Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2095 ORDINANCE 2095 POSTPONED 1-8-1996 ORDINANCE NO. 2095 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER TWENTY-ONE (21); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a zoning district change to a Planned Development; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. ç- THAT, Planned Development District Number T~enty-One (21) be hereby established in the Case Number PZ 95-26, on the following described property: BEING a tract of land out of the William Mann Survey, Abstract NO.1 01 0, Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of a 37.001 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 4204, Pogo 116, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and portion of a 47.254 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 7627, Page 292, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and all of a tract of land described in a deed to Anita Hall and Michael Franklin Hall recorded in Volume 5859, Page 550, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in Hightower Drive for the northwest corner of the said 37.001 acre Graham tract, being by deed call in the south line of the J. Condra Survey, Abstract No. 311 and in the north line of the said William Mann Survey, THENCE South 89 degrees 45 minutes East, 512 feet along Hightower Drive to a point for the northwest corner of a 3.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 4204, Page 114, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds East, 208 feet along the south line of Hightower Drive to an angle point; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 42 seconds East, at 175.42 feet passing the northwest corner of said Hall Tract, at 384.13 feet passing the northeast corner of said Hall Tract and the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 7392, Page 101, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 547.21 feet to a point in Hightower Drive for the northeast corner of the 1.63 acre Graham tract and the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to J.W. Bailey and wife, Barbara Bailey recorded in Volume 5359, Page 554 and Volume 5923, Page 321, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West, at 30.0 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 378.88 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the southwast corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, 226.06 feet along the south line of the Bailey tract to a 1/2- inch Tebar rod found for its southeast corner, ' , . THENCE North 01 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds East, at 345.82 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 375.82 feet to a point for the northeast corner of the Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 19.91 feet to a point for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Walter Charles Williamson and Debra Denae Williamson recorded in Volume 10378, Page 1915, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds West, at 30.0 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 375.80 feet to a fence post for the southwest corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East. 151.0 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the southeast corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE North 02 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds East, at 345.25 feet passing the south line of Hightower Drive, at 354.98 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod found, in all 375.25 feet to a point for the northeast corner of the Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 49.79 feet to a point for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Ezra E. Bland and wife, Amma Bland recorded in Volume 4777, Page 499, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 02 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, at 20.27 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod found, at 30.0 feet passing the approximate south line of Hightower Drive, in all 374.50 feet to a 1/2-inch pipe found for the southwest corner of the said Bland tract; ç THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, at 311.5 feet passing the southeast corner of the Bland tract and the southwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to A. Hubert Hawkins recorded in Volume 8903, Page 566, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 544.64 feet to a 114-inch rebar rod found for the southeast corner of the Hawkins tract being in the west line of Morgan Meadows Addition to the City of North Richland Hills according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-13, Page 50, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 05 minutes 46 seconds East, 1568.77 feet along the east line of Morgan Meadows Addition to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Jerry R. Winter~ and wife Shirley G. Winters recorded in Volume 6550, Page 882, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds West, 199.78 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the northwest corner of the Winters tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 04 minutes 58 seconds East, 519.91 feet along the west line of the Winters tract to a 1/2- inch rebar rod found for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to T. Jeff Graham and wife, Vickie D. Graham recorded in Volume 7825, Page 579, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 15 minutes 54 seconds West, 300.0 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northwest corner of the T. Jeff Graham tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes East, 168.03 feet along the west fine of the T. Jeff Graham tract to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the north line of Chapman Drive for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in deed to the City of North Richland Hills recorded in Volume 8120, Page 1710, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes West, 449.17 feet along the north line of Chapman Drive and the north fine of the North Rich/and Hills tract to an 'X' cut in concrete found for the northwest corner of the North Richland Hills tract and the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Richfield Subdivision, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-169, Page 18, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 54 seconds West, 1302 feet along the east line of Block 1 of said Richfield Subdivision to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northeast corner of Lot 18, Block 1; THENCE West (base bearing by deed in Vol. 4204, Page 116, DR.T.C.Tx.). 1306.59 feet to 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northwest corner of Lot 27, Block 6, Richfield Subdivision, being the southeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to HKEM#2 - Tom Ellis & Ted Pittman by deed recorded in Volume 7861, Page 915, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Ordinance No. 2095 Page 2 C, Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line. D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. E. Garage Entry Requirements: Lots around the perimeter of Tract I that do not have alleys shall be restricted to a maximum of one front entry garage per every four lots. The remaining three lots shall have front-swing, side or rear entry garages. Lots with alleys shall be restricted to rear-entry garage access. F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in Planned Development Number 29 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first ftoor, whichever is greater. The area of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement. The following de~elopment restrictions shall apply to Tract II: A. Lot and Area Requirement~ Minimum Lot Area: 7,000 square feet; however, the average lot size of all lots in Tract II L-shall be at least 7,700 square feet Minimum Lot Width 65 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet Minimum Front Building Line: 25 feet Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet Minimum Rear Building Line: 1 0 feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 1,800 square feet Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet Rear Yard Open Space Area: A minimum of 20% of the total lot area shall be reserved as an open space in the rear portion of every yard. The open space shall extend from one side property line to another side property line, abutting the rear property line, and not protruding beyond the two most extreme corners of the main structure. No part of the residential building and/or dwelling unit may be constructed so as to occupy any portion of the open space rear yard. B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. C. Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line. D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. E. Garage Entry Requirements: All lots in Tract II may be allowed front-entry garage access. However, lots facing the collector street shall not have front entry garage access. F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in Planned Development Number 29 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first ftoor, whichever is greàter. The area of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement. 