Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1978-10-09 Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS. TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY, HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, OCTOBER 9, 1978, 7:30 P.ti=-______ 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order October 9,1978. at 7: 30 p . m . 2. Present: Dick Faram Denver Mills James F. Cato John Michener Sid Cavanaugh Dave Freeman Lena Mae Reeder Mayor Councilmen Counc i 'j woman Rex McEntire Dick Perkins Ruth Pinner CHy Attorney City Engineer Director of Finance Kara Roggee Fort Worth Star Telegram Absent: Jim Wood Stan Gertz Jeanette Moore Ray Britton Councilman Acting City Manager City See reta ry Director of Public Works 3. The invocation was given by Councilwoman Lena Mae Reeder, Mayor Faram advised the Council he would like to depart from the agenda for the presentation of a Proclamation. Mayor Faram requested Carol Curie come forward to accept the Proclamation declaring October 15-21, 1978 as National Business Womens Week. Mayor Faram read the Proclamation. 4. Motion was made by Councilwoman Lena Mae Reeder, seconded by Councilman Mills, to approve the minutes of the Sept. 25, 1978, meeting as written. Motion carried 6-0. 5. Mayor Faram appointed Mr. Bill J. Betts, 4916 Reynolds Road, to a three-year term as a member of the Civil Service Commission with term to expire October 1,1981. Motion was made by Councilman Michener, seconded by Councilman Mills, to ratify the appointment. Motion carried 6-0. 6. t·1r. Thomas F. Bohardt appeared before the Council to speak on the Fossil Creek Park Project. Mr. Bohardt stated he was pleased at the ease to see the City Manager and be placed on the Council Agenda. He stated that the main purpose of the Richland Hills West Citizens was to insure and protect their property values. He said the project came as a surprise to residents of the area as they had been lead to believe it was a flood plain and-zoned for specific use. -i:::~ "::.../ CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL I NVOC¡:\TI ON APPROVAL OF MINUTES APPOINTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE comn 5S I ON ]'0,F¡~ß ER CITIZENS PRESEN- TATION, ~¡IFL THOMAS F. ßOHARDT CONCERNING FOSSIL CREEK PARK October 9, 1978 page 2 Mr. Bohardt proposed the following changes: 1. Lighted softball field be replaced by a more quiet activity (i.e., additional tennis courts or playground equipment). 2. Residential lots bordering the park have a 61-81 stock- ade fence erected to maintain privacy. 3. Any parking lots provided at the park border Onyx Drive South not residential lots. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Bohardt when he had talked to City Manager Riddle. Mr. Bohardt said the plan had been submitted to the State in June or July. Mr. Riddle showed him the plan after it had been submitted. Councilman Freeman stated we had to submit the plans and we had to build the same as plans or loose the money from the grant. Mr. Bohardt said Mr. Riddle had led him to believe the Council was not thrilled with the lighted softball field and not sure if sufficient funds would be approved to erect it. The softball field would be the last item funded. The swing sets and playground equipment would be the first item to be funded. City Engineer Perkins stated the plans were submitted in June or July. He felt that funding was marginal at best but that we had received interest from the State and believe now the plans will be funded. Mr. Perkins stated he feared that modification at this time would kill the grant, he would hesitate to make modifications. He stated that we must do a lot of justification of what goes into the plans and feel that a change now would effect other portions of the park and kill the entire project. Mr. Bohardt stated his main objection was the baseball field and no privacy. Councilman Freeman stated that the parks we now have are on the north side of town. The site cBme up and we took advantage of it since it was the only land available for a park in the south end of town. Councilman Cato stated that the land is indeed a flood Plain and zoned specific use. A permit was issued in 1969 or 1970 for an amusement park which was never constructed. Councilman Cato stated he understood we were in the preliminary stages and could make changes. City Engineer Perkins said he felt any change would kill the plan, that the first stage is in final stage and no longer preliminary. Councilman Cato said we cannot eliminate but we can restructure. Mr. Perkins said this was true. Councilman Cato stated we can turn down the grant if we cannot live within the framework. October 9, 1978 Page 3 Mr. Perkins said the entire grant would not be killed. The