HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1981-03-23 Minutes
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301
NORTHEAST LOOP 820, ~~RCH 23, 1981 -
7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order March 23, 1981,
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Wood
Wiley Thomas
J. C. Hubbard
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
Councilwoman
Mayor
Councilmen
Staff :
Chuck Williams
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
City Engineer
News Media:
Joe Norton
Robin Watkins
Kevin Todd
The Tribune
Mid Cities
North Richland Hills News
Absent:
Jim Kenna
Councilman
3. The invocation was given by Mr. Bob Skelton, Deacon, First
Baptist Church of Smithfield.
4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve the minutes of March 9, 1981.
Motion carried 4-0; Councilman Wood abstaining due to
absence from the meeting.
5. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Amon Adcock, 1701 West Freeway, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Adcock stated the application request was to rezone this
tract from agriculture to IF-9-l500. Hr. Adcock stated he
had an architectural rendering of the proposal. Mr. Adcock
stated they planned to continue Post Oak Drive through this
tract to Starnes Road. Mr. Adcock stated he felt this would be
an addition to North Rich1and Hills.
Hayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of
this request to please come forward.
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR
MEETING MARCH 9, 1981
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 8l~2, REQUEST OF
fu~ON T. ADCOCK (W.A.H
CORP.) TO REZONE A
PORTION OF TRACT 8,
ABSTRACT 321, FROM
AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-
1500
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
6. Mayor Faram advised the Planning and Zoning Commission
had recommended approval.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to postpone action on this request until the regular Council
meeting of April 13, 1981, in between that time the Council
will have a meeting set with Snyder and Associates on the
City Master Plan.
Motion carried 5-0.
7. Mayor Faram stated he was informed when he arrived at the
City Hall this afternoon there was a request from
Mr. Brannon to postpone this for 30 days. Mayor Faram
stated the request went to the Planning and Zoning Department.
Mayor Faram stated he would let the Council make the
decision on postponement; he had several requests to speak
on this subject.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to continue the hearing on PZ 81-3.
Motion carried 4-1; Councilmen Hubbard, Freeman and Thomas
and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilman Wood voting
against.
~2yor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak for this request to please come forward.
No one appeared.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
of this request to please come forward.
:1r. James R. Stevens, 7424 Eden Road, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Stevens stated the tract of land in question was
basically at the intersection of Eden and Rumfie1d Road.
Mr. Stevens stated the homes on Eden would be affected
greatly by anything that was put in on less than one
acre or better tracts.
Mr. Stevens stated about a year ago there had been a zoning
hearing on a tract of land within 100 yards of this area and
it was determined that Eden Road was below minimum standards
for any additional subdivisions. Mr. Stevens stated the
street was at best a very narrow, inadequate piece of paving.
March 23, 1981
Page Two
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 81-2'
POSTPONED
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 81-3, REQUEST OF
J. E. BRANNON TO
REZONE TRACT 18,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AGRICULTURE TO
IF-12-1800
March 23? 1981
. Page Three
Mr. Stevens stated it was his understanding that this
particular tract that was being requested for rezoning was
going to be platted into 16 lots. Mr. Stevens stated
that would be putting approximately 32 additional cars
traveling on these streets.
Mr. Stevens stated the people that lived in the area were
requesting that the Council maintain the area with the
types of houses that were presently there.
Mr. Royal Sherbet, 8937 Rumfield Road, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Sherbet stated he owned approximately five acres in
the area. Mr. Sherbet stated he worked long and hard for
thirty-seven years for a home in the country and in an area
that was zoned agriculture. Mr. Sherbet stated he looked
long and hard in Dallas County and Tarrant County and finally
found a section of land that he thought was ideal. Mr. Sherbet
stated that approximately ten months ago he closed on the
land and found that North Rich1and Hills had given permission
for a large subdivision to go in alongside Stoneybrook, approxi-
mately 250 homes. Everyone, most everyone without exception,
that lived in the area did so because they like and enjoy the
agriculture zoning.
Mr. Sherbet stated he had three points he would like to make.
Number one: the City of North Rich1and Hills has failed to
provide adequate roads, sewer, there are no sewer lines in
the area, and no water pressure; number two: everyone that
lives in that agriculture area, without exception. opposes
the zoning change; number three: North Rich1and Hills has
failed to provide the original residents in that area services
and only provided high water bills with low pressure.
Mr. Sherbet stated he would like to know what would be involved
in deannexing thè area.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Sherbet where he would get services if
the area were deannexed.
Mr. Sherbet stated they 'did not have any services;' the onJy time
a policeman came out was when they were called.
Mayor Faram stated the only time a policeman went to anyone~s
house was when they were called.
City Attorney McEntire stated if the City deannexed the area a
house could be built on every fourth acre.
March 23, 1981
Page Four
Mr. Sherbet stated that in that case he did not want to
be deannexed.
Mr. Albin stated there was a major sewer outfall line less
than a mile north of the area and would serve the entire
area.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Sherbet if he felt the City had
the right to deny a person. developer or not. a right to
use his land. Councilman Wood stated he felt Mr. Sherbet
was suggesting that the City had enough people, do not let
anyone else build in the area unless they had two, three,
four or five acre tracts.
Mr. Sherbet stated he could understand a variance from the
requirement, but the tract in question was just a little over
two acres which did not qualify for two homes under
zoning; however he could see a variance for two homes.
Mr. Sherbet stated if there was anyway possible he would
like to see the tract stay agriculture.
Mayor Faram stated there might be some confusion over the
agriculture zoning. Mayor Faram stated that when the Master
Plan was adopted the agriculture terminology was put on land
that had no particular plan laid out. The restrictions were
put in so no one could build on less than two acres.
Mayor Faram stated agriculture as a whole, he did not think
the City had a policy. Mayor Faram stated that was the
conception in the agriculture zoning. There were some
lands that had 25 to 30 acres and there was nothing to
do with those except to put them in a holding pattern
until the City could foresee some type of development
to go in.
Mr. Norvell Jordan, 8800 Kirk Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Jordan stated his property was just north of the property
in question. Mr. Jordan stated the neighbors had hit on all the
points that he had. Mr. Jordan stated his house was about one
and one-half years old, 2,400 square feet on three acres and he
had a lot of money invested. Mr. Jordan stated he felt that if
tract housing were put in the adjoining property it would drop
the value of his home. Mr. Jordan stated he would agree with
his neighbors in that the streets were not the best and there
was low water pressure. Mr. Jordan stated his real objection
to this request was that it would devalue his property.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Jordan if he knew how long
Mr. Brannon had owned the property.
Mr. Jordan replied no.
C~unci1man Wood asked Mr. Jordan how long he had lived
there.
Mr. Jordan replied about three years.
Mr. Charles Palachek, 8908 Kirk Lane, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Palachek stated he had lived in the area since 1964.
Mr. Palachek' stated if the Council would look at this one
particular block, which was said to be two and one-half
acres and it was set in the center of two, three, or ten
acre tracts they would see it was totally out of place.
Mr. Palachek stated this would be taking an area that was
already established and putting a lot of houses in it.
Mr. Palachek stated he felt the area should be maintained
as is.
Mr. Berwyn Caswell, 8900 Kirk Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Caswell stated his property was just northeast of the
property in question. Mr. Caswell stated most of his
comments had already been covered by previous speakers.
Mr. Caswell stated most of the residents in the area were
on septic tanks and he was not sure the City would want
to put that many houses on septic tanks.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Caswell if there had been any problems
in the area with the septic tanks.
Mr. Caswell stated no. Mr. Caswell stated the land in
question was surrounded by larger lots and there were
deed restrictions that the property would not be divided
below one acre tracts. Mr. Caswell stated he would like to
see it remain as such.
Mayor Faram advised Mr. Caswell deed restrictions were a
civil matter.
Mr. O. G. Tobis, 8800 Rumfie1d, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Tobis stated he lived directly across the street
from the property in question. Mr. Tobis stated he
thought most of his points had been covered by his
neighbors. Mr. Tobis stated he would like to point
out they had been in that area for many years and
this request was against the wishes of the residents
that had been there for years.
March 23? 1981
Rage Five
Mrs. Delores Wood, 6713 Karen Drive, appeared before the
Council.
Mrs. Wood stated she was a realtor in the area and felt
very strongly for the people in that area. Mrs. Wood
stated she felt they definitely had a legitimate gripe.
Mrs. Wood stated that in this particular case she knew
the property, and the people should have the right for
their property to remain the way it is. Mrs. Wood
stated in her opinion the small lots and houses would
destroy their property values.
Mr. Perry Wise, 7404 Eden Road, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Perry stated he was about l50 yards south of the
property in question. Mr. Perry stated he would like
to touch on a couple of points that had been mentioned.
Mr. Perry stated he thought it would be real nice if
the development could be held down to two or three
houses to keep it down to the type of value they
presently had. Mr. Perry stated he felt if this
property was loaded down with too many houses there
would be septic tank problems.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Perry if he had attended the
Planning and Zoning meeting when this request was
heard by them.
Mr. Perry replied no.
Mayor Faram stated that according to the Planning and
Zoning Commission minutes, Mr. Brannon stated there
would be no septic tanks in any of these houses, they
would be on City sewer.
Mr. Perry asked if there was City sewer coming into the
area.
Mayor Faram stated the developer would be required to
bring the sewer in.
Mrs. Anita Snow, 3201 Owens, Realtor, Haltom City, appeared
before the Council.
March 23, 1981
Page Six
Mrs. Snow stated she was familiar with the area that the
homeowners were speaking in opposition of this develop-
ment. Mrs. Snow stated it would in effect be spot zoning.
Mrs. Snow stated it would greatly devalue the property
owners' investment. If rezoned the property would not be
conforming to the previous usage of the land around this
area.
Councilman Freeman stated that it was unusual for two
real estate people to speak for or against zoning.
Councilman Freeman asked what inspired them to speak.
Mrs. Snow stated the people that already had the
vested interest had the greater right to protect that
vested interest than those coming into an area.
Mrs. Snow stated she faced this type of situation
everyday and knew the communities had to change
their usage, but not with the area already developed
in one, two or three acre tracts.
Mr. Tobis presented the Council with a petition signed
by the residents in the area against the rezoning.
Mayor Faram advised Mr. Tobis the petition was accepted,
but could not be accepted as requiring 3/4 vote because
it was not submitted in time to be considered as a
legal petition. Mayor Faram stated it did convey a
feeling.
Mayor Faram closed the public hearing.
8. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to postpone action on this item until the regular scheduled
meeting April 13, as the item prior, until the Council's
meeting with Wayne Snyder and Associates.
Councilman Hubbard stated in fairness to both parties, the
City had employed Snyder and Associates to set up a set
of rules for the City and update the Master Plan to stop
what some people consider spot zoning, and to update each
section of the City.
Councilman Wood asked the City Attorney if this request
was postponed would it come back with a public hearing.
March 23, 1981
Page Seven
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 81-3
POSTPONED
March 23, 1981
Page Eight
Mr. McEntire stated the ordinance would have to be
republished.
Motion to postpone carried 5-0.
Mayor Faram called for a fifteen minute recess,
RECESS
Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order.
The same Council Members and Staff were present
as recorded at the beginning of the meeting.
..BACK TO ORDER
9. Mayor Faram advised the Council he had Mr. Jim Ramseyts
resignation from the Civil Service Commission. Mayor
Faram stated he had appointed Mr. Bob Skelton to the
Civil Service Commission and asked the Council to con-
firm this appointment.
CONFIRMATION OF
APPOINTMENT OF MR.
BOB SKELTON TO
CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION
APPROVED
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman
Hubbard, to accept the resignation of Mr. Jim Ramsey
and appoint Mr. Bob Skelton to the Civil Service
Commission.
Motion carried 5-0.
10. Mr. Roy Miller, 4709 Vance Road, North Richland Hills,
Representative for Alexander and Alexander Insurance,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Miller stated he had submitted two proposals
and was present to answer any questions the Council
might have.
CONSIDERATION OF BID
FOR GENERAL AND
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
INSURANCE
APPROVED
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Miller if he had bid the
Police Professional Liability.
Mr. Miller stated he felt his company had adequate
protection for the Police Department and the Police
Professional Liability was not necessary.
City Attorney McEntire stated that if the company
had adequate protection for the police, why had
the claims that had been turned into the company
been denied.
Mr. Miller stated he was not familiar with the circumstances.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Miller if he had examined the proposal
submitted by his competitor.
Mr. Miller stated no more than just the figures that were read
off.
Mr. Hiller stated he felt his company had the Police
Department adequately protected and did not feel there
was a need for the Professional Liability.
Mr. Vic Smith, 8101 Irish Drive, North Richland Hills,
Representative for Crawford, Mitchell, Thomas and Frymark,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Smith stated his company had submitted a bid per
the specifications for general and auto liability.
Mr. Smith stated his bid for general liability was
$29,497.00 and for auto liability $52,828. Mr. Smith
stated that in addition to that he had quoted the Police
Professional Liability under four plans.
City Attorney McEntire stated he would recommend the City
accept the bid of Crawford, Mitchell, Thomas and Frymark
for general and auto liability and Plan 2 on the Police
Professional Liability.