5. Alleys: All alleys shall be constructed within a 15-foot easement located at the rear of the lots. The alley shall consist of 10-feet of pavement constructed to street standards as required by the Public Works Design Manual. Ordinance No. 2095 Page 4 THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes West, at 1320.21 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northeast corner of the said HKEM#2 tract, in all 1345.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 85.55 acres of land, more or less. This property is located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road. 2. THAT, the development regulations for Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21) shall be as follows: 1. Purpose: Planned Development District Number Twenty-One is intended to provide for single family detached residential dwelling units. 2. Permitted Uses: Single family detached dwelling units, community center, and park land. 3. Subdivision De~ign Criteria: A collector-type street with a 60-foot right-of-way shall be provided through this development, connecting Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. The street shall be designed in a curvilinear fashion. The general layout of Tract " (sO~..,9f the proposed drainage channel) shall consist of as many cul-de-sacs as feasible in order to keep the number of lots fronting on the collector street to a minimum. 4. Development Restrictions: Planned Development Number 29 shall be divided into two distinct development areas. Tract' shall be the area north of the proposed drainage channel shown on the Site Plan. Tract II shall be the area south of the proposed drainage channel shown on the Site Plan. - The following development restrictions shall apply to Tract I: A. Lot and Area Requirements Minimum Lot Area: Lots with alleys 8,000 square feet Lots without alleys 8,500 square feet Minimum Lot Width Lots with alleys 65 feet Lots without alleys 70 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet Minimum Front Building Line: 25 feet Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet Minimum Rear Building Line: Lots with alleys 20 feet Lots without alleys 10 feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 2,000 square feet Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet Rear Yard Open Space Area: A minimum of 20% of the total lot area shall be reserved as an open space in the rear portion of every yard. The open space shall extend from one side property line to another side property line, abutting the rear property line, and not protruding beyond the two most extreme corners of the main structure. No part of the residential building and/or dwelling unit may be constructed so as to occupy any portion of the open space rear yard. B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. Ordinance No, 2095 Page 3 6. Hike and Bike Trail Access: Four access points to the proposed hike and bike trail along Calloway Branch shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats. 3. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein, 4. THA T, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance Number 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development District Number Twenty-Nine (29), shall remain in effect regarding this property. 5. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is n~reby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinancë are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalidÖr unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 19th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995. dik /Ø /ß, I . ~ ØZ/?¿//__:#-JP.~:., Secretary, Planning and Zòñing'Commission ----------..-,'. .'. .-~' \ . --. ~::=::.----~/_~ . "-=-~j Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8th DAY OF JANUARY 1996. Ordinance No. 2095 Page 5 - ATTEST: Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, '1 City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City ~ .:.