HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1996-006
RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, that:
The mayor be, and is hereby authorized and directed to execute the ISTEAlCMAQ
Agreement of this date with the Texas Department of Transportation dealing with construction of
appurtenances to the Rufe Snow Drive/Glenview Drive Intersection as the act and deed of the
City.
2.
A copy of said agreement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part hereof.
3.
The sum of $2,000 as payment to the State of Texas to cover their administrative costs is
hereby approved. The funds have already been appropriated for the City's portion of the
engineering cost for this 1994 Bond Program project under account number 13-13-95-6000.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of January, 1996.
APPROVED:
" ~~<A~
Tommy Brow, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEG
~
Agreement No. 5XXF6089
Tarrant County
CSJ: 0902-48-280
Rufe Snow and Glenview Drive
56 % Federal 44% Local
STATE OF TEXAS *
COUNTY OF TRAVIS *
AGREEMENT
(CONGESTION MITIGATION AND
AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the
Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "State" and the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, acting by and through its authorized officials
hereinafter called the "City".
WIT N E SSE T H
WHEREAS, the Interrnodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, ("ISTEA")
codified under Title 23 V.S.C. Section 101 et seq., establishes the National
Interrnodal Transportation System that is economically efficient and environmentally
sound, provides the foundation for the nation to compete in the global economy, and
will move people and goods in an energy efficient manner; and WHEREAS, Title 23
V.S.C. Section 149 establishes a congestion mitigation and air quality improvement
program ("CMAQ") to contribute to the attainment of a national ambient air quality
standard to be implemented by the States' Transportation Agencies; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 V.S.C. Section 134 establishes that Metropolitan Planning
Organizations ("MPO's") and the States' Transportation Agencies to develop
transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the city is a member of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, a
Metropolitan Planning Organization established under the laws of the State of Texas.
WHEREAS, the State and the City desire the improvements to the intersection of Rufe
Snow Drive and Glenview Drive, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A", to be
12/14/95
Page 1 of 12
Type "J"
hereinafter identified as the IIproject"; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 V.S.C. Section 120 establishes that the Federal share of funding
for CMAQ will not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the cost of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the city has offered to participate in the development and construction of
the Projects by providing funding, preparing the design documentation, acquiring the
necessary right-of-way, accomplishing utility adjustments and other necessary items
required by the state; and
WHEREAS, on the 2L day of
TRTI11Rry
199..6., the N "RiC'nlRnn Hill¡::
City
Council passed Resolution No. 96-06
, attached hereto and identified as Exhibit
"B", authorizing the City's participation in the development of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the state will secure the federal cost share, let the construction
contract, provide the construction inspection, provide other items as required; and
WHEREAS, on the 30 day of November, 1994, the Texas Transportation commission passed
Minute Order 104667, attached hereto and identified as Exhibit "C", authorizing the
Project through the State Transportation Improvement Program;
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and
agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as
hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows:
1. CONTRACT PERIOD
This agreement becomes effective upon final execution by the State and shall
terminate upon completion of the Project or unless terminated or modified as
hereinafter provided.
2. SCOPE OF PROJECT
A. The State and the city agree that the scope of the Project shall be limited to
the scope authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission.
B. The Project will be designated a part of the State Highway System as a
METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY for the limited purpose of constructing the roadways; however
any existing city roads within the limits of the Project will not be designated or
12/14/95
Page 2 of 12
Type "J"
incorporated therein prior to the state's award of the construction contract.
C. The City will continue to provide maintenance for all city roads within the
limits of the Project until the State's award of the construction contract.
3. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
A. The City shall pay all costs and perform all necessary requirements to provide
title in the name of the City to the desired right-of-way required for the
construction of the Project, which title shall be acceptable to the State. The City
shall provide all right-of-way free and clear of all improvements and/or
encroachments. The City will comply with and assume the costs for compliance with
all the requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition policies Act of 1970, Title 42 U.S.C.A. Section 4601,
et seq., including those provisions relating to incidental expenses incurred by the
property owners in conveying the right-of-way to the City, and benefits applicable
to the relocation of any displaced person as defined in 49 CFR, 24.2(g).
Documentation to support such compliance must be maintained and must be made
available to the State and its representatives for review and inspection. The City
shall secure and provide easements over any other land in addition to normal right-
of-way as may be indicated on the approved right-of-way map. The City will be
responsible for any additional right-of-way required for the completion of the
Project.
B. In the event the right-of-way is donated to the City after the federal
authorization date for acquisition of right- of-way, the City will provide all
documentation to the State regarding the value of the acquired property. The State
will review the City I S appraisal of the donated property to determine the fair
market value. The fair market value of donated right-of-way will be credited
towards the City's financial share towards the cost of the project.
C. The State will not reimburse the City any funds in the event the right-of-way
was purchased before execution of this agreement or the fair market value of the
donated property exceeds the City's financial share towards the project.
12/14/95
Page 3 of 12
Type "J"
4. RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIPTION
The City shall prepare right-of-way maps, property descriptions and other data as
needed to properly describe the right-of-way which the City is to acquire and
provide for the project. The right-of-way maps and property descriptions shall be
submitted to the state for approval prior to the City acquiring the necessary right-
of-way. Tracings of the maps shall be retained by the City for its permanent
records.
5. UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS
If the required right-of-way encroaches upon existing utilities and the proposed
highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of such utility
facilities, the City and its consultant will establish the necessary utility work
and notify the appropriate utility company to schedule their adjustments. The City
shall be responsible for all costs associated with the adjustment, removal or
relocation of such utility facilities, and such adjustment, removal or relocation
shall be in accordance with applicable State law, regulations, policies and
procedures. In the event additional utilities are required to be adjusted, removed
or relocated during the construction of the Project, the City will be responsible
for all costs associated with the additional utility work.
6. DETERMINATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY VALUES
The City agrees to make a determination of property values for each right-of-way
parcel by methods acceptable to the state and to submit to the state's District
Office a tabulation of the values so determined, signed by the appropriate City
representative. Such tabulations shall list the parcel numbers, ownership, acreage
and recommended compensation. Compensation shall be shown in the component parts
of land taken, itemization of improvements taken, damages (if any) and the amounts
by which the total compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements.
This tabulation shall be accompanied by an explanation to support the determined
values, together with a copy of information or reports used in arriving at all
determined values. Expenses incurred by the City in performing this work may be
eligible for reimbursement after the City has received written authorization by the
12/14/95
Page 4 of 12
Type "J"
State to proceed with determination of right-of-way values. The state will review
the data submitted and may base its reimbursement for parcel acquisitions on the
values which are determined by this review.
7. CONDEMNATION
Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the City and will
be the City's responsibility at its own expense as hereinafter indicated. The City
will concurrently file condemnation proceedings and a notice of lis pendens for each
case in the name of the City, and in each case so files the judgement of the court
will decree to the City title to the property condemned.
8. COURT COSTS, COSTS OF SPECIAL COMMISSIONERS' HEARINGS
Court costs of Special commissioners' hearings assessed against the City in
condemnation proceedings and fees incidental thereto will be paid by the City. Such
costs and fees incurred after written authorization by the State to proceed with
condemnation will be eligible for reimbursement at an amount not to exceed fifty six
percent (56%) of the actual cost under the established reimbursement procedure
provided such costs and fees are eligible for payment.
9. REIMBURSEMENT
Reimbursement will be made to the City for right-of-way purchased in an amount not
to exceed fifty six percent (56%) of the cost of the right-of-way purchased in
accordance with the terms and provisions of this agreement. Reimbursement will be
in accordance with the terms and provisions of this agreement. Reimbursement will
be in the amount not to exceed fifty six percent (56%) of the State's predetermined
value of each parcel, or the net cost thereof, whichever is the lesser amount. In
addition, reimbursement will be made to the City for necessary payments to
appraisers, expenses incurred in order to assure good title to property acquired and
costs associated with the relocation of displaced persons and personal property as
well as incidental expenses. Reimbursement shall not exceed fifty six percent (56%)
of such documented costs. If condemnation is necessary and title is taken as set
forth herein under the section entitled "condemnation", the participation by the
State shall be based on the final judgement, conditioned upon the State having been
12/14/95
Page 5 of 12
Type "J"
notified as to all action taken therein.
10. CERTIFICATION
The City shall provide to the State forty-five (45) days prior to the construction
contract let date, a certification that all right-of-way has been acquired, all
environmental problems have been remediated, and all conflicting utilities have been
adjusted to clear the proposed construction.
11. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
A. The City will be responsible for the mitigation and remediation of any
environmental problems associated with the development and construction of the
Project. The City shall provide to the state written certification from the
appropriate regulatory agency(s) that the environmental problems have been remedied.
The State will not let the construction contracts until all environmental problems
have been remediated by the City.
B. All costs associated with the remediation of the environmental problems shall
be the responsibility of the City and/or the property owners. These costs will not
be reimbursed or credited towards the City's financial share of the Project.
12. ENGINEERING SERVICES
A. The City will prepare or cause to be prepared the preliminary engineering
necessary for the development of plans, specifications and estimates (P.S.& E).
Development of the preliminary engineering shall include environmental assessment
and holding of necessary public meetings and a public hearing.
B. The P.S.& E. shall be developed by the City or its consultant in accordance with
the State's latest Standard Specifications For Construction Of Highways, Streets And
Bridges or its currently approved revisions.
C. The City shall submit the completed P. S . & E. to the State for review and
approval. Should the State determine that revisions are required to the P.S.& E.,
the City shall make the necessary revisions. The State will not let the construction
contract until the P.S.& E. have been approved by the state.
13. PROJECT FUNDING
A. The total costs for right-of-way and construction for the Project
12/14/95
Page 6 of 12
Type "J"
is estimated at $450,000.
B. The state will be responsible to secure the federal share of the funding
required for the development and construction of the Project. The city will be
responsible for any non-federal participation costs associated with the Project.
C. Upon execution of this agreement, the City will remit a check or warrant made
payable to the "Texas Department of Transportation" in the amount of $2,000. This
amount is based on one percent (1%) of the estimated local share participation cost.
The funds will be utilized by the state to review the engineering documentation and
other incidental costs.
D. Sixty (60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids, the
state will notify the city that its financial share for the construction is
required. The City shall remit a check or warrant in the amount established by the
State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's written notification to
the address provided herein.
E. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the
City at any time during the development of the Project, the State will notify the
City in writing of the additional amount. The City will make payment to the state
within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's notification. Upon completion
of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the cost and any funds due the
City will be promptly returned.
14. INDIRECT COST RECOVERY PLAN
Chapter 2106, Texas Government Code, requires the State to recover indirect costs
based on a percentage of the State's actual direct costs to complete the Project.
The indirect costs will be in accordance with the State's Indirect Cost Recovery
Plan and will be based on the City's funding percentage provided herein.
15. CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The State shall advertise for construction bids, issue bid proposals, receive
and tabulate the bids and award a contract for construction of the Project in
accordance with existing procedures and applicable laws. Any field changes,
12/14/95
Page 7 of 12
Type "J"
supplemental agreements or additional work orders which may become necessary
subsequent to the award of the construction contract shall be the responsibility of
the City and subject to the approval of the state.
B. The state will supervise and inspect all work performed by the construction
contractor and will provide such engineering, inspection and testing services as may
be required to ensure that the construction of the Project is accomplished in
accordance with the approved P.S.& E.
C. Upon completion of the Project, the state will issue to the city a "Notification
of Completion", acknowledging that the Project has been completed. Upon the City's
receipt of the "Notification of Completion", the roadway will be removed from the
state Highway System and will revert under the jurisdiction of the City.
16. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
Upon completion of the Project, the City will assume responsibility for maintenance
of the completed facility.
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the City
shall remain the property of the City. All documents prepared by the State shall
remain the property of the State. All data prepared under this agreement shall be
made available to the State without restriction or limitation on their further use.
18. TERMINATION
A. This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions:
(1) By mutual written agreement and consent of both parties.
(2) By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill the obligation
as set forth herein.
B. The termination of this agreement shall extinguish all rights, duties,
obligations and liabilities of the State and City under this agreement. If the
potential termination of this agreement is due to the failure of the City to fulfill
its contractual obligations as set forth herein, the State will notify the City that
possible breach of contract has occurred. The City should make every effort to
remedy the breach as outlined by the state within a period mutually agreed upon by
12/14/95
Page 8 of 12
Type II J"
both parties.
19. REMEDIES
This agreement
shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any
agreement default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of
by either party to this agreement and shall be cumulative.
20. INDEMNIFICATION
The City acknowledges that it is not an agent, servant, or employee of the state and
thus, is responsible for its own acts and deeds and for those of its agents or
employees during the performance of the work defined in this agreement.
21. AMENDMENTS
Any changes in the time frame, character, agreement provisions or obligations of the
parties hereto shall be enacted by written amendment executed by both the City and
the State.
22. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION
In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any
reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and this
agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision
had never been contained herein.
23. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The City shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances,
rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any courts or administrative
bodies or tribunals in any manner affecting the performance of the agreement. When
required, the City shall furnish the state with satisfactory proof of the compliance
therewith.
24. NOTICES
All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be
delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed
to such party at the following respective addresses:
12/14/95
Page 9 of 12
Type "J"
State: Texas Department of Transportation
2501 Southwest Parkway
P.O. Box 6868
Ft. Worth, TX 76115-0868
City: The City of North Richland Hills, Texas
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the
mail, unless otherwise provided herein. Either party hereto may change the above
address by sending written notice of such change to the other in the manner provided
herein.
25. SOLE AGREEMENT
This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties hereto
and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the
within subject matter.
26. INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS
The state will, for purpose of termination of the agreement prior to completion,
examine the books and records of the City for the purpose of checking the amount of
the work performed by the City at the time of contract termination. The City shall
maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other documentation
relating to costs incurred under this agreement and shall make such materials
available to the State, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or their duly
authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office during the
contract period and for three (3) years from the date of completion of work defined
under this contract or until impending litigation is resolved. Additionally, the
State, FHWA and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to all
records of the City which are directly applicable to this agreement for the purpose
of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions.
12/14/95
Page 10 of 12
Type "J"
27. OMB AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
The City shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L.
98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in
paragraphs 6, 8 and 9 of OMB Circular No. A-128.
28. PROCUREMENT AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
The City shall adhere to the procurement standards established in Title 49 CFR Part
18.32 and the property management standards established in Title 49 CFR Part 18.36.
29. CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE
The City shall comply with the regulations of the Department of Transportation as
they relate to nondiscrimination (49 CFR 21 and 23 CFR 710.405 (B)); also Executive
Order 11246 titled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order
11375 and as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR 60).
30. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
The City shall comply with the "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program
Requirements" established in 49 CFR Part 23, Subpart D.
31. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATIONS
The City is prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party which is
debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in
federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension.
The City shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order awarded under
this contract as specified in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulation, Part 29
(Debarment and Suspension) to certify its eligibility to receive federal funds and,
when requested by the State, to furnish a copy of the certification.
12/14/95
Page 11 of 12
Type "J"
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed
in duplicate counterparts.
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
By:
~
-::z~
Typed Name
Mayor
Title
January 22, 1996
Date
ATTEST: (/ì .. .~ e '
''Ç/'JI'.¿..._-V' A::'¿&:.. . /(( ·<-L ¿ z.<L j
/ City secretary
I
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Exec.uted for the Executive Director and approved by the Texas Transportation
Commission under the authority of Stand Alone Manual Notice 95-4 for the purpose and
effect of activating and cazry.~g out the orders, established policies or work
programs heretof~)~ appr;v~d by lye ~~ Transportation commission.
By: {ÞðA_fü..//J.,/6<\vry /PL,
Charles W. Heald, P.E.
Typed Name
District Engineer
Title
,;2 .. .~/ - 'if
Date
12/14/95
Page 12 of 12
Type "J"
CERTIFICATION
I, Patricia Hutson, Assistant City Secretary of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution
No. 96-06 approved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills at a regular
meeting on the 22nd day of January, 1996 as the same appears in the records of this
office.