Councilman Wood asked the City Attorney if he felt this
company had better coverage.
Mr. McEntire replied yes.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Smith if his company had met all
the requirements.
Mr. Smith replied yes.
Mayor Faram asked the City Attorney if he was' satisfied
with the policy.
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to
accept the bid of Crawford, Mitchell, Thomas and Frymark
for General and Auto Liability and Plan 2 on the Police
Professional Liability.
Councilman Freeman asked for the City Manager's recommenda-
tion.
Mr. Williams stated due to the information he had received
from the staff and City Secretary's office he would recommend
Crawford, Mitchell, Thomas and Frymark.
Motion carried 5-0.
March 23, 1981
Page Nine
11. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to postpone action on this item until the Council had
a chance to study it further.
Mayor Faram appointed Councilmen Hubbard, Wood and
Freeman, Fire Chief Gertz and City Manager Chuck
Williams to a committee to study the proposed
ordinance.
Motion to postpone carried 5-0.
l2. Mayor Faram stated it was the recommendation of the
Fire Chief and Staff that this item be denied.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman
Hubbard, to deny the County Fire Protection Contract.
Motion carried 5-0.
13. Mayor Faram was advised that Mr. Bob Ash was not
present.
Mr. Bob Brady, 5601 Mary Court, appeared before the
Council representing Mr. Ash.
Councilman Wood stated that in this particular case he
did have a conflict of interest and he wanted to make
sure the conflict of interest was quite clear, that
he had been misquoted in the past. Councilman Wood
stated he had no personal interest in this property
whatsoever. Councilman Wood stated he did have a
licensed real estate broker, who worked for him,
who owned a portion of this property and it was
listed through his office. For this reason there
was a possibility of a financial gain if the property
was sold while it was listed by his company. Council-
man Wood stated that furthermore he would like to make
it very clear that he received no benefit from anyone
other than the licensed broker that he worked for,
even though he had been accused of receiving benefits
in other routes. Councilman Wood stated if he received
any benefit whatsoever, and he hoped the press reported
this correctly, but he noticed the famous reporter was
not present, he would receive, if the office grossed
a percentage, one-tenth of the agent's commission.
Councilman Wood stated he would again repeat, as he
had been accused lately of owning other shares and
properties in this City, that he owned no part of
this property and never had or never would.
March 23, 1981
Page Ten
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ADOPTING
FIRE CODE
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION CONTRACT
DENIED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MR. BOB
ASH (PERMA-STEEL)
FOR A VARIANCE
TO THE BRICK
ORDINANCE
RULED OUT OF ORDER
March 23, 1981
Page Eleven
Councilman Wood stated he was being very precise in this
particular case because he had been accused by persons
unknown, and he had the name of the FBI Agent who had been
investigating him. Councilman Wood stated further that it
bothered him to see that his family and friends should have
to be placed in the position where they are subject to
criticism of who knows what, and even to the point of
creating apparently some documents that were sent to the
FBI, friends allover town, out-of-town, and from what
he had been able to hear, as far as a State Senator.
Councilman Wood stated he would lay it out, did he take
stock in the TV Cable Company, take kickbacks on property?
He stated that as far as he was concerned, when you are accused
of being a crook and a thief, then you get to a point of is it
worth it all? Councilman Wood stated that if he went out and
picked up a brick off the street, he guessed the FBI would
investigate the City Manager for that, too, before it was over.
Councilman Wood stated the pressures that he and his family
were being subjected to had reached their limit. Councilman
Wood stated he would not run and he hoped before it was over
the newspapers would treat them like they treated everyone
else.
Councilman Wood stated once the FBI investigated you that the
file would never die. Councilman Wood stated he had been
assured the file had been closed and again there was another
piece of property tonight that he had an interest in. Council-
man Wood stated he wondered what all those people would say now,
how much did Jim Wood get?
Councilman Wood stated he would close with one more
statement. Councilman Wood stated he had a problem with
this piece of property. His agent had informed him that she
had not been contacted by anyone as to a variance to be
granted on her property. Councilman Wood stated he felt
this was a possible technical error in this case.
Councilman Wood stated that for every time he had stepped
down from the Council table he had been honest, he had
tried to make it quite clear. Councilman Wood stated he
had always asked the City Attorney to tell him what to do,
but apparently that had not been good enough. Councilman
Wood stated there would be a new day, the subject was not
dead, he would face his accusers somehow.
Mayor Faram stated he would start off by saying that Council-
man Wood was asking for disqualification and certainly that
would be granted.
