Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1976-02-23 Minutes ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, FEBRUARY 23, 1976 - 7:30 P.M. Mayor Dick Faram called the regular council meeting to order February 23, 1976, at 7:30 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Councilmen Councilwomen STAFF PRESENT: Ci ty Manager Ci ty Secretary Ci ty Attorney City Engi neer CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Dick Faram Norman Ellis George Conant John Lamond Tom Newman Jim Cato Dorothy McCl ure JoAn Goodnight M. E. Riddle Winnie Barclay Rex McEntire Dick Perkins Mr. Thad Biard, member of the Planning and Zoning Commission, was also present. There was no press representative present. The invocation was given by Councilwoman Goodnight. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of Minutes - February 9, 1976 Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilman Lamond, to approve the minutes as presented. Councilman Conant requested that the minutes to be changed on page six, last item, to reflect he made the motion, not the second. The minutes were so changed. There being no further discussion, the motion carried 7-0. Vote: 7-0 PZ-76-1, Request of J. P. Birdwell to rezone Lot 5B, Block 1 of Jack M. Estes, Jr. Subdivision from Local Retail to Commercial ORDINANCE NO. 623 PZ 76-1 Vote: 7-0 15' Mayor Faram declared the public hearing open and requested those wishing to speak in behalf of the rezoning to come forward. There being no one to speak in favor of the rezoning, those opposed to the rezoning were requested to come forward. No one appeared in opposition; therefore, Mayor Faram declared the public hearing closed. Motion was made by Councilman Lamond, second by Councilman Conant, to approve Ordinance No. 623, granting the rezoning. Councilman Newman asked if it were in order to approve the item as there . was no one present to speak. Planning and Zoning Commission Member Thad Biard informed the Council February 23, 1976 Page Two that there had been no opposition present at the planning and zoning meeting and that, in fact, the property had been used as commercial for years and it was the city's request to bring it into conforming use. Mayor Faram called for a vote and the motion carried 7-0. PZ 76-2, Request of Mrs. Juanita Anglin to rezone 4.035 acres of the M. Lynch Survey from Planned Development to Local Retail Mayor Faram declared the public hearing open and asked for those wishing to speak in behalf of the rezoning to come forward. Mr. Tim Truman, Attorney at Law, representing Mrs. Juanita Anglin, requested that the case be sent back to Planning and Zoning at the expense of Mrs. Anglin to request commercial zoning as originally requested. He detailed the background on the property and why it had been zoned planned development originally. He also explained that Mrs. Anglin had appeared by herself at the Planning and Zoning meeting and had agreed to local retail rather than disagree with other property owners present. Motion was made by Councilwoman Goodnight, second by Councilman Cato, to honor Mr. Truman's request and send the item back to Planning and Zoning at Mrs. Anglin's expense. Motion carried 7-0. PZ 76-2, SENT BACK TO ZONING BOARD Vote: 7-0 28' PZ 76-4, Request of Mangham Airport Joint Venture to rezone 99.71 acres of L. C. Walker Survey and T. K. Martin Survey from Industrial to Industrial Specific Use-Airport Mayor Faram declared the public hearing open and asked those wishing to speak in behalf of the rezoning to come forward. Mr. David Hughes, consulting engineer, 1004 West Euless Boulevard, came forward to represent Mangham Airport Joint Venture in requesting the rezoning. Lengthy discussion followed in which, responding to council questions, Mr. Hughes stated that the request for rezoning had been made to bring the airport into conforming use. City Manager Riddle also stated that this had been his suggestion to those requesting the rezoning. Councilman Newman asked for information regarding the additions to the runway. Mr. Bill Pasteur responded to the question by stating there had been re- pairs, but no extensions. He stated that if there had been any extension it had been quite minor and that it had been accidental. Mr. Hughes presented a Progress Report on Mangham