In testimony whereof, I subscribed my name hereto officially under the corporate
seal of the City of North Richland Hills, this the 30 day of January, 1996.
<;;:~ ..-
-C ·--2a/2f{(tZ Iy~
Patricia Hutson, Assistant City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, that:
The mayor be, and is hereby authorized and directed to execute the ISTEAlCMAQ
Agreement of this date with the Texas Department of Transportation dealing with construction of
appurtenances to the Rufe Snow Drive/Glenview Drive Intersection as the act and deed of the
City.
2.
A copy of said agreement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part hereof.
3;
The sum of $2,000 as payment to the State of Texas to cover their administrative costs is
hereby approved. The funds have already been appropriated for the City's portion of the
engineering cost for this 1994 Bond Program project under account number 13-13-95-6000.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of January, 1996.
APPROVED:
~ ~ ~~~
Tommy Bro";;?MaYOr
ATTEST:
nL/~J~ ¿~
Je,f1ette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEG
~
~"',,,",&; ", ":]1"'" ;;;;:, oJ, I 'c{ . ';'}.¡~~~"'~_)1~~;;
f~~~,.~,.;~' 8~ KITTY :g I ~"/?.::"> ~ ffi ~~rJ~I'W.é" ;;::-::-}r;'Ô~L::~ ¡'<RUTHETTHlR« Z"Ø :7;.F: ~ 'Q
~~ >- R/~~::~~ HAA IS ~I :;:~Ö~; ~:. . ~ 5 F AN::â~. ':/',~ MICJ(Éy?I"<>~':~I~\,;V¡r -;'/.<"'j .~. ~ c
~"" :D Iß- ~ «HAARISON ~~I.. ~. '", «, ;~DRIFFIELL ì \- . N TH FORT ·"5'.. ,1"E V~ïèoPPER ¿ ¡¡¡¡8J~ ;., 0 (
~ 0 e ~ t:: ~ I.U ~ ~ ::;¡ 2 ~ N CH ~ K . ~ NOR'i 1TH F j:¡TY... Cemetery P~KWAV ~ DON.. NÀ\~ .~ IRONGA. Tf. .". <: ð ~
ER \ o~ '" >- ~ "'~ ot è'j ~ 0 t": , BRIX ~ i';¡ ~;; 0 >- j S .j::ðf..: ......_.....:.." ~:'~~~ - ~ ~UL
~ OHIGHCRE$ §!8ifc X/ ' >,~ ON~ ....~¡;; ~ ~~ .. ~ (] ..... RANDY~;.. ~lgl~I~I.~SCN
. 1 "'cc >: ~ 01, CHAPMAN - ~ '" ~.{',~ t;% < ¡ ~ = ~L_-r;'¡;'AP"AN, ~. ~ '" . .rl!wËST ';.,;, G':.NAN ~: 11: ~ gl ~~ ~
~ ð ~:- -: ~I~I", ~ 1III ~1~;:H:i.' 1!.<·'·f· .~.~ liNCOLNSHI EDlNBU,r.- ·I~~~i' JAMIE~ RENEE '~/~ ~ ~I;' ....... :~ ~STA/R ~
~~ ~ H~ ~~t~ lM.~..~·....k::S;è,.·. J¡ \1~=1 ,;;, ~'~~. 0 ,,::~l;:::.:.!~:.'..F..,r \ ~'~lATE If'" ~I~I I MAATlN ~
T KENNEDY 1 \ Fci''' ~çß f<,~<$; . ~ pE1'1 : \ GLENHURst ~ & WINCHESTE~ '1 ~SANDHU;~R IL ...~ ~ CAADlN.JI..- I
.:; UNDA ~ ~t~NDY g¡ ~.} ~.. ~~EI'T.II ~~GLEf'{WooalJ{"'/¡~IC I.-~.,..r ""'..~SF C~~NIE!.7:: AATHÙR~. \ :\
F µQf!!i';¡_~ DEBO AH í .. SUr..I, .... ,. oS> ARBOR ~L.. If'f' ~ ,V;Ul)!ßfJJI).k< -:- "'7 '< '. :
~ BONNIE ~ ';:¡ K EN ¡CAAOUS~ ~~pJ.ON: ~ ~ BROO ~ CHATHitJ I~ ~,$' 't ÞE r=!!1 0 .____.. ~
~FlE'" \A AM ,.,'<-,., / SCOT"'-\ .~:§ IORCHAAD \sr\? ot\ y """'0 NORTH ~
.~ - ~~ / I'EBECC ,GH ME W:~ \~ ""
o \ ROSELANE --:; '9 ( ROOK IDE' r 80 (') iIJ N D .
HANSON HAN~ MA KNE MEUNDA I j I DE G,4.<¡r r _ RICHLA è')
I80WUN~\~ ~~ ~ 0 TARDUS~M'11.1 Z >" ~, !<; ""VEl¡ <¡¡, ?o0S'J", MANGHAM
I EMERSON ~ ~ ~ IJ1 \~, -¡:¡ ~ ~r---\ S N: 51 k INDUSTRIAL PAAK \ C J:.: 4t4PlE 0 1938 HILLS /(' I AIRPORT
SHIPP '" g:; '-:'~ I ::!~ I fir it: Ol1.EGE 0 L
~ \--èi'þAA~-M ~ 7~ ~_"ò -;;;~~~------- -' SIERR~ ~<=S .CICH'-"f \ . Y ~u ~NGBlRD, ¡,OP 46.8: ER \
BREN~,\\ RANC: : IE ~ ~ ~ "% ~ ~ F'E;:;:~~./ ~ ~ I ,,/ òt IRISH \
ARliNE ~\ ñ'" ~ \.. ' <:> ~~ T IN/OAD ~ ,. 0 .:: ~...5-~ 5 UMERICK ~ §1 ST~ ~PATRI ¡¡
~ GALL. fi :;." ~,~ ê ?¡ oj '< ¡? ~ SANh.r..nffi \; ~ % ~~" ~¡ 0 NEGAL ",;51 O'BRIAN ~ )
~ °1 ;;: I~ ~ o.::,~'?' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § SA;\~ ~ ~c-~¡Ø. ð I-- EMERALD'" ~ ~ ~ r-
~~ '''--Ñõp.iH--;J- ~ ~ <> '" >:... '" PÃUi:Ó\\\, I Ù..Isg!ß' ~ MAAY ;;! ~~ !!1- <> HILLS
~Ell C> : \ BROWNING Do ~ '" ~." i ~ II> NO*AST ~ ~I § ¡¡!!; ~ Norich \
p¡:;I'ÞE RO§!!' \ \ I¡;;I~I:¡<~ .~ I~"~/K c. ~~ 0 LYNDA.' Park
CASK.LkO I '" ADOW CREST ~ ~ Q :E ~ :g .\-~ ~ -4 ~ ~ ~ ~ LYNDA
. E 0 JU.Q --... HILLTOP 0 0 - TERRY 0 "'« ... 1.>1. \
~RILi 0 ~ ' ~ 6 ~ t~ ~ é;.. L='" ~ '\ ~ >: è'j'õ ~'õ
~tr: / LEWIS DR t; ::!~~!!= V 'iCHRJSrOPHER~ " I~ ~ ~ '" ~ \
~ '" , 15 ",'" ~ I ¡¡¡I ME~\ W !oQ '3 g R /
*,';1 ~~,. ~ ~~~:g'" ~ ~ ~ !!! ~~:
)tí~ç~rf~~'\~> ,~f/ ~ ~H ~ ,<~~TT ·¡§JADE: ~ ~; ~ ~ :=kM'~~~ ff ~¡ )¡f : ~~
1;j'~~ L ,,1' "If «2.9 .....::< g::< §I~ JZ~~ ~ r ~f--O~~'3 !Ii 1;/ THOUSAND ~ ~:;¡
j ~ /<~ 820 CORONA ~ '''' CORONA '" §? ~ ~I ~ ~~LE~ ~\ ~ >- ~ I MAP;; bo~ ~f\ ¡n.. JER:, J? OAXS ~"'~~ :~1.>121
.),,: ~ '" v1E'IEW \2 ME:::;~~~~1~)~<>J£·~llÎ11~~\11 1°""' ~ n. ~ "",~" I: !
~ -- ~ ~\ -'.jf;~ Q,.:q" ~~TnN MAAiLYN::< <3 ~ ~ ~ 01 ~~ ~ L-g RT . ;>/ ~ >: ~ ~ /~~:!: À 0 " ~
- -- '" ~~. " <;. ::¡ CAR : þAX ~ OMU/>ID ~ ~~ !!i~ 8 ~ L ~ ~~~ '{j' ~ ~ " WH,
'Y , T.,t- ~ WINNEU ~ J:: 0 -.l o~ )0.. <.:> ,
", ~ RNIEA SHAUNA 1 I . , « '" , _ _ _ )< ~ '
", ~t>ir>tT ..~::: ~~r;: S; @ ~ .¡r \ 9 )!iL ~~~'--:~ ~ o'&"'t -~ - \~ -- -~' -U
~GHT X'-\J· i/}¡~RA ~ ~CUFFSIDE :<~ GEORGJ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g) ~ OT~ ~ .. .. '/~~~;pr ~ MOUNTA/^
~ ¡¡¡ - -- -- ,r;or= ;;; VICTORI « . r:f;\ '-- ~ '" . _ " J \ \ <: ~
~G-", ..: ~ ,/1/, ~ ~ CIRCLEVIE dUNDA Ii,., ~\c t DEVILLE ..'( M ~6s ", \ g BED OR (OU
~..\' z GLENVIEW ~/G ~ a: I..~; AANOlD' 0 g BLAC f
..-¡r- ~~' -- - - - - :~S~- .tj BRILEY >: ¡¡¡ BRILEY....... ~ ,'? '\, r~ " a '< ~O'f g ~ 1
!.!:iÉ ST GHT " "CF ~ 01 TABOR TABOR '" Ii';¡ TURNER ~ \"" '3 \ g '. ;o,,! 1 :r: ,
~/J'C' \ » u\\ ~ ð --.; MIKE ~ ð , ot ~µ,« ~\ ~ G "CHERY '" ",' "I
-1,.1' y !"" ",..." <>~t~SHIRE 15~ .~M< OR C MMING , <> >: ~ :' ~ ~" /~~, « :;;1 r
~ J \ ~G G ~iß "It'" j')i; , 10 ~., ::z: :ö!: ~ ,I I ~'~ 41 C> <::t.
..91KS , '/" ,--1ß! ELBUR "'" MAN ~" '0' ~ ~ ~ ',~ ~ ~ '< ,'~ '" 0 ~ ::¡ ;:: ~ .
,;;' g /~, \ DI PROOEC J~A...!if- lfi j( ,;;> 3: < u~'~ j ~ § \ ~ 11 j ~ ~ ~ ~~ ALCUT ~ ~ "I ~i .
CST ~ (~./ , ~ GLENVIEW'" , - - _ _ LENV~E _' _ _ _ _', <> '"
0\ \ \ USI'" ~~I'i~ ~ __~ 26 HARblSTY LIMIT ~ '~~L£SUE: ( 82~ <ö ~ ~
Oaks \ GR EN >- 0 1.1..1 019 -.x:,S DlST õI "'-(:.., ij[~ ~
o Country Club \ b CA TLE ~ ~ co _ --- ~ ~ UJ ~":\ t!ff~f-~ --=.J .~ I Iii ~ 00"'" ~
')?.', : - §? ;--. ¡,¡ ~ ~ ,d:.,:/¡P \N MA: 'PAAK PLACE '~¡¡ 2 Po
Jt oft ."\ ' HAAMONSEN I.> ) ,:d" ,j,~ EVE G E \, : 183 MEt ~RN,= :; ð
----1-----"., :.~ ~ ! L YTONA ~",: ~:'-'--- ' 121 ~~t «~
/' \. '1" I - 'fos"" I ,~" KATHRYN §? >- ~
\ i' ':",~,; \:.~ - - - I " 0 ONYX NORTH *>-lØ:'" "{t;O .S "," .., I,," ~ RICHLAND :~ ./Javcees REDBUD 1 . g ~
~,~,X' -.?' "'''~ ~I. ~h: /;~,!j-'YJANNIE ~9"~" { ,,~w <t>G:/1R CH~",~ >: >: 2 i5 ~ 6~· 1: ,15 \C, '/ rPa~/~ ~ ............;-m~~
j'?' V" ì F~ss" ;j ~ !!1 ~~~..., '" J; _ 8 ~ 2 >: '< ¡¡ :;; ~ '" 'j .....~ \ «
\.~ Creek 0 çr I IN a: .û~ 474" G ð ii? ~ ~ ~ ~::r: <:: (3 ('-_ '. EE W 0 Ü ~ è
--r v p"ark.:t ~ £.: ~ ~ ~ I, JERREU ,. >- tI) OOVER u.. -' <: u -' (§ () ~ : ~ ~ ~I ~ t
g ð\ BEW Y . ~ ~ ~ ~f-- ' ~ V 2; , g:; g~ Park ~ I....:~:~ d :z W_ 0 ", ~ ~I ~ ~ S
~~ 91r Z~rRI T ONYX è'j ~ :i! i¡f rf/ #' BROOK ~ ~ BRooKS-!- "I--- EVEÌ;(N\' " KEVII:g §¡ ~ ':;1 ~ CHERRY ~
::::!¡; '¡! \ ONYX SOUl1 lit ,,~. / ~ iJ¡ ~, VALENCIA ï POW~ ¡¡J, ~ '" HARRIS 0:¡oF ~
~'" -~ - ~. ( CHl~D PLAZA' "' HOVENC 1 \ OVENKAM -........ "..... ~: 7/1;:¡¡ ~ '" ~~: ''1j,'AN "
: "lwSJ~\~ I ,/ <!'~Vbd RICHLAND ...... ,~ 'ENCINO /1// g <5 ~~ DOl ¡¡;;;;' C~ AY
'''' \, "",( (474)!?1 HILLS BRIDGES '< f?]'../ <.> r6Es VIEN··r \ "';;¡ HAROI[
-: ~\ u~S ",<',' / ____ลก"y go, ~ ,~ '-- BRIDGES , , ark r - \~
~ ~ ~~~D__r~\" _- ___,,' "'~ O.3~ '1~ :r: Pop 7.'97818/ BAXER WEST _I \ I" CAADIN Cern ...
)':Y ~ E Ros J'~<" :.t \ l... ~T ~ ~ ¡g ".....\ 1.6 : j/ifk}_i,:, I . _ _ H~RST
~ lvEAVE :m ~ ~ .fl "I ~ ~ >- LATHAM ~ "'~.:" ~".f ~f.tt"{~ _R~ _ _ - - - FORT WOR-TH .:::. -
:i! \'> \\ f!i «"'1~~E'J\o-':'N p '" ~1d ~lk r ..0£ (' h.' ,...'_---
- \ II I (0 ~ 61~~___~~'l..4cL-.:.:.·park P :~ _____ ~_ . _JI f?/J/* _---
, , / I t.I.J Q: ~ 0 ~ ~c:........, ~ tJ ~ ~r\D '~_ / _ _ L~ _
l--~S3 D'sarb'oo~' \\ :. '" '" ~ ~ ~JO-;;::- < !Ii ~ Aj ~I,;r- '< 0 i';¡ Ocp,oe>. . /;¿,"~., ~--
Park '-... \'.----1 lu ~ ~ 0.. '«9.: O~~~ _~;;-:/-/ _ 1/
::,.. Si,dviUe "'. ~'i- ~--Lf~VO"';:: '" : ~... ~ §! .////,,- 'i __ _,
~ Cemetery ",!IC ..¡ I \ J.'~ .<3 ): ~ 8 g:!C ::.:: ~ ::.:: 8 ~ !!.. . '" .~~¿0-;~_--- !i ~ ,:- ¡:- .
"{ >- f-t.q(-...l.:}"vo ~ lu & ¡¡ a: ~ ~ ~ ~ a lu 1.1.. ~ -ø-·/ Ii "' '"
~ ~¡I McCULLAR J l'Û""'----_'''Y.-( City..sï;r 0 ~ 0 g,o.. 0.. 0.. 0.. PNEPIRK<5Ç~-':/"'E'- X ~ YS~ ~I
i<:r: 4tO~AJm 0;~<" Pack ---.'~ipk ¡;;I::! 0 iJ¡ ¡Sl~~,x".,;;;,-, , IB "A" è; BRUSHY'(iji
;;¡AND ;:iln\ I J- , ::> j ~ ~ t.I.J /0-/(' 1 , _ 0 TAMAR "'>
HIGH 0 ""\q.~. \ g} ~ Q) .9 ~.--' . J ç~~ ~
~ ~
"
,.
'"
Q
'i'
/'.
'\.').
" "Tarra,
Junio
No,
Co
26
WI
j,
ï J I-
,~
'"
II
,
z
«
HI
SEN-T BY: TXDOT
;12-12-94; 7:51
TXDOT...
817 370 6759;# 2
"
-" .~
TEXAS TRANSPORT AnON COMMISSION
VARIOUS
County
MINUTE ORDER
Page -L.. of .2- Pages
L
District V ARIOU~
WHEREAS, Title 23, United States Code, Sections 134 and 135, as amended by the
I~termodal Surface Trarisportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991, requires each designated
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the State, respectively, to develop a
Transportation Improveplent Program (TIP) as a condition to securing federal funds for
transportation projects Under either Title 23 or 49 of United States Code; and'
WHEREAS, Se¡ction 134(h) requires an MPO to develop its TIP in cooperation with the
state and affected transi~ operators; to provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of
transportation agency employees, other affected employee representatives, private providers of
transportation and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the
proposed TIP; and further requires the TIP to be updated at least once every two years and to be
approved by the MPO and the Governor; and
WHEREAS, Section 135(f) requires the State to develop a Statewide Transportation
lµlprovement Program (Sl1P) for all areas of the state in cooperation with those designated
MPOs; and further req~ires the Governor to provide citizens, affected public agencies,
rþpresentatives of transportation agency employees, other affected employee representatives,
private providers of trapsportation and other interested parties with a reasonable opponunity to
c'omment on the propoi.ed STIP; and
WHEREAS, Sections 134(h) and 135(t) specify the respective requirements and eligibility
qiteria for projects to be included in the respective TIPs; and
WHEREAS, by letter dated September 9, 1992, addressed to federal transportation
officials, the Honorable Ann W. Richards, Governor of Texas, has delegated to the Texas
Transportation Commission (the commission) those powers and responsibilities granted to her by
ISTEA, save and except the Recreational Trails programs; and
WHEREAS, the FY 1995-1997 Sl1P, which was approved by commission Minute
Order 104371, on September 29, 1994, included the FY 1994-1996 TIPs for the
Dallas-Fort Worth, and Houston MPOs; and
WHEREAS, the MPOs in the non-attainment areas of Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston
desire to replace their FY 1994-1996 TIPs in the FY 1995-199.7 STIP with new FY 1995-1997
TIPs as shown in Exhibit .. A "; and '
WHEREAS, the MPOs have presented these new TIPs for public comments; and
WHEREAS, the final rule on transportation conformity requires the TIP in a non-
~ttainment area to show a reduction in the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Nitrogen
Oxides (NOx); and
WHEREAS, the Houston TIP met the air quality transportation conformity requirements
as promulgated by the federal tinal rule on transportation conformity; and
EXHIBIT ··C··
~ .'
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
VARIOUS
County
MINUfE ORDER
Page -1- of -2- Pages
District VARIOUS
WHEREAS, the Dallas-Fort Worth conformity analysis met the VOC test and not the
N Ox test; and
WHEREAS, the Dallas-Fort Worth MPO has adopted its FY 1995-1997 TIP subject to
receiving a NOx waiver from the federal Environmental Protection Agency ~PA); and
WHEREAS, the commission, at its meeting on October 27, 1994, reviewed the drafts of
the TIPs for the non-attainment areas of Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston and by commission
Minute Order 104500 directed the executive director to conduct or have conducted a public
hearing on these TIPs and to report public comments together with the department's
recommendations or responses for final action by the commission at the earliest date consistent
with applicable policies and procedures; and
WHEREAS, widespread notice was made available for review and comment at each of the
department's twenty-five (25) district offices, and at the department's headquarters in Austin, to
provide input from citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agencies
employees. other affected employee representatives, private providers of transportation and other
interested parties in accordance with Sections 134 and 135 of the United States Code; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on these TIPs was held at the department's offices at
200 East Riverside Drive in Austin, Texas, on November 18, 1994; and
WHEREAS, oral and written comments received due to this hearing process were
analyzed and the department's responses and recommendations were submitted to the commission
for consideration as reflected in Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, the commission finds that the requisites of Section 134 have been satisfied as
they pertain to the MPOs' TIPs subject to receiving a NOx waiver from the EPA in the
Dallas-Fort Worth area;
NOW, THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY DELEGATED TO THIS
COMMISSION BY THE GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Houston
FY 1995-1997 TIP is hereby approved; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDEREQ that the Dallas-Fort Worth FY 1995-1997 TIP is approved
subject to receiving an EPA NOx waiver; and
EXHIBIT "C"
SE~T BY:TXDOT
;12-12-94
7:52
TXDOT-.
