HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 1999-03-11 Minutes
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
MARCH 11, 1999 -7:00 p.m.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Richard Davis at 7:00 p.m.
2.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Chairman
Richard Davis
Ted Nehring
Doug Blue
James Laubacher
Ron Lueck
Mark Wood
Don Bowen
CITY STAFF
Mg. Dir of Dev
Planning Director
Recording Sec'y
Asst. Director PW
Staff Engineer
Steve Norwood
Marcy Ratcliff
Valerie Taylor
Kevin Miller
Julia Skare
3.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 1999
APPROVED
Mr. Laubacher, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to approve the minutes of
February 25, 1999, provided Mr. Bowen's name was added to the list of
Commissioners in attendance. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Norwood introduced the new Planning Director, Marcy Ratcliff to the
Commissioners and gave them an overview of her background, stating that staff
was extremely fortunate to get her.
Page 1 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
4.
PS 99-03
REQUEST OF RICK SIMMONS FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK
1, VILLAS ON BEAR CREEK ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 8000 BLOCK
OF DAVIS BOULEVARD)
APPROVED
Mrs. Ratcliff gave an overview of the case before the Commission and stated
that the applicant was present for any questions they may have. She stated that
staff recommends approval of this request subject to engineers comments as
well as notarized letters of permission referencing the approved plan sheet for
the grade to drain swale from adjacent property owners and, provided all
necessary offsite easements, metes and bounds and exhibits are obtained.
Chairman Davis stated that the Commission had been informed that the
applicant has progressed in obtaining the necessary documents and easements,
stating that the applicant is aware some documentation will need to be made
available prior to proceeding to City Council.
Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Nehring, moved to approve PS 99-03. The motion
carried unanimously.
Page 2 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
5.
PZ 99-02
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF BILL DAHLSTROM
FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM C2-COMMERCIAL TO PD-PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT ON LOT 3R1, BLOCK 50, NOR'EAST ADDITION.
(LOCATED AT 5205 - 5217 DAVIS BOULEVARD)
APPROVED
Mrs. Ratcliff explained that the P&Z originally heard this case at their February
11, 1999 meeting and tabled this case, allowing the applicant additional time as
well as the opportunity to attend a P&Z work session on February 25. The
applicant did attend that session, and received input from the Commissioners
regarding this case. She stated the applicant has revised his site plan and
landscape plan. She explained that staff has worked with the applicant to
achieve their final revised site and landscape plan. She explained that staff had
several major concerns, i.e., landscaping and irrigation, fire protection and
ingress and egress from Roberta Drive. Staff is also concerned about the impact
and appearance of a six-foot masonry fence along Roberta and Lola Drives.
The applicant has proposed to provide a six-foot masonry fence along Lola Drive
and Roberta Drive. He is proposing to place landscaping in front of this fence in
the ROW. Since this is an existing site, staff believes that landscaping in the
ROW will soften a six-foot masonry-screening fence next to a tilt wall building.
Additional landscaping will also be added in the front of the property along Davis
Boulevard as well as a six-foot masonry fence between buildings B & C. This
will screen the outside storage of the irrigation company from the Davis
Boulevard Baptist Church.
Mrs. Ratcliff stated that Mr. Dahlstrom is present and will answer any questions
the Commission may have. Additionally, late Wednesday afternoon staff
received a petition from property owners within 200' of this request. Because
more than 20% of the property within 200' oppose this request; it will require a %
vote by City Council, should the P&Z approve it.
Chairman Davis reopened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come
forward.
Mr. Bill Dahlstrom presented this request. He explained that at the
Commissioners direction, they were requested to put a six-foot masonry wall
along Roberta Drive; the applicant stated that they had agreed to do so as well
as to extend the wall along Lola Drive. Mr. Dahlstrom stated that two gates will
be provided as requested by the Fire Department. Additional landscaping has
been provided to soften the concrete appearance from Lola.
Page 3 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
Truck traffic has been prohibited along Roberta. And, the dumpsters will be
enclosed totally with a solid gate to eliminate the complaint of blowing trash.
The uses were discussed at length, explaining that the purpose of this case was
to take the uses that are currently non-conforming and make them conforming so
the property can be sold.
He explained that Building D was constructed with hydraulic lifts, and was
specifically designed for automotive repair kinds of uses. They requested this
type use remain allowed in Building D. He stated they are agreeable to prohibit
these kinds of automotive repair uses out of Buildings E & C so that the existing
automotive repair shop in that location would continue to be non-conforming, so
that when it leaves, it couldn't be replaced with a similar use.
Building A is primarily retail and they have agreed to limit those uses to the
office/retail allowed in C1-Commercial district uses, which will make it a more
restrictive area.
Buildings D & B are the more intensive uses and they are willing to exclude the
machine shop and manufacturing use. But, he believes the assembly use needs
to be left as a permitted use. He stated that would allow them the uses they
need to make the site conforming and he believes this will be a community
benefit, given the direction they have taken.
He stated that irrigation was at first an issue because landscaping was proposed
throughout the site. However, given staff direction, existing irrigation surrounds
the property so the landscaping in the ROW will be irrigated. Additionally, a
landscaping legend has been included on the site plan, which clearly indicates
what type plants are proposed.
Mr. Dahlstrom agreed to subject the site to signage regulations currently
adopted, opposed to grandfathering the site, as previously requested.
In closing Mr. Dahlstrom stated they feel they have addressed every issue
brought out in the previous public hearing. He stated they have worked diligently
with staff and significantly modified the plan from the previous submittal. He
stated they have also compiled a list of uses not to be allowed in buildings C &
E.
Mr. Wood asked if buildings D or B contained a paint and body shop currently.
Mr. Rick Gartner, Bradford Companies responded stating that Building E, which
is housed at the corner of Roberta & Lola, has an automotive shop, which will
Page 4 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
remain non-conforming, meaning that they can only stay until the end of their
lease term, and at that time no additional paint & body shops would be allowed.
Mr. Wood stated that a paint & body shop was not a use needed in Buildings C &
E, and should be removed from the ordinance as a permitted use.
Responding to a question, Mr. Gartner stated that the automotive shops lease
expires in a year; after that another would not be allowed.
Mr. Bowen stated that the Paragraph 5 referencing signage, in its entirety could
be deleted from the existing ordinance. The applicant agreed.
Mr. Nehring asked the applicant to apply for "No Parking" signage and the
applicant agreed.
Chairman Davis stated that "No Parking Signs" along Roberta would be a part of
the PD site plan.
Mr. Nehring stated that according to the ordinance as prepared they were
requesting six months for completion of the masonry-screening wall and
landscaping.
The applicant stated that less than six months could be handled if the
Commissioners so desired. He stated they would be amenable to a reasonable
time line.
Chairman Davis stated that the citizens would probably feel a little more assured
if they started seeing immediate results, instead of months of nothing happening.
Mr. Gartner stated that work would commence immediately and that there was
nothing magic with six months.
Chairman Davis asked the applicant if he was willing to commit to four months
tonight. The applicant agreed.
Chairman Davis referred to the ordinance again, Page 2, Paragraph Five should
be deleted since new signage regulations are proposed to be adopted by City
Council on March 15, 1999. The applicant agreed to Paragraph Five 5 on Page
2 of the proposed ordinance.
Chairman Davis asked if the parkway on Roberta Drive would be sprinkled and
the applicant stated that an irrigation system already exists. Chairman Davis
stated that a large amount of trees were being added and was concerned if the
existing irrigation system would be adequate. The applicant believes it will.
Page 5 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
Chairman Davis stated that additional shrubs would also be added, and wanted
to know if modifications to the irrigation system would be required for this. The
applicant stated if it was necessary it would be done since they are obligated to
maintain the landscaping once planted.
George Jones, the proposed buyer for the property, stated that he is aware there
may be special needs arise in tending to the trees and has no problem with
them. He is glad to dress up the property and see's it as a benefit to him.
Additionally, he stated they will be closing on this property by the end of the
month and it is important to him that the wall is installed before they close.
Seeing no additional proponents, Chairman Davis called for opponents.
Chairman Davis reminded the audience that a valid petition had been received
which will require a % majority vote of the Council, if P&Z recommends approval
on this case.
Opponents of this case were:
+Joseph Bullock, 7624 Palomar
+ Leon Clark, 7624 Lola
+ Terry Mitchell, 7624 Sybil Drive
The issues of concern were excessive parking on Roberta Drive, excessive
noise from the motorcycle shop and safety issues.
Chairman Davis informed the citizens that noise abatement is an issue that can
be resolved by Code Enforcement; he asked that staff have that department
notified.
Mr. Wood suggested that "No Parking" on both sides of Roberta would be more
effective and wanted to know if the homeowners would object to that.
Mr. Bullock stated that they would encourage that.
Seeing no additional opponents the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Dahlstrom stated that he would be meeting with surrounding property owners
once again prior to the City Council meeting.
Mr. Jones stated that many of the issues he has heard discussed are issues that
should be dealt with by the manager/landlord of the facility. He assured the
citizens and city that as the new owner and landlord, he will control the tenants
Page 6 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
or evict them, it is that simple. He stated he has as much interest in preventing
that sort of behavior as the neighbors and again, assured them it would be
stopped.
Mr. Wood stated that the Commissioner's are aware of the valid petition
submitted to staff and they don't want the passage of this item to reflect the idea
that the Commission isn't listening; obviously, some of the uses that exist would
not be approved if this were a new development. However, this is an existing
project that they are trying to make the best of.
Chairman Davis asked the applicant for the list of uses that would be excluded
from buildings C & E.
Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to approve PZ 99-02 subject to:
+ Under Category 1 of the Permitted Uses, Paragraph 2, Buildings D & B, strike
paint and body shops as a permitted use as well as the entire final sentence of
the same paragraph referring to machine shops, etc.
+Add to that paragraph that the only outdoor storage will be of landscaping
irrigation pipe and related materials, which is what's currently there today, at the
same location as is today and as shown on the site plan.
+Submit an application to City Council requesting a "No Parking" area be
designated along each side of Roberta Drive the width of the subject property
(506 feet)
+ Section 4 regarding the timing of the items being installed be changed from six
months to four months for completion
+Section 5 regarding signage be deleted
+ Excluding the following uses from Buildings C & E:
automobile & light truck repair shop
auto lubrication center
paint and body shop
auto, truck, trailer rental
car wash/auto laundry
tire and battery sales store
machine shop
reclamation center
welding shop
steel metal shop
The motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Davis thanked Mr. Dahlstrom for his time and efforts and for working
with the neighborhood. He additionally stated he hoped the neighborhood felt
they had been heard. He believes a great improvement was achieved and
Page 7 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
hopes the citizens can speak in favor of this request when it goes before the City
Council on March 29, 1999.
Page 8 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
6.
PZ 99-03
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JOHN COPE FOR A
ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 4C4, OF THE J. MCCOMAS SURVEY, A-1040
FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL AND R1-RESIDENTIAL TO R1S-SPECIAL
RESIDENTIAL. (LOCATED AT 6724 MEADOW ROAD AND PROPOSED TO
BE FINAL PLATTED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, COPE ADDITION)
APPROVED
Because of a prior commitment, Mr. Wood excused himself for the evening.
Chairman Davis opened the public hearing and asked for any proponents.
Seeing none, he called for any opponents. Seeing none, the public hearing was
closed.
Mr. Lueck, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to approve PZ 99-03. The motion
carried unanimously.
Page 9 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes
7.
STAFF REPORT
There were none.
8.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
There were none.
9.
ADJOURNMENT
Having no additional business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
C~\-~'J)~B-
Richard Davis, Chairman
~J4 /~I fl.
Ted Nehring, Secretary
Page 10 3/11/99
P & Z Minutes