS _! I D 1••- _ T`}'N,` �` \ V i HALTOM s'RICHLAND ISANSOM I CITY ® •-HILLS i' .PARK ® : I1 Old Northside PS -_-_ st7' -'-" .-RIVER 1 no - { 1 -' V,OAKS, /- I S. r /WESTWORTH.{ -T ,,,, t ; Westland GST and PS ` ' N``'[AGE ^t`+l F Randol Mill GST and PS &Chapel Creek PS i WHITE 1_.,P-Wests de PS North Holly WTP r` --. u_^-'• I ' ;SETTLEMENT W✓ESTOVER Meadowbrook EST, �. South Holly WTP I . L Westside WTP t-f � F:a : a 411_1_55: -- - -j _-- V Meadowbrook EST ® -- Stag oach GST and PS -. • �J i / e6 ®, Eastsiae PS lrlingtun t { r { 9 ; I l I ' ' co..GSTSandPS I li En k Rarte o �� c 'Tuk • . Waln h R h GST I- _ r stwood EST _ and Sts dp pe__�, ?_, t °' Edwards Ranch PS f{ Arlington \ -, DALWORTHINGTON ALEDO�j 1 1 • \ Y. Southside GST and PS- IN— c -4' GARDENS I r . - �Timberllne EST 1_ I-----1,---i r J' W Sem nary HIII EST �1"� -•� �r , - ,.,/ �` GIR I Russom Ranch PSf r 1 '-' '^ �� PGRAND II / , —_ FOREST A / i ® \ EDGECLIFF ILL _�� ,� ' I IV LLAGE ' �`e -_1 -- - '-Joe}'ool BEN BROOK -Rolling HMIs WTP - `� /•�,ENBR t "N, Alta M se GST and PS ; �1% KENNEDALE CI.f kLn \\\\ "Armstrong R ch ESTY JL .N ! ..c"-- . l 'I 11t o'L'-j .�� I.. •EVERMANL? { 1 i� � l t \\ 1 Sun Country EST rr, J Ir - McCart GST and PS t-I-, .V k j+ � �f C , CROWLEY ).,,-,_1 1 1 ( �... CT�P "� '='�; I n '\ ansfieidi .� 'y Y rc t� PARKER _.._- _ _�.._::_. _.._.._..5..5..5..5. �. ._..._. . _.. IC). ALLAS JOHNSON \ I �\ ELLIS 17 � BETH ES DA WSC l \I BURLESON f 4 ; 1 \^LrD ys ' ` f1_, t.5 t' } 171 ' S %i 0 , 5 ESI \ N J I I f� �_- r j 6� - n • i �_� 0 \--, , --, o 18,000 , • ■ - SCALE IN FEET i ^-__ -- .aa,ea 'a,a.,' _aWMrIP�re o,4evm.4wtee_Faam.Mn.i'I mee •cY 0.tb% r War 02 Relay Ixc,•F.v Additional TRWD FIGURE D-2 Projects ) CITY OF FORT WORTH z Integrated Pipeline& g 2017 WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY Pump Station '4 ["1- PROPOSED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Richland-Chambers LEGEND j. Wetlands j ELo . Proposed Pump Station Existing Z F Elevated Storage Tank ) .� u O Proposed ivawa ST ^_Z MORT Ground Storage Tank ■ Existing 3 Lu_____ Water Treatment Plant , I p t _- Proposed I --- � Elevated Storage Tank /--- Road I .. ,ssn,,T,„ it--_-. a Proposed Under Design/Construction nlConsWdion Lake l NS-II-2A MG EST—� 9 i ♦ - Pump Station r I S� Fort Worth City Limit \+~ � --� 111 Existing /-*' ; Pump Station Fort Worth 1 !� Existing FE To Boundary FN ma ` s - 4DV, 1 ® I) Ground Storage Tank Non-Wholesale --"� 1 .. l �u__, I 1 Customer•1 rSendera Ranch - ' • '! r-�---t GSTa PS r FORT WORTH® i County un a B ounda ry I &.---- __ /c-- iFREES E rlNICHOL S PARKER HELL RD r r I -,J f % r—: i rap r ' Iu , Caylor GSTI NS-11-5.0 MG GST y ' f N2-10 '� .I `°0 7:� `! p;' ,,,,C.C .' It 11 7 L HASLET ® D I ! i'''' 1 .NS-IV-1.0 MG EST I vE0E4 aD ' J . gpUM.4uxE ... Z �� _L r I� a \ �1 l i L--i I 1 f . 'v V a . ` ar% .sw Arg :. .,..,v �s I T--J uy } I r r`_ r1 % I CoUer gso a .. AIRPORT T r p l�- x A r '1 1 i I - l ^ -e, eve t Eagle Monn[am - ^�I. rte ---NS2 48-Inch Transmission Line an aD ,- .1:4: Du.DEn I2I igi [eke d Phase II i I ! , ,C�y, � 1 I 1. t .��y1 s.. Aornnw I 28 -* CHEEK ARGE eD 'lam` '1-AIM 7,s BIDa ---L AVGA $ Euless ._ L -_ l Mo.i d Watauga AND o; Be4Md l.. ! HILLS -1 { / r' K fOKG ft� 'y 1 '-'1 Eagle Mountain WTP - 1 3I I- 2 /--1----',2 E less gg 1 ‘,..,/,.: �7 Proposed Improvements 'e'�%, �g e�`tG.�/j ® i c : '°1 N2-18 A,B ,\ MPEImE aD l nt _.1 S°° ._ i F--- ._„i ouE -- -- ' de�F :� NURST C - Proposed __mu-L'' d LA E i. t eao.ee NE/Y r l i 4..n /"'.,• WS-V-1.0 MG EST i r- la ...._'z r_ wa ve ®T,';�'._.. ® � WSJ ' /' "S�'"� - 1 SON r . l If�t Y .. D '\\noinvel.vp ~ I •� RI( �Y_..__L- { R X BLVD i I 1 k."'"2 1� ® ono R T-H..w —`r' J R ® aTM9v }- W T1 �aoWn atVD 1_e �— *-. . r RITE OAKS t1T /�...�- - % } 1._. f SETTLElr1ENr — r ,��� 1 aaa �D�RD :_-Proposed (� 1 . ._j J ._ter r ,�1_ i �d aT�= eaiDOE ST:... _. WS-IV 1.0 MG EST�•! I ll Wed Improvements WTP INESrwoRTH "-- a` I r I /- W4-t0 L 11 Proposed Improvements vuL4GE D l i ' 3 ,. -r-_ s r'�1 1• I W8'-t5A B C TOYER 7 es/ tl l�1ow ' x i I us'...v1� � ,�•®D.LE p $u _ .- ' 35p I-_ ' ,r ) IIV a rnE sr� caaasr r -..Pa.K - I "'�' ) 1 ® V::'="4-11.1 j t- r 9 ti 20 1t i 5so a--1,,,r 1 Y 2 .:er4epo::1---- cue r"'°T j r l 0 DP z`,� �� senor es.Under Construction i t' L �� r �I o ws-v Ps,1^ i ® `"[akeAr[mglOn Arlington apY F� i Proposed; T r /' a ary on § 1 $ I WS-III-2.5 MG GSTj t ALEDO' PFOPOSed 5"4 Wad .�j �`L_ E "_r_ \ ._/^�D�L GARDENST.--t-`-�� 4' j WS-IV PS • k-i._3.'! _-...i : it .aLf�' { i °i `R 1!_- W4-3 . ,r i i\ Eagle Mountain `•r_- ^,,, Fo r } i g i 1. ,I II ' j --'— Connection Raw,Water Line 8■/ � r r �!� vEL s .r -Pump Station" /eDDECLEF ,a '..\s I I seNeno l ej}gy f r`, L✓— _i �_._.�J' 'To- VI.IA� �Ey :.�. KENNEDALE SUBLET( J,1 s 1 I _ $_ t I` — I _ J .<,�--PO it al /r`I rtir nhro kLake �, o f �l'� 1 1 N .N Li r 1` o. 1 A(R �\ > I _ II r�` l.-_--._J 4 `N III PRAIRIE �/ r"-',� �J'. I/ McCart GST and PS_�.eyop or \,,._.,),/,‘„,:\\.,,, /1 /{ Proposed y'�I Proposed Improvements r I ( i sr I SS-IV PS 9-- I f 1 S3-51 S2-73( � r. 84-5 I rl CROwLEr 1 L1r_] I `\ ..1 �!� �`� C® At ,5 1. '� \ s srtm _PARKER PARKER / t / 1 . HOOD T JOHNSON / C - kg, 1 . ae HESDA WSC ,..,` M \ a JOHNSON -./ e,,$,,,. i.-- g Ei -fie,,..COU.mrsuD f/%- J 1 ' . z � zi ei - Z _, '12$ ^tea/// \oq i•-• \,\ j ��a� I 'T1. —`1 1 s m ®'� 0 I ,,/ �"! ,ry t.-.. 0 ' 18,000 F� / , i_ /I•e wars N. 1 ( / r\ .4'.1 : < NNINGI ,.w.ca.._DZiw.,c,50..e_F....._w,,.M.. User 02499 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'•NICHO E.S FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities `_ APPENDIX A EXISTING WATER PUMPING CAPACITIES FREESE FORT WORTH. I IFIELNICHOLS APPENDIX A Existing Water Pumping Capacities North Holly Plant: Four 27 MGD and two 15 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 138 MGD.The total measured capacity of the pump station is 90 MGD due to piping restrictions. South Holly Plant: Four 30 MGD and one 15 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 135 MGD. Rolling Hills Plant: HSPS#1: Seven 30 MGD,one 22 MGD,one 17 MGD,and one 10 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 259 MGD. HSPS#2: Two vertical turbines 30 MGD and two 20 MGD vertical turbines. Total pumping capacity of 100 MGD. Eagle Mountain Plant: HSPS#1: Four 21.7 MGD,two 15 MGD,three 3.6 MGD,and two 8.6 MGD.Total pumping capacity of 144.8 HSPS#2: Three 22 MGD and two 3 MGD.Total pumping capacity of 72 MGD. Westside Plant: Two 9.8 MGD and two 6.3 MGD vertical turbines. Total Pumping Capacity 32.2 MGD. Southside II Pressure Plane: Edwards Ranch Station: Two 16 MGD and one 10 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,as well as one 5 MGD emergency generator pump. Total pumping capacity 47 MGD. South Side Reservoir Station: Two 5.7 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 11.4 MGD. Southside III Pressure Plane: Russom Ranch Station: One 6 MGD and one 5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,as well as one 10 MGD electric and gas unit.Total pumping capacity 21 MGD. Alta Mesa Station: Two 10 MGD,one 9.4 MGD,and one 5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,as well as one 5 MGD emergency generator pump.Total pumping capacity 39.4 MGD. McCort Station: Two 10.5 MGD,one 10 MGD,and one 4.6 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 35.6 MGD. A-1 Northside II Pressure Plane: North Side Station: Two 5.7 MGD and one 3.4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,and one 4.5 MGD gas driven unit. Total pumping capacity 19.3 MGD. Cantrell-Sansom Station: One 5 MGD,one 3 MGD,and one 2 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 10 MGD. North Beach Station: One 2 MGD electrically driven centrifugal unit. Total pumping capacity 2 MGD. North Side Station(NEW): Two 18.3 MGD, two 12.9 MGD, and one 11.9 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 74.3 MGD. Northside III Pressure Plane: Jenkins Heights Station: One 2 MGD,one 3.9 MGD and one 3.4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 9.3 MGD. North Beach Station: Two 4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 8 MGD. Sendera Ranch Station: One 5.8 MGD and three 10.1 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 36.1 MGD. Northside IV Pressure Plane: Lago Vista Station: Two.25 MGD and two.5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 1.5 MGD. Sendera Ranch Station: Three 10.1 MGD and one 5.8 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Totally pumping capacity 36.1 MGD. Westside II Pressure Plane: West Side Station: One 12 MGD,one 6.3 MGD and two 5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,and one 7 MGD gas driven standby unit. Total pumping capacity 35.3 MGD. Como Station: Three 15 MGD,one 10 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,and one 5.8 MGD emergency generator. Total pumping capacity 60.8 MGD. Westside III Pressure Plane: Stagecoach Road Station: Two 8 MGD and two 5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units,as well as one 5 MGD emergency generator. Total pumping capacity 31 MGD. A-2 Westside IV Pressure Plane: Westland Pump Station: Two 3 MGD and two 5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 16 MGD. Eastside II Pressure Plane: East Side Station: One 22 MGD,one 17 MGD and three 10 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units and one 7 MGD gas driven standby unit.Total pumping capacity 76 MGD. Randol Mill Station: One 10 MGD and two 5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 20 MGD. Fleetwood Station: One 3 MGD and three 2 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 9 MGD. A-3 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities ��?NICHOL S APPENDIX B EXISTING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STORAGE r7FREESE FORT WORTH. ?NICHOLS -1-1w- Oril.2. APPENDIX B Existing Distribution System Storage Eastside Pressure Plane II (805'): CAPACITY(MG) Eastwood Elevated Tank 1.5 Timberline Elevated Tank 2.0 Meadowbrook Elevated Tank 2.0 Randol Mill Ground Reservoir 6.0 Beach Street Ground Reservoir 5.5 Fleetwood Ground Reservoir 5.5 Holly Pressure Plane (706'): Northside Ground Reservoir 4.0 Como Ground Storage Reservoir 6.0 Como Ground Storage Reservoir 2.0 Southside Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Northside Pressure Planes: Elevation 853' Plane II Northwest Elevated Tank 1.0 Caylor Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Elevation 936' Plane III Lake Country Elevated Tank 0.5 Elevation 950' Plane III Bradley Elevated Tank 2.0 Willow Springs Elevated Tank 2.0 Elevation 1040' Plane IV Crumb Elevated Tank 1.0 Southside Pressure Planes: Elevation 850' Plane II Seminary Hill Elevated Tank 2.0 Alta Mesa Ground Storage Reservoir 9.2 McCart Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Elevation 990' Plane III Armstrong Ranch Elevated Tank 2.0 Sun Country Elevated Tank 2.0 B-1 Westside Pressure Planes: CAPACITY(MG) Elevation 857' Plane II Calmont Elevated Tank 1.0 Stagecoach Ground Storage Reservoir 5.5 Elevation 974' Plane III Westland Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Elevation 1055' Plane IV Walsh Ranch Ground Storage Reservoir 2.5 Walsh Ranch Standpipe (used for pressure) 0.06 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STORAGE CAPACITY: 90.26 MG Water Treatment Plants: CAPACITY(MG) Eagle Mountain WTP 10.5 Holly WTP 20.0 Rolling Hills WTP 17.2 Westside WTP 2.5 TOTAL CLEARWELL CAPACITY: 50.2 MG B-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities In-NICHOLS APPENDIX C WATER CIP PROJECTS Appendix C Water CIP Projects TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTS Project Title: Eagle Mountain Connection Raw Water Line and Pump Station Description: Construction of raw water line and pump station from Benbrook Lake to Eagle Mountain Lake. Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant. Allocation: This project is allocated 13%to growth in the study period,as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Project Title: Integrated Pipeline and Pump Stations Description: Construction of raw water line and pump stations from Richland-Chambers Reservoir to Benbrook Lake. Purpose: Provide an additional raw water line to provide additional raw water supplies. Allocation: This project is allocated 24.2%to growth in the study period,as it is required to Provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Project Title: Richland-Chambers Wetlands Description: Construction of wetlands near Richland-Chambers Reservoir. Purpose: Provide an additional raw water supply to the Integrated Pipeline Project. Allocation: This project is allocated 64.9%to growth in the study period,as it is required to Provide capacity to meet projected water demands. C-1 Appendix C Water CIP Projects RAW WATER SUPPLY Project Title: Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD(N2-18B) Description: Design and construction of additional pumping capacity in the Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water Pump Station. Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant to a capacity of 140 mgd. Allocation: This project is allocated 40%to growth in the study period as it is required to treat a portion the projected maximum day demand of 589 mgd in 2027. Project Title:Clear Fork Raw Water Pump Station Parallel Pipeline to Holly WTP Description: Design and construction of an additional raw water pipeline from the Clear Fork Trinity River Pump Station to the Holly WTP. Purpose: Provide an additional raw water line to provide additional raw water supplies. Allocation: This project is allocated 32%to growth in the study period,as it is required to bring an additional 50 mgd of raw water to the Holly WTP. C-2 Appendix C Water CIP Projects WATER TREATMENT PLANTS Project Title: Westside Water Treatment Plant(W3-15A) Description: Design and construction of new 12 MGD Water Treatment Plant. Purpose: A new water treatment plant is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 20%to growth in the study period,as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Project Title: Eagle Mountain Clearwell #3 Expansion (N2-6A) Description: Design and construction of the third clearwell at the Eagle Mountain WTP. Purpose: The completion of the third clearwell adds 2.5 MG of capacity as well as allows for the full 105 MGD capacity to be utilized at the water treatment plant. Allocation: This project is allocated 60%to growth in the study period,as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Project Title: Westside Water Treatment Plant Expansion (W3-15B) Description: Design and construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP. Purpose: An expansion of the water treatment plant capacity from 12 mgd to 15 mgd is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City.This project was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 100%to growth in the study period,as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Project Title: Westside Water Treatment Plant Expansion (W3-15C) Description: Design and construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP. Purpose: An expansion of the water treatment plant capacity from 15 mgd to 18 mgd is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 81%to growth in the study period,as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. C-3 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 105 MGD to 140 MGD; Expand High Service Pump Station (N2-18A) Description: Design and construction of Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant expansion to treat 140 mgd. Purpose: An expansion of Eagle Mountain WTP to be increased further to 140 mgd because of the growth of the City's north side and Alliance Airport area, and because of the projected water demand increase. Allocation: This project is allocated 40%to growth in the study period,as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. C-4 Appendix C Water CIP Projects PUMP STATIONS AND REGIONAL TRANSMISSION LINES Project Title: McCart Pump Station Improvements(S3-51) Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the McCart Pump Station with an expanded capacity from 25 to 35 mgd. Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to this pressure plane and redeveloping areas. Allocation: The additional 10 mgd pump station capacity increases the total pump station capacity by 40%to meet future water system demands.This project is allocated 86%to growth in the study period. Project Title: Westside V Pump Station with 3 mgd Capacity(W5-1) Description: Design and construction of a new Westside V Pump Station with a capacity of 3 mgd. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in this pressure plane.This project was recommended in the on- going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project was allocated 68%to growth in the study period. Project Title: Northside Pump Station Improvements (N2-8) Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the Northside Pump Station with an expanded capacity from 58 to 70 mgd. Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to this pressure plane and redeveloping areas.This project was recommended in the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project was allocated 33%to growth in the study period. Project Title: SSIV Pump Station at Sun County Tank(S4-5) Description: Design and construction of a new Southside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 3 mgd. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in this pressure plane.This project was recommended in the on- going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project was allocated 5%to growth in the study period. C-5 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: Westside IV Pump Station on Interstate 20 (W4-3) Description: Design and construction of a new Westside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 4 mgd. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in this pressure plane.This project was recommended in the on- going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 78%to growth in the study period. Project Title: Northside II 48-inch Transmission Line Phase II Description: Design and construction of a 48-inch transmission line in the Northside II Pressure Plane.This project runs from Cromwell Marine Creek Road to Texas Sage Trail. Purpose: A large transmission line is necessary to address the projected new population growth in the area. Allocation: This project is allocated 35%to growth in the study period. C-6 Appendix C Water CIP Projects STORAGE TANKS Project Title: Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Tank and Pump Station (N3-11) Description: Design and construction of a 5 MG ground storage tank. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population,additional storage facilities are needed.This improvement was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 29%to growth. Project Title: 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank on Highway 287 (N4-2B) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Northside IV Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population,additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside IV Pressure Plane.This improvement was recommended by the on- going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 55%to growth. Project Title: 5.0 MG Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site (N2-10) Description: Design and construction of a 5.0 MG ground storage tank for the Northside II Pressure Plane. Purpose: This improvement is to provide additional storage facilities that are needed in the Northside II Pressure Plane.This improvement was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 40%to growth. Project Title: 1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank North of Aledo Road (W5-3) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside V Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside V Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 31%to growth. C-7 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: 1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank(W4-10) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside IV Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside IV Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 47%to growth. Project Title: 2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20 (W3-4) Description: Design and construction of a 2.5 MG ground storage tank for the Westside III Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside II Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 36%to growth. Project Title: 5.0 MG Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station (S2-73) Description: Design and construction of a 5.0 MG ground storage tank at the McCart Pump Station. Purpose: This improvement is to provide additional storage facilities that are needed in the surrounding areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 25%to growth. Project Title: 2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank (N3-13) Description: Design and construction of a 2.0MG elevated storage tank for the Northside III Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside III Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the on-going Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 46%to growth. C-8 Appendix C Water CIP Projects ENGINEERING STUDIES Project Title: 2004 Water Master Plan Description: An engineering study to update the 1994 Water Master Plan. Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20. year period from 2005 to 2025.This plan was updated again in 2014.The water master plan guides the capital improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of the system. Allocation: 40%of the cost for the 2004 Water Master Plan is allocated to the study period because eight of the twenty years of the plan's useful life are within the study period. Project Title: 2014 Water Master Plan Description: An engineering study to update the 2004 Water Master Plan. Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20. year period from 2013 to 2033.The water master plan guides the capital improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of the system. Allocation: 50%of the cost for the 2014 Water Master Plan is allocated to the study period because ten of the twenty years of the plan's useful life are within the study period. Project Title: 2016 Impact Fee Study(2017-2027) Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the maximum allowable fee which can be assessed. Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five years. Allocation: 100%of the cost for the 2016 impact fee study can be allocated to the study period because seven of the ten years are within the study period.The impactfee covers water and wastewater,with 50%allocated to each. C-9 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities ��=NICHOLS APPENDIX D WATER METER SUMMARY Table D-1 Water Meter Summary City of Fort Worth Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 199,200 199,200 3/4" 1.50 663 995 1" 2.50 21,870 54,675 1-1/2" 5.00 2,046 10,230 2" 8.00 2,058 16,464 3" 21.75 20 435 4" 37.50 56 2,100 6" 80.00 130 10,400 8" 140.00 34 4,760 10" 210.00 3 630 TOTAL 226,080 299,889 / Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 7,265 7,265 3/4" 1.50 12 18 1" 2.50 3,571 8,928 1-1/2" 5.00 2,103 10,515 2" 8.00 5,202 41,616 3" 21.75 366 7,961 4" 37.50 331 12,413 6" 80.00 169 13,520 8" 140.00 68 9,520 10" 210.00 25 5,250 TOTAL 19,112 117,005 Wholesale Customer: City of Aledo Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 910 1,365 1" 2.50 9 23 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 920 1,396 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 89 134 1" 2.50 12 30 1-1/2" 5.00 5 25 2" 8.00 20 160 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 130 _ 467 Page D-1 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Bethesda Water Supply Corportation Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 6,875 6,875 3/4" 1.50 37 56 1" 2.50 34 85 1-1/2" 5.00 4 20 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 6,950 7,036 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 92 92 3/4" 1.50 4 6 1" 2.50 13 33 1-1/2" 5.00 7 35 2" 8.00 24 192 3" 21.75 1 22 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 143 497 Wholesale Customer: City of Burleson Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 12,998 12,998 3/4" 1.50 3 5 1" 2.50 43 108 1-1/2" 5.00 7 35 2" 8.00 3 24 ., 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 13,054 13,169 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 476 476 3/4" 1.50 5 8 1" 2.50 226 565 1-1/2" 5.00 130 650 2" 8.00 261 2,088 3" 21.75 22 479 4" 37.50 6 225 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,127 4,570 Page D-2 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Crowley Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 4,910 4,910 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 27 68 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 7 56 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 4,949 5,092 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 162 162 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 60 150 1-1/2" 5.00 21 105 2" 8.00 55 440 3" 21.75 9 196 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 308 1,090 Wholesale Customer: Dallas Fort Worth International Airport Board Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1 1 3/4" 1.50 1 2 1" 2.50 3 8 1-1/2" 5.00 12 60 2" 8.00 86 688 3" 21.75 13 _ 283 4" 37.50 22 825 6" 80.00 7 560 8" 140.00 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 146 2,566 Page D-3 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Dalworthington Gardens Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 303 303 3/4" 1.50 36 54 1" 2.50 205 513 1-1/2" 5.00 4 20 2" 8.00 7 56 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 555 946 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 39 39 3/4" 1.50 8 12 1" 2.50 24 60 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 10 80 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 81 191 Wholesale Customer: City of Edgecliff Village Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1,146 1,146 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,146 1,146 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1 1 3/4" 1.50 3 5 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 0 0 ■ 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 8 161 Page D-4 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Everman(Stand by Customer) Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 ` 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 - 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Wholesale Customer: City of Forest Hill Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 4,774 7,161 1" 2.50 0 0 _ 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 4,774 7,161 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 67 168 1-1/2" 5.00 37 185 2" 8.00 72 576 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 181 1,127 Page D-5 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Grand Prairie Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 4,033 4,033 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 41 103 1-1/2" 5.00 14 71 2" 8.00 56 452 3" 21.75 1 26 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 4 282 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 4,150 4,966 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 129 129 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 76 189 1-1/2" 5.00 50 248 2" 8.00 116 927 3" 21.75 7 154 4" 37.50 6 222 6" 80.00 1 95 8" 140.00 1 166 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 385 2,129 Wholesale Customer: City of Haltom City Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 11,985 17,978 1" 2.50 39 99 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 _ 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 12,026 18,084 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,033 3,049 1" 2.50 542 1,355 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 504 4,034 3" 21.75 122 2,652 4" 37.50 22 843 6" 80.00 5 379 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 3,228 12,313 Page D-6 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Haslet Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 615 615 3/4" 1.50 5 8 1" 2.50 12 30 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 _ 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 632 653 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 32 32 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 16 40 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 53 424 3" 21.75 4 87 4" 37.50 1 _ 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 _ 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 109 636 Wholesale Customer: City of Hurst Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 9,139 9,139 3/4" 1.50 1 2 1" 2.50 1,329 3,323 1-1/2" 5.00 42 210 2" 8.00 9 72 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 8 300 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 10,528 13,045 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 422 422 3/4" 1.50 1 2 1" 2.50 343 858 1-1/2" 5.00 210 1,050 2" 8.00 182 1,456 3" 21.75 30 653 4" 37.50 15 563 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,204 5,082 Page D-7 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Keller Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 14,452 14,452 3/4" 1.50 74 111 1" 2.50 161 403 1-1/2" 5.00 7 35 2" 8.00 5 40 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 14,699 15,041 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 440 440 3/4" 1.50 42 63 1" 2.50 315 788 1-1/2" 5.00 64 320 2" 8.00 203 1,624 3" 21.75 24 522 4" 37.50 5 188 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 3 420 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,096 4,364 Wholesale Customer: City of Kennedale Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 888 888 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 77 193 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 2 16 3" 21.75 0 9 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 970 1,120 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 91 91 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 17 43 1-1/2" 5.00 6 30 2" 8.00 14 112 3" 21.75 3 65 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 132 378 Page D-8 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Lake Worth Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1 1 3/4" 1.50 1,360 2,040 1" 2.50 117 293 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,479 2,342 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 108 162 1" 2.50 99 248 1-1/2" 5.00 35 175 2" 8.00 86 688 3" 21.75 20 435 4" 37.50 4 150 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 352 1,858 Wholesale Customer: City of North Richland Hills Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 12,727 12,727 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 650 1,625 1-1/2" 5.00 3 16 2" 8.00 11 85 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 13,391 14,453 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 450 450 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 230 575 1-1/2" 5.00 54 268 2" 8.00 491 3,924 3" 21.75 20 434 4" 37.50 13 473 6" 80.00 3 252 8" 140.00 1 147 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,260 6,523 Page D-9 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Town of Northlake Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 342 513 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 342 513 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 - 3/4" 1.50 4 6 1" 2.50 7 18 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 44 352 3" 21.75 23 500 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 81 891 Wholesale Customer: City of Richland Hills Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,783 4,175 1" 2.50 79 198 1-1/2" 5.00 8 40 2" 8.00 12 96 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 _.,_,,.., ,,.6' 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 2,882 4,508 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 173 260 1" 2.50 83 208 1-1/2" 5.00 29 145 2" 8.00 38 304 3" 21.75 4 87 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 329 1,078 Page D-10 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of River Oaks(Stand By Customer) Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Wholesale Customer: City of Roanoke Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,837 2,756 1" 2.50 47 119 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,885 2,875 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 271 406 1" 2.50 114 284 1-1/2" 5.00 33 164 2" 8.00 169 1,349 3" 21.75 5 102 4" 37.50 11 395 6" 80.00 2 187 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 603 2,888 Page D-11 Table 0-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Saginaw Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 6,964 10,446 1" 2.50 9 23 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 6,973 10,469 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 167 251 1" 2.50 116 290 1-1/2" 5.00 12 60 2" 8.00 137 1,096 3" 21.75 16 348 4" 37.50 7 263 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 456 2,387 Wholesale Customer: Sansom Park(Stand By Customer) Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Page D-12 , Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Southlake Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 842 1,263 1" 2.50 7,787 19,468 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 21 168 3" 21.75 1 22 _ 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 8,651 20,920 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 95 143 1" 2.50 834 2,085 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 441 3,528 3" 21.75 5 109 4" 37.50 37 1,388 6" 80.00 9 720 8" 140.00 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,422 8,112 Wholesale Customer: Trinity River Authority(Stand By Customer) Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Page D-13 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No.1 Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 2,116 2,116 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 1,582 3,955 1-1/2" 5.00 2 10 2" 8.00 9 72 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 3,709 6,153 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 31 31 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 23 58 1-1/2" 5.00 15 75 2" 8.00 65 520 3" 21.75 14 305 4" 37.50 10 375 6" 80.00 2 160 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 160 1,523 Wholesale Customer: Westlake Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 124 124 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 240 601 1-1/2" 5.00 29 147 2" 8.00 20 157 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 413 1,028 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 3 3 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 6 16 1-1/2" 5.00 7 36 2" 8.00 40 317 3" 21.75 3 68 4" 37.50 1 39 6" 80.00 2 167 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 63 646 Page D-14 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Town of Westover Hills Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 12 18 1" 2.50 93 233 1-1/2" 5.00 159 795 2" 8.00 46 368 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 313 1,495 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Wholesale Customer: City of Westworth Village Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 479 _ 719 1" 2.50 5 13 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 3 .. 24 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" _ 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 487 755 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 _ 0 3/4" 1.50 2 _ 3 1" 2.50 3 8 1-1/2" 5.00 5 25 2" 8.00 11 88 3" - 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 25 419 Page D-15 Table D-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of White Settlement Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 2,745 2,745 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 2,745 2,745 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 123 123 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 5 14 1-1/2" 5.00 24 121 2" 8.00 56 448 3" 21.75 7 143 4" 37.50 2 82 6" 80.00 1 88 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 218 1,018 Page D-16 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NICKS ES FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities < APPENDIX E CREDIT CALCULATION ANALYSIS Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities 111 NICHOLS CREDIT CALCULATION CODE GOVERNING IMPACT FEE DEVELOPMENT Local Government Code Title 12, Subtitle C, Chapter 395 contains the rules governing Impact Fee development. As defined in those rules,the maximum impact fee per service unit shall be calculated by dividing the costs of the portion of capital improvements attributed to new growth by the number of new growth units over the time period covered in the impact fee analysis (Section 395.015 MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT, (b)). In addition,the capital improvements plan must contain a plan for awarding either: • A credit for the portion of utility service revenues (rates)generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt,that are included in the capital improvements plan; or • In the alternative,a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan (Section 395.014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, (A)(7)). The code further states that the impact fee is not allowed to exceed the amount determined by subtracting the credit from the costs of the impact fee eligible capital improvements (maximum impact fee). (Section 395.015 MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT, (a)). As described by the definitions in the code,the following formulas result: Maximum Impact Fee= (Total Costs attributed to new growth over 10 years including Interest— Credit)/Number of New Service Units over next 10 years The purpose of this credit is to ensure that new growth is not charged twice for the portion of capital improvements attributed to them,once through the impact fee and then again through rates. The code does not specifically address the way in which this credit is to be calculated. Each utility should calculate the credit in a way that is consistent with the operation of their fund, the way they finance their capital improvements, and the way these capital improvements costs are represented in their utility rates.The next section describes how Fort Worth's credit was calculated. FORT WORTH FINANCING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND CREDIT ANALYSIS The City of Fort Worth finances all (100%) of its capital improvements through the issuance of bonds. As such, debt service payments include a portion of impact fee eligible costs. Fort Worth then uses impact fee funds collected to pay the portion of their debt service that is attributed to impact fee eligible costs. E-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities IFI1 NICHOLS This would result in none of their impact fee eligible costs being included in the calculation of their rates (no credit) unless the city chose to transfer impact fees in an amount less than the eligible costs. As part of its decision making process, the City of Fort Worth considered several options of impact fee and credit analysis.The three scenarios considered are below. • Scenario 1—The city would choose the option laid out in Chapter 395 guidelines of collecting only 50%of the maximum impact fee(a 50%credit, no credit analysis needed). • Scenario 2—The city would choose to collect an impact fee higher than 50%of the maximum (75%),thereby needing a credit analysis; in years 2017-2018 it is assumed impact fees would cover only a portion of the impact fee eligible debt service; in years 2019-2026 it is assumed impact fees would cover all of the impact fee eligible debt service. • Scenario 3—The city would choose to collect an impact fee higher than 50%of the maximum (100%),thereby needing a credit analysis; in years 2017-2018 it is assumed impact fees would cover only a portion of the impact fee eligible debt service; in years 2019-2026 it is assumed impact fees would cover all of the impact fee eligible debt service. As mentioned above, for Scenarios 2 and 3 the city is choosing not to cover all impact fee eligible debt with money from the Impact Fee Fund for the first two years. The reason for this is that those transfers have already been determined (the 2017 budget was already approved prior to this impact fee study, and the 2018 budget is nearing final approval). In both of those years, the budgeted transfer had been determined based on the anticipated Impact Fee Funds available using the prior Impact Fee collection rate of$921 per service unit. These budgeted transfers are not sufficient to cover all of the impact fee eligible debt service as calculated in this Impact Fee Study.This results in a credit for those years. In remaining years (2019-2026), it is Fort Worth's intent to transfer sufficient funds from the Impact Fees Fund to cover all impact fee eligible debt service. Fort Worth has a very detailed method of calculating the portion of each year's debt service payments for each bond series that is impact fee eligible, based on the projects that were funded in each bond series and what portion of those projects is impact fee eligible. Further, if there should be a year in which less impact fee funds have been collected than was projected and sufficient impact fee funds are not available to cover the portion of debt service that is impact fee eligible, then the city has committed to use other funds as necessary to pay that portion of the debt service. When additional impact fees have been collected, the city will reimburse those other funds. E-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r�FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities NICHOLS A summary of the impact fee credit analysis for all three scenarios are shown in Tables E-1 through E-3. Graphs of these results and their proposed phasing over the next three years are shown in Figures E-1 through E-3. Table E-1 Scenario 1-Impact Fee and Credit Analysis(50%) Water Wastewater Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure Cost $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Minus the CREDIT $0 $0 Max Allowable Calculated $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Infrastructure Cost Service Units 142,209 127,381 Max Allowable Impact Fee per Service Unit $4,395 $2,609 Collect 50%of Max Allowable Impact Fee per Service Unit $2,197 $1,304 E-3 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update minFREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities Irm?NICHOLS Table E-2 Scenario 2 -Impact Fee and Credit Analysis(75%) Credit Calculation Water 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to $14,236,513 $18,970,578 impact fee eligible costs Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund $6,206,967 $6,206,967 to Cover Debt Service Yearly Credit $8,029,546 $12,763,611 TOTAL Credit $20,793,157 Wastewater 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to $3,303,775 $4,377,409 impact fee eligible costs Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund $2,838,453 $2,838,453 to Cover Debt Service Yearly Credit $465,322 , $1,538,956 TOTAL Credit $2,004,278 Water Wastewater Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Cost Minus the CREDIT ($20,793,157) ($2,004,278) Max Allowable Calculated $604,248,600 $330,335,549 Infrastructure Cost Service Units 142,209 127,381 Max Allowable Impact Fee $4,249 $2,593 per Service Unit Collect 75%of Max Allowable Impact Fee per $3,187 $1,945 Service Unit E-4 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'N�EESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities Table E-3 Scenario 3 - Impact Fee and Credit Analysis (100%) Credit Calculation Water 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to $14,236,513 $18,970,578 impact fee eligible costs Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund $6,206,967 $6,206,967 to Cover Debt Service Yearly Credit $8,029,546 $12,763,611 TOTAL Credit $20,793,157 Wastewater 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to impact fee eligible costs $3,303,775 $4,377,409 Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund to Cover Debt Service $2,838,453 $2,838,453 Yearly Credit $465,322 $1,538,956 TOTAL Credit $2,004,278 Water Wastewater Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Cost Minus the CREDIT ($20,793,157) ($2,004,278) Max Allowable Calculated Infrastructure Cost $604,248,600 $330,335,549 Service Units 142,209 127,381 Max Allowable Impact Fee $4,249 $2,593 per Service Unit Collect 100%of Max Allowable Impact Fee per $4,249 $2,593 Service Unit E-5 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities IF�<NICHOLS .-1 d' N m v n r+ CD o M s,-1 - g m N 2 cu rci' Cl in .4 N M LI. '`/} '`/1 >' i/1. iA 4/1 U M E 47 co C o M a o Q N N N e N N a. o "c w E N 0 L� > m lI A' ? CCas J X ra W 03 -o G sc 13 u 3 I-1 G 3 11.1 ate, W O C L C 4.0 d 3 Q • N. • an IA a) N 0 L co to N e .O in in L- '�' V N cn 0 '- * m a n 0. +C" h y CU o V ar co do Q. r9 cu E 0I a Li L CO 0. N W r-i N at c DI °� N QNi �• �V = N y ai O in- 4" i/? w .L M C a, U V) cu 0 8 p 8 2 8 p 2 8 p 2 N �' 3 O L!1 ,_ i/1 VT N? V? if? -. 1 3 3 ($)sie ocj u! Is0, • • E-6 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities M�<NICHOLS N In N 47 m et 00 � * aA M ti) M `� at6i n nn (r1. I.L t�I) )- 41. 1I 41. a-I IA U to O. E d at cn -Q 0 o E Q N N eel E Vr fV n N 00 E ^ N 'Cr CO `m N n �X C m trl N a) N 4 N M' t0 3 0 >- v} 41. an E 'X t0 > a) C a v cu U 0j W 0 V O cu N Cp = 0 c6 •al � 'a cu ■ bp ■ V LL ii O ''' 'i+ b N 0 N .-1 e c u1 u i co • C m U1 Al m a oti m m Q. ,a; I.CL rn v1. iii. fu .4- V U d M C do E ..CO.., ar U Mw L C a°1 tn W e1. N O1 c 3° (N r1 al N N N LA O cn i = vii 4" 4011. W .L f C al V N L 8 8 8 8 8 8 v} `° 4• '{R 41. 4k 4/1. d (/1 (0 (C (0 '.'� 3 3 � ($) saeva u! lsoD • • E-7 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORT Ho Exhibit D—Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities IFin.?NICHOLS to N M 0% L. 0000 1t1 qt. a°. CR 0) Q lA N 'V N v > tn. v I" o 4/1• i/f. .in. CO 0. d 0 .0 Co 3 3 ° o a Q E co co 01 E is O C CO , N o Crt 01 CO m o 'x C 1, ri tNr1• r � 2 X = > +� v -a •m en 4— to aa) 1 O 0 0� = o a) o bu0 1.11 460 tG pt o� u� u >r g-i ID 0J E 0000 e,-t a° c0 Cl) N N n 00 4..• U. 3 ,n, } tai► +ten ro 4.1 4- Of C a°, ■ Q. co E 4. c a) OA u C a, o. vt .X W • el N G'1 C o N Q1 ei •L ,� ,�, W U? 4.4 4" CD C w 0 IA .. 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 ($) sie oa u! }sOD i FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. Exhibit D Capital Improvement Plan: Water Facilities FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 4055 INTERNATIONAL PLAZA,SUITE 200 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76109 817-735-7300 www.freese.com FREESE Innovative approaches Practical results Outstanding service Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Exhibit F: Capital Improvements Plan Wastewater Facilities 2017-2037 Prepared for: City of Fort Worth Water Department FORT Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. 4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817-735-7300 FTW16125 October 07, 2016 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® r7?NICHOLS Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Prepared for: City of Fort Worth Water Department a ',. III �.r, . •. a .:.**cc .GJ •• kP , E45:::A _ �3 z AWN / /hi 0� c� .`1 c:8 :r , 0 i'y: 106100 -'4,1: jp•• 115651 !vr,! tolet... VS, ......•_..,t .... 9144::R 40, II sI,LiNtA i„6„...,,,t, -1 s‘;PNAL t-,....."6 nrulvek,Ticck,...0.,44,...., a.„.6,_;". . .,4, F ,'I t '_ l�/1�" F't t , ;I . .. C�. j'� I''. FREESE AND CtHOLS.`INC .■i A%, hi' ,,I.-, ? F<I , - _ . L;. L ,; _ TEXAS REGISTERED .. t,...._ . _ 1-1-7:'!..1 F,.., — ` t -.�1 ENGINEERING FIRM I' 4 1' 4 F•2144 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. 4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817-735-7300 FTW16125 i Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r''NICHOLS FORT WORTH. Exhibit F-Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 EXISTING WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 2-1 2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants 2-1 2.2 Lift Stations and Force Mains 2-1 3.0 PROJECTED WASTEWATER FLOWS AND MODEL UPDATE 3-1 3.1 Projected Wastewater Flows 3-1 4.0 WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4-1 5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS 5-1 5.1 Service Units 5-1 5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation 5-3 TABLE OF TABLES Table 3-1 Projected Wastewater Flows 3-1 Table 4-1 Proposed Wastewater CIP Projects 4-2 Table 5-1 2017-2027 Impact Fee Eligible Costs 5-1 Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors 5-2 Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2017 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter 5-2 Table 5-4 Wastewater Impact Fees by Meter Size 5-4 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure F- 1 Existing Wastewater Facilities 5-5 Figure F- 2 Proposed Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan 5-6 APPENDICES Appendix A- Existing Wastewater Lift Station Capacities Appendix B -Wastewater CIP Projects Appendix C-Water Meter Summary Appendix D -Credit Calculation Analysis ii Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH ® r�iNICHOLS ''-'N111 Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI),to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study.This report establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2012. Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with expanding the municipal wastewater system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, lift stations, and pipelines that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the wastewater system is known as the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this study with capital project scope and cost provided by previously commissioned master planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water Department staff. The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities are eligible to be included in the impact fee analysis. The additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the study period are summarized. 1-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'REESE S FORT WORTH Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 2.0 EXISTING WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants The City of Fort Worth provides wastewater service to retail customers within the city and to 23 wholesale customers in the surrounding counties. The Fort Worth wastewater collection system is primarily a gravity flow system that follows the major drainage features of the service area. The City's collection system consists of 12 sewer basins. There are currently three major wastewater treatment facilities serving the study area:the Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility(WRF), which is owned and operated by the City of Fort Worth, and the Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant(WWTP) and the Central Regional WWTP, which are both owned and operated by the Trinity River Authority (TRA). The Village Creek WRF serves the majority of the population within the study area. The TRA Basin is served by the TRA Central WWTP,and the Denton Creek Basin is served by the TRA Denton Creek WWTP. 2.2 Lift Stations and Force Mains The City of Fort Worth currently operates 30 lift stations, which pump wastewater into gravity sewers. The City has made a conscious effort to limit the number of lift stations in the collection system. These lift stations are required because of local topographical constraints or to pump flows across sewer basins.Appendix A summarizes the existing lift station capacities. 2-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r''REES S FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 3.0 PROJECTED WASTEWATER FLOWS AND MODEL UPDATE 3.1 Projected Wastewater Flows The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) recommends a minimum of 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for municipal base flow. The 2012 master plan determined that the existing loading for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 91 gpcd based on flow monitoring data. The 2012 master plan recommends using 110 gpcd and an additional 10 gpcd to account for groundwater infiltration (GWI), resulting in a total per capita for future growth of 120 gpcd. The 2012 master plan determined that the current usage per employee per day for the City of Fort Worth is 37 gallons per employee per day. Additionally, the master plan recommends using 40 gped for future commercial growth. In order to calculate the annual average day wastewater flows,the population and employment growth projections were taken from Exhibit B:Land Use Assumptions- Wastewater Facilities. The 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan did not use a straight average flow to peak flow peaking factor because the City utilized an extended period simulation model to determine the projected peak flows. The model used the RTK method, which calculates a different peaking factor for each scenario dependent on amount of rainfall, peaking time, and recession time. From the 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan,the historical annual average flow to peak hour flow ratio is 3.03 and was used to calculate the peak flows. Table 3-1 summarizes the projected wastewater flows for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale customers. Table 3-1 Projected Wastewater Flows Non- Residential Residential Total Peak Wet Average Average Average Day Weather Day Flow Day Flow Flow Flow Planning Year (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) 2017 121 26 147 445 2027 150 32 182 552 3-1 Water& Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'RE EESS FORT WORTH ® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 4.0 WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS This section establishes the City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities and engineering studies that are eligible for inclusion in the calculation of the impact fee. The City's existing wastewater model was updated by FNI staff to reflect the updated flows for the impact fee period, as well as include the recommended CIP projects for the impact fee period. Projects included in the CIP increase system capacity as a result of projected growth. Only those projects warranted by capacity needs derived from growth occurring during the study period (2017 to 2027) can be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in place. Facilities included in the impact fee study are TRA projects, wastewater treatment facilities, lift stations, interceptors and engineering studies. Table 4-1 provides a summary of each wastewater CIP project cost and allocation for the 2017-2027 study period. The 2017 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing development. It is not included in the impact fee analysis. The 2017-2027 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve development projected to occur from 2017 to 2027.The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2017 through 2027 is calculated as the total cost multiplied by the 2017-2027 percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. Figures F-1 and F-2, show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study period. Appendix B describes each wastewater CIP project for the 2017-2027 planning period. The purpose of each project,the portion that are allocated to growth and the current status is also included. 4-1 1 FREESE FORT IF1`NICHOLS Table 4-1 Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects 2017-2027 v Cost A1.2180 Allocated to " fort � Added ,Ca °N3 %dating AR..lo x 4 L • > 0 c •n.2 to 2017-30E7 P.eJ.n Pl v.e TRA,OJeSxC P9 wlmcPN R1.I Pe6p.9�.1 Dollars' Date Date IMO 0I PRV Cape., Impact Fee, 027 423:3x7 TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS 5,es,om .61,7 iSo 506077060 2.1 0000 6s 6a0 573534355 Intercepter 50,x3651 23086,970 $360 .44s0e1125%U 54,44000 3.3sm $$360210 23360,160 • 00.17400 46mJVx.smU 5143.300 ,A99.6m S.S.001 $0 .<1,30x43,46 S,796,000 3910 1. 51.047 047 2016 2017 3 3 SO 311A1mv 31504,003 ¢3 23,x38000 59, 3,670 SO 6871464 7..3 6828 002 2,130 844.335 00 nCtreoxszsxl 76500 Hz $M4,308 30 1000, .mciM7mx.z99sR1 55540 $3.3 5$2,278.075 7016 2018 OM 50 .0%55 g9,ogg 00,6 gogg 0 0% m 60 0, 5100.604 50 C. 538060 S'.m,5m 20 51,956,660 Stssota 3878 101.2 peak slow 30.0.8% . 51.868400 m 00056456 30410,095 S30560.050 515.42.413 $0,070,422 .. 54,3017 st pa 382,7012 744371.506.4 Const ' 51,344¢9 x030 3031 $111,071 6524560 zsxcineo5rim.Iiamew 7wxJ.pmu TOTAL TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS 51369317544 5,85039.930 TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS RIG..COST $3,,a78 688 57 TREATMENT RACILmES 54,350023 53 $1,900,000 so I% 5,970 Oen • urvtmkwususaknzmeMJ.MPwe6.e. i"'4 51408 5639650 $413,1W 7011 2016 600%oe�e&er.3M'uslwrmimvmmea,,. Mrm 5995593�z9e S,SZ e9=x98 51o9Tz.s79 6398 we,,954843 Hee 402256Neu) CNVme 5$20971,046 S3492004 100 23.63407 $36,387.889 P9.e u.4e 96,.,.3.x30 uw✓,<„5 53691;6 w 916 7016 3019 00% 50 88.• sews w90O.L.94007 seen Io.l H 000 $3,190,103 2323.3109 i NN.Omts 29,4H.m H.,s n IP6.:e x44,93 uc0..e.^. rme36nang 2260 6]4,33x102 236.109 Om 323..4 3am19v 003..0^9pN 230704` - 510,311933 31,06300 VW.Up2431 .Clarent•ss10.328.IH,aie35ax910O04 04. CNN.. sum $30,097,438 so. 557338 627 130.1FP 0013 Man,1.150121102 1.1.8.31 33, S56.160 000 563 331 Ad 2023 wsm 9a.91 54600.010 Ss.SS.08i500 x021 86x4 92985304 ,3.056 5632,966 56569920 vcwerswzn i^n�,em LA wee.ly-31 TOTAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS $1565,,;93 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS ELwI6LE COST 593.041.443 REGIONAL LIFT STATIONS IL INTERCEPTORS 5y 6x4 Eng 5430850 2330000 2366 33070 50071926 033140 S.k Hm.940 ,,, - $13937$67 so. 51597. 32..x580 - So 51331,390 51.310796 Eng• Oeet xo�^en re,vv w' 52amz4m 5114,6& • oeete.1 saeewm 55m9m 51 700.,00 5o 55043119 Lcs 24400RywellMS3xm tss Wes.) use 23 SSln Slaeflmo 51,■2.400 1u 50 $1,1413993 20 MA 5785A. 1,6 142.11.8 158 78.1.12111/8 Co. $159,59 5■55000 nap 7073 3.0 5a $$x595966 5100x000 zazo zfal Rum 50 $1.17,166 74.080. 108 Hog Tot $3,670,746 fe H�37941m $m,599� S..IrmHaae.r...RH3463zm.14 3HNPO15 543333$,003 - 23433 n4 230 and 13 338 138.8 13.1.45180 around.Ta., 5xpmm0 v314. 52,216,656 LS, ore di 53 03414o 53,..I,SeWwuOSUUm6rrwau.uw $2.017,843 .056 51345 228 anions lS9 Fake arington•vC Wahl.645.Fat Pe,awl^10a13 $$533 5200000 5211. 2023 2.02S 51,42020 54453486 012434439 . 5700160 5039 595 2014 3035 • o cm so 10053 522,960 5x66.636 ber6wxN.m 51564,4. 20 5196,194 5063;00 R.6..w 724133S4uee3w .mxoten 56,942224 3l,e a6>renu.e - $6,224 397,013 . - 4 can Ss93 59640. 2035 3035 1.1.0 OA% m 608 551,869 gam SLOAN 4:v 1.x94001.$ewe&..lJns�6w>•P44H6,ewwup<o.w9.6^ <^^^ ENGINEERING STOGIES s6 fIm nsre�73,7x337 63636 I 00 1 7396 I 3 ems I ,'OF'a 1)'85 sreav 5317.98, $406..'00 51 23 TOTAL WASTEWATER CIP ,$136,932,545 $75,312,901 $2G34$E 411 $340,037,192 I $196,604,503 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NIEESES FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS Table 5-1 summarizes impact fee eligible costs for projects. Table 4-1 shows the detailed development of the costs and capacities of the eligible facilities. Table 5-1 2017-2027 Impact Fee Eligible Costs %Allocated to 2017-2027 Total Growth 2017-2027 Growth CIP Category Related Cost Impact Fees Related Cost TRA Projects $78,039,930 50.6% $39,478,688 Treatment Plants $156,677,593 59.4% $93,041,443 Lift Stations/ $62,719,329 Interceptors $101,724,832 61.7% Engineering Studies $4,274,837 31.9% $1,365,042 IMPACT FEE SUBTOTAL $196,604,503 FINANCING COSTS $135,735,324 TOTAL IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE COST $332,339,827 5.1 Service Units The different costs between customer types are allocated through the application of the equivalent meter concept. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential customer, a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8" x 3/4" meter capacity.Table 5-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standard C700-02, Cold-Water Meters— Displacement Type, Bronze Main Case and AWWA Standard C701-07, Cold-Water Meters—Turbine Type,for Customer Service. 5-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update �''NICHOLS FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors 5/8"x 3/4" Meter Size Equivalency Factor 5/8"x 3/4" 1.00 3/4" 1.50 1" 2.50 1-1/2" 5.00 2" 8.00 3" 21.75 4" 37.50 6" 80.00 8" 140.00 10" 210.00 Appendix C contains the number of water meters for residential and non-residential customers by meter size for the City of Fort Worth, as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this information to FNI. The number of equivalent meters was also calculated for the City and wholesale customers. The next calculation step determines factors for population per residential meter and employment per non-residential meter. Table 5-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and wholesale customers using 2017 information. Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2017 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter Description Residential Non-Residential City of Fort Worth Number of Equivalent Meters 299,889 117,005 Population/Employment 825,967 550,117 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.75 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 4.70 Wholesale Customers Number of Equivalent Meters 137,139 46,818 Population/Employment 339,103 142,309 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.47 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 3.04 FNI did not receive meter count information from four of Fort Worth's wholesale wastewater customers; however,their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee 5-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r''NICREESE HOLS FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities study. The number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per equivalent meter in Table 5-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent meter, FNI. divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or employment served by Fort Worth. The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2017 and 2027 uses the ratios in Table 5-3 and the population and employment projections for 2017 and 2027 from Exhibit B: Land Use Assumptions- Wastewater Facilities report.The calculation is shown below: City of Fort Worth Residential = Population Change/Population per Equivalent Meter = (1,026,780—825,967)/2.75 =73,023 Non- Residential = Employment Change/Employment per Equivalent Meter = (679,901—550,117)/4.70 =27,614 Fort Worth Total = Residential+Non-Residential =73,023+27,614 = 100,637 Wholesale Customers Residential = Population Change/Population per Equivalent Meter =(379,802—339,103)/2.47 = 16,477 Non-Residential = Employment Change/Employment per Equivalent Meter =(173,522—142,309)/3.04 = 10,267 Wholesale Total = Residential+Non-Residential = 16,477+ 10,267 =26,744 Grand Total =Fort Worth Total+Wholesale Total =100,637+26,744 =127,381 5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation This report is based on a credit equal to 50% of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan, as specified in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Should the City 5-3 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® rm iNICHOLS Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities choose to adopt an impact fee of greater than 50% of the total projected cost, a detailed credit calculation analysis is included in Appendix D. Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of expansion for the study period from Table 5-1 divided by the increase in equivalent meters. This fee equals the maximum wastewater impact fee for a 5/8" x 3/4"water meter size. Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee =Cost of Expansion/Increase in Equivalent Meters =$332,339,827/127,381 =$2,609 per 5/8"x 3/4" equivalent meter The wastewater impact fees for meters other than 5/8"x 3/4" are the product of the fee per 5/8"x 3/4" equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 5-2. The maximum allowable wastewater impact fees are provided in Table 5-4, as well as the resulting impact fee at a 50% collection rate. Table 5-4 Wastewater Impact Fees by Meter Size 5/8"x 3/4" Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Meter Size Equivalency Factor Impact Fee (Collected at 50%) 5/8"x 3/4" 1.00 $2,609 $1,304 3/4" 1.50 $3,914 $1,956 1" 2.50 $6,523 $3,260 1-1/2" 5.00 $13,045 $6,520 2" 8.00 $20,872 $10,432 3" 21.75 $56,746 $28,362 4" 37.50 $97,838 $48,900 6" 80.00 $208,720 $104,320 8" 140.00 $365,260 $182,560 10" 210.00 $547,890 $273,840 5-4 AMY Geatea By Freels...NKinla,Inc Job Na FFN16125 Ft.wwxoW&RecNeo,._F1ec b�w.aa_F.onn1ut>).:ma UMua.Fr.Center 07 2018 _ I1 r--f i ~ �`-----—1 FIGURE F-1 ' CITY OF FORT WORTH Coela lave La I Lake COUKry LS Nit I f----, I I 2017 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY J A j u' -.- Cosier Creek LS , l Eagle MouurbaLS 11+'- lir ' r} EXISTING FACILITIES Lake Country LS N4 1 1 `t�ik .1.`-- s= .Ot4,ty. LEGEND Engie.Alounrron Resennn" Lake Gauntry LS?J t fro,, Existing Lift Station Wastewater Wholesale■Lake Country LS N2 N- - i Tj I I Customer ��� _ x sunset Cove LS — _ = Existing Non-Wholesale Lake Country LS Ns Water Reclamation Center 1--1 Customer /---Road ETJ Boundary Ranch at Eagle Mountain LS�L !' i ' .... Lake County Boundary � _,,, La C unty B a 20a 1 , Coy Limit FORT WORTH SCALE IN FEET i Jgst FREESE WORTH. I �7�micHO�s � I r 1 L "1-'' _,,r' 1 1 { 1 'y 1 I_ r(------'Inl S#1 1"� ^z_.,.._\ _ A� �"�►. _J' '4 J J:,�e1 l'`^ �.rnpeeine Cnl�a \I ,I___.... { I r 1 Shield LS s t ._.il. - ._gil /V) ' /' parker I ; S' pL� ' Intel Ls#2 ` Se `- P .� ^' Senders Ranch LS '��a- ...`.Z Gwpsvaa County r-. ,•Spring Ranch LS 1' gi Cy I _ 26 gg Iiii f-r L..1 ae L--i �ll ��r A i` -�J Engle 1aintthh\�j of°.-4,^ IL 1 Glen Mills LS —._ '-,,•1 ColleyMS 97 r 1 1 ®�� y Rese nom Y L _ f'�+, r n,iY 4 �!—.__ WATAUGA I I __ --NORfH Tpt` `, 1-' i- SAGINAW -, II -. a PoCHLAND i�26 WI (: -__:ice ti S L-_ 1 BLUE 1` HILLS a " .1_41 Jeenkins Heights LS HURST , ®,r 1. Mead Lakes LS� ,/ 1 Ilia __._ L ,Gets rM�II ri .. _ HALTOM i \ r '--{- t WORTH �I CITY PoCHLAND 1U -{-.: t) -r�1,nA !1 rl ,> r Lake Worts LS li ® LL•S"' --_°- ` ♦ t SANSOM __ Spring Addition LS i/ Mosier Valley LS ^r Castle Circle LS1 } -� .r' PARK • '1® ®t l ' r L f r ,'�Live Oak Creek LS ' ) 'OAKS- 199 `" .�/_... 1 Village Creek WRC —•... ( r t L _ s- _ 1 GreanWaY LS. I WHITE `-WESTWORTH y �� f..__.. / w trey ` / VILLAGE�L - Museum Way 1 -ek J I SETTLEMENT- `� J� Western Hdls}LS� WESTOVER r .1� , - � - Z ■ 303 Jo, , . / 1 SPAN I 1 ,..,_7_,_____,..... i ®I , I r Mir '"Jrngb Arlington I' I 1 ,,/t ' .',-hoc. ' 1.-Enchanted Bari LS " . l'/ -_ llrvy ■ r- WlnnvvDbrle LS r 9. ---. 1 — BENBROOK 1\ 1� 1 ', s 1 1 Hulen Bend LS � `./EDGECLIF,F r j- HILL '1 s i I 1 ® w' FGREST I_- VILLAGES ( - _ ' ( Un\ ' I KENNEDALE 1 I s . I [�, Potlrartlson Slough LS I r L I_ _ A z1 ''"1s�u _ ', r"AN ti 1 1 " ugh} t r i"�- - \} i I ////J Poo Lnk_ (5 � `1 f�erUrook L d2�L,v'I, -__ Lam_ I _. "'1.. t.:3„..,, t P '.S' ' / S x mercreek Ranch LS V----- / - r \f}{�i' , r Rosemary Ridge LS 1 1 A _� CROWLEY i.. `l j. 377 -`,„ _..... _----+- -\ r ' { 1 / ,.� t `- �' BURLESON.� 1 / I I I•� /� BETHESDA ., 6 WSC m/ 1 ! � � �`\ , / 1 0 \\.. ) , __,....,,- ,c,i ' '-r-.---- n, SCALE IN FEET , FIGURE F-2 Job No FIVI16125 Vain.Friday C7:07 MI6 . CITY OF FORT WORTH ,1 1 2017 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY Denton I — PROPOSED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS County, l LEGEND 1 s. s 0 Proposed Lift Station 0 Lake s ��` 0 Lift Station Expansion i-u ,Fort Worth City Limit 11 tt I� Existing r----- 1 G Water Reclamation Facility ---?Fort Wodh ETJ Boundary J , I Water Wholesale �\ l , # F.,. ®Marys Creek WRF Customer She 10 t. L Non-Wholesale ( ti r-^"." TRA Sewer Line Customer 287 Alta J 1 Parallel Improvement :-••-‘County Boundary 1 ' NO � � Road ..-. j FORT` _ i ;-y ( ��NICHOLS -'""`—,' 7`",`x1 10-25HC-1S �_ 4'� ®; Denton Creek WWTP- "`� �*,. f '� qx, py.77.6 MGD �- -{-2.---z.) ` i 1 1�r P.OANOKE - ti i.- i �1`� L____1 10-25HC-2 (' 1 clue \ Lakes ; 81 10-201-1C-1 rape... ° — -- ff/ \ r_'. 15-25HC) l. - -_ /•�l,wE C 'Sr`�L. «xc""n_,"«; Proposed LS e, Parkes Bonds Ranch C ) IV, i 1 xo uK.R° 3.0 MGD -y ! �-,--.f 75-25HC5 ' County Ls-lc , ,,-, I 4 § J 'iggi L 1 HASLET• , f sourNURE Gra 1 e Proposed LS I pv I a Bonds Ranch B ._.: sox F .r 26 po 2.0 MGD L uoxxsox �t "E:weeEw v,uFm wu. sl .