Airport, dated February 23, 1976, from Elliott & Hughes, Inc., to the Council. This report is made a part of these minutes. Following Mr. Hughes' presentation, Mayor Faram called for others wishing to speak in favor of the rezoning to come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the rezoning, Mayor Faram called for those opposed to the PZ 76-4 Recessed: 6-0 74' February 23, 1976 Page Three rezoning to come forward. Mr. Bill Ratcliff, 9224 Amundson Road, came forth to speak against the rezoning. He presented information which he interpreted to mean that it was the intention of the Council in 1967 when the Zoning Ordinance was adopted to eventually phase out Mangham Air- port. This brought disagreement from the Mayor and other members of the Council who felt this was not the intention of the Council at all, but just an error or oversight as had occurred in other areas of the ordinance. He presented a petition which he purported to be signed by Louie Engler who, Mr. Ratcliff, stated was the owner of the entire tract to the south bordering the airport property. Upon questioning by Council- man Lamond regarding the signature having the designation "Agt" at the end, Mr. Ratcliff explained that explained that the property was in an estate, a trust, and Mr. Engler acted as agent. Because the petition could not be verified by the City Secretary as a legal petition by 20% of the property owners or an owner of 20% of the land within 200 feet of the property question, the City Attorney was directed to check into the matter. Councilman Cato informed Mr. Ratcliff that had the petition been presented when appropriate, the Thursday preceding the Council Meeting, the petition could have already been verified or discounted. Upon questioning by Councilman Ellis regarding what he wanted the Council to do, if he wanted the airport closed, Mr. Ratcliff replied that he did not but he did not want it to expand. Lengthy discussion followed between the Council and Mr. Ratcliff on the intent of the charter and ordinance. Mayor Faram called for others who were opposed to the rezoning to come forward. The following citizens appeared in opposition to the request: Mr. Glenn E. Schneider, 7009 Payte Lane, who spoke once as a homeowner and once as a realtor. Mrs. Mikel Brown, 8401 Main Street, who repeated many of the statements made in prior hearings. Mrs. Brown spoke at various times during the opposition portion of the public hearing. Mr. Dave Norman, 6504 Collard Court, who informed the Council that he had been the original chairman of the homeowners' group, and that he was relocating to Florida. Mr. George Keith, 4924 Lazy Lane, who said he had attended the original hearings regarding the zoning ordinance and that he remembered the nonconforming usage being discussed by Mr. Mangham at the hearings. February 23, 1976 Page Four Mrs. Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton Drive Mrs. Michelle Forman, 8425 Rand Mr. James R. Simmons, 6824 Clift Mayor Faram asked if there were others to speak against the proposed rezoning. He recognized Mr. Glenn Baker, 304 Glenn Drive, Hurst, who had attempted to speak prior to this time. Mr. Baker came forward and spoke in favor of the rezoning. Councilman Newman questioned him regarding where he worked, what he did, and stated he had been offered plane rides before but had never been taken. Mr. Baker replied he would be happy to take him up for a ride, but Councilman Newman stated his reluctance to go up with Mr. Baker. Side 2 of Tape Once more Mrs. Brown berated the Mayor regardinq his letting Mr. Baker speak during the opposition's time. Mayor Faram asked if there were others to speak in opposition to the proposal. There being no others to speak, Mayor Faram declared the public heari ng closed. Motion was made by Councilman Newman, second by Councilwoman McClure, to refuse the request for rezoning. Motion was made by Councilwoman Goodnight, second by Councilman Lamond, to table the item until more information regarding the legality of the pe- tition presented by Mr. Ratcliff could be obtained. Motion carried 5-2, with Councilwoman McClure and Councilman voting against the motion. Mayor Faram called a 15-minute recess. RECESS CALL TO ORDER The Mayor called the meeting back to order and stated that all those first above listed were still present with the exception of Councilman Newman who left because he was not feeling well. Mayor Faram stated that the previous item was tabled but it needed to be clarified as to tabled until what date. He said he felt the city attorney could have the information available by March 8 and that the item could be heard March 8. The City Attorney stated a motion to recess action on the item was in order. Mayor Faram stated he did not want to be unfair to those who had already left the meeting. He asked Mrs. Robinson if she felt there were enough people present to get the word to the rest of the people that the action on the item would be on the agenda for March 8. He stated that the public hearing had already been held and would not be held again, that only action on the item would be considered. The City Attorney requested that a motion be made concerning the recess. Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilman Lamond, to recess item number seven on the agenda, PZ 76-4, until the council meeting of March 8. Motion carried 6-0. Citizens Presentation by Charles Owen: Request to deviate from policy requiring taxes to be paid on property before zoning, platting, etc. Mr. Charles Owen made a request of the Council to postpone paying $2,060 in back taxes until the pre- liminary plat is approved for a development in College Hills. Councilman Cato questioned Mr. Owen regarding why $2,000 was a problem when they were talking about such large sums of money involved in the development. Mr. Owen explained that the funding would be done in a package deal, with the taxes being included in the package. Following a short discussion, Councilman Lamond moved, second by Councilwoman Goodnight, to waive the policy of collecting delinquent taxes prior to platting, with the understanding the taxes would be paid prior to final platting. The vote was tied 3-3, with Councilwoman Goodnight, Councilmen Lamond and Conant voting in favor of the motion and Council- woman McClure and Councilmen Ellis and Cato voting against the motion. Mayor Faram voted in favor of the motion. Motion carried 4-3. Request of RYA to improve lighting at Fossil Creek Park Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Council- man Cato, to approve the request Mr. Doyle Stanford made to install new quartz light fixtures on the Fossil Creek Senior Girls softball park. Councilman Ellis asked what the cost would be to the city. The City Manager said there would be no cost to the city but that he would recommend the motion specify a licensed electrician must be used and that the city would waive the fee. Council- man Ellis and Councilman Cato agreed to this amendment to their motion. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration of requiring signs on property with notifi- cation of rezoning This item was moved ahead of item 10 in order that the City Manager could furnish additional information on item 10. Motion was made by Councilman Lamond, second by Councilman Cato, that the city install signs on property being considered February 23, 1976 Page Five CITIZENS PRESENTATION Vote:4-3 Side 2 97' FOSSIL CREEK LIGHTING Vote: 6-0 Side 2 158' REZONING SIGNS for rezoning. Councilman Cato asked if this would be done by the city or the person requesting the rezoning. Councilman Lamond responded it would be done by the city. Councilman Ellis asked what the cost would be to the city. Councilman Lamond stated he did not know. City Attorney McEntire stated that in Haltom City the sign ran approximately $8.00 per property. Following a short discussion, motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilman Conant, to table the item until the costs and details could be worked out. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration of Liability Insurance Bids The Council asked for the City Manager's recommendation. City Manager Riddle's recommendation was: accept bid of Alexander and Alexander, because he interpreted it to be a firm bid while he interpreted the Leffingwell bid not to be a firm bid. Mr. Roy Miller, representing Alexander and Alexander, made his presentation, explain- ing his company's bids. Mr. Bill Leffingwell, 4005 Rufe Snow Drive, made a presentation regarding his bids. There had been an indication by the City Manager that the insurance representatives felt the city's insurance position would be weaker if the insurance were divided. Mr. Leffingwell stated he thought it doubtful if this would enter into the picture. Lengthy discussion followed which indicated there could be no definite dollar figure bid by either company for either coverage. Councilman Ellis moved, second by Councilman Conant, to accept the low bid, apparently Alexander and Alexander. Councilman Cato moved, second by Councilman Lamond, for a substitute motion, separating the bids, general liability to Alexander and Alexander and automobile liability to Leffingwell Insurance, with the stipulation the Leffingwell bid was interpreted to be $5,937 less premium discount. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration to purchase stencil making machine Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilman Lamond, to purchase the Gestetner electronic stencil maker. Councilman Cato asked purchase price and source of funds. Councilman Ellis stated the purchase price was indicated at approximately $1300 and that the funds would come from the City Secretary's budget. Councilman Cato suggested that the funds be from the City Secretary's budget, with the account shown in the red, and not to get in the realm of transferring funds. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration of calling joint meeting with the Park and Recreation Board Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilwoman Goodnight, to set a work session between the City Council February 23, 1976 Page Six LETTING OF BIDS Vote: 6-0 Side 2 1751 PURCHASE EQUIPMENT Vote: 6-0 395' WORK SESSION Vote: 6-0 406' February 23, 1976 Page ~even and Park and Recreation Board for March 15, 1976, if this date is agreeable with the Park and Recreation Board. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration of Speed Zone Ordinance on Davis Boulevard ORDINANCE NO. 624 Vote: 6-0 411' Motion was made by Councilman Lamond, second by Councilman Conant, to approve Ordinance No. 624, as requested by the State, regulating speed in school zones on Davis Boulevard. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration of payment of $26,370 to Thomas Electronics APPROVAL OF PAYMENT Vote: 0-6 429' Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilwoman Goodnight, to pay Thomas Electronics $26370. Discussion followed in which the Council expressed their dissatisfaction with the sound system. Councilman Cato stated he would like a representative of the company to appear before the Council. Mayor Faram recommended that payment be held up. Mayor Faram called for a vote. Motion failed 0-6. Consideration of Payment of $25,172 to Stafford R. Hardin, General Contractors APPROVAL OF PAYMENT Vote: 6-0 493' Motion was made by Councilman Lamond, second by Councilman Cato, to pay $25,172 to Stafford R. Hardin. Discussion followed concerning items which were still lacking or could not be accepted. Dis- cussion turned to the change order, next item on the agenda, and who approved the changes. Council- man Ellis questioned the City Manager and he stated that he approved most of them. Mayor Faram suggested that the bill be paid but that the architect committee be called back to go over any problem areas. Mayor Faram called for a vote. Motion carried 6-0. Consideration of Change Order #8 with Stafford R. Ha rd i n APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER Motion was made by Councilman Conant, second by Councilwoman Goodnight, to approve the change order as presented. Motion carried 6-0. Vote: 6-0 5491 Consideration of Payment to Komatsu & Associates in the amount of $3,797.09 APPROVAL OF PAYMENT Tabled: 5 - 1 562' Motion was made by Councilwoman Goodnight, second by Councilman Conant, to approve payment to Komatsu & Associates in the amount of $3,797.09. Discussion followed regarding withholding payment until all the problems were solved. Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilman Cato, to table the motion. Motion was tabled by a vote of 5-1, with Councilwoman Goodnight voting against the motion. February 23, 1976 Page Eight Consideration of Setting Aside an Area in the Library for a Bicentennial Exhibit Motion was made by Councilman Ellis, second by Councilman Lamond, to set aside an area in the library, as previously suggested by the Library Board, for a Bicentennial exhibit. Councilman Ellis provided information regarding the request. Mayor Faram called for a vote. Motion carried 6-0. LIBRARY EXHIBIT Vote: 6-0 575' There being no other items on the agenda, the meeting was adjourned. ADJOURNMENT Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Winnie L. Barclay, City Secretary Elliott & Hughes, Inc. Engineers /Planners February 23, 1976 The Honorable Mayor and City Council of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Ref: Progress Report on Mangham Airport Dear Mayor and Honorable Members of the Council: It is our intention in this report to bring you up to date as to the activities Mangham Airport has initiated since our last meeting. First, we must recognize that until additional property was purchased to the north, Cardinal Lane Closed, and specific use zoning granted, all plans to develop, improve, and modify were academic and, therefore, premature. Since our last meeting, Mangham Airport has installed a visual approach slope indicator, commonly called a V.A.S. I., to regulate the descent angle for all incoming planes from the north and which must be adhered to by all pilots. A V.A. S. 1. is a series of large painted panel s on the ground adjacent to the runway which can be seen from the traffic pattern. The pilot must line up these panels to be on the correct de- scent angle. The purpose of this V.A.S.1. is to establish uniformity of descent angle in the final approach and keep all aircraft coming in from the north as high as possible within the bounds of safety. We are happy to report this has worked very well and we have good com- pliance. It is our intent in the future to replace this experimental V.A.S.L with a much larger and more sophisticated V.A.S.L Mangham Airport has revised their traffic pattern, raising it from 800 feet above ground to 1,000 feet above ground and have extended it to the north to eliminate as much activity as possible over the GlennAnn Addition area. This is printed in color and attached to this report as l'Exhibit A". At this point they are dis seminating it by hand through their office and flight schools at Mangham. However, it will be in- corporated into a set of policies and procedures for Mangham Airport and published in flight manuals and journals. (Continued) 1004 \N. Euless Blvd., Suite 103 . Euless. Texas 76039 . 817/267-1303 February 23, 1976 Page Two We have collected policies and procedures from a number of airports this size, some of them municipal, and are in the proces s of revising all of the policies and procedures 0 These will become written rules and regulations, published in a booklet form. Incorporated in these policie s and procedures prominent! y, will be the traffic patte rn and the adherence to V.A.S 0 1. Upon final publication, all pilots will be issued copies and must acknowledge that they have read and will adhere to such by signature. The signature cards will be kept on file and vio- . lation of any of the policies or procedures shall cause expulsion from the airport. These policies and procedures will include many ground activities and instructions for safety on the ground as well as in the air and will be quite comprehensive. Attached as I1Exhibit B" are the specifications as set out by the Texas Aeronautics Commission for general utility and basic utility airports. Note that the specifications for a general utility airport require a min- imum runway length of 4,5001 and a design capability of the runway for 12,500# maximum weight. Note that even a basic utility airport re- quires a minimum of 3,200' runway length and up to 12,500# runway design. For practical reasons, we cannot meet these specifications nor do we think it is necessary in order to have a viable community airport. We propose a runway extension to the north of Cardinal Lane with limits of 3,000 feet and would design the runway to a max- imum aircraft weight of 10,500#. Mangham Airport has had their attorney prepare deed restrictions and covenants running with the land to insure you of their intentions, and they are in your possession. Hopefully this will quell the anxieties of even the most imaginative opponents of Mangham Airport 0 Mangham Airport has now retained us to prepare for them a master plan and feasibility study, covering the whole of 170 acres. This is both an extensive and expensive undertaking. We submit to you I1Exhibit C", an article from the Fort Worth Star Telegram of February 19, 1976, where the City of Fort Worth has decided to prepare such a plan for Meacham Field, as it is necessary for the development and promo- tion of their airport 0 On a similar scale, Mangham Airport can pro- vide similar opportunities of Meacham to the citizens of North Richland Hill s . Respectfully submitted, ELLIOTT & HUGHES, INC. David C. Hughes, Jr. PoE. T> '"'q.,,-l ~ ~ o a: o .J W LL I f- ¿ [f) CARDINAL LANE ò PLEASE USE V.A .S./. ~ )" ~ ~ P.LINE rV' -x- 108' ~ + + ~ ~ ~ HAR ODRD. ¿] o q; o a: w z :; f- Ü Z Ü w a: a. ì f t t.J 1; t~ o f t N f f- .J « z a: UJ f- f- q; a. ü iL LL <{ a: f- ~ \ , \ NORTH ~ MALL MANGHAM AIRPORT FLD. ELEV. 620' - UNICOM 122.8 TRAFFIC PA TTERN ALTITUDE - 1,600 MSL I- >~ V') w!::o « J:...Io..ZX I-¡::~-W ~~ t- ," <11 u <11 .. e:'~ Ou u 'U '0<11 e:+-> 'r- c: 3<11 Lt> E " "0 C; QJ QJ +->'" L: 0."'0 0 'r- C 0 -' '" Lt> ... ··r- d!::. "' \ ,_/ L -' . .. , " .... .... 0,', , . .... z C> "" 0.. "'" :.... ." I I I I I I ." I' J' f\ 30 .:. -«' -' "~ 4- 1J~ QJ e: -' e: o .µ u ... +-> '" QJ Dc' u, e: "0 ::> CO z o .... ct I- CI:: o Q. V) Z ct CI:: I- Ct: ct C> Z C -I ::> CO >- I- ~ 1-1- ::>0:: o a. 0:: ~ ct CI:: We::( Z W C> ~ ~ W CI:: C> o CI:: Q. >- I- z ::> ~ ~ o u CI:: o u.. >-- ,,= ~ "¡J ~ ::J C'O 0. U '¡;; C'O C'O 'f CO C'O 0. C'O ~ '~--'.' _.._-....- é: >-- ... C'O ::J ::J .,....... .... ~ ::J ... o ~ .... w .c ... .... o ...... o "'0 e:"'O ::J e: o w ... C'O e: ... ::J .... >- w .... -g § '¡J C'O ::J +-> e: QJ E . Cl. VI o+-> ~.. QJO >Cl. QJ .. '0 .~ '" ';;;>, +-'+-> c'~ QJ~ E'~ "'+-> '0::> C ::> .. ....0 .... .... OVl '0 >''' .. '" '" '0 ~~ ::>+-> '" VI w > C'O w .c<ro :2] ::J E 2 E V> 0 V> U .... u .c ... C'O U 0 C'O 0. w ... "'~ ...'~ QJ~ Cor- QJ'µ (!):::J z o V). V) ~ ~ o u V) U I- ::> <z: z o CI:: w ct V) ct >< w I- '" '" O~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~o~ao oW~O~WOWID~WWWW~~~ç .......-4>->-Z>->-2:>->>->->->->- .. ........ '" .~:"'~ VI~ "'.~ 0:> +0 => VI '" VI OV1v»V)V1 V1V1C;1V1V1V1V1V1C>C>OQ (l) ~W(l)WWOWW(l)W(l)W(l)WNWNM >-:->->-:2::>->->>->->->->- .. ........ M VI -' t:: ...J -' .....1- -'- .. 1--' 0 -..... +-> ....J ::£....J ftl 0: ,~ U _1.......J ~-u 0::........... ~ -JC -....J....J ro 11--_ ....Jc:t: t- ~ _ ..............'i........ 'r- ~....J Q) ....J::E:....J x rei......... Cl. 0::: ........... 1"0 ~....J 0 _1....J.......·r-r-r- QJ ::E I- X-VI QJ U ;>.¡-.- ro¿: C Q).,- IrU;:¿QJ'µ ...c co.-> 3: r- IUcnOUU~ >¡c: Ir-r- rUCU !....QJ ...c a...c: -n::I~ ~QJ~O·r-ro-U·r-V1 'µ~.r-~ V13:~V1s...r-rUs...~QJC:U rn.µs...~ QJ c ""'0 to r- 3. a. !.... ..Q Or- -a c: ""CJ .µ 'r- !....~""'Oc:Cl.ro·r-a.rU 3:-uc (l)'r-V13: .:-:~I u!.... C:J s..... xc::( E 0"1 QJ to ...- 3: ~ to -.-0_1"01"0 C-U.µ ~ rn~ --- QJ 3: !.... to o...µ.- >, ',- IV c: lI) c: >, >.., c: rU r-V1rt)'r- rUn::I'µ'µWV1'r-rUrU',-3 ""'OrnV1C:'µ_~:J3n::1£EQJu33:""'O'r- cc:O!....s.....r-~V1c:.µrnO"lucc:c:cx 1"O.,-!.... ~ ro ~'µ'r-:J 0''-- QJ U QJ ~ ~ ro rei ....JV1UI-~~~>~OC~~~~OCOC~~ "'~ '" VIe: ,~ 0 0> VI e: e: '~ <lJ 3 E o'~ ~"O 0'0 ....e: '" <lJ L: I- ·t ~ J, o..c ::J U C'O W C'O .... >- .c w ....::J CU .... ... ... U ~ >- 8."¡¡; C1.> X C'O ... C'O .c C'O ~ C'O .Q .... .... e: 2~~-gw >-r- :: C'O ~ ... . U V> C'O C'O V> .- "'0 q... ,ê § 0. e: 0. '~ ~ ð .2 o w ~ ~ ~ C'O .....co.We:.c C'O>-':O.c~<;;: C'O ,- e:.... > ~ ~ >< 0 C'O .!: .... V> >-- .... ~ .- w e: w 01 >-C'O C'O ::J ~ ê e: C'O 2 0 ~ >-0 0 ... 0 "¡J C'OÒC'O EN Þ .... .c ... .... 0 '~ e- C'O .... ... >- o .... 0.:= ~ .~ C'O ::J Vi'" _ w "'O.c e: ,,= ::J W e W C'O > e: C'O ... .c .... ::J co C'O ~"'O ::J ~o >--5; ctl :;; ~ 16 ~ C'O C1.> >:5~e:~ ~ e-"x 6 e: ~ (ü¡g~ð~ V) c( >- VI "0 '" o .. +-> .... ::> - ..c_·CT ._~ . QJ ..µ . -0 -4J ~ 4- .µ 'r- "+- ..........4- 3:.......... >-cia5 ?:6ð:;'" ....e:e: ~ 0 o ~ '¡¡; ~ -5 ~Eue:~<{w .... ,~"'O 0 .... V> e: C'O - e: '¡J e: C'O -E 16'~ ~ E ~ w ~"Ot;::J1- .0 'x ~ "~ "'0 w C'OC'O.cEC1.>.c :;;....~"O~r- ~-gc,o<{e:_ C'O ~ >- __ "Oe: e: w ex: .c"" 0...._ 01 ~ C'O, <ro ,~_ ~ e: .c e: e: ,- 0 ::J 0 > U '¡¡; V> ... U <{ ''2 ~ V> .... w æ C'O .c E O1~~t~~~ e: v>'~ ~ C'O >- U .Et<roL1..uC'OV> 01 0.... C ~"~ ,- 0. 0 w C'O e: .... ~"''''.ce:::J::J C'OC'Or-:.=ex::g - to.. o ..0 N >< o CQ o Q. - '" co '" z o V) « >< w I- I- « ..... ~ -I o I- a.. <z: u z .... ~ ::> <z: e: '" L: +-' VI <lJ L: U '" "' ... QJ 0> '" .. <lJ > o u >, '" 3 c ::> '- e: QJ .<: ~ '0 C .~ ~ c ~ e: 0 0 "'0 :3 'r- 'r- QJ o.µ~ ~ ~ ra It;) "'~ .. e:~ QJ ...",Cl. :-3""0 +-> V> c~ 4- ClI'r- rU "C ::> ~ () L C 'Uc::. OC: QJ ClJI.t-....- ra "OUO c ~ wo CJIlI:J..--Q ~ o...~~~ o U").- CJ}CJ UO'I ·..-N QJ C ~ ü:: -w ~. (' ,n --- ~ ex: (l)~ .... C'O 0. V> ,- .... ,~ .c .... 01 ... ,- C'O~ 0. :==16";t ~ ~ t e: 0 '::J 0. ex: ... C'O ~~ "V; .- e: '¡J w ::J .... .... e: C'O ~ ex: ~ .3~ · ~ ., ~ C;,- o u u.., ..,~ c; <:: 'i E "CJ '" ., ., - VI .;'-g ..JC r dC-, I I , / .J en I- ~ o Q. ~ « >- I- .... ~ {; ~ Q.) c ro 0.:::J o 0 ~ 0.Q.) >-o..c .001- "'0 LO_ ~~ ~ Q.) ..... u ro ~ ro ..c..... U~ Q.) ~ ~ u ro ~ .,; ..... ~ o ~ a. Q.) ~ -g ëõ :::J ..c ro ~ u ~-c ..c .- Q.) :> > .- :> 0 ~ .,; > '" Q.) ~ c ~ a. ~ -- - > o In U ..... e- c 0 .- 0 Q.) ;; <{ .;:¡ æ ..... I- ::) I- I· I· I· I- ~ ·1· -~ ·1 r<> > .~ ..... :::J ~ r,ç. ,. .\. I' I' I' I- -I· / ~ I ,. .. .S .J c: o u ~ '" c '" o Q. '" '" a: 0>' <::' 'ü .2 " <1 c; c <..> ~ aJ ::I CD t ~ LJ Q: ¡¡¡ ~ f o .- '" " :ë E ., f- >- t- -It- 0.:: t-O :::Jc.. Uo.:: "'<t: <t: c:c >- .... LO~~Co~-ct~ 0> Q.) 0 ,_ ~ 0 0 - ..... Q.) ~ a; g, E a.a.. g g- E ·E ~ 0 ~ E .o~~u .....roQ.)c ro a. ~ ..... U ~ ro ~ c E ç ~ -§¡.¡¡; >- ã: ~ 0 X ':; ~ .- .2 C/) E .;:¡ ro '';¡ 1-"" ..... ~ ro E U 0 Q) 0 ~ ª -~ -ô : ~ .~ -: e- £- o ro § .~ e- ë:: ~ <{ t ~ ~ 0 o.--:::J In 0 ro~o.",roE-g~e- ~ 8> 8 g .~ g ro ~ ~ e- Q) LO '" '¡:; U § Q) ro ..c N-'- :::J Q.) ..c c: ro..... ~ ~ ~ ..... 0 õ.... ~ ~.~ ~ :::J C .~ Q.)o~I-.2>g--cz o......c: -0.Q)Q) :~~.§,roEQ)-g<5 ~Q)Q)~o~u-g ¡:::2i;:¡::;;,8cð3cro - ::> u v, o co '" QJ .. U '" ';;jILt> +-> <.D o I- C1 <:: VI or- ttJ N N N .µ\jQ).-4.............. .. ~.. o 'r- « a. ::I .. CD '" >, ~ WI <.D <.D <.D .µQ)c................... .,.... ,-- 0 UN ~~ ~~ .. <1; g "'I" Lt> 0 "oQ)Mvt.n <:: .. "'ç( -' "0 ~:µ~ ã Ò 0 c 3: 0 0 0 rUCCNOU1 -J :J <1J ... f'o a::-J M V <q- E ::I E <:: >, +-> ~ u~ VI+-> '" => a> .... r: cu E 0- o - Q) > cu C ~o-o ro Q) ~ u a. ~ >- æ o .... c .... .~ ¿ ~ ~ Q) ro 0 :::J ........ .¡: 0 u - I- o Q. I- '¡: Q) U Q) .... a. In ro ~ ..c ;:.: c > Q) .¡: 0........ Q)....-c Q.) -In E..c......... 0) Q.) .... a. U Q) .¡: C C :::J 0 ro '¡: U -;:¡ E Q) Q) .0 In ~ ro > ~ X Q) ~ Q.) 0 Q.) Q.).....Q.)-c....~ Q) C ro >-"'OQ)....-c -~ .... 0) 0 ~ g' .:== 0 ~ o..~ -:; .... a. 0 ~ > g~ ro-go ....rou t)o o >'¡¡; ro Q) .... .... ro ..... Q):=.o~~ >'5...;E.oQ) Q) ~ ro ro 0 -c Q.) ~ a. C ..co~:::J t- .... ëõ u. « >- - .h ¿ ~ ç :::J ro 0·- (J) L- := ~ 0).... In Q) :::J Q) E- ~~:JE -CoE~ o ~ X Q) Eo.roO) EcEro o 0 U ..... U ro ro .:; .... ro ~ o a. ~ - ::> Q)- ro In ~ > :::J "'0 ro C C -c ..c c g~~ro o.~:::Jo E 0 .2' E 0 Q.)Oln....LO ro ~LO_~ 0 ~ .... O)N Q) e-~ ro o .oro o c ~ > I- ro _.0 ...; .... Q.) .t:~>In enO~ c: a. 0 ~ ,= 0 .¡:; > ro ..... ro o I- (U C Q) C> ro ~ Q) Q) o.>-c > = c: ..... ro :::J .~ +-' '" C .... ..c ro ro I- t) (j ~ ~~~!~ +-> M OJ " " M OJ .... o 0 N .... .... .... '<T ... ... N N N <.D <.D <.D .... .... .... 000 000 +-J L(') 0 0 => q- L.Ó '.0 >, ~+-> rt].,- QJ ..~ U Q)...... s..... <::+-> ::I QJ=> 0 '-" V> ..... o.~ o .... ..... c: Q) E a. o Q) > Q) -c ~ o 'm ~ E I- .,; .... '- o Q) a. Q) ...; <5 ~ > '- roO....> ..c a. 0 .~ ...... 0 .1 ,I Ina;o-- ~ a. LO (õ ~ ~~c~:~T~E ""roO..c.... Q.)~ol-° ..o~o Q+oJCC '" ..... Q) ..c ..... c: .2' 'ë; Q) Q) :J Q) ;; E ~ In E Q) In 0 .0 e U O)Q) > ~ Q) '" :J a. o a. Q) en '- ro ..... ':ü E b :J ~ E > X ro (1J E E ~ o -ô c: c :J o a. .~ ..c Q) .... b,'~ 0 c > c Q) Q) (1J Q) Q) ~ ..c' ;; - ..c :J .... C >..... t¡:; -:::J(1J't-'- § '- ;; 0 ~ .- -c c C E ~ C :::J ~ ._ ~ 0 ~ Q);; ..... a; Q.)õo."'E~E .0 cOO:::J Q) :J E In 0 ~ (j E Q) E :::J 0 C .... '+- (1J 't- 0"'0 Q) In (1J ..0 In Q)-g ..c Q.) I- c Cñ - ~ L.o.. > ro ;; c :::J cr: ro-c c ~ ;; (1J ;; Q.) c:..c :::J .... ~ c o .... o c c (1J Q.) U E ~';:¡ ;; Q) C..c :::J .... ~ "'0 Q) "'0 .... > ~ 0 o ~ a. a. -a ~ Q) (1J Q.) .~ 0) ::: >-ro..... .... ð3 :::J - > ..... 0 :::J U In ~ ro.... 0).:,£ (1J Q) ~ c U V) (\) ~g,"'O ro tu ~c:.o g, (1J- g'ëõ (1J ¡¡; ~~"Oo-aln (1J (1J C .... C In ~O)~>-ro C:Q)"¡:j:::::~ .....-c..cuo~ :::JCI-Q) ro (1J ~ .... .8h~~ ~~ro~ (1J0.0)Q) Q) C ~ "Oc ~ -c In ..c Q) (1J .... :::J C Q) 0 .0 2 _c .... -c I- C C ro In ..... ~ C 'ro ~ 0 t; "g -g ",- U .;:¡ ~ m"OQ) ~(õ -.J':; c: "'0 Q) o C A..... ~NroOO (1J N c (1J!... a C or- s... r-t QJ o o:x: ',- <:t ..<:: co o:x: U 0 C .. c: or-, \:J .µ C OJ enN (1J rò C :::J ',- CJ caE :> C1J 3: ::J or- q 0 f1j r- I-CY:,¿ UZr- V1 .µ !... o D.. !... o:x: >, .µ .µ ~~~ E E o U U ',- c:( r- .µ 0) C en :.;¿ .!:: CIJ"'O ~:= Q) '15 ..c ..... ..... C j'g CIJ .... .... C Q) U I.... C Q) Q) 0.0. LO 0 0> V) C Q) X ..c (1J ..... E ~ > CIJ-c ;; Q) c: I.... :J ~ > .0 ..c ..... CIJ C E 0 o E c: ..... '" Q) ~ ..c .... .... 0 ..c -c Q.) C..c (1J ..... "0 :J Q) cr C ~ E ~ > Q) ..... ro Q) :J"'O V) :::J V) <.... ~ o CIJ a. c: ~ 0 ro ..... Q)-c Q)..c"O .0 ..... CIJ ~~ ;; ~ c: ~ ;: ro ~- ~ -g ~ '3 ro c.o CIJ _ -c ..c CIJ ro Q) ~ _ C 0 <5 .2 g' 'E ~ ~ ~ E Q) ~ Q.) Q) U ~ .... U o CIJ CIJ - U ~0.0.~(1J '+- C.I) +"'" 0_ +""'tn~+-'~ æ (]) t; u C _"'O~CIJ.::L :::J ro :: ~ g .... 0 a. c:: ..... Q) ~ .!!! õ -g '~ 2i:ë ro CIJ 0 0 Þ Q) E In 0 C ro .... c-¡:;;.o~ Q) 0 -c E .... "0 Q) ~ Q) X ro U .;:¡ <¡:: o LO Q)N -..c ail- E :J Q) E C .,; Q) .¡:; òi::: C ..... ._ :J a N \D Q) > o o >, .a ct:S ft1 0,.... !... ..<::..c:..<:: c !...!... > (]) UUUV1(])OJC1J c OJ W ill V1 D.. D..:I: W W W ill Wo,....o,.... W c.!:J c:c c:c co u a.. a.. a V) .µ !... o D.. !... o:x: >, .µ a .µ !... N (]):::J W tt M Q) 'µ"'ON (])-", t:: c t:: A ..c: 0 ~ µ .µ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ U- 'I-- :::J ococo C;(U (1J U (1J >, (]) !... U ..<::..c: t:: (]) !...!... U U ',- 0 U U V1 C Q) Q) !... !... '" !...OJOJV)oo..D..:;:) ~ W W W W 0''''''0''''' 0 o:x: co c:( co c:c U :::: a.. a.. VJ V) 8 t Q.) o .... o.CIJ Thursday Mornin~. February 19. 1976 ~I FORT WORTII STAR·TELEGRAM 3·^ ., . .( . .:r . 1 ¡' -:~ , t~' .. .,:" \ ' ; ~ :: : " . r¡ , .' \ , , ¡' , ! :.¡ , \ ! 1 .~ ! f :.,;> ~:,. ,I r EWav;ofioo"paneI,OKs hiring firm to draw up Meacham plan . , IIv JDI SlBEET r¡lthcr than action," Public ~1"r,lt'k~r"1II IIrilrr \\'orl<s Director Jack Graham The Fort \\'ortl1 ,\\iatlon told the board, "Wc need a ¡\d\1sor\' Board authorized' plan that is carefullyand thor- \\'edllesda v the selel'tion of an . oughly ,thought out...instead ellginl'l'rilig firm to prl'p¡¡re a of just reacting to the prob-, nel\' m¡¡sler pl¡¡n lor th~ de· lems of the moment." \el?pltIelll of:lleacham held" ,,\irport ¡'¡lanager Barr~' ," I heproblcm <it :\leachmn' 1 {all said a master plan dated 'FIeld IS olle of reaclion, in Deccmber 1971 "is consld- " . , ., ----- cred inadequatl' for today's and future nee~Is," Ill' said it primarily was for, the runway alld taxil\'a~' com- I plex that W¡¡S completed a ye¡¡r ¡¡go and "wasn't de- signed for marketing and oUwr consideratilJ\1s," , , lIall said threc public hear- ings wi II be called after a suc- cessful bidder is chosen to make the master plan, Onc ' II oule! IX' at mght; one in the , e!a\' and UIIC lIould be de- sl~ned lor "pilots, (airport) users alld II hate\'f'r:' I Ie sail] bl'lore the plan is dr¡¡wlI up, I he public should: ,I lx' heard from, Iwl only 10 i ' comply \\ilh requircments of , , thc Fedcral Avialion Admin- : istration but also œç¡¡u.~e' "~'uu I!cver knol\' \\hat gex)d idl'¡L~ \\ill coqle from the gen- eral public:' Ilall said the mastcr plan is "II hat F:\,\ \\ants, it is what 1\lr. (;raham lIants and it is IIhat I want:' l; raharn said he had madL' a ' s¡nular 'pltl'h" tli 111(' cIty ,(,OUIIl'1I IIhll' ¡ authorized a m¡¡ster plan 10 be prepared In ut hcr ad lon, I!a 11 \\as asked 10 mak,~ a study and re- pnrt back at the next'meeting , on t \\0 quest ions askcd by: ward members, .Jühn Clardy wanted to, know the feasibilit \' of using part of the nOI\'-åbandoned' Southwest Airport for 1011'- I cost. remote parking for the' nearby Dallas-Fort Worth' Ai rpo rt. lie said he recently took a t lip and was unable tò park in tl1L' e!ose,in terminal parklllg at l),FW so he \\ent to a re- mote lot and found only three spaces lett in that lot. i\lore parkin~ \\111 be need· ',e'd s().)n at D-F\\', he said, and, the old airport might just pro- : \'ide the solution with a shut- tll' bus going to the tem1inals at l),I'W, ~Irs, Terry Hamsey \\anteö to know if Surtr¡¡n could make . a sllip at !\1eal:ham Field to pi, 'k lip passengers go ing 10 n,F\\' , I \ \ \ " . ,\ '.. ,~ .~ J,. . '\, i 0' l.. I..J ~, í.