- Ordinance No, 2095 Page 6 PZ Minutes - Page 5 December 19,1995 5. PZ 95-26 Mr. MacDougall asked how many bedrooms were in the house. Mr, Bourland stated four. Mr. Baxter stated the regulatory atmosphere has reached a point to where cities cannot pr ent or exclude these types of uses in neighborhoods. He stated that is why there is a one-hal' distance requirement between facilities. Mr. Mike Chaney, 5544 Shady Meadow, came forward to speak. nursing home in his neighborhood. Ms. Margaret McCarley, 5600 Havana Drive, came forvvard to speak. the request. She stated her concerns about increased traffic in the a There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield c ,Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 95-25, subject to accommodate extra cars. The motion was seconde ç- Mr. Lueck stated his is n"ot convinced there is or w: e a traffic problem in the area. circular driveway being constructed Mr. Baxter. Mr. Davis stated most of the traffic comes fro Aires. e high school down Meadow Oak to Buenos Mr. Miller stated if had more iflsight i time, he might be in favor of a circ how many cars will sit at this property for long periods of driveway. Chairman Barfield stated the wheelchairs. way is too narrow to accommodate persons with crutches or in ion regarding the off-street parking issue. ariveway could be expanded to the property line to accommodate more cars. B that the goal is to prevent the house from looking any different from the others in ood. He stated he would be opposed to making the driveway look like a parking lot. k stated they could reduce the requirement to three off-street parking spaces. . Davis amended his original motion to approve PZ 95-25, subject to providing space for three , 6-0. Public Hearing to consider the request of HSM Development to rezone Tracts 3, 3A3, 3A4, 3A3A, 3B, 3A3B, 3D and 4Al; Man Survey, Abstract 1010, from AG Agriculture to a Planned Development. (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) Mr. LeBaron stated the property in question is 85 acres in size. He stated the owner is requesting a Planned Development to accommodate residential uses. He stated the property would be split into two different areas with different restrictions, but only sin[.le family development would be allowed. He stated some lots would allow front entry access, and others would have alley access. Mr. LeBaron stated that the lots are generally R-2 type lots with R-1 type housing. He stated that building setbacks and rear yard open space need to be addressed. Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the req uest to come forvvard at th is time. Mr. Don Plunk, HSM Development, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Dallas, came forvvard to speak. He stated he is president of the development group. He stated they are requesting rezoning from PZ Minutes - Page 6 December 19, 1995 agriculture to a planned development district. He stated they are requesting a planned development district because their proposal does not fit neatly into an existing zoning district. Mr Plunk described the proposed regulations. He stated that drainage patterns are one of the most pressing concerns with the proposed development. He stated a part of this development will take water from the north and divert it to the Calloway Branch channel. Mr. Plunk stated the development will provide access to the hike and bike trail, and provide a private community center for residents of the development. He stated 15 % of the lots in tract one could have front entry access. He stated the density of the development is lower than the R-2 district. Mr. Plunk requested that the front building line be 25-feet, the rear building line be 15-feet on lots without alleys, the rear building line be 20-feet on lots with alleys, the side building lines be six feet, and that a 20% rear yard open space be required. He stated their development plan does not include a direct through street because of the number of lots facing the street. He stated circulation is provided through the area, but not a direct street. Mr. Plunk stated the development plan meets the concerns of the City Council from a previous meeting. He stated they are competing in a market with Watauga and south Keller. He requested approval of the request. 'There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the request, Chairman Barfield asked for those wishing to s¡:>eak in opposition to the request to come forward at this time. ç- Mr. Jerrell Stout, 7216 Chapman Drive, came forward to speak. He asked if there were plans to improve the drainage cñannel at Chapman Drive. Mr. Plunk stated no, the channel has already been designed for future development upstream. Mr. Stout stated his concerns ª-bout the ability of the channel to accommodate additional water. Mr. Davis stated the city has plans to expand the Calloway Branch channel. He stated the developer is taking the water to a recognized watercourse as required by the city. He stated the city is responsible for designing a channel that has the capacity to carry the water being fed into the channel. Mr. Steve Lane, 6848 Megan Lane, came forward to speak. He asked if the land would be graded evenly with his property. He stated the land is already higher than his rear yard. Mr. Davis stated there will most likely be some grading. Mr. Lane asked if there is a bridge proposed from the Richfield neighborhood to provide access for children to walk to school. Mr. Plunk stated they will be dedicating additional right-of-way for the expansion of the Calloway Branch drainage channel. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck stated his concern about front entry garages. He stated Little Ranch Road probably cannot carry any more traffic. He stated there is a need for a north/south road in this area. Mr. Plunk stated this development would not put any more traffic on Little Ranch Road since it provides direct access to Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. Mr. Baxter stated his concern about the need for another collector street. He stated the connection to the trail systems is an asset to this developrJ'lent and to the city. Chairman Barfield stated that collector streets are needed in this area. He stated he has no problem with the front entry garages if they were set back from the building line. Mr. Davis asked how wide a C2U right-of-way is. PZ Minutes - Page 7 December 19,1995 6. PS 95-38 7. PS 95-39 8. PS 95-44 Mr. LeBaron stated 60-feet of right-of-way and 41-feet of pavement. Mr. Plunk stated his major concern is a visible straight shot between Hightower and Chapman. Mr. Davis stated they could split the street in widths of rights-of-way from north to south. Mr. Baxter stated a more curved street would be a better solution. Mr. Plunk stated there will be lots fronting on this through street. He stated the lots in the south end may need to be 7,000 square feet to accommodate cul-de-sacs to keep lots from fronting a collector street. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve Pl 95-26 subject to the following requirements: a collector-type street with 60-feet of right-of-way be provided through the development with a curvilinear design; more cul-de-sac lots be shown in Tract /I (south); the lots in Tract /I be a minimum of 7,000 square feet with an average lot size of 7,700 square feet; the four access points to the hike and bike trail be shown on the preliminary plat; the front building lines be 25-feet; the rear buildin~lines be 15-feet on lots without alleys; the rear building lines be 20-feet on lots with alleys; the siãe-building lines be 6 feet on all lots; a 20% rear yard open space be required; and no front entry garages be ållowed on the collector street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 6-0-:- ed at ortheast corner of Smithfield Road and North Tarrant Parkway) Mr. Le on stated this is a 44-acre tract of land zoned R-2 single family. He stated the developer has agree all comments except for one street intersection that does not meet the criteria. Mr. Davis stat he Commission should not enforce the provisions the Little Bear Creek corridor ordinance for thi at since it was submitted prior to that being adopted. Mr. Lueck asked that involved in the develop minutes reflect the Commission's concern since was not notified or t or approval of the flood plain ordinance for Little Bear Creek. Mr. Davis made the motion t prove PS 95-38 subject to engineers comments, with the waiver of the street intersection. The 'on was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 5-0, with Ms. Spicer abstaining due to finan I involvement in the property. Request of Robert McCauley and Steven ster for Replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition. (Located at 8851 Grapevine HigH y) Mr. Baxter made the motion to approve PS 95- was seconded by Ms. Spicer. The motion carried The motion Request of Pack Properties for Preliminary Plat of Five 5t ord Addition. (Located at the southwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and NE Loop 820) Mr. LeBaron stated this is a 19 acre tract zoned C-2 Commercia d 1-2 Medium Industrial. He stated the only issue involves sewer service to a small lot at the no west corner. He stated if approved as proposed, the lot will not have sewer service. Mr. Davis asked if the developer would agree to a note on the plat to not permits on Lot 5 until all utility services have been provided. - Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 95-26 PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Planning and Zoning Commission: December 14, 1995 City Council: January 8, 1996 REQUEST: AG Agriculture to PO Planned Development APPLICANT: HSM Development, Dallas TX PROPERTY OWNER: Billy Graham, North Rich/and Hills TX SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately B5.50 acres iocated in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing house and accessory buildings. Very few trees. Existing ponds loc'lled in the northwest and south portions of the property. Property generally slopes-to the_south. PROPOSED USE: Single family residences ALLOWED USE: Planned Development uses are stated in the adopting ordinance. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES North South East West R-7-MF, R-4-D, and R-2-1400: existing duplexes, single family residences and school R-3-1S00 and R-3: existing single family residences R-1-S: existing single family residences and acreage tracts C-1: vacant commercial property DRAINAGE Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that the south portion of the property lies within both the 100-year and SOO-year flood plains. THOROUGHFARE PLAN Primary access to this property is from Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in this area. This request is consistent with the plan. ZONING HISTORY This property was initially zoned AG Agricunure in 1967. No zoning change requests have been submitted on this property. PLATTING HISTORY This property is currently unplatted. The developer will submit a Preliminary Plat of this property at a future date. D "/ - I. . , ^·o~. · ~ . ~/' x. ',_ V . , , , " 'r'-'=-.-v -~ iE· I - ;" '-c:----' \~\.:r~ ~ - \ .o"<m,.L-d..\ - \- ~,:;:: - ~ .:eKe,,. . I - I - ¡- - I - - ~~-f",_: .- ;\~~,.~'...O\\\\-I :\~\\-\-/_/_ ~_ -: -I-/-I-i-I-/-I ~~_~~ :1; :: ~I;I;~-g: ~ - -.. ~ -\ I \ I -c::~'oz,. """ _ I _ _ _ _ II I I 1;'- ;;>':.=\õ, I - -I- :1:1:/=1;/_/_ :'t"<:"'('~I~ :I~ :I~ ;;:I:~:I; , \\"\ I ~ _ ",...,,.""'" ~._ ','. I"" = !; .£'/:, 'll=,:;::I'I :~:1 + ,'I' 1' '1'1';~1' '1'1' :~ml'w!: I ,~:t :, I ~{\~7""1 ; /' lï~.~\8 ~ c ,..q:·:~Litrl:;u-;;q, a~\'~ \0 ~ 1¡. - ~-' ~ 'ª' 3_ :_ ',I ~'ï' .¡ H.I.: ·1·/·/ ~ I ;' -0.\-1'1+:1"" ',., "/:¡'I" ~ ; ; .: v i=1'/-/:!-j-¡" ~I" "/" liI~¡r!aT;:' : : of! .. I I + ~(i-~ -. -¡"/-- ~I~I ~ ~"-_. /_. ~ ~ ; ': ê.= ~ a9;~;" ~Ef I -:- : ,~ -. - - :' !i : : . _ 7;.~ ~ ~::- :; '+ I I ~;- ~- :. I = = ; ; ; - - - : _ !i _ '"' x "';-r-;- !:! f:t: f ~ I I ; --:- · - : - -";; - ; ~ !i '""t-r-;- ~ - ' .. --;- ~ ; - : - rrn- '''''''u,07¡i-¡-' /~ ' . 1"- _;: ~r-:-~ : :-: 114=/:J. ·N4~="--,.L.¡-h9 ./... _ ~ II \~_ :"ff!~roi!*l !~L:/,:': :I~I:~~:': ':,::' ;~~:.~~~- ~~ !~\,,: ¡ ; ; ~:;::.+=¡:= ~ . \ -f- ~ 7 '~"i~ ~~ ~J~:~ ~ óZ. - - - I H~_ - _ _ _ Ie- __ ...! + ¿ ~ -+- -¿ r-:- ¡--:..." TI"\;:; - - -1- .1--= )z, r ' 7 -,-, :t;=;:: ~ ~ FI"" ±' · ~'\.:~ ~:~ -j- -I- ì'rJ;t,e'leU1"" . .. - ~ 1: .. - '"¡jõ ..... -;,- ~~O¡ r _Y~ ' "¡ -, ì. "". ...:J:. ,,- ~\ \ d~'60 - -:; ,,- ~~~'" r ':- '\0. :; - , - Ii : - ì - 18= ; ) \: = = ~\ T -; r--;- ~ . "r ~'2, ,p :; t-:- "?-~ :; - r-:- - I I W;.IJcs -=- ~:; 1'- . · 1;.'1:.\' ~ '::"',~r-:-f~r-=- = ..... ~ . " -,' -. ,?I~:- - W~ ~ ~'-'\. ~ "\ II ...-- . : -:-' -r-=- ~ = '/ - ". A"""mo OIl - - r\. ' ~ '\.;"" - , ï"' _ ~¡+±¡.t;:!::¡ :,:: .¡. -I- + ' 'I'~' ' -I- '1'1' " ''-,- ,,'\. '\. '\. '\. '\. "~:- .~r V im ~' :t: '\. '\. '\ \. '\i~ \. '\ '\ '\ '\ l'\. '\ "\ '\.;" '\. '\. '\. '\. '- ;; I /.~ i'~~'>;~- :~ ::; l\ \ ~'\ :; ¡It.t_m, :;,("..\~ ; I..! \--=- : I:; ~ \ ,~"; r=- ~ :f: I: \". '-;!: '01·' L""ri -, , j I ¿ f ~ - , -.. 'i , _ .:......... I" 0 ~ ....h " \. 1/: ' .' , ; t\.. ' '" :\ '\ \ '\ '\ '\ '\ V" '\ '\ '\ '\ '\.:;:. '1': it :: . I - t - . "-' I.. ... w .. : r I ! _:. 81' :;~r----....: II I :----.. ./ l - ..:§ -' i; : 2 .~ ~ 't I 1."1 ¡: ! ~; .. - .. I I 17 .. - ("0 _ ii, ','. , .,. ,., li.iilibiê:l ,'¡c-,~~ ,~;;:2! ',.L· ! < /'~:-i . .¡,~ ~ Î'~f'i.~ '~;'":-~1 I . I .. cD - :~:!""''''~:''~.:¡~... ~~..J"! ""'"..uj(~ ~r-~I-:¡âf-~~::' : t~f t--:"~3;~ "ÄW 'i ' I r~· !I',~ë"''l¡'b~¡ Ñ1~:;fJ .~. ~I- "./,0.. I ,e"'I" i r¿-¡ ~ !.l ; ¡ = ~ ø-:-1' ~ = ~ r:-iìS.W~~J~1 ; 5" i ; i LL¡~ 10 I . I "'-=-j ~2..~ :;, _ :~~-!_~- :~.~~" ' : -hi :~ H J~t'1 ~171~tj " T ' Ii)! ! :; o ;. " . - ¡ _ UTTU: ¡"'!\ICII A. ~ ":b :; " :; ¡ " - ':<. ~ 'C. ... " - ':>Y "" - <::> " .~ " - .. :; :; I , :; - I I / . ! !i - -; ~ I' ; ~ - , ,. ! 'i~ !; . l \ . j·:,.H:Ji , .~ ..Y'-..... I --I! ~-~~~~ . s·-..o(.-'r ; I'¡ _ I . ;. . .r.j ! ,i, _, - - i Pag e G H T 0 YLE ~.... ....~... ~ . - - --1- , ) ~t}1:, \ ~ ""..¡'~1:"" IIIXHAM 01. , 't:I'L'l; . . - -F-~-1~~ 1- - " III"j-.r-) " II 10 ASTON 01. , . '. "I" " .. .. ..; 1: ': ): j2' :: 14 ) I I; ¡ H, I" " R 4 D \ì?~ ~ \dd:~~idd - - --\ --,.;- \ ,?OS þ..G " IC -;;;;,- ~\\.,\., , S \Aú\O :--,",. ~ R-7-MF I~ ~-;;:T~ , - - l' " - - , . , - R-2-1400 ;; [~z ~ -'>~L~'" 2 ¡ ....,C\\ ..¡ ; ¿~)ë~f~ \~I~, :---,-",' o -';'~ ~ .., - __. + ((VIEW II. ~ , : i /" I 101" I " Ii ~ ~~.,.",."",.:;, .. <J IR, JDL '" JC HLJCl L. 1"1" "\"1" ""Ii/· ~ ORlffHLO Cia, -:"\--::-" -;;-- ..)~ JJ ~"..¡:;~~ g~ -- ~ t---!!.. I "(~~ IJ I'" '.: ~ ~ Ht.SWICI; 01. ~ ~ - " " 20 "~ Ik j,ldU I;'>. ~...jA. IH JC1 TIit.JQ - IN. JtI - AG ow , It -- -- TH. JA." AG TR. JAJ ç -- ~ " ow -7- 1r- ~ - ~ - 17 0 -< 16 :; - - .. _.. .. ... ow - 0 L z i 1 , . > . 1 . . '0 " " ,-0 2 I ~ L'· , <: in :z: " l' 10 " ,. " " " .. 1J :z: :; ~ 32 Page: 86) -!!- .. ~ - " - .. - ~ ~ OJ - 1J - " - ,. - .. ü~ Q~ ...,~ ~ .. ~ f :: I " " - 10 .;:y . "11¡\1'1:J~o ':, l' 1J1:1"1,01,~' II W(c;"N IN. ~ I 11 " 1. ~~ j 1¡ICHflLLO 01: 1'-10 ~~" 15!~±~ 14 ~ I 1 17 10 '1 1 ~ 11 '.~\ ?~1~j~ ~ U_ _ 11 1~ c.\Ìß 1'2 ~ ~¿'\\~~" ~ u _ r'.'t\\,; _~~QU_ ~"v'~ 1\ L 10 " ~ 11 I~ J:~r--;- - ã r-=-,,-.--- !:: ---._ 11 >' 14 .....' _ ! '% - >1 1J \ II 10 ,.. 10 IJ Q~_ -~ ~ ~ 7 q'- r-~ rl' 1-'- - : r-: t:~ \~~ -7- \. . j'~ " . - , ,1·1, \ '. :- 01 1 , ± J 6 j ..riA 01. J I- 1--- 1~/1J!'I' " ~ 'l~__ 14_ :ï'4 IJ f- " f- '2 "f- o " Of- = 10 x- U . .f- . -- " 16 " 1. 1t JO )1 W[CAN Lp..!. > 1 I ,\ . ., , ..L., 1.1... ADOPTED: March 22. THROUGH: R-2-1 óQO \ 11( I C I : 1« :'~ 1 - R -1 - 5 ---: 1896 It(. ~I ,I¡.¡ ;'1' ~ '-.,;.J - -- --- '" Jr.J I: 1101 .... Rr-2 1 25 , I I ., I i I -- j "., u, I ! R- 1 - S i .... 1361 " "" - .. '" " Q" " I '" .., .... 'I I .. .1 '" ... -I '~ i .. I <..> r., I r., '" '-\- J r., :c. - I ..., I I :t: ! "" ... I :1 "'< :;,¡ '- I JI] I 1 ~ 1 IE 114,1" I r' = 400' October 10. 1994 78-43ó Page: 65 ~CCCCCQCCQoa~=~~cc~~~ , 'O~ ^~.l.ov NHOf.. ' "~ n Z J I ~ r-~~~ B ·O'tl 'ç'9öq an .o.n.", ".. Dà o m OV' ~~ _ ~:i . "..," l 2: :: n ~ _ ~\\~;m~ c=J. c=J ~ t=:=J IJI::::J,--"~V"'\, J n V:) O~~V~VH:> Ð~ ~ æ # O?; ~ \ ~ g ""'" '"'' -:5tt - -2 o ~j ~. ........:. i 8 ~ ¡ Ž, ~ ~c U =Ih r;l '", ."." :nf" u " ,,,.,,, -1:1.,... _ ,=to Lr _ o '" ".... ~~ :: ò ~ on 'f. : 4 - ~ g;: ......,,, <p= ==== =.4.== ~=IH~Gc:mllD!Jn~~= g.. ......,.. fJ .. ......... n v J Ð . M Q. .~,~ M 0 ~ u " ..J ~ 0.,......... fi .. ......... :r 8 ~ o B 0 ~ Ð n . ........ ~ o g I ,0 ·'·"'''.h ; ~ g N .. '''''' .",., _O".,.,,::¡ ~ It- "..' ; -....." ø.10'~ .. ........ \~ c g ~ ..." ...... .. ....: \.. \ ......... r....'7á'H~ 0 \- r"\ .... 0 .".,....;... "; Ð o .....0.,.... n v J 1: ~ ~ ., 2 N % ..'".".. "" On 0 I a r- ...-; U 0 _"." ~ tJ :> .,' 0 .. ,,0>' n .þ. ¡ Ð "'.. ." '. . D " ".."" u C ''''0;; J ~ r-z"J~'~: ,.... \. \ ..""' ~ 0 ,..,..~; 1 tJ ! ",,,. ''''''. .. .. ".. n c:n:J ~ (J' ~ '. ~ ~ C:IC::JCICI r""CCCCCCCCC'7CC?,C~CC "'=cccc'fi'ccojCCccc~ccccm"''''''~C n Z J 1 ....~.... n l J ~ ¥ ~O~ S3N~V.lS ..,,:~ 0 ./ ·;n l J '0' 20 ë g ; OD - . '" " ."",. ~ 6 ..;,',~:::,~ .., 1& " [ ." "".'" <J1 II o ~ß [] ,n no"·..·· U tl l o . n . o ..",.'~.~.~ {1 ~cccc~mœ~ n nz""' Û^, {1 J []'j , ~ n 00,.' ~, -.1 ~ /) ~oO.!)Og r. '- ~ U o 0 ~ Un. ~ 8g ~.- 7~~- g ~.. ..".. .."".. % ~~ . r :"'iI"'...~anIIU"'''~ U 'i d "....1) " ~Ú9 . ~u "-' ~ V..J..'t'"",\ . -IQ nllln'J....' n___.. U~d .'\1 n..../'H "n It....,,:> ~ ;' 'Ia J'3( ....'mJ i i' ,,< ;' . _,0 -,' ." .' " " o' ... ·.0 .00...0.... ?.. ::r: ll'~~ 0 ,",,1114'" , " .' .. ...\ .~'.l".....d ....\ ",...,¡~ ~~J\"" ' ...:; ~ (ì ",,,,, 7,~~ "..."",, ! .. .... - , o - ~ .....".un < j .; ...... ~ .. " "'.'1..· , o ~ 4 ·'4111i"'" - - ..~ ¡ I'.ln... o o 6.-"" O.O,IIU. . õ o III ..u""Utl'''J' \1..1..... '" hl..l) "I "'''\''IU)<OI: " , c c z:::::JCIl1ID:1Dm:Dt::=Jt=:=Jt:::::Jt::::=J np:) z :; 0 ~ , ~ .., I~ "Ulh ~ .., þ ;¡; C ,''',,.,,",.: :u () ~ þ () .,. () ... r .., > -< Z 0 r ;¡; ~ r .., r (f. (JJ () .¡ ( -< C r ... .. ~. ..(":.) ff o < :; g . ;;0 C -n m o - .<:11 "OU., U"u .1"1 . VI z O( <C o ;;0 ,0 ~ o .;, ;.J ..~ , ,APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE ?Iease prim all res:¡onses OTY OF NOA'T!i RlC>tu.ND ""w..s l T.D1 ",,£. LOOP ~ NOFITH ~ "'u...s, TEXAS 70' :\0 5T7·5ð'·5.5'5 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION /t4,1ME C;~ ÃPPI.JC..1NT I.J.GéNT' HSM Development, Inc. - Don Plunk, President s.¡:¡¿:, ..IDOAESS OF "PPUc..NT: 1100 Providence Towers West - 5001 Spring Valley Road I TELEP/-fON/fi MJM6E¡¡ OF .u>t'UCA/'IT: 214/419-4054 or Y I sr" r:= I ZIP OF ,.p,oUCJ.H1': Dallas, Texas 75244 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMA TION N.,JÑlê CF ~,qOP:¡:;;..,. OWNER: Billy and Ernestine Graham S.r.E:. ..IDOAESSOFPACPERTYOWNER: 5020 Mark IV Parkway On'I!