Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1979-08-27 Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, AUGUST 27, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order August 27, 1979, at 7:30 p.m. 2. PRESENT: CALL TO ORDER Dick Faram Jim Wood John ~1i chener Sid Cavanaugh Dave Freeman Jim Cato Lena Nae Reeder ROLL CALL Mayor Councilmen Councilwoman STAFF: Tom Paul Jeanette Moore Jim Anderson Rex NcEnti re Richard Albin Margie Nash Joann Williams City Manager City Secretary Director Public Works City Attorney City Engi neer Planning & Zoning Commission Member Board of Adjustment Member ABSENT: Denver Mills Councilman 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Michener. Motion carried 4-0; Councilman Cato and Councilwoman Reeder, abstaining due to absence from the meeting. I NVOCP.TI ON APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1979 APPROVED CITIZEN REQUEST, MRS. ELLEN HOUGH REQUESTING A VAR- IANCE FRm1 THE BRICK ORDINANCE 4. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Michener, to approve the minutes of August 13, 1979. 5. Mrs. Ellen Hough, Arlington, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Hough stated she presently lived in Arlington and had found a house in ~orth Richland Hills she wanted to purchase. Mrs. Hough stated she wanted to büild a hobby greenhouse in the back yard of the home in North Richland Hills. According to North Richland Hills building code the greenhouse would have to be 75% brick. Mrs. Hough stated she was asking the Council to grant her a variance from the brick ordinance. Councilman Cato asked how many square feet the building would have. Mrs. Hough stated the building would have 720 square feet inside, the walls would be of fiberglass, the floor would consist of six inches of gravel; The foundation would be of cyclinder block. .- August 27, 1979 Page 2 Mrs. Hough stated her lot was about 10,350 square feet and the greenhouse would cover about 7% of the lot. Councilman Cato asked where the house was located. t1rs. Hough stated the house was located at 4901 Strummer. Mayor Faram asked if there was a screening fence around the yard. Mrs. Hough replied there was a screening fence. Mayor Faram asked if the greenhouse would raise above the fence, could it be seen from the street. Mrs. Hough stated it would be hard to be seen above the fence. The fence is about 8 feet tall and the greenhouse would be about 12 feet tall. Mayor Faram asked t1rs. Hough if she had checked \'Jith the immediate neighbors to see if the structure would b2 objectionable to them. Mrs. Hough replied no. Councilwoman Reeder stated a 750 foot building would be the size of a commerical building and not the size of a normal greenhouse. Mrs. Hough stated she was a collector. Mrs. Hough stated she grew one type of plant and also traded plants. Mrs. Hough stated she belonged to the Fort Worth Garden Club, Tarrant County Garden Club and Dallas Garden Club. This greenhouse was a hobby only. Mayor Faram asked the City Attorney if the Council had the authority to vary from the ordinance. City Attorney McEntire stated the Council had the authority to vary from the ordinance, but Mrs. Hough did not have the standing to ask for a variance because she did not own the house or have a contract on it. Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Hough if she was under a pressure time to make the purchase of the house. Mrs. Hough stated the contract was contingent on what the Council said tonight. Councilman Cavanaugh stated he lived in the area and a greenhouse would be more appealing to him than a swimming pool. Mr. Anderson stated the'property Mrs. Hough was referring to was an extremely large lot and all provisions could be met. Mr. Anderson stated he did not think the greenhouse would cause offense. Councilman Michener ask€d if the city was required to notify the surrounding residents on a request such as this. City Attorney McEntire replied no. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Hough if she had a pending contingency contract on the house. Mrs. Hough replied yes. Councilman Wood asked if the contract had a written deadline. Mrs. Hough replied yes, Tuesday, noon. Councilman Wood asked the City Attorney if he suggested notifying the surrounding residents. City Attorney t1cEnti re stated the city was not requi red to notify the surrounding residents. Councilwoman Reeder asked if the Council could put a contingent, on this request that if Mrs. Hough did not sign the contract for the house the action by the Council would be null and void. Mr. Anderson stated he did not think it would be necessary because variances are granted to people and not property. Mayor Faram stated