HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1981-02-23 Minutes
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301
NORTHEAST LOOP 820, FEBRUARY 23, 1981
7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order February 23, 1981,
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Wood
J. C. Hubbard
Wiley Thomas
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
Staff :
Chuck Williams
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Dennis Horvath
Richard Albin
News Media:
Joe Norton
Kelvin Todd
Robin Robinson
Absent:
Jim Kenna
Mayor
Councilmen
Councilwoman
City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
Assistant City Manager
City Engineer
News Tribune
North Richland News
Mid Cities News
Councilman
3. Reverend Hal Brooks of North Richland Hills Baptist Chuch
gave the invocation.
4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve the minutes of the February 9, 1981 meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
5. Mayor Faram advised this request was passed September 15, 1980
then reconsidered and postponed for action until February 9,
1981.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF
THE REGULAR MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 9, 1981
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 80-21, PZ 80-22,
PZ 80-23 - REQUEST OF
JOHN W. BARFIELD TO
REZONE PORTIONS OF
TRACT 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B,
AND 5, BRENTWOOD
ESTATES FROM
AGRICULTURE TO IF-8-
1400, COMMERCIAL AND
LOCAL RETAIL
February 23, 1981
Page 2
Mr. John Barfield, 415 Louella, Hurst, appeared before
the CounciL
Mr. Barfield stated he would like to re-iterate some of
his testimony when he first applied for this zoning. On
September 15, 1980, a public hearing was held on PZ 80-21
and PZ 80-22 for the purpose of changing the zoning on
these two pieces of property. At that time both of the
zoning requests were approved and the ordinances read and
approved. Following the meeting that night an article
appeared in the newspaper that said North Richland Hills
Council had given approval to a major subdivision which
would be developed in the north sector of the city. The
developer, John Barfield and Company, received the Council
nod for rezoning property at Davis Boulevard and Shady
Grove Road from agriculture to Local RetaiL Mr. Barfield
stated the article stated that he had agreed to donate
land for the construction of a temporary fire station and
to sell ten acres at a reasonable cost to the Keller
Sc hool District for the construction of a school, also
to make 50% of the lots at least 9,000 square feet.
Mr. Barfield stated there was considerable discussion on
fuis tract of land as far as requirements for that section
of the City. After the ordinances and requirements were
approved, with 50% of the lots being 9,000 square feet and
1400 as minimum square footage homes. Mr. Barfield
stated that prior to that he had a meeting with Bedford
Joint Venture and they had agreed to purchase the property
from him if he was able to secure 1400 square foot zoning.
Mr. Barfield stated these builders were of the same opinion
as he and that was the area around was overloaded with
large homes that would not sell. Mr. Barfield stated after
having secured the zoning he contacted the builders and a
deal was made to sell the property. Mr. Barfield stated
he had to tell them this was up for reconsideration and
they advised him that without that size houses they were not
interested.
Mr. Barfield stated that according to Section 2.49, Council
Rules of Procedure, his zoning was approved and one reading
was held, therefore he thought and still felt he received
the zoning as applied for with the stipulations that were
made in the meeting of September 15, 1980.
Mr. Barfield stated that in addition he had received the
following information from a friend of his; "that the City of
North Richland Hills had rezoned his property and subsequently
the Council voted to reconsider and had taken the position that
he no longer had the zoning. After the Council rezones property
they must go through the same notice and hearing procedure they
went through for the zoning change. Reconsideration does not
grant the change. Before the Council will be able to reconsider
they will have to go through the notice and the hearing procedures
including hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
This was all governed by Article 1011c through 1011f Vernons
Revised Texas Statutes. The Court of Law upheld this procedure
was mandatory, that zoning could not be accomplished by
referendum or reconsideration."
Mr. Barfield stated he gave the Council this information
because he noticed that a public hearing was being held
tonight. Mr. Barfield stated he wondered if notice was
published in the newspaper as required and also if the
people within 200 feet were given a ten day notice.
Mr. Barfield stated he was wondering just where this
matter stood on being reconsidered. Mr. Barfield stated
it was his feeling that he had received the zoning fair
and square and he would hate to think that the City at
this particular moment was trying to take it away
from him. Mr. Barfield stated he was of the opinion
this size homes in the city was all people were going
to be able to afford. Mr. Barfield stated that by
the time he got one built it would sell for $75,000.
Mr. Barfield stated he received his zoning at a fair
hearing and would prefer to let it stand as is.
Mayor Faram stated he would try and answer Mr. Barfield's
questions on the notices. Mayor Faram stated it was
announced at one of the previous meetings that action
would be postponed on this request until this date.
Mayor Faram asked if the notices were sent out that
the hearing would be held this date.
Mr. McEntire stated the notice question was not the
problem with respect to taking action. The question
was if the publication was made. Mr. McEntire stated
no publication had been made on tonight's hearing.
Mayor Faram asked if he was to understand that any
action tonight would be null and void.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he would be agreeable
to delay action for one month so the proper publications
and notices could be made.
Mr. Barfield stated it was his feeling that he had
received his zoning, it was legal and was approved.
Mr. Barfield stated that according to Section 2.49
of the Council Rules of Procedure, date of Ordinances,
he felt it applied and it was his feeling he had
the zoning.
Mayor Faram stated the Council Rules of Procedure, adopted
by ordinance, had a provision made by which an item could
be reconsidered at the next meeting provided it was put
into motion by a member of the winning side.
February 23, 1981
Page 3
Mr. McEntire stated he thought there was a situation that
came up at the following meeting and a motion was made to
hear the request February 9, 1981.
Mr. Barfield asked if the Council did not meet every
second and fourth Monday night of the month.
Mayor Faram replied yes.
Mr. Barfield stated the request was heard on October 13, 1980,
and there was another meeting in between and it was not
brought back at the following meeting. It was brought back
two meetings later.
Mayor Faram asked the City Secretary to check the records
of the previous meetings.
Mayor Faram called a recess.
Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same
Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at
the beginning of the meeting.
Mr. McEntire stated the research revealed that in all
probability the first meeting at which action was taken was
a special meeting.
After further discussion, Councilman Freeman moved, seconded
by Councilman Hubbard, to postpone action of this request until
March 9, 1981.
Motion carried 5-0.
6. Postponed.
7. Postponed.
8. Postponed.
9. Mr. Bob Ash, 8025 Larkspur, Fort Worth, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Ash stated he was asking for a variance from the
Brick Ordinance in respect to the proposed construction
of some multi-family dwellings in the College Hill area.
Mayor Faram advised he had some requests to speak on
this item.
February 23, 1981
Page 4
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-21
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-22
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-23
POSTPONED
REQUEST OF MR. BOB ASH
(PERMA STONE STEEL)
COMPANY FOR VARIANCE
FROM BRICK ORDINANCE,
SECTION 1.04
DENIED
February 23, 1981
Page 5
Mrs. Velma Chewning, 600l-A Abbott, appeared before
the CounciL
Mrs. Chewning stated she had rather see the building
all brick.
Mr. James Davis, 6204 Abbott, appeared before the
CounciL
Mr. Davis stated they had a nice neighborhood, one
they were proud of. Everyone kept things looking nice
and from what he had heard about the proposed buildings
it would be asking the present residents to lower their
standards. Mr. Davis stated the material they planned
to use was not as good as brick and the design was ugly.
Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Davis if he had seen the
rendering of the propsoed buildings.
Mr. Davis stated no he had not, but had been told by
people that had seen them what they looked like.
Mr. Davis stated he felt it would lower the property
valuations and would be very depressing for the
neighbors.
Councilman Freeman stated the property was zoned
Neighborhood Retail and asked Mr. Davis to comment
on the possibility of a Seven-Eleven or any other
duplex that might be built there.
Mr. Davis stated that when he bought his property
in 1966 he was told a filling station might be
built on the property, but it would have to be
all brick.
Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Davis if whatever
was built, would he want it to conform to the
Bri<ik Ordinance.
Mr. Davis replied yes.
Councilman Wood stated a request could be made
for a two or four unit of brick.
Mr. Davis stated if it fit the neighborhood
requirements he would not object. His objection
was the low grade material.
Mayor Faram stated that Councilman Freeman, in the
previous meeting, had asked that this request be
postponed so some opinions could be obtained
from the neighbors.
Mr. Davis stated he was ashamed that the neighbors
had not shown up.
February 23, 1981
Page 6
Mr. Ellis Chewning, 6l00-A Abbott, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Chewning stated he lived in a duplex, he built it.
Mr. Chewning stated he did not like the material that
was being used.
Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Chewning if he was
familiar with the material.
Mr. Chewning stated yes and he did not like it.
Mr. John Cox, 6112 Abbott, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Cox stated his main objection was the type
material being used. Mr. Cox stated he had
not seen the material but had seen the photos.
Councilman Freeman stated that in all fairness
to the developers, he asked that they show
the type of material being used.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Cox if he was aware
this property was zoned neighborhood retail.
Mr. Cox replied yes.
Mr. Bob Hall, 6200 Abbott, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Hall stated he would like for the Council to
consider that this was the last vacant lot in the
neighborhood and when they built their homes
they complied with the ordinance. Mr. Hall
stated he thought the developers should be
required to comply also.
Mrs. Bounds, 7705 Bogart, appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Bounds stated she objected because of the type
of material and the type of people that would be
brought in.
Marty Linsley, #2 Chapel Court, appeared before the
CounciL
Mrs. Linsley stated she objected to the type of
material and the duplexes would bring in too many
people for such a small area.
Mrs. Wanda Co~, 6112 Abbott, appeared before the
Counc il .
Mrs. Cox stated she objected to the type of material
that was going to be used. Mrs. Cox stated it would
not be a good material. Mrs. Cox stated one of her
neighbors, Mrs. June Stephens, who was out of town,
had sent a letter of objection to the city.
Mayor Faram advised to let the record show there
was a letter from Mrs. Stephens objecting.
Mr. Bob Ash reappeared before the Council.
Mr. Ash stated that essentially they had asked
for a permit to build a building of this nature.
They did plan to use a steel framework. The building
would have more masonry on it than any of the
buildings presently there. Mr. Ash stated he would
like to remind the Council and the neighbors, the
houses everyone lived in would look kind of
peculiar to some of the people that live here now,
times do change. Mr. Ash stated people were placed
in a time now where they could not afford a lot of
house. Mr. Ash stated he had complied with all
the zoning requirements and all the building
requirements. Mr. Ash stated it was not his intention
to build anything cheap.
Councilman Wood stated that Mr. Ash's request was
for Lot 8! Did he have any plans for the adjoining
10 ts J
Mr. Ash stated there was actually only one lot.
Councilman Wood asked if Mr. Ash was proposing one
building for four units.
Mr. Ash stated they were proposing two buildings
of four units.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to deny the request of Mr. Bob Ash for a variance
from the Brick Ordinance.
Motion carried 6-0.
February 23, 1981
Page 7
February 23, 1981
Page 8
Councilman Wood stated that in looking at some of the
charts, data, zoning and maps he did not think a planner
or developer could make sense out of the city's Zoning
Ordinance. Councilman Wood stated that the ordinance
allowed for multi-family in local retail zoning and did
not speak to zoning, size or square footage. Councilman
Wood stated that in looking at the basic chart there
was no mention of local retail crossing over to multi-family.
Councilman Wood stated he would like to see the Council
or the Staff in the future try to talk to developers on
some of the requesæ that were coming in and try and get
them to wait because the city is in the process of having
a Master Land Plan for the city later on this year.
Councilman Hubbard stated he had taken the effort to talk
to the large organizations and they said they would not touch
a home of this type in a neighborhood.
Councilwoman Groves stated the city had an ordinance to
follow and she felt the Council should stick by it.
Motion to deny carried 5-0.
10.
Mr. Ted Everage, Engineer, 3328 W. Seminary appeared
before the Council.
REQUEST OF PARKER-
CROSTON ASSOCIATES
FOR VARIANCE FROM
BRICK ORDINANCE,
SECTION 1.04
APPROVED
Mr. Everage stated Schick Hospital was in the process of having
architectural plans prepared for an addition to the hospital.
Mr. Everage stated that at this point and time they were
short on space. While the plans were being prepared they
would like to build a temporary office building. Mr. Everage
stated the city ordinance did not allow for a temporary building.
The concept of having brick or stone on a temporary building,
was there a problem.
Mr. Don Burbine, Architect, 3108 West 6th, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Burbine stated the problem they were facing was in medical
records. Mr. Burbine stated the size of the building they
were wanting was approximately 400 to 600 square feet.
Mr. Burbine stated he felt the construction of the addition
to the hospital would be completed in 18 to 24 months.
Mr. Burbine stated that in talking with the Building Inspector
there were no type of provisions in the Code for this type
building. Mr. Burbine stated they were proposing a temporary
building with one hour fire rated walls and sprinkler system to
house three personnel and medical records for this period of time.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Burbine if he was talking about a
metal building.
Mr. BurbinR stated not necessarlLy. They had not gone
into finding out the most inexpensive type.
Mr. McEntire asked what type of building they wanted.
Mr. Burbine stated they wanted something other than brick.
Mr. Burbine stated they would like a temporary building,
maybe metal or wood.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Burbine if they only needed the
building for two years.
Mr. Burbine stated yes.
Mayor Faram stated it was his understanding the Fire Marshal
did not concur with the structure. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Burbine
if it would satisfy his purposes if a portable building were
moved in with some kind of time restraint that they would
have to move it off.
Mr. Burbine stated that was basically what they were
asking for. It would be fully equipped with sprinklers and tied
into the fire alarm.
Councilman Freeman asked why they needed the portable
building for two years.
Mr. Burbine stated the addition to the hospital had to
be approved by the State and it would not come up before
June or July.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Burbine if it would be satisfactory
if the Council were to authorize the use of a portable
building for two years, provided the Fire Marshal approved
it as being a safe structure.
Mr. Burbine stated that would be satisfactory.
Councilman Wood asked if a covenant could be signed
stating the building would be moved in two years.
Mr. Burbine stated yes.
Mayor Faram asked the Fire Marshal if there was anyway
the city could authorize a temporary building, a maximum
of 400 to 600 square feet to house no more than three
office people and records and properly sprinkled.
Mr. Howard stated his main concern was life safety. As
far as the building itself, the construction would be
approved through the Building Department. Mr. Howard
stated he could not say what the exterior, as far as
the fire rating would have to be; that came under the
UBC (Uniform Building Code). Mr. Howard stated he felt
sure it was going to have to be at least one hour fire rated.
February 23, 1981
Page 9
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Howard if a metal building could
be made safe with a sprinkler system, to house three
people and records.
Mr. Howard replied yes.
Councilman Wood asked if the portable building would
be attached or free standing. Councilman Wood asked
Mr. Howard his standing on the building being attached
or adjoining the existing building.
Mr. Howard stated that if the building was to be used
as a temporary structure, there were guidelines of
twenty feet from the main structure.
Councilman Freeman stated there were portable buildings
made out of cement asbestos material that looked nice
and had a fire rating. Councilman Freeman stated it
would be his desire to have something attractive at
the location.
Mr. Burbine stated he would prefer not to be restricted
to the type of the building. Mr. Burbine stated the
type of building they had been looking at was not metal.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Burbine if it would harm his
program if this request was postponed for two weeks with
the following conditions:
"The Staff, Building Official, Fire Marshal, and Mr. Burbine
sit down and worked out an agreement of the space, material,
sprinkler system, the distance from the existing building
and the wording of a covenant to make sure the building
was removed in two years.
Mr. Burbine stated he was asking for a temporary building
for two years knowing it would have to come under the
Fire Code Regulations.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas,
to approve a temporary building for Schick Hospital to be
constructed of metal or asbestos, not to exceed 600 feet
approved for safety by the Fire Marshal and a covenant
be executed that the building would be removed in two years.
Motion carried ~-l; Councilmen Freeman, Wood, Thomas, Hubbard
voting for; Councilwoman Groves voting against.
11. Mr. Ottis Gothard representing Gothard, Northeast, AA and
Parker Wrecker Services, appeared before the Council.
February 23, 1981
Page 10
CONSIDERATION OF
WRECKER ORDINANCE NO. 878
APPROVED
Mr. Gothard stated that due to increases in cost they
were asking for 30% increase in wrecker fees in North
Richland Hills.
Councilwoman Groves stated that in the new ordinance
pertaining to fencing, "Locked gate" was not included.
Mayor Faram stated after the word shall, "be locked at
all times" could be inserted.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Gothard if he had read the new
proposed ordinance.
Mr. Gothard replied no.
Councilman Wood stated in Article IV, Section 1, of the
proposed ordinance it read "all storage facilities shall
be enclosed by a permanent screening fence of masonry
and/or solid wood (weather resistant redwood, cedar,
or equal) not less than six (6) feet in height from all
directions."
Councilman Wood asked if all four wrecker services could
meet the ordinance.
Mr. Gothard stated none of them could meet the ordinance.
Mr. Gothard stated this was discussed about two years ago
and the Council agreed on a chain link fence.
Councilman Freeman stated as he remembered the discussion
of the fence and it could be a chain link fence if it had
alumimum strips in it.
Mayor Faram stated the verabage in this proposed ordinance
was taken from Ordinance No. 469 which was already in
existancH.
Mayor Faram called a recess at this time.
Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The
same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded
at the beginning of the meeting.
City Manager Williams stated the wording that was addressed
under Article IV, Section 1, was that all storage facilities
shall be locked at all times and enclosed by a permanent
secured fence not less than six feet in height in all directions.
Mr. Williams stated the rest would go as written and Mr. Gothard
had agreed.
February 23, 1981
Page II
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
February 23, 1981
Page 12
Councilman Freeman advised that the word "site barring"
had been left out.
After further discussion, Councilman Thomas moved, seconded
by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 878 without
the site barring fence.
Councilman Freeman stated the reason he brought this up was
because the last time some of the site barring fences were
made out of rusty steel iron and he thought that was the
reason for tightening up on the phrase. Councilman Freeman
stated he thought the city did allow the chain link fence as
long as it had the strips in it.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to
amend the motion to state a site barring fence.
Councilman Hubbard asked if a time limit would be set as to
how long they had to put the fence in.
Councilman Freeman asked when the permits were renewed.
Mr. Williams stated all permits expired December 31 of every year.
Councilman Freeman amended his motion, seconded by Councilwoman
Groves to state "anyone that renewed their permit would abide
by the ordinance".
Mr. Gothard stated if the increase was granted and these
requirements put on the wrecker companies it would take
two years to overcome the cost of doing this along with
the increase.
Mayor Faram called for a vote on the amendment.
Motion on the amendment carried 3-2; Councilmen Freeman,
and Hubbard and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilmen
Wood and Thomas voting against.
Councilman Freeman asked how many wrecker companies
served the city.
Mayor Faram stated there were four companies operating
in the city.
Councilman Freeman asked if there was not a request
recently from someone to have wrecker service in the city.
Mr. Williams stated that request was for a storage facility.
Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Gothard if the requirement
for a site barring fence would cause a hardship on the
wrecker companies.
Mr. Gothard replied yes.
February 23, 1981
Page 13
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to reconsider the amendment.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Faram called for a vote on the original motion.
Motion on the original motion carried by a vote of
5-0.
12. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of February 23, 1981.
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary