HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1960-04-11 Minutes
REGULAR COUNCIL JAEETING MINUTES- April 11. Jì.960
The City Council ot Borth iiobland Blls. Texas held its regulu
Council meetag at the CiTio Center. JIorgan Circle'" Pipe IJ.n.e
Road on April n. 1.960 and 'Was oalled to order at .,,30 P. M.
with Jlq'or Perry. Counoilmen Rowe, JW.tilek. Graner. Zellers
preaent, Vr. Iranklin a'bseut.
)layor Perry oalled on )Ir. Graner who read neotion resulta.Quote.
"Our oi1;y eleotion having been held April 5. 1960.
end returns thereot made 'by the eleotion judge, 1Ir. hank
De GioTØIlÌ. and it haTing 'been tound that
Place l-Fru.k11D 260
'ft"R'Ir %-JohDB --445
'IPI'D1r a-.Alliaon 13
Lewis' 1
Plue 3-i:cbra:rds.... 25'7
CampbelI.Mr i58
P1a.oe 5-Rowe -256
Bell i5.,
I move that the Council find and deolare the tollowing
persons to be eleoted.
Place l-Þn Jo1m8
PI..e a--..Kerb Campbell
Place S-lann Bell. Jr. "
:Mr. Zellers seconded the motion which carried.
Jlayor Perry brought up the point ot the tailure to have a 1"011
Tax. Reoeipt by one ot the n....ly elected Councilmen and ..ked
Jfr. Christopher. City AttorneY', tor a ruling. 1Ir. Christopher
presented the Counoil with a tour page statement, attached and
made a part of these minutes, ruling the legality ot luoh. The
:Mayor then proceeded to .....ar in 1Ir. larm Bell. Jr. and Vr.
Herbert Cupbell. 1Ir. HOhnB being nom in on .April 6, 1960 at
the City Office by the City Seoretary sinoe he 'Was to be out ot
the City .April 11, 1960. 1Ir. Rowe and JIr. JW.tilek ottered
congratulations to their aucceasors aDd seated thea at the
Counoil table.
Jlr. Graner then DIOnd to make JIr. Clyde Zellers .. or Pro-te.. Jlr.
Bell seoonded the motion whioh oarried.
The mimrtes ot the last regular meeting 'Was read am approved.
The Secretary reported the 'books were at the Auditor, 1Ir. C. F.
M1sgran, then read the monthly audit tor Karch and this 1I'a8
approved.
The Council read a questionaire trom. Convair ooncerning 1;he hir-
ing of "s. Auita Jo Uhlhorn and it 'Was decided 'that the ~
'WOuld till out this torm.
ThØ JIoyOr re"'" bide trea 1;hree d1ft....,.1¡ C_01>1·· tor a ..... t\.UD(!;
oo1>iI1ØI> tor i¡h. Cil¡1 OUio.. &1.80 tor a - ODd boù box. 1Ir.
ZOller. ......d I¡o purohall. i¡h. tile troa i¡ho 1iøIr bidder, Cii;f Qttiee
8I1pp~ Co. tor .395.60 ",d _ bOX trea _ù atti.. 8I1pp~ Co.
tor .1i.$1i ODd i¡ha't 0Dl1 ThØ Cii;f _r.-torr b. given a ka1 I¡o ....h.
lfo1¡iOl1...... ..oondød 1>1 1Ir. C_b.11 whiGh o..ried.
1Ir. ør_r I¡hoa .xplainOd t1>.O ...Uon 1>.0 I¡ri.d I¡. -- at 1¡1>.O
Verch 28th. ..eting , then møve4-
"!ha1; 1¡1>.O I!oll¡oa Cii;f stab. Bonk, .. a ð8po.il¡ory tor
i¡h. fund. of I¡hi. Cii;fb. o.<\'1d...d 1>1 I¡he Ci1>1 se.r.-torr,
I¡hal¡ .uGh fuJ>ÀO ch.ll be wil¡hdr- trOOl. .aid Ü'\'0dI¡Ory
on 1¡1>.O oh..k of i;hi. Ci1¡1. .igned 1>1 Ø/f - (Z) of i¡h.
toUowing repr...,øi.... of I¡hill Ci1>1; - or, _or Pro-
I¡_ or Cil¡1 se.r<rtorr' 1Ir. C_b.ll ...""ded i¡ho .....
tion whioh carrie4.
1Ir. ør_r a.ked se.rortorr it .he 1IO\11d turaich .opi.. ot all
JI1;mIt.. ODd -'>bl1 ""dil¡.l¡o aU .,..b.r. of 1¡1>.O C_il _0.·
torth.
1Ir. ZOll." read ....olo:l;io.. o_dUg ....r.. Paulliltilek,
JIardeI1 _ ...d wap>Ø J'renklin tor i¡hoir ..ni·· I¡o i¡ho Cii;f of
.,rth B1.hlODd 1J1l1o. 'fhe1 ..rnd I¡h. .iU-.o taii¡hful~ ...d
I¡o i¡ho b..1¡ ot their o1>ilil¡1 ",d the C.......il -. - a .-....
I¡hOI1kO . Ba.olo:l; ion..... ...onded 1>1 1Ir. ør_r. lfo1¡iOl1 .oni""'.
1Ir. Gr- I¡old of requ..t trom Goa Co. tor a propo.ed Baai~-
io1 ur1 C......ial 1I&i¡e .cheW.. ... JlHl¡Ug ... ..-t up al¡ i¡ho
City attioe tor Wønd.q, April 18, at .'00 P. JI.
JIr. zellers read a resolution, ~ote'
"the.'t the Ra1.t01D. City sta'te Ba:ak. as depoaito1'1 tor the
fundi of this City. be adv1se4 by the CitY' Seoretary that
auoh tun4s shall be withdre.1ßl from said depoai'to1'1 on the
cheok of i¡hi. Cii;f, dpd 1>1 Ø/f - (Z) of i¡ho tollowing
repre..,øiU.... ot I¡h!.. Cii;f' Jfa1Or, Jfa10r Pro-ll- or
CitY' Secretary."
fId. brough'!; on a dill"".. io.. wil¡h 1Ir. JI.... ...d 1Ir. 110..... .peek-
Ug trea I¡h. floor. 1Ir. _. .aid i¡ho Cii;f had orig1nol~ I¡o]œn
bide troa ditt....,..,t BOIIkB ODd ngge.-t.d 1nquirUg 1nt;0 I¡hi. bofore
withdrOJring .aid fuJ>ÀO. Be .-t..I¡.d al.o i¡ha't 1;h. C_il had or
proved ..-tl¡ing up a .aTing. ""oounl¡ wil¡h funds ia troa i¡ho .he.k-
ing ....ount in OXOO" of .Ii,OOO.oo 1>0:\; no ...I¡ion 118.8 I¡'- I¡o d.
.0. JIr. ZOll- I¡hoa møved I¡o .""I¡...I¡ !II1r.-t ...d B1...roide stabe
BOIIkB tor bids tor i¡h. Cii;f'. cheoking ODd ...Ting. ...0"",,1¡.. JIr.
Graner seoonded the motion whioh P oarried.
Page 3
Mr. Zellers asked about de-annexing the homes on the East side ot
Willman as the City ot Richland Rills had pand their street end
gave them other considerations. JIr. Graner moved that it :Mayor
Daniel would proTide and present a petition trom 2/1 ot those
people on the East side ot 1Illlman stating theY' wanted to go in
with Riohland Hilla, the ]forth iiohland City Counoil will give
consideration. JIr. Bell seconded the motion 1I'hioh oarried.
JIr. French 1ïold ot mix-up in sending letters to oitizens in
wrong blook of Rule Snow OIL curbing and guttering, such work
being north ot Pipe Line Rd. Letter ot apology and explaination
to be sent to said citizens.
Mr. Inowlton, oity Engineer, showed the Council the layout of
proposed widening of Rute Snow and explained what ia to be done.
Jlrs. Rodney Bell, representative torm Snow Heights sohool asked
about stop signs and roll awaY signs tor said sohool. She was
told that signs are readY' and will be installed soon.
Petition tor annexation verified bY' E. E. lfewman and two (2)
other signers was read and accepted. Mr. Graner moved to adopt
Ordinanoe No. 61. JIr. Zellers seconded motion which carried.
Petition tor annexation veritied by E. A. .AÞ'bott and two (2)
other signers was read and accepted. JIr. Campbell moved to
adopt Ordinance No. 62 whioh JIr. Bell seoonded with motion
.......i¡l!!~ oarrying.
Petition tor annexation nritied by B. W. Hutchens and two
(2) other signers was read and acoepted. Mr. Bell moved to
adopt Ordinance No. 63 with Mr. Campbell seconding the motion
whioh oarried, all three being attaohed and becoming a part
ot these minutes.
i!t'
JIr. Xno1l'l ton, speaking tor JIr. Renfro and himselt, presented
a preliminary platt ot the iichland Plaza lq--out recommend-
ing Counoil t ø approval. JIr. Zellers moved to acoept said ple:tt
with JIr. Bell seoonding and motion oarried.
Mr. Xnowlton then presen.ted a map showing the City ot Fort
Worth Metropol it en Area Thoroughfare Plan and reoommended such
a plan tor our City. JIr. Graner moved that the City Engineer
draw up suoh a major thoroughfare plan tor our City. Mr.
Campbell seconded the motion which carried.
Mr. Frenoh told ot a party in n....ly armexed area who is build-
ing a help-yourselt servioe station with top-ot-the-ground
gas storage tanka. It was suggested he get all the information.
as to cost and how tar along oonstruotion had gotten so as to
determine what, it anything, the Counoil oould do.
\->~
~.
"",..,..f"':;···'"
Page 4
""'"
JIr. Zell.r. asked abou1; i¡rottio lighi¡ ai¡ Ruto Snow ...d Qro:pevinO
JIw1. ...d i1; was brought aui¡ i¡h.1; su.h a light h.... b.- app.....d
a lii¡1;lo over a fOer ago ODd i¡¡,a1; i¡ho Bir)IWo:1 J)Opi¡. ...... i¡o in-
.-toll .aid light at no .0.1; 1;0 i¡ho Oii;f. JIr. ¡"owli¡on ~l"",,··r-
ed to check into to see what the holdup was.
Cii;f So<>ro1;Br1 "... yked i¡o _ ...d .0Dd oopio. ot Ordinan·· 110. 2
to all Utility compenies.
Dr. 11. o. A).liBOI1 ..pr....d his ODd o1;hOr ciU..... of 1;110 SDdi¡h-
tiold er.a o:pprociai¡ion ...d i¡hønlœ tor """.xing i¡hOir propor1;f
ini¡o 1;110 .ii;f. 1Ir. Zell.r. propo.ed a re.olution ot i¡hønlœ i¡o
Dr. A).liBon tor hiB i¡_ end en.rgy .pen1; i¡award 1;ho onnoxe.1;ion.
and i¡ho .1.c1;ion. I!r. Gran.r .ocond.d 1;ho ,.o1¡ion which cerried.
JIr. Gronor "",...d i¡o adjourn a1; 9.42 P. II. soconded bf 1Ir. C_-
bell. Motion Carried.
~dftrP ;{24
C1 y ecretary-' ?
READ AND AfPROVED THIS :J-..£'DAY OF .ßþf-. 1960.
¡/
BY THE NORTH RICHLAHD HILLS CITY COUNCIL.
¡i;;
LAW OFFICES
CHRISTOPHER & BAIL.EY
FORT WORTH 2, TEXAS
T. S. CHRISTOPHER
M. WARD BAILEY
April 11, 1960
CONTINENTAL. L.IFE ElUIL.CING
EDISON 2-2386
City Council
North Richland Hills, Texas
Gentlemen:
It appears that in the recent elect ion of aldermen that one
of the successful candidates does not have a poll tax and his
e 1 i g i bil i t y t 0 h old the 0 f f ice i s be i n g que s ti 0 n ed, a t 1 e a s t by so me.
The quest ion presented, of course, is whether or not one other-
wise fully qual ified to hold office is inell igible to hold the
office of alderman without having paid his poll tax for the current
year. The answer is that it does not disqua1 ify him.
Illegibility to hold office belongs equally to all persons not
excluded by the Const itution or statutes, and not exclusively or
specially to persons enjoying the right of suffrage. Stensoff vs.
state, 80 Tex. 428, 15 S.W. 1100; Harkreader vs. state, 33 S.W.117.
Of course, to enjoy the right of suffrage, which simply means the
right to vote in Texas, one must hold a pol I tax for the current
year. Thåt is a different proposition entirely. Disabil ity to
hold office may not be imposed on any citizan except under authority
given by law. Gordon vs. state, 43 Tex. 330. The Legislature may
not change or add to qualifications for an office nor take away
disqualifications that are prescribed by the Constitution. Ferguson
vs. Will Cox, 119 Tex. 280, 28 S.W.2d 526; Dixon vs. Strickland,
114 Tex. 176,265 S.W. 1012. The following persons only are dis-
qual ified from hold ing pub1 ic office:
1. To hold pub1 ic office one must acknowledge the existence
of a Supreme Being. Constitution, Art. 1, Sec. 4;
2. A person who has offered a bribe to procure election or
appointment. Constitution, Art. 16, Sec. 5;
3.
to duel.
Any person who has fought a duel or accepted a challenge
Constitution, Art. 16, Sec. 4;
4. Any person who has been a collector of taxes or intrusted
with public money until they have been discharged for the amount of
such collections. Constitution, Art. 3, Sec. 20;
5. Any person who has been convicted of bribery, perjury,
forgery or other high crimes. Art. 16, Sec. 2.
Page 2
The Constitution does not otherwise disqual ify any person from
holding public office. The Legislature may prescribe such qualifi-
cat ion s wit h i nth e f r a me w 0 r k 0 f the Con s tit uti 0 n , s u c has age,
length of residence within the state or within the particular sub-
division of the state, as in this instance the municipality. The
Legislature has done that.
It might be worth while to call attent ion to the fact that the
Constitution itself fixes the qual ifications required of one to hold
the office of governor, 1 ieutenant governor, attorney general,
comptroll er of publ ic accounts, and state treasurer. The Const itut ion
itself does not actually fix in specific terms the qualifications
of other state, county or municipal officers except to the extent
indicated above of prescribing certain disqual ifications. In this
respect your attent ion is invited to the earl ier statement herein-
above that as to such qualifications or disqualifications the
Legislature has the power neither to add to nor to take from.
Nothing in the Constitution requires the payment of a poll tax in
order to hold publ ic off ice.
So far as the qual if icat ions of a person to hold the off ice of
alderman, the Legislature has prescribed by Art. 987 the following
qual ¡ficat ions:
"No person shall be elligible to the office of Mayor
unless he is a qual ified elector and has resided 12 months
next preceding the election within the city 1 imits. To be
el igible for alderman, one must reside in the ward from which
he may be elected at the time of his election. If any alder-
man removes from the ward in which he was elected, his office
shall be deemed vacant."
The Legislature has by the foregoing statute required that for
one to be ell ig ible to the off ice of mayor that he must be "a
qua 1 i fie del e c tor. II I tis s i g n i fie ant t hat a s t 0 a Ide r me nth e
Legislature made no such requirement, the only requirement to be
elligible for alderman being that he "must reside in the ward from
which he may be elected at the time of his election." The very
fact that as to the mayor the requ irement was that he be a qual if ied
e 1 e c tor and t hat i nth e s a me par a g rap h and i nth e sue c e e din g s e n ten c e
the Legislature made no such requirement as to an alderman points
up the fact that the attention of the Legislature had been called
to the very question of whether or not an alderman would also be
required to be a qual ified elector, and the Legislature chose to
omit it out of those words. Thus it appears without doubt that the
Legislature intentionally refused to make the requirement that an
alderman be a qual ified elector.
The for e gd n g d i s c u s s ion ass u me s t hat the w 0 r d s " qua 1 i fie d
e 1 e c tor" me a n sap e r son who be i n got her w i s e qua I i fie d t 0 v 0 t e
also holds a poll tax.
Page 3
It is already obvious that it is not necessary that the alderman
in question hold a poll tax. This legal conclusion is, however,
made amply clear and the question is finally answered by the
Supreme Court of this state in Stensoff vs. State. The question
there arose in relation to a person who had been elected tax
assessor of Liberty County. The question involved in the case, as
stated by the court itself, was:
"We then have the question, did the fact that he was
not a legal voter in the county render him inell igible to
the office of tax assessor."
In answering the question the Supreme Court said:
"'Eligibility to office is not declared as a right or
principle by any express terms of the constitution, but it
results as a just deduct ion from the express powers and
provisions of the system. The basis of the principle is the
absolute 1 iberty of the electors and the appointing authorities
t 0 c h 0 0 s e· and a p poi n tan y per son who i s not mad e i n e 1 i g i b 1 e
by the constitution. Eligibility to office, therefore, belongs,
not exclusively or specially to electors enjoying the right
of suffrage. It belongs equally to all persons whomsoever
not excluded by the constitution.' When a constitution has
been framed which contains no provision defining in terms who
shall be eligible to office, there is strength in the argument
that the intention was to confide the selection to the
untrammeled will of the elctors. Experience teaches us that,
in popular elections, those only are chosen who are in
sympathy with the people both in thought and aspiration; and
that no law is needed to secure the selection of those only
who reside in the county or district in which these functions
are to be performed. The constitution of 1869 contained the
provision that 'no person shall be eligible to any office,
state, county, or municipal, who is not a registered voter
in the state.' Article 3, sec. 14. The omission of a
similar article in our present constitution is not without
significance."
The court held that he was not disqualified.
We have already referred to Dixon vs. Strickland, 265 S.W. 1012,
and it is probably unnecessary to do any more than refer to that
case because of the fact that in that case the Supreme Court of
Texas referred to the Stensoff vs. State case, quoting therefrom
and again specifically approved the point at issue here. It is
to be especially noted that in both the Stensoff case, as well as
in the Strickland case, that the Supreme Court said that "el igibil ity
to an office belongs not exclusivel or speciall to electors enJo Ing
t e rig t 0 su rage, u a I e ongs equa y 0 a persons
whomsoever not excluded by the constitution." Certainly it is not
.... ~ .. .
Page 4
necessary to go beyond that. It has already been pointed out that
the statute relating to aldermen does not require that they be
electors, and if it did such a statute would be in vio1at ion of
the Constitution under the foregoing holdings of the Supreme Court.
We might, however, refer to State vs. Fortinberry, 276 S.W.
466 (468) (Galveston CCA), which case likewise quotes from the
Stensoff vs. State case. See also 34 Tex. Juris. 341.
Incidentally, it might be added that in cities operating under
the general law the counc i 1 is made the judge of the elect ion and
qualification of its own members. Art. 1008, R.C.S.; Vosburg vs.
McCrary, 77 Tex. 568, 14 S.W. 195; Robinson vs. Hays, 62 S.W.2d 1007.
Yours truly,
T. S. CHRISTOPHER
City Attorney
TSC:1nd
LONE STAR GAS COMPANY
APPLICATION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
FOR APPROVAL OF COMPANYfS PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL RATE SCHEDULE
FOR NATURAL GAS SERVICE
TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEN
Gentlemen:
On February 15, 1960, the Railroad Commission of Texas
issued an order revising the city gate charge to be paid to the
Transmission Division of Lone Star Gas Company by the Distribu-
tion Division for the gas the Distribution Division sells in
Texas cities and towns for use by residential and commercial
customers. This order increased the city gate charge to the
Distribution Division by 5.4 cents per MCF effective February 15,
1960.
The Railroad Commission's order was issued only after a
very thorough study had been made by the Commission of all the
facts developed during extended public hearings, which clearly
established that the city gate charge of 30 cents per MCF that
was fixed in 1942 is now wholly insufficient to compensate Lone
Star Transmission Division for the increases in its operating
expenses since that time.
These increased expenses have resulted primarily from the
increased cost of purchasing gas in the fields. Within recent
years, numerous large gas pipe lines have been constructed
from the gas producing areas of Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma
to virtually every section of the United States; and these new
lines have vigorously competed for all available supplies of
gas. Progressively higher wellhead prices have been offered
by these new buyers, and Lone Star has, of necessity, had to
meet these higher competitive prices for both existing gas sup-
plies and for the new reserves required to protect the present
and future requirements of our customers. Additional operating
expenses have also resulted from higher wages, taxes, costs of
materials and supplies, and from the necessity of constructing
transportation and gathering lines into more remote areas.
The Transmission Division gathers gas in the field and
transports it to the various city gates. The Distribution
Division receives and pays for the gas at the city gate and dis-
tributes it to the customers' premises. The last change in the
Distribution Division rate charged for residential and commer-
cial service was based on cost of service for the year 19$1
with a city gate charge of 30 cents per MCF in effect. Since
that time the cost of serving these customers has continuously
increased, due to the higher wages, taxe s, and costs of materials
and supplies. As an e-xample, for the same pipe that in 19$1
cost $100.00, the 19$9 cost was $1$7.30. Likewise, for each
$100.00 spent in 1951 for meters, the 19$9 cost was $126.70;
for trucks $140.29; and payroll cost per employee $151.60. The
cost of residential and commercial gas has now increased $.4 cents
per MCF.
-2-
It would certainly be reasonable for Lone Star Gas Company
to request that you gentlemen authorize an adjustment in the
residential and commercial rate that would include all of the
increases in operating costs since 1951 including the 5.4 cents
per MCF in the city gate charge. R owever, Lone Star Distribution
Division is willing at this time to forego requesting the full
adjustment to which it is entitled if you will approve an imme-
diate adjustment in the existing rate for residential and com-
mercial service by increasing each step of the rate by 5.4 cents
per MCF. Since this is the exact amount of the increase in the
city gate charge approved by the Railroad Commission, it will
not increase the net income of the Distribution Division but
would only offset the increase in cost of gas at the city gate.
For the average residential customer on our system this
will amount to slightly more than one cent per day.
We therefore respectfully request your pr ompt approval of
the prop osed rate schedule by the enactment of the attached
ordinance.
Sincerely yours, -\
)
I
¡1//I~/ / /, /96 (J
Date Filed
-3-
_^._~__.___'___M__~_~__·'-"·__~
--~-_...__.._.~.._- -------
AN ORDINANCE FIXING AND DETERMINING THE GENERAL
SERVICE RATE TO BE CHARGED FOR SALES OF NATURAL
GAS TO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSUMERS
WITHIN THE CITY LIIHTS OF NORTH RTC"HT.A"Nn "HTLT,f:; ,
TÞ.RRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, PROVIDING
FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH SUCH RATE MAY BE CHANGED,
ADJUSTED AND AMENDED AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTHRICRLAND H!LLS:
SECTION 1. Effective with the first gas bills rendered on or
after the / day of ~~ ' 1960, the general service rate
for sales of natural gas renae d to residential and commercial consumers
within the city limits of North Richland Rills by Lone Star Gas Company,
a Texas corporation, its successors and assigns, is hereby fixed and de-
termined as follows:
First
Next
Next
Next
AllOVer
Minimum Monthly Bill $.60
700 Cu. Ft. 8 $.1760 per CCF gross; $.1584 per CCF net.
19 300 Cu. Ft." .8433 per MCF gross; .7590 per MeF net.
10 000 Cu. Ft." .8156 per MeF gross; .7340 per MeF net.
20 000 Cu. Ft. 8 .7600 per MCF gross; .6840 per MCF net.
50 000 Cu. Ft." .6489 per MCF gross; .5840 per MeF net.
Net rate shall apply to all bills paid within ten days from
monthly billing date.
In addition to the aforesaid rates, Company shall have the right
to collect such reasonable charges as are necessary to conduct its busi-
ness and to carry out its reasonable rules and regulations in effect.
The above rate is applicable to each residential and commercial
consumer per month or for any part of a month for which gas is used at
the same location.
SECTION 2. The rate set forth in Section 1 maybe changed and
amended by either the City or Company furnishing gas in the manner pro-
vided by law. Service hereunder is subject to the orders of regulatory
bodies having jurisdiction, and to the Companyls R~les and Regulations
currently on file in the Company s office.
SECTION 3. The fact that there is an imperative public need
for an immediate change and adjustment in the rate for gas and gas servi,ce
furnished to residential and commercial consumers creates an emergency and
-.----..--------------.""----
the reading and passage of this ordinance at three separate meetings is
hereby suspended and this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force
from and after the date of its passage at a single meeting and the approval
thereof by the mayor.
PASSED AND APPROVED on this the -LL day of
A.D. 1960.
f~
ATTEST:
~ .,
(if
r ~~/' '..--
City Secretary .
/Jc.A~~~/)-.
Mayor ,
STATE OF TEXAS 0
o
COUNTY OF TARRA'NT 0
/} .':?
Nœ-th "t Ch~~nò ~~--:/~~~ ' c~:~;~a~~~, t~:r~~~y C~~tify
that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance
passed and approved by the ~ity ~rnln~il of the City of
~;~~....;;;~ò 1!1~la"t a'fr~IÚt.// session hdd on the ¡R day of
______---s~ ' 1960, a It appears of record In the Minutes of sald
. ' , in Book , page .
,W¡rNESS MY HAND AJ'ID SEAL OF SAID CITY, this the -1L day of
~~' , A.D. 1960.
City of
-2-