State Department of Parks and Wild Life dictates what can be eliminated. Not all of Phase II will be funded. Mayor Faram appointed a committee composed of Mr. and Mrs. Jim Ayers, Councilmen Freeman and Cavanaugh, Mr. Bohardt and Tom Connell with Councilman Freeman as Chairman. The object of the committee was to work out plans that were agreeable to everyone, with a target date for completion. City Engineer Perkins said he did not know when the funding date was set. It could be forthcoming at any time. He would call them and see what effect changes would have. Councilman Mills stated that we had a short deadline when this was presented to the Council. We had to get the land purchased. He under- stood the park was not rigid and could be changed at a later date. This park came up so fast we could not relate as to how this would fit in with other parks in the City. City Engineer Perkins stated the over all preliminary plans could be changed. It was just Phase I that was set in concrete. He would find out tomorrow. 7. Mr. John Watson, Builder, stated his property was high and drains on the property across Bursey Road. He was advised that an underground storm drainage system would be required. He received tentative approval from Mr. Perkins and was told he needed to secure the approval of the people across the street. He worked with the neighbors this past summer and they reached an agreement but when he presented the legal documents to be signed, they refused to sign. CONSIDERATION TO CONDEMN AN EASE- MENT FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, MR. JOHN WATSON PRESENTI NG TABLED City Engineer Perkins stated he has to provide drainage or get an agreement with down stream property owners. It is a problem of diverting the water. His intent is to get the water from his subdivision to natural flow but in this case the natural flow is the front yard of Mr. Palmer. Councilwoman Reeder asked if he had worked in every way possible with property owners to reach an agreement. Mr. Watson stated he felt he had. City Attorney Rex McEntire stated he feels the Council needs to meet in executive session to work out this problem. He recommended no action on the resolution be taken tonight. October 9, 1978 Page 4 Mr. Watson stated the delay is costing him thousands of dollars and he would appreciate any expediting that we can do. Mr. William Palmer, 7325 Bursey Road, stated no easement was requested downstream from the property. The discussions were to find out what could be done and he did not give any agreement. He stated that to put a 30' pipe across his property would just drain the water into the property next door. He stated Mr. Watson had offered to build'a stock tank to help contain the water but he felt a stock tank would not contain the water. He requested the Council look into the matter further. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Perkins if this was a diversion of natural flow, what happens to the water. Mr. Perkins stated it drains down the street instead of through the yard to the point where it intersects the natural flow. Councilman Mills asked Mr. Palmer if alternates were discussed. He said yes but that Mr. Watson said it would cost too much. Mr. Palmer stated he would like to see the property developed if it doesn't flood his property. Councilwoman Reeder asked where the Eddy property was. Mr. Palmer stated it joined his property on the north. Councilman Cato asked Mr. Perkins what would happen if no drainage was provided. Mr. Perkins stated it would wash out Bursey Road. Councilman Cavanaugh asked if it would be feasible cost-wise to go down the street. Mr. Watson stated the cost estimate to cross the Palmer property was $40,000.00. City Engineer Perkins stated the subdivision across the street does not meet our specifications. It was in Keller when the City limits were moved. Jim Williams, Engineer for Mr. Watson, said it was not intended that the stock tank would contain the storm flow. It would provide some storage. Motion was made by Councilman Freeman, seconded by Councilman Cavanaugh, to postpone this item until the next meeting of October 23, 1978. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor Faram stated the Council would take a fifteen minute RECESS recess. ~1ayor Faram called the meeting back to order. BACK TO ORDER All Council persons and staff present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. 