>7"TEIZlPOF PAOPE."ITYO_E¡¡: ç_ Fort Worth, Texas 76106 - I rELE?HOHE NUMSé¡¡ OF P'ROPIfi¡¡TY OWNE¡¡, 817/ó26-4435 LE';;"I. OESCi'iIPTION 0': PfiOPEí'fTY -E¡¡E ZONING OSTRJ~.-(;;<ANGE IS BEING ilEOUESTEO: 85.0 Acre Tr~ct - W. Mann Survey, Abst. 1010 ~. ;;E:, ""DRESS" r LOc.. TlON ~RE ZONING CfSTRJÇ o."NGê IS 3EING AEOUES7Ej)' No Add:!:"ess - PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST o.AAENT ZONING: Agriculture 1 PROPOSED ZONING: I PROPOSEO USE OF i'RtJPC..ïrT T; Plan -Development Single-Family Residential 1-1'-'SCN FOR C"'''NGE: Provide for the construction of single-family housing units. SU~y OR MAP" T'T "eMED "S AECVlREO BY rHls F<::JRAr CXJ YES ONO I "T'T "eM..FFlo..lIfT FROIot P1IOP'!fiRTY OWNER 11= APPUC»rT IS NOT ~ C!J r:s D NO 1.If!rf!DY certify that the aDOve mformation is CDrrect to tne Dest of my knowledg!!. O,tr:: /(-/?-?jS-- r; \ Your Name (printed) IJf)AJ r¿VV)L Signature Yd~ ?ART 4. OFPICE USE ONL Y ~~ ,:I .1 : :1:,,"::,,-,= .-=":'¡;'N~ .:~;-: DYES c::J NO CAD, NO I ;-';'XES ?.JJO' I ;;':S;:N¡'¡M5iE,:¡ 0 YES DNO I UENS P"10' o YlfiS CJIYO FE: s:>a:l co I "SSESSMENTS P.&'O' o YES ONO 1"'5 .ACC:*GlO<:n ... nor Of s::n«1.4-=' :cw ø....oc n..f'W"Ç ....... ne .-:IO~Qf"'I - r.. rs r.:;_.ea. C/if ==VNC;L ,"'¿,.I.;:;' NG O..t ïE ~CNrNG 01SrRI(;7 C"'''NGE "PROVED, ST ,p'.U TlONS. - - ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE P~lol2 CD-044 CI·~ Billy J. Graham & Ernestine Graham 5020 Mark IV Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76106 Phone 817-626-4435 Fax 817-626-2528 November 14, 1995 City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 Re: Rezoning of 85 Acres ç Dear Sir, - We own approximately 85 acres of land located in the W. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010 in the city of North Richland Hills. We have been informed that HSM Development, Inc. intends to request a zoning change on this property from agricultural to a planned development single family residential. This letter evidences our consent for HSM Development, Inc. to request the proposed zoning provided that the conditions of the planned development are as stated on Exhibit A attached hereto with regard to the property described or depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. We request that the City Council of North Richland Hills not vote on the requested zoning at the first meeting of the City Council at which the requested zoning is considered. Rather, we request that the City Council take public input with regard to the zoning request at that meeting and then, at that meeting, table a vote on the requested zoning to a date not earlier than 30 days after the date of the first meeting. This request to table a vote of the zoning case is made to allow the sale of the subject property to be consumed before the City Council approves the ordinance containing the requested zoning. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Y~tr~~:~ .1#f# ;raham S; .l ~ -i---J¿ // (Lø/.¿J2;:J;(_þ4dP- Ernestine Graham January 8, 1996 Page 4 There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to deny Ordinance No. 2094. After considerable discussion by the Council, motion to deny carried 6-0. 10. PZ 95-26 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF HSM DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE TRACTS 3, 3A3, 3A3A, 3B, 3A3B, AND 4A1, MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010 FROM AG AGRICULTURE TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 2095 (LOCATED IN THE 7000 BLOCK OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE) PUBLIC HEARING RECESSED City Manager Sanford read a letter from the applicant requesting a continuance of the public hearing until January 22. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. No one wished to speak. Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to recess the Public Hearing to the January 22 Council meeting. Motion carried 6-0. *11. PS 95-39 REQUEST OF ROBERT MCCAULEY AND STEVEN HESTER FOR REPLA T OF LOT 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2, WALKER BRANCH ADDITION (LOCATED AT 8851 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) APPROVED 12. GN 95-150 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE NAME OF PARKMAN DRIVE TO ROGERS DRIVE- ORDINANCE NO. 2090 (POSTPONED AT THE DECEMBER 11, 1995 COUNCIL MEETING) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to deny Ordinance No. 2090.