� Proltdsed LS rti, j may: _r KEuER --- ®, gip. Bonds Ranch A ___-_. r .a i l ,�� 1 .,�.yq t 2.0 MGD 1 rl L--DOSIer Creek LS c-\\ \\ i 1 r"'+el--rte L3-1A� .Q L j_ Dosser Creek 20"FM a f Fa°° ° 14 1 1 1 '(gl Vou a 1- WWMP 28 287 "IA " / i•. v hh nt _ •most I-- I r a •R wy ® RD n AIR'.Rr A ^P rig -� RA t aas>,a 'g- a / ... Lake Country LS tf4 I sacwaw 1 P; i °°° „w�v,Ea°'�i i/ a EEK � w ® a I 1 ;t S w e / j,.2.0 MGD f , 1 p MIONFI�C....w 2B \ SNAG; .1f.- hj_�9 ,• I _ LS-13M/WMP--ee _\ C I I xo g y 0Anuv„o NoRTN g not n f I - - __. _l 4 -- WATAUGA RICNLA ° Pn al set _ and . I ' I `I j - 1 I -::3 1� I / - d ® Euless r._- )1,!,,NIUS : Casino Beach LS t -`r^�\, i G �'--� ® 0.3 MGD, � r,r^'. 'l y �.�''''''-yyyyyy.//////...! NURSr ■ I '.4") 1 J • WW_ 9,�,` I r• '�« \ oLxw�ivon i ( I �LOkas de L sd° -j. \\ I, f® tit TII-I I 8205 `C I' R/CNLAND I D --LJ `i. L4KESIDE`� ,Y l LAKE c\ W HILS. 1- _ l,` 1 i "°h1 \ ft Harry t08tinch Thirtl Barrel 1 1 _ °' Live Oak Creek LS I LaR 1� 1,--,I ..ov�,L I/ L,Interceptor r; 4.0 MGD '� _, ®_r Village Creek WRF--F LSD j / //1 o�-1, ti® Proposed Improvements 1 r-�) I 1 i/uL i WESTWORTHIIRIU® ®. '- , �/:iR /--__.� 1 r VILCAGE�I , ° I1 / i�-� I __ lr M� 1 aa,ar Y- �— 1,.. nexw Proposed t I E 1 \,..,e--1-.)- 1 ,r"n• (� Mary's Creek WRF • ti sE LEcEr;T wOS ro ER ,n I J ( r - _C,74- o \ WWMP 53 ;I / fti H S a° ufrrnowaxo I occ L7";,,,;;;.r.,,>'- . 1 1 K. xA. 1 I \ CT�P m , / } Cis.S08 L__.--1-1 I ® °,r• _.-2$ i EQ -'12 LMORTI(at3TON s / i ALEDO� I _ �t :�' I !�._iI �4 $ �`-••_... l + % 5 ---...�L# F j Walsh Ranch I J -I t .} oe',� - - �......-�./. roc w Phase IVB L5 z -- rr. .,� / # i \ `\ �'-'1.0 MGD I -J:. J Boson/OK 1..__.1- / -u_�I ,�� _ I % Proposed LS rx oaxs aLwo ,1 1 LS-6 I ✓mn f � : / ."--,....1,,,,ro ,itp', 7 1 F noon I 25.0 MGD 1 GRAN ao■ i / / :. EDGECLIFF. � L p 1 Hl y7:414.....1-77,` .y LS-9 / PRAIRI g t _ O J I VL AOE 1 I 1 I L_-� tits Richardson Slough LS 1 •1.L KENNEDALE 1�� l 4 10.0 MGD 1,t 1.+—�TFF++►""" cgs i t LS-12PWWM P-61 l _ f ----, E 1 \ /(jl J,Poo■ t . /''] N,\ 1 I EVERM N I l Sf A' . . `1 I 1 Benbroak LaS -1 _., -4 E - 1 B] - _--_./_II 5 t-___ • ,, rJ EZ. °1 ! Tarleton Regional LS ,1 i RDwLEr ; .In _ �� l �ijrl «/le 12.0 MGD "' L_, \ ! :1 n © .� LS 5 -,..� 1 ! 1-��� H �i i < . \I ,\.\ t 7,11_;. BETHESDA `'� l*>'a l l WSC �� 1 ® el.lohnson _--,_; p ze7 I County :. :. � ��� �`�. \ Ellis ,0--— J=l r ✓' c, m� County ■ D 18"000` — �. --"„" '\I - � SCALE IN FEET /I -!r ----- , , i �7 NICNOLS FORT WORTH® Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update ■ o ---"%lr-- Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities APPENDIX A EXISTING WASTEWATER LIFT STATION CAPACITIES rim<NFRICHOLEESE S FORT WORTH® APPENDIX A ---- Iir '- Existing Fort Worth Wastewater Lift Stations No. Name Address Firm Total #of Capacity Pumps 1 Castle Circle 9101 Heron Dr 1.0 mgd 2 pumps 2 Dosier Creek 9241 Boat Club Rd 10.0 mgd 3 pumps 3 Enchanted Bay 5788 Vesta Farley Rd 0.7 mgd 2 pumps 4 Glen Mills 9091 Saginaw Blvd 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 5 Greenway 1000 Nixon Rd 2 mgd 2 pumps 6 Hulen Bend 6401 Oakmont Blvd 0.8 mgd 2 pumps 7 Intel# 1 3001 Eagle Pkwy 3.9 mgd 2 pumps 8 Intel #2 3200 Keller-Haslet Rd 8 mgd 3 pumps 9 Jenkins Heights 4525 Norris Valley Dr 1.8 mgd 2 pumps 10 Lake Worth 6201 Cahoba Dr 2.2 mgd 2 pumps 11 Lake Country#11 9401 Boat Club Rd 0.9 mgd 2 pumps 12 Lake Country#12 9341 Mountain Lake 0.9 mgd 2 pumps 13 Lake Country#13 9331 Dosier Cove W 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 14 Lake Country#2 7903 Skylake Dr 0.1 mgd 2 pumps 15 Lake Country#3 8831 Random Rd 0.8 mgd 2 pumps 16 Lake Country#4 9033 Crosswind Dr 0.9 mgd 2 pumps 17 Lake Country#5 8420 Crosswind Dr 0.2 mgd 2 pumps 18 Live Oak 731 Verna Trail N 2.9 mgd 2 pumps 19 Meadow Lakes 4691 St.Thomas Place 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 20 Mosier Valley 3120 House Anderson Rd 0.14 mgd 2 pumps A-1 21 Ranch at Eagle Mtn 6692 Robertson Rd 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 22 Richardson Slough 7990 Old Granbury Rd 4.6 mgd 3 pumps 23 Rosemary Ridge 10499 Old Crowley Cleburne Rd 1.0 mgd 2 pumps 24 Sendera Ranch 1092 Avondale Haslet Rd 1.5 mgd 2 pumps 25 Shield 14050 Park Vista Blvd 0.7 mgd 2 pumps 26 Spring Ranch 1100 Travis Court 0.4 mgd 2 pumps 27 Summer Creek 9898 W Cleburne Rd 1.5 mgd 2 pumps 28 Sunset Cove 8505 Lake Country Dr 4.0 mgd 3 pumps 29 Western Hills 2717 Glenrock 0.3 mgd 2 pumps 30 Winn Dixie 200 SW Loop 820 0.5 mgd 2 pumps A-2 n cHOLS FORT WORTH® Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update ■�7 Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities APPENDIX B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS Project Title: Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Description Construction of a 6.5 mgd expansion of TRAs Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address potential growth needs by expanding the existing treatment plant. Allocation: This project is allocated 30%in the study period. Project Title: CB-1 30-Inch Parallel Relief Interceptor Description Land purchase and construction of a 30-inch relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide flow capacity to address potential growth needs by paralleling the existing interceptor. Allocation: This project is allocated 12%in the study period. Project Title: 25 HC-1 Relief Interceptor Description Land purchase and construction of 12,500 feet of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide flow capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 50% in the study period. Project Title: 25 HC-3 Relief Interceptor Description Land purchase and construction of 13,100 feet of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide flow capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 100%in the study period. Project Title: 25 HC-5 Relief Interceptor and MS 12.0 HC Description Land purchase and construction of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide flow capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 100%in the study period. B-1 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS Project Title: Two Alternate Discharge 14 MGD Pumps Description Design and construction of two alternate discharge pumps at the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide additional discharge capacity at the Denton Creek WWTP to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 50%in the study period. Project Title: Peak Flow Storage Description Design and construction of a peak flow storage structure at the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide additional peak flow storage capacity at the Denton Creek WWTP to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 50%in the study period. Project Title: 25 HC-2 Relief Interceptor Description Land purchase and construction of 4,400 feet of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WWTP. Purpose: Provide flow capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 19%in the study period. B-2 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS WASTEWATER TREATMENT Project Title: Mary's Creek WRF Site Selection and Land Purchase Description Land purchase for Mary's Creek WRF to address growth related needs in the Clear Fork sewer basin. Purpose: Provide treatment needs to address growth needs by constructing a new treatment facility to serve portions of the Clear Fork Basin. Allocation: This project is allocated 40%in the study period. Project Title: Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications Description: Modification of the deep bed media filters 1-20. Purpose: Provides added treatment capacity at the Village Creek Reclamation Facility. Allocation: This project is allocated 40%in the study period. Project Title: VCWRF Peak Flow Diversion Structure Description: Design and construction of a wastewater diversion and peak flow storage basin adjacent to the Village Creek Reclamation Facility(VCWRF). Purpose: Detention facility will equalize the peak influent flows to the VCWWTP.This project will divert and store the peak flows for later treatment under normal conditions. Allocation: This project is allocated 85% in the study period. Project Title: VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12&Grit System(Phase 2B of 191 mgd expansion) Description: Design and construction for the replacement of primary clarifiers 1-12 and addition of a new grit removal system sized to meet the 191 MGD expansion requirements. Purpose: The addition of new primary clarifiers to replace the existing primary clarifiers 1-12 would greatly increase the functional capacity of the primary clarifiers and increase hydraulic capacity of the internal 96 inch pipeline.Primary clarifiers 1-12 at VCWRF are a hydraulic bottleneck which needs to be addressed to realize the planned expansion to 191 MGD.In addition to being ahydraulic bottleneck,the reliability of the clarifiers are impacted by large amounts of grit (particularly at higher flows).These clarifiers need to be replaced before the 191 MGD capacity can be realized and a new grit removalsystem needs to be added to increase reliability in capacity and treatment. B-3 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS Allocation: This project is allocated 88% in the study period. Project Title: Mary's Creek WRF Phase 1 Description: Permitting,design and construction of Mary's Creek WRF to address growth related needs in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: Provide treatment needs to address growth needs by constructing a new treatment plant to serve portions of the Clear Fork Basin. Allocation: This project is allocated 40%in the study period. Project Title: VCWRF South Influent Lift Station Description: Design and construction of an influent lift station at the VCWRF. Purpose: The influent lift station is needed to address growth by providing added influent capacity at the VCWRF. Allocation: This project is allocated 88%in the study period. B-4 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS REGIONAL LIFT STATIONS AND INTERCEPTORS Project Title: Casino Beach Lift Station and Lake Worth Gravity Sewer Extension Description: Design and construction of a 0.3 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: This project is the extension of new sewer service to the west side of Lake Worth. The new service extension is a proposed 8-inch sewer line to serve customers on the west side of Lake Worth along Watercress Dr.The gravity line will convey flow to the Casino Beach Lift Station along Jacksboro Highway on the west side of the lake. The lift station will pump the flow across the lake to the existing Meadow Lakes Lift Station. The new gravity line, along with the proposed lift station and 3-inch force main will provide service to customers currently using an OSSF. Allocation: This project is allocated 85% in the study period. Project Title: Dosier Creek 20-inch Force Main Description: Design and construction of 20-inch force main in the Marine Creek and Big Fossil Basins. Purpose: The purpose of this force main is to provide future wastewater service to the Marine Creek Basin. Due to tight corridors and easements in the downtown area the future flow will be pumped from the Marine Creek Basin to the Big Fossil Basin through the Dosier Creek Lift Station.The transfer of flow will reduce the amount of flow through the downtown corridor and delay the need for paralleling larger interceptors in that area. Allocation: This project is allocated 50% in the study period. Project Title: Tarleton Regional Lift Station LS-5(Upsize) Description: Design and construction of a 12 mgd lift station in the Sycamore Creek Basin. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to the Sycamore Creek Basin. The lift station will serve potential growth in the southwestern corner of the Sycamore Creek Basin and convey it into the existing collection system. Allocation: This project is allocated 45% in the study period. B-5 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS Project Title: Walsh Ranch Lift Station and Force Main IVB Description: Design and construction of a 1 mgd lift station in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to the Clear Fork Basin. The lift station will serve potential growth in the western corner of the Clear Fork Basin and convey it into the existing collection system. Allocation: This project is allocated 80%in the study period. Project Title: Bonds Ranch Lift Station"A"and Force Main Description: Design and construction of 2 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City. Allocation: This project is allocated 72%in the study period. Project Title: Bonds Ranch Lift Station"B"and Force Main Description: Design and construction of 2 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City. Allocation: This project is allocated 72%in the study period. Project Title: 108-Inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 and M-338 Description: Design and construction of a 108-inch wastewater interceptor west of the VCWRF. Purpose: The purpose of this interceptor is to provide capacity to accommodate projected growth. Allocation: This project is allocated 64%in the study period. Project Title: Live Oak Creek Regional Lift Station and Force Main Expansion Description: Design and construction of a 1.12 mgd firm capacity expansion lift station of the Live Oak Creek Lift Station to serve future growth. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station expansion is to provide future wastewater service to the western portion of the West Fork Basin. Allocation: This project is allocated 100%in the study period. B-6 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS Project Title: Lake Arlington-VC Drainage Basin Lift Station and Force Main Description: Design and construction of a 25 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: The proposed 25 MGD Village Creek Lift Station and 30-inch force main will discharge into a proposed 54-inch gravity interceptor.The force main will follow the proposed alignment of the new Lakeshore Drive along the west side of Lake Arlington.The purpose of this lift station is to provide growth future wastewater service to the Village Creek Basin. Allocation: This project is allocated 60% in the study period. Project Title: Bonds Ranch Lift Station"C"and Force Main Description: Design and construction of 3 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City. Allocation: This project is allocated 24% in the study period. Project Title: 5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion and 20-inch Force Main in the Clear Fork Basin Description: This project is a 5.5 MGD expansion of the Richardson Slough Lift Station just east of Benbrook Lake in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: The purpose of this expansion is to provide future wastewater service to growth related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 10% in the study period. Project Title: 1.1 MGD Lake Country#4 Lift Station Expansion in the Marine Creek Basin Description: This project is the expansion of the existing Lake Country#4 Lift Station,which will be upgraded from a firm capacity of 0.95 MGD to 2.0 MGD. Purpose: The purpose of this expansion/rehabilitation is to provide future wastewater service to growth related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 6%in the study period. B-7 Appendix B WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS WASTEWATER ENGINEERING STUDIES Project Title: 2009 Wastewater System Master Plan Description: Engineering Study Purpose: The 2009 master plan was an update of the 1999 study and includes the planning period 2010 through 2020. Allocation: This project is allocated 30%to the study period. Project Title: 2012 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Description: Impact Fee Study Purpose: The 2016 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for the study period 2017 through 2027. Allocation: This project is allocated 100%to the study period. B-8 Water& Wastewater Impact Fee Update r''NICHOLS FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities APPENDIX C WATER METER SUMMARY Table C-1 Water Meter Summary City of Fort Worth Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 199,200 199,200 3/4" 1.50 663 995 1" 2.50 21,870 54,675 1-1/2" 5.00 2,046 10,230 2" 8.00 2,058 16,464 3" 21.75 20 435 4" 37.50 56 2,100 6" 80.00 130 10,400 8" 140.00 34 4,760 10" 210.00 3 630 TOTAL 226,080 299,889 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 7,265 7,265 3/4" 1.50 12 18 1" 2.50 3,571 8,928 1-1/2" 5.00 2,103 10,515 2" 8.00 5,202 41,616 3" 21.75 366 7,961 4" 37.50 331 12,413 6" 80.00 169 13,520 8" 140.00 68 9,520 10" 210.00 25 5,250 TOTAL 19,112 117,005 Wholesale Customer: Benbrook Water Authority Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 6,238 6,238 3/4" 1.50 58 88 1" 2.50 3,101 7,752 1-1/2" 5.00 10 49 2" 8.00 13 107 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 9,420 14,233 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 176 176 3/4" 1.50 8 11 1" 2.50 237 593 1-1/2" 5.00 52 258 2" 8.00 183 1,460 3" 21.75 40 864 4" 37.50 1 40 6" 80.00 1 86 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 697 3,489 Page C-1 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Bethesda Water Supply Corportation Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 14 14 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 14 14 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Wholesale Customer: City of Blue Mound Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 777 777 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 777 777 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 2 2 3/4" 1.50 10 15 1" 2.50 1 3 1-1/2" 5.00 1 5 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 15 33 Page C-2 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Burleson Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 12,978 12,978 3/4" 1.50 2 3 1" 2.50 27 68 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 3 24 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 13,013 13,088 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 391 391 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 129 323 1-1/2" 5.00 94 470 2" 8.00 191 1,528 3" 21.75 20 435 4" 37.50 3 113 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 829 3,339 Wholesale Customer: City of Crowley Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 5,168 5,168 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 28 70 1-1/2" 5.00 3 15 2" 8.00 7 56 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 5,208 5,353 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 171 171 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 63 158 1-1/2" 5.00 22 110 2" 8.00 58 464 3" 21.75 9 196 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 324 1,136 Page C-3 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Edgecliff Village Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1,257 1,257 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,257 1,257 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1 1 3/4" 1.50 3 5 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 3 16 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 1 152 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 9 174 Wholesale Customer: City of Everman Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,676 2,514 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,676 2,514 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 125 188 1" 2.50 8 20 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 11 88 3" 21.75 1 22 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 146 355 Page C-4 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Forest Hill Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 4,774 7,161 1" 2.50 0 0 11/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 4,774 7,161 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 64 160 1-1/2" 5.00 30 150 2" 8.00 50 400 3" 21,75 0 0 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 147 865 Wholesale Customer: Haltom City Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 11,985 17,978 1" 2.50 39 99 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80,00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 12,026 18,084 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,033 3,049 1" 2.50 542 1,355 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 504 4,034 3" 21,75 122 2,652 4" 37,50 22 843 6" 80.00 5 379 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 3,228 12,313 Page C-5 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Hurst Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 8,850 8,850 3/4" 1.50 1 2 1" 2.50 1,241 3,103 1-1/2" 5.00 40 200 2" 8.00 8 64 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 7 263 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 10,147 12,481 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 408 408 3/4" 1.50 1 2 1" 2.50 332 830 1-1/2" 5.00 203 1,015 2" 8.00 177 1,416 3" 21.75 29 631 4" 37.50 15 563 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,166 4,944 Wholesale Customer: City of Kennedale Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 67 67 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 6 15 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 9 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 73 91 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 7 7 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 1 3 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 9 18 Page C-6 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Lake Worth Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 1 1 3/4" 1.50 1,679 2,519 1" 2.50 144 360 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,825 2,888 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 133 200 1" 2.50 122 305 1-1/2" 5.00 43 215 2" 8.00 106 848 3" 21.75 25 544 4" 37.50 5 188 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 434 2,299 Wholesale Customer: City of North Richland Hills Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 16,704 16,704 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 853 2,133 1-1/2" 5.00 4 21 2" 8.00 14 110 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 17,575 18,968 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 590 590 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 301 754 1-1/2" 5.00 69 347 2" 8.00 643 5,143 3" 21.75 26 571 4" 37.50 17 630 6" 80.00 3 252 8" 140.00 2 294 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,652 8,581 Page C-7 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Pantego Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 488 732 1" 2.50 43 108 1-1/2" 5.00 4 20 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 535 860 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 316 474 1" 2.50 11 28 1-1/2" 5.00 9 45 2" 8.00 14 112 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 354 777 Wholesale Customer: City of Richland Hills Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,783 4,175 1" 2.50 79 198 1-1/2" 5.00 8 40 2" 8.00 12 96 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 2,882 4,508 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 173 260 1" 2.50 83 208 1-1/2" 5.00 29 145 2" 8.00 38 304 3" 21.75 4 87 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 329 1,078 Page C-8 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of River Oaks Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 2,562 2,562 3/4" 1.50 15 23 1" 2.50 50 125 1-1/2" 5.00 9 45 2" 8.00 2 16 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 2,638 2,771 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 121 121 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 29 73 1-1/2" 5.00 18 90 2" 8.00 16 128 3" 21.75 1 22 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 2 160 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 188 631 Wholesale Customer: City of Saginaw Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 6,964 10,446 1" 2.50 9 23 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 6,973 10,469 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 167 251 1" 2.50 116 290 1-1/2" 5.00 12 60 2" 8.00 137 1,096 3" 21.75 16 348 4" 37.50 7 263 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 456 2,387 Page C-9 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Sansom Park Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,481 2,222 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 1,481 2,222 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 115 173 1" 2.50 2 5 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 4 32 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 121 210 Wholesale Customer: Trinity River Authority Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Page C-10 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Watauga Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 7,949 11,924 1" 2.50 1 3 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 7,950 11,926 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 109 163 1" 2.50 107 269 1-1/2" 5.00 6 28 2" 8.00 122 978 3" 21.75 2 49 4" 37.50 1 42 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 1 158 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 349 1,688 Wholesale Customer: Westover Hills Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 12 18 1" 2.50 93 233 1-1/2" 5.00 159 795 2" 8.00 46 368 3" 21.75 2 44 4" 37.50 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 313 1,495 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 Page C-11 Table C-1 Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Westworth Village Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 540 810 1" 2.50 6 15 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 3 24 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 549 849 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 3/4" 1.50 3 5 1" 2.50 15 38 1-1/2" 5.00 6 30 2" 8.00 18 144 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 2 75 6" 80.00 1 80 8" 140.00 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 46 511 Wholesale Customer: White Settlement Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 5,088 5,088 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 5 13 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 2" 8.00 4 33 3" 21.75 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 5,098 5,134 Non-Residential Meters Meter Size Quantity Meters Served by Equivalent Meters Served Equivalency Factor Ft.Worth by Ft.Worth 5/8"x 3-4" 1.00 224 224 3/4" 1.50 0 0 1" 2.50 70 175 1-1/2" 5.00 44 219 2" 8.00 107 860 3" 21.75 12 262 4" 37.50 4 165 6" 80.00 1 88 8" 140.00 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 TOTAL 463 1,993 Page C-12 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update ICHtFORT WORTH.r'NOS Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities APPENDIX D CREDIT CALCULATION ANALYSIS Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NICHOLS FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities CREDIT CALCULATION CODE GOVERNING IMPACT FEE DEVELOPMENT Local Government Code Title 12, Subtitle C, Chapter 395 contains the rules governing Impact Fee development. As defined in those rules, the maximum impact fee per service unit shall be calculated by dividing the costs of the portion of capital improvements attributed to new growth by the number of new growth units over the time period covered in the impact fee analysis (Section 395.015 MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT, (b)). In addition,the capital improvements plan must contain a plan for awarding either: • A credit for the portion of utility service revenues (rates)generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt,that are included in the capital improvements plan; or • In the alternative,a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan (Section 395.014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, (A)(7)). The code further states that the impact fee is not allowed to exceed the amount determined by subtracting the credit from the costs of the impact fee eligible capital improvements (maximum impact fee). (Section 395.015 MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT, (a)). As described by the definitions in the code,the following formulas result: Maximum Impact Fee= (Total Costs attributed to new growth over 10 years including Interest— Credit)/Number of New Service Units over next 10 years The purpose of this credit is to ensure that new growth is not charged twice for the portion of capital improvements attributed to them,once through the impact fee and then again through rates. The code does not specifically address the way in which this credit is to be calculated. Each utility should calculate the credit in a way that is consistent with the operation of their fund, the way they finance their capital improvements, and the way these capital improvements costs are represented in their utility rates.The next section describes how Fort Worth's credit was calculated. FORT WORTH FINANCING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND CREDIT ANALYSIS The City of Fort Worth finances all (100%) of its capital improvements through the issuance of bonds. As such, debt service payments include a portion of impact fee eligible costs. Fort Worth then uses impact D-1 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update �''NICHOLS FORT WORTH. Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities fee funds collected to pay the portion of their debt service that is attributed to impact fee eligible costs. This would result in none of their impact fee eligible costs being included in the calculation of their rates (no credit) unless the city chose to transfer impact fees in an amount less than the eligible costs. As part of its decision making process, the City of Fort Worth considered several options of impact fee and credit analysis.The three scenarios considered are below. • Scenario 1—The city would choose the option laid out in Chapter 395 guidelines of collecting only 50%of the maximum impact fee(a 50%credit, no credit analysis needed). • Scenario 2—The city would choose to collect an impact fee higher than 50%of the maximum (75%),thereby needing a credit analysis; in years 2017-2018 it is assumed impact fees would cover only a portion of the impact fee eligible debt service; in years 2019-2026 it is assumed impact fees would cover all of the impact fee eligible debt service. • Scenario 3—The city would choose to collect an impact fee higher than 50%of the maximum (100%),thereby needing a credit analysis; in years 2017-2018 it is assumed impact fees would cover only a portion of the impact fee eligible debt service; in years 2019-2026 it is assumed impact fees would cover all of the impact fee eligible debt service. As mentioned above, for Scenarios 2 and 3 the city is choosing not to cover all impact fee eligible debt with money from the Impact Fee Fund for the first two years. The reason for this is that those transfers have already been determined (the 2017 budget was already approved prior to this impact fee study, and the 2018 budget is nearing final approval). In both of those years, the budgeted transfer had been determined based on the anticipated Impact Fee Funds available using the prior Impact Fee collection rate of$921 per service unit. These budgeted transfers are not sufficient to cover all of the impact fee eligible debt service as calculated in this Impact Fee Study.This results in a credit for those years. In remaining years (2019-2026), it is Fort Worth's intent to transfer sufficient funds from the Impact Fees Fund to cover all impact fee eligible debt service. Fort Worth has a very detailed method of calculating the portion of each year's debt service payments for each bond series that is impact fee eligible, based on the projects that were funded in each bond series and what portion of those projects is impact fee eligible. Further, if there should be a year in which less impact fee funds have been collected than was projected and sufficient impact fee funds are not available to cover the portion of debt service that is impact fee eligible, then the city has committed to use other funds as necessary to D-2 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® rl?NICHOLS Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities pay that portion of the debt service. When additional impact fees have been collected, the city will reimburse those other funds. A summary of the impact fee credit analysis for all three scenarios are shown in Tables D-1 through D-3. Graphs of these results and their proposed phasing over the next three years are shown in Figures D-1 through D-3. Table D-1 Scenario 1 - Impact Fee and Credit Analysis (50%) Water Wastewater Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure Cost $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Minus the CREDIT $0 $0 Max Allowable Calculated Infrastructure Cost $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Service Units 142,209 127,381 Max Allowable Impact Fee per Service Unit $4,395 $2,609 Collect 50%of Max Allowable Impact Fee per Service Unit $2,197 $1,304 D-3 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NFREESE ICHOiL FORT WORTH S Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities Table D-1 Scenario 2 -Impact Fee and Credit Analysis (75%) Credit Calculation Water 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to impact fee eligible costs $14,236,513 $18,970,578 Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund to Cover Debt Service $6,206,967 $6,206,967 Yearly Credit $8,029,546 $12,763,611 TOTAL Credit $20,793,157 Wastewater 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to impact fee eligible costs $3,303,775 $4,377,409 Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund to Cover Debt Service $2,838,453 $2,838,453 Yearly Credit $465,322 $1,538,956 TOTAL Credit $2,004,278 Water Wastewater Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Cost Minus the CREDIT ($20,793,157) ($2,004,278) Max Allowable Calculated Infrastructure Cost $604,248,600 $330,335,549 Service Units 142,209 127,381 Max Allowable Impact Fee per Service Unit $4,249 $2,593 Collect 75%of Max Allowable Impact Fee per $3,187 $1,945 Service Unit D-4 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NICHOLS FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities Table D-3 Scenario 3 - Impact Fee and Credit Analysis (100%) Credit Calculation Water 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to $14,236,513 $18,970,578 impact fee eligible costs Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund to Cover Debt Service $6,206,967 $6,206,967 Yearly Credit $8,029,546 $12,763,611 TOTAL Credit $20,793,157 Wastewater 2017 2018 Portion of debt service attributed to impact fee eligible costs $3,303,775 $4,377,409 Budgeted Transfer from Impact Fee Fund to Cover Debt Service $2,838,453 $2,838,453 Yearly Credit $465,322 $1,538,956 TOTAL Credit $2,004,278 Water Wastewater Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure $625,041,757 $332,339,827 Cost Minus the CREDIT ($20,793,157) ($2,004,278) Max Allowable Calculated Infrastructure Cost $604,248,600 $330,335,549 Service Units 142,209 127,381 Max Allowable Impact Fee $4,249 $2,593 per Service Unit Collect 100%of Max Allowable Impact Fee per $4,249 $2,593 Service Unit D-5 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'•NICHOLE.S FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities rl d' n O) in M ,.l f`W g M .0-1 in Q) V1 .-i N' M W q/). il!• .1/} V? in. to U CC Q E a) -o fa a) 3 _a o ca 'a o ; C` 0 D o W W E x V � am A .d e.1 la >- v> in v> 2 3 11). V X a) > ra co I-1 U a Ci O E u r 4J o a) L a, u. •� i.0 ■ O 00 4.0 Cr .i ri co 4J a-' V IN m 0 to Ln m r a +, BCD Z . . N in in ■Ni 0 V a, ■ RS to tO E C) a7 c.► i b0 C a N •X W N IIn ti) a' uNi to N O in W 'i Co C (1) U V) L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,+ 8 ° 8 2 8 51 8 3 4" � th r4 3 3 0 g ($)Sielloa U! Iso) • • D-6 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update MAIM NICHOLS FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities N vs N aa CU CU aMi al c'.i '- ° O� N .M-1 - ^ ei M V1 LL i�11 i!1 i/} } tR to to 4-+ V CO a. E 07 U 3 co -a o co — 3 a o E 00 N v-! E � Q N St 00 '- � �* 4 N Tc ict IN to et• C M 4 N cu in '"i N M' co ti} in. Y Vs to ih 2 •X 7,- > a, CO 3 a- (5o v 3 N V v CS N O tio N i u V in N u • .= m 0 r^rf m m a ri Q) N 3 e^I cu M tr} .. N E fo in t/} i/� >- +� to o se- t3 U 07 ■ (o C o0 p- co C 0) V L C d a. ....7. in • • W I-1 N Q1 C _ r.4 N Al cn ve a ' N in. +a► °i in.co C CU {d N I- 8 8 8 8 8 8 v} d, IA M N t, ir} {/ {R to J 4 to w f0 3 3 ($) saelloa ui IsoD ■ • D-7 Water&Wastewater Impact Fee Update r'NiEESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F—Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities N m m ca 0. or cu 76 .0 f0 to c oa E Q co rn ON E E ^ u) h co o��i E co oo cn 3 E ct ,-i N n n n f0 E 1I in 2 R > C1 2 u` c ' C+11 y- Lo u 1 0 V o +� CD Cr` o m u. p ao U u- LO to o, U • C CO ri 1'� N h o�0 fl. 4..i ii 3 ,Nip cI" Al `� .n v n co 9 v 73 U ■ fa ao Q coo C 4J U aO L C d in Tc W to a0 to m N LIN t0 7' ° u ..-1 0 01 qd' la r::), L fa C CU U in iii ` 3 p p o p p p p p 4" %? 4~/? in 4." 411 � n n -, Gl gm .I t0 3 3 a ($) saera ui lsop • • D-8 FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. Exhibit F Capital Improvement Plan: Wastewater Facilities FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 4055 INTERNATIONAL PLAZA,SUITE 200 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76109 817-735-7300 www.freese.com Exhibit D - Ordinance No. 3494 Chapter 110 -Appendix A- Fee Schedule Impact Fees Table 1 Fort Worth Access Fees Water NRH NRH Year Water Wastewater Fee NRH Wastewater (Base Ratio Rate) Year 1 (January 8, 2018— $1,429 $685 $971 58% $577 March 31, 2018) (April 1, 2018— $1,429 $685 $1,365 58% $810 January 7, 2019) Year 2 (January 8, 2019— $1,644 $1,008 $1,365 * $810 March 31, 2019) (April 1, 2019— $1,644 $1,008 $1,758 $1,044 January 7, 2020) Year 3 (January 8, 2020— $1,858 $1,330 $1,758 * $1,044 January 7, 2021) Year 4 (January 8, 2021 — $1,858 $1,330 $1,758 * $1,044 January 7, 2022) Year 5 (January 8, 2022— $1,858 $1,330 $1,758 * $1,044 January 7, 2023) * Fort Worth Water Access Fee changes annually. The annual rate will be the base rate shown multiplied by the NRH Ratio which is to be determined annually. The NRH Ratio will be calculated as the percentage of the overall water that the City of North Richland Hills purchases from the City of Fort Worth. Star-Telegram MEDIA Arlington Citizen-Journal I The Keller Citizen i Lc; ella Mansfield News-Mirror I Star-Telegram Northeast I Weatherford Star-Telegram star-telegram.com 1 808 Throckmorton St.I Ft Worth,Tx.76102-6315 1 800176.7827 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Account# Ad Number Identification PO Amount Cols Depth 600579 0003474104 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ORDINANC $90.72 1 54.00 Li Attention: THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS County of Tarrant PO BOX 820609 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 761820609 Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personally appeared CHRISTINE LOPEZ, Bid and Legal Coordinator for the Star-Telegram, published by the Star-Telegram, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas;and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say that the attached CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS clipping of an advertisement was AN ORDINANCE COF OTHE4CITY OF published in the above named paper NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, on the listed dates: TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 110, ARTICLE XIX, IMPACT FEES,APPENDIX A FEE SCHED- ULE OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES; AMENDING LAND USE AS- SUMPTIONS AND THE CAPITAL 2 Insertions) IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENTS; AM ND NG Published On: WATER IMPACT FE AND ES; PROVID NGTEA January 11,2018,January 12,2018 SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PRO- VIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whenever in this Code, or in any ordinance, rule or police regula- tion of the city,an act is prohib- ited or is made or declared to be unlawful or an offense or a mis- demeanor, or wherever in the Code the doing of any act is re- quired or the failure to perform such act is declared unlawful, the violation of such provision of the Code or any such ordi- nance, rule or police regulation shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $500.00; provided, violation u a on hatgoveros police regulation that governs fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation, including (Principal Clerk) dumping of refuse shall be a fine not exceeding$2,000.00. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO PASSED on this 8th day of Janu- ary,2018. BEFORE ME,THIS 16th day of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By:_/s/Oscar Trevino January in the year of 2018 Oscar Trevino,Mayor - ATTEST: /s/Alicia Richardson Alicia Richardson,City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LE- GALITY: !, /s/Ma eshia Maleshia c McGinnis ' , t Jam'J` Maleshia B.McGinnis,Attorney ' �� Notary Public _ Jp``11W!,i� LESLIE BUCKLEY P B i NComm.otary PublicExpires, State 09-24-2021 of Texas •'t,� '4'I°;!',,,, Notary ID 128058260