Mayor Faram stated he could not help but respond to some
of the remarks that Councilman Wood had made, Mayor
Faram stated it was brought to his attention that Council-
man Wood had been accused of perhaps receiving some financial
gain. Mayor Faram stated the person that brought this to him
was not able to name the accuser, that, in his opinion, was
the reason a Council seat vacancy existed on the Council.
Mayor Faram stated it was also brought to his attention on
Friday by Councilman Wood and again on Saturday by Council-
man Kenna. Mayor Faram stated he has also been implicated
in some wrongdoing, that being the ownership of stock in a
company franchised to do business in the City.
Mayor Faram stated he had talked to the FBI Agent today and he
advised him his name had been cleared. Mayor Faram stated
those on this Council whose names had been brought in and
accused had all been cleared and the file had been closed.
Mayor Faram stated he asked for the name of the accuser
and the 'FBI Agent advised him he was not at liberty to
give him that information.
Mayor Faram stated he had a call into the United States
District Attorney to see if he could give the authorization
for the name of the accuser to be released. Mayor Faram
stated he intended to find out who that person was. Mayor
Faram stated he would not sit by and let the Council Members
have their reputations ruined by people who would start a
gossip rumor in this City. Mayor Faram stated because
he had been accused he felt obligated to face it wide open
and say that anyone who had anything to face him with should
lay it on the table. Mayor Faram stated he may not
be perfect and may have made some bad decisions, but nothing
in the way of dishonesty. Mayor Faram stated he resented
this sort of little anonymous accusations.
Mayor Faram stated that in his opinion the City had received
some unfair publicity. Mayor Faram stated the story on the
bricks had gone a little, bit further than what he thought
was justified. Mayor Faram stated the Star'-Telegram had
accused, tried and found Mr. Williams guilty of a wrong-
doing. Mayor Faram stated the Star Telegram had the audacity
to call and ask him what the punishment would be. Mayor
Faram stated he had not tried the man; he thought if
Mr. Williams was guilty of anything it would be that he was
the victim of a set-up case and he felt very sorry that
people had to operate on that sort of thing. Mayor Faram
stated he further understood that the Star Telegram was
sitting at Mr. Williams' home waiting for a truck or
March 23, 1981
Page Twelve
trailer to arrive with bricks. Mayor Faram stated he had
to believe it was a set-up job. Mr. Williams was above
stealing one or two hundred bricks. Mr. ì~illiams was under
the impression the bricks were going to be dumped and he
simply was going to salvage them.
Mayor Faram stated this sort of routine of picking on public
officials has the effect of trying to destroy someonets
character, and in Mr. Williams' case, his profession.
Mayor Faram stated he, like Councilman Wood, had lived a
long time to try and establish a name without a stigma
and he resented rink-a-dink false accusations. Mayor
Faram stated if someone did not have the courage to come
and face him, he did not like it whispered allover the
City. Mayor Faram stated he would face any man and tell
him in the presence of his Maker, that he had not had any
financial gain in all the years he had served in public
office and he could further say that in his heart he believed
everyone sitting at the Council table could make the same
statement; there had been no gain.
Mayor Faram stated that just for someone to come up here
and say, an unknown source, was in his opinion a cheap-
shot and he refused to accept that. Mayor Faram stated
he thought the first and greatest part in the American
judiciary system was that the accused had the right to
face his accuser. Mayor Faram stated that when the press
or anyone else who hid behind the First Amendment Right
and tried to make this at the expense of a character
assassination, he had a real problem with it. Mayor
Faram stated he felt obligated to protect the members
of the Council.
Mayor Faram repeated that the FBI Agent had advised him
that his name had been totally cleared, as well as the
other members of the Council. Mayor Faram stated he
still intended to find out who the accuser was.
COUNCILMAN WOOD LEFT THE COUNCIL TABLE AT THIS POINT.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Bob Brady if he was representing
Mr. Bob Ash.
Mr. Bob Brady, 6900 Grapevine Highway, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Brady stated Mr. Ash had asked him to represent him.
March 23, 1981
Page Thirteen
Mr. Brady stated that for the record, he and Councilman
Wood had a conversation earlier and he had no objections
to Councilman Wood's presence on the Council. Mr. Brady
stated he did not feel there would be a conflict of
interest.
Mr. Brady stated his purpose was that he hoped to receive
a variance from the Brick Ordinance.
Councilwoman Groves asked how many fourplex units Mr. Ash
planned on building.
Mr. Brady stated a total of eight. Mr. Brady stated he
failed to mention that this property was located on
Flory Street.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Brady if the person he was represent-
ing was the owner of the property.
Mr. Brady replied no.
Mayor Faram asked if there was a contract of sale con-
tingent on the variance.
Mr. Brady stated that due to the expense of a plat they
could seek a request for a variance.
Mayor Faram stated it had been the rule of the Council
that you either ow~ed the property or had a contract
for sale on the condition before making that request.
Mr. Brady stated they did have a contract. He would
not say it was contingent on the variance.
Mayor Faram asked if they had a contract to purchase
the property.
Mr. Brady replied, yes, they did have a contract,
Mrs. Anita Anglin Snow appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Snow stated she represented Mrs. Juanita Snow,
Mr. Jerry D. Snow, Mrs. Hanson and herself, who were
owners of the property. Mrs. Snow stated they received
an offer on this property and it was below market value.
Mrs. Snow stated they countered back full price and did
not receive an answer. Hrs. Snow stated that at this time
there was no contract; there was an offer working.
Mrs. Snow stated the special provisions read "the seller
is to satisfy buyer that property was not located in any
flood plain area." Mrs. Snow stated she had a Corps of
March 23, 1981
Page Fourteen
Engineer's report which went back to Mr. Ash. Mrs. Snow
stated the contract was contingent on the buyer getting
a building plan approved by the City of North Rich1and
Hills. Mrs. Snow stated the word said contractt when
you are negotiating an offer, until all points from the
price to the date of closing, to the date of possession
you have an offer not a contract. Mrs. Snow stated she
would give them the benefit of the doubt that they did
not understand the contract terminology. Mrs. Snow
stated it was not against her wishes for duplexes or
triplexes. Mrs. Snow stated at this point and time,
since there was no contract, what in effect they were
asking for was blanket permission to build these
kind of buildings not knowing where.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Snow if she was part owner of
the property under discussion.
Mrs. Snow replied yes.
Mayor Faram asked if a contract did exist.
Mrs. Snow stated Diane Hall, Lightfoot Realty, was
representing Mr. Bob Ash. Mrs. Snow stated she was
the listing agent that put the property on the market.
Mr. Ash made an offer and it was not acceptable.
Mrs. Snow stated she made a counter-offer back with
a price that was acceptable to all the owners and
that Mr. Ash had not answered. Mrs. Snow stated the
other Lightfoot Agent was not present and she was not
aware the variance had been applied for until two of
the clients called her about it.
City Attorney McEntire checked the papers Mrs. Snow
had.
Mayor Faram stated that the Council was dealing with
a nippy situation and he ,understood a contract did
not exist.
Councilman Freeman asked if the people in the area
had been contacted.
Mr. Williams stated the people were contacted.
Mayor Faram asked the City Attorney if a contract
did exist.
Mr. M~Entire stated there was no contract.
March 23. 1981
Page Fifteen
Mayor Faram stated he was going to declare the request
out of order because there was no contract or
an owner of the property making the request.
ENERGENCY ITEMS ADDED
1. Mr. McEntire stated the present ordinance required
the Building Official to charge 100 percent for
garages and patios. Mr. McEntire stated previously
the City charged nothing. Mr. McEntire stated he
recommended the City charge 50 percent.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman
Hubbard, to approve Ordinance No. 881 with the
insertion of 50 percent, paragraph one, middle
of the page.
Motion carried 4-0.
2. Mr. McEntire stated this property had been traced
back over a period of nine years. This tract had
been zoned commercial, local retail, commercial,
local retail. Mr. McEntire stated it was on the
maps as both. The property was sold as commercial.
Mr. McEntire stated he recommended the Council
clarify this. Mr. McEntire stated he had been
through the Planning and Zoning Commission a
dozen times both ways and at the present time
it was on the map as commercial.
Councilman Freeman asked if the owner was in
agr eemen t .
Mr. McEntire stated the owner was the one wanting
it clarified.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman
Groves, to approve Ordinance No. 882.
Motion carried 4-0.
14. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of March 23, 1981
March 23, 1981
Page Sixteen
EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDED
PASS ORDINANCE CLARIFY-
ING BUILDING PE&~IT
CHARGE FOR GARAGE AND
PATIO
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 881
PASS ORDINANCE RATIFY-
ING AND CLARIFYING
ZONING ON SWEET ET AL,
TRACT l3C8-A ABSTRACT
l606. W. W. WALLACE
SURVEY. ZONED TO
COMMERCIAL
APPROVED
--
ORDINANCE NO. 882
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary