Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSRB 2024-04-22 Agendas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he Office of the City Manager DATE: April 22, 2024 SUBJECT: Approve minutes of the August 28, 2023 regular Sign Review Board meeting. PRESENTER: Traci Henderson, Assistant City Secretary GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The CSign Review Board meeting. The minutes for the previous meeting are placed on the agenda for review and approval by the Board. Upon approval of the minutes, an electronic copy will be uploaded to th RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the August 28, 2023 regular Sign Review Board meeting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he Office of the City Manager DATE: April 22, 2024 SUBJECT: SRB24-0009 Public hearing and consideration of a request from Hancock Sign Company for a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances at 5131 Rufe Snow Drive, being 1.02 acres described as Lot 6, Block 4, Tapp Addition. PRESENTER: Clayton Comstock, Managing Director of Development Services SUMMARY: On behalf of North Richland Hills Pads LLC (owner) and (tenant), Hancock Sign Company is requesting a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The site is located at 5131 Rufe Snow Drive. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow wall signs on all four elevations of the building. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The site is located at the southwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Combs Road, just north of NE Loop 820. The subject property is the former location of a Chick-fil-A restaurant, which constructed a new store on the NE Loop 820 frontage road. The 4,100- square-foot building is planned to be renovated casual restaurant. In December 2023, the sign contractor for applied for sign permits for the building and site. As part of the plan review, it was noted that wall signs were proposed for all four elevations of the building. The sign regulations limit wall signs to two elevations of a building. The owner considered modifications to the signs to comply with the standards. However, the owner ultimately decided to seek a variance to allow the signs as proposed. The variance application and supporting materials are attached. The materials include a copy of the application explaining the reasoning for the variance request and other relevant documents. An analysis of the request and relevant codes is below. ANALYSIS The variance request is related to standards for wall signs, which are contained in Section 106-13(b)(1) of the sign regulations. The site has street frontage on Rufe Snow Drive on the east and Combs Road on the north. It also fronts the signalized driveway entrance to the shopping center on the south. The west side of the building faces an internal driveway that connects to Combs Road. Section 106-13(b)(1) of the sign regulations permits a structure to have wall signage on a maximum of two building faces, and those building faces must have a street frontage or public entrance. The applicant proposes to construct wall signs on all four faces of the building. A summary of the location and design of the wall signs are shown in the exhibit below. Detailed sign drawings are shown in the attached wall sign exhibits. The sizes of the wall signs are compliant with the sign regulations. NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION The request is being processed as a variance application, which would waive certain sign standards for the property. The Board may include appropriate conditions as part of the approval of a variance request. The affirmative vote of four Board members is required to approve a variance. A public hearing is required for consideration of a request for variance. Notice of the public hearing was published in the newspaper and mailed to all owners of real property within 200 feet of the site. OPTIONS FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION The Sign Review Board has the following options on this application. 1. Approve the variance as presented. This action would approve variances to the sign standards for wall signs and allow wall signs on all four elevations of the building as presented. 2. Approve the variance with conditions. This action would approve variances to the sign standards for wall signs, subject to the owner making modifications to its size, location, or design as directed by the Board. 3. Deny the variance. This action would require the signs to be built in compliance with wall sign standards, which allows signs only on two elevations of the building. RECOMMENDATION: Approve SRB24-0009. COMBS DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 0100200400600800 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± COMBS DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 0100200400600800 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE: SRB24-0009 «OWNER» «MAILING_ADDRESS» «CITY_STATE» «ZIP» You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property requesting a sign variance on the attached map. as shown APPLICANT Hancock Sign Company LOCATION 5131 Rufe Snow Drive REQUEST Public hearing and consideration of a request from Hancock Sign Company for a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances at 5131 Rufe Snow Drive, being 1.02 acres described as Lot 6, Block 4, Tapp Addition. DESCRIPTION Variance request to allow wall signs on all four elevations of the building. The sign regulations limit wall signs to two elevations of a building. PUBLIC HEARING DATES Sign Review Board 7:00 PM Monday, April 22, 2024 MEETING LOCATION City Council Chamber - Third Floor 4301 City Point Drive North Richland Hills, Texas People interested in submitting letters of support or opposition are encouraged to contact the Planning & Zoning Department for additional information. Letters must be received by the close of the Sign Review Board public hearing. Because changes could be made to requests during the public hearing process, you are encouraged to follow the request through to final action by the Board. Planning and Zoning Department | 4301 City Point Drive - NRH, TX 76180 817-427-6300 | www.nrhtx.com | planning@nrhtx.com Planning and Zoning Department | 4301 City Point Drive - NRH, TX 76180 817-427-6300 | www.nrhtx.com | planning@nrhtx.com 5198 5161 5201 BS COM 5162 5198 5142 5131 6601 6615 5140 6655 6755 6645 DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 04080160240320 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± APPLICATION INFORMATION Sign Review Board Case SRB24-0009 5131 Rufe Snow Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas The following information was submitted with the application on the NRH E-SERVICES PORTAL on February 12, 2024. SIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION 1. List the pertinent section(s) of the Sign Regulations and indicate the specific interpretation(s), variance(s), or nonconforming use exception(s) being requested. Sec. 106-13 (b) Wall Signs (1) Asking for relief from "a maximum of two (2) building faces" rule. Proposed signage is on four (4) elevations. 2. State the grounds for the request and detail any special conditions that cause hardships that in your opinion justify the variances or exceptions being requested. Explain any unique circumstances, if applicable, not considered by the Sign Regulations. 1. There is a hardship because the only current monument sign is located away from the building. So, there will be facades facing intersections without signage. Patrons will not know what the restaurant is from the road. 2. If code minimums are followed only the front façade and side façade will have signage. The rear, facing a main intersection, will not have any branding that will let patrons on the street know what the restaurant is. The drive-thru elevation will not have any branding or drive-thru specific signage to label the drive-thru concept. 3. Provide wayfinding signage for vehicles navigating through the shopping center where the street side signs are not visible. 4. The current Chick-Fil-A restaurant has signage on more than two sides of the building. Note that there are signs on all 4 sides. WALLSIGNS PROPOSED LOCATIONS SIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMORANDUM FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: April 22, 2024 SUBJECT: SRB24-0010 Public hearing and consideration of a request from Sign Remedy Inc for a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances at 8225 Northeast Parkway, being 1.69 acres described as Lot 3R1, Block 2, Culp Addition. PRESENTER: Clayton Comstock, Managing Director of Development Services SUMMARY: On behalf of Realty Income Corporation (owner) and Crash Champions (tenant), Sign Remedy Inc is requesting a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The site is located at 8225 Northeast Parkway. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a wall sign to exceed fifty (50) square feet in the Transit Oriented Development District. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The site is located on the north side of Northeast Parkway east of Davis Boulevard. The subject property is the location of Crash Champions, a collision repair business. Formerly occupied by Service King, the 16,400-square-foot building has been occupied by a collision repair business since its construction in 2003. The property is in the Smithfield Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zoning district. The property was included as part of the rezoning of 279 acres for the Smithfield TOD that was approved on August 24, 2009 (Ordinance 3064). Prior to the rezoning, the property was zoned I-2 (Medium Industrial). The collision repair business is considered a legal nonconforming use of the property. In February 2024, the sign contractor for Crash Champions applied for a sign permit for a wall sign. As part of the plan review, it was noted that the size of the wall sign exceeded the maximum allowed size of fifty (50) square feet in the TOD district. The owner considered modifications to the signs to comply with the standards. However, the owner ultimately decided to seek a variance to allow the sign as proposed. The variance application and supporting materials are attached. The materials include a copy of the application explaining the reasoning for the variance request and other relevant documents. An analysis of the request and relevant codes is below. ANALYSIS The variance request is related to standards for wall signs in the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) district. Section 106-9 (Table of permitted signs) of the sign regulations outlines the allowed types of signs in the city. This table requires that signs located in a TOD district are subject to the additional standards in that zoning district. The sign standards for the TOD district are contained in Section 118-569 (Signage) of the zoning ordinance. These standards permit a structure to have one wall sign per tenant space. The area of the sign is calculated at one square foot of sign area per linear foot of street frontage, with a maximum sign area of fifty (50) square feet. The property has 258 feet of frontage on Northeast Parkway, which would allow a fifty (50) square foot wall sign on the building. The applicant proposes to construct a 103.17- square-foot wall sign above the building entrance facing the street. The proposed sign is approximately 17.5 feet wide and 5.75 feet tall. A summary of the location and design of the wall signs are shown in the exhibit below. Detailed sign drawings are shown in the attached wall sign exhibits. The request is being processed as a variance application, which would waive certain sign standards for the property. The Board may include appropriate conditions as part of the approval of a variance request. The affirmative vote of four Board members is required to approve a variance. A public hearing is required for consideration of a request for variance. Notice of the public hearing was published in the newspaper and mailed to all owners of real property within 200 feet of the site. OPTIONS FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION The Sign Review Board has the following options on this application. 1. Approve the variance as presented. This action would approve a variance to the sign standards for wall signs and allow a 103.17-square-foot wall sign on the building as presented. 2. Approve the variance with conditions. This action would approve a variance to the sign standards for wall signs, subject to the owner making modifications to its size, location, or design as directed by the Board. 3. Deny the variance. This action would require the sign to be built in compliance with wall sign standards, which limits the size of the sign to fifty (50) square feet. RECOMMENDATION: Approve SRB24-0010. MICKEY DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 0100200400600800 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± MICKEY DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 0100200400600800 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE: SRB24-0010 «OWNER» «MAILING_ADDRESS» «CITY_STATE» «ZIP» You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property requesting a sign variance on the attached map. as shown APPLICANT Sign Remedy Inc LOCATION 8225 Northeast Parkway REQUEST Public hearing and consideration of a request from Sign Remedy Inc for a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances at 8225 Northeast Parkway, being 1.69 acres described as Lot 3R1, Block 2, Culp Addition. DESCRIPTION Variance request to allow a 103-square-foot wall sign on the building elevation facing Northeast Parkway. The property is in the Smithfield Transit Oriented Development district, which limits the size of the wall sign to 50 square feet. PUBLIC HEARING DATES Sign Review Board 7:00 PM Monday, April 22, 2024 MEETING LOCATION City Council Chamber - Third Floor 4301 City Point Drive North Richland Hills, Texas People interested in submitting letters of support or opposition are encouraged to contact the Planning & Zoning Department for additional information. Letters must be received by the close of the Sign Review Board public hearing. Because changes could be made to requests during the public hearing process, you are encouraged to follow the request through to final action by the Board. Planning and Zoning Department | 4301 City Point Drive - NRH, TX 76180 817-427-6300 | www.nrhtx.com | planning@nrhtx.com Planning and Zoning Department | 4301 City Point Drive - NRH, TX 76180 817-427-6300 | www.nrhtx.com | planning@nrhtx.com 80338233 8217 8211822983018321 82138309 8241 8329 82458313 81058120 81128221 8116 80298324 6829 6828 6949 6944 8224 6941 6945 6840 6824 6940 6825 6937 6941 6937 6936 8028 6933 6820 8244 6932 6935 6929 67016935 6933 6816 8240 8232 6925 6928 6929 8236 8228 6921 6924 6812 6925 8001 6920 69216921 6920 6917 6808 6916 6917 6916 6917 6913 8225 6912 6913 6912 6913 6902 6909 6908 6800 6909 6908 6909 6904 6905 6904 6801 6905 6905 69006901 6901 6901 6900 8200 8100 6728 6701 DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 04590180270360 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± APPLICATION INFORMATION Sign Review Board Case SRB24-0010 8225 Northeast Pkwy, North Richland Hills, Texas The following information was submitted with the application on the NRH E-SERVICES PORTAL on March 12, 2024. SIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION 1. List the pertinent section(s) of the Sign Regulations and indicate the specific interpretation(s), variance(s), or nonconforming use exception(s) being requested. {ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЊЊБΏЎЏВͲ ğĬƌĻ В͵Њ ƌźƒźƷƭ ğƓǤ Ǟğƌƌ ƭźŭƓ źƓ Ʒŷźƭ ķźƭƷƩźĭƷ Ʒƚ ğ ƒğǣźƒǒƒ ƚŅ ЎЉγ ğƓķ /Ʃğƭŷ /ŷğƒƦźƚƓƭ źƭ ƩĻƨǒĻƭƷźƓŭ Ʒƚ źƓƭƷğƌƌ ğ ƭźŭƓ ƒĻğƭǒƩźƓŭ ğƷ ЊЉЌ͵ЊАγ͵ 2. State the grounds for the request and detail any special conditions that cause hardships that in your opinion justify the variances or exceptions being requested. Explain any unique circumstances, if applicable, not considered by the Sign Regulations. ŷĻ ǝźƭǒğƌ źƒƦğĭƷ ƚŅ ğ ЎЉγ ƭźŭƓ ƚƓ ğ ƭƷƚƩĻ ŅƩƚƓƷ ǞźƷŷ ğ ŅğĭğķĻ ƚŅ ƩƚǒŭŷƌǤ ЋͲЊЎЏγ źƭ ƒźƓźƒğƌ͵ ğ ƒĻƩĻ Ћі ƚŅ ƷŷĻźƩ ŅğĭğķĻ Ǟźƌƌ ĬĻ ƭźŭƓğŭĻ͵ ŷĻ ǝğƭƷ ƒğƆƚƩźƷǤ ƚŅ ĭźƷźĻƭ ĭğƌĭǒƌğƷĻ ƭźŭƓ ƭƨǒğƩĻ ŅƚƚƷğŭĻ ğƌƌƚǞğƓĭĻƭ ĬğƭĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ŅğĭğķĻ ƒĻğƭǒƩĻƒĻƓƷƭ Ʒƚ ğǝƚźķ ƭǒĭŷ ğ ƒğƭƭźǝĻ ķźƭƦğƩźƷǤ ƚŅ ƭźŭƓ Ʒƚ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ƩğƷźƚͲ ŭźǝźƓŭ ĬǒƭźƓĻƭƭĻƭ ƷŷğƷ ƩĻƭźķĻ źƓ ƷŷĻźƩ ĭźƷǤ ƷŷĻ ĬĻƭƷ ĭŷğƓĭĻ ƚŅ ğƷƷƩğĭƷźƓŭ ƦƚƷĻƓƷźğƌ ĭǒƭƷƚƒĻƩƭ͵ SIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMORANDUM FROM: The Office of the City Manager DATE: April 22, 2024 SUBJECT: SRB24-0011 Public hearing and consideration of a request from Hoar Construction for a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances at 8851 Boulevard 26, being 5.52 acres described as Lot 4R1, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition. PRESENTER: Clayton Comstock, Managing Director of Development Services SUMMARY: On behalf of Merlin Entertainments, Hoar Construction is requesting a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances. The site is located at 8851 Boulevard 26. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a pole sign on the property. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The site is located on the northwest side of Boulevard 26 adjacent to the NRH2O Family Water Park. The subject property is the former location of the Mountasia entertainment facility and is currently being redeveloped into a Peppa Pig theme park. As part of the building permit plan review, it was noted that a pole sign was proposed to be constructed adjacent to Boulevard 26. The sign regulations only allow pole signs in the freeway overlay zone, which includes properties within 200 feet of NE Loop 820 and Airport Freeway (SH 121/183). Since the subject property is outside of this area, it is limited to monument type ground signs. The owner considered modifications to the sign to comply with the standards. However, the owner ultimately decided to seek a variance to allow the pole sign on the site. The variance application and supporting materials are attached. The materials include a copy of the application explaining the reasoning for the variance request and other relevant documents. An analysis of the request and relevant codes is below. ANALYSIS The variance request is related to standards for monument signs, which are contained in Section 106-13(a)(2) of the sign regulations. This section permits a property to have one monument sign per street frontage. The sign structure must be constructed of masonry and may be seven (7) feet tall and 75 square feet in size. The message area on the sign may be 50 square feet, and the area must be surrounded by at least eight inches of masonry on all sides. The applicant proposes to construct a pole sign adjacent to Boulevard 26. The proposed sign design is shown in the exhibit below. The proposed sign structure is 13 feet in height, with a sign message area of 82.5 square feet. The design of the sign includes a 4.5-foot tall masonry base with 50 square feet of landscaping around the base. The request is being processed as a variance application, which would waive certain sign standards for the property. The Board may include appropriate conditions as part of the approval of a variance request. The affirmative vote of four Board members is required to approve a variance. A public hearing is required for consideration of a request for variance. Notice of the public hearing was published in the newspaper and mailed to all owners of real property within 200 feet of the site. OPTIONS FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION The Sign Review Board has the following options on this application. 1. Approve the variance as presented. This action would approve variances to the sign standards for ground signs and allow a pole sign to be constructed as presented. 2. Approve the variance with conditions. This action would approve variances to the sign standards for ground signs, subject to the owner making modifications to its size, location, or design as directed by the Board. 3. Deny the variance. This action would require the sign to be built in compliance with ground sign standards, which allows signs only monument signs on the property. RECOMMENDATION: Approve SRB24-0011. DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 02004008001,2001,600 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 02004008001,2001,600 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE: SRB24-0011 «OWNER» «MAILING_ADDRESS» «CITY_STATE» «ZIP» You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner of record within 200 feet of the property requesting a sign variance on the attached map. as shown APPLICANT Hoar Construction LOCATION 8851 Boulevard 26 REQUEST Public hearing and consideration of a request from Hoar Construction for a variance to Chapter 106 (Signs) of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances at 8851 Boulevard 26, being 5.52 acres described as Lot 4R1, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition. DESCRIPTION Variance request to allow a 13-foot tall 82.5-square-foot pole sign adjacent to Boulevard 26. The sign regulations allow for monument signs only that are 7 feet tall and 75 square feet in structure area. PUBLIC HEARING DATES Sign Review Board 7:00 PM Monday, April 22, 2024 MEETING LOCATION City Council Chamber - Third Floor 4301 City Point Drive North Richland Hills, Texas People interested in submitting letters of support or opposition are encouraged to contact the Planning & Zoning Department for additional information. Letters must be received by the close of the Sign Review Board public hearing. Because changes could be made to requests during the public hearing process, you are encouraged to follow the request through to final action by the Board. Planning and Zoning Department | 4301 City Point Drive - NRH, TX 76180 817-427-6300 | www.nrhtx.com | planning@nrhtx.com Planning and Zoning Department | 4301 City Point Drive - NRH, TX 76180 817-427-6300 | www.nrhtx.com | planning@nrhtx.com 8403 8851 9001 9001 8867 8350 8735 8875 8859 828 8733 8515 8613 8721 8551 DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Feet purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents 080160320480640 only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. ± APPLICATION INFORMATION Sign Review Board Case SRB24-0010 8851 Boulevard 26, North Richland Hills, Texas The following information was submitted with the application on the NRH E-SERVICES PORTAL on April 8, 2024. SIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION 1. List the pertinent section(s) of the Sign Regulations and indicate the specific interpretation(s), variance(s), or nonconforming use exception(s) being requested. ЊЉЏΏЊЌ 2. State the grounds for the request and detail any special conditions that cause hardships that in your opinion justify the variances or exceptions being requested. Explain any unique circumstances, if applicable, not considered by the Sign Regulations. ŷĻ ƦƚƌĻ ƭźŭƓ ƭĻĭƷźƚƓ ƨǒƚƷĻķ źƓ ǤƚǒƩ Ļƒğźƌ ğƦƦƌźĻƭ ƚƓƌǤ Ʒƚ ƦƩƚƦĻƩƷźĻƭ ƌƚĭğƷĻķ ƚƓ ŅƩĻĻǞğǤƭ ƚƩ ǞźƷŷ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭƭ ƷŷğƷ ƷƚƷğƌ ğƷ ƌĻğƭƷ ЋЉЉͲЉЉЉ ƭƨǒğƩĻ ŅĻĻƷ͵ ŷźƭ ƦƩƚƦĻƩƷǤ ķƚĻƭ ƓƚƷ ƒĻĻƷ ĻźƷŷĻƩ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷ͵ POLE SIGN EXHIBIT 21!gu 9/36!gu u g ! 4 2 83#!X!y!9#!E!y!65#!I 8!hbmmpo!tisvct!bu!29#!po!dfoufs gps!61!TG