817 370 6759;# 3
TEXAS TRANSPORT AnON COMMISSION
VARIOUS
County
MINUfE ORDER
Page -L. of -L. Pages
District VARIOUS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FY 1995-1997 STIP is hereby amended by taking
appropriate actions on projects as shown in Exhibit" A. n
~~
Deputy Executive DIrector for
Transportation Planning and Development
Minute Number
:104b6'(1
Date Passed. ijOV 30 ~!1
EXHIBIT nc··
PAGE NO. 2
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FORT \lORfH
DALLAS-FORT \lORTH MPO
0... iOéE~ c. ,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 1997
DISTRICT NAME OR DESIGNATION PROJ. ID FED PROG FEDERAL COMMENTS
COUNTY LOCATION (FROPl) F. CLASS ST. CAT. STATE
LOCATION (TO) LANES PHASE LOCAL
CSJ DESCRIPTION OF \lORK LENGTH MPC TOTAL
-----------+------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH CS
TARRANT REGIONAL CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
COG 1/ 4339
7
o
STP-MM
4C
T
1106
S400,OOO 01/97
100,000
o
S500,000
9902-48-930 INCIDENT DETECTION-RESPONSE PROGRAM
0.001
-----------+------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH FH 3029 COG 1/ 1648 STP-HH S1,126,4OO 11/96
TARRANT THOUSAND OAK DR 4 4C 281,600
SH 26 IN HURST ON PRECINCT LINE RD 5 C,E 352,000
3125-o1-0101lIDEN FROM 5 TO 7 LANES 0.900 1106 $1,760,000
+------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH HH
TARRANT ON DEBBIE LANE FROM BUSINESS US 287-P
US 287 IN KANSFIELD
8352-02-001 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING TIIO LANES TO A DIVIDED FOUR LANE
TXDOT
4
2
STP-UH
40
C,E,R
1106
$1,161.,028 11/95
291,007
461,000
$1,916,035
1.100
--. -----------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------.-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH FM 2280 TXDOT STP-R S2,128,080 11/95
JOHNSON US 67 5 4F 532,020
FM 917 IN SECTIONS 2 C, E 0
2465-01-009 YIOEN EXISTING TYO LANES TO INCLUDE PAVED SHOULDERS 4.852 1106 $2,660,100
-----------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------------
FORT IIORTH FH 1187
TARRANT AT HKT RR EAST OF CRO~LEY
TXDOT
3
o
STP-RX
4G
C,E,R
1106
S2,317,440 08/97
579,360
o
$2,896,800
E
1330-01-029 RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION & APPROACHES
0.001
_----t
-----------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH as 114L COG 1/ 4161. CHAC $2,849,353 11/96
TARRANT SH 114 TO SH 26 IH GRAPEVINE 3 5 736.902
t. C.E,R 1,326,423
0353-07-903 CORRIDOR IMPROVEHENTS 1.900 1106 $4.912,677
-----------+------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT YORTH CS COG 1/2674A CMAC S6,56O,000 01/97
TARRANT FORT IIORTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 4 5 0
. 0 T 1,6loO,000
0902-48-982 REPLACE 79 BUSES 0.001 1106 $8,200,000
-----------+------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH CS COG ø 4314 CMAC $129,600 11/96
TARRANT PIPELINE RD / HELBOURNE RD IN HURST 4 5 0
. 4 C,E,R 110,l.OO
9902-48-944 INTERSECTION IHPROVEKEHTS 0.001 1106 $240,000
I ----------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT YORTH CS COG ø 4172 CMAC $250,000 11/96
TARRANT RUFE SNOII ãI GLENVIEII DR IN NORTH 4 5 0
........ RICHLAHD HILLS 4 C,E.R 250,000
"" 9902-48-946 INTERSECTION IMPROVEKENTS 0.001 1106 $500,000
-----------+------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH CS ;OG ø 4013 C5KAC $120,7500\10/97
TARRANT FIELDER RD/NORYOOD LN IN ARLINGTOH ~
4 C,E,R 54,250
9902-48-950 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 0.001 1106 $175,000
--+----------------------------------------------------------.-----------+--------+-----------+----------------
FORT IIORTH CS COG 1/ 4173 CHAC $268,500 11/96
TARRANT RUFE SHO\I FR~ KAREH DR TO IH 820 IN 4 5 0
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 4 C,E,R 268,500
9902-48-951 INTERSECTION IHPROVEHENTS 0.001 1106 $537,000
_______+__ ____________________-+-____+--_____+___ I -----------
FORT WORTH ICS COG ø 4015 CKAC S120,750 10/97
TARRANT P.ARK ROW DR ¡¡¡ NORIIOOD LN IN ARLINGTON 44 5 0
C,E,R 54,250
9902-48-954 INTERSECTION IHPROVEMENTS 0.001 1106 S175,000
I I -+--- I ----
FORT WORTH ¡cs COG ø 4012 CMQ S355,500 07/97
TARRANT OAKWOOD LH TO RANDOL HILL PARK OH RANDOL 4 5 0
PULL RD IN ARLINGTON 4 C,E,R 94,500
9902-48-955 CORRIDOR IKPROVEHENTS 0.001 1106 $450,000
or-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHASE: E=ENGINEERING, C=CONSTRUCTION, R=ROII, T=TRANSFER
EXHIBIT "C"