he felt the only thing the Council could do tonight, if he was understanding the City Attorney, was a notification of intent. Mrs. Hough did not have the right, at this point, to ask for the variance since she did not own the property and had nothing to show she was acting on behalf of the owner. City Attorney McEntire stated Mayor Faram was correct. Councilman Cato stated he recommended the Council, by straw vote, show their intent if there was no serious objections voiced by the neighbors. . Mayor Faram asked for a show of hands on who intended to approve the request, barring any serious objections from the neighbors. All Council Members voted for the request. Mayor Faram advised Mrs. Hough if she could get an agreement from the neighbors everything would be all right., 6. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing on PZ 79-27 and ca11ed for anyone present wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Engineer, appeared before the Council on behalf of Mrs. Thompson. August 27, 1979 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARING- FOR PZ 79-27, REQUEST OF LAVADA THOMPSON TO REZONE TRACT 3B2, ASST. 1055 FROM AGRICULTURE TO IF-9, ONE FAMILY DVIELLING Mr. Stembridge stated the property in question was approximately 1/2 acre located on Precinct Line Road approximately 1300 feet north of Martin Road and Amundson. Mrs. Thompson would like to build a house on this tract and it needs to be platted and zoned in order for her to obtain a building permit. Mayor Faram called for anyone in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being none, Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 7. Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve PZ 79-27, Ordinance No. 770. Motion carried 6-0. 8. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve PS 79-46. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Anderson if the comment in the Engineer's letter concerning the building set back and the right-of-way had been settled properly. Mr. Anderson stated when this came before the Planning and Zoning Commission he mentioned that Precinct would eventually would be widened in the future. Mr. Anderson stated it was basically the Council's decision on whether or not they want the 25 feet now or wish to specify the set back line or the 25 foot right-of-way so the future widening of the street will not create a problem for the home. Councilman Wood stated there was not anything on the plat pertaining to the 25 feet of right-of-way or the 50 foot set back line on the plat. Mr. Anderson stated Mr. Stembridge would have to address that particular point. Mayor Faram asked if there was disagreement on the Engineer's comments with the applicant~ Mr. Anderson stated he \'/as sure Mr. Stembridge, on behalf of his client would. prefer the 50 foot set back as opposed to the 25 foot of right-of-way. August 27, 1979 Page 4 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 79-27 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 770 PS 79-46, REQUEST OF LAVADA THDr1PSON FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, t1ARTIN ADDITION APPROVED Mr. Stembridge stated on behalf of Mrs. Thompson, it would be more equitable to Mrs. Thompson to have a 50 foot set back line rather than dedicate the 25 foot of right-of-way and then have a 25 foot set back building line if in the future Precinct Line was widened. Mr. Stembridge stated that if Precinct Line was widened and the city had to require the right-of-way, all the neighbors and all others who presently live on Precinct Line would be compensated for their 25 foot of land. Mrs. Thompson does not feel like she should be required to give an additional 25 foot of right-of-way and then have a 25 foot building line from what is presently there now. Mr. Stembridge stated they would like to have the 50 foot set back line instead of dedicating 25 foot of right-of-way. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Stembridge if he would like to address comment number five of the Engineerls letter. Mr. Stembridge stated Mrs. Thompson was going to have to put in a septic tank because there was no sewer available at this time and she felt it would be a double financial burden to have to pay pro rata for sewer. Mr. Anderson stated it was the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning COJnmi ssi on to \'lai ve the pro rata for sewer. Councilman Wood asked if it would be appropriate at this time to require a covenant for the items that are coming in the future. Mr. Anderson stated he had discussed the sewer pro rata with Mr. Bronstad and he informed him that when the sewer goes in he has other means of obtaining the money, mainly the tap charge. Mr. Anderson stated that in terms of the 25 foot dedication, it would depend on what the Council wanted in the covenant. Mr. Anderson stated it would be the Council IS decision on whether or not they want to require the 25 foot of additional right-of-way at this time realizing that it maybe sometime before the road is widened. Councilman Wood stated that basically this plat, if the Council requi res the 50 foot, set back, is in error. Mr. Stembridge stated yes, the plat would have to be corrected 'before fil ing. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Anderson if in essence the city would have to require the ríght-of-way or the set back line at this time. Mr. Anderson stated that was correct and he would certainly want one or the other. Councilman Wood stated there was a motion on the floor, did Mr. Anderson recommend ,it be modified pending the receipt of the corrected plat before the motion is passed. August 27, 1979 Page 5 Mr. Anderson stated this was really not necessary. Mr. Anderson stated he would hold the plat until he was sure the intentions of the Council had been met. Mr. Anderson stated he would appreciate it if the Council would make it clear as to what their perferences were in the terms of either the 50 foot set back line or require the 25 foot dedication. Mr. Stembridge stated he would like to address comment number six the water distribution pro rata. Mrs. Thompson would like to enter into a covenant and pay hèr share at such time the water line is built. Mr. Anderson stated that Mr. Bronstad had indicated that he would accept a letter of covenant on the water pro rata. Mayor Faram stated his concern was the waiving of the sewer pro rata. Mayor Faram asked if the city should have some type of instrument that Mrs. Thompson would agree to tie onto the sewer and pay pro rata. Mayor Faram stated there were areas in the city where sewer was available and residents did not tie on. Mayor Faram asked if a percolation test had been made. Mr. Stembridge stated a percolation test had been made and approved by the County. Mayor Faram asked if Mrs. Thompson would be willing to sign a covenant on the same terms on the sewer as the water. Mr. Stembridge stated Mrs. Thompson would sign a covenant for water and sewer. Motion dies for the lack of a second. Mayor Faram stated he would recommend that if there was any wªy the .Coun·ci 1 did not set a precedence and did, ndt have the builders coming back to the Council on this situation, the Council go ahead and grant the request with the 50 foot set'back line. r,1ayor Faram asked City Atto;'ney McEnti re if the Council woul d be setting a precedence by doing this and could legal action be taken in this regard. Mr. McEntire st~ted he did not think it would create a legal problem, but an expense problem because it would have to be condemned anyway. Mayor Faram stated that if there was not a legal problem he would recommend the city require the 50 foot set back line and not require the dedjcation. Councilman Wood moved to amend the motion to state "subject to a covenant on water and sewer and require the 50 foot building set back line". August 27, 1979 Page 6 Mayor Faram asked for a substitute motion. Councilman Michener stated that in lieu of the motion on the floor, he would recommend to approve PS 79-46 subject to signing a covenant on water and sewer and requiring the 25 foot dedication. Councilman Freeman seconded the motion. Substitute motion carried 6-0. Councilman Cato stated it had been brought to his attention that the previous action on Ordinance No. 770 was improper since the ordinance was improperly presented as a IF-9 and there was no longer a IF-9 zoning. There is a IF-9-13 or 1500 etc,designating the minimum size house to be placed on the lot. Councilman Cato stated for that reason he would move to reconsider item Seven, Ordinance No. 770, to make a correction. Motion was seconded by Councilman Wood. Motion to reconsider carried 6-0. Councilman Cato asked what square footage was desired for the house. Mr. Stembridge replied 1500 square feet. Councilman Cato moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to amend the motion to state I-F-9-15, 1500 square feet minimum living area. Amended motion carried 6-0. 9. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone present wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Walter Elliott, Engineer, 1004 West Euless, appeared before the Council representing Alton Esbe 11 . Mr. Elliott stated this property was located along the eastern boundary of North Richland Hills, just west of Hurst. Mr. Elliott stated they planned to build approximately 62 homes in the subdivision. The Planning and Zoning had approved this request subject to 1500 square foot homes. Councilman Cavanaugh stated the plat Mr. Elliott was showing was different from the one the Council had. Mr. Elliott stated there were two cul-de-sacs on the plat the Council had. There were four or five lots that did not meet the requirements. They had taken the cul-de-sacs out and added to the footage of the lot. çorrections were made on the plat and re-submitted. August 27, 1979 Page 7 RECONSIDERATION PUBLIC HEARING- FOR PZ 79-28, REQUEST OF ALTON ISBELL TO REZONE TRACTS 3Bc, 3B, 3B5 & 3B7, ABST. 1055 FROM AGRICULTURE TO IF-8 ONE FAMILY D\~ELLI NG Councilman Freeman stated the plat showed a large area to the south of the property being discussed as IF-12 subdivision. Councilman Freeman asked how far the IF-12 was from the property being discussed. Mr. Elliott stated the property to the south was unimproved and undeveloped at this time. The property is about 800 feet to the south of the property being discussed. Mr. Anderson stated the streets on this property to the south had not been improved and there was no sewer. Councilman Cato asked if Hurst had been contacted as to what the property immediately across Precinct Line Road was zoned. Mr. Anderson stated Hurst had not been contacted. Mr. Elliott stated the property was zoned R-I residential, which could mean 1300 square feet to 1500 square feet requirements on homes. Councilman Cato stated he thought there was a requirement on boundary lines that the city check with the neighboring city to see what their zoning was before the Council passed the zoning. Mr. Anderson stated he was not aware of the requirement. Mayor Faram stated he did not think there was a requirement to notify the neighboring city, but a policy should be made to notify them. Mr. Anderson stated he had ,driven by and looked at the houses in the area and they appear to be the same as what Mr. Elliott was wanting to build. Mr. Paul stated the houses in Hurst that were new were 1400 square feet to 1600 square feet. Councilman Freeman asked what size the lots were in Hurst. Mr. Paul stated the lots in Hurst were much larger than the ones being di,scussed by Mr. Elliott. Mayor Faram called for anyone present wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being none, Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. August 27, 1979 Page 8 10. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to deny PZ 79-28, Ordinance No. 771. Motion carried 6-0. 11. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing and ~alled for anyone present wishing to speak for this request to please come forwa rd. Mr. Don Bowden appeared before the Council representing Dos Gringos. Mr. Bowden stated they were trying to put in a restaurant next to Penney's warehouse on Bedford Euless Road and would like to have a Specific Use Permit. Councilman Cato asked Mr. Bowden if he was aware of the requirements of the City' Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance. Mr. Bowden stated he was aware of the requirements of the Ordinance. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Bowden if he owned the property at the present time. Mr. Bowden stated he had a contract on the property. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Bowden if he would be the owner of the property. Mr. Bowden replied yes. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in oposition of this request to please come forward. There being none, Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 12. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve PZ 79-29, 'Ordi nance No. 772. Councilman Cavanaugh stated he would like to make sure the permit was issued to Dos Gringos only and not transferrable since Dos Gringos did not own the property at the present time. Councilman Cato asked if the City needed to have a letter from the owner of the property since Dos Gringos did not own the property. City Attorney McEntire stated no letter was needed, Dos Gringos had a contract and was ~quitable title to the property. August 27, 1979 Page 9 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 79-28 ORDINANCE NO. 771 DENIED PUBLIC HEARING, FOR PZ 79-29, REQUEST OF DOS GRINGOS, INC.~ TO REZONE TRACT 11, ABST. 1606 FROM COMMERCIAL TO COMMERCIAL-SPECIFIC USE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 79-29 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 772 Councilman Wood asked Mr. Bowden if he had a binding pending contract that had been signed by both parties. Mr. Bowden replied yes. Councilman Cavanaugh moved, seconded by Councilman Cato, to amend the motion to state IISpecific Use Permit to Dos Gringos only and non-transferable.1I Amended motion carried 6-0. Mayor Faram called for a vote on the original motion as amended. Motion carried 6-0. 13. Mr. Anderson stated the reason for this ordinance was that the city had some very old plats on some subdivisions and they had never been developed. Mr. Anderson stated this ordinance would give him permission to hold building permits on these plats until the City Engineer could look them over and approve them. Councilman Cato moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 773, amending Ordinance No. 195, Section 101D Subdivision Ordinance. Councilman Michener asked if the people would be notified of the change in the ordinance. City Attorney McEntire stated there was no requirement for nòtification. Councilman Freeman asked if this ordinance would apply to someone who was selling one lot. Mr. Anderson stated the ordinance would deal with subdivisions only. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 14. City Manager Paul stated the city had passed the same resolution in 1976. The resolution if passed, would help towards receiving any Block Grant Funds thru Tarrant County. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve Resolution No. 79-19. Motion carried 6-0. August 27, 1979 Page 10 CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANC( AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 195, SECTION 101~ (SUBDIVISION ORDIN- ANCE) APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 773 CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION PARTICI- PATING IN TARRANT COUNTY'S SIXTH YEAR COr-1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRArH PROGRAM APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 79-19 15. City Manager Paul advised the Council the funds for this project would come from Utility Fund Surplus. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Cato, to approve the bid of Joe R. Stark Construction Company in the amount of $30,701.74. Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Cato, Freeman, Michener and Cavanaugh and Councilwoman Reeder voting for; Councilman Wood voting against. 16. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Michener, to approve payment to J. L. Bertram in the amount of $29,182.07. Motion carried 6-0. 17. Mayor Faram advised the Council this item was postponed from the last meeting because of a problem on participation on the dra i nage. Mr. Paul stated the Council wanted to know the cost of the drainage. The total cost was $65,060.62 and adding one half of the drainage cost it would be $75,500. Mr. Paul stated the city would be about $4,060.62 in the hole. Councilman Freeman asked if the bid for the lots were accepted if the city would lose $4,060.62. Mr. Paul replied yes. Councilman Cato stated if the city accepted the only bid, the city would lose money on the development cost of the lots. Councilman Cato stated the bid did not include anything that went into the bridge improvements that was originally included as part of the problem. Councilman Cato stated the lots were originally retained by the city to be developed and sold to defray some of the cost of the city having to put in the bridge across the end of the street to the new school and it was hoped at the time that the development cost would be down enough that there would be some overage in the sale of the lots. Councilman Cato asked at what time and point the paving of the channel came into discussion. August 27, 1979 Page 11 CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR BURSEY ROAD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED AUTHORIZATION TO PAY ESTIMATE NO. FOUR (4) FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EXTENSIONS TO J. L. BERTRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,182.07 APPROVED CONSIDERATION AND AWARDING OF BID FOR 13 LOTS IN IRISH MEADOVJS REJ ECTED Mr. Paul stated it was his ùnderstanding that a portion of the channel to the north had been paved and he was saying that if and when the channel was developed on the east side it would be the city's cost of approximately one half, which would be $10,000. Councilman Cato stated the reason he asked was that at the time the bridge was put in there was no consideration of the paving of that easement. Mr. Paul stated he was saying that if the city had to put $10,000.00 into the channel it would be a total of $75,000. He was not saying the city wanted to pave the channel at this time. Councilman Cato stated the only bid received on the property excluded anything to be put on the buyer in the future for that participular drainage. Mr. Paul stated that was correct. ;Gouncilwoman Reeder asked if the city had to sell the lots. : ¡ ': Mayor Faram stated no. Councilman Cato stated that since there was only one bid and apparently the additional cost of the paving" it would mean going in the hole, therefore, he moved that the Council reject the bid. Motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman. Councilman Wood stated he did not think the city made clearly the bid requirements. Councilman Wood stated that in the future when the city had something for sale that it be specified what is to be done to the property in advance.~ " Councilman Cavanaugh stated he felt the city should send out not less than 20 notices on any bidding. Motion to reject the bid carried 6-0. 18. Mayor Faram stated this item was also postponed from the last meeting. Mr. Paul stated the Council had asked for some figures on the property. Mr. Paul stated the city purchased the total land with the house for $120,000. The city received one bid for $64,467~02, making a difference of $55,532.98 left in the house plus the site for the water tank. Mr. Paul stated the house was also put ,up for sale and no bids were received. Mr. Paul stated he anticipated the house would bring somewhere in the neighbor of $55,532.98. Mr. Paul stated no one could tell how much effect the tank was goi ng to have on the sale of the house. August 27, 1979 Page 12 CONSIDERATION AND A\~ARDING OF BID FOR 7.948 ACRES ON BURSEY ROAD REJECTED Councilman Freeman stated the city had a bid of $64,467.02, but just approved $30,701.74 worth of improvements on the property. Mr. Paul stated that was correct, but the staff looks at it as caused by some other problems other than what the $120.000.00 purchased. Councilman Freeman stated the would like to point out that was not the way it was presented to the Council, at the time. Councilman Cavanaugh asked if the an appraiser had appraised the property. Mr. Pual stated some people looked at the property and all said that they thought that the city should wait until the tank was built. An appraisal on the house would cost between $200.00 and $500. Mr. Paul stated it was his recommendation the city accept the bid. Councilman Freeman asked if the city would do the improvements on the property. Mr. Pual replied yes. Councilman Cato stated he believed going out for bids on the property prior to the completion of the water tank and drainage improvements was premature on the part of the city. Councilman Cato stated the fact that the ,city only received one bid on the property was evident that the unfinished nature of the property did not draw the quanitiy of bidders that the city would have liked to have and for that reason he recommended that the city disapprove the awarding of the bid for the 7.948 acres on Bursey Road. Motion was seconded by Councilman Wood. Motion to reject carried 5-1; Councilmen Cato, Wood, Freeman and Michener and COUDcilwoman Reeder voting for; Councilman Cavanaugh voting against. August 27, 1979 Page 13 19. Councilman Cato moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, tù àûthorìze canceiing the November 26 and December 24, 1979, Council meetings. Motion carried 6-0. 20. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to authorize using December 24, 1979, as a swing day and using Veteran's Day for the day after Thanksgiving. Motion carried 6-0. 21. Councilman Cavanaugh moved,· seconded by Gounciiwoman Reeder, to approve the job specifications as presented. Motion carried 6-0. 22. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilman Cato, to approve the changes in the job description for Clerk II. Motion carried 6-0. -- 22a. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to set the Public Hearing on the 1979-80 Budget and use of Revenue Sharing Funds for September 10, 1979. Motion carried 6-0. 23. Councilman Cavanaugh moved, seconded by Councilman Micheneri to approve Ordinance No. 774. Motion carried 6-0; 24. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of August 27, 1979. ..~J4m/ aram - Mayor ATTEST: Jei'\ ette Moore, City Secretary Augus t 27, 1979 Page 14 AUTHORIZATION TO CANCEL COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR NOVEMBER 26, AND DECEMBER 24, 1979 APPROVED AUTHORIZATION TO USE DECEMBER 24, 1979, AS SWING DAY AND VETERAN'S DAY FOR THE DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF JOB SPECIFICATIONS FOR LIBRARY ASSISTANL I, LIBRARY ASSISTANT II AND CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF CHANGES IN JOB DESCRIPTION FOR CLERK II APPROVED SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1979- 80 BUDGET AND THE USE OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS ORDINANCE AMENDING NO. 726, TAX ON THE COST OF ANY SLEEPING ROOM FURNISHED BY A MOTEL APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 774 AJOURNMENT