8. Mayor Faram declared the Public Hearing for PZ 78-31 was open and those wishing to speak for the rezoning to come forward. PUBLIC HEARING PZ 78- 31 Mr. Tim Truman, 4904 Carol Court, North Richland Hills, Texas, Attorney represented the owners. He requested the lot~ be rezoned to Industrial but Industrial be limited- to use as set forth in Article VI, Section II, October 9, 1978 Page 5 Subsection 35 of the Planning and Zoning Ordinance. He stated the Subsection 35 would make limitation as to type of industry that was placed there. He said that specific use would entail changing zoning every time they changed tenants. He felt it was more appropriate to zone the property instead of the people. He stated that specific use was not understood by lawyers, tenants and bankers and if you go to borrow money or sell, a very serious problem arises. He stated the zoning would revert to agriculture. at the end of the specific use permit. He stated there would be no smoke, no noise, no smoke stacks but that the word "Industrial II was needed as primary zoning. The limitations present no problems. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Truman if he had a suggestion as to the zoning. Mr. Truman stated he would prefer Industrial but limited to light manufacturing according to Article VI, Section II, Subsection 35 or Ordinance 179. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Truman if the entire shopping center was going to be industrial. Mr. Truman said it was no longer suited for local retail; the stores facing Grapevine Highway had ,value as Mom and Dad type shops but the back side was not suited for local retail. Mayor Faram asked if there were others to speak for the rezoning. There was none. ~~yor Faram asked if there were those who opposed the rezoning. There was none. Mayor Faram declared the Public Hearing closed. 9. Councilman Cato made a motion that we approve Ordinance #720 rezoning to Industrial with limitations as set forth in Article VI, Section II, Subsection 35 of the Planning and Zoning Ordinance. Motion carried 6-0. ORDINANCE #720 APPROVED 10. Motion was made by Councilman Freeman, seconded by Councilman Mills to approve the vacation of Green Oaks Estates Tract in order that this tract of land may be replatted as Londonderry Addition. Motion carried 6-0. 11. Motion was made by Council man Freeman, Seconded by Councilman Cato, to approve PS 78-35, subject to the comments from the City Engineer. City Engineer Perkins stated all items of his letter had been taken care of except the pro-rata require- ments and the drainage easements. REQUEST OF WATSON INVESTMENT CORP. TO VACATE GREEN OAKS ESTATES TRACT IN ORDER THAT THIS TRACT MAY BE REPLATTED AS LONDONDERRY ADD. APPROVED PS 78-35 REQUEST OF I.JATSON INVEST- MENT CORP. FOR FINAL PLAT OF LONDONDERRY ADD. APPROVED Motion carried 6-0. October 9, 1978 Page 6 12. ~btion was made by Councilman Mills, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve final plat of Lot 1, Block 32, College Hills Addition as presented in the Engineers letter of August 25, 1978. City Engineer Perkins stated his only question now was the insufficient fire hydrant. PS 78-76, REQUEST OF JAMES L. PARK FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 32, COLLEGE HILLS ADD. APPROVED Councilman Cato asked what the zoning was. City Engineer Perkins stated IF-9. Mr. Jim Park said he had owned the property for 7-1/2 years and that he was just enlarging and wanted a new building. He said the property had never been platted. Mr. Park stated the property was zoned Commercial and that the building had been there eleven years. City Attorney Rex McEntire stated the ordinance requires platting prior to a building permit being issued. Councilman Cato moved that we table this item until the next meeting. Councilman Michener asked Mr. Park if he was agreeable to the fire hydrant restriction. Mr. Park stated he would do whatever was necessary. Motion carried by a vote of 5-1 with Councilman Cato voting against. 13. Mot i on was made by Council man ~1i chener, seconded by Councilman Mills to approve PS 78-77. Motion carried 6-0. Motion carried 6-0. PS 78-77, REQUEST OF SOUTH CENTRAL OIL CO. FOR REPLA1 OF LOTS 14 & 15, EDGLEY ADD. APPROVED PS 78-80, REQUEST OF FIRST CHURCH OF SCIENTIST OF RICH- LAND HILLS FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STATION ADD. 3rd FILING APPROVED . 14. Motion was made by Councilman Michener, seconded by Councilman Mills to approve PS 78-80, subject to the Engineers comments. 15. Motion was made by Councilman Cavanaugh, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve PS 78-82, subject to the Engineers letter of September 19, 1978. Councilman Mills stated that at the end of Edison Drive near Riviera Drive it appeared the plat does not conform to the Throughfare Plan because of Riviera Drive being projected on the east and making a curve 'It Edison Drive like the Throughfare Plan shows, Edi son tUY'IlS and cuts off Ri vi era Dri ve. Ri vi era Dri ve deadends into Edison Drive instead of making a curve. Councilman Mills stated he would like to know if this was a satisfactory arrangement. PS 78-82, REQUEST OF JEWELCOR, INC., FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, EDISON JEWELRY ADD. APPROVED. October 9, 1978 page 7 Mr. Perkins stated that with the replatting of Skyline Homes Addition, the west end of Riviera was basically cut off from coming through to Rufe Snow. Therefore, in effect, Rivieria was terminated as secondary collector street. Mr. Perkins stated it was he and Mr. Brittons opinion that it would be better to make Edison Drive, across the street from Sanger Harris, from the standpoint of signalization and to allow Edison Drive run in this configuration so that it would eventually extend beyond Riviera Drive to the north and intersect the frontage road on LOOR 820. Mr. Perkins stated because of the fact that Riviera is not a through street he felt there was an advantage to allowing traffic to come off the frontage road and get to Sanger Harris. Mr. Perkins stated he felt very strongly that once Sanger Harris and the Mall is built up, and this area is built up, traffic congestion at Loop 820 Frontage Road and Grapevine Highway will be excessive. ~1r. Perkins stated he felt this would allow an additional outlet for people to proceed down this road and go into the Sanger Harris Drive without having to go through the light at 121. Councilman Cato stated there could be a potential problem with the people on the east end of Riveria Drive. Councilman Cato stated that, if the redesignation of Edison Drive to come perpindictular with Rivierai Drive and then intersect with the access road has not been presented to the people in the area or at least a letter sent out informing them the Council is considering this action, he would rather see action held until the next meeting to allow input from those residents. Mr. Perkins asked what would be preferred in an effort to accomodate the property owners. Councilman Cato stated he did not know what the property owners would want. It was his desire to make them aware of the change in concept and see if they had objection. Councilman Cato asked Mr. Perkins if there would be any significant change in Lot 1, Block A, if Edison Drive were realigned. City Engineer Perkins replied, yes. Any change in the north end of Edison Drive, in his opinion, would be a major change and if you go due east of Riveria there will be a major change there. Mr. Truman stated he wanted to be sure he understood the problem. Either the people coming down'Riveria are going to have a stop sign and a 90 degree turn or they are going to have a little "s" curve and the people coming off Loop 820 are going to have a stop sign. Mr. Truman stated it looked obvious to him that you could not have a stop sign half a block off the access road to Loop 820. Mayor Faram asked if the design of a fifty foot street considered getting off Grapevine Highway. Mayor Faram stated he did not understand the three lanes. Mr. Truman stated as he understood Mr. Britton and Mr. Perkins, they intend to have three lanes but after it gets to Grapevine Highway there is a left hand turn lane off Edison Drive into Grapevine Highway. October 9, 1978 p?ge 8 Mayor Faram asked if there would be a possibility of stacking traffic on Grapevine Highway both east aDd west bound trying to get into the area. Mayor Faram asked if an alternative would be made to keep the street two lanes to a point and then build a 371 street. Mr. Perkins stated that with the traffic study that was being done he di d not forsee that happeni ng. t~r. Perkins stated that two south bound lanes could be designated as such to proceed down Edison Drive to shop in this area as well as go across to Sanger Harris. These designated lanes could be used during peak traffic seasons and hours. Mr. Perkins stated his reason for the 41 1 street rather than the 371 street was because commercial type installation demands the wider street. There is no specific requirement that they have to put in a 411 street. Mr. Perkins stated he felt it was not only in the best interest of the City but the developers as well. Councilman Freeman stated he felt if the street was narrowed then cars stopping to make left hand turns into these establishments would create a traffic problem if a sufficiently wide street was not provided to make the turn onto. Councilman Michener asked Councilman Freeman if he was talking about Grapevine Highway or Edison Drive. Councilman Freeman stated he was talking about Edison Drive. Councilman Mills stated he felt the argument of 37' to 411 did not make a lot of difference as far as the flow of traffic was concerned. The additional four feet would not give us another lane just one foot per lane extra. Councilman Mills stated if a commercial street was going to be put in with IINo Parkingll on the curb the traffic would flow smoothly. Councilman Mills ask if it was being requested that the City participate in the cost of the street. Mr. Perkins stated that Mr. Truman was asking that the City participate. Councilman Mills stated he did not feel it would be worth the extra $9,000.00 to the City. Councilman Freeman stated he felt to build a 37' street in a commercial area would be a mistake. Councilman Cavanaugh stated that a tremendous amount of business would be generated by Edisons. He stated he did not feel a single turning lane would be adequate to control the volume of traffic. He knew the problem turning across two lanes of traffic but at least it would control the traffic. After further discussion, Councilman Mills ask if the motion to approve PS 78-82 could be restated. Mayor Faram advised the motion was to approve subject to the Engineers letter of September 19, 1978. Councilman Cavaugh stated his motion was for a 41 I street with 50' of right-of-way. October 9~ 1978 Page 9 Motion to approve carried 3-3; Councilmen Mills~ Cavanaugh and Freeman voting for; Councilmen Michener~ Cato and Councilwoman Reeder voting against; Mayor Faram voted for to br~ak the tie. Mr. Truman asked if he could impose for three related matters on the case. 1. The City participate in the oversizing of the street. 2. That the developer be able to re-coupe the cost of the storm drainage in Edison Drive from abutting property owners, which is standard procedure in other cases but wanted it on record that the Council authorized the staff to enter the re-coupe agreement. 3. When and how the pro-rata share for storm sewer on Grapevine Highway would be paid. Mr. Truman stated he wanted to make sure there was no misunderstanding on the right-of-way on the plat; fifty foot right-of-way with five foot easement on either side. Mr. Truman stated the reason for the fifty foot was when the developer came to the City~ that was what was requested. Consequently~ that was what the developer had purchased for the length of the street. The owner would not sell the property any other way. Mayor Faram advised the Council they had heard Mr. Trumans request, did the Council want to take action tonight or turn it over to the staff for recommendations. Councilman Cato asked the City Engineer to comment as to the status of the storm drain~ curb and gutter as related to the widening of Grapevine Highway in the area of Edisons. Mr. Perkins stated a meeting had been held with the State and the intention, as it stands now~ is not to build curb, gutter and storm drainage on that side of the street. Mr. Perkins stated he did request that they seek additional funding to build the storm drain, curb and gutter and an extra lane of pavement on the Edisons side. These funds to come from the Urban Assistance program. Mr. Perkins stated he had not heard the status on his request. Councilman Cato asked Mr. Perkins if his suggestion would be to escrow cash or to build the line now. Mr. Perkins stated he would recommend signing a covenant to run with the land. They would assume the cost by either installing the line themselves or preferably paying the cost across their frontage when it is installed by the State. Councilman Cato asked if this approach would be satisfactory to Mr. Trumans client. October 9, 1978 p.a~e 10 Mr. Truman stated the covenant was preferable to putting in the line right now. The only problem is if his client had an agreement and put up a letter of credit, the cost would be fixed. Mr. Truman stated he preferred that the State stand the risk of increased prices. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Truman if he objected to meeting with the staff for recommendation and if it would be inconvenient for him. Mr. Truman stated it would not inconvenience him and he would be happy to meet with the staff. He wanted the City to do the right thing. Mayor Faram stated he would direct the staff to meet with Mr. Truman and bring recommendations back to the Council. 16. Motion was made by Councilman Mills, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to pay American LaFrance $3,119.12 for repair to transmission to Fire Department Pumper truck. Motion carried 6-0. 17. ~btion was made by Councilman Freeman, seconded by Councilman Mills, to approve specifications as presented. Councilman Cato said he felt the specifications tied down to a specific vehicle. tr'btion carried with Councilmen Mills, Michener, ,and Freeman voting for; and Councilmen Cavanaugh, Cato and Councilwoman Reeder voting against. Mayor voted affirmative to break tie. 18. Motion was made by Councilman Michener, seconded by Councilman Mills to approve the specifications for five 5/8 ton pick-up trucks. Councilman Cato stated he had the same objection in that it tied down to a specific vehicle. Motion failed with Councilmen Mills, Michener, and Freeman voting for; and Councilmen Cavanaugh, Cato and Councilwoman Reeder voting against. Mayor Faram voting against to b~eak tie, motion fails. r~YOR PRO-TEM CATO PRESIDING: AUTHORIZATION TO PAY AMERICAN LA FRANCE FOR TRANSt,lISSION REPAIR TO FIRE DEPT. PUMPER TRUCK IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,119.1 APPROVED APPROVAL OF SPECI· FICATIONS AND BIDDING FOR SIX 1979 FOUR-DOOR SEDANS APPROVED APPROVAL OF SPECI· FICATIONS AND BIDDING FOR FIVE 5/8 TON PICK·-UP TRUCKS FAILED 19. Motion by Councilman Cato, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder to table this item indefinately. . Motion carried 6-0. 20. Motion by Councilman Cato, Seconded by Councilwoman Reeder to table this item indefinately. Motion carried 6-0. 21. Motion was made by Councilman Freeman, seconded by Councilman Mills to approve payment of $34,528.40 to First Southwest Corporation for services rendered in the sale and issuance of $3,500,000.00 City of North Richland Hills Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1978. Motion carried 6-0. MAYOR FARAM RETURNED TO THE MEETING AND RESUMED CHAIRMANSHIP: 22. Motion was made by Councilman Mills, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to authorize the Mayor and Finance Director to execute notes not in excess of $500,000.00 at 4.95% for C.I.P. Payments in October and November 1978. Finance Director Ruth Pinner explained that we have the necessary funds invested in Treasury Bills which will mature on December 7, 1978. The rate of interest on the Treasury Bills is 7.6% and we can make the short- term~note for 4.95%. Motion carried 6-0. 23. Motion by Councilman Mills, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve payment to Red River Construction Company for Estimate No.4 in the amount of $171,429.72 for the Fort Morth-Watauga Supply Line and Water Distribution System Extensions. October 9, 1978 Page 11 CONSIDERATION & APPROVAL OF STATE DEPT. OF HIGm~AY PUBLIC TRANSPORTA TION CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR SPUR 452 (GRAPEVINE HW TABLED CONSI DERATION & AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE WITH THE STATE DEPT. OF HIGH~IAYS & PUBLIC TRANSPORTA TION, NOT TO EXCEED $130,000.0 FOR THE RECONSTRU TION OF SPUR 452 TAB LED AUTHORIZATION TO PAY FIRST SOUTH- WEST CORPORATION $34,528.40 FOR SERVICES. APPROVED AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR & FINANCE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE NOTES NOr IN EXCESS OF $500,000.00 AT 4.95% FOR C.I.P. PAYMENTS. APPROVED RESOLUTION 78-15 AUTHORIZATION TO PAY RED RIVER CONSTRUCT ION CO. $171 ,429.72. APPROVED Councilman Cato noted that the City Inspector had not signed the estimated as to completeness of quantities. City Engineer Perkins stated that the City Inspector was not aware of Change Order #3. Mr. Perkins stated he could verify quantities on Iten~ 14-19 and 3aid he will obtain City Inspectors approval for other items. Motion carried 6-0. 24. Motion by Councilman Freeman, seconded by Council- woman Reeder to authorize payment to Red River Construction Company for Estimate No. 3 in the amount of $126,525.55 for the Watauga Drive Booster Pump Station. Motion carried 6-0. 25. ~~tion by Councilman Michener, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to authorize payment to Tank Buil ders, Inc., for Estimate No.2 in the amount of $23,251.98 for 2.0 MG Ground Storage Reservoir. Motion carried 6-0. 26. Motion by Councilman Cavanaugh, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder to authorize payment to Circle "CII Construction Company, Estimate No.2 & Final, in the amount of $13,445.77 for Miscellaneous Utility Adjustments Grapevine Highway, subject to maintenance bond. Motion carried 6-0. 27. Motion by Councilman Mills, second by Councilman Freeman to approve Ordinance 721. Motion carried 6-0. 28. r-1otion by Councilman Cato, seconded by Councilman Cavanaugh, to approve Ordinance 722. Motion carried 6-0. 29. MaY~r Faram declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: October 9, 1978 pase 12 AUTHORIZATION TO PA Y RED RIVER CONSTRUCTION CO. $126,525.55. APPROVED AUTHORIZATION TO PAY TANK BUILDERS INC., $23,251.98 APPROVED AUTHORIZATION TO PAY CIRCLE "C" $13,445.77. APPROVED ORDINANCE 721, UNLA~JFUL TO CONSUME BEER OR OTHER ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ON PREMISES WHERE BEER IS SOLD FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUl PTION. APPROVED , . ,., ORDINANCE 722, REGULATING TRAFFII & MOTOR VEHICLES THROUGHOUT C!TV APPROVED ADJOURNMENT Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary